MRS Submissions (Volume 5 of 6) - Part A

Transcription

April 2016
Metropolitan Region
Scheme Amendment
1210/41
Rationalisation of Stirling
Highway Reservation
Submissions 410 – 462
Volume 5 of 6
City of Fremantle, City of Nedlands,
Town of Claremont, Town of Cottesloe,
Town of Mosman Park and the Shire of
Peppermint Grove
Metropolitan Region Scheme
Amendment 1210/41
Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation
Submissions 410 - 462
Volume 5 of 6
City of Fremantle, City of Nedlands,
Town of Claremont, Town of Cottesloe,
Town of Mosman Park and the
Shire of Peppermint Grove
April 2016
Disclaimer
This document has been published by the Western Australian Planning Commission.
Any representation, statement, opinion or advice expressed or implied in this
publication is made in good faith and on the basis that the government, its employees
and agents are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a
result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be, in respect of any
representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein. Professional advice
should be obtained before applying the information contained in this document to
particular circumstances.
© State of Western Australia
Internet: www.wa.gov.au
Published by the
Western Australian Planning Commission,
140 William Street,
Perth WA 6000
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
MRS Amendment 1210/41 - Submissions 410 – 462 Volume 5 of 6
File 809-2-1-91 Pt 2
Published April 2016
Internet:
Email:
Phone:
Fax:
National
Infoline:
www.planning.wa.gov.au
[email protected]
(08) 655 19000
(08) 655 19001
Relay Service: 13 36 77
1800 626 477
This document is available in alternative
formats on application to Communications Services.
Introduction to Metropolitan Region Scheme major amendments
The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is responsible for keeping the
Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) under review and initiating changes where they are
seen as necessary.
The MRS sets out the broad pattern of land use for the whole Perth metropolitan region. The
MRS is constantly under review to best reflect regional planning and development needs.
A proposal to change land use reservations and zones in the MRS is regulated by the
Planning and Development Act 2005. That legislation provides for public submissions to be
made on proposed amendments.
For a substantial amendment, often referred to as a major amendment (made under section
41 of the Act), the WAPC considers all the submissions lodged, and publishes its
recommendations in a report on submissions. This report is presented to the Minister for
Planning and to the Governor for approval. Both Houses of Parliament must then scrutinise
the amendment before it can take legal effect.
In the process of making a substantial amendment to the MRS, information is published as a
public record under the following titles:
Amendment report
This document is available from the start of the public advertising period of the proposed
amendment. It sets out the purpose and scope of the proposal, explains why the
amendment is considered necessary, and informs people how they can comment through
the submission process.
Environmental review report
The Environmental Protection Authority must consider the environmental impact of an
amendment to the MRS before it can be advertised. Should it require formal assessment, an
environmental review is undertaken and made available for information and comment at the
same time as the amendment report.
Report on submissions
The planning rationale, determination of submissions and the recommendations of the
WAPC for final approval of the amendment, with or without modification, is documented in
this report.
Submissions
This document contains a reproduction of all written submissions received by the WAPC on
the proposed amendment.
Transcript of hearings
A person who has made a written submission may also choose to appear before a hearings
committee to express their views. The hearings proceedings are recorded and transcribed,
and the transcripts of all hearings are reproduced in this volume.
Alphabetical Listing of Submissions
MRS Amendment 1210/41
Submission
Number
48
137
308
309
128
189
447
446
398
120
355
337
44
138
587
184
365
145
433
175
30
132
468
119
440
441
17
228
419
211
385
32
124
47
576
75
63
62
165
13
282
Submitter Name
Abzalov, Aygul
Albrecht, Marina
Aldrovandi, Jill
Aldrovandi, Riccardo
Allan, Ken & Dot
Allan, Sarah
Allerding and Associates (act on behalf of landowners Harman Nominees
Pty Ltd)
Allerding and Associates (act on behalf of landowners Two Twenty
Investments Pty Ltd & Dion Nominees Pty Ltd)
Anglican Church, Diocese of Perth
Annear O.A.M., Anne
Armstrong, Patrick H
Art Deco Society of WA (Vyonne Geneve)
Artelaris, Spiro & Penelope
Artelaris, Steve (Steve Artelaris Architects)
Ashford, Max
Asphar, Florence E
Asphar, Ian
Auer, John
Australian Urban Design Research Centre
Auto Management Pty Ltd
Backhouse, Lisa M
Bagshaw, Anthony & Ann
Bailey, Carolyn
Bailey, Mark
Balfe, Michael
Banfield, Tim & Gemma
Barker, David
Barron, Steve
Barrymore, Geoffrey
Bartel, Matt
Basson, E J & R M
Beamish, Marjorie (Flamenco Holdings Pty Ltd)
Bellson Pty Ltd ATF Brady Property Trust
Bennett, Pamela
Bennett, Pia
Bennett, Samuel
Bentley, Marjorie R
Berden, Matthew
Bishop, Luke
Blackburne Property Group (on behalf of The Owners of St Quentins
Apartments)
Blackwell & Associates Pty Ltd (Tony Blackwell)
470
416
459
294
114
361
92
190
520
50
195
202
384
68
109
484
59
399
323
201
327
31
270
322
580
329
91
378
219
430
49
390
163
452
45
522
262
429
523
12
153
155
453
574
110
310
223
77
180
103
203
Blackwell, Emmet
Blackwood, Beth (on hehalf of the Presbyterians Ladies' College)
Blair, Alison
Blanchard, Serverine (Co-Manager of Allegro Pizza)
Blight, Nicole
Blumann, Siobhan
Boehm, Peggy R
Bogue, Kevin & Marion
Bond, I L
Bowra & O'Dea - Funeral Directors
Boyd, A G
Boyd, L
Boyland, Father Peter (Parish Priest, Anglican Parish of Christ Church
Claremont)
Boyle, Peter & Celia
Boyle, Rafeena
Brake, Anne
Bremner, Mark
Brescacin, Danny (on behalf of his parents)
Brooker, Jacinta
Brooks, Y
Brown, Carolyn
Brown, Russell & Sally (Belregis Pty Ltd)
Brown, Sherri
Bruns, Maurits
Burns, William
Burrows, Amanda
Butcher, Luke
Butler, David & White, Justine
Calcutt, Julie
Cant, Ryan
Cardno (WA) Pty Ltd (on behalf of BP Australia Ltd)
Carles MLA, Adele (Member of Fremantle)
Carr, Emma
Carter, Jacqui
Carton, Romilly
Caslleden Family
Catelli, Anna & Maria
Challen, Michael B
Charlecraft, Henry
Charlesworth, Kate
Chartres, Margot (owner Violet Pilot)
Cheffers, Freya (owner Violet Pilot)
Cheffins, Jane & Pete
Cheffins, Peter
Cheung, Carol
Christy, Julie-Anne
Churack, Danielle
Churley, Julie
Clancy, Robyn L
Claremont Baptist Church (Ian Simms)
Claremont, Town of
95 Clark, Donald (on behalf of the Landowners of Seaview Lane Strata Lot
52/100 Stirling Hwy, North Fremantle)
579 Clune, Anna
212 Cmielewski, Cecelia
581 Cock, Daniel
369 Connor, Tony
100 Cook, Bruce
568 Cooper, Katey
284 Cooper, S P & G R
273 Cotton, Sandra J
577 Courtney, Liam
341 Cowell, Wendy
89 Craig, Daniel
391 Cranfield, Richard L J
332 Cromag Pty Ltd
498 Cropley, Cecily
491 Cropley, Peter
386 Croudace, Michael
387 Croudace, Susan
487 Crugnale, Gianpaolo (Gage Roads Construction)
415 Cullity, Dr Marguerite
93 Cunningham, Lesley
111 Cunningham, Tom & Bryant, Peri
115 Currie, Rachel
121 Curtis, Jackie
280 Dagg, Alan & Jennifer
72 D'Angelo, Marissa
388 D'arcy, John L
346 Date, Russel
141 Davidson, David K
232 Davidson, Ron & Dianne
6 Davies, Denise
3 Davies, Xian-Li
253 Davis, Christopher
382 Davis, Dr Neville J
252 Davis, Mary
373 Daw, Ian T
396 Daw, Trevor A (Chairman of the Forrest Grove Villas Body Corporate on
behalf of the Forrest Villa owners)
420 Day, Brenna
485 Day, Robert
191 D'Cress, Brian G
288 de Caux, Christian
104 Dean, Allan & William
28 Deejay Nominees Pty Ltd (Durack & Zilko Lawyers on behalf of)
272 Deighan, Dorothy H
566 Demissie, Bayoush
331 Department of Transport, Main Roads WA & Public Transport Authority
286 Desforges, Jonah & Danielle
519 D'Esterre Family
81 Dobra, Wendy & Max
277 Dodd, Marilyn
423 Donovan, Kim S & Payne, Carl D (Twine Court Pty Ltd)
55
237
254
313
139
394
358
436
502
255
267
23
474
207
351
178
583
210
431
181
596
489
243
4
135
136
345
404
87
257
438
244
98
19
8
84
307
242
336
25
595
269
206
584
401
353
479
35
226
570
214
506
Douglass, Tony (on behalf of Empire City Superannuation Fund)
Drayton, Roslyn
Dreyfus, Michele
D'Souza, Father James (Parish Priest Cottesloe/Mosman Park)
Dutry, Danicia
Dwyer, Bryan & Nyree
Eastwood, David
Eidsvold. Jaimie
Eldon, Lisa
Eldred, Sara
Elsey, Richard
Elton, Sophie
Evans, Glenn
Farnsworth, Kate
Faye, Bridget
Fearis, Neil
Ferguson-Thomas, Susan
Ferrari, Robert
Ferrell, Margaret
Ferrell, Walter J
Findlater, Kate & Brendon
Finn, Kirsty
Fiocco, Suzanne & John
Fire & Emergency Services Authority of WA
Flack, Ian
Flack, Jacqueline
Fleming, Hamish
Fletcher, Paul F
Flynn, Amber
Forarty, Cain
Ford, Patrick
Forma, Ann
Forrest, David & Nedela, Janis
Freind Investments Pty Ltd (Clayton Friend, Director on behalf of)
Fremantle Ports
Fremantle, City of
Galan-Dwyer, Bianca
Gamblin, Paul
Gardiner, Leigh
Gare, Robert C & Kathleen L
Gay, Marlene M
Gerard McCann Architect (on behalf of the owners Lot 51 Stirling Hwy,
North Fremantle)
Gilchrist, Sylvia
Glass, Stuart
Glassby, Cathie
Glegg, Trevor
Godden, Alison & Andrew
Godlonton, Heath Sanderson & Sasha
Goodlich, Mary-Ann
Goodridge, Phillipa
Goodwin, Clare
Grant, Barbara
505
260
261
558
559
389
427
445
458
82
67
43
409
76
9
362
54
408
134
186
162
172
371
71
333
412
301
421
381
350
147
340
483
572
74
511
503
57
276
357
10
321
379
196
197
342
225
20
64
Grant, Randall
Green, David
Green, Janet
Green, Russell
Green, Shirley
Greenway, Claire
Greg Rowe and Associates (act on behalf of owners Ortona P/L & Don
Russell Holdings)
Greg Rowe and Associates (act on behalf of owners Yat-Wing Liu &
Precious Holdings Pty Ltd)
Griffin, Scot & Clare
Groves, Norman John
Hall, John D & Penuel K
Hall, Lorraine & Geoff
Hamersley, Vicki & Simon (property held in the name of LF Rural Nominees
Pty Ltd)
Hammond, L
Hams, Simon D D
Harper-Meredith, Karri
Harriott, John F
Harris, Daphne
Harvey, Clare
Hasluck, Sally A
Hatton, Damien
Hawkes, E
Hay, Cameron
Hayes, Bruce
Heagney, Karen
Health, Department of
Heard, Kent
Herbert, Serina
Hewitt, Maxwell E (on behalf of the North Fremantle Community
Association)
Hill, Richard & Schell, Fleur
Hills, Lisa J
Hills, Neville F
History Council of Western Australia (Dr Lise Summers, president)
Hopkins, Alexandra
Hopkins, Philip & Mary
Hos, Joanna
Hoskings, Janet
Hotchkin Hanly Lawyers (on behalf of Euro Form Constructions Pty Ltd)
House, Kate
Howe, Jim
Howe, Peter M
Howieson, Jill
Hume, B
Hunter, J M
Hunter, W
Hutchison, June
Hyndman, Trish
Imani, Dr Pedram
Independent Cinemas Pty Ltd
11
113
1
463
131
377
39
241
300
235
231
424
289
383
518
216
338
170
393
352
108
168
274
204
205
125
209
158
221
493
591
339
588
169
348
349
293
188
33
215
375
14
466
271
83
46
496
38
599
586
578
302
Indigenous Affairs, Department of
Ioppolo, Gary
Ioppolo, James
Jackson, Andrew (on behalf of all owners of Greenough Home Units)
Jeffree, Marjorie G V
Jelovsek, Francesco
Jeta Pty Ltd
Johnson, Jill
Johnson, Josephine
Johnstone, Graeme
Johnstone, Klara
Jones, Alex
Jones, Bryn
Jones, Peter F
Jordan, Ray
Joyce, Fletcher J
Kaesehagen, David
Kain, Anthony
Keely, Dr Nicholas
Keen, Michelle
Kelly, Simon
Kennedy, Dorothy
Kenny, Judith
Kent, Jack
Kent, Louis
Kidd, Paul
King, Natasha
Kleinig, Richard
Knutson, Barry
Kohan, Kimberley
Kotsoglo, Imogen
Kowald, Brian
Kruit, Michael
La Fontaine, Monique
Lane, Glendon
Lane, Jennifer
Lane, Richard
Langmead, Rex A (representing Langmead Investments P/L in trust for the
Langmead Familty Trust)
Leach, Jeffery & Helen
Leah, Ann
Leahy-Kane, Jane
Lee, Shirley C L
Leighton, Chris
Leondro Mika
Leslie, Benjamin & Oliver, Nicole
Lim, Tanya Fong
Line, Wendy
Ling, Kendrick
Litis, Desi
Llewellin, Michael
Loe, Louise
Lopresti, Frank (on behalf of the owners of 176 Stirling Hwy, Nedlands)
482
27
562
126
367
557
60
258
85
291
504
151
112
299
359
356
585
217
573
246
142
65
171
368
130
249
179
592
571
575
594
473
461
230
229
354
56
501
517
192
563
316
315
24
140
450
360
53
303
41
500
70
Lorenz, Anita
Lund, Wayne
Lushey, Robert A
Lyndon, Angie
Lyons, Christopher
Lyons, Emma
MacDougall, Sonya Lee
MacGill, Gerard (on behalf of the North Fremantle Community Association)
MacGowan, John & Charmaine
MacKay, Sharon
MacKie, Maggie
MacLeay, Shayne
MacLeay, Travis
MacNeill, Ron
Maher, Ingrid
Mair Property Securities Ltd (on behalf of all the owners of 525 Stirling Hwy,
Cottesloe)
Malacari, Luke S
Maley, Kirsten
Maloney, Bruce
Mannolini, Amanda; Gerrish, Laurence & Connolly, Anne-Maire
Mansell, Vanya
Martinick, Dirk
Martino, Bianca
Marwick, Susan
May, Sarah
McCormick, Jonathon R
McGechie, David & Ada
McGowan, Claire
McGown, Michael (on behalf of Kirsten Maley)
McKean, Andrew
McKenzie, Ian
McNab, Sandy C
Meehan, Pamela
Mellor, Edward
Mellor, Thomas
Meredith, David
Merks, Kristy
Metcalfe, Chris
Mian, C
Mignot, Belinda A
Miller, Todd
Milliner, Andrew
Milliner, Jessica
Mines and Petroleum, Department of
Monk, Anthony & Shirley
Monro, Caroline
Monro, Victoria
Morgan, Sue
Moriarty, Bruce
Morris, Dr Christina (Appollonia Nominees, Cottesloe Dental)
Morton, Keith
Mosman Park, Town of
582
457
600
476
495
413
494
101
372
486
26
292
29
183
123
462
347
182
434
222
567
437
52
298
236
99
516
314
187
256
296
418
213
512
513
90
34
561
560
467
263
233
428
320
319
278
247
295
564
480
266
364
156
Moulden, Deanne
Muir, Gregory
Mullen, Kate
Mulvena-Trinder, Brendan
Murray, David
Murray, John (Creation Landscape Supplies)
Murray, Lisa
Mussared, Helen A
Musto, Ken & Lyn
Nairn, Pam
Nardone, Rocco A (for Conpec Pty Ltd)
National Trust of Australia (WA)
Naughton, Paul
Nedlands Electors Association (Inc)
Nedlands, City of
Neil, Anne & Tepper, Steve
Newson, Alan & Barlow, Johanna
Nguyen, Thai Duy
Niblett, Dylan
Nichol, Colin
Nicholls, Scott
Nicholson, Charlie
Nikakhtar, Loghman
Nikolich, Amanda & Goran
Nixon, Bruce & Handcock, Karen
Nomet Pty Ltd
Nottage, J
O'Connor, David
O'Dea, John
Officer, Meg
O'Keefe, Joe
O'Loughlin, Edmond (on behalf of Geraldine O'Loughlin)
Orchard, Stuart
O'Reilly, Alexandra
Oria, Conrad
Orly, Tammy
Ou, Zhiliang
Owenell, Ben
Owenell, John
Owners of Brookwood, 396 Stirling Hwy (Andrew Bremner)
Owners of Terrara (Strata Plan 1275)
Palmer, Narayani
Palmer, Richard D
Paparone, Jack
Paparone, Romaine
Parmentier, Brice
Paterniti, Robert & Sue
Paterson, Alistair
Paterson, Eleanor
Paterson, Jennifer A
Paton, Mary-Anne
Pattison, Cate & Giles
Paulik-White, Dr Georgie
335
265
88
149
425
66
218
118
51
220
410
200
597
185
465
403
426
227
166
287
590
208
328
312
251
106
78
161
159
370
451
569
167
144
297
18
37
477
58
598
593
129
157
454
443
407
193
411
435
133
514
5
238
Pauling, Glenn
Paxton, James F
Pearce, Cameron
Pedro, Zamia
Peppermint Grove, Shire of
Petrides, Peter
Phillips, Dodie
Phillips, Jenny
Philpott, Martin & Mary
Pickles, Carol
Pieniazek, Jan & Cecilia
Pinkster, Lauren
Pinto, E
Pisano, Ngarie & Giglieto
Pittaway, Janine & Brown, Stewart
Planning Solutions (on behalf of Amana Living)
Poland, Greg
Pollard, Helena
Porter, Clare
Pratt, Brian & Gillian
Prindiville, T
Pritchard, Georgina
Ptolomey, Brendon (AAPI Certified Practising Valuer)
Pyvis, Sally
Quayle, Monica
Rae-Frae, Ama
Ramdas Tampi & Pamela Hendry
Ramsay, Rob
Randall, Brooke
Rattigan, Annabel
Rattigan, Graeme
Redgrave, Sian
Reed, Sandra
Rees, John (Mosman Park Veterinary Hospital)
Reeve, Thomas & Valerie
Reid, Sarah M
Remmerswaal, N
Revell, Kerry
Richardson, Gavin
Ridley, Ben & Dietrich, Jessica
Ridley, Cate
Rigg, Jeremy
Riley, Jim
Rippingale, Kelly
Rivalland, Virginia & Daniel
Roberts, Giles
Roberts, Lynn
Roberts, Peter; Strauss, Caroline; Wood, Anne & Lankester, Keith
Roberts, Tom
Robinson, John
Rogers, Joanna
Rogers, John
Rogers, Steve
515
127
173
160
400
326
565
79
510
40
488
432
290
380
22
275
490
259
250
281
344
343
448
21
107
234
69
414
442
248
116
366
509
80
481
279
224
97
330
456
499
469
15
283
285
240
334
94
102
154
521
148
174
Rogers, Steve
Rosenstein, Jennifer
Runco, Mario & Mary
Russell, Glenn
Ryan, Gary
Sambrailo, Christian
Savill, Julie
Savoy Management Pty Ltd
Scott, Elizabeth
Seng, James Cheah Kit (Duomark on behalf of the owners)
Shaw, Jeni
Shepherd, Melissa
Shepherd, Pip
Showell, John A
Simpson, John & Marie-Louise
Skipworth, Ric & Tish
Sluga, Lena
Smith, Deonne
Smith, Keith & Elizabeth
Smith, Roland
Smith, Sophie
Smith, Stewart
Socha, Pauline M
South West Aboriginal Land & Sea Council (SWALSC)
Spencer, David
Stansfield, Judith
State Heritage Office
Staude, Anita
Steffen, Thomas & Franscesca
Stirling, Kim
Stokes, Amy
Stone, Noel T
Stoner, B
Subiaco, City of
Sullivan, Andrew
Sullivan, Jane
Suttar, Craig
Swan River People Native Title Holders
Sweetman, Lorraine
Swift, Omega
Swiney, Tracey
Tambasco, Serena
Tan, John Tiang Tong
Tapp, Aimee
Taylor, Annie
Thayne, Nell
The Fremantle Society
The Landowners of Stirling Heights - SP5036
The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Perth
Thomas, Jacinta (Manager Violet Pilot)
Thompson, M O
Thompson, Stephen
Thorpe, John
122 Thorpe, Susan
444 TPG (on behalf of Rhys Edwards, owner Nedlands Post Office)
397 TPG (on behalf of the landowners Amhurst Enterprises Pty Ltd and John
Fountain as trusteee for the John Fountain Family Trust)
439 TPG (on behalf of the owners CITI Fiedlity Nominee Co Pty Ltd)
497 Tregonning, Anne
492 Trishs' Place (Antiques)
245 Truscott, Kate
449 Tucak, Layla
478 Tucak, Michael
146 Tulloch, Alastair (Councillor)
376 Turner, Stacey
96 University of Western Australia (Professor Paul Johnson)
471 Unknown
524 Unknown
525 Unknown
526 Unknown
527 Unknown
528 Unknown
529 Unknown
530 Unknown
531 Unknown
532 Unknown
533 Unknown
534 Unknown
535 Unknown
536 Unknown
537 Unknown
538 Unknown
539 Unknown
540 Unknown
541 Unknown
542 Unknown
543 Unknown
544 Unknown
545 Unknown
546 Unknown
547 Unknown
548 Unknown
549 Unknown
550 Unknown
551 Unknown
552 Unknown
553 Unknown
554 Unknown
555 Unknown
556 Unknown
601 Unknown
602 Unknown
61 Vasudavan, Dr Sivabalan (Sole Director of Lola Management Pty Ltd)
16 Victoria Creek Pty Ltd
198 Vidulich, K M
199 Vidulich, M
86
152
164
507
472
239
143
317
318
402
422
306
2
363
177
264
460
455
105
176
268
508
374
417
589
395
325
475
73
117
150
464
405
305
304
36
311
392
406
42
7
194
324
Late
Submissions
623
612
620
622
608
626
Vigano, Anthony J
Vujic, Tara
Vujic, Tijana
Wall, Jon
Wallbridge, Philip
Walsh, Aiden
Walsh, Brett
Walsh, Jane
Walsh, John
Walter, Peta (on behalf of the North Fremantle Community Association)
Walton, Haylee
Warrall, Ian
Water (Swan Avon Region), Department of
Water Corporation
Watson, Nevin J
Weber, David
West, Carly
West, Michael
Wheeldon, Chris
Whelans WA Pty Ltd (on behalf of owners Gull Properties)
Whelans WA Pty Ltd (on behalf of owners WA Flour Mills Pty Ltd)
White, Rolf
Whitley, John
Wickenden, Kyele J
Wilkinson, Kate
Williams, Simon & Jill
Willis, Jane
Willson, Hayley E
Wilson, Kerri
Wilson, Stacey
Wilson, Tracey
Woods, Trent
Woollett, Sara
Worrall, Charlotte
Worrall, Karen
Yau, Bonnie
Yeaton, Jeff
Yeo, Veronica J
Yu, Lawrence
Yuen, Julie (for Weng Hoong Nominees Pty Ltd)
YWB Pty Ltd
Zevis, M A & A C
Zuvela, Peter
Name
Adams, Pete
Bekkevold, Sacha
Bell, James
Berrovic, L
Caddy, Stephen M
Cottesloe, Town of
627
606
624
625
621
610
614
613
611
609
607
618
604
615
628
603
605
616
617
619
Crandell, J D
Evans, George M
Evans, Susan
Gow, Peter
Graeme Robertson Group
Hood, Libby
Lane, Gary
MacRae, Jenna
Merride, Christopher
Nolan, Clint
O'Driscoll, Nanette
Owenell, Helen; Willing, Suzanne & Bennett, Christine (Busatti)
Page, Jane & Gilmore, Mike, Jane, Tom & Elea
Rowe, Jacqui
Shell Company of Australia, The
Silove, Dr Kym
State Development, Department of
Unknown
Unknown
Wright, Timothy (Wrightfeldhusen Architects)
Submissions
DEPARTME T OP P ANNING
Planning and Development Act 2005
2 JUL 2012
Section 41 Amendment (Substantial)
Form 41
file -S jojjsi
Submission
IVletro olitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41
OFFICE USE ONLY
~ "1
To: Secretary
Western Australian Planning Commission
Submission) 41®
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
»..¦¦¦
. • • -
Name: Jan A Cecilia Pieni zek
(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)
Address: 2, nstey Street, Cl remeont Postcode: W 6010
Contact phone number: (00) 930S 6097 Email address: [email protected]
Tips for com leting a submission:
® Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues
® include roperty addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant
° Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission
Submission
As joint owners of No 2 Anstey Street we wish to advise the Western Australian Planning
Commission that we currently do not support the amended road reservation under the
Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment No. 1210/41 as shown on the Land Requirements
and Changes Plan as we object to the provision of dedicated bicycle lanes and the impact this has on
the width of the reservation required with the resulting effect on properties along the highway
listed and unlisted.
The section of the Highway between Cottesloe and Claremont in particular has a gradient which will
create additional hazards for road users, especially those travelling in the direction of Perth. We believe
that cyclists, children especially, will find this section a challenge to negotiate and will result in the
weaving action witnessed when cyclists climb a hill - a hazard in itself. The prospect of motorists having
to take evasive action due to unstable cyclists especially at bus stops and the intersection of Eric Street Osborne Parade is one which should be avoided at all costs - especially as alternati es are available.
We believe that completing the proposed high quality Principle Shared Path (PSP) alongside the railway
reserve from Freemantle to Perth, as has already been proposed should be the preferred option as it much
better caters for the needs of the cyclist and motorist alike.
Furthermore, being a much safer, gentler route with fewer busy intersections this also has
the potential to encourage current motor vehicle users to switch to cycling as a means of
transport potentially reducing traffic volumes on the highway.
Removing the requirement for cycle lanes along the highway and the larger reservation currently
proposed will enable a reduction in the reserve required.
This will further minimise the potential impact on properties on both sides of the highway
both listed and unlisted.
At our location specifically, the amendment as proposed will impact on the boundary wall of
our property along the highway. If passed, this will require a section of the existing wall, a
number of established trees and plantings together with our car-port to be demolished.
These are actions which we, as residents, rate & vehicle licence payers are strongly opposed to.
Any reduction in our plot size will have a negative impact on the value of our home especially with
the removal of the carport and the affect this will have on our potential of a secure retirement which we
are both working hard to achieve.
SUMMARY - removal of the provision for cycle lanes will:
° Be a safer option for all highway users including cyclists.
o Allow the verge reserve along the entire highway to be reduced minimising impact.
° At our location allow the reservation boundary to be re-aligned to contain the existing structures,
including trees and verge plantings.
° as the existing kerb line will be maintained allow the current intersection geometry at
Anstey Street and Stirling Highway to remain without modification.
Hearing of submissions
Anyone who has made a written submission on he amendment may personally present the basis of their
submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Your
written submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendment
whether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not.
Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.
