101 Chilled water system narrative

Transcription

101 Chilled water system narrative
CHILLED WATER SYSTEM
INTRODUCTION
New Mexico State University currently uses a chilled water production and distribution
system in order to provide space cooling services for 56 buildings on the main campus,
comprising nearly 3,800,000 square feet of conditioned space. According to recent
history, approximately 18,250,000 ton-hrs of refrigeration is delivered to campus
annually at a peak rate of roughly 6,600 tons.
CHILLED WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
The current chilled water production manifold for the NMSU campus consists of three
1500 ton Carrier 19XR electrically driven centrifugal chillers and two nominal 1570 ton
Carrier 16JR-150L double effect absorption chillers. Also included in the production
manifold is a thermal storage facility consisting of two 1.5 million gallon tanks
underground at the central utility plant capable of storing up to 25,000 ton-hrs of
refrigeration. In all, the production manifold is capable of producing up to 6,600 tons of
chilled water. Chilled water is delivered to campus through a primary-secondary-tertiary
pumping arrangement, representative of dedicated constant speed chiller pumps,
independent building booster pumps and the main pumping manifold which moves
chilled water from the central utility plant out to the buildings as demanded and back to
the central plant. This main secondary pumping manifold consists of four 3300 gpm units
capable of producing 210 ft of head for a total delivery capacity to campus of 13,200
gpm.
Due to the fact that the thermal storage tank is open to atmosphere and also open to the
system without a closed loop separation, the returning pressure of the chilled water must
be reduced to a level of about 15 psi. The secondary distributional pumping manifold is
thereby arranged in a somewhat unorthodox configuration being able to lower the return
chilled water pressure by forcing the flow through charging turbines which are directly
connected to the pump and motor assembly in order to supplement the electrical work of
the pump motor. Although there are still inherent losses in pressure through this
arrangement, given the configuration of the thermal storage facility, this pumping scheme
makes the best out of a somewhat unattractive energy drain.
Chilled water is delivered to campus via a distribution network consisting of roughly
20,000 linear feet of both supply and return piping routed both in the utility tunnels and
underground in a direct bury configuration. Chilled water piping is mostly schedule 40
steel with some lengths of pipe being PVC. Chilled water is delivered to campus at a
temperature of 42°F and returns to the central utility plant at a temperature of 54°F for a
total campus delta T of 12°F.
As it stands, the system does appear to have some trouble delivering the level of demand
of chilled water during peak conditions, mostly late in the summer. Because of this fact,
GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc.
Not For Construction
June 16, 2009
Chilled Water System
0874.00
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage Two Report
the system should not be considered adequate for the current needs of the campus and
further review is necessary to consider opportunities to alleviate this issue.
CHILLED WATER LOADS
As stated above, recent annual records indicate an operational peak chilled water delivery
capacity of 6,600 tons for an annual consumption of roughly 18,250,000 ton-hrs annually.
Due to the lack of and format of recorded data available, these figures, along with the
U.S. Department of Energy open source building energy modeling software known as
eQUEST, have been used to generate an hourly annual profile of chilled water usage on
campus in order to attain the highest resolution of data available for evaluation. Figure 1
below represents the monthly consumption of chilled water by the NMSU main campus,
representative of the year 2008.
Figure 1 – 2008 Monthly Chilled Water Usage
As seen in Figure 1, usage peaks in the summer months and dies down to a minimum for
building core cooling in the winter, as would be expected, ranging from 800,000 ton-hrs a
month in the winter to 2,750,000 ton-hrs a month in the summer.
Utilizing the hourly annual chilled water profile developed in eQUEST, a chilled water
load envelope for the year has been developed. Average days for each month are
generated on an hourly scale in order to obtain a brief comprehensive view of the hourly,
GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc.
Not For Construction
June 16, 2009
Chilled Water System
0874.00
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage Two Report
monthly and annual behavior of the system. Figure 2 below represents what the annual
chilled water load envelope was for the campus in 2008.
Figure 2 – 2008 NMSU Chilled Water Load Envelope
As seen in Figure 2, levels peak midday in the summer months and bottom out during the
winter nights, as would be expected. The area under this curve is representative of the
totalized annual chilled water usage by the main campus. This is a somewhat typical load
envelope for chilled water usage at any level and is representative of what is happening
on an hourly level for each month of the year.
FLOW ANALYSIS
According to the Physical Plant Department, the chillers are maxed out on capacity
during peak flow conditions. The individual building loads were reverse calculated
knowing the capacity of the chiller manifold and using adjusted standard cooling load
densities relative to each building type. The combination of this data set along with the
known averaged campus delta T of 12°F allows procuring of the flow information to
effectively evaluate system as it currently exists.
GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc.
Not For Construction
June 16, 2009
Chilled Water System
0874.00
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage Two Report
In order to best procure a comprehensive flow model of the NMSU chilled water
distribution system, a software package known as Pipe-FLO has been utilized to simulate
existing campus peak flow conditions. It should be noted that this model is a best
representation of the campus chilled water system and should not be considered an
absolute representation. In order to fill in gaps between available data sets, assumptions
have been made to determine individual building cooling densities according to function.
It should also be noted that for the purposes of evaluating the distribution system, the
pumping arrangement of the model does not include individual building pumps, and it is
assumed that, in general, these tertiary pumps pick up nearly all of the head loss through
individual building piping systems and are sized to do just that. It should also be
understood that as individual building improvements are made in the near future, the
delta T for each building may increase or decrease depending on the specific cooling
issues relative to that building, whether it is a three way valve system with constant speed
pumping and mixing or a situation in which pipes are clogged and restricting proper flow
through heat transfer coils. It is for this reason, in addition to the knowledge that projects
are currently in planning and operation to optimize the heat transfer systems in delinquent
buildings, that in analyzing flow in consideration for expansion, or rather a future state of
the system, all building temperature differentials are brought to an average number of
12°F for the purposes of this study.
Before examination of the flow model, there are a few configurations that should be
noted. There is a separate 14” line leaving the east side of the plant that serves the new
science hall and the Zuhl Library with a connection to the main distribution network at
the Branson Hall Library and Hershel Zohn Theatre area. This connection is shown as
normally closed in this model, corresponding to operator observation at the Physical
Plant Department. There is another connection shown as normally closed between
Breland Hall and Milton Hall, also according to operator observation. It should also be
observed that the existing tunnel connection at the Chamisa Village is unorthodox in that
it pulls supply water from the tunnel return line and returns it to the same line. This
ultimately means that there is no supply demand for the Chamisa Village in terms of
flow. It is assumed this sort of connection was implemented with oversized fan coils and
sub-par cooling capacity and ventilation in order to make an addition to a system believed
to already be at capacity.
Head loss through the existing system is calculated in the existing flow model and shown
to be estimated at 136’ for a delivery of 13,093.5 gpm. This is an estimated figure and
does not take into account the open atmosphere thermal storage facility or building
tertiary pumps. It is, however, a relatively accurate estimation of the energy lost in
delivering and returning chilled water up to the building level.
In order to plan for expansion it is crucial to understand distributional pipe capacity,
which can be indicated in a comprehensive flow model by showing flow velocities. It is
apparent in looking at this velocity gradient that there are very high velocities in and
around the central plant area, indicating that the roots of the distribution network have
become too small to sufficiently support flow to the extents of the system. It can also be
seen that the system is approaching unacceptable velocities just to the north of the plant
GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc.
Not For Construction
June 16, 2009
Chilled Water System
0874.00
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage Two Report
and extending east though the Pan Am Tunnel. It is also evident that velocities are
approaching unacceptable levels in the Sweet Tunnel due south from the plant. The most
noticeable high flow velocity is within the central plant itself, forcing 13,000 gpm
through a 20” main distribution header during times of peak flow for a velocity of over
15 ft/s. With high velocities branching off in every direction from the area of chilled
water production, there is the indication that additional loads to the system at any location
could push the central plant beyond its capacity for flow distribution not only in terms of
pumping capacity, but in relation to flow capacity in the existing pipeline network.
In calculating existing peak flow values, it was discovered that the central plant’s
capacity for chilled water production and distribution did not match the recommended
cooling densities in this climatic zone for the buildings on the system. It is currently
estimated the central utility plant is capable of providing only 2/3 of the ideal
refrigeration to campus during times of peak conditions. Discussions with NMSU
facilities staff indicate that during peak conditions, the central plant does in fact have
problems with successful delivery of chilled water to every building on campus. During
peak flow the central plant and facilities personnel have devised ways of rerouting flow
from the plant and around campus by changing valve positions, sometimes hourly,
according to what buildings have reported unacceptable service. It is also believed that in
order to best condition buildings on campus with consideration to the low chilled water
production capacity, many of the campus buildings are receiving less than adequate
ventilation air in order to significantly cut down on load.
Aside from the issues of chilled water production, distribution capacity has been found to
be limited on a similar scale. As the distribution pumping scheme exists, there is no
defined distribution header where flow can gather before it is separated off appropriately
in different directions to campus. Rather, the distribution pumps are scattered throughout
the plant and route all flow to the east side of the building for campus distribution. There
does exist a length of pipe routing some pressurized flow from the east to the west side of
the plant in order to serve buildings to the north and west of the plant, however, in the
flow model this line becomes restricted in capacity during peak flow periods, making for
significant head loss in the system and reducing the plant’s capacity to deliver chilled
water to this set of buildings. At times this issue becomes so intense that one chiller is
routed away from the secondary distribution pumps and delivers as best it can to the
distribution system with only pressurization from its dedicated primary pump, according
to central plant staff. Outside of the plant there are significant restrictions to flow delivery
in all directions in the distribution system with the heaviest restrictions to the north and
northeast areas of campus.
In addition to the questionable physical nature of the distribution pumping system, sheer
pumping capacity alone seems to fall short of the ideal. There have been reports by
central plant staff that often during the hotter months of the year, isolation valves in the
plant and around the distribution area are constantly being manipulated in order to
maintain adequate delivery pressure to buildings at the extents of the system. This is an
indication of an undersized pumping array and is just as important to consider as chilled
water production when making additions to the campus. There is currently no redundancy
GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc.
Not For Construction
June 16, 2009
Chilled Water System
0874.00
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage Two Report
in either chilled water production or distribution capacities, leaving no contingency for
equipment failure or opportunities for expanding the system.
CHILLED WATER SYSTEM STRATEGIES FOR CAMPUS EXPANSION
New Mexico State University has developed an architectural master plan to aid in
facilitating structured campus growth in five year phases out through the year 2034. A
chilled water system development plan is a crucial counterpart of this equation. Not only
are there significant deficiencies with the existing system, but it will need to change in
configuration as well to match the progressing architectural build out of the main campus.
As noted above, the current chilled water system is vastly undersized for the area of
service which means that not only will the system need to expand for the growth of the
campus, it will need to immediately expand to begin to appropriately satisfy the chilled
water demand for space cooling. Likewise, immediate expansion is a necessity before
consideration of adding any building to the load.
SYSTEM EXPANSION FOR GROWTH OF CAMPUS
Following are brief descriptions of changes to the chilled system through the set phases
of campus development. Cost estimates are also provided with inflation factored in. Cost
estimates for distributional piping are not included here and can be referenced in the
Utility Tunnel System report. For phased distributional piping improvements, see the
phased set of utility layout drawings in the back of this section.
Phase 1 – 2014
Accounting for not only the current deficiency in production capacity but also the growth
of the campus in the first phase, the chilled water peak load increases from 6,600 tons to
about 12,500 tons. This is an extreme increase in the system and according to the net
present value analyses described below, warrants the addition of a secondary utility plant
to connect to the main system. This utility plant can be built having the capability for
modular expansion. In other words, not only can chillers be installed only as they become
necessary, but the plant can be continuously built up from its base building in a modular
fashion as the additional chillers are required. This option reduces the first cost of
building the facility greatly as it only needs to be built up to hold the present capacity of
equipment. Also as discussed below in the net present value analysis is the attractiveness
of adding an ice storage facility to the secondary utility plant. This item is therefore
included in the costs for the first phase of development. The last major item included in
the first phase is the re-piping and re-sizing of the existing plant chilled water headers.
The headers are undersized to a point of constricting flow to campus, increasing the cost
of moving chilled water and need to be reconfigured in such a manner so that manual
intervention by means of valve repositioning is not required in order to provide
appropriate flow to all corners of the campus. In summation, the suggested additions
include two 1030 ton double effect absorbers and peripherals, two 2000 ton electric
chillers and peripherals, one 1000 ton glycol chiller and peripherals, 43 ice storage tanks,
the base building for a secondary utility plant, and the re-piping of the existing plant
GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc.
Not For Construction
June 16, 2009
Chilled Water System
0874.00
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage Two Report
chilled water headers. The combination of these items will be able to meet the foreseen
campus peak load while boasting an n+1 redundancy in production and results in a first
phase cost of roughly $18,350,000.
Additionally, the Arts Complex Ph I, the Bookstore, and Chamisa Ph II are all buildings
planned for construction within the next two years. This will possibly not be enough time
to expand the current chilled water system to match growth and will need contingency
plans to address their chilled water needs. It is recommended that the buildings be
outfitted with chilled water distribution systems and temporarily connected to outdoor
pad-mounted air cooled reciprocating chillers as standalone systems until the chilled
water distribution system is prepared to take on additional load. At this time the main
building connections can be disconnected from the air cooled chillers and connected up
to the campus chilled water system. The air cooled chillers can then be stored to be used
in the future for similar incidents. Cost estimates for outfitting these systems for each of
these buildings are included in this report.
Phase 2 – 2019
The second phase of development encompasses further growth of the chilled water
system and creates an additional peak load of over 2,500 tons. Additions to the system
production capacity include one 2000 ton electric chiller and peripherals and results in a
second phase cost of roughly $4,519,697.
Phase 3 – 2024
This phase of growth harvests an additional peak load of over 3,000 tons and warrants the
addition of two 2000 ton electric chillers with peripherals. Estimates for this phase come
out to roughly $10,479,000.
Phase 4 – 2029
Phase 4 continues the addition of buildings warranting chilled water service and creates
an additional peak load of nearly 4,000 tons. The addition of four 2000 ton electric
chillers and peripherals will be necessary for this phase and results in costs totaling
roughly $17,223,000.
