Brian Batell University of Chicago 8th Patras Workshop July 18

Transcription

Brian Batell University of Chicago 8th Patras Workshop July 18
Portals and the Hidden Sector
with Neutrino Experiments
Brian Batell
University of Chicago
8th Patras Workshop
July 18 - 22, 2012
Chicago
Plan
• Motivation for a hidden sector
• Communicating with portals
• Basic experimental setup; Rate estimates
• Current limits/sensitivities:
•
Dark photons, axions, dark higgs, dark matter ...
• Outlook: prospects for Project X
Where are the new particles?
Coupling to SM
1
ν
e
EWSB, Hierarchy
π, ρ, p
t
W, Z
µ
?
Energy
Frontier
-2
10
Intensity Frontier
10 -4
?
10 -6
10-8
10-10 -10
10
Hidden Sector
10
-7
-4
10
-1
10
10 2
Mass of particle (GeV)
105
Dark Matter
A Light Hidden Sector?
•
Light SM gauge singlet matter and new forces weakly
coupled to ordinary matter largely unconstrained
•
•
•
Singlets exist in SM:
•
Predicted in many BSM & top-down scenarios
•
Discover new principles in unexpected places!
L, eR , dR , uR , H, N
Many possibilities for very weak interactions
Could address various experimental &
observational anomalies
Hidden particles
Portal
• Dark photons
• Dark scalars
• Sterile Neutrinos
• PNGBs
• Dark Matter
κ
µν
− Bµν V
2
2
†
(µS + λS )H H
LHN
∂µ a µ 5
ψ̄γ γ ψ
fa
1
χ̄χq̄q
+
.
.
.
,
Λ2
gχ φχ̄χ + gq φq̄q + . . .
Proton Beam - Target Setup
Target
p
Beam Stop,
Dirt
Y
10m -100km
Detector
e
+
e
−
Event rate estimates:
Nevents = Nprod × Pdet
Production:
1) Direct production: Nprod = σ(pA → Y X) × (NPOT nT LT )
2) Decay of hadron: Nprod = NH × Br(H → Y + X)
Detection (via decay to visible matter (e.g. leptons) :
Pdet ∼ γ
2 dΩlab
4π
�
�
d
exp −
γvτ
�
�
d + Rd
− exp −
γvτ
��
Experiments
Experiment
NPOT
Energy
d
CHARM
1018
400 GeV
480 m
LSND
1023
800 MeV
30 m
MiniBooNE
1021
9 GeV
540 m
NuMI/MINOS
1020
120 GeV
1 km
Essig, Harnik, Kaplan, Toro
Dark Photons
A' Decay Length cΤ
!2
10
0.1
1 !2
10
10!3
10!3
10!4
10!4
10!5
10!5
10!6
10!6
10!7
10!7
Ε
V
f
10!2
Prompt !$10 Μm"
Displaced !$1 cm"
!8 Displaced !&1 cm"
10
Invisible !&100 cm"
Invisible !&100 m"
f¯
10!9
cτ ∼ 100m ×
�
−7
10
κ
�2 �
10!2
10!8
mA' !GeV"
100 MeV
mV
0.1
�
10!9
1
Dark Photons
BB, Pospelov, Ritz
!"
#
!"
*
Production via
!"
)
0
N !"
(
!"
'
!"
&
!"
%
LSND
p+A→π +X
followed by
0
+ −
π → γV → γe e
!"
N
#
!"
$
!"
!" +,-
!
!
Dark Photons
Essig, Harnik, Kaplan, Toro
!2
10
LSND
!3
10
0.1
ae
E774
1
$!3S"
aΜ
!4
Production via
10
0
10
E141
!5
Ε
p+A→π +X
followed by
0
0.01
E137
!6
10
!7
10
+ −
π → γV → γe e
!8
10
SN
!9
10
0.01
0.1
mA' !GeV"
1
10
!2
10
!3
10
!4
10
!5
10
!6
10
!7
10
!8
10
!9
Dark Higgs
BB, Pospelov, Ritz
cW K¶
f¯
<1m
1m- 103m
PK¶ *H9
h
!
f
103m- 106m
> 106m
P9 *H9
!
"2
! ! " ! 2 "−2 #
$
−1
κ
mh !
mV
α
cτh! ∼ 100 m ×
α
10−5
GeV
2mf
Dark Higgs
BB, Pospelov, Ritz
π0 → γV h�
MiniBooNE: ρ, ω → V h
α� = α
�
NuMi/MINOS pA → V h
PK¶ *H9
LSND:
κ ∼ 10−2
�
MINOS(2P)
MB (2P)
MiniBooNE
LSND
followed by
�
+ −
h →� �
P9 *H9
Pseudo-Nambu
Goldstone Bosons
Essig, Harnik, Kaplan, Toro
PNGB Decay Length cΤ
10
8
107
f
F !GeV"
aV
106
f¯
105
cτ ∼ 20m ×
100 MeV
ma
��
Prompt !#10 Μm"
Displaced !#1 cm"
Displaced !%1 cm"
Invisible !%100 cm"
Invisible !%100 m"
0.1
1 8
10
107
106
105
104
104
103
103
102
102
10
10
1
�
10!2
F
104 GeV
�2
!2
10
ma !GeV"
0.1
1
1
PNGBs
Essig, Harnik, Kaplan, Toro
Production via
F !GeV"
CHARM, LSND,
MiniBoone, MINOS
p+A→a+X
followed by
− +
a→� �
9
10
108
107
106
5
10
4
10
3
10
2
10
10
1
!2
0.1
10!2
ma !GeV"
10
0.1
1 9
10
108
107
106
5
10
4
10
3
10
2
10
10
1
1
Dark matter beam
N BB, Pospelov, Ritz
Dark matter produced in
decay of light mediator
π0 , η → γV
V → χ̄χ
Neutral current-like
event:
χe → χe
χN → χN
χe → χe
mχ = 1 MeV
P9 *H9
LSND
Dark matter beam
deNiverville, Pospelov, Ritz
10-1
10
10-1
-2
-2
10
10
10-3
-4
κ
κ
10-3
10-5
10
10-5
χN → χN
mχ = 1 MeV
-6
10-7
-4
10
50
150
250 350
mV (MeV)
π0 , η → γV
V → χ̄χ
450
χN → χN
-6
10
10-7
mχ = 50 MeV
150
250
350
mV (MeV)
450
MiniBooNE
Dark matter beam
deNiverville, McKeen, Ritz
χN → χN
MINOS
pA → V X
V → χ̄χ
Project X: New high-intensity proton source
3 MW at 3 GeV
potential for ∼ 10
23
POT
yr
Closing thoughts
•
Weakly-coupled, light particles are a generic & exciting possibility
for physics beyond the Standard Model
• Can be systematically explored via portals
• Proton Beam-target experiments offer complementary sensitivity
to other probes
• Provide another physics rationale for the experimental program
at the intensity frontier
Question:
What is the best way to utilize/expand existing experimental
infrastructure for a more comprehensive physics program?
Especially in the context of Project X?