Oakville Arena Revitalization

Transcription

Oakville Arena
Revitalization
March 6, 2014
ZAS Architects Inc.
Project Development Process
• Phase I: Master Plan
• Phase II: Design Options
• Existing Building Assessment
• Consultant Selection
• Existing Structural Assessment
• Heritage Assessment
• Environmental Assessment
• Structural Truss Assessment
• Technical Report Master Plan
• Stakeholder Consultation
• Public & Stakeholder Consultation
• Design Options & Costing:
• Master Plan Strategy
• Revitalization
• Council Approval
• Demolition / New
• Public Consultation
• Option Selection
• Council Approval
Oakville Arena
Master Plan Process
•
Technical Report Master Plan, (PRLFMP), 2011
•
Community Consultation – Spring 2012
 Given age and condition, close Oakville Arena
 Construct twin pad arena beyond 2021
 Retain ice, Kinsmen Pine Room, outdoor pool, fields and park
facilities at Trafalgar Park
•
Master Plan, October 2012
 Establish a strategy for renewal or replacement of Oakville Arena
at Trafalgar Park and potential development of another ice pad in
long-term
 Consider the replacement of the Oakville Seniors’ Citizen’
Recreation Centre as part of the renewal\replacement of Oakville
Arena
Oakville Arena
Council Direction
•
As a result of a report to Council in October of 2012 staff
received the following direction:
 That a single pad arena and current park facilities be retained at
Trafalgar Park
 That a Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment be completed for Oakville
Arena
 That staff develop preliminary architectural concepts with provision
for two options including renovating and refurbishing Oakville Arena
and demolishing the existing arena and construct a new single pad
Oakville Arena
Oakville Arena
Oakville Arena
Oakville Arena
Compressors
Oakville Arena
Rink Boards
Oakville Arena
Dressing Room
Oakville Arena
Bleacher Supports
Oakville Arena
Oakville Arena
Trusses
Building History – ERA Assessment
•
Designed by Oakville architect William Armstrong and
constructed between 1950 and 1951
•
Engineer Norman Hipel was in charge of the
construction of the arena
•
Employed the Hipel truss roof system – named after
Norman Hipel who was assigned the roof truss patent in
1940 for arena, barn and storage construction
•
Designed for year round use – hockey/skating for 7
months and dancing, roller skating, community events,
boxing, lacrosse etc. for rest
•
Funding for project raised by volunteers – total cost of
$220,000, half of this raised by local community
•
Arena was run by a group of volunteers until the late
1970s/early 1980s when the Town of Oakville took over
management
Cultural Heritage Values – Design/Physical Value
•
One of only four known surviving arenas in Ontario that have a Hipel truss roof system
•
Hipel truss creates a distinctive character and atmosphere and demonstrates an
economic/efficient system of spanning large spaces in the mid 20th century using wood
lumber.
•
Good example of a mid 20th century arena complex
Cultural Heritage Values – Historical/Associative Value
•
Hub for the community since it opened in 1951
•
Arena hosted a variety of sporting activities and many
large community and national events, giving the arena
emotive and symbolic value.
•
Designed to accommodate a range of functions and
act as both arena/sporting venue and community
centre/event space, illustrating the need in smaller
urban centres in Ontario in the mid 20th century to
create multi-purpose spaces.
•
Reflects work of Norman Hipel who became the
assignee for the truss roof system in 1940, which was
then implemented on many Ontario arenas in the
1940s and 50s
Cultural Heritage Values – Contextual Value
•
Located in Trafalgar Park since 1951, arena has played a key role in the history and
activity of the park
•
Arena maintains/supports the character of the park and surrounding area in scale,
orientation and function
•
Arena is a landmark building within Trafalgar Park and visually defines its southern edge
•
The arena is a community landmark in west Oakville
Project Challenges
• Heritage Integration
• Existing Building Assessment
• Structural Repair Options
• Existing Park Amenities & Views
• Existing Grades
• Parking, Access and Accessibility
• Rebecca Street Address
• Arena and Seniors’ Centre Integration
• Possible Future Fire Hall on Kerr Street
Design Options
•
Option 1: Revitalization
- Existing Structure Repair
- Ice Surface: 83’ x 183’ (existing)
- Running Track above corridor
- Lowest Heritage Impact
•
Option 2: Revitalization
- New Structure on Top of Existing
- New Arena End Bays
- Ice Surface: NHL 85’ x 200’
- Modest Heritage Impact
•
Option3 : Demolition / New
- Existing Building Demolished
- New Building Tucked into the Park
- Seniors’ Centre Access Adjacent to Park
- Running Track around Arena
•
Option 4: Demolition / New
- Existing Building Demolished
- New Building in Existing Location
- Seniors’ Centre Access West Side
- Running Track above Corridor
New Program: All Options
Arena
• Lobby / Display: 100-150sqm
• Administration: 120sqm (3-4 Offices)
• Staff Lunch Room: 20sqm
• Washrooms: 80sqm
