Monday Morning - California Alliance of Child and Family Services

Someday Morning
The California Alliance
of Child and Family Services
California Alliance
Member Agencies
 Arrow Child & Family
Ministries
 Aspiranet
 Aviva Family and


























Children’s Services
Bayfront Youth and
Family Services
Bienvenidos Children’s
Center
Bill Wilson Center
Boys Republic
Boys Town California
Casa Pacifica Centers
for Children &
Families
Casey Family Programs
Chamberlain’s
Children Center
Charis Youth Center
ChildNet Youth &
Family Services
Children’s Bureau
Children’s Receiving
Home
Corbett Group
Homes, Inc.
Crittenton Services for
Children & Families
East Bay Agency for
Children
Edgewood Center for
Children
EMQ FamiliesFirst
Ettie Lee Youth &
Family Services
Family Care Network
Family Life Center
Five Acres
Fred Finch Youth
Center
Hathaway-Sycamores
Child and Family
Services
Haynes Family of
Programs
Hillsides
Inland Empire
Residential Center
Someday Morning
California Alliance
Member Agencies
I N T HIS I SSUE
 Advanced Education
Services
 Aldea, Inc.
 Alliance Human
Services
 Alternative Family
Services
… functioning intelligently …
Thursday, April 21, 2016
Volume 13, #11
 Junior Blind of
POLICY

California Alliance Submits Recommendations for Realignment Growth Funding for
Children’s Mental Health
p. 1
 New Foster Care Rates Still in the Works
p. 3
 More Stringent Psychotropic Medication Regulations Taking Effect Even as New
Bills are Introduced
p. 4
THE ALLIANCE



Conferences, Training and Events

Mark Your Calendars for the Alliance Fall Executive’s Conference

Young Minds Hosting Advocacy Event

Registration Open for Forum on CalYOUTH Study Finding
For Your Information

Hillsides and Bienvenidos Announce Affiliation

Sunny Hills and River Stones Complete Accreditation

New Summer Camp for Foster Kids Available in Sacramento Area
And Just Remember…
p. 6
p. 6
p. 7
p. 7
p. 7
p. 7
p. 8
p. 8
p. 9
CALENDAR
Homes
 Lilliput Children’s
Services
 Lincoln Child Center
 Maryvale
 McKinley Children’s
Center
 Nuevo Amanecer






P OLICY
California Alliance Submits Recommendations
for Realignment Growth Funding for Children’s
Mental Health
The California Alliance recently submitted its recommendations to the
Department of Finance (DoF) for allocating 2011 Realignment Behavioral
Health Growth funds estimated to comprise over $400 million:




America
 Kern Bridges Youth
$60.1 million (actual) from FY 2013-14
$117 million (estimated) from FY 2014-15
$119 million (estimated) from FY 2015-16
$128 million (estimated) from FY 2016-17
The Alliance’s recommendations focus on “front loading” funds for county
mental health plans (MHP) to incentivize investment in the expansion of
Medi-Cal mental health services to children and youth. Each interested
county would submit a plan to the Department of Health Care Services
(DHCS) articulating how it would spend the money.
The Alliance recommends that each county plan submitted include how the
MHP will demonstrate the effectiveness of its approach in order for the
April 21, 2016


















Latino Children
Services
Oak Grove Center
Olive Crest Homes &
Services for Abused
Children
Optimist Youth and
Family Services
Pacific Lodge Youth
Services
Penny Lane
Phoenix House of
California
Promesa Behavioral
Health
Rancho San Antonio
Rebekah Children's
Services
Redwood Children's
Services
Remi Vista
River Oak Center for
Children
River Stones
Residential Services
Rosemary Children’s
Services
Sacramento Children's
Home
San Diego Center for
Children
Seneca Family of
Agencies
Sierra Forever Families
Sierra Vista Child &
Family Services
St. Anne’s
Stanford Youth
Solutions
Stars Behavioral Health
Group
Summitview Child &
Family Services
Tahoe Turning Point
Page 1 of 10
 Thunder Road






Adolescent
Treatment Centers
Transitions Children’s
Services
Trinity Youth Services
Unity Care Group
Valley Teen Ranch
Victor Treatment
Centers
The Village Family
Services
Provisional
Member Agencies
(pending accreditation)
 Aaron’s Boys Home
 A Better Way
 Advent Group
Ministries
 Agape Villages, Inc.
 Berhe Group Home
 California Anchor
Residents
 Childhelp, Inc.
 Children First Foster
Agency
 Children’s Home of
Stockton
 Children’s Institute,
















