5 setup of equipment under test

Transcription

Report No: 90921102-E
CE EMC
TEST REPORT
for
IPC
Model: IPC-619S; IPC-619XXXXXXXXXXXX;
SYS-4U619X-XXXXXXXXXX (X = 0-9, A-Z or Blank)
Test Report Number:
90921102-E
Issued for
Advantech Co. Ltd.
No.1, Alley 20, Lane 26, Rueiguang Road, Neihu District,
Taipei 114, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Issued By:
Compliance Certification Services Inc.
Linkuo Laboratory
No. 81-1, Lane 210, Pa-De 2nd Rd., Luchu Hsiang,
Taoyuan Shien, (338), Taiwan, R.O.C.
TEL: 886-3-324-0332
FAX: 886-3-324-5235
E-Mail: [email protected]
Issued Date: September 25, 2009
Note: This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of
Compliance Certification Services Inc. This document may be altered or revised by
Compliance Certification Services Inc. personnel only, and shall be noted in the revision
section of the document. The client should not use it to claim product endorsement by TAF,
A2LA, NIST or any government agencies. The test results in the report only apply to the
tested sample.
Page 1 / 79
Revision History
Rev.
Issue Date
00
September 25, 2009
Revisions
Initial Issue
Effect
Page
ALL
Revised By
Celine Chou
Page 2
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
TEST CERTIFICATION......................................................................................................4
2
TEST RESULT SUMMARY................................................................................................5
3
EUT DESCRIPTION...........................................................................................................7
4
TEST METHODOLOGY.....................................................................................................8
4.1. DECISION OF FINAL TEST MODE....................................................................................8
4.2. EUT SYSTEM OPERATION...............................................................................................8
5
SETUP OF EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST............................................................................9
5.1. DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS ...............................................................................9
5.2. CONFIGURATION OF SYSTEM UNDER TEST.................................................................9
6
FACILITIES AND ACCREDITATIONS.............................................................................10
6.1. FACILITIES ......................................................................................................................10
6.2. ACCREDITATIONS ..........................................................................................................10
6.3. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY.................................................................................... 11
7
EMISSION TEST..............................................................................................................12
7.1. CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT....................................................................12
7.2. CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT AT TELECOMMUNICATION PORTS..........17
7.3. RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT.........................................................................20
7.4. HARMONICS CURRENT MEASUREMENT.....................................................................31
7.5. VOLTAGE FLUCTUATION AND FLICKS MEASUREMENT .............................................36
8
IMMUNITY TEST .............................................................................................................41
8.1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION ...............................................................................................41
8.2. GENERAL PERFORMANCE CRITERIA DESCRIPTION .................................................43
8.3. ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE (ESD)............................................................................44
8.4. RADIATED, RADIO-FREQUENCY, ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD (RS)...........................49
8.5. ELECTRICAL FAST TRANSIENT (EFT)...........................................................................54
8.6. SURGE IMMUNITY TEST ................................................................................................57
8.7. CONDUCTED RADIO FREQUENCY DISTURBANCES (CS) ..........................................60
8.8. POWER FREQUENCY MAGNETIC FIELD......................................................................64
8.9. VOLTAGE DIP & VOLTAGE INTERRUPTIONS................................................................67
9
PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION.......................................................70
Page 3
1 TEST CERTIFICATION
Product: IPC
Model:
IPC-619S; IPC-619XXXXXXXXXXXX;
Brand: ADVANTECH
Applicant: Advantech Co., Ltd.
No.1, Alley 20, Lane 26, Rueiguang Road, Neihu District, Taipei 114, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Manufacturer: Advantech Co. Ltd.
No.1, Alley 20, Lane 26, Rueiguang Road, Neihu District, Taipei 114, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Tested: September 23 ~ 25, 2009
Test Voltage: 230VAC, 50Hz
Applicable EN 55022: 2006 +A1: 2007, Class A
Standards: EN 55011: 2007 + A2: 2007 Group 1, Class A
EN 61000-6-4: 2007
EN 61000-3-2: 2006, Class D
EN 61000-3-3: 1995+ A1: 2001 + A2: 2005
EN 55024: 1998 + A1: 2001 + A2: 2003
EN 61000-6-2: 2005
IEC 61000-4-2: 1995+A1: 1998+A2: 2000
IEC 61000-4-3: 2006
IEC 61000-4-4: 2004
IEC 61000-4-5: 2005
IEC 61000-4-6: 2003 + A1: 2004 + A2: 2006
IEC 61000-4-8: 1993+A1: 2000
IEC 61000-4-11:2004
Deviation from Applicable Standard
1. According to applicant’s declaration, this EUT is a class A product and to be market in industrial environment
only.
2. We carried out all the test standards on this report as per manufacturer defined.
The above equipment has been tested by Compliance Certification Services Inc., and found
compliance with the requirements set forth in the Electromagnetic Compatibility Directive
2004/108/EC and technical standards mentioned above. The results of testing in this report
apply only to the product/system, which was tested. Other similar equipment will not
necessarily produce the same results due to production tolerance and measurement
uncertainties.
Approved by:
Reviewed by:
David Wang
Director
Ethan Huang
Section Manager
Page 4
2 TEST RESULT SUMMARY
EMISSION【EN 55022: 2006 +A1: 2007; EN 61000-6-4: 2007】
Standard
Item
Result
Remarks
EN 55011: 2007 + A2: 2007
EN 55022: 2006 +A1: 2007
EN 61000-6-4: 2007
Conducted (Main Port)
PASS
Meet Class A limit
Conducted
(Telecommunication port)
Radiated
PASS
Meet Class A limit
PASS
Meet Class A limit
EN 61000-3-2: 2006
Harmonic current emissions
PASS
Meet Class D limit
EN 61000-3-3: 1995+ A1: 2001 +
A2: 2005
Voltage fluctuations & flicker
PASS
Meets the requirements
IMMUNITY【EN 55024: 1998 + A1: 2001 + A2: 2003】
Standard
IEC 61000-4-2: 1995 + A1: 1998 +
A2: 2000
Item
Result
Remarks
ESD
PASS
Meets the requirements of Performance Criterion B
IEC 61000-4-3: 2006
RS
PASS
Meets the requirements of Performance Criterion A
IEC 61000-4-4: 2004
EFT
PASS
IEC 61000-4-5: 2005
Surge
PASS
CS
PASS
PFMF
PASS
PASS
Meets the requirements of
Voltage Dips:
1) >95% reduction Performance Criterion B
2) 30% reduction Performance Criterion C
Voltage Interruptions:
1) >95% reduction Performance Criterion C
IEC 61000-4-6: 2003 + A1: 2004 +
A2: 2006
IEC 61000-4-8:1993 + A1: 2000
IEC 61000-4-11: 2004
Voltage
dips &
voltage
variations
Page 5
IMMUNITY【EN 61000-6-2: 2005】
Standard
IEC 61000-4-2: 1995 + A1: 1998 +
A2: 2000
Item
Result
Remarks
ESD
PASS
IEC 61000-4-3: 2006
RS
PASS
IEC 61000-4-4: 2004
EFT
PASS
IEC 61000-4-5: 2005
Surge
PASS
CS
PASS
PFMF
PASS
IEC 61000-4-6: 2003 + A1: 2004 +
A2: 2006
IEC 61000-4-8:1993 + A1: 2000
Meets the requirements of
Voltage Dips:
Voltage
1) 0% reduction Performance Criterion B
dips &
PASS
IEC 61000-4-11: 2004
voltage
variations
Note: 1. The statements of test result on the above are decided by the request of test standard only; the
measurement uncertainties are not factored into this compliance determination.
2. The information of measurement uncertainty is available upon the customer’s request.
Page 6
3 EUT DESCRIPTION
Product
IPC
Brand Name
IPC-619S; IPC-619XXXXXXXXXXXX;
Model
ADVANTECH
Applicant
Advantech Co., Ltd.
Serial Number
90921102
Received Date
September 25, 2009
EUT Power Rating
100-240VAC, 47-63Hz
AC Power Cord Type