Phase 5 – 2034
The final phase of development creates an additional peak chilled water load of nearly
5,500 tons and is mostly on the southern tip of the built out distribution system. At this
point in time, should the campus grow according to plan, it may be feasible to create a
tertiary chilled water facility in this vicinity and connect it to the main system. Either
way, it will be necessary to replace some of the equipment installed in the first phase, as
their useful lives will have run their course, and install some new equipment to keep up
with the additive loads. In all, this phase will add two 1030 ton absorbers, five 2000 ton
electric chillers, one 1000 ton glycol chiller and all the peripherals to match. In all,
estimates for this phase come to roughly $36,563,000.
GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc.
Not For Construction
June 16, 2009
Chilled Water System
0874.00
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage Two Report
NET PRESENT VALUE ANALYSIS
As mentioned in the Cogeneration System section of this report, the cogeneration model
has been outfitted to analyze multiple optional equipment configurations, including the
options for ice storage and the comparison between adding two absorbers to the HRSG
steam output versus one absorber and one steam driven turbine. Most importantly, the
cogeneration model has been outfitted with the capability of projecting system dynamics
with respect to the phased build out of the campus. In other words, estimates for the cost
of energy consumption in the forms of natural gas and electricity have been generated
and used in conjunction with estimates for capital investments in equipment to produce
estimates for net present values of the entire 25 year investment as well as leveled annual
costs should this be looked at from a “borrowing” perspective. For each run of the net
present value analysis, equipment additions have been tailor made to suit each individual
scenario. There are a total of 8 scenarios, creating every permutation of the 3 general
options.
Secondary Utility Plant
The first option is to either begin construction of a new utility plant or to tear down and
rebuild part of the existing plant. Even if the existing plant were rebuilt there would still
be a need for a secondary utility plant, but construction of the new plant could be delayed
until about 2019. Plausible locations for the secondary plant include the parking lot
immediately east of the Health and Social Services Building, the parking lot just south of
the Corbett Center, and the northwest corner of the intramural fields just south of the
Activity Center. Since there is an immediate need for improved flow to the northern
section of campus and since many of the parking lots around the Corbett Center are
already scheduled for demolition, the parking lot immediately east of Health and Social
Services and west of the proposed Jordan Parking Garage became a prime candidate. In
general, the net present value analysis yielded higher overall costs if the existing plant is
rebuilt versus constructing a new facility immediately. Not only does cost analysis
indicate near term construction of a secondary facility to be most feasible, but there are
many complications to rebuilding an existing facility, especially considering that total
shutdown of any branch of equipment is unacceptable, as the campus is constantly
requiring these utilities.
A preliminary drawing set of a conceptual secondary utility plant are included in this
report.
Ice Storage System
An ice storage option for the chilled water system can be an extremely attractive
investment, especially working in conjunction with a demand based electrical rate. Ice
storage allows for a dedicated glycol chiller to operate at night during off-peak hours to
create chilled water potential via the creation of ice. During the daytime, the glycol loop,
connected to the main chilled water system by means of a heat exchanger, is able to
extract heat from the chilled water system and use it to melt the ice in the storage tanks,
creating “free cooling” during times of more expensive consumption and cutting the
GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc.
Not For Construction
June 16, 2009
Chilled Water System
0874.00
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage Two Report
electrical demand charges by reducing the amount of energy consumption during peak
energy hours. A preliminary system is sized to meet the needs of the first phase of growth
and includes one 1000 ton glycol chiller working in conjunction with 43 ice storage tanks
for a total possible discharge of 5000 tons and a total daily storage capacity of about
14,000 ton-hours. Should this option be considered, further optimization of the system
size should be performed in order to maximize savings. In the 8 alternate net present
value runs, the ice storage option consistently yielded lower overall expenditures versus
excluding it from the chilled water system expansion. In addition to the obvious setbacks
of attempting a rebuild of the existing utility plant, there would not be the appropriate
spatial requirements to add ice storage to the existing plant and the campus would not be
able to reap the benefits of such a facility until construction of the secondary utility plant.
Dual Double Effect Absorbers vs. Single Effect Absorber w/ Steam Turbine
The heat recovery steam generator outputs a peak load of roughly 22,000 lbs/hr of 100
psi steam. Currently this steam can be sent to campus for space heating in winter months
or routed to one of two absorption chillers to create chilled water in summer months. The
existing absorbers are significantly de-rated and are in constant need of maintenance.
Since these machines are candidates for replacement, the question remains as to what will
be most effective replacement in terms of energy usage and economy. Two options have
been considered an analyzed. One is to replace them in kind with two new and efficient
absorption chillers. The alternate option is to stage a steam turbine and a single stage
absorber in series. In this configuration, during the summer months, the steam turbine
would take in steam at 100 psi and generate 275 kW of electricity while outputting 15 psi
steam to the single effect absorber for the production of chilled water. Either of these two
options will effect in a reduction of on-peak electrical consumption and will help to lower
overall demand charges by reducing consumption during peaking hours of the day.
According to the net present value analysis, each isolated comparison of these two
options came out significantly close to one another. Were they to be completely even, it
may be beneficial to lean towards the two absorbers versus the absorber and steam
turbine due to the increased complexity of the latter system.
Overall, the comparison between all 8 scenarios yields 2 closely matched candidates. The
least costly scenario was the result from scenario number 3 and consisted of immediate
construction of a new utility plant, the inclusion of an ice storage facility, and the
addition of two new double effect absorption chillers. This scenario ran a 25 year net
present value of roughly $205,123,000 with a leveled annual cost of $11,441,000 and an
annual savings from the worst case scenario of $933,000. The close second was scenario
number 4, differing from 3 only by the inclusion of a single effect absorber and steam
turbine rather than two double effect absorbers. This scenario came in with a 25 year net
present value of roughly $206,577,000 with a leveled annual cost of $11,522,000 and an
annual savings of $852,000. The next best scenario resulted in a net present value of
$214,784,000. The worst case was scenario number 6, consisting of renovation of the
existing plant, no ice storage, and the use of a single effect absorber in conjunction with a
steam driven turbine. This scenario resulted in a 25 year net present value of
$221,844,000 with a leveled annual cost of $12,374,000.
GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc.
Not For Construction
June 16, 2009
Chilled Water System
0874.00
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage Two Report
STAGE 1 PRODUCTION DEFICIENCIES
Deficiencies on the production side of the chilled water system have been addressed
along with expansion of the system for the growth of the campus.
STAGE 1 DISTRIBUTION DEFICIENCIES
Undersized Pipe Sizes in and Around the Central Utility Plant
During an in depth flow analysis it became evident that the chilled water line sizes in and
around the central plant area are nearly too small for acceptable flow velocities and that
the main distribution header is significantly smaller than ideal, forcing a peak flow of
over 15 ft/s. Were the pumping manifold sufficient to successfully deliver flow during
peak demand, this would only be an indication of unnecessary energy loss through
friction in the pipe, but in consideration of campus and chilled water distribution
expansion, the current pipe sizes and configurations in and around the central plant could
pose some serious problems in successfully delivering service to all areas of campus. The
re-piping of the chilled water plant header has been addressed in expansion for growth
and the line sizes around the area of the existing utility plant will grow in capacity once a
secondary plant is installed, alleviating the need for the current plant to push chilled
water out to every extent of campus.
Distribution Pumping Arrangement
Another deficiency noted here, common to many existing chilled water systems, is the
overall primary-secondary-tertiary pumping arrangement on campus. Were the system
constructed brand new today, it would be recommended to use what is known as a direct
primary scheme in which there would be only one set of pumps able to output variable
flow to campus and sized to take on the entire head loss from the chiller array to the top
of the tallest and farthest building and back. The existing arrangement is a cause for some
significant energy loss through constant pumping and 3-way valve arrangements, moving
an unnecessary amount of flow. The University is currently investing in a program to
retrofit existing buildings with a 2-way valve arrangement, alleviating the need for
tertiary pumps. This action will ultimately result in significant energy savings in system
pumping.
Cool Pool Pumping Arrangement
Another notable deficiency that had been addressed in a previous study by GLHN is the
fact that the thermal energy storage facility is not only open to atmosphere but open to the
campus distribution system as well. This means that in order to keep the “cool pool” from
overflowing, system pressure has to be killed off in the return chilled water supply. This
in turn means that to successfully pump flow back out to campus, the secondary pumping
manifold has to take the flow from almost atmospheric pressure back up to 60 or 70 psi,
resulting in significant excess energy costs. It should also be noted that the depth of the
cool pool is quite shallow and does not allow for appropriate stratification of the varying
temperatures between the top and bottom levels. It is recommended that previously
submitted materials by GLHN be reviewed and considered in order to generate additional
distributional pumping savings
GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc.
Not For Construction
June 16, 2009
Chilled Water System
0874.00
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage Two Report
Campus Delta T
The current 12°F delta T across campus is an acceptable temperature gradient. However,
it is not infeasible to obtain a delta T on the order of 16°F for a campus such as this by
means of eliminating 3-way valves and constant speed pumps. This issue is addressed
above in the distributional pumping arrangement.
Absorption Chillers
This deficiency is addressed in the planning for campus growth and includes replacement
of the existing machines.
EMCS
It has been observed that the existing data monitoring system for the chilled water system
is grossly undersized and fails to capture a comprehensive view of the operation of the
distribution system. Not only does the existing system have holes in data capture,
processing and storing, there are many buildings that have incomplete monitoring
capabilities as currently configured. This deficiency has already been picked up by the
University and is currently being improved upon by a dedicated team of personnel.
GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc.
Not For Construction
June 16, 2009
Chilled Water System
0874.00
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage Two Report
CHILLED WATER PLANT ASSETS
Chillers
Condenser
Mark
Model
Evaporator
Electrical
Size
(Tons)
Type
Refrigerant
EWT/LWT
(°F)
Flow
(gpm)
WPD
(ft)
EWT/LWT
(°F)
Flow
(gpm)
WPD
(ft)
Volt
Phase
HZ
1500
Centrifugal
HFC-134a
85 / 95
5100
-
54 / 42
3000
-
460
3
60
1500
Centrifugal
HFC-134a
85 / 95
5100
-
54 / 42
3000
-
460
3
60
1500
Centrifugal
HFC-134a
85 / 95
5100
-
54 / 42
3000
-
460
3
60
CH-3
Carrier 19XR 8787503
EMH68
Carrier 19XR 8787503
EMH68
Carrier 19XR 8787503
EMH68
CH-4
Carrier 16JT-150L
1570
Absorption
Water
85 / 95
6750
-
54 / 42
3600
-
460
3
60
CH-5
Carrier 16JT-150L
1570
Absorption
Water
85 / 95
6750
-
54 / 42
3600
-
460
3
60
CH-1
CH-2
Totals
7640
28800
Cooling Towers
16200
Outside Air
Fan Motor
Mark
Model
Size
(Tons)
Type
EWT/LWT
(°F)
Flow
(gpm)
WB
(°F)
DB
(°F)
HP
PH
Volts
RPM
CT-1
Marley
2812
Counterflow
95 / 85
6750
76
104
60
3
460
1775
CT-2
Marley
2812
Counterflow
95 / 85
6750
76
104
60
3
460
1775
CT-3
Amarillo
2125
Counterflow
95 / 85
5100
76
104
60
3
460
1775
CT-4
Amarillo
2125
Counterflow
95 / 85
5100
76
104
75
3
460
1750
CT-5
Amarillo
2125
Counterflow
95 / 85
5100
76
104
75
3
460
1750
Totals
11999
28800
Pumps
Motor
Mark
Model
Flow
(gpm)
Head
(ft)
Minimum
NPSH (ft)
Minimum
Efficiency
(%)
HP
PH
Volts
RPM
Speed
Control
CHWP-1
Cornell
3300
210
-
-
200
3
460
1785
VFD
CHWP-2
Cornell
3300
210
-
-
200
3
460
1785
VFD
GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc.
Not For Construction
June 16, 2009
Chilled Water System
0874.00
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage Two Report
CHWP-3
Cornell
3300
210
-
-
200
3
460
1785
VFD
CHWP-4
Cornell
3300
210
-
-
200
3
460
1785
VFD
Totals
13200
Charg-1
Cornell
4000
80
-
-
125
3
460
1800
VFD
Charg-2
Cornell
4000
80
-
-
125
3
460
1800
VFD
-
-
Totals
8000
CHP-1
Aurora
3100
95
-
-
100
3
460
1750
Constant
CHP-2
Aurora
3100
95
-
-
100
3
460
1750
Constant
CHP-3
Aurora
3100
95
-
-
100
3
460
1750
Constant
Totals
9300
CHP-4
Aurora
3600
150
-
-
200
3
460
1750
Constant
CHP-5
Aurora
3600
150
-
-
200
3
460
1750
Constant
Totals
7200
CWP-1
Aurora
5100
65
-
-
100
3
460
1188
Constant
CWP-2
Aurora
5100
65
-
-
100
3
460
1188
Constant
CWP-3
Aurora
5100
65
-
-
100
3
460
1188
Constant
CWP-4
Aurora
6750
95
-
-
200
3
460
1188
Constant
CWP-5
Aurora
6750
95
-
-
200
3
460
1150
Constant
Totals
GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc.
Not For Construction
June 16, 2009
28800
Chilled Water System
0874.00
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage Two Report
Official_Building_Master_List
New Mexico State University
Lab (SF/Ton)
Current
Future
507
592
300
350
Utility Development Plan
Acad (SF/Ton)
2009
Housing (SF/Ton)
761
450
Admin (SF/Ton)
592
350
Address
Category
Chilled Water Distribution System
2009
Bldg.
