Biodiversity of the River Meuse floodplain

Transcription

Biodiversity of the River Meuse floodplain
Biodiversity of the River Meuse
floodplain
in the context of the Common Meuse
restoration programme
Kris Van Looy
Research Institute for Nature and Forest,
Brussels, Belgium
Restoration of river habitats and species
1. Common Meuse floodplain biodiversity
2. River restoration and reference conditions
• Hydromorphological alterations
• Habitat fragmentation & species isolation
• Restoration concept
• Reference conditions
• Restoration experiences
3. Indicators floodplain biodiversity
• River corridor plants in isolation
• Flood dispersal determines genetic structure
• Modelling approach
• Indicator favourable conservation status
Kris Van Looy
1
The River Meuse
Introduction
River type:
– rain-fed river
– Source altitude 409 m
– Length 900 km
– catchment area: 34,500km²
- 6 reaches
– Common Meuse reach km
450-500
– Natura2000 B:floodplain
meadows/forests, NL: river
bed
Floodplain diversity river reaches
soortverdeling ecoregio's
Log species richness
Meuse reaches:
reaches:
I: Lorraine
II: Ardennen
III: Common Meuse
IV: Peelhorst Meuse
V: Sand Meuse
VI: Tidal Meuse
3
2,5
2
3-5
5
4
3
2
1,5
1
1
0,5
0
I
II
III IV V
Meuse reaches
1
Ecoregions:
1:
Fluviatiel
floodplain meadow
species
2: Kempen
riparian ground
beetles
3:
2
3
4
5
6 Brabant
riparian
macroinvertebrates
4:
Kalkstreek
Maastrajecten
5: Ardennen, Vogezen, Eifel
VI
Van Looy ea. 2006 Journal of Biogeography
2
Hydromorphological character river
Meuse
• free-flowing meandering river
3000
stretch
2500
• rain-fed
river (10-3000m³/s)
2000
• channelized
bed, gravel
mining
1500
•deeply incised river bed
1000
• disrupted floodplains (winter
dikes)
500
0
5/11/02
5/03/03
5/07/03
5/11/03
5/03/04
Kris Van Looy & Alexander Van Braeckel
Hydromorphological alterations: bed incision
AVERAGE BED ELEVATION
Common Meuse
45
1937; GM 40 m
1947; GM 40 m
1959; GM 40 m
1967
40
1970
35
1984; Peil8495.xls
1995; Meander
2004; Meander
2007; Meander
30
25
Strong incision by gravel
mining
20
55
53
51
49
47
45
43
41
39
37
35
33
31
29
27
25
23
21
19
17
15
15
elevation [m+NAP]
1976
Gradual lowering, still
going on
rkm Meuse
Kris Van Looy & Alexander Van Braeckel
3
Habitat fragmentation
Habitats are fragmented by
river regulation and land
use intensification
Flood frequency
~ species composition
&
Species diversity
Van Looy et al.
al. 2003
Belgian Journal of Botany
Location of sampled forest fragments in the Meuse valley
Restoration concept
Hoge climaxvegetatie
Kris Van Looy & Alexander Van Braeckel
4
Hydromorphological references
5
Hydromorfological, historical and actual reference
Hoge climaxvegetatie
Restoration experiences
Pilot projects showed a
restoration of hydromorphology,
habitats and species
Kris Van Looy & Alexander Van Braeckel
6
Hydromorphological aspects in the
restoration of river habitats and species
River bed recovers
•in elevation
•in habitat
•in species
• Waterplants
Potamogeton
nodosus,
ranunculus fluitans
• Dragonflies
gomphus flavipes
Pilot project
Kris Van Looy & Alexander Van Braeckel
Habitat restoration
November 2003
•
July 2004
7
Species recolonisation in pilot projects
plot 1
Amara aenea
Lionychus
quadrillum
Bembidion
atrocoeruleum
Bembidion
punctulatum
Bembidion
tetracolum
plot 2
Bembidion
atrocoeruleum
Amara aenea
Bembidion
femoratum
Bembidion
decorum
Bembidion
decorum
plot 3
Bembidion
atrocoeruleum
Bembidion
tetracolum
Bembidion
femoratum
Bembidion
decorum
Amara aenea
Bembidion
femoratum
Lionychus
quadrillum
Bembidion
tetracolum
Bembidion
punctulatum
Floodplain diversity and
species isolation
Species diversity ~ patch area
rare river corridor plants in isolated relics
8
Genetics of species recovery
• Annual species (Erisymum cheiranthoides)
metapopulation dynamics
• Mixed annual-perennial pioneer species
(Sisymbrium chrysanthum) shifting cloud with
sattelite populations
• Perennial floodplain species (Origanum
vulgare) patchy population
P. Breyne (Inbo), O. Honnay, H. Jacquemyn (Univ. Leuven)
Floodplain conditions in modelling
Strong gradient
• alcalinity
• Salt concentration
– Flood influence
pH
• pH ~ distance, contact
river
• EC ~ flood frequency,
texture
– vegetation
• composition/type
• Spatial and temporal shift
Zoutconcentratie
– Modelling
• Different types
• Patches in space and time
9
Modelling approach
• Dry river grasslands:4 types
•
•
•
•
Overbank gravel deposition: Alysso-sedion albi
Overbank sand deposition: Sedo-thymetum pulegioides
Gravel deposition floodplain: Thero-airion
Sand deposition floodplain: Medicagini-avenetum pubescens
Evaluation
Fauna
Bird
Target species
parameter
Habitat type
Marsh harrier
area & frequency
Marsh
Night heron
Kingfisher
Side water
length & area
Little plover
Mammal
Flora
Steep wall
Gravel bar
Beaver
bank length
Isolated lake
Otter
area
Marshland
Amfibian
Tree frog
area & frequency
Isolated lake
Insect
Gomphus
bank length
Running water
frequency
Nevengeul
Potamogeton nodosus
Ranunculus fluitans
Ondiepe bedding
Inula brittanica
Dynamisch grasland
Euphorbia esula
Dynamisch grasland
Corrigiola litoralis
Gravel bar
Salvia pratensis
Hogeweerdgrasland
Galeopsis angustifolia
High gravel bar
Senecio erucifolius
Hogeweerdruigte
Eryngium campestre
Dry river grassland
Thymus pulegioides
Dry river grassland
Corydalis solida
Hardwood forest
10
Thank you
and welcome
11
Welcome to the future
12

Similar documents