Unshielded, 1.8m (Detachable)
Power Supply Manufacturer
FSP
Model
FSP250-60ATV
FSP300-60PLN
Power Supply Power Rating
For FSP250-60ATV
I/P: 115/230VAC, 60/50 Hz, 10/5A
O/P: +3.3VDC, 20A; +5VDC, 27A; +12VDC, 13A or 17.0A;
+5Vsb, 2.0A; -5VDC, 0.3A; -12VDC, 0.8A
For FSP300-60PLN
I/P: 100-240VAC, 60-50 Hz, 10A
O/P: +3.3VDC, 28A; +5VDC, 30A; +12VDC, 15A;
+5Vsb, 2.0A; -5VDC, 0.3A; -12VDC, 0.8A
AC Power Cord Type
Unshielded, 1.8m (Detachable)
CPU Manufacturer
Intel
Memory Manufacturer
2GB
Mother Board Manufacturer
Model
Core™ 2 Duo 2.8GHz
ADVANTECH
Model
PCI-7020
Backplane Manufacturer
ADVANTECH
Model
PCI-7110P3S6
Chassis Manufacturer
ADVANTECH
Model
IPC-619SB00XE
HDD Manufacturer (Optional) Seagate
Model
ST3160318AS (160GB)
ODD Manufacturer (Optional) LITE-ON
Model
iHAS120
I/O PORT
I/O Port Type
Q’TY
TESTED WITH
1) D-SUB Port
1
1
2) PS/2 Port
1
1
3) USB Port
4
4
4) LAN Port
1
1
Note:
1. All model numbers (list on this report) are identical, just for marketing purpose only.
2. The means of “X” (X = 0-9, A-Z or Blank) on model number is just for marketing purpose only.
3. Client consigns one model sample (IPC-619S) to test. Therefore, testing Lab. just guarantees the
units, which have been tested.
Page 7
4 TEST METHODOLOGY
4.1. DECISION OF FINAL TEST MODE
1.
The following test mode(s) were scanned during the preliminary test:
Pre-Test Mode
Mode 1: 1920 x 1440 Resolution, 60Hz --- FSP300-60PLN Power Supply
Mode 2: 1920 x 1440 Resolution, 60Hz --- FSP250-60ATV Power Supply
2.
After the preliminary scan, the following test mode was found to produce the highest
emission level.
Final Test Mode
Emission
Immunity
Conducted
Emission
Mode 1
Radiated
Emission
Mode 1
Mode 1
Then, the above highest emission mode of the configuration of the EUT and cable was
chosen for all final test items.
4.2. EUT SYSTEM OPERATION
1 EMI test software was loaded and executed under “Windows XP” environment.
A communicated software was loaded and executed to communicate between
2
EUT and remote side.
3 EUT sends and receives data from Notebook PC on remote side via LAN Cable.
4 Data was sent to monitor filling the screen with upper case of “H” patterns.
Test program sequentially exercised all related I/O’s of EUT and sent “H” patterns
5
to all applicable output ports of EUT.
6 Repeat step 2 to 5
Note: Test program is self-repeating throughout the test.
Page 8
5 SETUP OF EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST
5.1. DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNITS
The EUT has been tested as an independent unit together with other necessary accessories or support units.
The following support units or accessories were used to form a representative test configuration during the
tests.
No.
Equipment
Model No.
Serial No.
FCC ID
Trade Name
Data Cable
D-SUB Cable:
Shielded, 1.8m
with two cores
Power Cord
CN-0FC255-46633-6
75-24TKS
FCC DoC
DELL
Y-SZ49
BT550DG
FCC DoC
Logitech
Unshielded, 1.8m
N/A
USB Keyboard
6512-UV
21200201-12939999
53
FCC DoC
ACER
Unshielded, 1.8m
N/A
4
USB Mouse
MO19UCA
020509291
FCC DoC
HP
Unshielded, 1.8m
N/A
5
Flash Device
U172
C072001301669
FCC DoC
PQI
Shielded, 1.8m
N/A
6
Flash Device
U172
C07200131674
FCC DoC
PQI
Shielded, 1.8m
1
LCD Monitor
2407WFPb
2
PS/2 Keyboard
3
7
Notebook PC
(Remote)
COMPAQ NC
4010
CNU441F8LV
FCC DOC
LAN Cable:
Unshielded, 10m
HP
Unshielded, 1.8m
N/A
AC I/P:
Unshielded, 1.8m
DC O/P:
Unshielded, 1.8m
with a core
Note: Grounding was established in accordance with the manufacturer’s requirements and conditions for the
intended use.
5.2. CONFIGURATION OF SYSTEM UNDER TEST
1. LCD Monitor
2. PS/2 Keyboard
3. USB Keyboard
4. USB Mouse
5. Flash Device
6. Flash Device
7. Notebook PC
---
---
D-SUB
IPC
(EUT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Test table
7
(Remote)
Page 9
6 FACILITIES AND ACCREDITATIONS
6.1. FACILITIES
All measurement facilities used to collect the measurement data are located at
No. 81-1, Lane 210, Pa-De 2nd Rd., Luchu Hsiang, Taoyuan Shien, Taiwan.
The sites are constructed in conformance with the requirements of ANSI C63.4 and CISPR
Publication 22. All receiving equipment conforms to CISPR 16-1-1, CISPR 16-1-2, CISPR
16-1-3, CISPR 16-1-4, CISPR 16-1-5.
6.2. ACCREDITATIONS
Our laboratories are accredited and approved by the following approval agencies according
to ISO/IEC 17025.
Taiwan
USA
TAF
A2LA
The measuring facility of laboratories has been authorized or registered by the following
approval agencies.
Industry Canada
Canada
TUV Rheinland
Germany
VCCI
Japan
BSMI
Taiwan
FCC
USA
Copies of granted accreditation certificates are available for downloading from our web site,
http:///www.ccsrf.com
Page 10
6.3. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY
Where relevant, the following measurement uncertainty levels have been estimated for
tests performed on the EUT as specified in CISPR 16-4-2:
Measurement
Frequency
Conducted emissions
9kHz~30MHz
Uncertainty
± 1.7806
30~200MHz
± 3.8906
200~1000MHz
± 3.8688
Radiated emissions
This uncertainty represents an expanded uncertainty expressed at approximately the 95%
confidence level using a coverage factor of k=2.
Consistent with industry standard (e.g. CISPR 22: 2006, clause 11, Measurement Uncertainty)
determining compliance with the limits shall be base on the results of the compliance
measurement. Consequently the measure emissions being less than the maximum allowed
emission result in this be a compliant test or passing test.
The acceptable measurement uncertainty value without requiring revision of the compliance
statement is base on conducted and radiated emissions being less than UCISPR which is 3.6dB
and 5.2dB respectively. CCS values (called ULab in CISPR 16-4-2) is less than UCISPR as shown
in the table above. Therefore, MU need not be considered for compliance.
Page 11
7 EMISSION TEST
7.1. CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT
7.1.1. LIMITS
FREQUENCY (MHz)
Class A (dBuV)
Class B (dBuV)
Quasi-peak
Average
Quasi-peak
Average
0.15 - 0.5
79
66
66 - 56
56 - 46
0.50 - 5.0
73
60
56
46
5.0 - 30.0
73
60
60
50
NOTE:
(1) The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies.
(2) The limit decreases in line with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15 to 0.50 MHz.
(3) All emanations from a class A/B digital device or system, including any network of conductors and
apparatus connected thereto, shall not exceed the level of field strengths specified above.
7.1.2. TEST INSTRUMENTS
Conducted Emission Room # 3
Name of Equipment
Manufacturer
Model
Serial Number
Calibration Due
EMI Test Receiver
R&S
ESCS30
845552/030
05/18/2010
LISN
R&S
LISN
FCC
Test S/W
ENV216
100074
FCC-LISN-50/25006013
16-2-07
CCS-3A1-CE-Luchu
12/09/2009
10/12/2009
NOTE: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are
traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
2. N.C.R = No Calibration Request.
Page 12
7.1.3. TEST PROCEDURES (please refer to measurement standard or CCS SOP PA-031)
Procedure of Preliminary Test
The EUT and support equipment, if needed, were set up as per the test configuration
to simulate typical usage per the user’s manual. When the EUT is a tabletop system, a
wooden table with a height of 0.8 meters is used and is placed on the ground plane as
per EN 55022 (see Test Facility for the dimensions of the ground plane used). When
the EUT is a floor standing equipment, it is placed on the ground plane, which has a
3-12 mm non-conductive covering to insulate the EUT from the ground plane.
All I/O cables were positioned to simulate typical actual usage as per EN 55022.
The EUT installed by AC main power, through a Line Impedance Stabilization
Network (LISN), which was supplied power source and was grounded to the ground
plane.
All support equipment power by a second LISN.
The test program of the EUT was started. Emissions were measured on each
current carrying line of the EUT using an EMI Test Receiver connected to the LISN
powering the EUT.
The Receiver scanned from 150kHz to 30MHz for emissions in each of the test
modes.
During the above scans, the emissions were maximized by cable manipulation.
The test mode(s) described in Item 3.1 were scanned during the preliminary test.
After the preliminary scan, we found the test mode described in Item 3.1 producing
the highest emission level.
The worst configuration of EUT and cable of the above highest emission level were
recorded for reference of the final test.
Procedure of Final Test
EUT and support equipment were set up on the test bench as per the configuration
with highest emission level in the preliminary test.
A scan was taken on both power lines, Line 1 and Line 2, recording at least the six
