Robeson County Comp Plan

Transcription

Town of
Robeson
County, NC
Sunset Beach
Unified Development Ordinance
Comprehensive Plan with
a Health & Wellness Component
Recommended for Adoption By
Planning Board: March 10, 2014
Comprehensive Plan with a Health & Wellness Component
Table of Contents
SECTION 1 – PREFACE
A.
Plan Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1
B.
Planning Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-2
C.
Health, Wellness, and the Built Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-3
SECTION 2 – INTRODUCTION
A.
Regional Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1
B.
Robeson County History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-3
SECTION 3 – COMMUNITY PROFILE
A.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1
B.
Health & Wellness Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1
C.
Population . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3
D.
Housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-7
E.
Economy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-9
F.
Community Profile Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-19
SECTION 4 – ENVIRONMENT/EXISTING CONDITIONS
A.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1
B.
Health Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1
1.
Medical Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1
2.
Mental Health . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-3
3.
Adult and Senior Care Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-4
4.
Dental Health . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5
5.
Access to Care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5
C.
Community Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-6
1.
Law Enforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-6
2.
Fire/Emergency Medical Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-7
3.
Emergency Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-7
4.
Parks, Recreation, Conservation, and Open Space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-8
5.
Arts and Cultural Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-11
6.
Historic Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-12
7.
Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-13
8.
Libraries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-15
9.
Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-15
10.
Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-17
D.
Environmental Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-18
1.
Climate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-18
2.
Geology and Topography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-18
3.
Water Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-18
DRAFT: March 10, 2014
Page i
Table of Contents
E.
F.
G.
4.
Flood Hazard Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.
Soils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.
Natural Heritage Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transportation Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.
Roads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.
Public Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Multi-Use Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.
Regional/National Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.
Traffic Volume Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Existing Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.
Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.
Existing Land Use Patterns - Unincorporated Robeson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Environment/Existing Conditions Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4-21
4-22
4-24
4-28
4-28
4-28
4-30
4-30
4-31
4-33
4-33
4-34
4-36
SECTION 5 – COMMUNITY PROJECTIONS AND FUTURE DEMAND
A.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1
B.
Population . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1
C.
Housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-2
D.
Economy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-2
E.
County Health Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-4
1.
Nutritionally Disparate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-4
2.
Elderly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-7
3.
Concentrations of Population Vulnerable to Chronic Disease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-8
4.
Access to Healthcare Providers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-9
5.
Access to Physical Activity and Recreation Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-9
6.
Priority Areas for Health and Wellness Improvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-11
F.
Community Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-13
1.
Law Enforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-13
2.
Parks and Recreation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-13
3.
Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-13
SECTION 6 – FUTURE LAND USE
A.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B.
Health and Wellness Priority Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C.
Future Land Use Sectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.
Local Commercial Service Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.
Regional Commercial Service Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.
Certified Industrial Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.
Community Service Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.
Low Density Residential Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.
Residential/Agricultural Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6-1
6-2
6-2
6-2
6-3
6-3
6-4
6-5
6-5
Page ii
Table of Contents
7.
Conservation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-6
SECTION 7 – GOALS AND IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES
A.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-1
B.
Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-1
C.
Implementing Strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-2
1.
Land Use and Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-2
2.
Natural Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-4
3.
Economic Growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-4
4.
Health and Wellness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-6
5.
Housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-7
6.
Infrastructure and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-8
7.
Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-10
D.
Land Use Plan Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-11
TABLES
Table 1. Population Growth, 1980 to 2030 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3
Table 2. Municipal Population, 1980 to 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-5
Table 3. Population by Age, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-6
Table 4. Population by Race, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-6
Table 5. Housing Characteristics, 2000 and 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-7
Table 6. Dwelling Unit Age, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-7
Table 7. Housing Cost and Condition, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-8
Table 8. Robeson County Employment and Wage by Industry, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-9
Table 9. Robeson County Top 25 Employers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-10
Table 10. Median Household Income, 2000 and 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-11
Table 11. Vehicle Availability and Travel Time to Work, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-11
Table 12. Robeson County Sites Available for Industrial/Business Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-12
Table 13. County Property Tax Rates for the Last Five Years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-15
Table 14. Health Professionals per 10,000 Population (2011) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5
Table 15. Criminal Offenses per 100,000 Population . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-6
Table 16. Conservation and Open Space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-11
Table 17. Properties Listed on the National Register of Historic Places . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-12
Table 18. Robeson County Flood Hazard Acreage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-21
Table 19. Unincorporated Robeson County Existing Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-34
Table 20. Full Service Groceries in Robeson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-4
Table 21. Produce Stands in Robeson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-5
Table 22. Robeson County Future Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1
Page iii
Table of Contents
MAPS
Map 1. Regional Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1
Map 2. Robeson County Municipalities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2
Map 3. Socioeconomic Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4
Map 4. Robeson County Available Buildings/Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-14
Map 5. Parks, Conservation, and Open Space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-10
Map 6. Robeson County Surface Waters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-20
Map 7. Flood Hazard Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-21
Map 8. Prime Farmland and Hydric Soils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-23
Map 9. Robeson County Wetlands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-26
Map 10. Significant Natural Heritage Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-27
Map 11. Transportation Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-29
Map 12. Traffic Volume . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-32
Map 13. Existing Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-35
Map 14. Potential NC Certified Industrial Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3
Map 15. Full-Service Grocery Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6
Map 16. Elderly Concentration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-7
Map 17. Population Vulnerable to Chronic Disease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-8
Map 18. Healthcare Provider Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-9
Map 19. Open Space Proximity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-10
Map 20. Health and Wellness Priority Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-12
Map 21. 2035 Capacity Deficiencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-17
Map 22. Highway Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-18
Map 23. Bicycle Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-19
Map 24. Future Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-7
FIGURES
Figure 1. Population Projections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1
Figure 2. Population Density . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-11
APPENDICES
Appendix 1.
Appendix 2.
Appendix 3.
Appendix 4.
Appendix 5.
Concentration of Hispanic Population
CTP Inventory and Recommendations
Agricultural and Forestry Best Management Practices
Brownfields General Description
Citizen Participation Plan
Page iv
Section 1 – Preface
A.
Plan Purpose
North Carolina legislation encourages all jurisdictions to have
an adopted comprehensive plan. However, there are broader
and more important reasons to engage in the planning process.
Planning should begin with understanding Robeson County
and its people and learning how to care for them. Choices must
be made about the natural, manmade, and financial resources
in the County.
Overall, this plan will accomplish the following objectives:
!
!
!
!
!
We plan our days, weddings, and vacations to
ensure things don't go awry. Planning our built
environment for growth and development
provides guidance to community leaders and
decision makers for a path forward. Image
Develop a clear statement of Robeson County’s future;
Address concerns of plan stakeholders & Robeson
Source: HCP, Inc.
County residents;
Provide demographic/economic analysis and forecasts;
Address land use, environment, public facilities, and transportation; and
Provide health & wellness initiatives.
The following provides a concise definition of a county-sponsored Comprehensive Plan:
A comprehensive plan is a statement by the community of what it is today, and what it
would like to be in the future. A comprehensive plan is an official public document,
adopted by the chief legislative body.
The Robeson County Comprehensive Plan differs from a traditional plan in that its contents includes
health information gained from the 2011 Robeson County Community Health Assessment. A
traditional plan addresses demographics, housing, economy, existing physical environmental
conditions, transportation, and future land use - without any reference to health and wellness.
Sections and components of the traditional planning model are included and coordinated with
identified health issues/needs.
Health concerns involve a wide range of community issues which are addressed by the plan. Those
health topics include: recreation, public safety, clean water, active transportation (multi-modal), clean
air, emergency preparedness, adequate housing, active living, physical activity, overall environmental
health, infrastructure, and care for the aging.
The inclusion of the health and wellness component of the comprehensive plan is the result of a
Community Transformation Grant received by the County. The grant is part of an allocation to the NC
Division of Public Health from the US Department of Health and Human Services to support public
health efforts to reduce chronic diseases, promote healthier lifestyles, reduce health disparities, and
Page 1-1
control health care spending. The objectives of the grant are to implement evidence-based strategies
in the following strategic directions:
!
!
!
!
Tobacco Free Living
Active Living*
Healthy Eating
Clinical Preventive Services
*Items shown in bold have been integrated into the planning process.
B.
Planning Process
The adoption of this plan by Robeson County is not the end but rather the beginning of an ongoing
process. This process includes four (4) essential elements:
1.
Study and Analysis. Robeson County must study land use, population trends, the economic
base of the city, and physiographic features.
2.
Plan or Policy Preparation. The comprehensive plan must provide a basic statement of how
the county will develop, in what direction, and at what pace.
3.
Basic Goals. Robeson County must consider basic goals including: Do we want to grow? Do
we want to be a center for high-tech industry? What balance do we want between growth
and preservation of the natural environment?
4.
Implementation and Effectuation. To implement the plan, the county must use such tools as
land use regulations, capital improvements programs, and general guidelines for private
development and public investment.
Specifically, this plan will:
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Review historical data.
Discuss principal issues.
Define problems associated with growth.
Define main trends and produce forecasts.
Define healthy eating and active living issues/community needs.
Define public, private, or public-private programs which should be implemented or improved.
Define goals, policies, and implementing actions.
Page 1-2
The plan was supervised by the Robeson County Planning Board. The Planning Board members are as
follows:
James Collins, Chairman
James Fuller Locklear, Vice Chairman
Terry Evans
Russell Montgomery
J. F. Thorndyke
Aubrey Sampson
Ava White
Fred Bergh
At the beginning of the planning process, the Planning Board identified and prioritized issues facing
the County. The following provides a prioritized summary of the issues identified and should be the
basis for consideration of future actions.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Increase jobs
Improve education
Identify high crime areas
Industrial/business recruitment
Preservation/protection of agricultural lands
Increase infrastructure
Reduce drug abuse
Prison rehabilitation/jobs
C.
Health, Wellness, and the Built Environment
Public health and wellness is affected in many ways by the design of the built environment, which is
defined as the environment as humans have shaped it - including roadways, buildings, parks, and
neighborhoods. In Robeson County, as in other places across the country, the design of our
roadways, residential developments, and settlement patterns all contribute to the relative health and
wellness of citizens. For the purposes of this plan, wellness is defined in the physical dimension as the
need for regular physical activity and physical development that encourages learning about diet and
nutrition. The diagram below summarizes the impact of land use and transportation systems on our
built environment. Land use and transportation planning lay the foundation for changes to our built
environment, and in turn, the effects to our air and water quality, level of motor vehicle use, and ease
of access to open space amenities (physical activity opportunities).
Page 1-3
In the United States, the automobile is often the dominant
force driving urban design. The vast demand for private
vehicular transportation regularly dictates the scale of our
streets, the relationship between buildings, and the speed at
which we experience our environment.
Land use decisions can also have an effect on the health and
wellness of individuals. Studies have shown that urban areas
with a range of land uses increase the walkability of an area
and subsequently lessen vehicular miles of travel. Traditional
zoning districts often restrict multiple uses making new
development single use in nature and thus contributing to a
lack of walkability and interconnectivity.
Human Scale - A built environment more tailored
to the needs of pedestrians and cyclists versus the
automobile. Image Source: Town of St. Pauls.
The creation of the health and wellness related elements in the comprehensive plan use multiple
academic and research based reports to establish an information base related to health and the built
environment. Local health related data has been gleaned from public health officials, and the 2011
Robeson County Community Health Assessment.
Page 1-4
Section 2 – Introduction
A.
Regional Location
Robeson County is located in southeastern North Carolina, and is
bordered by the State of South Carolina and the North Carolina
counties of Bladen, Columbus, Cumberland, Hoke, and Scotland (see
Map 1). Bisected by Interstate 95, Robeson County is at the mid point
between Boston and Miami. Other major highways serving the county
include US Routes 74, 301, and 501, and NC Highways 211, 41, 710,
and 71. The CSX Railroad traverses the County, intersecting at the
Town of Pembroke. General aviation airports in the area include
Lumberton Municipal Airport in Lumberton. Air carrier service is
provided through Fayetteville Regional Airport (33 miles), Wilmington
International Airport (73 miles), and Myrtle Beach International Airport
(95 miles). The County is located approximately 1.5 hours from the NC
beaches and 3 hours from the NC mountains.
In 1989, the Lumber River was
designated as a “Natural and Scenic
River” by the North Carolina General
Assembly.
Robeson County is the largest county in the state of North Carolina,
with a total area of 951 square miles. Of that figure, 949 square miles
are land and 2 square miles are water. There are numerous swamps throughout the County which
generally flow in a northwest to southeast direction and eventually drain into the Lumber River.
Map 1. Regional Location
Page 2-1
The County has fifteen (15) municipalities, including:
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Fairmont
Lumber Bridge
Lumberton
Marietta
Maxton
McDonald
Orrum
Parkton
Pembroke
Proctorville
Raynham
Red Springs
Rennert
Rowland
St. Pauls
Map 2. Robeson County Municipalities
Page 2-2
B.
Robeson County History
The first inhabitants in what is now Robeson County were Lumbee Indians who had migrated from
farther east and had settled along the banks of the Lumber River. Early settlers arrived about 1730. In
1787, Robeson County was formed from what was then part of Bladen County, and named in honor of
Colonel Thomas Robeson. Colonel Robeson served as one of the leaders in the Revolutionary War at
the Battle of Elizabethtown.
The City of Lumberton was created by an Act of the NC General Assembly in 1787 and was named the
County seat of Robeson County. It was established on the banks of the Lumber River, along the
waterfront of which the first businesses were established. Lumberton was incorporated in 1859. The
County is divided into twenty-nine (29) townships: Alfordsville, Back Swamp, Britts, Burnt Swamp, East
Howellsville, Fairmont, Gaddy, Lumber Bridge, Maxton, Orrum, Parkton, Pembroke, Philadelphus, Raft
Swamp, Raynham, Red Springs, Rennert, Rowland, Saddletree, Shannon, Smiths, Smyrna, St. Pauls,
Sterlings, Thompson, Union, West Howellsville, Whitehouse, and Wishart.
The Lumber River was designated as a National Wild and Scenic River and is part of the North Carolina
Natural and Scenic River System. The River has been classified as natural, scenic, and recreational and
is considered one of the most highly prized recreation sites in North Carolina. Recreation includes
canoeing and boating, fishing, hunting, picnicking, camping, nature study, swimming, biking,
jogging, crafts and fossil and artifact hunting.
The County is mainly agricultural. Early settlers grew wheat, corn, rice, potatoes, and cane. In the late
1800s, after the invention of the cotton gin, the major crop was cotton, but by the 1930s, it was
tobacco. Because of the abundance of good soil, the availability of water, and the local market and
transportation facilities, the Robeson County area is ideal for farming.
Robeson County Courthouse Image Source: North
Carolina Postcards Collection, UNC-CH
Elm Street, Lumberton, NC Image Source:
North Carolina Postcards Collection, UNC-CH
Page 2-3
Section 3 – Community Profile
A.
Introduction
This section provides a synopsis of the current population,
housing, and economic conditions in Robeson County. Public
Health and Wellness statistics have been summarized based on the
2011 Robeson County Community Health Assessment.
Demographic data is sourced from both the 2000 & 2010 Census,
NC Office of State Budget & Management (NC OSBM), and the NC
Department of Commerce, Division of Employment Security.
B.
Health & Wellness Issues
According to the 2011 Robeson County Community Health
Assessment, the "Top 3 Biggest Health Issues" were listed as the
following:
1.
2.
3.
Robeson County completed a Community
Health Assessment in 2011.
Chronic Disease
Drugs/Alcohol
Obesity
These three problems were identified in a survey completed by over 700 Robeson County residents.
The design of the built environment plays a role in both chronic disease and obesity. According to
the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), chronic diseases - such as heart disease, stroke, and diabetes are among the most common, costly, and preventable of all health problems in the United States.
Obesity is a leading cause of chronic disease in the United States and increases the risk for a variety of
chronic diseases including heart disease, strokes, glucose intolerance, and some forms of cancer. It is
not a direct cause of most diseases, but unfavorably alters the risk factor profile. For example, obesity
may lead to increases in blood pressure and blood cholesterol, which in turn, can lead to
cardiovascular disease and strokes. Of all United States counties, Robeson County ranks tenth in
childhood obesity.
“Chronic diseases – such as heart
disease, stroke, cancer, diabetes, and
arthritis – are the leading cause of
death and disability in the United
States.”
Source: Centers for Disease Control
Chronic disease differs from infectious disease (or
communicable disease) in the way it occurs in individuals.
Infectious diseases usually occur because of contact with an
affected host, while chronic diseases may occur solely because
of a sedentary lifestyle. Common infectious diseases of
current and past years include Tuberculosis, Ebola, Malaria,
Measles, and HIV/AIDs.
Page 3-1
Infectious diseases were once the primary cause of death in the United States a century ago, but
proper hygiene, environmental design, and immunization has led to the downfall of such disease in
the United States. In Robeson County, the primary cause of death is heart disease. Two “Health
Priority Areas” were established as a result of the Robeson County Community Health Assessment.
The Community Health Assessment Team agreed to work on the following priority areas: (1) Obesity
and (2) Substance Misuse/Abuse. These priority areas were selected because the community
indicated that their number one health concern is chronic disease, number two is drugs/alcohol, and
number three is obesity. Secondary data shows that Robeson County’s number one cause of death is
heart disease and the risk factors for chronic diseases are extremely high. After analyzing all the data,
the Community Health Assessment Team decided to select obesity as a priority because members
hope to emphasize prevention first.
Robeson County’s Priorities Image Source: 2011 Robeson County Community Health Assessment
Obesity Mechanisms
Obesity results from a positive caloric balance, meaning that the intake of calories is greater than
caloric expenditure. Nutrition plays a direct role in determining caloric balance because it is the sole
variable when accounting for caloric intake. Caloric output, however, is dependent on three specific
variables. These include physical activity, resting metabolism, and the thermogenic effect of food.
Thermogenesis occurs when your body raises its core temperature. When your body increases its
heat or energy output, your metabolism increases and your fat cells are used as the main source of
energy. Of the three variables, physical activity is the most often altered in order to increase caloric
expenditure.
In general, obesity tends to be a multi-faceted problem with
no one solution to combat its occurrence. However, there are
certain segments of the population that are more likely to be
obese as it is more prevalent in the low socioeconomic status
(SES) segments of society. Investigations have shown similar
results in urban, suburban, and rural communities.
“Two of the four most common
causes of chronic disease include lack
of physical activity and poor nutrition.
Both causes can be altered by
lifestyle changes.”
Source: Centers for Disease Control
Page 3-2
In addition, a childhood spent in poor social and economic conditions has been shown to lead to a
less healthy adulthood. In both adolescent boys and girls, low SES and parental education levels were
related to an unfavorable risk factor profile indicating a need for early intervention in low SES
communities.
To identify areas of Robeson County that are considered low in socioeconomic status, GIS analysis was
used. Census estimates for educational attainment, employment, and income levels were combined
to locate these areas. Concentrations of low SES are shown on Map 3.
C.
Population
Population Growth
According to the NC Office of State Budget & Management (NC OSBM) the population in Robeson
County is expected to increase by roughly 20% by the year 2030. All of the counties surrounding
Robeson County are expected to increase in population by 2030, except Scotland County which is
projected to experience a 8.2% decrease in population. However, the greatest population increase
will be in Hoke County, which borders Robeson County to the northwest. Hoke County is expected to
grow by close to 68% by the year 2030 (see Table 1). North Carolina’s population is expected to
increase by 22%.
Table 1. Population Growth, 1980 to 2030
Robeson County
Year
Number
1980
101,610
1990
2000
% Change
Columbus County
Number
–
51,037
105,170
3.5%
123,241
17.2%
2010
134,168
2020
2030
Number
–
30,491
49,587
-2.8%
54,749
10.4%
8.9%
58,098
148,103
10.4%
161,701
9.2%
Hoke County
Year
% Change
Bladen County
Number
% Change
% Change
Cumberland County
Number
% Change
–
247,160
–
28,663
-6.0%
274,713
11.1%
32,278
12.6%
302,960
10.3%
6.1%
35,190
9.0%
319,431
5.4%
60,620
4.3%
37,022
5.2%
363,337
13.7%
63,277
4.4%
38,802
4.8%
379,883
4.6%
Scotland County
Number
% Change
Dillon County (SC)
Number
% Change
North Carolina
Number
% Change
1980
20,383
–
32,273
–
31,083
–
5,795,278
–
1990
22,856
12.1%
33,763
4.6%
29,114
-6.3%
6,626,118
14.3%
2000
33,650
47.2%
35,998
6.6%
30,722
5.5%
8,049,319
21.5%
2010
46,952
39.5%
36,157
0.4%
32,062
4.4%
9,535,483
18.5%