Please choose one of the following:
S So, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)
OR
Q Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)
I will be epresented by:
C Myself - My telephone number (business hours):
or
A spokesperson
Name
of
spokesperson:
Contact telephone number (business hours):
Postal address:
I would prefer my hea ing to be conducted in:
C Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)
OR
C Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be
permitted to attend)
You should be aware that:
° The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may be
subject to applications for access under the act.
° In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of your
submission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.
° All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, are
tabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. The
WAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.
To be signed by personfs) making the submission
Note: Submissions MUST be received by the ad ertised closing date, being close of
business (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.
Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
2 7 JUL 2012
Form 41
Su mission
file
Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41
OFFICE USE ONLY
To: Secretary
Submission 41i
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
Name
L
.........
1
O.frfc.R .STllA S .. AhJM .
(PLEASE PRI T CLEARLY) / '
Address .\h.a/xd..1 /.A.CA?..b li L?!I' .tx.hiW.X..C&..T7rA§A .T? Postcode . J&. .ll
a/iJ
1.
,
,
,
Contact phone number A..Z-. Email address (&) £(.< .< U
Tips for completing a submission:
» Use headings or numbers to se arate different topics and iss es
a Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant
« Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission
Submission
...
.
£?.£.&
&TTACH&
turn ove to co plete your submission
Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of their
submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Your
M Wo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)
OR
O Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)
Myself - My telephone number (business hours):
or
A spokesperson
Name of spokesperson:
Postal address:
I would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:
d] Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)
OR
E Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be
9 The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybe
o In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of your
o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, are
To be signed by person(s) making the submission
EHrYomc
Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close of
business (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions ill NOT be considered.
Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://ww .planning.wa.go .au
1. The plan to reduce the width of the reserve at the above addresses is welcomed.
2. However, we do have issues with the concept plans for the changes to Stirling
Highway.
2a. The implementation of a 5 metre wide footpath in the present plan will mean that
the footpath will pass within centimetres of the front doors of units 15 and 16. This will
adversely affect the quality of life of the present (and future) residents, which could
already be considered stressful due to the close proximity of pedestrian traffic.
Pedestrian noise, which at present is acceptable as there is low pedestrian throughput,
will be further increased, affecting lifestyle and noise pollution. Large trees which at
present shield the residences from some of this noise will also need to be removed as
part of the concept plan. It will also affect vehicular entry and exit to all properties
mentioned above, increasing the already present danger upon entry (one resident has
already been involved in a motor vehicle accident in the present safer form, while
entering the residence).
2b. The implementation of a 1.5 metre cycle lane as part of the concept seems to be a
duplication of a project that is being undertaken some 500 metres to the west. Approval
has been given to extend the cycle path which parallels the railway line. The extension
will run from Grant street railway station through to and past Cottesloe town. Although
it could be argued that a cycle lane is needed on Stirling Highway too, it is well known
that cyclists heading toward Fremantle prefer to use the more scenic route that runs
parallel to Stirling Highway, along Bindaring Parade through Peppermint Grove and
Mosman Park.
2c. The development of the above, referred to in 2a and 2b will mean that the vehicular
traffic will also be moved closer to the residences. People who live in the units have
already attempted to develop some means of reducing this vehicular pollution (noise,
visual, emissions) such as the installation of high walls, plants and double glazing,
however at present this just makes this pollution tolerable. By moving the traffic even
closer it will increase these levels to an intolerable point. The question must be asked
why not utilise land alongside the railway line to develop a more acceptable means of
highway transportation?" This land is already vacant?
3. Overall, the movement of vehicular and pedestrian traffic closer to the residences, as
well as reducing the area of land comprising the residences, will also have a major
impact on the value and ability to resell the residences.
4. The individuals and families who live in the residences listed above are there
because it is their homes and they would just like to be able to enjoy the same
without having to worry about major disruptions to their lives and lifestyles.
Therefore we do not agree with the proposed amendments and object most strongly
to them.
Submission 412
Government of Western Australia
Department of Health
igI
i departme nt of planning!
Your Ref: 809-2-1-91 Pt 2 (RLS/0248)
Our Ref: EHB-01445 EHB12/645
2 7 JUL 2012
Contact: Vic Andrich
Phone: 9388 4978
FILE
Mr Neil Thomson
Secretary
Locked Bag 2506
PERTH WA 6001
Dear Mr Thomson
MRS PROPOSED AMENDMENT 1210/41 - RATIO ALIS TION OF STIRLING
HIGHWAY RESERVATION
Thank you for your letter dated 20 March 2012 requesting comment from the
Department of Health (DOH) on the above proposal.
Although DOH does not have specific comment in relation to this amendment, you
may wish to consider incorporating Health Impact Assessment (HIA) and/or Public
Health Assessment (PHA) principles in your decision making process related to
transport infrastructure.
This may be particularly pertinent in regards to potential safety, noise, light or
exhaust impacts in sections where traffic lanes are located closer to residential
housing or parks.
For your information and guidance, you may access the relevant information at the
following sites:
HIA - http://www.public.health.wa.gov.aU 2/1400/2/health risk assessment.pm
PHA - http://www.public.health.wa.gov.aU 2/1399/2/public health assessment.pm
Should you have queries or require further information please contact Vic Andrich on
9388 4978 or [email protected].
Yours sincerely
V7
Jim Dodds
/DIRECTOR
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIRECTORATE
ENVIRONM
24 July 2012
Environmental Health
All Correspondence: PO Box 8172 Perth Business Centre Western Australia 6849
Grace Vaughan House 227 Stubbs Terrace Shenton Park WA 6008
Telephone (08) 9388 4999 Fax (08) 9388 4955
wa.gov.au
ABN 28 684 750 332
Section 41 mendment (Substantial)
DEPARTMENT Of PLANNING
Form 41
2 7 JUL 2012
Submission
o
OFFICE USE ONLY
To: Secretary
Submission 413
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
Name
zv.
S
.V...:cc.
,
,
(
(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) /
Address
J.
/..
Contact phone number. ....Jmp.JM
,
Postcode
!....
.. Email address
° Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues
° Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant
° Attach additional numbered ages if you require more space to complete your submission
Submission
// I
A/Yv
y'
.
C/
Ot / ,
!/ tr?y .
A/
AzAAI//. ..
:
A/AAay-.A/. . .
.. .#/&.... ... y
..rtkZZ..<A*.
ftyy.
7 A.. . y??.
2. ~7.
. c.. a™. -g rz */....& r.
SyA . ...J:<k 7. s
XrA :. A-fy-yzX A'
.. Ay /
AxAA1. ?:....tyrify ?.yyr& A.....C iXf x T A y../....cry.. . yrrx .x.1.. (AArXi.
,
AA 6A!7r.f:£:.... .. .<>?...
u.. Ab/s
. .<<1.... /Xly:.....yAfy?/yigz.r A. ?A.... yAX . i.XA. X ..
...A. y/yA ...?Pr X. . fxA
/P.y
s g. .-i&A &y
. .A./xAri.xcy.... Ay ... ./yyy.... vdyAyyAA. A....
. £
A.C.... six.X
zXr yi
P/yy xAA
rii..... A. I.. X'ut/. a/. . Ax A., cyyy. /yy/. .. yyxyyxSA.y. A
../y/AA
. (/. yyf? y/sffay. t... . yJrZ .rXAy. .... /.. yAr?y<rAA... Q/k. ..A
/A&A.Arn
O
... .yy.e/...... yxy?Ayf..
Ah tx
?/ A.Ady. :£?.....i y r-.A
n
turn over to complete your submission
u,
yG tA.
/A/y
,
CREATION
LANDSCAPE
SUPPLIES
. oT Xst t- / z gf s .£? Z £?y,
s -t
Z { *7
/
L '-d s b&y r cJ/'
i
y
, t >
c /Vy .
y./&-
t
ehy-it t
/ Z
iyi
f ./ t -t ->-
?/
,/yc- yi-/-/lyyfy) y)/yfyi y?
fyydff/ j4?yy
p fAy?
y Pyyyyyy/
ify ,
A'l- /
i
/ d? t-*f
& //lAfy-i lW J.
' 7
y
A /
A
yyb:/ 1 ypp
X2 s t-LS
PL
sLePt/
p
y?fy_/
yl4&
ypyt f
44
/ /7
i£?d/~y
.- y?
P
//i ityyi. Py,
Zf/Zy
c
4y?
<
y/o<r*xS A
s<psty-
:L 4y ycff / xyA) /si- jxfpA d i /y? pp y/ y
yp yip /-y/
l t d
y P-yp PP . Lyi ff
V? o/tu ) ec/pJ .4 /
/
f c fi
y?
yA r p/d /yj ypy? y y. sy,'ypt/y„ 7
A/d .aCc:
/s ) A&// ye's/
.<&>;{}/ «/
L ' y -
?y
pAl y -A
/ f , dp
y
c- '
P Pc? iydefy. /A
/ dZysidf* £ij/ ~f L y?-? yfr i i
/
f
'-(S
i to yA/
y le
yAe
a
py/ si 4t )
.p yt - tpy
f t L<7U4pj
P-d dpc.yfs-yf
Creation Landscape Supplies 139 Stirling Hwy North Fremantle Western Australia 6159 T: (08| 9335 7383 F: (08) 9431 7029 ABN 38 609 27 239
Heading of submissions
m"'
Mo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)
OR
Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)
I will be ep esented by:
E Myself - My telephone number (business hours):
or
A spokesperson
Postal address:
I would p efer my hea ing to be conducted in:
EH Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)
OR
EH Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be
a The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may be
business (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will OT be considered.
'
J
¦-•
f
H
-
') ? v >
%
f~<j
y
-
-
.
i
x/lo
J 3 s xjo_ c/ p /- I Cgd "hj ) W~f.a . X
s -. /
n/ px
V.5 yP - -J
l
V
P ip p? v/' V
y 5c? )dJ
T~X~P> pj 1 j P
~X ~ Yp
-)
-
xP'
IX
y? 5
oZ j c Y? J- o
i ol . s lJo J oS)V SjV O) jX
) l -Y-> Jo
' ' )
J
P
A P
.;
A ? ) )<?
i/1A I Y aJ A
y o P X) hj r y a-y
~ <?S )a
P J y- c?X
y.
py .yy 'A X f AXl py p _> c5> y
j
' < j >Yic\-v?S 5 > 1-h 47
< >-/1c)/
p>-PcP
}
/j c -A
a !/ p/> y
PP-P/-5
S
4 '1
5 W l ?
P
rx i
R k / ,
PS
n?
pop
pxPo/y
xi
X ZP
j 7 \pl±. J
T'
y
cl\ ] \ ? Oj_
p ¦
KP > ))>p \ C?X /
0
> u 11 J s
AL
,
y\AiP 5P> G A P 2
" p-y •/•' 1P' .-.
p/Vop ppl
X P- p m y ykP y ?:-y /PPro PPCl 'X Xj- 4 lA
P & J? P _ , )
¦¦ opc
zlo2 inr
QNINNVld J0iN3I i Vd3G
£
P
5 S
j -xzMS I X
kX .7-51 y
-t
b -
y, 5 A-1
' i ll- °__/.
X /C Z-f,L (L.AA
/ 9 y. Z-X X -XO
-z.o zs Zy L
l s 0) V
a j fxs 7
;.xx x y-X P'V
XS s y-/J 4S A!
it? uoissiiuqng
Form 41
Submission
OFFICE USE ONLY
--1
To: Secretary
Submission 415
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
E
1
Name . .Qi\ f. 6\ LI. . rCr.... C.< \,I .'jriA.
cj (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)
Address . .1. L\>. .1.2-. . $ . 1 d?. .. S . . f fi
!i.kl
Postcode . j .G\
.
Contact phone number IJ.bC ... .0.0..{ Email address ALl>>.CuLIi.tzj.eo. .t£.cm*
J Czti
® Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant
® Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission
Submission
S.uhmiss.Lo.rf...
Mea ing of submissions
Piease choose one of the following:
r No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)
OR
I will be represented by:
or
A spokesperson
Postal address:
OR
e In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of your
Note: Submissions IVIUST be received by the advertised closing date, being close of
Contacts: Telephone-(08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au
Submission to the State Planning Commission:
Commission s Proposal to shift 1963 reserve boundary line
by
Dr Marguerite Cullity (PhD Melb)
(Owner of Unit 14, Forrest Grove Villas)
As the owner occupier of Unit 14, Forrest Grove Villas located at No. 444 [lot 38] Stirling
Highway, Peppermint Grove, I hereby submit comment and argument against the
proposed change to the road reserve boundary for Stirling Highway. I concur with all of
the points made by the Forrest Grove Villas Body Corporate that the road should not be
widened at Lot 38.
In addition to the Body Corporate comments I would like to add the following arguments
and suggestions.
1. Significant Det imental Effects to Forrest Grove Villas and Residents.
As noted in the submission from the Villa Grove Body Corporate if the proposed reserve
boundary is made one villa (# 23) will need to be demolished and seven
owners/occupiers will lose ready and safe access to their garages. The loss of ready
and safe access to car parking has the potential to affect the safety of pedestrians
walking on the east side of the Stirling Highway footpath, especially as cars will be
required to exit a garage with reduced distance between the said car, pedestrians and
traffic using Stirling Highway.
A World Health Organisation report (June, 2012) cites exhaust from diesel fuel as a
'known carcinogen especially for humans exposed to diesel exhaust on a regular basis.
With the proposed reduced distance between Stirling Highway and Forrest Grove Villas
there is an increased potential to affect negatively the lives and health of residents from
ongoing exposure to diesel and other fuel exhaust.
Submission 1: "the proposed zone line adjacent to Lot 38 be moved to the current
boundary of Stirling Highway due to the significant detrimental effects to
residents [and pedestrians] if the highway is widened (Forrest Grove Villas Body
Corporate).
2. Enhancing Traffic Flow on Stirling Highway
Limit the number of right hand turns that can made when exiting Stirling Highway. The
Road Planning Authority has successfully addressed this matter in creating a
designated right hand turning bays at Methodist Ladies College, Claremont and Bruce
St, Nedlands. I concur with the Body Corporate when it states: It is essential that the
number of right turns off the highway needs to be reduced and for the State Planning
Commission to consider a flyover bridge to cater for the south bound vehicles in Leura
Ave wanting to turn right [to entre] the highway . The Body Corporate submits;
Submission 2: every effort should be made to stop otorists making ight turns
off Stirling Highway unless there are specific turn-right, designated lanes in
operation [and that flyovers similar to that crossing West Coast Highway,
Swanbourne, be considered] .
3. Bicycle Lanes
Upgrade the existing bicycle and walk paths that run alongside the Fremantle to Perth
railway line for the reasons outlined in the Body Corporate s submission 3C and my
suggestions below.
Roof/cover for existing cycle and pathway: I suggest that the existing cycle and
pedestrian pathway on Marine Pde and Railway St, Cottesloe and Gugeri St Claremont
be provided with a roof/cover so cyclists and pedestrians are shaded from sun and rain.
Renovating the pathways in this way provides sustainable transport by giving users the
opportunity to regularly ride or walk in comfort with the possibility of making these
modes of transport more attractive to others; for example, school children, workers,
guardians pushing prams.
See the Bath-Bristol, UK, covered bike path:
http://www.bikeradar.com/news/article/roof-for-popular-bike-path-21055/
Cyclist friends tell me that slab-based cycle paths are uncomfortable and sometimes
unsafe to ride on, especially as bikes respond to the uneven ground. Bitumen or some
other smooth surface aids comfort and safety for them.
Upgrading the existing cycle/pedestrian pathway also has the potential to increase the
safety and well being of users as their route is distanced from heavy traffic (e.g., Stirling
Highway) yet can be observed by train passengers and local traffic.
In contrast, creating a cycle way along Stirling Highway exposes cyclist to a large
number of traffic and the exhaust that emanates from the traffic. The proposed bicycle
lane on Stirling Highway ignores ways of advancing a combined approach to improving
cyclist and pedestrian pathways.
Submission 3. The bicycle lanes currently planned for inclusion on the future
designs for Stirling Highway be deleted and that the Marine Pde and Railway St,
Cottesloe and Gugeri St Claremont cycle ways be provided with a roof/cover.
4. Dedicated School pick-up and Drop-off buses
I agree with Submission 3D (below) to improve the traffic flow in the Claremont area
[including Cottesloe] by providing dedicated school buses to pick-up and drop-off
children to and from school. The train stops at North Fremantle, Victoria St, Mosman
Park, Cottesloe and Claremont train stations, and also the gate areas at Claremont
show grounds all provide suitable and safe places for guardians to drop-off students so
that they can catch a dedicated bus service. I would also like to suggest that schools
that are in close proximity to each other could share this service (e.g., St Hilda s, Iona,
Cottesloe and Mosman Park primary).
Submission 4a: In order to improve the traffic flow in the Claremont area we
[Forrest grove Villas Body Corpo ate] suggest that the seven schools, MLC,
Christ Church Grammar, PLC, Saint Hilda s, Cottesloe Primary School, Scotch
College and Iona Presentation College be strongly encouraged to pick up, drop
off an bus their students to and from school at suitable sites away from Stirling
Highway. Parents should also be encouraged to car-pool to minimize the traffic
problems in the Claremont area.
Submission 4b: For the State and/or local government to reward schools which
encourage students to utilize transport that limits traffic congestion (e.g., house
points for students who car-pool; bus, train, walk or ride to school).
5. Effective Use of Vacant Land owned by the Fremantle Po t Authority and the
WA Government Railways.
"To solve the traffic problems associated with Stirling Highway, attention should be
focused on using the vacant land owned by [one of] the above organizations instead of
forcing people from their homes at tremendous cost to the taxpayer and the disruption
to the homeowners affected (Forrest Grove Villas Body Corporate, submission).
Submission 5: For grassed areas parallel to the railway line (Railway St and Curtin
Ave, Cottesloe) be used to enhance existing walk and cycle paths, and create pick-up
and drop-off areas for school and community buses.
Closing comment
As a long term resident of the Peppermint Grove and Cottesloe area I appreciate the
need to improve the flow of traffic along Stirling Highway. I believe, however, that this
will not be achieved in a sustainable and resourceful manner by enlarging the existing
road boundary to accommodate suggested increase and experienced traffic flow.
Alternate proposals such as those submitted above consider the current and ongoing
social, environmental, and personal well being for all residents and non-residents who
travel within the Cottesloe to Claremont precinct, with the aim of them using alternative
modes and/or uses of transport to that of one person or one child passenger per car.
27/07/2012 11:39
P GE 01
A PLC PERTH
0894246466
0894246466
DEPARTME T OF PLANNING
2 7 JUL 2012
Form 41
¦ s | c>c)jj2
FILE
Submission
Ration lisation of Stirling Highway Reservation
O FICE USE ONLY
Submission 416
To: Secretary
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
Name
S£fH iL QvP.
{PLE SE PRINT C EARLY) J
Address .\ ..
.'. .5.17,.
Postcode .b.P. .!
CwtactphonenumberD.?....TA.5.« l1....Enlailaddr6sskb £A ($ ]A, C
«> U e headings or numbers to separate different to ics and issues
Include ro erty addresses and sp cific lo ation descri tions where relev nt
Attach additional numb r d pages if you require mor pac to complete your submi ion
Submission
on/ bokcUJ Qj ,\ {.i\
f...
.. I k kw.&y...M..oj.
6. ,.... a x . ..
.dt
mk
stb.tui:
Jp tfM...
.....,
..
,
.e/....
h .tk Jho.. ./ v&iL.fe... mQ
-. ..
;
ij. .i ..
y
r
/'i
-
.......
i.. cJ v p.L......Am
\j
'w" . !M»oi£....&..A.
$*aLMi?... .I MfMWP.Qt.t..
. MfVM i.c P.U. 'jM ..J U Aj-/ iA .QrM.KM..
7 y;/vTj
;; M.MjA'Pi .
.&.M
/n )v c < Mi
rer o complete your submission
turn over/
27/07/2012 11:39
089424G466
PLC PERTH
PAGE 02
0894246466
Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment may personall present the basis of their
sub ission to a sub-co mittee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Your
written submission will be considered in etermining the recomm ndation for the proposed amendment
whether you nominate to spea at the hearings or not.
Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendi E of the amendment report.
3o, i do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to he bottom of the form an sign)
OR
Yes, wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)
l will be represented by:
Myself ~ My telephone number (business hours):. J., f
or
A spokesperson
Postal address:
I woul refer my hearing to be conducte in:
IZf
Public (members from the general pu lic may attend your presentation)
OR
Pri ate (only the people nomina e by you or the earings committee will be
permitte to attend)
You shoul be aware that:
a The WAPC i$ subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 an as such, submissions made to the WAPC may be
o In the cours of the WAPC assessing submissions, or ma ing its report on these submissions, copies of your
submission or the substance of that submission, may be isclosed to third parties,
o All hearings re recorded and transcrib d, Th t anscripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, are
tabled in Parliament and published as public records shoul the Governor approve the proposed amendment. The
WAPC recommendations are imilarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.
To be signed bv person l making the su mission
Contacts: Telephone - (OS) 65G1 900; Fax - (08) 6561 9001; Email - mre®plannlng.wa,gov.au; Website ¦ http://www.plannlng.wa.gov.au
0001/00
¦07 2012 FRI 12:03 FAX 1300 798 093 Frem BusirAjss Bank Cnt
anDi
K
1300 798 093
ih
Section 41 Amendment (Substantia!)
Form 41
Submission
ationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation
OFFICE USE ONLY
To: Secretary
Weste Australian Planning Commission
Submission 417
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
Name
4
I
Address
..
.,A:l-6
Contact phone number. .
Postcode
Email address j.;.L
x
o Use headings or numbers to separate different to ics and issues
* Include property addresses and s ecific location descriptions where relevant
a Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission
Submissi
tu n over to complete your submission
(21002/004
V 07 2012 FRI 2:03 FAX 1300 798 093 Frem BusirAjss Bank Cnt
1300 798 093
submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not com ulsory. Your
OR
Y@S, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)
I will be re esented by:
IZ] Myself - My telephone number (business hours):
or
C A spokesperson
Postal address:
Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)
OR
Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be
You should be a are that:
a The WAPC is subject o the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may be
° In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of our
0 All hearings are recorded and transcribe . The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, are
WAPC recommendations are similariy ublished in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.
Signature
Date
Vc/Zj
Npte: Submissions R/iUST be recei ed by the ad ertised closing date, being close of
usiness (5 m) on 27 JULY 2012. Late su missions will MOT be consi ered.
Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http:// ww.pla ning.wa.gov.au
27/07 2012 FRI 12:04 FAX 1300 798 093 Frem BusirAjss Bank Cnt
1300 798 093