highest emissions. Emission frequency and amplitude were recorded into a
computer in which correction factors were used to calculate the emission level and
compare reading to the applicable limit.
The test data of the worst-case condition(s) was recorded.
Page 13
7.1.4. TEST SETUP
Vert. reference plane
EMI receiver
40cm
EUT
80cm
LISN
Reference ground plane
For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of
the Test Configuration.
7.1.5. DATA SAMPLE:
Frequency
(MHz)
QuasiPeak
reading
(dBuV)
Average
reading
(dBuV)
Correction
factor
(dB)
QuasiPeak
result
(dBuV)
Average
result
(dBuV)
QuasiPeak.
limit
(dBuV)
Average
limit
(dBuV)
QuasiPeak
margin
(dB)
Average
margin
(dB)
Remark
x.xx
43.95
33.00
10.00
53.95
43.00
79.00
66.00
-25.05
-23.00
Pass
Frequency (MHz)
Reading (dBuV)
Correction Factor (dB)
Result (dBuV)
Limit (dBuV)
Margin (dB)
= Emission frequency in MHz
= Uncorrected Analyzer/Receiver reading + Insertion loss of LISN, if it > 0.5 dB
= LISN Factor + Cable loss
= Raw reading converted to dBuV and CF added
= Limit stated in standard
= Result (dBuV) – Limit (dBuV)
Page 14
7.1.6. TEST RESULTS
CCS Conduction Test 3
Model No.
IPC-619S
6dB Bandwidth
9 kHz
Environmental
Conditions
25℃, 57% RH
Test Mode
Mode 1
Tested by
Bill Cheng
Line
L1
QuasiPeak Average Correction QuasiPeak Average QuasiPeak Average QuasiPeak Average
NO. Frequency
Remark
reading
reading
factor
result
result
limit
limit
margin
margin
(MHz)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dB)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dB)
(dB)
(Pass/Fail)
1
0.3570
24.42
22.62
9.68
34.10
32.30
79.00
66.00
-44.90
-33.70
Pass
2
0.7906
26.51
24.51
9.59
36.10
34.10
73.00
60.00
-36.90
-25.90
Pass
3
10.2438
34.54
32.54
10.16
44.70
42.70
73.00
60.00
-28.30
-17.30
Pass
4
10.7945
36.02
34.02
10.18
46.20
44.20
73.00
60.00
-26.80
-15.80
Pass
5
11.8922
37.69
35.69
10.21
47.90
45.90
73.00
60.00
-25.10
-14.10
Pass
6*
13.4195
38.06
36.16
10.24
48.30
46.40
73.00
60.00
-24.70
-13.60
Pass
REMARKS: L1 = Line One (Live Line)
Page 15
Model No.
IPC-619S
6dB Bandwidth
9 kHz
Environmental
Conditions
25℃, 57% RH
Test Mode
Mode 1
Tested by
Bill Cheng
Line
L2
NO. Frequency
Remark
reading
reading
factor
result
result
limit
limit
margin
margin
(MHz)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dB)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dB)
(dB)
(Pass/Fail)
1
0.4313
23.84
22.04
9.66
33.50
31.70
79.00
66.00
-45.50
-34.30
Pass
2
1.2906
27.07
23.17
9.63
36.70
32.80
73.00
60.00
-36.30
-27.20
Pass
3
10.2438
34.40
32.40
10.20
44.60
42.60
73.00
60.00
-28.40
-17.40
Pass
4
10.7945
35.87
33.87
10.23
46.10
44.10
73.00
60.00
-26.90
-15.90
Pass
5
11.8922
37.44
35.44
10.26
47.70
45.70
73.00
60.00
-25.30
-14.30
Pass
6*
13.4195
37.79
35.89
10.31
48.10
46.20
73.00
60.00
-24.90
-13.80
Pass
REMARKS: L2 = Line Two (Neutral Line)
Page 16
7.2. CONDUCTED EMISSION MEASUREMENT AT
TELECOMMUNICATION PORTS
7.2.1. LIMITS
For Class A Equipment
Voltage Limit (dBuV)
FREQUENCY (MHz)
Current Limit (dBuA)
Quasi-peak
Average
Quasi-peak
Average
0.15 ~ 0.5
97 ~ 87
84 ~ 74
53 ~ 43
40 ~ 30
0.5 ~ 30.0
87
74
43
30
NOTE: The limits decrease linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0.15 MHz to 0.5 MHz.
For Class B Equipment
FREQUENCY (MHz)
NOTE:
Voltage Limit (dBuV)
Current Limit (dBuA)
Quasi-peak
Average
Quasi-peak
Average
0.15 - 0.5
84 ~ 74
74 ~ 64
40 ~ 30
30 ~ 20
0.5 - 30.0
74
64
30
20
The limits decrease linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range 0,15 MHz to 0,5 MHz.
Conducted Emission Room # 3
Name of Equipment
Manufacturer
Model
Serial Number
Calibration Due
EMI Test Receiver
R&S
ESCS30
845552/030
05/18/2010
LISN
R&S
100074
12/09/2009
LISN
FCC
06013
10/12/2009
ISN
FCC
ENV216
FCC-LISN-50/25016-2-07
FCC-TLISN-T2-02
20587
06/21/2010
ISN
FCC
FCC-TLISN-T8-02
20588
06/21/2010
Current Probe
FCC
06/29/2010
Telecom ISN
FCC
F-35
506
FCC-TLISN-T2-PL
20491
C
CCS-3A1-CE
Test S/W
12/28/2009
Page 17
7.2.3. TEST PROCEDURE (please refer to measurement standard or CCS SOP PA-031)
Selecting ISN for unscreened cable or a current probe for screened cable to take
measurement.
The port of the EUT was connected to the remote side support equipment through
the ISN/Current Probe and communication in normal condition.
Making a overall range scan by using the test receiver controlled by controller and
record at least six highest emissions for showing in the test report.
Emission frequency and amplitude were recorded into a computer in which
correction factors were used to calculate the emission level and compare reading to
the applicable limit.
In case of measuring on the screened cable, the current limit shall be applied;
otherwise the voltage limit should be applied.
The following test mode was scanned during the preliminary test:
Mode 1: 10/100 Mbps and 1 Gbps(Emission mode 1)
After the preliminary scan, we found the following test mode(s) producing the highest
emission level and test data of the worst case was recorded.
Mode 1
Page 18
7.2.4. TEST SETUP
7.2.5. DATA SAMPLE:
Frequency
(MHz)
QuasiPeak
reading
(dBuV)
Average
reading
(dBuV)
Correction
factor
(dB)
QuasiPeak
result
(dBuV)
Average
result
(dBuV)
x.xx
43.95
33.00
10.00
53.95
43.00
Frequency (MHz)
Reading (dBuV)
Correction Factor (dB)
Result (dBuV)
Limit (dBuV)
Margin (dB)
QuasiPeak. Average QuasiPeak
limit
limit
margin
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dB)
97.00
84.00
-43.05
Average
margin
(dB)
Remark
-41.00
Pass
= Uncorrected Analyzer/Receiver reading + Insertion loss of LISN, if it > 0.5 dB
= ISN Factor + Cable loss
= Raw reading converted to dBuV and CF added
= Result (dBuV) – Limit (dBuV)
Page 19
7.2.6. TEST RESULTS
Model No.
IPC-619S
6dB Bandwidth
9 kHz
Environmental
Conditions
25℃, 57% RH
Test Mode
Mode 1
Tested by
Bill Cheng
Line
10Mbps
NO. Frequency
Remark
reading
reading
factor
result
result
limit
limit
margin
margin
(MHz)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dB)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dB)
(dB)
(Pass/Fail)
1
0.6109
31.33
31.43
9.77
41.10
41.20
87.00
74.00
-45.90
-32.80
Pass
2
3.5875
25.07
16.27
9.83
34.90
26.10
87.00
74.00
-52.10
-47.90
Pass
3
8.4234
39.92
26.72
10.08
50.00
36.80
87.00
74.00
-37.00
-37.20
Pass
4
14.0758
34.19
21.09
10.31
44.50
31.40
87.00
74.00
-42.50
-42.60
Pass
5
18.2242
35.11
34.71
10.39
45.50
45.10
87.00
74.00
-41.50
-28.90
Pass
6*
21.2594
37.32
36.82
10.48
47.80
47.30
87.00
74.00
-39.20
-26.70
Pass
Page 20
Model No.
IPC-619S
6dB Bandwidth
9 kHz
Environmental
Conditions
25℃, 57% RH
Test Mode
Mode 1
Tested by
Bill Cheng
Line
100Mbps
NO. Frequency
Remark
reading
reading
factor
result
result
limit
limit
margin
margin
(MHz)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dB)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dB)
(dB)
(Pass/Fail)
1
10.2438
42.86
40.66
10.24
53.10
50.90
87.00
74.00
-33.90
-23.10
Pass
2
10.7945
43.44
41.24
10.26
53.70
51.50
87.00
74.00
-33.30
-22.50
Pass
3
11.8922
44.92
42.72
10.28
55.20
53.00
87.00
74.00
-31.80
-21.00
Pass
4*
13.4195
46.20
44.00
10.30
56.50
54.30
87.00
74.00
-30.50
-19.70
Pass
5
14.2125
44.89
42.59
10.31
55.20
52.90
87.00
74.00
-31.80
-21.10
Pass
6
16.2281
46.05
43.95
10.35
56.40
54.30
87.00
74.00
-30.60
-19.70
Pass
Page 21
Model No.
IPC-619S
6dB Bandwidth
9 kHz
Environmental
Conditions
25℃, 57% RH
Test Mode
Mode 1
Tested by
Bill Cheng
Line
1Gbps
NO. Frequency
Remark
reading
reading
factor
result
result
limit
limit
margin
margin
(MHz)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dB)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dBuV)
(dB)
(dB)
(Pass/Fail)
1
0.6108
33.53
31.53
9.77
43.30
41.30
87.00
74.00
-43.70
-32.70
Pass
2
9.3063
32.23
26.53
10.17
42.40
36.70
87.00
74.00
-44.60
-37.30
Pass
3
12.2554
33.61
27.91
10.29
43.90
38.20
87.00
74.00
-43.10
-35.80
Pass
4
18.2241
37.01
34.81
10.39
47.40
45.20
87.00
74.00
-39.60
-28.80
Pass
5*
21.2593
39.02
36.92
10.48
49.50
47.40
87.00
74.00
-37.50
-26.60
Pass
6
29.0211
34.25
28.65
10.65
44.90
39.30
87.00
74.00
-42.10
-34.70
Pass
Page 22
7.3. RADIATED EMISSION MEASUREMENT
7.3.1. LIMITS
FREQUENCY (MHz)
dBuV/m (At 10m)
Class A
Class B
30 ~ 230
40
30
230 ~ 1000
47
37
NOTE: (1) The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies.
(2) Emission level (dBuV/m) = 20 log Emission level (uV/m).
FREQUENCY (MHz)
dBuV/m (At 3m)
Class A
Class B
Average
Peak
Average
Peak
1000 ~ 3000
56
76
50
70
3000 ~ 6000
60
80
54
74
NOTE: 1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies.
Page 23
Open Area Test Site # 5
Name of Equipment
Manufacturer
Model
Serial Number
Calibration Due
Spectrum Analyzer
ADVANTEST
R3132
91700456
N.C.R
EMI Test Receiver
R&S
ESVS10
846285/016
06/10/2010
Bilog Antenna
