Providing Another LENS on Cardiovascular Surgery Using
Transcription
Providing Another LENS on Cardiovascular Surgery Using
Providing Another LENS on Cardiovascular Surgery Using RIPCHORD A self-assessment tool allowing cardiac teams to identify the nature and frequency of flow disruptions in the operating room Olivia D. Crowe, BS Doctoral Student, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Jennifer Cabrera, BS Doctoral Student, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Tara Cohen, BA Doctoral Student, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Erin Pohl, BA Doctoral Student, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Kristen Welsh, BA, BS Doctoral Student, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Albert J. Boquet, PhD Professor, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Scott Shappell, PhD Professor and Chair, Dept. of Human Factors and Systems, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Background Architectural study sought to develop an initial methodology for identifying and classifying flow disruptions in the cardiac OR 10 cardiac operations observed 1,080 observations Development of a robust taxonomy six categories: communication, usability, physical layout, environmental hazards, general interruptions, and equipment failures RIPCHORD Realizing Improved Patient Care through Human-centered Operating Room Design RIPCHORD 1.0 Observational Taxonomy Communication (verbal and non-verbal) Poor Communication Lack of Response Confusion Simultaneous Communication Non-essential Communication Environmental Noise Usability Computer Equipment Surfaces Barriers Packaging Data Entry (non-computer) Layout Connector Positioning Equipment Positioning Furniture Positioning Permanent Structures Positioning Inadequate Use of Space Impeded Visibility Interruptions Phone Calls Pages Non-essential Personnel Spilling/Dropping Items Teaching Moments Outside Distractions Shift Changes Searching Activity Common Information Environmental Hazards Slipping/Falling Sharps Crushing Equipment Failure Surgeons Equipment Anesthesia Equipment Perfusion Equipment RIPCHORD 2.0 Observational Taxonomy Communication (verbal and non-verbal) Poor Communication Lack of Response Confusion Simultaneous Communication Non-essential Communication Environmental Noise Ambiguous Communication Lack of Sharing Usability Computer Equipment Surfaces Barriers Packaging Data Entry (non-computer) Layout Connector Positioning Equipment Positioning Furniture Positioning Permanent Structures Positioning Inadequate Use of Space Impeded Visibility Interruptions Phone Calls/Pages/Texts Non-essential Personnel Spilling/Dropping Items Teaching Moments Outside Distractions Shift Changes Searching Activity Equipment/Supplies Wires/Tubing Coordination and Planning Personnel Rotation/Scheduling Personnel Not Available Common Information Procedural Failure Planning and Preparation Environmental Hazards Slipping/Falling Sharps Crushing Fluids Contaminated Equipment Equipment Failure Surgeons Equipment Anesthesia Equipment Perfusion Equipment General Equipment Flow Disruption Events that disrupt the flow or natural progression of the procedure Distract attention away from the primary task Increase the likelihood of errors which can cause sentinel events to occur in the OR Palmer, G., et. al., (2013) Methods: Data Management LENS Database (14,070) - Good Practices - Hazards - Preferences or Variations - Time Hazards (5,290) Eliminated Duplicates (3,956) Categorized/Coded (1,334) - RIPCHORD 24.59% (298) Results: RIPCHORD Frequency of Flow Disruptions by Major Categories 0.28 0.24 0.20 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.02 Communication Coordination Usability Layout Environmental Hazards Interruptions (0ther) Equipment Issues Results: RIPCHORD Frequency of Flow Disruptions by Coordination Subcategory 0.50 0.18 0.17 0.09 0.04 Planning/Preparation Scheduling 0.02 Procedural Failure Personnel Rotation Common Information Personnel Not Available Results: RIPCHORD Frequency of Flow Disruptions by Coordination Subcategory Planning/Preparation “After the patient was prepped and draped the PA said that the patient needed to be pulled down. Much more difficult and potential risk for contamination.” 