#
Building Name
Year Built
GSF
2014
Tons
GPM
GSF
2019
Tons
GPM
GSF
2024
Tons
GPM
GSF
2029
Tons
GPM
GSF
2034
Tons
GPM
GSF
Tons
Dwg
Area
GPM
EXISTING BUILDINGS
225
Astronomy Building
1959
1320 Frenger Mall
ACAD - LAB
278
Branson Library
1951
1305 Frenger Mall
ACAD
15,486
31
61
15,486
52
103
15,486
52
103
15,486
52
103
15,486
52
103
15,486
52
103
7
159,696
270
540
159,696
456
913
159,696
456
913
159,696
456
913
159,696
456
913
159,696
456
913
6
184
Breland Hall
1954
1525 Stewart St.
ACAD - LAB
95,313
188
376
95,313
318
635
95,313
318
635
31,771
106
212
31,771
106
212
31,771
106
212
7
386
Business Complex Building
1983
1320 University Ave.
ACAD - CLASSROOM
54,992
93
186
54,992
157
314
54,992
157
314
54,992
157
314
54,992
157
314
54,992
157
314
3
605
Chamisa Village
2006
1725 Stewart Street
HOUSING
114,056
150
300
114,056
253
507
114,056
253
507
114,056
253
507
114,056
253
507
114,056
253
507
7
187
Chemistry Building
1957
1175 North Horseshoe
ACAD - LAB
115,878
229
457
115,878
386
773
115,878
386
773
115,878
386
773
115,878
386
773
115,878
386
773
2
24,671
24,671
24,671
24,671
24,671
24,671
364
Clara Belle Williams Hall
1981
1395 International Mall
ACAD
126
Computer Center
1966
1275 Stewart St.
ACAD - LAB
285
Corbett Center
1968
1600 International Mall
AUX
60
Dan W. Williams Hall
1938
1390 E. University Ave.
ACAD - LAB
42
83
40,288
79
159
40,288
70
141
70
141
70
141
70
141
70
141
3
134
269
40,288
134
269
40,288
134
269
40,288
134
269
40,288
134
269
6
213,313
361
721
36,857
73
145
213,313
609
1,219
213,313
609
1,219
213,313
609
1,219
213,313
609
1,219
213,313
609
1,219
3
36,857
123
246
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
60A
Dan W. Williams Hall Annex
1984
1390 E. University Ave.
ACAD - LAB
11,926
24
47
11,926
40
80
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
56
Dove Hall
1936
1305 North Horseshoe
ADMIN
13,476
23
46
13,476
39
77
13,476
39
77
13,476
39
77
13,476
39
77
13,476
39
77
2
541
Ed and Harold Foreman Engineering Complex
1997
1060 Frenger Mall
ACAD - LAB
84,526
167
333
84,526
282
564
84,526
282
564
84,526
282
564
84,526
282
564
84,526
282
564
6
338
Educational Services Center
1978
1780 East University Ave.
ADMIN
50,366
85
170
50,366
144
288
50,366
144
288
50,366
144
288
50,366
144
288
50,366
144
288
4
363
Engineering Complex I
1980
1025 Stewart St.
ACAD - LAB
55,585
110
219
55,585
185
371
55,585
185
371
55,585
185
371
55,585
185
371
55,585
185
371
6
34
Foster Hall
1930
1200 S. Horseshoe
ACAD - LAB
98,084
193
387
98,084
327
654
98,084
327
654
98,084
327
654
98,084
327
654
98,084
327
654
6
154
Garcia Annex
1949
3024 Locust St.
ADMIN
275
Garcia Residence Hall
1968
1715 International Mall
HOUSING
28,895
49
98
28,895
83
165
28,895
83
165
28,895
83
165
28,895
83
165
28,895
83
165
7
208,371
274
548
208,371
463
926
208,371
463
926
208,371
463
926
208,371
463
926
208,371
463
926
3
188
Gardiner Hall
1957
1255 North Horseshoe
ACAD - LAB
63,224
125
249
63,224
211
421
63,224
211
421
63,224
211
421
63,224
211
421
63,224
211
421
2
244
Gerald Thomas Hall
1963
940 College Dr.
ACAD - LAB
139,950
276
552
139,950
467
933
139,950
467
933
139,950
467
933
139,950
467
933
139,950
467
933
2
10
Goddard Hall
1913
1100 South Horseshoe
ACAD - LAB
31,942
63
126
31,942
106
213
31,942
106
213
31,942
106
213
31,942
106
213
31,942
106
213
2
288
Guthrie Hall
1968
1325 International Mall
ACAD - CLASSROOM
41,531
70
140
41,531
119
237
41,531
119
237
41,531
119
237
41,531
119
237
41,531
119
237
3
172
Hadley Hall
1953
2855 Weddell St.
ADMIN
38,199
65
129
38,199
109
218
38,199
109
218
38,199
109
218
38,199
109
218
38,199
109
218
2
323
Hardman Hall
1974
2902 McFie Circle
ACAD - CLASSROOM
30,370
51
103
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
590
Health and Social Services Building
2003
1335 International Mall
ACAD - CLASSROOM
64,663
109
219
64,663
185
370
64,663
185
370
64,663
185
370
64,663
185
370
64,663
185
370
3
249
Herschell Zohn Theatre
1963
3014 McFie Circle
ACAD - CLASSROOM
23,572
40
80
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
250
Jacobs Hall
1963
2908 McFie Circle
ACAD - LAB
321
James B. Delamater Activity Center
1973
1600 Stewart St.
ACAD - GYMNASIUM
22,433
44
88
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
114,109
193
386
114,109
326
652
114,109
326
652
114,109
326
652
114,109
326
652
114,109
326
652
7
190
Jett Annex
1957
1025 Frenger Mall
ACAD - LAB
6,529
13
26
6,529
22
44
6,529
22
44
6,529
22
44
6,529
22
44
6,529
22
44
6
189
Jett Hall
1956
1040 South Horseshoe
ACAD - LAB
84,091
166
332
84,091
280
561
84,091
280
561
84,091
280
561
84,091
280
561
84,091
280
561
2
397
John Whitlock Hernandez Hall
1988
3035 S. Espina St.
ACAD - LAB
44,107
87
174
44,107
147
294
44,107
147
294
44,107
147
294
44,107
147
294
44,107
147
294
6
33
Kent Hall
1929
1280 E. University Ave.
ACAD - CLASSROOM
20,473
35
69
20,473
58
117
20,473
58
117
20,473
58
117
20,473
58
117
20,473
58
117
2
368
Knox Hall
1981
2980 South Espina St.
ACAD - LAB
75,737
149
299
75,737
252
505
75,737
252
505
75,737
252
505
75,737
252
505
75,737
252
505
6
83
Milton Hall
1941
2915 McFie Circle
ACAD - CLASSROOM
99,311
168
336
99,311
284
567
99,311
284
567
99,311
284
567
99,311
284
567
99,311
284
567
3
121,457
160
319
121,457
270
540
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
56,153
95
190
56,153
160
321
56,153
160
321
56,153
160
321
56,153
160
321
56,153
160
321
2
260
Monagle Residence Hall
1965
1525 International Mall
HOUSING
389
Music Building
1983
1075 North Horseshoe
ACAD - CLASSROOM
330
New Mexico Dept. of Agriculture
1975
3190 South Espina St.
IO
28,288
48
96
28,288
81
162
28,288
81
162
28,288
81
162
28,288
81
162
28,288
81
162
6
287
O'Donnell Hall
1968
1220 Stewart St.
ACAD - LAB
93,858
185
370
93,858
313
626
93,858
313
626
93,858
313
626
93,858
313
626
93,858
313
626
6
269
OFS Central Heating Plant
1966
3060 Sweet St.
POM
21,071
36
71
21,071
60
120
21,071
60
120
21,071
60
120
21,071
60
120
21,071
60
120
6
284
Pan American Center
1968
1810 E. University Ave.
AUX
215,633
365
729
215,633
616
1,232
215,633
616
1,232
215,633
616
1,232
215,633
616
1,232
215,633
616
1,232
4
604
Pinon Hall
2006
1760 E. University
HOUSING
263
PSL, Clinton P. Anderson Hall
1965
1050 Stewart St.
ACAD - LAB
97,395
128
256
97,395
216
433
97,395
216
433
97,395
216
433
97,395
216
433
97,395
216
433
3
135,847
268
536
135,847
453
906
135,847
453
906
135,847
453
906
135,847
453
906
135,847
453
906
6
248
Regents Row
1962
3034 McFie Circle
ADMIN
82,386
139
279
82,386
235
471
82,386
235
471
82,386
235
471
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
185
Rhodes-Garrett-Hamiel Res Hall
1955
2735 Jordan St.
HOUSING
18,522
24
49
18,522
41
82
18,522
41
82
18,522
41
82
18,522
41
82
18,522
41
82
3
79
Rhodes-Garrett-Hamiel Res Hall
1941
2715 Jordan St.
HOUSING
19,604
26
52
19,604
44
87
19,604
44
87
19,604
44
87
19,604
44
87
19,604
44
87
3
80
Rhodes-Garrett-Hamiel Res Hall
1941
2725 Jordan St.
HOUSING
27,709
36
73
27,709
62
123
27,709
62
123
27,709
62
123
27,709
62
123
27,709
62
123
3
391
Science Hall
1987
1290 Frenger Mall
ACAD - LAB
114,918
227
453
114,918
383
766
114,918
383
766
114,918
383
766
114,918
383
766
114,918
383
766
6
551
Skeen Hall
1999
945 College Dr.
ACAD - LAB
135,896
268
536
135,896
453
906
135,896
453
906
135,896
453
906
135,896
453
906
135,896
453
906
2
365
Speech Building
1981
1405 International Mall
ACAD - CLASSROOM
28,322
48
96
28,322
81
162
28,322
81
162
28,322
81
162
28,322
81
162
28,322
81
162
3
261
Student Health Center
1965
3080 Breland Dr.
AUX
16,456
28
56
16,456
47
94
16,456
47
94
16,456
47
94
16,456
47
94
16,456
47
94
7
301
Thomas & Brown Hall
1972
1125 Frenger Mall
ACAD - LAB
49,711
98
196
49,711
166
331
49,711
166
331
49,711
166
331
49,711
166
331
49,711
166
331
6
276
Walden Hall
1966
1200 Frenger Mall
ACAD - LAB
36,259
72
143
36,259
121
242
36,259
121
242
36,259
121
242
36,259
121
242
36,259
121
242
6
2745 South Espina St.
35
William B. Conroy Honors Center
1907
585
Wooten Hall
2002
ACAD - CLASSROOM
ACAD - LAB
9,505
16
32
9,505
27
54
9,505
27
54
9,505
27
54
9,505
27
54
9,505
27
54
2
29,600
58
117
29,600
99
197
29,600
99
197
29,600
99
197
29,600
99
197
29,600
99
197
6
32
Young Hall
1928
1300 South Horseshoe
ACAD - CLASSROOM
12,713
21
43
12,713
36
73
12,713
36
73
12,713
36
73
12,713
36
73
12,713
36
73
2
461
Zuhl Library
1992
2911 McFie Circle
ACAD
95,952
162
324
95,952
274
548
95,952
274
548
95,952
274
548
95,952
274
548
95,952
274
548
7
Page 1
Notes
Official_Building_Master_List
Totals
3,769,275
6,600
13,200
3,692,900
10,925
21,851
3,522,660
10,493
20,986
3,459,118
10,281
20,562
3,376,732
10,046
20,092
3,376,732
10,046
20,092
FIVE-YEAR ADDITIONS
05-01
Arts Complex - Phase 1
2014
-
ACAD - CLASSROOM
234,000
669
1,337
234,000
669
1,337
234,000
669
1,337
234,000
669
1,337
234,000
669
1,337
2
05-02
Institute for Public Policy (Domenici Center)
2014
-
ACAD - CLASSROOM
55,980
160
320
55,980
160
320
55,980
160
320
55,980
160
320
55,980
160
320
3
05-03
Student Service Facility, Ph. 1
2014
-
ADMIN
37,500
107
214
37,500
107
214
37,500
107
214
37,500
107
214
37,500
107
214
3
05-04
Native American Cultural Center
2014
-
ACAD - CLASSROOM
26,900
77
154
26,900
77
154
26,900
77
154
26,900
77
154
26,900
77
154
7
05-05
Tech. Lab/Classroom Facility
2014
-
ACAD - CLASSROOM/LAB
60,000
200
400
60,000
200
400
60,000
200
400
60,000
200
400
60,000
200
400
3
05-08
Bookstore
2014
-
AUX
35,000
100
200
35,000
100
200
35,000
100
200
35,000
100
200
35,000
100
200
3
60,000
171
343
60,000
171
343
60,000
171
343
60,000
171
343
60,000
171
343
6
7,387
21
42
7,387
21
42
7,387
21
42
7,387
21
42
7,387
21
42
3
55,628
124
247
55,628
124
247
55,628
124
247
55,628
124
247
55,628
124
247
7
572,395
1,629
572,395
1,629
572,395
1,629
3,257
572,395
1,629
3,257
572,395
1,629
3,257
05-09
NMDA Building Renovations and Additions
2014
-
IO
05-10
Addition to the Health and Social Services Building
2014
-
ACAD - CLASSROOM
05-13
Chamisa Dorms, Ph. 2
2014
-
HOUSING
Totals
0
0
0
3,257
3,257
1
2
NOTES:
1
following demolition of Hardman Hall (323), Jacobs Hall (250), and the Zohn Theatre (249)
2
SF based on assumption that Ph. 2 will double the size of the facility
TEN-YEAR ADDITIONS
10-01
West Mixed Use/Graduate Housing
2019
-
HOUSING
64,800
144
288
64,800
144
288
64,800
144
288
64,800
144
288
3
1
10-02
East Mixed Use/Graduate Housing, Ph. 1
2019
-
HOUSING
116,100
258
516
116,100
258
516
116,100
258
516
116,100
258
516
3
1,2
10-03
Student Service Facility, Ph. 2
2019
-
ADMIN
37,500
107
214
37,500
107
214
37,500
107
214
37,500
107
214
3
3,4
10-04
New Undergraduate Housing
2019
-
HOUSING
56,520
126
251
56,520
126
251
56,520
126
251
56,520
126
251
3
3,5
10-06
New Married Student Housing
2019
-
HOUSING
165,660
368
736
165,660
368
736
165,660
368
736
165,660
368
736
7
5
10-07
Student Activities Expansion
2019
-
AUX
87,160
249
498
87,160
249
498
87,160
249
498
87,160
249
498
7
6,9
10-08
New Academic Bulidings
2019
-
ACAD - CLASSROOM
263,250
752
1,504
263,250
752
1,504
263,250
752
1,504
263,250
752
1,504
6
1,7
10-14
Jordan Street Gateway
2019
-
AUX/Housing
190,000
422
844
190,000
422
844
190,000
422
844
190,000
422
844
3
8
10-16
Arts Complex - Phase II (Visual Arts)
2019
-
ACAD - CLASSROOM
71,500
204
409
71,500
204
409
71,500
204
409
71,500
204
409
2
5,261
1,052,490
5,261
1,052,490
Totals
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,052,490