2020
63,048
34.3%
34,638
-4.2%
32,800
2.3%
10,614,862
11.3%
2030
78,800
25.0%
33,178
-4.2%
33,400
1.8%
11,629,556
9.6%
Source: US Census Bureau, NC OSBM, and South Carolina Budget & Control Board Office of Research and Statistics.
Page 3-3
M a p 3 : S o c io e co n o m i c St a t u s ( S ES )
Parkton
Parkton
Lumber Bridge
Bridge
Lumber
¬
«
¤
¬
« £
211
Red Springs
Springs
Red
¬
«
710
Maxton
Maxton
Saint Pauls
Pauls
Saint
¬
«
211
§
¦
¨
95
72
74
Pembroke
Pembroke
¬
«
130
¬
«
Rennert
Rennert
¬
«
§
¦
¨
301
20
§
¦
¨
83
74
£
¤
501
Lumberton
Lumberton
¬
«
72
£
¤
74
Raynham
£
¤ Raynham
McDonald
McDonald
301
Rowland
Rowland
§
¦
¨
95
£
¤
74
Fairmont
Fairmont
Proctorville
Proctorville
Orrum
Orrum
¬
«
41
Marietta
Marietta
¬
«
904
Source: 2010 Census
Legend
Municipalities
Note: Median Household Income,
Employment, and Educational
Attainment have been combined to
create the Socioeconomic Status
County Boundary
Socioeconomic Status (SES)
High SES
Low SES
Page 3 - 4
Robeson County ranks 21st out of 100 NC counties in terms of population. The most densely
populated areas of Robeson County are found in and around the fifteen incorporated municipalities.
Of those fifteen municipalities, Lumberton has the highest population (21,542) followed by Red
Springs (3,428). Only five of the fifteen municipalities experienced population growth from 1980 to
2010 - those being Fairmont, Lumberton, Pembroke, Rennert, and St. Pauls. The municipalities of
Lumber Bridge, Orrum, Proctorville, and Rowland all experienced a dramatic decline in population,
decreasing by more than 40% since 1980 (see Table 2).
Table 2. Municipal Population, 1980 to 2010
Total Population
Percent Change
Municipality
1980
1990
2000
2010
Fairmont
2,658
2,519
2,604
2,663
-5.2%
3.4%
2.3%
0.2%
171
109
118
94
-36.3%
8.3%
-20.3%
-45.0%
18,241
18,733
20,795
21,542
2.7%
11.0%
3.6%
18.1%
233
206
164
175
-11.6%
-20.4%
6.7%
-24.9%
2,711
2,576
2,551
2,426
-5.0%
-1.0%
-4.9%
-10.5%
McDonald
117
88
119
113
-24.8%
35.2%
-5.0%
-3.4%
Orrum
167
103
79
91
-38.3%
-23.3%
15.2%
-45.5%
Lumber Bridge
Lumberton
Marietta
Maxton
Parkton
Pembroke
‘90-‘00
‘00-‘10
‘80-‘10
564
367
429
436
-34.9%
16.9%
1.6%
-22.7%
2,698
2,241
2,681
2,973
-16.9%
19.6%
10.9%
10.2%
205
168
133
117
-18.0%
-20.8%
-12.0%
-42.9%
83
106
72
72
27.7%
-32.1%
0.0%
-13.3%
3,607
3,799
3,493
3,428
5.3%
-8.1%
-1.9%
-5.0%
Proctorville
Raynham
Red Springs
‘80-‘90
Rennert
178
217
283
383
21.9%
30.4%
35.3%
115.2%
Rowland
1,841
1,141
1,146
1,037
-38.0%
0.4%
-9.5%
-43.7%
St. Pauls
1,639
1,992
2,247
2,035
21.5%
12.8%
-9.4%
24.2%
Source: US Census Bureau.
Population by Age
As the population of the nation ages, so too does that of rural Eastern NC. In fact, rural areas face
many challenges in providing resources for the elderly. Over ninety percent of seniors (65+) have at
least one chronic disease, and more than 75% have at least two. To exacerbate the issue, in the next
thirty years, the portion of the population over the age of 65 is expected to more than double. By
2030, more than nine percent of the United States population is estimated to be over the age of 85.
Robeson County, however, appears to have a young population profile, with its median age in 2000 at
32.0 years and in 2010, 34.4 years. Just over half of Robeson County’s population (57.4%) is under the
age of 40 years. This figure is comparable to the state’s population under the age of 40 (53.8%).
Table 3 provides a detailed breakdown of age composition for the County.
Page 3-5
Table 3. Population by Age, 2010
Robeson County
Age Group
Number
%
North Carolina
Number
%
Under 40
76,960
57.4%
5,126,689
53.8%
40 to 64
42,130
31.4%
3,174,715
33.3%
Over 65
15,078
11.2%
1,234,079
12.9%
134,168
100.0%
9,535,483
100.0%
Total
2010 Median Age
34.4
37.3
2000 Median Age
32.0
35.3
Gender & Racial Composition
The gender composition in Robeson County has stayed the same from 2000 to 2010. According to
the 2010 Census, 48.6% of the Robeson County population was male and 51.4% female. These
percentages were exactly the same in the 2000 Census.
The 2010 Census shows that the racial composition in Robeson County was 29.0% White, 24.3%
African American, 38.4% American Indian and Alaska Native, and 8.3% Other. This racial mixture is
different from that of the state as a whole (see Table 4). Robeson County is one of the 10% of United
States counties that are majority-minority; its combined population of American Indian, African
American, and other minority residents comprise over 70% of the total population. In 2000, the racial
composition of Robeson County was nearly identical to that of 2010 with 32.8% of the population
White, 25.1% African American, 38.0% American Indian and Alaska Native, and 4.1% other.
Table 4. Population by Race, 2010
Robeson County
Race
Number
White
38,877
29.0%
6,528,950
68.5%
Black
32,637
24.3%
2,048,628
21.5%
American Indian and Alaska Native
51,502
38.4%
122,110
1.3%
993
0.7%
208,962
2.2%
86
0.1%
6,604
0.1%
Some Other Race
6,672
5.0%
414,030
4.3%
Two or More Races
3,401
2.5%
206,199
2.2%
134,168
100.0%
9,535,483
100.0%
Asian
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
Total
%
North Carolina
Number
%
Page 3-6
The US Census Bureau distinguishes Hispanic or Latino as terms to define region of origin, not a
person’s race, and uses the terms to describe any person, regardless of race, creed, or color, whose
origins are of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or South American, or of some other Hispanic
origin. Of Robeson County’s total population (134,168), 10,932 people are of Hispanic or Latino origin.
Refer to Figure 2, page 5-11 for a graphic representation of the county’s population density/
distribution. Appendix 1 provides the concentrations of Hispanic population.
D.
Housing
Dwelling Unit Growth
In Robeson County, from 2000 to 2010, the number of dwelling units increased from 47,779 units to
52,731 units, a 10.3% increase. However, the number of owner-occupied housing units decreased
from 31,781 to 28,007, a 11.9% decrease (see Table 5). The number of vacant housing units nearly
doubled in Robeson County - increasing from just over 8% of total units to 18%.
Table 5. Housing Characteristics, 2000 and 2010
2000 Census
Robeson County
Number
2010 Census
North Carolina
Robeson County
%
Number
%
%
Number
%
Owner-occupied
31,781
66.5%
2,172,355
61.6%
28,007
53.1%
2,468,489
58.4%
Renter-occupied
11,896
24.9%
959,658
27.2%
15,230
28.9%
1,157,690
27.4%
4,102
8.6%
391,931
11.1%
9,494
18.0%
603,373
14.3%
47,779
100.0%
3,523,944
100.0%
52,731
100.0%
4,229,552
100.0%
Vacant
Total
Number
North Carolina
Dwelling Unit Age
In 2010, over 40% of Robeson County's housing units were more than 30 years old (see Table 6). This
percentage is comparable to the state’s percentage of older housing units (43.8%). For comparison, in
2000, 34% of housing units were more than 30 years old. The age of the housing inventory has
increased significantly.
Table 6. Dwelling Unit Age, 2010
Robeson County
Year Built
2005 or later
Number
1,745
%
North Carolina
Number
%
3.3%
242,715
5.7%
2000-2004
3,492
6.6%
513,028
12.1%
1990-1999
14,406
27.3%
896,428
21.2%
1980-1989
10,479
19.9%
725,467
17.2%
Prior to 1980 (over 30 yrs)
22,609
42.9%
1,851,914
43.8%
Total
52,731
100.0%
4,229,552
100.0%
Page 3-7
Housing Cost & Condition
In 2010, the median home value in Robeson County was $63,500. Statewide, the median housing
value is $149,100 - more than twice that of housing units in Robeson County. It is difficult to obtain a
precise picture of housing affordability in any jurisdiction. However, most measures of housing
affordability consider 30% of gross income an allowable/affordable expenditure for housing. For
homeowners, the cost includes mortgage payments, taxes, insurance, and utilities. For renters,
housing cost includes rent and utilities.
In 2010, over 38% of homeowners in Robeson County have a mortgage exceeding 30% or more of
their income. According to the 2000 Census, less than 25% of homeowners in the county allocated
that level of income to their mortgage - representing a 67% increase in homeowners burdened by a
large mortgage payment over last decade.
The number of renters paying a significant portion of household income for living purposes also grew
from 2000 to 2010. In 2000, just over 33% of renters used more than 30% of their income to pay rent.
By 2010, the percentage of renters burdened by their living costs increased to 58.9%, almost doubling
the amount of individuals facing difficulties paying rent. Across the state, this trend held true as
burdened mortgage owners and renters increased from 20.7% and 33.4%, respectively, to over 32% of
mortgage owners and close to half (48.9%) of all renters in 2010.
The percentage of housing units lacking complete plumbing facilities and/or complete kitchen
facilities in Robeson County is comparable to the statewide average.
Table 7. Housing Cost and Condition, 2010
Robeson County
Number
Median Housing Value
%
North Carolina
Number
$63,500
%
$149,100
Mortgage Greater than 30% of Income
4,746
38.6%
535,120
32.2%
Rent Greater than 30% of Income
7,333
58.9%
509,691
48.9%
Lacking Complete Plumbing Facilities
315
0.7%
16,548
0.5%
Lacking Complete Kitchen Facilities
300
0.7%
22,500
0.6%
Page 3-8
E.
Economy
Employment by Industry
According to the NC Department of Commerce, Division of Employment Security, the Health Care and
Social Assistance sector has the largest number of employees in Robeson County (note that all
employees are not listed in this table). Over 20% of the workforce is employed in the Health Care and
Social Assistance industry, followed by the Manufacturing industry, which employs approximately
16% of the workforce. The Utilities industry has the highest average weekly wage, at $1,341. The
weekly wage in the Utilities industry is double the average weekly wage of the Robeson County labor
force (see Table 8).
Table 8. Robeson County Employment and Wage by Industry, 2012
Establishments
Average
Employment
Percent of
Workforce
Average
Weekly Wage
Accommodation and Food Services
177
3,141
8.4%
$230.00
Administrative and Waste Services
67
1,407
3.8%
$356.00
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, & Hunting
46
233
0.6%
$504.00
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
21
222
0.6%
$296.00
Construction
202
1,317
3.5%
$577.00
Educational Services
60
5,235
14.0%
$666.00
Finance and Insurance
98
1,047
2.8%
$755.00
Health Care and Social Assistance
347
7,909
21.2%
$655.00
Information
19
215
0.6%
$612.00
Manufacturing
56
5,974
16.0%
$645.00
Other Services, Ex. Public Admin
145
387
1.0%
$430.00
Professional and Technical Services
126
543
1.5%
$540.00
Public Administration
41
2,762
7.4%
$691.00
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
64
182
0.5%
$477.00
Retail Trade
399
4,820
12.9%
$422.00
Transportation and Warehousing
85
700
1.9%
$758.00
Industry
Utilities
6
137
0.4%
$1,341.00
Wholesale Trade
83
1,132
3.0%
$919.00
2,042
37,363
100.0%
$639.65
Total
Source: NC Department of Commerce, Division of Employment Security.
Page 3-9
The Robeson County Public School System is the single
largest employer in the county. Other significant
employers are the Southeastern Regional Medical
Center, Mountaire Farms of NC, UNC-Pembroke, and
Campbell Soup Supply Company (see Table 9).
Unemployment in Robeson County has declined since
January, 2013, when it was 13.9%. The unemployment
rate recorded for July, 2013, was slightly less at 13.3%.
South Robeson High School Image Source: Public
Schools of Robeson County
Table 9. Robeson County Top 25 Employers
Company Name
Industry
Employment Range
Public Schools of Robeson County
1,000+
Southeastern Regional Medical Center
1,000+
Mountaire Farms of NC, Inc.
Manufacturing
1,000+
Robeson County
1,000+
UNC at Pembroke
1,000+
Campbell Soup Supply Company, Inc.
Manufacturing
500-999
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Retail Trade, Transportation
500-999
BB&T
Finance and Insurance
500-999
Two Hawk Employment Services, Inc.
500-999
Kayser-Roth Corporation
Manufacturing
500-999
Robeson Community College
500-999
A Primary Choice, Inc.
250-499
The Staffing Alliance, LLC
250-499
NC Department of Public Safety
250-499
City of Lumberton
250-499
Food Lion
250-499
Prestage Foods
Manufacturing
250-499
McDonalds
Accommodation and Food Services
250-499
RHA Health Services, Inc.
250-499
Elkay Southern Corporation
Manufacturing
250-499
Graphic Packaging International, Inc.
Manufacturing
250-499
Quickie Manufacturing Corporation
Manufacturing
250-499
Primary Health Choice, Inc.
100-249
BOS Supermarket
100-249
We Care For Your Home Care Corporation
100-249
Source: NC Department of Commerce, Division of Employment Security.
Page 3-10
Income
In 2010, the median household income in Robeson County was $29,041. The county still lags behind
the state and its more urban neighbors, Cumberland and Hoke counties. However, Robeson County's
median income is higher than its rural neighbors, Dillon County, SC, and the North Carolina counties
of Bladen and Scotland (see Table 10).
Table 10. Median Household Income, 2000 and 2010
Median Household Income
Person Below Poverty Level (%)
2000
2010
2000
2010
Robeson County
$28,202
$29,041
22.8%
30.5%
Columbus County
$26,805
$35,454
22.7%
24.3%
Bladen County
$26,877
$27,463
21.0%
24.5%
Cumberland County
$37,466
$43,660
12.8%
16.3%
Hoke County
$33,230
$42,613
17.7%
23.5%
Scotland County
$31,010
$28,695
20.6%
31.0%
Dillon County (SC)
$26,630
$26,342
24.2%
28.9%
North Carolina
$39,184
$45,570
12.3%
15.5%
The poverty rate in Robeson County is consistent with many other counties in eastern North Carolina.
It should also be noted that Robeson County is a Tier 1 County - a designation given to the forty (40)
most economically distressed counties in the state.
Vehicle Availability & Travel Time to Work
Close to ten percent of people in the occupied housing units in the county have no vehicle available
for private use. In North Carolina as a whole, 6.5% of residents are faced with this issue. In Robeson
County, the travel time to work is similar to the state overall.
Table 11. Vehicle Availability and Travel Time to Work, 2010
Robeson County
Number
Occupied
Housing Units
No Vehicles
Available
1 or More
Vehicles
Mean Travel
Time to Work
%
North Carolina
Number
%
43,237
100.0%
3,626,179
100.0%
4,057
9.4%
234,435
6.5%
39,180
90.6%
3,391,744
93.5%
23.0
23.4
Page 3-11
Economic Development
Robeson County’s economic development efforts are lead by the Robeson County Office of Economic
Development (OED). The Economic Development Commission is a nonprofit organization decicated
to promoting the County’s economic well being. Through the Robeson County Business Retention &
Expansion Program, the Commission works to facilitate the growth of new and existing industries and
to recognize their achievements and contributions to the community.
The County has a diverse group of private sector industries. However, the largest employers are food
processing industries which reflects the significance of agricultural production in Robeson County
and southeastern North Carolina.
In 2013, there are numerous buildings and sites available for industrial/business development. These
buildings/sites are summarized in Table 12 and delineated on Map 4.
Table 12. Robeson County Sites Available for Industrial/Business Development
Name
Size
Location
Former Use
BUILDINGS
Carolina Mills #25
127,000 sq ft
St. Pauls
Textile Manufacturing
Carolina Mills #26
239,578 sq ft
St. Pauls
Carolina Mills #27
97,305 sq ft
St. Pauls
Comark Building
152,800 sq ft
Pembroke
Modular Home Manufacturing
Converse
341,500 sq ft
Lumberton
Shoe Manufacturing
Croft Metal Building
476,695 sq ft
Lumber Bridge
Metal Fab
Fleetwood Homes Plant 2
73,528 sq ft
Pembroke
Mobile Home Manufacturing
Fleetwood Plant 1
77,953 sq ft
Pembroke
Formerly Lumberton Dyeing &
Finishing
69,353 sq ft
Lumberton
Industrial
Fun-tees Dye & Finishing Plant
97,610 sq ft
Lumberton
Fabric Finishing Plant
Howard-Haggins Building
27,432 sq ft
Fairmont
Textile
I-74 Fleetwood Mobile Homes
121,878 sq ft
Lumberton
I-95 Fox Properties Building
40,080 sq ft
Lumberton
Repacking & Distribution
Jasper Plant Building
25,200 sq ft
Lumberton
Textile
Lumbee Warehouse
63,896 sq ft
Lumberton
Storage Warehouse
Mueller Steam Building
97,000 sq ft
Lumberton
Pipevalve Manufacturing
Ohio Gear
84,000 sq ft
Maxton
Manufacturing
Outer Banks
205,000 sq ft
Lumberton
Knitting/Dyeing/Shipping
Planters
114,000 sq ft
Lumberton
Storage for Dupont
Premium Building
91,460 sq ft
Fairmont
Textile
Premium Building II
59,860 sq ft
Fairmont
RA Jeffreys
51,178 sq ft
Lumberton
Beverage Distribution
Rimption Building
111,087 sq ft
Lumberton
Page 3-12
Name
Size
Location
Former Use
Robetex
20,000 sq ft
Lumberton
Storage
Sanfatex
80,000 sq ft
Red Springs
Knitting, Dyeing, Finishing
Singletary Building
40,000 sq ft
Lumberton
Storage
Soldier Solutions
69,405 sq ft
Lumberton
Integration Facility
T & T Liquidators
81,000 sq ft
Lumberton
Cut & Sew Factory
T.R. Driscoll, Inc.
25,364 sq ft
Lumberton
Fabrication/Storage
Titan
21,400 sq ft
Lumberton
Valve Manufacturing
4700 West 5th Street
24.83 acres
Lumberton
Timberland
Air Park West
130.77 acres
Lumberton
Agriculture
COMtech
600.00 acres
Pembroke
Agriculture
Converse/Nordic Rail Site
90.00 acres
Lumberton
Farming
Highway 72 Rail Site
257.00 acres
Lumberton
Open Land
I-95/I-74 Biggs Industrial Park
700.00 acres
Lumberton
Agriculture
I-95 Eagle Site
190.00 acres
Lumberton
Agriculture
I-95 Fox Site
207.60 acres
Fairmont
Agriculture
I-95 Kings Industrial Park
240.00 acres
Lumberton
Open Land
I-95 Rowland Site
339.93 acres
Rowland
Agriculture
I-95 St. Pauls Site
580.00 acres
St. Pauls
Farmland
Nye Site
200.00 acres
Lumberton
Agriculture
Red Springs Industrial Park
200.00 acres
Red Springs
Open Land
SITES
Source: Robeson County Office of Economic Development.
The US military’s Base
Realignment and Closure (BRAC
2005) program is resulting in
major expansions at Fort Bragg
and five other area military
bases, which in turn is creating
unprecedented opportunity in
the defense and homeland
security industries. The All
American Defense Corridor
(http://www.bracrtf.com) is a
partnership among 11 counties
(including Robeson County)
created to support the growth
of defense-related businesses in
the region.
All American Defense Corridor Image Source: Robeson County OED.
Page 3-13
Parkton
Lumber Bridge
71
«
¬
Red Springs
h
k
20
¬
«
301
¤
£
h
k
hk
k
h
k
h
211
211
«
¬
Maxton
h
k
¬
«
72
¬
«
h
k
§
¦
¨
95
§
¦
¨
95
72
«
¬
Pembroke
71
«
¬
h
k
130
¬
«
k
h
h
hk
k
83
«
¬
711
«
¬
Raynham
501
¤
£
710
Rowland
h
k
McDonald
301
k
h
h
k
Fairmont
Map 4
Robeson County
904
«
¬
Available Buildings & Sites
Legend
h
h
k
h k
k
kk
h
hk
hk
hk
hk
h
k
h
hk
hk
k
h
k
h
k
h
h k
k
h
k
h
k
h
hk
k
h
72
¤
£
§
¦
¨
Municipalities
74
¤
£
130
130
72
¬
«
Proctorville
k
h
41
«
¬
41
¬
«
Robeson County
74
£
¤
«
¬¬
«
Marietta
NC DOT Primary Roads
Lumberton
h
h
k
kk
h
«
¬
¬
«
95
Saint Pauls
Orrum
kh
h
h k
k
Lumberton
Buildings
Building
k
h
h
k
h
k
Site
1 inch = 5 miles
0
1
2
4
Miles
6
8
²
h
hk
kk
h
h
k
h
k
kk
h
h
h h
k
k
h
k
kk
h
hk
k
kk
hk
hh
h
k
hh
h
k
Page - X
Page3-14
Economic Outlook
The following is an excerpt from the Robeson County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2013:
“Robeson County and the surrounding region are facing many of the same challenges from
the current recession as the rest of the country. The Robeson County area includes
intersection of I-95 and I-75 in southeastern North Carolina. Those interstate corridors should
be a tremendous asset as we ease out of tough economic times. Industrial recruitment is
handled by the county’s Economic Development Office. In the 2003-2008 time frame, there
were 36 announcements for new and expanded industry. Since 2008, new announcements
have been infrequent, although two of the major industries within the county have
completed major expansions during 2009-2010. During 2011, the county added Steven
Roberts Original Desserts, LLC to the list of industries beginning operations in the county. It is
a privately held, Denver-based company that was founded in 1995. It manufactures and sells
a broad line of frozen desserts and cookies to restaurant chains, distributors, and retails. For
2013-2014, companies have invested approximately 750 jobs for Robeson County including
Multiple Solar Energy projects, Trinity Foods ($15.5 million and 150 jobs), Cape Fear Arsenal
($15.5 million and 150 jobs), Mountaire Farms ($8 million and 100 jobs), Flo-Tile ($1 million
and 20 jobs), Due Process Stable Trading Company LLC ($2 million and 50 jobs), Project
Cardinal ($17 million and 65 jobs), Project Cartoon ($9 million and 10 jobs), Project Made in
America ($0.5 million and 25 jobs), and Project Emerald ($5 million and 30 jobs).”
The county’s economic outlook is strengthened by the fact that the county’s ad valorem tax rate is
competitive with other counties in the area (see Table 13).
Table 13. County Property Tax Rates for the Last Five Years (all rates per $100 valuation)
County
2012-13
2011-12
2010-11
2009-10
2008-09
Bladen County
0.7400
0.7400
0.7400
0.7400
0.7400
Columbus County
0.8150
0.8150
0.8150
0.8150
0.8150
Cumberland County
0.7400
0.7400
0.7400
0.7660
0.8600
Hoke County
0.7300
0.7300
0.7000
0.7000
0.7000
Robeson County
0.7700
0.7700
0.7900
0.8000
0.8000
Scotland County
1.0300
0.9900
1.0200
1.0200
1.0200
Page 3-15
Business Education and Training
Part of the national renowned North Carolina Community College System, Robeson Community
College (RCC) offers training programs for free or at minimal cost to qualifying companies. The
Industrial Services Center at RCC serves a diverse group of manufacturers with a full range of
customized training programs that include employee assessments, program development, skills
training, customized video training, temporary training facilities, supplies, and/or equipment.
Services provided at the Center are funded by these state-sponsored programs:
!
!
!
!
Customized Industry Training (CIT)
Focused Industry Training (FIT)
New and Expanding Industry Training (NEIT)
Industry Occupational Extension
The Advanced Manufacturing/Industrial Education and Training Labs at RCC opened in the fall of
2011 and provides area manufacturers with the development tools they need to complete in the
increasingly complex arena of advanced production. The facility houses five separate training labs:
!
!
!
!
!
Pneumatics/Hydraulics/Fluid Power Technology
CNC/Machine Tool Laboratory
PLC/CNC Laboratory
Mechanical Systems Laboratory
Mechantronics Laboratory
The Lumber River Workforce Development Board is focused on addressing the employment and
training needs of adults, dislocated workers, and youth. Through the Workforce Investment Act (WIA)
Program, eligible participants have access to a wide range of employment and training services from
basic job attainment and job keeping skills, to assistance with improving basic education skills, to
occupational skills training. JobLink partners ensure that appropriate services based on individual
needs are provided in a coordinated and friendly manner. Through partnerships and linkages with
education, economic development and business, the Board strives to align coordinated approaches
to the development of workforce development program design and delivery. The Lumber River
Workforce Development Board is housed at the Lumber River Council of Governments Office at
COMtech Park in Robeson County.
The Carolina Commerce and Technology Center, Inc., (COMtech) was developed to spur the
success of technology-focused businesses and industries. COMtech is an actively managed,
non-profit, tax-exempt, 501 (c) (3) corporation founded in July 2000. It is responsible for developing
an 800-acre, expandable site in central Robeson County, North Carolina. The COMtech. site will be the
home of technology-focused business, industry, education, training and business incubation facilities.
Page 3-16
Combining a state-of-the-art education and training center with ready-to-build sites, COMtech creates
a dynamic environment for accelerated growth.
Chartered in 1789, the University of North Carolina at Pembroke (UNC-P) was the first public
university in the US and today comprises a 16-campus system spanning the state. UNC-P provides
professional development, research capabilities, and specialized expertise to Robeson County
companies. The UNC-P Small Business Development Technology Center provides services specifically
designed to aid growing companies in expanding their markets and increasing competitiveness.
UNC-P is also home to the Thomas Family Center for Entrepreneurship (TFCE). The TFCE management
team serves as a valuable resource for the Southeastern North Carolina region. It offers confidential,
individualized consulting and evaluation services for entrepreneurs that are looking to start a small
business or new venture, or take their existing business to the next level. Services are provided free of
charge. TFCE consultants partner with other economic development organizations in the region to
maximize the resources for entrepreneurs. The mission of the TFCE is focused on education, research,
planning, technology transfer, and community engagement. The intent of TFCE is to stimulate
entrepreneurial thinking amongst the UNC-P student body, as well as assist and support
entrepreneurs and new ventures.
Industrial Parks
There are currently three industrial parks located in
Robeson County: Red Springs Industrial Park, COMtech
Industrial Park, and Biggs Industrial Park. Of these three
sites, two are certified by the State of North Carolina.
The North Carolina Certified Sites Program contains a
statewide inventory of industrial sites that have
undergone a rigorous prequalification process to
ensure they meet a consistent set of standards. A
Certified Site reduces the risks associated with
development by providing detailed information about
a site, including price and availability, utilities, access,
environmental concerns, and potential development
costs. Sites are periodically recertified in order to
ensure accurate, reliable data. Certified sites have
addressed 31 prerequisites, including:
!
!
!
!
!
Business/industrial use designation
Phase I environment audits
Geo-technical studies
Topographical analysis and maps
Aerial photography
Robeson County Industrial Parks Image Source:
North Carolina’s Southeast Regional Economic
Development Partnership
Page 3-17
!
!
!
!
!
Availability of public utilities
Industrial power quality
Engineered site development plans
Detailed analysis of development cost
Complete information on pricing
Robeson County currently has five (5) sites total which have been certified by the State of North
Carolina. These sites are as follows:
!
!
!
!
!
Carolina Commerce & Tech Center (COMtech)
I-95/I-74 Biggs Industrial Park
I-95 Eagle Site
I-95 Kings Industrial Park
I-95 St. Pauls Site
Page 3-18
F. Community Profile Summary
!
Robeson County ranked 10th of all US counties in
childhood obesity.
!
The population in Robeson County is expected to
increase 20% by 2030.
!
Robeson County’s 2010 median age was 34.4, with
57.4% of the population under 40.
!
Robeson County is one of the 10% of United States
counties that are majority-minority.
!
Robeson County’s median household income is only
63.7% of the state’s median income of $45,570.
!
Over 38% of homeowners allocate over 30% of
income for mortgage, compared to 32% for North
Carolina.
!
The Health Care and Social Assistance sector is
Robeson County’s largest employment sector.
!
There are numerous industrial/business sites
available in Robeson County, including five NC
Certified Sites.
!
10% of occupied housing units have no vehicle
available.
!
Robeson County is one of ten counties in the All
American Defense Corridor, which surrounds Fort
Bragg.
!
Robeson County is one of North Carolina’s Tier 1
(most economically distressed) counties.
Page 3-19
Section 4 – Environment/Existing Conditions
A.
Introduction
This portion of the plan provides an overview of the existing conditions within Robeson County,
including health services, community facilities, environmental conditions and natural resources,
transportation systems, and existing land use. In order to establish sound land development policies
aimed at long term growth, it is critical to establish a thorough understanding of the existing
conditions and environmental impediments to growth. Future needs are addressed in Section 5,
Community Projections and Future Demand.
B.
Health Services
1.
Medical Facilities
According to the 2011 Robeson County Community Health Assessment, the county has several health
resources, including Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Robeson County Health Department,
Scotland Health Care System, and Cape Fear Valley Health System. Additional resources such as
nursing homes, hospice care, and assisted living programs are also located throughout the county.
Southeastern Regional Medical Center