Mr Kyele Wickenden
6 Alfred Road
North Fremantle WA 6159
The Secretary
140 William Street
Perth WA 6000
Submission MRS Amendment 1210/41 Stirlin Highway
As a long term resident of Alfred Road, North Fremantle, I wish to voice my st ong
opposition to the planned changes for Stirling Highway and Queen Victoria Street.
These types of changes are always proposed to allow for a smoother traffic flow;
however, in effect they divide, destroy and alienate the communities they score
tlirough.
Whilst the majority of my comments relate in p rticular to the North Fremantle zone,
the effects are felt at every point along Stirling Highway.
The proposed amendments do very little to promote t e use of Public Transport and
are indicative of the Government s and Department’s plan to promote and encou age
the Car Society that Perth is rapidly becoming.
The residents of North Fremantle fight to retain a close sense of community.
The proposed road amendments can be seen to destroy many of the businesses that are
vital to the area. The resumption of land will imp ct adversely on the very d y to day
operations of the businesses ho’s Lots are directly affected.
A person with average business acumen would be able to work out that one of the
major impacts to these businesses wi l be the lack of parking amenities available if
these amendments go ahead. This will create a domino affect and most certainly result
in the closure of many businesses or at best the re-location to other areas.
The fact that strip shopping exists all along Stirling Highway helps create the sense of
community. The vast majority of the properties that will be affected do not have the
cap city to replace these lost parking services. As is historically shown these actions
result in downtu in passing clientele and in reality economically disastrous for any
business. Being involved in the finance industry I have had clients who have
e perienced first hand the ruinous ef ect of such development plans.
0003/004
27/07 2012 FRI 12:04 FAX 1300 798 093 Frem BusirAjss Bank Cnt
1300 798 093
A prime example of this will be the two galleries at 92 & 94 Stirling Highway North
Fre antle and the Liquor Store at the comer of Alfred Road and Stirling Highway,
North Fremantle.
This then leads to the disturbing fact th t the realigmnent of the ro d closer to many
historical building will have a detri ental affect on their foundations and structure.
The other disheartening result will be those that are destroyed completely. As a city,
we have unnecessarily lost so much of our historical buildings to make way for roads.
It seems we are so bent on erasing all that is our past and I believe that the P oposed
Amendments under the Plan follows unacceptable precedents.
There re many other cities in the world that have traffic problems far in e cess to
what we experience here in Perth, and they do not simply cut a swathe through
suburbs to allow more traffic to flow through. I have spent a lot of time in many
European cities. They all encourage and promote an efficient Public Tr nsport syste
to reduce vehicular movement and I believe it is a far better option to what is
proposed.
In Conclusion I can only comment that the pro osed widening must be a precursor to
the creation of six lane highway, the likes of Leach Highway! It is obvious to
anyone the affects the cancer of this type of development would have on tire
communities along Stirling Highway!
With all the supposed wealth the State of Weste Australia has, I find it unbelievable
and unacceptable that we cannot expend more to improve and promote a more
efficient and expansive public transport system. The decisions we make today on
these issues have a vita impact on the lifestyle and liveliness of our co munities. I do
not for one minute believe that building wider roads and demolishing the buildings
that are our history are decisions th t re looked on in a favourable or sensible manner
by future generations. One need only look around our city to see the consequences of
such decisions made in the p st and I a afraid that this Amendment ill indeed be
one that is judged to be in the same light.
Incrementally the pro osed hugely widened highway is inimical to the history,
communities and the architectural landscape through which it runs and I would hope
that the Proposed Development does not proceed.
Yours faithfully
0004/004
/
nna27/07/2012 12:28
0833855113
A SWANBOURNE LPO
PAGE 01/03
/
0893855113
Sec ion 41 Amendment (Substantial)
DEPARTME T OF PLANNING
Form 41
2 7 JUL 2012
Submissio
Ratio alisation of Stirling Highway Reservatio
OFFICE USE ONLY
Submissio 418
To: Secretary
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
Name
s
Address
...
.
...
Postcode
.t0
Contact phone number .. t .?.?. Email address f!
r/ps for completing a submission:
o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues
9 Include ro erty addre s s and s ecific lo ation descri tions wh re relevant
a Atta h additional number page if you require more space to complete your submission
Submission
A
/
O s
7'
-
f
/
/ r TS....
AAg.~G>
&
/(*
A/p..: .
Z ~A& C-efx f A~A
A *
:( r Aa /
1/ A/-t p, 'A
Ao AA-js
l~ Z -
c Z<Z
£? ~ Ay
P'rpZ-/® <S . „ ttZsi AZf1
< L 'S'iS A'
AA
r
. .fT/....ft.a.ifZ'frf.
/ ,A dr..Afp. AZ
AAr, gA
c>
Si
<
Z -cAs >A> Ae.. S >/e/ f' Ao
t> tx" -e. - AAe.
s? i Z:Z 13
A
AA . .
An
e-t.
r
/'
A
A .s csA AAp f, t
...
A~. AA/pAzazA
Ap . ArA/K C-... ..fiZAAAr. .A f> . .Arr ys' <
A frP7' '- r
rC
AAt ... AA A /rp e _.
tu
o
rr T
t
AryJ.
.. . ?. R A .C.
over to com lete your submission
AAf-pp
27/07/2012
12:23 0893855113
A SWANBOURNE LPO
PAGE 02/03
0893855113
'r
l
c.J
s-.
|/
)
L
f/Cf
f
.
-P
Aj
z.
-
O/
f
(ffisf
-rx>
Ijrnr
C.
-
!:
-
2-.
s
/M
J
r
6s cs yS r<
tszs
?/\
(d
y
rcy
s
r
z
L
j>
y?
A
d
ir
a?///yy
/''r- /-/y / f/ .
A '
~-
fs
.
<
< v
/
-
s &sxgS* S' s <Z2>A K
r Cr 7 c r e ' -/ <£> >- _
ypf S s
<
£- y /
AS* A t / ~~0 f? ASs'7 * y.
Sf
SS/ A-
aAC
G
~
SS ~a>a-
A
S
™
At o A~ SSW id A~ 4z,a- - 7
/2£
a/o <e-r- S 5>1,~ A s
4> -CC /
jA
-Z
o r
_
"j
J /r -C?_, M* ~
4£ z&<S'
f yx
y
27/07/2012 12:28
A
0893855113
PAGE 03/03
SWANBOURNE LPO
0893855113 '
-5 i $
Anyone w o has made a written submission on the amendment may personally p esent the basis of heir
Further information on submissions a d hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.
Please choose one of the following
OR
e
Yes, I wis to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)
or
A spokesperson
Postal address:
0
OR
You shoul be aware that:
« The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act f 992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybe
a In t e course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of your
submission or the substance of that submission, may e disclosed to third parties.
o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The tra scripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, are
tabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor approve t e propose amendment. The
WAPC r commendations are similarly publishe in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.
To be signed by personfs) maki
Signature
the submission
Date
SnW nii ( ri/R.' |
J': ,ih; : !|'|i-'-.-ir •'|l|,.:,-y1 •; h .H -,HAjl- . .'¦.ihRtoH ii dtliii
Contacts: Telephone. -(08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; Email - [email protected],gov.su; Website - http://www.plannlng.wa.go .au
Planning and Development Act 2005 S I (
SeciJen 41 men ment (Substantial)
Form 41
Submission
2 7 JUL 2012
EILE
Oh-FICE USE ONLY
To: Secretary
Submissio 419
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
Nam©.. ....9 t» $\.. .
' ( LEASE
(PLEAS6PF
PRINT CLEARLY)
Address I .....
LVlfli Jl/postcode
Contact phone number... .9 .9. .3.7.99 Email address . 9*9 . M. l .'.E .! 9 4
o Use headings or numbers to se arate di ferent topics and Issues
° Include pro erty addresses and s ecific location descri tion where rel vant
u Attach a ditional n mber d ages If you require more space to complete your submission
Is si i
Submission
mt
-.A TX.. . r.9T9 9,. 7.. .0 ... .T. 59.. >.9.9 .... .?.... .9:9.9
hi .<4 rtvst
.. S
. rL 99779 9. . STS s. .«9.
.. $>xy=tfr. ..... .9.,.. 9.fvg>c... ... >9.. .4
Wc*7SrA.Q.... . . XtT.S .. .Y
. .I
s.a
v.<
T
.
A.Q. . 7 .vtjS, (. ,
.... 9 T. 7*9,.,v4a,tS.7. ... s3G v 'C>. .. .' Sr '.TSS SX.. LAS.. Vr V.c
... . AM f2....
9.
9
9|.. AA... .vA.SS.SD.... . .r f. ...2,.
s-
9I9?Br .... ... Lw ?... . ... .(fr. .. H.(.<
_t
..
.-.
. lfN s x.. ,\ta x. taa, . . W. .|ory©.i7 sv's a \ c q ..
.
'X ,
7
AAAA.. .7x9... AST .
Tv\ .(
.7 9.9TXr ..9 A...f ) ). 77s.. Vvt
.AA.Alrrti.(DC,......vS.hj A.H.,.
....o'?:.. y opw- ..... so,..
, 7\& AS(
.. . s
TC . . lJ.b
.LSSr.. eo
.i. fe. .o
i
C urt,7.
.,:T" s.
i9.. 71 .. .ti.. .. \/ s fVATJ. .
.. ftoA\ S-.fr TT..,. >.9... . .C eIS, .
f.
turn o er to complete your submission
09 8SSX680
se.yMiuCJJ'sg
09 8SCC680 V'4 TO T Z10Z L
submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC If the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Your
written submission will be conside ed in determining the recommendation for t e proposed a endment
whether you nominate to speak at the hearings or not
Further information on submissions and hearings Is included in Appendix E of t e amendment report.
Pfeas© choose o e of the following:
Ho, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form an sign)
OR
M Yes, I wish to s eak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)
1 will be represented by:
C Myself
My telephone number (business hours):... Q r?
©r
[D A spokesperson
Postal address:
I would prefer my hearing to be con ucted in:
Public (members from the general public ay attend you presentation)
OR
1ST Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearing committee will be
o The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may be
a In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or ma ing Its report on these submissions, copies of your
submission or the substance of that s bmission, may be disclosed to third parties.
e All hearings are recorded and transcribe . The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, are
tabled in Parliament an ublished as public records should t e Governor approve the proposed amen ment. The
To be signed bv personfs) making the submission
Signature
Date
Note: submissions MUST be received b the advertised closing date, being close of
Contacts; Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected] .au; Website - http://www.planning.wa.go .au
09t8 680
200®
se.ymutjjeg
09T82CC680 XV'd T0:TT 2102 LO/LZ
SUBMISSION 419
IABIED AT THE HEARINGS 29/10/13
• ,• . £
i'
r*,
.
<r*
y.
s
j
:
*'
r
'
i. .i vX '
' -'
- •1: r
tL
departmeni OF PLANNING
Planning, and Development Act 2005
2 7 JUL 2012
Seetion 41 Amendmen fSwfeat n aS)
Form 41
FILE i to o2hl..
¦Sutaissi@ii
MetrspoSica i Region Scheme mendment 1210/41
RatJonaJisa lon of StidSng Highway Reaes-vafion ¦
0FFIC6 USE ONLY
Submission 420
To; . Secretary
Locked Bag 2508
Perth WA 0001
B
Name
T C. i
CV
c
3
Address .... ... >. )tPostcode ...A
Contact
SS.........
hone number ... 3 >-1...33.k.A..- Email address .
Tips for completing s submission:
© Use headings or numbers to sepamte different topics and issues
' o Include property addresses and spaciflc location descriptions where re/e anf
9 Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submissio
Submission
;ht
_
h£-
s-_
...lo.O
.
_
.
A.....A?7-.
Ak...?
-A
±3.....
,
.
...
.y.'
;
y
_\j
.
_
.... lb..
_
.k.... 1
j.0
,
.
A...
:..-Clip.Q
. A.4_.i 4.... ,i 9. >..... P A.... .QsA.&fyn....
Sf r. . e , .....
_;
...••¦¦
. i .c . Q.ir::
ta A ir
....\/
r....
f.!
...
j.!.....
...... 4 . iQ ki A'a.... .iaxA to..'. .th-J Ah ,WA<?.SpKt . - tofc;. it e;.. ;&?$& . i..
. kA .. .toPto.A.... CA'O.oh.. -. . s. h. t;.. .\a3.o_W . tk. ...toy.Alcre- •.¦
i V < \ .c to-A .V.... .f ... . to cs.fvA,pijr. ..to ?k -. . .c> \I.cl.. k. fe....'
¦¦;. . v.•v.jto-Jt; ,Q . A.. .-t Kb.. to
;...
kr.
ra.to
...A?.o.s
.
vto
;.
. rfhto .7 to.', k . toto-.
.
.\:
..
.7.. . ?. Ptolto... -QtoA. -.-.. .
to-toto... Pto . j.... .Itoto..:.
\.k....
... to.. to
to
.....
.... )k.,. . 43
.th.
•
!
;.
.... to...
toto... i to. k.. -tk ..... .k.'.l. r S t to )to
. 7 A.. to A toto.... .bc ito.tototo. . .tototofr. ..kto. 777. oto. to.... .toto.toDn . .f rto .o.;.
toto.... sAto h to toto totoktoA . ... A... to tok .to. ..ftotoA.. .TAtoBto.
.. t .S to.... loto . to to? to... to.... k .to.-c.... .1 x.toc....Q tototo .. Aktoto.. .ktototo
turn ©ver t© e@mpS©te your sufemlssl®}
nyone who as made a written submission on the amendment may personally present the basis of their
subm ssion to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the beiow 'Yes' box is ticked. T is is compulsory Your
written submission will be considered in det rmining the recommendation for the pro osed amendment
whether you nominate to s eak at the hearings or not.
Furth r information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amendment report.
Please hoose one of the following: .
I
I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to t e bottom of the form and sign)
OR
Y@@, I wish to speak at t e hearings. (Please complete the following details)
.8 will be represeratei by"
M self - My telephone number (business hours):
or
El] A spokesperson
Name of spokesperson: .
Contact telep one number (business hours):
Postal address:
3 would prefer my hearing to be conducted n:
Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation) .
OR
'
•
D Private (only the eople nominated by you or the hearing committee will be
per itted to attend)
You should be aware that
° The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to t e WAPC may be
subject to applications for access und r the act
«> In the course of toe WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on th se submissions, copi s of your
¦' sub iss on or the substance of that submission, may be disclose to third arties.
o All hearings are recor ed and transcribe . The transcripts of alt hearings, along ith all ritten, submissions, are
tabled in Parliament an pu lished as public records should toe Gove or ap rove the ro osed amend ent. T e
WAPC recommendations are si ilarl published in a re ort on submissions an tabled in Parliament
T® be sig ed bv TOmonlsi maikSna the aub fealisn
Signature
Date 2.
/.
Mo e: Subtntetons MUST b© reoef od by the a ertised closing afes being oss of
business (Spm) ©n 27 JULY 201Late submission® will MOT te ©©msidered,,
Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(OS) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - htip:/Aiww/.p!annlrtg.wa.gov.au
PQI of t
Planning and Development ct 2005
Form 41
I departme of planning
Submission
n V'l
27
inu fc !
OFFICE USE ONLY
Submission 421
To: Secretary
Locke Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
(PLEASE PR\m CLEARLY
Address (.
.!... Ol T
_
HAJ' e Postcode
Contact phone number.. Q&
Tips for completing s sotm/sston:
Email address .
. .
dOKffl fWVtf TtIWK C(r
o Use headings or numbers to eparate different topics and issues
a Include property addresses and specific location description where relevant
o Attach addition l numbered pages if you require more spac to complete your submission
ission
t
.
Su
/
//{/e
Gu&
d
m
(n.
St.../n
'
A
nc
...
v'.
di/t...
f... h/orfh.. Fv &wtfe-A. c dfyf.
tVierdiS Swl'L rcwertt. . RrtS.. of n.. RR nm. l. li
f&.J... fe.. ofi r. (f .hte.. Qrt. M.. .&..
M .n.YJM).. .S Mtf/Rihf... .p/QM... kP.tRf:. .p&pok..CM)-.. CQWtcf
q(( xR.. Q;..,. Maun fit. /. fy&fteRp . ettin ... v.d.P.h.... teti hYn.... m fi
h erf: ,IA... dffi. ff. ffluch. ftet.. sRfkf.. C tfdl
cffirm ui. .J.Qbste {hr....9. t n Mch. SfidrPitr ..
. .W/.Rl'MO. fa .fas
i. c
TOO©
XVd CC:FT ZT0Z LO/
a
submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Your
written submission ill be consi ered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendment
whether you nominat to speak at the hearings or not.
Furt er information on ub ssion and he rings is included in Appendix E of the amendm nt report.
PSease choose one of the following:
0
, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to th bottom of the form and sig )
OR
Y@S, I is to speak at the hearings. (Please comple e the following details)
I will be represented b :
O Myself - My telephone number (business hours):
OF
E A s okesperson
Contact telephone number (bu iness hours):
Postal
dress;
E Public (me bers from the general public ma attend your presentation)
85.
OR
per itted to attend)
You should be a are that:
o The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Infor ation Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WA C may be
° In the course of the WAPC assessing su missions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of your
submission or the sub tance of that submission, may be disclose to third parties.
® ll hearings ar r cord d an transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, are
tabled in Parliament and published as public recor s sho ld the Gover or approve the proposed amendment. The
WAPC recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and ta led in Parliament.
Note: Submissions UST be receive by the advertised closing date, being close o
business (Spun) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.
Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; F x *(08)6551 9001; Email - mi s@ lanning.w0.gov,au; ebsite * http: /wwvv.plannlng.wa.gov.au
300®
T
ITT 3T03 10/LZ
27/07/2012 16:15 93315277
A HAMILTON HILL POST
PAGE 01/02
93315277
[SSSiwo AN*®
Section 1 Amendment (Substantiallj)
Form 41
I 7 JUL 2012
Submission
Metropolitan Region ScSieme Amendment 1210/41
ll-E.
OFFICE USE ONLY
Su miss o 422
To: Secretary
Locked Bag 2506
Perth m 6001
Ma
(PL6ASE PRINT CLEARLY)
Address.
j
.C. 6
e
L-T . . postcode ,... .1
Contact phone number Email a dress
Tips for compl ting a submission:
o use headings or numbers to separate di erent topics and issu s
a include property addre ses and spacifc location descri tions wh re r l vant
s Attach additional numbered ages if you require mote s ace to complete your submission
Submission
turn over to complete our submission
27/07/2012 16:15
93315277
A
HAMILTON HILL POST
PAGE 02/02
93315277
Heari g of submiss ons
Anyone who lias made a written sub ission on the amendment may personally present t e basis of their
sub mission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the belo 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Your
written submission will be considered in determining the reco men ation for the propose amen ment
w ether you nominate to speak at t e hearings or not.
Furth r information on submissions an hearings is included in Ap en i E of the amen ment report.
Please choose one of the followi g:
m
NO, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)
OR
S3 Y®S, I wish to speak at t hearings. (Please complete the following details)
CJ Myself ~ My telephone nu ber (business hours):
or
A spokesperson
Name of s okesperson:
Contact telephone number ( usiness hours):
Postal address:
I would prefer my he ring to be conducted in:
LJ Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)
OR
[. J Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be
permitte to attend)1
T e WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Infor ation Act 1992 and as such, submissions mad© to the WAPC ay be
* In the course of t e WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of your
submission or th substance of that submission, ma be disclosed to third part es.
° All earings are recorded an transcribe . The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, are
tabled in Parliament an published as public records shoul the Gove or approve the propose amendment. The
WAPC recommen at ons ar similarly publis e in a r port on submissions an tabled in Parliament.
To be signe bv pereonfsf making t e submission
Signature
IT.
Contacts; Tcslophone - (08) 6551 SOO; Fax-(08)6551 S001; [email protected] .gov.au; Website - htt ://www. lannlng.wa,gov.au
Form 41
Submission
- 1 AUG 2012
Rationalisation of Sti ling Highway Reservation
OFFICE USE ONLY
To: Secretary
Submission 423
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
Name
m G- .
lr©
-TAjI ts .'
lT
(PLEASB PRINT CLEARLY)
Address . f2 . .P ... M... Postcode ..
Contact |phone
number.6. ....... Email address . l CAKn-.
Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues
Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission
Submission
?>...HP
« Pt u> T (?7 ) TO OGt
KJL?
A
£>
/ y ,
.
r..
,
TlV-& I HfclUT W/LL-
o \be4, - rfA F/fe jta J sy |T/(
.m
(SVVZ jh£ h? fy [ m.
AW; |T<2
f/ y,
MM
TH/ .
j
y..
.P6y'
. .mwa hy. Le
1 . ypti . 0 .D5WA).
p.
/ rM. .7
/AL feS. MIGUyr Ajt
. f q7.T:K APf/l.tTbT& fP. A /. Pf!A.
!] . . A . ,.... P ABIP. ,7;H6:r.T P. P.®..
.M/X
fr (p. L Uf
. ) N&zpG P g f j) .
turn ove to complete your submission
.
OR
Ef Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)
I will be ep esented b :
ulZJ
or
A spokesperson
Postal address:
OR
o The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybe
sub ission or the substance of that submission, may be disclosed to third parties.
med by person(s) making the submission
)Z-.<
Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; Email - [email protected]; Website - http:// ww.planning.wa.gov.au
Form 41
Submission
Rationalisation of Stirling Highw y Reservation
OFFICE USE ONLY
SUBMISSION NUMBER
To: Secretary
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
Name
!<!
I (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)
Address
Postcode..
Contact phone number .. Email address ..hcAt n..P~rP<tTips for com leting a submission:
• Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues
® Include pro erty addr sses and specific location descriptions where relevant
Submission
f
A S> i , - o r y
tr- l? /
I (VtS P- i
TH
<9
Bu/LP(a
Ove ly/
0dJj[\& j
[EPr]7 E
V'eCilS\Pry\ <)
iajh( h( vuvu Be pe B' Y .
0
.
'TH
| PE- HEpHTusK
Ar i; CHnru E p BE M5£ yH(H>Tl c
A >
J
THI K)i9<j\ 5? m 4et EuaHH A R\HKY (jA 0tY pMH|/ Y
TiWE KJOUU /VL5>0 Be Ad tf dd-feVdteC) A-/ D
PVtL os,p.i ftt©A) I'D W p © juy Td FFd-
B( p IklAO lU-0f IHS Sos)dfc?5eS Ardp RrapSV/rJtP,
<f- 8
Form 41
Submission
Rationalisation of Stirling Highway eservation
OFFICE USE ONLY
SUBMISSION NU BER
To: Secretary
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
Name
.
W..
.
J (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)
Address
.
..
Postcode
..
Contact phone number Email address
» Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues
» Include pro erty addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant
• Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission
Submission
\S(
tdn
i
lAj&oxjp
0 y m
jP
iajoolp evBT?
o
f
m A m? tHfese T ifp<e
Ev KAy S
&ui& ? /WO J-F
kh
p
d 2jv} i e i htye
Fu/WOl 0 ? .
VJhVO flvP 3e y -. 907
TPC l//V9f 0< pA7 5
o eiep /
&&( v i
Aj-cr /W £AXt! A E Wl AT/y
O/A
i ? S
t/GWLp
Form 41
Submission
OFFICE USE ONLY
SUBMISSION NUMBER
To: Secretary
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
Name
.'
?.*.
.
.
1 (PLEASE PRINT CLE RL )
Address ..P.k''..... Postcode .. A&.
. -.
Contact phone number Email address
Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant
Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission
Submission
0
- Q
V dA)
PA\\jAsA% L ajD. MJ 6 COM tjpE ? O -fu
ex tAiJjxsejj -p
1/ 6
JFKt Pfrr& > (XJOlT k) .
Rj
Tt-i
A A/0 <R 4
/
AJp W2-
f
I
RWUtfeD.
A
m)
L .e WWP iw BCfiOkfcAJ rp c& c k q&ZrU Be J
o/cxjt -pU MC,, A L >i//ty4 fete. rw- tHC r -
§ fi
UNIT 3 592 STIRLI G HIGHWAY MOSMAN P RK \m 6012
27 July 2012
Secretary
WA Planning Commission
Perth WA 6001
Re: Submission
Met opolitan Region Planning Scheme Amendmen 1210/41
As the owner / occupiers of a property affected by the proposed changes to the
planning scheme for the Stirling Hwy Reservation we write to enclose our submission,
detailing our concerns about these changes have been considered as being necessary
and about the de-stabilising effect that the manner in which these changes are mooted
is having and will continue to have on land values and security of tenure for our
property, our Body Corporate and the many hundreds of other properties along the
Stirling Highway which will be adversely affected.
