2010 Annual Report

THINK Together
Annual Report
2009 – 2010
Table of Contents
CEO’s Message........................................page 2
Programs........................................................... 6
Evaluation Outcomes....................................... 8
Schools & Community Sites............................ 9
Donors............................................................. 12
Financials......................................................... 14
Board of Directors........................................... 16
1
The Importance of Scale
“While small may be beautiful, size matters when it
comes to having a substantial impact on society’s
pervasive problems. By leveraging economies of
scale and management talent, large nonprofits can
deliver services at lower cost. They can offer their
staff compensation and career opportunities. They
have greater capacity to conduct experiments, assess
innovations and share best practices across multiple
locations. In an effective (philanthropic capital) system,
innovative nonprofits with the best management and
social change agendas would grow in scale and scope
while less effective and efficient ones would diminish
and eventually disappear.”
Robert S. Kaplan
Allen S. Grossman
Harvard Business Review
October, 2010
2
Message from the CEO
Dear THINK Together Friends:
Over the last few years, THINK Together has grown very rapidly while at the
same time delivering strong outcomes for its students. This has unleashed a
variety of dynamics many of which are articulated succinctly in the quote on the
facing page. With this report, we want to explore some of these dynamics but
first, let’s take a quick look at the numbers:
•
•
•
•
Revenue is up about 5% year-over-year to $42,150,532. Over the five-year period revenue is up
fifteen-fold from $2.6 million.
Students served were up 35% to more than 70,000. However, that is not an apples-to- apples
comparison because we are offering different kinds of programs with differing amounts of dosage.
On an apples-to-apples basis, the number of students attending our core afterschool program for
30 days or more was 31,138, up 16% year-over-year.
Philanthropy was down about 7% putting pressure on the organization’s infrastructure which
supports the rapid growth in students served.
The academic gains by our students continued to strengthen. A UCI comparison group study
showed that statistically significant gains were achieved by THINK Together students in both
language arts and math. A second UCI study showed that students that received multiple
treatments through the THINK Together Ecosystem, showed double the increase in gains when
compared against students that attended only the after-school program. These findings were also
statistically significant.
Where We Are Headed
After-school and related out-of-school time programs comprise an almost $10 billion market in
California alone. The field is characterized by smallish organizations providing for the most part
mediocre programs. The challenge for all of us working in this field is to deliver high quality programs
with very thin funding. As an example, in our core programs our school district partners receive $7.50
per student per day in funding (THINK receives 95% of that). The $7.50 is about 20% of the funding
that the regular school day receives. Our programs operate between 20 and 22 hours per week
(schools operate about 30 hours per week). So, we have 20% of the funds of the regular day and we
have students about two-thirds of the time. Delivering quality given these economic constraints is
very challenging.
That is why we have come to view after-school (from an economic perspective) as a high volume/low
margin business. In a high volume/low margin environment, scale matters. Our vision is to build a
world-class program department supported by best-in-class training and spread these costs over a
large number of sites. From a mission perspective, we feel this is the best way to deliver consistently
high quality programs for our students and families. We believe our programs are of higher quality
today across more than 200 schools than they were when we were at 25 schools. And, we have the
data to back that up.
In addition, the infrastructure being built to support after-school programs can be leveraged to deliver
other programs that surround schools including Summer Learning Programs, Saturday Programs,
Early Childhood Education, Parent Programs, and to build connections to Community Health Initiatives
that support these same students and their families. We believe with this structure we can build what
amounts to a replicable, scalable Community Schools model.
3
After a slower growth year in 2009-2010, THINK Together has resumed a faster growth rate in 20102011. We have added 50 new schools in the current year and are strengthening our capacity to add
100 or more new schools per year in the years to come. We also anticipate some consolidation as the
field matures and are in various stages of merger discussions with several different organizations. By
merging with other organizations, we believe we can become more financially efficient (and therefore
stronger) and can take the best practices of the combined entities and share those best practices with
more students, thereby serving our mission more effectively. This is being accomplished at a scale
few other youth-serving organizations have attempted.
Why We Need Private Philanthropy
The public funding that finances after-school programs was designed to be augmented by a 33% local
match. Some of this comes through in-kind donations of facilities (25% of the 33%) and through the
federal snack program. However, to really deliver quality, we need to raise cash match as well. The
public funds pretty much finance the direct site expenses. That is just enough to warehouse students.
But the quality enhancements that increase student performance are funded through philanthropy.
From a philanthropist’s perspective, this is a great investment. A relatively modest investment in
program quality can be leveraged across the publicly funded distribution system. Only about 10%
of California’s after-school programs raise any cash match. That is one reason why quality is often
subpar. By taking over underperforming programs and upgrading them with the support of our
strong (but not yet) world-class program department, we upgrade the quality of the services for more
students. Investing in one large robust system therefore provides a better return on the philanthropic
dollar than dividing up that same amount of money into smaller investments in weaker organizations.
