Agenda and Reports

Transcription

Agenda and Reports

District of Maple Ridge
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
March 3, 2014
1:00 p.m.
Council Chamber
Committee of the Whole is the initial venue for review of issues. No voting
takes place on bylaws or resolutions. A decision is made to send an item to
Council for debate and vote or to send an item back to staff for more
information or clarification before proceeding to Council.
Note: If required, there will be a 15-minute break at 3:00 p.m.
Chair: Acting Mayor
1.
DELEGATIONS/STAFF PRESENTATIONS – (10 minutes each)
1:00 p.m.
1.1
Affordable Housing Presentation
- Linda Meyer, A.A.B.A.P.B.D.
1.2
Kanaka Environmental & Educational Partnership Society (KEEPS) Update
- Ross Davies, Education Coordinator
1.3
Maple Ridge Concert Band Delegation
- Gale Yip, President, Colin Murray, Treasurer and Tom Walker, Director
2.
PUBLIC WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Note:
Owners and/or Agents of Development Applications may be permitted
to speak to their applications with a time limit of 10 minutes.
Note: The following items have been numbered to correspond with the Council
Agenda:
Committee of the Whole Agenda
March 3, 2014
Page 2 of 4
1101 2014-001-RZ, 23753 and 23771 130 Avenue, RS-2 to R-2
Staff report dated March 3, 2014 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7062-2014 to rezone from RS-2 (One Family Suburban
Residential) to R-2 (Urban Residential District) to permit 18 single family lots
zoned R-2 and a neighbourhood park lot be given first reading and that the
applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, F and G of
the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with the
information required for a Subdivision application.
1102 2013-052-RZ, 23227 Dogwood Avenue, Zoning Bylaw Text Amendment
Amending Bylaw No. 7003-2013 to allow a site-specific text amendment to
the C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) zone to permit apartment use and
parking as a permitted principal use, increased density for residential rental
units and retail commercial use for a mixed-use commercial and residential
development be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public
Hearing.
1103 2013-091-RZ, 20395 123 Avenue, RS-1 to RS-1b
Amending Bylaw No. 7035-2013 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential) to
permit future subdivision into two single family lots be given second reading
and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
1104 Municipal Equipment Purchase and Install – One Recycling Baler and
Conveyor
Staff report dated March 3, 2014 recommending that the contract for the
design, supply and install of a Two Ram Horizontal Baler System including a
conveyor be awarded to Machinex and that the Corporate Officer be
authorized to execute the contract.
1105 Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 156/14, Bosonworth
Avenue and Carmichael Street
Staff report dated March 3, 2014 recommending that the Corporate Officer be
authorized to sign and seal Excess Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC
156/14.
March 3, 2014
Page 3 of 4
3.
FINANCIAL AND CORPORATE SERVICES (including Fire and Police)
1131 Network Equipment Replacement
Staff report dated March 3, 2014 recommending that the contract for the
replacement of network core routers and edge switches be awarded to
Spyders Inc. and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the
contract.
1132 Server Replacement
Staff report dated March 3, 2014 recommending that the contract for
replacement of District servers and required server infrastructure be awarded
to Dell and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract.
4.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND RECREATION SERVICES
1151 Maple Ridge Concert Band Association Request
Staff report dated March 3, 2014 recommending that the request by the
Maple Ridge Concert Band Association to complete various works on the
Maple Ridge Bandstand and to fundraise during the 20th anniversary
celebration event be approved.
5.
CORRESPONDENCE
1171
6.
1181
OTHER ISSUES
March 3, 2014
Page 4 of 4
7.
ADJOURNMENT
8.
COMMUNITY FORUM
COMMUNITY FORUM
The Community Forum provides the public with an opportunity to ask questions of
Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing
by-laws that have not yet reached conclusion.
Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff
members.
Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to speak or ask questions (a second
opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the
podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to the
individual members of Council. The total time for this Forum is limited to 15
minutes.
If a question cannot be answered, the speaker will be advised when and how a
response will be given.
Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings and
delegations. The public may also make their views known to Council by writing or
via email and by attending open houses, workshops and information meetings.
Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to have a voice in the future
of this community.
For more information on these opportunities contact:
Clerk’s Department at 604-463-5221 or [email protected]
Mayor and Council at [email protected]
Checked by:________________
Date: ________________
TO:
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEETING DATE: March 03, 2014
FILE NO:
2014-001-RZ
MEETING:
C of W
First Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7062-2014
23753 and 23771 130 Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-2 (One Family Suburban
Residential) to R-2 (Urban Residential District). The developer is proposing 18 single family lots
zoned R-2 (Urban Residential District) and a “Neighbourhood Park” lot serviced by a 15.0 metres
wide cul-de-sac, as shown in Appendix E. The development proposal is subject to the policies and
densities in the Silver Valley Area Plan.
The subject site (Appendix A) located in between the River Village and Horse Hamlet (outside both) of
the Silver Valley Area Plan, consists of two lots that have multiple OCP designations (i.e. MediumHigh and Low Density Residential, Conservation, Open Space and Neighbourhood Park) in varying
proportions. The proposal meets the densities permitted in the Silver Valley Area Plan, however this
development application needs an OCP amendment to protect the natural features, adjust the
conservation boundaries and reconfigure/re-distribute the various designations.
To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the
development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether
consultation is required with specifically:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the
case of a Municipal Official Community Plan;
The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
First Nations;
School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards; and
The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies.
and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this
matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the
District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and;
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7062-2014 be given first reading; and
1101
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, F and G of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 – 1999, along with the information required for a
Subdivision application.
DISCUSSION:
a)
Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
Joel Lycan
FIRST COLONIAL INVESTORS LTD.
Legal Description:
Lot: 1, Block: 14, Section: SE28, Township: 12, Plan:
NWP12420; PID: 003-078-116, and
Lot: 2, Section: 28, Township: 12, Plan: NWP12420;
PID 009-705-201
OCP:
Existing:
Med-High Density Residential, Conservation, Neighbourhood
Park, Low Density Residential and Open Space
Med-High Density Residential, Conservation and Neighbourhood
Park
Proposed:
Zoning:
RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
R-2 (Urban Residential District)
Existing:
Proposed:
Surrounding Uses:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Use:
Single Family Residential and Conservation
Zone:
Designation: Med-High Density Residential, Conservation, Neighbourhood
Park, Low Density Residential and Eco-Cluster
Use:
Single Family Residential and 130th Avenue
Zone:
Designation: Low Density Residential, Conservation and Park
Use:
Single Family Residential
Zone:
Designation: Med-High Density Residential, Low Density Residential and Open
Space
Use:
Zone:
Designation: Med-High Density Residential, Conservation, Neighbourhood
Park, Low Density Residential and Eco-Cluster
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Consolidated Site Area:
Access:
Servicing requirement:
Single Family Residential, Conservation and Neighbourhood
Park
1.215 hectares (3.0 acres)
130th Avenue
Urban Standard
-2-
b)
Site and Project Description:
The subject site located in between the River Village and Horse Hamlet (outside both) of the Silver
Valley Area Plan consists of two lots that will need consolidation, neighbourhood park land
acquisition and subdivision. This area is surrounded by existing suburban single family lots and
conservation lands. Of the two lots under consideration, each lot currently contains a single family
house, which will be demolished as a condition of final reading. The western property (23753 130th
Avenue) shows steeper slopes (greater than 30%) along the south-west corner (west of the existing
single family house), closer to 130th Avenue (see environmental map attached as Appendix C). The
steeper areas on site are anticipated to be either dedicated for conservation or placed under a “NoBuild/No Disturb Restrictive Covenant” for slope protection, subject to future assessment, prior to
second reading. Both the properties are within the Fraser Sewer Area. All the standard off-site road
and servicing upgrades abutting the development site (curb, sidewalk, gutter, street trees, street
lights, etc.) will be required as a condition of final reading. A 15.0 metre wide municipal road ending
with a temporary turn-around will need to be dedicated as a condition of final subdivision approval.
The subject sites are not located in or near a known archeological resource according to Provincial or
local records. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance
with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and
comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed
analysis and a further report will be required prior to Second Reading. Such assessment may impact
proposed lot boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require
application for further development permits.
c)
Planning Analysis:
Silver Valley Area Plan:
The development site (Appendix A) is located within the Silver Valley Area Plan and shows multiple
designations in varying proportions, i.e. Medium-High and Low Density Residential, Conservation,
Open Space and Neighbourhood Park, as shown in Appendix B and the table below:
1
Address
23771 130th Ave
2
23753 130th Ave
OCP designation
Medium-High Density Residential
Low Density Residential
Neighbourhood Park
Open Space
Conservation
Medium-High Density Residential
Conservation
Neighbourhood Park
Proportion
39%
26%
24%
9%
2%
45%
54%
1%
Based on the Silver Valley Area Plan designations stated above, the “Medium-high density”
residential designation for hamlets would support 18-40 units per net hectare while the “Low
density” residential designation would support 8-15 units per net hectare. Based on preliminary
assessment of the existing OCP designations for the subject sites, total unit yield for the net
consolidated developable lot area is around 18 lots. The proposed preliminary subdivision plan
shows 18 lots (Appendix E).
-3-
The proposed R-2 zone correlates with the “Medium-High Density Residential” designation of the
Silver Valley Area Plan. Between the two existing designations, only a small portion is proposed to be
amended to support the R-2 zone. Justification provided for this is that most of the proposed lots are
anticipated to be larger than the minimum lot size for the R-2 zone. An OCP amendment is required
to allow for the R-2 zone on the portion designated “Low Density Residential”, for the development
site. The proposed overall density complies with the permitted density in the Area Plan.
The development proposes a larger area for the “neighbourhood park” (3233 m2) than what is
designated as per the OCP (3035.14 m2). With the proposed designation change, the neighbourhood
will benefit from a larger park area. The “Open Space” designation on the bigger property will be
satisfied through the “neighbourhood park” lot. Open spaces in the Silver Valley Area Plan are meant
to be linked through developments to form a network of greenways throughout Silver Valley area.
The subject site is anticipated to achieve pedestrian linkages from 130th Avenue to properties on the
north towards 132nd Avenue, through the proposed neighbourhood park on the subject site and the
conservation lands and right-of-way on the northern property (23810 132nd Avenue).
The development of Silver Valley is based on principles associated with achieving a complete
community with good pedestrian linkages. Guiding principles within the Silver Valley Area Plan form
the foundation that governs the future development of the Silver Valley Area.

