Mkambati Boat Launch site Draft BAR

Transcription

Eastern Cape Parks
and Tourism Agency
Boat House and Boat Launch site at Mkambati Nature
Reserve
Environmental Basic Assessment
June 2012
J31123
Arcus GIBB (Pty) Ltd Reg. 1992/007139/07
1
Head Office: Johannesburg, South Africa
BOAT HOUSE AND BOAT LAUNCH SITE AT MKAMBATI NATURE RESERVE
ENVIRONMENTAL BASIC ASSESSMENT
CONTENTS
Chapter
Description
Page
Section A: Activity Information
1
Section B: Site/Area/Property Description
14
Section C: Public Participation
29
Section D: Impact Assessment
31
Section E: Recommendations of Practitioner
48
Section F: Appendices
49
APPENDICES
Appendix A:
Site plans
Appendix B:
Photographs
Appendix C:
Facility illustration
Appendix D:
Specialist reports (none)
Appendix E:
PPP and Comments and Response Report
Appendix F:
Environmental Management Programme (EMPr)
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
(For official use only)
File Reference Number:
Application Number:
Date Received:
Basic assessment report in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010,
promulgated in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), as
amended.
Kindly note that:
1.
This basic assessment report is a standard report that may be required by a competent authority in terms of the EIA
Regulations, 2010 and is meant to streamline applications. Please make sure that it is the report used by the particular
competent authority for the activity that is being applied for.
2.
3.
The report must be typed within the spaces provided in the form. The size of the spaces provided is not necessarily
indicative of the amount of information to be provided. The report is in the form of a table that can extend itself as each
space is filled with typing.
Where applicable tick the boxes that are applicable in the report.
4.
An incomplete report may be returned to the applicant for revision.
5.
The use of “not applicable” in the report must be done with circumspection because if it is used in respect of material
information that is required by the competent authority for assessing the application, it may result in the rejection of the
application as provided for in the regulations.
6.
This report must be handed in at offices of the relevant competent authority as determined by each authority.
7.
No faxed or e-mailed reports will be accepted.
8.
The report must be compiled by an independent environmental assessment practitioner.
9.
Unless protected by law, all information in the report will become public information on receipt by the competent
authority. Any interested and affected party should be provided with the information contained in this report on request,
during any stage of the application process.
10. A competent authority may require that for specified types of activities in defined situations only parts of this report need
to be completed.
1
SECTION A: ACTIVITY INFORMATION
Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of this section? YES NO
If YES, please complete the form entitled “Details of specialist and declaration of interest”
for appointment of a specialist for each specialist thus appointed:
Any specialist reports must be contained in Appendix D.
1.
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
Describe the activity, which is being applied for, in detail1:
1 GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency (ECPTA), a public entity established in terms of
Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency Act (2010), is the managing authority at the Mkambati
Nature Reserve (MNR). The MNR is located on the coast of the Inguza Hill Local Municipality within
the Eastern Cape.
The ECPTA is required to maintain an inshore coastal patrol programme and this necessitates the
storage and launching of a semi-rigid ski-boat at the Mkambati Nature Reserve. The ECPTA has
therefore proposed to construct an approximately 50m2 boat house next to the caretaker’s house near
the Gwegwe Estuary and establish a beach based boat launch site at Gwegwe beach for use (twice a
week) by ECPTA personnel undertaking official patrol duties along the Pondoland Marine Protected
Area.
The development thus entails:
•
•
The construction of a 47.3m2 boathouse and entrance ramp; and
Upgrading the existing vehicular access to the beach.
Environmental Authorisation
The construction of the boat house and launching facilities constitutes listed activities as identified
under Listing Notice 1 (Government Notice No. R544, 2010) and Listing Notice 3 (Government Notice
No. R546, 2010). Activities under Listing Notice 1 and 3 require that a Basic Assessment be
undertaken in support of an application for environmental authorisation prior to commencement of the
activity. The following listed activities are triggered under Listing Notice 1 by the proposed
development:
ACTIVITY
16(v)
DESCRIPTION
Construction or earth moving activities in the sea,
an estuary, or within the littoral active zone or a
distance of 100 metres inland of the high-water
mark of the sea or an estuary, whichever is the
greater, in respect of –
(v)
buildings of 50 square metres or more
infrastructure covering 50 square metres or
more
Construction of boathouse for storage of a boat
used in the undertaking of official duties by
ECPTA. This activity will occur within 100m of the
high-water mark of the sea, and will only apply in
the event that the building and supporting
structures exceed 50m2 (e.g. boat house and
entrance ramp)
1
Please note that this description should not be a verbatim repetition of the listed activity as contained in the relevant
Government Notice, but should be a brief description of activities to be undertaken as per the project description.
2
The infilling or depositing of any material of more
than 5 cubic metres into, or the dredging,
excavation, removal or moving of soil, sand,
shells, shell grit, pebbles or rock from
18(iv)
(iv)
the littoral active zone, an estuary or a
distance of 100 metres inland of the highwater mark of the sea or an estuary,
whichever distance is the greater
Shaping of the site may require the use of fill
material to level the site for the boat house. Again,
this activity will only apply if the selected site is
located within 100m inland of the high water mark.
The following listed activity under Government Notice No. 546, Listing notice 3 is triggered by the
proposed development:
ACTIVITY
DESCRIPTION
The clearance of an area of 300 square metres
or more of vegetation where 75% or more of the
vegetative cover constitutes indigenous
vegetation
12
(c)
within the littoral active zone or 100 m
inland from high water mark of the sea or
an estuary, whichever distance is the
greater, excluding where such removal will
occur behind the development setback line
on erven in urban areas.
Preparation of the boathouse site and upgrading of
the existing beach access track may entail the
clearing of a combined total of 300 m2 of
indigenous vegetation within 100 m inland of the
high water mark of the sea or the Gwegwe estuary.
However, it must be noted that upgrading of the
existing beach access track will not trigger Activity
19, as it is not envisaged that the track will be
widened by as much as 4 m, nor will its length
change.
The construction of:
(iii) buildings with a footprint exceeding 10 m2 in
size
16 (iii) (a)
ii(ii)
where such construction occurs within 32 metres
of a watercourse, measured from the edge of a
watercourse, excluding where such construction
will occur behind the development setback line.
(a) In the Eastern Cape:
ii. outside urban areas, in:
(ii) Areas seawards of the development setback
line or within 1 kilometre from the high-water
mark of the sea if no such development
setback line is determined
Construction of boathouse for storage of a boat
used in the undertaking of official duties by
ECPTA:
The boathouse
(iii) exceeds 10m2;
(a) is within Eastern Cape Province
ii. is outside an urban area; and
(aa) is within a protected area identified in
terms of NEMPAA
(ii) is within 1km of the high-water mark of the sea.
This report represents the Basic Assessment Report (BAR) and has been prepared in accordance
with the EIA Regulations published in Government Notice No. R543, 18 June 2010.
Construction phase
The actual construction activities associated with the boathouse are as follows:
1.
Construction of a Boat House
The size of the boathouse has been designed with dimensions roughly 11 m x 4.3 m. The footprint is
estimated to be 15m x 6m, so as to include the foundations and the ramp. For the construction of the
boathouse, the site will be cleared of vegetation and levelled as necessary. Two alternative site
locations are assessed in this BAR, both of which are located within an existing development area at
the Gwegwe caretaker’s accommodation node.
3
Both are dominated by grasses, however tree and shrub clearance will be required around the edges
of the proposed sites.
The foundation for the proposed boathouse will be constructed as follows:
1. Excavation will be carried out to the final levels, as determined by the engineer
2. Four (4) concrete rectangular footings (600x230mm) will be installed at each corner to support
vertical concrete blocks and a horizontal concrete slab
3. The concrete blocks will have a continuous brick force with wall ties after every third row
4. 150mm in-situ material of fill will be compacted above the footings
5. 80mm thick sand bed will be compacted above the fill material
6. A 250µm gunplas USB green damp proofing will be laid above the compacted sand bed
7. 85mm mesh reinforced surface bed will inserted above the gunplas layer
8. 22mm screed will form the final layer
Concrete blocks will extend to a height of 3.4m, with a plastered, primed and painted exterior. Chromo
deck roof sheeting will be used to construct the roof. Gutters (100x125 mm) with a diameter of 75mm
will be installed. An industrial stainless steel basin will be installed inside the boathouse. See Appendix
C for facility design.
2.
Beach Access and Launch site
The beach access and launch site are for official use only, no public use of the launch site is
envisaged or anticipated. The existing beach access track from Gwegwe rondavels onto the beach
will be upgraded to the extent required to permit access by a 4x4 vehicle towing a semi-rigid boat on a
trailer to the beach. As a minimum this will entail repair of the existing concreted access ramp and
stabilisation of the interface between the ramp and beach. It may further entail:
•
•
•
construction of access control measures, most likely a lockable chain and supporting poles;
stabilisation of the track surface, possibly with grass blocks or similar, and
revegetation and rehabilitation of scarring from the existing or previous tracks.
The launch site itself will be beach-based and entails no construction on or physical changes to the
beach. It will, however, require the driving of a vehicle on the beach.
Compliance to Legal requirements
Legal requirements for the development of the boat launch site are contained within NEMA: Control of
vehicles in the coastal zone (GN No 1399 of 2012, as amended 2004). These regulations stipulate
that (7) vehicles operation within the coastal zone used in conjunction with a boat launch site is only
permitted if the boat launching site is licensed.
Since the unlicensed boat launch site is for official use only by ECPTA personnel for conducting twice
weekly patrols along the Pondoland Marine Protected Area, the reserve manager must apply in writing
to the Minister of Environmental Affairs for an exemption from obtaining a license for the boat launch
site. Section 20 of the regulation state that the Minister shall only issue an exemption if satisfied that
granting such exemption will not result in significant harm to the coastal zone, will not seriously affect
any rights of the general public to enjoy the coastal zone, and is in the public interest, alternatively in
the interests of protecting the environment.”
The exemption letter may thus be motivated by the BAR and EA (if granted) in light of the above
requirement.
4
Furthermore The NEMA Regulations for Control of Vehicles in the Coastal Zone (GN 1399 of 21
December 2001 as amended by GN R1426 of 7 December 2004) provide in regulation 4(d) that “the
use by an employee of any organ of state of any vehicle for the purposes of performing the public
duties of that organ of state” is a permissible use of a vehicle within the coastal zone and does not
require a permit under regulation 6.
A letter of exemption from applying for a boat launching license must be requested from the Minister of
DEA. Use of beach for launching must be restricted to the official boat for official use only. The beach
access is to be strictly controlled so that only ECPTA vehicles and officials are able to make use of it.