We are extremely disturbed that the WA Government and the WAPC are only now
presenting us with this scheme and as ing for comments from the public. It seems that
this public consultation process is a token gesture, being made in order to "tick
another public relations and bureaucratic box. Judging by all the design work which has
been done to date, as presented, this "scheme" is well advanced in the Planning
Department and given the commitment to date, it is probably considered as a fait
accomplii, where far too much time, money and effort has been spent to consider any
retreat from the proposals as made.
We consider that the Departmental directions given to complete the work to this
advanced stage have been ill-considered and extremely wasteful of state money and
resources, involving as they obviously have, the prolonged services of private sector
engineering consultants and extensive internal bureaucratic expenses. If the
Government and WAPC were sincere in seeking and taking regard of public comment,
the schemes presented need not have been nearly as advanced and detailed.
The reality is that this scheme is hardly likely to be implemented in the near or even
distant future because of the extreme difficulties, costs, inconvenience and the fact that
the entire streetscape would be destroyed in the process of the many demolitions
required, including a large number of buildings of important heritage significance.
UNIT 3 592 STIRLING HIGHWAY MOSM N PARK A 6012
We are of the opinion that this scheme is unrealistic, unimaginative, undesireable and in
15 years (or whenever) time, most likely it will also be unnecessary, given the projected
changes to be lifestyle and transportation brought on by a looming fuel crisis and
responsible efforts to mitigate global warming,.
It would seem that the basic justification for all this rationalization ie road widening
with central island waste land and wanton destruction of the streetscape, is to provide
easier passage for buses, ipso facto ta ing pressure off the traffic flow. We are no longer
living in 1955, this requires 21st C thinking. We ask that an equal amount of money and
time be spent on providing an alternative solution based on the premise that Stirling
Hwy should in fact be either downgraded or left intact, in its current form. There are
many other options to take the perceived pressure off Stirling Hwy. Eg rationalization
of parents dropping children at the western suburbs private schools, banning 4WDs or
utilizing the vast corridor of railway land. The latter of course would require the State
Government to insist on cooperation between different State Depts. Although this
concept of mutual cooperation is seemingly anathema to Govt Depts., it would be
bound to be more productive, more economical and simpler than the destruction of
Stirling Highway.
The resolution of the traffic issues along Stirling Hwy requires better than just an
engineering solution. It is more complex and more important than to allow engineers to
bludgeon a line along the map of Stirling Highway and consider it to be the only
solution.
Yours sincerely
Kim S Donovan
Carl D Payne
Owners: Twine Court Pty Ltd
3/592 Stirling Highway, Mosman Park WA 6012
CcThe Premier- Colin Barnett
«
.5
*•*3
10 C
o co
O
O ¦§
CM U)
< =I
2: c
C
CD -*
E c
9-
o c
CD ~
> TJ
:
Qs1
-<
11
I
IIU
0)
C
o
c
_o
03
£
0
(/)
£
©
nm
m
nc=3
o
¦¦o
£
¦a
o
a5
8
3
CO
a.
c:
c
E
?
)
¦o
s
n.
m
2
,
(/)
0)
t_
~3
<
6-2
1\
>%
<D
?
c
C
o
u
<r.
,5
o
<:
ir
C3
C
C
c
o
*cu
c
o
0
£
£
Z
O)
C £
o <
<0
C/)
i- o
J2 C
=5 c
o
CO *0)
c
CC
03
•+-»
O
o
Ct
2S5
CD
C
'c
c
ro
Q_
c
. D CD
c 111 §
CM CD
co CD
O)
< 00 <
0 CD j-
2E a
> O CD
CD > _J Q_
c
V:
o-
:
¦o
¦a
ro
LU
rJ
Q
p
| CO
-Q -§
L/sehadingsornumberstoepartdiferntopicsandisue Includero tyadres andspecif loatindescritonswher lvant Atachditonalumberdpagesifyorquiemorspaceto mletyoursbmi on
C
.2
c/)
s,
-c g-
£
o
.B.
2
5
§
o g
0
3
-Q
o
O
1
¦¦ A
D
x7
J
J
4
j
J
J
.A
-D r
j
>
c
J 4
4
j
Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendi E of the amendment report.
No, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)
OR
or
A spokesperson
Postal address:
zT Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)
OR
D Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be
• The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may be
• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or ma ing its report on these submissions, copies of your
• All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along w th all written submissions, are
tabled in Parliament and publishe as public records should the Governor approve the proposed amendment. The
Note: Submissions MUST be received by the ad ertised closing date, being close of
b siness (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will NOT be considered.
Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected] .au; Website -http://w w.planning.wa.go .au
My interest in the Highway
My family lives 50 metres from the Stirling
Highway in Clifton Street
My mother lives bordering the Stirling Highway in
Claremont
We have property bordering the Stirling Highway
in Claremont
I am a regular user of the Stirling Highway and
have been for 30 years
My family have been regular users of public
transport along Stirling Highway for 30 years
Tabledat heHearings SUBMIS ION 424
Concept design for Stirling Highway
doesn't address the top 10 crash s tes
T btePi.
§mJN! HSGRmYIN'EP SKTft
FilQyilSCY WM m
Sc.irra
&m
M
. . .
& . In
B4R!fi:13 Jiua l+rtrsi
! rai=q.
m
iSi ¦
sa
S
-S ! 55? 'n Fa
fl h? fiC y'
bu KiiiiflL
mCP!. JS I S IIhSS iC
MrtF?'
0 Lci . Ra
< ii
m
A
rase? "ira
TTZm-
t :
"
m
~' .
i
a 3Wf ;ir
.
.ssfr TH RE1
.' aT'
NB
mm Hv v L isr
n-a£F«»T»::«.T s -
mm
? ¦
E? : I SiE Is KL IHHYI faiginS
* f T ifiFfe- I'i DUi f Hirlv iV aEnia
yusweh P*3 ~
s J.31S: SnS li OH WEWls
-t
r
_
j
r-ETrg-gTTr iti r r
l&Zti
-23 * --' * T: ' 3 TT-TTTr? zn zjp m rM '" .-.J3
•
ilte
tt
|
lFIT r 'ii mStfYKSSf PD6- 5
:r
cr|.
--
-
.-,
' i
n. Er
it
s
i lai i
Right turns by local traffic (e,g„ Clifton
St) will likely increase crash rates
- ,*
¦i-feJ
r sjww wpi/Wiiltrrt. aatulli
Mwill l Ikuwam
STIRLING HIGHWAY - oute 9
CA 3IA0CWAY PATTERN
tJ« >»>-»<*»; li
Ml V<
«r»«r
A1
1.7237
Concept design for Stirling Highway
does not address traffic flow
Traffic lights and right turn traffic are the main
causes of delay to through traffic
A significant contributor to delay in Claremont is
local traffic to and from schools.
Main Roads and Claremont Council have ignored
for many years the risk and congestion from U-
turn traffic at Grange St. to school traffic
Other means of separating through traffic from
local traffic are not addressed by the Concept
Design ( A Concept Design would normally
compare alternatives)
Widening Stirling Highway destroys
local amenity
Amenity of shade trees for pedestrians will not be
preserved; no guarantee of green buffer zones
Inadequate vehicle and pedestrian separation e.g.
- Students playing chicken to cross the road and
- slower moving pedestrians will be at greater risk
Amenity of pedestrian access to public transport,
local shops and restaurants will further
deteriorate
WaNobility of precincts divided by the Highway
will greatly deteriorate. Slower moving
pedestrians have problems with fast flowing
traffic
The Concept Design Plans are
misleading
Traffic will still bank up at traffic lights
Increased right turns on to and off the Highway will
increase the risk of accidents e.g Clifton St
The proposal does not facilitate improvements to
amenity; landscaping and streetscape, as well as better
access to public transport. ... Safer pedestrian
movements and cycling infrastructure
The report concedes that Criteria may not be met
due to existing development or constraints e.g.
Claremont & 5m median with trees
The Concept Report should be
rejected
This Report jumps to conclusions and then white
washes the loss of amenity to residents with
misleading representations
A Concept Design Report should define the
problem and the issues
A Concept Design Report should address
alternative solutions to the issues
A Concept Design Report should provide the
costs, benefits and risks of the alternatives to
allow selection of the best option
Planning must retain space to:
Maintain green buffers, mature trees (beautiful
paperbarks) and shade trees for the amenity of
pedestrians and local residents
Separate vehicles and pedestrians with overpasses /
underpasses at frequent intervals (every 200 metres) - a
wider reserve is required for landings
Separate local and through traffic at high risk
intersections and eliminate traffic lights at the worst
intersections e.g. tunnels or flyovers require a wider
reserve
Separate local and through traffic by reducing the
number of local traffic access points to the Highway
(rather than increasing them as proposed)
And preserve our sense of place, heritage buildings and
significant trees
departme t of planning
Section 41 Amendmen (Substa tial)
2 7 JUL 2012
Form 41
Submission
Rationalisation of Sti ling Highway Reservation
OFFICE USE ONLY
To: Secretary
Submissio 425
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
Name ...11 } ....P ... f.PS.SPS.IY.T...k'.P.SS.
Address ..,V.T... .P. ff.'k PP.\ Y.TT..
Postcode ... .FA.
Contact phone number .( PP).. flPP.h.PP.P.?..... Email address T A! Y.Ol.Sf/. :YLPAWP. P.
e Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues
a Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant
o Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission
Submission
(P.P.P.P
.\p Af ;l.
? lg- \ uX .
turn over o compl te your submission
E Ho, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)
OR
or
A spokesperson
Postal address:
I would prefe my hearing to be conducted in:
E Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)
OR
° The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybe
a In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of your
a All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, are
Signature
Date
Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - ttp://www.planning.wa.gov.au
Council Chambers 1 Leake Street Peppermint Grove WA 6011
Ref: TPL11
27 July 2012
Secretary
Locked Bag 2506
PERTH WA 6001
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING;
2 7 JUL 2012
Dear Sir
Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41 Rationalisation of Stirling Highway,
Submission on behalf of the Shire of Pe ermint rove.
The Council of the Shire of Peppermint Grove has resolved at its ordinary Council meeting
held on 24 July 2012 to provide the following comments on Metropolitan Region Scheme
Amendment 1210/41 Rationalisation of Stirling Highway.
Council sup orts in principle the roposed amen ment to the primary oad reservation
for Stirling High ay (MRS amendment 1210/41) as it will provide for mo e certainty for
adjoining landowners and provide a safer traffic outcome, subject to the following
comments.
a) E isting heritage listed properties (both state and local) should be reserved and
alternative road design solutions be developed to ensure the adequate protection
of these pro erties.
b) Reservation zonings to be modified to rese ve the above mention d heritage
listed pro erties.
c) That staff rovide the W PC ith a list of affected heritage ro e ties and
suggested alignment changes to preserve the buildings (see list below).
) That the Shire encourages the WAPC to consider alternative traffic solutions to
reduce the impact on the streetsca e and amenity of the area adjacent to Stirling
Highway.
Listed on the Shire of Peppermint Grove Municipal Heritage Inventory (MHI)
Star of the Sea Roman Catholic Church, Lots 1 & 2 Stirling Hwy, Category 1 and,
Church Hall, Lots 3 & 4 Stirling Hwy, Category 1
Address all correspondence to The Chief E ecutive Officer P0 Box 221 Cottesloe W 6911
Telephone: (08) 9286 8600 Facsimile: (08) 9286 8610 Email: a min@pep ermintgrove.wa.gov.au Website: www.peppermintgrove.wa.gov.au
There will be minimal impact on the built structures. The main impact will be reduced onsite
parking for both the church and hall. No changes to preserve the buildings are
recommended for these properties.
Highway drycleaners, 488 Stirling H y, Catego y 1 and,
Shops, 490-494 Stirling Hwy, Catego y 1
The existing buildings have a nil setback from the existing front boundary. The proposed
road infrastructure will result in demolition of the front portions of these buildings. It is
recommended that the road design be amended to preserve these buildings.
Art deco (old roads board), 496 Stirling Hwy, Category 1
The proposed road infrastructure will result in demolition of the front portion of this
building. It is recommended that the road design be amended to preserve this building.
John Co ins, S02 Stirling Highway, Category 1
The existing building has a nil setback from the existing front boundary. The proposed road
infrastructure will result in demolition of the front portion and awnings of this building. It is
recommended that the road design be amended to preserve this building.
Listed on both the State Heritage and the Shire s MHI
Cottesloe State School, 530 Stirling Hwy, Category 1
There will be minimal impact on the built structures. No changes to preserve the buildings
are recommended for these properties.
Former Police Station, 548-550 Stirling Hwy, Category 1
The proposed road infrastructure will result in demolition of the front portion of this
building. It is recommended that the road design be amended to preserve this building. This
can in part be achieved by removing the bus priority lane at this intersection.
Where possible, the Council supports moving the highway closer to the railway line in order
to achieve some of the above recommendations.
If you require any further information regarding this issue, please do not hesitate to contact
the Manager of Development Services Mr David Chidlow on 9286 8600.
Yours faithf lly
Mrs Anne Banks-McAllister
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
DEPAR: «. ¦ (¦ NNING
2 '/ .IUI 21)12
nu. kJ M
Form 41
Submission
OFFICE USE ONLY
Submissio 42S
To: Secretary
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
,
I
Name.
Address
..
...
Contact phone number
Postcode
Email address
...
n/Pfi
iy).4v
o Use headings or numbers to se arate different topics and issues
f Include property addresses and s ecific lo ation descri tions where relevant
Submission
o4 o\( A .
Please choose one of the following;
No, i do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)
OR
O
Yes, 1 wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)
Myself - My telephone number (business hours);
or
A spokesperson
Name of spokespe son: .. X.. .1)
Postal address:. .P.9. XlPYu .b?.C. .M
kX.9 ,
1 would prefer my hearing to be conducted in:
Q
OR
You should be aware that;
® The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may be
Note: Submissions MUS i be received by the advertised closing date, being close of
business (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions will MOT be considered.
Contacts: Telephons - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http:/Avww.plaiining.wa.gov.au
Section 41 Amendment (Substan ial)
Form 41
Submission
Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendmen 1210/41
Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Rese vation
Submission
The Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendement 1210/41 (Rationalisation of Stirling Highway
Reservation), appropriately reduces the regional reserve over the properties Lots 281 (No. 83), 282
(No. 85) and 0 (No. 87) Stirling Highway Nedlands. Further, the Concept Design Reports and Plans
(reference 1.7237), depicts a carriageway plan that does not cause major intrusion to the current
building line or reduce the parking facilities of these properties.
However, it is in our belief that the reservation boundary should be reduced further. In our belief the
reservation boundary should in itself follow the existing property line and work around the pre¬
existing structures. The explanation for this belief is as follows:
1. The buildings on these properties are situated very close to the front property line;
2. If the proposed boundary were allowed to remain, and in the future this reservation
was utilized in future road redevelopments, there would be great expense in
demolishing and then rebuilding the front facades of these properties;
3. The property owner would experience considerable loss of income from the overall
decrease in rental area of the propoerties; and
4. There would be a decrease in vital parking facilities that these properties provide.
Further, as we are aware that there may be developments happening across the road, currently
proposed or possibly even approved, the more appropriate option would be to allow for the growth
of Stirling Hwy with the new developments being set back an appropriate measure from the existing
roads to allow for any need for an increased carriageway.
Planning and Development Act 2005 WjBv
Form 41
ijJOjZMS
Submissi©n
DEPARTMENT OF PLA NING
2 ? JUL 20.12
To: Secretary
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
Name
..
OFFICE USE ONLY
Submissio 427
/ FILE
...
.
..
Ar/.O....AA±.
Address ...A.Ty* .T.rf.
.OlA.T
J
m.)
AJPAjPosicode ..
Contact phone number ... ?r2<lr..l.a A.l Email address ..i?A<a( .rtrt.i rt . ptW..Q,..
» Include ro erty addresses and s ecific location descriptions where relevant
0 Attach additional numbered ages if you require more space to complete your submission
Submission
.... Tf... . ATIAAH. -&. ...0Q
... .
. .
bJfi
UM Es>j.
A. TJ. Q.h . N.Q . .&?>)
./A Aw.A.Vy. ... a TTE.-&L q.E..-.
GREG ROWE [& associates
FOCUSED ON ACHIEVEMENT
Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation
- Public Submission
Lot 100 (No. 501) Stirling Highway, Cottesloe
Gre Rowe and Associates acts on behalf of Ortona Pty Ltd and Don Russell Holdings, the owners of
Lot 100 (No. 501) Stirling Highway, Cottesloe (the subject site ). We have been instructed by our
Client to prepare and lodge a submission with respect to Amendment 1210/41 - Rationalisation of
Stirling Highway Reservation (‘Amendment ) to the Metropolitan Region Scheme (‘MRS ) currently
being advertised for public submissions.
Our Client supports aspects of the Amendment whilst opposes other aspects of the Amendment for
the following reasons:
Support
» It is understood the intent of the Amendment is to rationalise the amount of land actually
required for the widening of Stirling Hi hway and, as such, the Amendment proposes to reduce
the 'Primary Regional Roads' Reser ation at the subject site (and its surrounds).
» The Amendment will enable our Client to pursue long term land use planning approvals given
the majority of the subject site will no longer be reserved for 'Primary Regional Roads'.
Oppose
» As the Amendment proposes to retain approximately I 16sqm of the subject site (fronting
Stirling Highway) for ‘Primary Regional Roads Reseivation purposes, our Client opposes the
retention of the Reservation on any portion of the subject site that contains part/s of the
existing building.
» The Amendment should be modified to ensure none of the building is imp cted upon by the
revised ‘Primar Regional Roads Reservation and that the setbacks (between the building at the
subject site and the Reser ation) conform to all requirements of the Town of Cottesloe.
TOWNPLA INGMASTERPLANIGURBANDESIGNPROJECTMANGEMNT
7589J 2jul01 L_pc
Level 3. 369 Newcastle Street
Northbridge, Western Australia 6003
tel +618 9221 1991
perth
fax +618 9221 1919
email [email protected]
-I-
peel / south west
in r _
O mandurah@greg-ro e.com
tp:
'q mid west
- j geral [email protected]
c
.q pilbara
f [email protected]
L karratha@greg-ro'. a.com
w w.greg-rowe.com
GREG RO E
& associates
F O C U S E D ON ACHIEVEMENT
Each of the above points, relating to our opposition of the Amendment, is discussed in further det il
below.
The Amendment Retains the Primary Regional Roads Reservation on a Portion of the Subject Site
Site-specific characteristics, taking into consideration the existing constraint of part of the building at the
subject site bein loc ted in the revised 'Primary Regional Roads' Reser ation, ought to have resulted in
a modified verge width (on the corner of Stirling Hi hway nd Vera Street). The Amendment Report,
which refers to the various Concept Design Plans (also called Carriageway Plans), states the following
(underlining for emphasis):
» verges of 5.1 metres width on both sides of Stirling Highway, reduced to 4.5 me res in constrained
areas and to an absolute minimum of 4.1 metres in severely constrained isola ed locations...
Given the location of the building (in proximity to the Stirling Highway/Vera Street intersection and in
proximity to the revised Primary Re ional Roads Reservation) it is considered that the subject site is
severely constrained and a modified verge and truncation ought to be designed for this locality.
Furthermore, it is apparent that the verge width of the land north of the subject site (i.e. the street
block between Vera Street and Albion Street along Stirling Highway) has a reduced verge width when
compared to the subject site - possibl due to m nner in which the building/s on Lot 50 Stirling
Hi hway (corner Albion Street) are cited.
To illustrate our position, we attach a copy of the relevant Concept Design Plan showing the proposed
'Primary Regional Roads Reser ation in the context of the subject site. It is clear that a portion of the
buildin (at the subject site) will be in conflict with the revised Reser ation and may require demolition
or modification. We believe it is mutually beneficial (to both the WAPC and our Client) for the
Reservation to be modified (minor amendments to the truncation) as opposed to demolition of the
portion of the building that will still be located in the proposed Reserv tion.
The Amendment Should Be Modified to Ensure Setback Compliance
In addition to the conflict of the proposed 'Primary Regional Roads' Reservation on the building located
at the subject site, and taking into consideration that the existing building should be regarded as a
severe constraint'', the proposed 'Primary egional oad' Reservation should be amended to ensure
setback compliance is attained.
The Town of Cottesloe Local Planning Scheme No. 3 ('LPS 3 ) has been approved by the WAPC and
we understand its gazettal is imminent. We also understand that the portion of the subject site that is
proposed to be removed from the Prim ry Regional Roads Reservation will likely be rezoned to
' esidential Office Zone under the provisions of LPS 3. The revised Reservation should ensure the
existing buildin at the subject site complies with the setback requirements of the 'Residential Office’
TOWNPLAIG'MSTERPLANIGURBANDESIGPROJECTMANGE T
Zone.
In summar , further modifications to the 'Primary Regional oads' Reservation in proximity to the
subject site are requested to ensure the (revised) Reservation does not result in the
demolition/modification of the existing building at the subject site and that the existing building
conforms to all setbacks requirements (as per the Town of Cottesloe LPS 3 and any other local setback
policies that may be applicable).
7589_l2julOIL_pc
-2-
GREG ROWE | & associates
FOCUSED ON ACHIEVEMENT
As outlined above, we welcome the progression of the proposed Amendment in a modified form
taking into consideration the content of the above. Should you require any further information or
clarification in rel tion to this m tter, ple se contact Paul Cunnin ham on 9221 1991.
Yours faithfully
GREG ROWE AND ASSOCIATES
PAUL CU lNINeiHAM
Perth Office
End Form 1
TOWNPLAIGMSERUBDJCNT
7589_l2julOI L_pc
-3-
submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not com ulsory. You
Wo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)
OR
E3 Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)
Myself-My telephone number (business hours):
or
C A spokesperson
Postal address:
d] Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)
OR
° The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybe
® All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of ail hearings, along with all written submissions, are
