Gateway to the Indiana Dunes Gateway to the Indiana Dunes

Transcription

Gateway to the Indiana Dunes
sub area plan
Town of Porter, Indiana
december 2010
Draft
for
Porter Redevelopment Commission
SEH I JJR I
Naughton+Associates
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments
1 Introduction
Overview
Why This Plan
Plan Ingredients
History
ii
2 Process
3 Understanding Porter
Context
Development Suitability
Economic Development Snapshot
4 Framework
Guiding Principles
Composite Framework
5 Community Investment
Green Infrastructure
Best Management Strategies
Land Use Framework
Concept Plan
Gateway Development Area
Community Infill Development Area
Transit Oriented Development Area
6 Transform the Corridors
The Arrival Experience
Motorized Transportation
Alternative Transportation
Non Motorized Transportation
Gateways
Corridor Experiences
7 Implementation Strategies
Overview
Economic Impact Analysis
Validity of The Tourism Market in Porter
Conclusions and Recommendations
8 Design Guidelines
i
Overview
Open Space Zone
Gateway Development Zone
Infill Zone
Streetscape
Wayfinding / Signage
1
1
3
3
5
7
9
9
9
11
13
13
15
17
17
19
21
23
25
31
32
33
33
35
35
37
39
41
47
47
49
50
52
53
53
55
57
62
63
69
Acknowledgements
Town of Porter Town Council
Todd Martin
Jon Granat
Dave Babcock
Trevin Fowler
Michele Bollinger, President
Town of Porter Clerk-Treasurer
Carol Pomeroy
Town of Porter Redevelopment Commission
LeAnn McCrum
Al Raffin
Bruce Snyder, President
Michele Bollinger
Jon Granat
Working Group Members
Matt Keiser, Town of Porter
Bruce Snyder, Town of Porter
Michele Bollinger, Town of Porter
Brandt Baughman, Indiana Department of Natural Resources – Indiana Dunes State Park
Jenny Orsburn, Indiana Department of Natural Resources – Lake Michigan Coastal Program
Sergio Mendoza, Indiana Department of Natural Resources – Lake Michigan Coastal Program
Costa Dillon, National Park Service – Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore
Garry Traynham, National Park Service – Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore
Eric Ehn, National Park Service – Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore
Lorelei Weimer, Porter County Tourism
Kathy Brown, Northwest Indiana Regional Development Authority
Jim Powers, Indiana Department of Transportation
Bryan Donze, Indiana Department of Transportation
Nick Walding, Town of Chesterton
Jennifer Nebe, Save the Dunes Council
Bob Thompson, Porter County Plan Commission
John Swanson, Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission
Heather Ennis, Chesterton/Duneland Chamber of Commerce
John Parsons, Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District
The Consultant Team
SEH of Indiana
JJR
Naughton and Associates
Special Thanks
A special thanks to all who committed the time and energy to this effort and to the Northwest
Indiana Regional Development Authority (RDA) for funding this Sub Area Plan.
ii
1 Introduction
Overview
The 2005 Porter County Destination Audit
indicates that annually more than 3 million
visitors come to Porter County to visit
the Indiana Dunes. Those visitors find
themselves trying to navigate through a
place that lacks a gateway community or a
place to start their experience. During the
public hearings held in conjunction with the
development of the Marquette Plan, many
voiced concerns that this lack of a gateway
- a sense of arrival - negatively impacted
the quality of life of Porter County residents,
as well as the economic development
opportunities associated with these visitors.
The Gateway to the Indiana Dunes, as
identified in the Marquette Plan – Phase II: A
Vision for Lakeshore Reinvestment (February
2008)) and outlined in this report, strikes a
balance between the needs of the resident
and visitor. It also outlines a course of
action to invest in community infrastructure,
showcase our heritage, redefine the
edges, bridge the gaps, preserve, protect
and enhance our environmental systems,
protect our waters, and identify an effective
management and funding strategy – or in
other words – meet the principles outlined
in the Marquette Plan on our way toward
“Creating a Livable Lakefront”.
Like the Marquette Plan, the Gateway
to the Indiana Dunes Sub Area Plan has
required collaboration and cooperation to
be successful and has required a “local
champion” to help northwest Indiana realize
the long-term vision of the Marquette Plan. Through the course of this study, the Town
of Porter has stepped forward as that local
champion and worked collaboratively with the
Indiana Department of Natural Resources
(Indiana Dunes State Park), the National Park
Service (Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore),
the Porter County Convention, Recreation
and Visitors Commission, the Porter County
Parks Department, the Duneland communities
of Chesterton and Burns Harbor and various
other federal, state, and local agencies
to ensure the appropriate level of open
communication and broad level buy-in that is
critical for subsequent implementation. 1
This Sub Area Plan is one piece of a four
part strategy to develop the Gateway to the
Indiana Dunes. These include:
The Gateway to the Indiana Dunes Sub
Area Plan
• This document will guide future
development in the Indiana 49 Corridor
to create the iconic “Gateway to the
Indiana Dunes”. The Plan is guided by
the principles outlined in the Marquette
Plan. The Plan includes strategies and
an action plan that identifies responsible
parties, timelines, and catalytic projects
in order to clearly articulate plan
implementation.
Indiana 49 Reconstruction Project
• The proposed project involves the
design, engineering, and construction
of Indiana 49 between Interstate 94
and the Indiana Dunes State Park. The
reconstructed highway and associated
improvements to the visitor’s “arrival
sequence” will become the iconic
“Gateway to the Indiana Dunes” as
depicted in this Sub Area report. “Gateway to the Indiana Dunes”
Alternative Transportation Study
• This study analyzes the various
methods of transporting residents and
visitors between the many uses and
attractions along the corridor. The study
is being conducted as a partnership
with the Town of Porter, the Indiana
Department of Natural Resources
(Indiana Dunes State Park), the National
Park Service (Indiana Dunes National
Lakeshore), Northern Indiana Commuter
Transportation District, the Porter
County Convention, Recreation and
Visitors Commission, and the Indiana
Department of Transportation, elected
officials and project area stakeholders. The Dunes Kankakee Trail
• This project, as outlined in this Sub Area report, involves the design, engineering
and construction of the Dunes Kankakee
Trail from U.S. 12 south to the
intersection of Woodlawn Avenue and
Calumet Road. The project includes
pedestrian/bicycle bridge enhancements,
trailheads, wayfinding and interpretative
signage, crosswalks, lighting, storm
water conveyance systems (using best
management practices), bike racks,
benches and decorative and native
landscaping. The Indiana 49 Lakeshore Gateway Corridor
Development Project will reaffirm the
Duneland’s historical standing as being the
“Gateway to the Indiana Dunes”. The Plan,
successfully implemented, will improve our
community’s infrastructure and transportation
systems. These investments will enhance
our community’s opportunity to develop new
sources of revenue as a means to diversify
our tax base, as well as to better protect our
economic future – our natural environment
and the tourism associated.
Economic Engine
In 2007, as part of the completion of the
Marquette Plan: Phase II, (which included the
shoreline east of the Burns Waterway to the
Indiana / Michigan state line) a companion
study was completed relative to the U.S. 12 &
20 Corridors spanning Porter County. One of
the topics discussed in that study indicated a
desire for expanded economic development
and more specifically, tourism-related
development along the Corridors adjacent to
and leading into the Indiana Dunes National
Lakeshore and Indiana Dunes State Park. The economic opportunities identified in the
studies and reported by several stakeholders
throughout the Marquette Plan and Corridor
study processes require the development
of better access, people management, and
amenities for those who not only live in the
area, but also for those who visit. These
suggestions have long been supported by the
Porter County Convention, Recreation, and
Visitors Commission (PCCRVC), as well. The
Marquette Plan
LAKE MICHIGAN
Th
e
M
ar
qu
et
te
Plan:
A
Vision
Lak
for
esh
Re
e
r
o
i
e
nv
st
m
en
t
Gateway to the Dunes Sub Area Boundary
The Marquette Plan & Gateway to the Dunes - Sub Area Boundary illustration
Quality of Life
Indiana Dunes
National Lakeshore
Waverly
Rd.
U.S. 12
Indiana Dunes
State Park
a 49
Indian
U.S. 20
U.S. 20
.
nt Rd
o
Trem
Oak Hill Rd.
9
I 94
I 94
a4
The Town of Porter’s quality of life is
interwoven with Lake Michigan and the
dunes. The strengthened relationship with
the Lake and the dunes as envisioned in
this plan will enhance an already thriving
community full of opportunity, a community in
balance with their environment, a community
of vibrant, accessible neighborhoods, learning
and nurturing community, a safe and healthy
community, and a community that appreciates
the arts and celebrates life.
Lake Michigan
ian
The Indiana Dunes have long been
considered a destination to those living in
Chicago. Early visitors traveled using the
Chicago South Shore South Bend Commuter
Railroad. They brought their families and
their friends to explore the awesome beauty
of the dunes. As the automobile became
a fixture in the American household, city
dwellers commuted to northern Porter
County along the U.S. 12 (Dunes Highway). Today, residents of northwest Indiana and
Chicagoland still make the trek to northern
Porter County to swim in Lake Michigan and
explore the dunes.
“Sweeping changes will not come overnight. Nor can they
be dictated by one person or one governmental body. We in
Northwest Indiana must sit together as a unified community
and reach a consensus on our future.”
Congressman Pete Visclosky
Gateway to the Dunes Sub Area Boundary
Ind
The Duneland is home to an assortment
of natural habitats and a diversity of flora
and fauna not often found in such a small
geographic area. Over the years, many
have made the trek to northwest Indiana to
experience the beauty of Lake Michigan and
the Indiana Dunes. Today, the Duneland’s
geological history and beauty can be
experienced by hiking on any one of the trails
within the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore
or Indiana Dunes State Park.
Gateway to the Dunes - Sub Area Boundary & aerial perspective
2
1
Why this Plan
Over three million annual visitors frequent
the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore and
State Park with Indiana 49, which travels
through the Town of Porter and identified as
the primary portal to these tourist attractions. This makes Porter the Gateway to the Dunes
with the opportunity to leverage those millions
of visitors into millions in revenue if the right
strategy and plan were in place to capture
them in the town’s lodging, stores and other
businesses that would benefit from this
financial infusion. Porter is well positioned to
make this happen, with:
•
•
•
•
•
The Indiana 49 tourist conduit in their
community with a jointly operated
National Park Service and Porter County
Visitor Center to greet and orient the
three million annual visitors;
The confluence of four regional trails, as
well as popular National and State Parks
at their doorstep;
South Shore regional commuter rail
service within minutes of residents and
visitors;
A well structured TIF district in place
to fund infrastructure and community
development; and
Like-minded community leaders
committed to making this happen.
All the pieces are in place to fulfill the vision
outlined in the Marquette Plan. Supporting
this notion is funding by the RDA that provides
the venture capital to develop a true “Gateway
to the Dunes” that will:
•
•
•
•
3
Embrace and leverage the area’s natural
resources;
Transform Porter’s transportation
corridors and alternative transportation
network into a regional model of
sustainability and effectiveness;
Re-brand the arrival and visitor
experience; and
Extend the visitor stay in ways that
complement existing development in the
Duneland communities such as Porter’s
downtown and the Indian Boundary
Road commercial district.
The RDA has put their faith and resources
behind this endeavor because the benefits will
extend well beyond the Town of Porter and
energize a region that is in desperate need of
new and sustainable sources to refuel their
economic engine. They have also invested in
the fact that Porter has the mettle to make this
plan a built reality with a measureable return
on investment as outlined in this document.
As stated previously, the Town of Porter
has aligned all the variables for success
and is now in need of a document to turn
this potential into reality. As outlined in
the Marquette Plan, it is critical for each
community to have a well grounded and
detailed Sub Area Plan to take broad
recommendations into more focused actions.
This plan does just that, looking closely at
the physical lay of the land at things such
as existing transportation networks and
infrastructure, natural areas and development
opportunities, and impediments to quantify
what is possible and prudent from a
development perspective. It looks holistically
at how all the pieces could best fit together
and how it would look, feel and function. Finally, to ensure a built product in line with
the intended vision, the plan lays out the
guidelines to ensure this and documents an
action plan to make it happen. All of this
has been done in coordination with existing
Town processes with the final document
receiving approval by the Town of Porter
Redevelopment Commission as the enabling
body to implement and enforce it.
Plan Ingredients
This document summarizes a careful,
inclusive planning process and fulfills a
number of objectives. To achieve this, it
contains a series of components, each
with a particular purpose. First is Sub Area
Plan that assesses the existing community
physically, socially and economically to
determine the best composition for proposed
development and community investment,
such as infrastructure and open space. This
is done through the diagrams, plans and
illustrations contained in this report. These
are shown holistically for the entire study
area and as a series of “frameworks” that
illustrate a particular focus of the plan in
greater detail, such as community investment
or green infrastructure. Each contains maps
and specific recommendations to guide future
implementation of this plan.
Second, this document contains a series
of guidelines for each of the different
frameworks. These are in both written and
graphic form and a powerful tool for the Town
of Porter when assessing outside proposals
to develop in the study area, as well as guide
their own capital projects such as roads, trails
and parks.
The third and final component consists
of implementation strategies that outline
the estimated cost to implement this plan,
potential economic yield and other sources
of funding for implementation, as well as
phasing strategies that recognized some
of the recommendations may be long term
objectives while others more immediate
opportunities.
Studies indicate that for every 5% of current visitor trips extended one extra day can yield on
average $ 20 million in local benefits. Town of Porter is a confluence of regional network of trails - Calumet Trail, Dunes Kankakee
Trail, Brickyard Trail, Prairie Duneland Trail
Lake Michigan
The
Pavilion
Indiana Dunes
State Park
. 12
Indiana 49
U.S
Indiana Dunes
National Lakeshore
. 12
Tremont Rd.
U.S
Community Infill . 20
.S
Wagner Rd.
Waverly Rd.
U
U.S. 20
Gateway
Development
Gateway to the Dunes Sub area boundary
Oak Hill Rd.
I 94
9
na 4
India
I 94
Downtown Porter
oln
c
Lin
St.
Woodlawn Ave.
Indian Boundary Rd.
Corridor
Indian Boundary Rd.
The study area and adjacencies
4
1
History
1800s to early 1900s
Beginning with Joseph Bailey’s arrival in 1822
to set up fur trading along the Little Calumet
River, railroads, a race track, a mineral spa, and
brick factories have all played a part in the ever
changing face of the Town.
1926
The Indiana Dunes State Park celebrates its
Grand Opening. Nearly 63,000 visitors came
to the park during its first three months of
operation.
1858
Originating in 1858, the Town has had many
different names (Bailytown, Old Porter,
Hageman).
The Dunes Highway (U.S. Highway 12) opens.
1899
Dr. Henry Chandler Cowles publishes
“Ecological Relations of the Vegetation on
Sand Dunes of Lake Michigan” in the Botanical
Gazette. The article led to Dr. Cowles being
named the “father of plant ecology” and
international recognition of the duneland
ecosystem followed.
1908
The Prairie Club of Chicago forms and calls
for the preservation of a portion of the Indiana
Dunes.
The Chicago South Shore and South Bend
Railroad opens.
1916
Stephen Mather, First Director of the National
Park Service, proposes the creation of the Sand
Dunes National Park (12,000 acres). National Park Service established
1923
Richard Lieber, First Director of the Indiana
Department of Conservation, receives
legislative authorization for the Indiana Dunes
State Park, a 2,182 acre park along 3 miles of
Lake Michigan shoreline.
5
early 1900s to 2000s
1952
Save the Dunes Council (SDC) first meets at
the home of Dorothy Buell.
1958
Senator Paul Douglas introduces first bill
to establish an Indiana Dunes National
Monument.
1966
Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore authorized
by Congress.
Official Groundbreaking of the Port of Indiana.
1976
Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore (expansion)
authorized by Congress.
1980
1986
1992 Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore (expansion)
2000s to 2010
2005
The Marquette Plan adopted
The Northwest Indiana Regional Development
Authority (RDA) created.
2006
Dorothy Buell Memorial Visitor Center – Grand
Opening.
2008
The Marquette Plan: Phase II suggested a series
of north-south gateway corridors where lakefront
access should be maximized and the influx of
visitors leveraged for local and regional economic
gain. Indiana 49 in Porter was identified as one
of these corridors and as a place for sustainable
tourism and transit-oriented development by
capitalizing on Indiana 49’s designation as the
official exit from I-94 to the National and State
Parks and the proximity to the Dunes Park South
Shore commuter rail station located at the doorstep
to both parks.
Portage Lakefront and Riverwalk (Indiana Dunes
National Lakeshore) – Grand Opening.
2009
The Town of Porter developed a strategy to
implement their component of the Marquette
Plan, assembling a package of funding sources
including local TIF funds and state and Federal
grants to leverage $18.5 million in funding from the
Northwest Indiana Regional Development Authority
(RDA). The Town of Porter receives approval from the
Northwest Indiana Regional Development Authority
for the Indiana 49 “Gateway to the Indiana Dunes”
Project.