Principle 3.1.1 states “Ensure significant environmental features of the site are protected or
enhanced” and “Ensure that the ‘land informs development’-development will be limited to
suitable sites and follow guiding criteria”.
Pursuant to the principle above, some steeper slopes on the subject site need to be protected, either
dedicated or placed under a “No-Build/No Disturb Restrictive Covenant” for slope protection, as
shown on the environmental map attached as Appendix D. The “Conservation” designated portion
will be met through the protection of these steep slopes in the south-west corner and in the
proposed “neighbourhood park” area (see Appendix D).
Although the proposal needs some changes in the existing OCP designations, the intention is not to
increase the density. The OCP amendment is required to protect the natural features, adjust the
conservation boundaries, reconfigure/re-distribute the designations and increase the size of the
neighbourhood park, to achieve a feasible future subdivision of the lands as shown in Appendix E.
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the properties located at 23753 and 23771 130th
Avenue from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to R-2 (Urban Residential District) to permit a
future subdivision of 18 single family lots and a neighbourhood park lot.
Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance
Permit application. This will be discussed in a future Council report.
Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the OCP, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is
required for all developments and building permits within 50 metres of the top of bank of all
watercourses and wetlands. The purpose of the Watercourse Protection Development Permit is to
ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian
areas.
-4-
Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the OCP, a Natural Features Development Permit application is required
for all development and subdivision activity or building permits for:
All areas designated Conservation on Schedule “B” or all areas within 50 metres of an
area designated Conservation on Schedule “B”, or on Figures 2, 3 and 4 in the Silver
Valley Area Plan;
All lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 %;
All floodplain areas and forest lands identified on Natural Features Schedule “C”



to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment and
for development that is protected from hazardous conditions.
Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting will be required for this application. Prior to Second Reading the
applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Policy 6.20.
d)
Interdepartmental Implications:
In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input, will be sought
from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
Engineering Department;
Operations Department;
Building Department;
Fire Department;
Parks Department;
School District; and
Canada Post.
Parks & Leisure Services Department:
A referral was sent to the Parks and Leisure Services Department to determine the suitability and
size of the proposed “Neighbourhood Park” lot as this will involve acquisition of these lands by the
District. Details of this will be discussed in the second reading report.
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not
been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation
of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take
place between First and Second Reading.
e) Early and Ongoing Consultation:
In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an Official Community
Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early
posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the District’s website, together with an invitation to the
public to comment.
-5-
f)
Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 – 1999 as amended:
1.
2.
3.
4.
An OCP Application (Schedule A);
A Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F);
A Natural Features Development Permit Application (Schedule G);
A Subdivision Application.
The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the
assessment of the proposal progresses.
CONCLUSION:
The development proposal is in compliance with the densities permitted in the Silver Valley Area
Plan. OCP amendment is required to protect the natural features, adjust the conservation
boundaries, reconfigure/re-distribute the designations, and increase the size of the neighbourhood
park, to achieve a functional and feasible future subdivision of the lands. It is, therefore,
recommended that Council grant First Reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7062-2014 (Appendix
C), subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to Second Reading.
The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations
governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must
be approved by the District of Maple Ridge’s Approving Officer.
“Original signed by Rasika Acharya”__________________
Prepared by:
Rasika Acharya, B-Arch, M-Tech, UD, LEED® AP, MCIP, RPP
Planner
“Original signed by Christine Carter”__________________
Approved by:
Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”_____________________
Approved by:
Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule”____________________
Concurrence:
J. L. (Jim) Rule
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Map showing existing OCP designations
Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7062-2014
Appendix D – Environmental map for the subject site
Appendix E – Proposed preliminary subdivision plan
-6-
APPENDIX A
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
Scale: 1:2,000
District of Mission
´
City of Pitt
Meadows
^
District of
Langley
23753/71 130 AVENUE
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FRASER R.
DATE: Jan 10, 2014
FILE:2014-001-RZ
BY: PC
CONSRV
EDHI
RMED
APPENDIX B
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
P
S
EN
P
O
RLOW
RMEDHI
K
AR
NP
RMEDHI
RLOW
ECO
PARK
´
Scale: 1:2,000
Legend
CONSERVATION
23753/71 130 AVENUE
ECO CLUSTERS
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
NEIGHBOURHOOD PARK
OPEN SPACE
LOW DENSITY URBAN
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
MEDIUM/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
DATE: Jan 10, 2014
FILE:2014-001-RZ
BY: PC
APPENDIX C
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7062-2014
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
___________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1.
This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7062-2014."
2.
Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 1 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 12420
Lot 2 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 12420
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1610 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to R-2 (Urban Residential District)
and P-1 (Park and School).
3.
Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the
day of
READ a second time the
day of
PUBLIC HEARING held the
day of
READ a third time the
day of
ADOPTED, the
day of
_____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER
, 20
, 20
, 20
, 20
, 20
____________________________
CORPORATE OFFICER
EP 13725
A
P 2637
5
PARK
4
P 2637
EPP 21932
EPP 18791
7
PARK
EP 78615
P 16555
P 16555
EPP 18791
3
13006
44
NT
P 39085
P 43375
34
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING
Bylaw No.
Map No.
From:
7062-2014
1610
To:
R-2 (Urban Residential District)
P-1 (Park and School)
23850
Rem 3
1
P 13634
P
73 4
47
12
9A
P 7417
3
VE
.
A
4
23879
CE
2
23882
ES
33
23865
CR
31
32
23861
RN
35
P 39085
23843
FE
P 53482
23740/23750
58
53
23831
23753
23733
23717
237 S T.
13020
*PP158
130 AV E.
P 46207
23664/706
57
13025
23771
1
CRES CENT
Rem 16
13040
52
P 64261
EP 67619
23689
23679
23653
23647
2
P 12420
56
238 S T.
E 1/2 15
13055
5
P 2637
13060
23840
4
3
55
51
23830
W 1/2 15
P 7739
13086
13085
RP 64262
P 12420
50
P 64261
P 64261
P 2637
23788
6
P 64261
54
B
(P 7417)
9
2385
1
2387
´
C
SCALE 1:2,500
APPENDIX D
APPENDIX E
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEETING DATE:
FILE NO:
MEETING:
March 3, 2014
2013-052-RZ
C of W
First and Second Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7003 – 2013
23227 Dogwood Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received for a mixed-use commercial and residential development at
23227 Dogwood Avenue, the subject property. This application requires a site-specific Zoning Bylaw
text amendment to the C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) zone to allow apartment use as a
permitted principal use; to allow parking as a principal use, which would be provided under covenant
for 12968 232nd Street (the Black Sheep Pub), located south of the subject property; and to permit
increased density for the residential rental units and the retail commercial use. The Housing
Agreement for the five rental units to be provided on the second storey of the commercial building
requires an authorizing bylaw that is not subject to a Public Hearing. This will be discussed in a
future report to Council.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7003 – 2013 be given first and second reading and be
forwarded to Public Hearing;
2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to Final Reading:
i.
That Land Use Contracts R4089 and Y146324 be discharged from Title;
ii.
That Access and Parking Easements BB1312550 to BB1312553 registered on Title
for 13 parking spaces for 12968 232nd Street (the Black Sheep Pub) be discharged
and replaced by a new Access and Parking Easement that would provide for 18
parking spaces for 12968 232nd Street (the Black Sheep Pub);
iii.
Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant at the Land Title
Office which addresses the suitability of the subject property for the proposed
development
iv.
Registration of a Restrictive Covenant at the Land Title Office protecting the Visitor
Parking;
1102
v.
That previous Development Permit DP/080/08, registered on Title as BB4033853
be discharged from Title and be replaced by Development Permit 2012-062-DP;
and
vi.
That a Housing Agreement Bylaw be adopted, under the provisions of Section 905
of the Local Government Act, along with its accompanying covenant and
agreement.
DISCUSSION:
a)
Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
David Ho
Beta Enterprises Ltd.
Legal Description:
Lot 1, Section 28, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan LMP46534,
Except: Plan BCP39158
OCP:
Existing:
Proposed:
Commercial
Commercial
Existing:
Proposed:
C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial)
C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial)
Zoning:
Surrounding Uses:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Access:
Site Area:
Servicing:
Companion Applications:
Residential
Estate Suburban Residential
Pub and Liquor Store
CS-1 (Service Commercial)
Commercial and Estate Suburban Residential
Residential
Residential (Strata)
RG-2 (Residential Strata) and RS-2 (One Family
Suburban Residential)
Vacant
Five commercial rental units and five rental housing
units for the C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) zone
Dogwood Avenue
1758 m²
Urban
VP/080/08 and 2012-062-DP
-2-
b)
Project Description:
The subject property is approximately 1758 m² (0.4 acres), and is located on the north-east corner
of 232nd Street and Dogwood Avenue. It is bordered to the north, east, southeast and southwest by
single family residential developments. The Black Sheep Pub is located to the south and a
residential strata development is located to the west (see Appendix A).
The subject property was rezoned from a Land Use Contract and the RS-2 (One Family Suburban
Residential) zone to the C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) zone on January 10, 2012; however the
Land Use Contract was not discharged from Title. That rezoning application was accompanied by a
Development Permit DP/080/08 and Development Variance Permit VP/080/08, which were also
approved on January 10, 2012, to do a tenant improvement, which entailed converting the existing
buiding to three rental commercial units.
The applicant has since changed their proposal and is now proposing a mixed-use commercial and
residential development that will consist of five commercial units on the main level, and five rental
housing units on the second storey. A text amendment to the C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial)
zone is required to allow for the increased density, and the previous Development Permit
DP/080/08 will need to be replaced on title with the new Development Permit, under application
2012-062-DP and the associated variances under Development Variance Permit VP/080/08, to be
discussed in future reports to Council.
c)
Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The area of the intersection of 232nd Street and 128th Avenue up to Dogwood Avenue is considered
a Historic Commercial centre in the Official Community Plan (OCP). The neighbourhood commercial
use with the rental accommodation on the upper floor is supported by the following OCP policies:
Policy 6-45 – Maple Ridge will support limited commercial development in Historic Commercial
centres to provide for the commercial needs of the adjacent population. The Historic
Centres generally reflect the historic commercial footprint of the area. Limited infill or
expansion of a Historic Commercial centre may be supported if the development is
sensitive to the historic character of the centre, and is compatible in use and form
with the surrounding area.
Policy 3-33 – Maple Ridge supports the provision of rental accommodation and encourages the
construction of rental units that vary in size and number of bedrooms.
Policy 3-34 – Maple Ridge supports the provision of affordable, rental and special needs housing
throughout the District.
OCP policy 3-33 supports the provision of rental accommodation in varying dwelling unit size and
number of bedrooms, and OCP policy 3-34 supports the provision of affordable, rental and special
housing needs throughout the District. A Restrictive Covenant and Housing Agreement will include
the language necessary to secure this as rental housing. The Housing Action Plan has not been
-3-
completed; however, the proposed rental apartments would be a step in addressing the kinds of
housing and affordability issues this study will be identifying. This approach has been used for
similar mixed-use projects in the vicinity of 240th Street and 112th Avenue.
Zoning Bylaw and Housing Agreement Bylaw:
The C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) zone permits a maximum lot coverage of 40% of the net lot
area and a maximum building height of 7.5 m. The proposed lot coverage is 30% and a height
variance will be required for the proposed height of 7.8 m. This zone also restricts gross floor area
of all permitted principal uses to an aggregate area of 279 m2 and all permitted accessory uses to
an aggregate area of 279 m2. A site-specific text amendment to the C-1 (Neighbourhood
Commercial) zone is proposed to permit “apartment use” and “parking” as principal uses and to
permit the maximum gross floor area of the principal use not to exceed 959.5 m2. This site-specific
text amendment also restricts the ground floor commercial uses to a gross floor area of 530.6 m2
(see Appendix B).
The C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) zone requires the front and exterior side yard setbacks to be
7.5 m; the rear setback to be 6.0 m and the interior side yard setback to be 3.0 m from the property
line. In order to bring the building closer to 232nd Street to have a greater street presence, setback
variances are being sought and are the subject of Development Variance Permit report VP/080/08
and are discussed in the following section.
The site-specific text amendment to the C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) zone is supported by the
provision of rental housing with this development. These rental units will be secured through a
Section 905 Housing Agreement which is passed by Bylaw under Section 905 of the Local
Government Act. Section 905 of the Local Government Act states that:
(1)
A local government may, by bylaw, enter into a housing agreement under this section.
(2)
A housing agreement may include terms and conditions agreed to by the local government
and the owner regarding the occupancy of the housing units identified in the agreement,
including but not limited to terms and conditions respecting one or more of the following:
(a) the form of tenure of the housing units;….
This Housing Agreement will restrict the five units as rental units in perpetuity and will run with the
land regardless of a change in ownership, and will be enforceable by the District. This Housing
Agreement will increase the rental stock in Maple Ridge and allow the District to enforce the
conditions under Section 905 of the Local Government Act. The Housing Agreement Bylaw will be
discussed in a future report to Council.
Proposed Variances:
The applicant has requested the following variances for this development:
 Front yard setback variance from 7.5 m to 1.57m to the roofline;
 Exterior yard setback variance from 7.5 m to 0 m to the roofline;
 Interior yard setback variance from 3.0 m to 1.2 m to the roofline;
-4-