Inc.
Community Solutions
Concept 7
Courage to Change
Crossroads Treatment
Centers
Dangerfield Institute
for Urban Problems
David & Margaret
Youth and Family
Services
D’Veal Family and
Youth Services
Elite Family Systems
Families for Children
Family Builders by
Adoption
Fields Comprehensive
Youth Services
First Place for Youth
Foster Hope
Sacramento
Golden State Family
Services
Greater Hope
Foundation
Greater New
Beginnings
funding to continue, and how the MHP proposes to measure the
effectiveness of its expanded service. Such a stratagem is not unprecedented:
front-loaded funding for mental health services was used as part of 1991
Realignment implementation.
Developed after discussions with California Alliance members and extensive
conversations with Department of Finance staff, the Alliance plan took into
consideration the following factors:
1. Unmet mental health needs for children and youth
2. Inequities in access to specialty mental health services for children
across the state
3. Gaps in the children’s mental health continuum of care
4. Stalled children’s mental health initiatives (such as Katie A
implementation)
5. Recommendations from the Legislative Analyst’s Office
6. Recommendations from other advocacy organizations focusing on
children’s mental health
Services
 Vista Del Mar
 Walden Family
Services
 Westcoast Children’s
Clinic
 Youth For Change
 Youth Homes, Inc.
Provisional
Member Agencies
(pending accreditation)
 Heritage Group
Homes
 Human Services
Project, Inc.
 Inner Circle FFA
 JT Residential Care
Facilities, Inc..
 MAC’s Children &
Family Services
Background
 Martin’s Achievement
SB 1020 (Statutes of 2012) created the permanent structure for 2011
Realignment, including the Behavioral Health Subaccount, out of which is
funded:





 TLC Child & Family
Specialty Mental Health
Drug Medi-Cal
Residential perinatal drug services and treatment
Drug court operations
Other non-Drug Medi-Cal programs
Realignment funds are allocated by DoF based on an October 1-September
30 fiscal year and are paid monthly to counties by the State Controller’s
Office. DoF, in consultation with the California State Association of
Counties (CSAC), develops schedules for funding allocations to the county
MHPs from the Behavioral Health Subaccount (for the base funding) and
the Behavioral Health Services Growth Special Account (from growth in
Realignment revenue above the base).
Growth revenue may only be used for the programs funded through the
Behavioral Health Subaccount and DoF repeatedly has confirmed that the
first priority for growth is the federal entitlement programs: Medi-Cal
Specialty Mental Health and Drug Medi-Cal. Indeed, DoF has given first call
on Growth funds to counties that have approved claims that exceed the total
allocated for all the entitled services.
Place
 Mary’s Shelter
 Milhous Children’s
Services
 MSK Solutions
 North Star Family
Center
 Northern Valley













Information
The recommendations developed by the California Alliance may be accessed
at this LINK.