One may ask, “What difference will my $100, $1,000, $10,000 or even $100,000 matter to an
organization with a budget north of $40 million?” It’s a good question. The answer is a BIG
difference! Here’s why: First, we privately fund our legacy community sites which have now sent over
200 kids to college and the first 50 or so have graduated and are doing amazing things. Second, we
privately fund several pilot programs that provide the opportunities to incubate innovations we hope
can be taken to scale when shown to be effective. Third, we privately fund much of our evaluation
work which helps us to continually improve our programs and document their impact. Fourth, we
privately fund policy work which we hope will help to break down silos and re-shape public funding
streams so those dollars can be used more effectively. Finally, we privately fund the augmentations to
our programs (like our STEM Initiative) that enable them to be that much richer for our students.
4
Thank You
Thank you to all of you, our partners that have helped us to become one of the fastest growing, most
effective non-profit organizations in the U.S. We feel that we have only just begun. We believe
we can build a statewide platform delivering high quality programs that surround our schools with
learning. Many of the resources are already in place. It is often a matter of re-organizing them and
leveraging them so that they can be put to greater use. It will take all of us working Together – schools,
federal, state and local officials, businesses, foundations, and individuals – to enable us to Teach, Help,
Inspire, and Nurture our Kids in such a way that California regains its leadership position in education.
Education is the engine that drives the greatest innovation machine on the planet – the California
private sector. Thank you for your continued investment in the fuel of that economic engine – the
education of the next generation of innovators.
Sincerely,
Randy Barth
Founder and CEO
5
After-School Programs
California leads the nation in funding for daily comprehensive after-school programs. State funding
(known as ASES) and California’s portion of federal funding (21st Century Community Learning Centers and ASSETS) create an annual public investment of more than $700 million per year. These funding streams provide the basis for financing after-school programs at more than 4,400 schools across
the state.
THINK Together operated ASES and 21st Century funded programs at 192 schools across 17 districts
in 2009-2010. In the 2010-2011 year we are currently operating at 230 schools across 20 districts.
In total, THINK Together served 69,001 students in after-school. This breaks down by county as: 43,033
Orange County, 16,548 Los Angeles County, 6,217 Riverside County, 13,410 San Bernardino County. In
2010-2011, we began serving students in San Diego County and expect to begin operating in Sacramento County this school year as well.
Saturdays and Summer
Over the last two years THINK Together applied for and received $3.1 million in Supplemental 21st
Century funding to serve schools in Azusa, Ontario and Santa Ana. This funding enables us to provide
Saturday and Summer programs to more than 33,000 students. Saturdays and Summer are important
opportunities for Extended Learning Time. Summer programs, in particular, are helpful in preventing
summer learning loss and keeping students on track for performing at grade level.
Supplemental Education Services
Supplemental Education Services is the small group tutoring program funded by federal Title I dollars
at schools that have been designated as Program Improvement Schools under No Child Left Behind.
THINK Together and Santa Ana Unified are a U.S. Department of Education National Demonstration
Site to build alignment between SES, after-school and the regular school day. In 2009-2010, THINK
Together served 537 students across six districts through the SES program.
Early Literacy
THINK Together is very focused on using out-of-school time resources to help close the achievement
gap. Research shows that exposing low-income children ages 0-5 to more words and different kinds
of questioning makes them more receptive when they begin reading in the early K-12 years. Fewer
than half of low-income students have access to quality Early Childhood Education. We are running a
pilot program in Santa Ana funded by the Orange County Children and Families Commission to build
the capacity of parents to read to their children. We teach these parents researched-based strategies
and supply them with books through a book bag exchange program that we augment called Raising a
Reader.
In our inaugural year, we served more than 500 students and their parents. In the current year, we are
also piloting another program with strong evidence called HABLA.
School Age Care
School Age Care is the term used for child care programs (often licensed) serving students ages 5-12
years old before school, after school, during school breaks and in the summer. These programs provide on-campus childcare for working parents. In more affluent communities, parents pay for these
6
Programs
programs. In low income communities, the state and federal government subsidize these programs.
State and federal subsidies in California combined amounted to $1.2 billion last year. Together with
parent fees, this is a more than $7 billion market in California.
These programs are often provided by organizations that are primarily preschool providers. The programs often feel like preschool for older children. We think there is an opportunity to upgrade these
programs and make them aligned and complementary with their schools. From the business perspective, operating additional parent pay programs would diversify our revenue streams making THINK
Together better able to sustain possible cuts in public funding. In 2009-2010, we either operated or
managed in conjunction with schools 5 school age care programs. Over time, we expect to grow this
segment of our organization significantly.