Height variance from 7.5 m to 7.8 m; and
Retaining wall height variance, to be greater than 1.2 m.
The requested variances are supported as they will result in a better designed building with an
improved street presence along 232nd Street and Dogwood Avenue (see Appendix C). The minor
increase in height is the result of a parapet used to obscure mechanical equipment on the roof.
Application VP/080/08 has been received and is currently being reviewed. This will be the subject
of a future Council report.
Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw:
The Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw requires 1 off-street parking space per 30 m² gross floor
area for retail or personal service commercial use in the C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) zone; 1
sapce per unit for apartment use; and 0.2 spaces per unit for visitors. This results in a total of 24
required off-street parking spaces for this development. The applicant is proposing to provide 52
off-street parking stalls in total (34 for the subject property, and 18 for 12968 232 nd Street (the
Black Sheep Pub), which will be provided through a restrictive covenant), plus a loading zone.
The Black Sheep Pub, located at 12968 232nd Street, currently requires a total of 73 off-street
parking spaces; however only 60 spaces are able to be provided on this property. An access and
parking easement was previously registered with the Development Permit DP/080/08 that provided
13 spaces for 12968 232nd Street (the Black Sheep Pub). This easement will be discharged and
replaced by an access and parking easement that will allow for 18 spaces for 12968 232 nd Street
(the Black Sheep Pub), allowing for five more additional off-street parking spaces than what is
required by the Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw.
When the old pub existed, some residents complained about pub patrons parking on Dogwood
Avenue. Since the new pub opened, there have been no parking complaints documented. Prior to
the new pub opening, residents were offered “Resident Only” parking under Council’s policy. The
majority of residents declined this offer. Going forward, the District will continue to monitor parking
on Dogwood Avenue. Should non-resident parking become an issue with pub patrons parking along
Dogwood Avenue and blocking the roadway or driveways, then “Resident Only” parking will again be
offered. A modified option could entail the consideration of “Resident Only” parking on the section
of Dogwood Avenue in proximity to the pub, with the actual distance to be evaluated based on
parking patterns.
A Form and Character Development Permit is required for this commercial and residential
development. Application 2012-062-DP has been received and is currently being reviewed. This will
be the subject of a future Council report.
-5-
Advisory Design Panel:
The application was forwarded to the Advisory Design Panel on July 9, 2013. Resolutions were
proposed and have been addressed. These will be discussed in the 2012-062-DP Council report for
the Development Permit.
A Development Information Meeting was not required for this development as it did not require an
OCP amendment and there is less than 25 dwelling units proposed, as per Council Policy 6.20
Development Information Meetings.
d)
Engineering Department:
A Rezoning Servicing Agreement was registered on Title with the rezoning application RZ/080/08
that was given final reading on January 10, 2012.
The storm sewer connection will require a utility trench be cut into the new asphalt on 232nd Street
that was placed in 2009 with the District’s road improvement project. The design engineer will be
requested to move the connection to Dogwood Avenue where new asphalt will be placed with the
development to avoid disturbing the asphalt on 232nd Street. Should the connection not be able to
go to Dogwood Avenue for any reason, then pavement degradation charges will be applied and be
the responsibility of the applicant.
e)
Citizen/Customer Implications:
The arborist report dated January 7, 2013, provided by PMG Landscape Architects for this
development identified two trees along the northwestern property line that would need to be
removed for this development to occur. A tree removal agreement signed by the owners of 23214
130th Avenue has been received, giving permission to Beta Enterprises to have the trees removed by
a licensed tree removal contractor. The arborist report notes that the Birch tree is in poor health
and the Alder tree has been poorly pruned such that neither tree is considered to offer any
significant value and are not proposed to be replaced; however, Council may want to consider the
loss of urban tree canopy to be worth preservation where possible or replacement requirements for
trees removed.
The additional underground parking provided with this development will help to alleviate the parking
concerns in the neighbourhood, by providing 18 stalls through a restrictive covenant, to 12968
232nd Street (the Black Sheep Pub), five more than what is required by the Off-Street Parking and
Loading Bylaw.
-6-
CONCLUSION:
It is recommended that first and second reading be given to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.
7003 – 2013, and that application 2013-052-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing, along with the
recommendation to discharge Land Use Contracts R4089 and Y146324.
“Original signed by Michelle Baski”________________
Prepared by: Michelle Baski, AScT
Planning Technician
“Original signed by Christine Carter”_________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”____________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng.
“Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule”____________________
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Appendix B – Zone Amending Bylaw 7003 – 2013
Appendix C – Site Plan
-7-
*LMP6904
23 2 S T.
APPENDIX A
P 15594
C
232 65
231 77
A
BCP 38954
2
232 99
K
232 87
P 26004
21
22
Subject Property
129 68
232 98
J
232 71
Rem A
232 80
232 62
232 42
P 14790
P 15594
3
P 10938
232 64
2
N
I
G
232 40
P 75590
231 51
P 77424
F
232 57
232 27
LMP 46534
1
.
AV E
232 45
P 15594
E
D
232 14
231 00
13 0
232 28
CP
P 15594
P 14790
232 36
A
SK 12238
Rem. C
232 41
232 23
P
3
P 6337
12 9 AV E .
P 20593
128 99
Sca le: 1:1,5 00
P 25708
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of Mis sion
´
129 12
231 99 /
233 53
77424
33
^
District of
Langley
P 20593
*PP131
1
6
5
23227 Dogwood Ave
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
P L A N NIN G D E P A RT M E N T
FR AS ER
R.
DATE: M ay 30, 2013 2013-052-RZ
BY: J V
W 1/2 4
APPENDIX B
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7003 – 2013
A Bylaw to amend the text of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended.
___________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 – 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in
open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1.
This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7003 – 2013."
2.
That PART 7 COMMERCIAL ZONES, 701 NEIGHBOURHOOD COMMERCIAL: C-1 1.
PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES is amended by:
i.
item e) is amended by adding the following legal description in the correct
sequence:
Lot 1 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan LMP46534
Except: Plan BCP39158; PID 024-815-756
ii.
Adding item f) off-street parking is permitted specific to the following site:
3.
That PART 7 COMMERCIAL ZONES, 701 NEIGHBOURHOOD COMMERCIAL: C-1 8.
OTHER REGULATIONS is amended by:
i.
item a) is amended by adding “principal off-street parking” before “and
accessory off-street parking and loading…”
ii.
item b) is amended by adding the following in the correct sequence:
(iv)
The gross floor area of all permitted principal uses shall not in the
aggregate exceed 959.5 m² on Lot 1 Section 28 Township 12, New
Westminster District Plan LMP46534 Except Plan: BCP39158; PID
024-815-756. Gross floor area of the ground floor commercial uses
shall not exceed a total of 530.6 m².
iii. item f) is amended by adding the following legal description in the correct
sequence:
4.
Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 – 1985, as amended, is hereby amended
accordingly.
READ a first time the
day of
, 20 .
, 20 .
day of
day of
day of
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the
_____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER
, 20 .
, 20 .
day of
, 20 .
____________________________
CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
TOP OF 4 FT. HIGH WOOD FENCE
@ 19.49m
ALDER TREES TO BE
REMOVED
STREET TREES AS
PER LANDSCAPE
DRAWINGS
TIER 2
TIER 1
RETAINING WALL
STAIRS TO
UNDERGROUND
PARKING
T.O RETAIN. WALL 18.29m
P.L 57.92m ( 190.03 ft.)
LANDSCAPED AREA
TIER 3
TIER 2
TIER 1
WALKWAY
T.O RETAIN. WALL
@ 17.09m
TOP OF 4 FT. HIGH
WOOD FENCE
@ 19.49m
WALKWAY
PAVERS
12 S.C
11 S.C
8
10
T.O RETAIN.
WALL 17.09m
TOTAL 17 STALLS AT GRADE
FOR COMMERCIAL UNITS
T.O FIN. GRADE 17.65M
4
TWO STOREY
BUILDING
OUT DOOR
PATIOAREA
T.O RETAIN.
WALL 18.29m
3
RETAINING WAL
P.L 30.50m ( 100.07
232 STREET
TIER 2
TIER 1
6
13
ft.)
WALKWAY
L
2
14
WHEEL CHAIR RAMP
(2) 24"X24"X84"CULTURED STONE
COLUMN
WALKWAY
PAVERS
4 FT. HIGH PT.
SOLID WOOD FENCE
LOADING
ZONE
H.C 17
24"X24"X48"CULTURED STONE COLUMN
WITH BUILT-IN LIGHTING AT WALKWAY
ENTRANCE
TIER 1
VISITOR 16
WALKWAY
PAVERS
T.O RETAIN.
WALL 18.29m
3'-0" WALKWAY
1
15
UNDERGROUND PARKING
WALL BELOW
P.L 57.87m ( 189.86 ft.)