Southeastern Health, a non-profit organization, is a comprehensive health care system which offers a
wide array of health care services through its affiliated divisions. The organization is accredited by
The Joint Commission and has been designated as a Magnet organization. Southeastern Health
includes Southeastern Health Park, Southeastern Health - Pembroke, and Southeastern Regional
Medical Center (SRMC). Southeastern Health Park is located in Lumberton and contains an
ambulatory surgery center and medical office space. Southeastern Health - Pembroke is located on
West Third Street in Pembroke and offers fitness and rehabilitation services. Southeastern Health’s
established services in other locations in Pembroke, including urgent care and outpatient, will be
moved to this site. SRMC is licensed for 452 beds and offers a combination of general acute care
(292), hospice care (12), nursing home care (115), and psychiatric services (33) to more than 16,000
inpatients and approximately 75,000 emergency patients annually. The hospital provides an array of
services, including those listed below.
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Allergy/immunology
Anesthesiology
Dermatology
Endocrinology
Emergency Medicine
Ear, Nose, and Throat (Otolaryngology)
Family Practice
Gastroenterology
Southeastern Health exists to provide quality
regional health in a safe, compassionate,
and efficient environment.
Page 4-1
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
General and Vascular Surgery
Geriatrics
Gynecology
Hematology
Internal Medicine
Nephrology
Neurology
Obstetrics
Occupational Medicine
Ophthalmology
Orthopedics
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Pathology
Pediatrics
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Plastic Surgery
Psychiatry
Pulmonary Medicine
Radiation Oncology
Radiology
Rheumatology
Urology
Robeson County Health Department
The Robeson County Health Department, established in 1912,
is one of the nation’s oldest rural health departments. The
Department’s mission is for all residents to achieve the highest
level of health possible through identifying and reducing
health risks; detecting, investigating and preventing the spread
of disease; promoting healthy lifestyles and a safe and healthful
environment; promoting the availability and accessibility of
quality healthcare services through the private sector; and
providing quality health services to those in need. The
department provides the following services:
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Animal Control
Child Health
Communicable Disease
Dental Health
Environmental Health
Health Check/Health Choice
Health Education
Home Health
Home Visitation Programs
Immunization
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
In 1958, the Robeson County Health
Department received the NC Public Health
Association’s Merit Award. More than 50 years
later, the Department continues to be
recognized as one of the most comprehensive
health departments in the state.
Interpreter Services
Laboratory
Management Support
Nutrition
Orthopedic Clinic
Public Health Preparedness/Response
Social Work
Vital Statistics
Women's Health
Page 4-2
Cape Fear Valley Health System
Cape Fear Valley Health System is the 9th largest health system in the state, with more than 935,000
patient visits annually. The regional health system contains 765 beds, five hospitals, and primary care
physicians offices throughout Cumberland County and surrounding areas. Cape Fear Valley Medical
Center is an acute-care hospital offering quality care in open-heart surgery, home health and hospice,
cancer treatment, maternity services, emergency medicine, pediatric intensive care, and wellness
programs. Highsmith-Rainey Specialty Hospital provides long-term acute care as well as an
ExpressCare facility. Cape Fear Valley Rehabilitation Center is a physical rehabilitation facility offering
inpatient and outpatient care for brain- and spinal-cord injured, neurologically impaired patients,
stroke patients, and orthopedic patients. Behavioral Health Care is a comprehensive psychiatric
hospital with inpatient services for adults and outpatient services for children, adolescents, and
adults. Bladen County Hospital is a public, not-for-profit facility that includes a 24-hour Emergency
Department, 40-bed Medical/Surgical Unit, an Intensive Care Unit and an up-to-date Birthing Center.
Scotland Health Care System
Scotland Health Care System is located in Laurinburg, North Carolina. The facility is licensed for 104
acute care beds and its 71 physicians cover a comprehensive range of specialties including:
anesthesiology, cardiology, dermatology, emergency medicine, family medicine, gastroenterology,
general surgery, gynecology and obstetrics, hospitalist, internal medicine, medical and radiation
oncology, nephrology, neurology, occupational medicine, ophthalmology, orthopedics,
otolaryngology, pathology, pediatrics, pulmonology, urology, and vascular surgery. Five primary care
practices provide care in the hospital’s service areas of Laurinburg, Maxton, Pembroke, and Wagram,
in NC; and Bennettsville in SC, with a combined total of nearly 27,000 visits in a year. The System also
owns and operates the following practices through the Scotland Regional Health Network:
!
!
!
!
Marlboro OB/GYN in Bennettsville, SC
Scotland Women's Care in Laurinburg
Scotland Surgical & GI in Laurinburg
Scotland Gastroenterology in Laurinburg
2.
Mental Health
Local Management Entities (LMEs) are where people can go to find information on receiving mental
health, developmental disability, or substance abuse services. Eastpointe oversees mental health
services in a 12-county LME area, which includes the following counties: Bladen, Columbus, Duplin,
Edgecombe, Greene, Lenoir, Nash, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Wayne, and Wilson. Eastpointe
provides a toll free Call Center number to access information, assessment, crisis care, and referrals to
Eastpointe providers 24 hours a day, 365 days a year (1-800-913-6109). Eastpointe manages a network
of licensed practitioners and comprehensive, independent, and specialty provider agencies who offer
a variety of services designed to meet consumer needs.
Page 4-3
North Carolina has a plan to change the way Medicaid pays for mental health, developmental
disabilities, and substance abuse services. The change is known as the 1915(b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver
and is expected to serve a total population of 500,000 by July 1, 2013. The goal of the change is to
make sure that people needing help are able to easily get high quality services. Eastpointe has been
identified as a 1915 (b)/(c) Medicaid Waiver site.
3.
Adult and Senior Care Services
Robeson County provides a wide range of services tailored to the needs of both adult and senior
citizens throughout the county. The NC Division of Aging and Adult Services provides the following
listing of service providers in the Robeson County area:
Provider
Location
Services Offered
Companion Care
Lumberton
In-Home Respite
Interim Health Care
Whiteville
In-Home Level 1 - Home Management
In-Home Level 2 - Personal Care
In-Home Level 3 - Personal Care
Legal Aid of NC-Pembroke
Raleigh
Legal Assistance
Lumber River Council of
Governments
Pembroke
Congregate Nutrition
Assistance with Access Adm
Caregiver Directed Vouchers
Community/Program Planning
Counseling, Training, Supp Adm
Home Modifications/Accessibility
Information and Assistance
Information Education
Legal Assistance
Program Promotion
Public Information
Respite Administration
Supplemental Services Administration
Support Groups
Training Programs
Health Promotion
Home Delivered Meals
Disease Prevention
Robeson County Church
and Community Center
Lumberton
Housing and Home Improvement
Information and Assistance
SEATS
Lumberton
Transportation
Transportation (Medical)
In addition to these services, there are a number of private and non-profit assisted living and group
home facilities located within municipalities throughout the county.
Page 4-4
4.
Dental Health
North Carolina ranks 47th in the nation in dentists per capita at 4.3 dentists per 10,000 population. In
fact, only eight North Carolina counties have dentist-to-patient ratios which exceed the national
average of 6.0 dentists per 10,000 population (Wake, Durham, Orange, Alamance, Guilford, Forsyth,
Mecklenberg, and New Hanover Counties). Seventy-nine North Carolina counties are recognized as
federally designated dental shortage areas.
Robeson County ranks below the state average of dentists per capita at 2.0 dentists per 10,000
residents and is recognized as a federally designated dental shortage area. The Robeson County
Health Department has a Dental Outreach program which provides dental education, screenings,
assessments, and referrals for Robeson County residents in various community settings, including the
public schools and daycare centers. The program also assists with providing dental treatment for
inmates at the Robeson County Detention Center.
Additionally, the East Carolina University School of Dental Medicine is working to improve access to
dentistry throughout eastern North Carolina. This effort will involve the construction of several dental
clinics throughout the state, including a facility to be located next to the Robeson County Health
Department. The facility will bring dental care to limited-income, underserved residents while
providing educational opportunities to East Carolina University dental students. Once open, the
center will provide a variety of services, including general, preventive, and emergency dental care and
will include services such as crowns, root canals, and bridges.
5.
Access to Care
Robeson County falls significantly behind the state in all health professionals categories (see Table
14). Bladen, Columbus, and Hoke Counties also rank below the statewide average for health
professionals.
Table 14. Health Professionals per 10,000 Population (2011)
County
Population*
Physicians**
Registered Nurses**
Dentists**
Pharmacists**
Bladen
35,420
5.1
46.9
1.7
4.3
Columbus
58,178
11.8
74.4
1.6
11.1
327,246
16.6
88.4
4.2
7.1
48,873
2.4
23.2
1.6
3.3
Robeson
135,863
12.0
69.0
2.0
6.2
Scotland
35,950
18.0
92.7
2.2
8.0
9,721,198
22.1
98.6
4.3
9.5
Cumberland
Hoke
North Carolina
Source: *LINC Database, Office of State Planning; **NC Department of Commerce, AccessNC.com.
Page 4-5
C.
Community Facilities
1.
Law Enforcement
Law enforcement is provided to the county by the
Robeson County Sheriff’s Department. The
department is located at 120 Legend Road in
Lumberton, NC. The department has three
divisions: Administration, Patrol, and Detective.
The Chief Deputy assists the Sheriff in day-to-day
administrative operations and assumes
The Robeson County Sheriff Department’s mission is to preserve
responsibility in the Sheriff’s absence, including
and protect lives and property of its citizens by preventing crimes
working with Animal Cruelty Aid on a daily basis
and pursuing those criminals who have violated Federal, State
and supervising the Sheriff’s Office Internal Affairs and County laws.
Investigator and the Domestic Violence Unit. The
Patrol Division Major supervises Patrol Division, Warrant Division, DSS, Civil Division, Courthouse
Security/Bailiffs, Traffic Enforcement Team, and the Narcotics Enforcement Team. The Detectives
Division Major supervises the Major Crimes Unit, Juvenile Division (School Resource Officers), Arson
Investigator, Copper Theft Detective, and Gang Detectives. The Robeson County Detention Center is
located at 122 Legend Road in Lumberton and currently houses approximately 410 inmates.
The Towns of Fairmont, Maxton, Pembroke, Red Springs, Rowland, and St. Pauls, and the City of
Lumberton all have municipal police departments which provide service to their residents.
Robeson County has experienced a slight decline in the number of violent offenses reported over the
last few years. From 2011 to 2012, the property crime rate decreased by six percent (see Table 15).
The decrease in crime rate is slightly higher than the rate of decrease experienced statewide and by
the surrounding counties (with the exception of Hoke County) during the same time period.
Table 15. Criminal Offenses per 100,000 Population
Robeson County
Bladen County
Year
Index
Crime Rate*
Violent
Crime Rate
Property
Crime Rate
Index
Crime Rate*
Violent
Crime Rate
Property
Crime Rate
2011
7,133.1
781.3
6,351.8
4,440.6
323.5
4,117.1
2012
6,783.2
809.5
5,973.7
4,700.1
398.3
4,301.8
% Change ‘11-‘12
-4.9%
3.6%
-6.0%
5.8%
23.1%
4.5%
Year
Index
Crime Rate*
Violent
Crime Rate
Property
Crime Rate
Index
Crime Rate*
Violent
Crime Rate
Property
Crime Rate
2011
4,925.8
349.7
4,576.1
6,615.7
548.1
6,067.5
2012
4,735.2
381.9
4,353.3
6,723.5
583.1
6,140.4
% Change ‘11-‘12
-3.9%
9.2%
-4.9%
1.6%
6.4%
1.2%
Columbus County
Cumberland County
Page 4-6
Hoke County
Scotland County
Year
Index
Crime Rate*
Violent
Crime Rate
Property
Crime Rate
Index
Crime Rate*
Violent
Crime Rate
Property
Crime Rate
2011
2,834.8
162.5
2,672.2
5,507.2
479.1
5,028.1
2012
1,950.5
140.6
1,809.8
5,553.3
528.5
5,024.9
% Change ‘11-‘12
-31.2%
-13.5%
-32.3%
0.8%
10.3%
-0.1%
Year
Index
Crime Rate*
Violent
Crime Rate
Property
Crime Rate
2011
3,942.2
356.6
3,585.6
2012
3,767.2
358.6
3,408.6
% Change ‘11-‘12
-4.4%
0.6%
-4.9%
North Carolina
*Index Crime includes the total number of violent crimes (murder, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault) and property crimes
(burglary, larceny, and motor vehicle theft).
Source: NC Uniform Crime Reporting Program.
2.
Fire/Emergency Medical Services
Fire response and emergency medical services are provided to Robeson County residents through a
total of 32 fire departments, all but one department (Lumberton) operate on a volunteer basis. Each
district has its own separate taxing district and rate.
In addition to fire protection, emergency medical response service is provided by both private and
public entities throughout the county. EMS providers within the County include: Parkton Rescue, Red
Springs Rescue, Lumberton Rescue, Pembroke Rescue, Maxton Rescue, South Robeson Rescue, St.
Pauls Medical Responders, and Rowland Rescue.
3.
Emergency Management
The Robeson County Emergency Services Department oversees emergency response efforts following
natural and manmade hazardous events. The mission of the Robeson County Fire Marshal/
Emergency Services Department is to protect life, property and the environment through a
partnership effort between local, state, and federal agencies through effective leadership in
emergency response, planning, recovery, training and mitigation. Also, to preserve and protect public
health and safety in Robeson County through the enforcement of the NC Building Code Volume V,
Fire Prevention. The Department also provides technical assistance to fire departments, the public,
industry and schools in obtaining the above-referenced goals and assists with investigation into cause
and origin of fires in Robeson County. Robeson County Emergency Services also undertakes predisaster mitigation planning efforts. The Robeson County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
was adopted in 2012 to assist with ongoing mitigation activities and floodplain management. This
plan must be updated every five years. The policies contained in that plan are incorporated herein by
reference.
Page 4-7
4.
Parks, Recreation, Conservation, and Open Space
Robeson County maintains a full-time Parks and Recreation Department. The Department’s mission is
to offer recreational activities for all ages and genders to the communities of Robeson County. The
County offers youth cheerleading, baseball, softball, T-ball, basketball, football, and soccer, along with
a newly organized senior center. The Department also maintains 22 parks around the county (see
Map 5), including the following:
Map #
Park Name/Location
Amenities
1
Sammy Cox Park
750 Norment Road, Lumberton
Softball Field, Tennis Court, Playground, Picnic Shelter, Concession
Stand, Restrooms
2
Tom Blanks Park
10846 US 301 North, Lumberton
Baseball Field, Playground, Picnic Shelter, Restrooms
3
Allenton Community Park
6721 NC 211 East, Lumberton
Baseball Field, T-Ball Field, Playground, Concession Stand,
Restrooms
4
Sam Noble Park
3924 Meadow Road, Lumberton
Softball Field, Tennis, Horseshoes
5
Alamac Park
1886 Alamac Road, Lumberton
Basketball Court, Playground, Picnic Shelters (2)
6
Deep Branch Park
4097 Deep Branch Road, Lumberton
Baseball Field
7
Archie Oxendine Park
3935 Evergreen Church Road, Pembroke
Baseball Field, Volleyball Court, Playground, Picnic Shelter,
Concession Stand, Restrooms
8
Maggie Oxendine Park
962 Pine Street, Pembroke
Softball Field, Playground, Concession Stand, Restrooms
9
James Dial Memorial Park
4515 Elrod Road, Rowland
Softball Field, Playground, Picnic Shelter, Volleyball Court,
10
Purvis Community Park
5415 NC 710 South, Rowland
Softball Field, Playground, Picnic Shelter
11
Bonnie/Ballard Little League Field
609 S. Martin Luther King Street, Rowland
Softball Field, Playground, Picnic Shelter, Concession Stand,
Restrooms
12
Oxendine Ball Park
5601 Oxendine School Road, Maxton
Baseball Field, Picnic Shelter, Concession Stand, Restrooms
13
Prospect Park/Prospect Little League Park
Missouri Road, Maxton
Baseball Fields (2), Playground, Picnic Shelter
14
Barker Ten Mile Building
4823 Barker Ten Mile Road, Lumberton
Kitchen, Restrooms, Senior Citizens Activities, Line Dancing,
Aerobics
15
Rob Henderson Park
317 East Cottingham Street, Maxton
Softball Field, Baseball Field, Soccer Field, Basketball Court,
Playground, Picnic Shelter, Concession Stand, Restrooms
16
Parkton Community Park
336 N. Washington Street, Parkton
T-ball, Baseball Field, Playground, Picnic Shelter,
Concessions/Restrooms
17
St. Pauls District Park
625 E. Blue Street, St. Pauls
Baseball Field, Soccer Field, Horseshoes, Playground, Hiking (0.5
mile), Swimming Pool, Picnic Shelter
18
Calvin Haggins Park
620 Linden Street, Fairmont
Softball Field, Basketball Court, Playground, Picnic Shelters (2)
Page 4-8
Map #
Park Name/Location
Amenities
19
Rudolph Curry Park
Marvin Street, Fairmont
Playground, Basketball Court, Picnic Shelter
20
Tom Cope Park
119 Graham Street, Red Springs
Softball Field, Concession Stand, Restrooms
21
J.W. Hunt Park
209 Resettlement Drive, Rowland
Softball Field, Playground, Picnic Shelter, Volleyball Court,
22
Raynham Community Park
120 Phyllis Circle, Raynham
Playground
Additionally, Robeson County maintains joint use agreements with the Robeson County Schools. The
following sports are made available through the use of County public school facilities:
Sport
# of Teams
# of Participants
Boys Basketball
40
480
Girls Basketball
20
300
Football
17
595
Flag Football
24
360
Cheerleading
12
240
Babe Ruth Baseball
19
285
Adult Basketball
14
210
Wrestling
7
205
There are also several recreation areas within the County that are either operated by the State of
North Carolina or the US Fish and Wildlife Service (see Table 16 and Map 5). Additionally, the Lumber
River is an exceptional natural resource and offers opportunity for passive open space. In 1989, the
river was designated as a "Natural and Scenic River" by the North Carolina General Assembly. In
addition, it is the only blackwater river in North Carolina to be designated as a National Wild and
Scenic River by the Department of Interior. In 2010, the Lumber River was voted one of North
Carolina’s Ten Natural Wonders, the result of an on-line contest held by Land for Tomorrow, a
coalition dedicated to supporting the preservation of North Carolina’s land and water resources.
The Lumber River and some of its adjoining banks are part of the Lumber River State Park, which
contains 9,234 acres of land and 115 miles of state natural and scenic waters that meanders through
four North Carolina counties. The park’s recreational activities are currently at Princess Ann Access in
the south (near the Towns of Orrum and Fair Bluff) and the Chalk Banks access to the north (near the
Town of Wagram).
There are 24 boat launches along the Lumber River that serve as access points to Lumber River State
Park. The entire length of the river is open to fishing. Nine primitive camping sites are located at the
Princess Ann section of the park. Each camp site features a picnic table and grill, lantern holder, trash
can, and fire ring. There are several hiking trails and picnic areas at Princess Ann as well as the many
municipal and county parks that are located on the Lumber River.
Page 4-9
Map 5 - Parks, Conservation, & Open Space
71
¬
« 16l
301
¬
«
20
¬
«
12l
71
¬
«
13
l
15
72
¬
«
l
74
130
21l
501
¬
«
2l
6l
710
¬
«
l
4l
41
¬
«
3l
5l
22l
301
¬
«
14l
1l
711
¬
«
12l
11
95
8l
9l
83
¬
«
§
¦
¨
211
¬
«
7l
£
¤
¬
«
17l
20l
41
¬
«
§
¦
¨
95
72
74
18l
19l
211
¬
«
£
¤
¬
«
904
¬
«
41
¬
«
Legend
l
Park
Non-participating Municipalities
State Conservation & Open Space Areas
Page 4-10
Table 16. Conservation and Open Space
AREA NAME
MANAGEMENT AGENCY
PUBLIC ACCESS
ACRES
ADM INDIAN CULTURAL TOURIST CENTER
NORTH CAROLINA INDIAN AFFAIRS
YES
683.86
BIG MCQUEEN
NC DIVISION OF PARKS & RECREATION
NO
8.30
EARL DEESE
US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
NO
38.78
HARVEY AND JENNIE EDGE
NO
61.47
JAMES BRITT
NO
98.97
JJ AND K COMPANY, LLC
NO
17.58
JOHN AND ALICE LEETTA RUS
NO
46.71
LENNIS WATTS
NO
68.38
MAE C. / JACK L. SAVANT
NO
56.98
PRINCESS ANN
YES
1715.13
LUMBER RIVER STATE PARK
YES
4597.07
WILLIAM K. JOHNSON, JR.
NO
125.51
WRC ASHPOLE SWAMP
NC WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION
YES
45.99
WRC BULLARD AND BRANCH HUNTING
PRESERVE
YES
298.32
WRC HIGH HILL ACCESS AREA
YES
6.23
WRC LENNON’S BRIDGE ACCESS AREA
YES
12.74
LUMBER RIVER CONSERVANCY
LUMBER RIVER CONSERVANCY
LIMITED
540.33
8,422.35
Source: Robeson County GIS; Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.; and NCDENR.
5.
Arts and Cultural Resources
Robeson County hosts cultural gatherings and local
institutions focus on the region’s rich heritage. The
Robeson Little Theatre, the Border Felt Farmer’s
Museum, the North Carolina Indian Cultural Center,
and the Robeson County Showcase Museum are
cultural organizations in Robeson County. Some
annual festivals held in the county include Fairmont Lumbee Spring Pow Wow Image Source: Lumbee Tribe
of North Carolina.
Farmers Festival, the Lumbee Spring Pow Wow, St.
Paul’s Annual Festival, and the Native American Wild Game Festival. In addition, the Strike at the Wind!
play which commemorates the exploits of Lumbee outlaw, Henry Berry Lowrie (or “Lowry”), is
performed during the summer in Pembroke.
Page 4-11
6.
Historic Properties
Various historic places and houses continue to exist in Robeson County. The Humphrey-Williams
House (1846), the Luther Henry Caldwell House (1894), and the Carolina Theatre (1927) are a few
historic landmarks in the area. There are currently twenty-four (24) properties in Robeson County
which are listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Table 17 provides a listing of these
properties, their general location, and the date they were published to the National Register.
Table 17. Properties Listed on the National Register of Historic Places
Site
Location
Date
Asbury Methodist Church
Town of Raynham
4/30/2009
Ashpole Presbyterian Church
Unincorporated Robeson County (near Rowland)
10/19/1982
Baker Sanatorium
City of Lumberton
10/8/1978
Luther Henry Caldwell House
City of Lumberton
9/18/1978
Carolina Theatre
City of Lumberton
7/9/1981
Centenary Methodist Church
Unincorporated Robeson County (near Rowland)
4/10/2007
Fairmont Commercial Historic District
Town of Fairmont
4/7/2010
Humphrey-Williams House
Unincorporated Robeson County (near Lumberton)
7/24/1973
Humphrey-Williams Plantation
Unincorporated Robeson County (near Lumberton)
11/16/1988
Lumberton Commercial Historic District
City of Lumberton
12/21/1989
Flora MacDonald College
Town of Red Springs
4/3/1978
Maxton Historic District
Town of Maxton
2/12/1999
Kenneth McKinnon House
Unincorporated Robeson County (near St. Pauls)
9/15/2005
Old Main, Pembroke State University
Town of Pembroke
5/13/1976
Former Pembroke High School
Town of Pembroke
9/1/1995
Philadelphus Presbyterian Church
Unincorporated Robeson County (near Red Springs)
10/3/1975
Planters Building
City of Lumberton
11/3/1987
Robeson County Agricultural Building
City of Lumberton
4/16/2012
Rowland Depot
Town of Rowland
5/18/2001
Alfred Rowland House
City of Lumberton
1/17/2008
Rowland Main Street Historic District
Town of Rowland
2/2/2005
W. R. Surles Memorial Library
Town of Proctorville
9/16/2009
United States Post Office (Federal Nomination)
City of Lumberton
3/6/1985
Williams-Powell House
Unincorporated Robeson County (near Orrum)
4/9/1984
Source: NC State Historic Preservation Office.
Page 4-12
7.
Education
Elementary and Secondary Education
The Board of Education of the Public Schools of Robeson County (PSRC) is
made up of eleven members, eight of whom are elected by district and
three at-large. PSRC is one of the largest school systems in North
Carolina, with an enrollment population of approximately 24,000
students in its 43 schools. There are 24 elementary schools, 11 middle
schools, and eight high schools (including the Robeson County Career
Center and the Early College High School). Such a large enrollment
requires the services of approximately 2,100 certified employees
including teachers, principals, assistant principals and counselors along
with about 1,100 classified employees.
The following provides the Board of Education’s vision statement for the school system:
“To educate all students by building a foundation for learning in an
ever-changing global society.”
There are also several private schools located in Robeson County. Southeastern Academy is an
independent co-educational day school for students from Junior Kindergarten through Grade Nine.
Founded in 1990, as a non-profit corporation, it operates under the direction of twelve-member
Board of Directors. Riverside Academy was established in 1985 as a mission out of the Riverside
Independent Baptist Church. The Academy is self-supportive, and its enrollment consists of K-12. The
curriculum of the school is A.C.E. (Accelerated Christian Education). Flora Macdonald Academy is an
independent, college preparatory, coeducational day school for grades PK-12, serving Red Springs,
Raeford, Fayetteville, Laurinburg, Lumberton, and surrounding areas. The school provides a
values-based college preparatory education in a small, safe, and nurturing environment.
Higher Education
Robeson Community College (RCC) in Lumberton offers
county residents a variety of degree programs ranging
from curriculum-based programs for degree completion
to continuing education. RCC is accredited by the
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of
Colleges and Schools to award the associate degree. In addition, RCC offers training to start-up
businesses through its Small Business Center. Training sessions are offered as seminars, workshops,
and short-term courses, most of which are free. The Small Business Center also offers confidential
business counseling at no charge to individuals wishing to start a new business or expand an existing
Page 4-13
business. Counseling is also available to existing business owners who are experiencing an obstacle
or problem that is hindering the success of their business. In 2013, Robeson Community College was
ranked among the top 50 community colleges in the nation by the Washington Monthly magazine.
Robeson Community College offers a variety of curriculum programs, including:
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Air Conditioning, Heating & Refrigeration Technology
Associate Degree Nursing
Associate in General Education
Business Administration
Computer Information Technology
Cosmetology
Criminal Justice Technology
Culinary Arts
Early Childhood Education
Electrical/Electronics Technology
General Occupational Technology
Industrial Systems Technology
Medical Office Administration
Office Administration
Practical Nursing
Radiography
Respiratory Therapy
Surgical Technology
The University of North Carolina at Pembroke (UNCP) is one of the
nation’s oldest and largest predominantly Native American institutions of
higher learning. Founded in 1887 as the Croatan Normal School, UNCP’s
campus now spans across 152 acres. With a total enrollment of 6,222, the
university offers 41 undergraduate programs, 18 graduate programs in
business and education, and 1 certification program. UNCP is fully
accredited by the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of
Colleges and Schools and has been recognized by the Princeton Review
and US News & Word Report for its rapid growth, instructional quality,
and affordability.
Methodist University and St. Andrews University are a short drive from Robeson County. In addition,