2,631
5,261
1,052,490
2,631
2,631
2,631
5,261
NOTES:
1
SF based on building footprint for three stories
2
following demolition of Delta Zeta and Zeta Tau Alpha sorority houses (213, 163)
3
following demolition of Monagle Hall (260)
4
SF based on assumption that Ph. 2 will double the size of the facility
5
SF based on footprint for three stories
6
7
following demolition of Animal Science (376, 241, 198), Tejada Extension Annex (245), Animal Husbandry Barn (162), Sheep Barns (194), Cattle Feed Barn (240), Small Animal Lab (246), Livestock Judging Pavillion (195) and Neale Hall (164)
following demolition of Rentfrow Gymnasium (211)
8
following demolition of D.W. Williams Hall and Annex (60, 60A)
9
SF based on building footprint for single story
FIFTEEN-YEAR ADDITIONS
15-01
East Mixed Use/Graduate Housing, Ph. 2
2024
-
HOUSING
117,720
262
523
117,720
262
523
117,720
262
523
3
1,2
15-02
Zuhl Library Expansion
2024
-
ACAD
110,850
317
633
110,850
317
633
110,850
317
633
7
1,3
15-03
Academic/Lab Building
2024
-
ACAD - LAB
15-04
Academic Building
2024
-
ACAD - CLASSROOM
26,220
87
175
26,220
87
175
26,220
87
175
6
1
117,600
336
672
117,600
336
672
117,600
336
672
7
1
15-05
Academic/Lab Building
2024
-
ACAD - LAB
218,190
727
1,455
218,190
727
1,455
218,190
727
1,455
6
1,4
15-06
Research/Lab Building
2024
-
ACAD - LAB
233,250
778
1,555
233,250
778
1,555
233,250
778
1,555
6
1,5
1
15-07
Academic Lab Building
2024
-
ACAD - LAB
90,930
303
606
90,930
303
606
90,930
303
606
7
15-14
O'Donnell Hall - Phase II
2024
-
ACAD - CLASSROOM
35,000
100
200
35,000
100
200
35,000
100
200
6
15-15
Arts Complex - Phase III (Performance Hall)
2024
-
ACAD - CLASSROOM
76,500
219
437
76,500
219
437
76,500
219
437
2
6,256
1,026,260
6,256
1,026,260
Totals
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,026,260
3,128
3,128
3,128
6,256
NOTES:
1
SF based on building footprint for three stories
2
following demolition of Chi Omega sorority houses (268)
3
following demolition of Breland Hall Addition (north part of 184)
4
following demolition of Bull Barn (193), Heardsmen Residence (199), Stucky Hall (282), Animal Husbandry (290), and the Feeding Research Building (303)
5
6
7
following demolition of PSL West Shop (280), Guardhouse (281), Machine Shop (216), Rocket Shop (243) and East Shop (279)
following demolition of East and West Greek Complexes (271, 272, 273, 274, 414), Wells Hall (355), Cosmic Ray Lab (398), Theatre Scene Shop (385), Housing Warehouse (467), Ag Service Storage (316) and Flammable Storage (320), SF based on building footprint for two stories
SF based on building footprint for two stories
TWENTY-YEAR ADDITIONS
20-01
Academic/Lab Building
2029
-
ACAD - LAB
118,260
394
788
118,260
394
788
7
1,2
20-02
Academic/Research Building
2029
-
ACAD - CLASSROOM
686,350
1,961
3,922
686,350
1,961
3,922
6
3,4
20-03
Academic/Research Building
2029
-
ACAD - CLASSROOM
273,440
781
1,563
273,440
781
1,563
7
3,5
Page 2
Official_Building_Master_List
20-04
Family Housing, Ph. 2
2029
-
HOUSING
20-08
Arts Complex - Phase IV (Music, Dance, CMI)
2029
-
ACAD -CLASSROOM
Totals
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
255,064
567
1,134
255,064
567
1,134
7
36,000
103
206
36,000
103
206
2
1,369,114
3,806
7,612
1,369,114
3,806
7,612
3
NOTES:
1
SF based on building footprint for three stories
2
following demolition of Regent's Row Dorms (248)
3
SF based on building footprint for two stories
4
following demolition of Sutherland Village (206)
5
following demolition of Tombaugh Observatory (317, 318, 319) and PE Restroom (314)
BEYOND TWENTY-YEAR ADDITIONS
25-01
Academic/Research Buildings
2034
-
ACAD - CLASSROOMS
864,366
2,470
4,939
9
1,4
25-02
Academic/Research Buildings
2034
-
ACAD - CLASSROOMS
439,110
1,255
2,509
10
2,4
25-03
Academic/Research Buildings
2034
-
ACAD - CLASSROOMS
338,655
968
1,935
10
3,4
25-04
Arts Complex - Phase V
2034
-
ACAD - CLASSROOMS
251,388
718
1,437
2
4
Totals
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,893,519
5,410
10,820
3,769,275
6,600
13,200
4,265,295
12,554
25,108
5,147,545
14,752
29,504
6,110,263
17,669
35,337
7,396,991
21,239
42,479
9,290,510
26,649
53,299
NOTES:
1
following demolition of Tom Fort Village and Cole Village
2
following demolition of Cervantes Housing
3
following demolition of Genesis Center (394, 395) and Academic Research Center ( 412)
4
SF based on building footprint for three stories
OVERALL TOTALS:
POM - Productions and Operations Management
IO - Independent Operation
AUX - Auxiliary
Page 3
OPINION OF PROBABLE
CONSTRUCTION COST
BASIS FOR ESTIMATE
CODE A ( No design completed)
CODE B (Preliminary design)
CODE C (Finished design)
COMPUTED BY: DHW
CHECKED BY:
6/16/09
SUMMARY
1030 ton dbl eff absorption chiller
2000 ton duplex centrif chiller
1000 ton glycol chiller
ice storage tanks
1000 ton cooling tower
2000 gpm CHW pump
4000 gpm CHW pump
3000 gpm CW pump
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
2009 Chilled Water Capital Costs
QUANTITY
Proj. No.
Dept.
Sheet No.
MATERIAL
No.
UNIT
UNITS
MEAS.
PER
LABOR
TOTAL
UNIT
0874.00
Mechanical
PER
TOTAL
UNIT
EQUIP
TOTAL COST
PER
UNIT
2
2
1
43
4
2
2
4
ea
ea
ea
ea
ea
ea
lf
lf
$650,000.00 $1,300,000.00 $81,000.00
$553,000.00 $1,106,000.00 $23,100.00
$250,000.00
$250,000.00 $17,500.00
$14,500.00
$623,500.00
$500.00
$137,375.00
$549,500.00 $8,500.00
$20,900.00
$41,800.00 $1,300.00
$36,750.00
$73,500.00 $2,250.00
$22,050.00
$88,200.00 $1,550.00
10000
1
ton
ea
$280.00 $2,800,000.00
$500,000.00
$500,000.00
controls
6000
ton
$101.00
$606,000.00
$606,000
secondary plant building
5402
sf
$180.00
$972,360.00
$972,360
plant piping
repipe existing plant headers
$162,000.00
$46,200.00
$17,500.00
$21,500.00
$34,000.00
$2,600.00
$4,500.00
$6,200.00
$1,462,000
$1,152,200
$267,500
$645,000
$583,500
$44,400
$78,000
$94,400
$2,800,000
$500,000
distribution piping (see utility tunnel system)
electrical (see electrical power system)
$9,205,360
Subtotal
Subcontractor Overhead, 10%
Subcontractor Profit, 10%
Subtotal
$920,536
$1,012,590
$11,138,486
General Contractor Overhead, 10%
General Contractor Profit, 5%
Subtotal
$1,113,849
$612,617
$12,864,951
General Contractor Liability, 1.5%
General Contractor Bond, 2.5%
General Contractor Tax, 5.5%
General Contractor Total
Soft Costs, 30%
Escalation, 3% per year
Total
$192,974
$321,624
$735,875
$14,115,424
$4,234,627
yrs
$18,350,051
OPINION OF PROBABLE
CONSTRUCTION COST
BASIS FOR ESTIMATE
CODE A ( No design completed)
CODE B (Preliminary design)
CODE C (Finished design)
COMPUTED BY: DHW
CHECKED BY:
6/16/09
SUMMARY
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
2014 Chilled Water Capital Costs
QUANTITY
No.
Dept.
PER
LABOR
TOTAL
0874.00
Mechanical
Sheet No.
MATERIAL
UNIT
UNITS
Proj. No.
PER
TOTAL
TOTAL COST
PER
MEAS.
UNIT
1
2
1
2
ea
ea
lf
lf
$553,000.00
$137,375.00
$36,750.00
$22,050.00
plant piping
2000
ton
$280.00
$560,000.00
$560,000
controls
2000
ton
$101.00
$202,000.00
$202,000
secondary plant building
1332
sf
$180.00
$239,760.00
$239,760
2000 ton duplex centrif chiller
1000 ton cooling tower
4000 gpm CHW pump
3000 gpm CW pump
UNIT
EQUIP
$553,000.00 $23,100.00
$274,750.00 $8,500.00
$36,750.00 $2,250.00
$44,100.00 $1,550.00
UNIT
$23,100.00
$17,000.00
$2,250.00
$3,100.00
$576,100
$291,750
$39,000
$47,200
distribution piping (see utility tunnel system)
electrical (see electrical power system)
$1,955,810
Subtotal
Subcontractor Overhead, 10%
Subcontractor Profit, 10%
Subtotal
$195,581
$215,139
$2,366,530
General Contractor Overhead, 10%
General Contractor Profit, 5%
Subtotal
$236,653
$130,159
$2,733,342
General Contractor Liability, 1.5%
General Contractor Bond, 2.5%
General Contractor Tax, 5.5%
General Contractor Total
Soft Costs, 30%
Escalation, 3% per year
Total
$41,000
$68,334
$156,347
$2,999,023
5
yrs
$899,707
$620,967
$4,519,697
OPINION OF PROBABLE
CONSTRUCTION COST
BASIS FOR ESTIMATE
CODE A ( No design completed)
CODE B (Preliminary design)
CODE C (Finished design)
COMPUTED BY: DHW
CHECKED BY:
6/16/09
SUMMARY
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
2019 Chilled Water Capital Costs
QUANTITY
No.
Dept.
MEAS.
PER
LABOR
TOTAL
UNIT
0874.00
Mechanical
Sheet No.
MATERIAL
UNIT
UNITS
2000 ton duplex centrif chiller
1000 ton cooling tower
4000 gpm CHW pump
3000 gpm CW pump
Proj. No.
PER
TOTAL
UNIT
$553,000.00 $1,106,000.00 $23,100.00
$137,375.00
$549,500.00 $8,500.00
$36,750.00
$73,500.00 $2,250.00
$22,050.00
$88,200.00 $1,550.00
EQUIP
TOTAL COST
PER
UNIT
2
4
2
4
ea
ea
lf
lf
$46,200.00
$34,000.00
$4,500.00
$6,200.00
$1,152,200
$583,500
$78,000
$94,400
plant piping
4000
ton
$280.00 $1,120,000.00
controls
4000
ton
$101.00
$404,000.00
$404,000
secondary plant building
2664
sf
$180.00
$479,520.00
$479,520
$1,120,000
distribution piping (see utility tunnel system)
electrical (see electrical power system)
$3,911,620
Subtotal
Subcontractor Overhead, 10%
Subcontractor Profit, 10%
Subtotal
$391,162
$430,278
$4,733,060
General Contractor Overhead, 10%
General Contractor Profit, 5%
Subtotal
$473,306
$260,318
$5,466,685
General Contractor Liability, 1.5%
General Contractor Bond, 2.5%
General Contractor Tax, 5.5%
General Contractor Total
Soft Costs, 30%
Escalation, 3% per year
Total
$82,000
$136,667
$312,694
$5,998,046
10
yrs
$1,799,414
$2,681,674
$10,479,134
OPINION OF PROBABLE
CONSTRUCTION COST
BASIS FOR ESTIMATE
CODE A ( No design completed)
CODE B (Preliminary design)
CODE C (Finished design)
COMPUTED BY: DHW
CHECKED BY:
6/16/09
SUMMARY
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
2024 Chilled Water Capital Costs
QUANTITY
Proj. No.
Dept.
Sheet No.
MATERIAL
LABOR
PER
TOTAL
EQUIP
TOTAL COST
No.
UNIT
PER
UNITS
MEAS.
UNIT
4
4
4
4
ea
ea
lf
lf
$553,000.00
$137,375.00
$36,750.00
$22,050.00
plant piping
4000
ton
$280.00
$1,120,000.00
$1,120,000
controls
8000
ton
$101.00
$808,000.00
$808,000
secondary plant building
2664
sf
$180.00
$479,520.00
$479,520
2000 ton duplex centrif chiller
1000 ton cooling tower
4000 gpm CHW pump
3000 gpm CW pump
TOTAL
0874.00
Mechanical
UNIT
$2,212,000.00 $23,100.00
$549,500.00 $8,500.00
$147,000.00 $2,250.00
$88,200.00 $1,550.00
PER
UNIT
$92,400.00
$34,000.00
$9,000.00
$6,200.00
$2,304,400
$583,500
$156,000
$94,400
distribution piping (see utility tunnel system)
electrical (see electrical power system)
$5,545,820
Subtotal
Subcontractor Overhead, 10%
Subcontractor Profit, 10%
Subtotal
$554,582
$610,040
$6,710,442
General Contractor Overhead, 10%
General Contractor Profit, 5%
Subtotal
$671,044
$369,074
$7,750,561
General Contractor Liability, 1.5%
General Contractor Bond, 2.5%
General Contractor Tax, 5.5%
General Contractor Total
Soft Costs, 30%
Escalation, 3% per year
Total
$116,258
$193,764
$443,332
$8,503,915
15
yrs
$2,551,175
$6,168,380
$17,223,470
OPINION OF PROBABLE
CONSTRUCTION COST
BASIS FOR ESTIMATE
CODE A ( No design completed)
CODE B (Preliminary design)
CODE C (Finished design)
COMPUTED BY: DHW
CHECKED BY:
6/16/09
SUMMARY
1030 ton dbl eff absorption chiller
2000 ton duplex centrif chiller
1000 ton glycol chiller
1000 ton cooling tower
2000 gpm CHW pump
4000 gpm CHW pump
3000 gpm CW pump
plant piping
controls
secondary plant building
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
2029 Chilled Water Capital Costs
QUANTITY
Proj. No.
Dept.
Sheet No.
MATERIAL
No.
UNIT
UNITS
MEAS.