Catholic Social
Services
Oakendell
Parents by Choice
Plan-It Life
Plumfield Academy
Progress Ranch
The Resource
Environment for
Underprivileged
Groups Enterprise
(The REFUGE)
Triad Famly Services
Sierra Child & Family
Services
St. Andrews
Residential Programs
for Youth, Inc.
Sunny Hills Services
Valley Oak Residential
Treatment Program
Westside Children’s
Center
Woodland Youth
Services, Inc.
Youth Services
Network
For more information, contact Lynn Thull at [email protected].
Someday Morning
April 21, 2016
Page 2 of 11
New Foster Care Rates Still in the Works
The California Alliance is in conversation several times weekly with Department of Social Services
(CDSS) staff on aspects of the new Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) rate structures for foster
family agencies (FFA) and Short Term Residential Therapeutic Programs (STRTP, formerly
STRTC), but to date CDSS has made available no concrete information on future rates.
CDSS staff says the foster care rate models are still in development and hopes to have them
completed this month for the Governor’s May Budget Revision. About the only thing CDSS will
confirm at the moment is that there likely will be four
*WIC 11462.04
“regular” FFA rates, a single rate for Intensive
(d) A group home may request an exception to
Treatment Foster Care (ITFC) Rate that will also be
extend its rate as follows:
(1) The department may grant an extension for up
used to fund the foster care activities in Therapeutic
to two years, through December 31, 2018, except
Foster Care (TFC), and one, maybe two STRTP rates.
as provided in paragraph (2), on a case-by-case
New rates are scheduled to go into effect Jan. 1,
2017, with a potential 24-month transition period for
FFAs and group homes serving children in the child
welfare system, and beyond 24 months for group
homes serving youth in the juvenile justice system.
Alliance Input
The Alliance has provided CDSS with a FFA rates
model supported by extensive background
information and detailed cost assumptions, has
engaged CDSS in extensive conversations regarding
the funding of FFAs and Adoption Agencies and on
the costs of the Residentially-Based Services (RBS)
Reform projects on which STRTPs are based. The
Alliance also has provided the department with
updates on emerging cost drivers such as the recently
enacted state minimum wage increase to $15/hour by
2022 and changes in federal regulations regarding
employees who may be exempt from overtime
requirements.
Extensions
Programs seeking to continue operating under the old
models and rates will be required to obtain case-bycase extensions from CDSS (see sidebar*), and
extensions may be granted only under specified
conditions.
basis, when a written request and supporting
documentation are provided by a county placing
agency, including a county welfare or probation
director, that absent the granting of that
exception, there is a material risk to the welfare of
children due to an inadequate supply of
appropriate alternative placement options to meet
the needs of children. The exception may include
time to meet the program accreditation
requirement or the mental health certification
requirement.
(2) Pursuant to Section 11462.041, the department may
grant an extension to a group home beyond December
31, 2018, upon a provider submitting a written request
and the county probation department providing
documentation stating that absent the grant of that
extension, there is a significant risk to the safety of the
youth or the public, due to an inadequate supply of
short-term residential treatment centers or resource
families necessary to meet the needs of probation
youth.
*WIC 11463.1
(d) A foster family agency may request an
exception to extend its rate as follows:
(1) The department may grant an extension for up to
two years, through December 31, 2018, on a case-bycase basis, when a written request and supporting
documentation are provided by a county placing
agency, including a county welfare or probation
director, that absent the granting of that exception,
there is a material risk to the welfare of children or
youth due to an inadequate supply of appropriate
alternative placement options to meet the needs of
children. The exception may include time to meet the
accreditation requirement or the mental health
certification requirement.
Information
For more information, contact Doug Johnson at [email protected].
Someday Morning
April 21, 2016
Page 3 of 10
More Stringent Psychotropic Medication Regulations Taking Effect
Even as New Bills are Introduced
Even as the Judicial Council, Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) and Department of
Social Services (CDSS) continue to plan how they will implement last year’s spate of bills aimed at
strengthening oversight procedures and authorization requirements for prescription of psychotropic
medications for foster children, the Legislature is weighing additional bills related to this issue.
Last Year’s Bills
SB 238 requires important revisions and additions to the judicial processes for authorization of
psychotropic medications. The Judicial Council was tasked with revising the JV 220 regulations and
forms, increasing youth voice in the process, and requiring prescribers to conduct comprehensive
examinations and consider the full medical history of the child before the court will authorize
administration of the medication.
The latter requirement, however, ignores the problem that children’s Health and Education
Passports may not be complete or available to prescribers. Additionally, SB 238 requires augmented
training curricula for the field in the areas of psychotropic medications and accessing behavioral
health services, and compels CDSS and DHCS to increase data matching efforts to inform county
child welfare departments of potentially inappropriate prescriptions.
SB 484 increases group home reporting requirements regarding their resident’s use of psychotropic
medications, and creates a new Community Care Licensing (CCL) requirement to conduct site visits
to facilities that have been determined to have high utilization rates of psychotropic medications.
A summary of activities related to implementation of these bills in included below.
This Year’s Bills
SB 1174 (McGuire) would identify specific physicians that have high rates of prescribing
psychotropic medication for youth under the jurisdiction of the juvenile courts. Stakeholders are
working with the author and sponsors to craft legislative language that first moves to improve
prescriber practice and adherence to existing medical parameters rather than moving directly to
disciplinary actions.
SB 1220 (McGuire), a “placeholder” bill, is positioned to respond to the state audits of county child
welfare and mental health departments requested by Senator Mike McGuire last year and due to be
released in May of 2016. The audit was particularly focused on the use – or lack of use – of other
types of mental health services when psychotropic medications are prescribed. The audit was
requested in response to testimony in committee that foster children are frequently prescribed
medication when other types of treatment may have been more useful or may have increased the
efficacy of the medication, but were not provided or were not accessible.
SB 1291 (Beall) is sponsored by the National Center for Youth Law, and contains recommendations
and requirements that would consolidate county level data in the areas of mental health service
provision for children and youth under the jurisdiction of the juvenile courts in the form of annual
reports. This legislation reflects the ongoing concerns of advocates and community providers that
some counties have not fully invested in providing behavioral health access and services required by
the EPSDT entitlements. The bill would create transparency in the service delivery record of each
county, and require DHCS to perform additional tasks to increase compliance with federal
requirements.
Someday Morning
April 21, 2016
Page 4 of 10
What’s Happening on Last Year’s Bills
The Spring 2016 Children’s Residential Program Quarterly Update distributed to licensees by CCL
includes information regarding the progress being made on the implementation of SB 238 and SB
484. The following information fills in some of the missing pieces:

SB 238
CCLD will hold its third stakeholder session on the development of curricula that would satisfy
the legislative requirements, and be appropriate for the target audiences. Determining the
content of the curricula is just the first step, to be followed by the selection/authorization of
vendors approved to provide the training.
SB 238 also included data matching between CDSS and DHCS, for the purpose of identifying
potentially dangerous drug interactions and other issues to related psychotropic medication use
within foster care populations. DHCS has submitted a budget change proposal (BCP) that
would add staffing necessary to assist in this interdepartmental activity. Because of Proposition 30
AB 484 Requirements of Group Homes
(2011 Realignment) implications counties would not
re: Psychometric Medication
be required to participate; interested counties would
1. Psychotropic medications shall be
have to opt-in to this program component.
used only in accordance with the
The bill also requires significant revisions of the JV220 authorization form for psychotropic
medication. The California Alliance partnered with the
County Behavioral Health Directors Association of
California (CBHDA), the California Medical
Association (CMA), California Psychiatric Association
and the CAL-Academy of Child and Adolescent
Psychiatry, to submit a letter of concern on April 13
to the full Judicial Council on the proposed changes
and potential unintended consequences of some of
the revisions.

SB 484
CCL, with support from DHCS, has combined the
implementation discussions regarding SB 484 with the
SB 238 stakeholder sessions. As stated in the CCL
Update, the core objectives of SB 484 are increased
specificity in the record keeping protocols within each
facility and augmented CCL oversight of facilities that
have been determined to have higher levels of
psychotropic medication use among their residents.
CCL and DHCS have outlined their first year
approach to identifying potential facilities for follow
up site visits, a methodology that will allow them to
initially focus on residential programs that have higher
percentages of youth with psychotropic medications,
and within that larger pool, increased focused on polypharmacy, adherence to needed laboratory monitoring
follow-ups, and multiple medication changes.
Someday Morning
April 21, 2016
written directions of the physician
prescribing the medication and as
authorized by the juvenile court
pursuant to Section 369.5 or 739.5
of the Welfare and Institutions
Code.
2. The facility shall maintain in a
child’s records all of the following
information:
a. A copy of any court order
authorizing the psychotropic
medication for the child.
b. A separate log for each
psychotropic medication
prescribed for the child, showing
all of the following:
i. The name of the medication.
ii. The date of the prescription.
iii. The quantity of medication
and number of refills initially
prescribed.
iv. When applicable, any
additional refills prescribed.
v. The required dosage and
directions for use as specified
in writing by the physician
prescribing the medication,
including any changes
directed by the physician.
vi. The date and time of each
dose taken by the child.
Page 5 of 10
Alliance staff have continued to frame these initial CCL efforts as “looking and learning first”,
rather than assuming and reacting to a data set that is disconnected from program details and
resident populations’ treatment needs.
In addition to the reviewing the basic “medical” issues (e.g., assessment/examination, diagnosis,
treatment plan, interventions) related to each facility’s management and oversight of
psychotropic medication usage, it is likely that CCL program analysts will be reviewing program
staff adherence to all state requirements regarding, such as accurately charting of children’s
behaviors, following all authorized uses of psychotropic medications, assuring that each child’s
basic rights were respected, and that any refusals of medications were well documented.
Youth testimony that supported the passage of these bills suggested that some group homes do
not follow directions on usage of authorized medication, use denial of rights to control or
influence children’s willingness to accept medications, and do not adequately assist residents in
fully understanding the purpose of psychotropic medications or the specific benefits/risks.
Finally, one more stakeholder group was added focusing on reducing the use of psychotropic
medications. With extremely short timeframes, and priority areas that must be addressed first, this
new stakeholder group likely will be convened until sometime in the fall, perhaps as part of existing
CCL mandates to convene stakeholders to address identified areas of concern.
Information
For more information, contact dave neilsen at [email protected].
You may access the statutory language in which is contained the requirements of SB 484 on both
providers and the state:

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=HSC&sectionNu
m=1507.6

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=HSC&sectionNu
m=1538.9.
T HE A LLIANCE
Conferences, Training and Events
Mark Your Calendars for the Alliance Executive’s Fall Conference
Plans are underway for the Executive’s Fall Conference
on Sept. 7-9, 2016 at the Marriott Laguna Cliffs Resort &
Spa in Dana Point.
Mark your calendars for these dates and watch your
mailbox and Someday Morning for details about
registration, hotel reservations and sponsorships.
Someday Morning
April 21, 2016
Page 6 of 10
Young Minds Advocacy Hosting Advocacy Event
Young Minds Advocacy will host Honoring Youth and Adult Mental Health Leaders as part of the
organization’s kick-off to May is Mental Health Awareness Month Saturday, April 30, 6:00-9:00 pm at
the SOMArts Cultural Center, 934 Brannan St. in San Francisco.
Founded by Executive Director Patrick Gardner, Young Minds
Advocacy is a strong ally of the California Alliance in advocating
for a comprehensive, adequately funded array of behavioral health
services for children and youth. Most recently, Young Minds was
successful in advocating with the Department of Health Care
Services to expand access to Katie A intensive home and community based services to all eligible
youth receiving Medi-Cal funded healthcare services. Young Minds estimates that this policy shift
will expand services to more than 23,000 youth with serious mental health needs in California.
California Alliance member agency executives are encouraged to join the Alliance in attending or
sponsoring the event by accessing https://www.youngmindsadvocacy.org/creative-advocacyevent/.
Registration Open for Forum on CalYOUTH Study Findings
Registration is filling up for “Fostering Futures,” a forum that will examine the second wave of
results from the California Youth Transitions to Adulthood Study (CalYOUTH). Scheduled for May
10, 2016 at the Japanese American National Museum in Los Angeles, the forum features
presentations and panels with Professor Mark Courtney from University of Chicago’s Chapin Hall
and his team of researchers who will facilitate a dialogue with stakeholders from Southern
California on the policy and practice changes needed to improve the trajectories of youth in care.
These survey results include perceptions of foster youth and caseworkers on the adequacy and
quality of services for young adults in extended foster care. The study provides invaluable data on
education, employment, housing, financial stability, personal well-being and relationships.
A copy of the announcement with more information is attached to this issue of Someday Morning.
To register, visit: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/fostering-futures-aforum-on-the-calyouth-studyfindings-registration-22123546122. The last day to register is COB May 6, 2016.
For Your Information
Hillsides and Beinvenidos Announce Affiliation
On April 14, the boards of directors of Hillsides and Bienvenidos signed a Memorandum of
Understanding and Term Sheet stating their
intent to merge. Both Hillsides and Bienvenidos
will retain their individual names with
Bienvenidos becoming an affiliate of Hillsides.
A recent joint letter from the two California
Alliance member agencies pointed to multiple
developments that impacted their decision: the need to find new ways to
achieve cost-effective collaboration, passage of the Continuum of Care Reform legislation (AB 403),
Someday Morning
April 21, 2016
Page 7 of 10
the Affordable Care Act, the integration of Los Angeles County’s health and behavioral health
services, and the creation of the Nonprofit Sustainability Initiative.
With a combined workforce of over 600, the two agencies anticipate the merger will increase their
impact on the more than 13,000 children, youth and families they serve annually in Los Angeles,
Orange, San Bernardino, and Riverside Counties.
Sunny Hills and River Stones Complete Accreditation
Congratulations to two Alliance-member agencies for their recent accreditations. Sunny Hills Services
recently achieved accreditation through Joint Commission and River Stones Residential Treatment
Services, Inc. achieved accreditation through CARF.
Sunny Hills Services provides services to children and youth, ages 5 to 25,
who have been impacted by trauma and have serious emotional and
behavioral problems, offering early intervention as well as intensive services
including case management and treatment, special education, supportive
housing and youth development. Headquartered in Marin County, since its
founding in 1895 and operating primarily in Alameda, Marin, Napa and
Sonoma counties, Sunny Hills programming is geared to helping clients