Place-Based Initiatives
Children living in poverty face many challenges inside and outside of school that combine to make
it very challenging for them to reach their full potential. Therefore, it is important to build integrated
systems of support to address the whole child and the family support system to counter-balance the
effects of poverty. Schools sit in the center of most neighborhoods, and are a trusted resource for the
families in most communities. However, schools have their hands full providing a high quality education between 8 and 2:30. So, strategies utilizing public/private partnerships with services co-located at
schools seem to be a promising way to build these integrated support systems.
In New York City, the Harlem Children’s Zone (HCZ) has had some high-profile success with this sort of
strategy. HCZ served as the inspiration for two place-based initiatives that THINK Together has become involved with. The first is the US Department of Education’s Promise Neighborhoods initiative.
THINK Together serves as the lead agency in broad collaboration in Santa Ana pursuing this strategy.
We are currently in the planning stage for a strategy that would provide integrated services from
cradle-to-career in a neighborhood serving more than 8,000 students.
The second is a place-based health initiative led by The California Endowment (TCE) called Building
Healthy Communities. TCE has targeted 14 communities across California and THINK Together is an
integral part of the Santa Ana Building Healthy Communities initiative. These two initiatives have
some overlap in both their geography and their objectives, providing a real opportunity to build this
integrated services model. THINK Together was also an integral part of planning a Promise Neighborhood-type initiative in San Bernardino. Some important early work was done in that deeply troubled
community before that project was side-tracked by some perceived turf issues between the Mayor’s
office and the local school board. There is hope that this work will be resurrected at some future date.
7
Evaluation Outcomes
2009-2010
Each year, THINK Together conducts extensive surveys of parents, students and principals and other
stakeholders involved with our programs. Some highlights from this year’s surveys include:
•
•
•
Over 80% of our principals indicated that they were satisfied or strongly satisfied with the quality
of the academic program components in our program and found our staff to be professional and
caring in their relationships with parents and students.
Parents are overwhelmingly satisfied (97%) with the quality of the program in terms of the
program helping their child to be in a safe place, do better in school and feel more confident.
Notably, over 60% of parents report that the availability of the program has helped them keep a
job, accept a job or continue their education.
While we are pleased that our program is meeting the expectations of our stakeholders, we also
want evidence that we are accomplishing our mission by making a positive impact on academic
outcomes for students. Therefore, we examine test scores annually, both internally and more recently,
externally, as described below:
Gains made in Afterschool
• In general, about one-third of our elementary students and one-fifth of our middle and high
school students moved up one performance level on the state standardized test scores in
English Language Arts (ELA) and math from where they tested before they entered program; the
percentages are about half of that when looking at students who moved from below proficient to
the goal of proficient. When looking across years, movement between performance levels on the
CSTs is greater for students who have participated for multiple years.
• In 2010, comparison group analyses conducted by the University of California, Irvine, found that
test score gains in ELA and math were significant for students who attended THINK Together for
two years within one of our largest, most urban school districts. The gains were more than double
those made by non-participants in ELA and Math. These gains were especially notable in math;
whereas non-participants actually saw mean test scores decrease over two years by almost 12
points; THINK Together participants’ scores rose by almost 15 points.
Impact of Supplemental Educational Services (SES)
Perhaps the most notable finding in the UCI comparison analysis was that the most significant
gains were made among students who participated in layered programming that included small
group tutoring (1:5) and one other program element: THINK SES and afterschool or THINK SES and
supplemental programming, which included summer and weekends during the school year. These
gains were double those made by students who participated in the after-school program alone.
8
Partners
Schools and Community Sites
THINK Together serves more than 70,000 at-risk students at 225+ sites in communities
throughout Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties.
Bassett Unified School
District
La Primaria Elementary
Edgewood Academy (Elem)
Miramonte Elementary
Azusa High
Julian (Don) Elementary
Monte Vista Elementary
Center Middle School
Sunkist Elementary
Parkview Elementary
Dalton (Henry) Elementary
Torch Middle School
Payne Elementary
Ellington (Alice M.) Elementary
Vanwig (J. E.) Elementary
Twin Lakes Elementary
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Azusa Unified School
District
Foothill Middle School
Maxson Elementary
Voorhis Elementary
Gladstone St. Elementary
Duarte Unified School
District
Hodge (Victor F.) Elementary
Andres Duarte Elementary
South Whittier School
District
Lee (Charles H.) Elementary
Beardslee Elementary
Carmela Elementary
Longfellow Elementary
Maxwell Elementary
Magnolia Elementary
Northview Intermediate
Graves (Richard L.) Middle
School
Mountain View Elementary
Royal Oaks Elementary
Lake Marie Elementary
Murray (Clifford D.) Elementary
Valley View Elementary
Loma Vista Elementary
Gladstone High
Los Altos Elementary
Paramount Elementary
Little Lake City School
District
McKibben (Howard J.)