TESEQ
CBL 6112D
23190
06/05/2010
Pre-Amplifier
WIRELESS
FPA-6592G
060010
08/29/2010
Turn Table
CCS
CC-T-1F
N/A
N.C.R
Antenna Tower
CCS
CC-A-1F
N/A
N.C.R
Controller
CCS
CC-C-1F
04
N.C.R
RF Switch
ANRITSU
MP59B
10877
N.C.R
Site NSA
CCS
N/A
N/A
12/26/2009
Test S/W
LabVIEW 6.1 (CCS OATS EMI SW V2.7)
3 Meter Chamber
Name of Equipment
Manufacturer
Model
Spectrum Analyzer
Agilent
E4446A
MY48250064
10/28/2009
Pre-Amplifier
HP
8449B
3008A00965
12/31/2009
Pre-Amplifier
MITEQ
AMF-6F-260400-40-8P
985646
05/24/2010
Horn Antenna
EMCO
3115
9602-4659
04/16/2010
Horn Antenna
EMCO
3116
00026370
10/15/2009
Low Loss Cable
Huber+Suhner
104PEA
24813/4PEA
04/17/2010
Low Loss Cable
Huber+Suhner
104PEA
30956/4PEA
04/17/2010
Site VSWR
SIDT EUROPE
9x6x6
N/A
02/27/2010
Turn Table
CCS
CC-T-1F
N/A
N.C.R
Antenna Tower
CCS
CC-A-1F
N/A
N.C.R
Controller
CCS
CC-C-1F
N/A
N.C.R
Test S/W
Serial Number Calibration Due
CCS-3A1RE
Page 24
Procedure of Preliminary Test
The equipment was set up as per the test configuration to simulate typical usage per
the user’s manual. When the EUT is a tabletop system, a wooden turntable with a
height of 0.8 meters is used which is placed on the ground plane. When the EUT is a
floor standing equipment, it is placed on the ground plane which has a 3-12 mm
non-conductive covering to insulate the EUT from the ground plane.
Support equipment, if needed, was placed as per EN 55022.
All I/O cables were positioned to simulate typical usage as per EN 55022.
The EUT received AC power source from the outlet socket under the turntable. All
support equipment power received from another socket under the turntable.
The antenna was placed at 3 or 10 meter away from the EUT as stated in EN 55022.
The antenna connected to the Spectrum Analyzer via a cable and at times a
pre-amplifier would be used.
The Analyzer / Receiver quickly scanned from 30MHz to 6000MHz. The EUT test
program was started. Emissions were scanned and measured rotating the EUT to 360
degrees and positioning the antenna 1 to 4 meters above the ground plane, in both the
vertical and the horizontal polarization, to maximize the emission reading level.
The test mode(s) described in Item 3.1 were scanned during the preliminary test:
After the preliminary scan, we found the test mode described in Item 3.1 producing
the highest emission level.
The worst configuration of EUT and cable, antenna position, polarization and
turntable position of the above highest emission levels were recorded for the final test.
Procedure of Final Test
EUT and support equipment were set up on the turntable as per the configuration
with highest emission level in the preliminary test.
The Analyzer / Receiver scanned from 30MHz to 6000MHz. Emissions were
scanned and measured rotating the EUT to 360 degrees, varying cable placement and
positioning the antenna 1 to 4 meters above the ground plane, in both the vertical and
the horizontal polarization, to maximize the emission reading level.
Recording at least the six highest emissions. Emission frequency, amplitude,
antenna position, polarization and turntable position were recorded into a computer in
which correction factors were used to calculate the emission level and compare
reading to the applicable limit and only Q.P. reading is presented.
The test data of the worst-case condition(s) was recorded.
Page 25
7.3.4. TEST SETUP
Test table &
Turntable
1m ~ 4m
Boundary of
EUT
Coaxial
Cable
Power
Cable
0.8 m
3 or 10 m
Filter
Ground Plane
To Power
EMI
Receiver
7.3.5. DATA SAMPLE:
Below 1GHz
Frequency Reading
(MHz)
(dBuV)
xx.xx
16.49
Correction
Factor
(dB/m)
Result
(dBuV/m)
Limit
(dBuV/m)
Margin
(dB)
Degree
(。)
Height
(cm)
Remark
9.86
26.35
40.00
-13.65
116.00
101.00
QP
Above 1GHz
Frequency
MHz
Corr.
Factor
(dB/m)
xxxx.xxx
-4.35
Reading
Result
Limit
Margin
Average
Peak
Average
Peak
Average
Peak
Average
(dBuV/m) (dBuV/m) (dBuV/m) (dBuV/m) (dBuV/m) (dBuV/m)
(dB)
49.81
Frequency (MHz)
Reading (dBuV)
Correction Factor (dB/m)
Result (dBuV/m)
Limit (dBuV/m)
Margin (dB)
Q.P.
58.74
45.46
54.39
56.00
76.00
-10.54
Peak
(dB)
-21.61
= Uncorrected Analyzer / Receiver reading
= Antenna factor + Cable loss – Amplifier gain
= Reading (dBuV) + Corr. Factor (dB/m)
= Result (dBuV/m) – Limit (dBuV/m)
= Quasi-Peak
Page 26
7.3.6. TEST RESULTS
Model No.
IPC-619S
Test Mode
Mode 1
Environmental
Conditions
26℃, 50% RH
6dB Bandwidth
120 kHz
Antenna Pole
Vertical
Antenna Distance 10m
Detector
Function:
Quasi-peak.
Tested by
No. Frequency
Reading
Correction
Result
Limit
Margin
Degree
Height
(dB)
(°)
(cm)
Remark
(MHz)
(dBuV)
1
33.48
41.10
-11.15
29.95
40.00
-10.05
321.50
100.00
QP
2
58.92
47.84
-21.14
26.70
40.00
-13.30
207.40
100.00
QP
3
135.52
40.25
-15.80
24.45
40.00
-15.55
0.00
100.00
Peak
4
173.22
41.99
-17.65
24.34
40.00
-15.66
346.70
100.00
Peak
5
243.87
43.57
-14.41
29.16
47.00
-17.84
121.00
100.00
Peak
6
338.00
41.71
-10.85
30.86
47.00
-16.14
142.70
399.90
Peak
7
522.10
38.97
-5.04
33.93
47.00
-13.07
305.80
205.50
QP
8
567.50
37.36
-3.67
33.68
47.00
-13.32
154.50
205.50
QP
9
673.20
34.81
-1.73
33.08
47.00
-13.92
318.70
183.30
QP
10
800.00
30.89
0.31
31.20
47.00
-15.80
252.80
100.00
QP
REMARKS:
Factor(dB/m) (dBuV/m) (dBuV/m)
Bill Cheng
The other emission levels were very low against the limit.
Page 27
Model No.
IPC-619S
Test Mode
Mode 1
Environmental
Conditions
26℃, 50% RH
6dB Bandwidth
120 kHz
Antenna Pole
Horizontal
Antenna Distance 10m
Detector
Function:
Quasi-peak.
Tested by
No. Frequency
Reading
Correction
Result
Limit
Margin
Degree
Height
(dB)
(°)
(cm)
Remark
(MHz)
(dBuV)
1
34.06
37.26
-11.56
25.70
40.00
-14.30
332.50
399.90
QP
2
59.26
45.63
-21.18
24.45
40.00
-15.55
150.70
399.90
Peak
3
185.88
40.79
-17.59
23.20
40.00
-16.80
210.20
399.90
Peak
4
245.88
40.10
-14.15
25.95
47.00
-21.05
306.80
385.80
Peak
5
364.50
37.78
-9.69
28.09
47.00
-18.91
2.60
379.60
Peak
6
400.50
37.19
-7.98
29.21
47.00
-17.79
348.90
373.40
QP
7
522.50
37.87
-5.02
32.85
47.00
-14.15
328.70
194.40
QP
8
571.60
38.71
-3.61
35.11
47.00
-11.89
184.40
204.00
QP
9
677.30
36.14
-1.65
34.49
47.00
-12.51
43.60
182.70
QP
10
875.50
39.00
1.29
40.29
47.00
-6.71
345.00
100.00
QP
REMARKS:
Factor(dB/m) (dBuV/m) (dBuV/m)
Bill Cheng
The other emission levels were very low against the limit.
Page 28
Model No.
IPC-619S
Test Mode
Mode 1
Environmental
Conditions
18℃, 60% RH
Test Frequency
Range
1GHz ~ 6GHz
Antenna Pole
Vertical
Antenna Distance
3m
Tested By
Bill Cheng
Detector Function: Peak/Average
Frequency
Corr.
Factor
MHz
Reading
Average
Peak
Result
Average
Peak
Limit
Average
Margin
Peak
Average
Peak
(dBuV/m)
(dB)
(dB)
1337.500
-7.68
--
50.57
--
42.89
56.00
76.00
--
-33.11
1500.000
-6.75
--
51.85
--
45.10
56.00
76.00
--
-30.90
1625.000
-5.97
--
51.18
--
45.21
56.00
76.00
--
-30.79
2000.000
-3.66
--
50.63
--
46.97
56.00
76.00
--
-29.03
2250.000
-2.79
--
46.88
--
44.09
56.00
76.00
--
-31.91
2662.500
-1.15
--
45.99
--
44.84
56.00
76.00
--
-31.16
REMARKS:
1. The other emission levels were very low against the limit.
2. “--”, means the average measurement was not performed when the measured peak data
under the limit of average detection.
Page 29
Model No.
IPC-619S
Test Mode
Mode 1
Environmental
Conditions
18℃, 60% RH
Test Frequency
Range
1GHz ~ 6GHz
Antenna Pole
Horizontal
Antenna Distance
3m
Tested By
Bill Cheng
Detector Function: Peak/Average
Frequency
Corr.
Factor
MHz
Reading
Average
Peak
Result
Average
Peak
Limit
Average
Margin
Peak
Average
Peak
(dBuV/m)
(dB)
(dB)
1175.000
-8.61
--
51.20
--
42.59
56.00
76.00
--
-33.41
1337.500
-7.68
--
51.09
--
43.41
56.00
76.00
--
-32.59
1500.000
-6.75
--
52.75
--
46.00
56.00
76.00
--
-30.00
1625.000
-5.97
--
55.70
--
49.73
56.00
76.00
--
-26.27
2000.000
-3.66
--
52.17
--
48.51
56.00
76.00
--
-27.49
2287.500
-2.66
--
48.22
--
45.56
56.00
76.00
--
-30.44
REMARKS:
1. The other emission levels were very low against the limit.
2. “--”, means the average measurement was not performed when the measured peak data
under the limit of average detection.
Page 30
7.4. HARMONICS CURRENT MEASUREMENT
7.4.1. LIMITS OF HARMONICS CURRENT MEASUREMENT
Limits for Class A equipment
Max. permissible
Harmonics
harmonics current
Order
A
n
Odd harmonics
3
2.30
5
1.14
7
0.77
9
0.40
11
0.33
13
0.21
15<=n<=39 0.15x15/n
Even harmonics
2
1.08
4
0.43
6
0.30
8<=n<=40
0.23x8/n
Limits for Class D equipment
Harmonics
Order
n
Max. permissible
harmonics current
A
Max. permissible harmonics
current per watt mA/W
Odd Harmonics only
3
5
7
9
11
13
15<=n<=39
3.4
1.9
1.0
0.5
0.35
0.30
3.85/n
2.30
1.14
0.77
0.40
0.33
0.21
0.15x15/n
NOTE: 1. Class A and Class D are classified according to item 7.4.3.
2. According to section 7 of EN 61000-3-2, the above limits for all equipment except for lighting