6
2 Process
Process
The preparation of the “Gateway to the
Indiana Dunes” Sub Area Plan has included
study area reconnaissance, review of
existing documents, meetings with project
stakeholders, elected officials, town council
and RDA briefings, and project working group
meetings. Over a period of nine months, the
process included:
•
•
•
•
•
Stakeholder group meetings
Working group meetings
Public open house
Site visits
Team design Charrette
The purpose of the inclusionary, interactive
and transparent process was to gather input
from all stakeholders in the study area,
address the issues and concerns that the
communities and the region face, and work
together to develop a consensus-based vision
and actionable implementation
recommendations.
Stakeholder Group
Stakeholder interviews were conducted in
May and June of 2010. Interviews were
conducted at either the Dorothy Buell
Memorial Visitor Center, Porter Town Hall,
or at the office of the stakeholder(s). The
purpose of the interviews was to gather first
impressions, ideas and thoughts regarding
the development of the “Gateway to the
Indiana Dunes” Sub Area Plan. During
the interviews, the Consultant Team
explained how the Sub Area Plan will guide
economic development, redevelopment, and
rehabilitation by recommending development
guidelines, ordinance amendments, and a
comprehensive implementation strategy.
Working Group
The “Gateway to the Indiana Dunes” Working
Group, comprised of project stakeholders,
was established at the outset of the project to
provide direction and offer input throughout
the planning process. The Working Group
worked closely with the Consultant Team
to identify issues and opportunities in
the project area, inform design, and offer
recommendations for implementation. 7
Working Group Meeting Summaries
Kick-Off Meeting (May 13, 2010):
• The project team offered a project
history and overview of the Sub Area
Plan focusing on its relationship to the
Marquette Plan. Action items included:
creating a vision statement, establishing
guiding principles, and developing a list
of project stakeholders to be interviewed. Meeting #2 (June 11, 2010):
• The project team recapped the project
history and Sub Area Plan, offered a
summary of stakeholder interviews
conducted to date, and presented work
products developed during the June 3,
2010 Design Charrette. Action items
included: discussion about the design
concepts developed during the Charrette,
review of stakeholder interview list, and
media outreach strategies. Meeting #3 (July 9, 2010):
• The project team offered a recap
of the prior working group meeting,
ongoing media outreach, the July
1st Groundbreaking Ceremony, and
presented the work products developed
during the June 3rd and 29th team
design charrette. Action items included:
discussion about the design concepts
developed and upcoming public open
house.
Meeting #4 (August 12, 2010):
• The project team recapped the Public
Open House held on July 28th, offered
an update on natural resource site visits,
and provided an construction update
on the Indiana 49 at US 20 Bridge. Action items included: discussion about
feedback received during the Public
Open House and next steps.
Meeting #5 (September 9, 2010)
• The project team presented the preferred
development plan and proposed
development guidelines for the Sub Area.
Next steps for the project were also
discussed, including Plan presentation
to the Town of Porter Redevelopment
Commission, Plan Commission and
Town Council. Public Open House
A public open house was conducted on
July 28th at Porter Town Hall to engage
the general public and share with them
the design concepts and gather their
feedback. The meeting agenda included
project recap and update, presentation of
the preliminary character sketches for the
corridor improvements, and design concepts
for the gateway development. After the
presentation, the participants were engaged
in a candid dialogue about the elements from
the concepts that they liked or disliked. This
information was used to develop the draft
concepts. Site Visits
Site reconnaissance was conducted as part
of the process during different phases of the
project. These included site visits for visual
survey, environmental validation and context
understanding.
Team Design Charrettes
Consultant team design charrettes were
conducted at various stages throughout the
process to analyze information gathered and
to brainstorm design ideas. These charrettes
were held on May 29th, June 3rd & 29th, July
13th, and August 18th.
Lak
ic
e M
hig
Indiana Dunes
State Park
an
rail
et T
lum
Ca
2
.1
U.S
Indiana Dunes
National Lakeshore
Working Group Meeting
Dune Park South
Shore Station
1
SR 49
Cowles
Bo
With Gr g Trail
eenbelt
rail
et T
lum
Ca
l
ai
We Tr
o-Ki-
Ly-C
Lakeshore Gateway
Sub-Area Plan Boundary
U.S. 20
2b
2a
. 12
U.S
2a
Proposed Marquette
Greenway Trail
Br
ic
ar
d
In
3
Interstate 94
SR
ky
Waverly Rd.
Tr
a
il
49
et
lum
Ca rail
T
tle
Lit iver
R
Wagner Rd.
Mineral Springs Rd.
Site Visits - Environmental Validation
. 20
U.S
Dorothy Buell Memorial
Visitor Center
Development Zones within the Study Area
Various themes emerged as part of
the inclusionary process. The following
summarizes the potential uses for each of the
development zones in the Sub Area. These
themes and potential land uses were used to
develop the alternative design concepts that
were tested with the development community
to develop a realistic concept plan.
Site Visits
Common Themes:
• Preserve corridor’s natural beauty
• Indiana 49 is the “Gateway to the Indiana
Dunes”
• POTENTIAL! POTENTIAL! POTENTIAL!
• Wayfinding signage must be improved
• Redevelop the water park – make it what
it can be!
• Create a pedestrian-friendly area
Potential Uses by Zone
(see illustration above)
Public Open House
Redevelopment Zone 1: Option A
• Include café – restaurant
• Include trail head
• Develop within existing footprint.
Redevelopment Zone 2A
• Theme based development, inspired by
dunes and lake
• Preserve Dunes Creek and emphasize
water quality and low intensity resort
development/retreat center
• Dunes Creek Park
Water Park Location:
• Family entertainment venue
• Community infill with residential and/or
business park
Redevelopment Zone 2b
• Integrate visitor center in new
development
• Family oriented uses with resort, water
park, lodging
• Multi-modal center at visitor center
Redevelopment Zone 3
• Visual enhancement/beautification of
the Indiana 49 corridor (Interstate 94
and Indiana 49, Indiana 49 and Oak Hill
Road), landscaping and streetscaping,
bridge enhancements
• Gateways/wayfinding and signage
Redevelopment Zone 1: Option B
• Transit oriented development with multimodal node (train station, trolley, bikers,
pedestrian and cars), bike rental/outfitter
• Transit oriented development with mix of
uses (hotel with structured parking, office
space, café/restaurants, etc).
Public Open House
8
3 Understanding Porter
Context
The Town of Porter is home to the Indiana
Dunes National Lakeshore and, with a
population of 4,972, enjoys a diverse mix
of both people and businesses. Porter lies
within Porter County and is a member of the
Duneland Communities, which also include
Beverly Shores, Burns Harbor, Chesterton
and Dunes Acres. Downtown Porter boasts
several restaurants and a quaint residential
neighborhood, while the corridor along U.S.
Highway 20 is home to several manufacturing
and service industries. The Town has seen a
great surge in new residential subdivisions,
indicating that Porter is a great place to live
and raise a family. Porter is uniquely situated
as Indiana’s “Gateway to the Dunes” as the:
•
•
•
•
Crossroads of major roadway networks
that connect the region to the lake,
including I-94, U.S. 20, U.S. 12 and
Indiana 49 which is the officially
designated exit for the Indiana Dunes
National Lakeshore, State Park and
Visitor Center.
Confluence of four regional trails.
Home to three of the state’s most popular
outdoor attractions in the National Park,
State Park and Lake Michigan itself.
Adjacent community to one of the busiest
South Shore commuter rail stations
in the system, connecting the town to
Chicago to the west and South Bend to
the east and other northwest Indiana
communities.
It is important to note that one of the
primary goals of the Gateway to the Dunes
project is to create new and complementary
development that will strengthen existing
investments in areas such as Downtown
Porter and the Indian Boundary Road
commercial area. In the end, the plan
envisions a new, vital tourist oriented
development in the Gateway, transit oriented
development at the Dunes Park South Shore
station, recreation oriented development
around a revitalized State Park Pavilion, and
stronger existing developments as a result of
each finding the right niche. This plan aims to
find that optimal balance and recommend a
connected fabric of parkways, streetscapes,
trails, transit and wayfinding to help them
work in unison.
9
The Gateway to the Indiana Dunes study
area is a 764 acre tapestry of natural
and built systems that reflect the region’s
diverse history and uses. From a natural
perspective, there is a mixture of upland and
bottomland communities, including Dunes
Creek and the surrounding wetlands and
hydric soils of this riparian corridor that forms
a tributary to Lake Michigan. Woodlands,
savanna and prairie communities dot the
uplands and transitional areas, and majestic
dunes punctuate the northern reaches as
one nears Lake Michigan. This natural or
“green infrastructure” is complemented by
an extensive network of built infrastructure
including local and regional highway corridors,
existing developments, regional commuter
rail, communication towers and a myriad of
underground utilities.
In order to understand the appropriate
land use and level of development that
could be sensitively constructed in this
area, a “development suitability analysis”
was prepared based on an assessment
of the site’s physical conditions. This was
conducted only for the study area. Based
on this assessment a series of development
restrictions were mapped and calculated
including:
• Dunes Creek floodplain;
• Existing wetlands;
• Hydric or poorly drained soils
• Mature woodlands;
• Wetland and creek buffers (75’ width)
Using GIS mapping, a “layer” was created
for each of these restrictions, then overlaid
on the others to illustrate the aggregate area
where physical development could occur
with minimal or no mitigation and areas
where development should be discouraged. This analysis is illustrated on this page. In summary, 213.7 acres were deemed
“restricted” (within the study area boundary),
leaving about 93 acres for new and infill
development and about 8.3 acres for transit
oriented development.
Dunes
Creek
Wetlands
Creek
Hydric Soils
Floodplains
Mature Woodland(within study area)
Existing Natural Resources
Wetland & Creek Buffer
Developable Land
Indiana Dunes
State Park
Beverly Shores
Indiana Dunes
National Lakeshore
. 12
U.S
0
.2
Dune Acres
U.S
4
I9
Porter
IN 149
Chesterton
Indiana
49
Burns
Harbor
Sub Area Plan
Boundary
Porter Corporate Boundary
I 80
Duneland Communities
0
3,125 6,250
12,500
18,750
Feet
25,000
State and National Parks
Confluence of Regional Trails. Source: NIRPC Ped & Pedal Plan
rail
et T
lum
Ca
e
rac
dT
oo
new
Du
l
e Trai
-Ki-W
o
Ly-C
Cowles
Bo
With Gr g Trail
eenbel
t
rail
et T
lum
Ca
Sub Area Plan Boundary
Porter Corporate Boundary
Proposed Marquette
Greenway Trail
et
lum
Ca rail
T
tle
Lit iver
R
Br
ic
ky
ar
d
Tr
a
il
Dunes Kankakee Trail
Dunes Kankakee Trail Future Link
Brickyard Trail
Marquette Greenway Trail
Prairie Duneland Trail
Calumet Trail
South Shore Train Station
10
3
National Economic Trends‐Industry Trends In 2010, our County, along with the State of Indiana finds itself in troubled economic times. As you can Gateway Economic Development Strategy Outline: see by the chart listed below, our National Unemployment Rate stands at 9.6%. Looking back to the same time period in 2008, we can see a large increase of 3.4%. National Economic Trends‐Industry Trends Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
9.5
9.5
9.6
9.6
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
In 2010, our County, along with the State of Indiana finds itself in troubled economic times. As you can Economic Development Snapshot
2010
National Economic Trends-Industry Trends
In 2010, Porter County, along with the State of
Indiana finds itself in troubled economic times. As one can see by the adjacent chart the
National Unemployment Rate stands at 9.6%. Looking back to the same time period in 2008,
one can see a large increase of 3.4%. In the State of Indiana, the current
unemployment rate sits at 9.2% slightly better
than the national average. Specific to Porter
County, the unemployment rate in 2010 is yet
lower than the national average. However
looking back to 2008, there has been both
a decrease in the Labor Force as well as an
increase in unemployment of 3.6 %, which
is greater than the increase over the same
period in the State of Indiana.
9.7
9.7
9.7
9.9
9.7
see by the chart listed below, our National Unemployment Rate stands at 9.6%. Looking back to the 2009
7.6
8.1
8.5
8.9
9.4
9.5
9.4
9.7
9.8
10.2
10.0
10.0
same time period in 2008, we can see a large increase of 3.4%. 2008
4.9
4.8
5.1
5.0
5.5
5.6
5.8
6.2
6.2
6.6
6.8
7.2
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
In the State of Indiana, the current unemployment rate sits at 9.2% slightly better than the national 2010
9.7
9.7
9.7
9.9
9.7
9.5
9.5
9.6
9.6
average. Specific to Porter County, the unemployment rate in 2010 is yet lower than the national 2009
7.6
8.1
8.5
8.9
9.4
9.5
9.4
9.7
9.8
10.2
10.0
10.0
average. However looking back to 2008, there has been both a decrease in the Labor Force as well as an 2008
4.9
4.8
5.1
5.0
5.5
5.6
5.8
6.2
6.2
6.6
6.8
7.2
increase in unemployment of 3.6 % which is greater than the increase over the same period in the State Source:
Bureau of Labor Statistics
of Indiana. In the State of Indiana, the current unemployment rate sits at 9.2% slightly better than the national September 2010 Unemployment average. Specific to Porter County, the unemployment rate in 2010 is yet lower than the national average. However looking back to 2008, there has been both a decrease in the Labor Force as well as an Labor
Force
Employed
Unemployed
Rate
increase in unemployment of 3.6 % which is greater than the increase over the same period in the State of Indiana. 79,676
73,035
6,641
8.3
Average Annual Unemployment 2008
September 2010 Unemployment Labor Force
Employed
Unemployed
Rate
Labor Force
Employed
Unemployed
Rate
84,681
80,677
4,004
4.7
6,641
8.3
Source:
Development
79,676 Indiana Department of Workforce
73,035
Average Annual Unemployment 2008
As indicated by the Federal Reserve, as
Labor Force
Employed
Unemployed
Rate
As indicated by the Federal Reserve, “U.S. economic activity and output dropped far below full capacity, “U.S. economic activity and output dropped
and employers shed large numbers of jobs, the unemployment rate climbed to more than twice the far below full capacity and employers shed
84,681
80,677
4,004
4.7
corresponding natural (full capacity) rate of unemployment. Moreover, because it now takes longer to large numbers of jobs, the unemployment rate
development opportunity, it is recommended
AIA
attributes
this downturn to several factors,
find a job, a large and growing portion of workers either have ceased looking for work or accepted part‐
Source:
Indiana Department of Workforce Development
climbed to more than twice the corresponding
that an analysis be completed and utilized
including
the current status of the financial
time jobs instead of the full‐time jobs that they prefer; these individuals are not counted in the official natural (full capacity) rate of unemployment.
to attract the commercial development
industry,
large surplus of commercial space,
unemployment rate.” It is clear to see from the above referenced rates as well as the Federal Reserve Moreover, because it now takes longer to find
As indicated by the Federal Reserve, “U.S. economic activity and output dropped far below full capacity, within the Area. Additionally, as the fragile
and
the general international business
review of economic activity, that in order to decrease the nation’s unemployment, greater production a job, a large and growing portion of workers
and employers shed large numbers of jobs, the unemployment rate climbed to more than twice the nature of the lending community continues,
climate. With
the exception of the industrial
and output is required across all industry sectors. corresponding natural (full capacity) rate of unemployment. Moreover, because it now takes longer to either have ceased looking for work or
community support for such development,
sector,
AIA consensus (which is made up
find a job, a large and growing portion of workers either have ceased looking for work or accepted part‐
accepted part-time jobs instead of the full-time
either through allocation of funding to offset
of
McGraw Hill, Global Insight, Moody’s
time jobs instead of the full‐time jobs that they prefer; these individuals are not counted in the official jobs that they prefer; these individuals are not
public improvements and/or use of tax
Economy.com,
FMI and Reed Construction
unemployment rate.” It is clear to see from the above referenced rates as well as the Federal Reserve counted in the official unemployment rate.” increment financing or other incentives, will
Data) projects a positive trend in expenditures
review of economic activity, that in order to decrease the nation’s unemployment, greater production It is clear to see from the above referenced
be necessary and may need to be more
across all of the private sector activities. and output is required across all industry sectors. rates as well as the Federal Reserve aggressive than previous incentive packages
In relation to the Gateway Project Area,
review of economic activity, that in order to
for similar projects that were retail in nature in
targeted development activities include
decrease the nation’s unemployment,For the purposes of this analysis, we utilized a review of industry sectors as identified in ZweigWhite greater
the region, such as Cabala’s in Hammond and
Hotel, Retail and Amusement/Recreation. 2010 ACE Industry outlook. As one could well imagine, few of the economic indicators reviewed showed production and output is required across
all
Bass Pro Shop in Portage.