To be si ned by person(s) making the submission
d itio to
Su mission 42
- e '
SGE ASY?ORK,S?oW '
-SUBJECT SITE REGIONAL ROAD BOUNDARY DESIGN CYCLE LA E
SSaKbounda
I PROPOSED KERB LINE
DESIG I I F MAR ING
DEPARTMFi'.'T C:: PLANNING:
Form 41
2 7 JUL 2012
Submission
[ etropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/lffi
OFFICE USE ONLY
u
To: Secretary
Submissio
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
Name
p
..
Address .. /.
-
28
j
.
7.
(PLEASE PRINT CL ARLY) -
S
stcode. 6o.%S..
)address
> yT/;
p.
. Qct.:k W
® Use headings or numbers to se arate different topics and issues
o Include property addresses and s ecific location descriptions where relevant
Submission
turn ove to complete you submission
cm '
OR
or
A spokesperson
Postal address:
I woul prefer my hearing to be conducted in:
OR
Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au
Planning and De elopment Act 2005
Form 41
Submission
IVleti-opoliian Region Scheme Ame dment 1210/41
OFFICE USE ONLY
To: Secretary
Submission 42©
Locked Bag 2506
Perth A 6001
Name
..M.J.Cr-.Lci.e
J (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)
...cl
Address . /A. '..\l . . b.tn.. St.CTTFt bijavT-hV .. Postcode
Email address qu
» Include roperty addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant
o Attach additional numbered pages if you require more s ace to complete your submission
Submission
.IM®-.. X'ff C'f . . <?.T . 1. ftk >.. ,V\ TAA,, .
.A A. .t'FF , .Lj,, .y. f.'-r.Fr F f ..t
a .1. .\:4 .* . Sj.. tv& .. .L.t.'.ci .Otj . f.i.nC.l/ .C. .<&¥?{&<>&.*/? . ..Vor r jifT.. AY!.. YcrU' if t >
Tp. . M &. . J.M g )l. . yr.. . Ti
ivl- ¦ b uh
fccz ki f j.
sa. .-Hy . .
v)). .O. '.I. . . s &Lut'xu rrj-
TO. , j s hcaS. «?£. Lavs . /H,\« . thtf . .k. rj k . <r
.). h.A., ,p Irtfti dJ- •,<W . t.l. .'.?.. Apt. AH i S--- • . n. fi'T'YF-; . C. rViCr. .vS&ll..C. (C- r'.-eh. ChuiFjA
.hu.d -.orj. .tS.pD tijrkji. iLA.
.
.
. ?.. . t .O.Srh'ip .. . . O.
. .l,Vv*... -
5jj»T¥.
. rtO.tSislvFakL'S-YY
-Fi-j. . k.r i <i evnf.ncj... !.*•>.Vu.V? f.Ls . .-i.F.A., Aft /il:V»Y;t.l.. £>.O.Pn.<rt s.. .*«t;. . r.L<ftre*wovjt'
(.13 a IJ. t/l&W
Y(
jmojcL . .l.o. .ItrYie, . . rv.L.i.ck. Nruto.ulf/.. .ixi.-F r-CstJ.
;l:|)r<i. . ia i..
f ).,.
. S/ir). ¦ W.'Fjct v..Ev
O.O sf A'
s. .-ht. .to-?-, .e*... . a a )w-.b p.M.. .<-.A. .-bmAfrf-. ,s Y>#iJA%Yt<&3b..
tkA . f5v iHM<ay»fc| . .ilr. . zk .&r. .neAr.aUfvxV. ; ® . Mu *. ..j. .s. j. . .hvie
Cm.. .c LlriESc.kv tilr / c .. hcL.. .. .13
F:'.., .yt«\( .. \? , A f.Yr v:*?.. i
-L?,kw;i. r. fcrTf'Xt.. . r'rC.'Cij: A F. b!<\1. . .k-YrA. ,<£sf ,.S.. .h . _ AC.. . k. tF?.T .F.Fi5\< 1 hi. •k A . .Y isI U <5<ftej(.. ,b. .S)... A-.. .A-ATAA.k S.. f.S .tS .r.AeF.... cC joA rftl. #5>Vt..
i
t-
S
i-
.t
f-wmi
i'C/-*-
b
<iaAF«
" J turn over to complete your sub ission
¦
!; r?. f 'r v'P
submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulso y. Your
written submission will be considere in determining the recommendation for the proposed amendment
H Wo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)
OR
D Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)
or
E A spokesperson
Postal address:
OR
The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may be
a All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, are
WAPC recommendations are similarl published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parlia ent.
Signature ..
Date .. HY.
- . idHE?/
Note: Submissions MUST be received by the ad ertised closing date, being ciose of
Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - htlp://www.planning.wa.gov.au
Submission 430
t Ar
- '/ C .
No;r. ;
_
(
A IM
_....
pptei) c
j n caugifj
i 'Hnj t
I
MS
I
i
i
-A - lA J £> l blN/fvfe
v/igr Hg-iA . r f p .
. PAt J -, l-HfiJ " KJpui (2h\~\ ~ I S
2 . iD i'- " d afesifo-/ " -i - tjeerr e - eai t)'
. lKJ__ Qg 7 i - Qaa
A
....S
t G- C
j V . & aim
- (.Af ;
iI a T oiaJ :
ii, y.;! A .-
to-
•
/'
rasip
|DEPARTME T Of PLANNING
2 7 JUL 2012
Planning and D velopment Act 2005
Form 41
ICli,
I Gol
FILE
Submission
Me ropolitan Region Schema mendment 1210/41
Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reser ation
OFFICE USE ONLY
Submission 431
To: Secretary
Locked Bag 2508
Perth W 8001
Name Wi . M
. ftfr.g. .... P6.G
fe
9o.MP.o g., i1l.6..... .C.LA«St4 aitfr...fe
/(P EASE PRINT CLEARLY) ,
_ » __
C nlac.pho anumber.. .3?.5.0fr.?TL... Em il addr ss
rr !.ab .< .£«
7/ps for completing a submission:
e Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and iss es
» Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant
® Attach additional numbered ages If you require more space to com lete your submission
Submission
t1 vr ol'Cs,.
Tr T. ..f-Q.
...l
ojlk
L,
.
.g.
r
T
.
LPT
(J)
v
(
T
1.5.... QQ.'s g,,
£.... k-.tyP j
'
S...
!tV T
.1
.
f
r
./. y.i.!. 1 9...
it?... ..
..
.
r h£
t?s... . I £. ..
.te...
•)¦
( 1( , i
)
a?.
,.
(Xv-S
5
E
I <i
rfe
-.
f
o-Gi
.b
P....
...
6': -j,
.
111
.LfTPif!
Q \J i c
e LuS o£
¦
-b A
.L r rf?.......1
dr t rS}' «SS S'./ Ao ( a H j
I
0
....
<r.
...
..
t • Lv2_t rn over to com leto your submission p &(.
tr t- Qf ui 5 Si-tVtt'r (~in ( < j pr c a fe
a
d
.
I -
(D
LO t
t cL o ~
p
6u s
9
\
l
S'
q ca'vJ
C - V dLl1
(
-5
.'f:
i
„ !a i
v.o Ic
l-'vj
i} '
:P
n. -A-o
>
c (? Cy€c
t,
.
\
<6 f _
-S
-Q_ 2T
l
In
Q
4 rf
de
fl
£Atj ,
Son9-
Wj '
J
sdf
j s
tA,j- i( a U S Ji 2Q.£X 17
1
s
Ar-j t
.O
I,d
-ti l |
to <>3 A_j? /V
Aa {, A, ?X
A\a Q p-fj
A-O-au i
fiO L
P u
( i'-
iL(/v i ,'5
lP. to
-
G tdUL jl to „ »eu l c
1tlU , S4 _a- ' \J tA
(C 6u
Sj h ' -Qo I t (jtgi\ i4 (g 'pc &v
A\ ()~ gk_G
A-
x<7\ „ ct O
feat &Jljc, e ix -c -U ~ -.t i5 - ? >a
io i A ,. 4 b jL4f S u sl 0S€&VI
'< cr- Z&pJ &l
-5-i''
ui€_tiL
o v
submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC ifthe below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulso . Your
Further information on submissions and hearings is include in Appendix E of the amendment report.
m/
iMO l do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)
OR
O J- is h-to-speatrat-the-hearirrgs. (Please complete the following details)
I will be rep esented b :
or
C A spokesperson
Postal address:
I would p efer my hearing to be conducted in:
OR
d] Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be
To be signed by person(s) makin the submission
Signature
Date
Ndte: Submissions IVIUST be receive by the advertised closing ate, being cipse of
Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected] .au; Website ~ http:/ www.planning. a.gov.au
DEPARIMEWT rp f PANNING
Section 41 Amendment (Substasitsai)
2 7 JUL 21.112
Form 41
Submission!
FILE
Ra ionalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation
OFFICE USE ONLY
To: Secretary
Loc ed Bag 2506
Submission 432
Perth WA 6001
Name ., b L tf A. P P.
Address
Postcode
...
&.{.
Contact phone number : E ail address
AL 1 ( tfob .
/
ns,/.;
Af
( / 1 11
CP
Tips for completing a submission: 1 /
o L/se headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues
° Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant
° Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to com lete your submission
Submission
1
..
rj
?..
p.
. 7/Ppp . rribJ...
.i
c.
.
(..
wi-.
'1/ .. i W .
j U PwSlAL
.
k
¦
l.tf f
7 TA hJ rJ.
Uyv.
to L toto
.
6V
.
..
e/, to. dto
.
.
.
.
Le..
Lf L i Afi T
o '
v
-d .. ..
.Cp m v .i : i kM£ ..to.. . f/iMM/i/.. . 4X
.4 4. .
.. . I
4b.. jiife?.
.44..
.itAk.
.'.i
.S
ib to.- f:
%. .&K. . 4 ¦ • -
.b-¦. & ... • Ia . &i'X&fiAt.-4
A fcto .to i .i Utovt..
.
to .i/Luk..(.C
v.(
b/. .k. Uaj . . to ¦ to Vi /t to.
¦I'M y ?..to .to. 4{.( . . i ., to ; cto .to totok .toto
.
M.. .tot.. itoi ... . .to - .to.&v . to. tototoi... tt&i..
.mdtA..:
....J
i to • . .4 .. to t. . . .
I I i.
u
ove
to complete
j.....
to. • j
(
\/V V tto 1'V'-C *
;
r
nto.. .. .
our sub ission
OUlt /7TN l/l/W Uk lcr V
i
=
J},, _ ,
Uk UUAt JL
h to T
TO f c
He ring of submissions
submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is ot compuisory . Your
Fleas® choose ome off the following:
M©, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)
OK
Y@S, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)
J wiifi be represented by:
©r
A spokesperson
Postal address:
8 woul prefer my hearing to ® conducted in:
OR
You should be aware that
e The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may be
WAPC recommendations are similarl published in a report on submissions and tabled in arliament.
To be signed by maE einigi the s b lsslog
Signature
Note Su mis tons MUST be rece ve by the a ve tise eiosing ate, being close of
business (S m) on 27 JULY 2812. Late submission wii! NOT be consi ered.
Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www. lanning. a.gov.au
EPARTMENT OF PLANNING
2 7 JUL 2012
Form 41
FILE fits/0 1%
Submissiosi
OFFICE USE ONLY
To: Secretary
Submission 433
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
L
Name ... WlS.iGM. . .MFStMCU... CBmog ..(
Address . I7 ... lO Z. M' .. .Si T .
Contact phone nu ber
TR.
.?.QP.
Postcode
.9P.Q.
Email address @ eplv.nv
° Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues
a Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission
Submission
PpeAsE . .SEE ATf/VQ
n wo, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)
OR
E3
Myself - My telephone number (business hours): .. .1?
or
A spokesperson
Postal address:
0
OR
a The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 an as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybe
Signature
AUD C
AUSTRALIAN UR A DESIGN RESE RCH CENTRE
METROPOLITAN REGION SCHEME MAJOR AMENDMENT 1210/41
STIRLING HIGHWAY RESERVATION
Dear Sir/Madam
studio Level 2, 1002 Hay Street
Perth 6000 Western Australia
rosi GPO BOX 2729
CLOISTERS SQ PO WA 6850
phone +61 (0)8 9226 0777
a www.audrc.org
The following comments are offered in relation to the MRS Amendment 1210/41
and the Stirling Highway Activity Corridor Study.
The Stirling Highway Activity Corridor could clearly be an exemplar of sustainable
and affordable transit oriented development given its unique, advantageous and
historic location in the Perth Metropolitan area. Such a project should act as a
catalyst for similar projects engendering a pattern of urban intensification which is
supported in much national and state policy and discourse (Department of
Infrastructure and Transport (Cwlth), 2011, Western Australian Planning
Commission, 2010, Adams, 2009, Newman and Kenworthy, 1999).
In order to make the most of this opportunity a pattern of redevelopment (including
the roadway) is required which is integrated with the splendid street based public
transport opportunities that such a corridor presents and optimises the extent and
use of the land in close proximity to this service.
T n University or
V / Western australia
As the study description acknowledges it is now well established that the key to
delivering such sustainable transit oriented patterns of urban development are
examining and promoting interrelationships between transport (both public &
private), urban form and land use (Gehl, 2010, Newton, 2008, Newman and
Kenworthy, 1999, Cervero, 1998, Rogers, 1997). Currently it is unclear whether
Department of
Planning
this integrated approach has been applied to the study, and the proposed
amendment is driven by a road transport focussed solution.
GOVEJWMOJT OF
WESTERN AUSTRALIA
For example the impact of the proposed road design, which introduces lengthier
crossings and wider carriageways, especially around intersections, would
markedly increase pedestrian severance between either side of the roadway
thereby reducing the accessibility of public transport. Such a measure erodes
both the extent and capacity of adjacent land to support desirable transit focussed
development and the positive urban outcomes this entails.
The urban consequences of the proposed and other alternative transporl/land use
scenarios needs to be assessed prior to a decision on the location of the future
road reserve. These scenarios should be evaluated in terms of their overall
economic performance, including impacts on redevelopment potential. Whilst it is
appreciated that there is pressure to give certainty to the current development
process the current scheme lacks the conviction that a significant opportunity to
demonstrate and achieve urban infill, productivity gains and increased affordability
has been sufficiently capitalised upon.
The Centre recommends that an integrated land use and transport study method
be developed, which considers the urban planning and design opportunities
alongside and not subsequent to the transport planning process. Such a study
could revisit key assumptions about the roles of other significant transport
systems and management opportunities in and alongside the corridor with a view
to optimising the urban outcomes for this part of the metropolitan area into the
future. This method could engage the community through scenario development
and envisioning and ameliorate the opposition resulting from traditional methods
and approaches. The Centre would be happy to contribute to the formulation of
such a method and has specific research expertise in this area.
The Stirling Highway Activity Corridor study is a positive undertaking, aligned with
current policy, however the study method risks overlooking significant urban
opportunities inherent in this type of project in this location. Given the long-term
nature of these decisions it would appear that an approach which explores these
opportunities in a more strategic fashion could realise substantial dividends and
garner community support.
Yours faithfully
Dr Anthony Duckworth-Smith (BE) (BArch) PhD (UWA)
REFERENCES CITED
ADAMS, R. 2009. Transforming Australian Cities for a More Financially Viable and Sustainable
Future: Transportation & Urban Design. Australian Economic Review, 42,209-216.
CERVERO, R. 1998. The transit metropolis: a global inquiry, Washington, DC, Islan Press.
DEPARTMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRANSPORT (CWLTH) 2011. Our Cities, Our Future: A
national urban policy for a productive sustainable and liveable future. Canberra.
GEHL, J. 2010. Cities for People, Washington DC, Island Press.
NEWMAN, P. & KENWORTHY, J. 1999. Sustainability and Cities. Overcoming Automobile
Dependence, Washington DC, Island Press.
NEWTON, P. W. (ed.) 2008. Transitions: pathways towards sustainable urban development in
Australi, Collingwood VIC: Springer.
ROGERS, R. G. 1997. Cities for a small planet, London, Faber.
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN PLA NING COM ISSION 2010. Directions 2031 and beyond. Perth:
Western Australian planning Commission.
UDRC
AUSTR LIAN URBAN DESIGN RESEARCH GENTR
to engage with the big issues facing the city,
the state and the nation in terms of urban
development and through research,
education and advocacy lead debates on
urban design and have a practical impact
upon the ay in which Australian cities are
designed and developed
H C/D
>C
CD oo
m
0 /D
>
HO
HZ
1 4
m d
i w
m
>
73
THE UNIVERSITY OF
Western Australia
J hi
bit ryi tiona! Excellence
Gove ment of Western Australia
Department of Planning
nnn
Iei a 1,1
sm
Sgffliasosf /! |
S !!!sS8!SHijSjE:
RESEARCH - INTENSIFICATION OF CTIVITY CORRIDORS
provide logical sites for urban intensification
and to meet infill dwelling targets
= > high density living and working in places
that are well connected by public transport,
walking and cycling to employment and
cultural destinations,
reduce automobile dependence,
= make more efficient use of infrastructure,
= give residents options to age in their
neighbourhoods.
A.U f
a ratUKi mss BtscsfSH tan
RESEARCH - INTENSIFICATION OF ACTIVITY CORRIDORS
AU
\ \J imJ f
U3f C
ann a*':; t-iev.: Ka sn cw
Stirling Hwy as part of an urban system -
TRANSPORT
LIVING
I I commercial and N G
PLAYING
MFFTIMn
Report a roblem
Report a problem
what is the integrated vision and how does the road design support this?
VISION SCENARIO A-A RIBBON OF LIVI G &
WORKING
•
'
> :
•
'
TRANSFORMING PERTH
REGENERATING TRA SPORT CORRIDORS AS
A NETWORK OF HIGH STREET PRECINCTS
building typologies for a Perth
FEBRUARY 2013
context
current actions & objectives:
> Refinements to typologies for inclusion in MAX planning framework (on-corridor
development)
> Development feasibility
'
¦.
Msnvsti r .2 rj wj car.
design,modelingandtesting
o
0
G
o a:
o
VISION SCENARIO A A RIBBON OF LIVI G &
WORKING
1
spirasuc
-
t- rr;.-*;. r: t.:pi
cu
£3
O
N
S3
o
¦4->
-Q
s_
33
3
3
)
</3
>~
ro
cu
03
o
)
c
ro
u
F3 io
X-29 Inter-Qty Roadway north block expanded redevelopment stage sectional study
• greatest intensity of development is possible closest to the carriageway
• greatest opportunity for provision of affordable dwellings is in these areas of
greatest intensity
»»> maximise the developable land supply which can yield greatest intensity, and
therefore
Iicom ercial ndeucationalcentres
VISION SCENARIO B - A SERIES OF LI KED PLACES
Link and Place: A Guide to Street Planning and Design Prof. Peter Jones, Centre for Transport Studies,
UCL, London, Engineers Australia, 6th October 2009
S;'
¦ 41 S
;•» • -7
•iv -."n
.
¦t'usr iUv.'j m 'ii bese m rgs
Does the current highway road widening
approach support an integrated land use and
transport VISION?
5
K
s'3'
\ | (Hi »»«« *_ _ n
U
M
M
»»• i U l»« l*»l kMiM ntLitw
8a
av
lii
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
11.14
V.
DE AILS. S OWN ON THIS PLAN ARE
PRELIMINARY ONLY. STAGE CONSTRUCTION
AND ULTIMATE DEVELOPMENT MAY DIFFER
FROM DETAILS SHO N
Proposed Stirling Highway Concept Road Design, Department of Planning (WA), Perth, 2012
IR'JNG HIGHWAY ROAD & PUBLIC TRANSPORT NETWORKS
.»• t 0 »i !
S JMp
'
isnjraaiw ssk-s cssa cctT.r!i« ¦ j
SUBIACO
AN INTEGRATED
TRANSPORT STRATEGY
7 WIDWOI WTL
F E ANTLEWEST COAST ,
, HIGHWAY
KINGS «
PARK t
Jill Rod lu U S
PERTH
if WOTWEW
'( TD5UWCO[-2«ib]
CLAREMONT ¦
\ SUBIACO
; '.wrn la Re.-ttl ouItk
(k'
consider the movement
system
Pre o-i i To»n siolioi
C'CHURCH
look at specific movements
•COMMUTER CYCLING KEPT 0\
STIRU G HIGHWAY FO Sflg
(origin - destination)
FRESHW TER
OTTESLOE
BEACH
look at capacity of alternative
INDIAN
OCEAN
routes
ff. rautwiBUTE
make efficient use of rail for
people movement
CANNING HWY
'Sr*
investigate local bus services
and travel management for
schools
NO TH
F EMAf
PROPOSED MRS
E-ALIGNMENT
ERm
LEACH HIGHWAY
FRE ANTLE
accommodate commuter
cyclists on veloway and local
streets
: -
«r 5raiB:i vrr tiaaB kx .s tan
OUTCOME
possible reduction in carriageway cross
section
~8m
> supports development of integrated
land use vision - Activity Corridor
:
Resumption/land value: $3,000/m2
10km x 8m = $240IV!
Service Relocation: up to 30%
10km 100 - ZOOM
+ infill development benefits
$ rates
$ land tax
$ infrastructure efficiencies
$ health & wellbeing
infill 50% cost of greenfields
Trubka, R Newman, P. & Bilsborough, D. 2008
to support an integrated VISION for this part of the city
a COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORT STRATEGY building on the opportunities and
capacity of the existing movement networks is required
without this decisions could quash opportunities to develop this unique location which
could contribute much to the liveability, sustainability and productivity of the city.
Form 41
Submission
MetropoSitan Region Scheme Amendmen 1210/41
Rationalisation of Stirli g Highway Reser ation
DEPARTM NT OF PLANNING
2 7 JUL 2012
To: Secretary
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
Name.
OFFICE USE ONLY
Submission 434
FILE
P '11 /% _ _ ,Aj
Address .. . ....
:.. ..P.
P tPP Postcode
9. .. .
6 Email
;] Emailaddress
__i l
address
/ >.v
© Include pro erty addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant
© Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission
Submission
T
or hm ,
\ & -
OR
or
A spokesperson
Postal address:
I would refer my hearing to be conducted in:
C Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)
OR
To be si ned by person(s) makin the submission
Signature
oa»...
..-;.;.:.T:.::7:
Contacts: Telephone-(08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au
Submission MRS Amendment 1210/41
Contact - Dylan Niblett
27th July 2012
The Secretary
140 William Street
Perth, Western Australia
6000
Attention: The Secretary
SUBMISSION OPPOSING THE METROPOLITAN REGION SCHE E MAJOR
END ENT 1210/41 - R TIONALISATION OF STIRLING HIGHW Y
RESERVATION
The Major Amendment 1210/41 to the Metropolitan Region Scheme ( the Amendment")
- Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation - is strongly opposed due to the
detrimental impact it will ha e on the North Fremantle Town Centre.
It is important to note that whilst the Amendment may result in some benefits to certain
sections of Stirling Highway and adjacent land uses, due to the deleterious impacts of
the proposed road widening of Queen Victoria Street and Stirling Highway in North
Fremantle, the Amendment cannot be supported and is opposed on this basis.
The proposed road widening as depicted in Plan 1.7221, spanning from Queen Victoria
Street in North Fremantle, further north until where Staples Street intersects with Stirling
Highway, would unequivocally be of severe detriment to the local residents, businesses
and the North Fremantle Town Centre ( Town Centre ) as a whole.
Any potential benefits which may be realised by idening the aforementioned portion of
road, which may or may not pro ide for a dedicated bus lane, would be marginal
relative to the negative impacts the Amendment would have on the North Fremantle
Town Centre.
It is understood that pervious planning of Queen Victoria Street in North Fremantle has
sought to downgrade the road to a two lane road in order to calm traffic an pro ide for
a more pedestrian friendly environment. This has had a positive effect on the
revitalisation of the Town Centre which is now one of Perth s most vibrant, eclectic,
activated, iconic and appealing cultural destinations. The proposed road widening
would significantly impact on the amenity of the Town Centre as it would pro ide for a
localised increase of traffic, which would diminish pedestrian permeability and
accessibility of the area, in turn detrimentally impacting on local residents and adjacent
businesses. As such, the Amendment proposes poor planning outcomes which would
contradict the positive place making outcomes which have been realised to date.
The Amendment poses unacceptable risk to the vibrancy and viabilit of the Town
Centre. Gi en that a number of local businesses would be directly affected by the
construction of the proposed road widening (i.e. demolition, alteration and amendment
to the building structures of affected businesses) their viability would be significantly
impacted. Given the uncertainty for existing and future local businesses due to the
Amen ment, the viability of the Town Centre would be servery threatened should the
proposed road widening proceed. As such, the social fabric and vibrancy of the Town
Centre is threatened by the Amendment.
At a time when Perth City as a whole is seeking to promote cultural revitalisation and
activation of numerous spaces throughout the metropolitan area (e.g. Peth City Link,
Perth Cultural Centre, William Street, Subiaco Town Centre), the proposed road
widening is completely unacceptable and is not reflective of contemporary planning and
place making considerations which are operating elsewhere in Perth.
Furthermore, the North Fremantle Town Centre represents a successful cultural hub
and activity destination which has been largely achieved though organic growth. The
success of the Town Centre is something which revitalisation projects such as the Perth
Cultural Centre and William Street strive towards - this is something which is valued
throughout the larger community and must be protected.
In summary, the Amendment is opposed on the grounds that the proposed road
widening would result in a poor planning outcome for the North Fremantle Town Centre,
effectively rendering the Town Centre unviable and imposing eleterious impacts upon
local residents, businesses and the vibrancy of the area as a whole.
Yours faithfully
Dylan Niblett
0427 057 997
Enc: Form 41
DEPARTMENT Of PUNNING?
2 7 JUL 2012
Form 41
Submission
I ietro olitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41
OFFICE USE ONLY
Submission] 435
To: Secretary