equipment having an active input power > 75 W and no limits apply for equipment with an active
input power up to and including 75 W.
Immunity Shielded Room
Name of Equipment
HARMONICS
SYSTEM
Test S/W
Manufacturer
Model
EMC-PARTNER HARMONICS-1000
Serial Number
Calibration Due
094
12/14/2009
HARCS Immunity (4.10)
NOTE: The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable
to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
Page 31
The EUT was placed on the top of a wooden table 0.8 meters above the ground and
operated to produce the maximum harmonic components under normal operating
conditions for each successive harmonic component in turn.
The classification of EUT is according to section 5 of EN 61000-3-2.
The EUT is classified as follows:
Class A: Balanced three-phase equipment, Household appliances excluding equipment
as Class D, Tools excluding portable tools, Dimmers for incandescent lamps,
audio equipment, equipment not specified in one of the three other classes.
Class B: Portable tools; Arc welding equipment which is not professional equipment.
Class C: Lighting equipment.
Class D: Equipment having a specified power less than or equal to 600 W of the
following types: Personal computers and personal computer monitors and
television receivers.
The correspondent test program of test instrument to measure the current harmonics
emanated from EUT is chosen. The measure time shall be not less than the time
necessary for the EUT to be exercised.
7.4.4. TEST SETUP
Harmonics &
Flicker
Analyzer
+
Power Source
Power
Cord
EUT
Support
Units
0.8m
Page 32
7.4.5. TEST RESULTS
ADVANTECH
Operator :
Bill Cheng
Unit :
IPC
Serialnumber :
IPC-619S
Remarks :
Temp.:26¢J Hum:46%
Full Bar
: Actual Values
Empty Bar : Maximum Values
Blue : Current , Green : Voltage , Red : Failed
Page 33
Measurement
ADVANTECH
Date : 2009/9/29 AM 10:49 V4.17
Operator :
Bill Cheng
Unit :
IPC
Serialnumber :
IPC-619S
Remarks :
Temp.:26¢J Hum:46%
Urms =
230.1V
Freq =
49.987
Range:
1A
Irms =
0.418A
Ipk
0.683A
cf
=
1.631
P
86.59W
S
96.29VA pf
=
0.899
13.0 %
THDu =
0.10 %
Test - Time :
5min
( 100 %)
Limit Reference:
Pmax = 87.017W
=
THDi =
=
=
Class D
Test completed, Result: PASSED
Order
Freq.
Imax
Imax%
Imax%L Limit
[Hz]
[A]
[%]
[%]
[A]
1
50
0.4159
99.387
2
100
0.0017
0.4084
3
150
0.0439
10.502
14.854
0.2959
4
200
0.0002
0.0438
5
250
0.0116
2.7713
7.0142
0.1653
6
300
0.0002
0.0583
7
350
0.0131
3.1214
15.010
0.0870
8
400
0.0004
0.1021
9
450
0.0154
3.6756
35.351
0.0435
10
500
0.0004
0.1021
11
550
0.0096
2.3046
31.664
0.0305
12
600
0.0005
0.1313
13
650
0.0099
2.3775
38.605
0.0258
14
700
0.0005
0.1313
15
750
0.0129
3.0922
57.935
0.0223
Status
Page 34
16
800
0.0005
0.1167
17
850
0.0016
0.3792
18
900
0.0004
0.0875
19
950
0.0056
1.3273
20
1000
0.0002
0.0583
21
1050
0.0047
1.1231
22
1100
0.0002
0.0438
23
1150
0.0026
0.6272
24
1200
0.0004
0.0875
25
1250
0.0037
0.8751
26
1300
0.0002
0.0583
27
1350
0.0026
0.6126
28
1400
0.0003
0.0729
29
1450
0.0042
1.0064
30
1500
0.0003
0.0729
31
1550
0.0044
1.0502
32
1600
0.0002
0.0583
33
1650
0.0011
0.2625
34
1700
0.0002
0.0583
35
1750
0.0013
0.3063
36
1800
0.0002
0.0583
37
1850
0.0014
0.3355
38
1900
0.0002
0.0583
39
1950
0.0038
0.9043
40
2000
0.0002
0.0583
8.0526
0.0197
31.500
0.0176
29.460
0.0160
18.018
0.0146
27.328
0.0134
20.660
0.0124
36.455
0.0116
40.664
0.0108
10.822
0.0102
13.391
0.0096
15.504
0.0091
44.053
0.0086
NOTE: Limits classified according to item 7.4.3.
Page 35
7.5. VOLTAGE FLUCTUATION AND FLICKS MEASUREMENT
7.5.1. LIMITS OF VOLTAGE FLUCTUATION AND FLICKS MEASUREMENT
TEST ITEM
LIMIT
Pst
Plt
Tdt (ms)
dmax (%)
dc (%)
1.0
0.65
500
4%
3.3%
REMARK
Pst means short-term flicker indicator.
Plt means long-term flicker indicator.
Tdt means maximum time that dt exceeds 3.3 %.
dmax means maximum relative voltage change.
dc means relative steady-state voltage change
Name of Equipment
HARMONICS
SYSTEM
Test S/W
Manufacturer
Model
EMC-PARTNER HARMONICS-1000
Serial Number
Calibration Due
094
12/14/2009
HARCS Immunity (4.10)
Page 36
The EUT was placed on the top of a wooden table 0.8 meters above the ground and
operated to produce the most unfavorable sequence of voltage changes under normal
operating conditions.
During the flick measurement, the measure time shall include that part of whole
operation cycle in which the EUT produce the most unfavorable sequence of voltage
changes. The observation period for short-term flicker indicator is 10 minutes and the
observation period for long-term flicker indicator is 2 hours.
7.5.4. TEST SETUP
Harmonics &
Flicker
Analyzer
+
Power Source
Power
Cord
EUT
Support
Units
0.8m
Page 37
7.5.5. TEST RESULTS
Observation
Period (Tp)
Environmental
Conditions
10mins
Test Mode
Mode 1
26oC, 43% RH
Tested By
Bill Cheng
Power Continuity
Pst
MEASUREMENT
VALUE
0.072
Plt
0.072
0.65
PASS
Tdt (ms)
0
500
PASS
dmax (%)
0%
4%
PASS
dc (%)
0%
3.3%
PASS
LIMIT
REMARK
1.0
PASS
TEST PARAMETER
LIMIT
REMARK
1.0
PASS
Power Switched Manually
Pst
MEASUREMENT
VALUE
0.072
Plt
0.072
0.65
PASS
Tdt (ms)
0
500
PASS
dmax (%)
0%
6%
PASS
dc (%)
0.12%
3.3%
PASS
TEST PARAMETER
Note: dmax (%) limit classified:
1. 6% for equipment which is switched manually or switched automatically
more frequently than twice per day.
2. 7% for equipment which is attended whilst use or switched on
automatically no more than twice per day
Page 38
ADVANTECH
Date : 2009/9/24 AM 10:04 V4.17
Operator :
Bill Cheng
Unit :
IPC
Serialnumber :
IPC-619S
Remarks :
Temp:26 Hemid:43 (Power Continuity)
Urms =
229.9V
Freq =
49.987
Range:
1A
Irms =
0.403A
Ipk
0.661A
cf
=
1.639
P
82.88W
S
92.73VA pf
=
0.894
=
Test - Time :
=
=
1 x 10min = 10min ( 100 %)
LIN (Line Impedance Network) :
Limits :
Plt
:
L: 0.24ohm +j0.15ohm N: 0.16ohm +j0.10ohm
0.65
Pst
:
1.00
dmax :
4.00 %
dc
:
3.30 %
dtLim:
3.30 %
dt>Lim:
500ms
Fail
Plt
=
0.072
Pst
1
0.072
dmax
dc
dt>Lim
[%]
[%]
[ms]
0.000
0.000
0.000
Page 39
ADVANTECH
Date : 2009/9/24 AM 10:27 V4.17
Operator :
Bill Cheng
Unit :
IPC
Serialnumber :
IPC-619S
Remarks :
Temp:26 Hemid:43 (Power Switched Manually)
Urms =
229.9V
Freq =
49.987
Range:
1A
Irms =
0.403A
Ipk
0.662A
cf
=
1.640
P
82.78W
S
92.73VA pf
=
0.893
=
Test - Time :
=
=
1 x 10min = 10min ( 100 %)
LIN (Line Impedance Network) :
Limits :
Plt
:
L: 0.24ohm +j0.15ohm N: 0.16ohm +j0.10ohm
0.65
Pst
:
1.00
dmax :
4.00 %
dc
:
3.30 %
dtLim:
3.30 %
dt>Lim:
500ms
Fail
Plt
=
0.072
Pst
1
0.072
dmax
dc
dt>Lim
[%]
[%]
[ms]
0.060
0.020
0.000
Page 40
8 IMMUNITY TEST
8.1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
EN 55024: 1998 + A1: 2001 + A2: 2003;
EN 61000-6-2: 2005
Product
Standard
Test Type
Minimum Requirement
IEC 61000-4-2 Electrostatic Discharge – ESD:
8kV air discharge, 4kV Contact discharge,
Performance Criterion B
IEC 61000-4-3 Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Field
Susceptibility Test – RS:
For EN 55024:
80 ~1000 MHz, 3V/m, 80% AM(1kHz),
For EN 61000-6-2:
80 ~1000 MHz, 10V/m, 80% AM (1kHz),
1400 ~2000 MHz, 3V/m, 80% AM (1kHz),
2000 ~ 2700 MHz, 1V/m, 80% AM (1kHz),
Performance Criterion A
Basic Standard,
Specification,
and
Performance
Criterion
required
IEC 61000-4-4 Electrical Fast Transient/Burst - EFT,
For EN 55024:
AC Power Port: 1kV
DC Power Port: 0.5kV
Signal Ports and Telecommunication Ports: 0.5kV
For EN 61000-6-2:
AC Power Port: 2kV
DC Power Port: 2kV
Signal Ports: 1kV
IEC 61000-4-5 Surge Immunity Test:
1.2/50 us or 10/700 us Open Circuit Voltage
8/20 µs or 5/320 Short Circuit Current
For EN 55024:
AC Power Port ~ line to line: 1kV,
line to earth (ground): 2kV
DC Power Port ~ line to earth: 0.5kV
Signal Ports and Telecommunication Ports ~ line to ground: 1kV
For EN 61000-6-2:
AC Power Port ~ line to line: 1kV, line to earth: 2kV
DC Power Port ~ line to earth: 0.5kV, line to line: 0.5kV
Signal Ports ~ line to earth: 1kV
Page 41
EN 61000-6-2: 2005;
EN 55024: 1998 + A1: 2001 + A2: 2003
Product Standard
Test Type
Basic Standard,
Specification,
and
Performance
Criterion
required
Minimum Requirement
IEC 61000-4-6
Conducted Radio Frequency Disturbances Test –CS:
For EN 55024:
0.15 ~ 80 MHz, 3Vrms, 80% AM, 1kHz,
For EN 61000-6-2:
0.15 ~ 80 MHz, 10Vrms, 80% AM, 1kHz,
IEC 61000-4-8
Power frequency magnetic field immunity test
For EN 55024:
50 Hz, 1A/m
For EN 61000-6-2:
50/60 Hz, 30A/m
IEC 61000-4-11
For EN 55024:
Voltage Dips:
i) >95% reduction for 0.5 period,
ii) 30% reduction for 25 period,
Performance Criterion C
>95% reduction for 250 period
For EN 61000-6-2:
Voltage Dips:
i) 0% reduction for 1 period,
ii) 40% reduction for 10/12 period at 50/60Hz
iii) 70% reduction for 25/30 period at 50/60Hz
0% reduction for 250/300 period at 50/60Hz
Page 42
8.2. GENERAL PERFORMANCE CRITERIA DESCRIPTION
Criteria A:
The apparatus shell continues to operate as intended without operator
intervention. No degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed below
a performance level specified by the manufacturer, when the apparatus is used
as intended. The performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of
performance. If the manufacturer does not specify the minimum performance
level or the permissible performance loss, then either of these may be derived
from the product description and documentation, and by what the user may
reasonably expect from the equipment if used as intended.
Criteria B:
After test, the apparatus shell continues to operate as intended without operator
intervention. No degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed, after
the application of the phenomenon below a performance level specified by the
manufacturer, when the apparatus is used as intended. The performance level
may be replaced by a permissible loss of performance.
During the test, degradation of performance is however allowed. However, no
change of operating state if stored data is allowed to persist after the test. If the
manufacturer does not specify the minimum performance level or the permissible
performance loss, then either of these may be derived from the product
description and documentation, and by what the user may reasonably expect
from the equipment if used as intended.
Criteria C:
Temporary loss of function is allowed, provided the functions is self-recoverable
or can be restored by the operation of controls by the user in accordance with the
manufacturer instructions.
Functions, and/or information stored in non-volatile memory, or protected by a
battery backup, shall not be lost.
Page 43
8.3. ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE (ESD)
8.3.1. TEST SPECIFICATION
Basic Standard:
Discharge Impedance:
Discharge Voltage:
Polarity:
Number of Discharge:
Discharge Mode:
IEC 61000-4-2
330 ohm / 150 pF
EN 55024; EN 61000-6-2
Air Discharge: 2 ; 4 ; 8 kV (Direct)
Contact Discharge: 2 ; 4 kV (Direct/Indirect)
Positive & Negative
Air Discharge: min. 10 times at single test point for each
negative and positive polarity
Contact Discharge: min. 200 times in total
Single Discharge
1 second minimum
8.3.2. TEST INSTRUMENT
Name of Equipment
Manufacturer
Model
Serial Number
Calibration Due
ESD Generator
EM TEST
dito
V0712102350
10/31/2009
Page 44
The discharges shall be applied in two ways:
a) Contact discharges to the conductive surfaces and coupling planes:
The EUT shall be exposed to at least 200 discharges, 100 each at negative and positive
polarity, at a minimum of four test points. One of the test points shall be subjected to at
least 50 indirect discharges to the center of the front edge of the Horizontal Coupling
Plane (HCP). The remaining three test points shall each receive at least 50 direct
contact discharges. If no direct contact test points are available, then at least 200
indirect discharges shall be applied in the indirect mode. Test shall be performed at a
maximum repetition rate of one discharge per second.
b) Air discharges at slots and apertures and insulating surfaces:
On those parts of the EUT where it is not possible to perform contact discharge testing,
the equipment should be investigated to identify user accessible points where
breakdown may occur. Such points are tested using the air discharge method. This
investigation should be restricted to those area normally handled by the user. A
minimum of 10 single air discharges shall be applied to the selected test point for each
such area.
The basic test procedure was in accordance with IEC 61000-4-2:
a) The EUT was located 0.1 m minimum from all side of the HCP (dimensions 1.6m x
0.8m).
b) The support units were located another table 30 cm away from the EUT, but direct
support unit was/were located at same location as EUT on the HCP and keep at a
distance of 10 cm with EUT.
c) The time interval between two successive single discharges was at least 1 second.
d) Contact discharges were applied to the non-insulating coating, with the pointed tip of the
generator penetrating the coating and contacting the conducting substrate.
e) Air discharges were applied with the round discharge tip of the discharge electrode
approaching the EUT as fast as possible (without causing mechanical damage) to touch
the EUT. After each discharge, the ESD generator was removed from the EUT and
re-triggered for a new single discharge. The test was repeated until all discharges were
complete.
f) At least ten single discharges (in the most sensitive polarity) were applied at the front
edge of each HCP opposite the center point of each unit of the EUT and 0.1 meters
from the front of the EUT. The long axis of the discharge electrode was in the plane of
the HCP and perpendicular to its front edge during the discharge.
g) At least ten single discharges (in the most sensitive polarity) were applied to the center
of one vertical edge of the Vertical Coupling Plane (VCP) in sufficiently different
positions that the four faces of the EUT were completely illuminated. The VCP
(dimensions 0.5m x 0.5m) was placed vertically to and 0.1 meters from the EUT.
Page 45
8.3.4. TEST SETUP
10 cm
Support
units
0.5 mm Thick
Insulator
EUT
VCP
470 kΩ
30 cm
Wooden Table
470 kΩ
HCP Wooden Table
470 kΩ
0.8 m
Ground Reference Plane
NOTE:
TABLE-TOP EQUIPMENT
The configuration consisted of a wooden table 0.8 meters high standing on the Ground Reference Plane.
The GRP consisted of a sheet of aluminum at least 0.25mm thick, and 2.5 meters square connected to
the protective grounding system. A Horizontal Coupling Plane (1.6m x 0.8m) was placed on the table
and attached to the GRP by means of a cable with 940k　total impedance. The equipment under test,
was installed in a representative system as described in section 7 of IEC 61000-4-2, and its cables were
placed on the HCP and isolated by an insulating support of 0.5mm thickness. A distance of 1-meter
minimum was provided between the EUT and the walls of the laboratory and any other metallic
structure.
FLOOR-STANDING EQUIPMENT
The equipment under test was installed in a representative system as described in section 7 of IEC
61000-4-2, and its cables were isolated from the Ground Reference Plane by an insulating support of
0.1-meter thickness. The GRP consisted of a sheet of aluminum that is at least 0.25mm thick, and 2.5
meters square connected to the protective grounding system and extended at least 0.5 meters from the
EUT on all sides.
Page 46
8.3.5. TEST RESULTS
Temperature
26oC
Pressure
985mabr
Required Passing Performance
Humidity
Tested By
40% RH
Bill Cheng
Criterion B
Air Discharge
Test
Points
±2
kV
Performance
Criterion
A
A
A
A
A
A
Front
Back
Left
Right
Top
Bottom
B
B
B
B
B
B
± 4
kV
Test Levels
Performance
Criterion
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
Results
±8
kV
Performance
Criterion
A
A
A
A
A
A
Pass
Fail
B
B
B
B
B
B
Observation
Note 1
Note 1
Note 1
Note 1
Contact Discharge
Test
Points
±2
kV
Front
Back
Left
Right
Top
Bottom
Performance
Criterion
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
B
B
Test Levels
± 4 Performance
Criterion
kV
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
Results
±6
kV
Performance
Criterion
A
A
A
A
A
A
Pass
Fail
B
B
B
B
B
B
Observation
Note 1
Note 1
Note 1
Note 1
Note 1
For the tested points to EUT, please refer to attached page.
(Blue arrow mark for Contact Discharge and red arrow mark for Air Discharge)
Side of EUT
Discharge To Horizontal Coupling Plane
Test Levels
Results
± 2 kV
± 4 kV
± 6 kV
Pass
Fail
Front
Back
Left
Right
Side of EUT
Performance
Criterion
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
Observation
Note 1
Note 1
Note 1
Note 1
Discharge To Vertical Coupling Plane
Test Levels
Results
± 2 kV
± 4 kV
± 6 kV
Pass
Front
Back
Left
Right
Fail
Performance
Criterion
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
Observation
Note 1
Note 1
Note 1
Note 1
NOTE: 1. There was no change compared with initial operation during the test.
Page 47
The Tested Points of EUT
Photo 1 of 4
Photo 2 of 4
Page 48
Photo 3 of 4
Photo 4 of 4
Page 49
8.4. RADIATED, RADIO-FREQUENCY, ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD (RS)
Basic Standard:
Frequency Range:
Field Strength:
Modulation:
Frequency Step:
Polarity of Antenna:
Test Distance:
Antenna Height:
IEC 61000-4-3
For EN 55024: 80 MHz ~1000 MHz,
For EN 61000-6-2: 80 MHz ~1000 MHz,
1400 MHz ~2000 MHz,
2000 MHz ~27000 MHz
For EN 55024: 3 V/m
For EN 61000-6-2: 10 V/m, 3 V/m, 1 V/m
1kHz Sine Wave, 80%, AM Modulation
1 % of preceding frequency value
Horizontal and Vertical
3m
1.5m