Elementary
Valleydale Elementary
Cresson Elementary
Monte Vista Elementary
Jersey Avenue Elementary
Telechron Elementary
Baldwin Park Unified
School District
Lake Center Middle School
Lakeland Elementary
ORANGE COUNTY
Bursch Elementary
Lakeside Middle School
Central Elementary
Orr (William W.) Elementary
Santa Ana Unified School
District
De Anza Elementary
Paddison Elementary
Adams Elementary
Elwin Elementary
Studebaker Elementary
Carr Intermediate
Geddes Elementary
Los Nietos School District
Carver (George Washington)
Elementary
Heath Elementary
Aeolian Elementary
Kenmore Elementary
Los Nietos Middle School
Pleasant View Elementary
Nelson Elementary
Diamond Elementary
Santa Fe Elementary
Rancho Santa Gertrudes
Elementary
Esqueda (Manuel) Elementary
Powell (W. R.) Elementary
Slauson Intermediate
Foster Elementary
Tracy Elementary
Vineland Elementary
Walnut Elementary
Century High
Davis (Wallace E.) Elementary
Edison Elementary
Franklin Elementary
Mountain View School
District
Fremont (John C.) Elementary
Baker Elementary
Harvey (Carl) Elementary
Cogswell Elementary
Heninger Elementary
Garfield Elementary
9
Heroes Elementary
Community Sites
Elsinore Middle School
Hoover Elementary
Highland Learning Center
Lakeland Village Middle School
Jackson (Andrew) Elementary
Highland Teen Center
Machado Elementary
Jefferson (Thomas) Elementary
Noah Teen Center
Railroad Canyon Elementary
Kennedy (John F.) Elementary
Shalimar Learning Center
Terra Cotta Middle School
King (Martin Luther, Jr.)
Elementary
Shalimar Teen Center
Wildomar Elementary
Lathrop Intermediate
THINK Together CARE Consulting Partnerships with:
Lincoln (Abraham) Elementary
Withrow Elementary
Lowell (James Russell)
Elementary
THINK at St. Angela Merci
Romoland Unified School
District
THINK at St. John’s
Boulder Ridge Middle School
MacArthur (Douglas)
Fundamental Institute
THINK at St. Norbert’s
Harvest Valley Elementary
THINK at Veeh
Romoland Elementary
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
THINK Together CARE Consulting Partnerships with:
Madison Elementary
Martin (Glenn L.) Elementary
McFadden Intermediate
Mendez (Gonzalo Felicitas)
Fundamental Intermediate
Monroe (James) Elementary
Monte Vista Elementary
Muir (John) Fundamental
Elementary
Pio Pico Elementary
Remington (Frederick)
Elementary
Romero-Cruz (Lydia) Elementary
Roosevelt (Theodore)
Elementary
Jurupa Unified School
District
THINK at Mesa View
Glen Avon Elementary
Granite Hill Elementary
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
Ina Arbuckle Elementary
Jurupa Middle School
Cucamonga School
District
Mira Loma Middle School
Cucamonga Elementary
Mission Bell Elementary
Los Amigos Elementary
Mission Middle School
Rancho Cucamonga Middle
Pacific Avenue Elementary
The Ontario Center
Pedley Elementary
Peralta Elementary
Ontario-Montclair School
District
Santiago Elementary
Rustic Lane Elementary
Sepulveda Elementary
Stone Avenue Elementary
Sierra Intermediate
Sunnyslope Elementary
Spurgeon Intermediate
Troth Street Elementary
Taft Elementary
Van Buren Elementary
Thorpe (Jim) Fundamental
Elementary
West Riverside Elementary
Central Elementary
Valley High
Lake Elsinore Unified
School District
De Anza Middle School
Brown (David A.) Middle School
Edison Elementary
Walker (Adeline C.) Elementary
Butterfield Elementary
Elderberry Elementary
Washington Elementary
Collier (William) Elementary
Euclid Elementary
Willard Intermediate
Elsinore Elementary
Hawthorne Elementary
Villa (Raymond A.) Fundamental
Intermediate
Wilson Elementary
10
Arroyo Elementary
Berlyn Elementary
Bon View Elementary
Buena Vista Elementary
Corona Elementary
Del Norte Elementary
Haynes (Richard) Elementary
Lincoln Elementary
Mariposa Elementary
Oaks Middle School
Sultana Elementary
Vina Danks Middle School
Vineyard Elementary
Vista Grande Elementary
Wiltsey (Ray) Middle School
Redlands Unified School
District
Clement Middle School
Cope Middle School
Franklin Elementary