Duke University, North Carolina State University, East Carolina University, the University of North
Carolina at Wilmington and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill are all within a two-hour drive
of the County.
Page 4-14
8.
Libraries
Library facilities in Robeson County are provided through the Robeson County Public Library system.
The main library is located in Lumberton with branch libraries in Maxton, Fairmont, St. Pauls, Red
Springs, Pembroke, and Rowland. Each library has internet computers available for use by the public,
and wireless internet is also available. The libraries have books, DVD’s, videos, audio books, manga
and graphic novels available for check out. There are numerous magazine and newspaper
subscriptions for use in the library. The library provides inter-library loan service for materials that are
not available in the collection.
9.
Utilities
Water System
The County’s water system consists of 12 well treatment facilities and one water treatment plant. The
water transmission and distribution system is comprised of approximately 1,739 miles of water lines
ranging in size from 2 to 24 inches in diameter. Maxton Water Treatment Plant was completed in
1981 to provide service to county customers and the Campbell Soup Company. The plant drew water
from the Lumber River and from a couple of wells until it was migrated into a complete Well facility in
the early 1990s. The Lumber Bridge well treatment facility was established and maintained by that
local municipality until it was purchased and upgraded to supply water to the local community and
Piedmont poultry (now know as MountAire). Additionally, Robeson County has buy-sell agreements
with all municipalities in the county. The following summarizes the water use by type:
Type of Use
Metered Connections
Metered Average Use (MGD)
Residential
24,398
4.519
Commercial
0
0.000
Industrial
6
6.266
Institutional
0
0.000
Sewer Service
Currently, Robeson County does not provide wastewater treatment services to any unincorporated
portions of the county. Central sewer service is available within the City of Lumberton, and the towns
of Fairmont, Maxton, Pembroke, Red Springs, Rowland, St. Pauls. These systems are operated
independent of the county. Developments throughout unincorporated portions of the county are
required to either establish local septic systems or package treatment plants to provide sewer service.
Page 4-15
Solid Waste
Robeson County adopted their initial Solid Waste Management Plan for the Robeson County planning
area (Robeson County and the municipalities of Lumberton, Red Springs, Fairmont, Pembroke, St.
Pauls, Rowland, Parkton, Rennert, Marietta, Proctorville, McDonald, Lumber Bridge, Orrum, and
Raynham) in June 1997. NOTE: Maxton is not included in the Robeson County planning area because
they utilize Scotland County facilities. The fourth update of the County’s Ten Year Solid Waste
Management Plan was prepared in accordance with NC General Statute 130A-309.09A, which requires
a mandatory update every three years.
Based on the County’s Waste Disposal Report for FY2007-2008 (most recent full year of reporting), the
Robeson County planning area disposed of approximately 88,748 tons (1,328 annual pounds per
person) of residential, commercial, and institutional waste and 21,511 tons of construction and
demolition debris (C&D) waste in FY2007-2008. These wastes represent approximately 80.5% and
19.5% of the disposed waste stream, respectively. By comparison, in 2011, North Carolina had 1,352
pounds per person of domestic waste and the United States produced 861 annual pounds per person.
Residential, commercial, and institutional waste was disposed of at the Robeson County Landfill in St.
Pauls (86,534 tons), the Uwharrie Environmental Regional Landfill in Montgomery County (3,425 tons)
via the Scotland County Transfer Station, and the Waste Industries Sampson County Disposal Landfill
(2,620 tons). C&D waste was disposed of at the Robeson County C&D Landfill (17,709 tons), the
Scotland County C&D Landfill (3,793 tons), and the Waste Industries Sampson County Disposal C&D
Landfill Unit (9 tons).
Electricity/Phone/Internet/Natural Gas
Robeson County has four energy providers that offer service to residents.
Those include Duke Energy Progress, Lumbee River Electric Corporation,
City of Lumberton Public Utilities, and Town of Red Springs Utilities.
Piedmont Natural Gas provides service to parts of Robeson County.
Phone and internet service is provided by AT&T, Sprint, Time Warner, US Cellular, and Verizon.
Page 4-16
10.
Administration
The Robeson County Administration office is located at 701 N. Elm Street in Lumberton. The county
operates under a Commissioner-Manager form of government. Robeson County maintains 30
departments overseeing various aspects of county services and functions. These departments
include:
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Building Safety/Code Enforce
Communications Center
Computer Operations
Cooperative Extension
Emergency Services
EMS
Finance
Health Department
Housing Authority
Human Resources
Jail Health
Offender Resources
Office of Economic Development
Parks & Recreation
Robeson Juvenile Restitution
Public Works
Public Buildings
Purchasing
RC Garage
Register of Deeds
Solid Waste
SEATS
Sheriff’s Department
Dept. of Social Services
Soil & Water
Tax
Veterans Services
Water Department
Wellness
Zoning & Planning
Page 4-17
D.
Environmental Factors
1.
Climate
The climate of Robeson County is influenced by latitude, elevation, distance from the ocean, location
on the continent, and other factors. The mean annual temperature in Robeson County is about 63  F.
The annual rainfall is reported to be 46.39 inches. The average length of the growing season is about
225 days, from late March until early November. A large part of the rainfall during the growing season
comes from summer thunderstorms and varies widely. Frequently in the fall and occasionally in the
summer, tropical storms pass through the coastal waters or inland and increase rainfall. A little snow
or sleet occurs almost every winter, but the accumulation is usually small and melts quickly. The
blanketing effect of a layer of snow lasting several days is rare.
2.
Geology and Topography
Robeson County lies wholly within the Coastal Plain province of North Carolina. It has a mostly level
to undulating surface, largely made up of sandhills and coastal dunes with elevations that vary from
60 feet above mean sea level in the extreme southeastern portion of the County to 250 feet above
mean sea level in the north.
The County’s soils are derived from unconsolidated sand, silt, and clay deposited by water. The soils
are nearly level to sloping and are well suited to farming. Generally, the well-drained soils occupy
broad outer rims of the interstream divides next to the drainageways, and the more poorly drained,
nearly level soils are farther from the drainageways, on the floodplains of streams, and in Carolina
bays. The County’s major waterway is the Lumber River, which meanders from north to south
through the approximate center of the County. Major tributaries in the County include Big Swamp,
which forms the eastern boundary of the County, Big Marsh Swamp, Raft Swamp, Richland Swamp,
Back Swamp, Hog Swamp, and Ashpole Swamp. Shoe Heel Creek drains the western tip of the
County.
3.
Water Resources
The majority of Robeson County is located in the Lumber River Basin with a very small area located in
the Cape Fear River Basin. The Lumber River Basin covers an area of approximately 3,329 square
miles. It has approximately 2,222 miles of freshwater streams, 9,865 acres of freshwater lakes, and
4,680 acres of estuarine or saline waterbodies. In addition, there are 26 miles of coastline along the
basin. There are nine counties and 52 municipalities within the basin.
The basin is made up of three main ecoregions: the sandhills, loam plains and Carolina flatwoods. The
sandhills region is typically characterized by upland pine forest and wiregrass. Soils in the sandhills
are well drained and provide a reliable source of groundwater recharge to the streams that run
Page 4-18
through the area. This is not the case in the loam plains and Carolina flatwoods regions where flow is
often slow and ephemeral. This low flow contributes to the coastal plain being dominated by
blackwater systems that often consist of braided streams, wide floodplains and pocosin wetlands. A
unique type of wetland known as Carolina bays can be found throughout much of the basin. Carolina
bays are a type of isolated depressional wetland that range in size from a few acres to several hundred
acres.
Within the Lumber River Basin, Robeson County falls within the Lumber Subbasin (03040203). This
subbasin encompasses about 1,631 square miles within North Carolina. The Lumber River headwaters
are located in the sandhills of Hoke, Montgomery, Moore, Richmond, and Scotland Counties. The
Robeson and Columbus County portions of the basin lie within the Inner Coastal Plain. All 115 miles
of the Lumber River have been designated as a North Carolina Natural and Scenic River. In addition,
81 miles of the Lumber River are designated as a Federal Wild and Scenic River. These designations
allow restrictions to be placed on dam construction and other water resource projects. The Lumber
River State Park, created in 1989, currently protects 8,438 acres along the Lumber River, as well as,
providing recreational opportunities. The Lumber River discharges to the Little Pee Dee River in
South Carolina. Agriculture dominates much of the land use at just over 30 percent; however, the
headwaters have remained heavily forested. Close to a quarter of this subbasin is comprised of
wooded wetlands found mainly in the floodplains of the braided river systems.
There are 14 minor NPDES permitted facilities along with 104 permitted animal operations located
within the watershed. There were no aquatic life impairments reported in any of the previous
basinwide plans. However, in the 2010 plan, there were three freshwater stream segments impaired
due to benthic macroinvertebrate samples. Two are most likely due to nonpoint source pollution and
the other one was related to problems with the Red Springs Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP).
DWQ is working with the Red Springs WWTP to upgrade and improve performance at the facility. In
addition to these three freshwater impairments, there are two saltwater streams impaired for
exceeding aquatic life standards. Since the last basinwide water quality plan in 2003, the percent of
shellfish waters meeting their uses has decreased from about 16 percent to zero percent due to high
fecal coliform levels. This loss of use results from both automatic closures following rainfall and
permanent closures. All waterbodies in the Lumber Basin are currently impaired for fish consumption
as are all surface waters in North Carolina. Recreational swimming advisories were announced only as
a precaution during severe tropical weather events, which can often create a health hazard in coastal
areas. No recreational areas were closed as the result of bacteria testing. Currently no waterbodies
are impaired for loss of recreational use. Map 6 provides the surface water locations throughout the
County.
Page 4-19
Map 6: Robeson County Surface Waters
71
¬
«
20
¬
«
211
¬
«
72
¬
«
301
£
¤
211
¬
«
72
¬
«
71
¬
«
§
¦
¨
95
130
¬
«
83
¬
«
711
¬
«
501
£
¤
710
¬
«
£
¤
301
£
¤
74
§
¦
¨
95
130
¬
«
904
¬
«
Legend
72
¬
«
41
¬
«
Robeson County
Water Supply Watershed
High Quality Water
DWQ Primary Stream Classifications
(1) Water Supplies
41
¬
«
(2) Primary Freshwater Recreation
(3) Secondary Freshwater Recreation
Page 4-20
4.
Flood Hazard Areas
Flooding is a localized hazard that is generally the result of excessive precipitation. It is the most
common environmental hazard, due to the widespread geographical distribution of rivers and coastal
areas, and the attraction of residents to these areas. However, in coastal regions, storm surge and
wind-driven waves are significant components of flooding. Floods can be generally considered in
two categories: flash floods, the product of heavy localized precipitation in a short time period over a
given location; and general floods, caused by precipitation over a longer time period and over a given
river basin. While flash floods occur within hours of a rain event, general flooding is a longer-term
event, and may last for several days. The primary types of general flooding are riverine flooding,
coastal flooding, and urban flooding.
Floodplains are divisible into areas expected to be inundated by spillovers from stream flow levels
associated with specific flood-return frequencies. The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) uses
flood zone designations to indicate the magnitude of flood hazards in specific areas. The following
are flood hazard zones located within Robeson County and a definition of what each zone means.
!
Zone A/AE. Areas subject to inundation by the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event.
!
X-500. Areas which have a 0.02, or 1 in 500, chance of flooding each year.
The following summarizes the County’s
floodplain acreage:
Table 18. Robeson County Flood Hazard Acreage
Hazard Area
Acres
% of County
A/AE
136,967.8
22.5%
X-500
9,941.4
1.6%
Source: NC Flood Mapping Program.
There is approximately 136,967.8 acres of flood
hazard in the county, all of which is classified as
“A/AE” (see Map 7). This equates to just over
twenty percent (22.5%) of the total land in
Robeson County. Development throughout
defined flood hazard areas in the county is
regulated by the Robeson County Flood
Damage Prevention Ordinance. This Ordinance
is enforced by the County Inspections
Department.
Map 7. Flood Hazard Areas
Page 4-21
5.
Soils
There are a wide variety of soils present throughout Robeson County. The last published Robeson
County Soil Survey was completed in 1978 and provides a comprehensive summary of soil conditions
throughout the county.
In terms of land use in relation to development and economic development, there are several factors
that should be acknowledged including environmentally sensitive areas and soils, and those
considered prime farmlands. The following sections provide an overview of these issues and their
impact on the county overall.
Prime Farmlands
Prime farmland is land that has the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics for
producing food, feed, forage, fiber, and oilseed crops and that is available for these uses. It has the
combination of soil properties, growing season, and moisture supply needed to produce sustained
high yields of crops in an economic manner if it is treated and managed according to acceptable
farming methods.
In general, prime farmland has an adequate and dependable water supply from precipitation or
irrigation, a favorable temperature and growing season, an acceptable level of acidity or alkalinity, an
acceptable content of salt or sodium, and few or no rocks. Its soils are permeable to water and air.
Prime farmland is not excessively eroded or saturated with water for long periods of time, and it
either does not flood frequently during the growing season or is protected from flooding. Other
considerations include: land use, frequency of flooding, irrigation, water table, and wind erodibility.
There are approximately 162,899.33 acres of prime farmland in Robeson County. These soils are fairly
evenly distributed throughout the county, as indicated on Map 8.
Hydric Soils
Hydric soils are defined by the National Resource Conservation Service as soils that formed under
conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop
anaerobic conditions in the upper part. These soils are either saturated or inundated long enough
during the growing season to support the growth and reproduction of hydrophytic vegetation. There
are approximately 103,135.51 acres of hydric soils located throughout Robeson County. These areas
are delineated on Map 8.
Page 4-22
Map 8: Prime Farmland and Hydric Soils
¬
«
71
£
¤
¬
«
¬
«
211
¬
«
710
£
¤
74
¬
«
211
§
¦
¨
95
¬
«
72
§
¦
¨
301
20
74
¬
«
711
¬
«
130
§
¦
¨
¬
«
83
74
£
¤
501
¬
«
72
£
¤
74
£
¤
301
£
¤
74
§
¦
¨
95
¬
«
130
¬
«
41
Legend
¬
«
904
County Boundary
Hydric Soils
All areas are Prime Farmland
Farmland of Statewide Importance
Page 4 - 23
Wetlands
Wetlands provide a multitude of ecological, economic and social benefits. They provide habitat for
fish, wildlife, and a variety of plants. Wetlands are nurseries for many saltwater and freshwater fish
and shellfish of commercial and recreational importance. Wetlands are also important landscape
features because they hold and slowly release flood water and snow melt, recharge groundwater,
recycle nutrients, and provide recreation and wildlife viewing opportunities for millions of people.
The federal regulations implementing Section 404 of the Clean Water Act define wetlands as:
Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water (hydrology) at
a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances
do support, a prevalence of vegetation (hydrophytes) typically adapted for life in
saturated soil conditions (hydric soils). Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes,
bogs, and similar areas (40 CFR 232.2(r)).
The National Wetlands Inventory Program (NWI) has been producing wetland maps and geospatial
wetland data for the United States since the mid-1970s. According to the NWI there are
approximately 165,015.5 acres of wetlands located throughout Robeson County. These wetland areas
are delineated on Map 9.
6.
Natural Heritage Areas
The NC Natural Heritage Program has identified more than 2,500 Significant Natural Heritage Areas
across the State. A Significant Natural Heritage Area is a site (terrestrial and aquatic) of special
biodiversity significance. An area's significance may be due to the presence of rare species, exemplary
or unique natural communities, important animal assemblages, or other important ecological
features.
More than half of these areas are entirely or partially in conservation ownership. However, many
remain privately owned and are unprotected from threats such as development.
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program works with many partners, including state and federal
conservation agencies, national conservation groups, and the Land Trust Company, to implement
protection for these ecologically significant areas. Through these partnerships, and utilizing funding
from federal sources and the Natural Heritage Trust Fund, the Clean Water Management Trust Fund,
and the Parks and Recreation Trust Fund, the most important areas are brought into protection.
Page 4-24
There are thirty-five (35) Natural Heritage Areas located within Robeson County. These areas include
the following (see Map 10):
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Ashpole Swamp Aquatic Habitat
Ashpole Swamp at NC 904
Beulah Church Flatwoods
Big Sandy Ridge and Swamp
Big Swamp/NC 211
Big Swamp/NC 41
Big Swamp/Old Whiteville Road
Biggs Longleaf Stand
Bluff Swamp
Bullfrog Bay
Camp Rockfish
Cypress Bay
Dunahoe Bay
Goose Pond Bay
Great Desert Longleaf Pine Stands
Gum Pond Bay
Horse Neck Pond
Judges Bay (The Cypress Pond)
Lennons Bridge Flatwoods
Lumber River/Bear Swamp Aquatic Habitat
Mill Branch Sand Ridge
Moss Neck Savanna
Net Hole/Buck Landing Swamp
Oak Savanna Bay
Pretty Pond Bay
Princess Anne Swamp
Raft Swamp/Shannon
Raft Swamp/SR 1318
Rex Rennert/Chain Pond Bays
Salt Marsh Bay
Shoe Heel Creek Floodplain
Toothache (Shorebird) Bay
Upper Lumber River Swamp
Warwick Mill Bay
Page 4-25
Map 9: Robeson County Wetlands
71
¬
«
20
¬
«
211
¬
«
72
¬
«
301
£
¤
211
¬
«
72
¬
«
71
¬
«
§
¦
¨
95
130
¬
«
83
¬
«
711
¬
«
£
¤
501
710
¬
«
£
¤
301
74
£
¤
§
¦
¨
95
130
¬
«
904
¬
«
72
¬
«
41
¬
«
Legend
41
¬
«
Robeson County
Wetlands
Page 4-26
Map 10: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
71
¬
«
20
¬
«
211
¬
«
72
¬
«
£
¤
301
211
¬
«
72
¬
«
71
¬
«
§
¦
¨
95
130
¬
«
83
¬
«
711
¬
«
501
£
¤
710
¬
«
£
¤
301
£
¤
74
§
¦
¨
95
130
¬
«
904
¬
«
72
¬
«
41
¬
«
Legend
41
¬
«
Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Robeson County
Page 4-27
E.
Transportation Systems
1.
Roads
By private vehicle, Robeson County is roughly a two-hour drive from the Charlotte Metropolitan area
and close to an hour and a half drive to the North Carolina coast and the Raleigh-Durham area. The
County is bisected by Interstate 95, running from north to south through the county, before passing
through the South Carolina state line. I-95 is also a major north-south route running through the
eastern United States and is anticipated to be over capacity (LOS C) by the year 2035. I-95 is
recommended to be widened from a 4-lane divided facility to a 6-lane divided facility. This widening
is expected to occur within the existing right-of-way (ROW) of 300 feet. This project should coincide
with other I-95 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) widening projects in NC.
US 74/Interstate 74 traverse the county from east to west carrying vehicular travel along the southern
boundary of North Carolina. US 74/Interstate 74 is the primary route for travelers commuting
between the Charlotte metro region and southeastern North Carolina. US 74 is identified as a
Strategic Highway Corridor (SHC) throughout Robeson County. This corridor is not anticipated to
have capacity deficiencies by the year 2035, but is identified by the SHC vision for improvement to
improve mobility and safety. US 74 is recommended to be improved to a 4-lane divided freeway from
the Lumberton Planning Area Boundary (PAB) to the Columbus County line.
The county is also served by US Highways 301 and 501. Map 11 delineates the major transportation
routes throughout the County.
2.
Public Transportation
South East Area Transit System (SEATS) is Robeson County's community transportation program.
SEATS provides human service agency and rural general public transportation for Robeson County
residents. The North Carolina Department of Transportation Public Transportation Division provides
operating and capital assistance for the program.
SEATS has established routes throughout Robeson County operating Monday through Friday from
5:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. for the general public and agency-sponsored passengers. SEATS provides
scheduled routes for out-of-county medical trips to Duke Hospital, UNC-Chapel Hill Hospitals, and
Veterans Hospitals in Durham and Fayetteville. SEATS vehicles are accessible to passengers with
disabilities. Reservations are required on most routes, therefore, requests for transportation are
considered on first come - first serve basis.
Rural general public riders are required to pay a fare of $2.00 each time they board a transit vehicle.
Passengers whose transportation is sponsored by an agency are not charged a fare. Fare boxes are
located on transit vehicles. Transit passes may also be purchased at the transit office.
Page 4-28
M a p 11: Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n Fa ci li t i e s
Parkton
Parkton
Lumber Bridge
Bridge
Lumber
£
¤
¬
«
¬
«
211
Red Springs
Springs
Red
¬
«
710
Rennert
Rennert
Saint Pauls
Pauls
Saint
¬
«
211
§
¦
¨
§
¦
¨
95
¬
«
¬
«
72
Maxton
Maxton
95
72
§
¦
¨
74
¬
«
¬
«
130
301
20
Pembroke
Pembroke
130
§
¦
¨
¬
«
83
74
£
¤
501
o
Rowland
Rowland
§
¦
¨
¬
«
72
£
¤
74
Raynham
£
¤ Raynham
301
Lumberton
Lumberton
McDonald
McDonald
£
¤
£
¤
74
95
¬
«
130
Fairmont
Fairmont
74
Proctorville
Proctorville
Orrum
Orrum
Legend
County Boundary
Municipalities
o Lumberton Municipal Airport
Railroad
Interstate/US Highway
I-74
¬
«
41
Marietta
Marietta
¬
«
904
I-95
US 301
US 501
US 74
Page 4 - 29
3.
Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Multi-Use Facilities
Bicyclists and pedestrians are a growing part of the transportation equation in North Carolina. Many
communities are working to improve mobility for both cyclists and pedestrians.
NCDOT's Bicycle Policy, updated in 1991, clarifies responsibilities regarding the provision of bicycle
facilities upon and along the 77,000-mile state-maintained highway system. The policy details
guidelines for planning, design, construction, maintenance, and operations pertaining to bicycle
facilities and accommodations. All bicycle improvements undertaken by the NCDOT are based upon
this policy.
The 2000 NCDOT Pedestrian Policy Guidelines specifies that NCDOT will partner with localities in the
construction of sidewalks as incidental features of highway improvement projects. At the request of a
municipality, state funds for a sidewalk are made available if matched, using a sliding scale based on
population.
NCDOT's administrative guidelines, adopted in 1994, ensure that greenways and greenway crossings
are considered during the highway planning process. This policy was incorporated so that critical
corridors which have been adopted by localities for future greenways will not be severed by highway
construction.
The following roadways were recommended for increased mobility and safety for bicyclists as part of
the 2011 Robeson County Comprehensive Transportation Plan:
!
!
!
!
NC 711
Leeper Road (SR 1716)
NC 71
Barlow Road
4.
Regional/National Transportation
Rail
Today, North Carolina has 3,684 miles of railroad tracks throughout the state. There are two types of
trains that operate in the state, passenger trains and freight trains. The North Carolina Department of
Transportation sponsors two passenger trains, the Carolinian and Piedmont. The Carolinian runs
between Charlotte and New York City, while the Piedmont train carries passengers from Raleigh to
Charlotte and back every day. Combined, the Carolinian and Piedmont carry more than 200,000
passengers each year. There are currently no passenger trains in Robeson County.
Page 4-30
There are two major freight railroad companies that operate in North Carolina, CSX Transportation
and Norfolk Southern Corporation. Also, there are more than 20 smaller freight railroads, known as
shortlines. In Robeson County, there are two CSX rail lines that run north to south and east to west.
The two lines cross each other in Pembroke. This is the only east/west - north/south cross state
railroad connection in North Carolina.
Bus
Robeson County offers bus transportation and parcel service through the Greyhound Bus Line. The
bus terminal is located at 301 East 2nd Street in Lumberton. Each day there are three north bound
and three south bound departures at the terminal.
Air
Robeson County has one public airport, owned and operated by the City of Lumberton, and
approximately ten privately-owned landing strips. It is defined as general aviation airport which is a
licensed facility that excludes routine landing services for commercial aircraft. The airport has two
5,000-foot runways and an instrument landing system on the main runway to facilitation inclement
weather landings. The airport often functions as a refueling location for private air traffic vacationers.
Robeson County residents in search of commercial or international air travel must utilize services
available at Fayetteville Regional Airport (domestic flights only), Raleigh-Durham International,
Charlotte International or Wilmington International. Raleigh-Durham is the east coast hub for
American Airlines, while Charlotte is the hub for US Airways.
Trucking
Most East Coast destinations are within a day's trucking distance from Robeson County. A full 70% of
US and Canadian markets (and 170 million consumers) can be reached overnight. National and
regional carriers serve the Robeson County area. Because of the County's close proximity to both I-95
and I-40, the trucking industry functions efficiently and effectively.
5.
Traffic Volume Maps
Traffic volume or Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) is collected across the state by the NCDOT
Traffic Survey Group and the State Road Mapping Unit. The highest volume of vehicular traffic in the
County runs along the I-95 corridor (see Map 12, Traffic Volume).
Page 4-31
M a p 12: Tr a f f ic Vo lu m e
!!
!
!
!
!!
Parkton
!!
Parkton
!!
!
Lumber!
Bridge
!Bridge
Lumber
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
Maxton
Maxton
!
!!
!
!
!!!
710
!!
!
!
! !
!
!!!
!
!
!
¬
«
83
!!
!
§
¦
¨
130
!
!!
!
!
!
130
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!!
! 74
!
!
!
£
¤
501
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
£
¤
301
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
! !
!
Rowland
Rowland
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
¬
«
1!
30
!
!
!
!! !!
!!
!
Legend
!
o Lumberton Municipal Airport
NCDOT AADT (2011)
!
0 - 1,800
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
£
¤
£
¤
74
!
!
Proctorville
Proctorville
Orrum
Orrum
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
! !!
! !
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
¬
«
41
!
County Boundary
Municipalities