5
2.
FEASIBLE AND REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES
“alternatives”, in relation to a proposed activity, means different means of meeting the general purpose
and requirements of the activity, which may include alternatives to—
(a)
the property on which or location where it is proposed to undertake the activity;
Boat house
Two alternative locations have been considered for the construction of the boat house. Both locations
are within the caretaker’s yard.
The first alternative is the preferred site and is located adjacent to the caretaker’s house (south side).
The second alternative is located opposite (western side) the caretakers house.
Beach Access Track and Boat Launch site
As per Section 22 (4) of EIA Regulations (2010), the EAP managing the application must provide the
competent authority with motivation if no reasonable or feasible alternatives exist, as contemplated in
sub regulation 22(2)(h):
“a description of any identified alternatives to the proposed activity that are feasible and reasonable,
including the advantages and disadvantages that the proposed activity or alternatives will have on the
environment and on the community that may be affected by the activity”.
Only one route option has been considered as restriction is placed on selecting an alternative beach
access track as the adjacent land is environmentally sensitive, comprising the coastal zone. It is thus
not reasonable to select new or alternative routes. Upgrading the existing route and rehabilitating
degraded areas, so as to prevent further erosion, is the best practicable option.
This will entail upgrading an existing beach access track from the Gwegwe rondavels onto the beach
to an extent required to permit access by a 4x4 bakkie towing a semi-rigid boat on a trailer to the
beach.
As a minimum the upgrade will include the repair of the existing concreted access ramp and
stabilisation of the interface between the ramp and beach. It may further entail:
•
•
•
construction of access control measures, most likely a lockable chain and supporting poles;
stabilisation of the track surface, possibly with grass blocks or similar; and
revegetation and rehabilitation of scarring from the existing or previous tracks.
The beach access and launch site are for official use only, no public use of the launch site is
envisaged or anticipated. The launch site itself will be beach based and entails no construction on or
physical changes to the beach. It will, however, require the driving of a vehicle on the beach.
See Appendix A for Locality Map
(b)
the type of activity to be undertaken;
No reasonable alternative activity can be considered.
6
(c)
the design or layout of the activity;
No alternative designs have been considered for the boathouse.
(d)
the technology to be used in the activity;
No reasonable alternative technology can be considered.
(e)
the operational aspects of the activity; and
No reasonable operational alternatives can be considered.
(f)
the option of not implementing the activity.
No-go Alternative
In terms of supporting informed decision making and the assessment of environmental impacts
associated with the development of the boathouse and boat launch site, the No-Go alternative is
considered in the Basic Assessment Report as it is required by the EIA legislation.
The Pondoland Marine Protected Area (MPA) comprises the coastline between Port St Johns and the
Mtamvuna River and the adjacent offshore area, and fully protects two substantial estuaries. This
MPA has a unique mixture of tropical and temperate ecosystems, with a high rate of species turnover
within similar habitat, and a high proportion of species that are endemic to the region. This area needs
to be protected to fill an important gap in South Africa's protected area network.
By not developing the boathouse and associated infrastructure to house the boat, the ECPTA will not
have the resourced to provide an inshore coastal patrol programme. Without this Coastal Patrol
Programme control can be enforced on illegal fishing activities and on the protection of species within
this MPA
In terms of the development, vegetation clearing will be restricted to the perimeter of the site and
related disturbance of faunal species. However vegetation clearing also includes the eradication of
any invasive plants and weed species which occur on the proposed sites.
Describe alternatives that are considered in this application. Alternatives should include a consideration
of all possible means by which the purpose and need of the proposed activity could be accomplished in
the specific instance taking account of the interest of the applicant in the activity. The no-go alternative
must in all cases be included in the assessment phase as the baseline against which the impacts of the
other alternatives are assessed. The determination of whether site or activity (including different
processes etc.) or both is appropriate needs to be informed by the specific circumstances of the activity
and its environment. After receipt of this report the competent authority may also request the applicant
to assess additional alternatives that could possibly accomplish the purpose and need of the proposed
activity if it is clear that realistic alternatives have not been considered to a reasonable extent.
Paragraphs 3 – 13 below should be completed for each alternative.
7
3.
ACTIVITY POSITION
Indicate the position of the activity using the latitude and longitude of the centre point of the site for each
alternative site. The co-ordinates should be in degrees and decimal minutes. The minutes should have
at least three decimals to ensure adequate accuracy. The projection that must be used in all cases is
the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection.
List alternative sites, if applicable. (BOAT HOUSE)
Alternative:
Latitude (S):
2
AlternativeS1 (preferred /only site alternative) 31o
17.275‘
Alternative S2 (if any)
31o
17.280‘
o
‘
Longitude (E):
30o
00.578‘
30o
00.565‘
o
‘
In the case of linear activities: (BEACH ACCESS TRACK)
Alternative:
Latitude (S):
Alternative S1 (preferred or only route alternative)
• Starting point of the activity
31
o
•
Middle/Additional point of the activity
31
o
•
End point of the activity
31
o
• Middle/Additional point of the activity
• End point of the activity
• Middle/Additional point of the activity
• End point of the activity
o
o
o
o
o
o
Longitude
(E):
17.3063 30
o
‘
17.2992 30
o
‘
17.2917 30
o
‘
‘
‘
‘
o
‘
‘
‘
o
o
o
o
o
41.6925
‘
41.6915
‘
41.6903
‘
‘
‘
‘
‘
‘
‘
In the case of linear activities:
For route alternatives that are longer than 500m, please provide an addendum with co-ordinates taken
every 250 meters along the route for each alternative alignment.
N/A
4.
PHYSICAL SIZE OF THE ACTIVITY
Indicate the physical size of the preferred activity/technology as well as alternative
activities/technologies (footprints):
Expansion of existing infrastructure N/A
Alternative:
Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative)
Alternative A2 (if any)
2
Size of the activity:
m2
m2
m2
“Alternative S..” refer to site alternatives.
8
or, for linear activities: (BEACH ACCESS TRACK)
Alternative:
Length of the activity:
15m x 4 m = 60m2
Indicate the size of the alternative sites or servitudes (within which the above footprints will
occur):
(BOAT HOUSE)
Alternative:
5.
Size of the site/servitude:
50 m2
50 m2
m2
SITE ACCESS
Does ready access to the site exist?
If NO, what is the distance over which a new access road will be built
Describe the type of access road planned:
YES NO
N/A
N/A
Include the position of the access road on the site plan and required map, as well as an indication of the
road in relation to the site.
6.
SITE OR ROUTE PLAN
A detailed site or route plan(s) must be prepared for each alternative site or alternative activity. It must
be attached as Appendix A to this document.
The site or route plans must indicate the following:
6.1 the scale of the plan which must be at least a scale of 1:500;
6.2 the property boundaries and numbers of all the properties within 50 metres of the site;
6.3 the current land use as well as the land use zoning of each of the properties adjoining the site or
sites;
6.4 the exact position of each element of the application as well as any other structures on the site;
6.5 the position of services, including electricity supply cables (indicate above or underground), water
supply pipelines, boreholes, street lights, sewage pipelines, storm water infrastructure and
telecommunication infrastructure;
6.6 all trees and shrubs taller than 1.8 metres;
6.7 walls and fencing including details of the height and construction material;
6.8 servitudes indicating the purpose of the servitude;
6.9 sensitive environmental elements within 100 metres of the site or sites including (but not limited
thereto):
rivers;
the 1:100 year flood line (where available or where it is required by DWA);
ridges;
cultural and historical features;
areas with indigenous vegetation (even if it is degraded or invested with alien species);
6.10 for gentle slopes the 1 metre contour intervals must be indicated on the plan and whenever the
slope of the site exceeds 1:10, the 500mm contours must be indicated on the plan; and
6.11 the positions from where photographs of the site were taken.
9
7.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Colour photographs from the centre of the site must be taken in at least the eight major compass
directions with a description of each photograph. Photographs must be attached under Appendix B to
this form. It must be supplemented with additional photographs of relevant features on the site, if
applicable.
8.
FACILITY ILLUSTRATION
A detailed illustration of the activity must be provided at a scale of 1:200 as Appendix C for activities that
include structures. The illustrations must be to scale and must represent a realistic image of the
planned activity. The illustration must give a representative view of the activity.
9.
ACTIVITY MOTIVATION
9(a)
Socio-economic value of the activity
What is the expected capital value of the activity on completion?
What is the expected yearly income that will be generated by or as a result of
the activity?
Will the activity contribute to service infrastructure?
Is the activity a public amenity?
How many new employment opportunities will be created in the development
phase of the activity?
What is the expected value of the employment opportunities during the
development phase?
What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals?
How many permanent new employment opportunities will be created during
the operational phase of the activity?
What is the expected current value of the employment opportunities during
the first 10 years?
What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals?
n/a
No income will
be generated
YES
NO
YES
NO
Limited – 3 or 4
Approximately
R7000.00
90%
Nil
Nil
Nil
9(b) Need and desirability of the activity
Motivate and explain the need and desirability of the activity (including demand for the activity):
NEED:
1.
Was the relevant provincial planning department involved in the
NO
YES
application?
2.
Does the proposed land use fall within the relevant provincial
NO
YES
planning framework?
3.
If the answer to questions 1 and / or 2 was NO, please provide further motivation /
explanation:
In terms of providing an inshore coastal patrol programme, the ECPTA is required to
maintain a boat and boat launch facility. The Coastal patrol programme is essential to
ensuring that no illegal fishing activity is undertaken along the adjacent coastline, a
Marine Protected Area (MPA). This MPA has a unique mixture of tropical and temperate
ecosystems, with a high rate of species turnover within similar habitat, and a high
proportion of species that are endemic to the region. This area needs to be protected to
fill an important gap in South Africa's protected area network.
10
DESIRABILITY:
1.
Does the proposed land use / development fit the surrounding area?
YES NO
2.
Does the proposed land use / development conform to the relevant
YES NO
structure plans, SDF and planning visions for the area?
3.
Will the benefits of the proposed land use / development outweigh the
YES NO
negative impacts of it?
4.
If the answer to any of the questions 1-3 was NO, please provide further motivation /
explanation:
N/A
5.
Will the proposed land use / development impact on the sense of
YES NO
place?
6.
Will the proposed land use / development set a precedent?
YES NO
7.
Will any person’s rights be affected by the proposed land use /
YES NO
development?
8.
Will the proposed land use / development compromise the “urban
YES NO
edge”?
9.
If the answer to any of the question 5-8 was YES, please provide further motivation /
explanation.
N/A
BENEFITS:
1.
Will the land use / development have any benefits for society in general?