Kingsbury Elementary
Lugonia Elementary
Moore Middle School
Victoria Elementary
San Bernardino City
Unified School District
Chavez (Cesar E.) Middle School
Curtis Middle School
Del Vallejo Middle School
Golden Valley Middle School
Richardson Prep Middle School
Serrano Middle School
Shandin Hill Middle School
Warm Springs Elementary
11
KEY STRATEGIC PARTNERS
COMERICA BANK | THE IRVINE COMPANY | ST. JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM
FoundationS
BNSF Foundation
California Community Foundation
CarMax Foundation
Community Foundation of Western
Nevada
The Croul Family Foundation
Draper Family Foundation
Dwight Stuart Youth Foundation
Edward and Helen Shanbrom Family
Fund
Fainbarg Family Foundation
The Green Foundation
Henry L. Guenther Foundation
Hughes Schmidhauser Family Fund
Kroger Co. Foundation
LA84 Foundation
Majestic Realty Foundation
The Marion Knott Foundation
Orange County Community
Foundation
Pacific Life Foundation
PLUS Foundation
The Rose Hills Foundation
Singgod Foundation
Ueberroth Family Foundation
Union Pacific Foundation
The Wal-Mart Foundation
Willdan Group of Companies
Foundation
ORGANIZATIONS
Anaheim Ducks & Honda Center
Anonymous
Apollo Electric
Bank of America
Brown Colonial Mortuary
Charles Abbott Associates, Inc.
Church of the Messiah
Food Industries Sales Managers Club
of Los Angeles Inc.
Ganahl Lumber Company
Garrett Concrete Coring & Sawing,
Inc.
Global Impact
Henkel of America
Hindu Matiya Patidar Samaj Inc.
IBM Employee Service Center
Innovate Partners, Inc.
Irvine Company
Jamba Juice
K2 Demolition Co., Inc.
12
Latham & Watkins, LLP
Law & Mediation Office of Troy Roe,
Esq.
Livingston Family Foundation
MOMS Club of Southeast Irvine
MOMS Club Tustin North
National Charity League, Inc.,
Newport Chapter
National Charity League, Orange Villa
Park Chapter
The Nikols Company
The O’Donnell Group, Inc.
Orange County United Way
Partners Pantry
Posterscope USA
Ralphs
RR Medical Services, Inc.
Second Church of Christ Scientist,
Newport Beach
St. Andrews Presbyterian Church
Stater Bros. Charities
Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth
Surface Mount Technology
Association
TenneyHarrison PR
The Prudential Foundation Matching
Gifts
Trinity United Presbyterian Church
United Way California Capital Region
United Way of Greater Los Angeles
United Way Silicon Valley
United Way of the Inland Valleys
University of California, Irvine
University of Phoenix
Women of Vision
INDIVIDUALS
Abbott, Mark
Abbott, Susan
Adams, Zoe
Albonetti, Joseph
Alfieri, Joseph
Allen, Jon & Kathryn
Alvarez, Elizabeth
Anderson, Darrel
Anderson, Sam and Susan
Aronoff-Sadacca, Leona
Artis, Kimberly
Barkawi, Janet
Barth, David and Marseilla
Barth, Katie
Barth, Randy and Mary
Bergman, James and Judy
Berry-Cowen, Katie
Blank, Kathleen
Blase, Bobbi
Blodgett, Kurt and Michelle
Bock, Larry and Diane
Bogh, Mark
Bombardier, Sara
Braun-Lewis, Kathy
Bren, Donald and Brigitte
Broedlow, Theodore and Elizabeth
Brown, Bart and Laurie
Brown, Greg and Stacey
Brown, Roy and Joyce
Bryan, Vaughn and Ann
Bucci, Donna
Bucci, Erin Nicole
Budner, Lawrence
Bui, David and Cheryl
Calderon, Lupita
Campbell, John
Cano, Michelle
Cantú, Celeste
Cardoso, Norberto and Erica
Carlson, Karen Kay
Casey, Chris and Lynn
Cazares, Fernando and Alicia
Christeson, Don and Bonnie
Clark, Matthew and Kathleen
Claster, William
Coffee, Bill and Mary Lynn
Contreras, Leticia
Crawford, Kim
Daley, Rod and Nancy
Daniher, Jr., Charles and Margaret
Dauderman, Jerry and Bobbi
Davis, Donna
Dialynas, Chris
Diaz, Melissa
Diaz, Miguel and Maria
Dobrenen, Diana
Donahue, Joan
Donaldson, David and Leigh
Dorsey, Megan
Dyche, Jerry and Katherine
Fairborn, John and Sharon
Felix, Joshua
Feller, Frank and Shirley
Ferris, Josephine
Florian, Luis and Monica
Fox, George and Natalie
French, Tony
Partners
Donors FY 2009 – 2010
Fuller, Jr., Winston and Carlita
Gaeta, Jesus
Garcia, Trisha
Gartman, Laurel Peniche
Gerken, Andrew and Catharina