733 RS Chamber
Name of Equipment
Manufacturer
Model
Serial Number
Calibration Due
S.G.
Agilent
8648C
4108A05772
11/06/2009
Power Meter
R&S
NRVD
837794/029
08/11/2010
Power Sensor
R&S
URV5-Z2
835640/015
08/11/2010
Power Sensor
R&S
URV5-Z2
835640/016
08/11/2010
Power Amplifier
ar
150W1000
300300
N.C.R
Power Amplifier
ar
60S1G3M3
0328274
N.C.R
Bilog Antenna
SCHAFFNER
CBL 6140A
1221
N.C.R
Horn Antenna
EMCO
3115
00022257
12/21/2009
EM PROBE
ar
FL7006
0330722
02/17/2010
Test S/W
SW1006 (V1.13)
CBL 6140A
1221
N.C.R
Test S/W
SW1006 (V1.13)
2. N.C.R.= No Calibration required
Page 50
The test procedure was in accordance with IEC 61000-4-3
a) The testing was performed in a fully anechoic chamber. The transmit antenna was
located at a distance of 3 meters from the EUT.
b) The frequency range is swept from 80 MHz to 1000 MHz, with the signal 80% amplitude
modulated with a 1kHz sine-wave. The rate of sweep did not exceed 1.5 x 10 -3 decade/s,
where the frequency range is swept incrementally, the step size was 1% of preceding
frequency value.
c) The dwell time at each frequency shall be not less than the time necessary for the EUT
to be able to respond.
e) The test was performed with the EUT exposed to both vertically and horizontally
polarized fields on each of the four sides.
Page 51
8.4.4. TEST SETUP
3 meter
7x3x3
EUT & Support
Units
1.5 meter
0.8m
Power Amp
Signal
Generator
PC Controller to
control S.G. & PA as
well as forward
power
EUT Monitoring by
using a camera
Control Room
NOTE:
TABLETOP EQUIPMENT
The EUT installed in a representative system as described in section 7 of IEC 61000-4-3 was placed on a
non-conductive table 0.8 meters in height. The system under test was connected to the power and signal
wire according to relevant installation instructions.
FLOOR STANDING EQUIPMENT
The EUT installed in a representative system as described in section 7 of IEC 61000-4-3 was placed on a
non-conductive wood support 0.1 meters in height. The system under test was connected to the power and
signal wire according to relevant installation instructions.
Page 52
8.4.5. TEST RESULTS
Temperature
Pressure
26oC
984mbar
Tested By
Bill Cheng
Humidity
45% RH
Dwell Time
3 sec.
Required Passing
Criterion A
Performance
For EN 55024:
Frequency
(MHz)
Polarity
Azimuth
Field
Strength
(V/m)
80 ~ 1000
V&H
0
3
A
80 ~ 1000
V&H
90
3
80 ~ 1000
V&H
180
80 ~ 1000
V&H
Performance
Criterion
Observation
Result
B
Note 1
PASS
A
B
Note 1
PASS
3
A
B
Note 1
PASS
270
3
A
B
Note 1
PASS
Observation
Result
For EN 61000-6-2:
Frequency
(MHz)
Polarity
Azimuth
Field
Strength
(V/m)
80 ~ 1000
V&H
0
10
A
B
Note 1
PASS
80 ~ 1000
V&H
90
10
A
B
Note 1
PASS
80 ~ 1000
V&H
180
10
A
B
Note 1
PASS
80 ~ 1000
V&H
270
10
A
B
Note 1
PASS
1400 ~ 2000
V&H
0
3
A
B
Note 1
PASS
1400 ~ 2000
V&H
90
3
A
B
Note 1
PASS
1400 ~ 2000
V&H
180
3
A
B
Note 1
PASS
1400 ~ 2000
V&H
270
3
A
B
Note 1
PASS
2000 ~ 2700
V&H
0
1
A
B
Note 1
PASS
2000 ~ 2700
V&H
90
1
A
B
Note 1
PASS
2000 ~ 2700
V&H
180
1
A
B
Note 1
PASS
2000 ~ 2700
V&H
270
1
A
B
Note 1
PASS
Performance
Criterion
NOTE: 1. There was no change compared with the initial operation during the test.
Page 53
8.5. ELECTRICAL FAST TRANSIENT (EFT)
Basic Standard:
Test Voltage:
Polarity:
Impulse Frequency:
Impulse Wave-shape:
Burst Duration:
Burst Period:
Test Duration:
IEC 61000-4-4
For EN 55024:
AC Power Port: 1kV
DC Power Port: 0.5kV
Signal Ports and Telecommunication Ports: 0.5kV
For EN 61000-6-2:
AC Power Port: 2kV
DC Power Port: 2kV
Signal Ports: 1kV
Positive & Negative
5 kHz
5/50 ns
15 ms
3 Hz
Not less than 1 min.
Immunity Shield Room
Name of Equipment
EMC TEST SYSTEM
Clamp
Manufacturer
Model
Serial Number
Calibration Due
754
09/01/2010
080 421.13
N.C.R
EMC-PARTNER TRANSIENT-2000
HAEFELY
TRENCH
093 506.1
Test S/W
Genecs (2.54)
a) Both positive and negative polarity discharges were applied.
b) The length of the “hot wire” from the coaxial output of the EFT generator to the
terminals on the EUT should not exceed 1 meter.
c) The duration time of each test sequential was 1 minute.
d) The transient/burst waveform was in accordance with IEC 61000-4-4, 5/50ns.
Page 54
8.5.4. TEST SETUP
10cm
AC Line
EFT/Burst/
Surge Generator
EUT
Support
Units
Controller Computer
Comm. Line ≧ 3 m
To Load
10cm
AC Line
10cm
EUT
Burst Generator
Injection Clamp
NOTE:
TABLETOP EQUIPMENT
The configuration consisted of a wooden table (0.8m high) standing on the Ground Reference
Plane. The GRP consisted of a sheet of aluminum (at least 0.25mm thick and 2.5m square)
connected to the protective grounding system. A minimum distance of 0.5m was provided
between the EUT and the walls of the laboratory or any other metallic structure.
FLOOR STANDING EQUIPMENT
The EUT installed in a representative system as described in section 7 of IEC 61000-4-4 and its cables,
were isolated from the Ground Reference Plane by an insulating support that is 0.1-meter thick. The GRP
consisted of a sheet of aluminum (at least 0.25mm thick and 2.5m square) connected to the protective
grounding system.
Page 55
8.5.5. TEST RESULTS
Temperature
26oC
Pressure
984mbar
Humidity
Tested By
46% RH
Bill Cheng
Criterion B
For EN 55024:
Performance
Criterion
Test Point
Polarity
Test Level
(kV)
L
+/-
1
A
N
+/-
1
PE
+/-
L+N
Observation
Result
B
Note 1
PASS
A
B
Note 1
PASS
1
A
B
Note 1
PASS
+/-
1
A
B
Note 1
PASS
L + PE
+/-
1
A
B
Note 1
PASS
N + PE
+/-
1
A
B
Note 1
PASS
L + N + PE
+/-
1
A
B
Note 1
PASS
LAN
+/-
0.5
A
B
Note 1
PASS
Test Point
Polarity
Test Level
(kV)
Observation
Result
L
+/-
2
A
B
Note 1
PASS
N
+/-
2
A
B
Note 1
PASS
PE
+/-
2
A
B
Note 1
PASS
L+N
+/-
2
A
B
Note 1
PASS
L + PE
+/-
2
A
B
Note 1
PASS
N + PE
+/-
2
A
B
Note 1
PASS
L + N + PE
+/-
2
A
B
Note 1
PASS
LAN
+/-
1
A
B
Note 1
PASS
For EN 61000-6-2:
Performance
Criterion
Page 56
8.6. SURGE IMMUNITY TEST
Basic Standard: IEC 61000-4-5
Wave-Shape: Combination Wave
1.2/50 us or 10/700 us Open Circuit Voltage
8/20 µs or 5/320 Short Circuit Current
Test Voltage: For EN 55024:
AC Power Port ~ line to line: 1kV,
line to earth (ground): 2kV
DC Power Port ~ line to earth: 0.5kV
Signal Ports and Telecommunication Ports ~
line to ground: 1kV
For EN 61000-6-2:
AC Power Port ~ line to line: 1kV, line to earth: 2kV
DC Power Port ~ line to earth: 0.5kV, line to line: 0.5kV
Signal Ports ~ line to earth: 1k
Surge Input/Output: Power Line: L1-L2 / L1-PE / L2-PE
Generator Source Impedance: 2 ohm between networks
12 ohm between network and ground
Polarity: Positive/Negative
Phase Angle: 0 / 90 / 180 / 270　Pulse Repetition Rate: 1 time / min. (maximum)
Number of Tests: 5 positive and 5 negative at selected points
Name of Equipment
Manufacturer
Model
Serial Number
Calibration Due
Surge Tester
HAEFELY
TRENCH
PSUGER 4010
583 334-71
09/01/2010
Test S/W
Winpats (3.25)
Page 57
a) For EUT power supply:
The surge is applied to the EUT power supply terminals via the capacitive coupling
network. Decoupling networks are required in order to avoid possible adverse effects on
equipment not under test that may be powered by the same lines, and to provide
sufficient decoupling impedance to the surge wave. The power cord between the EUT
and the coupling/decoupling networks was shorter than 2 meters in length.
b) For test applied to unshielded un-symmetrically operated interconnection lines of EUT:
The surge was applied to the lines via the capacitive coupling. The coupling /
decoupling networks didn’t influence the specified functional conditions of the EUT. The
interconnection line between the EUT and the coupling/decoupling networks was
shorter than 2 meters in length.
c) For test applied to unshielded symmetrically operated interconnection /
telecommunication lines of EUT:
The surge was applied to the lines via gas arrestors coupling. Test levels below the
ignition point of the coupling arrestor were not specified. The interconnection line
between the EUT and the coupling/decoupling networks was shorter than 2 meters in
length.
8.6.4. TEST SETUP
To AC
Source
Surge Immunity
Test
EUT
&
Support Units
0.8m
Controller Computer
Page 58
8.6.5. TEST RESULTS
Temperature
26oC
Pressure
984mbar
Humidity
Tested By
46% RH
Bill Cheng
Criterion B
Performance
Criterion
Test Point
Polarity
Test Level
(kV)
L–N
+/-
1
A
L - PE
+/-
2
N - PE
+/-
2
Observation
Result
B
Note 1
PASS
A
B
Note 1
PASS
A
B
Note 1
PASS
Page 59
8.7. CONDUCTED RADIO FREQUENCY DISTURBANCES (CS)
Basic Standard:
Frequency Range:
Field Strength:
Modulation:
Frequency Step:
Coupled cable:
Coupling device:
IEC 61000-4-6
0.15 MHz ~ 80 MHz
For EN 55024: 3 Vrms
For EN 61000-6-2: 10 Vrms
1kHz Sine Wave, 80%, AM Modulation
1 % of preceding frequency value
Power Mains, Unshielded
CDN-M3 (3 wires)
CDN-T8 for LAN
Name of Equipment
