EDITED_Achieving Barrel Consistency 1015 AM

Transcription

EDITED_Achieving Barrel Consistency 1015 AM
Achieving Barrel Consistency
Achieving Barrel Consistency
Corey Beck – Moderator – President and Director of Winemaking
Francis Ford Coppola Winery
Dr. Marie-Laure Badet-Murat, Owner
Enologie by MLM, Bordeaux
Jeffrey Stambor, Director of Winemaking
Beaulieu Vineyard
Justin Seidenfeld, Winemaker
Rodney Strong Vineyards
Corey Beck - Moderator
Francis Ford Coppola Winery
Dr. Marie-Laure Badet-Murat
Owner – Enologie by MLM, Bordeaux
RELATION BETWEEN WOOD TANNIN POTENTIAL AND
WINE QUALITY
JC VICARD, ML BADET-­MURAT
A. WATRELOT, J. KENNEDY
1. OAK WOOD COMPOSITION
TOASTING ²
²
²
90 ≈ 95 %
QTT
Time
Temperature
Humidity
NON EXTRACTABLE
Phénols (guaïcaol, eugenol)
10 ≈ 15 %
EGT
EGT
LIGNINS
Aldehydes (vanillin)
EXTRACTABLE
CELLULOSE
HEMICELULLOSES
WL (cis, trans)
PHENOLS (eugenol)
Furanic aldehydes (furfural, 5MF, 5HMF)
Volatile thiols (FFT)
Variable effect
OAK QUALITY
+
TOASTING MANAGEMENT
2. OAK WOOD HETEROGENEITY
èè Variability
èè Inter-­individual
(differences between trees from the same forest & specie)
+
èè Within the same tree
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX
Snakkers, 2000 ;; Doussot, 2000, 2002 ;; Feuillat, 2003, Prida, 2006
Masson et al, 1995, 1996 ; Mosedale et al., 1996
3. MANY SOURCES OF VARIABILITY!
GENETIC VARIABILITY
TIME
SPECIE
CLIMATE
RAW MATERIAL
SEASONING
SYLVICULTURE
GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN
TIME
WINE & AGING PROCESS
TOASTING
TEMPERATURE
HUMIDITY
Collins TS et al, Tetrahedron (2015), doi: 10.1016/ j.tet.2015.02.079.
A new approach to sort oak wood:
TANNIN POTENTIAL (TP)
• Measure ellagitannin content of EACH STAVE
prior to coopering barrel using near-­infrared
spectrometry (NIRS).
1° High heterogeneity
g EGT /g o f dry wood
10000.0
9000.0
8000.0
HTP (ENERGIE)
7000.0
6000.0
MTP (SYMETRIE)
5000.0
4000.0
3000.0
LTP (ORIGINE)
2000.0
1000.0
0.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
number o f p ieces
2° Partial correlation with grain
Distribution of EGT level according to grain size
Very fine grain
number o f p ieces
700
600
500
FI
1,5-­2 mm
GR
> 3 mm
LTP
HTP
Fine grain
LTP
400
300
HTP
Mid-fine grain
LTP
200
HTP
100
Open grain
0
LTP
MTP
HTP
LTP
HTP
3° Correlation between darkening of the wood and TP
•
•
UNTOASTED STAVES after STEAM BENDING (4 min)
Same origin, grain size and humidity level
HTP
TOASTING
HTP
LTP
LTP
+/3°C
• The higher the TP, the darker the staves.
• BUT the higher the toasting intensity (time x temp), the darker the staves.
è Surface darkness is not a relevant indicator to control toasting: different
technique can make similar looking barrels that have very different composition!
4° Sensorial impact of TP
WL
FURANIC ALDEHYDES
100
2500
80
2000
60
C WL
40
T WL
20
0
1500
Furfural
1000
5HMF
500
5MF
0
LTP LTP G150 HTP G150 HTP G190
BLANCHE
LTP LTP G150 HTP G150 HTP G190
BLANCHE
VANILLIN
ELLAGITANNINS
50
10000
40
8000
30
6000
4000
20
EGT
2000
10
0
0
LTP BLANCHE
LTP G150
HTP G150
HTP G190
LTP LTP G150 HTP G150 HTP G190
BLANCHE
Content in μg/g
LTP
HTP
5° Correlation with geographic origin?