Gleason, Fredrick and Betty
Goodrich, Lori
Granitto, Shelly
Greene, Heather
Guggenheim, Daniel and Sue
Hall, Richard and Elinor Jane
Harrison, Gloria
Harrison, Nancy
Hayes II, Kevin
Held, Rick
Hermesch, Anita
Hill, Robert
Holmes, Bill
Howard, Glenn and Joyce
Hughes, Michael and Donna Davis
Inman, Fran
Jackson, Gary
Jackson, Gordon and Wilma
Jaquess, Jerry
Jenkins, Walter and Laurie
Johnson, Archie and Erin
Joshua Gonzalez and Maria Aguilar
Kargenian, Robert and Michelle
Kato, Stacey and Leslie
Katz, Ina
Kelly, Sara
Kim, David
Kingston, Adriana
Kingston, Chris
Kiralla, John and Josephine
Kiralla, Nick
Kiralla-Orr, Gail
Kirschenbaum, Larry and Myra
Kiss, Robert and Marisa
Kozberg, Roger and Joanne
Krejci, Rise Lee
Kuehl, Karl and Norma
Laborde, Beatriz
Lambert, Mark and Carol
Lauer, Lois
Lee-Johnson, Monalisa
Lewis, Mike and Kathy
Leyden, Timothy and Margaret
Linnert, Charles
Linnert, Ralph and Alice
Loats, Norm and Sara
Loper, Meghan
Louchheim, Mark and Cathy
Lunde, Robert and Peggy
Macias, Vanessa Nichole
Magana, Lupe
Magdaleno, Lawrence
Manchester, Colleen
Margolis, Jeff and Debbie
Marshall, Al
May, Bruce
Mc Whertor, Jill
McClellan, Robert
McDermott, Rod
Metzler, Michael
Miedema, Henry and Janet
Mirando, Linda
Miya, Kirk and Kathy
Mooradian, Aregnaz
Moore, Dwight and Barbara
Moore, Steve and Melinda
Munoz, Jayne
Murillo, Julie Amanda
Murphy, Pat and Michele
Nelson, Eric
Nguyen, Kathy
Nichols, Michael
Nussbaum, Marc and Besser, Sherri
O’Donnell, John and Patricia
Olsky, Martin & Cathie
Ornelas, Enedelia
Ouellette, Joseph
Pangan, Conrad
Paulsen, Scott and Elizabeth
Paulson, Theodore and Suzanne
Pedroza, Martin and Cordova,
Evelyn
Peters, James and Beverly
Petersen, Lynn
Pettis, Alan
Pham, Quang
Pichardo, Aydde
Pollock, Becky
Ramirez, Sheri
Rayner, Ralph and Eva
Recinos, Maritza
Rehnborg, Joan
Rivera, Maria
Roberts, William and Barbara
Robertson, Pauline
Robinson, Tanisha
Robles, Gabriel and Arcelia
Rodriguez, Cassandra
Ross, Alan and Linda
Rudin, Murray
Rutherford, Frank
Rutledge, Richard and DaruwalaRutledge, Tehnaz
Salata, Paul
Salgado, Ken
Sandoval, Astrid
Schoettinger, Paul
Schutz, Andrew and Elisabeth
Selna, Mike and Marja
Sewell, Sandra
Shepard, Betty
Shimamoto, Alan and Ellen
Shimoff, Paul
Silberman, Donn
Simon, John and Mary Ellen
Siperstein, Jerold and Phyllis
Skorpanich, Mary Anne
Slaughter, Liza
Solano, Paul
Somers, Maclyn and Gerry
Stafford, Ruth
Stanbridge, Ericand Polly
Succa, Cynthia
Tamaribuchi, Sat
Tarbell, Donald and Betsy
Taube, Robert and Penny
Taylor, Regina
Temkin, Gary and Janet
Tenney, Larry
Thomsen, Bart and Deborah
Tipre, Karl and Katherine
Tirre, Lorenzo
Trujillo, Siria
Uribe, Maria
Vaca, Veronica
Valenzuela, Enrique and Valdez,
Guadalupe
Valenzuela, Valerie
Van Dyke, Adam
Varner, Bruce and Nancy
Varner, Sean
Villaescusa, Frank and Ly
Von Freymann, Ronald and Janet
Wang, Yuh Shin (Jackie)
Wenke, William and Jean
Williams, Tamika
Wittenberg, Donald
Wride, Douglas and Gretchen
Wylde, Trent and Christy
13
Revenues & Expenses
Revenue 2009-2010
7%
Revenue 2009-2010
2%
Program Services - State
Revenue 2009-2010
2%
Program Services - State
Program Services - Federal
7%
7%
Expe
2%
Exp
2%
Pr
Expe
2%
Fu
2%
Program
Services
- State
Program
Services
- Federal
Program Services - In-Kind
Pr
Ge
21%
Program
Services
- Federal
Program
Services
- In-Kind
Supplemental Education Services (K-12)
Program
ServicesEducation
- In-Kind Services (K-12)
Supplemental
Philanthropy
Fu
21%
52%
21%
Supplemental
PhilanthropyEducation Services (K-12)
Other
Philanthropy
Other
Ge
52%
16%
52%
16%
16%
Other
Program Services - State.............................. 22,261,931
Progra
Program Services - Federal.............................. 6,619,825
Program Services - State.............................. 22,261,931
Program Services - In-Kind .............................. 9,073,427
Program Services - Federal.............................. 6,619,825
Program
Services
- State..............................