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
Name l (V\
'(PLEASE PRI T CLEARLY)
Address . I.?rr.
. i... r
.
Postcode
Email address
o Include roperty addresses and s ecific location descriptions where relevant
o Attach additional numbered ages if you require more space to complete your submission
Sub
ission
¦
.Ar
A
\o
.
©F..
A.
©.. ':1M.. . {M . . A|:;]
)
.A
..
v ; .
dt
..0a
' ~ ~
p ....!
*A ..~ QP..
.
,
|
.
.
p
... .-CT . , t |2 aAp..... .(
..
..
.
.T
pAA (
l2
/
A
p.
.i....(.A1..
A
.
-RfO n. .;;(t
....F
jg
A
..
..fh'AAA......
K-f. . < CfelAh\.. .
trAj'
1
... \fir
v...
...( .,"p
. .P
....pf.ApB.i .. sAb..pyiAJAAP
.. fi-eiePv/eA. ... .pl fe. .. / cATA.
.
O.
E
si.
,v..
...
..
/A. . f
fev....
AAp\teP-- .Pp.pitp. .. Ppp. c ... M iK). .A-AX k >V
p ; /AQ.ppVr. .v . .. (pA.. A .A...
11.1
cfT.. .. .PpAMpp. .. . pP .Be. . .. L.'P5K ...
ipi A BvfeA .. . p.. Kr .rc '-Pp pA. ,f.
, ,
PP.,. BPPPtt1 . (..
. turn over to complete your submission
IAP B
cV f- to l cV f .;r 3C-A bPl''
• fo A: bs>eAC
submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not com ulsory. Your
OR
n" Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)
/ I will be represented by:
er
C] A spokesperson
Postal address:
I ould prefe my hearing to be conducted in:
OR
To be signed by person(s) makin the submission
Signature
: r&A HbAM m* -
©aspj
(J
f <U>fpl
sp Ajo , zPix w S)&*»&>
TKAfF
tWfc
cct£'XX>' P3K& i
l.f fcS -iHft tV F j J M
ffeJ/J A ? \ r f 'Ai Jl P01
'ryg
- 6 /
-Itisw |(cUSB-l!j
ilAt* ftsstyg?
E.V&
jl.i p ffy. i i-; --
.;r ;o> j F&sW?'\HEf5_CF* =ni Wt' H W\V
[uj UHi -C tA , ,
F'ct M CT'V-WfJff
J'vk -e NcR + p'< J-V.K]
SUBMISSION 244 & 435
TABLED AT THE HE RINGS 29/10/13
A case for rejection of the amendme t
The reservation lifted in 1996 is the correct way to proceed for North Fremantle. It allows
North Fremantle s culture and highly important herita e to remain intact. This amendment
applies a simplistic blanket approach to road design, uninformed by any of the critical
background issues of Curtin Avenue extension, Port Options Study, Perth to Fremantle
Cycleway, new bridges and significant Heritage issues such as the North Fremantle Town
Centre
Lack of integration of this Amendment ith critical planning and transport issues
1. Curtin Avenue extension
The Fremantle Regional Strategy 1994 proposed a road west of the rail line in North
Fremantle referred to as the Curtin Avenue extension.
The local community accepted the Curtin Avenue extension as a two lane road and only
because of the logic that it was a way of saving the built fabric along Stirling Highway from
the damage of a Stirling Highway expansion to 6 lanes.
It is a betrayal of community trust to now plan a four lane Curtin Avenue extension as well as
propose this Amendment which results in so much damage to buildings along Stirling
Highway and in the Town Centre of North Fremantle, thereby destroying its character.
The lack of integration of this proposal with the Curtin Avenue proposal, which together feed
a total of 8 lanes into North Fremantle at the northern end of the Town Centre is
unacceptable. This Town centre is one of the most important Heritage P ecincts in Western
Australia.
There has been no consultation with local community to provide information for a planning
context to this Amendment.
2. Port Options Study
Successive governments have ignored the major Port Options Study completed in 1990. The
figures in this report showed a new container Port would be needed by 2015 to 2020 -when
Fremantle would be at capacity.
Most other historic ports in the world have made provision to relocate container operations to
a new port with excellent road and rail links to save the historic fabric of the old port and
streamline movement of containers. We witness daily the results of this inaction, with over¬
use of the Stirling Bridge by container trucks, and the tortuous path of container trains
through the historic west end of Fremantle.
3. Perth to Fremantle Cycleway
Surprisingly there is no mention of this cycleway in the Amendment. It is currentlywill be
constructed to Mosman Park. Why is the planning not in place for the extension to Fremantle,
via North Fremantle? Bicycle paths should not be on Stirling Highway, but alongside the rail
and continue into Fremantle with a dedicated lane over the rail bridge. Access from the
suburb could be at Alfred Rd or further north.
4. Bridges
A new traffic bridge into Fremantle is planned. There may be a need for a new rail bridge.
Planning is required to plan for cycle access preferably via the rail bridge into Fremantle.
5. Heritage issues and Town Centre
There is a continued attitude that North Fremantle and the histo ic Town Centre does not
exist and can continue to be arbitrarily blighted and demolished despite the great importance
of this historic gem and it’s recent revival as a destination for music, food, shops and
services.
Recently a new building on the south end has put back the corner . This is the thrust of all
Policy, to maintain the integrity of the centre by preserving it’s edges. Demolishing a group
nj r
of shops for a bus stop and cutting a sweeping corner off the North end at the church is not
acceptable.
Important documents: Refer to:
Community Map and graphic by Craig Burton in Mapping Report
Fremantle City Council Town Centre Policy
North Fremantle Town Centre Traffic Study by Voran consultants 1999for Main Roads. This
led to the Traffic Calming of the North Fremantle Town Centre.
All along the highway this widening affects scores of properties by just slicing the front off
them. The building fabric of North Fremantle is rendered worthless by all the historic
cottages losing their front fafade. Not to mention walls and other elements, some of them
very old and possibly convict built.
The comment in the report that the land required is a small amount disguises the fact that the
impact of this small amount is huge. Removing the front of the building is as damaging as
demolishing the whole building. Is this a ploy to devalue all these properties to the extent the
owners are willing to sell to those wishing to amalgamate lots and build high rise.
As well as buildings on the Council s heritage list, the curtilage of State listed Heritage
buildings is also severely affected.
If Main Roads owned properties on Stirling Highway were sold there would be a rapid
renaissance and redevelopment could happen. This money could go into much'needed public
transport options like buying back the rail line from Kenwick to South Fremantle.
Traffic flows
Stirling Highway is adequate. Two things should be done, before destruction of property and
heritage:
Firstly, synchronise the traffic lights all the way from McCabe St to the T- junction at High St
Fremantle and from North Fremantle to Perth.
Secondly introduce split grades for 2 lanes at critical major intersections.
These solutions are widely used in European cities, and are far cheaper than the expense of
acquiring more land for ever wider roads.
Pedestrians
The plan claims to improves pedestrian safety with median islands. The most dan erous place
for pedestrians is at Harvest Rd and Stirling Highway, where a massive median exists. It fails
to protect pedestrians from the 1960’s wide open road design that allows 2 lanes of speeding
traffic to descend on pedestrians around a blind corner. A fatality there a couple of months
ago shows that road designs that slow traffic rather than facilitate it are safer for pedestrians.
Address
.
rlf
...
Postco
e
J.
Email address ..<J.:. f .
o Use headings or nu bers to separate different topics and issues
o Include ro erty addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant
Submission
ft&t SCJL
i
b
/
>k2 L
j!g
hnM
turn over to complete your su mission
i e?
Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendmen may personall present the basis of their
submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the belo 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Your
written submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amen ment
whether you no inate to speak at the hearings or not.
Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of the amen ment report.
Please choose one of the follo ing;
I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)
OR
1 will represente by:
Cl Myself - y telephone number (business hours):
o
A spo esperson
Name of spo esperson:
Postal address:
I would prefer my hearing to be con ucte in:
d Public (mem ers from the genera! public may attend your presentation)
OR
Private (only the eople nominated by you or the hearings committee will be
9 The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may be
® All hearings are recorded an transcr bed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written sub issions, are
table in Parliament and published as public records should the Governor appro e the proposed amendment. The
WAPC recommen ations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.
To be si ned bv personfs) makin tSie submission
Date.
Note: Submissions MUST be receive b the advertised closing date, being close of
business (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late sub issions will NOT be considere .
27th of July 2012
The Secretary
Western Australia Planning Commission
140 William Street
PERTH WA 6000
Attention: 1 he Secretary
SUBMISSION OPPOSING T E METRO OLITA REGION SCHEME M JOR
END E T 1210/41 ¦ R TIO LISATION OF STIRLI G HIGHW Y
RESERVATIO
The Major Amendment 1210/41 to the Metropolitan Region Scheme (the
Amendment) - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation - is strongly
opposed due to the serious consequences it poses to the amenity, sense of
place and community, local businesses and heritage of the North Premantle
Town Centre (Town Centre) and wider Fremantle area.
The proposed road widening depicted in Plan 1.7221, from Queen Victoria
Street to the intersection of Stirling Highway and Staple Street, will have a
detrimental impact on the Town Centre.
The City of Fremantle has recently implemented street calming techniques,
such as road crossing islands and on street parking, which has improved
pedestrian accessibility and safety within the Town Centre. This has greatly
transformed the street and it has fostered the growth of a number of diverse
local businesses such as small bars, restaurants and boutique shops creating a
vibrant and successful cultural hub. The Amendment will directly impact on a
number of the local businesses and in turn have a negative impact on the
vibrancy and vitality of the Town Centre as a whole. In addition the increased
traffic through the area would contradict the efforts that have been made to
create a pedestrian friendly area as higher volumes of traffic would reduce
pedestrian permeability and accessibility.
It has been extremely disheartening to hear of the Amendments impact on a
number of locally Heritage Listed properties. North Fremantle Town centre is a
fantastic example of the revitalisation and use of heritage buildings and
demonstrates how the preservation of heritage and commercial growth can
thrive together. North Fremantle s mix of heritage buildings; residential,
commercial and industrial, create an environment with strong sense of place
and a unique atmosphere different from anywhere else in the Perth Metropolitan
Area.
2
The Amendment proposes to impact a number of locally listed heritage
properties including the demolition of 18 of them, this would have a drastic
impact on the local heritage of North Fremantle and the wider Fremantle area.
This includes the total demolition of the double storey, heritage listed shops
from 261 to 267 Queen Victoria Street, which house a number of extremely
successful small bars, boutique shops and restaurants with people coming from
all over the Metropolitan Area to visit. It would result in a totally unacceptable
planning outcome as these businesses and building facades are an integral part
of the North Fremantle Town Centre.
In addition it is hard to understand why this Amendment would be proposed
when the Perth Metropolitan area has been moving towards fostering and
promoting the cultural revitalisation of a number of areas throughout the
Metropolitan area such as; William Street (Northbridge), Burswood, Subiaco
Town Centre and the Perth Northbridge link. The proposed road widening is
therefore not reflective of current planning practises which are functioning
elsewhere in Perth. North Fremantle is a current example of an exciting and
unique cultural hub which is valued by not just North Fremantle residents but
those living throughout the metropolitan area.
To conclude, the Amendment is strongly opposed on the basis that it will have a
detrimental impact on the North Fremantle s local businesses and commercial
growth, vibrancy, vitality and heritage, sense of place and pedestrian access of
the North Fremantle Town Centre.
Yours faithfully
JAIMIE EIDSVOLD
0421 463 541
Form 41
Submission
( etropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41
To: Secretary
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
2 7 JUL 2012
Submission 43?
FILE 0 3
i
i
Name ... .Cffat&. .C... M
Address ../ ff. J f>. (.
stcode ....
.A A Email address . 1 .1 . i ). . VAA [
Tips for completing a submission: / /
o Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues t t
o Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant
Submission
turn ove to complete your submission
x
submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is tic ed. This is not compulsory. Your
OR
"
.
_
Myself- My telephone number (business hours):
e/
o
CvL
j
Jl
.
A s okesperson '
Name of spokesperson:. ft. fr...(
Contact telephone number (businessjiours):...
Postal address: A-b ../Uffl JfI would
efe m hearing to be conducted in:
fr tEnbUfaSTLtF...V/A
; fosq
OR
0 The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may be
« All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, are
Note: Submissions MUST be received y the advertised closing date, being close of
business (6pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late sub issions will NOT be consi ered.
Contacts: Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - ttp:/Avww.planning.wa.gov.au
The Secretary
Locked Bag 2506
PERTH WA 6001
Re: Amendment 1210/41 Rationalisation of StMing Highway Reservation - North Fremantle
The proposed amendment through North Fremantle s ould be dropped.
The proposal to bulldoze a swathe down Queen Victoria St to create a highway is an appalling
idea not worthy of being called planning . I trust the maps were prepared to demonstrate
just how crazy it is to knock out a town centre which has thrived sine Fremantle closed off
lanes to slow the traffic and create street parking.
The planning documentation justifies widening Stirling Highway to create bus lanes and cycle
lanes. We already have a bus lane, it s called Queen Victoria Street. Buses stopping on this
two lane road are an effective form of traffic calming. Anyone who wants to drive freely and
fast through the North Fremantle centre can forget it. Heading into Fremantle, use Stirling
Highway and High Street, or Tydeman Road. Unfortunately inept road planning o erlooked
the need for a slip lane to turn left off Tydeman into Queen Victoria Street to cross the Traffic
Bridge, but this can be retro-fitted to avoid having to queue up behind container trucks. While
on that subject, get those trucks off the road, get the containers onto rail, thereby eli in ting
the congestion on Stirling Bridge.
For traffic leaving Fremantle, use Tydeman Road and Port Beach Road, or use
Canning Highway then tu left onto Stirling Bridge.
Why sacrifice human values and quality of life for the motor vehicle? Road transport exists to
serve us; we citizens don t exist to be subservient to traffic flows.
Perhaps I have misunderstood the complicated mapping and the poorly explained need to
demolish the Queen Victoria St buildings. Is this amendment furtively slipping in the
provision for a left turn slip lane into the much conjectured re-routing of Port Beach
Rd/Curtin Ave along the railway to connect into Stirling Hwy at the Queen Victoria St
intersection? But your plans showing the red dotted line for that project clearly state that this
is not part of the current amendment, and nor should it be, because Fremantle has opposed
this plan which came out of the Fremantle to Cottesloe Transport Plan 2001. There is ample
underutilised industrial land west of the railway for continuing Curtin Ave to Tydeman Rd.
So just forget it, you are not going to take our town centre from us.
Of course one way to reduce traffic is to get people, especially commuters, onto bicycles. I
appreciate the intention to create bicycle lanes, but there are better ways to provide them than
demolishing functional and historic buildings which are the heart of our community. When
the Liberal Government shut down the Fremantle railway, I took to my bike and cycled into
Perth daily. There were several routes fo avoiding Stirling Highway, some of these have
subsequently been made much safer with dual use paths or cycle lanes. When the subsequent
Labor Government announced it was re-opening the railway and electrifying it, I rote to the
Minister for Transport proposing the construction of a Fremantle to Perth commuter cycle
way along the railway reserve. The Minister graciously undertook to examine the proposal,
and lo and behold we now have a well used cycleway along the railway line from Perth as far
as Grant St (excepting some on-road sections through Shenton Park which I understand have
1/3
recently been funded for relocation on the rail reserve). But for some reason the southern end
of the Premier s electorate has missed out again. Your plans clearly show a PSP (Principle
Shared Path) along the railway reserve, so hy duplicate it along Stirling Hwy between
Fremantle and Claremont? There might be a case for a highway bike path from Claremont to
Nedlands, to UWA across to the Mounts Bay Rd cycle path, with a short link from the
railway to the highway at Claremont.
Nobody really wants to ride along the side of a busy highway sucking in car fumes and being
knocked over by ignorant drivers tu ing across the bike lane, as happened to my son-in-law
on Port Beach Road. The idea of riding alongside Sti ling Highway is mad. So, simply finish
the railway bike path from Grant St to Fremantle to cater for commuter cyclists. For us local
cyclists, the existing Stirling Highway footpaths cany few pedestrians (except for the peak
hour train commuters between Alfred Road and North Fremantle Station). Just renovate the
footpaths as dual use paths from Wellington St, and find a way to wend through the North
Fremantle town cent e.
Be aware of the distinction between local recreational or shopping cycling (riding into Freo to
the picture show and the supermarket, down to the beach for the daily winter swim, to
Vanya s for a coffee and so on) and work-commuter cycling. The former can use more
complicated paths; the latter need a fast, uncomplicated run, otherwise they will opt for the
car to get to work. They need the railway bike path. Then there are the nuances of school
bicycle traffic. Mosman Park have recently done a thorough review of inte al bilce traffic,
much of it serving schools. Isn’t the WAPC capable of likewise finessing its planni g, rather
than calling in the bulldozers?
The astonishing thing about this proposed amendment to rationalise Stirling Highway is its
brutal lack of consideration of alternatives and of local community amenity, and the an iety
it causes among locals and businesses, to solve some kind of undefined problem . Smart
planners would come down to North Fremantle, talk to the locals and the Council and see for
themselves how a perceived traffic problem is perhaps not such a problem, and how there
could be many ways to improve rather than demolish. Simply rolling out standards and
“design criteria which were developed for greenfields urban development is totally
inappropriate in well established and heritage-rich communities. “Consistency in decision
making across six Stirling Highway LGAs (Stirling HwyAmendment Report) is not a reason
for reducing our old and valued buildings and the activities theysupport to rubble. Lazy,
lowest common denominator planning! Much t lk about “activity corridors , and here you
want to turn our local rich activity corridor in Queen Victoria St to another bitumen
wilderness in order to meet irrelevant design criteria.
I note that the solution proposed for the traffic jam i Claremont is to reduce the speed limit to
50kmh, rather than knock down buildings. Veiy lateral, very elegant, very cheap. Note that
we have already done this in Queen Victoria St, so there is no need to take out our old
buildings and new enterprises, even for a slip road to a junction that might never materialise.
Please apply that kind of problem solving to the rest of the highway. Phasing traffic lights for
instance.
We have already had several studies of Curtain Avenue, Port Beach Road and Tydeman
Road, all calling for an alignment along the railway. Widening Stirling Highway through
North Fremantle was never part of the debate; why throw it up now as a fait accompli?
2/3
If Stirling Highway is such a problem, perhaps its time to go back to the Stock Road Dalkeith proposal. Shouldn t be a problem now Dalkeith no longer houses the Premie .
I trust you will treat this submission seriously and engage in the necessary dialogue with
North Fremantle to solve whateve your problem is without creating one for us.
12 Herbert St
cha lienic@westnet. com. au
9335 3214
3/3
t '
i-ii ' .
V A is \
Form 41
received
Su mission
2 / JUl.
Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendm nt 1210/41
2 7 JUL 2012
To: Secretary
Loc ed Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
Name
SybmissSosi 438
FILE
pA 17\C
Address
Contact phone number.0. Email address
7/ps for completing a submission:
o Use headings or numbers to se arate different topics and issues
Submission
5
.P.
t
/
e
T5
submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below'Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. Your
OR
Myself - My telephone number (business hours): ..Q. i r.. ....?. ?.??..f ?
or
A spokesperson
Postal address:
I would pref r my hearing to be conducted in:
OR
To e signed by person(s) makin the submission
Signature
Date
. O
rz-
Note: Submissions MUST be received by the advertise closing date, being close of
Contacts: Telephone-(08) 6551 900; Fax - (08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - http://www.planning.wa.gov.au
The Secretary
Locked Bag 2506
PERTH WA 6001
Re: Amendment 1210/41 Rationalisa ion of Stirling Highway Reservation - North
Fremantle
Thankyou for the opportunity to provide comments. My comments below refer primarily to
how the proposed amendments impact on my local neighbourhood of North Fremantle. The
proposed amendment as it applies to North Fremantle should be refused.
Comments regarding rationale and sco e of amendments
The scope of the proposed amendment is overwhelmingly disappointing, at times idiotic and
without a sound rationale. It reveals a failure of process of good decision making on behalf of
the Department or Transport and demonstrates a total lack of understanding of the North
Fremantle community and our needs.
The rationale for this amendment is not made clear in the amendment report. The statement
that the existing Stirling Highway Primary Regional Roads reservation, south of Jarrad
Street, Cottesloe, is ineffectual is as much justification as the report provides for the
amendment, however, there is no further detail to explain what was analysed or assumed to
develop the proposed amendment and how in fact the measures shown in the amendment
address this apparent problem.
The amendment proposes fundamental changes to the North Fremantle area without being
clear as to what is actually being proposed. Securing of a road reserve for a future link with
Curtin Avenue as part of this amendment is not made clear or explained in the amendment
report and only shown within a single attached concept plan. This is sneaky and
