Reference Catalogue Safedock A-VDGS

Transcription

Reference Catalogue Safedock A-VDGS
Docking Guidance Systems
Reference List
Safedock A-VDGS and SafeControl - Apron Management (GOS)
Safedock A-VDGS
Safegate Group´s Safedock A-VDGS systems results in safety, efficiency and
environmental benefits for airports all over the world.
By securing safe operations at the gate, a lot of time and money is won. Safedock
ensures that your airport is optimally equipped - today and for the future. When
using Safedock systems, all aircraft are quickly and smoothly parked in a correct setup,
providing the possibility for tight time schedules to be maintained. When an aircraft is
parked faster and the gates are turned more efficiently, a lot of CO2 emissions are
prevented. This result is optimal safety, increased efficiency and reduced power and
aircraft fuel consumption, which lead to a cleaner environment.
Our Safedock systems exists in 3 different models : T1, T2 and T3. All Safedock systems
contains scan function, aircraft verification check, parking accuracy of 10cm and
docking in severe weather.
Safedock T1 is equipped with apron scan, PBB scan, Ramp Information Display
System (RIDS) and stop position 2-65 meters.
SafeControl – Apron Management
Origin Gate Operating System (GOS)
The Safegate concept of centralized control and monitoring of stands and aprons is
called SafeControl - Apron Management. The origin of this new concept is Safegate‟s
Gate Operating System (GOS), built on a new platform to enhance integration and
data sharing capabilities.
SafeControl is a group of software modules used to automate and improve safety at
airports around the world. SafeControl - Apron Management is based on the same
platform as used for Air Traffic Management guaranteeing you highest safety and
availability.
Page 2 of 94
Safedock – SafeControl - Apron Management ..................................................................................... 6
North and South America ......................................................................................................................... 6
Canada – Calgary International Airport ............................................................................................. 6
USA – Charlotte-Douglas International Airport – US Airways ..................................................... 7
USA - Dallas / Fort Worth International Airport - American Airlines.......................................... 8
USA – Houston George Bush Intercontinental Airport ................................................................. 9
Europe ........................................................................................................................................................... 9
Switzerland - Geneva Airport ................................................................................................................ 9
Middle East ................................................................................................................................................ 10
KSA – Jeddah Airport ........................................................................................................................... 10
Kuwait - Kuwait International Airport .............................................................................................. 10
Oceania ...................................................................................................................................................... 11
Australia - Perth International Airport.............................................................................................. 11
Safedock – Gate Operating System ...................................................................................................... 12
North and South America ...................................................................................................................... 12
Canada - Toronto Pearson International Airport .......................................................................... 12
Canada - Vancouver International Airport ..................................................................................... 13
Chile - Santiago de Chile Airport ....................................................................................................... 13
Netherlands Antilles - St. Maarten Princess Juliana International Airport ............................. 14
Puerto Rico, San Juan Luis Muñoz Marín International Airport – JetBlue ............................ 14
USA – Boston Logan International Airport – JetBlue Airways ................................................. 15
USA - Chicago O‟Hare International Airport – American Airlines ........................................... 15
USA – Los Angeles International Airport – Tom Bradley Terminal ......................................... 16
USA - Miami International Airport – American Airlines .............................................................. 16
USA - New York JFK International Airport – T4 – JFKIAT........................................................... 17
USA - New York JFK International Airport – T8 – American Airlines ...................................... 17
USA - New York JFK International Airport – T5 – JetBlue Airways ......................................... 18
USA – Orlando International Airport – JetBlue Airways ............................................................ 18
USA - Philadelphia International Airport ......................................................................................... 19
USA - Seattle-Tacoma International Airport ................................................................................... 19
Africa ........................................................................................................................................................... 20
Cameroon - Yaoundé Nsimalen International Airport ................................................................ 20
Egypt - Cairo International Airport, Terminal 3 ............................................................................. 20
Morocco - Casablanca International Airport .................................................................................. 21
Asia .............................................................................................................................................................. 22
China - Beijing Capital International Airport, Terminal 3 ........................................................... 22
China - Hangzhou Airport ................................................................................................................... 23
China - Hong Kong Chep Lak Kok International Airport............................................................ 23
China - Kunming Airport...................................................................................................................... 24
China - Lanzhou Airport ...................................................................................................................... 25
China - Ningbo Airport ......................................................................................................................... 25
China - Shanghai Pudong International Airport, Terminal 2 .................................................... 26
China - Shanghai Pudong International Airport ........................................................................... 27
India – Bangalore Airport .................................................................................................................... 27
India - Kolkata; Mumbai; Cochin; New Delhi; New Hyderabad Airport ................................ 28
Indonesia - Juanda International Airport, Surabaya................................................................... 29
Indonesia - Sultan Hasanuddin International Airport, Makassar ............................................ 30
Japan - Central Japan International Airport .................................................................................. 30
Japan - Narita Airport ........................................................................................................................... 31
Malaysia - Kuching Airport .................................................................................................................. 31
Russia - Anadyr Airport......................................................................................................................... 32
Russia – Moscow Domodedovo Airport ......................................................................................... 32
Russia – Moscow Sheremetyevo Airport ........................................................................................ 33
Russia – Moscow Vnukovo Airport .................................................................................................. 33
Singapore - Changi Airport ................................................................................................................. 34
Sri Lanka - Bandanaike International Airport, Colombo ............................................................. 34
Thailand - Bangkok Don Muang International Airport............................................................... 35
Thailand - New Bangkok International Airport ............................................................................. 36
Vietnam - Noi Bai International Airport, Hanoi ............................................................................. 37
Europe ........................................................................................................................................................ 38
Denmark - Copenhagen Kastrup Airport........................................................................................ 38
France – Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport ........................................................................................ 38
France – Paris Orly Airport .................................................................................................................. 39
Germany - Munich Airport .................................................................................................................. 39
Italy - Cagliari Airport ............................................................................................................................ 40
Italy - Catania Airport ............................................................................................................................ 40
Italy - Genoa, Marco Polo..................................................................................................................... 41
Italy - Milan Airports: Malpensa, Linate and Bergamo ................................................................ 41
Italy - Rome Fiumicino Airport ............................................................................................................ 42
Italy - Trieste Airport .............................................................................................................................. 42
Netherlands - Amsterdam Schiphol Airport ................................................................................... 43
Norway - Oslo Gardermoen Airport ................................................................................................ 43
Poland - Warsaw Airport ..................................................................................................................... 44
Romania - Bucharest Henri Coanda International Airport – Otopeni .................................... 45
Slovenia - Ljubljana Airport ................................................................................................................. 45
Spain - Barcelona Airport ..................................................................................................................... 46
Spain - Bilbao Airport ............................................................................................................................ 46
Spain - Fuerteventura Airport ............................................................................................................. 47
Spain - Las Palmas Airport ................................................................................................................... 47
Spain - Palma de Mallorca Airport ..................................................................................................... 48
Spain - Tenerife South Airport ............................................................................................................ 48
Spain - Valencia Airport........................................................................................................................ 49
Sweden - Stockholm Arlanda Airport .............................................................................................. 49
Turkey - Antalya Airport ....................................................................................................................... 50
United Kingdom - Cardiff Airport ...................................................................................................... 50
United Kingdom - London Heathrow Airport ............................................................................... 51
United Kingdom - Glasgow Airport .................................................................................................. 53
Page 4 of 94
United Kingdom – London Gatwick Airport ................................................................................. 53
United Kingdom – Stansted Airport ................................................................................................. 54
Middle East ................................................................................................................................................ 54
Bahrain International Airport ............................................................................................................. 54
Kuwait International Airport............................................................................................................... 55
United Arab Emirates - Al Maktoum International Airport, Dubai .......................................... 55
United Arab Emirates - Dubai International Airport .................................................................... 56
United Arab Emirates - Sharjah International Airport ................................................................ 60
Oceania ...................................................................................................................................................... 61
Australia - Kingsford Smith International Airport, Sydney ......................................................... 61
Australia - Melbourne International Airport ................................................................................... 62
Australia - Perth Intl; Brisbane Intl; Townsville Intl; Cairns Intl; Darwin Intl ........................... 63
Australia - Perth International Airport.............................................................................................. 65
New Zealand - Auckland International Airport ............................................................................ 66
New Zealand - Christchurch International Airport ..................................................................... 67
Complete Reference List, Docking Guidance Systems ..................................................................... 68
North America ........................................................................................................................................ 68
South America ........................................................................................................................................ 70
Oceania..................................................................................................................................................... 71
Middle East .............................................................................................................................................. 74
Europe....................................................................................................................................................... 77
Africa ......................................................................................................................................................... 86
Asia............................................................................................................................................................. 87
Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 94
Safedock – SafeControl - Apron Management
North and South America
Canada – Calgary International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-24/T1
70 (T2-24) + 4 (T1) = 74
2012-2015
Safegate Group was awarded a contract to install A-VDGS on all
gates of YYC‟s existing terminal and future international facility,
beginning with 41 Safedock systems installed in early 2013 on
existing Airline Terminal Building gates. In late 2013 the gate
operating system will be updated to SafeControl – Apron
Management. Safedock systems will be installed on all gates of
the new international facility before its opening in 2015. This
will include 29 Safedock T2-24 systems and 4 T1 systems for
gates with challenging layouts
Client objective:
Improve ramp and gate efficiency, particularly during IROPS.
Selection process: RFP process
Page 6 of 94
USA – Charlotte-Douglas International Airport – US Airways
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-24
37+46=83
2012-2013 (upgrade from GOS to SAM)
In a combined project with US Airways and the airport, Safegate
was selected to provide Safedock T2-24 on all US Airways gates
at its major CLT hub. All current and future systems will connect
to the GOS gate operating system with an interface to US
Airways flight systems for automated docking initiation and data
collection. When not docking aircraft the Safedock displays will
serve as a ramp information display (RIDS) providing timely
information to ground crew.
Client objective:
Improve ramp and gate efficiency, particularly during IROPS.
Selection process: Technical evaluation.
USA - Dallas / Fort Worth International Airport - American Airlines
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
T3-9, T2-24
92+41(T2-24)+1+11SDK=145
Installations in Safedock 2007/08, 2011 and SafeControl – Apron
Management 2012
Scope:
In the largest airport/airline cooperative project to date, Safedock
systems have been installed at all gates on Terminals A, B, C and
D for D/FW Airport and American Airlines. In 2012, the Gate
Operating System (GOS) was replaced by Safegate‟s new
SafeControl - Apron Management system that interfaces directly to
the flight information system providing management of the apron,
real-time information and historical data to both D/FW and
American Airlines. This was Safegate Group first SafeControl –
Apron Management installation.
Client objective:
The primary objective is to improve ramp and gate efficiency,
particularly in times of irregular operations.
Selection process: Safegate was the preferred provider selected by the general
contractor that won the contract in a competitive RFP process.
Page 8 of 94
USA – Houston George Bush Intercontinental Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-24
8
2012
Safegate Group was awarded a contract to install 8 Safedock
Docking Guidance Systems on international gates at IAH as part
of the airport‟s Terminal D renovation. IAH will use Safedock‟s
Ramp Information Display System (RIDS) capability to
communicate important arrival and departure information to
ground crew and Safedock‟s camera feature to provide a live
view of all gate activity to strengthen security surveillance. The
contract also includes Safegate‟s newest gate operating
software, SafeControl - Apron Management that will integrate
with the airport‟s flight information system and feed critical gate
utilization information to the Airport Operational Database
(AODB).
Client objective:
1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates.
2. Provide gate equipment familiar to foreign flag carriers.
3. Accommodate new large and wide body aircraft.
Selection process: CMAR bid process.
Europe
Switzerland - Geneva Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-24
20
2012
2012 delivery of 20 Safedock systems. The contract also includes
Safegate Group newest gate operating system, SafeControl - Apron
Management. The customer is using SafeControl – Apron Management
since January 2013, but the final reception is not yet validated.
Middle East
KSA – Jeddah Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Client objective:
Selection
process:
78 x T1, 28 x T3, 120 Gate signs, 78 workstations (IASS) including
all hardware accessories such as cabinets.
76 x T1, 28 x T3, 120 Gate signs, 76 workstations (IASS) including
all hardware accessories such as cabinets.
Began 2013. To be completed late 2014 or early 2015.
a) Complete design. Including DGS location, infrastructure such as
poles and cabling. Safegate have design liability. IASS design,
development, installation and implementation.
b) Coordination with other vendors for design and development.
c) Complete installation for all equipment and infrastructure.
d) FAT and training
e) T&C
f) Handover Documentation for all systems and equipment
provided, including As-Builts
Client objective: Issue a design that uses our efficiency when it
comes to the T1's (i.e. multiple centrlines and stands making use of
one system). Our (IASS) will be the platform for all services related
to the stand. Accelerated installation is crucial to the client.
Compliant DGS maximising end users‟ needs. Exposing new
technology and interfaces for KAIA through IASS.
Kuwait - Kuwait International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-15 + T1
7
1988-2008, 2011, 2012
2012 delivery of 7 Safedock Type 3-15 systems. The contract also
includes Safegate Group newest gate operating system, SafeControl Apron Management.
Client objective:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Selection
process:
The first project in 2002 involving replacement of 15 loop systems with
Safedocks and a new GOS was executed within the specified project
period. The systems since 2002 have been reliably operational. The
DGCA decided to directly place an order to Safegate. The state-of-the-art
gate system gives the airport additional features and the possibility for
easy upgrades, which goes in line with the airport‟s future plans.
Page 10 of 94
Performance, availability and quality
Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates
Minimise the number of incidents and accidents
System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.
Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to that of
the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the PBB.
Oceania
Australia - Perth International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Client objective:
T1
17
The installations of systems will be staggered, commencing in
November 2013, and for the contract to be completed by
February 2014. The first 2 systems are to be installed and
connected to Safecontrol Apron Management by Mid-November.
With the expansion of Terminal 1, Safegate Group has entered into
a contract for the supply and commissioning of 17 x T1 Systems,
and for the installation of Safecontrol Apron Management. The
Safecontrol Apron Management installation will also be connected
to 5 existing Safedock systems currently installed on site
The client is interested in Safecontrol Apron Management for the
full automation of monitoring and docking aircraft.