22,261,931
Supplemental
Education
Services (K-12) ............
779,582
Expenses 2009-2010
Program Services - In-Kind ..............................
9,073,427
Program
Services
Federal..............................
6,619,825
Philanthropy.................................................... 3,045,464
Supplemental Education Services (K-12) ............ 779,582
Program
Services - In-Kind .............................. 9,073,427
Other ..................................................................
635,680
Philanthropy.................................................... 3,045,464
Supplemental Education Services (K-12)
............
779,582
Program Services
Other .................................................................. 635,680
Philanthropy....................................................
3,045,464
Expenses
Fundraising 2009-2010
Other .................................................................. 635,680
Fundra
Prog
Genera
Fun
Progra
Gen
Fundra
2%
Expenses 2009-2010
General & Administrative
Program Services
52%
Program
Services
Fundraising
2%
6%
Genera
2%
6%
6%
92%
Fundraising
General & Administrative
General & Administrative
52%
Revenues & Expens
92%
Revenues
& Expen
45 million
Year............................................Revenue
.................. Expenses
52%
92%
1998-1999.................................. 552,410 .................... 430,125
millionRevenues & Expens
Year............................................Revenue .................. Expenses
40 45
million
1999-2000.................................. 812,809 .................... 740,556
1998-1999.................................. 552,410 .................... 430,125
45 40 million
Year............................................Revenue
.................. Expenses
2000-2001..................................
983,850 Services
....................
928,198
Program
.........................................
38,982,982 35 million
1999-2000..................................
812,809 ....................
740,556
1998-1999..................................
552,410 .................
....................1,322,079
430,125
2001-2002
............................... 1,446,638
Fundraising
676,683 30
2000-2001..................................
983,850 ......................................................
.................... 928,198
million
40 35
million
1999-2000..................................
812,809 .................
....................1,818,653
740,556
2002-2003
.............................. 1,763,308
General
&
Administrative...............................
2,490,867
2001-2002 ............................... 1,446,638 ................. 1,322,079
million
2000-2001..................................
983,850 ....................1,900,156
928,198
2003-2004
.............................. 1,804,091.................
35 30
25
million
2002-2003 .............................. 1,763,308 ................. 1,818,653
2001-2002 ...............................
1,446,638
2004-2005
.............................. 2,590,996
.................
2,651,140
Program
Services1,322,079
.........................................
38,982,982
2003-2004 .............................. 1,804,091.................
1,900,156
30 25
million
20
million
2002-2003 .............................. 1,763,308
1,818,653
2005-2006
3,160,919
.................
3,266,151
Fundraising
......................................................
676,683
2004-2005 ..............................
2,590,996
.................
2,651,140
Program
Services
.........................................
38,982,982
14
million
2003-2004 ..............................
1,804,091.................
1,900,156
2006-2007
(a)........................ 19,231,847...............
18,989,339
15 20
million
25
General
&
Administrative...............................
2,490,867
2005-2006 ..............................
3,160,919......................................................
................. 3,266,151
Fundraising
676,683
2004-2005 ..............................
2,590,996 .................
