13-26064

Transcription

13-26064
I
-
()RI GINIA-1-
PP3
IBEABuCH),IKEMEFLAA,c.
\19017 NiO, 70761/65376
ELY STATE FRistrAl
-0-B0X t clg9
E13 NV 930.1
rr„rr,
se:44Ln_
-
CLEUNOEMAN
leitelmtrus
ea
PI.' A.(212
•
AMILA"..-41 rAigard
DEP CLERK-
419
1/1-1-VITELLANT IN FROfS PETSON
THE SuPREivIE COT. OF THE St4TE OF
,
NFVADA
lb
12
13
• 14
IK.7.1vIEFLIGA CHARLE5 113EABUCI-1/
API7ELLA
.51FRENIE CIA/Kr
NO- G20 G7
OM Cl/ORLI) WIDE- VIEBI
DI5TR1 Li CiauKT
NOA59g230
E1 Cirrn-LTUDi CiAL. IDl5ICTCbJT
18
- 19
20
21
22
23
25 27
2i
OF TRE STATE OF NEVADA) IN AO NEVNt9PAY) TANuAgY
•
FCF TFiE COLINI-Y OF CLARK
69,ZDf3 fp:54Am
RE5P6NDENT5
IFKIRTEv
OPPOSIii bN TO' THE RECEIVE() JAN bg
013"TKADE K , UNIVektAN CLERK (OF SLIPKEME a-.
u7T
:
, ...,.t, :-Pki lit:I.:EkK)__Fff-: GA gPiNG DOCKET ENTRY I/17112 e lat3G7., 7).)_AND Fig5'0ANT TO 714E
Et- 1- _ r'prEarNEK TO PRoC2 1 N -,: RM4 P741_5_,_ _1 1:ETCLERK Fr LE 61 A Nia_g,f7-:auESTI__ECiK
(
1
(Lb
■
••■••
EAL FO-011-3-d4900
COME5 NOv■LAFLL.,1,\&iT RE--MEP-LILA CHARpRopER FE•Rsoi\l, A All7
ENT TLE-p ile)FT,05_
iLE5
,2
3
1 42E-7 ciFu fly
11 • i,11•110,W. f
.
i51 pw,p ,Tuo& Ai a-NT: OF A 1317a--AL
4pOCK1 - NO 62067,, P.Rt/Trap oF yyç-PA147:5D/V; - RECEIPT gy in/A44Am
.i1 7NLIARY 0.9 ) 2013 (
#7/97? 6F ELy STA
' 1E . 1 1[364\8244_if
It PRISON, (A1DOC) Ot '6(/l03 DO C-3626,4 CREV..
1,7/0i) AND AmiT A- cHop,_ A5 pRob -5‘1
-
9
to.
OrPOsITC0-7■/ T6 iffE IIRECEIVET3\
OF TRE' CLRK, ..(9F
AN
• v..
RECE(PT Fo-g ECW4ENTS tdoeizoi2i_FILEP
011 CEw
AL PkoPEg PawsoN Pr1-07- PRo6
1G .
la
Cl
20
21
22
23
.24
• 25
„ 2)
27
•
iLED
Da
E
0
?;
OTT CE
N b.
2t36`.7
CASE
F AF PEA
1' 2 e\ - ANP,..THErzE71N ) dER THE PE517.645a-.. TO
1THE
Tif-V\I, n2 2013,, _RE-c.E79.vgp_
• 10---AN (vs' 2.013 T.F40.g 14,LiNpAN ) cLERK,OF:71
. • .47,
CoaRr DEPI4TycLERKIISLuEsTAMP'', AND Pkial
)
•AND
AI-TAD-NEP AS PRooF, lia-KEN--
-FRE /0-DAy Loc
t_IR_StJANT
RE-HEARIN OF MATTER OF C1ARI-15 PerciSteg
Arl MI5 508M) 5318 NN'ETZ-E7 Also TTAlatY,
.
7-14ÄT 7r-iE FiLE7 DEC. Oa) 2011, CLERK oF
KT, _?el PPlA CA
LflDf ROCE-1, IN-FORMA p41417E:Roi
ND ORD-a-IR) id&-R SLISmirm-E,
oF ENEaRC.EmE-Arr or "Ji4DailIEN7 1/ CASE- NO- A5 --
982,31)
Tera-K e9 F
T-1-1.15 CcsuRT
SC.- NO 47261 REmi -1.ftTED `7-0 71-iE P' z1c1T
CoLig-r/(EIcyfITH)i'pivisto-Ni OF CAW_ MATTY- R5
MARcH9 , 20,o7 AND WERE RECEiVED ATLAIA1 OF THE MAR i2 2,6C7, ANC) 8)/ TI-IE GIs
THE pigt-Ricr- Co “R-r-, FbR THE 'EACTITLE-'D
LiE7-1 THERe(Nr
ISPosiTtbN
jaELE_P_LSCfnaay2_.
STATEMENT OF THE' CASE )
PURSLIANIT it) THE CciveLAINT DFNE--CIAFNCE DtsTR1CT CouRT C,ASa- NO. A 5-96230 OF
RECENED .9.4gm ssi ON) , NOV 2S 201( aLEKK oF ,
ECouRT; reriz NV. i 1TH2Q (I, REQuEST;
FNFoRC,A1ENT OF 3-1_10GmENT, CoArRAcT/ACCAtfi
44D ATT4D-4e", NE-REINI As EV41,
3173 Fo-R RE-viEw OF THE 03-uRT1
FoR FUN/GI Su1mod5/M7ER
Si TO
PRocEEP IN-RYRA174 PALipos,
THE
OF PR 0 ce-ss Ar MCP s CO; 5(6)
A /VP 4r, LI witerer) Tb APRcP. 4 .
EKE
issumx
THE APPL CATI t54 WE'RE FLED big DE'C C'))
01i AND .13Y nia Co-aRyi fr1mcAL5p i /S5LiED
VER ,$'HEET"17‘' OF 66-ot\ITY, NEVADA ,Fagm
viL
17A 201 _REV 2- 5 Si GnIFD il)(_EGAL 2EPARWIa-A/774IVP
t)AT'D DEc.„6 zoiLi
i E'R
f CAL.
As g erf.
NG, ENFoRcEfriEALT nF Ti-rPGAIA(r,` iff3u.4 E- r
ArrAcHEO /45 EXHJBIT5 fREVIEIAl i ay 77+13
uRT,
it-e aMPIANT _RAP 0-EGFP THE - 1\11:7 1-1
4EdCE OF LACk. OE RL-aF OFSLRRe-Mff Cotm-r
/\/6 - 472(.i) FE/sill -7ED .SIA/cE ivIM'CH 7 2007, TO
DisTRtc.-T CouRT, 44.17,- ,LAIA/ 1 M-604 61-54 frk/ERE A FiNAL 0 -14.DGAIFNT; NANP/Imwsi rerR cir-roR
CL4/m5
OF 17/5Poscn
IN) ll_ORPFR
ARI5e- PURIN& THE CALISE
oF THE CaLiRT OF F"'I3 oo2C61-7
IN- PART Pr e- VEgs(NC IN - 04
ANp REM/VI-DIN LINPffg NRcF' )2(17)5.
_
)ivtiniC
7
HAT
LiFoN TR-E _RDA's-510 N 6F 7.415 f41 G1-1- '
CN1RT 1N1 MARCH 200 171 MP TILL t7ATE- op - Co,MPLAINT .45F FiLaD APP40A-770--Al PEc C
cl
THAT NEGCJGENCE OCcoz,i!..,e.P) WHILE THE RGY_77
jERSAL OF 6KPER WO. 4726( 14/0 E-'- /N--FFa- .1_
IAND pis ros(TioN) INR-RE NOT' RE1-C -1\/-"rP. Fl...__
IFELIF5 ""INIT11-1_Ep Trt-4gETO •
!
iHE /MA1TE F Rm_LEF AS Ci-ArmEP Fois
0,45/4/›LiC
ER E, _1T4E 1- RS. III N"F•RAIAt_. A u
gel-f LFF FLAmIrriFF (KEMERAA (seAsucw
fro 719. 761 IA( - Ci-L51-0/7X 1 OF /VW, AND /9/4/A/537
TT763 OF 13ANK OF/WE-Ric/VT NEW Mgkr
PHopAld( 14-Rizo/vAi CECe3; ELI-5 FA RGo 1314NK)
pizic KLISi-fAIER) OF NEIAI )1g.k.) AND CEPRic KusfiN
PMM, 4F AtFliv)*x i /4W7 eril MAY i 3 2.06 4, JN
PAL-AS -1-
(-4s, Hob CommcgcE STRa•-a--
(1-{Ai THE ALITR,RITy AT- LAW c'D'F SA-ID A-1-1Coulz-rIT 1A/ERE GNERNED B)", THE Si4pRE-/yiE
R. 14E_ Ko S' 6 )C2)C), REPEALEP Fb-R ADA/WS-I-RATNG' RuLEO
AND UR- DATEP Fo-R. OPeRATkiff
DCFDaRE 0(3) 11\1770,17 OF 2007 ,APCP THAT)
11-fg APMIMSTRATIVE AND /NVE5TIGATIVE FuNcTioA/3
jfrI5LER V- PA cHTmAN, 424 Li-s 1449 ) /4-750-31r
S-cT ciSq- ) ,q91-1--% Z.N.33 j 1-1-7 1,-E13-217 12g6i75
PiSCLISSiNG LiNla• THAT .3 -71;3AP.NT,5 ADMIN151k4
F\IR AND INVEsTiGtATIVE Ft4NCTI0-N5 FiKopet 7405 E
OF AN ADVOCATE ) , (ACA ,3-4-035*; 3-4036; ETC---.