achieve emotional, social and functional well-being.
Founded in Redlands in 2000 by Executive Director Russell Rice, River
Stones Residential Treatment Services comprises a RCL 11 residential
treatment program for boys ages 7-21 with behavioral and emotional
challenges. Evidenced-based and family focused, River Stones uses best
practices and innovative techniques that form a unique relational model of
transformation with a new narrative as the overarching goal.
Congratulations!
New Summer Camp for Foster Kids Available in Sacramento area
The Royal Family Kids camp has been around for 25 years with camps throughout the United
States, and several camps throughout California. Now, a new camp is available in the Sacramento
area and organizers are looking for foster children aged 6 to 11 years
old to attend.
Royal Family Kids is an international network of over 200 camps
specifically for abused and neglected foster children (ages 6‐11) with
the mission of creating life‐changing moments for children of abuse.
Though the camp has a very serious mission, this mission is
accomplished through creating a fun and carefree environment and giving these kids a week of
childhood, which they often do not have at “home.” Because of the specific population of campers
at RFK, there are different safety concerns, which are addressed with specific camp rules. There is
also a “Child Protection Plan” in place at every camp, which includes a camper orientation video
shown to the campers on the first day of camp. Although there have been no reported instances of
abuse at any RFK camp in the 25 years of operation, these safety rules are in place because we take
the safety and protection of our campers very seriously.
For more information on the organization and videos of camp stories, visit the
www.royalfamilykids.org. This specific camp website is www.sacramento.royalfamilykids.org and
Facebook page is facebook.com/RFKCSacramento.
Someday Morning
April 21, 2016
Page 8 of 10
To find out more, contact Justine Hamric Matteucci, RFK Sacramento director, at
[email protected], or call 916/595-7755.
And Just Remember…
The Editor has a cold and can barely function intelligently, forget coming up with anything funny.
Ask anyone who has been in a meeting with him this week. So, here’s more of Mitch Hedberg:
I’m against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
I was walking down the street with my friend and he said, “I hear music,” as if there is any other
way you can take it in. You’re not special, that’s how I receive it too. I tried to taste it but it did
not work.
I haven’t slept for ten days,…because that would be too long.
One time, this guy handed me a picture of him, he said, “Here's a picture of me when I was
younger.” Every picture is of you when you were younger.
C ALENDAR
2016
April
30
Creative Advocacy
(Mental Health
Awareness Month KickOff)
SOMArts Culture Center,
San Francisco
Registration:
https://www.youngmindsadvocacy.org/creativ
e-advocacy-event/
13th Annual FFTA Policy
Institute and Advocacy
Day
Washington, D.C.
Registration (login required): LINK
CCR Reform Convening
Sacramento TBD
Registration:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1t7yktmzc
cfcobbdj3ccmtbdz8ywbbp9six0ph7c-So/viewform?Usp=send_form
Webinar
Registration: www.jointcommission.org/BHCS
36th Annual CMHACY
Conference
Asilomar Conference
Grounds
Workshops proposals due Dec. 15, 2015:
www.cmhacy.org. Registration begins Jan. 15,
2016
CARF BH/CYS 202
Chandler, AZ
Information: www.carf.org/events
Middle Management
Santa Clarita, CA
Registration:
May
2-3
5
10 Joint Commission –
Orientation to the
Accreditation
Requirements
11-13
12
23-26
Someday Morning
April 21, 2016
Page 9 of 10
Academy
http://www.cccmha.org/Meeting_LandingPag
e.aspx?M=14
24
CARF BH/CYS 100
San Diego, CA
Information: www.carf.org/events
25-26
CARF BH/CYS 101
San Diego, CA
Information: www.carf.org/events
17
Project Fatherhood
Westin Los Angeles Airport
Hotel
Registration:
http://www.projectfatherhood.org/events/det
ails/22
28
Joint Commission Faceto-Face Meeting
Hilton Orange County
Registration:
http://pages.jointcommission.org/0628Works
hopCA.html
10-13
FFTA 30th Annual
Meeting
Hyatt Regency, New
Orleans, La.
Registration coming in March. Check
www.ffta.org/conference
17-19
COA Conference
New York City
Information:
www.coanet.org/2016Conference/
Marriott Laguna Cliffs
Resort & Spa
Information coming soon
June
July
September
7-9
Alliance Fall Executive’s
Conference
GET 25% OFF! Enter code P4B3P4AN
Current listings:
Campus Director, Residential Treatment, Trinity Youth Services, El Monte
President and CEO, Edgewood Center for Children & Families, San Francisco
Someday Morning
April 21, 2016
Page 10 of 10