2.
Explain:
YES NO
The Pondoland Marine Protected Area (MPA) comprises the coastline between Port St
Johns and the Mtamvuna River and the adjacent offshore area, and fully protects two
substantial estuaries. This MPA has a unique mixture of tropical and temperate
ecosystems, with a high rate of species turnover within similar habitat, and a high
proportion of species that are endemic to the region. This area needs to be protected to
fill an important gap in South Africa's protected area network.
The benefits to society in general of conducting weekly patrols are that:
•
•
•
•
3.
4.
traditional fishing continues in a regulated manner
prevent commercial and semi-commercial fishing from over exploiting local resources
ensure the sustainability of marine living resources of the Wild Coast
vulnerable ecosystems are protected for the enjoyment of current and future
generations.
Will the land use / development have any benefits for the local
YES NO
communities where it will be located?
Explain:
From a fishery perspective, the area needs protection as many over-exploited linefish
species spawn here. The inter-tidal shellfishery also needs to be brought under control,
as many areas have been stripped of the larger molluscs. The benefits of regular coastal
patrols for the local communities are increased regularity and visibility of protection
measures, while allowing fishing to continue elsewhere. The conservation of the MPA will
also contribute to promotion of eco-tourism in this poverty-stricken area.
11
10. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION, POLICIES AND/OR GUIDELINES
List all legislation, policies and/or guidelines of any sphere of government that are applicable to the
application as contemplated in the EIA regulations, if applicable:
Title of legislation, policy or guideline:
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act No. 108 of 1996
National Protected Areas Expansion Strategy
Administering
authority:
South African
Government
South African
Government
Date:
1996
2008
Province of the
Eastern Cape, SA
2010
OR Tambo District Municipality Spatial Development Framework
Province of the
Eastern Cape, SA
2009/2010
Ingquza Hill Local Municipality Spatial Development Framework
Province of the
Eastern Cape, SA
2011
DEA
1998
DEA
2010
DEA
2003
DEA
2004
National List of Threatened Ecosystems (GG 3489, GN 1002, 9
December 2011)
DEA
2011
Eastern Cape Biodiversity Conservation Plan
DEDEAT
2007
DEDEAT/ECPTA
2010
Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency Act (2010)
DEDEAT / ECPTA
2010
National Heritage Resources Act (NHRA) No. 25 of 1999
SAHRA
1999
National Water Act (Act No 35 of 1998)
DWA
1998
Mineral and Petroleum Resource Development Act (Act No. 28 of
2002)
DMR
2002
Transkei Decree (Decree 9 of 1992)
South African
Government
1992
Eastern Cape Provincial Spatial Development Plan
National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) No. 107 0f
1998
Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations and Listings
Notice 1 and 3 (Government Notice No. R. 543 and 544 and
546)
National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act, 57 of
2003
National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act 10 of 2004
Mkambati Nature Reserve Management Plan
12
11.
WASTE, EFFLUENT, EMISSION AND NOISE MANAGEMENT
11(a) Solid waste management
Will the activity produce solid construction waste
construction/initiation phase?
If yes, what estimated quantity will be produced per month?
How will the construction solid waste be disposed of (describe)?
during
the YES NO
Less than 3m3
All solid waste which is not reusable will be collected at a central location and will be stored
temporarily until removed to the landfill site as approved by the Nguza Hill Local Municipality
Where will the construction solid waste be disposed of (describe)?
Waste must be disposed at the landfill site as utilised by the Nguza Hill Local Municipality.
Will the activity produce solid waste during its operational phase?
How will the solid waste be disposed of (describe)?
YES
n/a
NO
n/a
Where will the solid waste be disposed if it does not feed into a municipal waste stream
(describe)?
n/a
If the solid waste (construction or operational phases) will not be disposed of in a registered
landfill site or be taken up in a municipal waste stream, then the applicant should consult with the
competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping
and EIA.
Can any part of the solid waste be classified as hazardous in terms of the YES
NO
relevant legislation?
If yes, inform the competent authority and request a change to an application for scoping and
EIA.
Is the activity that is being applied for a solid waste handling or treatment YES
NO
facility?
If yes, then the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is
necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.
11(b) Liquid effluent
Will the activity produce effluent, other than normal sewage, that will be YES NO
disposed of in a municipal sewage system?
N/A
Will the activity produce any effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of on Yes
NO
site?
If yes, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is
necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.
Will the activity produce effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of at YES NO
another facility?
13
If yes, provide the particulars of the facility:
Facility name:
N/A
Contact person:
Postal address:
Postal code:
Telephone:
Cell:
E-mail:
Fax:
Describe the measures that will be taken to ensure the optimal reuse or recycling of waste
water, if any:
n/a
11(c) Emissions into the atmosphere
Will the activity release emissions into the atmosphere?
YES NO
If yes, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government?
YES
NO
If yes, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine
whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.
If no, describe the emissions in terms of type and concentration:
During the construction phase, it is expected that there will be slight dust generation and
emissions from vehicles and machinery. However dust and vehicular emissions will have a
limited to negligible impact on the surrounding environment, due to the short term nature of
construction period (not more than a month) and the small scale of the development footprint.
Where appropriate dust suppression measures will be implemented to reduce dust generation.
It is recommended that construction vehicles are regularly serviced and kept in good
mechanical condition to minimise possible exhaust emissions.
11(d) Generation of noise
Will the activity generate noise?
YES
If yes, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government?
YES
If yes, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine
whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.
If no, describe the noise in terms of type and level:
Noise control regulations and SANS 10103:
NO
NO
Short term noise impacts are anticipated during the construction phase of the project. It is
however anticipated that the noise will be localised and contained within the construction site.
Noise impacts during the construction phase, will be restricted to timeframes between 07H00
and 17H00 Monday to Friday and 08 h00-13 h00 on Saturdays. This is will reduce noise
disturbances outside normal working hours. All construction equipment must be maintained and
kept in good working order to minimise associated noise impacts.
The applicant must adhere to the relevant provincial noise control legislation (if any) as well as
SANS 10103.
14
12.
WATER USE
Please indicate the source(s) of water that will be used for the activity by ticking the appropriate box(es)
municipal water board groundwater river, stream,
Otherthe activity will not
dam or lake
Water tanker use water
If water is to be extracted from groundwater, river, stream, dam, lake or any other natural feature,
please indicate
the volume that will be extracted per month:
N/A
Does the activity require a water use permit from the Department of Water YES NO
Affairs?
If yes, please submit the necessary application to the Department of Water Affairs and attach
proof thereof to this application if it has been submitted:
13.
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Describe the design measures, if any, that have been taken to ensure that the activity is energy
efficient:
N/A
Describe how alternative energy sources have been taken into account or been built into the
design of the activity, if any:
N/A
15
SITE ALTERNATIVE 1 – BOAT HOUSE
SECTION B: SITE/AREA /PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Important notes:
1. For linear activities (pipelines, etc) as well as activities that cover very large sites, it may be
necessary to complete this section for each part of the site that has a significantly different
environment. In such cases please complete copies of Section C and indicate the area, which
is covered by each copy No. on the Site Plan.
Section C Copy No.
(e.g. A):
2. Paragraphs 1 - 6 below must be completed for each alternative.
3. Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of YES
NO
this section?
If YES, please complete the form entitled “Details of specialist and declaration of interest” for each
specialist thus appointed:
All specialist reports must be contained in Appendix D.
Property
description/physical
address:
The proposed project is located on Farm 8 within the Mkambati Nature
reserve, Eastern Cape.
(Farm name, portion etc.) Where a large number of properties are involved (e.g.
linear activities), please attach a full list to this application.
In instances where there is more than one town or district involved, please attach a
list of towns or districts to this application.
Current land-use zoning:
The land use of the boat launch site falls within a nature reserve area. The
adjacent coastline constitutes the Pondoland Marine Protected Area. Both
are protected areas proclaimed in terms of the Transkei Decree and the
National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act, Act 57 of 2003.
In instances where there is more than one current land-use zoning, please attach a
list of current land use zonings that also indicate which portions each use pertains
to , to this application.
Is a change of land-use or a consent use application required?
YES
NO
Must a building plan be submitted to the local authority?
YES
NO
Locality map:
An A3 locality map must be attached to the back of this document, as Appendix A.
The scale of the locality map must be relevant to the size of the development (at
least 1:50 000. For linear activities of more than 25 kilometres, a smaller scale e.g.
1:250 000 can be used. The scale must be indicated on the map.) The map must
indicate the following:
• an indication of the project site position as well as the positions of the
alternative sites, if any;
• road access from all major roads in the area;
• road names or numbers of all major roads as well as the roads that provide
access to the site(s);
• all roads within a 1km radius of the site or alternative sites; and
• a north arrow;
• a legend; and
16
•
2.
locality GPS co-ordinates (Indicate the position of the activity using the latitude
and longitude of the centre point of the site for each alternative site. The coordinates should be in degrees and decimal minutes. The minutes should have
at least three decimals to ensure adequate accuracy. The projection that must
be used in all cases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection)
LOCATION IN LANDSCAPE
Indicate the landform(s) that best describes the site:
2.1 Ridgeline
2.2 Plateau
2.3 Side slope of hill/mountain
2.4 Closed valley
2.5 Open valley
2.6 Plain
2.7 Undulating plain / low hills
2.8 Dune
2.9 Seafront
3.
GROUNDWATER, SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL STABILITY OF THE SITE
Is the site(s) located on any of the following (tick the appropriate boxes)?
Alternative S1:
Shallow water table (less
than 1.5m deep)
Dolomite, sinkhole or doline
areas
Seasonally wet soils (often
close to water bodies)
Unstable rocky slopes or
steep slopes with loose soil
Dispersive soils (soils that
dissolve in water)
Soils with high clay content
(clay fraction more than 40%)
Any other unstable soil or
geological feature
An area sensitive to erosion
YES
NO
Alternative S2
(if any):
YES
NO
Alternative S3
(if any):
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
If you are unsure about any of the above or if you are concerned that any of the above aspects may be
an issue of concern in the application, an appropriate specialist should be appointed to assist in the
completion of this section. (Information in respect of the above will often be available as part of the
project information or at the planning sections of local authorities. Where it exists, the 1:50 000 scale
Regional Geotechnical Maps prepared by the Council for Geo Science may also be consulted).
17
4.
GROUNDCOVER
Indicate the types of groundcover present on the site:
The location of all identified rare or endangered species
indicated on the site plan(s).