Safedock – Gate Operating System
North and South America
Canada - Toronto Pearson International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9
6+12+51+5+16+3+5+1=99
Installations in 1998, 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007, 2012
The first delivery of 7 Safedock Type 3-9 systems was in 1999.
Since then Safegate has been awarded 5 additional contracts for
the new Terminal 1 and the Terminal 3 redevelopment project.
Features include ID check, digital countdown and interlock to
boarding bridges. Systems are being connected to a campuswide Safegate Gate Operating System (GOS). Pearson is
Safegate‟s second largest North American customer and one
of the largest in the world.
Client objective:
1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates.
2. Real-time control and monitoring of the gates.
3. Modernize the airport.
Selection process: Safegate was initially selected in a competitive process that
emphasized the technical evaluation. The subsequent contracts
have come both from the airport authority and from prime
contractors.
Page 12 of 94
Canada - Vancouver International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Client objective:
T3-15
9+9+3+3+3+2=29
Installations in 1999, 2004, 2009, 2011, 2013
In 1999 the wide body international gates were equipped with
the Safedock Type 3-15 system. Since then additional Safedock
systems have been installed in conjunction with the terminal
expansion and at the request of WestJet, Canada‟s largest lowcost airline. The WestJet units are connected to a GOS gate
operating system for automation. Other features include ID
check, digital countdown, dead-man switches and an interface to
the synchronized clock system.
1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates.
2. Provide gate equipment familiar to foreign flag carriers.
3. Automate the docking process.
Chile - Santiago de Chile Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Client objective:
T3-9
17
Installation during 1999 -2000
Safegate‟s first installation of laser guided system Safedock in
Latin America. The installations cover all gates at the new
terminal.
ICAO Annex 14 compliance
Netherlands Antilles - St. Maarten Princess Juliana International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Client objective:
Selection Process:
T2-18
4
2006
Provide modern docking systems for the four gates in the new
terminal as part of the boarding bridge package supplied by
Thyssen.
1. Utilize modern technology
2. Support common use environment
Selected by Thyssen for the boarding bridge package.
Puerto Rico, San Juan Luis Muñoz Marín International Airport – JetBlue
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Client
objective:
Selection
process:
Page 14 of 94
T2-24
7
2012
Safegate Group installed 4 Safedock T2-24 systems on JetBlue gates at
SJU. The project includes the Safegate GOS and interface to JetBlue‟s FIS
for docking automation. JetBlue has been a Safegate customer since
2007 when they added systems to their gates at JFK International
Airport, Terminal 5. Safedock is also in use on JetBlue gates at Boston
(BOS) and Orlando (MCO) and will be installed at Ft. Lauderdale (FLL)
during 2013.
Improved efficiency, especially during irregular operations.
Negotiated.
USA – Boston Logan International Airport – JetBlue Airways
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-24
16
2011
Safegate installed 16 Safedock T2-24 systems on JetBlue gates at
BOS as part of a frame agreement that also included Safedock
installation on JetBlue gates at Orlando (MCO). The project
includes the GOS gate operating system and RIDS. JetBlue has
been a Safegate customer since 2007 when they added systems
to their gates at JFK International Airport, Terminal 5.
Client objective:
Efficiency and irregular operations.
Selection process: Negotiated
USA - Chicago O‟Hare International Airport – American Airlines
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-24
35
2010
ORD is the 4th of American Airlines‟ major hubs to be equipped
with the Safedock system. All 35 systems are connected to the
GOS gate operating system with an interface to American
Airlines‟ FOS for automated docking initiation and data collection
of in and out times. When not docking aircraft the Safedock
displays serve as a ramp information display (RIDS) providing
timely information to ground crews. The GOS is linked to
American‟s headquarters via the airline‟s WAN.
Client objective:
Improve efficiency, especially in times of irregular operations.
Selection process: Negotiation
USA – Los Angeles International Airport – Tom Bradley Terminal
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-18
16
2012-2013
Safedock was selected to provide safer, more visible docking for
the airlines on the Tom Bradley West Terminal gates. The systems
will be connected to a GOS and interfaced to the airport‟s flight
information source for automated docking.
Safety through improved visibility and situational awareness.
Client objective:
Selection process: Sub-supplier to the boarding bridge provider.
USA - Miami International Airport – American Airlines
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-24, T1
9+2+26+6+7+9+1(T1)=60
Installations in 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013
In 2004 American Airlines became the first airline in the world to
specify, procure and own Safedock systems. Following a highly
successful pilot project with 11 Safedock systems, American
Airlines installed 39 more Type 2 systems for its Miami hub. Like
the initial installation, these are linked via WAN to the airline‟s
FOS through the Safegate GOS. This provides AA with real-time
monitoring and control of the Safedock systems as well as ramp
information display. The GOS interface to FOS facilitates
automatic docking initiation and automatic block time reporting.
Client objective:
1. Allow aircraft parking during ramp closures due to
thunderstorms.
2. Reduce taxi times and improve on-time performance.
3. Reduce operational costs, including fuel burn.
Selection process: Safegate was selected in a competitive proposal process that
emphasized experience and technical evaluation.
Page 16 of 94
USA - New York JFK International Airport – T4 – JFKIAT
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9
16
Installation during 2000-2002
JFKIAT, managed by Schiphol of Amsterdam, became the first U.S.
airport to install the Safedock system. After using various types of
docking systems in Amsterdam, Safedock was selected for the
new 16-gate terminal. Features include ID check and dead-man
switch.
Client objective:
1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates.
2. Modernize the airport.
3. Provide gate equipment familiar to foreign flag carriers.
Selection process: Bid followed by negotiation.
USA - New York JFK International Airport – T8 – American Airlines
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-24
29
2008
Safegate was contracted to supply and install Safedock systems at
all mainline gates for larger aircraft at this new terminal. The
systems are controlled and monitored by a GOS which is linked to
the airline‟s FOS via WAN to American‟s headquarters. When not
docking aircraft, the Safedock displays ramp information on
departing and arriving flights.
Client objective:
Based on the success of the Safedock project at Miami, the
systems have been installed at JFK to improve ramp efficiency,
particularly in times of irregular operations.
Selection process: Bid followed by negotiation.
USA - New York JFK International Airport – T5 – JetBlue Airways
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-24
26
2008
JetBlue was the first low-cost carrier to incorporate A-VDGS into
their hub operation. In addition to the 26 Type 2 systems,
Safegate was contracted to supply a GOS for the control and
monitoring of the systems. When not docking aircraft, the
Safedock displays ramp information on departing and arriving
flights, including information on baggage and fuel to maximize
efficiency.
Client objective:
Maximize efficiency on the ramp for quick turns and high
customer satisfaction.
Selection process: Bid followed by negotiation.
USA – Orlando International Airport – JetBlue Airways
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-24
7
2012
Safegate installed 7 Safedock T2-24 systems on JetBlue gates at
MCO as part of a frame agreement that also included Safedock
installation on JetBlue gates at Boston (BOS). The project includes
the Safegate GOS and interface to JetBlue‟s FIS for docking
automation. JetBlue has been a Safegate customer since 2007
when they added systems to their gates at JFK International
Airport, Terminal 5.
Client objective:
Improved efficiency, especially during irregular operations.
Selection process: Negotiated.
Page 18 of 94
USA - Philadelphia International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-18
13
2003
Delivery of 13 Safedock Type 2-18 systems for the new
International Terminal A-West as requested by US Airways.
Features include ID check and digital countdown.
Client objective:
Facilitate safe docking, especially for wide body aircraft with close
in parking positions.
Selection process: US Airways selected Safegate as a sub-supplier to JB/Jetway in a
negotiation process.
USA - Seattle-Tacoma International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-13, T2-24
4+5+2+4(T2-24)+2+3(T2-24) =20
Installations in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2012
The initial installation of the Safedock systems was done in
conjunction with the new Terminal A project. Since then
additional systems have been installed at the request of various
airline operators. The Type 2 systems are fully upgradeable to
RIDS and network connectivity to a centralized GOS system. SEATAC was the first U.S. airport to employ Safedock systems for its
domestic operations.
Client objective:
1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps to maximize
capacity.
2. Modernize the facilities.
Selection process: Negotiation based on the requirements of the airlines.
Africa
Cameroon - Yaoundé Nsimalen International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Client objective:
T3-9
4
2009
Installation of Safedock T3-9 on the 4 gates with PBB.
The gates were earlier equipped with Safegate inductive loops.
The customer wanted to upgrade to the modern Safedock
technology.
Egypt - Cairo International Airport, Terminal 3
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Client objective:
T3-15 + T3-9
5+25=30
2001-2006
Supply of 25 Safedock Type 3-9 systems and GOS.
1. Performance, availability and quality
2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates,
maximise capacity
3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents
4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.
5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to
that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the
boarding bridge.
Selection process: Cairo Airport Company released a BOT tender that was won by
TAV. TAV selected Safegate as we were fully compliant to the
tender specifications. 5 nos. systems were already operational at
Terminal 2 since 2001.
Page 20 of 94
Morocco - Casablanca International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Client objective:
T3-9
28
2007
Supply of 28 Safedock Type 3-9 systems.
6. Performance, availability and quality
7. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates,
maximise capacity
8. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents
9. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.
Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to that
of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the boarding
bridge.
Asia
China - Beijing Capital International Airport, Terminal 3
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-18 + GOS
1(T2-24)+99 + 26 =126
2007-2008
Beijing International Airport is one of the world‟s busiest and
most rapidly developing airports. Safegate International of
Malmo, Sweden, has been entrusted to help assure the safety and
efficiency with movement of Beijing‟s more than 60 million air
travellers and Olympic Games visitors. Safegate is the global
leader in aircraft docking guidance systems and addressable light
systems for terminals, taxiways and runways.
To handle Beijing‟s rapidly growing air travel volume, the huge
international airport is to be expanded with a new terminal,
adding more than 100 gates. Each new gate will be equipped
with the Safedock® Advanced Visual Docking Guidance System
to safely and efficiently guide the aircraft to its parking position.
The SafeControl® system helps Pilots with the best, safest and
quickest route between runway and terminal. Safegate‟s
SafeControl® and ASP systems will all be an integrated part of
Beijing Airport‟s Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and
Control System (A-SMGCS). Beijing Airport‟s more than 23,000
airfield lights will be under the direct and dynamic control of
Safegate‟s systems.
Together, these Safegate systems reduce aircraft turnaround time
and enable busy airports such as Beijing‟s to manage increased
traffic with improved safety, efficiency and operational
awareness, even during extreme weather conditions.
Page 22 of 94
China - Hangzhou Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-13
5
2001-2002
The new terminal of Hangzhou airport installed Safedock systems
on all gates. All airports have automatic start of docking executed
from the airport central system and FIS.
China - Hong Kong Chep Lak Kok International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-24, T1
T2: 89 T1:27
1997, 2012
The old airport in Hong Kong, Kai Tak, was replaced 1997 by Chep Lak
Kok.
Safegate were asked by BAA and what later became the HKG CAA to
quote docking guidance systems for the airport. Together with the
pilot organisation a new standard of the pilot display was developed.
This became later known as the T2- 24. 1996 Safegate received the
order for 79 systems all centrally controlled by our Gate Operating
System. Safegate managed the service for the project in more than
three years. Safegate did also deliver the single light monitoring system
for the airport. During 2012 Safegate installed 8 T1 for Western apron
and 18 T1 for Midfiels concourse.
China - Kunming Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Client objective:
T2-18 + GOS
68
2009 - 2010
Kunming New Airport is a complete new airport located on the
mountain of more than 2100m above sea level. It‟s the fourth
biggest airport in China, which is also a hub airport in southwest
area of China.
Safegate is contracted to supply 68 Safedock systems together
with a Safegate GOS system.
With Safedock systems installed on all gates of the new terminal
building, it will increase the capability of traffic management of
such a busy airport by providing a safe and efficient docking
procedure.
The GOS system will be interfaced to AODB to obtain flight
information and active docking procedure.
To maximum the capacity of gate resources and to enhance
safety of docking.
Selection Process: Bid followed by negoniation
Page 24 of 94
China - Lanzhou Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9
8
2001-2002
The new terminal of Lanzhou airport installed Safedock systems
on all gates. All airports have automatic start of docking executed
from the airport central system and FIS.
China - Ningbo Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-13
7
2001-2002
The new terminal of Ningbo airport installed Safedock systems on
all gates. All airports have automatic start of docking executed
from the airport central system and FIS.
China - Shanghai Pudong International Airport, Terminal 2
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-18
42
2006 - 2007
The airport terminal 2 to be built during the second-phase
project, at a cost of 10 billion Yuan (1.2 billion US dollars) is
expected to go into operation in 2007. The new terminal at
International Airport in Shanghai Pudong selected Safegate for
the delivery of docking guidance systems. The laser based
guidance systems will be installed at all gates and will be
connected to the airport central system AODB via the Gate
Operating System (GOS). The GOS will be linked to the FIS via the
local LAN network. The selection of the aircraft is made from the
local operator‟s panel where the selection is compared and
confirmed by FIS before starting the docking procedure.
The Central system will be delivered by the company Ultra.
The Gate operating system will keep the scheduled flight for 48
Hrs. if for any reason the FIS communication will be down.
Safegate will also upgrade the Terminal 1 Gate Operating System
to the same standard as Terminal 2. In the future there will be
common system for both terminals.
Page 26 of 94
China - Shanghai Pudong International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9
28
1998
The new International Airport in Shanghai selected Safegate for
the delivery of docking guidance systems. The systems are
installed at all gates and are interfaced to the FIS system via a
Safegate Gate Operating System. The selection of the aircraft is
made from the local operator‟s panel and the selection is
compared and confirmed by the interface with the FIS before
starting the docking procedure.
India – Bangalore Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Client objective:
SDK T2-24 + GOS, Interface to IBM Information Broker & AXA GPU
17
One Year (Three Phases)
Supply, testing and commissioning of SDK, GOS, realize the
interface with IBM interface broker, RIDS, interface with GPU to
log on time, off time and power consumption.
Safe and efficient dockings in all weather conditions, accurate
blocks, measurement of power consumption when GPU is used
India - Kolkata; Mumbai; Cochin; New Delhi; New Hyderabad Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9
1+4, 19+3, 5, 9, 13+12=66
2003-2005
NSCBIA Project 1: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 3-9 system. First new
generation VDGS commissioned in India.
CSIA Mumbai: Delivery of 19 Safedock Type 3-9 systems to replace
existing Agnis systems.