Because of the specific nature of the
growth. Specifically, the private construction markets such as manufacturing, hotels, retail industry sectors.
entertainment and offices have taken a large hit across the board in 2010. Below is a review of the For the purposes of this analysis, we private current and projected investments that could have an impact in the Gateway Project Area. utilized a review of industry sectors asThese figures are provided by the American Institute of Architects: identified in ZweigWhite 2010 ACE Industry
outlook. As one could well imagine, few of
the economic indicators reviewed showed
growth. Specifically, the private construction
markets such as manufacturing, hotels, retail
entertainment and offices have taken a large
hit across the board in 2010. The adjacent
chart is a review of the private current and
projected investments that could have an
impact in the Gateway Project Area. These
figures are provided by the American Institute
of Architects:
11
July 2010 AIA Market Consensus Growth Forecasts
Market Sector
Commercial
Office
Retail/Other Commercial
Hotel
Industrial
Institutional
Health
Education
Religious
Public Safety
Amusement/Recreation
Source: The American Institute of Architects
2010
-20.30%
-29.60%
-29.10%
-25.60%
2011
3.10%
5.50%
0%
8.70%
-21.30%
-2%
-12.30%
-6.50%
-13.20%
-10.20%
-9.10%
-14.40%
4.10%
5.10%
1.30%
0%
0.70%
8.10%
AIA attributes this downturn to several factors including the current status of the financial industry, Lake 132 $ 46,391,217 1.21%
2 Porter 57 $ 19,769,125 0.52%
9 LaPorte 30 $ 6,869,955 0.18%
15 Total $ 73,030,297 1.91%
Source: www.recovery.org In reviewing the total allocation by County, Northwest Indiana levels of investment paled in comparison Regional Activities
Northwest Indiana has had some positive
activities and investments occur in
government (including stimulus-funded
projects), medical and heavy industrial
sectors. With substantial investments
occurring at U.S. Steel, Mittal Steel and BP
Whiting Refinery, technical and construction
professionals have seen steady opportunities. The decline in construction is at 15% of 2009
levels and much of that can be attributed to
the reduction in housing. At a federal level,
the federal stimulus program provided for
1,864 projects in the State of Indiana with
a total investment of $3.81 billion. In Lake
Porter and LaPorte counties the projects and
investments are listed on adjacent table.
In reviewing the total allocation by County,
Northwest Indiana levels of investment paled
in comparison to those around Marion County. The investments in surrounding counties
included; Howard County (18th in population)
$131 M, Madison (12th in population) $204
M and Hamilton (5th in population) $549 M
for a total of $880 M or 23%. This amount
excludes Marion County and represents an
investment of 12 times of what was indicated
for Northwest Indiana. Northwest Indiana
communities need to continue to promote
local private sector investment and utilization
of incentives where necessary to procure
new investment. This also serves as an
indication of the importance of regional
economic development efforts such as the
Regional Development Authority and County
Redevelopment Commissions. Housing Data:
Porter County has had a stable housing
market for the previous decade. There has
been an increase in population over the last
10 years and a successful housing market. The Town of Porter and Porter County have
experienced substantial growth during the
last 10 years. According to the 2009 Census
Estimate, the town’s population increased by
8.2% since 2000,while the county’s population
increased by 26.9% since 1990. In recent
years (2008 to present) there has been a
to those around Marion County. The investments in surrounding counties included; Howard County 1,864 projects in the State of Indiana with a total investment of $3.81 billion. In Lake Porter and LaPorte th
(18
in population) $131 MM, Madison (12th in population) $204 MM and Hamilton (5th in population) counties the projects and investments are listed below, $549 MM for a total of $880 MM or 23%. This amount excludes Marion County and represents an Stimulus Project Northwest Indiana investment of 12 times of what was indicated for Northwest Indiana. Northwest Indiana communities need to continue to promote local private sector investment and utilization of incentives where Number of Percentage of Rank in County Projects Level of Investment Total Size necessary to procure new investment. This also serves as an indication of the importance of regional Lake 132 $ 46,391,217 1.21%
2 economic development efforts such as the Regional Development Authority and County Redevelopment Commissions. Porter Housing Data: 57 $ 19,769,125 0.52%
9 LaPorte 30 $ 6,869,955 0.18%
15 Porter County has had a stable housing market for the previous decade. There has been an increase in population over the last 10 years and a successful housing market. The Town of Porter and Porter Total $ 73,030,297 1.91%
County have experienced substantial growth during the last 10 years. According to the 2009 Census Estimate, the town’s population increased by 8.2% since 2000,while the county’s population increased Source: www.recovery.org by 26.9% since 1990. In recent years (2008 to present) there has been a significant slowdown on In reviewing the total allocation by County, Northwest Indiana levels of investment paled in comparison housing sales as well as a decrease in average sale prices per units. Below is a change of housing values, to those around Marion County. The investments in surrounding counties included; Howard County sales and Dollar Value over the last five years. (18th in population) $131 MM, Madison (12th in population) $204 MM and Hamilton (5th in population) Housing Statistics Porter County $549 MM for a total of $880 MM or 23%. This amount excludes Marion County and represents an Year Units Sold Average Price Total Dollar Value investment of 12 times of what was indicated for Northwest Indiana. Northwest Indiana communities 2006 2255 $187,256 $422,262,908 need to continue to promote local private sector investment and utilization of incentives where necessary to procure new investment. This also serves as an indication of the importance of regional 2007 2103 $197,336 $414,997,987 economic development efforts such as the Regional Development Authority and County Redevelopment Commissions. 2008 1630 $191,576 $312,269,102 Housing Data: 2009 1473 $182,002 $268,088,959 Porter County has had a stable housing market for the previous decade. There has been an increase in population over the last 10 years and a successful housing market. The Town of Porter and Porter 2010 1162 $183,957 $213,757,806 County have experienced substantial growth during the last 10 years. According to the 2009 Census As you can see by the significant decrease in Total Dollar Value in 2006 to 2010, there was a decrease in Estimate, the town’s population increased by 8.2% since 2000,while the county’s population increased housing sales of 40% which represents $168MM in economic activity in the County. On the town of by 26.9% since 1990. In recent years (2008 to present) there has been a significant slowdown on Porter level, the decrease in housing economic activity represented closer to a 50% decrease. the decrease in housing economic activity
significant
slowdown on housing sales, as
housing sales as well as a decrease in average sale prices per units. Below is a change of housing values, represented closer to a 50% decrease.
well
as a decrease in average sale prices per
sales and Dollar Value over the last five years. Town of Porter units. Below is a change of housing values,
Year Units Sold Average Price Total Dollar Value The corridor is located within the Lake
sales
and2006 dollar value over the last
five years. Housing Statistics Porter County 64 $186,414 $11,930,526 Michigan Watershed
and a segment of the
Year Units Sold Average Price Total Dollar Value 2006 2255 $187,256 $422,262,908 2009 1473 $182,002 $268,088,959 corridor
is
within
the
Indiana
As one can
see by the significant57 decrease $169,099 2007 $9,638,652 Dunes National
Lakeshore. The
corridor
also provides access
in Total Dollar Value in 2006 to 2010, there
2007 2103 $197,336 $414,997,987 2010 1162 $183,957 $213,757,806 to
the
South
Shore
Chicago
was a decrease
of 40%
2008 in housing sales49 $164,733 $8,071,907 and South Bend
As you can see by the significant decrease in Total Dollar Value in 2006 to 2010, there was a decrease in Interurban
Commuter
Railroad. which represents $168M in economic activity
housing sales of 40% which represents $168MM in economic activity in the County. On the town of 2008 1630 $191,576 $312,269,102 2009 44 level, $166,844 $7,341,126 in the County. On
the Town of Porter
Porter level, the decrease in housing economic activity represented closer to a 50% decrease. 2010 32 $169,730 $5,431,347 Town of Porter Year Units Sold Average Price Total Dollar Value Source: GNIAR 2006 64 $186,414 $11,930,526 The corridor is located within the Lake Michigan Watershed and a segment of the corridor is within the 2007 57 $169,099 $9,638,652 Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. The corridor also provides access to the South Shore Chicago and South Bend Interurban Commuter Railroad. 2008 49 $164,733 Gateway Project Development Area: $8,071,907 2009 44 $166,844 $7,341,126 The Gateway Project Development Area is a total of 148 acres for development adjacent to the National Lakeshore and Indiana Dunes State Park. As you can see by the targeted project map and uses, the 2010 32 $169,730 $5,431,347 Town is pursuing a mixture of family oriented venues, hotel, housing and limited retail development. The targeted economic development opportunities have been defined so as to capitalize on the more Source: GNIAR than 2.9MM visitors that visit the National and State park adjacent to the Gateway Project Area. The corridor is located within the Lake Michigan Watershed and a segment of the corridor is within the Insert Area Map Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. The corridor also provides access to the South Shore Chicago and 12
4 Framework
Guiding Principles
This study represents the implementation of
key recommendations from the Marquette
Plan and embraces the vision and principles
established in that plan. In addition, the following project specific
guiding principles were established to provide
additional guidance for the more detailed
recommendations in this plan. These are
outlined below and illustrated on the adjacent
page.
Embrace the Resources
• Extend park to Interstate 94 / Indiana 49 interchange
• Preserve, protect & enhance environmental systems
• Leverage Porter’s location at the confluence of the region’s green infrastructure
Complementary Development
•
Balance resident & visitor needs
•
Expand economic activity, not move it
•
Promote family-oriented uses
Extend the Stay
•
Capitalize on existing tourist destinations (natural and built)
•
Promote the region as one destination with diverse types of activities for all,
encouraging multiple day stays
•
Create a place to live, work, play and stay
Transform the Corridors
13
•
Leverage and enhance existing transportation assets, including mass transit
•
Implement “Complete Streets” policies
•
Provide “Green Streets” in all new development
•
Enhance the arrival experience
Indiana Dunes
State Park
The
Pavilion
ail
et Tr
um
Cal
2
.1
U.S
-Ki-We
Ly-Co
Trail
Indiana Dunes
National Lakeshore
ail
et Tr
IN 49
um
Cal
2
.1
U.S
U.S. 20
Oak Hill Rd.
0
IN
I - 94
49
Waverly Rd.
.2
U.S
I - 94
pRINCIPLE - Extend Stay
rd
ckya
Bri l
Trai
Embrace the Resources
n
iga
ich
eM
Lak
The
Pavilion
Indiana Dunes
State Park
ail
et Tr
um
Cal
2
.1
U.S
-Ki-We
Ly-Co
Trail
Indiana Dunes
National Lakeshore
TOD
ail
Main St.
IN 49
2
.1
U.S
Tremont Rd.
et Tr
um
Cal
U.S. 20
The
Infill
Oak Hill Rd.
0
Waverly Rd.
.2
U.S
Gateway to the Indiana
Dunes - Sub Area Boundary
INGateway
49
I - 94
I - 94
Downtown
Indian Boundary Rd.
Corridor
pRINCIPLE - Complementary development
rd
ckya
Bri l
Trai
Complementary Development
n
iga
ich
eM
Lak
The
Pavilion
Indiana Dunes
State Park
ail
et Tr
um
Cal
2
.1
U.S
-Ki-We
Ly-Co
Trail
Indiana Dunes
National Lakeshore
ail
Main St.
IN 49
2
.1
U.S
Tremont Rd.
et Tr
um
Cal
IN
Oak Hill Rd.
.
U.S
Waverly Rd.
20
U.S. 20
49
I - 94
I - 94
Downtown
Indian Boundary Rd.
Corridor
Framework
rd
ckya
Bri l
Trai
Extend the Stay
n
iga
ich
eM
Lak
The
Pavilion
Indiana Dunes
State Park
ail
et Tr
um
Cal
2
.1
U.S
-Ki-We
Ly-Co
Trail
Indiana Dunes
National Lakeshore
ail
Tremont Rd.
IN 49
2
.1
U.S
Main St.
et Tr
um
Cal
U.S. 20
0
.2
U.S
Waverly Rd.
Oak Hill Rd.
IN
49
I - 94
I - 94
Downtown
rd
ckya
Bri l
Trai
Indian Boundary Rd.
Corridor
14
4
Composite Framework
Based on stakeholder and public input over
the course of the project, the planning team
developed a “framework plan” that builds
upon the guiding principles to illustrate the
components of the Sub Area Plan. The diagram on the following pages highlights
the plan’s key recommendations. They are
categorized by:
•
Embrace the Resources – pertaining
to green infrastructure enhancements,
including parks and open space.
•
Transform the Corridors – pertaining to
motorized and alternative transportation
corridors.
•
Complementary Development and
Extend the Stay – pertaining to new and
re-development opportunities throughout
the study.
Each of these is described in greater detail
later in this document with a series of
actionable recommendations and associated
guidelines.
Gateway Communities
A growing body of research has defined and studied the trends in Gateway Communities.
Gateway communities can be described as “towns and cities that border America’s
magnificent national and state parks, wildlife refuges, forests, historic sites, wilderness areas
and other public lands”. These areas are often small towns surrounding national and state
parks, and are seeing significant changes in all aspects of their community.*
“Gateway communities are important not just because they provide food and lodging for
Americans on their way to visit national parks and other public lands. They are also portals to
our most cherished landscapes. Indeed, they define the park experience for many visitors.” **
* Participant’s Guide for Gateway Communities: Keys to Success. Interactive Television Workshop. The
Conservation Fund, 2004; p. 4; Tourism and Preservation in Gateway Communities: A Case Study of
the Towns Surrounding Mesa Verde National Park, Valerie L. Gomez, University of Pennsylvania, 2005.
** Gateway Communities by Edward McMahon, PCJ #34, Spring 1999.
15
ke
La
Indiana Dunes
State Park
The
Pavilion
n
iga
ch
Mi
l
ai
t Tr
e
m
lu
Ca
Ly-Co-Ki-We Trail
Indiana 49
lu
2
.1
U.S
Waverly Rd.
a
an
20
di
49
S.
U.
U.S. 20
In
Oak Hill Rd.
Tremont Rd.
l
Main St.
U.S
ai
t Tr
e
m
Ca
2
.1
Indiana Dunes
National Lakeshore
Saemann Rd.
I - 94
Brickyard
Trail
Downtown
Porter
in
L
n
l
co
.
St
Woodlawn Ave.
Existing Trails
Embrace the resources
Dunes Creek Greenway Corridor
Indian Boundary Rd.
Corridor
Complementary Development / Extend the Stay
Gateway Development
Transit Oriented Development
Streetscape Improvements/Trail Linkages/Wayfinding Signage
Community Infill Development
Gateways
Pavilion Redevelopment
16
5 Community Investment
Green Infrastructure
One of the distinguishing features of the study
area, and perhaps its greatest potential asset
as a tourist attraction, is the surrounding
open space and natural areas. From lakefront
dunes to inland riparian corridors, this green
infrastructure not only defines the character
and experience for visitors but also connects
the components of the Sub Area through a
potential greenway network. 17
Indiana Dunes
State Park
l
rai
et T
lum
Ca
Ly-Co-Ki-We Trail
U.S
Main St.
2
.1
U.S
Tremont Rd.
l
rai
et T
lum
Ca
2
.1
Indiana Dunes
National Lakeshore
Oak Hill Rd.
.
.S
U
Waverly Rd.
As the guiding principle states, “embracing
the resources” is critical to both provide the
green, park character sought by visitors but
also to leverage it for economic gain. High
quality, connected green corridors to the
State and National Park areas is critical to
capturing these tourists and getting them to
embrace alternative transportation instead of
their cars. Integrating this green character
into the community fabric is critical in
making downtown Porter and other existing
developments a logical part of the visitor’s
journey and getting them to spend time and
money throughout the community.
La
The
Pavilion
n
iga
ich
M
ke
Indiana 49
Three million people visit the area annually
for one thing – to enjoy the natural beauty
and escape provided by the Indiana Dunes
and Lake Michigan. These resources are
nationally renowned but not embraced to
the level one would expect of such national
treasure. These natural systems actually
extend beyond the boundaries of these
parks, as riparian corridors associated with
tributaries, such as Dunes Creek and the
Little Calumet River, as well as remnant
prairies, savannas and woodlands that are
scattered throughout the study area, often
times adjacent to these riparian corridors.
Fortunately, these corridors were difficult to
develop due to hydric soils and wetlands
and are perfect for providing the green
infrastructure needed to balance the projected
development envisioned in this plan. 20
U.S. 20
In
di
an
a
49
Saemann Rd.
I - 94
Downtown
Brickyard
Trail
n
ol
nc
Li
.
St
Woodlawn Ave.
Green Infrastructure Framework diagram
Wetlands, floodplains, hydric soils (outside parks)
Wetlands, floodplains, hydric soils (inside parks)
State/National Park
Dunes Creek Greenway Corridor
Dunes Kankakee Parkway / Gateway Corridor
Indian Boundary Rd.
Corridor
The
Pavilion
The Sub Area Plan includes a series
of components and associated
recommendations for green infrastructure
including:
•
•
•
Parks and Open Space – Despite the
large amount of open space contained
in the National and State Parks, it is
essential that smaller scale park and
flexible public spaces also be contained
in each of the development areas. These serve a number of purposes,
including beautification and gateway
potential, resident programs and
community activities, and seasonal
visitor activities that keep the area lively
and attractive to visit on a regular basis,
regardless of the season.
Riparian Corridors - corridors such as
Dunes Creek and its tributaries are ideal
for linear, connective open spaces that
contribute to the community’s overall
character and function in line with the
principles of this plan. Sensitively
placed trails, overlooks and interpretive
information provides a destination in
itself, while also providing important
linkages in the overall open space and
non-motorized transportation network. The plan identifies a “Dunes Creek
Greenway” that provides a link from the
creek’s headwaters near Oak Hill and
Waverly to the lakeshore where it enters
the state park.