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
74
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
Fairmont
Fairmont
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
«
!
!!
!
!! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
£
¤
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!74
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
o
!
McDonald
McDonald
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
§
¦
¨
!!
95
Raynham
Raynham
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!! !
!!
Lumberton
! !!!
! Lumberton
! ! !!!!!!!!!!
!!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
72
!
¬
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
§
¦!
¨
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Pembroke
Pembroke
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
95
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
95
!
!
!
!
§
¦
¨
§
¦
¨
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
72
!
!
!
!
¬
«
¬
«
!
!
72
!
!
!
!
!
!
74
!
¬
«
¬
«
!!
!
211
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
¬
«
!
!
!!
!
!!
!!!!!!
Saint
Pauls
!
!
Saint
Pauls
!
!
!
20
!
!
!
!
!
!
Rennert
Rennert
!
!
!
¬
«
!
!
!!!
!
!
301
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
£
¤
¬
« !!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
Red
Springs
!
!
Red
!
! Springs
!
!
!
¬
«!!
211
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Marietta
Marietta
!
!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
¬
«
904
!
!
1,801 - 6,000
! 6,001 - 13,000
!
13,001 - 27,000
!
27,001 - 52,000
Page 4 - 32
F.
Existing Land Use
1.
Methodology
All land has an inherent utilization that can be classified to better understand the existing conditions
and makeup of a given jurisdiction. Because Robeson County is predominately undeveloped and
rural, much of the existing lands are classified as vacant, rural residential, or agricultural lands. Vacant
lands refer to properties with no significant structures. These lands may be working agricultural lands
or simply fully vegetated, dormant acreage.
Existing land use should not be confused with zoning, as no unincorporated land in the county is
currently zoned. Existing land use classifies the current land condition, which differs from zoning that
is used to specify what is allowed to be constructed on a particular piece of property. Lumberton,
Pembroke, Maxton, Fairmont, St. Pauls, Parkton, and Red Springs enforce zoning regulations within
their corporate limits and extraterritorial jurisdictions.
Eight (8) land use categories were used to create the existing land use surface. They are as follows:
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Commercial - retail, service, and shopping establishments
Office and Institutional - government and public service, church, offices, and schools
Industrial - waste water treatment and sanitary sewer facilities
Medium Density Residential - all residential properties less than 2 acres
Low Density Residential - all residential properties 2 to 10 acres
Rural Residential/Agriculture - all residential properties 10+ acres, land may be utilized for
agricultural purposes
Recreational - public open space and recreational facilities
Vacant - uninhabited properties with no significant structures, land may be utilized for
agricultural purposes
The Robeson County tax parcel file, in coordination with aerial photos, was used to determine the
existing land use classification for properties in the county. Field surveys and Google's street view
were used to confirm the accuracy of the aerial photos and tax data. Further, property value was
used to ensure whether parcels were vacant.
Page 4-33
2.
Existing Land Use Patterns - Unincorporated Robeson County (see Map 13)
The vast majority of lands in the unincorporated areas of the county are undeveloped or used for
agricultural purposes (52.8%). Rural Residential - Agriculture is the second largest land use category
in unincorporated Robeson County, occupying well over a quarter of the acreage (37.7%). This
pattern is consistent with other rural counties in eastern North Carolina.
Table 19. Unincorporated Robeson County Existing Land Use
Existing Land Use Category
Acres
Commercial
2,760.31
0.52%
Office & Institutional
5,665.48
1.07%
Industrial
1,689.63
0.32%
Medium Density Residential
16,173.99
3.05%
Low Density Residential
22,718.69
4.29%
199,988.85
37.74%
1,127.70
0.21%
Vacant
279,827.42
52.80%
Total
529,952.07
100.00%
Rural Residential-Agriculture
Recreational
% of Total
NOTE: Right-of-way is not included.
Source: Holland Consulting Planners, Inc.
Page 4-34
Map 13 - Existing Land Use
Legend
Municipalities
Commerical
Industrial
Medium Density Residential
Office & Institutional
Recreational
Rural Residential-Agriculture
Vacant
Page 4-35
G.
Environment/Existing Conditions Summary
Community Facilities/Services Summary
!
Robeson County falls slightly behind the state in all
health professional categories.
!
Major healthcare providers include: Southeastern
Regional Medical Center, Robeson County Health
Department, Scotland Health Care System, and Cape
Fear Valley Health System.
!
Robeson County experienced a slight decline in crime
from 2011 to 2012.
!
The County’s violent and property crimes rates are
above the state.
!
The County has 32 fire departments, all but one are
volunteer.
!
Full-time recreation department maintains 22
parks.
!
The County has significant conservation and open
space areas.
!
There are seven National Register properties
located within Robeson County’s jurisdiction.
!
Robeson County offers both secondary and higher
education.
!
Robeson County operates a county water system
with 24,938 residential customers.
!
Robeson County collected and disposed of 110,259
tons of solid waste in FY2007-2008.
Page 4-36
Environmental Factors
!
Robeson County is located almost entirely in the
Lumber River Basin.
!
The Lumber River above Lumberton is classified as
high quality water.
!
22.5% of the County is in the A/AE (100-year)
flood zone.
!
There are 162,899 acres of prime farmland in
Robeson County.
!
There are 103,135 acres of hydric soils in the
County.
!
There are 165,015 acres of wetlands located in the
County.
!
There are 35 natural heritage sites in the County.
!
Robeson County has a complete transportation system
including modern roads, rail system, and airport
access.
!
Robeson County can reach 70% of US and
Canadian markets (170 million consumers)
overnight.
Page 4-37
Section 5 – Community Projections and Future Demand
A.
Introduction
The following sections of the Robeson County Comprehensive Plan focus on future needs and
demands as they relate to County services, economic development, and health and wellness. A core
component of this discussion is a comprehensive health and wellness analysis. Community focus
areas are identified where there are concentrations of citizens with varying needs relating to public
health. This narrative and the resulting maps and data will help guide the development of targeted
and effective implementation strategies. These strategies will serve as guidance to County and
Municipal leaders as decisions are made with regard to staff and funding considerations for future
programs and initiatives relating to improved public health, increased recreational opportunity, and
access to active transportation.
This portion of the plan also defines population and housing projections. Due to the volatile nature
of current market conditions, these projections should serve as basic guidance which take into
account growth and development trends over the last twenty to thirty years. The forecasts are a
"moving target" which must be carefully and continually monitored.
B.
Population
The following provides a summary of forecasted population growth for each municipality, as well as
Robeson County and neighboring jurisdictions. The Robeson County forecast, in conjunction with
neighboring jurisdictions, was initially presented in Section 3, Community Profile (page 3-3). As
evidenced by this data, the overall Robeson County population is expected to increase by
approximately 20% by the year 2030.
Figure 1. Population Projections. Source: US Census Bureau and NC OSBM.
Page 5-1
It is anticipated that this population increase will not only affect rural portions of the County, but
some of the municipal jurisdictions as well. From 1980 to 2010, only the following Robeson County
municipalities experienced any noticeable population increase: Lumberton, Pembroke, Rennert, and
St. Pauls. All of these except Rennert have municipal water and sewer systems. The ability to provide
central water and sewer will continue to attract a large portion of the county’s population growth.
C.
Housing
Robeson County’s population is expected to increase by 27,533 people by 2030. In 2012, the average
dwelling unit occupancy was 3.10. If this occupancy average remains constant, the increase in
population will result in a demand for 8,882 dwelling units. This demand will not necessarily result in
new construction. In 2010, there were approximately 43,237 occupied dwelling units and 9,500
vacant dwelling units. Some of these units will be removed from the housing inventory because of
age and/or substandard conditions. At a minimum, it is estimated that approximately 4,500 new
dwelling units will be required by 2030 to accommodate forecast population growth. These units
should be affordable to the Robeson County workforce. In order to access central sewer service and
be accessible to employment and services, new housing will be concentrated around the
municipalities of Fairmont, Lumberton, Pembroke, and Red Springs. All of these municipalities have
municipal water and sewer systems.
D.
Economy
In October 2013, Robeson County continued to have a high rate of unemployment at 11.2%. This rate
was well above the state and federal levels of 8.0% and 7.3%, respectively. The greatest economic
challenge facing Robeson County is increasing the number of quality employment opportunities in
the county. To increase job opportunities, the county must support/encourage the following:
!
!
!
!
!
Increase the number of state certified industrial sites.
Increase the availability of natural gas including access to 6-8 inch lines. Approximately 60%70% of the County by land area is not within a ¼ mile of a transmission or distribution gas
main.
Expand municipal sewer services to both industrial/business and housing sites.
Present an improved image of Robeson County including positive “branding.”
Work with the NC Department of Commerce to improve the Department’s presentation of
Robeson County’s economic assets.
Potential additional North Carolina Certified Industrial Sites include the following (see Map 14):
!
!
!
!
Red Springs Industrial Park located on NC 71.
Highway NC 72 Railroad Site.
I-95 Air Park West Industrial Site.
Rowland I-95, Exit 2, with two industrial sites.
Page 5-2
Securing certification of a site is a demanding process (see page 3-16). In 2013, the estimated cost of
certification was $18,000 to $25,000, depending upon the site’s characteristics. If possible, the
additional sites should be certified in the next ten years.
As Robeson County looks to the future, its three greatest economic development assets may be:
!
!
!
The county’s regional location;
Access to trained/certified* workforce - 11,318 within a 25-mile radius of the county; and
Access to extensive job training programs/facilities.
*Certified workers have graduated from an established recognized job related training program.
Page 5-3
E.
County Health Assessment
The following section provides the results of a thorough analysis focused on identifying portions of
the County that are more or less susceptible to a range of public health concerns. The analysis takes
into account several factors including access to healthy foods, socioeconomic status, concentrations
of elderly populations, and access to recreational facilities. This analysis culminates in the
establishment of health and wellness priority areas. These priority areas will help guide the
development of implementation strategies focused on improving public health County-wide,
especially in high priority areas as defined on Map 20.
1.
Nutritionally Disparate
Food is essential for life. Yet unlike other enduring necessities - water, air, and shelter - food has not
been considered a priority for planning by state and local officials and decision makers. Increasing
access to and encouraging consumption of fresh, healthy foods are important ways to address
disease incidence and health care expenditures, particularly in under-served communities in Robeson
County.
North Carolinians face a number of health challenges related to our food system. Food insecurity is
present across the state, which exists when an individual or family lacks adequate or consistent access
to the foods necessary to lead an active, healthy lifestyle.
Children's health and well-being are connected to diet, nutrition, and food security. Access to an
ample quantity and variety of fruits and vegetables at school, at home, and in the community is
critical. Access is especially important for school-age children, given that poor dietary habits can
linger or worsen into the high school years and adulthood.
In Robeson County, there are twenty-five (25) establishments that offer full-service grocery items. For
the purposes of this assessment, a “full service grocery” is defined as an establishment that is open 7
days a week, offers a variety of fresh fruits and vegetables at a competitive price, and accepts SNAP
(Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program), EBT (Electronic Benefits Transfer), and WIC (Benefits for
Women, Infants, and Children).
Table 20. Full Service Groceries in Robeson County
Name
Address
Town
Food Lion
805A E 4th Avenue
Red Springs
Wal-mart Neighborhood Market
th
908 E 4 Avenue
Red Springs
Piggly Wiggly
210 E 4th Avenue
Red Springs
Food Lion
1062 W Broad Street
St. Pauls
Piggly Wiggly
326 S 5th Street
St. Pauls
Bo’s Food Stores
406 E Broad Street
St. Pauls
Food Lion
638 N Patterson Street
Maxton
Piggly Wiggly
104 S Patterson Street
Maxton
Page 5-4
Name
Address
Town
Food Lion
913G W 3 Street
Pembroke
Wal-mart Supercenter
930 W Highway 711
Pembroke
Piggly Wiggly
406 E 3rd Street
Pembroke
Bo’s Food Stores
506 Union Chapel Road
Pembroke
Food Lion
500 N Walnut Street
Fairmont
Bo’s Food Stores
116 N Walnut Street
Fairmont
Food Lion
2779 W 5th Street
Lumberton
Food Lion
2710 Roberts Avenue
Lumberton
Food Lion
6685 Elizabethtown Road
Lumberton
Lowes Foods
5075 Fayetteville Road
Lumberton
Wal-mart Supercenter
Lumberton
Bo’s Food Stores
1733 Roberts Avenue
Lumberton
Bo’s Food Stores
1000 N Pine Street
Lumberton
Bo’s Food Stores
1002 E 2nd Street
Lumberton
ALDI
Lumberton
Kash and Karry Supermarket
1218 MLK Jr Drive
Lumberton
Food Pride
211 E Main Street
Rowland
rd
Ten produce stands are also available to residents of Robeson County. At this time, none of these
operations are open year-round because of the seasonal produce they offer, nor do they accept SNAP,
EBT, or WIC payments. However, three outlets expressed an interest in accepting these benefits. As a
result, individuals of low socioeconomic status may be limited by the cost or hourly availability of
produce vendors and markets. For this reason, they are not included in the Nutritionally Disparate
analysis. Table 21 provides a list of produce stands available to Robeson County residents.
Table 21. Produce Stands in Robeson County
Outlet
Years in
Operation
Shelter Type
Est. amt. of
NC grown/
sold produce
What type of
sales happen
at this outlet?
Interest in
accepting
SNAP, EBT,
WIC?
Transportation
Access
UNCP Farmers
Market
2-5 years
A permanent structure
that provides overhead
shelter
All
Direct (farmer to
consumer)
Ellery Locklear
Roadside Stand
10+ years
Canopy (ies)
All
Direct (farmer to
consumer)
No
Car
Strawberries on
Elizabethtown Rd
6-10 years
None
All
Direct (farmer to
consumer)
No
Car
Double CA Farms
10+ years
Farm
All
Resale
(distributor/
aggregator to
consumer)
No
Car
Butch’s Goat
Haven
6-10 years
None
All
Direct (farmer to
consumer)
No
Car
Henderson
Produce
Not sure
Canopy (ies)
All
Direct (farmer to
consumer)
No
Car
Car, bike, walk
Page 5-5
Outlet
Years in
Operation
Shelter Type
Est. amt. of
NC grown/
sold produce
What type of
sales happen
at this outlet?
Interest in
accepting
SNAP, EBT,
WIC?
Transportation
Access
Jack Pait
Strawberry Farm
10+ years
shelter
All
Direct (farmer to
consumer)
No
Car, bike
Bob’s Pick and Pay
10+ years
Canopy (ies)
All
Direct (farmer to
consumer)
Yes
Car
Powers
Strawberries and
Farmers Markets
10+ years
shelter
All
Direct (farmer to
consumer)
Yes
Car
Robeson County
Farmers Market
10+ years
None
All
Direct (farmer to
consumer)
Yes
Car
Source: Region 8 CTG.
Red Springs, St. Pauls, Maxton, Pembroke, Lumberton, Fairmont, and Rowland residents are located
within a mile of a full-service grocery (see Map 15). Residents residing outside of these towns are
limited in their access to fresh fruits and vegetables.
Page 5-6
2.
Elderly
Over 90% of seniors (65+) have at least one chronic disease and more than 75% have at least two. To
exacerbate the issue, in the next thirty years, the portion of the population over the age of 65 is
expected to more than double. Although estimates vary in terms of the extent to which this segment
of the population will increase, all are certain that increases will be nothing short of significant –
whether the number will double, or increase by half is yet to be seen. In addition, by 2030, more than
nine percent of the county’s population is estimated to be over the age of 85. Increasingly, these
individuals will be stranded in the suburban landscape as most have no access to public transit. It will
be important for Robeson County to prioritize paratransit access for concentrations of the elderly
population.
In Robeson County, elderly populations are scattered throughout the jurisdiction with a significant
concentration (relative to the population) located in and around Lumberton (see Map 16). This
finding is consistent with findings nationwide that show elderly populations are found in rural and
urban areas alike. Concentrations of the elderly are similar to the population density distribution
shown on Figure 2 (page 5-11).
Page 5-7
3.
Concentrations of Population Vulnerable to Chronic Disease
In order to prioritize investment, it is important to locate spatially those areas most in need of health
and wellness enhancement. To do so, GIS analysis was used to combine socioeconomic status and
concentrations of the elderly population.
In general, the composite map showing Population Vulnerable to Chronic Disease (Map 17) is very
similar to the Socioeconomic Status map. The most vulnerable populations are located in the
northwest portions of the county from the Red Springs area curving in an arc southeastward towards
Lumberton. There are also concentrated areas of population vulnerable to chronic disease around
southeastern Lumberton.
Page 5-8
4.
Access to Healthcare Providers
Healthcare providers with general practitioners were identified across the county. Locations and
proximity to each were created using spatial analysis. Residents in Lumberton and Pembroke have
the greatest access to healthcare providers (see Map 18). Areas shown as white on the map are
located greater than a ten-minute drive from the closest healthcare provider.
5.
Access to Physical Activity and Recreation Facilities
Research shows that the one of the best ways to offset weight gain is through increased physical
activity. Coincidentally, individuals looking to increase physical activity encounter barriers when
access to recreational facilities is limited.
According to the Centers for Disease Control, the following is a list of items that can be accomplished
through increased or regular physical activity:
1.
Weight control;
Page 5-9
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Reduced risk of cardiovascular disease;
Reduced risk of Type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome;
Reduced risk of some cancers;
Stronger bones and muscles;
Improved mental health and mood;
Improved ability to do daily activities and prevent falls (if you're an older adult);
Increased chances of living longer.
Residents located in the southern portion of the county have little access to active recreation
opportunities (see Map 19). However, open space recreation, in the form of hiking and hunting, is
available to almost all residents in the rural areas of the County.
Page 5-10
6.
Priority Areas for Health & Wellness Improvement
In Robeson County, public health officials should strive to focus their efforts in areas that are most
vulnerable to wellness issues. Spatial analysis was used to identify those areas most in need of health
and wellness related facilities. High priority wellness investment and enhancement areas are shown
in red on Map 20.
GIS software was used to combine the following health and wellness contributing factors:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Population Vulnerable to Chronic Disease
Nutritionally Disparate Areas
Parks and Recreation Facility Access
Socioeconomic Status
Healthcare Provider Access
Population Density*
*Population density was used to prioritize the final
outcome in an effort to locate areas that will benefit
the greatest number of Robeson County residents
(see Figure 2).
Figure 2. Population Density
Population vulnerable to chronic disease was weighted higher than all other factors in the analysis.
The above contributing factors were identified by local health officials as barriers to a healthy and
active lifestyle for Robeson County residents. The primary health and wellness focus areas (shown red
on Map 20) are in and around Red Springs and the southeastern portion of Lumberton.
Page 5-11
Map 20: Health and Wellness Priority Areas
Parkton
¬
« Parkton
71
Lumber Bridge
Bridge
Lumber
£
¤
¬
«
¬
«
211
Red Springs
Springs
Red
¬
«
710
Maxton
£
¤Maxton
74
Rennert
Rennert
Saint Pauls
Pauls
Saint
¬
«
211
§
¦
¨
95
¬
«
72
§
¦
¨
74
301
20
Pembroke
Pembroke
711
¬
«
¬
«
130
§
¦
¨
¬
«
83
74
£
¤
501
Lumberton
Lumberton
£
¤
74
Raynham
£
¤Raynham
301
Rowland
Rowland
§
¦
¨
95
¬
«
72
McDonald
McDonald
£
¤
74
Fairmont
¬
«Fairmont
130
Proctorville
Proctorville
Orrum
Orrum
¬
«
41
Legend
Municipalities
County Boundary
Marietta
Marietta
¬
«
904
Health and Wellness Priority Areas
Least Priority
High Priority
Page 5 - 12
F.
Community Facilities
1.
Law Enforcement
The Robeson County Detention Center has been limited to a capacity of 410 due to the age and the
design of the facilities. At present, the jail is at full capacity and 30 prisoners have been assigned to
other county jails in the area. Also, ten (10) prisoners are in the misdemeanor confinement program
and there is a good possibility that these prisoners may have to be returned to the jail at any time.
There is a strong need for a new detention facility to be built adjacent to the present jail (the county
owns the land next to the present facility). Updated design would afford more security and require
fewer personnel to supervise the prisoners.
2.
Parks and Recreation
All of the parks in the Robeson County system are described by staff as being “out of date.” Only one
park has an identifiable walking trail and it is not lit to a point of being usable after sunset. The largest
park in the county (Sam Noble, 64 acres) is no longer useable (except for playing horseshoes in one
small section near the highway) because of overgrowth and vandalism. The county will continue to
apply for grants (such as PARTF) and hopes to get funds to add at least a walking trail to every park
and upgrade the lighting, but there are not definite plans to create additional park facilities. Future
long-term needs include the following: (1) getting all the current parks upgraded to include adding a
pool or “splash pad” to several parks in the county, (2) renovating the Sam Nobles park facility to a
useable form to include baseball, football, and soccer fields, and (3) building two indoor facilities (one
in the northern part of the county and one in the southeast part of the county) that could be used for
physical activities and community centers.
3.
Transportation
The Robeson County future roadway improvements/needs are identified in the Robeson County 2010
Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP). Map 21 identifies the anticipated 2035 roadway capacity
deficiencies. Maps 22 and 23 depict the anticipated roadway and bicycle route improvements. The
following summarizes the recommendations for highway and bicycle improvements. No Public
Transportation, Rail, or Pedestrian recommendations were made in the development of the Robeson
County CTP.
Highway
!
Interstate 95. I-95 in Robeson County is anticipated to be over capacity (LOS C) by the year
2035. I-95 is a major north-south route through Robeson County and the eastern United
States. I-95 is vital to the County’s economy by allowing industry, offices, agriculture, and
other jobs and services to reach their respective markets. I-95 is recommended to be widened
from a 4-lane divided facility to a 6-lane divided facility.
Page 5-13
!
US 74. This corridor is not anticipated to have capacity deficiencies by the year 2035 but is
identified by the Strategic Highway Corridor vision for improvement to improve mobility and
safety. US 74 is recommended to be improved to a 4-lane divided freeway from the
Lumberton Planning Area Boundary to the Columbus County line.
!
NC 211. NC 211 is anticipated to be operating over-capacity by the year 2035 from the
Lumberton Planning Area Boundary to the Red Springs Planning Area Boundary. Current
capacity along NC 211 is 9,500 vehicles per day while future travel demand is expected to
range from 10,000 to 11,500 vehicles per day. This section of NC 211 has been recommended
to be improved to a 4-lane divided expressway in order to improve mobility and safety
between Red Springs and Lumberton.
!
NC 20 Boulevard. NC 20 is anticipated to be operating over-capacity by the year 2035 from
the Bladen County line to Shaw Road (SR 1729). Existing capacities along this facility range
from 9,500 to 42,400 vehicles per day. NC 20 is recommended to be upgraded to a 4-lane
divided boulevard along this section, except for a small portion through downtown St. Pauls.
!
NC 20 Major Thoroughfare. NC 20 is anticipated to be operating near and over-capacity by
the year 2035 from the Hoke County line to Shaw Road (SR 1729). Existing capacity along this
facility is 9,500 vehicles per day. Future travel demand is anticipated to range from 7,600 to
14,000 vehicles per day. NC 20 is recommended to be improved to a 3-lane major
thoroughfare along this section.
!
US 301. US 301 is anticipated to be operating over-capacity by the year 2035 from I-95 to NC
20 in St. Pauls. Capacities along existing US 301 range from 9,400 to 9,500 vehicles per day.
Future travel demand is anticipated to range from 9,500 to 12,000 vehicles per day.
!
NC 71 Lumber Bridge Bypass. NC 71 is expected to be over capacity through Lumber Bridge
by the year 2035. Existing capacity on this facility is 9,500 vehicles per day. Future travel
demand is expected to range from 9,700 to 15,000 vehicles per day. A 2-lane major
thoroughfare bypass of Lumber Bridge is recommended to provide better mobility and
relieve anticipated deficiencies along existing NC 71.
!
NC 71 Parkton Bypass. NC 71 is expected to be over-capacity through Parkton by the year
2035. Existing capacity on this facility is 9,500 vehicles per day. Future travel demand is
expected to be 17,000 vehicles per day. A 2-laned major thoroughfare bypass of Parkton is
recommended to provide better mobility and relieve anticipated deficiencies along existing
NC 71.
Page 5-14
!
NC 41 (Fairmont Planning Area Boundary to Lumberton Planning Area Boundary). NC 41 is
expected to be operating over-capacity by the year 2035 from the Fairmont Planning Area
Boundary to the Lumberton Planning Area Boundary. Existing capacity along NC 41 is 9,500
vehicles per day and future travel demand is expected to range from 10,000 to 12,000 vehicles
per day. NC 41 is recommended to be widened to a 4-lane major thoroughfare along this
section.
!
NC 71. NC 71 is expected to be over capacity by the year 2035. Current capacities along this
corridor are 9,500 vehicles per day. Future travel demand is expected to range from 9,700
vehicles per day to 22,000 vehicles per day. It is recommended that NC 71 be widened to 3
lanes from the Maxton Planning Area Boundary to the Red Springs Planning Area Boundary
and from the Red Springs Planning Area Boundary to Leeper Road (SR 1716). Bypasses of
Lumber Bridge and Parkton are recommended in conjunction with this recommendation.
!
Leeper Road. Improvements to Leeper Road (SR 1716) are needed in order to improve
mobility and safety. Currently there are no identified capacity deficiencies on this road;