APPLIE7 t-tizEIN AND e -F-- ThE (1A5E No. Ci6lzG ,
THAT 1.-IERIN ) RIMKtNa A5 ADVacATE ) WERE
11-1E RETAINFD OFNER4 Co2JN5Et ) Acwowl.E-12
13)/ -Ttf CbuFT- or FiLE77 /4-PR AL 409 rm)D3 Cia
1gEMERILA 1E64 :
17.144iNTIFF/1-7671770Fo-KT
eLiaff 1/VERE DAVID z. CifFESNOFfr, ESQ. NOVADA
.BAK )\10, 2272 6F RADMAN g- CI-ESN6F-F, 52o SO114744 Fem-cgm STRT 1-1As VEGA 5 9 NEVADA 89101
7iLF1-1-014E;(702)384-5563 M-tO WERE -n-+E gas T
rmIPENT TD5L-IF7RalviE CeruRT CASE NO- 4726 t) AN
p 6P/15i T,/ o-N1 N Po 7 Pf,TH/N THERE! N
E 1A15gF ALSo THE. SLIFREmE CfroRT OFAiSt
2602 '/A171>`./CC5i>a, r-s)
DA `vbgPel
T17-4E \tgiFirop ASsNil Fcriz 5L:4133)-TTLITE Cti-NALSL
suPRG-ma°
AMP 7PENCEFQ-17-rti_, fiA
UT CAse No frkk. (NITAINFE) WE lpri-te-N4L FuNCTio-a5 AS CtruN
SEL 'Tb PLAINTIFF tNHi5 CRimiNbot-t- 1K0-ce --7/1\/G 5
AND A1-50 ACTEV NAIPE:g COL.07, OF sTATe LAvVil iN
/41>1inliSTRATIO-ig OF 'PC-ZCEIPT5 6F THE (- RiNf RAIAtOF Mk'/ L3 2064 ) AND IN SCR,l6c,
14 1-fiCH 71746-1\1 LJE R6PEALFD Fb -g AR- 1. 13) IN 24564
1.4ANIT -719 SCR. 42
Antp &RAN-FLP
AND -THE TkAAISR_ eF PRI)-PffR-17, RSQ1-11REP
SETTL-c--,D AT-LAWI
V'L VJRIE NEVER Di si;365.5p,
SEE 'i7A'Y V. zusal 922 F22 5v3 1i2 N 972 _
/VEY. (1%)
,
FRE Ce3MPARFD ScNAa, -TD IIDAy' l
ThAT APPELLANT 114E4IFF4LA CIIARLEs
affNCE OF LACK oFp6::_t_L,
HAD St-IFFFRED
oF THE Cort4gT.15 Og:DER[DF CASE No.4747
„2_007, RE4)0(gil4& ' al-tasN6FF"') TO 1.7-A41(?I ) F'13
FER ACCOON7 LA/HfC,H WERE IN 1-113 possEss'og
AND Fag -ME' AppELLAnn- PaR5U4Afr TOIf fE
HI. CS, AND 4 -P-1(3, ANp
umAwF-1_41Ly
°DAY' CA-Liso_ THE" FALSE- /1■47K1SoAIMEN'Ti oF
1607a7L-L-A-NTI iEYAE51-iCi-fi" I N "Th-fE NEVADA DEFART:
PRISON I SINCE 2007 1 OF 'PIE RE4'1171?mag-T_
r..ET T$1E C0LAT,OF AIEVA2A 7 t5SUEO,
gFspb-wpwroig5/vofF,
ANp
PT ACT LiNPR Col-crg OF .577-17 tAlAi
74:01zFf3,1 Ni o-LATTN6 ,APPOIANT5 CZN5ITTLIT10/441_
f-fT5 AT-L4 . C5FE 47H AvV/2 114TH 41v1EAOMEAn3
CDN5Tri-Ltifo-NO;AND 14AP
NoT REMITTED MYR 1RAIAL5FRRE4-.D PRop-FrrY)
F
uNiTm7
sirr
AMILAgT i TELL TH15 DAy
RGuMENT
TOE CoN5717LiTto1JALITY OF ME SiNG-E-51.133-ECT
(NCTIATNe REOuiREmeNT OF NFAI -REv- STAT: ss2515.
609 MUST (3E EVALLiAT6D LINPFR 7FIE Fli2c(5 LE
ALANC(N'e TEST, NOT 5TRtc1- SCRLJTIN
PE SIN. aLE -5 La.TE-c-r REQL.wElYSENT OF IRE
CAGE NO‘ .o(7, REet..11RINIC. A FILING Fe 6 FUR
•
-
.
t715Fb5MoN1,1 5TffM.5 FM SUPREME 0.9rtjg-T12CYCAZET NO . .3265-1 1NvoLv(Ne APPEtimT 1i3E4BLIct-ft, AND THE STATE OF N5VADA 1 14 2002,
AN7 1_1170:4 M ESTAI3LotiMENIT o'r A NE13-silE
RPRis-a. vt.1 2, Fog APPotIANT) pURNC,
I1\-PLANTczt.I.Dutt
AL-ElYT
FF-15. /APM_LANT'5 BEHALF, AND PARol_k'tivaR-
EME-17 FOR THE- RE-FtrizT- P. Na7 1- vvc.wili 'OF .5-'06
MtLitO-Ki
At4DIT ‘THERI-13
Ai7VOCATE GI4ESNOFT- WERE t5R--R.T) To TR
TFfE DiSTRicy
NSFER ReCo-RD.5 AND FiLas )
DIN
len-fiRT) clUD 3"%&.F>f-i 7 BoNAVUntit-Rc',
ANP 113 TREApp
4i\i)/FCLED oF ,TL4L 7 2
aLLANTilEgErN,As t it3,_E/ABuCI-1-t t AND 6F
1-W HAD NibT LL -ME CbMP/A-thir biz WRIT' (Z4EP /3')/ DtSTRicT iN CASEIWRITA/6-A5172 612
1b1 CASE No- C16( 26 12, AT-I-At ,SEF
RANT OF FE 5 13 It:(5-Am 2,066p fro-ficH CI4LI5F3 OFACTwN /ro-R, RE/4
1-ir SEvEN
S REVE-R5E7 AAlp REM EP Fug 1'EL40- F 13Y
IS C6ft-OZT IN Pa-cger NO. 47264 ,AirWci-I 72ô117
PE5
-
1417( cATA 61\AI
LINPEK "TFtg- FlgigeLe BALANCING 7 - 5-7,0 AN_Pgi
1 'S'iR ci SLRuiLaYi -1t7-1-E A-Pw-cAr C-HF5A/DFF: /WE)
TriE STA:MI AND AS R-ILFP OF TWi COU7
ScMi. 4726/ I- Alifir7E - SuPposzo Tv •TR4A/5FP
015171,517-7DN - NAIPo7-grtz)-1-41N5 , 70 AFF7F4LANT`fE4
BUCtie ANP AT- .4-AiAl
E
1100
131-IFFINGMN
SGs P- 2D
THE STATE 6NEVADA
1-V3 1994- NEV.' LE705
HFKE 1HE _TuDGE LAcKEp 7LigisD.raTteitv OF
tsetATT5K t4NTrLttT ii/VETE-- RECE--IVF2
FRE Pisi-RicT- CznAr (MAR 12 2007). I t-fAT
jA/RE VES1Z-D 5eLaty (1■17He 51.4PREME.
CMRTI LINDER 7-+E RataVANT 5TAM-It7:53 -THE 94CottRI-- HAD eNriRta .04/4DI-ipvis_toA/
AN! ApparAt
F71./A/6 OF -Pia":
friATTER FRom
NOTiCE &FA-pPEAL_ UNTIL THE- IS5LIAA/cE OF
RTIF(cAT 0r- 3-I/PGA-a-NT%
ArPFUANTJ/E3EA6uci-e AS An/ fivfrIATE. Na0C),
FF-KE /Ar-RE2grP7 - or CEgriFiciri OF 31JDG(4FAITc-A10-472(1„ oN MAK. (Fc 2,6(f.
Rs177.155' Mp *5177 - 305 "NTANS THAT
714E CERTIFic4T OFT0,0mENT/iA/P VAR(er05 inkg
PO- CLIMEWT5 COWSPTI-ITE 770-1-F gEmiThThigi
_
tkrVIEVF,tc AIRAP 41Cci) DE7A/F5 THE
R TO 5E 4 cER1Fia-9 CoPY OF THEL-Tioo - ,
Of,M0N OF TfiE CoaRT; F111 01,
NA Cu-PI 6- F
eau7 To Costs 04E55
p 4Ny PlE.C.110A1 A.5
DREcf, THAT A Fc3FAIAL REMITTITUR (.4111 11. is•
THE ReGIVE17 CeiRT1 CANt O• 7c LiP■ Olvtar TD
NO '4 7261 . oF MAK 13 2,011, P
THE Aff2E-Al_ NO- $7774, AO ierrAcei
evio--eveE; tAERE wi71-1.6-07 etTT/R4 4 709A1
MD MUST 13E Fo-RGD,A7---miAil ,
CiTirVC iv . g.s 239-330. ziAlEIFEL V , STATE ) 1 6 73
510 17-2P S72, '39 NFV.242 FRA-up la-77 6s-
WHERE TliE TEgM 8 FALse IA/L--;7RE /\10T5YrVoNYMOu e j
(Allift ilFt7RGEI- 17'1. So THAT pf.:711-7\12AAtil (NO AcLE --, .1.-(MNT.5 ()-1 7FfE -TRUE _
ap Tf+Ar 7-IE (NST"R
-: AA/p -rt-tRE-70-pE bt/c-'-: SIGAlkirM.-,-- OF TF-t. frtivaTHE---- OVNOT FogGp, Cc3 LILP a E-- co N V I Cr&Y, 14/11-6
4
FiTKViA77 (Y.-ig EWT,AtNE-p 1N THE cE-g-RT---1&47E5 MERE FALS 'R , (SEE ISIGNIED T- R c.d1-4.ART)51 Ci-fiEFDFp.clE
TI4E'KE- R-F-7, THE siNGiz---sUBD-E---cr
AT AIR. 295009, W C t -i i?ff01-irRE7 THAT T1 -fa
ie ff5FbAIDEA/75 6A/ AFFEA -1- TkoAA/5F
EE NOT 54-Fspo-D ) RiRSLIANT Tb THE 1.4N Egi-TFLE-1,› Reerr--1-- /OF A4A-f (3 20 j
oF 744PGAIN7- 1 gFcwisiTE oF pEr5p651-rtNNR7 - RFLT1-(W5., AND Tf-ft,5 &NAT - INE-Rff
A-Lao ) Pg5/7 6N5f8t..F AND NO atey / 4pt/Ks/47-F _
C.t4EsNoPF II IN -Tr-fE Co i4oKT ) lAlfritCH RPF5L1LT3 17\/
ATE LLANIT FALsE I 1\1117r< ISO AIMENT Cti NG I I DAY °
.1-Fiz A AT 54/0 Ca).
IHEREFeg i AFPFAL Pocke= T WO- 6.2o 67 mug;
CCD Sp AS ) To SEAL AN,p C ---R-riF-Y POCKET
AID - 4726 ) 6 F TwDOmEATT- OF E2F Ar-1A L.
ei NRicF6o 4 PAAP2P NP 4o2 FE y-K ToE 5477
AL OF IRE SLIFgENE C.MRTATAig 4P45/1,5 -.__
a
NOTICE OF POTU-KnAL 1715MISS4L FeY-R
L-Lig:E_TO f24Y_S_LIPKE/467 CouR T F7LiNc FEE
922 P.2d 536, 112 Nev. 972, Day v. Zubel, (Nev. 1996)
Page 5
case like this, Day must satisfy two elements. First,
Day "must prove that the conviction or sentence has
been reversed on direct appeal, expunged by executive
order, declared invalid by a state tribunal authorized to
make such determination, or called into question by a
federal court's issuance of a writ of habeas corpus."
Heck, 512 U.S. at ----, 114 S.Ct. at 2372. This element
was satisfied when the district judge dismissed with
prejudice all criminal charges pending against Day.
concluded that a delay in filing an appeal was not an
action under color of state law. In further support,
Zubel states that a public defender's decision not to file
a frivolous suit is within the scope of traditional lawyer
functions. See Polk, 454 U.S. at 312, 102 S.Ct. at
446-47. Zubel argued that Polk is directly on point
because the allegation raised in that case--that the
public defender injured the appellant while acting
pursuant to administrative rules and procedures for
handling criminal appeals--is identical to the allegation
raised in Day's underlying claim. We conclude that
these cases cited by Zubel are not dispositive because
in both cases the individual attorney made a unilateral
decision either to delay or to not file an appeal on
behalf of his/her client after the case had been assigned
to the attorney, whereas in the instant case, no attorney
was apparently even assigned to the habeas corpus
proceedings.
*540
[8] Second, Day must prove that the
defendants' representation of him during his unlawful
imprisonment violated Day's constitutional rights and
that defendants were acting under color of state law.