2,651,140
2007-2008
(a)........................ 32,416,478
................ 32,347
,924
General & Administrative
Financials
92%
Statement of Activities
52%
THINK Together Statement of Activities For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010
2009-2010
Revenues
2009-2010
Expenses
ASES/21stCCLC (K-12)**.................................. 37,407,183
Program Services
Supplemental Education Services (K-12)............. 779,582
ASES/21stCCLC** (K-12).................................. 36,390,930
Program Services ......................................... 38,982,982
Early Childhood (0-5)............................................. 548,000
Supplemental Education Services (K-12)............. 641,807
Fundraising ...................................................... 676,683
School Aged Care (K-5)......................................... 560,269
Early Childhood (0-5)............................................. 505,807
General & Administrative............................... 2,490,867
Philanthropy........................................................ 3,045,464
School Aged Care (K-5)......................................... 556,633
Other......................................................................... 75,411
Community Sites (K-12)........................................ 887,805
Total Revenues......................................................... 42,415,909
Total Program Services........................................... 38,982,982
Fundraising................................................................... 676,683
General & Administrative......................................... 2,490,867
Total Expenses.................................................. 42,150,532
Net Income................................................................. 265,377
Ending Net Assets.................................................. 913,310
Revenues & Expenses 1998-2010
45 million
40 million
35 million
30 million
25 million
20 million
15 million
10 million
5 million
Revenue
01
20
01
-2
00
2
20
02
-2
00
3
20
03
-2
00
4
20
04
-2
00
5
20
05
-2
00
20
6
06
-2
00
7
**
20
07
-2
00
8
**
20
08
-2
00
9
**
20
09
-2
01
0
**
20
0
0-
20
0
00
-2
19
99
19
9
9
0
19
98
-
92%
Revenue
Expense
Expense
** Includes recognition of In-Kind program services, such as volunteer time, and
facility and snack costs contributed by school district partners.
15
Partners
2009-2010 Board of Directors & Leadership Council
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Randy Barth
Founder & CEO, THINK Together
Joseph Albonetti
Founder, Latinolandia USA
Darrel Anderson
President, (Ret.), Knott Anderson Enterprises
Jayne Munoz
English Teacher, Santa Ana Community College
Carole Beswick
President & CEO, Inland Action Inc.
Eric Nelson
Vice President, Red Mountain Retail Group
Mark Bogh
President, Bogh Construction Inc.
Alan W. Pettis
Partner, Innovate Partners
Celeste Cantú
General Manager, Santa Ana Watershed
Project Authority
Quang X. Pham
Founder & CEO, Lathian Health
Samuel Anderson
Retired Pharmaceutical Executive
Ken Salgado
Partner, Moss Adams LLP
Leona Aronoff-Sadacca
Founder, LBJ Management, LLC
Lois Lauer
Owner, Lois Lauer Realty
Ellen Weisser
(Ret.), Network Pharmaceuticals
Sat Tamaribuchi
Environmental Policy Consultant
Mark Bogh
President, Bogh Construction
ORANGE COUNTY LEADERSHIP COUNCIL
LOS ANGELES LEADERSHIP COUNCIL
Kathy Braun-Lewis
Retired Executive, Western Digital
Brigitte Bren
Attorney/Education Advocate
Brigitte Bren
Attorney/Education Advocate
Jorge Delgado
President, ValueSat LLC
Sam Anderson
(Ret.) Pharmaceutical Executive
Bobbi Dauderman
Community Volunteer
Ranney Draper
Chairman, Spring Creek Investors
Celeste Cantú
General Manager, Santa Ana Watershed Project
Authority
Senator Martha Escutia
Attorney (Ret.)
Mary Lynn Coffee
Attorney at Law, Nossaman, LLP
Lynda Boone Fetter
Principal, Samuelson & Fetter LLC
Tony French
Philanthropist
Fran Inman
Senior Vice President, Majestic Realty Co.
Kevin Hayes, II
Sr. Vice President - Southern California, Lincoln
Property Company
Gilbert Ivey
Chief Administrative Officer, Metropolitan Water
District of Southern California
Judge Frances Muñoz
(Ret.), Harbor Municipal Court
Glenn Howard
Attorney & CPA
Lupe Valdez
Director of Public Affairs, Union Pacific Railroad
John O’Donnell
The O’Donnell Group, Inc.
Fran Inman
Senior Vice President, Majestic Realty Co.
Alan Arkatov
President, Changing.edu
Bill Podlich
Co-Founder (Ret.), PIMCO Advisors
Rod McDermott
Managing Director, McDermott & Bull Executive
Search
INLAND EMPIRE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL
Michael Metzler
President & CEO, Greater Santa Ana Business
Alliance
Michael Kerr
CEO, Bluestone Communities
Marion Knott
Philanthropist
Don Moe
Consultant
Leona Aronoff-Sadacca
Chair, IE Leadership Council
Founder, LBJ Management, LLC
Pete Aguilar
Consultant
THINKtogether.org
facebook.com/THINKtogether
twitter.com/THINK_together
2100 E. Fourth Street, Suite 200, Santa Ana CA 92705
888.485.THINK