PER
LABOR
TOTAL
UNIT
0874.00
Mechanical
PER
TOTAL
UNIT
$650,000.00 $1,300,000.00 $81,000.00
$553,000.00 $2,765,000.00 $23,100.00
$250,000.00
$250,000.00 $17,500.00
$137,375.00 $1,373,750.00 $8,500.00
$20,900.00
$41,800.00 $1,300.00
$36,750.00
$183,750.00 $2,250.00
$22,050.00
$220,500.00 $1,550.00
EQUIP
TOTAL COST
PER
UNIT
2
5
1
10
2
5
10
ea
ea
ea
ea
ea
lf
lf
6000
ton
$280.00 $1,680,000.00
$1,680,000
12000
ton
$101.00 $1,212,000.00
$1,212,000
3996
sf
$180.00
$719,280.00
$162,000.00
$115,500.00
$17,500.00
$85,000.00
$2,600.00
$11,250.00
$15,500.00
$1,462,000
$2,880,500
$267,500
$1,458,750
$44,400
$195,000
$236,000
$719,280
distribution piping (see utility tunnel system)
electrical (see electrical power system)
$10,155,430
Subtotal
Subcontractor Overhead, 10%
Subcontractor Profit, 10%
Subtotal
$1,015,543
$1,117,097
$12,288,070
General Contractor Overhead, 10%
General Contractor Profit, 5%
Subtotal
$1,228,807
$675,844
$14,192,721
General Contractor Liability, 1.5%
General Contractor Bond, 2.5%
General Contractor Tax, 5.5%
General Contractor Total
Soft Costs, 30%
Escalation, 3% per year
Total
$212,891
$354,818
$811,824
$15,572,254
20
yrs
$4,671,676
$16,318,859
$36,562,789
OPINION OF PROBABLE
CONSTRUCTION COST
BASIS FOR ESTIMATE
CODE A ( No design completed)
CODE B (Preliminary design)
CODE C (Finished design)
COMPUTED BY: DHW
CHECKED BY:
6/16/09
SUMMARY
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Arts Complex, Ph I - Initial CHW Delivery
QUANTITY
Dept.
UNIT
UNITS
MEAS.
2
100
2
ea
lf
ea
concrete slab
600
sf
electrical
controls
660
660
ton
ton
PER
LABOR
TOTAL
UNIT
PER
TOTAL
UNIT
$193,000.00 $386,000.00
$406.00
$40,600.00
$12,800.00
$25,600.00
$4.11
$2,466.00
$100.00
$50.00
$66,000.00
$33,000.00
0874.00
Mechanical
Sheet No.
MATERIAL
No.
330 ton air cooled recip chiller
10" supply and return piping
1500 gpm chilled water pump
EQUIP
TOTAL COST
PER
UNIT
$7,725.00
$15,450.00
$1,050.00
$2,100.00
$401,450
$40,600
$27,700
$7.56
$4,536.00
$7,002
$66,000
$33,000
$575,752
Subtotal
Subcontractor Overhead, 10%
Subcontractor Profit, 10%
Subtotal
$57,575
$63,333
$696,660
General Contractor Overhead, 10%
General Contractor Profit, 5%
Subtotal
$69,666
$38,316
$804,642
General Contractor Liability, 1.5%
General Contractor Bond, 2.5%
General Contractor Tax, 5.5%
General Contractor Total
Soft Costs, 15%
Escalation, 3% per year
Total
Proj. No.
$12,070
$20,116
$46,026
$882,853
2
yrs
$132,428
$61,831
$1,077,112
OPINION OF PROBABLE
CONSTRUCTION COST
BASIS FOR ESTIMATE
CODE A ( No design completed)
CODE B (Preliminary design)
CODE C (Finished design)
COMPUTED BY: DHW
CHECKED BY:
6/16/09
SUMMARY
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Bookstore - Initial CHW Delivery
QUANTITY
Proj. No.
Dept.
Sheet No.
MATERIAL
No.
UNIT
UNITS
PER
LABOR
TOTAL
0874.00
Mechanical
PER
TOTAL
TOTAL COST
PER
MEAS.
UNIT
100 ton air cooled recip chiller
4" supply and return piping
200 gpm chilled water pump
1
100
2
ea
lf
ea
$68,500.00
$232.00
$3,475.00
$68,500.00
$23,200.00
$6,950.00
$6,075.00
$6,075.00
$540.00
$1,080.00
$74,575
$23,200
$8,030
concrete slab
300
sf
$4.11
$1,233.00
$7.56
$2,268.00
$3,501
electrical
controls
100
100
ton
ton
$100.00
$50.00
$10,000.00
$5,000.00
UNIT
$10,000
$5,000
$124,306
Subtotal
Subcontractor Overhead, 10%
Subcontractor Profit, 10%
Subtotal
$12,431
$13,674
$150,410
General Contractor Overhead, 10%
General Contractor Profit, 5%
Subtotal
$15,041
$8,273
$173,724
General Contractor Liability, 1.5%
General Contractor Bond, 2.5%
General Contractor Tax, 5.5%
General Contractor Total
Soft Costs, 15%
Escalation, 3% per year
Total
UNIT
EQUIP
$2,606
$4,343
$9,937
$190,610
2
yrs
$28,591
$13,349
$232,551
OPINION OF PROBABLE
CONSTRUCTION COST
BASIS FOR ESTIMATE
CODE A ( No design completed)
CODE B (Preliminary design)
CODE C (Finished design)
COMPUTED BY: DHW
CHECKED BY:
6/16/09
SUMMARY
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Chamisa, Ph II - Initial CHW Delivery
QUANTITY
Proj. No.
Dept.
Sheet No.
MATERIAL
No.
UNIT
UNITS
PER
LABOR
TOTAL
0874.00
Mechanical
PER
TOTAL
TOTAL COST
PER
MEAS.
UNIT
130 ton air cooled recip chiller
6" supply and return piping
300 gpm chilled water pump
1
100
2
ea
lf
ea
$88,000.00
$290.00
$4,075.00
$88,000.00
$29,000.00
$8,150.00
$6,350.00
$6,350.00
$700.00
$1,400.00
$94,350
$29,000
$9,550
concrete slab
300
sf
$4.11
$1,233.00
$7.56
$2,268.00
$3,501
electrical
controls
130
130
ton
ton
$100.00
$50.00
$13,000.00
$6,500.00
UNIT
$13,000
$6,500
$155,901
Subtotal
Subcontractor Overhead, 10%
Subcontractor Profit, 10%
Subtotal
$15,590
$17,149
$188,640
General Contractor Overhead, 10%
General Contractor Profit, 5%
Subtotal
$18,864
$10,375
$217,879
General Contractor Liability, 1.5%
General Contractor Bond, 2.5%
General Contractor Tax, 5.5%
General Contractor Total
Soft Costs, 15%
Escalation, 3% per year
Total
UNIT
EQUIP
$3,268
$5,447
$12,463
$239,057
2
yrs
$35,859
$16,742
$291,658
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage 2 - 06-16-09
Utility Net Present Value Analysis
Summary
"
"
"
"
!
%
&
'
#
#
#
#
$
$
$
$
+ $
()*
.
.
.
! '& &/
#
.
&'
% !&% %%
.
/'
/
. / &'!
.
!
%
.'! !''
'
.!' %&
&/& /%/
.
%
.
'
.
&
.
!! !
.
'
.
'' %
.
2
%&
.
.
%
$
"
-
!
!
0& 1
0 1
0& 1
,
,
!
& ' !
.
&&
%
. !
&
!
. %& &''
"
3
/#
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage 2 - 06-16-09
Utility Net Present Value Analysis
Scenario 1
! "#
$% &# ! " ' " ( #) &#$
! # )#"
# ! #(
$% +!, - $ .
-#
$ .& ) ,
, &/ " &! & !%0
#* &! "
3
9
4
:
6
5
8
7
3
33
3
39
34
3:
36
35
38
37
3
9
4
:
$8,214,112
$8,214,112
$8,214,112
$8,214,112
$8,214,112
$8,455,265
$8,455,265
$8,455,265
$8,455,265
$8,455,265
$8,827,196
$8,827,196
$8,827,196
$8,827,196
$8,827,196
$9,346,643
$9,346,643
$9,346,643
$9,346,643
$9,346,643
$9,946,761
$9,946,761
$9,946,761
$9,946,761
$9,946,761
$10,838,691
!
' !)
!
1, ) !
& ) !
2 3.456.36
29.8
.5
25.643.44
233.565.48
23 .756. 4
23 .63 .3
#!
,
#!
2 7.67 . 5
28. 34.33
28. 34.33
28. 34.33
28. 34.33
23 . 5:.78:
28.4::. 6:
28.4::. 6:
28.4::. 6:
28.4::. 6:
236.468.696
28.8 5.376
28.8 5.376
28.8 5.376
28.8 5.376
2 3.334.3 9
27.946.649
27.946.649
27.946.649
27.946.649
29:.:99.3 3
27.746.563
27.746.563
27.746.563
27.746.563
23 .898.673
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage 2 - 06-16-09
Utility Net Present Value Analysis
Scenario 2
!"! # $% "
! ! &' (%"#" $! )!$ * %+ (%&! ! # % +%$!
%"# %* ! &' -#. / ! & "
/% ! & " ( + ."
. (0 "!$ ! !(# ( #'1
%,!(#!$ !
4
5
6
;
:
9
7
8
4
5
6
;
:
9
7
8
4
4
44
45
46
4;
$8,296,297
$8,296,297
$8,296,297
$8,296,297
$8,296,297
$8,530,348
$8,530,348
$8,530,348
$8,530,348
$8,530,348
$8,895,845
$8,895,845
$8,895,845
$8,895,845
$8,895,845
$9,404,245
$9,404,245
$9,404,245
$9,404,245
$9,404,245
$9,994,764
$9,994,764
$9,994,764
$9,994,764
$9,994,764
$10,877,177
#
)!"#+! #"
2. +! #
! (!+! #
345 678 967
35 74 94
35 74 94
3
7 7 66
3
6:4 :
3 4 :68 7
%#
.
%"#
35 97: 6;
37 48: 489
37 48: 489
37 48: 489
37 48: 489
3 4 5; :7
37 ;5 567
37 ;5 567
37 ;5 567
37 ;5 567
3 4 9 : ;:;
37 78; 76;
37 78; 76;
37 78; 76;
37 78; 76;
34 4 4 :7;
38 6 6 46;
38 6 6 46;
38 6 6 46;
38 6 6 46;
356 : 946
38 886 9:6
38 886 9:6
38 886 9:6
38 886 9:6
3 799 99
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage 2 - 06-16-09
Utility Net Present Value Analysis
Scenario 3
!"#" $ %& !#
" "!'( )&#$# %"! *"% +!&, )&'" "! $ & ,&%"
&#$ &+ "!'( .$/!0 " ' #1
0& "! ' #1 ) , /#
/!)2 #"% " ")$! ) $(3
!&-")$"% " !
6
9
:
7
8
;
6
66
6
6
6
69
6:
67
68
6;
6
9
$8,046,323
$8,046,323
$8,046,323
$8,046,323
$8,046,323
$8,287,476
$8,287,476
$8,287,476
$8,287,476
$8,287,476
$8,659,408
$8,659,408
$8,659,408
$8,659,408
$8,659,408
$9,178,855
$9,178,855
$9,178,855
$9,178,855
$9,178,855
$9,778,972
$9,778,972
$9,778,972
$9,778,972
$9,778,972
$10,670,903
$
*"#$," $#
4/ ," $
" )"," $
56718 617
5 18
17
571: 61
56 18 81
56 1 9 16:
581;;81
&$
/
&#$
5 918:81
581 :1
581 :1
581 :1
581 :1
56 16 816;:
581 871 7:
581 871 7:
581 871 7:
581 871 7:
56:1
18 8
581:9;1 8
581:9;1 8
581:9;1 8
581:9;1 8
56;1;871 ;9
5;16781899
5;16781899
5;16781899
5;16781899
5 ;1 ;1
5;17781;7
5;17781;7
5;17781;7
5;17781;7
56 1:7 1;
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage 2 - 06-16-09
Utility Net Present Value Analysis
Scenario 4
! "#$%$!& '( #%
$!$#)* +(%&% '$# ,$' -#(. +()$!$# & (! .('$
(%& (- !$#)* 0&1#2 !$ ) %
2( $# ) % + ."1%
"1#+3 %$' $ $+&# + &*4
#(/$+&$' $ #
:
9
<
;
8
7
:
9
<
;
8
7
:
:
::
:
:
:9
$8,128,509
$8,128,509
$8,128,509
$8,128,509
$8,128,509
$8,362,560
$8,362,560
$8,362,560
$8,362,560
$8,362,560
$8,728,057
$8,728,057
$8,728,057
$8,728,057
$8,728,057
$9,236,456
$9,236,456
$9,236,456
$9,236,456
$9,236,456
$9,826,976
$9,826,976
$9,826,976
$9,826,976
$9,826,976
$10,709,389
"&
51 ".$!&
$" +$.$!&
!,$%&.$!&%
6 78 9
8
6 8: ;:
6 8: ;:
6
<:7 <
68 : 7<
68 8<< :9
(&
!!1
(%&
6:; 7< 8 ;
68 :8 9 7
68 :8 9 7
68 :8 9 7
68 :8 9 7
6 : 8 :8
68 <: 9<
68 <: 9<
68 <: 9<
68 <: 9<
6 : 9 8 ;;;
68 ;:8 9;
68 ;:8 9;
68 ;:8 9;
68 ;:8 9;
6: 8<9 < <
67 : < 9<
67 : < 9<
67 : < 9<
67 : < 9<
6:< 8
8<
67 8:< 7;<
67 8:< 7;<
67 8:< 7;<
67 8:< 7;<
6 ; 7 87
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage 2 - 06-16-09
Utility Net Present Value Analysis
Scenario 5
#$ %"
!"
! & ! ' "( %"#
" ("!
" "'
#$ * + , # ,"
# -% ( +
+ %. ! % % $/
") % !
8
5
3
2
6
9
4
7
8
88
8
85
83
82
86
89
84
87
8
5
3
2
$8,214,112
$8,214,112
$8,214,112
$8,214,112
$8,214,112
$8,455,265
$8,455,265
$8,455,265
$8,455,265
$8,455,265
$8,827,196
$8,827,196
$8,827,196
$8,827,196
$8,827,196
$9,346,643
$9,346,643
$9,346,643
$9,346,643
$9,346,643
$9,946,761
$9,946,761
$9,946,761
$9,946,761
$9,946,761
$10,838,691
&
(
0+ (
% (
1 2-343-3
14-934-
14-6 9-8
19-638-33
188-36 -86
188-79 -3
"
+
"
155-674-28
14- 83-88
14- 83-88
14- 83-88
14- 83-88
189- 5-362
14-322- 62
14-322- 62
14-322- 62
14-322- 62
189-323-586
14-4 9-876
14-4 9-876
14-4 9-876
14-4 9-876
186-744- 45
17-536-635
17-536-635
17-536-635
17-536-635
155-548-5 8
17-736-968
17-736-968
17-736-968
17-736-968
18 -454-678
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage 2 - 06-16-09
Utility Net Present Value Analysis
Scenario 6
! " #$ !