The determination of whether a public defender acts
under [112 Nev. 9791 color of state law depends on the
nature and context of the function he is performing.
Georgia v. McCollum, 505 U.S. 42, 54, 112 S.C.
2348, 2356, 120 L.Ed.2d 33 (1992). "[A] public
defender does not act under color of state law when
performing a lawyer's traditional functions as counsel
to a defendant in a criminal proceeding." Polk County
v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 325, 102 S.Ct. 445, 453, 70
L.Ed.2d 509 (1981). However, "a public defender may
act under color of state law while performing certain
administrative, and possibly investigative, functions."
McCollum, 505 U.S. at 54, 112 S.Ct. at 2356 (citing
Polk, 454 U.S. at 325, 102 S.Ct. at 453-54); see also
mbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 430-31 & n. 33, 96
S.Ct. 984, 994-96 & n. 33, 47 L.Ed2d 128 (1975)
(discussing line that separates administrative and
investigative functions from those of an advocate);
see, e.g., Branti v. Finkel, 445 U.S. 507, 100 S.Ct.
1287, 63 L.Ed.2d 574 (1980) (public defender acted
"under color of state law" when making hiring and
firing decision on behalf of the state).
,
f
-
[9] Zubel does not dispute that the state and county
public defenders' offices violated Day's constitutional
rights; however, he argues that the state and county
public defenders' offices were not acting under color of
state law when the violations occurred and therefore no
viable cause of action under § 1983 existed. Our
analysis is therefore restricted to determining whether a
genuine issue of material fact exists regarding whether
the state and county public defenders' offices acted
under color of state law when the alleged violations
occurred.
The district judge said that there was "no question in
his mind" that the actions of the public defender, and
any actions of a prosecutor, were traditional lawyer
functions. We disagree. We [112 Nev. 9801 conclude
that a genuine issue of material fact exists regarding
whether the state and county public defenders' actions
of (1) failing to assign personnel to handle Day's writ
petition and (2) losing the writ petition were
administrative functions or traditional lawyer functions.
Therefore, summary judgment was improperly granted
on this issue, and we remand this cast; to the district
court for further proceedings.
CONCLUSION
We conclude, as a matter of law, that the statute of
limitations commenced on May 17, 1991, the date the
district judge dismissed all criminal charges against
Day. We further conclude that genuine issues of
material fact remain regarding whether Day had a
viable underlying claim against the state and county
public defenders' offices. Therefore, the grant of
summary judgment is reversed, and this case is
remanded to the district court for further proceedings
consistent with this opinion.
STEFFEN, C.J., and YOUNG and SHEARING, JJ.,
concur.
SPRINGER, J., dissents.
In support of his contention that the state and county
public defenders' actions were traditional lawyer
functions and therefore not conducted under color of
state law, Zubel cites Franklin v. Oregon, State
Welfare Division, 662 F.2d 1337, 1345 (9th Cir.1981),
a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision that
*541. SPRINGER, Justice, dissenting:
The majority notes the trial judge's comment that
there was "no question in his mind" that the actions of
the public defender and the prosecutor were traditional
© 2006 Thomson/West. No claim to original U.S. Govt. works.
PATT, NOVEMSER 05) 20(2 "-TA ciG- LiNer)/Yit\f, C_LEKis
P CouR -r i SLIPREmE Gerai- NO,C2o6 7
1HF OLIESTIeN As To tAlt-i-ETH-EzR_ OR NoT/F
THE A1742E-Li-ANT PrEP THE' FILING FEe OF,S250 A 7 NR52. 25'o COC60 lAltruLL? 1-f4c) PlzervEN
F-F(CtE-NC7 6&1( THE FART OF 7T-E API:717,71/14757
71-1F1E- Fo-RE Thist5
C.6-L4R7 WE-RE: RFsERVED› TO
AN5vvaR HEREN AN)? Skitn_iLp sGAL CCA-)2/4
RTIRcATE ,TLIDGAIT N6-14726/ t.So 77-64rAPPELIANT MA'y ZECEIVE jr_iDGA4-EArr OFREttEE,
CcoC-A5 Nto - A 5/ 7 292 oF Pi sik( C7 ectiRT;
NRAP240)C3),ANP IN-PFg-77NERDANCF
NT- PART) TO T (NIT) i( pg7tyR APpRoVA-e
I/4 FART -ii vitt° NEKE ,PEgmi -Trov TO PRoci-PP
_clot
Go.LiRT-Ael
Fo-RMA PAuFFRIs
nON MAY 19goCEL7 ow APPEAL IN FORMA P4LI-
17?Ri5 WIFicyz_ir FoRMOR A LITI-OR i zATI NO_
SEE, ATTACHED ExIll3t75 OF FKlaR APPRoVAL OF
sTR
CryuRT o F CASE, NO A5, 7252) CS. 'CA/ 05
472(, /, 515176i 5r7r794). ONE CAsE ANP
11AFFFA-L /7tYcKET1-5; F-0-R LAci< oF CFRTIRED
ME-14T *DUE TO No 4726i , AS RECEIVE)? itihR
IS 2011 ) Sy APPELLANT HERF/Al, AS ii\liatE 16E-
Ast_tb4t, Npop N 7(97'?.
.
IN Colvausta4
_
g5 uANT Tb THE: Ft NANCIAL LER Ti
lycVp 11M5ANO2NOV 29
Fo-R CASF5i N
ciefTG-5
sa-R51
11,2067) ar7opj Li(g),5777cN AA/74726/ 1 14AD SiCA/4---pl
AALLTAITT-tOgizep efl9 e oF IAL5727-17-0A0/01/4-
ACC&LiAlTA-AITICND0C)
,%
EACANLE OF -.73et AND 42ot?.o0 1mS'AvaV65,"1
IAND Lit3/417-M.ID 14811■1 A5 Extlierr FO-R, RE -vow
_
OF TT-1(s CouRT,
,:litRi5Dicercod vti6RE
AN' 17 WE-f -R
ESTP.2 LIPM 7Th$ n0-7AT RiRsi../ANT 773 THE dM.:1171 GATE. 0F JZIDOME/VT _No- 4 -726ii_/Uf1I A/co WIE
2067_,40_,
TIRED ebP>711 0-4T. 74,4-klAnip
1 110 7 PE miTTABLE
hi-AT 7T-115 it5PPO."1.77oN‘ BE CA/S!2L?7?EV FTIf
1 47/FFi1fOTDA(1 11) TT/EOF7,$
:„.17-1E
fEr'-577-Fori OA/ Fai7 _
ILY/A/6
_
, •
OF ,7-0Z(sDICP0A(
HWI-ItCH l?ErDLIIREp sTR4N5
liaP6N REM rip ThI To_77pg Pi .,.51R/C,TCPURT/4AV
bT, ANyTT4/N&
8E-f-TygE -MAT As
113:Y Mg RECOPT C)1 ,7, MAR_ 10- 26/ RRO;EP
I .A1E14-17
Ff
0-1 4/0<s,
•
. }ESPL-r
-zeaVE 9-43040717
b.
m
H
•
PAY ()F
so/m-11[R 167-,
2of
,
113EA13LICHI, IkEMEFULA Fko
VFR I Fi CAT
3
ic
12
3
4/ 14_
I('
INMATE1 IN 13),OPE/Z PEwtoi\I I P6, /KEWFFLILA CHN<LE5 Ii3EABLIctil,No.`7197% AND Ag
APPE:LIANT TO THE 51(19RE -AiE Coak=rr6F NEVADA ) IN( PoreKE-75 MO- /-1726 ANP 6'2067 po
HERESY. VEPIFY THE FogE . G0-TwO ibPPo511713N 11 E:Arrin.F.p.) 1-21-0;4c)/N ) 76 HAD E -0-iv
0--RRifc -r- AN't30 CONCA5F- ArThrs-T-A4E-WT &F
MY TRuE MingLEP&E ) M f3E5-7-' 1-E/distiNtia
At\sp Flii5o/4Af7 . TbThE LeAliv5 OF
jorz7 mAIP __)14EARtA-TR-LAIAl i AT i52,41-o31
3( •
„DAT-Lp
TH15
1<
t7A) / OF
-
etr1
'
S _6:NA-fit RE
17
-E:teE31.4Ci-f1).1)<E/14E-FLgil,
INMATE #7/97q 1`40
20 1 1 R,Ly
I h N -VA PA
ATo, /:/)/D BETo
7-1E
p4sEic. ) AT-4,41Ai
23
24
Zq
PA/ &f
1 g AATLIRE
NO774
Pasb
(5si-L) HERE IN
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIoNs
ELY STATE PRISON
LEGAL MAIL
J
NAME:
e-
Doc#:
UNIT:
4' '1:32
REPORT TO CONTROL AT ADM1N FOR THE FOLLOWING:
LEGAL MAIL:
Supreme Court, Clerk
201 N. Carson St. Suite 201
Carson City, Negada 89701
CERTIFIED MAJL:
s
REGISTERED MAIL: _
DATE:
01I
INMATE SIGNATURE:
i
OFFICER:
FP6^5-3
DOC#TIT 9 -7
9
DOC - 3020A (REV. 7/01)
1-1
-1ANI
. . „.
• /0/4
ID
I'L.J17REME-r Ca1,11- oNVAPA
ii„OFTICE OF TRE.CL,ERk:,,,
11. TRACIE. IZ- LINDEMAN! CLEgg.
I..Z •
13
•
14
.•
15
ill■ t
I1
I
i
li
11
17._
1c6
illi.ti
li,!
I1
if
!1
,
22
23
25'_
26
27
2g
KE' (Lep NN/ 19 Zolz, RPL`LFOR.
RECel-
FOR DOCWNIENT5 /I/0Z /201_2 ) FiLe]
1\iciicg bEAPpEAL/PIRDFER Its°5ai RLDT
bGRAM- FitFP LL-FT-IF-16D CuPy_bF_Pgi
FER m-R561\) NrilCE OF APPAL )
CASE NO. 62b67) D-C, CASE ND. A598230
L1iVi2EmAN/ 1
11
11
V\i1W:y.6744SFM? M 1-)-4-É?: FD P
.1rEK5bi\I LuT_,PFoOlAm_ R,17 TF-1E7 AOtNE -- /-)
11 k
113EABL)c-Hf) PENEFT4LA. c
APPELLANT' )N1 PgbPER.,
A-L77
Nevada Supreme Court Docket Sheet
Page 1
Docket: 62067 IN RE: PETITION OF FORMA PAUPERIS (IBEABUCHI)
Supreme Court No. 62067
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF FORMA PAUPERIS REQUEST,
Consolidated with:
IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI,
Appellant,
vs.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN
AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK,
Respondent.
Counsel
lkemefula Charles lbeabuchi, Ely, NV, Appellant, in proper person
Attorney General/Carson City, Carson City, NV \ Catherine Cortez Masto, as counsel for Respondent, The Eighth
Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, in and for the County of Clark
Case Information
Panel: Panel
Panel Members:
Unassigned
Disqualifications:
Case Status: Appeal Docketed/Awaiting Filing Fee
Category:
Civil Appeal
Type:
General
Submitted:
Subtype:
Proper Person
Date Submitted:
Oral Argument:
Sett. Notice Issued:
Sett. Status:
Sett. Judge:
Related Supreme Court Cases:
58848, 60260
District Court Case Information
Case Number:
A598230
Case Title: IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF FORMA PAUPER'S REQUEST (APPLT: IKEMEFULA IBEABUCHI)
Judicial District:
Eighth
County:
Division: ,
Clark Co.
