SITE SELECTION ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION HIGH SCHOOL

Peninsula High School
Students’ Cities of Residence
City
Zip
Code
City
Zip
Code
Students
%
Students
%
Burlingame
94010
30
8.3%
40
8.1%
Millbrae
94030
18
5.0%
21
4.3%
Foster City
94404
16
4.4%
27
5.5%
San Bruno
94066
87
24.0%
113
23.0%
San Mateo
94401
110
30.4%
160
32.6%
San Mateo
94402
35
9.7%
48
9.8%
San Mateo
94403
66
18.2%
82
16.7%
362
100%
491
100%
211
58.3%
290
59.1%
TOTAL
Total Students Attending
PHS Residing in the
City of San Mateo:
2011-12
2010-11
Peninsula High School Students
Attending San Mateo Adult School
City
Zip
Code
Spring
2012
Fall
2011
Spring
2011
Fall
2010
Spring
2010
Total
%
Burlingame
94010
1
3
2
0
0
6
4.5%
Millbrae
94030
0
0
1
1
0
2
1.5%
Foster City
94404
2
1
1
0
1
5
3.8%
San Bruno
94066
6
8
5
5
2
26
19.5
%
San Mateo
94401
11
22
10
13
4
60
45.1
%
San Mateo
94402
3
1
1
1
4
10
7.5%
San Mateo
94403
5
10
2
7
0
24
18.0
%
28
45
22
27
11
133
100%
Total
Total Students Enrolled at PHS and
Attending Adult School and
Living in the City of San Mateo:
94 students or 71% of Total
PHS Students Attending Adult School
SITE SELECTION ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION HIGH SCHOOL
PURCHASE PROPERTY
PRO’s
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
CON’s
Only needs additional security staff to address increased o
enrollment
Less coordination required between multiple school sites
Student psychological impact would be positive
Purchase land specific to the needs of District and
students
Build structure specific to the needs of District and
students
Control over the location of school to address
transportation and access to community based resources
More flexibility to scope of the program and scheduling
Greater control of the impact of the scope and scheduling
on the community and stakeholders
Central location
Separate identity
o
o
o
o
o
o
Full environmental impact report. Adds approximately
one-year. This requires full comprehensive studies that
are reviewed by multiple agencies and public hearing
o Traffic
o Noise
o Glare and night lighting
o Architectural impact on neighboring houses and
business
o Utility and off-site impacts
o Potential for Endangered species issues
o Fish and Game, Fish and wildlife and Army Corps
o Construction disruption
o DTSC Review – Can be very time consuming
o Numerous public hearing during board meeting
o Other studies
Time delay due to studies - Minimum delay of one year
and beyond
Study expense would be expensive and could range
between $500,000 to $3,000,000 including City required
improvements
Invoke involvement of California Department Education
oversight
Property expense associated with 2.5 to 3 acre site
Time would result in construction escalation
NIMB
SITE SELECTION ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION HIGH SCHOOL
EXISTING SCHOOL SITE
PRO’s
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Opportunity to rethink Alternative Education within the
District
o Synergy of shared courses
No involvement of DTSC
Timing and few delays
Scheduling possibilities that could support more than
“just” alternative education students
Money spent on building programs and facilities not land
o Support new graduation requirement (CTE 10
credits)
Opportunity to consolidate summer school program on
one site without impacting comprehensive school sites
CEQA compliance is less extensive than new site
acqquition
Reduced construction costs including reduced off-site
development
CON’s
o
o
o
o
o
o
Additional security staffing with co-mingling of students
from different campuses
Security staff
Traffic issues-limiting scheduling possibilities
Psychological impact on students
o “cross the parking lot and now transformed”
Disparity of programs may be more apparent when
compared to comprehensive high schools
More impact to site
Comparison of Other SF Bay Area Districts
District
School, city & ADA Campus
Location
Sequoia UHSD
Redwood H.S.