NSCBIA Project 2: Delivery of 4 Safedock Type 3-9 systems.
Cochin International Airport: Delivery of 5 Safedock Type 3-9
systems.
IGIA New Delhi: Delivery of 9 Safedock Type 3-9 systems.
New Hyderabad Intl‟ Airport: Delivery of 13 Safedock Type 3-9
systems with a Gate Operating System (GOS). The GOS will be
interfaced with airport‟s database management system AMS/GAS to
obtain flight information. In return the GOS will provide Block
On/Off data. The GOS will also be interfaced with SCADA to report
status and errors of VDGS.
Client objective:
1. Provide a system fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.
2. System capable of meeting all tender requirements.
3. Provide a reliable system capable of docking all existing aircraft
types and future aircrafts.
4. System capable of distinguishing the profile of the incoming
aircraft to that of the selected aircraft type.
Page 28 of 94
Selection
process:
NSCBI Project 1: AAI-IAD procured the first new generation VDGS to
evaluate the performance and reliability by means of public tender.
FMT participated in the tender.
CSIA Mumbai: AAI-IAD floated a public tender. FMT participated in
the tender.
NSCBI Project 2: AAI-IAD floated a public tender. Honeywell
participated in the tender.
Cochin International Airport: CIAL floated a tender.
IGIA New Delhi: AAI-IAD floated a public tender. Honeywell
participated in the tender.
New Hyderabad Intl‟ Airport: HIAL had floated a tender, which was
won by China State Engineering & Voltas. Voltas evaluated our
submission, as we were fully compliant to the technical
specifications, we were the chosen one. Honeywell participated in
the tender.
Indonesia - Juanda International Airport, Surabaya
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9
4
Installed in 2010
Installed at all new VVIP gates for safety, faster operation and
prestige. The aim is to improve safety in the apron area and to
ensure quick and safe aircraft parking also in dark and at all times
of low visibility. Safegate Gate Operating System will be added
later when all old DGS have been replaced with Safegate
equipment.
Indonesia - Sultan Hasanuddin International Airport, Makassar
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9
2
Installed in 2010
Sultan Hasanuddin Airport is the newest international airport in
East Indonesia - and this was the first DGS system installed in the
area. The objective was to have a modern solution, to increase
the safety of the people working in the apron area and to park
the aircraft quickly and safely even during bad weather and at
night.
Japan - Central Japan International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Page 30 of 94
T2-27NRT
23
2002-2004
When the new Central Japan airport was to be built the chosen
docking guidance system was Safedock, centrally controlled by
Safegate Gate Operating System. The airport was taken into
operation in 2006. Safegate has delivered the single light
monitoring system, as well.
Japan - Narita Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-27NRT
6+6+13+27+12+2=66
2000-2006
After more than one year‟s test at the Narita airport, Safegate
received the first order for 6 systems in year 2000. Our system
was selected after a comparison test with our competitors. The
system is specially designed for Narita and was extended with
one extra row of LED modules. An additional order was received
in 2002 for 6 more, 2004 for 13, 2005 for 27 plus 12 and 2006
another 2 systems.
All 66 systems are connected to Safegate‟s Gate Operating
System and to the airport central data base through the Airport
LAN network.
Malaysia - Kuching Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9
4+3+9=16
2005-2006
Project 1: Delivery of 3 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for gates that
will be equipped with new PBB.
Project 2: Delivery of 6 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for gates that
will be equipped with new PBB.
Client objective:
1. Performance, availability and quality
2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates,
maximise capacity
3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents
4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.
5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to
that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the
boarding bridge.
Selection process: Project 1: Tianda the PBB manufacturer won the tender for
supplying PBB & VDGS. 4 nos. Safedock systems delivered in 1998
were reliably operational at the airport. As the airport authority
was happy with Safedocks, Tianda chose Safegate‟s VDGS.
Project 2: Tianda received a variation order to supply 9 more
additional PBB & VDGS. As they had supplied 3 systems earlier in
2005, they chose to procure Safedock.
Russia - Anadyr Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9
2
2004
At the coast of Bering sea right across Alaska, Safegate got
awarded to deliver 2 Safedock systems to Anadyr airport in 2004.
Even if the lakes are used as roads and the ground is covered
with snow, Safegate‟s A-VDGS parks aircraft as usual with an
accuracy of 10 cm. One of the reasons behind Safedocks
successful operational history is the intelligent last echo logic that
allows aircraft to park aircraft in heavy snow, rain and fog.
Russia – Moscow Domodedovo Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Page 32 of 94
T3-15
10+7+2+8=27
2003-2006
Making a fast decision can sometimes be difficult when the latest
information is not available. How do airports know if the gates
are free, ready or in maintenance? With connection to Safegate‟s
Gate Operating System (GOS) Domodedovo Airport can
individually control and monitor the gates from a central position,
making decisions a lot easier and improving the operational
flexibility and safety. Safegate started its relationship with
Domodedovo International Airport back in 2003 with 10
Safedock systems. After one year of operation Domodedovo
continued finding trust in Safegate when they employed an
additional 9 Safedock systems. Safegate are pleased to continue
participating in Domodedovo expansion and are happy to
announce that 8 more Safedock systems and Safegate‟s GOS will
operate for a safer and more efficient docking procedure.
Russia – Moscow Sheremetyevo Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9 + T2-18
9+30
2007
Moscow‟s Sheremetyevo International Airport have continued to
invest in Safedock® with the addition of 30 more of the
advanced visual docking guidance systems (A-VDGS) for the
Terminal 3 project. The order includes Safegate‟s Gate Operating
System (GOS) enabling them to control and monitor every
Safedock unit from a central location. This brings the total
number of Safedock systems at Sheremetyevo to 39. Safegate is
providing A-VDGS at all three Moscow airports. Par Helmersson,
Safegate‟s sales manager for Russia, said “To be part of the
airport‟s continued expansion not once but twice, demonstrates
the successful working relationships of all involved and their trust
in the Safegate Effect”. With an order for nine Safedock advanced
visual docking guidance systems (A-VDGS), Sheremetyevo Airport
fills out Moscow as the latest of Safegate‟s home markets.
Moscow is one of many capital cities where the airports are facing
continued traffic growth and require solutions for more and safer
movements. Safegate started its relationship in Moscow with the
Vnukovo and Domodedovo airports back in 2003. Both airports
have continued their investment in Safedock (A-VDGS) during the
years, and now with the addition of Sheremetyevo this year
Safegate proudly serves all three of the major big airports in
Moscow making the city one of the many that Safegate considers
to be home markets.
Russia – Moscow Vnukovo Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9
1+3+2=6
2003-2006
International Moscow Vnukovo Airport in Russia first selected
three Safedock® systems in 2003. Three years later Vnukovo
continues its investment in safety and efficiency with an order
for two additional Safedock® systems. With the Safedock® 3Dimensional measuring technology Safegate can ensure that
the five Safedock® systems employed in Vnukovo will provide
a safe and efficient docking procedure. Vnukovo Airport
processed more than 3,5 million passengers in 2005 and has
been in operation for more than 60 years.
Singapore - Changi Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-18
16+21+24+23+9+15=108
1997-2006
First project, which was for 16 Docking Guidance Systems,
Safedock, was started in 1997 with the T1 extension project.
Following the success of the docking systems there, the rest of T1
was also equipped with Safedock systems during 01-03, bringing
the total number of Safedocks at T1 to 37. The latest project is to
supply docking systems to the new Terminal 3 project. This
project is for 24 systems and Safegate has developed a special 50
key panel for this project.
Client objective:
1. Have a fully ICAO compliant docking system that provides
reliable and easy to understand guidance in all weather
conditions.
2. Have a system that is easy for the operators to use.
Selection process: Public tender. We were fully compliant to all the specs and met all
the client requirements.
Sri Lanka - Bandanaike International Airport, Colombo
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9
9
2006
Turn-key supply and installation of 9 Safedock Type 3-9 systems
and GOS. Scope also includes design and implementation of a
LAN to connect the VDGS with GOS. The project has to be
completed in 5 months.
Client objective:
1. Performance, availability and quality
2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates,
maximise capacity
3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents
4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.
5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to
that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the
boarding bridge.
Selection process: The Airport Authority released a tender, only Safegate
participated in the tender. Safegate‟s proposal was compliant to
the tender requirements and within the allocated budget.
Page 34 of 94
Thailand - Bangkok Don Muang International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-15
6
2001-2002
Delivery of 6 Safedock Type 3-15 systems & 1 Gate Operating
System (GOS) for the new Pier 5. The VDGS shall be controlled,
monitored and maintained from a central location.
Client objective:
1. Provide a system fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.
2. Real-time control and monitoring of the gates.
3. Have working systems (the system procured from another
vendor for previous project never worked).
Selection process: Public tender. We were fully compliant to all the specs and met all
the client requirements.
Thailand - New Bangkok International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-18
93+66=159
2004-2005
Project 1: Delivery of 93 Safedock Type 2-18 systems & a Gate
Operating System for the Second Bangkok Intl' Airport. Features
include ID check, digital countdown, stand monitoring and
interlock to boarding bridges. The GOS will have redundant
servers. The GOS will be interfaced with AIMS to receive flight
information. The GOS upon receiving information from AIMS will
automatically activate the VDGS. The GOS will forward Blocks
On/Off data to the AIMS.
Project 2: Delivery of 66 Safedock Type 2-18 systems & upgrading
of existing Gate Operating System for the Second Bangkok Intl'
Airport. Features include ID check, digital countdown, stand
monitoring and interlock to boarding bridges. The systems will be
equipped at remote stands and cargo bays. The existing GOS
shall be able to accommodate the additional systems. The VDGS
at the concourse will be interfaced with GPU (400Hz) & PCA. The
GOS will log the time when the GPU & PCA were turned on and
off. Up to a maximum of 4 external systems can be interfaced
with the existing system.
Client objective:
1. Provide a system fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.
2. Real-time control and monitoring of the gates.
3. System that is expandable and capable of docking future
aircraft types by simple upgrading of software.
Selection process: Project 1: Public tender. IOT placed an order to us as we were
fully compliant to the specs. FMT also proposed but did not
qualify as they were not fully compliant.
Project 2: The client procured our system after a thorough
evaluation. They wanted to have similar systems all over the
airport. A variation order was placed.
Page 36 of 94
Vietnam - Noi Bai International Airport, Hanoi
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9
2+1=3
2006-2008
Delivery of 2 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for gates that will be
equipped with new PBB.
Client objective:
1. Performance, availability and quality
2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates,
maximise capacity
3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents
4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.
5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to
that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the
boarding bridge.
Selection process: The NAA released a tender for procuring PBB & VDGS. This
tender was won by LO Group, Finland. LO Group chose Safedock
as our system was fully compliant with the specs and had been
reliably operational at HCMC since 2002.
Europe
Denmark - Copenhagen Kastrup Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Client objective:
T2-18
1+6+6+1+7+4+1=26
The first Safegate Docking Guidance System was delivered in
1997. Since then, Safegate has provided 24 Safedocks to Kastrup
in 6 installations.
The system at Kastrup had a request for confirmation selected
versus incoming aircraft and a serial interface to the Passenger
Boarding Bridge (PBB), offering efficient pre-positioning of the
PBB. The selection of the aircraft is made from the operator‟s
panel of the PBB.
Identification availability. Serial interface with passenger boarding
bridge. ICAO Annex 14 compliance.
France – Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Client objective:
Page 38 of 94
T1 and T2-24
4
2009-2010
Equipment of 4 gates on the Terminal 2, one dedicated to the
A380 of Air France. Paris- CDG then became the first European
airport equipped with the Safedock T1.
ADP and Air France are willing to test the Safedock solutions to
assess the benefits in terms of safety and efficiency.
France – Paris Orly Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Client objective:
T2-24
1
2010
Equipment of 1 gate at Terminal West.
ADP and Air France are willing to test the Safedock solutions to
assess the benefits in terms of safety and efficiency.
Germany - Munich Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
T2-18
T2: 184
First 63 Safegate DGS were taken into operation at Terminal 1
1991, followed by 64 Safedocks for terminal II year 2001. In the
year 2003 Safegate was asked to provide additional 13 units for
Ramp III. Another 23 Safedocks were delivered in 2005 to
terminal I.
Scope:
Munich Airport uses Safegate DGS at all gates and remote
parking positions. These are all connected to FIS over the airport‟s
central computer system but also to the central maintenance
station. The latest contracts were won after through tests of
different systems.
Client objective:
1. Performance, availability and quality
2. Life Cycle Cost (Wirtschaftlichkeit)
Selection process: The decision was based on technical evaluation and experience.
Italy - Cagliari Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9
8
2001
The new airport installed Safedock laser systems together with
the new passenger boarding bridges.
Italy - Catania Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Page 40 of 94
T3-9
6+6=12
2005-2006
The new terminal installed Safedock laser systems together with
the new passenger boarding bridges.
Italy - Genoa, Marco Polo
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9, Inductive loop
5+5=10
1986-1998
When the new terminal in Genoa airport Marco Polo was built in
the 1980th Safegate installed 5 inductive loop systems. The
systems were replaced by the laser system Safedock 1998.
Italy - Milan Airports: Malpensa, Linate and Bergamo
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9, Inductive loop
8+26+10+7+1, 5+5, 2=64
1995-2005
Milan North installed eight Inductive Loop systems in 1995 after
the good experience of the 5 systems installed at Milan Linate in
1992.
When the new Malpensa terminal was built in 1997, the airport
installed 26 new Safedock laser systems. Milan Bergamo installed
two systems in 1998. For the expansion of Malpensa, the airport
installed another 10 Safedock at poles before the next satellite
was built. All systems are connected to a central computer via
Safegate GOS. The inductive Loop systems at Linate and
Malpensa North were replaced by Safedock laser systems in 2002,
2003 and 2005 respectively.
Italy - Rome Fiumicino Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9, Inductive loop
5+4+16+17+11+12+10+4+3+1=83
1986-2006
Safegate made the first installation of docking systems in Italy as early as
1986 with 5 inductive loop systems at Fiumicino airport. This installation
was followed by 4 more systems in 1988, 16 more in 1991 and further
17 in 1995.
The first Safedock Laser Systems were installed at the new Europe
terminal in 1999, when the airport installed the Gate Operating System,
covering all the inductive systems as well as the new laser systems.