Sitting Judge:
Replaced By:
Notice of Appeal Filed:
Judgment Appealed From Filed:
11/05/12 Appeal
Docket Entries
Date
Docket Entries
11/08/12
Filing Fee due for Appeal.
11/08/12 Filed Notice of Appeal/Proper Person Pilot Program. Filed certified copy of proper person
notice of appeal.
12-35329
11/08/12 Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. No action will be taken on this matter until
Pap up5(12 filing fee is paid. Due Date: 10 days.
12-35336
11/19/12 Filed Proper Person Document (Reply Notice of Potential Dismissal for Failure to Pay
Supreme Court Filing Fee), Order Denying Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
without Prejudice Filed in District Court 3/1/12 attached.
12-36727
01/09/13 Filed District Court Order. Certified copy of order filed in district court on December 12,
2012. (Order Denying Application to Proceed lnforma Pauperis without Prejudice.)
13-00826
Wednesday, January 09, 2013 10:54 AM
CIVIL COVER SHEET
CLARK
County, Nevada
Case No.
I.
Defendants..NCIRL0
Plaintiffs .....
kvivE WEB
jiv
.‘BUCtil iVEz
4
Attorney i(rAllarin/rffdrEgAne)..1.
ILA C. ii _7Lil 1:6e
C9‘ SOX f (icsti ,.pLy Alv, cm 30 (
FC) F1/4-14
..
Attorney (name/address/phone) (13
1;E:xievs
NATURE OF CONTROVERSY (Place An X in One Box Only)
TORTS
DOMESTIC
O 1. Divorce
O 2. Annulment
O 3. Adoption
0 4. Name Change
O 5. Paternity
O 6. Termination of Parental Rights
O 7. Other (Specify)__________-
REAL PROPERTY
Negligence:
O I. Vehicle, Airplane, Marine, etc.
Negligence-Professional:
O 2. Medical
O 3. Dental
0 4. Legal
O 5. Accounting
0 6. Architectural
0 7. Other (Specify).-------------.----
Intentional Misconduct:
O I. Assault
O 2. Battery
O 3. Interference With Contractual Rights
O 4. Defamation (Libel or Slander)
O 5. Wrongful Termination of Employment
O 6. Other (Specify)
Product Liability:
O I. Motor Vehicle
0 2. Other (Specify)
Business/Commercial Tort:
O 1. Anti-Trust
0 2. Unfair Competition
O 3. Fraud and Misrepresentation
O 4. Negligence-Slip and Fall
O 5. Other (Specify).-- -.--------
O I. Landlord and Tenant
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
2. Quiet Title
3. Unlawful Deiainer
4. Partition
5. Specific Performance
6. Foreclosure
7. Liens
8. Condemnation
9. Planning and Zoning
10. Other (Specify)..
Bad Faith:
O I. Insurance Carrier
0 2. Other (Specify).-
PROBATE AND GUARDIANSHIP
O I. Guardianship
O 2. Conservatorship and Trusts
O 3. Special Administration
0 7. Other (Specify)._
0 4. Summary Administration
0 5. Full Administration
0 6. Set-Aside Estates
CONTRACT/ACCOUNTS/JUDGMENTS
PERSONAL PROPERTY
0 I. Damage to Property (Specify)._____--.....
0 2. Recovery of Property
0 I. Insurance
0 2. Commercial Instrument
0 7. Guarantee
0 8. Collection of Actions
0 .3. Uniform Commercial Code
0 9. Sale Contract
0 3. Conversion of Property
X 4. Enforcement of Judgment
0 4. Other (Specify).
0 5. Building and Construction
0 6. Stockholder Suits
0 10. Employment Contract
0 II. Other (Speci(y).
-------------
-
-
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
0 I. Gaming
0 5. Other (Specify)._...-
0 2. Dept. of Motor Vehicles
0 3. Public Service Commission
0 4. S.I.I.S.
-_----__
...-
SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS
0 I. Habeas Corpus
0 4. Other (Specify)
JUSTICE/MUNICIPAL COURT APPEALS
Municipal Court:
0 I. DUI
0 2. Other (Specify)
Justice Court:
0 I. DUI
0 2. Other (Specify).
..____. ...... ..
ALL OTIIER
Briefly Specify Nature of Action.
0 2. Mandamus or Prohibition
0 3. Certiorari
877t,ZOIl
165
MI Po Po
CIVIL COVER SHEET
County, Nevada
Case No.
(Assigned by Clerk's Office)
I. Party Information
ILlaintif1(s1 (name/address/phone): '
Ke co.8/uat,
<
"Tc,c. tres,
1K
Defendant(s), (name/address/phone):
LOC9(1 a C...0 ;c1.e.
d
6t
gt-i C. IA
Attorney (name/address/phone):0
a.
coc
We-6
(3 s
s
Attorney (name/address/phone):
FkAIA
0
4/1/iitr,Sol
0 Arbitration Requested
II. Nature of Controversy (Please check applicable bold category and
applicable subcategory, if appropriate)
Civil Cases
Real Property
Torts
Negligence
0 Landlord/Tenant
0 Product Liability
0 Negligence—Auto
O Unlawful Detainer
O Product Liability/Motor Vehicle
O Other Torts/Product Liability
0 Negligence — Medical/Dental
0 Title to Property
0 Negligence—Premises Liability
O Foreclosure
O Liens
O Quiet Title
El Specific Performance
0 Intentional Misconduct
O Torts/Defamation (Libel/Slander)
O Interfere with Contract Rights
0 Employment Torts (Wrongful termination)
(Slip/Fall)
0 Negligence — Other
0 Other Torts
0 Condemnation/Eminent Domain
O
O
O
O
O
0 Other Real Property
O Partition
O Planning/Zoning
Anti-trust
Fraud/Misrepresentation
Insurance
Legal Tort
Unfair Competition
Other Civil Filing Types
Probate
0 Appeal from Lower Court
0 Construction Defect
Estimated Estate Value:
O
O
0 Summary Administration
Chapter 40
General
O Transfer from Justice Court
O Justice Court Civil Appeal
0 Breach of Contract
0 General Administration
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0 Special Administration
0 Set Aside Estates
0 Trust/Conservatorships
O Individual Trustee
O Corporate Trustee
0 Other Probate
Building & Construction
Insurance Carrier
Commercial Instrument
Other Contracts/Acct/Judgment
Collection of Actions
Employment Contract
Guarantee
Sale Contract
Uniform Commercial Code
0 Civil Petition for Judicial Review
O Foreclosure Mediation
O Other Administrative Law
O Department of Motor Vehicles
O Worker's Compensation Appeal
III. Business Court Requested
o NRS Chapters 78-88
O Commodities (NRS 90)
O Securities (NRS 90)
(also check
applicable civil case box)
0 Civil Writ
O Other Special Proceeding
ti`Other Civil Filing
O Compromise of Minor's Claim
O Conversion of Property
O Damage to Property
O Employment Security
LULEnforcement of Judgment
1113 Foreign Judgment — Civil
O Other Personal Property
O Recovery of Property
O Stockholder Suit
O Other Civil Matters
(Please check applicable category; for Clark or Washoe Counties only.)
o Investments (NRS 104 Art. 8)
0 Deceptive Trade Practices (NRS 598)
O Trademarks (NRS 600A)
O Enhanced Case Mgmt/Business
O Other Business Court Matters
k
Date
ignature of initiati g party or representative
See other side for family-related case filings.
Nevada AOC Research and Statistics Unit
Res
Forte
( 2250 11
I N IT-E.GI-iTi-i :TA> &AL 17) 51R 1 CT CC51-11_77IN A-ND FOR THE STATE oF NVA-177At, CoLiNT5/
CIVIL ACT(01\t, FILE
,
IKEISEABLICHI. Ot1(\
AN17
kE 'LIRE 17 1E51 .1), ENT- Co frc
rt-ANTIEE5
V
0 LP KliT?•E. 1N55
NUMER*.
DEPAgimENT
- .4726f
DOCKE1pi 0
HEARING 17"r( ?
I iME
14
:I
AMENDED
•
II
1
•r
AL
ENS':.DFCEMENT OF -3 I-DOME/4115
"-- 04E2, A Nip
__PrTr-tii.A
SLiFranetE Coltzr NO. 1-r126i .
_OKES NOV\LI PLANTIEF I N PElz150.NL,_10_7_51,1C+414_11<eviEFlu LA. C . OF Tr-1E 1\TEV/Art: PE: PAri r-7vtEATTCo_FEcriws iNivf,4 it: 71779 AT Tiff - ELY _
TAT,L7. _FRISaN 0_4 g'_FENTI:Yi_AN7 F/ I-55 THL5 _
CIVI L. _ Arc m O N
ON/ rtw-rizAc-7--)A CcouATT5 /31/00vVAirs
w F." R -Erki OW?
NAfrtt,--. y
AN_17 AQAP\i5T
i LiCX"%wri\rr
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI,
Appellant,
vs.
DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, RICHARD A. SCHONFELD, AND
LAW OFFICES OF GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, AN
ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
D/B/A GOODMAN & CHESNOFF,
Respondents.
Supreme Court No. 47261
District Court Case No. A517292
CLERK'S CERTIFICATE
STATE OF NEVADA, ss.
I, Janette M. Bloom, the duly appointed and qualified Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of
Nevada, do hereby certify that the following is a full, true and correct copy of the Judgment in this
matter.
JUDGMENT
The court being fully advised in the premises and the law, it Is now ordered, adjudged and decreed,
as follows: "We affirm the district court's order to the extent that it dismissed Schonfeld as a
defendant, we reverse the order in all other respects, and we remand this matter for further
proceedings consistent with this order."
Judgment, as quoted above, entered this 8th day of February, 2007.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have subscribed my name and affixed
the seal of the Supreme Court at my Office in Carson City,
Nevada, this 7th day of March, 2007.
Janette M. Bloom, Supreme Court Clerk
By:
Chief Deputy Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI,
Appellant,
Supreme Court No. 47261
VS.
DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, RICHARD A. SCHONFELD, AND
LAW OFFICES OF GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, AN
ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
D/B/A GOODMAN & CHESNOFF,
Respondents.
District Court Case No. A517292
FILED
'MAR 2 0 2007
REMITTITUR
,ANfTTE M. BLOOM
maw vF $UPREME COURT
BY
TO: Charles J. Short, Clark District Court Clerk
OtPUTY CLERK
Pursuant to the rules of this court, enclosed are the following: Certified copy of Judgment and Opinion/Order.
Receipt for Remittitur.
DATE: March 7, 2007
Janette M. Bloom, Clerk of Court
BY:
Chief Dieputy Clerk
cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge
Goodman & Chesnoff
lkemefula Charles lbeabuchi
RECEIPT FOR REMITIITUR
Received of Janette M. Bloom, Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Nevada, the
REMITTITUR issued in the above-entitled cause, on
INAck
DOPUtiDi4trict Court Clerk
CE
RECEIVED
MAR 1 2 2007
ijIv 40
• MAR 1 9 2007
JANErrE N.
koc.,
Eft OF SUPREME
COURT
.."....._DEP
LITY CLERK
70°7
•
IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI
NDOC #71979
Lovelock Correctional Center
1200 Prison Road - POB 359
Lovelock, Nevada 89419-0359
FILED
105 FEB I 3 A II: I 1
PLAINTIFF, In Proper Person
,0
u
DISTRICT COURT
CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA
--00000-IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI,
Plaintiff,
100°
CP‘Case NcRi 5 1
Vs.