San Carlos
ADA 300
Separate campus with On El Camino Real, 1
district offices of
mile north of Sequoia
SpEd and C&I
HS
MVLAUHSD
Mountain View &
Los Altos
Alta Vista H.S.
Mountain View
ADA 200
On Mountain View
H.S. campus &
Freestyle Academy
Comm., Art, Tech.
Center of District and
next to HW 85 and
near El Camino Real
Tamalpais UHSD
San Andreas H.S.
Larkspur
ADA 120
Redwood H.S.,
Tamiscal Ind. Study,
Mewah Opportunity
School, District
Office
Center of District
next to HW 101
Fremont UHSD
Alternative Ed.
Center
Sunnyvale
On Fremont H.S.,
Adult Ed.& Comm.
Center, Community
Day School, District
Office
Center of District,
between HW 85 and
El Camino Real
District
School Campus
Location
SSFUSD
Baden H.S.
Adult School
South San Francisco
ADA 80
Center of District, one
block from El Camino Real
and SSFHS, Boys and Girls
Club, District Office
Jefferson UHSD
Thornton H.S.
Daly City
ADA 110
Separate
Near Mission St., and HW
280, .5 mile from
Jefferson H.S.
Acalanes UHSD
Alternative Ed Ctr
(former Del Oro
HS) Walnut Creek
ADA 70
Adult School
Center of district, near
Rossmoor Pkwy
San Ramon Valley
USD
Del Amigo H.S.
Danville
ADA 110
Alternative Ed. Ctr
San Ramon
ADA 40
San Ramon
Valley H.S.
Center of District, near HW
680
Dougherty
Valley H.S.,
District
Office
Eastside of district
Crestmoor High School Site
SITE SELECTION ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION HIGH SCHOOL
CRESTMOOR SCHOOL SITE
PRO’s
o
o
o
No involvement of DTSC
Timing and few delays
Money spent on building programs and facilities not
land
o
o
o
o
o
o
CON’s
Support new graduation requirement (CTE 10
credits)
CEQA review and compliance is less extensive than
new site acquition
No requirement to purchase land resulting in cost
savings
Reduced community opposition by placing on and
existing school site
Gym space
Difficult cutting class due difficulty getting home
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Expensive site development work due to poor soils
conditions
Cost of demolishing existing campus (except perhaps
gym)
Requires temporary campus and double move of
Peninsula High School for construction
Not convenient to students residence (80% south of
Millbrae Ave and east of El Camino)
Not centrally located
Difficult to acquire new identity
Requires District to provide transportation
Limited access to public transportation
Slow emergency response time
Distance and lack of partnerships and work in close
proximity to campus or public transportation
Distance from Adult School and Regional Occupation
Program
Identify
Not centrally located
Future enrollment growth anticipated in southern part of
the District
Capuchino High School
SITE SELECTION ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION HIGH SCHOOL
CAPUCHINO SCHOOL SITE
PRO’s
CON’s
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Not a viable alternative education site option
o Only 1.6 Acre area for Alternative
Education – too small for facilities
needed.
o Buildable land is too long and narrow
for reasonable development.
o Hetch Hetchy intersects campus
Majority of Alternative Education students
resident in southern part of District
Enrollment disparity
CHS enrollment anticipated to be flat with
student growth in southern portion of district
Not centrally located
Requires additional security
Understaffed police force
Proximity to Adult School and other
alternative programs
Size and quality of Alternative Education
program may be compromised
Mills High School
SITE SELECTION ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION HIGH SCHOOL
MILLS HIGH SCHOOL SITE
PRO’s
CON’s
o
o
o
Not a viable alternative education high school site
option
o Would require a sports field to be repurposed for
Alternative Education High School building site
o MHS would lose 50% of the sites athletic facilities
Majority of Alternative Ed students reside in San Mateo
Hetch Hetchy intersects campus
Burlingame High School
SITE SELECTION ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION HIGH SCHOOL
BURLINGAME HIGH SCHOOL SITE
PRO’s
CON’s
o
Not a viable alternative education high school option
o Would require sports facilities (fields, tennis
court, swimming pool) be repurposed for
alternative high school
o Front of school acreage incurred arsenic mediation
o Home Economics building has too small of a
footprint and resides in the center of the campus
o Parking
o
Fewer city agencies and programs that
help to serve at risk students
San Mateo High School
SITE SELECTION ALTERNATIVE HIGH SCHOOL
SAN MATEO HIGH SCHOOL SITE
PRO’s
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Adequate room for new Buildings if relocate Adult
Education, Bus Barn and District Office
New ball fields if locate Alternative Education buildings
to the northwest.