The airport replaced the inductive loop systems with Safedock laser
systems in 2003 and 2004, a total of 26 systems. Today there are totally
37 Safedock laser systems and 10 inductive loop systems in operation.
Italy - Trieste Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Page 42 of 94
T3-9
3
2003
Trieste
When the airport in Trieste upgraded the airport to new standard with
passenger boarding bridges the airport selected the laser guided system
Safedock from Safegate.
Netherlands - Amsterdam Schiphol Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Client objective:
T2-23
1+10+13+8+8+1+15+3+12+2+10+1+4+25+9+1+1+5+1+1+1+6+
4+4=146
1980-2008
In principle all gates at Schiphol are equipped with a Safegate
DGS. Some equipped with a serial interface to the Passenger
Boarding Bridge (PBB) offering efficient pre-positioning of the
PBB. All DGS are connected to a central maintenance centre.
1. High availability
2. Uniformity at all gates
3. Limited Maintenance
Norway - Oslo Gardermoen Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-21
34+1=35
1996-2005
Safegate delivered the first docking systems to Norway for
Stavanger and Oslo Fornebu airports in1986-97, followed by
Bergen and Bodö airports in 1987-89. Totally 29 Loop systems
was delivered.
The new airport for Oslo, Gardermoen, was one of the first to
install our Safedock laser system. The new airport has installed 34
systems and a Gate Operating System. For the first time the
Docking system was interfaced with the ground radar. The
position of the aircraft entering and leaving the apron area is
exchanged with the radar preventing swapping of radar echo as
a part of the airport SMGCS system.
Poland - Warsaw Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9
31
2006
Warsaw Frederic Chopin Airport in Poland has turned to
Safegate‟s solutions for safer and faster movements at the gate.
Thirty-one Safedock® advanced visual docking guidance systems
will be supplied to the new terminal in Warsaw. Safegate
continues to increase airport safety and efficiency on airfields and
at gates worldwide and now with more than 2300 Safedocks
installed. Safegate has been providing safe and accurate parking
guidance of aircraft since 1977. Over 4 million aircraft are parked
annually with an accuracy of 10 cm regardless of the aircraft stop
position.
Selection process: 1. Accurate parking
2. Safer, faster movement
3. Best value
Page 44 of 94
Romania - Bucharest Henri Coanda International Airport – Otopeni
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Selection
process:
T1
9
2010
First installation of 5 pcs T3-9 was made in 1998 with Romairport.
With the terminal extension, Otopeni Airport decided to install our
new docking system T1 for their 9 new gates.
1. Utilize modern technology
2. Easy to use and to maintain
3. Optimization of the gate usage
Slovenia - Ljubljana Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9
5
2007
The capital city of Slovenia, Ljubljana will now enjoy the benefits
of the “Safegate Effect”, more and safer movements, with their
investment into five Safedock advanced visual docking guidance
systems (A-VDGS) for their new terminal.
Among the many benefits associated with the Safedock system is
the positive effect on the environment. Statistics shows that the
cost of fuel burn can reach up to 48 Euro per minute, but what is
the environmental cost? Ljubljana, and all other airports around
the world using the Safedock solution, can cut fuel burn at the
airport by eliminating the need to wait for airport personnel to
marshal aircraft into the gate. The Safedock solution gives both
pilots all information they need to efficiently park all aircraft types,
not only preventing unnecessary fuel burn, but increasing overall
efficiency at the same time.
Spain - Barcelona Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-15 + T2-18
27+55+1=84
1998-2008
The first major installation of our Safedock laser system in Spain
was Barcelona Airport. The Safedock type was T3-15, the first
installation with 15 LED modules covering the whole display. The
total number of systems ordered was 27. The system was
programmed for curved centrelines. In 2008 we made an
additional delivery of 56 Safedock type T2-18 for the new South
Terminal at Barcelona Airport. Another T2-18 to join the existing
27 Safedock T3-15 in the old Terminal. Also a GOS to control and
monitor all the systems installed in both Terminals.
Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluation
made by AENA.
Spain - Bilbao Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Selection
process:
Page 46 of 94
T3-9
7
2001
The systems are installed at the new terminal designed by famous
architect Calatravas. The wall-support on the terminal was designed to
match the terminal. The system has a check of incoming aircraft versus
selected.
Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluation made by
AENA.
Spain - Fuerteventura Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9
7+12
2000-2009
Installation of 7 nos. T3- 9 systems, one gate with two convergent
centrelines. By installing one system for two centrelines the
airport could use the seventh system for a remote gate.
Customers require well proven environmental protection as the
airport is situated on an island in the Atlantic Ocean. The systems
have a check of incoming aircraft versus selected.
Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluation
made by AENA.
Spain - Las Palmas Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9
15
2003-2004
The systems are installed on the glass façade. Costumers require
well proven environmental protection as the airport is situated on
an island in the Atlantic Ocean. The system has a check of
incoming aircraft versus selected.
Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluation
made by AENA.
Spain - Palma de Mallorca Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9
22+5+1+11=39
1999-2009, 2010
Summer time one of the busiest airports in Europe with a great
demand for fast turnaround time. Safedock laser systems were
installed at all new gates of the new Terminal. 22 systems were
installed in 1999 and expanded with another 5 systems in 2003.
The systems have Aircraft identification possibilities and some of
the gates have curved centrelines.
More Safedocks were installed in 2009 and 2010.
Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluation
made by AENA.
Spain - Tenerife South Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9
9
2001
Customers require well proven environmental protection as the
airport is situated on an island in the Atlantic Ocean. The systems
have a check of incoming aircraft versus selected.
Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluation
made by AENA.
Page 48 of 94
Spain - Valencia Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-15
3
1999
One of the smallest installations of Safedock laser systems. Two
type T3-15 installed.
Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluation
made by AENA.
Sweden - Stockholm Arlanda Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Client objective:
Inductive loop, T1-21, T2-22, T2-21, T2-24
1+14+20+14+10+4=91 (34 in operation)
Stockholm Arlanda installed the first DGS from Safegate already in
1983, followed by the first laser systems in 1995. In total, Safegate
has provided 91 DGS to Stockholm Arlanda Airport.
Replacement of 10 existing units at Terminal 4. With the new
systems, Arlanda Airport now has a DGS capable of performing
an ID-Check (Aircraft Safety Check) of approaching aircraft. A very
important and safety critical feature, especially when operating
fixed Passenger Boarding Bridges as Arlanda does.
Technical Performance (Aircraft Safety Check)
Turkey - Antalya Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Client objective:
T3-9, T3-15
16+16=32, 4
Safegate delivered the first DGS to Turkey (Istanbul Airport)
already in 1983. First delivery to Antalya took place in 1998 to the
BOT contractor Bayindir (50% owned by Fraport). Later Safedocks
were delivered to the BOT contractor Celebi (handles 50% of all
ground operation in Turkey).
Another 4 units were installed in the Domestic Terminal in 2010.
16 Safedocks to the new BOT terminal: All Safedocks are
connected to FIS for automatic start of docking and all block
on/off times to FIS are completely automatic.
1. Performance
2. Availability
3. Experience
4. Limited time for commissioning
United Kingdom - Cardiff Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-18
1
Installed & Commissioned 2013
Safedock Docking Guidance Systems selected to replace existing
non -compliant AGNIS unit.
Client objective:
1.Provide compliant A-VDGS
2. Provide uniformity of docking operation with proven
accuracy
Selection process: Safegate selected based on proven experience and technical
evaluation.
Page 50 of 94
United Kingdom - London Heathrow Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-18
31+1+4+4(T3-9)+2+1+10+5+3+9+3+2+2+3+2=82
2003-2007
Project1: Heathrow Airport installed 1 Safedock systems type 2-18.
Project2: Heathrow Airport installed 2 Safedock systems type 2-18.
Project3: Heathrow Airport installed 4 Safedock systems type 2-18.
Project4: Heathrow Airport installed 4 Safedock systems type 3-9.
To provide an accurate and reliable docking alternative. to the
problem encountered with the limited use of parking mirrors on
stands serving a rail drive passenger boarding bridge
“Safegate International was delighted to be part of aviation
history when the world‟s largest passenger jet - the Airbus A380 arrived at Heathrow for the first time on 18 May 2006.
Heathrow‟s Managing Director Tony Douglas described the day
as “a truly monumental day in aviation history.” Safegate‟s
Safedock Advanced Visual Docking Guidance System (A-VDGS)
was chosen to park the aircraft at the new pier 6, which has been
specifically designed to accommodate the A380 twin-deck airliner.
The successful landing and docking, was witnessed by leading
dignitaries from the aviation industry, and follows hot on the tail
of the A380`s inaugural flight to Dubai.
Heathrow‟s Safety Development Manager, John Kirkham, was
impressed with the system. “It guided the aircraft right to its exact
stopping position on the apron and proved beyond doubt that
the Safedock system is right for Heathrow`s future.”Safegate can
now boast of participating in the first live tests of the A380 at both
Heathrow and Dubai airports and is proud to be recognised as
the number one supplier of A-VDGS in the world.”
Client objective:
1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates,
maximise capacity
2. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents
3. Uniformity of docking operation
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-18
34, whereas 31 to T5 and 3 to T2
First test was initiated during 2002
Safedock Docking Guidance Systems for new Terminal 5 at
Heathrow Airport. Most stands are MARS stands meaning either
used by one wide body aircraft or two narrow body aircraft.
Safegate solution provides interlock between the centrelines
preventing wrong aircraft to enter the gate. The MARS operation
demands a Docking Guidance System able to handle a great
variation of stop distances, from below 5 metres to almost 30
metres. BAA has for a long time used Agnis system but an
unacceptable high rate of incidents and accidents helped them
decide to use modern, active Docking Guidance Systems. First T5
installation was made 2004 at remote stands and the project will
be finalised 2008 with a total amount of 31 Safedocks. BAA
selected Safegate as supplier after a comprehensive test of all
manufacturers.
Client objective:
1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates,
maximise capacity
2. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents
3. Uniformity of docking operation
Proven accuracy of docking serving a rail drive bridge
Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluation
made by BAA and pilots using the different test systems.
Safegate selected on successful completion of trial system and
technical evaluation.
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
T2-18
36, 22 systems for T2B and 14 systems for T2A projects
Systems to be installed in 2013 in preparation for the Opening in
June 2014
Scope:
Safedock Docking Guidance Systems for new Terminal 2: The
Queens Terminal at Heathrow Airport
Client objective:
1. Provide uniformity to pilots and ground handling personnel
2. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents
3. Allow flexibility of use among a wide range of aircraft
Selection process: Safegate selected to continue the roll out of full compliant
Advanced Docking Guidance Systems throughout the airport
Page 52 of 94
United Kingdom - Glasgow Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-18
3+4+4+8=19
2006-2008
The 3 type 2 units are used in a MAR; s configuration and
incorporate the Safedock interlock function which allows the
Airport Operators to choose which individual or combination of
Centre lines should be selected.
Client objective:
Uniformity of docking operations and compliance with ICAO
Annex 14 Standard & recommended practices for P1 & P2
Selection process: Safegate selected on BAA experience and technical evaluation.
United Kingdom – London Gatwick Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-18
32+11+21+30+61=155
2005-2009
Gatwick Airport installed 28+4 Safedock systems type 2-18. The
Systems form part of the new Pier 6 stands and are in addition to
the 28 Safedock units recently supplied.
Client objective:
Uniformity of docking operations and compliance with ICAO
Annex 14 Standard & recommended practices for P1 & P2
Selection process: Safegate group has been chosen by BAA to supply 28 Safedock®
Docking Guidance Systems to London Gatwick Airport, the
award demonstrates the growing relationship between the two
companies and adds to the 31 systems recently purchased for the
prestigious T5 project at London Heathrow Airport.
The Safedock® Docking Guidance system will help eliminate the
possibility of a collision by an aircraft with a passenger boarding
bridge which has been incorrectly positioned. The Safedock®
system provides a Safe, Accurate and Reliable parking for all types
of aircraft with apron driven or (static) Passenger boarding
bridges.
United Kingdom – Stansted Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
T2-18
24 Systems to complete the Phase 2 & 3 projects for Stansted
Airport
Duration:
Systems installed in 2013 to follow completed phase 1 project
Scope:
Safedock Docking Guidance Systems installed on satellites 2&3
plus Cargo and Zulu stands at Stansted Airport
Client objective:
1. Provide uniformity to pilots and ground handling personnel
2. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents
3. Allow flexibility of use among a wide range of aircraft
Selection process: Safegate selected to complete the third phase of works and
provide compliant Advanced Docking Guidance Systems
Middle East
Bahrain International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9 + T2-24
18+7+10=35
2001-2008
Project 1: Delivery of 18 Safedock Type 3-9 systems & a Gate
Operating System for Bahrain Intl' Airport. Replacement of
existing Agnis systems with new generation systems. Features
include ID check, digital countdown and interlock with boarding
bridges. The GOS shall be used for central monitoring, control
and maintenance. The GOS has been interfaced with FIDS to
obtain flight information. In return the GOS provides Blocks
On/Off data to FIDS.
Project 2: Delivery of 7 Safedock Type 3-9 systems & upgrade of
the existing Gate Operating System and interface with FIDS.
Client objective:
1. Provide a system fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.
2. Real-time control and monitoring of the gates.
3. Complete the project in time and within allocated budget.
Selection process: Project 1: Public tender. FMT and Honeywell participated in the
tender. Safegate chosen after thorough investigation.
Project 2: As the first project was completed within the specified
time & budget, besides the systems being very reliable the client
requested the main contractor to supply Safedock Type 3-9
systems.
Page 54 of 94
Kuwait International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Inductive loop + T3-15 + T1
1+9+5+15+1+1+6+3+1=42
1988-2008, 2011
208 delivery of 6 Safedock Type 3-15 systems for the new cargo
apron. The GOS had to be upgraded to accommodate these 6 new
systems. 2011 delivery of Safedock T1 system.
Client objective:
6. Performance, availability and quality
7. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates
8. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents
9. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.
10. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to
that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the PBB.
Selection process:
The first project in 2002 involving replacement of 15 loop systems
with Safedocks and a new GOS was executed within the specified
project period. The systems since 2002 have been reliably
operational. The DGCA decided to directly place an order to Safegate.