7 29 2
Dept No. X"
DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, RICHARD A.
SCHONFELD, and LAW OFFICES OF
GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, An Association of Professional Corporations, dba GOODMAN & CHESNOFF,
ORDER
Defendants.
Plaintiff, IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI (hereinafter "Ibeabuchi") has filed an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, on
his civil action, in the above-entitled action, together with a
sworn affidavit, and an Inmate Financial Statement. The Court
has reviewed Application and the file herein.
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, pursuant to NRS 12.015, it is hereby
Ordered that Ibeabuchi's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis
along with process of services is GRANTED.
DATED THIS ,cY1DAY OF
"
CO
....
cifira
I/
a,o
fr
g
RECEIVED
JAW 2 3 7nrri
Muff, crr.r.x
JvD5-zi J (?) L dJa/ 3s 11 'cO M OHS
.1a.ci)JO CIL A-14.34 1
W\7/ 0
4.14\ivONaa---a
1
• t S'CN S TsliVOrivbNs_INI
Air
U.
—18T -
L!
'7 71.J314-3
NIERMEI V aVMN 'AIN)/ QT X1V33.
'TA
11()DJJ~.LL$ i cJ
AMU
d - 006069 - 60 - V
0I
-
)
•
6-S6TM"gi"mO7
...d
-3
--
4 i-fcc t
• 59g2.
1.
. :‘, ,
.
I
-
• O.__
. f 1 _.
...14
t3
15
142
,.
• --11--
• 22_
'
2
261
27
2S
ke.
11,
AP
.
iv
7 L I Pt-it/A/RE
t\tb NOT TEt.Ef-toalc. CL
LEVI REPUE5
ktiffictf HAD, Nor S___L\LAPPL4L--t). CoR
MEI< ER5KMPPLKAAti- HE-R5IN
T-t-E S 2
Aet6INT4tA/5
a F TFFE S' J.Z.
' 1 A 1 0
wk.!
LA BEAeuct-fr 1 5485cR(ser) b 1 a K. a
_a.LT__T/D
Al
4 ir. _ff 2-012 + ASEE1
6
.a k/ CALIEE oRcrEK 4 MP Art-Act4e5 CAmE A
EV LPFMCL , 70 -n-u's R E Y
ssca-
c.RD(NL6 To The
THOu at..A ND triEgEN.je_Ei
0
TTEK Wsiza- "The AM(ArriAINE7 ORDE-icsIV-
r>
. _V
••.B
(D _
- ii-tE- Fi
rEnT-TE2, NOW 5EALEP ANiu5Lit3mITTE-v
THAT, ijw 60 MeAL6.415_4_A- R-ELtEF
S'UFW .FRo Nek Suck{ '314Gilei,E141..,EN 46 sr; PAk -rtcizAR5 Ric---RS(413Mt-r-ri> 1 N -ri-fE 1-2.:EGILt 6- -s-r
65F AFR(1 (2. i 261Z As ' PRO() F :e..uggst_tykArr TO
Au NR5 12-1'315 PrscLosuR,G•2 FeyR FIN4140' STAILIS OF- APPLecivr -rrs_t_: .
•3
32
4
011/2AW2. 7 14ERE7N/
1?
A
FRE Mil Z1-405 O F R'g-Liq- OF 5 C-NO- 4726/
Pf5POSCTION WI Po7 - R (7/TiVA/5 1 Tf-JE- 1-<-Eni reTic17. As
ILIK OF FINAL ji./DeAelE,VT NIA-ci-1, 7i
_
23
t k.
a
0
60 AIN
4 E.
TT F _L Pa
-
14AT --TIE
' Ft-tRrt4ER
A%
ai
- 0
. IN- FoEttlA PALIP - R15 AM) AT
. t . 0
•
lp
6
CE-7 Ti4ff 71--IDGE GOA/z4L&-.2._ CDF I T
•
A
2.• 2 1/ORpER ,0. - (A/6 ApPL
c CATAI TO PRnCE-7) IN PPMA PALITRIS_ WIT
5RL4 A lc
.
I
Hour
vLp_ :,_Gsz-:
PRE3-1471cE) FicED jvk4E_o_L2gjza
,
6.0
lA/ 7g•
A -
6 A p:
DvP
T1 F Oka&
N ta
PE -
La
f/VroGAliORDFR S
DEFacTS CL1rE0 1, 6- I/ APPEICATIoN
12 tW A 4' Am t •
• (.I
ELizttn
D -T-tr 5 , szD DA
• -
11_ -E1d4XLAILL77 FE
C EP
?RD
142
_13
23
2
2(4
zs
30
_V32
ER4
At:ERG:TE -
kE g U 4
p
_Nc
(4b/14L-
E
a- NI
_
EX j-ttO1T3) FcriZ 12.6---0vU •
_
•11_
2D
A 1-161- I Sr , 201 2
er Fp KE.4
E 610 E- g..
bu'i:
d IA7
P4UPFKt5 NE 4/ARRA - '_R'S A
Ta
•- .
rifolPIARANICESigFkoPni?
AS Al-ErE KAWT-6-7) --rb FlAtAmFF-PcppEIW
200; (2ea5) 14T-Th4Fp A5 t Xi-403115 a- PAGE,
-
N.515k,
CocasFL (WA Sui.rrEaciAIG AP74L " n"EP CoaRT
ED 0 Gk-4,
AA E:R f 5-5 /OW —(9
a tvr&-6175
PKOM-R Pg-RSoN ' ,24-sboVGLY)
CLE 6F 7T-TE Cazik — IVEK° PtkEr - f>
6 0 E' tI tiAl it ED a- A
"trrED
A
NC EK aP
Eo
05-
=7
,
a.
ispc)E . ALL MATTE K5 As tAlFgE NoW ,C6A/CoLl-
S
P_A
ct41_ OiscLosuRe
r :73 THe NR5 12.015 , lAltbookAiG 7T-IE REC.
0- A 17212 NHICE
"rimiilAL, AN, CjekilL
bZE
Ro PER PEI?So-tq [AiR4,i7
aA
5-EkL) As STIOnittri - D. /6rPR IL (2, 20(z
Q
IL
SO , Ti- 4T 7T4
-
3
15
_
Disr
Lic3
(19s72
N AAI
ORN
c
•
374
ORO
.
A Tio-At -To _t=1) e
- -Gm RBAL 0-7R- P Flto
Fiotvi 4- lleto-RTG,
20
-
APPaIVASL,E. PLR
I\IF74-1. PART
Fir-R
ac
C(Ta:C)
I i
l.cauisall
6-
5LJA 1T
_ F1
_ LL
_
RrzekSo Ai
EYTH _CP -WKILLA_IYaga
- E5
I
lEr )CI4 T( ts-u
k UL
AL
21_
23
77-fer
2
Pp\ I1 4 FD-R AC):87Q/J4T g OM
0(4R2 14 jAmri&- ERK., cpg'cu=-/ sc4u-
'
2$
-74- —
a I 41; EIT-Lrbt Ca- • gr3f -rA_elLX A_Atz).
Ina
/
Pos-E-
Fcrg-n-fp\trn-f,
.51
aNyok:
F6-1E C
E iN-17--A-VaZ
cApk(
or:
E "r-
L
I
kC c
A
ME Tt-t-oz.G.
,
IwAL
'DC
EtzE -Cow sts -rEnrr Jirt4
5E E
ARRITR Pc-TuR, WtA51--cg)
iiu
FHANK5
g'FSFE- CTEgaZ siligkurrp
MAK
las-zo cirg s-'7ro pi?
1, 1-10EAfuct4(i)ilvt)
id- FRO
V--/-Py VERIFY Ti-f-E- Fo-e-ac?-fr46 ITR_PLY`i 7-0 6
121O Sf-to (Ai CAu 5 E. /VI
RiCe 7 G
AL16.______TR14T[4 1 ANC:, AG/ST PE,?-(4RX;
HVEm_E_F-141Acti
.r :.. r:1-1-,T,
_
2_:___i_
3
4
5
•
,
,
cat___
HD i5270`15 CLARK Colon)/
11_3.gAi3t4c1-1-LIKEfrreFutii-cDor. 1\1065:376 C7/979)
EL -I STATE PRI5bN
IIP-6- aox (q451
Ff-"/ NV Vi30 I
7
ID _
.e■
.
.
PLANTiFF i 114 PRoPER
_
K
13 _
Cou
--000
R
NeVADA
boo--
Re7vtEFaLUBFA(3.1.1CRI
60(14-36,---5617
'VI -F-11247;C
)CASE o.Agz3o
pEArNTIT-T
'5
_KIEMAThistAL134.614_5ss MACfliN
ND Xf
1_0_4EazIHNoRT14.
W-0.-4■11)ANT:
_
23
FRDAVI
zsET
114EME-FLitAiaEABoa_.:,
114E Sr4Tt OF NEVADA)
CouNTy - OF //WM PINE
30
31
3z 1,4 igENEFLAA tapewigAiL,
331 frNiDiz,Af ACcRtuIcro LAtAii OF LEGAL AC,
-
0.5-a• A5 FoLLows
2.
J.1
it4A-T- Livag'E- Ti-fE AFF/ArAir fiq 111-1E "FoREGa-
NC? 51A1eKNI,AfFIDAVII_
Coo
2 11:1AT Tt4i5 FppidwiT tAIERV
gi4 Atip_g01 - LINDR DLIRass ) OR F0
- -ASONS.'
Art4"/ IMPROP6R rz a
3. -THAT IT-fis AFT-- pAvir
Nff'RE
sb ,- /■/
t4AJ.fJ. St412Fbizr oF My APPLIeATioN Tb
iJ FoRMA PzUPRt OF THE" Af3ow
ENTLT --D CdituSg. oF AcTION
teViiIIENRRcE,,
MENT OF '1/4TLIDGMNIT SC No-4726 (
4-
ITIAT I BELIEVE" 7iT-4/41
TO -71-1 R6-1)5.s StNafri- 7F4 i1E:i ,J
5.
iT FoR TRE PAST ILA/et-VP' MONTHS, I RAD,
NOT' RcE-k\IED
ENANCIAL j7)VILE'--- 1\11)51 FROTHMA/15
.1.Y1-B-1E ___EQUX_MNI-C_SouRCE-5
E'MPI-70\lavi&147,. REAL "OJAI IT) FDR645
01%
--R-TY, RENTAL I NI OWE, INTL-REST; DiviDEN
4 Lf
C iL_ PR)R RE iRFMuN"-- CO -N.LAsitY
_ 25_
.
Li2tia.5j7roALSNaz)
2S
Zcf
_
3(
32
..33J
Tui
R5,540 RENUTTY'ag. 8.12A7 266 2yRE:A44--o coLIR
OF NE-vADA, FwArL atD6A/tArT/ORDER. A - a
7 ) 2.7.