Water Resources and Ecology – the
Gateway area has a number of corridors
comprised of difficult to develop hydric
soils. These corridors are ideal for
key water resource improvements
that provide both habitat and drainage
functions that are needed in supporting
the new development without impacting
surrounding fragile natural areas. They
are also ideal for sensitive trail and
boardwalk development as part of the
broader non-motorized transportation
system.
Indiana Dunes
State Park
Indiana Dunes
National Lakeshore
Existing Parks & Open Spaces
Indiana Dunes State Park
Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore
New / Enhanced Parks & Open Spaces
Public and private open spaces, programmed open spaces
Enhanced open spaces (including existing woodlands/open spaces)
Dunes Kankakee Parkway / Gateway Corridor enhancement and linkage
Existing & Proposed Open Spaces
Existing & Preserved Natural Resources
The
Pavilion
Existing/Preserved Water Resources
Wetlands
Floodplains
Hydric Soils
Dunes Creek Greenway Corridor along existing natural resources
Dunes Kankakee Parkway / Gateway Corridor enhancement and linkage
18
5
Best Management Strategies
Sustainable stormwater management
practices are key to maintaining and restoring
water quality and the natural functions of
streams, rivers, lakes, wetlands and aquifers
in Porter County (source: Porter County
Landscape Standards and Guidelines,
Stormwater Best Management Practices).
It is the intent of this plan to reduce storm
water runoff, increase infiltration, improve
water quality, improve air quality, decrease
green house gas emissions, reduce water
consumption, and reduce solid wastes.
There are various techniques and
strategies that can be used to achieve this
sustainable goal. Porter County Landscape
Standards and Guidelines lists “Low Impact
Development Best Management Practices”
or LID. The following techniques are not
exhaustive but are recommended as they
would be effective in reducing impervious
surface and stormwater runoff.
Techniques
Vertical gardens
•
Includes landscaping for narrow vertical
spaces and providing aesthetically
pleasing vertical pedestrian views (in
areas with limited space and at locations
that require screening).
Vegetated Swales/Rain Gardens
•
Includes landscaping with water
absorbing species planted in
depressions (internal landscaped areas
in parking lots, along streets, medians
etc.) to collect and convey storm water,
allowing natural filtration.
Green Buffers
•
Landscaped areas adjacent to sidewalks
and streets to slow the flow of storm
water runoff, filter pollutants and visually
enhance the streetscape.
Pervious pavements
Green Roof (roof top gardens), green
terraces, eco-roof
•
•
•
•
Recommended to be used for walkways,
patios, plazas, driveways, parking lots,
and some portions of streets.
Recommended to be used to minimize
impervious surfaces, reduce urban heat
island effects, and capture rainwater.
Street “bump outs” can be used to
reduce impervious area, create runoff
capture areas and provide traffic
calming.
•
A lightweight roof system of
waterproofing material with thin soil/
shallow root/drought resistance
vegetation.
Recommended to be used in place of
traditional roofs as a way to minimize
impervious surface, reduce urban heat
island effects, capture rainwater, improve
air quality and improve aesthetics
pleasing to the upper view shed.
Contained planter
Cisterns (capture and reuse)
•
•
•
•
Recommended to be used to plant trees,
shrubs, and ground cover and are placed
over impervious surfaces, such as,
sidewalks, plazas, streets.
Recommended to be a prefabricated
pot or constructed on site in a variety of
shapes and dimensions.
Accept precipitation only, not storm
water runoff and enhance the visual
appearance of areas where they are
placed. Low Impact Development (LID): LID is
about preventing runoff by integrating
site design and planning techniques
that minimize impervious surfaces, and
preserves natural systems, open space,
and natural hydrologic function. Parking Lots: vegetated swales example
Parking Lots: vegetated swales example
Cisterns are indoor or outdoor rain
catchment systems used to capture roof
runoff.
Pervious pavement example
19
Dunes Kankakee Trail linkage through Dunes Creek illustration. A boardwalk providing pedestrian linkage with minimal impact to existing green infrastructure.
Bioswale example
Rain Garden example
Reduction in paved surface by addition of landscaped islands
20
5
Land Use Framework
Various land use themes emerged as part
of the inclusionary process (see page 7 for
process). Two alternative land use concepts
were developed where varying land use
options were tested. Through an iterative
process of refinement and dialogue, a
preferred land use framework was developed
that is illustrated on the adjoining page. For
planning purposes, various development
zones were created, each with diverse and
relevant land uses. These development zones
and the details about land uses within each of
these zones are listed in the adjoining table.
As stated earlier, it was one of the primary
goals of this project to create new and
complementary development that will
strengthen existing investments in areas such
as downtown Porter and the Indian Boundary
Road commercial area. The plan envisions:
•
•
•
•
•
New vital tourist oriented development
in the family resort zone and gateway
retreat center zone;
Preservation zone where the emphasis is
preserving existing natural resources and
offer compatible recreation opportunities
with trail linkages, trail heads and nodes
for nature lovers.
Recreation oriented development around
a revitalized State Park Pavilion.
Transit oriented development at the
Dunes Park South Shore Station
Community infill opportunities where
the emphasis is to strengthen existing
developments as a result of each finding
the right niche.
General Program
Hotel*
±8.7
C Pedestrian oriented general commercial
±3.5
D Family style vacation rental villas/cottages1
±9.2
E Potential future for-sale & rental villas/cottages1
±16.0
Preservation Zone
F Preserve existing natural resources, Dunes Creek
±60.0
greenway corridor
Gateway Retreat Center Zone
G Lodge with meeting rooms & detached cottages for
±11.2
smaller receptions and social events.
Total Gateway Development Zone2
±121.2
Community Infill Zone
H Potential family entertainment venue/business park
±20.2
I Potential residential development
±13.7
Total Community Infill Zone
±33.9
Transit Oriented Development Zone
J Transit oriented development at Dune Park South
±8.3
Shore Station - mixed use development with links to
Dunes Kankakee Parkway and regional trails.
Existing Developments
1 Existing developments within Gateway development
±14.6
zone
1. Total acreage includes hydric soils in this zone
2. Excludes existing developments
Area
75,000 sq. ft.
Indoor water park
50,000 - 55,000 sq. ft.
5 - 5.5 acres
General commercial
25,000 - 30,000 sq. ft.
Family style vacation rental (east of Tremont)**
60,000 - 65,000 sq. ft.
Gateway retreat center
35,000 - 40,000 sq. ft.
Putting course
±12.6
B Conference center & potential mini golf
20,000 - 25,000 sq.ft.
Mini Golf Course
Area (acres)
A Hotel & indoor / outdoor water park
Conference center
Outdoor water park
21
Family Resort Zone
2.5 - 2.75 acres
1 acre
No. of spaces
Area
Structured Parking (behind commercial)***
242
85,000 sq.ft.
Structured Parking (behind hotel)***
165
58,000 sq.ft.
Surface Parking (behind conference center)****
182
64,000 sq.ft.
Surface Parking (behind gateway retreat center)****
105
37,000 sq.ft.
Parking
* Based on a standard of 500 sf per room
**A combination of multiple size units (500 sf, 1000 sf, 1500 sf , 2000 sf & 2500 sf)
*** Based on a standard of 350 sf per parking space
**** Based on a standard of 350 sf per parking space
Lake Michigan
The
Pavilion
Indiana Dunes
State Park
2
.1
U.S
Indiana Dunes
National Lakeshore
J
2
.1
In
di
H
I
an
a
Tremont Rd.
Main St.
U.S
C
Waverly Rd.
S.
20
E
F
G
Oak Hill Rd.
1
D
F
1
F
U.
A
B
49
U.S. 20
1
1
In
di
an
a
49
Saemann Rd.
I - 94
0 100 250 500
n
ol
nc
Li
S
t.
Woodlawn Ave.
1000 Ft.
N
Land Use Framework Plan
22
5
Concept Plan
A number of activities and amenities
are recommended in the Sub Area Plan
to provide year-round services to the
residents and the visitors. The following is
a summary of the key recommendations
that are categorized by:
•
•
•
Transit Oriented Development
1
Resort style hotel.
2
Meetings & conference center.
3
3a
3b
4
5
6
7
23
Year round entertainment areas.
• Indoor water park
• Outdoor water park
Pedestrian-friendly node with retail/
duneland outfitters catering to
tourists/residents. Restaurants /cafes
fronting natural landscape & linked
to trail network. 2-level structured
parking with retail fronting the streets
on first level.
Family style vacation rental villas/
cottage/suites fronting greenway
corridors/wooded areas/water. Allows
for users to walk to entertainment
areas.
Potential future developments
(market-driven). For-sale & rental
villas/suites fronting greenway
corridors/wooded areas.
Areas for stormwater management /
existing hydric soils.
8
Potential mini golf course - 3-hole
practice and teaching course.
9
Potential putting course & garden
restaurant - 18-hole garden putting
course.
10
Gateway Promenade: Pedestrianfriendly plaza for community festivals
overlooking development to the west
and natural landscape to the east.
11
Gateway Retreat Center: Retreat
lodge and detached cottages on
Dunes Kankakee Parkway. Lodge
with meeting rooms for smaller
receptions and social events, place
for hosting students, church groups,
camps, and family reunions.
12
Transit-oriented development at
existing train station - hotel, retail,
restaurants/cafes with structured
parking and link to Dunes Kankakee
Parkway, trail node with links to
regional trails.
Community Infill Development
13
Potential family entertainment venue
/ Business Park fronting U.S. 20
and Waverly Road with necessary
buffers.
14
Potential Residential development
adjacent to existing residential
developments.
The detailed recommendations for each
of the development areas are explained
in the following pages. For Gateway
Development Area refer page 25, for
refer page 31, and for Transit Oriented
Development Area refer page 32. 5
This section illustrates the various physical
design elements, their location and
benefits that are proposed for the gateway
development. These include:
• Street framework
• Development intensity
• Open space framework
• Pedestrian circulation
•
•
Street Framework
•
•
•
•
Development Intensity
Street and transportation framework
capitalizes on the existing street network.
Well connected network of existing and
proposed streets integrates this site with
adjacent developments. New roundabout along Dunes Kankakee
Parkway offers a new front door to the
gateway development. Existing entry
drive to the visitor center is re-aligned
with the new roundabout to create
a single point of gateway entry. The
new roundabout also facilitates traffic
calming and pedestrian connectivity to
development across Dunes Kankakee
Parkway.
A second roundabout at the heart of the
development offers ease of circulation,
traffic calming, and an aesthetically
pleasing intersection.
Potential for a gateway promenade - a
small portion of the entrance street can
be used for community festivals.
•
•
•
High intensity and compact development
with up to 4 story buildings close to
Dunes Kankakee Parkway. As one
moves from west to east, lower intensity
development with smaller building
footprints that are up to 1 story high.
Low intensity development west of
Dunes Kankakee Parkway.
A collection of buildings with one to
four story and mix of uses surround the
central roundabout and engage with
street.
Buildings front streets with parking to the
rear.
Parking structures are wrapped by
commercial buildings.
active to passive. These include: Dunes
Creek Greenway Corridor, large open
spaces with gateway trail, landscaped
streets, and front and backyards.
Pedestrian Circulation
•
•
•
Open Space Framework
•
•
•
Linked series of existing and proposed
open spaces.
All natural resources preserved on site.
The natural resources (woodlands,
wetlands, Dunes Creek corridor and
hydric soils) incorporated into parks and
open spaces to be used as trail corridors,
to provide wildlife habitat and natural
scenic areas, and, where appropriate, to
serve as stormwater management areas.
A hierarchy of open spaces ranging from
large to small, public to private, and
Street Framework
•
An interconnected network of streets and
sidewalks emphasize the goal of having
multiple pedestrian/bicyclist connections.
Open spaces and developments are
accessible by foot or bike or transit, as
well as car.
A network of trails that link to sidewalks
and offer range of walking/biking
experiences.
Wider sidewalks that meet the base
of the buildings to promote walkability
(along commercial, hotel, conference
center zone). These areas also offer
the opportunity for outdoor dining
programming.
Different uses throughout the gateway
development are within a 3-5 minute
walking distance, offering ease and
comfort to pedestrians.
Development Intensity
High
Low
P
D
D
D
D
P
Low
P
P
D
25
Existing streets
New street connections
New roundabout
Existing street re-aligned with
new roundabout, replaced with
open space
Existing roundabout vacated/
replaced with open space
Service Drive
Surface parking
Structured parking
Existing buildings
Proposed buildings location
D
Structured parking
Resort style hotel
2
Meetings & conference center
3 Year round entertainment areas
3a •
Indoor water park
Outdoor water park
3b •
4
Potential 3-hole practice and teaching golf course
11 Gateway Retreat Center: Retreat lodge and detached cottages on Dunes Kankakee Parkway. 9
Potential putting course & garden restaurant - 18-hole garden
putting course
d
5
6
Potential future developments
(market-driven). For-sale & rental
villas/suites.
p Surface Parking
Structured Parking
10 Gateway Promenade: Pedestrian-friendly plaza for community festivals.
U.S. 20
Pedestrian-friendly node with retail /
duneland outfitters / restaurants /
Cafes.
Family style vacation rental villas/
cottage/suites.
7
8
9
8
In
di
an
a
p
7
49
d
p
2
3a
3b
7
d
1
Tremont Rd.
1
7
4
5
10
5
6
Areas for stormwater management /
existing hydric soils
Dunes Creek
Greenway
11
Waverly Rd.
p
0 100
Oak Hill Rd.
250
500
1000 Ft.
N
Gateway Development Concept Plan Illustration
d
a
Gateway Promenade
10’-20’ wide sidewalks
5’ wide sidewalks
c
a
a
b
c
a
c
d
d
b
Dunes Kankakee Trail Future Links
Gateway Trail Links
Bike Boulevard (Oak Hill &
Tremont)
3-minute walking radius
5-minute walking radius
Open Space Framework
Enhanced Open Space
along Indiana 49
Private Open Space at
Gateway Development
Public Open Space at
Gateway Development
26
5
A bird’s eye view illustrating the gateway development
area. View looking north along Indiana 49 (Dunes
Kankakee Parkway) with Lake Michigan, the State and
National Parks and the Pavilion in the foreground.
na
ia
Ind
49
U.S. 20
Indiana 49
27
The
Pavilion
Tre
d.
tR
n
mo
28
5
A street level view illustrating pedestrian-friendly, tourism oriented development character at
the heart of the gateway development. View looking north along the proposed new street (just
north of the new roundabout) with restaurants/retail on both sides of the street, active pedestrian
activity and streetscape character.
29
30
5
The Splash Down Dunes property on U.S.
20 offers the opportunity for community infill
development that contributes to Porter’s tax
base. This site that is about 33.9 acres offers
multiple opportunities for development and
potentially could inlcude:
• An office park in the eastern half that
capitalizes on the visibility of U.S. 20
frontage and residential development
in the west half that complements the
surrounding residential area; or
• A family entertainment venue fronting
U.S. 20 and residential development
in the west half that complements the
surrounding residential area
In
di
14
Waverly Rd.
The plans illustrates how this property could
be subdivided with necessary landscape
buffers and linkages.
S.
U.
13a
an
a
49
20
Oak Hill Rd.
Splash Down Dunes property with residential and business park option
13a
Business Park fronting U.S. 20 and
Waverly Road with necessary buffers
14
Residential development adjacent to
existing residential developments
Greenway corridor linking existing & proposed trails/bike
routes with State/National Parks and the Lake
Open space and landscaped buffers along major
corridors & adjacent developments
In
di
Existing wetlands
Dunes Kankakee Trail Future link
an
a
49
On-Street Bike Trail (Waverly)
Existing Trails
S.
U.
13b
Waverly Rd.
14
20
Oak Hill Rd.
Splash Down Dunes property with residential and family entertainment Venue option
13b
31
Family entertainment venue fronting U.S. 20 and Waverly Road with
necessary buffers
14
Residential development adjacent to
existing residential developments
The NICTD Dunes Park South Shore
commuter rail station provides many benefits
to the gateway development area as part of
the multi-modal approach to transportation
in and around the development. In addition,
this parcel offers great potential as a
complementary development site that places
tax generating amenities at the doorstep
of the State and National Park. The plan
envisions this parcel as a denser, vertical
development that uses the air rights of the
existing surface parking lots. By providing
structured parking, both tourism and transit
oriented development (TOD) becomes
possible in a very sustainable way that can
capture millions of potential visitors that
may visit from the Chicago region and leave
their cars behind. In addition, by developing
vertically, it is possible to meet Indiana 49
at street level, giving this development an
address on both U.S. 12 and Indiana 49 in
addition to the South Shore commuter line.