LEGAL DISCRIPTION :
LOT 1 SECTION 28 TOWNSHIP 12
NWD PLAN LMP46534
GROSS FLOOR AREA :
PERMITTED PRINCIPAL:
PROPOSED:
CIVIC ADDRESS :
23227 DOGWOOD AVENUE,
MAPLE RIDGE B.C
ZONING:
EXISTING ZONE: C-1
SITE AREA:
1,757.80 SQ.M. (18,931.51 SQ.FT. )
(MAIN FLR.)
COMMERCIAL UNITS
GARBAGE ROOM
STAIR WELLS
TOTAL
PERMITTED ACCESSORY:
279.0 SQ.M. (3,004.83 SQ. FT.)
REAR YARD REQ'D: 6.0M (19.7')
PROVIDED: 28.42 M (93.25' @ COLUMN)
30.86 M (101.25' TO BUILDING)
473.52 SQ.M. (5,099.80 SQ.FT.)
16.09 SQ.M. (173.31 SQ. FT.)
41.03 SQ.M. (441.88 SQ.FT.)
EXTERIOR SIDE YARD REQ'D: 7.5M (24.6')
(DOGWOOD AVENUE)
2.84 M (9.33' TO BUILDING)
0.00 m (0.00' TO ROOF)
INTERIOR SIDE YARD REQ'D: 3.0M (10.0')
PROVIDED: 1.8M (6.0')
1.2 m (4.0' TO ROOF)
OFF STREET PARKING:
PROVIDED: 1 H/C
4 SMALL CAR
47 STANDARD
530.64 SQ.M. (5,714.99 SQ.FT.)
279.0 SQ.M. (3,004.83 SQ. FT.)
COMMERCIAL:
530.64 SQ.M. / STALL PER 30 SQ.M. = 17.68
TOTAL REQ'D = 18
PROPOSED:
TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT :
PERMITTED: 7.5M (24.6')
PROPOSED = 7.8M (25.59')
LOT COVERAGE
PERMITTED = 40% 703.12 SQ.M. (7,572.60 SQ.FT.)
PROPOSED = 30.1% 530.64 SQ.M. (5,714.99 SQ.FT.)
4.27 M (14.00' TO BUILDING)
1.57 m (5.16' TO ROOF)
(SECOND FLOOR)
UNIT 1
UNIT 2
UNIT 3
UNIT 4
UNIT 5
COMMON AREA
67.96 SQ.M. (732.00 SQ.FT.)
64.97 SQ.M. (699.82 SQ.FT.)
70.34 SQ.M. (757.62 SQ. FT.)
85.92 SQ.M. (925.35 SQ.FT.)
85.24 SQ.M. (918.03 SQ.FT.)
54.41 SQ.M. (586.01 SQ.FT.)
TOTAL
428.86 SQ.M. (4,618.83 SQ.FT.)
APARTMENT:
1 UNIT = 1.0 PER DWELLING USE
TOTAL REQ'D = 5
SMALL CAR PERMITTED 10% = 5.2 (5 SMALL CAR)
TOTAL PROVIDED: 52 STALLS
(34 STALLS FOR 23227 DOGWOOD AVE.)
(18 STALLS DEDICATED TO BLACK SHEEP PUB)
VISITORS
5 UNIT = 0.2 PER DWELLING USE
TOTAL REQ'D = 1
LOADING ZONE REQ'D: = 1
TOTAL REQ'D: 18 + 5+ 1 = 24 STALLS
- REQ'D AISLE WIDTH: = 7.3M (24.0' ABOVE GROUND)
= 7.0M (23.0' CONCEALED))
PROVIDED: = 1
- PROVIDED: 7.3M (24.0' ABOVE GROUND)
7.0M (23.0' CONCEALED)
DOGWOOD AVE.
DRAWING INDEX - ARCHITECTURAL
A1 - SITE PLAN
A1.1 - UNDERGROUND PARKING PLAN
A1.2 RETAINING WALL
A2 - FLOOR PLANS
A2.1 ROOF PLAN
A3 - SOUTH & WEST ELEVATIONS
A3.1 - NORTH & EAST ELEVATIONS
A3.2 - BUILDING MASS
A4 - SECTION A & B
ARCHITECT
DAVID J. HO ARCHITECT INC.
202-3190 ST. JOHN'S STREET
PORT MOODY B.C V3H 2C7
TEL. 604.469.9649 FAX. 604.469.0800
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
THOMAS LEUNG STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
121 6th AVE. VANCOUVER B.C
TEL. 604.873.1768 FAX. 604.873.9978
CIVIL ENGINEER
H.Y ENGINEERING
200 - 9128 152ND STREET, SURREY B.C
TEL.604.583.1616 FAX. 604.583.1737
SURVEYOR
TERRA PACIFIC
16133 110TH AVE SURREY, B.C V4N 4Y1
TEL.604.951.7748 FAX. 604. 951.7746
NEW LET DOWN TO
UNDERGROUND
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
INTERGRAL BUILDING CONSULTANTS
4 - 15243 91 AVENUE SURREY B.C
TEL. 604.790.6038 FAX. 604.468.8618
MECHANICAL ENGINEER
MEC ENGINEERING CONSULTING LTD.
4 - 15243 91 AVENUE SURREY B.C
TEL. 604.581.6338 FAX. 604.581.7448
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
HARRY HAGGARD LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
304 - 255 2ND STREET EAST
NORTH VANCOUVER, B.C V7L 1C4
TEL.604.985.0137
ARBORIST
PMG LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
C100 - 4185 STILL CREEK DRIVE
BURNABY, B.C V5C 6G9
TEL.604.294.0011 FAX.604.294.0022