however, this project is recommended to be widened to 4 lanes from future I-295 to NC 71 as
Leeper Road (SR 1716) will be affected by I-295.
!
Glenn Road (SR 1710). Improvements to Glenn Road are needed in order to improve
mobility and safety. It is anticipated that this endeavor will include road widening.
!
NC 72. NC 72 is expected to be near and over capacity by the year 2035. Current capacity
along NC 72 is 9,500 vehicles per day. Future travel demand along this corridor is anticipated
to range from 7,800 to 11,800 vehicles per day. It is recommended that NC 72 be widened to
two 12-ft. lanes from the Lumberton Planning Area Boundary to US 74.
!
Old Lowry Road (SR 1505). Improvements to Old Lowry Road are needed in order to improve
mobility and safety. Two intersections were identified near the corridor as high crash
locations. It is recommended that Old Lowry Road be widened to two 12-ft. lanes with paved
shoulders from NC 211 to NC 71 to help address safety.
!
NC 41 (Lumberton Planning Area Boundary to Bladen County). NC 41 is expected to be over
capacity by the year 2035. Current capacity along this corridor is 9,500 vehicles per day while
future travel demand ranges from 10,000 to 14,800 vehicles per day. It is recommended that
NC 41 be widened to two 12-ft. lanes with paved shoulders (with turn lanes at major
intersections) from the Lumberton Planning Area Boundary to Bladen County.
!
Rennert Road (SR 1752). Rennert Road is expected to be over capacity by the year 2035.
Current capacities along the corridor range from 9,300 to 9,500 vehicles per day while future
travel demand is anticipated to range from 14,000 to 16,000 vehicles per day. It is
Page 5-15
recommended that Rennert Road be widened to two 12-ft. lanes with paved shoulders (with
turn lanes at major intersections) from the Lumberton Planning Area Boundary to NC 71.
!
Old Stage Road (SR 1734). Improvements to Old Stage Road (SR 1734) are needed in order to
improve mobility and safety. It is recommended that Old Stage Road be widened to a 4-lane
divided facility from NC 20 to Great Marsh Church Road (SR 1006) to improve safety and
mobility.
!
NC 130. NC 130 is expected to be near capacity by the year 2035. Current capacities range
from 9,500 vehicles per day to 11,100 vehicles per day. Future travel demand is anticipated to
range from 8,000 vehicles per day to 8,400 vehicles per day. It is recommended that NC 130
be widened to 3 lanes from NC 710 to I-95 as traffic is expected to approach capacity.
Bicycle
!
NC 711. NC 711 needs to provide increased mobility and safety for bicyclists. It is
recommended that better signage and pavement markings be added to NC 711 from the
Pembroke Planning Area Boundary to the Lumberton Planning Area Boundary.
!
Leeper Road. Leeper Road needs to provide increased mobility and safety for bicyclists. It is
recommended that Leeper Road add widened paved shoulders from the Cumberland County
line to NC 71 to provide improved accommodations for bicyclists.
!
NC 71. NC 71 needs to provide increased mobility and safety for bicyclists. It is
recommended that NC 71 add widened paved shoulders from Barlow Road (SR 1712) to
Leeper Road.
!
Barlow Road (SR 1712). Barlow Road needs to provide increased mobility and safety for
bicyclists. It is recommended that Barlow Road add widened paved shoulders from the Hoke
County line to NC 71.
Appendix 2 provides a tabular summary of these proposed projects and applicable definitions of
terms used in the summary.
Page 5-16
CU
Map 21
M
D
AN
RL
BE
Parkton
71
SR 13
(M odes 13
t R d)
18
13 Zio n )
SR u nt R d
h
o
(M h ur c
C
0
13 1
d)
SR G in R
Gir t
c
(M
20
Red Springs
TY
$
$
HOKE COUNTY
Robeson County CTP
2035 Capacity Deficiencies
UN
CO
Lumber Bridge
95
Map Date: 10/5/2011
Rennert
St. Pauls
$
$
72
Pembroke
Legend
h Rd )
S
(Rega R 19 55
n C hu
rc h Rd
)
V/C ratio not near capacity (<0.8)
V/C ratio over capacity (>1.0)
V/C ratio near capacity (0.8-1.0)
$
Non-Network Roads
41
$
83
(C ab ine
SR 11 66
t Sh op
$
$
211
t
u
301 Raynham
74
d)
Po
nd
R
$
)
)
Y
UN
T
CO
BU
S
LU
M
)
(Affinity Rd)
(Fa irbluff Rd
SR 22 82
SR 22 56
Marietta
CO
$
SR 22 25
24
42
hit
e
SR
W
(E
d)
R
e
St
or
24
85
ar
d
SR
72
130 Proctorville
Orrum
41
904
$
$
)
25
2 2 t Rd
SR gg et
(Le
LI
NA
$
t
u
Planning Area Boundary
Fairmont
130
(W
O
5
County Boundary
(C ree k Rd
130
CA
R
43
S
(W R 2
hi 20
te 8
G
ra
ss
SR
2
Rd
)
34
St
11
en
SR
tch
95
Hydrology
0 02
SR 1
R d)
v ille
Wh ite
(O ld
UT
H
301
501
SR 22 35
t
u
$
(Old Sta ge
Rd )
SO
McDonald
Rowland
(K
i
d)
Rd)
01 l R
11 M il
S R y 's
d
ad
(G
t
u
501
Lumberton
710
Municipalities
BLADEN COUNTY
TL
A
SC
O
3
115 )
d
SR
od R
(Elr
130
SR 10 06
M arsh
C
05 d)
10 le R
SR s vil
r
la
(To
(R S R
en 1
ne 75
rt 2
R
d)
(U
ni o S R
n C 15
ha 1 5
pe
lR
d
ND
$
)
(G re at
301
)
Rd
t
u
( Ta SR
r h 10 0
ee 4
lR
d)
211
- P SR
hi l 13
ad 1 8
el p
hu
s
(M S R
cQ 13 1
ue
en 8
Rd
)
$
uie
CO
UN
T
$
710
(B
1
193 d)
S R rtin R
(M a
( Old
)
3
Rd
13 0 g s
S R S pr in
d
Re
1
100 d)
S R no n R
an
(Sh
Maxton
SR 13 39 Rd )
an ch
(D ee p Br
2
13 1
S R 1 3 1 2)
#
(S R
Y
71
0
1.5
3
6
Miles
9
Page 5-17
Base map date: September 11, 2006
µ
Refer to CTP document for more details
See Inset 2A
$
$
71
Rd
)
(R S R
en 1
ne 75
rt 2
R
d)
(G re at
SR 10 06
M arsh
C
!
.
3
115
SR d Rd)
o
(Elr
72
$
UN
TY
CO
(Fa irbluff Rd
)
See Inset 2B
SR 2256
SR 22 82
(Affinity Rd)
BU
S
$
CO
LU
M
d)
Po
nd
R
24
42
hit
e
Rd
e
24
85
St
or
d
SR
ar
(W
$
)
25
2 2 t Rd
SR gg et
(Le
$
72
Minor Thoroughfares
Existing
Needs Improvement
Recommended
130
41
904
$
)
See
Fairmont
Tansportation Plan
130
74
)
$
LI
NA
t
u
Rd
5
SR 22 25
43
!
(
Other Major Thoroughfares
Existing
Needs Improvement
Recommended
(C ree k Rd
130
RO
)
CA
SR
2
SR
)
St
11
n
SR
tc
he
(K
i
H
t
u !.
!
.
$
95
!
(
Boulevards
Existing
Needs Improvement
Recommended
0 02
SR 1
d)
v ille R
Wh ite
(O ld
UT
!
.
.
!
(!
SR 22 35
SO
Expressways
Existing
Needs Improvement
Recommended
211
(O ld Sta ge
Rd )
34
301
301
501
Existing
Needs Improvement
Recommended
$
S
(W R 2
hi 20
te 8
G
ra
ss
t
u
(
!
( !
!
.
!
(
!
(
W
d)
d)
t Sh op R
$
Freeways
See
Lumberton
Transportation Plan
710
(E
(C ab ine
SR 11 66
01 l R
11 M il
S R y 's
d
ad
(G
t
u
Plan date: August 16, 2010
41
83
501
Comprehensive
Transportation Plan
h Rd)
05 d)
10 le R
SR s vil
r
la
(To
$
See
Pembroke
Transportation Plan
$
t
u
!
(301
(U
ni o S R
n C 15
ha 1 5
pe
lR
d
SC
OT
LA
N
$
130
(M S R 1
cQ
u e 3 18
en
Rd
)
- P SR
hi l 13
ad 1 8
el p
hu
s
)
710
uie
D
CO
U
$
$
211
(B
31
19 d)
S R rtin R
a
(M
( Old
1
100 d)
S R no n R
an
(Sh
SR 13 39 Rd )
an ch
(D ee p Br
See
Maxton
Transportation Plan
2
13 1
S R 1 3 1 2)
#
(S R
NT
Y
71
BLADEN COUNTY
See
Red Springs
Tansportation Plan
)
3
Rd
13 0 g s
S R Spr in
d
Re
ROBESON
COUNTY
!
.
!
.
!
(
( Ta SR
r h 10 0
ee 4
lR
d)
$
95
S
(Reg a R 19 55
n C hu
rc h Rd
)
SR 1
(M ode 31 3
st R d)
18
13 Zio n )
SR u nt R d
h
o
(M h ur c
C
(M
0
131
d)
SR G in R
t
c Gir
Highway Map
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
!
(
20
HOKE COUNTY
Map 22
!
.
!
( !
(!
!
(
.
!
(
NOTE: Exact
interchange
locations in area to
be determined by
future project study.
0
1.25
!
.
!
.
Existing Interchange
!
(
Existing Grade Separation
!
(
Proposed Grade Separation
2.5
Proposed Interchange
5
Page 5-18
Miles
7.5
µ
Base map date: June 2006
M
CU
RL
BE
Map 23
AN
Parkton
D
71
$
95
$
20
Y
HOKE COUNTY
Bicycle Map
T
UN
CO
Lumber Bridge
ROBESON
COUNTY
See
Red Springs
Rennert
Transportation Plan
St. Pauls
71
$
TY
72
$
SC
OT
LA
ND
CO
UN
Maxton
Transportation Plan
301
t
u
$
130
See
Pembroke
Transportation Plan
$
711
t
u
83
$
41
$
BLANDEN COUNTY
$
See
$
211
710
Comprehensive
Transportation Plan
Plan date: August 16, 2010
On-road
Existing
See
Needs Improvement
Lumberton
501
Transportation Plan
$
Recommended
710
$
211
t
u
301
95
Off-road
Existing
McDonald
Needs Improvement
Rowland
Recommended
t
u
301
501
t
u
74
72
$
!
(
!
(
See
O
LI
$
$
130
NA
Proposed Grade Separation
Orrum
$
$
41
904
0
1
2
CO
AR
Proctorville
S
C
Transportation Plan
130
UN
TY
130
BU
$
Existing Grade Separation
Marietta
LU
M
TH
CO
SO
U
Fairmont
Page 5-19
4
Miles
6
µ
Base map date: June 2006
Section 6 – Future Land Use
A.
Introduction
Adopting a future land use map is critical to achieving a preferred pattern of growth for Robeson
County. The county has been classified into one of the following land use sectors (based on the
development criteria and land use types outlined for each sector): Local Commercial Service Areas,
Regional Commercial Service Areas, Community Services Areas, Low Density Residential Areas,
Residential/ Agricultural Areas, Certified Industrial Sites, and Conservation. The future land use map
establishes objectives for development throughout the county. The future land use map (Map 24)
and supporting policies/implementing strategies should be used on a daily basis to make judgements
regarding growth and development of the county.
Table 22. Robeson County Future Land Use
Land Use
Regional Commercial Service Area
Acres*
% of Total
220.48
0.04%
Community Service Area
8,959.65
1.62%
Local Commercial Service Area
1,037.64
0.19%
NC Certified Industrial Sites
900.43
0.16%
Potential NC Certified Industrial Sites
343.32
0.06%
96,607.80
17.42%
Residential/Agriculture
313,714.77
56.56%
Conservation
132,831.37
23.95%
Total
554,615.46
100.00%
*Acreages does not include municipalities or ETJ areas.
The Future Land Use Map is not intended to provide precise, parcel-level detail concerning future
land use. Rather, it is intended to serve as a general guide for important infrastructure development
and other decisions. The Future Land Use Map is intended to be dynamic and continually evolving
with changing conditions. Also, it should be periodically revised to reflect important changes
affecting schools, recreation, transportation, sewer/water infrastructure, and economic development
planning.
Page 6-1
B.
Health and Wellness Priority Areas
The health and wellness priority areas are an overlay category which should be used in concert with
the other land use categories. This overlay is delineated on Map 24 and is based on the health and
wellness priority areas identified in Section 5. Any development of public facilities or private land
uses or services should consider:
!
!
!
!
Access to healthy foods.
Access to transportation.
Access to active living facilities.
Access to healthcare services.
Such considerations may affect subdivision design, individual site designs, infrastructure design,
location of healthcare services, and day-to-day planning decisions.
C.
Future Land Use Sectors
1.
Local Commercial Service Areas (LCS)
The following provides a description of the LCS areas and their support services:
!
LCS areas are intended to be relatively intensive, efficient, defined concentrations of mixed
services that meet the needs of the surrounding community and local service areas.
!
LCS nodes are appropriate for a mixture of commercial uses scaled to the service area in
question; residential areas of varying densities depending upon available services; and
community facilities such as schools, parks, community centers, and other similar community
facilities.
!
The mixture and intensity of land uses contained within LCS areas are intended to be dictated
by the service demand of the surrounding community.
!
LCS areas should be located in concentrations at higher traffic volume intersections,
thoroughfares, and central locations that are convenient to nearby residential development
so as to minimize problems associated with “strip” commercial development.
!
LCS areas should be priority targets of investments for water, public transportation,
pedestrian facilities, other general road improvements, and other appropriate infrastructure
improvements.
Page 6-2
!
LCS areas are identified on Map 24, Future Land Use Map. Other LCS areas throughout the
county may be identified during the planning period.
2.
Regional Commercial Service Areas (RCS)
The following provides a description of the RCS areas and their support services:
!
RCS areas should be located at key regional transportation access points.
!
RCS areas are intended to service a regional market area. As such, they serve high volumes of
traffic and should be located on major roadways. Water and municipal sewer services to RCS
areas are desired.
!
RCS areas should include a variety of retail sales and services, public and private
administrations, offices and all other uses done primarily for sale or profit on the local,
community, and regional level.
3.
Certified Industrial Sites (CI)
The following provides a description of the CI sites and their support services:
!
All CI sites should be so designated by the North Carolina Department of Commerce.
!
CI sites include both existing and future Certified Industrial Sites.
!
CI sites should have access to a full range of infrastructure including water and sewer.
!
Most industrial sites should be located in RCS areas.
!
CI park development is the county’s desired pattern of industrial development.
!
Industries which use noxious materials or produce hazardous materials are not desired.
!
The location, extent, and intensity of future industrial areas should be coordinated with the
Robeson County Economic Development Commission.
Page 6-3
4.
Community Service Areas (CS)
The following provides a description of the CS areas and their support services:
!
The CS areas are where most urban services and urban-scale development is expected to be
concentrated.
!
Growth and development may be proactively managed through planning. Some of the CS
areas may be absorbed into municipal planning jurisdictions and eventually managed by
those jurisdictions. Land use planning for those areas within the county’s jurisdiction should
be comparable and compatible in its approach and intensity with planning conducted within
the various municipal jurisdictions.
!
Wide ranges of residential densities may exist. Over the long term, land use regulations and
policies should favor higher density development, consistent with natural constraints and the
availability of urban services.
!
The CS areas may contain commercial development at a mixture of scales. Commercial
development should be in keeping with the surrounding community.
!
The CS areas may contain some light industrial development.
!
Development within the CS areas should be accessible by roads which are developed to
urban standards, with capacities to accommodate increasingly complex volumes of traffic.
Access along roads should be managed appropriately.
!
Land use planning should acknowledge the presence of sensitive natural areas such as
floodplains, wetlands, and other natural and cultural assets and should strive to protect these
areas from development that would damage them or diminish their integrity.
!
Sewer and water infrastructure investments should be focused within the CS areas. Priority
should be given to economic development sites, commercial districts, dense residential areas,
schools, and existing areas prone to septic failure with the CS areas.
!
The extent of the CS areas should be periodically reviewed in light of any changes in sewer
and water services.
!
Residential density may be 2 to 3 units per acre.
Page 6-4
5.
Low Density Residential Areas (LDR)
The following is a description of the patterns of development envision within the LDR areas:
!
The LDR areas have historically been predominantly rural/agricultural but are developing as
residential/agricultural areas.
!
Economic development activities may take place within the LDR areas in limited form.
Noxious/hazardous industrial and regional commercial land uses should be discouraged.
!
Both central water and municipal sewer service should be increasingly available during the
planning period.
!
floodplains, wetlands, and other natural and cultural assets, and should strive to protect these
areas from development which would damage such resources or diminish their integrity.
!
Average population density may be 0.05 to 2 units per acre.
6.
Residential/Agricultural Areas (RA)
The following is a description of the patterns of development envisioned within the RA areas:
!
The RA areas cover those portions of the county that are predominantly rural and are
characterized by low-density residential development with substantial land areas devoted to
agriculture and undeveloped lands. Land use decisions should seek to support that character.
!
Most sections of the RA areas are so far from municipal sewer services as to make their
extension largely impossible. Land development policies should recognize this by not
encouraging densities that would require sewer services or introduce traffic capacity
problems.
!
Care should be taken in these areas to preserve their rural character and to protect valuable
farmlands as well as environmental and cultural resources. Farmland protection measures
should be pursued within the RA areas.
!
Voluntary agricultural districts may be established.
!
floodplains, wetlands, and other natural and cultural assets, and should strive to protect these
areas from development which would damage such resources or diminish their integrity.
Page 6-5
!
Commercial development and community facilities will be directed to defined LCS areas,
which are located at key intersections within LDR areas. Commercial development should be
of a local service nature, and most industrial and regional commercial land uses should be
prohibited. Large economic development activities should normally be encouraged in
industrial park settings which have access to infrastructure.
!
Density should average <.05 units per acre.
7.
Conservation (C)
This category includes land areas that are intended to remain largely in their natural state with only
limited development. Such areas should be targeted for protection through regulations and
incentives. Conservation areas are lands that generally exhibit any of the characteristics of sensitive
natural areas such as floodplains and wetlands.
Page 6-6
M a p 24 - Fu t u r e L a n d U s e
Parkton
Lumber Bridge
71
¬
«
20
¬
«
211
¬
«
Red Springs
Rennert
Saint Pauls
301
£
¤
72
¬
«
Maxton
§
¦
¨
95
Pembroke
130
¬
«
83
¬
«
711
¬
«
Lumberton
501
£
¤
710
¬
«
Rowland
Legend
Raynham
§
¦
¨
95
McDonald
74
£
¤
Roads
Over Capacity (2035)
Railroad
Municipal Planning Jurisdiction
Health and Welness Priority Areas
Fairmont
Proctorville
Orrum
904
¬
«
41
¬
«
Future Land Use
Regional Commercial Service Area
Community Service Area
Marietta
Local Commercial Service Area
NC Certified Industrial Sites
Potential NC Certified Industrial Sites
Residential / Agriculture
Conservation
Page 6-7
Section 7 – Goals and Implementing Strategies
A.
Introduction
A key objective of any comprehensive plan is the creation of an achievable set of goals and
implementing strategies. Implementation of these strategies is the responsibility of Robeson County
community leaders, staff, and citizens. Decisions made as a result of the following goals and
implementing strategies should serve to enhance the quality of life for residents, support long-term
economic growth, and promote viable land use and development patterns.
The true test of this planning effort will come in putting this plan, ordinances, and programs into
action on a day-to-day basis. Implementation of the policies contained in this plan will be an ongoing
process. Some of the strategies contained in this plan may be implemented in months while others
may require years to effectively accomplish. Planning is only as good as the commitment and abilities
of the people responsible for implementing the plan.
B.
Goals
In order to effectively support the policies and strategies included in this plan and achieve the desired
land use patterns portrayed on the county’s future land use map, numerous specific implementing
actions should occur. This section of the plan includes goals and specific implementing actions for
each of the following seven (7) areas of concern:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Land Use and Form
Natural Environment
Economic Growth
Health and Wellness
Housing
Infrastructure and Services
Transportation
Goals were authored based on issues identified by the Planning Board during the planning process.
Each goal is supported by implementing strategies crafted to guide the county in achieving the goals.
The adoption of this plan is not the end, but rather the beginning of a continuous pragmatic process.
Achieving the goals contained within this plan will be an ongoing process. Some of the
implementing strategies may take only months to accomplish, others may take many years, while
some may never come to fruition.
Goal 1: Land Use and Form
Protect the county’s natural assets, while providing land use patterns which will be supportive of
overall economic development.
Page 7-1
Goal 2: Natural Environment
Promote the county’s natural environment as an important economic development factor.
Goal 3: Economic Growth
Increase job opportunities through promotion of Robeson County as a regional hub for commercial
activity, agriculture, and industry in southeastern North Carolina.
Goal 4: Health and Wellness
Enhance health outcomes for Robeson County residents, by promoting active living, healthy eating,
and safe physical environments.
Goal 5: Housing
Enhance Robeson County’s residential areas while also providing increased workforce housing
opportunities.
Goal 6: Infrastructure and Services
Increase effective and reliable infrastructure and services to county citizens and property owners.
Goal 7: Transportation
Maintain an efficient and cost-effective regional transportation system to serve the needs of residents,
businesses, and industries alike.
C.
Implementing Strategies
NOTE: Implementing strategies are numbered consecutively throughout the plan for ease of
reference. The Board of Commissioners, with Planning Board input, will be responsible for directing
the County's implementation effort.
1.
Land Use and Form
I.1
Protect farmland through the following measures:
!
Support North Carolina legislative changes that enable the transfer of development
rights for protection of prime farmland areas.
!
Support establishment of a Robeson County Voluntary Agricultural District program.
!
Collaborate with the Robeson County Cooperative Extension to establish protocols
and commerce networks between local farmers and food establishments.
Page 7-2
I.2
!
Discourage heavy industries which generate air pollution, damage surface and
groundwater, and have other side effects detrimental to agriculture.
!
Support development of agri-tourism.
!
Support land use decisions which will protect agricultural lands and encourage new
developments to locate near towns and existing subdivisions.
!
Encourage proper agricultural and forestry management practices (see Appendix 3)
!
Pursue grant funds which may assist with the preservation of agricultural lands.
Employ and promote the following land use considerations when siting business and
industrial development projects:
!
Light industries (lower impact/generally smaller than heavy industry) should have
easy access to major transportation facilities and infrastructure but be compatible
with nearby residential, agricultural, and conservation areas.
!
Industrial development shall not be located in areas that would diminish the
desirability of existing and planned non-industrial areas, nor shall incompatible nonindustrial uses be allowed to encroach upon existing or planned industrial sites.
!
Industrial development shall be located on land that is physically suitable and has
unique locational advantages for industry. Advanced planning for the identification
of such land should be encouraged. Locational decisions should be coordinated with
the future land use map.
!
Industrial uses should be located in or near existing built up areas to take advantage
of available services. Careful design and/or buffering shall be required to ensure
compatibility with surrounding areas.
!
Warehousing, storage, and distribution facilities should have access to appropriate
thoroughfares.
!
New industrial development should be encouraged to locate in existing and/or
planned industrial parks.
Page 7-3
2.
Natural Environment
I.3
Discourage new development and redevelopment activities which would significantly
degrade the quality of natural and scenic resources in Robeson County. Utilize the future land
use map as a development management tool to protect valuable resources, in particular the
Lumber River and its tributaries.
I.4
Support regulation of development in the county’s flood hazard areas.
I.5
Work with economic development agencies to promote reuse of abandoned commercial and
industrial sites, and to explore funding opportunities for brownfield site cleanup and
redevelopment. See Appendix 4 for a general description of Brownfield sites.
I.6
New development and redevelopment activities which would significantly degrade the
quality of natural and scenic resources in Robeson County, prematurely diminish the
predominantly rural character of the area, or create incompatibilities of scale, design, or land
use shall not be permitted.
I.7
Oppose the disposal of any toxic wastes, as defined in the US Environmental Protection
Agency’s Listing of Hazardous Substances and Priority Pollutants (developed pursuant to the
Clean Water Act of 1977), within the county’s planning jurisdiction.
I.8
Support the policy that all State of North Carolina projects should be designed to limit to the
extent practicable stormwater runoff into public waters.
I.9
Support septic systems approved by the Robeson County Health Department and package
treatment plants approved by the NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
3.
Economic Growth
I.10
Increase the number of state certified industrial sites.
I.11
Increase the availability of access to 6-8 inch natural gas lines.
I.12
Expand municipal sewer services to both industrial/business and housing sites.
I.13
Present an improved image of Robeson County including positive “branding.”
I.14
Work with the NC Department of Commerce to improve the Department’s presentation of
Robeson County’s economic assets.
Page 7-4
I.15
I.16
Achieve North Carolina Certified Industrial Site status for the following:
!
Red Springs Industrial Park (NC 71)
!
Highway NC 72 Railroad site
!
I-95 Air Park West Industrial site
!
Rowland I-95, Exit 2 (two industrial sites)
Implement the following activities to support tourism and provide a solid foundation for
overall economic development:
!
Request that cleanup programs be coordinated among local, state, and federal
agencies as appropriate.
!
Work with Regional and State agencies to promote and leverage the county’s riverine
resources (Lumber River) for economic development purposes.
I.17
Support a more diversified economic base including development of increased health care
services and options for county residents.
I.18
Implement the following activities to support economic development:
!
Formulate and expand local incentives to attract industry.
!
Support the continued inventory of unused business facilities.
!
Support expansion of county water systems and other infrastructure (including
municipal facilities).
!
Create awareness of incentives for the employment of the elderly and young adults.
!
Encourage clean industry to locate in Robeson County to promote a healthy
environment.
!
Support sustainable aquiculture and energy generation/transmission as economic
development initiatives, as feasible.
!
Adopt local regulations for solar and wind energy generating facilities.
Page 7-5
!
Expand opportunities (both public and private) for employment and procurement by
using local vendors when feasible.
I.19
Support North Carolina Department of Transportation projects to improve regional access for
Robeson County.
4.
Health and Wellness
I.20
Implement the following activities to enhance the health of Robeson County residents:
!
Provide prevention/intervention services throughout the county.
!
Expand the Robeson County website with links to federal, state, and local
organizations that focus on wellness and/or provide health care resources.
!
Support health and wellness initiatives carried out by the Robeson County Health
Department.
!
Work with state and federal legislators to obtain grant money for initiatives to reduce
health care costs.
!
Incorporate health and wellness concerns into future hazard mitigation planning.
!
Work with local religious groups to provide emergency support systems for large scale
or traumatic events.
I.21
Continue to support the Robeson County Farmers Market.
I.22
Support efforts to improve access to local produce and value-added agricultural products.
This effort will serve as an economic development tool for improving access to healthy eating
options for under-served populations, as identified in this plan.
I.23
Work in collaboration with municipal jurisdictions to increase access to active recreation