9
na 4
India
Link to Indiana 49 at
street level
Transit Oriented Development illustration. By developing vertically, it is possible to link to Indiana 49 at street level, giving
this development an address on both U.S. 12 and Indiana 49 in addition to the South Shore commuter line.
p
ail
t Tr
me
Calu
d
2
.1
U.S
Link to Indiana 49 at
street level
Indiana 49
Proposed buildings
Link to Gateway Development
Surface Parking
Structured Parking
Promenade
Open space and landscaped buffers along major corridors &
adjacent developments
Existing wetlands
Gateway Trail Link
Existing Trails
Transit Oriented Development opportunity illustration at existing South Shore train station
32
6 Transform the Corridors
The Arrival Experience
Despite the presence of nationally-renowned
green lakefront treasures and the attractive
development product that Porter is committed
to creating, these are lost on the millions of
motorists that are bombarded with a very
different message when traveling through
the region on area highways. The primary
message to these potential visitors is not
about the lakeshore – rather it touts truck
stops, casinos, fireworks, cigarettes, adult
entertainment and tourism in neighboring
states. Porter is doing their part, as highlighted
in this study, with coordinated signage
and wayfinding and new context sensitive
infrastructure guided by cohesive urban
design and landscape standards to
reinforce the gateway character externally
as a branding tool for their community. The
success of Porter’s efforts, however, are
negatively impacted by their surroundings,
but there is only so much that the Town of
Porter can do about it. The solution is not
simply about changing billboards – it involves
a cultural shift on a regional scale with a
new image and message to the millions that
would live, work, play and stay at Indiana’s
lakeshore if properly marketed. Again, Porter
cannot do this alone or beyond their borders,
which makes it critical that overarching bodies
such as Chambers of Commerce and the
three county Convention and Visitor Bureau’s
abutting the lakeshore work collectively on
a cohesive multi-media “branding” message
and campaign for this corridor. This campaign
must tap the positive reasons to visit and
extend the stay in line with this project’s and
the Marquette Plan’s broader objective and
maintain this momentum over the short and
long term. Such an approach will benefit
communities beyond Porter that have similar
potential associated with the dunes and
lakeshore. In addition, it is important that
regional entities such as INDOT and county
highway departments, as well as surrounding
municipalities, embrace the cohesive
infrastructure approach outlined in this plan as
new construction occurs elsewhere on highly
visible bridges and other structures along
major, influential thoroughfares. Dunes Kankakee Parkway (Indiana 49) Gateway at Oak Hill illustration. View looking north along Dunes Kankakee Parkway with secondary gateway elements, streetscape enhancement,
median, pedestrian crosswalks and Dunes Kankakee trail linkage to the east.
33
Dunes Kankakee Parkway Gateway Bridge over I-94 illustration. View looking east along I-94 with primary gateway elements
34
6
Motorized Transportation
The character and function of Porter’s
roadway network within the study area plays
a key role in establishing the Gateway to the
Dunes as a unique place to play and stay, as
well as live and work. Porter is well served
by Indiana 49, U.S. 20, U.S. 12 and I-94,
but each of these lack the community charm
or character that is in line with the gateway
experience sought in this plan. Each of
these roadways has the potential for subtle
or dramatic transformation, whether through
landscaping and urban design gestures or
more dramatic structural changes such as
“road dieting” lane reductions where excess
capacity exists and roundabouts that slow
traffic and convert highways to parkways as
envisioned for Indiana 49.
Like the trail framework, a hierarchy is
envisioned for Porter’s roadways, aligning
character with intended function. Indiana 49,
identified as the primary “brown sign” tourism
exit from I-94 for the dunes and lakeshore,
will remain an important north-south spine in
the area but be transformed from a sterile,
high-speed highway into a narrower, morelively parkway that extends the character of
the state park south to I-94 and beyond. This
will include more visible trail users to convey a
park setting, attractive landscaping and urban
design, cohesive wayfinding and signage,
planted medians, a new roundabout at the
Visitor Center, and a reduction in lanes and
speed as one moves north to the lake. This
“re-branding” of a functional highway into a
parkway is completed with a recommended
name change to “Dunes Kankakee Parkway”.
U.S. 20 will continue to serve the heavy
haul route role it has always played but
receive enhanced landscape treatment
and wayfinding to serve visitors entering
the Gateway along this route. The large
interchange at Indiana 49 will receive
additional landscaping as well and geometric
adjustments to improve function and safety. U.S. 12 will continue to play its current
role of primary scenic east-west connector
along the lakefront but receive wayfinding
improvements and geometric improvements
at the Indiana 49 interchange.
35
Alternative Transportation
The plan also identifies key local connectors
as part of the Gateway experience and
“complementary development” principle. Waverly, Tremont, Oak Hill and Woodlawn
Roads are all classified as important
“Gateway Streetscapes” that will receive a
consistent aesthetic and wayfinding treatment
to reinforce one cohesive district to visitors as
well as residents. The intersection of Indiana 49 and Oak Hill is
the first intersection encountered by tourists
after they exit I-94 and has therefore been
identified as a Primary Gateway Intersection.
Tremont north of U.S. 20 is identified as an
innovative Bike-Transit Boulevard with the
potential to provide a convenient alternative
transportation link directly into the state park
as part of the potential transit loop currently
under further study. This, coupled with the
non-motorized enhancements described
previously, will provide the means for visitors
to conveniently leave their cars behind
when visiting the lakefront in line with the
sustainable principles of this plan.
The diagram on the following page illustrates
the motorized transportation framework.
For planning purposes, the various
motorized corridors within the study area
were subdivided into smaller segments
and were identified by letters for each. The
recommended streetscape characters for
each of the corridors are illustrated in the
following pages. In addition, Chapter 8
(page 63) illustrates sectional diagrams with
recommended streetscape character for each. The Indiana Dunes Gateway Alternative
Transportation Study (ATS) is being
undertaken to analyze various methods of
transporting residents and visitors between
the many uses and attractions along the
Dunes Gateway corridor, extending along
Indiana Route 49 in Porter, Indiana. The
study is being conducted as a partnership
with the Town of Porter, the Indiana
Department of Natural Resources (Indiana
Dunes State Park), the National Park Service
(Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore),
Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation
District, the Porter County Convention,
Recreation and Visitors Commission, and the
Indiana Department of Transportation, elected
officials and project area stakeholders.
Initiated by the Town of Porter as an
outgrowth of the Marquette Plan regional
planning effort, this study examines
Alternative Transportation Systems (ATS)
to improve accessibility and mobility while
reducing the need for private automobiles as
the primary transportation mode in the Dunes
Gateway area. Given the area’s available
resources, the Town of Porter recognized
the need to develop a comprehensive plan
to facilitate ATS opportunities and encourage
utilization of ATS by visitors to the Dunes
Gateway area. It is the vision of this effort that
strategies identified in the plan could improve
access to the lakefront and encourage
greater utilization of lakefront resources, as
well as the amenities and facilities in the
adjacent communities. This will establish the
Indiana Dunes and Dunes Gateway area as
a primary visitor destination in Northwestern
Indiana and the Chicago Metropolitan Area
while encouraging economic development
opportunities in the region. Alternatives being
considered include:
Near-Term Alternatives and Opportunities
•
•
•
•
Shuttle between South Shore Commuter
Rail Line Dunes Park Station and Indiana
Dunes State Park.
Shuttle between Indiana Dunes Visitors
Center and Indiana Dunes State Park.
Improved Information and Wayfinding.
Enhancements to Bicycle and Pedestrian
Transportation.
Mid-Term Alternatives and
Opportunities
•
The
Pavilion
Peak Season Shuttle
between South Shore
Line Dunes Park Station,
Indiana Dunes State Park,
Other Area Attractions, and
neighboring communities.
I
Long-Term Alternatives and
Opportunities
D
N
C
2
.1
U.S
In
di
J
F
Complete streets: “are
designed and operated to
enable safe access for all
users. Pedestrians, bicyclists,
motorists and transit riders of
all ages and abilities must be
able to safely move along and
across a complete street.”
Ingredients that may be found
on a complete street include
sidewalks, bike lanes (or wide
paved shoulders), special
bus lanes, comfortable
and accessible transit
stops, frequent crossing
opportunities, median islands,
accessible pedestrian signals,
curb extensions, and more.
SOURCE: National Complete
Streets Coalition; http://www.
completestreets.org/
0
2
S.
U.
Oak Hill Rd.
E
Downtown
Porter
ln
co
n
Li
.
St
L
Tremont Rd.
es
un
aD e
ian
r
Ind esho
Lak
H
nal
atio
Main St.
•
Fixed Route Bus or Fixed
Guideway Transit to State
Park.
Year Round Fixed Route
Bus Service to Connect
train stations, Lakefront
destinations, area
attractions and neighboring
communities.
Waverly Rd.
•
2
.1
U.S
an
a
U.S. 20
F
K
49
B
G
In
di
an
a
49
A
Saemann Rd.
M
I - 94
Woodlawn Ave.
Motorized Transportation Framework Diagram
H
Tremont - Bike/Trolley Boulevard (up to
Calumet Trail)
C Indiana 49 (roundabout - U.S.12)
I
D Indiana 49 (north of U.S. 12)
Tremont - Bike/Trolley Boulevard
(north of Calumet Trail)
J
U.S. 20
K
Gateway Development Street
L
Lincoln - Downtown Porter
M
I - 94
A Indiana 49 (up to Oak Hill)
B Indiana 49 (Oak Hill - roundabout)
E Woodlawn/Waverly
F Waverly (north of Oak hill) / Tremont
G Oak Hill - Bike Boulevard
36
6
Non Motorized Transportation
Studies indicate that quality trails are
integral to community or regional identity
and competitiveness. Increasingly, trails
are demonstrating a wealth of benefits
beyond utilitarian point A to B transportation,
embracing the principles of economic,
environmental and social sustainability known
as a Triple Bottom Line philosophy that
values these benefits equally. Porter, as the
confluence of four regional trails, is in line
for these same benefits if the right holistic
strategy is embraced. From recreation to
wellness and from education to community
identity, Porter’s trails will carry a greater load
as a defining element of the community’s
fabric as outlined in this plan.
Porter is already in line with a growing trend
which is the demand for trails as tourism
draws or “destination trails” that dovetail
with a community’s broader external sales
message. The Dunes Kankakee Trail will
have this potential if properly developed
as an integral part of Porter and the
Duneland’s overall branding and marketing
that projects a healthy lifestyle as part of
their competitive edge to retain and attract
residents, businesses and visitors. This
plan embraces this philosophy and aims to
connect “to” not “through” these communities,
purposely linking to destinations such as
the new Gateway Development and existing
Visitor Center, the Dunes Park South Shore
rail station, downtown Porter and nearby
regional trails. By embracing this principle
and connecting to other regional trails that
converge in Porter such as the Marquette
Greenway Trail, Porter is positioned to draw
beyond the over 3 million annual visitors to
Indiana Dunes as part of the state-to-state
trail system from Michigan to Illinois and
ultimately beyond via the American Discovery
Trail. This is part of a broader tourism
opportunity for the region that benefits each
potential gateway community along the
corridor. The trail framework on these pages illustrates
a hierarchy of trails intended to achieve the
vision outlined above. It is anchored by
the Dunes Kankakee Trail that will form a
north-south spine primarily along Indiana
37
49 but also through diverse natural areas
associated with Dunes Creek and then
connecting along Waverly Road as a critical
link between the lakeshore, Gateway and
downtown Porter. In addition, this route
creates an exciting trail junction between the
Dunes Kankakee and Porter Brickyard Trails
through downtown Porter, providing a diverse
range of amenities to regional trail users
while providing important patrons to these
establishments. Also illustrated are more
attractive, user friendly junctions between the
Dunes Kankakee and Calumet Trail near U.S.
12 to better tap this potential flow of visitors
into the Gateway and downtown Porter. This plan also illustrates potential linkages
south of Porter, currently being explored by
Porter County and neighboring communities
and the potential for an extended “Dunes
Creek Greenway” that could link the Dunes
Kankakee Trail and Gateway area to
lakeshore and State Park Pavilion. When
completed, the Dunes Kankakee Trail has
the potential for a mainline and business
loop, capitalizing on Porter’s location at the
confluence of four regional trails.
The second tier of connectivity serves local
needs with a comprehensive connector
system to and within the proposed new
developments. These include bike trails,
sidewalks, nature trails and boardwalks that
connect to the regional trails and transit nodes
as part of a holistic alternative transportation
network. This is augmented by on-street bike
lanes, shared bike boulevards and potential
transit loops that turn all roads in the Gateway
area into “complete streets”, which emphasize
a livable, walkable character that doesn’t rely
solely on the personal automobile.
All of this is important both functionally and
psychologically in Porter’s transformation
into a more sustainable, multi-modal gateway
community by making alternative modes such
as bikes, pedestrians and transit highly visible
to visitors and potential visitors. The routes
of this holistic network, coupled with effective
wayfinding and signage, are key components
of the “complementary development” principle
that builds upon the synergies between
each development area and aims to make
movement between them safe and intuitive.
The diagram on this page
illustrates the non motorized
transportation framework. For
planning purposes, the various
trail corridors (existing and
proposed) within the study area
were identified by numbers. The
recommended character for each
of the proposed non-motorized
corridors is illustrated in the
following pages (page 41).
The
Pavilion
l
rai
et T
m
alu
C
Ly-Co-Ki-We
Trail
4
Triple Bottom Line:
l
rai
et T
lum
Ca
It strengthens local economies.
It reinforces and protects the
corridor’s natural and historical
legacies.
5
7
It improves people’s lives.
While the “Gateway to the
Dunes” begins physically at
exit 26B to I-94 travelers, it
must be extended well beyond
that to truly tap the lakeshore’s
potential with an appropriate
message and arrival sequence.
5
6
Source: Friends of CalumetSag Trail; http://www.calsagtrail.
org/Friends_of_the_CalumetSag_Trail/Triple_Bottom_Line.
html, accessed Dec 10, 2010
One must travel 25 miles
east from the Illinois border
before being told that the
dunes or lakeshore exists five
minutes to the north and the
message is not much better
once off the highway. A similar
situation exists westbound from
Michigan. 6
1
4
1
Brickyard
Trail
Downtown
Porter
3
8
2
1
2
Non- Motorized Transportation Framework Diagram
1
6
Bike Boulevard (Oak Hill & Tremont)
2
Dunes Kankakee Trail - Future Links
7
3
Porter Brickyard Trail
8
4
Calumet Trail
Dunes Kankakee Trail - Downtown Porter
Link
5
Gateway Trail Links
38
6
Gateways
Gateways have been proposed for a number
of key locations identified throughout the
Sub Area in order to give an overall sense of
place to the community and provide specific
locational information as to the immediate
surroundings.
These gateway elements will create an
identity for the Town of Porter within the
community and the region, and provide an
address, or generally provide information
and directions. Gateways are recommended
to be located in public R.O.W. or easements
adjacent to R.O.W. Primary Gateway Example - Bridge over I-94
A hierarchy of gateways is recommended,
namely:
1. Primary Gateways
2. Secondary Gateways
3. Tertiary Gateways
Primary Gateways
Recommended at key locations that can
include existing bridges (as portals) and can
serve to announce regional destinations.
Secondary Gateway Example identifying local destinations
Secondary Gateways
Recommended at major street intersections
and announces local destinations.
Tertiary Gateways
Recommended at street intersections/trail
nodes and identifies local businesses.
Tertiary Gateway Example - Banner example on light pole
39
Ca
2
l
Ca
2
.1
U.S
Tremont Rd.
ai
t Tr
e
lum
Indiana 49
u
aD e
ian
r
Ind esho
Lak
nal
tio
Na
Main St.
nes
Ly-Co-Ki-We
Trail
.1
U.S
l
ai
t Tr
e
lum
U.S. 20
Oak Hill Rd.
Waverly Rd.
0
2
S.
U.
Dunes
Creek
In
di
an
a
49
Saemann Rd.
I - 94
Little Calumet
River
Brickyard
Trail
Downtown
Porter
ln
o
nc
Li
.
St
Woodlawn Ave.
Gateway Framework Diagram
Primary Gateways
Secondary Gateways
Tertiary Gateways
40
6
ail
t Tr
me
lu
Ca
Ly-Co-Ki-We
Trail
4
Corridor Experiences
The following pages illustrate various corridor
experiences. These include non-motorized
corridors or trail experiences where motorized
and non-motorized traffic coexist. The key
map illustrates the location of each corridor on
the overall map.
rail
et T
5
7
Dunes Kankakee Trail illustration at Visitor Center
41
5
6
1
Nature Trails
These pages illustrate recommended trails
as they move along natural/wooded areas.
These include:
• The Dunes Kankakee Trail through
diverse natural areas associated with
Dunes Creek
• The potential Dunes Creek Greenway
that could link the Dunes Kankakee Trail
and Gateway area to lakeshore and
State Park Pavilion. • Gateway trails through natural/wooded
areas.
6
1
4
lum
Ca
Brickyard
Trail
Downtown
Porter
3
8
2
1
2
Key Plan
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Calumet Trail
Gateway Trail Links
Dunes Kankakee Trail - Downtown Porter Link
1
Dun
2
Dun
Futu
3
Port
4
Calu
5
Gate
6
Bike
Trem
7
On-S
8
Dun
Dow
Typical trail illustration at natural/wooded areas, Dunes Creek Greenway Corridor and Gateway Trail
Drainage/Amenity
Natural / Wooded Areas
Typical ±12’ wide Trail
Natural / Wooded Areas
Typical trail section at natural/wooded areas
42
6
ail
t Tr
me
lu
Ca
Ly-Co-Ki-We
Trail
4
Corridor experiences
Community Linkage Trails
These pages illustrate recommended trails
as they serve local needs and offer enhanced
connectivity as part of a comprehensive
connector system to and within the existing/
proposed developments. These include:
• The Dunes Kankakee Trail linkage along
Waverly Road
• The shared, on-street “bike boulevard”
on Oak Hill Road between Waverly
Road and Indiana 49/Dunes Kankakee
Parkway.