_
.6 . 0-3AT_ WERE ONOviPLIVED., AND BEFN
1 1131,-Y .INCArkcERA -rap g jAiimike E NEvAipA
MFARTMENIT PE CoRRcrt biv5_
'cli4AT I Do OWN A Ci4ECWkiG e9R SAtarvcs
Or? D-1.315irgAFE- E3Dx, AcCeLpvT5 writ/
ht'VEF116c0.13M/K i P/1-4o5E 4ccoota;)-07-4TEMa-NT F0R CjiecKiNQ REF-1.6c-r5 A 557 // 454
LANCE IN 7-44Ly 2011, Accerz_INT Nwr1BaR; 412461(0 148155-
2.
Srj—THAT
PuRsuANT 7D 7Fic-- 11-c.CoaniT
Et411A1
MRilizeD.) NE-11-5 F;4RCe OR
NO V74 E I Tt4RouGH
VF&3LPI 2& 07
_ MIc 771RoLIGI-1 AliCus -r 77-iktz-iGil- AuGLIST,
2(9toS Fog) SAbiff A CLeSt-INT N4MI3 ; 67 It)
7
-
_
ID
_
(3
.
1T4E. /30 WD Mr-MizEsT Rowe-Nue PL/4R c 101,93
To ibtoi F27 Co 38) SEZIATFicifFD FAIN317-5;
_
ILL
140
_
tiL
2b__
21
23
A heloTORI,
.• Th4LL o NOT bkvN ANY RtAL
Vm+tatzs, ExCEPT -IRE° SECti_0! ■11.1
10- DL1E 112 MY
NT Acs TRE SANKINO AcCe5UNTINC PRoC
1-14va- ANY Pareso,Vc
Np_ENIT 1-IPON ME. roR 4.5'uPPoRTI 1D(CEPT MY
IFE.
25 12. 114A1- I Do ExPerT A 54/4/F-ie./itTr CHANG
IN MY FiNANCE CvER "THE fRi OD 6F "ii-tE
2(0
27 _
moNTH5; AP-Tr-1:z ME- 3 1"riL,F/y{2$ a-NT OF Sc -N0. 1-1726 I/ El%/FoRcE--MArr 6 F.
tr
39
•
,cm_ArT 3vt L CASE NA5i72?Z4WNilhelamus
-Trie
Nr)lhc DEFAULT 7IIIZAIENT5
3(
SAW OF AMERICA, W4-7.1-s Fri-RCO, a-0RK Kus
31
PRN\40770N5; DIREOVR CoMF
33 „_INDoc i ETC4 Cli4S.E5 s, A-1(-6tiggo9-c_ivrt.
_
oi
(S ,
•
-
(1-6417402-c PLED
_ _AFFt ANT s'ilYallf A/ALIGHT-
1- ugmeR `-ituR
_4
1
7
g
9
• IQ .
1_ _
_ 7, _
T-t-fiS t>ATE i BY ME Lit■IM-RksiGnio
yiivt) 8 EFOR'g _/
A.j_--,._.1
e
....__,_____
74. __:.__aL.
.5T7iTe--
ExE-c4TED
Ar--- /ANIT t
FRI5Oki NTT:ARV FLIBLI C , LIN L)
L:TiS al
R THE Ft9
RES PE(.11-utl_
IDA7M IT-HS 1531
_L4
'TT
7)
ARC.
AiM) 12,..1
...du
eti
varR
t6e-454cHI, IN - PR°
iiurr pEeR SE
17
LL
t-fasnoKtJ3i
/4-15
—
•
swo R
cr
ND
sip
FP. 0.■
'
•
2012
44
23 •
dwf
-;-, ,„
KAY ELLEN WEISS
.
/111.
•
_
2,5
27 _
2i
30
1•
_
-
N
3 /il
32
0_5:
"
"I
I FAL) 1-4L, -r-G>A1.
,•
1
FILED
MA g o 1 2012
ORD
2
DISTRICT COURT
CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA
3
4
5
6
IKEMEFULA C. IBEABUCHI for anda
IBEABUCHLCOM and IICE "THE
PRESIDENT.COM ,
7
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
11 591,23 0
Case No. Unassigned
Dept No. Xi
)
8
)
vs.
)
9
)
10
IBM (WORLD WIDE WEB)
)
)
11
Defendant.
)
)
12
13
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
14
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
5
16
This application has been assigned for handling to the Presiding Judge of the Civi
17
Division by the Chief Judge pursuant to EDCR 1.30 and heard pursuant to EDCR 2.23. Upot
18
consideration of 1KEMEFULA C. IBEABUCHI's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis:
19
20
21
22
23
iti r100 3H1 JO Ae1313
24
25
26:
2egi
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE due
to the application being incognizable.
DATED this
day of February, 2012.
1
2
Certificate of Service
3
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on or about the date filed, I mailed a copy of this order to th
4
5
6
7
following party:
Ikemefula C. lbeabuchi/80689
NDOC #71979
PO Box 1989
Ely, NV 89301
9
10
II
Maximilieil
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 ,
-2-
1
OrFP
IKEMEFULA I EEA FUG' I
FILED
#71979
2 Lovelock Correctional Center
P.O. Box 359
3 Lovelock, Nevada 89419
•
4 DEFENDANT
In Pro Se
Auc ' 1 2
CLERK
6
DISTRICT COURT
7
CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA
*
8
IKEI■IFFULA IEEAEUCHI
9
DEFENDANT
10
11
* *
)
) '
)
Case No. C161262
-vs-
Dept. No.
VI
STATE OF NEVADA
12
PLAINTIFF
13
)
, )
1
15
16
rtrIS
•
5
14
25
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAOPERIS
Upon consideration of DEFENDANT'S
's Application to Proceed in
17
Forma Pauperis and it appearing that there is not sufficient income, property
18
or resources with which to maintain the action and good cause appearing
19
therefore:
20 1
, IKEMEFULA IEFAEUCNI
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that DEFENDANT
21
shall be permitted to proceed In Forma Pauperis with this action as permitted
22
by NRS 12.015, with no fees, costs or securities being necessary towards the
23
filing or issuance or any necessary writ, process, pleading or other paper.
24
,5
26
Dated this
day of
AUG 0 1 2005
JOSER
, 200
.
210,VERMICON
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
27
28
(F-1
IKEMEFULA CHARLES /BEABUCHI
NDOC #71979
Lovelock Correctional Center
1200 Prison Road - POE 359
Lovelock, Nevada 89419-0359
PLAINTIFF, In Proper Person
DISTRICT COURT
CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA
--00000-IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI,
Plaintiff,
1.
V
Case No.
5 72 9
V s.
Dept No.
DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, RICHARD A.
SCHONFELD, and LAW OFFICES OF
GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, An Association of Professional Corporations, dba GOODMAN & CHESNOPF,
; t
ORDER
Defendants.
Plaintiff, IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI (hereinafter "Ibeabuchi") has filed an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, on
his civil action, in the above-entitled action, together with a
sworn affidavit, and an Inmate Financial Statement. The Court
has reviewed Application and the file herein.
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, pursuant to NRS 12.015, it is hereby
Ordered that Ibeabuchi's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis
along with process of services is GRANTED.
DATED THIS
/ DAY OF , .j(
, 2006.
///
///
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
•
• et
Nevada Supreme Court Docket Sheet
Page 1
Docket: 47261 IBEABUCHI VS. CHESNOFF
Supreme Court No. 47261
IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI,
Appellant,
vs.
DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, RICHARD A. SCHONFELD, AND LAW OFFICES OF
GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, AN ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL
CORPORATIONS D/I3/A GOODMAN & CHESNOFF,
Respondents.
Consolidated with:
Counsel
Ikemefula Charles lbeabuchi #71979, Ely, NV, Appellant, in proper person
Goodman & Chesnoff, Las Vegas, NV David Z. Chesnoff, Richard A. Schonfeld, as counsel for Respondents
Case Information
Panel: NNP07
Disqualifications:
Panel Members: Parraguirre/Hardesty/Saitta
Type: Proper Person
Category: Civil Appeal
Case Status: Closed
Date Submitted: 12/01/06
Submitted: On Record
Oral Argument:
Sett. Status: Exempt\
Sett. Notice Issued:
Sett. Judge:
Related Supreme Court Cases: 51596
District Court Case information
Case Number A517292 .
.
•
•
Case Title: IBEASUCHI VS. CHESNOFF
Judicial District: Eighth
County: Clark Co.
Division:
Sifting Judge: Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez
Replaced By:
Notice of Appeal Filed: 65/04/06
Judgment Appealed From Filed: 05/09/06
Appeal
Docket Entries
Date
Docket Entries
05/10/06
Filing Fee Waived: In Forma Pauperis.
05/10/06
Filed Certified Copy of proper person Notice of Appeal. (Pilot program civil appeals
order and documents mailed to proper person appellant.)
06-09808
05/17/06
Filed Civil Proper Person Transcript Request Form.
06-10422
05/30/06
Filed Certified Copy of Transcript. Proceedings: April 17, 2006. Court Reporter Jill
Hawkins.
06 - 11322
06/01/06
Issued Notice to Transmit Required Document. Order filed May 9, 2006 and Notice of
Entry filed May 9, 2006. Due Date: 10 days.
06/09/06
Filed District Court Order/Judgment Certified copy Order Granting Defendants' Motion
to Dismiss filed in district court on May 9, 2006.
06-12151
06/09/06
Filed certified copy of Notice of Entry of Judgment or Order. Filed in district court on:
May 9, 2006.
06-12152
Friday, October 16, 2009 01:39 PM
I. ,
tit}
Nevada Supreme Court Docket Sheet
Page 2
Docket: 47261 IBEABUCHI VS. CHESNOFF
06/16/06
Filed Proper Person Motion. Appellant's Motion for Leave to file Longer than Normal
Appeal Statement.
06-12608
06/16/06
Filed Proper Person Document. Sworn Affidavit of lkemefula Charles lbeabuchi in
Support of Proper Person Case Appeal Statement.
06-12609
06/16/06
Filed Proper Person Document. Appellant's Notice of Pending Motion (Motion for
Reconsideration of Judgment.)
06-12610
06/16/06
Filed Civil Proper Person Appeal Statement.
06-12607
Filed Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. and Denying as Moot Motion to
06-16424
08/08/06
file an extended Civil Proper Person Appeal Statement. Record due in District Court
Case No. A517292: 120 days. As appellant's civil appeal statement has already been
filed, we deny as moot his motion to file an extended civil appeal statement.
12/01/06Filed
_ Record on Appeal (Copy).
12/01/06
Processing status update: Submitted for decision on record.
06-24666
01/11/07
Filed Order Directing Response. Due: 30 days. No extensions of time to file the
response will be granted absent extreme and unforeseeable circumstances.
07-00781
01/25/07
Filed Response to Proper Person Appeal Statement. Respondent's Answering Brief to
Appellant's Civil Proper Person Appeal Statement.
07-01939
01/25/07
Filed Appendix. Respondent's Appendix on Appeal. (Appendix to Respondent's
Answering Brief to Appellant's Civil Proper Person Appeal Statement.)
07-01941
01/25/07
Issued Notice to Provide Proof of Service. Due date: 10 days. Respondent's Answering 07-01944
Brief to Appellant's Civil Proper Person Appeal Statement.
01/31/07
Filed Proof of Service - (Response) Answering Brief to Appellant's Civil Proper Person
Appeal Statement and Appendix.
07-02470
02/08/07
Filed Dispositional Order. Order Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part and Remanding.
"We affirm the district court's order to the extent that it dismissed Schonfeld as a
defendant, we reverse the order in all other respects, and we remand this matter for
further proceedings consistent with this order." NNP07-RP/JH/NS
07-03262
02/13/07
Received Proper Person Letter. Letter in response to Notice to Provide Proof of Service 07-03552
issued on January 25, 2007.