facilities and programs to county residents. These efforts should target elderly populations.
I.24
Take steps to ensure, to the maximum practicable, that all county buildings and facilities are
handicap accessible and will work to provide recreation options specifically targeting persons
within the community with disabilities.
Page 7-6
I.25
Work in conjunction with the Robeson County Health Department and the Robeson County
Cooperative Extension office to establish a promotional campaign focused on increasing the
availability of fresh fruits and vegetables at corner/country store locations.
I.26
Work with the Robeson County Health Department to ensure that the results of the health
and wellness analysis outlined in this plan are incorporated into the county’s next Community
Health Assessment update.
I.27
Revise Robeson County plans, policies, and ordinances to ensure consistency with the health
and wellness actions stated in this plan.
I.28
Involve all county departments in development grant applications for health initiatives.
I.29
As Planning Board membership vacancies occur, recruit members which have interest and/or
expertise in public health.
I.30
Promote social cohesion through community programming by the Health Department, faithbased organizations, or local non-profits.
I.31
Partner with municipalities to pursue funding for a comprehensive greenways plan.
I.32
Support the acceptance of NC Food and Nutrition Services Program benefits at the Farmers
Market.
I.33
Promote ordinances to limit exposure to second-hand smoke by creating smoke-free spaces.
I.34
Facilitate the provision of transportation services to health and human services and healthy
food retail, especially in high priority health and wellness areas (see Map 20).
5.
Housing
I.35
In order to provide a wide variety of housing choices and affordability, Robeson County will:
!
Look for opportunities to provide housing choices that will support the aging and
retirement community, especially in high priority healthcare areas of the county.
!
Explore different approaches to creating an ample workforce/financially achievable
housing stock within the county.
!
Work to establish additional multi-family housing opportunities throughout the
county in an effort to provide more affordable workforce housing.
Page 7-7
I.36
Encourage development to occur at densities consistent with this plan.
I.37
Support greater residential densities in areas that are accessible to county/municipal water
and/or municipal sewer services.
I.38
Encourage residential developments which are consistent with Robeson County’s ability to
provide services.
I.39
Continue to look for opportunities to secure funding through federal and state grant
programs for the rehabilitation of substandard housing and removal of dilapidated and
abandoned manufactured homes throughout the County.
6.
Infrastructure and Services
I.40
Review residential development proposals in coordination with the Robeson County Public
Schools to determine and mitigate impact(s) on the school system. Additionally, locational
decisions for community facilities will be made in consideration of the facility impact on
adjacent land uses and infrastructure capacity for support including the water system and
transportation system.
I.41
Continue to provide sufficient emergency management facilities to address all natural and
manmade hazards identified in the county’s Emergency Operations Plan and the Robeson
County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan.
I.42
Annually adopt a Capital Improvements Plan to address solid waste disposal, law
enforcement, emergency management, recreation, and educational services needs.
I.43
Support increased availability of access to natural gas services.
I.44
Support the provision of public recreational facilities and pursue grant funds for recreation
facilities.
I.45
Support the location of commercial solar and wind-driven power generating facilities within
the county. However, local land use regulatory controls should be considered for adoption.
I.46
Make all Robeson County locational decisions for community facilities in consideration of the
facility impact on adjacent land uses and infrastructure capacity for support including the
water system, municipal sewer systems, and transportation system.
Page 7-8
I.47
Require that all necessary infrastructure firefighting capability/capacity be provided in new
subdivisions and non-residential developments.
I.48
Review new proposals against the Future Land Use Map to ensure consistency, when
considering new public facilities. If the proposal is inconsistent, the proposal will be revised
or the county will review this plan to see if revisions are needed.
I.49
Require that water systems be constructed with lines designed and sized for adequate fire
protection and sufficient water pressure.
I.50
Prepare a detailed community facilities plan to address solid waste disposal, law enforcement,
emergency management, recreation, and educational services needs.
I.51
Vigorously pursue grants to expand the county’s water system.
I.52
Seek state and federal technical and financial assistance to provide facilities for physically
challenged persons.
I.53
Support educational grants to subsidize in-county continuing education by nearby colleges
and universities and support community education programs.
I.54
Pursue funding to provide and improve sewer service to all industrial park sites.
I.55
Support development/improvement of the following community facilities:
!
Expansion of the Robeson County water system.
!
Expansion/improvement of school facilities.
!
Improvements to the Robeson Community College facilities.
!
Continued development of senior care facilities/services.
!
Improvement of healthcare facilities.
NOTE: Support of these facilities does not necessarily commit county fiscal resources.
Page 7-9
I.56
The following recreation facility improvements should be accomplished:
!
Upgrade the existing parks to replace worn/out-dated equipment and add pools and
splash pads.
!
Prepare an updated specific park plan and renovate the Sam Nobles Park facility to a
usable condition including baseball, football, and soccer fields.
!
Construct two indoor activity centers (one in the northern part of the county and one
in the southeast part of the county).
NOTE: These proposed improvements will be contingent upon funding availability.
7.
Transportation
I.57
Endorse and support the NCDOT TIP projects included and outlined in this plan.
I.58
Support and continue to seek funds for sidewalk and bikeway improvements identified and
endorsed in this plan, including expansion of bike lanes and trails in the CS land use sector
located along NC 711 between Lumberton and Pembroke.
I.59
Support and continue to explore funding and funding opportunities available for a paratransit
service provided throughout the county for persons with disabilities.
I.60
Coordinate all proposed development with the Transportation Improvement Program (see
page 4-27).
I.61
Encourage local access street connections between adjoining residential subdivisions which
have public roads, and connections between parking lots of adjoining commercial
developments.
I.62
Support regional intergovernmental planning and cooperation for transportation
improvements to and within southeastern North Carolina and northeastern South Carolina.
Page 7-10
D.
Land Use Plan Administration
This comprehensive plan must be utilized in the county’s day-to-day decision-making processes. If it
is not, the time and money invested in the preparation of this document will have been wasted. The
impact of deviations from the guidance offered by this plan should be carefully considered. This plan
is an integrated document and changes to one “part” may affect the whole.
This plan provides the framework upon which zoning and subdivision regulations and the capital
improvements program should be based. In fact, the preparation of a land use plan and map is
mandated by legislation as a prerequisite for zoning. North Carolina General Statute 153A-341 states
the following about the purpose for land use plans:
“Zoning regulations shall be made in accordance with a comprehensive plan. Prior to
adopting or rejecting any zoning amendment, the governing board shall adopt a
statement describing whether its action is consistent with an adopted comprehensive
plan and explaining why the board considers the action taken to be reasonable and in
the public interest. That statement is not subject to judicial review.
The Planning Board shall advise and comment on whether the proposed amendment
is consistent with any comprehensive plan that has been adopted and any other
officially adopted plan that is applicable. The Planning Board shall provide a written
recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners that addresses plan
consistency and other matters as deemed appropriate by the Planning Board, but a
comment by the Planning Board that a proposed amendment is inconsistent with the
comprehensive plan shall not preclude consideration or approval of the proposed
amendment by the governing board.
Zoning regulations shall be designed to promote the public health, safety, and
general welfare. To that end, the regulations may address, among other things, the
following public purposes: to provide adequate light and air; to prevent the
overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; to lessen
congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; and to
facilitate the efficient and adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage,
schools, parks, and other public requirements. The regulations shall be made with
reasonable consideration as to, among other things, the character of the district and
its peculiar suitability for particular uses, and with a view of conserving the value of
buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the county.
In addition, the regulations shall be made with reasonable consideration to expansion
and development of any cities/towns within the county, so as to provide for their
orderly growth and development.”
Page 7-11
Specifically, in implementing this plan, the following should serve as guiding land use/planning
principles:
!
Consider the future land use map as part of the policies included in this plan.
!
Consult this plan, including the future land use map, during the deliberation of all re-zoning
requests and proposed text amendments, as required by NCGS 153A-341.
!
Consider the following in deliberation of all zoning petitions:
"
All uses that are allowed in a zoning district must be considered. A decision to rezone or not to re-zone a parcel or parcels of property cannot be based on
consideration of only one use or a partial list of the uses allowed within a zoning
district.
"
Requests for zoning changes should not be approved if the requested change will
result in spot zoning. Spot zoning is a form of discriminatory zoning whose sole
purpose is to serve the private interests of one or more landowners instead of
furthering the welfare of the entire community as part of an overall zoning plan. Spot
zoning is based on the arbitrary and inappropriate nature of a re-zoning change rather
than, as is commonly believed, on the size of the area being re-zoned.
"
Zoning which will result in strip development should be discouraged. Strip
development is a melange of development, usually commercial, extending along
both sides of a major street. Strip development is often a mixture of auto-oriented
enterprises (e.g., gas stations, motels, and food stands), and truck-dependent
wholesale and light industrial enterprises along with the once-rural homes and farms
that await conversion to commercial use. Strip development may severely reduce
traffic-carrying capacity of abutting streets by allowing for excessive and conflicting
curb cuts.
"
The concept of uniformity should be supported in all zoning deliberations. Uniformity
is a basic premise of zoning which holds that all land in similar circumstances should
be zoned alike; any different circumstances should be carefully balanced with a
demonstrated need for such different treatment.
"
Zoning regulations should be made in accordance with this plan.
Page 7-12
"
Specifically, the Planning Board and Board of Commissioners should ask the following
questions:
-
Is the request in accordance with this plan?
-
Will the request have a serious adverse impact on traffic circulation, water
services, and other infrastructure?
-
Will the request have an adverse impact on other county services, including
police protection, fire protection, or the school system?
-
Is there a good possibility that the request, as proposed, will result in
lessening the enjoyment or use of adjacent properties?
-
Will the request, as proposed, cause serious noise, odors, light, activity, or
unusual disturbances?
-
Does the request raise legal questions such as spot zoning, hardship, or
violation of precedents?
-
Does the request adversely impact water quality or other natural resources?
Robeson County will utilize the following additional tools to implement this plan:
!
Conduct annual training sessions for the Robeson County Planning Board and Board of
Adjustment.
!
The Planning Department staff, in concert with the Planning Board, shall prepare an annual
report assessing the effectiveness of plan implementation. This report shall be presented to
the Board of Commissioners.
!
At a minimum, update this plan every five years.
!
At least annually, conduct a joint meeting of the Robeson County Board of Commissioners
and the county’s Planning Board to identify planning issues/needs.
!
Annually review the county’s existing land use related regulatory ordinances to ensure their
consistency with the recommendations of this plan and the evolving nature of the county.
Page 7-13
Citizen participation should be an ongoing process. At the outset of the preparation of this plan,
Robeson County adopted a citizen participation plan. A copy of that plan is included as Appendix 5.
Following adoption of this plan, Robeson County will implement the following to ensure adequate
continuing effective citizen participation:
!
Encourage public participation in all land use decisions and procedure development
processes and encourage citizen input via its boards and commissions.
!
Publicize all meetings of the county’s Planning Board and Board of Adjustment through
newspaper advertisements and public service announcements.
!
Utilize advisory committees to assess and advise the county on special planning issues/needs.
!
All Planning Department activities will be available on the county’s website. The site will
include this plan.
!
Ensure that the membership of all planning related and ad hoc advisory committees has a
broad cross section of the county’s citizenry.
Page 7-14
Appendix 1: Concentration of Hispanic Population
Parkton
Parkton
Lumber
Bridge
Lumber Bridge
Red Springs
Springs
Red
710
Rennert
Rennert
301
¤
¬
« £
20
Saint Pauls
Pauls
Saint
¬
« ¬
«
Maxton
Maxton
§
¦
¨
95
72
¬
«
Pembroke
Pembroke
130
¬
«
83
¬
«
211
§
¦
¨
74
501
£
¤
Lumberton
Lumberton
72
74
Raynham
Raynham
Rowland
Rowland
§
¦
¨
95
£
¤
McDonald
McDonald
74
£
¤
Fairmont
Fairmont
Legend
Municipalities
County Boundary
Concentration of Hispanic Population (2010)
Minimal
Low
Moderate
High
¬
«
Proctorville
Proctorville
Orrum
Orrum
41
¬
«
Marietta
Marietta
904
¬
«
Appendix 2
CTP Inventory and Recommendations
Assumptions/ Notes:
• ID: If a TIP project number exists it is listed as the ID. Otherwise, the following system is used
to create a code for each recommended improvement (this code is the same as the one used
as the SPOT prioritization tool ID): the first 4 letters of the county name is combined with a 4
digit unique numerical code followed by ‘-H’ for highway, ‘-T’ for public transportation, ‘-R’ for
rail, ‘-B’ for bicycle, or ‘-P’ for pedestrian modes. If a different code is used along a route it
indicates separate projects will probably be requested. Also, upper case alphabetic characters
(i.e. ‘A’, ‘B’, or ‘C’) are included after the numeric portion of the code if it is anticipated that
project segmentation or phasing will be recommended.
• Jurisdiction: Jurisdictions listed are based on municipal limits, county boundaries, and MPO
Metropolitan Planning Area Boundaries (MAB), as applicable.
• Cross-Section: Listed under ‘(ft)’ is the approximate width of the roadway from edge of
pavement to edge of pavement. Listed under ‘lanes’ is the total number of lanes, with the
letter ‘D’ if the facility is divided.
• ROW: The estimated existing right-of-way is based on using the NCDOT - Road Conditions
layer and from aerial photography. These right-of-way amounts are approximate and may
vary.
• Existing Capacity: The estimated capacities are given in vehicles per day (vpd) based on
LOS C for existing facilities and LOS C for new facilities. These capacity estimates were
developed using the NCLOS program, as documented in Chapter II.
• 2035 AADT (Annual Average Daily Traffic) volumes, given in vehicles per day (vpd), are
estimates only based on a systems-level analysis. The ‘2035 AADT’ is an estimate of the
volume in 2035 with no additional facilities/ improvements assumed to be in place that were
not open to traffic in the base year (2004). For additional information about the assumptions
and techniques used to develop the AADT volume estimates, refer to Chapter II.
• Rec. (Recommended) Cross-section: The CTP recommended cross-sections are listed by
code; for depiction of the cross-section, refer to Appendix D. An entry of ‘ADQ’ indicates the
existing facility is adequate and there are no improvements recommended as part of the CTP.
• CTP Classification: The CTP classification is listed, as shown on the adopted CTP Maps
(see Figure 1). Abbreviations are F= freeway, E= expressway, B= boulevard, Maj= other
major thoroughfare, Min= minor thoroughfare.
• Tier: Tiers are defined as part of the North Carolina Mulitmodal Investment Network (NCMIN).
Abbreviations are Sta= statewide tier, Reg= regional tier, Sub= subregional tier.
• Other Modes: If there is an improvement recommended for another mode of transportation
that relates to the given recommendation, it is indicated by an alphabetic code (H=highway, T=
public transportation, R= rail, B= bicycle, and P= pedestrian).
C-1
C-2
US 74
--
US 301
US 301
US 301
US 301
US 301
US 301
US 301
US 301
--
--
--
--
--
---
--
ROB0006-H
ROB0006-H
ROB0006-H
--
US
US
US
US
301
301
301
301
ROB0006-H US 301
US 301
--
ROB0002-H US 74
ROB0002-H US 74
-US 301
ROB0002-H US 74
US 74
--
ROB0001-H I-95
ROB0001-H I-95
ROB0001-H I-95
ROB0001-H I-95
ROB0001-H I-95
ROB0001-H I-95
Local ID
Facility
ROB0001-H I-95
ROB0001-H I-95
Section (From - To)
Cumberland County Line to US 301
US 301 to NC 20
NC 20 to Great Marsh Church Rd. (SR
1006)
Great Marsh Church Rd. (SR 1006) to
Lumberton Planning Boundary
Lumberton Planning Boundary to Chicken
Rd. (SR 1003)
Chicken Rd. (SR 1003) to Sand Hole Rd.
(SR 2455)
Sand Hole Rd. (SR 2455) to NC 130
NC 130 to SC Line
Maxton PB to Pembroke Planning
Boundary
Pembroke Planning Boundary to
Lumberton Planning Boundary to NC
2220
Broadridge Rd. (SR 2220) to NC 130
NC 130 to Columbus County Line
SC Line to Rowland Planning Boundary
Rowland Planning Boundary to Peach
Street
Peach Street to Sout Robeson Rd. (SR
2519)
South Robeson Rd. (SR 2519) to Adams
Rd. (SR 1144)
Adams Rd. (SR 1144) to Boyce Rd. (SR
2457)
Boyce Rd. (SR 2457) to Kelly Rd. (SR
2429)
Kelly Rd. (SR 2429) to Chicken Rd. (SR
1003)
Chicken Rd. (SR 1003) to I-95
I-95 to Lumberton Planning Boundary
Lumberton Planning Boundary to Bell Rd.
(SR 1941)
Bell Rd. (SR 1941) to St. Pauls Planning
Boundary
St. Paul Planning Boundary to NC 20
NC 20 to St Pauls Planning Boundary
St Pauls Planning Boundary to I-95
I-95 to Blanchard Rd. (SR 1727)
4.8 64
3.1 24
Robeson County
C-3
44
44
24
24
3.6 22
3.3 22
0.4 24
0.5 24
Robeson County 0.4
Robeson County 0.8
Robeson County 1.1
Robeson County 0.50
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
1.3 24
2.7 24
Robeson County
Robeson County
8.8 24
0.6 36
Robeson County
Robeson County
3.8 64
0.9 64
2.1 24
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
4.5 24
2.8 24
4.9 48
2.4 48
3.3 48
2.6 48
6.6 48
0.8 48
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
2
4
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
60
60
60
100
60
60
60
300
300
300
300
300
300
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,400
46,100
46,100
9,500
46,100
9,500
9,500
40,500
40,500
40,500
40,500
40,500
40,500
35
35
55
55
55
55
9,400
9,400
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
55
9,500
(common to I-95)
55
55
55
55
55
35
55
55
55
55
55
55
65
65
65
65
65
65
Existing
Capacity
(vpd)
40,500
40,500
2004 Existing System
CrossSpeed
Dist. Section ROW Limit
Jurisdiction
(mi) (ft) lanes (ft) (mph)
Robeson County 5.6 48
4
300
65
4
300
65
HIGHWAY
CTP INVENTORY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6,900
5,600
4,400
3,800
3,500
3,300
2,500
2,500
2,500
800
1,100
3,000
4,300
10,000
10,000
3,800
9,400
11,000
13,000
32,000
29,000
32,000
34,000
38,000
38,000
2004
AADT
38,000
38,000
15,000
12,000
9,500
8,200
8,800
8,300
6,300
6,300
6,300
1,100
1,500
4,100
5,900
34,000
34,000
5,200
32,000
28,300
32,500
69,000
62,000
69,000
73,000
82,000
82,000
2035 AADT
82,000
82,000
4C
4C
4C
--
4C
--
---
--
--
--
--
--
--
6A
6A
--
6A
--
--
6A
6A
6A
6A
6A
6A
CrossSection
6A
6A
2035 Proposed System
B
B
B
Maj
B
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
F
F
Maj
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Sta
Sta
Reg
Sta
Sta
Sta
Sta
Sta
Sta
Sta
Sta
Sta
-----
--
--
---
--
--
--
--
--
--
----
--
--
--
---
--
--
--
--
CTP
ClassifiOther
cation Tier Modes
F
Sta
-F
Sta
--
US 301
US 501
US
US
US
US
US 501
US 501
US 501
--
--
-----
--
---
NC 41
--
ROB0009-H NC 41
NC 41
NC 41
NC 41
----
ROB0005-H NC 20
ROB0005-H NC 20
ROB0005-H NC 20
ROB0005-H NC 20
NC 20
NC 20
ROB0005-H NC 20
ROB0005-H NC 20
ROB0004-H NC 20
ROB0004-H NC 20
ROB0004-H NC 20
501
501
501
501
US 301
--
Facility
US 301
--
Local ID
Section (From - To)
Blanchard Rd. (SR 1727) to Parkton
Tobemry Rd. (SR 1723)
Parkton Tobemry Rd. (SR 1723) to Green
Spring Rd. (SR 1718)
Green Spring Rd. (SR 1718) to
Cumberland County Line
SC line to NC 301 split (common to US
301)
US 301 split to Canal Street
Canal Street to Ward Rd. (SR 1141)
Ward Rd. (SR 1141) to NC 710
NC 710 to Kitchen Street Rd. (SR 1134)
Kitchen Street Rd. (SR 1134) to NC 130
split
NC 130 split to NC 83
NC 83 to Scotland County Line
Hoke County Line to Graham Rd. (SR
1706)
Graham Rd. (SR 1706) to Blanchard Rd.
(SR 1727)
Blanchard Rd. (SR 1727) to Shaw Rd.
(SR 1729)
Shaw Rd. (SR 1729) to Nash Rd. (SR
1733
Nash Rd. (SR 1733) to Veterans Rd. (SR
1732)
Veterans Rd. (SR 1732) to St Pauls City
Limit
St Pauls City Limit to Old Stage Rd. (SR
1734)
Old Stage Rd. (SR 1734) to US 301
US 301 to St. Paul County Line
St Pauls City Limit to Currie Rd. (SR
1924)
Currie Rd. (SR 1924) to Bladen County
Line
SC line to Marietta Rd. (SR 2277)
Marietta Rd. (SR 2277) to NC 904
NC 904 to Bailey Rd. (SR 2452)
Bailey Rd. (SR 2452) to Fairmont
Planning Boundary
Fairmont Planning Boundary to
Centerville Church Rd. (SR 2239)
-50
34
24
26
2.6 22
Robeson County
C-4
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
1.4 26
1.2 24
1.8 24
1.3 24
3.3 24
2.7 24
1.8 24
0.2 44
0.7 60
0.4 44
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
0.3 22
Robeson County
0.8 22
1.8 22
Robeson County
Robeson County
2.1 22
1.7 24
3.8 26
1.6 26
4.0 26
0.3
3.0
0.9
2.2
2.6
0.3 24
2.1 24
3.0 20
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Jurisdiction
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
--
2
2
2
60
60
60
60
60
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
60
60
60
60
100
100
60
60
--
100
100
100
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
35
35
35
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
20
35
55
55
--
55
55
55
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,400
42,400
9,400
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
--
9,500
9,500
9,500
Existing
Capacity
(vpd)
CrossSpeed
HIGHWAY
6,300
3,100
1,600
1,900
2,500
4,600
5,900
8,300
10,000
12,000
7,200
6,600
4,900
4,900
3,100
2,600
3,600
4,000
4,400
7,700
6,400
5,700
4,400
0
8,000
2,500
2,400
2004
AADT
10,000
5,900
2,500
3,000
4,000
9,900
13,000
18,000
22,000
26,000
21,000
19,000
14,000
14,000
9,000
7,600
6,700
7,400
8,100
14,000
12,000
11,000
8,100
0
17,000
5,400
5,300
2035 AADT
4B
--
----
4B
4B
4B
4B
--
--
4B
4B
3A
3A
3A
---
--
-----
--
--
--
--
CrossSection
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
B
B
B
B
Maj
Maj
B
B
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
--
--
----
--
--
---
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
---
--
-----
--
--
--
--
CTP
ClassifiOther
cation Tier Modes
Facility
NC 20 to Church St.
Church St. to Malloy Rd. (SR 1714)
Malloy Rd. (SR 1714) to Wash. St.
(Parkton)
Washington St (Parkton) to Parkton
Planning Boundary
Parkton Planning Boundary to Leeper Rd.
(SR 1716)
Leeper Rd. (SR 1716) to US 301
US 74 to Drop Off Dr. (SR 2123)
Drop Off Dr. (SR 2123) to Lumberton
Planning Boundary
Lumberton Planning Boundary to
Pembroke Planning Boundary
Pembroke Planning Boundary to Mount
Zion Church Rd. (SR 1318)
Mount Zion Church Rd. (SR 1318) to Red
Springs Planning Boundary
SC Line to Morrison Rd. (SR 1104)
Morrison Rd. (SR 1104) to US 501
US 501 to NC 130
Maxton Planning Boundary to NC 83
NC 83 to Oquinn Rd. (SR 1170)
Oquinn Rd. (SR 1170) to NC 710
NC 710 to NC 301/501
US 301/501 to Rowland City Limit
Rowland City Limit to I-95
I-95 to Cotton Valley Rd. (SR 2492)
NC 72
NC 72
NC 83
NC 83
NC 83
NC 130
NC 130
NC 130
NC 130
NC 130
NC 130
NC 130
--
--
------ROB0018-H
ROB0018-H
ROB0018-H
--
ROB0013-H NC 72
ROB0013-H NC 72
-NC 71
ROB0013-H NC 72
ROB0008-H NC 71
ROB0008-H NC 71
C-5
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Highland Games Rd. (SR 1701) to NC 20 Robeson County
ROB0010-H NC 71
6.2 26
0.5 26
24
3.3
1.7
2.3
1.9
3.0
7.3
1.3
0.4
0.9
0.4
20
24
20
22
22
22
32
46
22
24
2.4 24
2.7 24
3.3 24
2.5 24
1.6 24
5.5 24
0.8 24
0.7 44
1.5 24
0.2 44
2.1 24
3.7 24
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County 6.6
24
2.6 24
Robeson County 1.4
Robeson County
Jurisdiction
ROB0007-H NC 71
ROB0007-H NC 71
Section (From - To)
Centerville Church Rd. (SR 2239) to
Lumberton Planning Boundary to Regans
Church Rd. (SR 1955)
Regans Church Rd. (SR 1955) to Bladen
County Line
Maxton Planning Boundary to Red Hill
Rd. (SR 1312)
Red Hill Rd. (SR 1312) to Red Spring
Planning Boundary
Red Springs Planning Boundary to
Highland Games Rd. (SR 1701)
ROB0007-H NC 71
ROB0010-H NC 71
ROB0010-H NC 71
ROB0010-H NC 71
ROB0015-H NC 41
ROB0015-H NC 41
ROB0009-H NC 41
Local ID
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
60
60
100
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
100
60
100
60
100
100
60
60
100
60
60
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
35
35
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
35
55
45
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
Existing
Capacity
(vpd)
Speed
CrossDist. Section ROW Limit
HIGHWAY
500
900
900
3,200
2,200
1,300
1,300
3,900
3,700
3,200
3,600
2,200
5,900
4,700
5,000
3,100
5,900
5,900
7,600
4,500
4,500
7,000
5,800
4,200
4,100
4,400
5,900
7,800
2004
AADT
1,300
2,200
2,300
8,000
5,700
3,300
3,300
8,400
8,000
8,000
9,300
5,500
14,800
11,800
13,000
7,800
17,000
17,000
22,000
9,700
11,000
15,000
12,000
11,000
11,000
11,000
14,800
12,000
2035 AADT
------3A
3B
3A
--
--
--
2A
2A
-2A
3A
3A
3A
3A
3A
3A
3A
3A
3A
3A
3A
4B
CrossSection
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
----
-------
--
--
--
--
---
B
B
B
---
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
CTP
ClassifiOther
cation Tier Modes
NC 130
NC 130
NC 130
NC 130
NC 130
NC 130 Business
NC 211
NC 211
--
--
--
--
---
--
--
NC 710
NC 711
NC 904
NC 904
NC 904
NC 904
NC 904
Shannon Rd. (SR 1001)
--
--
----
--
--
--
--
---
Burnt Island Rd. (SR 1002)
NC 710
--
--
NC 710
--
ROB0003-H NC 211
ROB0003-H NC 211
NC 130
NC 130
---
Facility
NC 130
--
Local ID
Section (From - To)
Cotton Valley Rd. (SR 2492) to Stuarts
Mill Rd. (SR 2489)
Stuarts Mill Rd. (SR 2489) to NC 904
NC 904 to Sand Hole Rd. (SR 2455)
Sand Hole Rd. (SR 2455) to Fairmont
Planning Boundary
Fairmont Planning Boundary to Orrum
County Line
Orrum County Line to Leggette Rd. (SR
2225)
Leggette Rd. (Leggette Rd. (SR 2225) to
Orrum County Line
Orrum County Line to US 74
NC 130 to Fairmont Planning Boundary
Bladen County Line to Singletary Chruch
Rd. (SR 2100)
Singletary Chruch Rd. (SR 2100) to
Lumberton Planning Boundary to Velenda
Rd. (SR 1507)
Velenda Rd. (SR 1507) to Red Springs
Planning Boundary
US 501 to Kitchen Street Rd. (SR 1134)
Kitchen Street Rd. (SR 1134) to SR
Pembroke Planning Boundary
Pembroke Planning Boundary to Red
Springs Planning Boundary
Pembroke Planning Boundary to
NC 130 to Sand Hole Rd. (SR 2455)
Sand Hole Rd. (SR 2455) to NC 41