United Arab Emirates - Al Maktoum International Airport, Dubai
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Client objective:
T2-24 + T1 + GOS
7+64=71
2007
1. Delivery of 52 Safedock Type 2-24 for the new airport „Dubai
World Central‟. The Safedocks include IP-camera for stand
monitoring and logging.
2. A GOS in redundant configuration will be supplied. The GOS
will be interfaced with AFLCMS, TMS, Ground Radar and FIDS.
3. 2-sided signs to display bay numbers and one-sided sign to
display GPS co-ordinates.
1. Provide a system fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.
2. System fully compliant to the tender technical specifications.
3. Systems similar to the 158 systems delivered to Dubai
International Airport.
4. Systems capable of checking the profile of the incoming
aircraft to that of the selected one.
5. GOS that can be upgraded to include additional VDGS in the
future.
6. Stand monitoring and logging of docking images.
7. System to be able to operate in high temperatures and meet
the Cat 3B visibility conditions.
Selection process: Danway, an electro-mechanical contractor had to procure these
systems in this package. Danway chose Safegate as our systems
were already approved by DCA for Dubai International Airport
projects and our systems were fully compliant to the technical
specifications. Our proposed systems were approved by the DWC
Airport project team.
United Arab Emirates - Dubai International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Page 56 of 94
T3-9 + T2-24 + GOS
27+42+19+3+1+17+10+16+23=158
1998-2007
Project 8: Delivery of 16 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for
Concourse 2. The systems will be equipped with digital cameras
(IP based) for apron monitoring and logging. The systems will be
connected to the existing GOS at Concourse 1. GOS will be
interfaced with IASS to exchange flight information and system
status information.
Project 9: Delivery of 10 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the
temporary apron north of Concourse 2. System shall have the
capability of displaying alphanumeric information on 2 rows.
Future integration of the systems with the existing GOS.
All VDGS on remote stands shall be equipped with internal
battery backup with an autonomy of 10 minutes, such that
docking process does not abort when main power is lost. The
systems will be equipped with digital cameras (IP based) for
apron monitoring and logging. Two-sided illuminated gate sign
and illuminated signs to display GPS co-ordinates will also be
supplied.
Project 10: Delivery of 23 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the new
cargo apron. System shall have the capability of displaying
alphanumeric information on 2 rows. Future integration of the
systems with the existing GOS. All VDGS on remote stands shall
be equipped with internal battery backup with an autonomy of
10 minutes, such that docking process does not abort when main
power is lost. The systems will be equipped with digital cameras
(IP based) for apron monitoring and logging. Two-sided
illuminated gate sign and illuminated signs to display GPS coordinates will also be supplied.
Client objective:
1. Provide a reliable and safe VDGS.
2. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.
3. Modernize the airport.
4. Docking possible by both the pilots.
5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to
that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the
boarding bridge.
6. Control and monitoring of all VDGS from Control Tower.
Reduce the number of personnel on the apron.
7. The system shall be capable of being interfaced with external
systems such as UFIS, Ground Radar, IASS, AFL, etc.
8. Ability to store long logs for every docking and easy access of
these logs for analysis.
9. Stand Monitoring and logging of docking images.
Selection process: Project 8: Thermo LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to
procure these systems in the package AX324. As 109 systems are
already operational at the airport, they selected Safedocks.
Project 9: B.K.Gulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to
procure these systems in the package AX94. Since 125 systems
were already supplied to Dubai Airport they decided to choose
Safedock.
Project 10: B.K.Gulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to
procure these systems in the package AX94. The client wanted
systems similar to those supplied for Project 9.
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
VDGS T1
164
2011-2012
Project 1: Delivery of 164 T1 VDGS to replace VDGS T2 and T3
and to expand up to a total of 168 gates with VDGS. The systems
will be equipped with the Apron Scan function to ensure an
object and obstacle free apron ready for docking an aircraft.
Client objective:
1. Increased efficiency of the “pit stop” process by interfacing of
VDGS to the aircraft movement routing and guidance system.
Selection process: Project 1: Al Naboodah, a contractor signed by Dubai Airport to
assist in construction of new terminals and stands, designed to
allow for the aggressive growth targets incorporated in strategic
plan SP100, will in different phases install 164 new VDGS T1 from
Safegate.
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Client objective:
Page 58 of 94
T3-9; T2-24; GOS & Illuminated Gate Signs
109
2000-2005
Project 1: Delivery of 27 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for the
Concourse 1. The airport was procuring the new generation
VDGS for the first time as they were using Agnis systems.
Project 2: Delivery of Gate Operating System for control and
monitoring the VDGS at Concourse 1. The system should also
have the capability of performing maintenance. The system shall
be modular and capable of being expanded in the future to
accommodate more VDGS. The GOS shall have Servers in
redundant configuration and 3 workstations installed at various
locations.
Project 3: Delivery of 42 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for the Echo
Apron. The airport wanted to equip the remote stands with
VDGS. Future integration of the systems with the existing GOS.
Project 4: Delivery of 19 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for the Tango
Apron & Air show Apron. The airport wanted to equip the
remote stands with VDGS. Future integration of the systems with
the existing GOS.
Project 5: Delivery of 4 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for Dubai Air
Wing & Bay E43 at Echo Apron. System shall have the capability
of displaying alphanumeric information on 2 rows. Future
integration of the systems with the existing GOS. Illuminated
Stand Signs to display Bay number and GPS co-ordinates will also
be supplied.
Project 6: Delivery of 17 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the Cargo
(Charlie) Apron. System shall have the capability of displaying
alphanumeric information on 2 rows. Future integration of the
systems with the existing GOS. All VDGS on remote stands shall
be equipped with internal battery backup with an autonomy of
10 minutes, such that docking process does not abort when main
power is lost.
Project 7: Upgrade 3 existing systems at Concourse 1 to dock
A380. First trial docking of A380 expected in November 2005.
The existing GOS will be upgraded to interface with IASS
(Integrated Aircraft Stand System); stand monitoring functionality
will be provided too. Illuminated Stand Signs to display Bay
number and GPS co-ordinates will also be supplied.
1. Provide a reliable and safe VDGS.
2. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.
3. Modernize the airport.
4. Docking possible by both the pilots.
5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to
that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the
boarding bridge.
6. Control and monitoring of all VDGS from Control Tower.
Reduce the number of personnel on the apron.
7. The system shall be capable of being interfaced with external
systems such as UFIS, Ground Radar, IASS, AFL, etc.
8. Ability to store long logs for every docking and easy access of
these logs for analysis.
9. Stand Monitoring and logging of docking images.
Selection process: Project 1: Thermo LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to
procure these systems in the package TD-48. The contractor
proposed FMT, the consultant Bechtel rejected the product as the
system was not fully compliant to the specs. Our system was
proposed and the consultants and the client approved it.
Project 2: The client signed the contract with us as we had
supplied the VDGS and we met all their current and future
requirements.
Project 3: Transgulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to
procure these systems in the package AX11. FMT also proposed
their system. The client and consultant were happy with the
system performance at Concourse 1 and decided to place an
order to us.
Project 4: Transgulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to
procure these systems in the package AX92. Since 69 systems
were reliably operating, the client chose our system.
Project 5: B.K.Gulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to
procure these systems in the packages AX90 & AX94. Since 88
systems were reliably operating, the client chose our system.
Project 6: B.K.Gulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to
procure these systems in the package AX94. Since 92 systems
were reliably operating, the client chose our system.
Project 7: Thermo LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor signed
the contract with us as we had supplied the systems at
Concourse 1.
United Arab Emirates - Sharjah International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T3-9 + T2-24
4+3=7
2003, 2006
Delivery of 3 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the terminal
expansion project. A Basic GOS to control and monitor the 3 new
Safedocks as well as the 4 existing Safedocks (operational since
2003).
Client objective:
1. Performance, availability and quality
2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates
3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents
4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.
5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to
that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the
PBB
Selection process: The first project in 2003 was completed in time and within the
allocated budget. The systems since commissioning have been
extremely reliable.
Page 60 of 94
Oceania
Australia - Kingsford Smith International Airport, Sydney
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
Client
objective:
Selection
process:
T2-24
2+3+1+6+2+1+2+4+1+2+1+1+1+1+1=29
2002-2008
KSIA Sydney Project 5: Delivery of 6 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for
A380 bays. The NIGS shall be interfaced with boarding bridge to
provide the ROLL value, such that the boarding bridge knows the
exact location of the aircraft door(s). Systems will be delivered between
2006 & 2008.
KSIA Sydney Project 6: Delivery of 2 Safedock Type 2-24 systems at the
Virgin Blue Domestic Terminal. NIGS shall be capable of docking a
B737 with the nose of the aircraft 4.8m away from the NIGS location
(terminal building). 3 nos. Safedocks were delivered earlier in 2003.
KSIA Sydney Project 7: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system at Bay
58.
1. Performance, availability and quality
2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates, maximise
capacity
3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents
4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.
5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to that
of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the boarding
bridge.
6. Work reliably in Australian climatic conditions.
KSIA Sydney Project 5: As the systems have been extremely reliable and
safe, they decided to equip the remaining A380 bays with our system.
KSIA Sydney Project 6: As the systems have been extremely reliable and
safe, they decided to equip some more Virgin Blue bays.
KSIA Sydney Project 7: The systems operational at Bays 31 and 33,
since 2001/2002 has been extremely reliable. SACL intends equipping
all the bays with Safedocks over a period of time.
Australia - Melbourne International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-24 + T1
1+1+2+2+1=7
2003-2008
Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system at the International
Terminal. First new generation NIGS at Melbourne.
Client objective:
1. Performance, availability and quality
2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates
3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents
4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.
5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to
that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the
PBB
6. Work reliably in Australian climatic conditions.
Selection process: Melbourne Airport wanted to test our system as they have
received positive feedback from other Australian airports using
the system.
Page 62 of 94
Australia - Perth Intl; Brisbane Intl; Townsville Intl; Cairns Intl; Darwin Intl
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-24
6+1, 2+2+6, 3+1, 3+1+5+2, 1+1=34
2001-2005
Perth Project 1: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system. First new
generation NIGS commissioned in Australia.
Brisbane Project 1: Delivery of 2 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for
the terminal expansion project.
KSIA Sydney Project 1: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system at
the International Terminal. First new generation NIGS at Sydney.
The NIGS shall be capable to being extremely accurate as the
boarding bridge tolerance was 0.2m.
Brisbane Project 2: Delivery of 2 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for
existing bays at International Terminal.
KSIA Sydney Project 2: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system at
the International Terminal. NIGS shall be capable of docking a
B747 with the nose of the aircraft 4.6m away from the NIGS
location (terminal building). The NIGS shall be capable to being
extremely accurate as the boarding bridge tolerance was 0.2m.
Townsville: Delivery of 3 Safedock Type 2-24 systems. One NIGS
shall be capable of docking aircrafts along two parallel centrelines
7m apart. One centreline was for Jets using the boarding bridge;
the second centreline was for turbo props.
Cairns Project 1: Delivery of 3 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the
domestic terminal. Systems had to guide aircrafts very accurately
as wing clearance was extremely tight when two Code E aircrafts
were parked on adjacent bays.
KSIA Sydney Project 3: Delivery of 3 Safedock Type 2-24 systems
at the Virgin Blue Domestic Terminal. NIGS shall be capable of
docking a B737 with the nose of the aircraft 4.8m away from the
NIGS location (terminal building).
Darwin: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system. First new
generation NIGS at Darwin.
Cairns Project 2: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system for the
International terminal.
KSIA Sydney Project 4: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system
for a bay that is being upgraded to dock the A380. The NIGS shall
be interfaced with boarding bridge to provide the ROLL value,
such that the boarding bridge knows the exact location of the
aircraft door(s). A380 to perform a trial docking in November
2005.
Cairns Project 3: Delivery of 5 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the
International terminal.
Perth Project 2: Delivery of 6 Safedock Type 2-24 systems, 4 for
the International terminal and 2 for the domestic terminal.
Client objective:
1. Performance, availability and quality
2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates,
maximise capacity
3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents
4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.
5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to
that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the
boarding bridge.
6. Work reliably in Australian climatic conditions.
Selection process: Perth Project 1: Perth Airport ordered the systems as they wanted
to test the new generation NIGS.
Brisbane Project 1: The airport decided to select us based on the
performance of the test system at Perth.
KSIA Sydney Project 1: SACL wanted to test the system based on
the performance at Perth.
Brisbane Project 2: As the systems delivered in the previous
project were extremely reliable and safe, Brisbane Airport Corp.
(BAC) placed an order directly to us.
KSIA Sydney Project 2: SACL wanted to test the system with
extremely short clearance between the aircraft nose and the
terminal building. As the test system was extremely reliable and
precise they placed an order to us.
Townsville: Leighton Contractors placed an order to us after
tender evaluation. System also had the ability to dock aircrafts on
two different centrelines using only one system but still
complying with all ICAO Annex 14 requirements.
Cairns Project 1: Cairns Port Authority (CPA) placed an order to us
based on system‟s performance at various Australian airports.
KSIA Sydney Project 3: Airport Equipment, the boarding bridge
supplier placed an order to us, as SACL wanted our equipment.
Darwin: The airport wanted a reliable system, based on the
performance at various Australian airports the airport decided to
procure our system.
Cairns Project 2: Airport Equipment, the boarding bridge supplier
placed an order to us, as CPA wanted our equipment.
KSIA Sydney Project 4: As the systems have been extremely
reliable and safe, they decided to equip the A380 bays with our
system. This is the first bay project.
Cairns Project 3: Cairns Port Authority (CPA) placed an order to us
based on system‟s performance at domestic terminal and to
standardize the equipment in the airport.
Perth Project 2: As the first system commissioned in 2001 is
extremely reliable they have decided to place an order to us.
Page 64 of 94
Australia - Perth International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T1
1
2011
Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 1 system at the Terminal,
supply and installation
Client objective:
To replace old and obsolete FMT units. To allow use of multiple
centrelines for docking of aircraft using the latest available
technology
Selection process:
- Competitive tender
- Undertaking to support into the future
- Commonality of gates across Australia
New Zealand - Auckland International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-13
2+2+3+4+3=14
2005-2006
Delivery of 2 Safedock Type 2-13 systems at the existing
International Terminal and Basic GOS in mid 2006. The GOS will
be interfaced with either FIDS or Airport Operational Database
System to exchange flight information and Blocks On/Off. 6
Safedock Type 2-9/13 and 2 state-of-the-art Safedock T1 will be
delivered in the period 2006-2008.