%& '$!"! # ( # ) $* '$%
" $ *$#
$!" $)
%& ,"- . % !
.$
% ! ' * -!
- '/ ! # '" ' "&0
$+ '" #
3
8
5
9
:
4
7
6
3
8
5
9
:
4
7
6
3
3
33
38
35
39
$8,296,297
$8,296,297
$8,296,297
$8,296,297
$8,296,297
$8,530,348
$8,530,348
$8,530,348
$8,530,348
$8,530,348
$8,895,845
$8,895,845
$8,895,845
$8,895,845
$8,895,845
$9,404,245
$9,404,245
$9,404,245
$9,404,245
$9,404,245
$9,994,764
$9,994,764
$9,994,764
$9,994,764
$9,994,764
$10,877,177
"
( !"*
"!
1- * "
' * "
234 564 677
27 457 3
27 :34 3
28 73 43
2
3:
:
2 3 488 :
$"
-
$!"
289 465 379
27 36: 364
27 36: 364
27 36: 364
27 36: 364
2 4 347 957
27 98 857
27 98 857
27 98 857
27 98 857
2 4 933 6:9
27 769 759
27 769 759
27 769 759
27 769 759
2 8 335 6:9
26 5 5 359
26 5 5 359
26 5 5 359
26 5 5 359
288 677 935
26 665 4:5
26 665 4:5
26 665 4:5
26 665 4:5
2 744 44
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage 2 - 06-16-09
Utility Net Present Value Analysis
Scenario 7
!"! # $% "
! ! &' (%"#" $! )!$ * %+ (%&! ! # % +%$!
%"# %* ! &' -#. / ! & "0
/% ! & "0 ( + ."
. (1 "!$ ! !(# ( #'2
%,!(#!$ !
9
5
7
:
6
8
9
99
9
9
9
95
97
9:
96
98
9
5
$8,214,112
$8,214,112
$8,214,112
$8,214,112
$8,214,112
$8,455,265
$8,455,265
$8,455,265
$8,455,265
$8,455,265
$8,659,408
$8,659,408
$8,659,408
$8,659,408
$8,659,408
$9,178,855
$9,178,855
$9,178,855
$9,178,855
$9,178,855
$9,778,972
$9,778,972
$9,778,972
$9,778,972
$9,778,972
$10,670,903
#
)!"#+! #"
3. +! #
! (!+! #
4 50 6 0
4705: 065
0:
4990 7 097
.
4
460: 60
4 06
%#
49 079 09
%"#
0786059
460 9 099
460 9 099
460 9 099
460 9 099
49:0
0 75
460 550 75
460 550 75
460 550 75
460 550 75
4950
0 56
4607580 6
4607580 6
4607580 6
4607580 6
49 088805:5
4809:60655
4809:60655
4809:60655
4809:60655
4 06590
480::608:
480::608:
480::608:
480::608:
49 07: 08
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage 2 - 06-16-09
Utility Net Present Value Analysis
Scenario 8
!"#$# % &' "$
# #"() *'$%$ &#" +#& ,"'- *'(# #" % ' -'&#
'$% ', #"() /%0"1 # ( $
1' #" ( $ * -!0$
!0"*2 $#& # #*%" * %)3
"'.#*%#& # "
6
:
;
7
9
8
6
:
;
7
9
8
6
6
66
6
6
6:
$8,296,297
$8,296,297
$8,296,297
$8,296,297
$8,296,297
$8,530,348
$8,530,348
$8,530,348
$8,530,348
$8,530,348
$8,728,057
$8,728,057
$8,728,057
$8,728,057
$8,728,057
$9,236,456
$9,236,456
$9,236,456
$9,236,456
$9,236,456
$9,826,976
$9,826,976
$9,826,976
$9,826,976
$9,826,976
$10,709,389
!%
+#$%-# %$
40 !-# %
#! *#-# %
567 87 899
59 7 9 6
5; :7 9:
5 96 76
5
;6 ;
5 6 9 9 ;:
'%
0
'$%
5 : 78 69:
59 68; 687
59 68; 687
59 68; 687
59 68; 687
5 7 679 : 9
59 :
9
59 :
9
59 :
9
59 :
9
5 : 68 7
59 769 :7
59 769 :7
59 769 :7
59 769 :7
5
:7 7;
58 6 ; :;
58 6 ; :;
58 6 ; :;
58 6 ; :;
5
87 79;
58 96; 87;
58 96; 87;
58 96; 87;
58 96; 87;
5 7 8 98
New Mexico State University
Utility Development Plan
Stage 2 - 06-16-09
Simple Payback for Ice Storage Facility
Assumptions:
Ice Storage Facility consists of one 1000 ton
glycol chiller and 43 312 ton-hr tanks for a
total of 13,188 ton-hrs of ice storage with a
discharge capacity of 4310 tons
The below numbers are reflective of on peak
operation under EPE proposed rate 26 and
are derived from the cogeneration model
included in this report
The below numbers are a product of an
11,000 ton total campus peak load
The figures below represent a preliminary
feasibility study only, thus warranting a
sensitivity study for optimization
Annual Avoided
Electrical
Demand
Annual Avoided OnPeak Electrical
Consumption
-$90,692
-$122,557
1000 Ton Glycol Chiller:
43 Ice Storage Tanks:
Plant Piping:
Subtotal:
Contractor O&P:
Subtotal:
Contractor Liability, Bond, Tax:
Contractor Total:
Soft Costs:
Total:
Simple Payback Period (years):
Annual Cost of
Production (offpeak charging)
$45,460
$250,000
$623,500
$80,000
$953,500
$190,700
$1,144,200
$108,699
$1,252,899
$187,935
$1,440,834
8.6
Total Annual
Savings
$167,789
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 437 US gpm
Vel: 4.857 ft/sec
dP: 0.74 psi
Ø: 5 in
Flow: 117 US gpm
Vel: 1.878 ft/sec
dP: 0.18 psi
Ø: 16 in
Flow: 3688 US gpm
Vel: 6.701 ft/sec
dP: 8.398 psi
Ø: 16 in
Flow: 4140 US gpm
Vel: 7.524 ft/sec
dP: 9.084 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1016 US gpm
Vel: 2.914 ft/sec
dP: (5.421) psi
Ø: 4 in
Flow: 218 US gpm
Vel: 5.499 ft/sec
dP: (0.629) psi
Ø: 10 in
Flow: 1622 US gpm
Vel: 6.606 ft/sec
dP: 3.015 psi
Ø: 10 in
Flow: 1438 US gpm
Vel: 5.858 ft/sec
dP: (0.189) psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1728 US gpm
Vel: 4.957 ft/sec
dP: 6.576 psi
Hadley Hall
FCV @ 218 US gpm
dP: 39.16 psi
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 576.6
US gpm
Vel: 6.41
ft/sec
dP: 3.242
psi
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 542 US gpm
Vel: 6.025 ft/se
c
dP: 2.882 psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 8446 US gpm
P: 95.46 psi g
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 2414 US gpm
Vel: 6.926 ft/sec
dP: 14.74 psi
P: 54.92 psi g
P: 45.09 psi g
Ø: 10 in
Flow: 585.6 US gpm
Vel: 2.385 ft/sec
dP: 0.092 psi
Ø: 10 in
Flow: 630.2 US gpm
Vel: 2.566 ft/sec
dP: 5.824 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 2186 US gpm
Vel: 6.272 ft/sec
dP: 2.827 psi
Ø: 10 in
Flow: 662.6 US gpm
Vel: 2.698 ft/sec
dP: 5.841 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 421 US gpm
Vel: 2.702 ft/sec
dP: 0.101 psi
Gardiner Hall
FCV @ 421 US gpm
dP: 39.58 psi
P: 92.63 psi g
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 2979 US gpm
Vel: 8.546 ft/sec
dP: 14.81 psi
Ø: 10 in
Flow: 1399 US gpm
Vel: 5.699 ft/sec
dP: 0.875 psi
Ø: 10 in
Flow: 1630 US gpm
Vel: 6.638 ft/sec
dP: 2.258 psi
Old Chemistry
FCV @ 773 US gpm
dP: 24.73 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1
Vel: 4.
dP: 0.4
P: 90.41 psi g
P: 40.19 psi g
P: 96.85 psi g
Ø: 10 in
Flow: 1564 US gpm
Vel: 6.369 ft/sec
dP: 2.086 psi
Ø: 10 in
Flow: 1262 US gpm
Vel: 5.139 ft/sec
dP: 7.595 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 2970 US gpm
Vel: 8.52 ft/sec
dP: (2.133) psi
P: 67.89
psi g
Ø: 8 in
Flow:
90
Vel: 5. 6 US gpm
816 ft/
sec
dP: 0.5
66 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1483 US gpm
Vel: 4.254 ft/sec
dP: 3.753 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 857.1 US gpm
Vel: 5.502 ft/sec
dP: 1.948 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 920 US gpm
Vel: 5.905 ft/sec
dP: 2.422 psi
Skeen Hall
FCV @ 906 US gpm
dP: 26.76 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1448 US gpm
Vel: 4.154 ft/sec
dP: (7.654) psi
P: 90.15 psi g
P: 95.76 psi g
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1522 US gpm
Vel: 4.366 ft/sec
dP: (4.886) psi
Music Center
FCV @ 321 US gpm
dP: 31.23 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 791 US gpm
Vel: 5.077 ft/sec
dP: 1.672 psi
Ø: 5 in
Flow: 773 US gpm
Vel: 12.41 ft/sec
dP: 5.111 psi
Conroy Honors Center
FCV @ 54 US gpm
dP: 29.13 psi
Kent Hal
FCV @ 1
dP: 43.9
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 935.4 US gpm
Vel: 6.005 ft/sec
dP: 2.487 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1643 US gpm
Vel: 4.714 ft/sec
dP: 6.029 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1643 US gpm
Vel: 4.714 ft/sec
dP: 0.425 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1484 US gpm
Vel: 4.257 ft/sec
dP: 1.557 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 927.9 US gpm
Vel: 5.956 ft/sec
dP: 2.462 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 146.9 US gpm
Vel: 0.422 ft/sec
dP: (5.6) psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1867 US gpm
Vel: 5.357 ft/sec
dP: 0.856 psi Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1893 US gpm
Vel: 5.431 ft/sec
Ø: 3 in
dP: 5.189 psi
Flow: 54 US gpm
Ø: 8 in
Vel: 2.346 ft/sec
Flow: 375 US gpm
dP: (4.446) psi
Vel: 2.407 ft/sec
dP: 5.714 psi
Ø: 3 in
P: 57.35 psi g
Flow: 54 US gpm
Vel: 2.346 ft/sec
Ø: 8 in
dP: 6.879 psi
P: 57.34 psi g
Flow: 375 US gpm
Vel: 2.407 ft/sec
dP: 0.109 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1458 US gpm
Vel: 4.184 ft/sec
dP: (4.056) psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1496 US gpm
Vel: 4.292 ft/sec
dP: (4.909) psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1437 US gpm
Vel: 4.123 ft/sec
dP: 2.636 psi
Ø: 4 in
Flow: 206 US gpm
Vel: 5.196 ft/sec
dP: 1.794 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 121.2 US gpm
Vel: 0.348 ft/sec
dP: (1.29) psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 952.8 US gpm
Vel: 6.116 ft/sec
dP: (3.029) psi
20-08 Arts Complex, Ph 4
FCV @ 206 US gpm
dP: 25.22 psi
15-15 Arts Complex, Ph 3
FCV @ 437 US gpm
dP: 29.14 psi
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 321 US gpm
Vel: 3.568 ft/sec
dP: 0.167 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1337 US gpm
Vel: 3.836 ft/sec
dP: 0.315 psi
25-04 Arts Complex, Ph 5
FCV @ 1437 US gpm
dP: 26.42 psi
10-16 Arts Complex, Ph 2
FCV @ 409 US gpm
dP: 28.74 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 409 US gpm
Vel: 1.173 ft/sec
dP: 0.019 psi
05-01 Arts Complex, Ph 1
FCV @ 1337 US gpm
dP: 27.67 psi
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 933 US gpm
Vel: 10.37 ft/sec
dP: 1.601 psi
Ø: 3 in
gpm
Flow: 152 US
ec
Vel: 6.603 ft/s
Gerald Thomas Hall
FCV @ 933 US gpm
dP: 18.4 psi
Ø: 3 in
Flow:
Vel: 3
dP: (3
Branson Library 01
FCV @ 152 US gpm
i
Goddard Hall
FCV @ 213 US gpm
S gpm
ec
in
: 356.4 US gpm
3.961 ft/sec
1.562 psi
dP: 3.48 psi
10-01 W. Mixed Use/Grad Housng
FCV @ 288 US gpm
dP: 43.29 psi
10-14 Jordan St. Gateway
FCV @ 322 US gpm
dP: 44.81 psi
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 322 US gpm
Vel: 3.579 ft/sec
dP: 16.61 psi
Ø: 4 in
Flow: 200 US gpm
Vel: 5.045 ft/sec
dP: 15.15 psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 7434 US gpm
Vel: 5.939 ft/sec
dP: 0.503 psi
P: 69.6 psi g
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 7439 US gpm
Vel: 5.943 ft/sec
dP: (15.06) psi
10-14 Jordan Street
Gateway
FCV @ 200 US gpm
dP: 41.08 psi
05-05 Tech. Lab/Clsrm Facility
FCV @ 400 US gpm
dP: 39.12 psi
Ø:
6
Flo in
Ve w: 5
67
l
:
dP
: 4 6.30 US
gp
.68 2 f
6 p t/se m
c
si
m
gp
US c
in
e
.3
1 2 3 7 1 ft/s
:
5
Ø w:
.06 psi
Flo l: 1
54
Ve 25.
:
dP
Ø:
Fl 1 2
o
i
Ve w: n
21
l
:
dP
1
: 4 6.06 4 U
S
.8
6
gp
77
ft/
P:
42
.