Natural veld - Natural
veld Natural veld with
good
with scattered heavy
alien
E
E
condition aliens infestationE
Sport field
Cultivated land
Paved surface
or other elements should be accurately
Veld
dominated by Gardens
alien speciesE
Building
or
other
structure
Bare soil
If any of the boxes marked with an “E “is ticked, please consult an appropriate specialist to assist in the
completion of this section if the environmental assessment practitioner doesn’t have the necessary
expertise.
5.
LAND USE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING AREA
Indicate land uses and/or prominent features that does currently occur within a 500m radius of the site
and give description of how this influences the application or may be impacted upon by the application:
5.1 Natural area
The proposed site is in a natural area, namely the Mkambati Nature Reserve, and a protected area
within the Eastern Cape. The site alternative 1 (preferred site) has been previously cleared to
accommodate the caretaker’s house and yard which is surrounded by indigenous vegetation.
5.2 Low density residential
5.4 High density residential
5.5 Informal residential
5.6 Retail commercial & warehousing
5.7 Light industrial
5.8 Medium industrial AN
5.9 Heavy industrial AN
5.10 Power station
5.11 Office/consulting room
5.12 Military or police base/station/compound
5.13 Spoil heap or slimes damA
5.14 Quarry, sand or borrow pit
5.15 Dam or reservoir
5.16 Hospital/medical centre
5.17 School
5.18 Tertiary education facility
5.19 Church
5.20 Old age home
5.21 Sewage treatment plantA
5.22 Train station or shunting yard N
5.23 Railway line N
5.24 Major road (4 lanes or more) N
5.25 Airport N
5.26 Harbour
5.27 Sport facilities
5.28 Golf course
18
5.29 Polo fields
5.30 Filling station H
5.31 Landfill or waste treatment site
5.32 Plantation
5.33 Agriculture
5.34 River, stream or wetland
The Gwegwe Estuary and high water mark of the sea are both situated less than 100m from the location
of the site. Potential adverse impacts on these features are associated with the construction activities
with regard to earthworks, storage and disposal of hazardous chemicals (including cements and paints),
management of construction material and storage and disposal of construction and general wastes.
Given that the magnitude of this development is very small, these potential impacts are also small and
can easily be prevented provided the specifications of the EMPr are adhered to.
Positive impacts are foreseen during the operational phase, during which monitoring of the coastline will
be done in order to regulate the use of coastal resources and protect vulnerable ecosystems.
5.35 Nature conservation area
The Reserve is part of the Pondoland Centre of Endemism, one of 235 sites identified world-wide as
having important global biodiversity. The area is thus regarded as being of regional and national
conservation significance.
Potential impacts on these features are associated with the construction activities with regard to
earthworks, storage and disposal of hazardous chemicals (including cements and paints), management
of construction material, and storage and disposal of construction and general wastes. Given that the
magnitude of this development is very small, these impacts are also small and can easily be prevented
provided the specifications of the EMPr are adhered to.
Positive impacts are foreseen during the operational phase as the project is aimed at monitoring the use
of coastal resources and preventing illegal exploitation.
5.36 Mountain, koppie or ridge
5.37 Museum
5.38 Historical building
5.39 Protected Area
The reserve is currently proclaimed as a Provincial Nature Reserve under NEM: Protected Areas Act, 57
of 2003. The coastal zone abutting Mkambati is also proclaimed as a Marine Protected Area.
of construction material and storage and disposal of construction and general wastes. Given that the
During the operational phase, this development will allow for official patrolling along the coastline will
positively impact this conservation area by ensuring that traditional fishing may continue in a regulated
manner to ensure the sustainability of these resources which will ensure that vulnerable ecosystems are
protected.
19
5.40 Graveyard
5.41 Archaeological site
5.42 Other land uses (describe)
If any of the boxes marked with an “N “are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by the
proposed activity? N/A
If any of the boxes marked with an "An" are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by the
proposed activity? : N/A
If YES, specify and explain
If YES, specify:
If any of the boxes marked with an "H" are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by the
proposed activity. N/A
If YES, specify and explain:
If YES, specify:
6.
CULTURAL/HISTORICAL FEATURES
Are there any signs of culturally or historically significant elements, as YES
defined in section 2 of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999, (Act
No. 25 of 1999), including
Heritage Features
NO
No sites of heritage significance were observed at the site upon inspection. Notification was
submitted to SAHRA regarding the proposed development, who exempted the client from
undertaking a Heritage Impact Assessment. See Appendix E for letter from SAHRA.
Should the contractor uncover any potential heritage resources (e.g. burial sites,
archaeological and paleontological artefacts) during construction the following will apply:
1. Work at the point of the discovery is to cease, and may not recommence until such time
as guidance from the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) has been
received
2. The point of discovery is to be clearly demarcated
3. The SAHRA is to be informed within 24 hours of the discovery.
Archaeological or palaeontological sites, on or close (within 20m) to the site? NO
N/A
If YES, explain:
If uncertain, conduct a specialist investigation by a recognised specialist in the field to
establish whether there is such a feature(s) present on or close to the site.
Briefly
explain
the
N/A
findings of the specialist:
Will any building or structure older than 60 years be affected in any way? YES
NO
Is it necessary to apply for a permit in terms of the National Heritage YES
NO
Resources Act, 1999 (Act 25 of 1999)?
If yes, please submit or, make sure that the applicant or a specialist submits the necessary
application to SAHRA or the relevant provincial heritage agency and attach proof thereof to
this application if such application has been made.
20
SITE ALTERNATIVE 2 – BOAT HOUSE
Important notes:
Section C Copy No.
(e.g. A):
NO
this section?
Property
address:
YES
NO
YES
NO
Locality map:
• a north arrow;
• a legend; and
21
•
2.
be used in all cases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection.
2.1 Ridgeline
2.2 Plateau
2.4 Closed valley
2.5 Open valley
2.6 Plain
2.8 Dune
2.9 Seafront
3.
Alternative S1:
Alternative S2
(if any):
Shallow water table (less YES
NO
YES NO
than 1.5m deep)
Dolomite, sinkhole or doline YES
NO
YES
NO
areas
Seasonally wet soils (often YES
NO
YES NO
Unstable rocky slopes or YES
NO
YES
NO
Dispersive soils (soils that YES
NO
YES
NO
dissolve in water)
Soils with high clay content YES
NO
YES
NO
Any other unstable soil or YES
NO
YES
NO
geological feature
YES
NO
YES NO
Alternative S3
(if any):
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
22
4.
GROUNDCOVER
Natural veld - Natural veld Natural veld with
good
with scattered heavy
alien
E
E
E
infestation
condition aliens Sport field
Cultivated land
Paved surface
or other elements should be accurately
Veld
alien speciesE
Building or
other
Bare soil
structure
expertise.
6.
6.1 Natural area
Site alternative 2 is within the caretaker’s yard in the Mkambati Nature Reserve, and Protected
Area. The site has previously been cleared to accommodate the caretaker’s house and yard which
is surrounded by indigenous vegetation.
5.10 Power station
5.17 School
5.19 Church
5.20 Old age home
5.23 Railway line N
5.25 Airport N
5.26 Harbour
23
5.28 Golf course
5.29 Polo fields
5.32 Plantation
5.33 Agriculture
of the site. Potential adverse impacts on these features are associated with the construction activities
with regard to earthworks, storage and disposal of hazardous chemicals (including cements and paints),
management of construction material and storage and disposal of construction and general wastes.
Given that the magnitude of this development is very small, these potential impacts are also small and
can easily be prevented provided the specifications of the EMPr are adhered to.
Positive impacts are foreseen during the operational phase, during which monitoring of the coastline will
be done in order to regulate the use of coastal resources and protect vulnerable ecosystems.
of construction material, and storage and disposal of construction and general wastes. Given that the
Positive impacts are foreseen during the operational phase as the project is aimed at monitoring the use
of coastal resources and preventing illegal exploitation.
5.37 Museum
5.39 Protected Area
of construction material and storage and disposal of construction and general wastes. Given that the
protected.
24
5.40 Graveyard
If YES, specify:
If YES, specify:
6.
Heritage Features
NO
undertaking a Heritage Impact Assessment.
received
N/A
If YES, explain:
Briefly
explain
the
N/A
NO
NO
25
ROUTE ALTERNATIVE 1 – BEACH ACCESS TRACK
Important notes:
Section C Copy No.
(e.g. A):
NO
this section?
Property
address:
YES
NO
YES
NO
Locality map:
• a north arrow;
• a legend; and
26
•
3.
be used in all cases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection)
2.1 Ridgeline
2.2 Plateau
2.4 Closed valley
2.5 Open valley
2.6 Plain
2.8 Dune
2.9 Seafront
3.
Alternative S1:
Alternative S2
(if any):
Shallow water table (less YES
NO
YES NO
than 1.5m deep)
Dolomite, sinkhole or doline YES
NO
YES
NO
areas
Seasonally wet soils (often YES
NO
YES NO
Unstable rocky slopes or YES
NO
YES
NO
Dispersive soils (soils that YES
NO
YES
NO
dissolve in water)
Soils with high clay content YES
NO
YES
NO
Any other unstable soil or YES
NO
YES
NO
geological feature
YES
NO
YES NO
Alternative S3
(if any):
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
27
4.
GROUNDCOVER
Natural
veld Natural veld with
Natural veld with
scattered
heavy
alien
good conditionE
aliensE
infestationE
Sport field
Cultivated land
Paved surface or other elements should be accurately
Veld
alien speciesE
Building
or
Bare soil
other structure
expertise.
7.
7.1 Natural area
This site is located on the Coast of the Mkambati Nature Reserve and Protected Area.
5.10 Power station
5.17 School
5.19 Church
5.20 Old age home
5.23 Railway line N
5.25 Airport N
5.26 Harbour
5.28 Golf course
5.29 Polo fields
28
5.32 Plantation
5.33 Agriculture
of the access track.
Potential adverse impacts are associated with the clearance of vegetation and vehicular movement on
the beach. Given that the magnitude of upgrading this access track is very small, the potential impacts
can be prevented provided the specifications of the EMPr are adhered to.
Positive impacts are foreseen in terms of monitoring the coastline which will be done in order to regulate
the use of coastal resources and protect vulnerable ecosystems.
Potential adverse impacts on these features are associated with the clearance of vegetation and
vehicular movement on the beach. Given that the magnitude of this development is very small, these
potential impacts can be prevented provided the specifications of the EMPr are adhered to.
Positive impacts are foreseen in terms of monitoring of the coastline which will be done in order to
regulate the use of coastal resources and protect vulnerable ecosystems.
5.37 Museum
5.39 Protected Area
Potential adverse impacts on these features are associated with the clearance of vegetation and
vehicular movement on the beach. Given that the magnitude of this development is very small, these
potential impacts can be prevented provided the specifications of the EMPr are adhered to.
protected.