• The bike-transit boulevard on Tremont
Road from Indiana 49/Dunes Kankakee
Parkway to the state park.
rail
et T
6
1
4
lum
Ca
5
7
5
6
1
Brickyard
Trail
Downtown
Porter
3
8
2
1
2
Key Plan
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Calumet Trail
Gateway Trail Links
Typical corridor experience illustration: Enhanced Dunes Kankakee Trail/Waverly Road Bridge over I-94. View illustrating improved corridor where motorized and non-motorized
traffic coexists and unified bridge similar to U.S. 12 and U.S. 20 bridges
43
1
Dun
2
Dun
Futu
3
Port
4
Calu
5
Gate
6
Bike
Trem
7
On-S
8
Dun
Dow
Typical corridor experience illustration: Dunes Kankakee Trail along Waverly Road at Little Calumet River. View illustrating
improved corridor where motorized and non-motorized traffic coexists, with a trail node, wayfinding/signage elements
Existing Bridge
Trail Head
10’
8’
Travel Lanes
Typical corridor experience section: Dunes Kankakee Trail along Waverly Road at Little Calumet River. View illustrating improved corridor where motorized and non-motorized
traffic coexists, with a trail node, and wayfinding/signage elements
44
6
Corridor experiences
Gateway Area Trails
These pages illustrate recommended on
and off-street trails within the Gateway
development area. These include:
• The off-street trails and sidewalks that
connect various components of the
Gateway development on the east and
west side of Indiana 49/Dunes-Kankakee
Parkway
• The shared, on-street bike lanes on the
Gateway development’s public roadways
•
The Dunes-Kankakee Trail future
extension along Indiana 49/DunesKankakee Parkway between Oak Hill
Road and the new roundabout.
Typical corridor experience: Dunes Kankakee Trail at Gateway development and Visitor Center. View looking west along Dunes Kankakee Parkway towards the gateway retreat center
development with streetscape enhancement, median, pedestrian walk zones, and Dunes Kankakee trail linkage to the east.
45
ail
t Tr
me
lu
Ca
Ly-Co-Ki-We
Trail
4
rail
et T
2
Dunes Kankakee Trail Future Links
3
4
Calumet Trail
5
Gateway Trail Links
6
Bike Boulevard (Oakhill &
Tremont)
7
8
Dunes Kankakee Trail Downtown Porter Link
6
1
4
Possible text
• Key recommendations
• Importance of each trail corridor
with Character renderings
1
lum
Ca
5
7
5
6
1
1
2
2
3
4
Brickyard
Trail
Downtown
Porter
3
Key Plan
8
5
6
1
2
7
8
Calumet Trail
Gateway Trail Links
46
7 Implementation Strategies
Overview
Implementing the Indiana 49 “Gateway to
the Indiana Dunes” Sub Area Plan requires
ongoing collaboration and cooperation of the
stakeholders the formulated this Plan.
Gateway to the Indiana Dunes Sub Area
Plan
•
•
Adopt the Indiana 49 “Gateway to
the Indiana Dunes” Sub-Area Plan as
an amendment to the Town of Porter
Comprehensive Plan for Future Land
Use.
Update the Town’s Zoning Ordinance
and Map to reflect the zoning and
development recommendations outlined
in the Indiana 49 “Gateway to the Indiana
Dunes” Sub-Area Plan.
Indiana 49 Reconstruction
•
•
•
47
Present the Indiana 49 “Gateway to the
Indiana Dunes” Engineer’s Feasibility
Study to the Indiana Department of
Transportation (by Town of Porter). Status: Final Report.
Indiana Dunes State Park Entrance
to Indiana 49 Bridge at NICTD (by
INDOT). Status: Engineering / Design. Construction: INDOT FY 2012. Indiana 49 Reconstruction U.S.
Highway 12 to Interstate 94 (by
INDOT / Town of Porter). Status: Final
Report. Engineering / Design: 2011. Construction: INDOT FY 2012. Dunes Kankakee Trail
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Indiana 49 Bridge at US 20 (by INDOT)
Status: Under Construction
Indiana 49 bridges at US 12 and NICTD
(by INDOT) Status: Under Construction
Indiana Dunes State Park Entrance
to NICTD Bridge segment (by
INDOT). Status: Engineering / Design. Construction: INDOT FY 2012
U.S. Highway 12 to U.S. Highway 20
segment (by Town of Porter). Status:
Engineering / Design. Construction:
2011
Indiana 49 and U.S. Highway 20
Interchange segment (by Porter
County). Status: Engineering / Design. Construction: 2011.
Dorothy Buell Memorial Visitor Center to
“Gateway” Entrance Drive segment (by
Town of Porter). Status: Engineering /
Design. Construction: 2012.
Gateway” Entrance Drive to Oak Hill
Road via Munson segment (by Town of
Porter). Status: Engineering / Design. Construction: 2012.
Oak Hill Road / Waverly Road
Intersection (by Town of Porter). Status:
2012.
Oak Hill Road / Waverly Road
Intersection to Orchard Apartments
segment (by Town of Porter). Status:
2012.
•
•
•
Waverly Road Bridge at Interstate 94 (by
Town of Porter). Status: Engineering /
Design. Construction: 2012. Waverly Road at Little Calumet River
Bridge to League Lane (by Town of
Porter). Status: Engineering / Design. Construction: 2011 / 2012. League Lane to Town of Porter
Corporate Limits (by Town of Porter). Status: Engineering / Design. Construction: 2012. Gateway Development Area
•
•
•
•
Develop a comprehensive incentive
package for “Gateway” Development
Area (by Town of Porter). Status:
Ongoing.
Develop Infrastructure Plans
and Specifications for “Gateway”
Development Area (by Town of
Porter). Engineering / Design: 2011.
Construction: 2011.
Promote “Gateway” Development Area
(by Town of Porter). Status: Ongoing.
•
•
•
Develop and Adopt an Economic
Development Plan for the area at the
Northwest Corner of U.S. Highway 20
and Waverly Road and establish an
allocation area (by Town of Porter). Status: Ongoing.
Develop a comprehensive incentive
package for “Community Infill”
Development Area (by Town of Porter). Status: Ongoing.
Develop Infrastructure Plans and
Specifications for “Community Infill”
Development Area (by Town of Porter). Promote “Community Infill” Development
Area (by Town of Porter). Status:
Ongoing. “Gateway to the Indiana Dunes”
Alternative Transportation Study
•
Present the Indiana 49 “Gateway to the
Indiana Dunes” Engineer’s Feasibility
Study (by Town of Porter). Status: Final
Report 2012.
Next Steps
•
•
•
Request Year Two Funding from
the Northwest Indiana Regional
Development Authority (RDA). Funding
request to include: Construction
funding to the Dunes Kankakee Trail,
Engineering / Design funding for the
“Gateway” development area,
Present the Indiana 49 “Gateway to
the Indiana Dunes” Sub-Area Plan to
project stakeholders (by Town of Porter). Status: Ongoing.
Develop a Downtown Master Plan
(by Town of Porter). Status: Grant
Application Due January 2011.
48
7
As illustrated in the previous sections,
the Town is pursuing a mixture of family
oriented venues, hotel, housing and limited
retail development. The targeted economic
development opportunities have been defined
soInc.as to capitalize on the more than 2.9M
SEH,
visitors that visit the National and State park
adjacent to the Gateway Development Area. File: PORTT 112156
Town of Porter - Gateway Development Area
PorterCounty,Indiana
Tax Year
2030
Gross Tax Rate
Retail/Office/Hotel
$3.0000
(per$100ofassessedvalue)
Rental
$2.0000
(per$100ofassessedvalue)
Taxing District
PorterCounty
PROPOSED ASSUMPTIONS
Bldg.Area(s.f.)
LotArea(Acres)
1
Phase 1 = Hotel/Recreational/Entertainment Center/Waterpark
372,000
2
Phase 2 = Retail/Dining
115,000
2.5
3
Phase 3 = Gateway Retreat Center
77,000
11.2
4
Phase 3 = Vacation Rentals
65,000
14.8
629,000
49.8
Total
CALCULATIONS
21.3
NOTES
Phase 1 = Hotel/Recreational/Entertainment Center/Waterpark
372,000 s.f.
$140
Combinedtotalsq.footage
5
FairMarketValueperSq.Foot
6
TotalAssessedValue(80%)
7
CurrentAssessedValueofLand
$426,000
$20,000peracre
8
SiteDevelopmentCosts
$639,000
$30,000peracre
$41,664,000
9
Total Projected New Assessed Value
$42,729,000
10
Annual Realized Tax Revenue
$1,281,870
RSMeansconstructioncostdata
Conservativelyassumed80%ofvalue
Lineitems2+3+4
InYear2030uponcompletebuildout
includes parking structures
115,000 s.f.
Phase 2 = Retail/Dining
$110
FairMarketValueperSq.Foot
12
13
$50,000
14
$75,000
$30,000peracre
Lineitems2+3+4
$10,120,000
15
$10,245,000
16
$307,350
Phase 3 = Gateway Retreat Center
17
FairMarketValueperSq.Foot(includesparking)
18
19
20
$120
$7,392,000
$224,000
$336,000
21
$7,952,000
22
$238,560
23
FairMarketValueperSq.Foot(includesparking)
24
25
26
27
28
29
Total Annual Realized Tax Revenue
Table showing Economic Impact Analysis
Conservativelyassumed80%ofvalue
$20,000peracre
77,000 s.f.
Phase 3 = Vacation Rentals
49
Combinedtotalsq.footage
11
Assumed80%ofvalue
$20,000peracre
$30,000peracre
Lineitems8+9+10
65,000 s.f.
$115
$5,980,000
$296,000
$444,000
$6,720,000
$134,400
$1,962,180
Assumed80%ofvalue
$20,000peracre
$30,000peracre
Lineitems8+9+10
Viability of the Tourism Market in Porter
The Porter County Tourism Bureau has
long promoted travel to and the vibrancy of
Lake Michigan, the Indiana Dunes and the
National Lakeshore. The Tourism Bureau has
presented information related to the impact
of tourism in Porter County and reports that
$218 M per year is imported into the local
economy, with a spending increase of $83 M
since 2000. This industry has also generated
as estimated 3,488 jobs. Along with the
above reported benefits, the Bureau also
indicates that $77 M in taxes are generated by
visitors which equates to $1,175 per resident. Given the need for a diversified tax base
these funds are used to reduce a potential tax
burden on residents and business alike. This information is critical in that there is a
reported 3 M visitors that recreate in Porter
County and an estimated 2/3 indicated that
they were there for a day trip. Porter County’s
main goals include continuation of marketing
of Porter County and promoting the extended
stay. The Bureau indicates that should 5%
of the Indiana Dunes visitor’s increase their
stay by two nights, revenues attributed to this
activity would increase by $20M annually. As of October 2010, the U.S. Travel
Association indicates that on average, Travel
Price Index is 250.9. This data is based on
the Department of Labor price data collected
for the Consumer Price Index. This amount
is up 4% for the same period last year. More
specific to the type of investment that the
Gateway Project is attempting to attract,
in the Midwest for hotel/waterpark/family
entertainment venues, the average daily
spend for booked room nights ranges as
follows:
•
•
•
•
•
Guest Room Rates $180-$230
Food and Beverage $45-$50
Retail $32-$38
Spa/other $5-$10
Total Average Daily Spend $262-$328
product categories to capitalize on regarding
maintaining and increasing tourism and the
associated revenues. Those “Key Products”
are:
•
Nature and Adventure
•
Culture and Heritage
•
Sports and Outdoor Recreation
•
Entertainment and Attractions
•
Lodging and Conferences
Gateway Development Products:
The anticipated costs for public improvements
for the Gateway Development Area are listed
below. These improvements are designed to
make the Gateway Area, developer ready. Source: HVS Global Hospitality Services
The Tourism Bureau points to five key
Gateway Development Products: The anticipated costs for public improvements for the Gateway Development area are listed below. These improvements are designed to make the Gateway Area, developer ready. Travel Price Index:
As of October 2010, the U.S. Travel
Association indicates that on average,
Travel Price Index is 250.9. This amount is
up 4% for the same period last year.
Source: data based on the Department
of Labor price data collected for the
Consumer Price Index
ROADWAY - GATEWAY PROMENADE
53
Mass Grading
54
Roadway (22' E-E)
2.8
AC
12,000.00
33,000.00
2,010
LF
180.00
361,800.00
55
Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk (10' wide, both sides)
2,010
LF
120.00
241,200.00
56
Water Main
2,010
LF
70.00
140,700.00
57
Sanitary Sewer
2,010
LF
125.00
251,250.00
58
Storm Sewer
2,010
LF
90.00
180,900.00
59
Lighting
2,010
LF
40.00
80,400.00
60
Landscaping (includes blvd islands)
2,010
LF
40.00
SUB-TOTAL
80,400.00
1,369,650.00
TREMONT ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
61
Demolition
1.0
LS
50,000.00
50,000.00
62
Roadway (30' E-E) (2" surface, 2" binder, 10" agg.)
2,600
LF
130.00
338,000.00
63
Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk (5' wide, one side)
2,600
LF
65.00
169,000.00
64
Water Main
2,600
LF
70.00
182,000.00
325,000.00
65
Sanitary Sewer
2,600
LF
125.00
66
Storm Sewer
2,600
LF
90.00
234,000.00
67
Lighting
2,600
LF
40.00
104,000.00
68
Landscaping
2,600
LF
30.00
SUB-TOTAL
78,000.00
1,480,000.00
50
7
Phase 1
The proposed Gateway Development
Products have been developed to embrace
the natural features of the surrounding
landscape, while promoting investment
and development targeted to serve the
visitor and the day trippers. The first
phasing of the Gateway Development call
for the construction of a hotel and family
entertainment complex that is to include
both an indoor and outdoor waterpark.
Connectivity via pedestrian access and
alternative transportation options are to be
made available to both patrons of the family
entertainment complex as well as those day
trippers that are interested in easy on easy off
access to the shores of Lake Michigan.
Projected Property Tax Benefits: $307,350.00
Phase 3
Development Goal: 1 – 5 years
The third phase of the development
anticipates family style vacation rentals,
villas(future residential), cottages and suites
that embrace the natural beauty of the
Gateway and afford those families that are
interested in a relaxing pace and an at home
atmosphere for their vacations. In addition to
this, there is an option of a Gateway Retreat
Center that will offer the visitor the ability to
stay in a relaxing environment.
Development Area: 21.3 Acres
Total Square footage (anticipated
development size): 372,000 Square Feet Development Area: 26.2 Acres (1,141,272
Square Feet)
Anticipated Private Investment:
• Infrastructure Development (Parking Included): $5,960,950.00
• Vertical Development (Buildings):
$35,000,000.00 - $40,000,000.00
development size): 142,000 Square Feet Projected Property Tax Benefits:
$1,281,870.00
• Infrastructure Development (Parking
Included): $5,966,650.00
$10,000,000.00 - $15,000,000.00
Phase 2
Projected Property Tax Benefits: $372,960.00
The second phase of the development
anticipates pedestrian friendly retail shopping
related to the Lake Michigan experience and
targeted to capture those 3 M visitors for daily
supplies, dining and shopping.
In addition to the sites that have been
recommended for Gateway Development
above, the Sub Area Plan also identified
parcels that can serve as “Community
Infill Development Zone.” Within this
complimentary development (33.9 acres),
there is an opportunity for a potential
business park and potential residential
development. Another option is currently
being explored that will serve as a “TransitOrientated Development Zone.” This possible
development (8.3 acres) at Dunes Park
Train South Shore Station is suggested to be
mixed use with links to the Dunes Kankakee
Parkway.
Development Area: 2.5 Acres (108,900
Square Feet)
development size): 115,000 Square Feet 51
• Infrastructure Development(Parking
Included): $5,239,200.00
$4,000,000.00 - $10,000,000.00
Conclusion and Recommendations
Porter County like most other places in the
US and the State have seen a sharp decline
in economic activity. This can be seen by
the increase in unemployment, decrease
in housing activities, and the decrease in
investment across all business sectors. The
Gateway Project, coupled with the other RDA
and Town of Porter project activities, including
Indiana 49 Feasibility Study, Alternative
Transportation Plan and Engineering and
Design of the Dunes Kankakee Trail, provide
the necessary public study and investment
to help attract the private sector. The RDA
grant for $19.0 M coupled with the Town’s
investment in public utilities, ($5.1M) are
an indication of a strong desire to promote
demand generators and tourism related
economic development. The study and review of the area allows for
a mixture of land uses including hotel, family
resort, retail, housing and ample green space. The targeted private sector investment in the
Gateway Project Area is +/- $115 M over the
next 20 years. Should this goal be achieved
as indicated, the property tax impact would
generate an estimated $2.6 M in new property
taxes and create hundreds of construction
jobs, as well as new full and part time jobs in
the area. In order to move this investment
forward, below are specific recommendations
related to private sector investment in the
Gateway:
1. Commission an area specific feasibility
study that will analyze the financial
feasibility of the development of a family
entertainment complex, including hotel
and other preferred amenities.