62
p
si
g
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 5105 US gpm
Vel: 4.078 ft/sec
dP: 8.009 psi
Ø: 12 in
m
82 US gp
Flow: 20
3 ft/sec
Vel: 5.97
9) psi
dP: (3.9
g
P: 63.
m
gp
in
US ec
1 2 4 0 6 ft/s
:
5 i
Ø w:
s
16
Flo : 1. 2 p
l
1
Ve : 1.5
dP
P: 27.53 psi g
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 292 US gpm
Vel: 3.246 ft/sec
dP: (7.626) psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 10254 US gpm
Vel: 8.191 ft/sec
dP: 2.024 psi
Ø: 4 in
Flow: 214 US gpm
Vel: 5.398 ft/sec
dP: 0.941 psi
m
Ø: 12 in
76 US gp
Flow: 16
c
808 ft/se
Vel: 4.
i
8 ps
dP: 13.5
psi g
P: 65.18
i
11 ps
P: 41.
Milton Hall
FCV @ 567 US gpm
dP: 37.27 psi
.9 US gpm
5 ft/sec
psi
10-03 Student Serv Fac, Ph 2
FCV @ 214 US gpm
dP: 36.1 psi
05-03 Student
Serv Fac, Ph 1
FCV @ 214 US
gpm
dP: 39.35 psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 9826 US gpm
Vel: 7.849 ft/sec
dP: (5.912) psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 673.9 US gpm
Vel: 4.325 ft/sec
dP: 3.666 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 737.5 US gpm
Vel: 4.734 ft/sec
dP: (1.835) psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 5356 US gpm
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 251 US gpm
Vel: 2.79 ft/sec
dP: 1.998 psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 9382 US gpm
Vel: 7.495 ft/sec
dP: 17.26 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 2604 US gpm
Vel: 7.471 ft/sec
dP: 12.21 psi
Clara Belle / Speech
FCV @ 303 US gpm
dP: 42.84 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1931 US gpm
Vel: 5.54 ft/sec
dP: (10.67) psi
Ø: 5 in
Flow: 303 US gpm
Vel: 4.864 ft/sec
dP: 8.002 psi
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 400 US gpm
Vel: 4.446 ft/sec
dP: 0.511 psi
Young Hall
FCV @ 73 US gpm
dP: 35.57 psi
Rhodes-Garrett-Hamiel Res Hall
FCV @ 292 US gpm
dP: 34.84 psi
P: 38.96 psi g
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 8954 US gpm
Vel: 7.153 ft/sec
dP: 3.35 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 1137 US gpm
Vel: 7.301 ft/sec
dP: 1.559 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1917 US gpm
Vel: 5.501 ft/sec
dP: 7.708 psi
Ø: 3 in
Flow: 42 US gpm
Vel: 1.824 ft/sec
dP: 0.243 psi
P: 41.19 psi g
P: 39.99 psi g
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 578.3 US gpm
Vel: 3.712 ft/sec
dP: 8.382 psi
m
n
73 US gpm
3.171 ft/sec
3.035) psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1875 US gpm
Vel: 5.38 ft/sec
dP: 0.571 psi
P: 85.1 psi g
P: 84.7 psi g
10-04 New Undergrad Housing
FCV @ 251 US gpm
dP: 41.03 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 1074 US gpm
Vel: 6.893 ft/sec
dP: 1.376 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 500.8 US gpm
Vel: 3.215 ft/sec
dP: 0.998 psi
Guthrie Hall
FCV @ 237 US gpm
dP: 43.62 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 237 US gpm
Vel: 1.521 ft/sec
dP: 0.048 psi
Dove Hall
FCV @ 77 US gpm
dP: 42.33 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 370 US gpm
Vel: 2.375 ft/sec
dP: 7.165 psi
05-10 Addition to H&SS
FCV @ 42 US gpm
dP: 43.78 psi
CUP2 CHWP
Set @ 30409 US gpm
TH: (143.1) ft
5 psi g
Ø: 12 in
gpm
8.7 US
Flow: 89
8 ft/sec
Vel: 2.57
7 psi
dP: 1.67
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 406 US gpm
Vel: 4.513 ft/sec
dP: 1.946 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 2590 US gpm
Vel: 7.431 ft/sec
dP: (0.525) psi
Vel: 6.747 ft/sec
dP: (4.396) psi
Health & Social Services Bldg
FCV @ 370 US gpm
dP: 44.55 psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 5874 US gpm
Vel: 4.692 ft/sec
dP: 0.543 psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 5879 US gpm
Vel: 4.697 ft/sec
dP: 0.544 psi
Corbett Center
FCV @ 813 US gpm
dP: 21.18 psi
Ø: 5 in
Flow: 165 US gpm
Vel: 2.649 ft/sec
dP: 0.998 psi
Business Administration
FCV @ 314 US gpm
dP: 44.71 psi
Ø: 5 in
Flow: 77 US gpm
Vel: 1.236 ft/sec
dP: 0.138 psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 6261 US gpm
Vel: 5.002 ft/sec
dP: 0.372 psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 6266 US gpm
Vel: 5.006 ft/sec
dP: 0.373 psi
P: 37.57 psi g
P: 48.64 psi g
P: 92.23 psi g
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 6395 US gpm
Vel: 5.109 ft/sec
dP: 0.312 psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 6917 US gpm
Vel: 5.526 ft/sec
dP: 0.304 psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 7117 US gpm
Vel: 5.686 ft/sec
dP: 0.5 psi
10-02 E MixUse/Grad Hsng, Ph1
FCV @ 387 US gpm
dP: 42.36 psi
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 978 US gpm
Vel: 10.87 ft/sec
dP: 6.575 psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 10983 US gpm
Vel: 8.774 ft/sec
dP: (4.061) psi
Secondary Utility Plant
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 6912 US gpm
Vel: 5.522 ft/sec
dP: 0.304 psi
P: 22.01 psi g
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 314 US gpm
Vel: 3.49 ft/sec
dP: 0.257 psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 10130 US gpm
Vel: 8.092 ft/sec
dP: (4.291) psi
P: 85.16 psi g
n
1516 US gpm
.35 ft/sec
447 psi
P: 86.57 psi g
m
gp
US ec
in 08 ft/s
6
3
i
:8
Ø ow: .90 ps
Fl l: 3 811
.
Ve : 0
dP
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 6390 US gpm
Vel: 5.105 ft/sec
dP: 0.312 psi
Ø: 4 in
Flow: 214 US gpm
Vel: 5.398 ft/sec
dP: 2.141 psi
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 320 US gpm
Vel: 3.557 ft/sec
dP: 0.261 psi
m
gp
c
US /se
08 3 f t
8
6
:
Ø w: .90 psi
o
Fl l: 3 806
Ve : 0.
dP
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 7112 US gpm
Vel: 5.681 ft/sec
dP: 0.499 psi
10-02 E. MixUse/Grad Hsng, Ph1
FCV @ 129 US gpm
dP: 43.35 psi
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 322 US gpm
Vel: 3.579 ft/sec
dP: 13.59 psi
Bookstore
FCV @ 200 US gpm
dP: 43.09 psi
m
gp
c
US e
in 88 ft/s i
8
s
9
2
:
Ø w: .84 9) p
o
1 6
Fl l:
.3
e
5
(
V :
dP
ll
117 US gpm
95 psi
in
10-14 Jordan St Gateway
FCV @ 322 US gpm
dP: 42.53 psi
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 387 US gpm
Vel: 4.302 ft/sec
dP: 7.85 psi
10-01
dP: 1 psi
Ø: 4 in
Flow: 200 US gpm
Vel: 5.045 ft/sec
dP: 16.1 psi
05-02 Inst. for Public Policy
FCV @ 320 US gpm
dP: 43.1 psi
Ø: 4 in
Flow: 129 US gpm
Vel: 3.254 ft/sec
dP: 7.717 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 288 US gpm
Vel: 1.849 ft/sec
dP: 5.84 psi
New Corbett Equip Rm
FCV @ 406 US gpm
dP: 36.93 psi
Ø: 12 in
05 US gp
Flow: 13
3 ft/sec
Vel: 3.74
2 psi
dP: 2.10
15-01 E MixUse/Grad Hsng, Ph 2
FCV @ 523 US gpm
dP: 39.96 psi
Vel: 4.279 ft/sec
dP: 0.408 psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 5351 US gpm
Vel: 4.275 ft/sec
dP: 0.408 psi
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 523 US gpm
Vel: 5.813 ft/sec
dP: 2.908 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 433 US gpm
Vel: 2.779 ft/sec
dP: (6.893) psi
Pinon Residence Hall
FCV @ 433 US gpm
dP: 34.61 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1943 US gpm
Vel: 5.576 ft/sec
dP: (1.19) psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 2716 US gpm
Vel: 7.791 ft/sec
dP: 10.96 psi
P: 67.28 psi g
pm
P: 23.51 psi g
P: 52.43 psi g
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1510 US gpm
Vel: 4.333 ft/sec
dP: (6.384) psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 2283 US gpm
Vel: 6.549 ft/sec
dP: 5.761 psi
P: 1
7
P: 46.67 psi g
Ø:
5
Flo in
w
V e : 288
l: 4
US
.6
dP
: (3 23 ft/ gpm
.6 9
1) p sec
si
P: 31.52 psi g
Ø: 10 in
Flow: 926 US gpm
Vel: 3.771 ft/sec
dP: 0.28 psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 5100 US gpm
Vel: 4.074 ft/sec
dP: (0.871) psi
Garcia Residence Hall
FCV @ 926 US gpm
dP: 39.8 psi
.13
psi
g
Ø:
12
in
Flo
w:
Vel: 1222
dP: 3.50 US gp
m
7.3 7 ft/s
87
psi ec
Ø:
12
in
Flo
w:
Vel: 1995
US
dP: 5.722
gpm
(10
ft
.51 /sec
) ps
i
P: 5
7
P: 2
4
.19
psi
g
.52
psi
g
Ø:
12
in
Flo
w:
Vel: 1232
US
g
dP: 3.535
ft/se pm
11.6
c
psi
Ø: 4 in
Flow: 154 US gpm
Vel: 3.885 ft/sec
dP: 5.093 psi
Pan American Center
FCV @ 1232 US gpm
dP: 31.09 psi
EducationalServicesCntr
FCV @ 288 US gpm
dP: 31.57 psi
15-03 Academic Lab Bldg
FCV @ 175 US gpm
dP: 34.18 psi
Ø: 4 in
Flow: 175 US gpm
Vel: 4.414 ft/sec
dP: 0.632 psi
Engineering Complex II
FCV @ 294 US gpm
dP: 32.34 psi
10-08 New Academic Buildings
FCV @ 1504 US gpm
dP: 24.24 psi
Ø: 16 in
Flow: 2228 US gpm
Vel: 4.048 ft/sec
dP: (8.353) psi
Ø: 16 in
Flow: 1821 US gpm
Vel: 3.309 ft/sec
dP: 0.092 psi
Ø: 14 in
Flow: 831.9
Vel: 1.975
dP: (8.316)
Walden Hall
FCV @ 242 US gpm
dP: 33.39 psi
Ø: 14 in
Flow: 458.5 US gpm
Vel: 1.089 ft/sec
dP: (28.19) psi
Engineering Complex III 564
FCV Fully Open
dP: 0 psi
Ø: 14 in
Flow: 304.4 US gpm
Vel: 0.723 ft/sec
dP: 2.842 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 766 US gpm
Vel: 4.917 ft/sec
dP: 5.177 psi
P: 79.9 psi g
Ø: 14 in
Flow: 704.8 US gpm
Vel: 1.673 ft/sec
Ø: 14 in
dP: (4.155) psi
Flow: 657.4 US gpm
Vel: 1.561 ft/sec
dP: 4.321 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1987 US gpm
Vel: 5.701 ft/sec
dP: (8.907) psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 192.8 US gpm
Vel: 0.553 ft/sec
dP: 0.026 psi
Ø: 10 in
Flow: 1706 US gpm
Vel: 6.948 ft/sec
dP: 1.084 psi
Ø: 14 in
Flow: 1254 US gpm
Vel: 2.977 ft/sec
dP: (8.271) psi
Ø: 14 in
Flow: 958.4 US gpm
Vel: 2.275 ft/sec
dP: 0.13 psi
Ø: 14 in
Flow: 600.2 US gpm
Vel: 1.425 ft/sec
dP: 2.876 psi
Ø: 4 in
Flow: 242 US gpm
Vel: 6.105 ft/sec
dP: 1.091 psi
Ø: 10 in
Flow: 1763 US gpm
Vel: 7.179 ft/sec
dP: 1.154 psi
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 654 US gpm
Vel: 7.269 ft/sec
dP: 4.468 psi
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 544 US gpm
Vel: 6.047 ft/sec
dP: 1.542 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 537.3 US gpm
Vel: 1.541 ft/sec
dP: 0.098 psi
Ø: 14 in
P: 88.52 psi g Flow: 358.2 US gpm
Ø: 14 in
Vel: 0.85 ft/sec
Flow: 1016 US gpm
dP: 1.427 psi
Vel: 2.411 ft/sec
dP: (4.127) psi
Ø: 14 in
P: 51.72 psi g
Ø: 14 in
Flow: 767.2 US gpm
Flow: 62.41 US gpm
Vel: 1.821 ft/sec
P: 56.03 psi g dP: 4.313 psi
Vel: 0.148 ft/sec
dP: (4.243) psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1628 US gpm
Vel: 4.671 ft/sec
dP: 0.115 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1504 US gpm
Vel: 4.315 ft/sec
dP: 9.367 psi
Ø: 10 in
Flow: 1706 US gpm
Vel: 6.948 ft/sec
dP: (7.382) psi
Thomas & Brown Hall
FCV @ 331 US gpm
dP: 32.13 psi
P: 92.65 psi g
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1515 US gpm
Vel: 4.348 ft/sec
dP: 12.83 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1504 US gpm
Vel: 4.315 ft/sec
dP: (7.878) psi
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 605 US gpm
Vel: 6.725 ft/sec
dP: 5.016 psi
Ø: 4 in
Flow: 505 US gpm
Vel: 12.74 ft/sec
dP: 4.541 psi
P: 97.69 psi g
Ø: 10 in
Flow: 1763 US gpm
Vel: 7.179 ft/sec
dP: 9.664 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1553 US gpm
Vel: 4.456 ft/sec
dP: 3.673 psi
Ø: 5 in
Flow: 935 US gpm
Vel: 15.01 ft/sec
dP: 10.79 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 1201 US gpm
Vel: 7.711 ft/sec
dP: 1.608 psi
Ø: 12 in
Jet Annex
Flow: 1746 US gpm
FCV @ 44 US gpm Vel: 5.008 ft/sec
dP: 29.06 psi
dP: (1.771) psi
Ø: 5 in
Flow: 29
4 US gp
Vel: 4.
m
719 ft/
sec
dP: 0.46
8 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 613.2 US gpm
Vel: 1.759 ft/sec
dP: 8.546 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 588 US gpm
Vel: 3.774 ft/sec
dP: 0.294 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 1258 US gpm
Vel: 8.074 ft/sec
dP: 1.236 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 704.5 US gpm
Vel: 2.021 ft/sec
dP: (8.41) psi
P: 69.57 psi g Ø: 8 in
Flow: 553.4 US gpm
Vel: 3.552 ft/sec
dP: 0.364 psi
P: 67.97 psi g
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 197 US gpm
Vel: 2.19 ft/sec
dP: 0.223 psi
Wooten
FCV @ 197 US gpm
dP: 24.77 psi
Ø: 10 in
Flow: 1213 US gpm
Vel: 4.941 ft/sec
dP: 5.272 psi
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 391 US gpm
Vel: 4.346 ft/sec
dP: 1.836 psi
Foster Hall
FCV @ 654 US gpm
dP: 32.4 psi
Knox Hall
FCV @ 505 US gpm
dP: 18.61 psi
P: 95.81 psi g
dP: 33.65 psi
Ø: 10 in
Flow: 1397
Vel: 5.69 ft/
dP: 2.765 p
Ø:
Flo
Vel
dP:
dP: 32.04 psi
Jet Hall
FCV @ 561 US gpm
dP: 27.41 psi
Science
FCV @
dP: 33.