5.40 Graveyard
29
If YES, specify:
If YES, specify:
6.
Heritage Features
NO
undertaking a Heritage Impact Assessment. (please see Appendix E for exemption letter from
SAHRA)
received
N/A
If YES, explain:
Briefly
explain
the
N/A
NO
NO
30
SECTION C: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
See Appendix E for details of PPP undertaken.
1.
ADVERTISEMENT
The person conducting a public participation process must take into account any guidelines applicable
to public participation as contemplated in section 24J of the Act and must give notice to all potential
interested and affected parties of the application which is subjected to public participation by—
(a)
fixing a notice board (of a size at least 60cm by 42cm; and must display the required
information in lettering and in a format as may be determined by the competent authority) at a
place conspicuous to the public at the boundary or on the fence of—
(i)
the site where the activity to which the application relates is or is to be undertaken; and
(ii)
any alternative site mentioned in the application;
(b)
giving written notice to—
(i)
the owner or person in control of that land if the applicant is not the owner or person in
control of the land;
(ii)
the occupiers of the site where the activity is or is to be undertaken or to any alternative
site where the activity is to be undertaken;
(iii)
owners and occupiers of land adjacent to the site where the activity is or is to be
undertaken or to any alternative site where the activity is to be undertaken;
(iv)
the municipal councillor of the ward in which the site or alternative site is situated and
any organisation of ratepayers that represent the community in the area;
(v)
the municipality which has jurisdiction in the area;
(vi)
any organ of state having jurisdiction in respect of any aspect of the activity; and
(vii)
any other party as required by the competent authority;
(c)
placing an advertisement in—
(i)
one local newspaper; or
(ii)
any official Gazette that is published specifically for the purpose of providing public
notice of applications or other submissions made in terms of these Regulations;
(d)
placing an advertisement in at least one provincial newspaper or national newspaper, if the
activity has or may have an impact that extends beyond the boundaries of the metropolitan or
local municipality in which it is or will be undertaken: Provided that this paragraph need
not
be complied with if an advertisement has been placed in an official Gazette referred to in
subregulation 54(c)(ii); and
(e)
using reasonable alternative methods, as agreed to by the competent authority, in those
instances where a person is desiring of but unable to participate in the process due to—
(i)
illiteracy;
(ii)
disability; or
(iii)
any other disadvantage.
2.
CONTENT OF ADVERTISEMENTS AND NOTICES
A notice board, advertisement or notices must:
(a)
indicate the details of the application which is subjected to public participation;
and
(b)
state—
(i)
that the application has been submitted to the competent authority in terms of these
Regulations, as the case may be;
(ii)
whether basic assessment or scoping procedures are being applied to the application,
in the case of an application for environmental authorisation;
(iii)
the nature and location of the activity to which the application relates;
31
(iv)
(iv)
3.
where further information on the application or activity can be obtained; and
the manner in which and the person to whom representations in respect of the
application may be made.
PLACEMENT OF ADVERTISEMENTS AND NOTICES
Where the proposed activity may have impacts that extend beyond the municipal area where it is
located, a notice must be placed in at least one provincial newspaper or national newspaper, indicating
that an application will be submitted to the competent authority in terms of these regulations, the nature
and location of the activity, where further information on the proposed activity can be obtained and the
manner in which representations in respect of the application can be made, unless a notice has been
placed in any Gazette that is published specifically for the purpose of providing notice to the public of
applications made in terms of the EIA regulations.
Advertisements and notices must make provision for all alternatives.
4.
DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE MEASURES
The practitioner must ensure that the public participation is adequate and must determine whether a
public meeting or any other additional measure is appropriate or not based on the particular nature of
each case. Special attention should be given to the involvement of local community structures such as
Ward Committees, ratepayers associations and traditional authorities where appropriate. Please note
that public concerns that emerge at a later stage that should have been addressed may cause the
competent authority to withdraw any authorisation it may have issued if it becomes apparent that the
public participation process was inadequate.
5.
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
The practitioner must record all comments and respond to each comment of the public before the
application is submitted. The comments and responses must be captured in a comments and response
report as prescribed in the EIA regulations and be attached to this application. The comments and
response report must be attached under Appendix E.
6.
AUTHORITY PARTICIPATION
Please note that a complete list of all organs of state and or any other applicable authority with their
contact details must be appended to the basic assessment report or scoping report, whichever is
applicable
Authorities are key interested and affected parties in each application and no decision on any
application will be made before the relevant local authority is provided with the opportunity to give input.
32
SECTION D: IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The assessment of impacts must adhere to the minimum requirements in the EIA Regulations, 2010,
and should take applicable official guidelines into account. The issues raised by interested and affected
parties should also be addressed in the assessment of impacts.
1.
ISSUES RAISED BY INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES
List the main issues raised by interested and affected parties.
1. No comments and/or issues have been raised by the I&APs.
2. In response to the notification of the proposed development of the boathouse and upgrade of
boat launch facilities within Mkambati Nature Reserve, the South African Heritage Resource
Agency (SAHRA) has granted an exemption from undertaking a Heritage Impact Assessment.
Exemption was granted as per section 38 (1) of the National Heritage Resource Act (Act 25 of
1999) whereby the development falls below the 5000m2 threshold. However, due to the proximity
to the archaeologically sensitive coastline, SAHRA has suggested that the developer and foreman
are made aware of the presence of archaeological material.
See Appendix E for letter of response from SAHRA.
Response from the practitioner to the issues raised by the interested and affected parties (A full
response must be given in the Comments and Response Report that must be attached to this report as
Annexure E):
Please see Appendix E
Response to SAHRA’s request for the developer and foreman are made aware of the presence of
archaeological material has been included as part of the EMPr.
33
2.
IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE PLANNING AND DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION,
OPERATIONAL, DECOMMISSIONING AND CLOSURE PHASES AS WELL AS PROPOSED
MANAGEMENT OF IDENTIFIED IMPACTS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES
List the potential direct, indirect and cumulative property/activity/design/technology/operational
alternative related impacts (as appropriate) that are likely to occur as a result of the planning and design
phase, construction phase, operational phase, decommissioning and closure phase,
2.1. PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE
BOAT HOUSE
2.1.1 Site Alternative 1 (preferred alternative)
DIRECT IMPACTS:
No direct impacts are foreseen during the planning and design phase
INDIRECT IMPACTS:
No indirect impacts are foreseen during the planning and design phase
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS:
No cumulative impacts are foreseen during the planning and design phase
2.1.2. Site Alternative 2
DIRECT IMPACTS:
INDIRECT IMPACTS:
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS:
BEACH ACCESS TRACK AND LAUNCH SITE
DIRECT IMPACTS:
INDIRECT IMPACTS:
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS:
2.1.4. N o-Go Alternative
The option of not developing the Boat house and boat launch site will eliminate the need for any
vegetation clearance, and associated impacts including erosion.
However, by not developing the boathouse and associated infrastructure to house the boat, the ECPTA
will not have the resources to provide an inshore coastal patrol programme. Without this Coastal Patrol
this MPA.
34
2.2. CONSTRUCTION PHASE
BOAT HOUSE
2.2.1. Site Alternative 1 (preferred alternative)
DIRECT IMPACTS:
2.1.1.1 Vegetation removal
The major concern regarding construction of the boathouse is related to the sensitivity of the
surrounding environment as located within a protected area: Mkambati Nature Reserve. The area
comprises extensive wetlands and the proposed site is located within 100m of the high-water mark of
the sea, as well as within 100m of an estuary.
Vegetation removal has been taken into account in the planning and design phase, as site alternative 1
requires additional vegetation clearing of shrubs as opposed to site alternative 2 which requires little to
no clearance of shrubs or trees. Site selection in the planning and design phase must therefore consider
the aspect of vegetation clearance.
Site alternative 1, which serves as the preferred site is located on a disturbed area, which has
previously been cleared of vegetation for the existing caretaker’s house. Currently this enclave is
grassed and regularly mowed. The site has a relatively flat gradient, and will require vegetation to be
cleared over approximately 200m2 in order to position the boathouse adjacent to the caretaker’s house
without blocking the existing access to the caretaker’s yard. The vegetation to be removed is primarily
grass, identified as Buffalo grass (Stenotaphrum sp), however shrubs will need to be removed around
the perimeter of the site (See Appendix A, Figure A2 and Appendix B, Figure B1 for vegetation clearing
required at Site Alternative 1). Furthermore, this location will also allow sufficient space for the boat to
be manoeuvred in and out of the boathouse by the appropriate vehicle.
Vegetation clearance may result in the direct loss of indigenous or protected plant species. This may
further result in loss of habitat for faunal species.
Mitigation
In order to protect soil, prevent increased runoff and soil loss, as well as ensure the restriction of
vegetation removal, the following are recommended:
•
Non-woody vegetation such as grasses and forbs are not to be removed prior to stripping topsoil
from work areas in order to assist in maintaining viability of the soil during storage.
• Clearing of vegetation to only be undertaken within demarcated work area boundaries.
• No protected species (plant or animal) may be damaged or removed without appropriate permits
from DAFF or DEDEAT.
• Vegetation may only be cleared from designated areas, and no material, waste or spoil may be
stored or dumped outside of these areas.
• Only indigenous grass and plant species to be used in rehabilitation.
Vegetation cover is to be re-established as quickly as possible after completion of construction
2.2.1.1 Soil loss (erosion)
Construction activities that may result in soil erosion include:
•
•
•
•
stripping of topsoil
excavation for the stormwater drainage channels, service trenches and access road
incorrectly managed topsoil and construction stockpiles
use of construction vehicles.
35
Mitigation
• Erosion must be contained and prevented on an ongoing basis
• Excavation must be carried out to the final level i.e. Rock or firm foundation
• Topsoil must be stored separately to subsoil
The EMPr (Appendix F) outlines the steps to be followed during construction to prevent and mitigate soil
erosion.
2.2.1.2 Soil and Land Contamination
During construction, potential soil and land pollution may arise from incorrectly managed waste:
•
•
•
Construction wastes – including builders rubble, spoil material, pipes or other materials that may
arise from the construction activities
Solid general waste – Workers will generate municipal wastes such as food wastes, packaging
Hazardous waste such as cement, paints, oils, petrol/diesel.
Incorrectly managed waste may result in:
• Wind strewn litter - may pollute the adjacent Gwegwe Estuary and sea and cause asphyxiation of
aquatic species
• Leachate (general or hazardous waste not stored in sealed containers) - may contaminate soil and
ground water
• Spillage and leaking of liquid chemicals such as paints, solvents - may cause soil and land
contamination.