3. Establishment of a Redevelopment Area
and Separate Allocation Area for the
Gateway Project Area for the purposes of
financing public improvements, servicing
debt for private activity bonds and/or
providing credit enhancements should
it be determined that the proposed
private activity meets and/or exceeds the
development criteria established for the
Gateway Project Area.
4. Establishment of Economic Revitalization
Area Designation for the purposes of
offering in limited circumstances the
use to real and personal property tax
abatement should a project or projects
meet or exceed the development criteria
established for the Gateway Project
Area.
5. Identification of additional/transitional
Gateway financial resources including
but not limited to:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Utilization/Reallocation of RDA
resources to align with proposed
private sector investments
Utilization of Town of Porter Tax
Increment Financing Funding
Additional Direct Federal
Appropriations
Funding from existing County
revenue streams
Funding derived from Innkeepers
tax
Funding for Federal and State
Parks in relation to alternative
transportation opportunities
2. Further evaluate the cost of public
improvements at the gateway, including
engineering and design for proposed
public improvements.
52
8 Design Guidelines
Overview
The concept plan emphasizes the importance
of creating a gateway community that is safe,
attractive, highly visible, and easily accessible
for pedestrians, bicyclists and automobile
users, and well connected both within the
study area and with the region.
The primary intent of the guidelines is
to establish and promote standards for
development planning and urban design. The
guidelines will provide direction for:
•
•
•
•
•
Preserving natural resources;
Streetscape improvements;
Development opportunities, uses, and
their location;
Landscape in public realm; and
Sustainable design techniques
applicable to new development.
The guidelines have been conceived to allow
flexibility within the parameters of the desired
vision of the Gateway Sub Area Plan.
Regulating Plan
The regulating plan identifies the basic
physical characteristics of each building
site and the guidelines assigned to it.
The illustration on next page explains the
elements of the regulating plan and serves
as a reference when examining the plan. The
Regulating Plan provides specific mapping of
the requirements of this overlay, including the
following:
• Street Location
• Street Frontage Types
• Development Zone Definition
• Open Space / Preservation Zone
53
Street Types & Frontages
Organization
The street frontages are parcel edge adjoining
any street type
The following sections lists the design
guidelines. The recommendations are
organized by zones listed below:
• Open Space Zone
• Gateway Development Zone
• Community Infill Development Zone
• Streetscape Enhancements
•
•
•
•
•
Thoroughfare frontage: Any development
fronting county designated arterial
streets (Indiana 49 and U.S. 20)
Primary frontage: Any development
fronting gateway primary streets.
Secondary frontage: Any development
fronting gateway secondary streets
Tertiary frontage: Any development
fronting county designated local streets
(Tremont)
Greenway Frontage: Any development
fronting Dunes Creek Greenway Corridor
Gateway Development Zones
Gateway Zones G1 - G4
• Mixed-use zone with diverse and
pedestrian oriented uses.
• Diverse uses in gateway zone can
include hotel, conference center,
retreat center, mini golf course, general
commercial, water park, residential.
Boundaries are illustrated on the
regulating Plan.
Open Space Zone (OS)
• Preservation Zone (includes wetlands,
hydric soils, dunes creek, woodland).
• Potential uses can include preserving
natural resources to provide wildlife
habitat and natural scenic areas,
passive recreation, trails corridors.
Community Infill Zones I1 - I4
• Zone with pedestrian oriented uses.
• Uses in infill zone can include residential,
business park and family entertainment
venue. Boundaries are illustrated on the
Regulating Plan.
G1
I2
G1
G2
I1
G3
G3
OS
OS
OS
G4
The Regulating Plan Illustration
Arterial Streets (thoroughfare frontage), 100 feet R.O.W.
Local Streets (Tertiary frontage), 60 feet R.O.W.
Gateway Primary Streets, 60 feet R.O.W.
Gateway Secondary Streets, 46 feet R.O.W.
Dunes Creek Greenway Corridor (Greenway frontage)
Development Zones
G1 - G4 Gateway Zones OS
Open Space Zone I1 - I2
Infill Zones
54
8
Open Space Zone Guidelines
Intent
Preservation And Buffering Natural Areas
Protect life and property, promote open space
and habitat conservation, and enhance water
quality and natural hydrological systems.
•
General Guiding Principles
•
•
•
•
•
Preserve open space, protect its
environment and, especially, its beauty
Conserve native plants, wildlife habitat,
wetlands, and water bodies.
Conserve the natural features important
to land and water resources (e.g.,
headwater areas, groundwater recharge
zones, floodway, floodplain, springs,
streams, wetlands, woodlands, prime
wildlife habitats) and other features
constituting high recreational value
or containing amenities that exist on
developed and undeveloped land.
Conserve natural, scenic, and recreation
areas within and adjacent to creek areas
for the community’s benefit.
Provide necessary buffers from existing
natural resources to preserve them while
allowing complementary developments
•
Incorporate into the overall design of the
development or leave the unique natural
features undisturbed.
The unique natural features include
the following (source: Porter County
Landscape Standards and Guidelines,
section 9; Natural areas protection):
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
•
•
•
Natural streams and rivers
Wetlands
Natural lakes and shorelines
Floodplains
Prairie remnants
Savanna remnants
Dunes
High quality woodlands
Critical wildlife habitat areas
Aquifer recharge areas
Buffer preserved unique natural features
on site by naturalized open space
Provide a minimum buffer of 75 feet
from existing wetlands for any new
development (source: Porter County
Landscape Standards and Guidelines;
Section 9 Natural Areas Protection).
Provide a minimum buffer of 75 feet from
Dunes Creek for any new development
(source: Porter County Landscape
standards and guidelines; Section 9 Natural Areas Protection).
Source: Porter County Landscape Standards and
Guidelines; Section 9 Natural Areas Protection
55
Wetlands with 75 feet buffer
Dunes Creek with 75 feet Buffer
Mature Woodland / Tree Cover
Hydric Soils
Building Siting
•
•
•
•
•
Limited development is allowed in the
open space zone and only along the
secondary streets as illustrated in the
concept plan.
Provide as much street-oriented and
trail-oriented building frontage as
possible.
Maintain shared driveways between
adjacent lots to minimize excessive curb
cuts.
Preserve existing mature woodlands
when placing any development in this
zone.
Limit development on any site with
natural resources such as hydric soils.
Existing open spaces and natural resources with necessary buffer requirement Illustration
Building Elements
Use Specification
•
•
•
Building Height
•
•
Limit the maximum absolute height
of new buildings to 1 story or 14’ (whichever is less). Building heights in
excess of existing nearby mature trees is
discouraged.
Limit the height of any parking structure
to not exceed height of any building
within 50 feet.
•
To encourage a pedestrian-friendly
development, building transparency
seeks to provide visual interest at street
level and to minimize blank walls.
Provide a minimum of 20% of ground
floor building façade as transparent
through the use of windows, doors,
or window displays along secondary
frontage (for residential, villas, cottages)
- measured for each facade between 3
and 8 feet above grade.
Blank lengths of facade along a
sidewalk in excess of 15 lineal feet are
discouraged.
•
Allowable uses - detached villas,
cottages at the edges of existing
woodland.
Trails, pedestrian linkages in this zone is
encouraged
Limited development
permitted in this zone
Open Space
Zone
Open Space Zone
Open Space Zone
Trails / pedestrian linkages in this
zone is permitted
Concept plan illustrating allowable development within Open Space Zone
56
8
Gateway Zone Guidelines
Intent
The building envelope standards intend to
create a safe and vibrant built environment
that promotes pedestrian activity, and a
sense of place and community. The building
envelope standards include
• Building siting
• Building height
• Building elements, such as awnings &
overhangs, and street wall transparency. • Use recommendations.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Buildings are aligned and close to
streets. Provide as much street-oriented
buildings as possible where the views
are directed to the street and the open
spaces, not facing away from the streets.
Buildings oversee the street with active
fronts.
The street is a coherent space, with
consistent building forms on both side of
street.
Parking, storage, mechanical
equipments etc are located to the rear of
the buildings.
Parking (not including on-street parking)
should be away from streets and
shared by multiple owners/users when
applicable.
Consider locating utilities underground
Utilize LEED ND principles wherever
possible.
Provide flexible design parameters.
Anticipate growth and change in adjacent
land uses.
G1 Zone
Building Siting
Building Elements
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
through the use of windows, doors, or
window displays along primary frontage
(for commercial, hotel, conference
center) - measured for each facade
between 3 and 8 feet above grade.
discouraged.
window displays along thoroughfare
frontage (for commercial, hotel,
conference center)- measured for each
facade between 3 and 8 feet above
grade.
Awnings and overhangs along primary
frontage are encouraged.
Use Specification
•
Allowable uses - hotel, conference, water
park, mini golf course
Building Height
•
•
•
•
57
Provide as much street-oriented building
frontage as possible.
Maintain building walls within the build-to
zone parallel to the R.O.W. for at least
70% of primary frontage.
Extend the build-to zone from the R.O.W.
to 10 feet beyond the R.O.W (into the
site).
Extend sidewalks to the base of the
building on all primary frontages.
Maintain a setback of at least 10’ from
nearest building face along primary
frontage for indoor water park. Provide
architectural façade treatment for indoor
water park building to blend in with
neighboring buildings.
Maintain a setback of at least 15 feet
from nearest building face along primary
frontage for structured parking.
Provide architectural façade treatment
for structured parking to blend in with
neighboring buildings. Design ground
level facades to reinforce pedestrian
scale at the street level.
Maintain a setback of 50 feet from
R.O.W. for at least 50% of the total linear
feet of street facing building facade along
thoroughfare frontage.
Maintain functional entries to the
buildings at an average of 50 feet or less
along primary frontage.
natural resources, such as, hydric soils.
of new buildings to 4 story or 56’ (whichever is less) along primary and
Building heights in excess of existing
nearby mature trees is discouraged.
Maintain floor elevations on the ground
floor that are directly accessible from
sidewalks along a public space (street,
plaza, gateway promenade, but not a
parking lot).
within 50 feet.
Maximum Allowable
Building Heights
Limit building heights to not exceed
existing matured tree line
Building Envelope
Pedestrian walk/landscape
zone/outdoor dining
Contiguous sidewalk that meet the base of the
buildings facade
Landscaped Islands / vegetated swales (± 7’)
G2 Zone
Building Siting
•
•
•
Building Height
•
•
•
•
of new buildings to 2 story or 28’ (whichever is less) along primary
frontage.
parking lot).
within 50 feet.
•
Structured Parking
Proposed
Building
Meets build-to-zone
Sidewalk
Outside build- Setback - at least 15’
from building face along
to-zone
primary frontage
seeks to provide visual interest at
street level and to minimize blank
walls.
or window displays along primary
frontage (for all uses) - measured for
each facade between 3 and 8 feet
above grade.
sidewalk in excess of 30 lineal feet
are discouraged.
Awnings and overhangs along
primary frontage are encouraged.
Street R.O.W.
•
Primary Street Frontage
Outside buildto-zone
Build-to-zone
Street R.O.W.
Use Specification
• Allowable uses - general
commercial, outdoor cafes’, dining
areas
Proposed
Building
Thoroughfare Street Frontage
•
Building Elements
•
Typical Section illustrating the applicable building envelope recommendations for G1 - G2 Zones
Street R.O.W.
•
Shared Lanes
On-Street
Parking
Build-to-zone
•
Build-to-zone
Meets build-to-zone
•
10’
Setback Line
•
Extend the build-to zone from the R.O.W.
to 10 feet beyond the R.O.W.
Extend sidewalks to the base of the
building on all primary frontages.
Maintain a setback of at least 15 feet
from nearest building face along primary
frontage for structured parking.
Provide architectural façade treatment
for structured parking to blend in with
neighboring buildings. Design ground
level facades to reinforce pedestrian
scale at the street level.
along primary frontage.
Meets setback
req. •
Meets build-to-zone
Sidewalk
Outside buildto-zone
Build-to-zone
Street R.O.W.
Typical diagram illustrating allowable building to street
frontage relationship
58
8
G3 Zone
Building Siting
Building Elements
Building Siting
•
•
or window displays along secondary
frontage (for residential, villas, cottages)
- measured for each facade between 3
and 8 feet above grade.
discouraged.
•
Use Specification
• Allowable uses - residential, resort villas/
cottages
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
60% of secondary frontage.
Build-to zone located between 15 and 30
feet into the site from R.O.W.
Maintain a landscape buffer of at least 20
feet along tertiary frontage.
Provide parking in the rear yard, behind
the back facade of the building. Screen
parking and garage areas from all street
faces by buildings.
Provide a landscape buffer from Dunes
Creek for any new development per
open space guidelines for required buffer
or Porter County Landscape Standards
and Guidelines (see page 55)
Maintain shared driveways between
adjacent lots to minimize excessive curb
cuts.
Building Height
•
•
•
•
plaza, but not a parking lot).
within 50 feet.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Provide as much street-oriented and
trail-oriented building frontage as
possible.
Build-to zone located between 10 and 20
feet into the site from R.O.W.
Maintain a setback of 50’ from property
line along thoroughfare frontage.
Trail Frontage- Maintain a setback of
15’ from trail for at least 50% of the total
linear feet of trail facing building facade.
along primary frontage and trail frontage.
Maintain a setback of at least 15’ from
building face along primary frontage for
surface parking or parking garage.
Building Height
•
Maximum Allowable
Building Heights
•
Limit building heights to not exceed
existing matured tree line
•
59
G4 Zone
•
•
parking lot).
within 50 feet.
Building wall within
build-to-zone
Front Yard
Pedestrian walk/
Landscape Zone
Light fixtures with banners/wayfinding elements along potential future
development
Building Elements
Build-to-zone
Sidewalk
Shared Lanes
Landscape
Typical Section illustrating the applicable building envelope recommendations for G3 Zone
Parking
Parking
Property Line
Adjacent Parcel
Property Line
Proposed
Building
Secondary Street Frontage
Shared Driveway
Meets buildto-zone
Adjacent Parcel
Outside
build-to-zone
Use Specification
• Allowable uses - retreat lodge, meeting
rooms
Sidewalk / Landscape Zone
•
5’
Street R.O.W.
•
window displays along primary frontage
(for retreat lodge) - measured for each
facade between 3 and 8 feet above
grade.
Blank lengths of facade along a sidewalk
and/or trail in excess of 15 lineal feet are
discouraged.
Build-to-zone
•
Landscaped zone/ vegetated
swales
Sidewalk / Landscape Zone
Meets build-to-zone
Outside build-to-zone
Build-to-zone
Street R.O.W.
Typical diagram illustrating allowable building to street frontage relationship
60
8
Building Scale & Massing
Parking Edge Treatment
•
One of the goals of the Sub Area Plan
plan is to provide a pedestrian-friendly
environment. An important element of
this is the safeguarding and separating of
pedestrians from vehicular traffic and other
vehicular activities, including parking. Key to
this is treating the edges of parking areas in
ways that will both screen parked cars and
reduce the visual mass of paved areas, while
promoting safe sight lines.
•
•
Utilize design techniques and/or material
changes to differentiate building base
from top.
Create visual interest and hierarchy by
emphasizing entry points, corners and
special functions of the building
Portions of large building mass should
be subdivided into smaller, appropriately
scaled modules, with changes in both
horizontal and vertical planes indicated
by projections and indentations along
street frontage to visually reduce the
scale of large buildings
•
Building Materials
•
•
•
•
•
Coordinate building materials with
landscaping to complement and enhance
the natural environment.
Screen mechanical elements with
materials designed to integrate with the
primary facade materials.
Use materials consistently on all sides of
the building with the best quality material
to the front of the building.
Incorporate materials that promote
ecological sustainability (e.g. locally
produced, high recycled material
content, low energy inputs required for
manufacturing, etc.).
Encourage use of current sustainable
materials and building methods
to promote buildings that are
environmentally responsible, profitable,
and healthy places to live and work
(resource: US Green Building Council,
www.USGBC.org)
•
•
•
Screen all parking lots using 36” to
42” high opaque screen wall or piers
and fencing, in combination with plant
material, so as to minimize glare from
headlights and provide a comfortable
walking environment.
Locate all new parking lots to the rear
of buildings with necessary setbacks as
stated in previous sections.
Distribute parking into smaller areas
subdivided by intervening areas of
landscaping for sites that require large
areas of surface parking. Maintain
internal landscaped areas that equate to
15% of the total area.
Refer to Porter County Landscape
standards and guidelines; section 3 parking lot landscaping for setbacks and
fencing requirements. Source: Porter County Landscape standards and guidelines; section 3 parking lot landscaping
61
Infill Zone Guidelines
I1 - I2 Zone
Building Siting
Building Elements
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Maintain a build to line of 50 feet from
the R.O.W.
Maintain a rear and side setback of 20
feet.
Parking shall not be provided between
the R.O.W. and the build to line.
Parking shall not be located closer than
10 feet from the rear and side setback,
unless the owner(s) of the lots establish
a shared parking agreement.