02/28/07
Filed Order Regarding Service. In light of our February 8, 2006 disposition, no further
action is necessary concerning appellant's letter, and we deny as moot any relief
requested therein..
07-04836
03/07/07
Issued Remittitur.
07-04892
03/07/07
Processing status update: Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
03/20/07
Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on March 12, 2007.
10/18/07
Returned Unfiled Proper Person Document. Original document entitled, "Affidavit and
Request to Enter Default Judament."
07-04892
Friday, October 16, 2009 01:39 PM
1
•
ORD
2
DISTRICT COURT
CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
IKE1BEABUCHLCOM and IKE "THE )
PRF-SIDENT.COM,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
WORLD WIDE WEB
)
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
)
MACHINE,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
75t
Case No. Vss1gne
Dept No. IX
3r)
13
14
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPER'S
15
WITHOUT PREJUDICg
16
This application has been assigned for handling to the Presiding Judge of the Civi
18
Division by the Chief Judge pursuant to EDCR 1.30 and heard pursuant to EDCR 2.23. Upo
19
consideration of IKEIBEABUCHI.COM and IKE "THE PRESIDENT.COM's Application t
20
Proceed in Forma Pauperis:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
21
1. The Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE du
22
to the application being incognizable. 1 6
23
• DATED this 14 day of January. 2012.
24
23
26
27 II
Cal
. Cse44,6z 4vezx 240245
ELI 1.4TH G a TialaiISTRICT JUDGE
23 ji 1 The Application may also be denied on other grounds (1) due to the application lacking a Financial Certificate an
Inmate Account Statement and (2) pursuant to EDCR 7.42, which states that a corporation or entity may no
represent itself in proper person.
il
-I-
1
2
Certificate of Service
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on or about the date filed, I mailed a copy of this order to th
3
following party:
4
5
6
Ikemefula C. Ibeabuchi
Inmate #71979, Esp.
PO Box 189
Ely, NV 89301
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Ii
Maximilieli
0IW
4P3
DISTRICT COURT
CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA
(7'e
10
11
12
IKEMEFULA IBEABUCHI, an individual, )
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
)
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
)
MACHINE IBM, FORTWORTH,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
A5q3Z50
Case No.: Linessigiiie&Department No.: XI
Efectronical Filed
08/24/2012 04: 5:07 PM
CLERK OF THE'COURT
13
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
14
15
TO: Ikemefula lbeabuchi:
16
17
38
19
WHEREAS NRS 12.015 permits indigent persons to proceed in forma pauperis withou
the payment of court costs and fees.. Such rules and statutes are designed to ensure that even
person in Nevada is afforded meaningful access to the courts, regardless of that person';
financial status.'
20
WHEREAS an indigent has a right of reasonable access to the courts, this right is noi
21
unrestricted. 2 Typically, monetary sanctions and/or professional discipline deter the filing of
22
frivolous, malicious, or repetitive lawsuits; however, pro se litigants render such deterrents
23
ineffective because the public assumes their filing fees and court costs.
24
25
tu.
1.*
. 28
Jordan v, State. Deo't of Motor Vehicles, 121 Nev. 44, 55-56, 110 P.3d 30, 39 (2005) (rev'd on other grounds b.
Buzz Stew. LLC. v. City of N. Lis_ Vegas, 124 Nev. 224, 181 P.3d 670 (2008) (Jordan v. State, Dep't of Moto
Vehicles may also be referred to as Luckett v. Doumani).
2 Jordan, 121 Nev. at 56, 110 P.3d at 40 (noting that "a litigant's right to access the courts in proper person and wit
in forma pauperis status is not without limits"); Baffles v. Dist. Court, 103 Nev. 679, 682-83, 748 P.2d 483, 48
(1987).
1
WHEREAS the Chief Judge of the Eighth Judicial District Court, or designee pursuant I
2
1.31(b)(26) 3, may hold a preliminary evidentiary hearing — referred to as a "Luckett Hearing"
3
to examine a complaint for frivolity and to determine whether the complaint lacks "an arguabl
4
basis . in law or in fact."'
5
6
WHEREAS if the Court, after conducting a Luckett Hearing, deems the petitione
indigent and determines that the action or claim is not frivolous, then the Court will allow the
petitioner to file his complaint (or petition) and to proceed in forma pauperis.
However, if the
7
Court finds the complaint (or petition) to be without merit and/or deems the litigant to be
vexatious, then the present suit is dismissed.
9
THEREFORE, YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY ip
10
District Court, Department XI at 200 Lewis Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89155 on the 25th da))
11
of September, 2012, at 8:30 a.m. to address the request made in your complaint to proceed i
12
forma pauperis, show cause why you should not be deemed a vexatious litigant and why you
13
complaint should not be dismissed under N.R.C.P. 11. The hearing will consider the factor'
14
enumerated by the Nevada Supreme Court in Jordan v. State ex rel. Dept. of Motor Vehicles, 121
15
Nev. 44 (2005) (attached hereto as Exhibit 1).
16
17
DATED this—day of
2012.
18
19
20
ELIZ
DISTRICT JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3 EDCR 1.31(b)(26) states that the presiding judges of the criminal, civil, and family division Iciomplete an
assignment received from the chief judge of the Eighth Judicial District . . . to assist in the smooth and efficien
work of the district court on behalf of the public."
4 ,lordart, 121 Nev. at 56, 110 P.3d at 41 (quoting Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 109 S.C1. 1827, 1831-3:
(1989)).
2
1
Certificate of Service
2
I hereby certify that, on or about the date filed, I faxed and or mailed a copy of this orcle
3
4
5
6
to:
Ely State Prison
Attn: Skye
Fax No.: 775-289-1205
7
8
9
10
lkemefula lbeabuchi, NDOC No. 65376
Ely State Prison
PO Box 1989
Ely, NV 89301
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
ZiOZ z,
CP
cOS 08 614 E l 0
00
•
mi 20
1.0E69 da
006-deg
...06
.4.1g3wiso dsn
AN kr-12)cot
4.1..V.1,S Kr-12,
6r1
,L.2/ kL1 L. QN
iiin-w-.a>1
C Case No
eszoG7
Dept. No.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE
STATE OF NEVADA
FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE
IN THE MATTER OF,
L
kE.m
ne.441_z_Aaut
:
Got
j
#71979'
On a Motion to Proceed
In Forma Pauperis
Prison Number
L3n,d.A.
#
Signature
653
Prison Number
I hereby certify that the Petitioner/Applicant herein has the sum of
10
on account to his credit at the institution (Ely State
Prison) where he is confined. I further certify that the Petitioner/Applicant likewise has the following
securities to his credit according to the records of said institution (Ely State Prison):
43i
Dated this (`)—C1 day of
-3
'
tv\.)F)s--
Kf. C J
atO
tt
Nevada Department of Corrections
Inmate Services Accountant
Authorized Officer of Institution
5
AFFIRMATION PURSUANT TO: N.R.S. 239B.0/10
I, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE UNDERSIGNED
INDIVIDUAL AND THAT THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT
THAT IS ENTITLED: FWAN(C/4L CEkTi ACATR T5 THE
5t_1Pg-EmF cLAIRT,FoR,eAs - --- f. 62o67 ,
DOES NOT
CONTAIN THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF ANY
PERSON, UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF
PERJURY, THIS, DAY OF,
NOV, 20
,2012. .
SIGNATURE:
INMATE NAME PRINTED: 548Llaff ikE/XEF4LA CHA
INMATE NUMBER:
q71
ADDRESS: ELY STATE PRISON, P.O. BOX 1989, ELY, NV 89301
SC . Case No. 6(700
Dept. No.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE
STATE OF NEVADA
FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE
IN THE MATTER OF,
ikrm
Name
T
,c4f3E451.4ai
#
On a Motion to Proceed
In Forma Pauperis
7 iti79
Prison Number
# 6 53 7
Signature
Prison Number
I hereby certify that the Petitioner/Applicant herein has the sum of
t 0
on account to his credit at the institution (El y State
Prison) where he is confined. I further certif y that the Petitioner/Applicant likewise has the followin g
securities to his credit accordin g to the records of said institution (El y State Prison):
4
GT • 0-1)
;---61
day of
4( , 9- \
Dated this
14 (1 6
f
_
t
fV5S'
, 200
I '-
Nevada Department of Corrections
Inmate Services Accountant
Authorized Officer of Institution
5
AFFIRMATION PURSUANT TO: N.R.S. 239B.010
I, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE UNDERSIGNED
INDIVIDUAL AND THAT THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT
THAT IS ENTITLED: FliV A WCIA L CERT id c_AIL" :
n-Lp7-7k.-1,/cF
6)(70:'\, DOES NOT
CONTAIN THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF ANY
PERSON, UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF
PERJURY, THIS„DAY OF, IVO-V, 26
SIGNATURE:
INMATE NAME PRINTED: i)/.
INMATE NUMBER:
/
.L1
ADDRESS: ELY STATE PRISON, P.O. BOX 1989, ELY, NV 89301
Ole
S C , Case No.61A1
Dept. No.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE
STATE OF NEVADA
IN THE MATTER OF,
FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE
Wei4at_smiA CtiA)16EAFLICti I
certify that
7/9749
On a Motion to Proceed
In Forma Pauperis
Prison Number
#
Signature
I hereby
#
675376
Prison Number
the Petitioner/Applicant herein has the sum of
t
on account to his credit at the institution (Ely State
Prison) where he is confined. I further certify that the Petitioner/Applicant likewise has the following
securities to his credit according to the records of said institution (Ely State Prison):
Dated thisd"
day of
'
, 200 /
T
Nevada Department of Corrections
Inmate Services Accountant
Authorized Officer of Institution
5,
AFFIRMATION PURSUANT TO: N.R.S. 239B.0,1 0
I, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE UNDERSIGNED
INDIVIDUAL AND THAT THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT
THAT IS ENTITLED:
<ii
-
ME
A i\IANCiA L C efeiTI Fi CATE To "Rig
11. M o15l
,
DOES NOT
CONTAIN THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF ANY
PERSON, UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF
PERJURY, THIS„DAY OF,
SIGNATURE:
/1/0-11, 70
,20k. .
>
INMATE NAME PRINTED: I FEA13LICi4( likizAAFFI-11A) CH 41INMATE NUMBER: 7/977
ADDRESS: ELY STATE PRISON, P.O. BOX 1989, ELY, NV 89301
SC - case No.
5 77
Dept. No.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE
STATE OF NEVADA
FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE
IN THE MATTER OF,
tiZMEMCHit,16E-A6u0-1(
C?E?A_Ja
Signature
#
On a Motion to Proceed
In Forma Pauperis
7/ 497 (i
Prison Number
#
6537
Prison Number
I hereby
certify that the Petitioner/Applicant herein has the sum of
on account to his credit at the institution (Ely State
Prison) where he is confined. I further certify that the Petitioner/Applicant likewise has the following
securities to his credit according to the records of said institution (Ely State Prison):
i-\/5S"'
Dated this
02-9
day of
N.1 6 vi
,
Nevada Department of Corrections
Inmate Services Accountant
Authorized Officer of Institution
5
3.
