Grid Flexibility, a key priority for the Global Smart Grids Federation

The Global Smart Grid Federation
- some perspectives
Paddy Turnbull
Chairman
1
GSGF: Overview
2
GSGF: Working groups 2014
• 2014 programme
• Grid Connectivity of Distributed Generation
• Interfaces of Grid Users/Focus on EV and local
storage
• Interoperability and Standards
www.globalsmartgridfederation.org
3
GSGF Work Groups 2015
• 3 areas of research and collaboration
- Smart Grids System flexibility
Leader; Laurent Schmitt, Smart Grid France
- Energy storage in the power grid
Leader; Hiroshi Kuniyoshi, Japan Smart Community Alliance
- Cyber Security
Leader; Subodh Belgi, Indian Smart Grid Federation
4
Smart grids system flexibility:
Challenges for the electricity supply
RES generation
flexible demand
total demand
Weather dependent
Adapts to RES generation
Biomass-, hydro, &
geothermal plants are
added
Is covered
New Distributed Energy Resources
New integration
opportunities
Renewables
Demand Response
Wind, Solar, Wave
• Instant data reporting
• Two-way communication
• Remote access and control
Electric Vehicles, Smart Appliances
& Buildings
• Can react to price fluctuation
• Can shave peak load
• Energy conservation
Intermittency
Energy Storage
Can react to price fluctuation
• Can shave peak load
• Augment renewables
New System flexibility challenge
fenix
Transmission
Transmission
networks
networks
10%
Flexible Supply
Central
Central
Generation
2009
Renewable
Subsidy
Transmission
Transmission
networks
networks
15-20% Flexible Supply
Central
Central
Generation
2012
Renewable
Connection
Intermittent
Renewable
Flexible
5-10% Demand & Storage
Integrated
Transmission
T&D Control
networks
Zones
15-25%
Flexible Supply
Central
Central
Generation
2020
Renewable
Integration
Dispatched Resources
Distribution
Distribution
networks
networks
Distribution
Distribution
networks
networks
20-25%
Passive
Intermittent
Renewable
10-15%
Intermittent
Renewable
Dispatched Resources
Capacity
3-5%
Dispatched Resources Passive
‘… a step towards the future of
electricity networks’
FENIX Future
Integrated
DG
Distributed
control
Challenges to operate DERs
Growth in Distributed Generation
Resulting Operational Challenges
Installed Capacity
(Nov 2012) 1,639 MW
Plan for additional
3,990 MW till 2030
Ireland
At T level: « manual voltage mgt gets very challenging »
At D level: flow inversions, congestions
Denmark
1980s
Today
Target 50% of WT penetration by 2020 (MWh)
New TSO-DSO interactions
c
Possible way forward
Transmission Grid Management
Distribution Grid Management
Distribution
Automation
•
MV/LV State
Estimation &
Incident
Management
•
DSO Ancillary
Service
Management for
DERs
•
Microgrid
Islanding
•
New Flexibility
operator for DG &
Storage (NBA)
First draft Whitepaper
Smart Grid France - White Paper Flexibility
Table of Content
1.
2.
Auteurs : Christophe Kieny (Tenerrdis), Michel Bena (RTE, S2E2), Marie Miquel (ERDF, Tenerrdis),
Laurent Fournié, Arthur Rallu (Artelys, Systematic), Henry Angleys , Benoît Duretz, Jacques Arbeille
(Energy Pool), Jean-Paul Krivine (EDF, Cap energies), Laurent Schmitt (Alstom, Systematic), Rodolphe
de Beaufort (Alstom, Systematic)
3.
Introduction. .................................................................................................................................... 2
Needs of the electrical system ......................................................................................................... 3
2.1
Production/Consumption balancing management.................................................................. 3
2.2
French Demand’s characteristics ............................................................................................. 3
2.3
Massive REN integration .......................................................................................................... 4
2.4
Need to address congestions ................................................................................................... 4
National market mechanisms .......................................................................................................... 5
3.1
Adjustment Mechanisms ................................................................................................. 6
3.1.2
Ancillary Services swap system ........................................................................................ 6
3.2
Annexe 1: List of significant demonstration and research projects
related to flexibility management in France
4.
Balancing Responsible Party mechanism and energy market ................................................. 6
3.2.1
NEBEF mechanisms allows demand response offers to participate on energy market .. 7
3.2.2
Capacity Mechanism ........................................................................................................ 7
Consumption flexibility management .............................................................................................. 7
4.1
GreenLys
Effective production/consumption balancing mechanisms .................................................... 5
3.1.1
Demand modulation : from consumer to « prosumer ».......................................................... 8
4.1.1
Role of the modulation Aggregator ................................................................................. 9
Smart electric Lyon
4.1.2
Consumer segmentation and associated services ........................................................... 9
Nice Grid
4.1.3
Two illustration of the effective contribution of demand on balancing mechanisms in
France: 10
Smart Grid Vendée
4.1.4
Projets européens
EvolvDSO
DREAM
ADVANCED
5.
6.
European Demand Response record – April 5th 2013................................................... 11
4.2
Impact management of third-party activated flexibilities on distribution network .............. 12
4.3
Use of the flexibilities connected on the PDN by DSOs ......................................................... 12
4.4
Value creation and sharing between participants ................................................................. 14
Costs/benefits analysis for energetic systems and flexibility value ............................................... 16
Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 17
Annexe 1: List of significant demonstration and research projects related to flexibility
management in France ...................................................................................................................... 18