Client objective:
1. Performance, availability and quality
2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates
capacity
3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents
4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.
5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to
that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the
PBB
Selection process: Auckland Airport released a tender, which was participated by
FMT and us. The airport intended equipping VDGS at 8 bays,
which had 13 centrelines. FMT require 13 systems however we
require only 10 systems. Besides the additional safety features
available in our system there was also considerable cost saving.
Page 66 of 94
New Zealand - Christchurch International Airport
Equipment:
Quantity:
Duration:
Scope:
T2-24
7+1+1+1=10
2004-2005
Project 1: Delivery of 7 Safedock Type 2-24 to replace the existing
FMT systems and a MOS (GOS used for maintenance purpose
only) that supports adjacent bay interlock. The airport had several
bay restrictions due to wing tip clearance, the various possibilities
were providing to us by the airport authority. This was realized in
the MOS to ensure that the operator cannot dock an aircraft type
by mistake at a certain bay due to adjacent bay restrictions.
Project 2: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 and upgrade of MOS.
Client objective:
6. Performance, availability and quality
7. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates
8. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents
9. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.
10. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to
that
of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with
the PBB.
Selection process: Project 1: Christchurch Airport released a tender, which was
participated by FMT and us. As our system had more safety
features and fully compliant with the specifications, the client
chose us.
Project 2: The client placed an order to standardize the systems.
Complete Reference List, Docking Guidance Systems
North
America
COUNTRY IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT
Canada
QTY YEAR REMARKS
Calgary International Airport Airport Authority
T1
4
2013
YYC
Calgary International Airport Airport Authority
T2-24
70
2013
YUL
Airport Authority
T2-24
1
2013
Airport Authority
T2-24
1
2012 + GOS
Airport Authority
T3-9
4
2003
Install 2013/14 +
SafeControl – Apron
Mangement
Install 2013/14 +
SafeControl – Apron
Mangement
DGS
YYZ
YYZ
YYZ
Toronto Pearson Intl Airport
Toronto Pearson Intl Airport
Toronto Pearson Intl Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
1
5
3
2012
2007
2005
YYZ
YYZ
YYZ
YYZ
YYZ
Toronto Pearson Intl Airport
Toronto Pearson Intl Airport
Toronto Pearson Intl Airport
Toronto Pearson Intl Airport
Toronto Pearson Intl Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
16
5
51
12
6
2002
2002
2002
2000
1998
Installed
Installed 07
+ GOS
for 93 Safedocks
Installed 03
Installed 03
Installed 04-07
+ GOS 2002
Installed
YVR
YVR
YVR
YVR
YVR
YVR
Vancouver Intl Airport
Vancouver Intl Airport
Vancouver Intl Airport
Vancouver Intl Airport
Vancouver Intl Airport
Vancouver Intl Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-15
T3-15C
T3-15C
T3-15C
T3-15C
T3-15C
2
3
3
3
9
9
2013
2011
2009
2009
2004
1999
DGS
Installed 2011
Installation 09
Installation 09
Installed 05-06
Installed
SXM
St Maarten Princess Juliana
Intl
St Maarten Princess Juliana
Intl
Airport Authority
1
2013
GOS
Airport Authority
T2-18
4
2005
Installed 06
BOS
Boston Logan Intl Airport
JetBlue Airways
T2-24
16
2011
Installed 2011 + GOS
CLT
Charlotte-Douglas Intl
Airport
Charlotte-Douglas Intl
Airport
Charlotte-Douglas Intl
US Airways
1
2013
SXM
USA
TYPE
YYC
Montreal-Trudeau Intl
Airport
YUL Montreal-Trudeau Intl
Airport
YOW Ottawa Intl Airport
Dutch
Antilles
OWNER
CLT
CLT
Page 68 of 94
US Airways
T2-24
37
2012
upgrade from GOS
to SAM
Installed 2013 + GOS
Airport Authority
T2-24
46
2012
Installed 2013
Airport
ORD
Chicago O‟Hare Intl Airport
American Airlines
T2-24
35
2010
+ GOS
DFW
Dallas Fort Worth Intl
Airport
Dallas Fort Worth Intl
Airport
Dallas Fort Worth Intl
Airport
Dallas Fort Worth Intl
Airport
Airport Authority
T2-24
11
2013
DGS
Airport Authority
T3-9
1
2012
Airport Authority
T2-24
41
2011
Airport Authority
T3-9
92
2007
+ SafeControl –
Apron Management
+SafeControl -Apron
Management
Installed 08
FLL
Ft. Lauderdale Hollywood
Int. Airport
JetBlue Airways
T2-24
8
2013
+ GOS
IAH
Houston George Bush
Intercontinental Airport
Airport Authority
T2-24
8
2013
+SafeControl -Apron
Management
LAS
Las Vegas McCarran
Intl Airport
Airport Authority
T2-24
15
2009
Install 2011
LAX
Los Angeles Intl Airport
Airport Authority
T2-18
16
2012
Installed 2012 + GOS
MIA
MIA
MIA
MIA
MIA
MIA
MIA
Miami Intl Airport
Miami Intl Airport
Miami Intl Airport
Miami Intl Airport
Miami Intl Airport
Miami Intl Airport
Miami Intl Airport
American Airlines
American Airlines
American Airlines
American Airlines
American Airlines
American Airlines
American Airlines
T1
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
1
9
6
7
26
2
9
2013
2011
2010
2009
2007
2005
2003
DGS
JFK
JFK
JFK
New York/JFK Intl Airport
New York/JFK Intl Airport
New York/JFK Intl Airport
JetBlue(Terminal 5)
AA (Terminal 8)
JFKIAT (Terminal 4)
T2-24
T2-24
T3-9
26
29
16
2008
2008
1998
Installed 08
Installed 08
Installed
JetBlue Airways
T2-24
7
2011
Installed 2011 + GOS
PAE
Orlando International
Airport
Paine Field
Boeing
T2-24
3
2013
DGS + SAM
PHL
Philadelphia Intl Airport
Philadelphia Dept.
T2-18
13
2001
Installed 03
SJU
San Juan Luis Muñoz Marín
JetBlue Airways
T2-24
7
2012
+ GOS
SEA
SEA
SEA
Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport
Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport
Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport
Port of Seattle
Port of Seattle
Port of Seattle
T2-24
T2-13
T2-24
3
2
4
2012
2007
2007
Installed 12
Installed 07
Installed 07
DFW
DFW
DFW
MCO
Installed 10
Installed 09
Installed 08
Installed 05
Inst. 04 + GOS
SEA
SEA
SEA
Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport
Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport
Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport
Port of Seattle
Port of Seattle
Port of Seattle
T2-13
T2-13
T2-13
2
5
4
Number of systems in order or in operation in
North America
2006
2005
2004
Installed 06
Installed 05
Installed 04
721
South America
COUNTRY
Brazil
IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT
OWNER
TYPE
QTY YEAR REMARKS
CNF
Belo Horizonte Airport
Airport Authority
Inductive
11
1983
FOR
Fortaleza Airport
Airport Authority
Inductive
9
1999
+ GOS
GRU
International Airport/ São Paulo Private consortium
T1
109
2013
DGS + SAM
Chile
SCL
Santiago de Chile Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
17
1999
Installed
Peru
LIM
LIM
LIM
Jorge Chavez Intl Airport
Jorge Chavez Intl Airport
Jorge Chavez Intl Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
12
1
6
2008
2004
2004
Installed 08
Installed 04
Installed 04
Number of systems in order or in operation
in South America
Page 70 of 94
165
Oceania
COUNTRY
Australia
IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT
ADL
Adelaide, New Intl Terminal
BNE
BNE
BNE
BNE
BNE
BNE
Brisbane International Airport
Brisbane International Airport
Brisbane International Airport
Brisbane International Airport
Brisbane International Airport
Brisbane International Airport
CNS
CNS
CNS
CNS
OWNER
TYPE
QTY YEAR REMARKS
VDGS
1
2004
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T1
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
1
12
2
6
2
2
2013
2013
2011
2007
2003
2001
Inst. 07 + GOS
Installed
Installed
Cairns International Airport
Cairns International Airport
Cairns International Airport
Cairns International Airport
Port Authority
Port Authority
Port Authority
Port Authority
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
2
5
1
3
2008
2005
2005
2004
Installed 08
Installed 05
Installed 05
Installed
CBR
CBR
CBR
Canberra International Airport
Canberra International Airport
Canberra International Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
8
2
1
2013
2010
2008
DGS
Installed 10
Installed 08
DRW
DRW
DRW
DRW
Darwin International Airport
Darwin International Airport
Darwin International Airport
Darwin International Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
1
1
1
1
2012
2011
2007
2004
Installed 07
Installed 05
MEL
Melbourne Intl Airport
T2-24
5
2013
MEL
MEL
MEL
MEL
MEL
MEL
Melbourne Intl Airport
Melbourne Intl Airport
Melbourne Intl Airport
Melbourne Intl Airport
Melbourne Intl Airport
Melbourne Intl Airport
T2-24
T2-24
T1
T1
T2-24
T1
1
1
3
2
2
2
2013
2012
2012
2011
2011
2010
DGS
MEL
MEL
MEL
MEL
MEL
MEL
MEL
Melbourne Intl Airport
Melbourne Intl Airport
Melbourne Intl Airport
Melbourne Intl Airport
Melbourne Intl Airport
Melbourne Intl Airport
Melbourne Intl Airport
Australia Pacific
Airports Pty Ltd
Qantas Airways
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Australia Pacific
Airports Pty Ltd
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-24
T1
T2-24
T1
T2-24
T2-24
T2-25
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
2009
2009
2008
2008
2006
2006
2003
Installed 09
Installed 09
Installed 08
Installed 08
Installed 06
Installed 06
Installed
DGS
New Zealand
PER
PER
PER
PER
PER
PER
PER
PER
PER
PER
Perth International Airport
Perth International Airport
Perth International Airport
Perth International Airport
Perth International Airport
Perth International Airport
Perth International Airport
Perth International Airport
Perth International Airport
Perth International Airport
Perth Airport Pty. Ltd
Perth Airport Pty. Ltd
Perth Airport Pty. Ltd
Qantas Airways
Perth Airport Pty. Ltd
Qantas Airways
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Westralia Airports
T1
T2-24
T1
T2-24
T1-24
T1
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
1
6
17
1
1
2
2
2
6
1
2013
2013
2013
2012
2012
2011
2011
2010
2005
2001
DGS
DGS
DGS, SAM
SYD
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
T2-24
4
2013
DGS
SYD
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
T1
1
2013
DGS
SYD
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
2013
DGS
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
T1 Split
Safedock
T2-24
T1
T2-24
T2-24
1
SYD
SYD
SYD
SYD
20
1
12
7
2012
2012
2011
2011
DGS
SYD
SYD
SYD
SYD
SYD
SYD
SYD
SYD
SYD
SYD
SYD
SYD
SYD
SYD
SYD
SYD
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport
Sydney Airport Corp.
Ltd.
Sydney Airport Corp.
Ltd.
Sydney Airport Corp.
Ltd
Qantas Airways
Qantas Airways
Airport Authority
Sydney Airport Corp.
Ltd.