• Cement mixing on bare soil - may cause soil and land contamination and ground water pollution.
Due to the short term nature of the construction period and the relatively small magnitude of the
development, no more than 5 employees are will be required for construction and the amount of general
waste that will be generated from the construction period is not expected to exceed 3m3.
Contamination of soil and land from hazardous, construction or general waste can be easily contained
and thus does not represent a significant potential impact.
Mitigation
• All construction waste, builders rubble and spoil must be stored at a central point and removed prior
to the contractor vacating the site
• All general waste generated by construction workers must be stored in sealed waste bins, which are
removed when full and/or removed when the contractor vacates the site
• All hazardous substances at the site must be adequately stored and accurately identified, recorded,
and labelled
• Petrochemicals, oils and identified hazardous substances shall only be stored under controlled
conditions
• Used oils, grease or hydraulic fluids shall be placed in the appropriate sealed container and
removed on a regular basis
• The contractor must supply sufficient spill kit equipment in event of spills
• No cement mixing may take place on bare soil, all cement mixing is to take place on mortar boards
or a suitably lined area
• All cement contaminated waste water is to be directed to a containment area for settling (minimum
of 3 sequential settlement containers) prior to release of water to the environment.
• Settled cement sludge/sediment is to be disposed of to a recognised waste disposal site.
36
2.2.1.3 Ground and surface water contamination
Ground and surface water contamination may occur as a direct result of incorrectly management of
waste as discussed above. Spills or leachate resultant from incorrectly stored general and hazardous
waste may pollute ground water, the effects of which are increased owing to the close proximity of the
estuary, sea and the occurrence of a high water table which is characteristic of the area. Due to the
aquatic nature of the environment, pollutants can travel faster and further. Contamination of ground and
surface water may furthermore impact upon faunal and floral species, as discussed under the indirect
impacts of construction activities. However, due to the small scale of this development and the short
term nature of the construction period, contamination of ground and surface water from chemicals is of
low probability and can be easily managed provided the contractor follows the specification of the EMPr.
Mitigation
Since the source of this pollution is leachate from solid waste, mitigation will apply to the management
of general and hazardous waste and is listed under mitigation for item 2: soil and land contamination.
2.2.1.4 Air pollution
Air pollution during the construction phase is considered as an insignificant impact due to the short term
nature and small scale of the development footprint which will generate negligible dust and air
emissions.
2.2.1.5 Noise
Short term noise impacts are anticipated as a result of movement of machinery and vehicles and use of
construction equipment. However due to the nature of construction, noise generation will be short term,
localised and contained within the construction site. Since there is a high diversity of bird species within
the reserve, such disturbances may cause temporary disturbance of avifaunal species.
Dust generation during construction may result from movement of machinery and vehicles to the site.
However dust and vehicular emissions will have a limited impact on the surrounding environment, due
to the short term nature and the relatively small scale of the development footprint of construction period
(not more than a month). Besides its nuisance factor to humans, increased dust deposition on
vegetation may negatively effect plant growth and fauna grazing on this vegetation.
Where appropriate dust suppression measures will be implemented to reduce dust generation. It is
recommended that construction vehicles are regularly serviced and kept in good mechanical condition
to minimise possible exhaust emissions.
Mitigation
All work will be undertaken during normal working hours due to the proximity of the site to the
caretaker’s residence.
2.2.1.6 Loss of indigenous vegetation
The caretaker’s yard has previously been cleared of vegetation in order to accommodate the caretaker’s
house. However, for site alternative 1 as located adjacent to the caretaker’s house (southward) it is
approximated that 200m2 of vegetation would need to be cleared in order to construct the boathouse.
This loss of vegetation may result in negative impacts in terms of increased runoff, erosion and
sedimentation and loss of biodiversity, species richness and removal of vulnerable, threatened and/or
protected species.
Mitigation
In order to protect soil and prevent increased runoff and soil losses, as well as ensure the restriction of
vegetation removal, the following methods shall be employed:
37
•
•
•
•
from work areas in order to assist in maintaining viability of the soil during storage
Clearing of vegetation to only be undertaken within demarcated work area boundaries
No protected species (plant or animal) may be damaged or removed without appropriate permits
from DAFF or DEDEAT
Vegetation may only be cleared from demarcated work areas, and no material, waste or spoil may
be stored or dumped outside of these areas.
2.2.1.7 Damage to National Heritage
No sites of heritage significance were observed during the field investigation. However, cultural heritage
and paleontological artefacts may potentially be uncovered during excavation and/or possibly damaged
by construction activity.
Mitigation
The South African Heritage Resource Agency (SAHRA) was notified about the proposed development
of the boathouse at the Mkambati Nature Reserve, who subsequently exempted the applicant from
undertaking a Heritage Impact Assessment. The Exemption letter is attached in Appendix E: Comments
and Response.
Should any heritage resources be discovered (e.g. burial sites, archaeological and paleontological
artefacts) during construction the following will apply:
Work at the point of the discovery is to cease,
1. The point of discovery is to be clearly demarcated.
3. Removal or destruction of archaeological or historical matter will be done under the supervision of
appointed heritage specialist in communication with SAHRA.
INDIRECT IMPACTS:
2.1.1.2 Erosion
Bare soil is more susceptible to erosion from runoff. Erosion may result from vegetation clearance,
which serves to intercept precipitation.
Mitigation
Ensure that erosion that is resultant from vegetation clearing is control by applying specification
discussed under the direct impacts section and section 4.3.6 of the EMPr.
2.2.1.8 Fires
Fires may occur as a result of incorrectly stored chemicals such as fuel, oil. Smoke generated by fires
may in turn affect vegetation and fauna at the site of occurrence, which may result in migration of faunal
species or loss of floral and faunal species.
Mitigation
It is anticipated that fires may potentially result from flammable chemicals where not properly stored or
as a result of negligent behaviour such as smoking near flammable substances or defective electrical
equipment used during construction. Therefore the storage of chemicals, legible signage and staff
training must be employed by the contractor.
In addition to control measures for hazardous material storage, the contractor must ensure that fire
control equipment is kept on site and that an adequate number of staff is provided with fire fighting
training.
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS:
No cumulative impacts are foreseen during the construction phase
38
DIRECT IMPACTS:
Owing to the close proximity of site alternative 2 and thus the similar topography, gradient and geology,
the construction impacts at this site will be typical of those experienced at the preferred site:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Soil loss (erosion)
Soil and Land Contamination
Ground and surface water contamination
Air pollution
Damage to Natural Heritage
Impact Assessment and mitigation is thus analogous for the two sites, except in terms of the amount of
vegetation clearing that will be required to accommodate the boathouse.
2.2.2.1. Removal of vegetation
Site alternative 2 may require less vegetation clearing compared to the preferred site, thus the
significance of this impact is greatly reduced. Mitigation measures as discussed under vegetation
clearing at the preferred site will apply to site alternative 2 if required:
•
•
•
•
•
from work areas in order to assist in maintaining viability of the soil during storage
Clearing of vegetation to only be undertaken within demarcated work area boundaries
Alien invasive species and plant material not required for rehabilitation purposes are to be removed
from site and disposed of at an appropriately permitted waste site
No protected species (plant or animal) may be damaged or removed without appropriate permits
from DAFF or DEDEAT
Vegetation may only be cleared from clearly areas, and no material, waste or spoil may be stored or
dumped outside of these areas.
INDIRECT IMPACTS:
Indirect impacts that may potentially result from construction activities at site alternative 2 are the same
as indirect impacts expected at site alternative 1, in probability, extent and significance.
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS:
2.2.3. Site Alternative 1 (preferred alternative)
DIRECT IMPACTS:
Construction activities during the upgrade of the existing beach access track include:
•
•
•
stabilisation of the access track surface, possibly with grass blocks or similar
revegetation and rehabilitation of scarring from the existing or previous tracks
construction of access control measures, most likely a lockable chain and supporting poles.
39
2.2.3.1. Removal of vegetation
Possible vegetation removal may be required from the beach berm during the minor upgrade of the
existing beach access track which is positioned between the Reserve’s main gravel road and the beach.
The vegetation consists of grass and shrubs which separate the foreshore and inland areas. This bank
of earth acts as a buffer against coastal erosion, traps sand and assists in anchoring the beach berm.
Removal of vegetation may directly contribute to the loss of indigenous species, affect bank stability and
the ability to trap sand and increase vulnerability to erosion. However little to no vegetation removal will
be required, which lowers the significance of this impact. Furthermore rehabilitation of exposed areas
shall be undertaken.
Mitigation
• Non-woody vegetation such as grasses and forbs are not removed prior to stripping topsoil from
work areas in order to assist in maintaining viability of the soil during storage.
• Clearing of vegetation will only be cleared within demarcated work area boundaries.
2.2.3.2 Loss Faunal species and habitat
Construction activities may create temporary disturbance to beach biota such as ghost crabs, sand
mussels or whelks and removal of vegetation may cause destruction of beach dwelling organisms and
bird’s nests. However, due to the short term duration of construction (1-2days) and the small scale
development consisting mainly of upgrade and rehabilitation of the existing beach access track
construction time is short.
2.2.3.3 Destruction of Heritage Resources
No artefacts of heritage significance were observed during the field investigation. However, cultural
heritage and paleontological artefacts may potentially be uncovered during excavation and/or possibly
damaged by construction activity.
Mitigation
The South African Heritage Resource Agency (SAHRA) was notified about the proposed development
of the boathouse at the Mkambati Nature Reserve, who subsequently exempted the applicant from
undertaking a Heritage Impact Assessment. The Exemption letter is attached in Appendix E: Comments
and Response. However, the coastline area is archaeologically very sensitive and there is a possibility
to encounter shell middens.
If any evidence of archaeological remains (e.g. shell middens, marine shell) is found during construction
activities, SAHRA will be notified immediately and an accredited professional archaeologist must be
contacted as soon as possible to inspect the findings and provide instruction before any further
construction continues.
INDIRECT IMPACTS:
No indirect impacts are foreseen during the construction phase.
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS:
2.2.4. No-Go Alternative
The option of not developing the boat house and boat launch site will eliminate the need for any
vegetation clearance, and potential impacts associated with construction activities, including use of
chemical material, earthworks, noise and air pollution. Furthermore no license application (exemption)
will need to be considered for the boat launch site.
40
this MPA.
2.3. OPERATIONAL PHASE
BOAT HOUSE
DIRECT IMPACTS:
2.3.1.1 Aesthetics
Erection of a boathouse in a natural area, not fitting in with the surrounding environment.