AFFIRMATION PURSUANT TO: N.R.S. 239B.010
I, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE UNDERSIGNED
INDIVIDUAL AND THAT THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT
THAT IS ENTITLED: Fit\cAN Li A L Ct Ri Fi C4 Tk. 7' ThE
DOES NOT
SLPReLVIF CbtiRT, FTR_ CASE No. 57791-1
,
CONTAIN THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF ANY
PERSON, UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF
PERJURY, THIS„DAY OF,
WM/ 2t:),
,2012.
SIGNATURE:
INMATE NAME PRINTED:k5E4NIN1 IklYMER4A CHA
INMATE NUMBER: 7/ 977
ADDRESS: ELY STATE PRISON, P.O. BOX 1989, ELY, NV 89301
21-72. 1
, Case No.
Dept. No.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE
STATE OF NEVADA
FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE
IN THE MATTER OF,
Name
IKEMEFuLA 1.:44.0EABLiCii)
#
7/97/
#
hereby
*
Prison Number
Signature
I
On a Motion to Proceed
In Forma Pauperis
(1;53
Prison Number
certify that the
Petitioner/Applicant
herein
has
the
sum of
on account to his credit at the institution (Ely State
f
Prison) where he is confined. I fluffier certify that the Petitioner/Applicant likewise has the following
securities to his credit according to the records of said institution (Ely State Prison):
clfleq c
Dated this.*;1
o, orv)
day of
tN
tkV IV
IN( 0
(
, 200.1_72_—
Nevada Department of Corrections
Inmate Services Accountant
Authorized Officer of Institution
F;ECE-tvE-p• T. ififr_
:PREME:: Cfror.T. litet.E7 1‹,141?1,P4,41\I ..Aktaltrer)
(4
'S
2
12, cieRK cEKTIpicAm
INrtilki441111-71
i
VEF cAnc
KT.7 TO
RET/A
FLRSLJA--
CoNMENT5 (No. 47261)
THE NRAF
KEcsNED NOV_ 13 20(Z
TRAccE k_-LNDOWN/ CLERK
!IF .9-FREME COURT DGRAT1/74. cLEKK `!. 13LuE 51-Am te.
A5
SIGNED Foiz„A.K_p_ By 0.4E,15E45u041; T.,_ _
.r.4
AA/p_O.F_.„
, _ IF. ,, ____ _. _Le- PDC- 3°2 0A CREv.7/01) FRortv• S LI PRE/vita"_aTuR .._...
__I_
CLEgK 2O1 N. CAR56-N ..ST_Swir: 20_1 CAK5o&I CLTY4E- - - Way 13 .
BPA ?c/76(_, Fog _ Mkt.__OF 115/ CAKSONf svi-kEil‘k
,h______
A
10
MAILE17 E___
z.Alket_Z(P_____.
__
__12_______ c6i)E. se376/4._
_ __________
i 5,
WFgE FRIAP AfgECE_WED Aim/ (3 2017. T_TA_C,7_, .____,,,
UN %/MN CLERK 0 Fgu PKE-ME CCURT_PERITY
• (5
f/ _114P S-1,-Ampl Ot.1114E CWRK15 coz-ciFicivi-a- noamal
1 ,
IVO- 47261_, a 1767:- RP1.71415321, 5Pb5liltrAl AL ergot
IT
n"FMARci-f 7 26o7_ KEM(Ticrul Ntto5E 113LuE STA
A41.7‘1 C-KIGiNAL_Wa_Er NOT_TI-fE_AT.Ta'57T2 suppeyi
_
IS
■6*, 1„,OA1_734: E
1 ' FACE OF Mca
Ai_ _ Cb-ug-r5 /qA-F
.20
AfiP 74FFEFoR.g-_„„MAY Altr REPLACE" 5,4ME:
DATEp Mr 5 .NoVEM,6FK gOV) 2012. .
. __21 _
22
.23
Z4
25 .
Zc
27
ZS
A
.
l
RE
...... . ..
.
...
t,
r, 9e t -d
.. .
. ...........
.. ..
.. .... .
...............
.......
UIVDER THE Ely .,STATE;,
NDTARY pwal
sicA/ATuRE,
NoTAKVF145Lt C.
„1 . .
C5E-A L) 44EREW .
•
f-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI,
Appellant,
vs.
DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, RICHARD A. SCHONFELD, AND
LAW OFFICES OF GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, AN
ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
D/B/A GOODMAN & CHESNOFF,
Respondents.
Supreme Court No. 47261
District Court Case No. A517292
CLERK'S CERTIFICATE
STATE OF NEVADA, ss.
I, Janette M. Bloom, the duly appointed and qualified Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of
Nevada, do hereby certify that the following is a full, true and correct copy of the Judgment in this
matter.
JUDGMENT
The court being fully advised in the premises and the law, it is now ordered, adjudged and decreed,
as follows: "We affirm the district court's order to the extent that it dismissed Schonfeld as a
defendant, we reverse the order in all other respects, and we remand this matter for further
proceedings consistent with this order."
Tudgment, as quoted above, entered this 8th day of February, 2007.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have subscribed my name and affixed
the seal of the Supreme Court at my Office in Carson City,
Nevada, this 7th day of March, 2007.
Janette M. Bloom, Supreme Court Clerk
By:
Chief Deputy Clerk
c1/4
""."CEItleo
NOV 13 2012
TRACE. K. LINDEMAN
CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
DEPUTY CLERK
•
4
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI,
Appellant,
Supreme Court No. 47261
VS.
DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, RICHARD A. SCHONFELD, AND
LAW OFFICES OF GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, AN
ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
D/B/A GOODMAN & CHESNOFF,
Respondents.
District Court Case No. A517292
FILED
MAR 20 2007
REMITTITUR
TTE M. BLOOM
PREME COURT
CL K
BY
TO: Charles J Short, Clark District Court Clerk
PUTY CLERK
Pursuant to the rules of this court, enclosed are the following:
Certified copy of Judgment and Opinion/Order.
Receipt for Remittitur.
DATE . . March 7, 2007
Janette M. Bloom, Clerk of Court
Z.1_1-Natj._
.. (
BY:
Chief Deputy Clerk
cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge
Goodman & Chesnoff
lkemefula Charles lbeabuchi
RECEIPT FOR REMITTITUR
Received of Janette M. Bloom, Clerk of the
Supreme Court of the State of Nevada, the
REMITTITUR issued in the above-entitled cause, on 'ftek /2 / 7C01
•
DeputiDi4trict Court Clerk
ØtEIV
RECEIVED
MAR 1 2 2007
• ri
sr. nr%i ICIT
MAR 1 9 2007
JAKErFE M. SLOok
CLERK OF SUPREME
Cam
DEPUTY CLERK
NOV 1 3 2012
TRACE K. LINDEMAN
CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
IY- PUTY CLERK
FV
■
a /4E1
AFFIRMATION PURSUANT TO: N.R.S. 239B.010
I, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE UNDERSIGNED
INDIVIDUAL AND THAT THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT
THAT IS ENTITLED:
LiPRITAAF 0.71-4rCr,
L
CET<TiFi CAW 773 71-117
DOES NOT
CAsivz), 47z6/
,
CONTAIN THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF ANY
PERSON, UNDER TIIE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF
PERJURY, THIS„DAY OF,
MTV. 2 0
,20/2_
SIGNATURE:
INMATE NAME PRINTEDI6E-A5iiC1-6,/*ALA-,
INMATE NUMBER: 7/9 7q
ADDRESS: ELY TATE PRISON, P.O. BOX 1989, ELY, NV 89301
CH4.
4- *
N..
*
*
*
*
N
*
LI,(C.
*
7
7c, ^ram:IVT.7777 ,: ,
—
MxAs
7. -;74
t.hrt
BAK' K
-
V-
"
•
t
4e
-7?-7
tyt.
-4
4
4 .4 * * * *
* * * * * * * * *
4.
HZ NS-20
s-lcgAT4KE
Z57it ?E-R-7E:REive452520)
Et/ 5TAT4
OAN/
t?RisdNI
oiTL
t
Iroki\EFI-4LA) C. IFF-A51--/Ci-fi
."?7 BLuE.. VE- Ri Fie-2 1-INDLik
KEVAD4) &RI-AR:7 P & L ,6
71-ft5
Nevada
t
;wt. '''''
'''
Notary Public. State of
White Pine County
APPOintment Recorded in
208
17 - EgifeSlinilary 9,
411
'
Form A240
LIMITE6 POWER OF ATTORNEY
(With Durable Provision)
or
R-4LA C.
stAcru,Nt,op NO. 71'179
TO ALL PERSONS, be it known, that 1, li3aA1N-lcal,t1cama
ay .STATe- FRI 50-N
t Mite PINE Cout4Ty, NENOkt:›Ar
,
as Grantor, do hereby make and grant a limited and specific power of attorney to
of
and appoint and constitute said individual as my attorney-in-fact.
My named attorney - in - fact shall have full power and authority to undertake, commit and perform only
the following acts on my behalf to the same extent as if I had done so personally: all with full power of
substitution and revocation in the presence: (Describe specific authority)
DEC-L AATioki OF- TRI-is-r ti REF 2_520 NIA
IKE C I BEABL4041 Vs. NELL 5 F4RG0
1 1494
PAT
(APgf L 2.C ; ZC12.)
CenIRT 6F- /\:—VADA (2602) —
711451-ci-,14
C2-012) , i,7 12.b 13 1-1-4E- Fi(S7
The authority granted shall include such incidental acts as are reasonably required or necessary to carry
out and perform the specific authorities and duties stated or contemplated herein.
My attorney-in,faet agrees to accept this appointment subject to itrterms, and agrees to act and perform
in said fiduciary capacity consistent with my best interests as my attorney-in-fact deems advisable, and I
thereupon ratify all acts so carried out.
I agree to reimburse my attorney-in-fact all reasonable costs and expenses incurred in the fulfillment of
the duties and responsibilities enumerated herein.
Special durable provisions:
be affected by disability of the Grantor. This power of attorney may be
This power of attorney shall
revoked by the Grantor giving notice of revocation to the attorney-in-fact, provided that any party relying in
good faith upon this power of attorney shall be protected unless and until said party has either a) actual or
constructive notice of revoCation, or hi upon recording of said revocation in the public records where the Grantor
resides.
Other terms:
REA5 0 NPTBLE Co9m ' A5 To
t)F
A6L-ve Rec..tpTs To
IT-fe ArtitnEy-fr-t- FAc-r
PGRceNT(76) OF 1-t-fE
GRArtio-K 824,1Are- RG To
THE
Z4170
day of
Signed under seal this
Signed in thspresynce of:
c
Witness
Grantor
Witness
Att
C5f4A1A. (As 20g-I6
YINIINMIIMNPO1lVNO•OPIHIIPMIO.MM•WONWVo“.t
KAY ELLEN WEISS
1
Notary Public- State of Nevada
Appobtasat Recorded la Mb 1119W:sly
No: 04-R059-17 • ExplibaJessarya, 2015
State of
County of
On .3
before me,
appearer
-ei2.1r)
be the person(s) whose name(s)
lice
personallftWown to me (or
of satfsfa
o me on
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
nowledged to me thar er eithey executed the same in
er/their signature(s) on e instrument the person(s), or the
his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that b
entity upon behalf of which the Rerson(s) acted, )(-ECuted the instrument.
.
WITNESS my hand a off,a1
Sionahire
Signature
r•-y
Affiant
coduced ID