MPH [email protected]

MPH
[email protected]
British Medical Association
(Methods)
(Validity)
Rate Ratio Odds Ratio Risk Ratio P- value
SPSS
scientific writing
60
50
40
40
32
30
22
20
10
3
0
2
1
15.0
n
n
Eligibility
50
42
40
30
20
17
16
6
4
4
1
te
m
he
m
ic
al
A
N
Sy
s
PU
S
T
EN
C
C
U
RR
IN
bs
tr
ac
t
C
O
N
SC
O
TE
NT
SE
EM
BA
IS
I
DE
X
M
ED
IC
U
S
0
ot
in
de
xe
d
10
n
Eligibility
n
Eligibility
n
(CI)
Rate Rat io ,Odds Ratio,
(Randomization)
Risk Rat io
(placebo)
(Inclusion Criteria)
(Ex clusion Criteria)
n
p
Impact
Factor
(Knowledge Translation)
(Knowledge Disseminat ion)
(Knowledge
(Knowledge
(Research
Transferring)
Implementation)
Utilization)
(Systemat ic Reviews)
(Guidelines)
Curriculum
Scientific Writing
(Scientific Writing)
1. Saboury AA. Research report status of IRAN 2002,
13.
Rahyaft 2003 28; 87- 93.
7.
14.
communication. Am J Health Syst Pharm . 1999 Jul
Approach
to
Azizi F. m edical publication growth. Journal
of faculty of medicine 1995, 20: 1- 3.
15.
1; 56: 1353.
Rezaei- Ghaleh
N,
Siadat
F,
Azizi
F.
Quantit at ive and qualit at ive assessment of Iranian
4. Gopen GD, Swan JA. The Science of Scientific
biomedical publicat ions in internat ional journals
Writing. Am Sci 1990 Nov- Dec; 78: 550- 58.
between 1992 and 2002 according to t heir Impact
5. Naylor WP, Munoz- Vireros CA. The Art of Scientific
Factor. Journal of faculty of medicine 2003; 27:
Writing: How t o Get your Research Published. J
Contemp Dent pract 2005 May; 6: 164- 80.
139- 43.
16.
6. Goldbert RC. Scientific Writing as an Art and as a
14: 209- 11.
7. Basmajian JV. Quality in Scient ific Writ ing. Canada
17.
Med Ass J 1964 May 9; 1121- 25.
qualitative
publications
Cerebrovasc Dis 2004; 18: 135- 8.
and
Valaei N, kousarian M, Nasiri A. Quantitative
and
8. Alex androv AV. How t o Writ e a Research Paper.
Evaluating
Neuberger J, Counsell C. Impact factors: uses
and abuses. Eur J Gastroent erol Hepat ol. 2002Mar;
Science. J Environ Hearth 2001 Mar; 63: 22- 5.
in
assessment
t he
of
Mazandran
biomedical
universit y
of
m edical sciences Journal (Name) from issues no 1Appraisal
of
Epidemiological Scientific Papers. Medical Facult y
47. 2005; 139: 131- 9.
18.
Graham
Ian
D,
Tetroe
et
Some
2002; 11: 64- 9.
Translation. Acad Emerg Med. 2007; 14: 936- 41.
19.
Hedges
JR.
The
of
al.
Theoret ical
Kallet RH. How to Writ e t he Met hods Sect ion
Underpinnings
J,
Journal of Guilan university of medical sciences.
10.
12.
HN.
Interv 2003; 58: 391- 6.
3. Hamilt on CW. Bad medical writ ing as a barrier to
11.
Bonneau
Get your paper Accept ed. Catheter Cardiovasc
a Scientific Manuscript. J Surg Res 2005; 28: 165-
H,
MJ,
Manuscript Preparat ion and Submission: How to
2. Cetin S, Jtlackam D. An Approach to t he Writing of
9. Soori
Kern
Knowledge
Knowledge
Paradigm:
of a Research Paper. Respi care 2004; 49: 1229-
Hist orical, Philosophical, and Pract ice Perspect ives.
32.
Acad Emerg Med.2007Nov; 14: 924- 7.
Perneger VT, Hudekon PM. Writ ing a Research
20.
Armstrong R, Waters E, Roberts H, Oliver S,
Art icle: Advice to beginners. Int J Qual Healt h Care
Popay J. The role and t heoret ical evolution of
2004; 16: 191- 2.
knowledge t ranslation and ex change in public
Diat el M. Requirements for Medical Writing.
Obes Surg 2004; 14: 3- 7.
health. J Public Healt h (Oxf). 2006 Dec; 28: 384- 9.
Epub 2006 Nov 2.
This document was created with Win2PDF available at http://www.daneprairie.com.
The unregistered version of Win2PDF is for evaluation or non-commercial use only.