Manufacturer
Model
Serial Number
Calibration Due
S.G.
Agilent
8648C
4108A05772
11/06/2009
Power Meter
R&S
NRVD
837794/029
08/11/2010
Power Sensor
R&S
URV5-Z2
835640/015
08/11/2010
Power Sensor
R&S
URV5-Z2
835640/016
08/11/2010
Power Amplifier
ar
75A250AM1
306334
N.C.R
CDN
FCC
FCC-801-M3-16A
99122
11/09/2009
CDN
FCC
FCC-801-T8-RJ45
04023
07/08/2010
Test S/W
EMS-K1 (V1.20)
Page 60
The EUT shall be tested within its intended operating and climatic conditions.
The test shell performed with the test generator connected to each of the coupling and
decoupling devices in turn, while the other non-excited RF input ports of the coupling
devices are terminated by a 50-ohm load resistor.
The frequency range was swept from 150 kHz to 80 MHz, using the signal level established
during the setting process and with a disturbance signal of 80 % amplitude. The signal was
modulated with a 1 kHz sine wave, pausing to adjust the RF signal level or the switch
coupling devices as necessary. The sweep rate was 1.5 x 10-3 decades/s. Where the
frequency range is swept incrementally, the step size was 1 % of preceding frequency
value from 150 kHz to 80 MHz.
The dwell time at each frequency was less than the time necessary for the EUT to be
exercised, and able to respond. Sensitive frequencies such as clock frequency(ies) and
harmonics or frequencies of dominant interest, was analyzed separately.
Attempts was made to fully exercise the EUT during testing, and to fully interrogate all
exercise modes selected for susceptibility.
Page 61
8.7.4. TEST SETUP
10 cm isolation
supporter
AUX
Support units
EUT
Clamp
or
CDN
Attenuator
Power
Amplifier
RF Signal
Generator
AC Main
Note: 1. The EUT is setup 0.1m above Ground Reference Plane
2. The CDNs and / or EM clamp used for real test depends on ports and cables configuration of
EUT.
NOTE:
TABLE-TOP AND FLOOR-STANDING EQUIPMENT
The equipment to be tested was placed on an insulating support of 0.1 meters height above a ground
reference plane. All relevant cables shall be provided with the appropriate coupling and decoupling devices at
a distance between 0.1 meters and 0.3 meters from the projected geometry of the EUT on the ground
reference plane.
Page 62
8.7.5. TEST RESULTS
Temperature
26oC
Pressure
984mbar
Humidity
Tested By
45% RH
Bill Cheng
Criterion A
For EN 55024:
Frequency
Band (MHz)
Field
Strength
(Vrms)
Cable
Injection
Method
0.15 ~ 80
3
Power Line
CDN-M3
A
0.15 ~ 80
3
LAN
CDN-T8
A
Performance
Criterion
Observation
Result
B
Note 1
PASS
B
Note 1
PASS
Observation
Result
For EN 61000-6-2:
Frequency
Band (MHz)
Field
Strength
(Vrms)
Cable
Injection
Method
0.15 ~ 80
10
Power Line
CDN-M3
A
B
Note 1
PASS
0.15 ~ 80
10
LAN
CDN-T8
A
B
Note 1
PASS
Performance
Criterion
Page 63
8.8. POWER FREQUENCY MAGNETIC FIELD
Basic Standard:
Frequency Range:
Field Strength:
Observation Time:
Inductance Coil:
IEC 61000-4-8
50Hz,
EN 55024: 1 A/m
EN 61000-6-2: 30 A/m
1 minute
Rectangular type, 1mx1m
Name of Equipment
Manufacturer
Model
Serial Number
Calibration Due
TRIAX ELF Magnetic
Field Meter
F.W.BELL
4090
9711
11/23/2009
Clamp Meter
National
300K
11-5980 K
11/23/2009
Magnetic Field Tester
HAEFELY
TRENCH
MAG 100.1
080 938-01
06/04/2010
a) The equipment was configured and connected to satisfy its functional requirements. It
shall be placed on the GRP with the interposition of a 0.1m-thick insulating support.
b. The equipment cabinets shall be connected to the safety earth directly on the GRP via
the earth terminal of the EUT.
c. The power supply, input and output circuits shall be connected to the sources of power
supply, control and signal.
d. The cables supplied or recommended by the equipment manufacturer shall be used. 1
meter of all cables used shall be exposed to the magnetic field.
Page 64
8.8.4. TEST SETUP
Induction
Coil
1/2 Dimension
of EUT
EUT
Signal
Generator
To
Earth Ground
NOTE:
TABLETOP EQUIPMENT
The equipment shall be subjected to the test magnetic field by using the induction coil of standard dimension
(1 m x 1 m). The induction coil shall then be rotated by 90 degrees in order to expose the EUT to the test field
with different orientations.
FLOOR-STANDING EQUIPMENT
The equipment shall be subjected to the test magnetic field by using induction coils of suitable dimensions.
The test shall be repeated by moving and shifting the induction coils, in order to test the whole volume of the
EUT for each orthogonal direction. The test shall be repeated with the coil shifted to different positions along
the side of the EUT, in steps corresponding to 50 % of the shortest side of the coil. The induction coil shall
then be rotated by 90 degrees in order to expose the EUT to the test field with different orientations.
Page 65
8.8.5. TEST RESULTS
Temperature
26oC
Pressure
984mbar
Humidity
Tested By
46% RH
Bill Cheng
Criterion A
For EN 55024:
DIRECTION
Field Strength
(A/m)
Performance
Criterion
X
1
A
Y
1
Z
1
OBSERVATION
RESULTS
B
Note 1
Pass
A
B
Note 1
Pass
A
B
Note 1
Pass
Observation
Results
For EN 61000-6-2:
Direction
Field Strength
(A/m)
Performance
Criterion
X
30
A
B
Note 1
Pass
Y
30
A
B
Note 1
Pass
Z
30
A
B
Note 1
Pass
NOTE: 1. There was no change compared with the initial operation during the test.
Page 66
8.9. VOLTAGE DIP & VOLTAGE INTERRUPTIONS
Basic Standard:
Test duration time:
Interval between event:
Angle:
Step:
IEC 61000-4-11
Minimum three test events in sequence
Minimum 10 seconds
0~360 degree
45 degree
Immunity shielded room
Name of Equipment
Manufacturer
Model
Serial Number
Calibration Due
Dips/Interruption and
Variations Simulator
HAEFELY
TRENCH
PLINE 1610
080 344-05
04/29/2010
Test S/W
Winpats (3.25)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The EUT and support units were located on a wooden table, 0.8 m away from ground floor.
Setting the parameter of tests and then perform the test software of test simulator.
Conditions changes to occur at 0 degree crossover point of the voltage waveform.
Recording the test result in test record form.
Removes the Battery Pack to test if any.
Page 67
8.9.4. TEST SETUP
To AC
Source
Dips/Interruption
and Variations
Simulator
EUT
&
Support Units
0.8m
Controller Computer
Page 68
8.9.5. TEST RESULTS
EN 55024:
Temperature
26oC
Pressure
Tested By
984mbar
EN 55024:
Criterion B: >95% reduction 0.5 period
Criterion C: 30% reduction 25 period &
>95% reduction 250 period
>95% reduction 250 period
Required Passing
Performance
Humidity
46% RH
Bill Cheng
Test Power: 230Vac, 50Hz
Voltage
(％ Reduction)
Duration
(Period)
>95
0.5
A
B
30
25
A
>95
250
A
Performance
Criterion
Observation
Test Result
C
Note 1
PASS
B
C
Note 1
PASS
B
C
Note 2
PASS
EN 61000-6-2:
Temperature
26oC
Pressure
Tested By
984mbar
Bill Cheng
EN 61000-6-2:
Criterion B: 0% reduction 1 period
Criterion C: 40% reduction 10/12 period, 50/60Hz &
70% reduction 25/30 period, 50/60Hz &
0% reduction 250/300 period, 50/60Hz
Required Passing
Performance
Humidity
46% RH
Test Power: 230Vac, 50/60Hz
Voltage
(％ Reduction)
NOTE:
Duration
(Period)
Performance
Criterion
Observation
Test Result
C
Note 1
PASS
B
C
Note 1
PASS
A
B
C
Note 1
PASS
A
B
C
Note 2
PASS
50Hz
60Hz
0
1
1
A
B
40
10
12
A
70
25
30
0
250
300
1. There was no change compared with initial operation during and after the test. No unintentional
response was found during the test.
2. The function stopped during the test, but can be recoverable manually after the test.
Page 69
9 PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TEST CONFIGURATION
CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST
Page 70
CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST AT TELECOMMUNICATION PORTS
(RJ45 Telecom Port with ISN (10/100 Mbps)
Page 71
RADIATED EMISSION TEST
Page 72
POWER HARMONIC & VOLTAGE FLUCTUATION / FLICKER TEST
Page 73
ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE TEST
Page 74
RADIATED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD TEST
Page 75
FAST TRANSIENTS/BURST TEST
Page 76
SURGE IMMUNITY TEST
Page 77
CONDUCTED DISTURBANCE TEST
Page 78
POWER FREQUENCY MAGENTIC FIELD IMMUNITY TEST
VOLTAGE DIPS / INTERRUPTION TEST
Page 79
Report No: 90921102
PHOTOGRAPHS OF EUT
Page 1 / 3
Report No: 90921102
Page 2
Report No: 90921102
Page 3

5 setup of equipment under test

Transcription

Similar documents

CE EMC TEST REPORT For External USB Floppy Disk Drive Trade

oc pepper spray certification course

Map 8c Area from which Beckford`s Tower is Visible (Landmark 2)

MANU DIBANGO: AFRICA`S HIPPEST HOPPER

IACCA 2016 Brochure April 2016

The Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994

Petal Recognition - International Living Future Institute

matthias kolowrat

C1v1LN01R

certificate - Dietze + Schell