NEW LET DOWN
SETBACKS:
FRONT YARD REQ'D: 7.5M (24.6')
(232ND STREET)
PROJECT DATA
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEETING DATE:
FILE NO:
MEETING:
March 3, 2014
2013-091-RZ
C of W
Second Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7035 – 2013
20395 123 Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone 20395 123 Avenue, the subject property, from RS-1
(One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to permit
future subdivision into two single family lots. This application is in compliance with the Official
Community Plan (OCP) and received first reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7035 – 2013 on
November 26, 2013.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7035 – 2013 be given second reading, and be
forwarded to Public Hearing; and
2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to Final Reading:
i.
Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant at the Land Title Office
which addresses the suitability of the subject property for the proposed development;
ii.
Approval from the Coast Mountain Bus Company to relocate the existing bus stop t hat
is located in the middle of the subject property, to a location that is also acceptable to
the District of Maple Ridge;
iii.
Removal of the existing buildings;
iv.
A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising
whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks; and
v.
Pursuant to the Contaminated Site Regulations of the Environmental Management
Act, the property owner has provided a Site Profile for the subject land.
1103
DISCUSSION:
a)
Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
Mayur Mehta
Anuradha Sharma
Legal Description:
Lot 45, Except Part Dedicated Road on Plan LMP 6759, District Lot
276, Group 1, New Westminster District Plan 43216
OCP:
Existing:
Urban Residential
Existing:
Proposed:
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
Zoning:
Surrounding Uses:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Site Area:
Access:
Servicing requirement:
Companion application:
b)
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Uses:
Zones:
Urban Residential
RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential
Urban Residential
Urban Residential
Single Family Residential and Duplex
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) and
RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
0.24 ha (0.59 acres)
123 Avenue
Urban Standard
2013-091-SD
Project Description:
The subject property is approximately 0.24 ha (0.59 acres) in size and is bound by single family
residential properties to the north, east, and west, and 123 Avenue to the south (see Appendix A).
The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), to permit future subdivision
into two single family residential lots.
-2-
c)
Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The development site is designated Urban Residential and is located on a Major Corridor, as
identified on Figure 4 of the OCP. The Urban Residential designation includes ground-oriented
housing forms such as single detached dwellings, garden suites, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes,
townhouses, apartments, or small lot intensive residential, subject to compliance with Major
Corridor Residential Infill policies. The subdivision of this property into two single-family lots and use
of the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone is in compliance with the OCP.
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the subject property, located at 20395 123 Avenue from
the RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) zone to the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density)
Residential) zone (see Appendix B). The RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
zoned lots are proposed to be approximately 17 m in width and 70 m in depth, and 1198 m², which
is in compliance with the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone (see
Appendix C).
A Form and Character Development Permit is not required for this single-family residential
development.
Advisory Design Panel:
A Form and Character Development Permit is not required and therefore this application does not
need to be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel.
A Development Information Meeting was not required for this development as it did not require an
OCP amendment and there is less than 25 dwelling units proposed, as per Council Policy 6.20 for
Development Information Meetings.
d)
Environmental Section of the Planning Department:
A Tree Survey was received in support of this application, which identified 40 trees on the subject
property. One tree was identified as a hazard tree to the property to the north of the subject
property and should be removed. This will be addressed at the subdivision stage. All other trees on
the subject property appear to be structurally sound. Proposed building envelopes were not
provided to the arborist to determine how many trees will need to be removed. The District of Maple
Ridge would prefer that as many trees as possible are retained, and for those trees that will be
-3-
retained, protective measures will be required to ensure that they are not damaged during
construction activities. The subject property is not within a watercourse setback area, therefore a replanting plan is not mandatory through a Watercourse Protection Development Permit; however,
Council may want to consider the loss of urban tree canopy to be worth preservation where possible
or replacement requirements for trees removed.
Engineering Department:
A Rezoning Servicing Agreement is not required for this rezoning application, as there are no works
or services required. A Subdivision Servicing Agreement will be required at the time of subdivision.
There is an existing Coast Mountain Bus stop in the middle of the site on 123 Avenue. The
subdivision will require construction of a driveway letdown near the bus stop, which might affect the
ability of the bus to operate at this location. Prior to approval of the zoning application, the applicant
must obtain approval from Coast Mountain Bus Company to change the location of the bus stop to a
new location that is also acceptable to the District of Maple Ridge. Any cost to make the change
that is not covered by the bus company would be the responsibility of the applicant as a condition of
subdivision.
CONCLUSION:
As this application is in compliance with the OCP, it is recommended that second reading be given to
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7035 – 2013 and that application 2013-091-RZ be
forwarded to Public Hearing.
“Original signed by Michelle Baski”________________
Prepared by: Michelle Baski, AScT
Planning Technician
“Original signed by Christine Carter”_________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”____________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng.
“Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule”___________________
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Appendix B – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7035 – 2013
Appendix C – Proposed Subdivision Plan
-4-
APPENDIX A
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Scale: 1:1,500
District of Mission
´
City of Pitt
Meadows
^
20395 123 AVENUE
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
District of
Langley
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
FRASER R.
DATE: Sep 25, 2013
FILE: 2013-091-RZ
BY: PC
APPENDIX B
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7035 – 2013
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in
open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1.
This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7035 – 2013."
2.
That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 45 Except: Part Dedicated Road on Plan LMP6759; District Lot 276 Group 1
New Westminster District Plan 43216
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1598 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium
Density) Residential).
3.
Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 26th day of November, 2013.
day of
day of
day of
ADOPTED the
day of
_____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER
, 20
, 20
, 20
, 20 .
____________________________
CORPORATE OFFICER
8
7 12239
20497
20484
20487
20479
13
20491
20492
20486
20480
20476
EP 74860
20472
74
86
0
16
15
P 74861
20493
20496
20502
B
20492
20489
20488
20460
20503
3
20499
2
20491
20475
20447
A B
P 22101 1 2
3 BCP 7509
BCP 12914
LMP 35108
1150
BCP
20485
20450
A
P 76349
P 77017
1
2
20471
20453
20445
BCP 40947
20440
20485
20470
20460
20471
20465
204B ST.
P 74861
20483
20410
P 78325
EP
17
12
LMP 1594
15
LMP
LMP
Bylaw No.
Map No.
From:
7035-2013
1598
To:
RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
6
35108
5
20498
7
20490
8
20480
9
20472
LMP 1593
18 19
16 17LMP
1594
20462
122B AVE.
13
LMP
1593
14
1
12246
8
123B AVE.
18
20456
55
122
49
122
11
LMP 6719
20448
12
22
12269
4
EP 74860
12272
11
10
12387
LMP 1593
23
21 20
20439
3
12282
7
12395
26 27
24
20431
4
21
3
6
BCP 40946
2
3
1
20435
20421
12275
204 ST.
10
5
12258
25
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING
12234
20404
20312
20308
20395
12290
20430
12266
20388
20381/83
12272
12401
2
20
123 AVE.
LMP 1593 12289
6
2
12253
20304
20302
12280
LMP6713
9
22
19
43
Rem 42
LMP 6759
8
5
P 37662
20424
6
4
P 78325
20418
20305
LMP 5254
20347
5
7
12252
P 74873
20298
IRVING ST.
P 74873 9 12233
20300
20297
20296
20294
4
3
LMS
910
3
*LMP13506
12289
EP 76691
RW 74874
Rem 45
2
12293
P 76690
5
6
7
4
20301
20303
20295
3
20299
2
20293
20285
1
P 43216
12322
12301
8
P 76690
2
59
1
20380
P 19038
58
12309
3
LMP 5255
LMP 5256
8
57
2
3.0
12332
203 ST.
7
12327
20307
20328
20335
20312
6
2
P 17085
S 52' 7
P 19098
15
14
P 31261
20308
5
P 71429
20338
20330
20314
16
20296
20311
20303
17
20323
20292
P 22747
20288
P 32902
20288
20295
P 19098
19
18
13
12
P 18706
1
12351
12345
6
31
20
22
Rem 7
8
7
203 6
20
12411
12409
20324
123B AVE.
23
9
20442
12373
8
20311
10
20321
P 78325
9
20305
53
P 15611
E 150' 4
10
11
P 72064
12
12387
P 74861
1
20436
1
TWIN AVE.
64
11
124
20400
12393
8
124A AVE.
13
12388
P 21555
46
20327
20323
52
20297
45
12415
12404
P 13221
P 42230
Rem 80
12420
20472
B
A
BCP 22537
EPP 24619
EP 42229
81
P 26590
P 40628
20334
20338
20324
82
P 21555
204 ST.
12419
124 AVE.
4
35108
´
SCALE 1:2,000
APPENDIX C
TO:
DATE:
FILE NO:
March 3, 2014
OPS1401
FROM:
ATTN:
Committee of the Whole
SUBJECT:
Municipal Equipment Purchase and Install, One Recycling Baler and Conveyor
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The approved Financial Plan includes funding for the replacement of one existing recycling baler and
accompanying conveyor. Successive Business Plans have identified the pending replacement of the
existing baler which was purchased over 18 years ago. A fully functional baler is the fulcrum and
heart of the daily recycling operations. The existing baler is several years beyond its life span and has
been patched together for the past two years to maintain operations. Like all large equipment owned
by the District of Maple Ridge, funds for the replacement of the baler have been set aside in reserve
accounts throughout its life span. There is sufficient funding in the reserve accounts to now
purchase a replacement baler. Accordingly, the purchase of the new replacement baler does not
impact the recycling rates and no increase in rates is required.
A public request for proposals, RFP-OP13-43, to supply and install the equipment was issued
December 19, 2013. Following a review and detailed analysis of the submission, it is recommended
that the contract to supply the baler and conveyor be awarded to Machinex Recycling Services Inc.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the contract for the design, supply and install of a Two Ram Horizontal Baler System including a
conveyor be awarded to Machinex Recycling Services Inc. for an estimated contract value not to
exceed $763,955.00, which consists of the contract amount of $693,955.00, including applicable
taxes, and a 10% contingency of $70,000.00, and furthermore that the Corporate Officer be
authorized to execute the contract.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Successive Recycling Society Business Plans have identified the pending replacement of the
existing baler which was purchased over 18 years ago. The approved Financial Plan includes
funding for the replacement of the existing recycling baler and accompanying conveyor.
1104
The baler is essentially the anchor of the recycling processing operation. It is required to
allow the maximization of the weight of processed materials for shipping and therefore