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
DGS
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
4
2
1
2
6
1
3
2
1
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2007
2007
2007
2006
2006
2006
2005
2003
2002
1996
Installed 08
Installed 08
Installed 08
Installed 08
Installed 08
Installed 08
Installed 07
Installed 07
Installed 07
Installed 06
Installed 06
Installed 06
Installed 05
Installed
Installed
TSV
TSV
Townsville Airport
Townsville Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-24
T2-24
1
3
2007
2003
Installed 07
Installed
AKL
AKL
Auckland International Airport
Auckland International Airport
AIAL
AIAL
T2-13
T2-13
3
4
2008
2008
Installed 08
Installed 08
Page 72 of 94
DGS
Installed 06
Installed
AKL
AKL
AKL
Auckland International Airport
Auckland International Airport
Auckland International Airport
AIAL
AIAL
AIAL
T2-13
T2-13
T2-13
3
2
2
2008
2005
2005
Installed 08
Inst. 06 + GOS
Installed 06
CHC
CHC
CHC
CHC
CHC
Christchurch Intl Airport
Christchurch Intl Airport
Christchurch Intl Airport
Christchurch Intl Airport
Christchurch Intl Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
6
1
1
1
7
2012
2008
2007
2005
2004
Installed 08
Installed 07
Installed 05
+ GOS 2005
WLG
WLG
Wellington Airport
Wellington Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-13
T2-24
1
1
2009
2007
Installed 09
Installed 07
Number of systems in order or in operation in Oceania
227
Middle East
COUNTRY
IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT
OWNER
TYPE
Bahrain
BAH
BAH
BAH
BAH
Bahrain Airport
Bahrain Airport
Bahrain Airport
Bahrain Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-24
T2-24
T3-9
T3-9
25
10
7
18
2011
2008
2003
2001
+GOS
Installed 08
+ GOS
+ GOS
Iran
THR
Tehran/Immam Khomeini
Airport Authority
T3-9
14
2000
Inst. 04 + GOS
Iraq
SDA
Bagdad Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
18
2012
+GOS
Erbil Airport
Erbil Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
4
2
2007
2007
Installed 07
Installed 07
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T1
T3-9
T3-9
4
16
10
2011
2011
1998
+ GOS
+ GOS
Jordan
KSA
Kuwait
Qatar
AMM Amman/Queen Alia Airport
AMM Amman/Queen Alia Airport
AMM Amman/Queen Alia Airport
QTY YEAR REMARKS
JED
Jeddah
T1
127
2013
MED
Medinah
T3
45
2013
KWI
Kuwait International Airport
Airport Authority
T3-15
7
2012
KWI
KWI
KWI
KWI
KWI
KWI
KWI
KWI
KWI
KWI
KWI
Kuwait International Airport
Kuwait International Airport
Kuwait International Airport
Kuwait International Airport
Kuwait International Airport
Kuwait International Airport
Kuwait International Airport
Kuwait International Airport
Kuwait International Airport
Kuwait International Airport
Kuwait International Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T1
T3-9
T3-9
T3-15
T3-15
T3-15
T3-15
T3-15
Inductive
Inductive
Inductive
1
6
1
3
6
1
1
15
5
9
1
2011
2009
2008
2008
2005
2003
2002
2001
1993
1989
1988
DOH Doha Airport
DOH Doha Airport
Qatar Airways
DIA/Qatar Airways
T3-9
T3-9
6
14
2012
2009
DOH Doha Airport
DIA/Qatar Airways
T3-9
10
2008
Page 74 of 94
+SafeControl –
Apron
Management
Installed 09
Installed 08
Installed 08
Inst. 06 + GOS
Installed
Installed
+ GOS
Replaced by laser
Replaced by laser
Replaced by laser
Installed 2012
DGS+GOS
(turnkey)
DGS+GOS
(turnkey)
Saudi Arabia
Syria
UAE
DOH Doha Airport
DIA/Qatar Airways
T3-9
24
2007
DOH
DOH
DOH
DOH
Doha Airport
Doha Airport
Doha Airport
Doha Airport
Qatar Airways
Qatar Airways
Qatar Airways
Qatar Airways
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
10
6
7
17
2006
2005
2003
2001
Hamad International Airport
HIA/Qatar Airways
T1
91
2012
NDIA New Doha Airport
Qatar Airways
NDIA New Doha Airport
NDIA New Doha Airport
Qatar Airways
Qatar Airways
DMM Dammam KFIA Airport
DMM Dammam KFIA Airport
DMM Dammam KFIA Airport
RUH
RUH
2012
DGS+GOS
(turnkey)
Installed 06
Installed 05
Installed 04
+ GOS
DGS+GOS
(turnkey)
30 nos. VDGS
poles
Installed 08
Inst. 08 + GOS
T3-9
T1
14
61
2008
2007
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
Inductive
1
2
13
2011
2002
1989
Installed 11
Installed
Riyadh/King Khaled Airport
Riyadh/King Khaled Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-18
Inductive
34
41
2007
1983
Installed 07
TUU
Tabuk Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
2
2009
Installed 09
YNB
Yanbu Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
2
2007
Installed 07
DAM Damascus Airport
DGCA
T3-9
5
2002
Installed
ALP
Nejrab Airport (Aleppo)
Airport Authority
T3-9
4
2007
Installed 07
AUH
AUH
AUH
AUH
AUH
AUH
Abu Dhabi International Airport
Abu Dhabi International Airport
Abu Dhabi International Airport
Abu Dhabi International Airport
Abu Dhabi International Airport
Abu Dhabi International Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Presidential Flight
Presidential Flight
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T1
T3-9
T1
T1
T3-9
T3-9
1
14
1
1
5
34
2012
2011
2011
2010
2009
2008
Installed 11
Installed 11
Installed 10
Installed 09
Installed 08
JXB
JXB
JXB
Al Maktoum Intl Airport
Al Maktoum Intl Airport
Al Maktoum Intl Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T1
T1
T2-24
1
64
7
2009
2007
2007
Installed 09
Installed 08
Installed 07
DXB
DXB
DXB
DXB
DXB
Dubai Airport
Dubai Airport
Dubai Airport
Dubai Airport
Dubai Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T1
T1
T1
T2-24
T2-24
134
30
2
23
16
2012
2011
2009
2006
2006
Installed 12-13
Installed 11-12
Installed 09
Inst. 07 + GOS
+ GOS 2007
DXB
DXB
DXB
DXB
DXB
DXB
DXB
Dubai Airport
Dubai Airport
Dubai Airport
Dubai Airport
Dubai Airport
Dubai Airport
Dubai Airport
DWC Jebel Ali
DWC Jebel Ali
SHJ
SHJ
Sharjah International Airport
Sharjah International Airport
Number of systems in order or in operation
in the Middle East
Page 76 of 94
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T2-24
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
10
17
1
3
19
42
27
2006
2005
2004
2004
2003
2003
1998
+ GOS 2007
+ GOS 2007
+ GOS 2007
+ GOS 2007
+ GOS 2007
+ GOS
+ GOS 2003
Airport Authority
T1
T1
12
1
2013
2009
Installed 09
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-24
T3-9
3
4
2006
2003
Inst. 06 + GOS
+ GOS 2006
1192
Europe
COUNTRY
IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT
OWNER
TYPE
QTY
YEAR REMARKS
Austria
VIE
VIE
Vienna Airport
Vienna Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-18
T1-21
Inductive
42
23
2009
19981996
Installed 09
+ GOS
Belgium
BRU
Brussel Airport
Airport Authority
T2-18
33
2013
+ GOS
LGG
Liege Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
2
2012
Bulgaria
SOF
Sofia Airport
Airport Authority
T2-18
7
2004
Installed 05
Cyprus
LCA
LCA
LCA
Larnaca Airport
Larnaca Airport
Larnaca Airport
Thyssen
Thyssen
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
1
3
22
2013
2008
2008
DGS
Installation 09
Inst. 08 + GOS
Denmark
CPH
CPH
CPH
CPH
CPH
CPH
CPH
Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport
Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport
Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport
Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport
Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport
Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport
Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
1
4
7
1
6
6
1
2005
2004
2000
1999
1998
1997
1997
Installed 05
Installed 04
Installed
Installed
Installed
Installed
Installed
Estonia
TLL
TLL
TLL
Tallinn Airport
Tallinn Airport
Tallinn Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
4
5
3
2008
2007
1999
Installed 08
Installed 07
Installed
Finland
HEL
HEL
HEL
HEL
Helsinki-Vantaa Airport
Helsinki-Vantaa Airport
Helsinki-Vantaa Airport
Helsinki-Vantaa Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
Inductive
5
11
3
2
2012
2009
2008
1984
Installed 12
Installed 09
Installed 08
HEL
Helsinki-Vantaa Airport
Airport Authority
T2-18
5
2013
DGS
OUL
Oulu Airport
Finavia
T2-18
4
2011
+ GOS
NCE
NCE
Nice Airport
Nice Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9/T1
T3-9
1+1
2
2011
1998
Installed
CDG
CDG
CDG
Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport
Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport
Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport
T3-9
T3-9
T1, T2-24
16
2
4
2011
2012
2009
Installed
France
Air France
T2-24
1
2010
Installed
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T1
T2-18
1
29
2012
2012
+ GOS
Frankfurt Airport
Airport Authority
T1
26
2013
FRA
Frankfurt Airport
Airport Authority
T1
18
2012
FRA
Frankfurt Airport
Airport Authority
T1
2
2011
Hannover Airport
Airport Authority
T2-18
20
2011
+ GOS
Leipzig Airport
Airport Authority
T2-18
6
2012
MUC
MUC
MUC
MUC
MUC
MUC
Munich/Franz Josef Strauss
Munich/Franz Josef Strauss
Munich/Franz Josef Strauss
Munich/Franz Josef Strauss
Munich/Franz Josef Strauss
Munich/Franz Josef Strauss
Airport Authority
Flugh. München
Flugh. München
Flugh. München
Flugh. München
Airport Authority
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
Inductive
19
42
1
78
64
63
2007
2005
2004
2003
2001
1991
+ GOS + FIS
Interface
Inst. 07 + GOS
Inst. 05 + GOS
Installed 04
Installed
+ GOS
23 replaced
laser, + GOS
Greece
ATH
Athens Eleftherios Venizelos
International Airport
Airport Authority
T2-18
1
2009
Installed 09
Hungary
BUD
BUD
BUD
BUD
Budapest/Ferihegy Airport
Budapest/Ferihegy Airport
Budapest/Ferihegy Airport
Budapest/Ferihegy Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-18
T2-18
Inductive
1
6
9
6
2008
2005
1996
1984
GOS
Installed 05
+ GOS 1999
Replaced by
laser
Iceland
KEF
KEF
KEF
KEF
Keflavik Airport
Keflavik Airport
Keflavik Airport
Keflavik Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
2
2
2
8
2007
2005
2004
2000
Installed 07
Installed 05
Installed 04
Installed
Italy
GOA Genoa Airport
GOA Genoa Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
Inductive
5
5
1998
1986
CAG
Cagliari Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
8
2001
Installed
Replaced by
laser
+ GOS
CTA
CTA
CTA
Catania Airport
Catania Airport
Catania Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Romagnoli
T3-9
T3-9
1
6
6
2008
2006
2005
GOS
Installed 06
Installed 06
Germany
ORY
Paris Orly Airport
DUS
DUS
Düsseldorf Airport
Düsseldorf Airport
FRA
HAJ
LEJ
Page 78 of 94
+ GOS + FIS
Interface
+ GOS + FIS
Interface
+ GOS + FIS
Interface
FCO
FCO
FCO
FCO
FCO
FCO
FCO
FCO
Rome/Fiumicino Airport
Rome/Fiumicino Airport
Rome/Fiumicino Airport
Rome/Fiumicino Airport
Rome/Fiumicino Airport
Rome/Fiumicino Airport
Rome/Fiumicino Airport
Rome/Fiumicino Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
FCO
Rome/Fiumicino Airport
FCO
T1
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
1
1
1
3
4
10
12
11
2011
2004-6
2006
2005
2004
2004
2003
1999
Airport Authority
Inductive
17
1995
Rome/Fiumicino Airport
Airport Authority
Inductive
16
1991
FCO
Rome/Fiumicino Airport
Airport Authority
Inductive
4
1988
FCO
Rome/Fiumicino Airport
Airport Authority
Inductive
5
1986
BGY
Milan/Bergamo Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
2
1998
LIN
LIN
Milan/Linate Airport
Milan/Linate Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
Inductive
5
5
2002
1992
MXP
MXP
MXP
MXP
MXP
Milan/Malpensa Airport
Milan/Malpensa Airport
Milan/Malpensa Airport
Milan/Malpensa Airport
Milan/Malpensa Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
Inductive
1
7
10
26
8
2005
2003
1999
1997
1995
TRS
Trieste Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
3
2003
Installed
Replaced by
laser
Installed 05
+ GOS
+ GOS
+ GOS
Replaced by
laser
Installed 03
Lithuania
VNO
Vilnius Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
4
2007
Installed 07
Netherlands
AMS
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
T2-23
4
2008
Installed 08
AMS
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
T2-23
4
2008
Installed 08
AMS
AMS
AMS
AMS
AMS
AMS
AMS
AMS
AMS
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Siemens
Nederland
Siemens
Nederland
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-23
T2-24
T2-AMS
T2-AMS
T2-AMS
T2-AMS
T2-AMS
T2-AMS
T2-AMS
6
1
1
1
5
1
1
9
25
2007
2005
2005
2004
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
Installed 07
Inst. 05 + GOS
Installed 05
Installed 05
Installed 04
Installed
Installed
Installed
Installed
GOS
Installed 06
Installed 06
Installed 04
Installed 04
Installed
+ GOS:
40 Safedocks
Replaced by
laser
Replaced by
laser
Replaced by
laser
Replaced by
laser
Installed
Norway
Poland
AMS
AMS
AMS
AMS
AMS
AMS
AMS
AMS
AMS
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-AMS
T2-AMS
T2-AMS
T2-AMS
T2-AMS
K
K
K
Inductive
4
1
10
2
12
3
15
1
8
1999
1999
1999
1999
1998
1996
1995
1994
1991
AMS
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Airport Authority
Inductive
8
1989
AMS
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Airport Authority
Inductive
13
1989
AMS
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Airport Authority
Inductive
10
1987
AMS
Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport
Airport Authority
Inductive
1
1980
BGO
Bergen/Flesland Airport
Luftfartsverket
Inductive
11
1987
BOO
BOO
BOO
Bodö Airport
Bodö Airport
Bodö Airport
Avinor
Avinor
Luftfartsverket
T2-13
T2-13
Inductive
2
1
4
2003
2003
1989
FBU
Oslo/Fornebu Airport
Luftfartsverket
Inductive
5
1987
OSL
OSL
OSL
OSL
OSL
Oslo Gardermoen Airport
Oslo Gardermoen Airport
Oslo/Gardermoen Airport
Oslo/Gardermoen Airport
Oslo/Gardermoen Airport
Oslo Airport AS
Oslo Airport AS
Oslo Lufthavn AS
Oslo Lufthavn AS
Oslo Lufthavn AS
T1
T1
T2-21
T2-21
1
1
6
1
34
2013
2013
2011
2005
1996
SVG
Stavanger/Sola Airport
Luftfartsverket
Inductive
9
1986
TOS
Tromsö Airport
Luftfartsverket
T3-9
5
1997
RZE
Rzeszów Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
1
2012
WAW Warsaw Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
31
2006
WRO Wroclaw Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
4
2012
Page 80 of 94
Installed
Installed
Installed
Installed
Installed
Installed
Installed
Installed
Replaced by
laser
Replaced by
laser
Replaced by
laser
Replaced by
laser
Replaced by
laser
Installed 04
Installed
Replaced by
laser
Replaced by
laser
SAM
DGS
Installed 05
+ GOS
Replaced by
laser
Installed
Installed 06
Romania
OTP
OTP
OTP
OTP
Bucharest/Otopeni Airport
Bucharest/Otopeni Airport
Bucharest/Otopeni Airport
Bucharest/Otopeni Airport
Airport Authority
Romairport
s.c.a.r.l.