0.50 0.18 0.17 0.09 0.04 Planning/Preparation Scheduling 0.02 Procedural Failure Personnel Rotation Common Information Personnel Not Available Results: RIPCHORD Frequency of Flow Disruptions by Coordination Subcategory 0.50 Common Information Surgical fellow to scrub nurse, ‘do you have the real rib spreaders?’ after he was handed the incorrect equipment. ‘No, not the chest spreaders.’ 0.18 0.17 0.09 0.04 Planning/Preparation Scheduling 0.02 Procedural Failure Personnel Rotation Common Information Personnel Not Available Results: RIPCHORD Frequency of Flow Disruptions by Coordination Subcategory 0.50 Personnel Not Available “Resident (anesthesia) was struggling with the line placement. Attending was not in room. Needed more supervision.” 0.18 0.17 0.09 0.04 Planning/Preparation Scheduling 0.02 Procedural Failure Personnel Rotation Common Information Personnel Not Available Results: RIPCHORD Frequency of Flow Disruptions by Coordination Subcategory Procedural Failure “Resident and fellow are shaving the leg. AA told them to stop (because patient was not draped and risk for cross-contamination and SSI).” 0.50 0.18 0.17 0.09 0.04 Planning/Preparation Scheduling 0.02 Procedural Failure Personnel Rotation Common Information Personnel Not Available Results: RIPCHORD Frequency of Flow Disruptions by Communication Subcategory 0.33 0.18 0.15 0.13 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.01 Ineffective Communication Lack of Response Lack of Sharing Ambiguous Communication Confusion Simultaneous Non-essential Communication Communication Environmental Noise Results: RIPCHORD Frequency of Flow Disruptions by Communication Subcategory Lack of Sharing “Anesthesia. “What are we giving there?” CRNA to attending anesthesiologist' inquiry as to what medication the attending was giving. The attending had not shared with her up front what it was.” 0.33 0.18 0.15 0.13 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.01 Ineffective Communication Lack of Response Lack of Sharing Ambiguous Communication Confusion Simultaneous Non-essential Communication Communication Environmental Noise Results: RIPCHORD Frequency of Flow Disruptions by Communication Subcategory Lack of Response “Surgeon asked to see the TEE. Neither anesthesia resident heard him. He called AR1 by name and asked him to move the monitor so that he could see it.” 0.33 0.18 0.15 0.13 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.01 Ineffective Communication Lack of Response Lack of Sharing Ambiguous Communication Confusion Simultaneous Non-essential Communication Communication Environmental Noise Results: RIPCHORD Frequency of Flow Disruptions by Communication Subcategory Confusion “AR1 “CVP high, stuck.” AR2 “What’s high buddy?” AR1 “CVP here what was our number again?” Perfusion student “you mean ACT?” AR1 “yes” Perfusion student “112.” 0.33 0.18 0.15 0.13 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.01 Ineffective Communication Lack of Response Lack of Sharing Ambiguous Communication Confusion Simultaneous Non-essential Communication Communication Environmental Noise Results: RIPCHORD Frequency of Flow Disruptions by Communication Subcategory 0.33 0.18 Ambiguous Communication “Surgeon “Where you at, 25? 250?” Perfusion “At 2” Surgeon “Were you at 250 before?” Perfusion “No at 2” Surgeon, somewhat exasperated “200?” Perfusion “Yes” Surgeon “How much is in?” Perfusion “300 in” Surgeon “Off on plege” Perfusion “Off on plege.” 0.15 0.13 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.01 Ineffective Communication Lack of Response Lack of Sharing Ambiguous Communication Confusion Simultaneous Non-essential Communication Communication Environmental Noise Results: RIPCHORD Frequency of Flow Disruptions by Interruption Subcategory 0.33 0.30 0.16 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.00 Phone Calls/Pages/Texts Non-essential Personnel Spilling/Dropping Items Teaching Moments Outside Distractions Searching Activity Medical Alert Equipment/Supplies Results: RIPCHORD Frequency of Flow Disruptions by Interruption Subcategory 0.30 Equipment/Supplies “Surgeon to perfusion “Do you have a smaller veinous cannula?” Circulator “Uh, smaller veinous cannula? Yes, I have to run out & get that.” Left & came back “This is a 2836.” Surgeon “all right, we’ll use that.” 0.33 0.16 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.00 Phone Calls/Pages/Texts Non-essential Personnel Spilling/Dropping Items Teaching Moments Outside Distractions Searching Activity Medical Alert Equipment/Supplies Results: RIPCHORD Frequency of Flow Disruptions by Interruption Subcategory 0.30 0.16 Spilling/Dropping Items “The anesthesia team removed the “batwing” from the head of the patient’s bed. As they removed it the TEE probe fell (it had been perched on the smart pump). The probe did not fall out of the patient’s mouth but made quite a jerk as it landed on the floor. ” 0.33 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.00 Phone Calls/Pages/Texts Non-essential Personnel Spilling/Dropping Items Teaching Moments Outside Distractions Searching Activity Medical Alert Equipment/Supplies Results: RIPCHORD Frequency of Flow Disruptions by Interruption Subcategory 0.30 0.16 Teaching Moments “Delay in connecting perfusion tubing by scrub nurse who wasn't certain how to do it. Had adequate(appropriate)supervisi on and direction from senior nurse who was in the room appears that she was in training.” 0.33 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.00 Phone Calls/Pages/Texts Non-essential Personnel Spilling/Dropping Items Teaching Moments Outside Distractions Searching Activity Medical Alert Equipment/Supplies Conclusions Flow disruptions observed in the CVOR Largely populated in Coordination (28%), Communication (24%) and Interruptions (20%) categories largest percentage accounted for in Coordination by “Planning/Preparation” (60%) largest percentage accounted for in Communication by “Lack of Sharing” (33%) largest percentage accounted for in Interruptions by “Equipment/Supplies” (33%) Conclusions Results compared to the original architectural study Heavily represented by Layout (31%), Interruptions (24%) and Usability (20%) categories Specifically looking at architecture and design Communication accounted for 15% Conclusions RIPCHORD Validation modification required RIPCHORD 3.0 Current Research: Interdisciplinary Study to identify flow disruptions threatening specific clinical specialties of the cardiothoracic surgical team RIPCHORD: Newest Edition Observational Taxonomy Communication (verbal and non-verbal) Computer Design Equipment Design Surfaces Design Barriers Design Packaging Design Data Entry (non-computer) Design Layout Ineffective Communication Lack of Response Confusion Simultaneous Communication Non-essential Communication Environmental Noise Lack of Sharing Usability Interruptions (Other) Connector Positioning Equipment Positioning Furniture Positioning Permanent Structures Positioning Inadequate Space Wires/Tubing Distractions Outside Distractions Teaching Moments Searching Activity Alerts Equipment/Supplies Slipping/Falling Spilling/Dropping Items Interaction with Biohazards Coordination and Planning Personnel Rotation Personnel Not Available Common Information Protocol Failure Scheduling Charting/Documentation Planning and Preparation Equipment Issues Surgeons Equipment Anesthesia Equipment Perfusion Equipment General Equipment RIPCHORD: Newest Edition Observational Taxonomy Communication (verbal and non-verbal) Computer Design Equipment Design Surfaces Design Barriers Design Packaging Design Data Entry (non-computer) Design Layout Ineffective Communication Lack of Response Confusion Simultaneous Communication Non-essential Communication Environmental Noise Lack of Sharing Usability Interruptions (Other) Connector Positioning Equipment Positioning Furniture Positioning Permanent Structures Positioning Inadequate Space Wires/Tubing Distractions Outside Distractions Teaching Moments Searching Activity Alerts Equipment/Supplies Slipping/Falling Spilling/Dropping Items Interaction with Biohazards Coordination and Planning Personnel Rotation Personnel Not Available Common Information Protocol Failure Scheduling Charting/Documentation Planning and Preparation Equipment Issues Surgeons Equipment Anesthesia Equipment Perfusion Equipment General Equipment Thank You Questions? Contacts: Olivia Crowe, [email protected] Scott Shappell, [email protected] Bert Boquet, [email protected]