maximization of revenues.
The baler and conveyor system are owned by the District of Maple Ridge and operated by the
Ridge Meadows Recycling Society. The existing baler is 18 years old and a financial
replacement plan has been included in the Equipment Replacement Reserve and the
Recycling Capital Budget.
A Public Request for Proposals closed on January 20, 2014, for the supply and installation of
a Two Ram Horizontal Baler System including a conveyor. Three proposals were received
which met the tender requirements. Following a detailed assessment of the submissions the
proposal submitted by Machinex Recycling Services Inc. was the highest scoring proponent
and provides best value for the District of Maple Ridge and the Ridge Meadows Recycling
Society.
b) Financial:
As stated above the funds for this replacement have been set aside over the years in
recognition that the baler would need to be replaced. Funds are allocated from the following
sources:
•
•
•
Equipment Replacement Reserve
Recycling Capital Reserve
Ridge Meadows Recycling Society Contribution
Total
$330,000.00
$405,000.00
$100,000.00
$835,000.00
The estimated expenditures include:
•
•
•
Contract Amount
Contingency
GST Rebate
$693,955.00
$ 70,000.00
- $ 34,313.00
Total
$729,642.00
c) MMBC Implications:
A baler is the core to a commodity recycling process which is fundamental to optimizing the
processing weight for shipping sales and to minimizing storage space and shipping costs.
Since inception the existing baler has been able to process 5 times more annual tonnage
and 17 additional commodity categories than anticipated. Baler technology has advanced to
accommodate these variations in commodity handling and the new unit will greatly improve
commodity quality and efficiency in loading, unloading and processing speed. With respect
to MMBC the new baler is timely; whereas MMBC will assist with the revenue risk and
financial burden, the new baler will provide product consistency and efficient production
rates. Owning a baler fits with the planned and approved model for MMBC and also provides
an ongoing stability and does not restrict options for unplanned outcomes or business model
changes.
d) Alternatives:
Multiple options were analyzed including leasing, purchasing used, keeping existing baler
until failure and eliminating the baler altogether. All analysis, for both short and long term
success, conclude that purchasing a new baler and upgrading the loading and unloading
systems provides best value for recycling in Maple Ridge.
CONCLUSION:
The approved Financial Plan includes funding for replacement of one existing recycling baler and
accompanying conveyor. Successive Business Plans have identified the pending replacement of the
existing baler.
All analysis, for both short and long term success, conclude that purchasing a new baler and
upgrading the loading and unloading systems provides best value for recycling in Maple Ridge. The
award of the contract to Machinex Recycling Services Inc. to supply and install the baler and
conveyor is recommended.
“Original signed by Russ Charmichael”_________________
Prepared by: Russ Carmichael, AScT, Eng.L
Director of Engineering Operations
“Original signed by Trevor Thompson”_________________
Approved by: Trevor Thompson
Manager Financial Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”_____________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
General Manager, Public Works and Development Services
“Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule” ____________________
Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule
TO:
FROM:
MEETING DATE:
FILE NO:
SUBJECT:
MEETING:
Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 156/14
March 3, 2014
E08-015-1062
06-2240-20
C of W
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A developer has subdivided land at Bosonworth Avenue and Carmichael Street. Part of the
subdivision servicing is considered to be excess or extended servicing in accordance with the Local
Government Act. The extended servicing benefits adjacent properties. Latecomer Agreement LC
156/14 provides the municipality’s assessment of the attribution of the costs of the excess or
extended servicing to the benefiting lands.
RECOMMENDATION:
That with respect to the subdivision of lands involved in subdivision SD 102/03 located at
Bosonworth Avenue and Carmichael Street, be it resolved:
1.
That the cost to provide the excess or extended services is, in whole or in part, excessive to the
municipality and that the cost to provide these services shall be paid by the owners of the land
being subdivided, and
2.
That Latecomer Charges be imposed for such excess or extended services on the parcels and
in the amounts as set out in the staff report dated March 3, 2014; and further
3.
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Excess Capacity Latecomer
Agreement LC 156/14 with the subdivider of the said lands.
DISCUSSION:
The attached map identifies the lands which are involved in the subdivision and those which
will benefit from the excess or extended services. The cost breakdown for each excess or
extended service is shown on attached Schedule A.
In addition, a copy of Excess Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC 156/14 is also attached for
information purposes.
1105
b) Strategic Alignment:
Administration of excess or extended services legislation complies with the Smart Managed
Growth element of the Corporate Strategic Plan. The administration procedure supports the
requirement for a developer to construct municipal infrastructure in support of land
development and recognizes that the infrastructure may provide benefit to other land.
c) Policy Implications:
Part 26, Division 11, of the Local Government Act provides that where a developer pays all
or part of the cost of excess or extended services, the municipality shall determine the
proportion of the cost of the service which constitutes excess or extended service and
determine the proportion of the cost of the service to be attributed to parcels of land which
the municipality considers will benefit from the service. Latecomer Agreement LC 156/14
will provide such determination for Subdivision SD 102/03.
CONCLUSION:
A developer has provided certain services in support of Subdivision SD 102/03. Some of the
services benefit adjacent lands therefore, it is appropriate to impose Latecomer Charges on the
benefitting lands. Latecomer Agreement LC 156/14 summarizes the municipality’s determination of
benefitting lands and cost attribution and also establishes the term over which such Latecomer
Charges will be applied.
“Original signed by Stephen Judd”
Prepared by: Stephen Judd, PEng.
Manager of Infrastructure Development
“Original signed by Frank Quinn” for
Reviewed by: David Pollock, PEng.
Municipal Engineer
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng.
“Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule”
TG/mc
Schedule A
TYPE OF EXCESS OR EXTENDED SERVICE
1. OVERSIZE WATER SYSTEM
SERVICE
Water Reservoir,
Pump Station &
Watermains
# BENEFITTING
LOTS
COST OF
BENEFIT
COST PER
LOT
209
$3,389,562
$16,218
BENEFIT ATTRIBUTED BY
PROPERTY EXCLUDING
SUBDIVISION
Lot 2. NWP 2713
RN 84407-0000-3
1 x $16,218.00
Lot 4, NWP 2713
RN 84409-0000-4
2 x $16,218.00
Lot 5, NWP 2713
RN 84410-0000-1
2 x $16,218.00
Lot 6, NWP 2713
RN 84411-0000-7
2 x $16,218.00
Lot 8, NWP 8336
RN 84436-0000-7
5 x $16,218.00
Lot 72, NWP 56277
RN 84458-0200-8
1 x $16,218.00
Lot 1, NWP 23771
RN 84403-0100-5
2 x $16,218.00
Lot 3, , BCP39010
RN 84394-0102-0
8 x $16,218.00
Lot 7, , NWP 1363
RN 84393-000-1
4 x $16,218.00
E ½ of Lot 6, NWP 1363
RN 84392-0100-X
1 x $16,218.00
W ½ of Lot 6, NWP 1363
RN 84392-0000-6
1 x $16,218.00
Lot 4, BCP 39010
RN 84394-0103-0
8 x $16,218.00
Lot 5, NWP 37195
RN 84384-0200-8
2 x $16,218.00
Page 1
SERVICE
Water Reservoir,
Pump Station &
Watermains
# BENEFITTING
LOTS
COST OF
BENEFIT
COST PER
LOT
209
$3,389,562
$16,218
(Cont’d from
previous page)
PROPERTY EXCLUDING
SUBDIVISION
Lot 10, NWP 1363
RN 84396-0000-8
8 x $16,218.00
Lot 2, NWP 65405
RN 84397-0402-2
1 x $16,218.00
Lot 1, NWP 65405
RN 84397-0401-1
2 x $16,218.00
Rem. N ½ of E ½ of SW ¼
Sec. 11, NWP 37195
RN 84384-0000-0
9 x $16,218.00
W 135.31’ of N ½ of E ½ of
SW ¼ Sec. 11, NWP 37195
RN 84384-0100-4
1 x $16,218.00
Lot E, NWP 23702
RN 84397-0500-1
4 x $16,218.00
Lot 56, NWP 39169
RN 84468-0300-8
1 x $16,218.00
Lot 57, NWP 39169
RN 84468-0400-1
1 x $16,218.00
Parcel A, Ex. Plan 30870
RN 84468-0100-0
2 x $16,218.00
Lot 41, NWP 35648
RN 84467-0300-2
1 x $16,218.00
Rem Lot 25, NWP 32801
RN 844670100-5
1 x $16,218.00
Lot 6, NWP 17459
RN 84461-0200-6
3 x $16,218.00
Lot 5, NWP 17459
RN 84461-0100-2
1 x $16,218.00
Lot 1, NWP 2713
RN 84406-0000-8
2 x $16,218.00
Page 2
2. ONSITE SERVICE FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY
SERVICE
# BENEFITTING
LOTS
COST OF
BENEFIT
COST PER
LOT
Roadworks on 112
Avenue and
Bosonworth Ave.
40
$581,560.00
$14,539.00
PROPERTY EXCLUDING
SUBDIVISION
Lot 1, NWP 23771
RN 84403-0100-5
2 x $14,539.00
Lot 3, BCP39010
RN 84394-0102-0
1 x $14,539.00
Lot 56, NWP 39169
RN 84468-0300-8
1 x $14,539.00
Lot 57, NWP 39169
RN 84468-0400-1
1 x $14,539.00
Pcl. A, Ex. Plan 30870
RN 84468-0100-0
2 x $14,539.00
Lot 41, NWP 35648
RN 84467-0300-2
1 x $14,539.00
Rem. Lot 25, NWP 32801
RN 84467-0100-5
1 x $10,894.00
Lot 6, NWP 17459
RN 84461-0200-6
3 x $14,539.00
Lot 5, NWP 17459
RN 84461-0100-2
1 x $14,539.00
Lot 1, NWP 2713
RN 84406-0000-8
1 x $14,539.00
Page 3
3. EXTENDED NOMINAL SERVICE
SERVICE
Roadworks on
Carmichael Ave. &
108 Avenue
# BENEFITTING
LOTS
COST OF
BENEFIT
COST PER
LOT
22
$276,320.00
$12,560.00
PROPERTY EXCLUDING
SUBDIVISION
Lot 4, BCP 39010
RN 84394-0103-0
5 X $12,560.00
Lot 10, NWP 1363
RN 84396-0000-8
1 X $12,560.00
Lot 1, NWP 65405
RN 84397-0401-1
1 X $12,560.00
Rem. N ½ of E ½ of SW ¼
Sec. 11, NWP 37195
RN 84384-0000-0
6 X $12,560.00
Lot 27, NWP 34411
RN 84397-0800-2
2 X $12,560.00
Page 4
A total of all of the aforementioned services for each property is as follows:
Property
Amount of Benefit
Lot 2, Sec 12, TP 12 NWP 2713
RN 84409-0000-3
Lot 4, Sec 12, TP 12 NWP 2713
RN 84409-0000-4
Lot 5, Sec 12, TP 12 NWP 2713
RN 84410-0000-1
Lot 6, Sec 12, TP 12 NWP 2713
RN 84411-0000-7
Lot 8, Sec. 13, TP 12, NWP8336
RN 84436-0000-7
Lot 72, Sec 14, TP 12, NWP 56277
RN 84458-0200-8
Lot 1, Sec 11, TP 12 NWP 23771
RN 84403-0100-5
Lot 3, Sec.11, TP 12, BCP39010
RN 84394-0102-0
Lot 7, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 1363
RN 84393-000-1
E ½ of Lot 6, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 1363
RN 84392-0100-X
W ½ of Lot 6, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 1363
RN 84392-0000-6
Lot 4, Sec. 11, TP 12, BCP 39010
RN 84394-0103-0
Lot 5, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 37195
RN 84384-0200-8
Lot 10, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 1363
RN 84396-0000-8
Lot 2, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 65405
RN 84397-0402-2
Lot 1, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 65405
RN 84397-0401-1
Rem. N ½ of E ½ of SW ¼ Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 37195
RN 84384-0000-0
W 135.31’ of N ½ of E ½ of SW ¼ Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 37195
RN 84384-0100-4
Lot E, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 23702
RN 84397-0500-1
Lot 27, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 34411
RN 84397-0800-2
Lot 56, Sec. 14, TP 12, NWP 39169
RN 84468-0300-8
Lot 57, Sec. 14, TP 12, NWP 39169
RN 84468-0400-1
Pcl. A, Sec 14, TP 12, Ex. Plan 30870
RN 84468-0100-0
Lot 41, Sec 14, TP 12, NWP 35648
RN 84467-0300-2
Rem. Lot 25, Sec. 14, TP 12, NWP 32801
RN 84467-0100-5
Lot 6, Sec. 14, TP 12, NWP 17459
RN 84461-0200-6
Lot 5, Sec. 14, TP 12, NWP 17459
RN 84461-0100-2
Lot 1, Sec. 12, TP 12, NWP 2713
RN 84406-0000-8
Page 5
$16,218.00
$32,436.00
$32,436.00
$32,436.00
$81,090.00
$16,218.00
$61,514.00
$144,283.00
$64,872.00
$16,218.00
$16,218.00
$192,544.00
$32,436.00
$142,304.00
$16,218.00
$44,996.00
$221,322.00
$16,218.00
$64,872.00
$25,120.00
$30,757.00
$30,757.00
$61,514.00
$30,757.00
$30,757.00
$92,271.00
$30,757.00
$46,975.00
EXCESS CAPACITY LATECOMER AGREEMENT
LC 156/14 -- SD/102/03
THIS AGREEMENT made the
BETWEEN:
day of
, 2014
Grant Hill (GP) Ltd.
15080 North Bluff Road
White Rock, BC V4B 5C1
(Hereinafter called the “Subdivider”)
OF THE FIRST PART
AND:
THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, a Municipal Corporation under the “Municipal Act”,
having its offices at 11995 Haney Place, in the Municipality of Maple Ridge, in the
Province of British Columbia
(Hereinafter called the “Municipality”)
OF THE SECOND PART