NC 41 to Oliver Farms Rd. (SR 2285)
Oliver Farms Rd. (SR 2285) to Fair Bluff
Rd. (SR 2256)
Fair Bluff Rd. (SR 2256) to Columbus
County Line
NC 211 to Hancock Rd. (SR 1757)
Hancock Rd. (SR 1757) to Jacquelyn
Ave. (SR 1756)
Jacquelyn Ave. (SR 1756) to NC 71
NC 71 to Hoke County Line
Lumberton PB to Ball Park Rd. (SR
2119)
3.7 26
0.3 22
4.3 20
2.7 24
3.7 22
2.1 22
2.1 22
0.8 26
C-6
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
1.7 22
5.2 22
1.6 22
2.8 22
2.8 22
2.3 20
2.9 20
2.6 22
4.3 22
2.8 20
4.5 24
4.3 20
3.7 20
3.1 20
2.5 22
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Jurisdiction
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
60
60
60
60
60
100
100
60
60
100
60
100
60
60
100
100
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,300
9,300
9,500
9,500
9,300
9,500
9,300
9,300
9,300
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,300
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,300
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
Existing
Capacity
(vpd)
CrossSpeed
HIGHWAY
2,000
1,900
2,300
2,200
2,400
2,000
1,400
1,500
1,600
1,700
--
4,300
1,600
1,300
4,600
4,000
4,200
4,200
1,000
2,600
900
1,200
1,400
2,500
2,900
2,800
2,400
2004
AADT
3,800
5,500
6,700
6,600
7,200
5,000
3,500
3,800
4,000
4,300
--
14,500
3,000
2,400
11,500
10,000
9,000
9,000
1,800
4,800
1,600
2,200
2,600
6,300
8,400
7,000
6,000
2035 AADT
--
---
--
--
--
--
----
--
--
--
--
4A
4A
--
--
---
--
--
--
--
---
--
CrossSection
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
E
E
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Maj
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
Reg
--
---
--
--
--
--
----
B
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
---
--
--
--
--
---
--
CTP
ClassifiOther
cation Tier Modes
----------
--
--
--
---
--
--
--
--
--
------
--
---
--
--
--
--
Local ID
Great Marsh Church Rd. (SR 1006)
Gaddy Mill Rd. (SR 1101)
Fairley Rd. (SR 1107)
Kitchen Street Rd. (SR 1134)
Aspole Rd. (SR 1138)
Dew Rd. (SR 1155)
Barker Ten Mile Rd. (SR 1005)
Tar Heel Rd. (SR 1004)
Chicken Rd. (SR 1003)
Tar Heel Rd. (SR 1004)
Facility
C-7
Section (From - To)
Jurisdiction
Ball Park Rd. (SR 2119) to Phillips Rd.
(SR 2121)
Phillips Rd. (SR 2121) to Columbus
County Line
Fiarmont Planning Boundary to Pleasant
Hope Rd. (SR 2426)
Pleasant Hope Rd. (SR 2426) to
McDonald Rd. (SR 2422)
McDonald Rd. (SR 2422) to US 301
US 301 to Dew Rd. (SR 1155)
Dew Rd. (SR 1155) to Biggs Rd. (SR
1159)
Biggs Rd. (SR 1159) to U 74
US 74 to NC 711
NC 711 to NC 72
NC 72 to NC 211
NC 41 to Rozier Siding Rd. (SR 1936)
Rozier Siding Rd. (SR 1936) to Bladen
County Line
Lumberton Planning Boundary to Currie
Rd. (SR 1924)
Currie Rd. (SR 1924) to Regans Church
Rd. (SR 1955)
Regans Church Rd. (SR 1955) to Great
Marsh Church Rd. (SR 1006)
Bladen County Line to Currie Rd. (SR
1924)
Currie Rd. (SR 1924) to US 301
US 301 to Emma Jane Rd. (SR 1762)
Emma Jane Rd. (SR 1762) to Rennert
City Limit
Rennert City Limit to Rennert City Limit
Rennert City Limit to Shannon Rd. (SR
1001)
Morrison Rd. (SR 1104) to NC 83
NC 83 to Fairley Rd. (SR 1107)
Fairley Rd. (SR 1107) to US 501
SC Line to Gaddy Mill Rd. (SR 1101)
SC Line to US 501
US 501 to NC 710
NC 710 to Adams Rd. (SR 1144)
SC Line to US 501
SR 1154 to Chicken Rd. (SR 1003)
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
35
35
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
9,300
6,900
9,300
9,300
6,900
6,900
9,300
9,300
6,900
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,300
9,300
9,300
9,300
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,300
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,300
9,500
9,500
Existing
Capacity
(vpd)
CrossSpeed
HIGHWAY
300
400
300
500
400
400
400
1,000
900
2,500
2,500
1,900
1,000
3,500
800
1,100
1,000
1,100
1,100
2,300
2,500
2,200
2,100
3,200
1,900
2,300
1,300
1,100
1,100
2,200
2,200
2004
AADT
1,000
1,400
500
1,800
1,000
700
700
1,800
1,500
8,800
8,800
6,700
3,400
7,100
2,800
3,900
3,400
3,900
2,800
8,100
8,400
7,700
5,300
10,800
4,900
5,900
3,300
2,800
2,800
5,700
5,700
2035 AADT
----------
--
--
--
---
--
--
--
--
--
------
--
---
--
--
--
--
CrossSection
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
----------
--
--
--
---
--
--
--
--
--
------
--
---
--
--
--
--
CTP
ClassifiOther
cation Tier Modes
--
--
--
--
--
--
----
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
----
--
--
Local ID
---
Zion Church Rd.
Zion Church Rd.
Zion Church Rd.
Zion Church Rd.
(SR 1318)
(SR 1318)
(SR 1318)
(SR 1318)
Preston Rd. (SR 1339)
Dairy Rd. (SR 1320)
Arthur Rd. (SR 1338))
Mount Zion Church Rd. (SR 1318)
Mount
Mount
Mount
Mount
Modest Rd. (SR 1313)
Modest Rd. (SR 1313)
Red Hill Rd. (SR 1312)
McGirt Gin Rd. (SR 1310)
McGirt Gin Rd. (SR 1310)
Old Red Springs Rd. (SR 1303)
Cabinet Shop Rd. (SR 1166)
Martin L. King St. (SR 1185)
Martin L. King St. (SR 1185)
Franklin St. (SR 1196)
Facility
Back Swamp Rd. (SR 1164)
NC 72 to Old Red Springs Rd. (SR 1303)
Old Red Springs Rd. (SR 1303) to Hoke
County Line
Hoke County Line to Red Springs
Planning Boundary
NC 71 to US 74
Lumberton Planning Boundary to Chicken
Rd. (SR 1003)
Chicken Rd. (SR 1003) to Pates Rd. (SR
1557)
Section (From - To)
US 74 to Hilly Branch Rd. (SR 1207)
US 74 to Elrod Rd. (SR 1153)
Elrod Rd. (SR 1153) to Midway Rd. (SR
1131)
Midway Rd. (SR 1131) to Kitchen Street
Rd. (SR 1134)
US 501 to Cherry St
Cherry St to Franklin St. (SR 1196)
US 301 to Martin L. King St. (SR 1185)
Red Springs Planning Boundary to
Maxton Planning Boundary
Scotland County Line to McGirt Rd. (SR
1308)
McGirt Rd. (SR 1308) to Modest Rd. (SR
1313)
NC 71 to Beaver Damn Rd. (SR 1315)
Beaver Damn Rd. (SR 1315) to Modest
Rd. (SR 1313)
Modest Rd. (SR 1313) to Old Red
Springs Rd. (SR 1303)
Old Red Springs Rd. (SR 1303) to
Hoke County Line to Adrenia Rd. (SR
1382)
Adrenia Rd. (SR 1382) to Red Hill Rd.
(SR 1312)
Emma Jane Rd. (SR 1762) to Shannon
Rd. (SR 1001)
Shannon Rd. (SR 1001) to NC 211
NC 211 to Livermore Rd. (SR 1514)
Livermore Rd. (SR 1514) to NC 72
0.3 36
0.6 20
0.2 20
3.2 18
2.7 26
C-8
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
--
3.2 22
4.1 22
0.4
1.1 18
5.0 26
3.0 24
2.7 22
2.4 18
2.0 20
4.2 24
1.2 22
2.0 24
3.8 22
2.9 22
5.3 18
2.5 18
2.5 22
0.9 24
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
2
2
--
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
55
55
--
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
9,500
9,500
--
6,900
9,500
9,500
9,500
6,900
9,300
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
6,900
6,900
9,300
9,500
9,300
9,500
9,300
9,300
6,900
9,500
Existing
Capacity
(vpd)
9,300
9,500
Speed
CrossDist. Section ROW Limit
Jurisdiction
2
60
55
2
60
55
HIGHWAY
3,700
2,800
400
300
1,400
1,400
2,500
1,100
1,400
1,200
1,100
1,100
1,400
2,000
600
600
2,400
2,400
1,500
500
500
500
200
500
2004
AADT
800
2,900
9,500
7,200
1,100
1,100
4,700
4,700
6,400
3,900
4,700
4,000
3,300
3,300
4,700
7,000
2,000
2,000
7,200
7,200
3,900
1,300
1,300
1,300
700
1,800
2035 AADT
2,900
9,800
--
--
--
--
--
--
----
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
----
--
--
CrossSection
---
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
--
--
--
--
--
--
----
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
----
--
--
CTP
ClassifiOther
cation Tier Modes
Min Sub
-Min Sub
--
Facility
Old Lowry Rd. (SR 1505)
Barlow Rd. (SR 1712)
Malloy Rd. (SR 1714)
Glenn Rd. (SR 1710)
Livermore Rd. (SR 1514)
Lowe Rd. (SR 1550)
Lowe Rd. (SR 1550)
Lowe Rd. (SR 1550)
Chason Rd. (SR 1709)
--
--
--
Blanchard Rd. (SR 1727)
Carolina Church Rd. (SR 1725)
Carolina Church Rd. (SR 1725)
Black Bridge Rd. (SR 1716)
ROB0011-H Leeper Rd. (SR 1716)
-Carolina Church Rd. (SR 1725)
--
---
--
--
ROB0012-H
-----
--
ROB0014-H
Old Lowry Rd. (SR 1505)
ROB0014-H Old Lowry Rd. (SR 1505)
ROB0014-H
-Recreation Center Rd. (SR 1354)
ROB0014-H Old Lowry Rd. (SR 1505)
--
--
--
--
--
Local ID
--
Carolina Church Rd. (SR 1725) to US 301
Section (From - To)
Pates Rd. (SR 1557) to NC 710
NC 710 to Recreation Center Rd. (SR
1354)
Recreation Center Rd. (SR 1354) to Red
Bank Rd. (SR 1347)
Red Bank Rd. (SR 1347) to Hezekaih Rd.
(SR 1378)
Hezekaih Rd. (SR 1378) to Modest Rd.
(SR 1313)
Modest Rd. (SR 1313) to Arthur Rd. (SR
1338)
Preston Rd. (SR 1339) to US 74
NC 71 to Shannon Rd. (SR 1001)
Shannon Rd. (SR 1001) to Fodiesville Rd.
(SR 1779)
Fodiesville Rd. (SR 1779) to Pearsall Rd.
(SR 1777)
Pearsall Rd. (SR 1777) to NC 211
Mount Zion Church Rd. (SR 1318) to NC
72
US 74 to Preston Rd. (SR 1339)
Preston Rd. (SR 1339) to NC 711
NC 711 to NC 72
NC 71 to Hoke County Line
NC 71 (Lumber Bridge Bypass) to
Cumberland County Line
Hoke County Line to Parkton Bridge City
Limit
Parkton Bridge City Limit to Armory Rd.
(SR 1715)
Armory Rd. (SR 1715) to NC 71
NC 71 to McIver Rd. (SR 1731)
Cumberland County Line to Barlow Rd.
(SR 1712)
Cumberland County Line to NC 71
NC 71 to Parkton Planning Boundary
Parkton Planning Boundary to Shaw Rd.
(SR 1729)
Shaw Rd. (SR 1729) to Blanchard Rd.
(SR 1727)
1.6 22
0.6 20
1.5 22
1.6 20
1.5 20
0.4 32
Robeson County
Robeson County
C-9
Robeson County
Robeson County
4.6 20
3.5 20
2.2 18
0.2 28
2.3 20
0.3 30
3.2 20
3.8 18
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
1.1 22
1.4 22
Robeson County
Robeson County
0.3 22
0.9 24
2.0 20
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
2.4 22
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
80
60
60
60
60
60
60
55
55
55
55
35
55
35
55
35
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
9,300
9,300
6,900
9,300
9,500
6,900
9,500
9,300
9,500
9,300
9,500
9,500
9,500
6,900
9,500
9,300
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,300
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,300
9,500
Existing
Capacity
(vpd)
9,500
CrossSpeed
Jurisdiction
2
60
55
HIGHWAY
1,200
1,600
1,600
1,400
2,200
1,500
2,300
--
2,200
700
--
1,400
1,100
1,100
3,500
700
2,600
1,000
1,800
2,700
1,800
--
--
3,000
3,600
3,000
2004
AADT
5,600
3,600
5,600
5,600
2,300
7,400
4,500
6,900
2,600
6,600
2,000
--
4,900
3,900
3,900
10,200
2,300
6,500
2,600
4,500
8,100
4,500
8,700
8,700
8,700
10,800
7,500
2035 AADT
14,000
--
--
--
4B
--
--
---
--
--
2A
-----
--
2A
2A
2A
-2A
--
--
--
--
--
CrossSection
--
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
--
--
--
B
--
--
B
--
B
B
--
-----
--
--
--
--
---
--
--
--
--
--
CTP
ClassifiOther
cation Tier Modes
Min Sub
--
Emma Jane Rd. (SR 1762)
Pearsall Rd. (SR 1777)
Fodiesville Rd. (SR 1779)
Shaw Mill Rd. (SR 1907)
Currie Rd. (SR 1924)
Martin Rd. (SR 1931)
Howell Rd. (SR 1935)
Regans Church Rd. (SR 1955)
Seventh St. (SR 2104)
Old Whiteville Rd. (SR 2115)
Wire Grass Rd. (SR 2208)
Wire Grass Rd. (SR 2208)
Rice Rd. (SR 2212)
Collins Dr. (SR 2214)
Alamac Rd. (SR 2215)
Fire Tower Rd. (SR 2233)
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Rennert Rd. (SR 1752)
Old Stage Rd. (SR 1734)
Facility
McIver Rd. (SR 1731)
--
ROB0016-H
ROB0016-H
ROB0016-H
ROB0016-H
ROB0017-H
Local ID
-----
Section (From - To)
NC 71 to Malloy Rd. (SR 1714)
US 301 to St Pauls City limits
St Pauls Ciy limits to Pavement Change
Pavement Change to NC 20
1006)
1006)
Rennert City Limit
Rennert City Limit to Mount Zion Church
Rd. (SR 1318)
Mount Zion Church Rd. (SR 1318) to
Red Springs Planning Boundary to Old
Lowry Rd. (SR 1505)
Shannon Rd. (SR 1001) to Old Lowry Rd.
(SR 1505)
NC 20 to Bladen Co. Line
Martin Rd. (SR 1931) to Howell Rd. (SR
1935)
Currie Rd. (SR 1924)
Barker Ten Mile Rd. (SR 1005) to Regans
Howell Rd. (SR 1935) to NC 41
Lumberton Planning Boundary to Burnt
Island Rd. (SR 1002)
Burnt Island Rd. (SR 1002) to Lumberton
Planning Boundary
NC 130 to Fred Rd. (SR 2311)
Fred Rd. (SR 2311) to Lumberton
Planning Boundary
Alamac Rd. (SR 2215) to Collins Dr. (SR
2214)
Rice Rd. (SR 2212) to Hurricane Dr. (SR
2216)
Lumberton Planning Boundary to Rice
Rd. (SR 2212)
NC 130 to Broadridge Rd. (SR 2220)
0.8 18
0.7 18
5.8 24
2.5 24
0.5 20
0.9 20
1.5 20
2.9 20
0.9 18
2.7 22
5.0 22
2.1 22
2.0 24
3.8 20
C-10
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
2.3 18
2.6 18
Robeson County
Robeson County
3.6 24
1.9 22
Robeson County
0.7 22
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
60
150
60
60
60
60
60
80
60
70
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
35
55
55
55
9,300
9,300
9,300
6,900
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
6,900
6,900
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
6,900
9,500
9,500
9,300
9,500
6,900
Existing
Capacity
(vpd)
6,900
6,900
9,500
9,300
CrossSpeed
Section ROW Limit
(ft) lanes (ft) (mph)
18
2
60
55
18
2
60
35
32
2
60
35
20
2
60
35
Robeson County
Jurisdiction
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Dist.
(mi)
1.8
0.5
0.4
0.2
HIGHWAY
500
2,500
1,000
900
2,000
1,200
3,400
2,800
800
400
1,500
1,500
--
2,200
2,200
1,400
3,200
3,200
3,300
2,900
3,200
2004
AADT
900
----
1,100
5,500
2,200
2,100
7,000
4,000
8,800
9,800
2,900
1,300
5,300
3,300
23,800
7,400
7,400
4,700
15,000
15,000
16,000
14,000
8,000
2035 AADT
2,600
2,300
2,300
2,300
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
2A
2A
2A
2A
4B
CrossSection
-----
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
CTP
Classification
Min
Min
Min
Min
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Other
Tier Modes
Sub
-Sub
-Sub
-Sub
--
Sand Hole Rd. (SR 2455)
Boyce Rd. (SR 2457)
McKinnon-Pate Rd. (SR 2460)
McKinnon-Pate Rd. (SR 2460)
Ward Store Rd. (SR 2485)
Ward Store Rd. (SR 2485)
Jake Rd. (SR 2488)
Cotton Valley Rd. (SR 2492)
Sout Robeson Rd. (SR 2519)
--
---------
Blue St. (St Pauls)
Sand Hole Rd. (SR 2455)
--
Lafayette St. (St Pauls)
East White Pond Rd. (SR 2442)
--
--
Iona Church Rd. (SR 2435)
--
--
--
McLean St. (St Pauls)
--
Blue St. (St Pauls)
Affinity Rd. (SR 2282)
Affinity Rd. (SR 2282)
Oliver Farms Rd. (SR 2285)
----
--
Jennrette Rd. (SR 2281)
--
----
Marietta Rd. (SR 2277)
Williamson Rd. (SR 2278)
--
Facility
Fair Bluff Rd. (SR 2256)
Marietta Rd. (SR 2277)
--
Local ID
---
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Robeson County
Sand Hole Rd. (SR 2455) to Fairmont
Planning Boundary
Fairmont Planning Boundary to NC 904
US 301 to East White Pond Rd. (SR
2442)
East White Pond Rd. (SR 2442) to Iona
US 301 to McDonald Rd. (SR 2422)
NC 130 to Sout Robeson Rd. (SR 2519)
Sout Robeson Rd. (SR 2519) to US 301
NC 130 to SR 2535
SR 2535 to SC line
SC line to NC 130
NC 130 to SC line
US 301 to McDonald Rd. (SR 2422)
Inman Rd. (SR 1741) (Old Stage Rd.) to
5th Street.
5th St. to Burlington St.
Burlington St. to Lafayette St.
Lafayette St. to Burlington St.
Burlington St. to Inman Rd. (SR 1741)
(Old Stage Rd.)
NC 20 to McLean St.
1.4 18
C-11
Robeson County 0.3
Robeson County 0.4
Robeson County 0.4
Robeson County 0.3
Robeson County 0.3
Robeson County 0.3
27
33
32
23
23
18
Robeson County
3.6 20
1.2 18
Robeson County
4.0 20
5.9 18
0.7 18
1.2 20
1.8 20
0.4 20
0.8 20
1.9 20
0.7 20
Robeson County
Robeson County
McDonald Planning Boundary to SR 1164 Robeson County
Section (From - To)
NC 904 to Leggette Rd. (SR 2225)
NC 41 to Oliver Church Rd. (SR 2258)
Oliver Church Rd. (SR 2258) to Affinity
Rd. (SR 2282)
Marietta Rd. (SR 2277) to Oliver Farms
Rd. (SR 2285)
SC line to Marietta Rd. (SR 2277)
Jennrette Rd. (SR 2281) to NC 904
Sand Hole Rd. (SR 2455) to McDonald
Planning Boundary
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
--
--
----
--
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
9,500
6,900
9,300
6,900
6,900
9,300
9,300
9,500
9,300
9,500
6,900
6,900
9,300
9,300
6,900
6,900
9,300
9,300
9,300
9,300
9,300
9,300
Existing
Capacity
(vpd)
6,900
9,300
CrossSpeed
Jurisdiction
2
60
55
2
60
55
HIGHWAY
--
--
----
--
0
400
200
1,100
1,000
1,000
200
1,400
500
900
300
800
500
600
700
700
0
--
200
300
2004
AADT
300
300
500
1,900
600
600
400
1,500
3,400
1,300
600
3,900
3,500
3,500
200
4,900
1,600
3,100
500
2,100
1,400
1,900
1,800
1,800
100
200
500
900
2035 AADT
400
1,000
--
--
----
--
---------
--
--
--
--
--
--
----
--
--
--
CrossSection
---
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Min
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
Sub
--
--
----
--
---------
--
--
--
--
--
--
----
--
--
--
CTP
ClassifiOther
cation Tier Modes
Min Sub
-Min Sub
--
Facility/ Route
CSX Railroad
CSX Railroad
CSX Railroad
CSX Railroad
Red Springs &
Red Springs &
Local ID
--
--
--
--
---
Local ID
Section (From - To)
Bladen County Line to Lumberton Planning
Boundary
Lumberton Planning Boundary to Pembroke
Planning Boundary
Pembroke Planning Boundary to Maxton
Planning Boundary
Bladen County Line to Lumberton Planning
Boundary
Cumberland County Boundary to Pembroke
Northern RailroadPlanning Boundary
Northern RailroadParkton to Red Springs Planning Boundary
C-12
---
--
--
--
--
Class
RAIL
---
--
--
--
--
Speed
Limit
(mph)
17.6
10.5
12.6
3.2
3.8
5.9
Distance
(mi)
---
--
--
--
--
---
--
--
--
--
---
--
--
--
--
Other
Modes
---
--
--
--
--
---
--
--
--
--
---
--
--
--
--
---
--
--
--
--
Proposed System
ROW
Trains Other
Type
(ft)
per day Modes
Type
Proposed System
Existing System
ROW
Trains
Type
(ft)
per day
Existing System
Speed
Limit Distance
Facility/ Route
Section (From
- To) (mi)
Type
(mph)
No public transportation recommendations were made for the 2011 Robeson County CTP.
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND RAIL
ROB0004-B
Facility/ Route
NC 71
ROB0003-B
Local ID
Leeper Rd. (SR 1716)
ROB0002-B
PEDESTRIAN
3.7
1.1
Barlow Rd. (SR 1712) to Leeper Rd. (SR
1716)
Hoke County Line to NC 71
1.5
4.4
Cumberland County Line to NC 71
Section (From - To)
Pembroke Planning Boundary to Lumberton
Planning Boundary
Distance
(mi)
20
24
20
24
2
2
2
2
Existing System
Cross-Section
(ft)
lanes
C-13
Existing System
Distance
Side of
Section (From - To)
(mi)
Type
Street
No pedestrian recommendations were made for the 2011 Robeson County CTP
NC 711
Facility/ Route
ROB0001-B
Local ID
BICYCLE
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN
Type
Side of Street
Proposed System
Modes
Other
Other
Cross-Section Modes
Type
Wide Outside
2A
H
Shoulders
Wide Outside
2A
H
Shoulders
Wide Outside
2A
H
Shoulders
Wide Outside
2A
H
Shoulders
Proposed System
APPENDIX 3
AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
AGRICULTURAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
I.
Crop and Pasture Lands
A.
BMPs for Sediment Control
Conservation Tillage System
Critical Area Planting
Diversion
Field Border
Filter Strip
Grade Stabilization Structure
Grassed Waterway
Rock-Lined Waterways or Outlets
Sediment Control Structure
Sod-Based Rotation
Stripcropping
Terrace
Water Control Structure
Pastureland Conversion
B.
BMPs for Nutrient Control
Legumes in Rotation
Soil Testing
Liming
Setting Realistic Crop Yield Goals (determines fertilization rates)
Fertilizer Waste Application (method, rate, and timing)
Sediment Control BMPs
C.
BMPs for Pesticide Control
Alternative Pesticides
Optimize Pesticide Formulation, Amount, Placement, Timing, Frequency
Crop Rotation
Resistant Crop Varieties
Other Cultural or Biological Controls
Optimize Crop Planting Time
Plant Pest Quarantines
Proper Disposal of Obsolete Pesticides and Containers
Certification of Applicators
Sediment Control BMPs
II.
Animal Production (esp. Confined Animal Operations)
BMPs for Bacteria and Nutrient Control
Grade Stabilization and Nutrient Control
Heavy Use Area Protection
Livestock Exclusion
Spring Development
Stock Trails and Walkways
Trough and Tank
Waste Management System
Waste Storage Pond
Waste Storage Structure
Waste Treatment Lagoon
Land Application of Waste
Water Control Structure
Source: North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
FORESTRY BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
1.
Properly design and place access roads, skid trails, and loading areas on forestland.
a.
b.
c.
d.
Avoid streambanks and channels except when crossing streams.
Install water management structures and techniques.
Stabilize bare soil areas.
Prevent steep slopes on roads and trails.
2.
Designate streamside management zones (SMZ) which are undisturbed strips of vegetation
parallel and adjacent to the stream channels.
3.
Avoid placing debris in stream channels (Stream Obstruction Law).
4.
Use practices which minimize soil exposure when reforesting.
5.
Use environmentally safe procedures when applying chemicals in forested areas.
6.
Train forestry related personnel in nonpoint source pollution control methods.
Source: NC Division of Forest Resources.
APPENDIX 4
BROWNFIELD SITES GENERAL DESCRIPTION
There may be brownfield sites within Robeson County. A brownfield is a property, the expansion,
redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a
hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
estimates that there are more than 450,000 brownfields in the U.S. Cleaning up and reinvesting
in brownfield properties increases local tax bases, facilitates job growth, utilizes existing
infrastructure, and both improves and protects the environment.
Clean-up of these properties will enhance economic opportunities in Robeson County, increase
adjacent property values, and stabilize land use within the area. It should be understood that
brownfield clean-up and redevelopment often poses the following challenges:
!
Environmental Liability Concerns. Developers and property owners want to manage
past and future liabilities associated with the property’s environmental history.
!
Financial Barriers. Private lenders are often reluctant to give loans for potentially
impaired lands. In some cases, clean-up costs for a property may ultimately be more than
the property’s value.
!
Clean-up Considerations. A brownfields redevelopment timeline may take longer than
typical real estate development due to environmental assessment and clean-up activities.
!
Reuse Planning. A reuse plan based on community goals or sound economic and
environmental information (e.g., market potential) may be lacking.
An action which must be taken early in the potential redevelopment of a brownfield site is
identifying the presence and extent of contamination, essential to evaluating risk, limiting liability,
and determining an appropriate reuse. A Phase I environmental assessment should be performed
to identify the presence, type, and extent of contamination that may exist on-site. If required, a
Phase II assessment may be conducted to sample or test for specific hazards that may have been
identified in Phase I and to help develop a remedial action plan. EPA grant funding is available to
assist with the brownfield process, including clean-up.
Brownfield redevelopment typically follows one of the following two scenarios:
!
Private Redevelopment. In a typical, privately driven redevelopment scenario, a
developer takes responsibility for the entire redevelopment process but may require some
limited public investment to first define the extent of contamination on-site. The first step
is for the developer to take title of the land via purchase or conveyance, and plan for the
property’s reuse. Given the developer’s financial resources, private financing will need to
be identified either through debt or equity. Public funding, such as an EPA Brownfields
Assessment grant, might be used to identify and quantify the property’s contamination and
define the environmental clean-up required. The developer completes all environmental
clean-up activities, meeting the state’s voluntary clean-up program requirements and other
applicable federal or state regulations. Once clean-up is considered complete by the
appropriate regulatory authority, the property may be redeveloped.
!
Public-Private Redevelopment. A public-private partnership is an agreement between
at least one public-sector entity and one private-sector organization to combine resources
and efforts to accomplish a common goal. The level of participation can vary from all public
to nearly all private. In typical public-private partnerships associated with brownfields
restoration, the public entity usually sponsors the project and provides some initial funding,
often for assessments that remove contamination uncertainties and for infrastructure to
support development; a private-sector developer then funds and manages the predevelopment and construction process.
The composition of the public-private partnership is unique for each brownfields project.
Public-private partnerships are often successful because initial public investments provide
the necessary incentives for private-sector development and operation.
These
collaborations reduce the financial burden on the public sector while accelerating property
clean-up, redevelopment, and community revitalization. Source: EPA.
APPENDIX 5
ROBESON COUNTY
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
FOR PREPARATION OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WITH A HEALTH & WELLNESS COMPONENT
Introduction
Robeson County has initiated the preparation of a Comprehensive Plan with a Health & Wellness
Component. The final document will provide a creative and dynamic plan to guide future long-term
growth and development throughout the next fifteen to twenty years. The intent of this project
is to draft a plan that will establish a solid foundation for the ongoing planning program and to
serve as the primary policy guide for short and long-range planning, zoning, and development
related decision-making within the Robeson County planning area.
The initial step in the planning process is the adoption of this Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) which
defines a collaborative effort with the public. Approval of the CPP was accomplished on August 5,
2013.
Comprehensive Plan Drafting Committee
The Robeson County Planning Board will supervise the preparation of the draft Comprehensive
Plan. The County’s staff will serve in an advisory capacity to the Planning Board. The plan will be
drafted by Holland Consulting Planners, Inc., the county’s consultant.
Meetings
The Planning Board will conduct approximately five (5) work sessions to prepare the draft
Comprehensive Plan. All meetings will be advertised and open to the public. At a minimum, the
following meetings will be conducted:
•
Monthly (or at a minimum semi-monthly) meetings of the Planning Board. Five (5) work
sessions will be conducted. At each Planning Board meeting, the location, date, and time
of the succeeding meeting will be determined.
•
Special meetings, as may be called at the discretion of the Chairperson.
•
A meeting to present the draft plan to the Board of Commissioners.
•
A public hearing for consideration of the draft Comprehensive Plan with a Health & Wellness
Component.
Public Notification
To ensure that the public is informed of meeting times and has access to the draft Comprehensive
Plan throughout this process, the following steps will be taken:
•
Notices of all CPAC meetings will be posted on the Robeson County Comprehensive Plan
website.
•
A sign-up sheet will be placed in the County Administration Building. Individuals who place
their names and addresses on this list will be mailed/e-mailed notices announcing meeting
times for review of the Comprehensive Plan.
Dissemination of Information
The following procedures will be utilized to ensure the availability of information:
•
Copies of the draft plan will be placed at the County Administration Building and the County
Planning Department in the Robeson County Centralized Services Building for citizen review,
as well as being available at all meetings to ensure that the citizens in attendance can
review items being discussed.
•
The draft Plan will be posted on the Robeson County Comprehensive Plan website as it is
developed so that citizens may either review the document online or print it out.
Information regarding the location of the document online will be included in all published
notices of Planning Board meetings.
•
Sections of the proposed plan will be provided to the Planning Board prior to any meetings
at which the draft plan section(s) will be discussed.
Public Comment
Throughout the process, the public will have the following opportunities for input:
•
At each Planning Board meeting, time will be allocated for public comments and/or
questions.
•
At any time during the preparation of the draft Plan, the public may obtain information
and/or offer comments via e-mail.
•
The public hearing will provide additional opportunities for public input and questions.
Schedule
The Comprehensive Plan planning process will utilize the following schedule:
Project Task
Schedule
Issue Notice to Proceed
July 2013
Project Initiation
July - August 2013
Research and Analysis/
Plan Development
August - December 2013
Public Hearing
January 2014

Robeson County Comp Plan

Transcription

Similar documents

using campuscruiser

University - Voices of Central Pennsylvania

ROBESON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY A 501©(3) CORPORTATION

RCCSTUDENT Quick Start Guide 11112013

Sources: I. Willie O`Ree a. http://missioncreep.com/ mw/oree.html II

Regional Agricultural Regional Agricultural

Aware October 2013 - Public Schools of Robeson County

Document - Robeson County Humane Society

2016 Rumba on the Lumber

2`f - Lumbee