Engineering Complex I
FCV @ 371 US gpm
dP: 3.939 psi
Ø: 14 in
Flow: 65.93 US gpm
Vel: 0.157 ft/sec
dP: 8.49 psi
P: 55.87 psi g
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1051 US gpm
Vel: 3.015 ft/sec
dP: 2.56 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 799.5 US gpm
Vel: 2.294 ft/sec
dP: 0.298 psi
P: 87.79 psi g
P: 54.21 psi g
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 505 US gpm
Vel: 3.242 ft/sec
dP: 4.585 psi
15-05 Academic/Lab Bldgs
FCV @ 1455 US gpm
dP: 25.36 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1694 US gpm
Vel: 4.86 ft/sec
dP: (0.78) psi
O'Donnell Hall
FCV @ 626 US gpm
dP: 31.81 psi
PSL Anderson Bldg
FCV @ 906 US gpm
dP: 26.93 psi
2
15-14 O'Donnell Hall, Ph
FCV @ 200 US gpm
dP: 32.53 psi
US gpm
ft/sec
) psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 906 US gpm
Vel: 5.816 ft/sec
dP: 1.908 psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 4368 US gpm
Vel: 3.49 ft/sec
dP: 2.564 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 906 US gpm
Vel: 5.816 ft/sec
dP: 6.176 psi
Ø
F
V
d
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 626 US gpm
Vel: 6.958 ft/sec
dP: 1.063 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 505 US gpm
Vel: 3.242 ft/sec
dP: 0.338 psi
P: 52.46 psi g
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 269 US gpm
Vel: 2.99 ft/sec
dP: 0.348 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1080 US gpm
Vel: 3.099 ft/sec
dP: (1.66) psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 2255 US gpm
Vel: 6.468 ft/sec
dP: 4.396 psi
Computer Center
FCV @ 269 US gpm
dP: 33.6 psi
Ø: 4 in
Flow: 200 US gpm
Vel: 5.045 ft/sec
dP: 1.035 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 2346 US gpm
Vel: 6.73 ft/sec
dP: 4.741 psi
CHWSP-1
Set @ 13000 US gpm
TH: (113.9) ft
P: 90.28 psi g
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1455 US gpm
Vel: 4.174 ft/sec
dP: 2.671 psi
OFS Central Heating Plant
FCV @ 120 US gpm
dP: 34.62 psi
Ø: 32 in
Flow: 8816 US gpm
Vel: 3.843 ft/sec
dP: 0.231 psi
Ø: 32 in
Flow: 13000 US gpm
Vel: 5.668 ft/sec
dP: 0.054 psi
Ø: 32 in
Flow: 9010 US gpm
Vel: 3.928 ft/sec
dP: 0.24 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 890.8 US gpm
Vel: 2.556 ft/sec
dP: 0.365 psi
P: 92.84 psi g
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 737.5 US gp
Vel: 4.734 ft/sec
dP: 0.629 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 67
Vel: 4.3
dP: 0.53
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 673.9 US gpm
Vel: 4.325 ft/sec
dP: 0.588 psi
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 304 US gpm
Vel: 3.379 ft/sec
dP: 4.516 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 737.5 US gpm
Vel: 4.734 ft/sec
dP: 6.341 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 457 US gpm
Vel: 2.934 ft/sec
dP: 4.607 psi
Ø: 14 in
Flow: 307.5 US gpm
Vel: 0.73 ft/sec
dP: (24.02) psi
Ø:
Fl 12
o
Ve w: in
2
dP l: 7 510
: 1 .20
US
1.
33 1 ft/
g
ps sec pm
i
gpm
2 in
US
Ø: 1 606.8
:
/sec
w
ft
lo
1
F
1.74 si
Vel:
2p
0.28
dP:
Ø:
F l 12
o
Ve w: in
3
l
dP : 8 055
: 0 .76
US
.9
98 5 ft/
g
ps sec pm
i
Ø: 10 in
Flow: 548 US gpm
Vel: 2.232 ft/sec
dP: (6.463) psi
Zuhl Library Expansion
FCV @ 633 US gpm
dP: 32.49 psi
Ø: 4 in
Flow: 103 US gpm
Vel: 2.598 ft/sec
dP: 6.252 psi
Garcia Annex
FCV @ 165 US gpm
dP: 21.78 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 633 US gpm
Vel: 4.063 ft/sec
dP: 1.507 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1093 US gpm
Vel: 3.136 ft/sec
dP: 5.215 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1187 US gpm
Vel: 3.406 ft/sec
dP: (3.274) psi
P: 50.69 psi g
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1014 US gpm
Vel: 2.908 ft/sec
dP: 5.854 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1240 US gpm
Vel: 3.558 ft/sec
dP: (5.313) psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 2678 US gpm
Vel: 7.684 ft/sec
dP: 7.178 psi
P: 45.38 psi g
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 3451 US gpm
Vel: 9.899 ft/sec
dP: (3.177) psi
P: 68.36 psi g
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 2026 US gpm
Vel: 5.814 ft/sec
dP: 2.628 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 2799 US gpm
Vel: 8.029 ft/sec
dP: (0.372) psi
10-07 Student Activities Exp.
FCV @ 498 US gpm
dP: 32.11 psi
15-07 Academic/Lab Bldg
FCV @ 606 US gpm
dP: 30.52 psi
Activity Center
FCV @ 652 US gpm
dP: 21.35 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 672 US gpm
Vel: 4.314 ft/sec
dP: 7.008 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1145 US gpm
Vel: 3.286 ft/sec
dP: 3.834 psi
P: 42.2 psi g
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 94 US gpm
Vel: 1.045 ft/sec
dP: (2.045) psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 788 US gpm
Vel: 5.058 ft/sec
dP: (0.748) psi
P: 77.56 psi g
15-04 Academic Bldgs
FCV @ 672 US gpm
dP: 21.82 psi
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 652 US gpm
Vel: 7.247 ft/sec
dP: 1.453 psi
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 606 US gpm
Vel: 6.736 ft/sec
dP: 1.264 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 192.9 US gpm
Vel: 0.553 ft/sec
dP: (4.234) psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1051 US gpm
Vel: 3.016 ft/sec
dP: (4.733) psi
P: 44.64 psi g
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 798.9 US gpm
Vel: 2.292 ft/sec
dP: (1.283) psi
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 498 US gpm
Vel: 5.535 ft/sec
dP: 0.821 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 234.7 US gpm
Vel: 0.673 ft/sec
dP: 4.258 psi
Breland Hall
FCV @ 212 US gpm
dP: 30.76 psi
P: 75.54 psi g
Student Health Center
FCV @ 94 US gpm
dP: 31.55 psi
20-01 Academ
ic Lab Bldg
FCV @ 788
US gpm
dP: 29.8 ps
i
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 840.7 US gpm
Vel: 2.412 ft/sec
dP: 1.559 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1665 US gpm
Vel: 4.777 ft/sec
dP: 1.014 psi
Ø: 18 in
Flow: 5131 US gpm
Vel: 7.366 ft/sec
dP: 8.074 psi
e Hall
@ 766 US gpm
.98 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 2422 US gpm
Vel: 6.949 ft/sec
dP: 1.334 psi
Astronomy Bldg
FCV @ 103 US gpm
dP: 34.93 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1877 US gpm
Vel: 5.385 ft/sec
dP: 0.95 psi
Ø: 18 in
Flow: 4831 US gpm
Vel: 6.935 ft/sec
dP: 7.653 psi
Zuhl Library 319.84
FCV @ 548 US gpm
dP: 34.88 psi
P: 81.39 psi g
9 US gpm
5 ft/sec
) psi
Ø: 10 in
Flow: 548 US gpm
Vel: 2.232 ft/sec
dP: 3.438 psi
g
Ø: 14 in
Flow: 121.2 US gpm
Vel: 0.288 ft/sec
dP: 4.245 psi
psi
Ø: 14 in
Flow: 600.8 US gpm
Vel: 1.426 ft/sec
dP: (1.383) psi
gpm
2 in
US
Ø: 1 1547
ec
:
/s
w
ft
Flo
39
4.4
si
Vel: .291 p
7
dP:
9.04
Branson Library 03
FCV @ 304 US gpm
dP: 35.62 psi
p
ps /sec m
i
P: 8
Branson Library 02
FCV @ 457 US gpm
dP: 35.45 psi
7
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1354 US gpm
Vel: 3.886 ft/sec
dP: 9.903 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 2127 US gpm
Vel: 6.101 ft/sec
dP: (4.476) psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 9.522 US gpm
Vel: 0.027 ft/sec
dP: (2.122) psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 762.6 US gpm
Vel: 2.188 ft/sec
dP: 0.495 psi
05-04 Native Americ Cult Cntr
FCV @ 154 US gpm
dP: 29.51 psi
~N{031}
dP: 10.25 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 256.5 US gpm
Vel: 0.736 ft/sec
dP: 3.57 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 736 US gpm
Vel: 4.724 ft/sec
dP: (2.705) psi
10-06 New Married Student Hsg
FCV @ 736 US gpm
dP: 19.46 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 515.6 US gpm
Vel: 1.479 ft/sec
dP: 0.106 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 256.5 US gpm
Vel: 0.736 ft/sec
dP: (4.214) psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 762.6 US gpm
Vel: 2.188 ft/sec
dP: (1.905) psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 9.522 US gpm
Vel: 0.027 ft/sec
dP: 4.244 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 9.522 US gpm
Vel: 0.027 ft/sec
dP: (2.122) psi
P: 58.41 psi g
Ø: 6 in
Flow: 247 US gpm
Vel: 2.745 ft/sec
dP: 2.494 psi
Chamisa Village
FCV @ 507 US gpm
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 515.6 US gpm
Vel: 1.479 ft/sec
dP: 7.903 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 762.6 US gpm
Vel: 2.188 ft/sec
dP: (1.932) psi
05-13 Chamisa Dorms, Ph 2
FCV @ 247 US gpm
dP: 29.81 psi
P: 28.76 psi g
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 433
Vel: 3.46
dP: (1.68
NM Dept. of Agriculture
FCV @ 505 US gpm
dP: 30.13 psi
15-06 Academic Research Lab
FCV @ 1555 US gpm
dP: 33.75 psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 2813 US gpm
Vel: 2.247 ft/sec
dP: 6.476 psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 2781 US gpm
Vel: 2.222 ft/sec
dP: (6.257) psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1555 US gpm
Vel: 4.461 ft/sec
dP: 2.403 psi
20-02 Academ/Res Bldgs
FCV @ 1961 US gpm
dP: 32.62 psi
P: 83.33 psi g
20-02 Academic/Res Bldgs
FCV @ 1961 US gpm
dP: 32.62 psi
P: 48.26 psi g
Ø: 20 in
Flow: 1141 US gpm
Vel: 1.318 ft/sec
dP: 0.077 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1961 US gpm
P: 48.33 psi g
Vel: 5.626 ft/sec
dP: 4.874 psi
Ø: 20 in
Flow: 1109 US gpm
Vel: 1.281 ft/sec
dP: 0.073 psi
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1961 US gpm
Vel: 5.626 ft/sec
dP: 9.185 psi
P: 83.4 psi g
Ø: 20 in
Flow: 1141 US gpm
Vel: 1.318 ft/sec
dP: (6.166) psi
Ø: 20 in
Flow: 1109 US gpm
Vel: 1.281 ft/sec
dP: 6.554 psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 1109 US gpm
Vel: 0.886 ft/sec
dP: (6.331) psi
P: 81.07 psi g
P: 48.02 psi g
Ø: 12 in
Flow: 1563 US gpm
Vel: 4.484 ft/sec
dP: 0.645 psi
P: 89.96 psi g
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 1141 US gpm
Vel: 0.911 ft/sec
dP: 6.402 psi
20-03 Academic/ Research bldgs
FCV @ 1563 US gpm
dP: 30.74 psi
P: 54.42 psi g
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 2672 US gpm
Vel: 2.134 ft/sec
dP: 0.319 psi
Ø: 24 in
Flow: 2704 US gpm
Vel: 2.16 ft/sec
dP: 0.326 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 1134 US gpm
Vel: 7.279 ft/sec
dP: 3.368 psi
Ø: 8 in
Flow: 1134 US gpm
Vel: 7.279 ft/sec
dP: 6.756 psi
20-04 Family Housing, Ph2
FCV @ 1134 US gpm
dP: 7.272 psi
Lineup:
System:
Date:
Company:
Project:
by:
2034 Distribution (12°dT)
0874.00 NMSU CHW - 2034
06/11/09 10:36 am
GLHN
0874.00 NMSU UDP
DHW
CHW - Stage 2 - Campus Build Out
Darcy-Weisbach
PIPE-FLO 2007
Flow: US gpm
Pressure: psi g
Size: in
Elevation: ft
Velocity: ft/sec
Length: ft
Volume: gallons