Opportunity to rethink Alternative Education within the
District
o Synergy of shared courses
o Combined and use multiply resources for
alternative high school students as well as ALL
SMUHSD students and adults
No involvement of DTSC
Timing and few delays
Scheduling possibilities that could support more than
“just” alternative education students
Easy access to the Adult School programs
Money spent on building programs and facilities not land
o Support new graduation requirement (CTE 10
credits)
Opportunity to consolidate summer school program on
one site without impacting comprehensive school sites
CEQA review and compliance is less extensive than new
site acquition
Reduced construction costs including reduced off-site
development
Access to other resources (YMCA, Boys and Girls
Club), youth athletics)
Central location-close to 101 and public transportation
Largest percentage of students reside in San Mateo,
Foster City and Burlingame areas
Supportive and highly qualified police force
CON’s
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Additional cost to relocate Bus barn
Additional cost to relocate Adult education relocatable
classrooms
Additional security staff required with co-mingling of
students from different campuses
Traffic issues-limiting scheduling possibilities
More students on site
Psychological impact on students
o “cross the parking lot and now transformed”
Disparity of programs may be more apparent when
compared to comprehensive high schools
Large at-risk population being served at SMHS and
Adult School
Close proximity to crime and gang violence area
Aragon High School
SITE SELECTION CONTINUATION HIGH SCHOOL
ARAGON HIGH SCHOOL SITE
PRO’s
CON’s
o
Not a viable option for alternative education high school
o Simply no reasonable place to build the
Alternative Ed facility without repurposing fields.
o Impacted site with expansion of neighboring grade
school
Hillsdale High School
SITE SELECTION ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION HIGH SCHOOL
HILLSDALE HIGH SCHOOL SITE
PRO’s
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Opportunity to rethink Alternative Education within the
District
o Synergy of shared courses
No involvement of DTSC
Timing and few delays
Scheduling possibilities that could support more than
“just” alternative education students
Money spent on building programs and facilities not land
o Support new graduation requirement (CTE 10
credits)
Opportunity to consolidate summer school program on
one site without impacting comprehensive school sites
CEQA compliance - less intense review
Reduced construction costs including reduced off-site
development
CON’s
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
4.7 acre site is too close to future and current classroom
buildings – increase student interactions between the two
schools.
4.7 acre site is immediately adjacent to neighbors who
regularly have issues with student activities.
Site at 31st Avenue too small and too close to residents
on a quieter residential street.
Additional security staffing required
Traffic issues-limiting scheduling possibilities
Psychological impact on students
o “cross the parking lot and now transformed”
Disparity of programs may be more apparent when
compared to comprehensive high schools
Requires District to provide transportation
Limited access public transportation
Proximity to major shopping mall
Measure O
Pending Project List
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Technology Replenishment
San Mateo Brick Building
Burlingame High School Building Replacement
San Mateo High School Bleachers
Burlingame High School Bleachers
Capuchino High School Electrical Panel Upgrade
2 way radios
District Office
Alternative High school
Property
Hillsdale High School New Classroom Building
Solar Thermal
Mills High School Artificial Turf Field
Capuchino High School Artificial Turf Field
Transite Replacement Metal Schools
Concurrence
Under discussion
Pending enrollment growth realized
Funding surplus