Screen parking from R.O.W. and
neighboring uses.
Entrance drives may cross any minimum
lot setback, but are to do so in a
perpendicular fashion.
Provide a landscape buffer of minimum
50 feet thoroughfare frontage.
Provide a landscape buffer of minimum
20 feet around perimeter of development. Larger landscape buffer yards of
minimum 50 feet should be required
when special uses are considered.
•
or the R.O.W. in excess of 30 feet are
discouraged for non residential uses.
or the R.O.W. in excess of 15 feet are
discouraged for residential uses.
Use Specification
•
•
Allowable uses – professional office,
medical office, business office,
residential, restaurant
Special uses – hotel, familyentertainment venue, restaurant
Landscape Buffers along thoroughfare frontage (50 feet)
Building Height
•
•
•
Sidewalks/Pedestrian Zone along future infill development
of new buildings to 2 stories or 28
feet (whichever is less). Special
consideration should be given to hotels
and family-entertainment venues, but
should not exceed 4 stories or 56 feet.
sidewalks or public spaces.
within 50 feet.
Landscaped tree lawn/vegetated swales along
infill development
Light fixtures with banners/wayfinding elements
along thoroughfare frontage/infill development
Sidewalk
Landscape
5’
12’
Travel Lanes
Typical Section illustrating the applicable building envelope recommendations for I1-I2 Zone with thoroughfare frontage
62
8
Streetscape Guidelines
Intent
Planting
Establish and promote standards for
pedestrian friendly zones. Provide direction
for streetscape improvements, enhanced
character of gateway elements, improved
wayfinding/signage and landscape in public
realm.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Establish a distinctive, positive image
and identity.
Integrate and connect the diverse uses.
Create interconnected system of streets
and trails that allow easy orientation
and convenient access for all modes of
transportation.
Create safe, human scaled, pedestrian
oriented environment.
Provide dedicated pedestrian paths that
are physically and visually separate from
vehicular traffic.
Provide flexible design parameters.
Anticipate growth and change in adjacent
land uses.
•
•
•
•
•
•
The sections on the following pages illustrate
the guidelines for each of the street types.
The key map illustrates the various street
segments and locations.
Mid-term Alternatives and
Opportunities
•
Peak-Season Shuttle
between South Shore
Line Dunes Park Station,
Indiana Dunes State Park,
Other Area Attractions, and
neighboring communities
es
un
aD e
ian
r
Ind esho
k
La
63
H
nal
tio
Na
C
2
.1
B
paved shoulders), special
bus lanes, comfortable
and accessible transit
stops, frequent crossing
opportunities, median islands,
accessible pedestrian signals,
2
.1
U.S
D
Indiana 49 (up to Oak Hill)
Indiana 49 (Oak Hill - roundabout)
E Woodlawn/Waverly
Complete streets: “are
- Bike/Trolley
Boulevard
(up to
H Tremont
designed
and operated
to
enable
safe access for all
Calumet
Trail)
users. Pedestrians, bicyclists,
I Tremont - Bike/Trolley Boulevard (north of
motorists and transit riders of
all ages
and abilities must be
Calumet
Trail)
J U.S. able
20 to safely move along and
across a complete street.”
K Gateway Development Street
Ingredients
that may
be found
L Lincoln
- Downtown
Porter
on a complete street include
M I - 94
sidewalks, bike lanes (or wide
A
I
U.S
IN
J
F
Oak Hill Rd.
Waverly Rd.
Long-term Alternatives and
Opportunities
•
Fixed-route Bus or FixedGuideway Transit to State
Park
•
Year-round Fixed-Route
Bus Service to Connect
Train Stations, Lakefront
Destinations, area
attractions and neighboring
communities
The
Pavilion
0
.2
U.S
E
Downtown
Porter
n
ol
nc
Li
.
St
L
Tremont Rd.
•
Establish a width of a minimum of six
feet for landscaped tree lawns zone
wherever possible. The width of the
landscape zone may vary and will
depend the actual R.O.W of each street
type.
Align street trees in straight rows,
centered in landscaped tree lawns zone.
Include vegetated swales as possible in
landscape tree lawn zone and medians
for improved infiltration and promote
use of good stormwater management
practices (see page 19 for Best
Management Strategies).
Include decorative planters, shrubs,
grass etc. at primary gateway locations
and in medians to announce entry into
the region (see page 69 for gateway
locations).
Main St.
•
Include detached pedestrian sidewalks
parallel to the curb.
Establish uninterrupted sidewalks,
continuous across driveways, and
where they meet a street intersection,
crosswalks are to be ADA accessible and
clearly marked with contrasting paving
materials or painted striping.
Maintain a width of a minimum of five
feet for sidewalks; separate sidewalks
from vehicular traffic by landscaped tree
lawns.
Connect sidewalks to open space trail
at intersections of open space linkages
and street, or at nearest feasible and
practical location.
When right-of-way is available,
encourage a tree lawn between adjoining
use and sidewalk.
Provide dedicated bike path at feasible
locations on streets that is at least four
feet wide. Separate bike paths from
pedestrian paths. Where dedicated bike
paths are not feasible, provide shared
lanes for use.
K
49
U.S. 20
F
B
G
IN
49
A
Saemann Rd.
M
I - 94
Woodlawn Ave.
Key Plan
Motorized Transportation framework diagram
H
Calumet Trail)
C IN-49 (roundabout - U.S.12)
I
D IN-49 (north of U.S. 12)
J
U.S. 20
A IN-49 (up to Oakhill)
B IN-49 (Oakhill - roundabout)
Landscaped tree lawn/vegetated swales
Future
Trail Link
8’
A
Travel Lanes (cars/shuttle)
varies
varies
Typical section along corridor A (see key map) with recommended streetscape guidelines
5’
B
varies
11’
Median
11’
4’-16’
11’
Trail
11’
varies
8’
Typical section along corridor B (see key map) with recommended streetscape guidelines
Gateways/wayfinding elements along
Gateway development
Landscaped tree lawn/
vegetated swales
Sidewalk
5’
C
Landscape
varies
Travel Lanes
(cars/shuttle)
11’
Median
4-16’
Travel Lanes
(cars/shuttle)
11’
Landscape
varies
Trail
12’
Typical section along corridor C (see key map) with recommended streetscape guidelines
Landscaped tree lawn/
vegetated swales
D
Sidewalk Landscape
varies
5’
Travel Lanes
(cars/shuttle)
11’
Median
4-16’
Travel Lanes
(cars/shuttle)
11’
Landscape
varies
Typical section along corridor D (see key map) with recommended streetscape guidelines
Trail
12’
64
8
Trail
Coordinated light fixtures with
banners/wayfinding elements
Landscaped zone/
vegetated swales
Landscape
Zone
5’
Varies
11’
11’
Landscape
Zone
Trail
Varies
12’
Typical section along corridor E (see key map) with recommended streetscape guidelines
Gateway
Development
Pedestrian walk/ or existing
landscape zone developments
Pedestrian walk/
landscape zone
Trail
Gateway Development landscape buffer
(where applicable)
Gateway
Development
or existing
developments
Light fixtures with banners/
wayfinding elements
On-Street Bike
lane
Trail
8’
F
Travel Lanes
Landscape Bike
Lane
Varies
4’
Landscaped zone/
vegetated swales
11’
11’
Gateway Development landscape buffer
(where applicable)
E
Sidewalk
Bike Landscape
Sidewalk
Lane
4’ Varies
5’
Typical section along corridor F (see key map) with recommended streetscape guidelines
Vegetated Swales example: Vegetated swales
are long narrow landscaped depressions used
to collect and convey stormwater runoff, allowing
pollutants to settle and filter out as the water
infiltrates into the ground or flows from one bay
to the next through the facility. Swales should be
integrated into the overall site design and can be
used to help fulfill a site’s required landscaping
area requirement.
65
The
Pavilion
Pedestrian
walk/landscape
zone
Shared Lane Zone
wayfinding elements
Pedestrian
walk/landscape
zone
I
2
.1
U.S
D
H
nal
C
2
.1
U.S
IN
J
0
.2
U.S
Oak Hill Rd.
Waverly Rd.
F
E
Downtown
Porter
n
ol
nc
Li
.
St
L
Tremont Rd.
tio
Na
Main St.
es
un
aD e
ian
r
Ind esho
k
a
L
G
U.S. 20
F
K
49
B
G
IN
Sidewalk Shared Lanes: sharrow (Bikes/cars) Sidewalk
11’
11’
5’
5’
Typical section along corridor G (see key map): Bike Boulevard with recommended
streetscape guidelines
Pedestrian walk/
landscape zone
49
A
Bike Lane / Trolley Lane Zone
Pedestrian walk/Shuttle
stop/landscape zone
Saemann Rd.
M
I - 94
Woodlawn Ave.
Key Plan
H
Calumet Trail)
B Indiana 49 (Oak Hill - roundabout) I Tremont - Bike/Trolley Boulevard
Indiana 49 (roundabout - U.S.12)
D CIN-49 (north of U.S. 12)
J
U.S. 20
Indiana
49
(north
of
U.S.
12)
D
E Woodlawn/Waverly
Woodlawn/Waverly
(north of Oak hill) / Tremont
F EWaverly
L Lincoln - Downtown Porter
Waverly
(north of Oak hill) / Tremont
G FOakhill
- Bike Boulevard
M I - 94
H Tremont - Bike/Trolley Boulevard (up to
Calumet Trail)
Calumet Trail)
J U.S. 20
M I - 94
A
H
Sidewalk
Landscape Sidewalk Shared Bike Lane Shuttle
zone
5’
5’
2’
10’
10’
Typical section along corridor H (see key map): Bike/Trolley Boulevard with
recommended streetscape guidelines
Pedestrian walk/
landscape zone
36
Shared Lane Zone
Landscape
zone
I
Shared Lane 22’
Pedestrian walk/Shuttle
stop/landscape zone
Landscape
zone
Typical section along corridor I (see key map): Bike/Trolley Boulevard
with recommended streetscape guidelines
Landscape Buffers along thoroughfare frontage (50 feet)
Sidewalks/Pedestrian Zone along potential future development
along potential future development
Light fixtures with banners/wayfinding elements
along potential future development
J
Sidewalk
Landscape
5’
12’
Travel Lanes
11’
11’
Landscape
11’
Typical section along corridor J (see key map) with recommended streetscape guidelines
11’
Varies
66
8
zone/outdoor dining
zone/outdoor dining
R.O.W. - 10’
60’ R.O.W.
Build-to-zone
R.O.W. - 10’
Build-to-zone
Light fixtures with
banners/wayfinding
Landscaped islands/
shallow infiltration basin
Shuttle bus stops
Pedestrian Friendly Zone
K
Pedestrian walk/
outdoor dining
Pedestrian walk/
Landscape
Islands
varies
10’
Pedestrian Friendly Zone
Travel Lanes
On-Street
Parking
parallel
11’
11’
On-Street
Parking
Pedestrian walk/
Landscape
Islands
Pedestrian walk/
outdoor dining
parallel
10’
varies
Typical section along corridor K (see key map) with recommended streetscape guidelines. Section along high intensity uses/Gateway Primary Streets
60’ R.O.W.
Visitor Center
Pedestrian walk/landscape zone
Trail
wayfinding elements
Landscaped islands/
shallow infiltration basin
Shuttle bus stops
Gateway Promenade
Pedestrian walk
K
Pedestrian walk/
Landscape
Islands
Travel Lanes
Pedestrian walk
Landscape Zone
10’
8’
11’
10’
Varies
11’
Typical section along corridor K (see key map) along gateway development entrance with recommended streetscape guidelines.
Trail
8’
Infiltration Basin examples: Street right-of ways are usually impervious and is the source of many of the pollutants and sediments that end up in our rivers and streams.
Green Streets are streets that mitigate this by cleaning
and infiltrating storm water through the use of shallow
infiltration basins and other Best Management Practices
that fit seamlessly into the urban fabric.
67
Pedestrian
walk/landscape
zone
Pedestrian
walk/landscape
zone
46’ R.O.W.
wayfinding elements
Build-to-zone
K
Frontyards
Sidewalk
5’
Landscape
Zone
Varies
11’
Shared Lane
Villas/Cottages
Villas/Cottages
Landscaped zone/
vegetated swales
Landscape
Zone Sidewalk
Varies
5’
11’
Frontyards
Build-tozone
Typical section along corridor K (see key map) at gateway development for secondary streets with recommended streetscape guidel
wayfinding elements
Amtrack R.O.W.
Pedestrian walk/landscape zone/
outdoor dining
Bike Lane
Bike/Vehicular
Traffic barrier
Indiana 49 (Oak Hill - roundabout)
E Woodlawn/Waverly
H Tremont - Bike/Trolley Boulevard (up to
Calumet Trail)
Calumet Trail)
J U.S. 20
M I - 94
A
B
The
Pavilion
angled
L
Bike
Lane
Travel Lanes
On-Street Parking
11’
11’
1’
8’
Typical section along corridor L (see key map) with recommended streetscape guidelines.
Buffer from Dunes Creek
75’
Drainage Buffer
Zone
I
2
.1
U.S
D
Landscape buffer
varies
H
nal
atio
N
nes
u
aD e
ian
r
Ind esho
Lak
IN
J
Oak Hill Rd.
Waverly Rd.
F
0
.2
U.S
E
Downtown
Porter
n
ol
nc
Li
.
St
L
Tremont Rd.
Main St.
C
2
.1
U.S
5
K
49
Varies
Typical section along Trail corridor 5 (see map on page 38). Trails within gateway development /
Adjacent to gateway development
Drainage Buffer
Zone
B
G
IN
Natural/wooded areas
U.S. 20
49
A
Saemann Rd.
M
I - 94
Woodlawn Ave.
Gateway Trail
8’
Key Plan
H
Calumet Trail)
I
D IN-49 (north of U.S. 12)
J
U.S. 20
Dunes Creek
8’
F
Gateway Trail
5
Typical section along Trail corridor 5 (see map on page 38). Trails within gateway development / Adjacent to natural areas
68
8
Wayfinding / Signage
Gateways have been proposed at a number
of locations throughout the study area. These
have been envisioned to enhance the arrival
experience of the users, as well as guide the
users to their destinations.
A hierarchy of gateways has been proposed
that includes:
•
•
•
Primary Gateways
Secondary Gateways
Tertiary Gateways
Primary Gateways
•
Provide Primary Gateway elements at
major entry points that lead to Porter,
National and State Parks, gateway
development, and other regional
destinations. Place them in highly
visible areas, at intersections with major
thoroughfare (I-94, Indiana 49, U.S. 12,
U.S. 20), or in locations at which they
can help to identify Porter within a larger
context, such as at the intersection of: 1.
2.
3.
4.
I-94 and Indiana 49
I-94 and Waverly Rd.
Indiana 49 and U.S. 20
Indiana 49 and U.S. 12
•
A flush-mounted back-lit panel with
identification sign. Tertiary Gateway
•
Provide Tertiary Signage elements at
visible locations identifying specific
businesses within a multiple-business
development, at various visible locations
identifying specific parks/open spaces,
as a trail identifying sign, and at locations
to identify specific developments
within the sub area. Locations include
intersections of::
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Waverly Rd. at Calumet River
Waverly and Woodlawn
Lincoln St and Brickyard Trail
Waverly and Oak Hill
Along Dunes Creek Greenway
Corridor (Dunes Kankakee Trail
corridor)
Along Gateway Trail links
Tremont and Dunes Creek Greenway
corridor
Tremont and Calumet Trail
Tremont north of Calumet Trail
Woodlawn and Dunes Kankakee
Trail future link
Typical Primary Gateway element (bridge enhancement)
with identification sign
Typical Tertiary Gateway element
(banner) with identification sign
Primary Gateway Elements
• Bridges and intersection of major
thoroughfare
Secondary Gateways
•
Provide Secondary Gateway elements
at highly visible areas, to announce local
destinations, and to identify Porter along
its perimeter , such as at the intersection
of: 1. Indiana 49 and Oak Hill Rd.
2. Indiana 49 and Gateway
development entry/roundabout
3. U.S. 20 and Waverly Rd.
4. U.S. 20 and Tremont Rd.
5. Waverly and Lincoln St.
Secondary Gateway Elements
• Column-supported panel with the
identification sign. • A low lying planter connected to a stone
wall with identification sign, or
69
Typical Tertiary Gateway element
with identification sign
Typical Secondary Gateway element with identification sign
Typical illustration of a trail node along a major thoroughfare with gateway elements for wayfinding/signage, street furniture and necessary landscape buffers
Typical illustration of a trail head at the confluence of multiple regional trails with gateway elements for wayfinding/signage, street furniture
70

Gateway to the Indiana Dunes Gateway to the Indiana Dunes

Transcription

Similar documents

Biking Trails - Chesterton, IN

Strategies for Infusing Global Concepts and Content into the K

A Decade of Dune Restoration at the Lanphere Dunes - Cal-IPC

Sandbanks Provincial Park maps

Fifth Grade Textbooks - Duneland School Corporation

internship program - Hunt Construction Group

Trail of Tears (Robert Lindneux in 1942)

Enjoy! - Indiana Dunes

porter brickyard trail