Mitigation
The boathouse is located in a disturbed section, next to the caretaker’s house. Due to this section being
previously cleared, and maintenance infrastructure already existing at this location, it will not impact
upon the aesthetics of the nature reserve. Furthermore, this site is enclosed by large shrubs and trees
(except at the entrance), and is therefore not readily visible within the Nature Reserve.
2.3.1.2 Positive Impact: coastal patrol
The construction of the boathouse, will allow for the Mkambati Nature Reserve’s operational staff to
undertake twice weekly patrols along the Pondoland Marine Protected area, and contribute to ensuring
that the coastal zone is monitored against legal activities, and protected for present and future
generations.
INDIRECT IMPACTS:
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS:
2.3.2 Site Alternative 2
DIRECT IMPACTS:
Direct impacts will be similar to those of the site alternative 1
2.3.2.1. Lack of space
Site alternative 2 is not ideally located in terms of allowing space for the boat to be manoeuvred into and
out of the boathouse. In order for the boat to be stored, the towing vehicle would need sufficient turning
space to reverse the boat into the boathouse.
Mitigation
A possible mitigation method is clearing vegetation next to the caretaker’s house in order to allow space
for the towing vehicle to reverse the boat into the boathouse.
INDIRECT IMPACTS:
No indirect impacts are foreseen during the construction phase
41
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS:
DIRECT IMPACTS:
2.3.3.1 Compaction of beach sand
Compaction of sand in the beach zone may result from the use of vehicles on the beach and whose
effect may be enhanced by the removal of grass vegetation from the construction phase. Use of vehicle
on the beach may compact and displace sand down shore, and backshore (area of shore lying between
the average high-tide mark and the vegetation) which may further affect opening of Gwegwe estuary.
2.3.3.2 Fauna
The compaction of sand from vehicles on the beach itself liquefies the near surface sand and can affect
the growing conditions of wildlife such as shellfish and crabs. This means that they may float to the
surface and litter beaches, becoming vulnerable to predators such as gulls and oyster catchers.
Use of vehicles may furthermore destruct the habitats of sand dwelling fauna such as ghost crabs. Dune
and beach dwelling birds tend to nest in or around the dunes above the high water mark. Since most
vehicles operate at or below the high water mark, nests may be relatively safe from vehicle disturbance.
However, once chicks hatch, they move from their nests to the intertidal zone where they feed and
roost. This puts them directly in the path of vehicles.
Mitigation
The use of the beach for launching activities, including the use of a towing vehicle, will be restricted to
use by ECPTA officials only. The beach access is to be strictly controlled so that only ECPTA vehicles
and officials are able to make use of it. Further, conditions of Environmental Authorisation should
require the undertaking of a comprehensive permit application with regard to the Vehicles on Beaches
regulations if the ECPTA wish to make the launch site available for use by the public or a tourism
concessionaire.
Vehicles on the beach are restricted:
• outside of the designated routes
• during high tide
• at night
• in areas with damage.
2.3.3.3 Aesthetics
Tyre tracks from vehicles and boats on the shore may impact upon the natural aesthetics of the
coastline. With the location of the boat launch site within a Nature Reserve and a Marine Protected are,
the severity of aesthetics is enhanced.
Mitigation
The beach access is to be strictly controlled so that only ECPTA vehicles and officials are able to make
use of it. Furthermore, it shall be ensured that vehicles only make use of the designated area and only
twice weekly.
42
INDIRECT IMPACTS:
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS:
No cumulative impacts are foreseen during the construction phase.
2.3.4 No-Go Alternative
The option of not developing the Boat house and boat launch site will eliminate potential threats to the
natural aesthetics of the coastal area. By not developing the boat launch site will prevent the potential of
sand compaction and the disturbance of fauna as a result of disturbance from the use of vehicles on the
beach. No vegetation clearing will be required and thud no potentially associated impacts such as
erosion. Furthermore no license application (exemption) will need to be considered for the boat launch
site.
this MPA.
43
3.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
Taking the assessment of potential impacts into account, please provide an environmental impact
statement that summarises the impact that the proposed activity and its alternatives may have on the
environment after the management and mitigation of impacts have been taken into account, with
specific reference to types of impact, duration of impacts, likelihood of potential impacts actually
occurring and the significance of impacts.
Boat House Alternative 1 (preferred alternative)
Soil erosion
Soil erosion is a potential impact during the construction phase. Activities such as stripping of
topsoil, vegetation clearing, excavation and compaction, incorrectly managed topsoil and
construction stockpiles and use of construction vehicles are potential catalysts of soil erosion.
Provided the contractor follows the vegetation clearing and soil erosion control methods
stipulated within the EMPr, no significant soil losses are expected due to the relatively small
scale of this development.
Soil and Land contamination
Soil and land water pollution may result during the construction phase as a result of spilled
construction material such as fuel, oils and chemicals and solid waste pollution by wind strewn
litter, dumping or leachate.
However, due to the stringent specification of the EMPr in ensuring that chemicals are properly
stored, labelled and handled in such a way so as to prevent contact with soil it is unlikely that
spills will occur. The contractor must ensure that no cement mixing takes place directly on soil,
as this is often the case during construction activities. The contractor is responsible for providing
waste bins for employee general waste, which will be appropriately disposed of. The contractor
is also to ensure that spoil, and construction rubble is located at a central point. The contractor
is further responsible for ensuring that the site is completely waste free before vacating the site.
Ground and surface water pollution
Ground and surface water pollution may result during construction as a result of spilled/ leaked
construction material such as fuel, oils and chemicals or leachate from incorrectly stored
general waste. With the close proximity of the high water mark of the sea, and the Gwegwe
Estuary it is vital that the management of both hazardous chemicals and solid waste is properly
contained to ensure that these water bodies are not contaminated.
The stringent specification of the EMPr ensure that chemicals are properly stored, labelled and
handled in such a way so as to prevent contact with soil it is unlikely that spills will occur.
Damage to heritage features
No artefacts of historical or paleontological significance were observed at the site. SAHRA has
not requested that a heritage assessment study be undertaken. See Appendix E.
44
Should any structures of archaeological importance be discovered, these will be handled prior to
construction and as guided by the archaeologist in communication with SAHRA.
Air pollution
Noise will result during the construction phase due to vehicle movement, equipment and
excavation activities. This may cause temporary disturbance of avifaunal species at the site.
However due to the short term nature and small scale of this development, it is expected that
species will return once the contractor vacates the site.
Air pollution may arise from of dust and smoke from fires during the construction phase. This
may impact both upon faunal and floral species. However, due to the stringent specification of
the EMPr in ensuring that fires are prevented, it is unlikely that a fire will be started, and should
this happen, trained staff will immediately eliminate it and thus the effects of it will not be severe.
Dust may arise as a result of vehicle movement, equipment and excavation activities. This may
cause temporary migration of avifaunal species at the particular site. However due to the short
term nature of this and the small amounts of dust expected to be generated, this is not
considered a significant impact.
Aesthetics
Visual impacts have been considered due to the locality of this project within a nature reserve
and near the Pondoland Coastal Protected area. However, the boathouse selected will not
impact upon the aesthetics of the area, as the site is within the caretaker’s yard, where an
existing house and cleared area, which is enclosed by vegetation.
Boat House Alternative 2
Owing to the close proximity of site alternative 2 and thus the similar topography, gradient and
geology, the impacts at this site will be typical of those experienced at the preferred site:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Soil loss (erosion)
Soil and Land Contamination
Ground and surface water contamination
Air pollution
Damage to Natural Heritage
The potential Impacts are thus similar for the two sites, except in terms of the amount of
vegetation clearing that will be required to accommodate the boathouse.
Site alternative 2 will require minimal vegetation clearing as opposed to the preferred site, thus
the significance of this impact is reduced.
However, the site is not ideally located for the boat to be removed from and returned to the
boathouse as it does not allow sufficient space for the towing vehicle.
Boat Launch Site and Beach Access Track
Vegetation clearance
Vegetation removal from the beach berm during the upgrade of the existing beach access track
could directly contribute to the loss of indigenous species, affect bank stability and the ability to
trap sand and increase vulnerability to erosion. However minimal vegetation removal will be
required, which lowers the significance of this impact. Furthermore rehabilitation of exposed
areas shall be undertaken.
45
Mitigation
• Non-woody vegetation such as grasses and forbs are not removed prior to stripping topsoil
from work areas in order to assist in maintaining viability of the soil during storage.
• Clearing of vegetation will only be cleared within demarcated work area boundaries.
Compaction of beach sand
Compaction of sand in the beach zone may result from the use of vehicles on the beach during
the operational phase of the boat launch site. The effects of compaction may be enhanced by
the removal of grass vegetation from the construction phase. Use of vehicle on the beach may
compact and displace sand down shore, and backshore (area of shore lying between the
average high-tide mark and the vegetation).
Aesthetics
Tyre tracks from vehicles and boats on the shore may impact upon the natural aesthetics of the
coastline. With the location of the boat launch site within a Nature Reserve and a Marine
Protected area, the severity of the impact upon aesthetics is enhanced.
Provided that beach access is to be strictly controlled so that only ECPTA vehicles and officials
are able to make use of it and those vehicles only make use of the designated area and only
twice weekly, the potential for adverse impact upon aesthetics is considered low.
Fauna
Use of vehicles on the beach can affect the growing conditions of wildlife such as shellfish and
crabs and may furthermore destruct the habitats of sand dwelling fauna such as ghost crabs.
However, once chicks hatch, they move from their nests to the intertidal zone where they feed
and roost. This puts them directly in the path of vehicles.
The beach access shall be strictly controlled so that only ECPTA vehicles and officials are able
to make use of it. Vehicles on the beach will be restricted:
• outside of the designated routes
• during high tide
• at night
No-Go Alternative (compulsory)
Not implementing this project will eliminate the potential for adverse impacts that may arise
during the construction phase. However the option of not implementing this project will result in
the ECPTA not being able to undertake the Coastal patrol programme in the Pondoland Marine
Protected Area (MPA). This area needs to be protected to fill an important gap in South Africa's
protected area network.
46
Impact Assessment Methodology
The impacts that may result from the planning and design phase, construction phase, operation phase
and decommissioning phase of the project was assessed according to a number of criteria to arrive at
an overall significance rating. The criteria used were as follows:
Spatial Scale
Site
Local
Regional
(S)
(L)
(R)
Caretakers yard/ beach access/ beach
Mkambati Nature Reserve
Outside Mkambati Nature Reserve
Duration
Short Term
Medium Term
Long Term
Permanent
(ST)
(MT)
(LT)
(P)
Less than the duration of the activity
Impact persists until activity ceases
Impact persists well beyond the cessation of the activity
Impact is permanent
Probability
Low
Medium
High
(L)
(M)
(H)
Unlikely
Possible
Likely
Intensity
Low
(L)
Medium
(M)
High
(H)
Ecological functions may continue undisturbed. No rare or endangered
species affected. No objection from I&APs.