WHEREAS:
A.
The Subdivider has developed certain lands and premises located within the
Municipality of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia, and more
particularly known and described as:
Lot 8 and 9, Plan 1363 and N.E. ¼ Sec. 11, TP. 12 Except: Firstly Part Subdivided by
Plan 23771; Secondly: Parcel “A”, Statutory Right of Way Plan LMP1489; Section 11,
Township 12, N.W.D.
(Hereinafter called the “said lands”);
B.
In order to facilitate the approval of the subdivision of the said lands, the Subdivider
has constructed and installed the road, water reservoir, pump station and water
mains shown on the design prepared by Vector Engineering Services Ltd. – Off-Site
Design, revision 4, dated 30 June, 2010, reviewed as noted by the municipality July
20, 2010 and the Off-site Waterworks design drawings prepared by Kerr Wood Leidel
Consulting Engineers, dated Aug. 2011, sheets W201 to W205, revision C, reviewed
by the municipality Aug. 24, 2011 Municipal Project No E08 015-1062.
(Hereinafter called the “Extended Services”);
Page 1 of 8
C.
The extended services have been provided with a capacity to service the said lands
and other than the said lands;
D.
The Municipality considers its cost to provide the Extended Services to be excessive;
E.
The Subdivider has provided the Extended Services in the Amount of
$4,247,442.00.
F.
The Municipality has determined that
Lot 1, Sec. 12, TP 12, NWP 2713
Lot 2, Sec 12, TP 12, NWP 2713
Lot 4, Sec 12, TP 12, NWP 2713
Lot 5, Sec 12, TP 12, NWP 2713
Lot 6, Sec 12, TP 12, NWP 2713
Lot 8, Sec 13, TP 12, NWP 8336
Lot 72, Sec 14, TP 12, NWP 56277
Lot 1, Sec 11, TP 12, NWP 23771
Lot 3, Sec.11, TP 12, BCP39010
Lot 7, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 1363
E ½ of Lot 6, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 1363
W ½ of Lot 6, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 1363
Lot 4, Sec. 11, TP 12, BCP 39010
Lot 5, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 37195
Lot 10, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 1363
Lot 2, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 65405
Lot 1, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 65405
Lot E, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 23702
Lot 27, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 34411
Lot 56, Sec. 14, TP 12, NWP 39169
Lot 57, Sec. 14, TP 12, NWP 39169
Lot 41, Sec 14, TP 12, NWP 35648
Rem. Lot 25, Sec. 14, TP 12, NWP 32801
Lot 6, Sec. 14, TP 12, NWP 17459
Lot 5, Sec. 14, TP 12, NWP 17459
(the “Benefitting Lands”) will benefit from the Extended Services;
G.
The Municipality has imposed as a condition of the owner of the Benefitting Lands
connecting to or using the Extended Services, a charge (the “Latecomer Charge”) on
the Benefitting Lands in the following amounts:
Page 2 of 8
Lot 2, Sec 12, TP 12, NWP 2713
RN 84407-0000-3
 $16,218.00 for use of the municipal water system
Lot 4, Sec 12, TP 12, NWP 2713
RN 84409-0000-4
 $16,218.00 per lot to a maximum of $32,436.00 for use of the municipal
water system
Lot 5, Sec 12, TP 12, NWP 2713
RN 84410-0000-1
water system
Lot 6, Sec 12, TP 12, NWP 2713
RN 84411-0000-7
water system
Lot 8, Sec 13, TP 12, NWP 8336
RN 84436-0000-7
water system
Lot 72, Sec 14, TP 12, NWP 56277
RN 84458-0200-8
Lot 1, Sec 11, TP 12, NWP 23771
RN 84403-0100-5
water system
 $14,539.00 per lot to a maximum of $29,078.00 for direct driveway
accesses to Bosonworth Avenue that are in addition to the one existing
access
Lot 3, Sec.11, TP 12, BCP39010
RN 84394-0102-0
water system
 $14,539.00 for a direct driveway access to 112 Avenue that is in addition to
the one existing access and is within the area from the east property line to
60m west of the east property line
Page 3 of 8
Lot 7, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 1363
RN 84393-000-1
water system
E ½ of Lot 6, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 1363
RN 84392-0100-X
W ½ of Lot 6, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 1363
RN 84392-0000-6
Lot 4, Sec. 11, TP 12, BCP 39010
RN 84394-0103-0
water system
accesses to Carmichael Street that are in addition to the one existing access
Lot 5, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 37195
RN 84384-0200-8
water system
Lot 10, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 1363
RN 84396-0000-8
water system
 $12,560.00 for direct driveway access to 108 Avenue that is in addition to
the one existing access
Lot 2, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 65405
RN 84397-0402-2
Lot 1, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 65405
RN 84397-0401-1
water system
 $12,560.00 for direct driveway access to 108 Avenue.
Page 4 of 8
RN 84384-0000-0
water system
accesses to 108 Avenue that are in addition to the one existing access
RN 84384-0100-4
Lot E, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 23702
RN 84397-0500-1
water system
Lot 27, Sec. 11, TP 12, NWP 34411
RN 84397-0800-2
accesses to 108 Avenue from 30m east of Morrisette Place to the east
property line that are in addition to the one existing access
Lot 56, Sec. 14, TP 12, NWP 39169
RN 84468-0300-8
 $16,218.00 for use of the municipal water system for a second service
connection if more than one connection is installed
 $14,539.00 for direct driveway access to Bosonworth Avenue
Lot 57, Sec. 14, TP 12, NWP 39169
RN 84468-0400-1
 $14,539.00 for direct driveway access to Bosonworth Avenue that is in
addition to the one existing access
RN 84468-0100-0
water system for a second or third service connection if more than one
service connection is installed
access
Page 5 of 8
Lot 41, Sec 14, TP 12, NWP 35648
RN 84467-0300-2
Rem. Lot 25, Sec. 14, TP 12, NWP 32801
RN 84467-0100-5
Lot 6, Sec. 14, TP 12, NWP 17459
RN 84461-0200-6
water system for a second, third or fourth service connection if more than
one service connection is installed
access
Lot 5, Sec. 14, TP 12, NWP 17459
RN 84461-0100-2
Lot 1, Sec. 12, TP 12, NWP 2713
RN 84406-0000-8
water system for a second or third service connection if more than one
service connection is installed
 $14,539.00 for direct driveway access to 256 Street
plus interest calculated annually from the date of completion of the Extended
Services as certified by the General Manager – Public Works & Development
Services of the Municipality (the “Completion Date”) to the date of connection of the
Benefitting Lands to the Extended Services;
H.
The Latecomer Charge when paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and
collected by the Municipality shall pursuant to Section 939 (7) of the Local
Page 6 of 8
Government Act R.S.B.C. 1996, c.323 be paid to the Subdivider as provided for in
this Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE AS AUTHORIZED BY Section 939 (9) of the Local Government Act
R.S.B.C 1996, c. 323, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.
The Latecomer Charge, if paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and collected by
the Municipality within fifteen (15) years of the Completion Date shall be paid to the
Subdivider and in such case payment will be made within 30 days of the next June
30th or December 31st that follows the date on which the Latecomer Charge was
collected by the Municipality.
2.
This Agreement shall expire and shall be of no further force and effect for any
purpose on the earlier of the payment of the Latecomer Charge by the Municipality to
the Subdivider, or fifteen (15) years from the Completion Date, and thereafter the
Municipality shall be forever fully released and wholly discharged from any and all
liability and obligations herein, or howsoever arising pertaining to the Latecomer
Charge, and whether arising before or after the expiry of this Agreement.
3.
The Subdivider represents and warrants to the Municipality that the Subdivider has
not received, claimed, demanded or collected money or any other consideration from
the owner of the Benefitting Lands for the provision, or expectation of the provision
of the Extended Services, other than as contemplated and as provided for herein;
and further represents and warrants that he has not entered into any agreement with
the owner of the Benefitting Lands for consideration in any way related to or
connected directly or indirectly with the provision of the Extended Services. The
representations and warranties of the Subdivider herein shall, notwithstanding
paragraph 2 of this Agreement, survive the expiry of this Agreement.
4.
The Subdivider (if more than one corporate body or person) hereby agrees that the
Municipality shall remit the Latecomer Charge to each corporate body or person in
equal shares.
5.
If the Subdivider is a sole corporate body or person, the Municipality shall remit the
Latecomer Charge to the said sole corporate body or person, with a copy to the
following (name and address of director of corporate body, accountant, lawyer, etc.):
6.
In the event that the Subdivider is not the owner of the said lands, the owner shall
hereby grant, assign, transfer and set over unto the Subdivider, his heirs and
assigns, all rights, title and interest under this Agreement.
Page 7 of 8
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto affixed their respective Corporate
Seals, attested by the hands of their respective officers duly authorized in that behalf, the
day and year first above written.
SUBDIVIDER
Subdivider - Authorized Signatory
Subdivider - Authorized Signatory
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
Corporate Officer - Authorized Signatory
Page 8 of 8
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Network Equipment Replacement
MEETING DATE:
March 3, 2014
MEETING: Committee of the Whole
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The District needs to replace both its core network routers and edge switches in order to properly
secure and meet the increased demands of performance, resiliency and complexity required to
support data communications across its multi-site network.
In 2014 a capital project of $250,000 was approved to upgrade and replace the core network
routers with a further planned project of $100,000 to replace the edge switches.
The top ranking proponent, Spyders Inc., delivered a proposal to replace and upgrade all of the
network equipment at the same time with Juniper hardware. By combining the replacement of the
network core and edge infrastructure, the District is able to secure preferred pricing and save
significant dollars, with much of the equipment being discounted at 78% below list price. There are
enormous benefits in upgrading and replacing all of the equipment at the same time, including
reduced costs, administrative burden and compatibility with protocols and management interfaces.
As well, making these changes at the same time will eliminate duplicate work and integration with
existing equipment.
We are seeking approval to award a contract to Spyders Inc., for the purchase, installation and
configuration of our network core routers and edge switches, in the amount of $248,014.54, plus
taxes with a further 10% contingency for unanticipated additional works.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the contract for replacement of the network core routers and edge switches be awarded to
Spyders Inc. in the amount of $248,014.54, plus taxes and further that a 10% contingency be
allowed for unanticipated additional works. And further that the Corporate Officer be authorized to
execute the contract.
1131
DISCUSSION:
The District’s current network equipment has reached the end of its useful life for performance,
reliability and resiliency. We have had some recent failures resulting in unplanned down time of
District services. It was determined that the replacement of this equipment was necessary to ensure
all of the recent network changes, additions and improvements are fully realized.
Over the past five years, the District has added several services to the corporate network
infrastructure, including VOIP phones, increased internet bandwidth, additional/growth in sites, WiFi, and increases in mobile and internet services. All of these increases in services contribute to the
increased complexity in design and bandwidth demands on the corporate network.
In 2014 a capital project of $250,000 was approved to upgrade and replace the core network
routers with a further planned project of $100,000 to replace the edge switches.
The top ranking proponent, Spyders Inc, has produced a bid to replace all of the equipment at one
time. By combining the replacement of all of the network equipment, we are able to leverage deeper
discounts on both equipment and labour, with up to 78% off list pricing for much of the network gear