• Concession / Warm Viewing: 200sqm
• Pine Room: 225sqm
• Ice Surface: NHL Sized
• Bleachers: 450 people
• Dressing Rooms: 6 @ 50sqm each
• Referee Room: 15sqm
• Coaches’/Referee Room: 15sqm
• Storage: 40sqm
• Ice Resurfacer Room: 45sqm
• Work Shop: 35sqm
• Ice Plant: 70sqm
• Storage / Garbage / Custodian: 45sqm
• Mechanical & Electrical: 85sqm
• Elevator & Machine Room: 10sqm
Park
• Park Washrooms: 60sqm
• Park’s Garage: 50sqm (540sqft)
• Tennis Courts (includes winter ice)
Senior’s Centre:
• Lobby / Display: 100sqm
• Administration Office: 14sqm
• Washrooms: 40sqm
• Lounge: 75sqm
• Multipurpose Room 1: 100sqm
• Snooker Room: 50sqm
• Gymnasium: 500sqm
Shared
• Walking Track:
Options 1,2 & 4: 250sqm (2,690sqft)
Option 3: 600sqm (6,458sqft)
Total GFA Areas
• Option 1: 7,154 sqm (77,000 sqft )
• Option 2: 7,042 sqm (75,800sqft)
• Option 3: 6,364 sqm (68,500 sqft)
• Option 4: 6,813 sqm (73,000 sqft)
Existing
Existing
Ground Floor
Basement
Preliminary Option #1: Revitalization
Site Plan
Structural Section: Repairs to Existing
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Maintains Heritage Value
Reinforcing of Existing Truss will be required for current gravity & snow loads
Structure will not meet seismic requirements of 2012 Building Code
20 to 30 Year Life expectancy (Periodic structural reviews will be required)
Existing top and bottom Tie Rods shall remain across the arena
Construction of new steel framed gymnasium, offices, track, and viewing area
Slippery roof system shall be required to reduce snow loads
Basement Floor Plan
Ground Floor Plan
Second Floor Plan
Image: Rebecca Street Aerial View
Image: Rebecca Street Arena Entrance
Image: Park Side Aerial View
Image: Seniors’ Recreation Centre Entrance
Image: View inside Arena
Site Plan
Structural Section: New Structure on top of Existing
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Maintains /Improves Heritage Value
New Steel Framed Structure constructed over the existing arena
Structure will not meet seismic requirements of 2012 Building Code
50 Year Life expectancy (Periodic structural reviews will be required)
Existing Top Tie Rod shall remain across the arena
Construction of new steel framed gymnasium, offices, track, and viewing area
New building perimeter will encroach into current zoning setbacks
New arena structure allows for a NHL sized hockey rink
Basement Floor Plan
Ground Floor Plan
Second Floor Plan
Image: Park Aerial View
Heritage Impact Assessment - ERA
Option 1:
•
Existing arena structure is largely retained and
Hipel truss system is repaired
•
Design/physical values and
historical/associative values are preserved
•
New Pine Room/community uses in new
extension mitigate loss of existing front of house
community space
•
The new addition is distinguishable
•
Low heritage impact (least impact of 4 design
options)
Heritage Impact Assessment - ERA
Option 2:
•
Existing arena is largely retained
•
New roof structure is built over the existing Hipel truss
system to protect it and reduce loads on it
•
Some later structural reinforcements are removed
enhancing original 1950s design and configuration
•
Interior appearance of the Hipel truss system is
conserved and continues to define the distinctive
heritage character of the building
•
The new structure maintains the gambrel roof shape
•
New Pine Room/community uses in new extension
mitigate loss of existing front of house community space
•
The new addition is distinguishable
•
Modest heritage impact
Preliminary Options #1&2: Revitalization
Comparison
•
Option 1:
- Existing Structure Repair
- Ice Surface: 83’ x 183’ (existing)
- Seating on One side: 450 seats
- Seniors’ Centre Access off Park
- Lowest Heritage Impact
- Cost Estimate: $20,800,000*
(*excludes soft costs)
•
Option 2:
- New Structure on Top of Existing
- New Arena End Bays
- Seating on One Side: 450 seats
- Senior’s Centre Access off Park
- Modest Heritage Impact
Preliminary Option #3: Demolition / New
Site Plan
Ground Floor Plan
Second Floor Plan
Image: Park Aerial View
Image: View from Walking Track
Site Plan
Ground Floor Plan
Second Floor Plan
Image: Rebecca Street Aerial: Gymnasium, Arena Entrance & Track
Image: Rebecca Street Aerial: Seniors’ Entrance , Track & Gymnasium
Image: Rebecca Street Senior’s Recreation Centre Entrance
Image: View from Walking Track
Preliminary Option #3&4: Demolition / New
Comparison: Rebecca Street Views
•
Option3:
- New Building Tucked into Park
- Seniors’ Centre Access Adjacent to Park
- Seating on one side of Arena: 450 seats
- Running Track around Arena
•
Option 4:
- New Building in Existing Location
- Seniors’ Centre Access West Side
- Seating on one side of Arena: 450 seats
- Running Track above Corridor
Contacts & Schedule
• Town of Oakville Project Manager: Michael Brennan
• Project Email Address: [email protected]
• Presentation: Town of Oakville website: www.oakville.ca/culturerec/oakville-arena.html
• Schedule: Construction 2017- 2018
• Completion: September 2018

Oakville Arena Revitalization

Transcription

Similar documents

post showreport

soft launch of angkasa apartment in darau menggatal

reidin-gyoder new home price index