underhanded given the impact of such an amendment. A future link with Curtin Avenue at
this point would comprehensively increase the number of vehicles on Queen Victoria Street
as well as adversely impact on the quality of the North Fremantle environment in a
significant way. It would seem to contradict the albeit thinly argued environmental, social and
economic benefits outlined in the amendment report. The Department of Transport and
WAPC would know full well that the local community is vehemently against the link with
Curtin Avenue at this point on Stirling Highway and the attempt to grant this link legitimacy
by stealth through the proposed amendment is appalling.
Our city has broader issues to do with traffic congestion, environmental quality (e.g. air) and
rapid population growth to name but a few on which transport planning has a distinct impact.
However, these must be tackled in holistic way which takes into account the existing
structure, character and functioning of communities. The SHAGS project and the proposed
amendment takes a purely technical approach to solving apparent problems rather than
looking for more flexible solutions. It has chosen ‘Standardised’ planning and design criteria
Stirling Highway Reservation Comments
Patrick Ford Page 1
and run rough-shod over any adjacent land use or owner which falls within these
parameters. In doing so it is proposing to create a whole new suite of problems, including but
not limited to:
© Destruction of viable businesses and homes;
© Dislocation of residents from their community;
© Intensification of traffic;
© Undermining the civic character and cohesiveness of North Fremantle;
Other jurisdictions nationally take a more holistic approach to transport planning than what
this proposal, and the process by which it has been developed, has indicated. Read for
instance the New South Wales Government s Beyond the Pavement developed by
Transport, Marine and Maritime Services (Formerly the RTA - equivalent of our PTA) which
provides obligatory urban design guidance for road and transport infrastructure projects. The
principles are quoted below:
Beyond the Pavement urban design principles
The planning and design of road infrastructure should be governed by the principles of:
1. Contributing to urban structure and revitalisation.
2. Fitting with the built fabric.
3. Connecting modes and communities.
4. Fitting with the landform.
5. Responding to natural pattern.
6. Incorporating heritage and cultural contexts.
7. Designing roads as an experience in movement.
8. Creating self-explaining road environments.
9. Achieving integrat d and minimal maintenance design.
Had these or a similar set of principles been incorporated into this process there would be no
way that such an abject proposal would have eventuated. The community would have had
more faith in the process and a more integrated solution to our transport needs could have
been delivered. The lack of consideration for these kinds of principles within the proposed
amendment is clear. This is a major blindspot within government’s planning apparatus which
tends to treat issues of transport planning in total isolation of the needs of people and their
communities.
Patrick Ford Page 2
Comments regard ng practical alternati es to the proposed amendments
Some practical alternatives that may deal with some issues for which the proposed
amendment is apparently intended, include:
o Extending the PSP from Grant Street to Fremantle along the railway line instead of
placing a cycle lane on Stirling Highway.
® Extending Curtin Ave to Tydeman Road instead of diverting it to Stirling Highway at
the intersection with Queen Victoria Street which would prove a disaster for North
Fremantle s community.
o Retain Queen Victoria Street as it currently is (single lanes in two directions with
parking and street landscaping) so that it continues to grow as a functional, viable
and attractive town centre. This includes not pursing a dedicated bus lane travelling
north on Queen Victoria Street at the intersection with Stirling Highway. This is
unnecessary as the single northbound lane of Queen Victoria street becomes two
lanes at this point anyway, so there is already an effective bus priority lane. (Just this
alone would spare North Fremantle of some of the most blatantly destructive
consequences of the proposed amendment)
o Create a generous bus siding on Stirling Highway travelling north at the location of
the bus stop adjacent to North Fremantle station (where there is currently plenty of
room and no impact on existing buildings and residents) instead of the proposed
priority bus lane only 100 metre further south at the intersection with Alfred Road
which would force the removal of buildings and residents.
o Consider the location of the North Fremantle train station in the context of the long¬
term strategic development of North Fremantle
o Consider the strategic future of the port and how it is accessed. Look to minimise the
amount of container trucks accessing the port terminal through improving rail
infrastructure or the moving of the port to Henderson/Kwinana.
Patrick Ford Page 3
Comments regarding 8. Sustainability Appraisal
The proposed amendment, even assuming easier movement for buses, will only further
encourage car usage and undermine its environmental rationale. The expansion of the road
reserve as it applies to North Fremantle will reduce amenity and undermine the quality of the
current streetscape and recent efforts to landscape the road/public environment around
Queen Victoria Street.
Contrary to the claim that the proposed amendments provide certainty to land owners the
proposal removes certainty by inconsiderately displacing existing businesses and residents
and by extending the road reserve boundary over other existing properties and buildings.
So-called containment is already happening in North Fremantle, adjacent to Queen Victoria
Street for example, because of efforts to pedestrianise the environment, calm traffic and
encourage public transport. Queen Victoria Street, and further north towards the intersection
with Alfred road are seeing the slow but steady development of residential, commercial,
retail and civic infrastructure and a growing sense of a town centre. This proposal (especially
the amendment of the road reserve to secure future land fora bridge to Curtin Ave from
Queen Victoria Street/Stirling Highway) casts uncertainty over this progress and will
undermine the sense of community in North Fremantle.
The community asset’ of the highway is defined by the existing businesses and residents
who operate, live and interact on its edges - not the highway itself as outlined in the
amendment report. This assumption frankly gives a startling insight into the myopia of
transport planners and says spades about their lack of consideration for the needs of our
community and their lack of regard for the impact that their narrow and technical view of road
planning has on the way these communities actually function.
The claim that the amendment will encourage new residents, businesses and economic
development is idiotic and shameful. The proposal lobotomises an important stretch of
businesses on Queen Victoria Street - businesses which have worked very hard over the
last few years to become viable. The council and local rate payers, recognising the important
contribution they make to the local community in providing vitality, amenity and local
commerce, have supported these businesses with efforts to pedestrianise Queen Victoria
Street, calm traffic and provide more generous landscaping. This amendment totally
undermines these efforts and in doing so is totally at odds with the concerns of the local
community. At best this proposal sets back the economic and social development of the
North Fremantle town centre by a decade, but this of course assumes that further road
widening and new construction (link to Curtin Ave) won t totally destroy the possibility of an
amenable, attractive, welcoming and pedestrianised town centre in the future.
In general, these paragraphs on the ‘’Environmental’, Social’ and ‘Economic benefits of the
amendment are nothing more than a cruel joke which only further shrouds the proposal in
distrust and ignominy. One gets the sense that the people who devised these proposals
haven’t walked the site or are not skilled in understanding its qualities and the impact of their
decisions on these qualities.
Stirling Highway Reservation Comm nts
Patrick Ford Page 4
I trust that these comments will be treated seriously and will be of benefit to the WAPC. I
look forward to a more holistic and appropriate proposal being developed in the future which
is based on genuine consultation and understanding of relevant issues.
Yours Sincerely,
Patrick Ford
24/38 John Street
[email protected]
0423 283 194
Stirling Hi hway Reservation Comments
Patrick Ford Page 5
SUBMISSION 438
TABLED AT THE HEARINGS 8/11/13
Proposed MRS Amendment - Stirling Highway
Key problems
• Rationale is faulty
• Concept road design is poor
• Will create impacts and outcomes that are
overwhelmingly negative
° Process
Perth s rapid rate of growth is providing very real challenges to the fabric of the City
and to the current planning apparatus.
We are facing the threat of:
significant traffic congestion, environmental quality (e.g. Air and water) and resilient
communities.
I support good planning that tackles these challenges However, these must be
tackled in holistic way which takes into account the existing structure, character and
functioning of communities. The SHAGS project and the proposed amendment takes
a purely technical approach to solving apparent problems rather than looking for
more flexible solutions. It has chosen Standardised' planning and design criteria and
not accounted for any adjacent land uses or built form. In doing so it is proposing to
create a whole new suite of problems, including but not limited to:
Destruction of viable businesses and homes;
Dislocation of residents from their community;
Intensification of traffic;
Undermining the civic character and cohesiveness of North Fremantle;
Poor process is a common theme throughout.
1
Rationale: What problem does it solve?
Congestion?
Clarity and Certainty?
Density?
Sustainability Appraisal?
Clarity and Certainty
For whom? On one level, yes the proposal achieves clarity and certainty
But while there has been no integration of land-use planning and urban design with
the transport planning there is no certainty
Density
We are told that Directions 2031 is an important driver of this proposal and that the
proposal will enable approximately 1500 new residences along the corridor.
Sustainability???
Congestion
Research and experiences from around the world continually reinforce that road
development, of the nature proposed here, leads inexorably to greater volumes of
new vehicles and further congestion. Simply, roads beget traffic and more roads will
mean more traffic.
It is important to ask how this proposal sits in the broader context of the City s traffic
movement. What are the strategic centres and destinations beyond the Stirling
Highway corridor? Will they welcome more traffic? Particularly while measures to
restrict/reduce car trips are being actively promoted in nearly all adjacent local
government areas and strategic centres.
Claremont is rightly identified as the section of the Stirling Highway which has the
most acute peak traffic congestion. The proposal concedes that the road design
would include reduced width and speeds - 50km/hr - due to spatial constraints and
State heritage listed properties in this section.
We are told that features of the road design elsewhere along the highway (width and
bus prioritisation for example) will improve traffic flow and mobility. If this is true
then it follows that the strategy in Claremont will create congestion rather than
relieve it.
On the other hand, if it is good enough to respond to the built form parameters of
Claremont - the pinch point along the Stirling highway - why is it not good enough
for the rest of the highway?
Pi
Concept Road Design - How does it compare to
best practice?
5.1 m . . j LSm | t 3.5_m j. 3.5m. 3.5 j. 3.5m 2.Oft j, 3.5m 3.5m I.Sntj 5m l 5.1m
Verge Bi e Pnoriry Vehicle Lnne Vehicle Lane Right T rning Median Vehicle Lane ehicle Lane Bike Priorit Bui Lane erge
Lane B s Lane Pocket 39 7m Lane Leli Turn Pocket
Road Reserve
Cross Section C (29.5m Pedestrian C o ing) Bus prio it lane inte ection fo a main T juction inter ecti n
Allow me to quickly define what I believe are best-practice principles of transport
planning that would be relevant in this case.
Good transport planning would:
Separate modes and users where possible - such as providing a Principal Shared Path
for cyclists and pedestrians rather than a cycle lane.
While improving integration with existing and future modal networks. (Pedestrian,
bike, vehicle, bus, train, light-rail, freight etc) (See AustRoads guidelines)
It would also consider:
Downstream congestion impacts
Traffic impacts on non-motorized/pedestrian movement and mobility
Strategic land use impacts
Impacts on physical activity and public health
Direct and Indirect environmental impacts - including contributions to the urban
heat island effect, acoustic impacts, and air and water quality.
Separate modes
Inconsistent with:
• AustRoads
• DoP s guidance on integrated transport
planning
• Context sensitive road design
• Global and national research and experience
Applying the same road design condition full the length of the highway (with the
exception of Claremont) is inconsistent with best practice transport planning.
Key issues:
• Responsiveness to context
• Verge and median width
• Bus Priority
• Cycle lane
In general the scale of the road design width will be an imposing barrier to the
communities that interact with and must cross the highway.
The highway passes through what are fine grained areas, both in terms of existing
built form and street networks.
The verge and median widths both have an adverse impact in this respect, but so
does the
Cycle lane would be dangerous and inferior to creating a dedicated PSP along the rail
line.
Bus priority - is this necessary the full length of the highway?
DoF s guidance on Integrated Transport Planning
Traffic volumes and choices of mode of travel
are influenced by the location, density
and mixture of land uses.
Pg 75, Department of Plannin Guidelines for the Preparation of Integrated Transport Plans
Context sensitive solutions for road network planning seek a deeper understanding
of context, particularly in urban places by considering the urban form as a factor that
can influence community objectives such as a reduction in auto trips and
preservation of open space. Context sensitive solutions analyse land use within a
design and activity framework that.is more complex than typical density measures.
For example, similar land use developments located in different urban settings will
have different trip generation characteristics and will make different contributions to
the street context that in turn call for different responses by the road design.
AustRoads
What impacts would it create?
• Destruction of viable businesses and homes
• Dislocation of residents from their town
centres
• Intensification of Traffic
• Undermine the civic character and
cohesiveness of urban environments
Essentially this proposal is destructive. Of residential areas and homes. Of
community identity and neighbourhood connectivity. Of pedestrian amenity and
comfort.
The principal aim of the proposal is to provide clarity and certainty for future road
planning and orderly land use planning along the urban corridor.
Without land-use planning there is no certainty...
So what are the alternatives...
Sustainability can be improved, Density increased and Traffic Congestion eased
through a more integrated approach to transport planning and land use planning.
What is needed is to look at the effectiveness of our modal networks, in particular:
Heavy rail
Buses
Cycling networks
Pedestrian networks
Separate modes where we can:
Invest in a PSP against the railway line rather than cycle lanes, and connect it with a
more
Good transport planning would:
Separate modes and users where possible - such as providing a Principal Shared Path
for cyclists and pedestrians rather than a cycle lane.
While improving integration with existing and future modal networks. (Pedestrian,
bike, ehicle, bus, train, light-rail, freight etc)
It would also consider:
Downstream congestion impacts
Traffic impacts on non-motorized/pedestrian movement and mobility
Strategic land use i pacts
Impacts on physical activity and public health
Direct and Indirect environmental impacts - including contributions to the urban
Fremantle line is running well below capacity both in terms of number of trips
number of trains and number of carriages.
12
Fremantle line is running well below capacity both in terms of number of trips,
13
Fremantle line is running well below capacity both in terms of number of trips
14
Fremantle line is running well below capacity both in ter s of number of trips
Good planning needs a good process:
• No evidence of land-use planning
• No evidence of urban design considerations
• No qualitative assessment of affected
communities or their environments
Proposal, by stealth, makes a committment to
future amendments such as:
• to make Queen Victoria Street 2 lanes of
traffic in both directions (otherwise why need
the bus prioritisation lane?)
• To connect Curtin Avenue with the Queen
Victoria Street/Stirling Highway intersection
Proposal, by stealth, makes a commitment to future amendments such as:
• to ma e Queen Victoria Street 2 lanes of traffic in both directions (otherwise
why need the bus prioritisation lane?)
• To connect Curtin Avenue with the Queen Victoria Street/Stirling Highway
intersection
Both of which would destroy the North Fremantle Town Centre and any pretense
that the proposal is motivated by Directions 2031.
Why it should be withdrawn:
• rationale is faulty
• road design is poor
• Impacts to the community would be
extraordinary, deleterious and costly
The scheme amendment should be withdrawn
20
Approval would reward:
• poor planning
• farcical process
• poor outcomes for the urban environment
and the community
In conclusion, approval would send the message that the WAPC is content with not
following best-practice in transport planning, is content with poor outcomes in the
urban environment and content with a process that is dis-engaged with land-use
planning and the community.
I understand the importance of the MRS, the difficulty in amending it and the very
real impact it has. But there is a cognitive dissonance between how government
perceives the benefits of this proposal and how it is perceived by the community. For
example where government sees value in clarity the community, more or less, see
chaos.
In my opinion, the way of overcoming this juncture is through improving processes.
By improving the integration between statutory and strategic planning, by improving
the integration of transport and land-use planning; and by engaging with the
community earlier and more readily.
It seems to me that there is excellent guidance on all of these matters available to
government - particularly from its own planning department. It is therefore
disappointing that it seems to have had no effect on the current proposal.
A
RECEIVED
27 JU ' >2
Form 41
Su mission
[ etropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41
Rationalisation of-Stirli g Higtiway Reservation
DEPARTMENT 0T PLAIWING|
OFFICE USE ONLY
2 7 JUL 7012
To: Secretary
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
Submissio 439
FILE
Name TPG Town Planning Urban Design and Heritage
Address P .B°.X 7375 Cloisters Square, Perth Postcode ...6850
Contact phone number..08.9289 8.300 Email address . Reter:simPson@tP9wa:com:au
° Use headings or numbers to se arate different to ics and issues
° Include roperty addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant
° Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to complete your submission
Submission
Submission prepared on behalf of the owners of Lot 20 (No. 168) Stirling Highway, Nedlands.
turn over to complete our submission
m
OR
dl Myself - My telephone number (business hours):
or
C A spokesperson
Postal address:
OR
a The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybe
To be si ned by person(s) making the submission
Signature
/T.
Date
.2.7. .7 J
Note: Submissions WlJdST be received by the advertised closing date, being close of
PERTH
SYDNEY
Our Ref: 712-322
Your Ref: 1210/41
26 July 2012
The Secretary
Locked Bag 2506
TOWN PLANNING
AND URBAN DESIGN
PERTH WA 6001
Dear Sir
RATIONALISATION OF STIRLING HIGHWAY RESERVATION (MRS 1210/41) - LOT 20 (NO. 168)
STIRLING HIGHWAY, NEDLANDS
TPG Town Planning, Urban Design and Heritage (TPG) has been appointed by the landowners
of No. 168 Stirling Highway, Nedlands to prepare an objection to the proposed MRS Scheme
Amendment 11210/411 - Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
The subject property at Lot 20 (No. 168) Stirling Highway, Nedlands is located in the City of
Nedlands and is currently subject to the statutory provisions of Town Planning Scheme No. 2
(TPS 2). The subject pro erty is 1181m2 in size and located on the southern side of Stirling
Highway at the Waroonga Road intersection.
The legal description and details of the subject site are summarised in the following table. A
copy of the certificate of title is contained in Attachment A of this document. The land is not
encumbered by any easements.
m
lan
Address
Vol/Folio
Proprietor
ml 1590 168 Stirling Highway, Nedlands 2099/886 | CITI Fidelity Nominee Co Pty Ltd |
The site is currently developed with a recently constructed office building comprising of two
levels of office space, basement tenant car parking and visitor car parking at the ground level.
The majority of the ground floor has a 16.94 metre front setback to Stirling Highway and the
majority of the upper floor has a front setback of 14.87 metres. A portion, comprising an
internal emergency stairwell is setback 11. 4 metres from Stirling Highway. The basement
level comprising of 32 tenant car bays, stores, plant rooms and a change room is setback
approximately 5.3 metres from Stirling Highway.
When the subject site was developed, the development was based on the 5 metre setback
policy the WAPC applied at the time.
PERTH OFFICE
Level?, 182 St Georges T e PO Box 7375 Cloisters Square Telephone+61 8 9289 8300 The Planning Group WA Pty Ltd
Perth Western Australia 6000 Perth Western Australia 6850 Facsimile +61 8 9321 4786 ABN 36 097 273 222
vvw . tpg wa .com.au
The Secretary
RATIONALISATION OF STIRLING HIGHWAY RESERVATION (MRS 1210/411 LOT 20 [NO. 168] STIRLING HIGHWAY,
NEDLANDS,
CURRENT MRS ZONING
Under the provisions of the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) almost the entire property
falls within the 'Primary Regional Road' reservation (PRR), approximately 1062.9 square
metres (90%). Specifically the current reservation boundary intersects the site along the
western boundary 45 metres from Stirling Highway and again along the eastern boundary 44
metres from Stirling Highway. The remainder of the subject site, approximately 118.1 square
metres (10%) is zoned 'Urban'.
PROPOSED MRS ZONING
The proposed Stirling Highway Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment will substantially
reduce the existing PRR reser ation of the subject site from approximately 1062.9 square
metres to approximately 327 square metres of land.
Specifically the proposed reservation boundary would intersect the property 13.3 metres from
Stirling Highway along both side boundaries. Adjoining properties along Stirling Highway in
this location are similarly affected by the proposed scheme amendment. This alignment cuts
straight through the basement level parking and a portion of the emergency stairwell on site.
Refer to Attachment B - Proposed MRS Amendment on Subject Site
Refer to Attachment C - Impact of Proposal on Existing Development