Ecological functioning temporary affected. No rare or endangered species
affected. Some concern from I&APs.
Ecological functioning permanently altered. Rare or endangered species
impacted. Major concern from I&APs.
Significance
Impacts can be Low, Medium or High and can be positive (+ve) or negative (–ve)
47
Table 1: Summary of Post Mitigation Impact Ratings for boat house and access track
ALTERNATIVE SITE 1
(Post Mitigation impact
rating)
ACCESS TRACK
SIGNIFICANCE
INTENSITY
PROBABILITY
DURATION
SPATIAL
SCALE
SIGNIFICANCE
INTENSITY
PROBABILITY
DURATION
SPATIAL
SCALE
SIGNIFICANCE
INTENSITY
PROBABILITY
DURATION
PHASE
SPATIAL
SCALE
IMPACT
ALTERNATIVE SITE 2
rating)
DIRECT IMPACTS
Soil erosion
Heritage
resources
Ground and
Surface Water
Pollution
Loss of
vegetation
Construction phase
•
stripping of topsoil and management of top soil
stock piles
•
excavation and soil compaction during earth bulk
works
•
use of construction vehicles.
Construction phase :
•
Excavation may uncover/damage artefacts of
archaeological/
historical
significance
or
paleontological importance.
•
Spillage/leakage of chemicals such as fuel, oils,
cement additives, curing compounds, paints, glues
and solvents.
•
Incorrectly storage, and/or disposal of general and
construction waste by contractors.
•
Runoff from the construction site may result in the
silting of surface water for the duration of
construction.
•
Wind strewn litter
•
Leachate from accumulated waste may pollute soil
and groundwater.
•
Vegetation clearing
L
ST
L
M
L
L
ST
L
M
L
S
ST
L
M
L
S
ST
L
M
L
S
ST
L
M
L
S
ST
L
M
L
L
ST
L
L
L
L
ST
L
L
L
S
ST
L
L
L
S
LT
M
M
M
S
LT
L
L
L
S
ST
L
M
L
Noise
•
Movement of machinery and haul vehicles during
construction
S
ST
M
L
L
S
ST
M
L
L
S
ST
M
L
L
Air pollution
•
Movement of machinery and haul vehicles to the
site to lead to increased dust.
•
Fires
S
ST
L
L
L
S
ST
L
L
L
S
ST
M
L
L
48
ALTERNATIVE SITE 1
rating)
ACCESS TRACK
SIGNIFICANCE
INTENSITY
PROBABILITY
DURATION
SPATIAL
SCALE
SIGNIFICANCE
INTENSITY
PROBABILITY
DURATION
SPATIAL
SCALE
SIGNIFICANCE
INTENSITY
PROBABILITY
Loss of natural
aesthetics
Construction phase:
•
Removal of vegetation
•
Use of Vehicles on the beach
Construction phase:
•
Removal of vegetation gossip girl
•
Use of Vehicles on the beach
DURATION
Loss of faunal
habitat
PHASE
SPATIAL
SCALE
IMPACT
ALTERNATIVE SITE 2
rating)
S
ST
M
L
L
S
ST
L
L
L
S
LT
M
M
M
S
ST
M
L
L
S
ST
L
L
L
S
LT
M
M
M
49
SECTION E.
RECOMMENDATION OF PRACTITIONER
Is the information contained in this report and the documentation attached YES
hereto sufficient to make a decision in respect of the activity applied for (in
the view of the environmental assessment practitioner)?
NO
If “NO”, indicate the aspects that should be assessed further as part of a Scoping and EIA process
before a decision can be made (list the aspects that require further assessment):
N/A
If “YES”, please list any recommended conditions, including mitigation measures that should be
considered for inclusion in any authorisation that may be granted by the competent authority in
respect of the application:
In the opinion of the Environmental Practitioner, the proposed activity is not fatally flawed and
all potential impacts can be mitigated to an acceptable level.
1. Boat house
It is recommended that the preferred site (alternative 1) is authorized because it is better
located in terms of removing and returning the boat to the boathouse. The key issue is to
ensure that no adverse impacts are imposed upon the adjacent coastal area, estuaries and
wetlands. As such, it is only during the construction phase of the boathouse that potential
negative environmental impacts may arise. Due to the short term duration of the construction
period, as well as the relatively small size of this development, these impacts can be sufficiently
prevented and mitigated provided that the contractor follows the specifications of the EMPr.
No adverse environmental impacts are foreseen during the operational phase of this activity.
However, the operation will result in positive environmental impacts as the ECPTA would be
able to undertake the coastal patrol programme in the Pondoland Marine Protected Area
(MPA). This area needs to be protected to fill an important gap in South Africa's protected area
network.
2. Access Track and Boat Launch site
The impacts associated with the use of vehicles on the beach during the operation of the boat
launch site, will include:
•
•
•
•
Disturbance of birds and sand dwelling invertebrates, e.g. ghost crabs, sand mussels and
whelks
Destruction of beach dwelling organisms and birds nests
Compaction of beach sand; and
Aesthetics of the beach will be impacted by tyre tracks and disturbance of beach.
Use of beach for launching must be restricted to the official boat for official use only.
The beach access shall be strictly controlled so that only ECPTA vehicles and officials are able
to make use of it. Vehicles on the beach will be restricted:
• Outside of the designated routes
• During high tide
• At night
YES NO
Is an EMPr attached? See Appendix F
50
SECTION F: APPENDIXES
The following appendixes must be attached as appropriate:
Appendix A: Site plan(s)
Appendix B: Photographs
Appendix C: Facility illustration(s)
Appendix D: Specialist reports
Appendix E: Comments and responses report
Appendix F: Environmental Management Programme (EMPr)
51
APPENDIX A
Site Plan
52
N
R3984
to
Flagstaff
Reserve Entrance
Boat House
GWEGWE BAY
Boat launch site
1:50 000
Figure A1. Locality Map of proposed boat house and boat launch site (See Figure A4 for image of area outlined in red)
53
Figure A2. Locality Map of proposed boat house and boat launch site (See Figure 4 for image of area outlined in red)
54
Figure A3. Site Plan of proposed boat house and boat launch site (See Figure 4 for image of area outlined in red)
55
N
Caretaker’s house
Site Alternative 2
Site Alternative 1
Beach Access Track
20m
Figure A4.. Image for locality of proposed boat house and boat launch site (Vegetation clearing required at area outlined in red)
56
APPENDIX B
360º Photographs
57
N
W
CENTRE
E
S
VEGETATION CLEARING REQUIRED
VEGETATION CLEARING REQUIRED
Figure B1: 360o view of Site location alternative 1 (preferred site) adjacent to the caretaker’s house.
58
N
W
CENTRE
E
S
Figure B2: 360o view of Site location alternative 2, opposite to the caretaker’s house.
59
APPENDIX C
Facility Illustration
60
Figure C1: Design of Boathouse
61
APPENDIX D
Specialist Report- None
62
APPENDIX E
Comments and Response Report
63
1. Site Notice
A site notice was fixed at a conspicuous place at the entrance of the reserve, in accordance with
section 54 (3) and (4) of the National Environmental Management Regulation, GN R543 of
2010.
2. Written notification
Stakeholders were identified based on their potential interest in the project (Table E1). These
organisations were contacted either via e-mail and were sent a Letter of Notification (Figure E1)
and a Background Information Document - BID (Figure E3).
Figure E1. Letter of Notification sent to stakeholders
65
Figure E2. Letter of Notification sent to adjacent landowners
66
Figure E3. Background information document (page 1)
67
Figure E3. Background information document (page 2)
68
Figure E4. Copy of notification sent to stakeholders ([email protected] – DEDEAT; Siyabulela [email protected] – DEDEAT;
[email protected] – OR Tambo Municipality; [email protected] ; [email protected] – Port Saint Johns Local Municipality;
[email protected] – DWA; [email protected] – SAHRA; [email protected] – SANBI)
69
3. Advertisement
An advertisement was placed in the Daily dispatch on 15 November 2011 giving details of the
application which is subjected to public participation, in accordance with section 54 (3) (b) (i-vi)
of the National Environmental Management Regulation, GN R543 of 2010.
Figure E5: Newspaper advertisement placed in the Daily Dispatch
70
Table E1: I&AP Database
Mkambati Access Road Basic Assessment
Interested & Affected Party
Database
COMPANY
FIRST NAME
SURNAME
POSITION
CONTACT NO
EMAIL
Environment
043 742 0340
[email protected]
Environment
071 874 8728
[email protected]
KEY STAKEHOLDERS
(e.g. authorities)
Eastern Cape DEDEA
Qondile
Paliso
Eastern Cape DEDEA
Mtonjeni
OR Thambo Municipality
Mbuso
Ncube
Municipal Manager
047 501 7050
Port Saint Johns
N
Jakuja
Municipal Manager
047 489 5800
[email protected]
[email protected]
APM Impact Assessor
Provincial
Coordinator: Eastern
Cape
(0)21 462 4502
[email protected]
082 8207083
[email protected]
[email protected]
Department of Water Affairs
Lizna
Fourie
SAHRA
Mariagrazia
Galimberti
Working for Wetlands (South African
National Biodiversity Institute)
Japie
Buckle
71
Registered I&APs
No I&APs have registered.
Public Meeting
Due to no I&APs registering for the proposed development, a public meeting was not deemed
necessary.
No I&APs have registered for the proposed project.
Comments and Response
No comments were received during the Public Participation Process Assessment Report. Comments
from the Draft Basic Assessment Report shall be included in the Final Basic Assessment Report.
72
Figure E6. Response from SAHRA – Letter of Exemption
73
APPENDIX F
Environmental Management Programme (EMPr)
74

Mkambati Boat Launch site Draft BAR

Transcription

Similar documents

We`ve recently acquired a beautiful 2005 Action Craft Newport 20

For sale is barely used 2014 Porta-Bote w/ a 2014 Suzuki 6 HP four

For Sale Classic 12 ft. Merrimack Skiff

You`re invited to the 3nd annual Weenie Roast

BROCHURE-ACQUALINA MIAMI

Janmor Pegaz 737 - {ModelName} Charter Brochure

Mrs. House and Mrs. Huba`s STEM Challenge Day

Weenie Roast - Cape Fear Sail and Power Squadron

Palm Beach - Blue Ocean Apartment