Trial done in collaboration with the ONF and Château LATOUR
•
Wood origin: France, 4 forests
(2)
•
•
Wood seasoning: 30 months
Wood toasting: gradual 170 (G170)
Forest 1
•
•
•
WINE: LATOUR BLEND 2013 (95% CS)
BARRELING: January 2014, Barrels of 225, DUPLICATE
AGING PERIOD: 15 months (analysis carried out at the end of aging)
Forest 2 Forest 3
Forest 4
F1-­LTPa
F2-­LTPa
F3-­LTPa
F4-­LTPa
F1-­LTPb
F2-­LTPb
F3-­LTPb
F4-­LTPa
F1-­HTPa
F2-­HTPa
F3-­HTPa
F4-­HTPa
F1-­HTPb
F2-­HTPb
F3-­HTPb
F4-­HTPb
Trial VICARD / ONF / LATOUR
FOREST / TP
FURANIC ALDEHYDES / TOASTED NOTES
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
WHISKY LACTONES
g/L
g/L
Levels of aromatic compounds in wines
500
400
300
200
100
F1
F2
F3
F4
VARIABLES
LTP
HTP
0
F1
F2
F3
F4
LTP
HTP
VARIABLES
• Stronger impact of TP classification.
• The higher the TP, the higher the levels in furanic aldehydes and conversely
the lower the levels in WL.
Impact on grape based tannins?
≈ 25 %
Alamo-Sanza and Nevares, . J. Agric. Food Chem, 2014
≈ 75%
O2
EGT
Dissolved / Consumed
Condensed tannins
Phloroglucinolysis
Total tannins concentration
Dpm
Tannin origin
Kennedy et al. 2001
Trial VICARD / ONF / LATOUR
FOREST / TP
mg/L
Phenolic composition
CONDENSED TANNINS (phloroglucinolysis)
mDP
8
7.5
7
6.5
6
5.5
5
4.5
4
850
800
750
700
650
600
550
500
F1
F2
F3
F4
VARIABLES
LTP
HTP
F1
F2
F3
F4
LTP
HTP
VARIABLES
• The higher the TP, the higher the levels in condensed tannins and the higher
the mDP: wine tannins in HTP barrel are slower oxidized
• Stronger impact of TP classification
Trial VICARD / ONF / LATOUR
FOREST / TP
Tannins reactivity (SPI: saliva protein index)
SPI
%
80
79
78
77
76
75
74
73
72
71
70
F1
F2
F3
F4
LTP
HTP
VARIABLES
• The higher the TP, the higher the tannins reactivity.
• Stronger impact of TP classification
CONCLUSION
•
•
•
•
•
•
The heterogeneity of oak wood composition, combined with irregular toasting protocols, can lead
to substantial variation in wine perception after aging.
Oak selection by forest should be used with caution as it doesn’t reflect the heterogeneity of oak
wood chemical composition.
Selection by grain allows some control of this heterogeneity but variability remains high.
To achieve homogeneity, as well as take advantage of the high diversity in chemical composition,
sorting by Tannin Potential at the stave level will yield better outcomes.
Rationalization of cooperage oak wood selection by Tannin Potential, combined with precise
toasting management, is evidenced both by sensory and chemical analysis.
We expect this rationalization of wood sorting will play an increasingly important role as natural
resources are more effectively utilized and the demand for a consistent product increases.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
•
Wine Business Monthly
•
Hélène Genin from Château LATOUR
•
Aude Watrelot and James Kennedy
•
Jeffrey Stambor, Beaulieu Vineyards
•
Justin Seidenfeld, Rodney Strong •
Jean-­Charles Vicard, Christy Thomas and Georges Milcan
Jeffrey Stambor
Director of Winemaking – Beaulieu Vineyard
Justin Seidenfeld
Winemaker – Rodney Strong Vineyards