OBJECTION TO PROPOSED AMENDMENT
Our client supports the initiative of the WAPC to rationalise the PRR reservation in the
Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) that presently exists over the subject property. However,
the landowner has serious concerns and objects to the PRR reservation as currently proposed
under MRS Amendment 1210/41. The primary reason for the object are as follows:
Visitor Parking
The proposed scheme amendment would have a serious impact on the availability of visitor
parking onsite. The proposed reservation would require the removal of all eight-visitor bays at
the front of the property. These bays are crucial to the tenant, are well utilised and located
immediately adjacent to the entrance.
Limited formal parking opportunities exist within the locality and street parking on Waroonga
Road is already relied upon. The closure of these visitor bays will result in additional vehicles
parking along Waroonga Road, raising both safety and amenity concerns for residents and
motorists.
Basement
The proposed PRR boundary intersects the basement level and would remove at least seven
tenant car bays, two storerooms and the fan motor room and exhaust riser. This would require
the basement to be redesigned and reconstructed at significant cost.
Including both the ground floor and basement car bays, the total number of bays onsite would
be reduced from 40 to approximately 25. This not only compromises the commercial viability
of the site but severely impacts the car parking compliance of the development.
2
The Secretary
RATIONALISATION OF STIRLING HIGHWAY RESERVATION [MRS 1210/ 11 LOT 20 [NO. 168] STIRLING HIGHWAY,
NEDLANDS.
The City of Nedlands Town Planning Scheme No. 2 (TPS 2] requires that an 'Office' use have
4.75 car bays per 100m2 of gross leasable floor area. Based on a gross leasable floor area of
957.22m2 the development has a car-parking requirement of 46 bays. The reduction in parking
as a result of the resumption of the proposed PRR reservation would result in a shortfall of 21
bays. This reduction would not be supported and is considered excessive.
Emergency Stairwell
The proposed PRR boundary intersects the emergency stairwell to the northwest of the
building. The stairwell is a safety requirement and cannot be removed without an alternative
being constructed.
In relation to the subject site the PRR reservation has been aligned to accommodate a verge of
5.1 metres wide. It is noted that in the WAPC Amendment Report, dated March 2012, the Road
Design Requirements for Stirling Highway makes provisions for verges to be '4.5 metres in
constrained areas'and '4. / metres in severely constrained isolated locations'. Given that these
provisions can be made the removal of the emergency stairwell is not warranted.
PREFERRED MODIFIED AMENDMENT AND CONCLUSION
In light of the above, we believe that the impact of the PRR boundary in relation to the subject
property is unacceptable given that in its current form the scheme amendment would have a
catastrophic impact on the property and the availability of parking onsite. The current proposal
severely reduces parking availability for both tenants and visitors and has serious implications
on the structural fabric of the building, notably the basement level and emergency stairwell.
Accordingly, we respectfully request that the Commission extend the 'Urban' zone northward
to include the basement parking area. This realignment would provide for the retention of
tenant and visitor parking, emergency stairwell, storerooms and exhaust riser.
Should you have any queries in relation to the above, please do not hesitate to contact the
undersigned
Yours sincerely
TPG Town Planning And Urban Design
3
ATTACHMENT A
Certificate of Title
REGISTER NUMBER
20/P1590
AUSTRALIA
DUPLICATE
EDITION
DATE DUPLICATE I UED
N/A
N/A
RECORD OF CERTIFICATE OF TITLE
VOLUME FOLIO
2099 886
UNDER THE TRANSFER OF LAND ACT 1893
The person described in the first schedule is the registered proprietor of an estate in fee simple in the land describe below subject to the
reservations, conditions and depth limit contained in the original grant (if a grant issued) and to the limitations, interests, encumbrances and
notifications shown in the second schedule.
REGISTRAR OF TITLES
LAND DESCRIPTION:
LOT 20 ON PLAN 1590
REGISTERED PROPRIETOR:
(FIRST SCHEDULE)
CITI FIDELITY NOMINEE CO PTY LTD OF 117 STIRLING HIGHWAY, NEDLANDS
(T G774044 ) REGISTERED 24 APRIL 1998
LIMITATIONS, INTERESTS, ENCUMBRANCES AND NOTIFICATIONS:
(SECOND SCHEDULE)
1. G774045 MORTGAGE TO BANK OF WESTER AUSTRALIA LTD REGISTERED 24.4.1998.
Warning: A current search of the sketch of the land should be obtained where detail of position, dimensions or area of the lot is required.
* Any entries preceded by an asterisk may not appear on the current edition of the duplicate certificate of title.
Lot as described in the land description may be a lot or location.
E D OF CERTIFICATE OF TITLESTATEMENTS:
The statements set out below are not intended to be nor should they be relied on s substitutes for inspection of the land
and the relevant documents or for local gove ment, legal, surveying or other professional advice.
SKETCH OF LAND:
PREVIOUS TITLE:
PROPERTY STREET ADDRESS:
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA:
2099-886 (20/P1590).
1674-85, 1655-795.
168 STIRLING HWY, NEDLANDS.
CITY OF NEDLANDS.
LANDGATE COPY OF ORIGINAL NOT TO SCALE Mon Apr 16 14:16:02 2012 JOB 38952058
ATTACHMENT B
Proposed MRS Amendment on Subject Site
Proposed Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) Amendment
Reduction in land required
for road purposes
No. 168 (Lot 20) Stirling Highway, Nedlands
Proposed area required 327 m2
subject to survey
extract of proposed changes: plan number 1.7145 ( 95-b)
J
Existing reserve boundary
Western
i Australian
Planning
Propose reserve boundary
Scale 1: 00
Commission
nedSS.dgn
10 Aug 2011
Produced by MappVig & GooSpa al Dala Branch. Oepartmenl of Planning, Perth V/A
On be 3II ol lha Western Au-.l a'ian lan irg Commission.
Base information suppKrd b estern ustralian Lend Ir ormation utho ity LI 430-2009-1
Property boundary
GDA
Proposed area required
E3
0
8
I
I
metres
Note: All dimensions are i etres.
ATTACHMENT C
Impact of Proposal on Existing Development
D AWING NOTES
Proposed Primary Regional
Roads Reservation
M' II ¦
1 SS S fiSirllrDfg Hwy
BASEMENT PLAN
- RC H 1 T E C T 3
117 STIRLING HIGHV AY. NEDLAND5 A 6009 telephone (09)336 8840 fax (09)386 62 3
IWS
riMr
|.n.l;.|,vli
•JOB j DWC-. | REV.
9803.031 \ | l!
mi
"/xA)
-
V''
'
uojssjiuqns jnoA e a|diuoo oj jsao ujrq
' -
'
';'''
.....
p.|"y i j j "y "'w'
j j ' l| "" pl
'\j j v 0 v
'
.
o. ''''
f j o
,c...l.
''X- r'] , .'
c "" 3 ' K
!o '' rjp'
'" '
w
»
'
(.. v ¦.••.•
-X •
o > .
. v- i c1
'
p
r
•v?:
|'
1
- j? 'j
'
r-
> V o>"
'
v py'' '(p n'
i fV ¦
ri ~i x xr ™ ::X' 7T'?:y
V
\
7 0 "p ' 0 X
rv,-',7 Vj
5
J
oS' Ae la b h /CJ
VlV.' xA'iU '
Yj-P iY/ [vj
..../....J..
'' •"• ""c
jp'"" &"''iK.:ur)'c7
o ''
' vo ~)if j ij i.
AA-op'
p-j
p , X>' pj p px y?
'vir.' ll 5 c/ c <7
v-o -xi-'' yW
''
0
•¦; '5j 'ps p ' y)'-r \>o ;, y px ' " 'i"
: : 'A <
,¦
/T
¦ a'i yX'
.I'wq A A
(x? r £ >.' > r< y ' \- X
V
i -> \ •i/O'i Si.xii i
Yp '
Yb-:2j.
9 ¦= ' = ' VrlrYV
.
-' yl
pi
""W
••••?•• "Co
l
y"'
'¦'''>>p7
vA
"
T
gX- Vp lj
uoissiiuqng
uoissiuiqns jnoA ejeiduioo o) eoeds bjolu ejinbej noA;i seBed pajaqujnu leuoifippe qoeuv 0
)UBAaiaj ajeL/M suoyduosap uo/ eoq/ o oads pue sassajppe A adojd apnpui ®
sanssi ue soldo; luajafflp a;ejedas o; sjequmu jo sBuipeaq asp °
luoissiuiqns e Buifa/dujoo jo; sdi±
't)' ' j j -"p 4/'
r-i
V07
ssajppe l!BU|3
apoojsod
v
oP7PgXP"J0quJnu 9U0L*d l0Byj°3
?)
i cI?
,cPs\ -y
I SS9JPPV
(Aiyvaio iNiad asvand)
?)j)l;?
gnd[ 7
oissiiuqns
-'A-
8LUB|S|
17
[¦009 VM 1P9d
90QZ Beg p9 |oo-]
uoissj iaioo 6u|uub|c1 uei|ej}snv uj8}S0/\a
jb}8J08S :oi
311=1
mi w l i
aino 3sn aoiddo
QNINN l dO XM3WlHVd3Q
uoqeAjasag ABMqBjH Bunjqg jo uoqesiieuoqey
iWO IZ l lusujpuauj suie og uoiBay ue}!|odo4ie|/\]
iP\
uojssji qng
\
IP LUJOJ
\4' L ~
(|B!iUB sqns) luetupueiuv I uoii eg
SOOZ l V luauido|8A0a pue Buiuueid
\A
, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)
OR
/
E Yes, I wish to speak at the hearings. (Please complete the following details)
I will be
epresented by: .... ,
Q Myself - My telephone number (business hours): ... . . . . ... .
or
C A spokesperson
Contact telephone number (business hours): ;..
Postal
address:
I would p efer my hearing to be conducted in:
E Public (members from the general public may attend your presentation)
OR
E Private (only the people nominated by you or the hearings committee will be
To be signed by erson(s) making the submission
Signature
Note: Submissions MUST be received by the a vertised closing date, being close of
business (5pm) on 27 JULY 2012. Late submissions ill NOT be considered.
i <
¦ f ir\
vt
if
Jj i 12 t
I
r-t
i
/
_
_
A
a
J- . « - (o( t'ti > \ kv\~ito-\£
Cc77£
V-
'\ c .
(
/\ ri
7
f
li 1
5
C
/
h>c idi i.(A S e>A 7i<C d
)1 7
? 1 k a
7
*r
f/
" DOO Lt l-te i -A
'
C- oi Q -J < -\
D
.>* l CA.
f c
.
'c/L A
o\
1G2Aa v c Ilisi . lai v ot < .7
7
Co m i/ .n 1 k -t?
S
Cl/
4
- rt/ -
i-y j
1 tt/
fY A A
-
f Lt .'li t
c\r ~ sI
x
n/yk c i
-o
I l
37
i
f
1
.
" - ' 'l
L
%
i
v_
oljoO. i't i Q
suSi
cis xlL >'
C -i. I C' -Jt I
V v 'y
/ - si -Q
J C
-LX - lQACi
[0
- (
1 OCc-a//
\jhAnr o(m o - /
<< 0l CCOJAti
v.S. ,;
¦ o
, sj_Jg
v,
-- •«-1
diol
_)
(ri- /, TS l \ _ L g y 0/ - g TO
A
3
U- C )ycy 3 il/
I ,
,
. ksi »" cA
'5-
~
g, J; j
- wV J. <-
.\
, /;'7
1 v //
.a
tCoc c .
, /9\
(V etinl jy/VtV'-
(
r
tv\G-eltt ~s c
7
iZ
'
7
7 1
) O 'l,77,l i ClX (-;,o \ , A . ) O jLM onC-eZ
(
/
1
/
'bjpVuj
ydijf 'f
' j PS
uojss iqns jmo 9j0|ciujoa o? jsao tun}
'SMo i'oj' SD'' 'udISSUa)qn' '' '.yy na
i//
dli fjif '(m) ¦o' 'Xij'\iy/ ' &rtY)' (r ixii' itii.y'jc)' 'diAfy
yC(/y?'Mj''pjoAl'bj''.'fnct'af ' .jYf pjiioM f'''AA/ /hji c '
fxja/ij '- ddiS
W
u VOi/'J/j$ "J-jo' W j' Guiotjni' p bCj
'' y ( u' // jo' i // y/'y -)'' )i// ' 'udijoJ 'jpi Ay A j' pj Mjb j t) aj' ji/' 'j/w '''
YCio YsPuYCf YP
' iY upA /
i7/' / WXpjii) jmrjCj jcjju' ij'j
i/ "j XIXfG' yA/j 'Puofb' ftoh'su' PdwtjO'
' fjAit/ ' ypAoj' 'V/// ?' "pAi ' ' yv ' 'sjfd iA jAJ-i/j Aj/Y/yj
'' ' / '9 ' //' '.r ¦|V /'
;) /'' 'y/ 'Plb/Mb yjji ' '
'aij/u//> "jo'Y j Yx/ fib u/ jjd' 'dxff'yPu 'pfo 's'ibyP,rjpT'P/j}yAj/Xp)d i?s/' yw'j aoj¦
' // y;t77 'yi/.7y/' yi y''v ' ''j&jpyff' }WUjyjb] ' 'ci'ffjbf tici' 'S'/' '/YO'J ' ' Sfjofij
' /')" p'C fy'yJb'd')'// O iji/'/l'f )' fx)ncf)"
'" '/Yfi/j Vf/YM'".YjWoqj&W "Y/Y YJ/) "of jg/uf "y /)/j/j' f wl/j/UM{'YYAj jj'b ciijri ujy jiijo'
iyj/idd~f/'' 377;' "<)'& >'y' /sviy'p //"syf "/svys' y/up) jo "Y/y pYY j "oyyjy i/¦ yyi¦ ¦
"Y/)Onaw !f')'lj()"i
uoissjiuqns
uoissiuiqns jpoA aioidwoo 0) eoeds djoiu ejinbaj noA ji saBed pajaquinu leuomppe qoepv »
fUBAa/aj eja m suoijduosep uoijeooi o/jiosds pue sassajppe A adojd apn/oui «
sanssi ue sojdo) fuajejji ajejedos oj sjequinu jo sBui eaq as/q »
luoissiwqns e Bu/faidiuoo joj sd/i
no ¦ uy> ) jyu ydd p/yj iw'' ss9jp b
a o$%'W8'Wd m 9U0L|C| }OE)UO
o'Yd1)"" spo sod •• jy -y • • TO/yy/yi/Yj "i ' jjij Yj j bi/p "'/" SS3JPPV
( IMValO NfHd 3SV31 )
'(/bj/j/Jj/j'' 'dYii'Oj "Y iiij"" 0LLIBN
1
1 009 VM M 3d
909Z Beg ps>|ooi
UO|SS|UJUJOO BujUUBId UB!|BJ]SnV UJ8)S0/\/\
/tlBJQJOBS :01
yo;ssiiuqns
A1NO 3Sf1 331330
uo!}BA.!9say Ab iiBih B jijjjs jo uojiBSjieuoijBy
l-WOlsnuotopuauiv aiuai s uoiBoy uBi!|odoj 9i/\|
uojssjiuqns
7 ujjoj
(jBi sqns) jueaipuaiuy ip uojjoag
002 V )U9UJdo|9A8Q pue Bu ueid
/. htfc ar q large, rumba/ 'chil ren on /nlkr hr.?! a cwo rmmrhj tr/ret!
Qnd l/v, d nger af mno Irqff c cl tsk
o l\h//<Y s hale I is a vccyj
re ell da yc. or he d cem es hu /he, qufe/y off'/n che/eje'em cm/lie. lri&h
The ficnhcjO Prtc/Acf oh Chromrnh needs h be p/orcc rcl ivlw eertr
pos ible s rr fuh/m (jon&raho S of Clq e/no l rf /d h can Cnja/
i sun foun s qn
m Ho/ qrjC dryras of M area. Wo of fires f
has txony Syruf/Ccml Pla e shjlc ol rCS/d pcyx, These resrden as
and Vvl> sh .ed need !o he profthrxf
ayi g mere. rn fc, dire/tod to
vJdlor SfreeJ wW Cjmlab f tur l)ioy thro gh V/bna/uois s foliation
h the edrrmmt of this edreof, m addi ion to/kfunthf o/so thrf ///
he cop r ib lod do a a is a su bur hem, local s/me./r
f /o turn night out of Wot key Sinead cm to 5 //biyg rghifg (S'
01 readn d uxjnfous and t /s dan C/ is f r he/ emhanctei uf/ncj prat
traf ic peneds ff righ hand urning lane wi / o/lg erve to
furthxb/ h s dagger , The tes sofu trn in this case i to not allow
ci right laon turn o to Sind mg H h Way fo nut/ffg the C/hanU
of a scm/rus a ca nt Th/s weald q/so 6 cxmd sknf tmth of hem
drt.eds
5/
1/ i/ d mate, rjnd sense, tv allow tra-Pfup to flow
+hroVh be Loch Sfrt l art* Lew Ccocme SaffLc hpt vxto s,
and mmmvec disivrba ce to Walk/ Slrmt an /Is residents.
submissio to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below 'Yes' box is ticked. This is not com ulsory. Your
written submission will be considered in determining the recommendation for the proposed amen ent
Further information on submissions and hearings is included in Appendix E of t e amendment report.
, I do not wish to speak at the hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)
OR
Yes, I wish to s eak at the earings. (Piease complete the follo ing details)
Myself - My telephone number ( usiness hours):. ff&Q
or
A spokes erson
Postal address:
I wo ld refer my hearing to be conducted In:
OR
rivate (only the people nominated y you or the hearings committee will be
permitted to atten )
a The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to t e WAPC may be
• In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of your
® All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of all earings, along with all written submissions, are
tabled in Parliament and published as public recor s should the Governor approve t e proposed amendment. T e
To be signe bv personfs) making the subm ssion
Signature....
. Date .. Jy./ M.
Note: Submissions MUST be recei ed by the ad ertise closing date, being close of
business (5p ) on 27 JULY 2012. L te submissions will NOT be consi ere .
Contacls: Telephone - (08) 6551 000; Fax-(08)6551 9001; [email protected]; Websilo - http://www.plannIng.wa.go .au
Planning an Development Act 2005
2 7 JUL 2012
Sec ion 41 mendment (Substantial)
Form 41
FILE S jv l h .
Su mission
IVletropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41
OFFICE USE ONLY
Submission 442
To: Secretary
Locked Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
i_~
™
«
Name.. hlOM AS>... AtriP.... PKAt4.C£acA ..Smf . sl
, nr(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)
Address
Postcode
f... Email address . r'iClFfL' ;,A! rt °
Tips for completing a submission: \
Use headings or numbers to separate different topics and issues
o Include property addresses and specific location descriptions where relevant
o Attach additional numbered pages if you require more space to com lete your sub ission
Submission
%
¦* :* *••*** * •»* * ¦ .*:« * * *
t W. >
tu
o e to complete your submiss on
&§« /A
Anyone who has made a written submission on the amendment ma personall present the basis of their
No, I do not wish to speak at t e hearings. (Please go to the bottom of the form and sign)
OR
C Myself - My telephone number (business hours): I
or
A spokesperson
%
Name of spokes erson:
Contact telep one number (business hours):
Postal address:
iz
OR
® The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC may be
® In the course of the WAPC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of our
submission or the substance of that submission, ay be disclose to third parties.
® All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The transcripts of ail hearings, along with all written submissions, are
tabled in Parliament and published as public records should the Go e or approve the proposed amendment. The
To be signed by personfs) making the submission
Signature
Y.ggj
Contacts:' Telephone - (08) 6551 900; Fax-(08) 6551 9001; [email protected]; Website - hitp;/Avww.planning.wa.gov.au
1 (o
Thomas and Francesca Steffen (9 alter Street Claremont 6010; 0408932501)
r
Introduction:
We purchased our home at 9 Walter Street 12 years ago and live there with our two children.
We were and still are attracted to Walter Street by its heritage homes and consistent streetscape; an
important part of which is the tree lined nature of the street. T is heritage precinct of Claremont
is an important part of Perth history and valued by its residents and we elieve the broader
community.
Im act of the proposed modifications on the residents:
We believe the proposed modifications will have the following ne ati e impacts:
Greater traffic flow t rough Walter Street making t e street less suitable for families with
small children. Currently Walter Street an the surrounding streets are family oriented and
populated, which will be compromised.
Greater traffic flow leading to St Thomas Primary School, (at the north end of Walter Street)
posing a safety risk to the children currently getting to school by foot or bike from the
surrounding streets. \
The likely need to widen Walter Street which will mean remo ing at least one ro of trees
an a erge thus destroying the streetscape. We believe it is contradictor to on one hand
heritage list the homes in the street due to their street appeal, and then destroy this app al
by remo ing the trees and verges.
Duplication of the thoroughfare already in place via Loch Street, thereby further dissecting
the heritage area and destroying the value of the area and its heritage im ortance; via the
introduction of increased traffic.
Turning right from Stirling Highway already presents a major hazard for cars turning towards
Fremantle from Walter Street. Given the adjacent bus stop and businesses on the other side
of the Stirling Highway, traffic is regularly constricted to one lane, resulting in turning into
Walter Street from the city taking a long time. This makes a right turn out of Walter Street
ery hazardous. We belie e it is already a major issue which should be addressed ia
blocking off Walter Street.
Traffic flo observations:
While we are not aware of the logic behind the proposed modifications, we speculate that it is to
allo enhanced access for Gugeri street for traffic coming from the city on Stirlin Highway.
Currently this traffic flows via och street onto Gugeri directly, an also via Melville and Chancellor.
We believe the better solution to allowing flo of traffic in the area is to enhance traffic flow
through t ese existing paths, instead of creating another.
Durin peak times, traffic on Gugeri street ban s bac from Claremont often to and beyond the
Gugeri/Melvilie T-junction (please refer sketch (a) attached). This means that there is often a queue
of traffic on Melville turning left onto Gugeri. Increasing traffic flow through Walter will exacerbate
this, potentially to the point where turning right from Walter onto Melville is blocked at peak times.
This sit ation is worst around school start/finish and a ound 5-6pm. This coincides with the time
when St Thomas students are dropped off an icked up and will further hinder this due to the
increased congestion. Again, guiding the traffic in those heavy periods via Chancellor an Loch
Streets is more effecti e as left turns onto Gugeri are not obstructe by the queue of traffic from
Claremont
f
We believe this could be achie ed by lengthening the turning lane at Loch Street lights on Stirling
Highway, and also by blocking off the right turn from Stirling Highway onto alter Street. Similarly,
increasing the length of the turning lane at Leura Avenue lights to allow traffic flow to Gugeri Street
ia this route would be very useful as during pea times this is not over-utilised, allowing an easy
right-turn onto Gugeri from Leura and onto the Shenton Roa underpass; or left into Claremont
(please refer to sketch (b) attached).
A safer, more sustainable an better solution for Claremont:
We belie e lengthening the turning lane at Loch Street and possibly Laura Street lights and also
blocking off the right turn fro Stirling Highway onto Walter Street will:
sustain the streetscape and heritage importance of the locale,
result in a safer outcome for the students of St Thomas
result in a safer outcome for cars turning right from Walter onto Stirling,
sustain the value of the area,
im rove safety for families li ing in the area; and
represent a more sustainable solution as the tree-lining of the street can be maintained.
We believe the tra fic flow can be managed via Lock and Leura Streets which are already furnished
with traffic lights and round-abouts to facilitate flow of traffic bet een Stirling High ay and Gugeri
Street.
We appreciate your consideration of our concerns and welcome the opportunity to present our
views.
\Ce. -oU ( )
MofflinAve SI reel S ©
5>H eCucoicM
Pd S /
Loch gj
offlin Ave si fee, Sin I;
c P3
Judge Ave
Se i
¦
|9
61
d
jwgro nd
q e iian Ccnlfft
Cert
Showgro nds f
r
O
E
5
W
2
5
(7
o
Mel ille Sr
I
0)
3
§
n>
•t.
w
(A
Rowe Park
(/)
Stevens Si
Smith St
¦amont
to
Corner Store
S'
30XMQ|MKtt
sW*
¦ Ctaremon!
jaapS b.©'
[.a.
Medical Oilnhe
De nings
jKllp
tia
LL •
0
i
B
|j
&
c:
€
->
CP
g
7)
o
0
1
. i
Jenkins Avo
R)
*<
nnimontl Rd
cx
y, I (
(
4 U e. C
C .o f k ( \ C
< /l
t c tv. e
g?
¦r
C?
c
l
-
i
V
I i k. Ic, C / rA rC
Pcv e,. > /
@001
1/10 2012 14:49 FAX 93846669
93846669
¦s-
DEPART 1' '1 P NNING
Section 41 Ame dment (Substantial)
Form 41
- 2 OCT 2012
o §
Submission
Metropolitan Region Scheme Amen ment 1210/41Rationalisation of Stirling Highway eservatio
OFFICE USE ONLY
SU MISSION NUMBER
To: Secretary
443
Locke Bag 2506
Perth WA 6001
]/i Q r_ (Hi . .R. W.
Name
A, .
(PliEASE PRINT CLEARLY) .
Address
.(....g .!4-.. .. ...WTr A o
. Postcode ....<?« /
Email address
T/ps for completing a submission:
® t/se headings or numbers to separate different to ics and issu s
Includ property addresses and s ecific location descri tions wh re r levant
o Attach additional numbered pages if yo requi e more space to complet our submission
Submission
.a Idm. -
. b&teUXl.
at M/GfitM
St t/M
A J6&.
P VcMr/k/. tfjy. Ml- £. tUJt/MA fVXJ&y.
...
psfkks. w.m.
Wp k .11. ... fi.Kb.. i. 4. .¦Sr .... k&l:... Affd ..
SmM
t&l. i /m upi. r
..Mkfls...Jk.Ml
kkk .k ...r.
PPF.~.:.i .
&e...f
fr
....Ai....M
....... .PApf.r.rd....Am.fiK&f&eff..
....
...
..Au
...y
u
oi>..
IMp..
..Me.?.-
over to compiefe your s bmission
..
1 1001
a_"/10 2012 14:51 FAX 93846669
nnD
93846669
DDn
Heari g of su missions
submission to a sub-committee of the WAPC if the below Yes' box is ticked. This is not compulsory. You
whether you no inate to speak at the hearings or et.
Please choose on© of the following;
Mo, I do not wish to speak at t e hearings. (Please go to he bottom of the form and sign)
w
OR
i will b® represente by:
Cki Myself - My telephone number (business hours): 3
or
FI A spokesperson
Postal address:
II would prefer m hearing to b© conducted in:
[S Public (members from the general public may a tend your presenta ion)
OR
I I Private (only the people nominated by you or the'hearings committee will be
The WAPC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1992 and as such, submissions made to the WAPC maybe
o In the course of the W PC assessing submissions, or making its report on these submissions, copies of your
submission or the substance of that submission, ay be disclosed to third parties.
o All hearings are recorded and transcribed. The tra scripts of all hearings, along with all written submissions, are
tabled in Parliament and published as public records should t e Governor approve the proposed amendment. The
WA C recommendations are similarly published in a report on submissions and tabled in Parliament.
To Foe
maki g the submission
Contacts: Telephone - (Q8) 5551 900; Fax-(08) 6361 9001; [email protected]; Website - hllpV/vAW/.planning.wa.gov.au

MRS Submissions (Volume 5 of 6) - Part A

Transcription

Similar documents

BGTV Earth Week Gallery Flyer

Submissions on the - Have Your Say

Submission Themes: Knit Picks is looking for

Yateem Legacy Shopping Center

PDF call - ESEC/FSE 2015

Tree

discoveryAUG15

2016 Events - Farmtown Park

are factory farms hog-tying people`s

Map of Site 1 – Lyndale Farmstead Park