and that this discount will remain with the District on an ongoing basis.
b) Desired Outcome:
The desired outcome is to replace the current network core and edge network infrastructure with
Juniper hardware, with the purchase, installation and configuration of this equipment from Spyders
Inc..
c) Strategic Alignment:
This project is consistent with the Corporate Strategic values of Financial Management in providing
quality services to the District in a cost effective manner,
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
The interdepartmental implications for disruption are low as these services are replaced out of
business hours and should result in minimal disruption in services during business hours.
New hardware and an increase in performance and reliability with improved features will ensure we
can deliver excellent service.
e) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The cost for the purchase, installation and configuration of the routers and core switches is
$248,014.54 and included in our Financial Plan.
Page 2
f)
Alternatives:
The alternative is to replace equipment in phases, starting with the network core routers. This will
likely result in increased overall costs as we are able to leverage considerable savings by replacing
both the core and edge network equipment at the same time. We also save on labour costs as we
eliminate duplicate work and the interim step of integrated our existing edge switches with the new
equipment for the short time that the older equipment remains in place.
CONCLUSIONS:
Staff recommend Spyders Inc. be awarded the contract to install and configure the network core
routers and edge switches in the amount of $248,014.54 and that the Corporate Officer sign the
contract.
“Original signed by Christina Crabtree”_
_
Prepared by: Christina Crabtree, Director of Information Technology
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
_____
Approved by: Paul Gill, General Manager of Corporate and Financial Services
“Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule”_____________________
cc:
Page 3
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Server Replacement
MEETING DATE:
March 3, 2014
MEETING: Committee of the Whole
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The District needs to replace several servers in its current infrastructure as they have reached the
end of their useful life. In addition, new servers are required to support and upgrade existing
services. In order to achieve the best overall value for server procurement, the District put out an
RFP to standardize on a single vendor’s equipment. Funding for this project is included in our 20142018 Financial Plan.
Standardization of equipment and establishing a business relationship with a single vendor provides
enormous benefits to the District, including reduced costs of hardware and administration and an
increase in compatibility, service and support.
The top ranking proponent for this RFP is Dell. Dell’s proposal includes all of the necessary servers,
chassis, switching and cable infrastructure required to replace and upgrade the servers. The
proposal also secures pricing on the purchase of new equipment.
We are seeking approval to award a contract to Dell, for the purchase of 20 servers, 2 chassis and
all of the necessary switching, cable and optic equipment in the amount of 208,868.26 plus taxes
and to provide a 10% contingency for unanticipated additional works.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the contract for replacement of the District servers and required server infrastructure be
awarded to Dell in the amount of $208,868.26, plus taxes and further that a 10% contingency be
allowed for unanticipated additional works and further that the Corporate Officer be authorized to
execute the contract.
Page 1
1132
DISCUSSION:
The District needs to replace several servers in its current infrastructure as they have reached the
end of their useful life. In addition, new servers are required to support existing services. In order to
achieve the best overall value for server procurement at the District, the District put out an RFP to
standardize on a single vendor’s equipment.
Standardizing on equipment and establishing a business relationship with a single vendor provides
enormous benefits to the District. Benefits of standardization includes ease of administration as a
single set of management tools need to be learned and used to mange the fleet, increased
compatibility as the hardware supports and implements the technology in the same way and a
reduction in hardware costs as parts of the server infrastructure can be consolidated and shared
among servers. There are also substantial cost savings with volume purchasing and secured pricing
and discounts.
The top ranking proponent for this RFP is Dell. Dell’s proposal includes all of the necessary servers,
chassis, switching and cable infrastructure required for the servers to be deployed in a resilient
manner.
We are seeking approval to award a contract to Dell, for the purchase of 20 servers, 2 chassis and
all of the necessary switching, cable and optic equipment in the amount of 208,868.26 plus taxes
with a further 10% contingency for unanticipated additional works. .
b) Desired Outcome:
The desired outcome is to upgrade services and replace the current end of life server infrastructure
with the purchase of the new equipment from Dell.
c) Strategic Alignment:
This project is consistent with the Corporate Strategic values of Financial Management in providing
quality hardware to the District in a cost effective manner,
The interdepartmental implications are low in terms of disruption as the servers will be replaced out
of business hours and should be completed with minimal disruption to customers.
New hardware and an increase in performance and reliability with improved features will ensure we
can deliver excellent service.
Funding for this project was anticipated in the District’s financial plan. About 80% of the funding is
from the Equipment Replacement Fund with the balance funded from general revenue.
Page 2
f)
Alternatives:
The alternative would be to not replace the existing end of life servers or to upgrade the existing
services. As the infrastructure is end of life, support for this hardware becomes very costly or is not
available. Furthermore, running on outdated hardware will certainly produce an increased number of
failures, reduce performance and affect customer service.
CONCLUSIONS:
Staff recommends Dell be awarded the contract for purchase of servers and the necessary
infrastructure in the amount of $208,868.26 and that the Corporate Officer sign the contract.
“Original signed by Christina Crabtree”____________________
_
Prepared by: Christina Crabtree, Director of Information Technology
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
_______________________
Approved by: Paul Gill, General Manager of Corporate and Financial Services
“Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule”___________________________
cc:
Page 3
TO:
FROM:
MEETING DATE:
FILE NO:
MEETING:
SUBJECT:
MAPLE RIDGE CONCERT BAND REQUEST
March 3, 2014
0640-01
COW
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The following recommendation was discussed at the Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure
Services Commission meeting of February 13, 2014, and at the direction of the Commission, is
being forwarded to Council for consideration and direction.
That the following requests made by the Maple Ridge Concert Band Association be approved:
(a)
To complete the wrought iron ornamentation and copper roof treatment on the Maple Ridge
Bandstand subject to meeting the District’s permit and safety requirements.
(b)
To recognize their sponsors with the placement of raised bronze plaques consistent with
those already in place on the bandstand steps, to a maximum of twenty plaques.
(c)
To fundraise during the 20th anniversary celebration event, for the funds needed to complete
the remaining bandstand projects.
The staff report with background information is attached.
‘Original signed by Kelly Swift’
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Kelly Swift, General Manager,
Community Development, Parks & Recreation Services
‘Original signed by Jim Rule’
_______________________________________________
:ik
Attachment –PLS Commission Report of February 13, 2014
1151
Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows
Parks & Leisure Services Commission Report
REGULAR MEETING
February 13, 2014
SUBJECT:
MAPLE RIDGE CONCERT BAND ASSOCIATION REQUEST
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Mr. Tom Walker and Ms. Gale Yip from the Maple Ridge Concert Band recently met with staff
to discuss their plans to host a 20th anniversary celebration of the Maple Ridge Bandstand.
The purpose of the meeting was two fold; they wished to share their ideas for a special event
in June 2014 and, to request approval to complete aspects of the original construction
project they were unable to complete twenty years ago, as a result of a funding shortfall.
RECOMMENDATION:
That a recommendation be sent to Maple Ridge Council that the following requests made by
the Maple Ridge Concert Band Association be considered for approval:
(a)
To complete the wrought iron ornamentation and copper roof treatment on the Maple
Ridge Bandstand subject to meeting the District’s permit and safety requirements.
(b)
To recognize their sponsors with the placement of raised bronze plaques consistent
with those already in place on the bandstand steps, to a maximum of twenty plaques.
(c)
To fundraise during the 20th anniversary celebration event, for the funds needed to
complete the remaining bandstand projects.
DISCUSSION:
The Maple Ridge Concert Band played a leadership role in the fundraising, design and
construction of the Maple Ridge Bandstand almost 20 years ago. Mr. Walker was the
architect for the project and has a strong desire to see the project through to completion.
The work will involve adding ornamental iron scroll hangers on each of the eight posts
and refinishing the copper roof so that it will develop a patina over a relatively short
period of time.
b) Desired Outcome:
That the Maple Ridge Concert Band as well as some of the other original partners in this
project be authorized to complete the project in the manner that it was originally
designed.
\\mr.corp\docs\CDPR-Admin\01-Admin\0540-Council-Committees\20-PLSC\02-Agendas\Regular\2014\2014-0213\PLSC_MR_Concert_Band_Anniv_2014-02-13.doc
#1
c) Citizen/Customer Implications:
The completion of the wrought iron work and the acid wash of the roof will provide a
more interesting and aesthetically pleasing structure in Memorial Park for the
foreseeable future.
Staff would like to ensure that the acid washing of the roof is carried out by a skilled
professional as the copper roof is very valuable and considerable care should be taken
to ensure that this work does not create a negative environmental impact.
The additional work to the bandstand is an initiative of the Maple Ridge Concert Band
and they have offered to raise funds to complete the work described above. The District
is not being asked to fund any of the improvements beyond the ongoing care of the
facility in the future, which is not anticipated to affect existing budgets in this regard.
f) Alternatives:
In this case the alternative would be to deny one or more of the recommendations
above. Staff suggests that the proposed work will provide a long term benefit to the
community.
CONCLUSIONS:
Staff recommends that the additional ornamentation and the acid wash be permitted and
also, that the group be permitted to acknowledge their sponsors’ generosity through the use
of plaques on the bandstand steps, provided that the number of plaques be limited so that it
does not detract from the various uses of this public facility.
‘Original signed by David Boag’
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: David Boag
Director, Parks and Facilities
‘Original signed by Kelly Swift’
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Kelly Swift
General Manager, Community Development,
Parks and Recreation Services
db
\\mr.corp\docs\CDPR-Admin\01-Admin\0540-Council-Committees\20-PLSC\02-Agendas\Regular\2014\2014-0213\PLSC_MR_Concert_Band_Anniv_2014-02-13.doc
#2

Agenda and Reports

Transcription

Similar documents

Open living room

BIRKDALE VILLAGE | HUNTERSVILLE, NC MIXED-USE

June-Aug 2016 - Maple Ridge Museum

Get the pdf HERE.

Manaslu East Ridge Attempt. Hervé Thivierge, Gilles Claret Tournier

Residential Fire Safety Kits

Rafco Exceptional Service

Floodwatch®

Specialist Residential Risks