GOS
T1
T1
T3-9
1
9
9
5
2012
2011
2010
1998
DME
Moscow Domodedovo Airport
Airport Authority
T3-15
29
2003-6
Pulkovo Airport
Airport Authority
T2-24
8
2012
SVO
Sheremetyevo Airport
Airport Authority
T2-24 /T3-9
72
200712
AER
Sochi Airport
Airport Authority
T3-15
5
2012
VKO
Vnukovo Airport
Airport Authority
T3-15
6
2003
Slovenia
LJU
Ljubljana Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
5
2007
Installed 07
Spain
ALC
Alicante International Airport
Airport Authority
T3-15
17
2009
Installed 09
BCN
BCN
BCN
BCN
BCN
Barcelona Airport
Barcelona Airport
Barcelona Airport
Barcelona Airport
Barcelona Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
T3-15
T3-15
1
1
55
27
27
2011
2008
2008
1998
1998
Installed 09
Installed 08
Installed
Installed
BIO
Bilbao Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
7
2001
Installed
FUE
FUE
Fuerteventura Airport
Fuerteventura Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
12
7
2009
2000
Installation 09
Installed
LPA
Gran Canary Int. Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
2
2013
IBZ
Ibiza Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
4
2012
ACE
ACE
LPA
LPA
Lanzarote Airport
Lanzarote Airport
Las Palma Airport
Las Palmas Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
1
5
8
15
2002
2001
2012
2003
MAD
MAD
MAD
MAD
Madrid/Barajas Airport
Madrid/Barajas Airport
Madrid/Barajas Airport
Madrid/Barajas Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-18
T2-18
T1-21
Inductive
4
4
2
3
2013
2011
1995
1989
Russia
PIE
Installed
Installed
Installed
Installed
Installed 04
Installed
Replaced by
MAD Madrid/Barajas Airport
Airport Authority
Inductive
9
1984
MAD Madrid/Barajas Airport
Airport Authority
Inductive
1
1982
AGP
Airport Authority
T2-24
14
2008
laser
Replaced by
laser
Replaced by
laser
Installed 08
Airport Authority
T3-15
5
2007
Installed 07
Malaga Airport
MAH Menorca Airport
Sweden
PMI
PMI
PMI
PMI
Palma de Mallorca Airport
Palma de Mallorca Airport
Palma de Mallorca Airport
Palma de Mallorca Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T2-18
T3-9
T3-9
11
1
5
22
2010
2008
2003
1999
Installed 10
Installed 09
Installed 03
Installed
SCQ
SCQ
Santiago de Compostela
Santiago de Compostela
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
10
5
2010
2001
Installed 10
Installed
OZP
Seville Airport
Airport Authority
T3-15
5
2007
Installed 07
TFS
Tenerife South Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
9
2001
Installed
VLC
Valencia Airport
Airport Authority
T3-15
3
1999
Installed
VGO
Vigo Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
5
2008
Installed 09
GOT
Gothenburg/Landvetter Airport Luftfartsverket
Inductive
2
1985
GOT
Gothenburg/Landvetter Airport Luftfartsverket
Inductive
10
1977
Replaced by
laser
Replaced by
laser
LLA
Luleå/Kallax Airport
Luftfartsverket
Inductive
3
1984
Replaced by
laser
MMX Malmoe/Sturup Airport
MMX Malmoe/Sturup Airport
Airport Authority
Luftfartsverket
T2-24
Inductive
1
4
2004
1992
MMX Malmoe/Sturup Airport
Luftfartsverket
Inductive
1
1982
ARN
ARN
ARN
ARN
ARN
Stockholm/Arlanda Airport
Stockholm/Arlanda Airport
Stockholm/Arlanda Airport
Stockholm/Arlanda Airport
Stockholm/Arlanda Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Luftfartsverket
Luftfartsverket
Luftfartsverket
T2-24
T2-21
T2-22
T1-21
Inductive
4
10
14
20
14
2007
2004
1996
1995
1983
ARN
Stockholm/Arlanda Airport
Luftfartsverket
Inductive
1
1982
Installed
Replaced by
laser
Replaced by
laser
Installed 07
Installed 04
+ GOS 1997
+ GOS 1997
Replaced by
laser
Replaced by
laser
Page 82 of 94
Switzerland
Turkey
SDL
SDL
Sundsvall/Midlanda Airport
Sundsvall/Midlanda Airport
Airport Authority
Luftfartsverket
T2-18
T1-21
3
3
2004
1996
Installed 04
Installed
GVA
Geneva International Airport
Geneva airport
T2-24
20
2012
+ SafeControl
– Apron
Management
GVA
Geneva International Airport
AIG
SAM
1
2012
ZHR
Zurich/Kloten Airport
Airport Authority
T2-18
70
2003
ZRH
Zürich/Kloten Airport
Airport Authority
Inductive
26
1985
ZRH
Zürich/Kloten Airport
Airport Authority
Inductive
1
1982
ESB
ESB
ESB
Ankara Airport
Ankara Airport
Ankara Airport
T.A.V
T.A.V
T.A.V
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
1
1
18
2010
2007
2006
Installed 10
+ GOS
Installed 06
AYT
AYT
AYT
Antalya Airport
Antalya Airport
Antalya Airport
Airport Authority
Celebi (BOT)
Airport Authority
T3-15
T3-9
T3-9
4
16
16
2009
2004
1998
Installed 09
+ GOS
Installed
DLM
DLM
Dalaman Mugla Airport
Dalaman Mugla Airport
Airport Authority
Civil Aviation
Dept.
T3-9
Inductive
9
4
2005
1990
Inst. 06 + GOS
Replaced by
laser
ADB
ADB
ADB
Izmir-Adnan Menderes Airport
Izmir-Adnan Menderes Airport
Izmir-Adnan Menderes Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
Inductive
9
6
6
2006
2005
1987
+ GOS
Installed 05
IST
IST
IST
IST
IST
Istanbul/Ataturk Airport
Istanbul/Ataturk Airport
Istanbul/Ataturk Airport
Istanbul/Ataturk Airport
Istanbul/Ataturk Airport
T.A.V
T.A.V
T.A.V
T.A.V
DHMI
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
6
1
9
4
1
2010
2009
2006
2003
2000
IST
IST
Istanbul/Ataturk Airport
Istanbul/Ataturk Airport
DHMI
Airport Authority
T3-9
Inductive
18
9
1999
1983
Installed 10
Installed 09
Installed 06
Inst. 04 + GOS
Test unit +
GOS
+ GOS
Replaced
BJV
Milas Bodrum Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
9
2011
+GOS
T3-9
24
2009
Installed 09
Sabiha Gökcen
Inst. 2003 +
GOS
Replaced by
laser, + GOS
Replaced by
laser
Ukraine
U.K.
DOK
DOK
Donetsk Airport
Donetsk Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-15
3
3
2011
2005
LWO Lvov Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
10
2012
ABZ
ABZ
Aberdeen Airport
Aberdeen Airport
BAA
Airport Authority
T2-18
T2-18
5
2
2008
2006
BHX
BHX
BHX
BHX
BHX
Birmingham Intl Airport
Birmingham Intl Airport
Birmingham Intl Airport
Birmingham Intl Airport
Birmingham Intl Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
2
12
1
1
7
2011
2009
2008
2003
2001
CWL
Cardiff Airport
T2-18
1
2013
EDI
EDI
EDI
Edinburgh International
Edinburgh International
Edinburgh International
BAA
BAA
BAA
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
1
15
9
2011
2009
2008
GLA
Glasgow Airport
Airport Authority
T2-18
6
2011
GLA
GLA
GLA
GLA
Glasgow Airport
Glasgow Airport
Glasgow Airport
Glasgow Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
8
8
4
7
2009
2008
2007
2006
LHR
London Heathrow Airport
T2-18
36
2013
LHR
London Heathrow Airport
T2-18
50
2011
LHR
London Heathrow Airport
T2-18
57
2010
LHR
London Heathrow Airport
T2-18
25
2009
LHR
London Heathrow Airport
T2-18
14
2008
LHR
London Heathrow Airport
T2-18
3
2007
LHR
London Heathrow Airport
T2-18
7
2006
LHR
London Heathrow Airport
T2-18
3
2005
LHR
London Heathrow Airport
BAA / Airport
Authority
BAA / Airport
Authority
BAA / Airport
Authority
BAA / Airport
Authority
BAA / Airport
Authority
BAA / Airport
Authority
BAA / Airport
Authority
BAA / Airport
Authority
T2-18
34
2004
LGW
London Gatwick Airport
T2-18
18
2010
LGW
London Gatwick Airport
BAA / Airport
Authority
BAA / Airport
T2-18
61
2008
Page 84 of 94
Installed 08
Installed 06
LGW
London Gatwick Airport
LGW
London Gatwick Airport
LTN
London Luton Airport
STN
London Stansted Airport
STN
London Stansted Airport
STN
London Stansted Airport
MAN Manchester International
Number of systems in order or in operation in Europe
BAA / Airport
Authority
BAA / Airport
Authority
T2-18
62
2007
T2-18
32
2006
Airport Authority
T3-9
2
2005
T2-18
24
2013
BAA
T2-18
8
2011
BAA
T2-18
20
2008
1
2010
2478
Installed 05
Installation 0809
A380 Stand
Africa
COUNTRY
Cameroon
Egypt
IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT
OWNER
TYPE
QTY YEAR REMARKS
NSI
NSI
NSI
Yaoundé Nsimalen Intl Airport
Yaoundé Nsimalen Intl Airport
Yaoundé Nsimalen Intl Airport
0Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
Inductive
3
4
4
2011
2009
1990
Installed 09
CAI
CAI
Cairo Airport
Cairo Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-15
25
5
2006
2001
+ GOS 2007
+ GOS
Installed 08
Ethiopia
ADD
Bole International Airport
FNC
T3-9
4
2008
Mali
BKO
Bamako
Bamako Airport
T3-9
4
2012
Mauritius
MRU
SSR International airport/
Mauritius Island
Mauritius airport
T2-18
6
2012
Morocco
CMN
Casablanca Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
28
2007
New Dakar airport
Airport Authority
T3-15
6
2012
Durban International Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
14
2009
Installation 09
Enfidha Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
14
2009
Installation 09
Senegal
South Africa
Tunisia
DUR
Number of systems in order or in operation in Africa
Page 86 of 94
117
Installed 07
Asia
COUNTRY
IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT
Azerbaijan
GYD
GYD
Brunei
China
OWNER
Heydar Aliyev International
Airport (Baku)
Heydar Aliyev International
Airport (Baku)
TYPE
QTY
YEAR
REMARKS
T1
12
2013
DGS
GOS
1
2013
5
5
3
6
2011
2001
1997
1987
Bandar Seri Begawan Airport
Bandar Seri Begawan Airport
Bandar Seri Begawan Airport
Bandar Seri Begawan Airport
Dept of Civil Aviation
Dept of Civil Aviation
Airport Authority
T2-24
T2-16
T2-18
Inductive
PEK
PEK
PEK
Beijing Airport
Beijing Airport
Beijing Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-18
T2-18
T2-24
26
99
1
2008
2007
2005
+ GOS
+ GOS
Installed 05
CSX
Changsha Airport
Airport Authority
T2-18
22
2011
+ GOS
CKG
Chongqing Airport
Airport Authority
T2-18
12
2010
+ GOS
FOC
Fuzhou Changle Airport
Airport Authority
T2-18
9
2013
+ GOS
CAN
Guangzho Baiyun
International Airport,
Airport Authority
T2-13
22
2008
Installation 0809
HGH
HGH
HGH
Hangzhou Airport
Hangzhou Airport
Hangzhou Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-18
T2-18
T2-13
36
9
5
HFE
Hefei New Airport
Airport Authority
T2-18
5
2011
Hongqiau
Airport Authority
T2-18
46
2009
Installation 09
HKG
HKG
HKG
HKG
HKG
Hong Kong/Chek Lap Kok
Hong Kong/Chek Lap Kok
Hong Kong/Chek Lap Kok
Hong Kong/Chek Lap Kok
Hong Kong/Chek Lap Kok
Gammon/AAHK
PCCW/AAHK
PCCW
Gammon
Airport Authority
T1
T1
T1
T1
T2-24
19
8
8
19
10
2013
2013
2012
2012
2008
HKG
HKG
Hong Kong/Chek Lap Kok
Hong Kong/Chek Lap Kok
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-24
T2-24
10
69
1997
1997
+ GOS
+ GOS
+ GOS
+ GOS
Installation 0809
+ GOS
+ GOS
KMG
Kunming New Airport
Airport Authority
T2-18
68
2010
+ GOS
LHW
Lanzhou/Zhongchuan Airport Airport Authority
T2-18
9
2013
+ GOS
BWN
BWM
BWN
BWN
Dept of Civil Aviation
Installed
Installed
Replaced by
laser
2011-2012 + GOS
2010
+ GOS
2002
+ GOS
India
LHW
Lanzhou/Zhongchuan Airport Airport Authority
T3-9
8
2001
+ GOS
MFM
Macau Airport
Airport Authority
T1
4
2011
+GOS
NGB
Ningbo Airport
Airport Authority
T2-13
7
2002
+ GOS
PDG
PDG
Shanghai/Pudong Airport
Shanghai/Pudong Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-18
T3-9
42
28
2006
1998
+ GOS
+ GOS
WUH Wuhan Airport
Airport Authority
T2-13
20
2007
Installed 07
AMD Ahmedabad Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
6
2008
Installed 08
LUH
Amritsar Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
2
2008
Installed 08
IXU
Aurangabad Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
2
2008
BLR
Bangalore International
Airport
BIAL
T2-24
17
2012
GOS int with
IB + GPU
BPL
Bhopal - AAI Non-Metro
AAI
T3-9
2
2013
DGS
BBR
Bhubneshwar - AAI NonMetro
AAI
T3-9
2
2013
DGS
CCJ
Calicut Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
3
2008
Installed 08
IXC
Chandigarh Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
2
2012
Installed 13
MAA Chennai Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
14
2012
Installed 13
COK
Cochin International Airport
Cochin Int‟l Limited
T3-9
1
2012
COK
Cochin International Airport
Cochin Int‟l Limited
T3-9
1
2011
Installed 12
COK
Cochin International Airport
Cochin Int‟l Limited
T3-9
5
2004
Installed 05
DIB
Dibrugarh Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
2
2008
Installed 08
GAY
GAY
Gaya Airport
Gaya Airport
AAI
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
2
2
2013
2008
DGS
Installed 08
GOI
Goa Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
5
2012
Installed 13
GAU
Guwahati Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
2
2008
Installed 08
Page 88 of 94
IND
Indore - AAI Non-Metro
AAI
T3-9
2
2013
DGS
JAI
Jaipur Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
2
2008
Installed 08
KJR
Khajurao - AAI Non-Metro
AAI
T3-9
2
2013
DGS
MDR
Madurai- AAI Non-Metro
AAI
T3-9
2
2013
DGS
Mangalore Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
2
2008
Installed 08
BOM Mumbai CSI Airport
BOM Mumbai CSI Airport
BOM Mumbai CSI Airport T I (A) & II
MIAL
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
65
3
19
2010
2007
2004
Installed 08
Installed 04
NAG
Nagpur Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
2
2008
Installed 08
DEL
DEL
New Delhi Airport
New Delhi Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
81
9
2009
2005
Installed 09
Installed 05
HYD
HYD
New Hyderabad Intl Airport
New Hyderabad Intl Airport
Hyderabad Intl
Hyderabad Intl
T3-9
12
2007
2005
HYD
New Hyderabad Intl Airport
Hyderabad Intl
T3-9
13
2005
Installed 07
GOS 2007:
8 Safedocks
Installed 06
CCU
CCU
CCU
NSCBIA Kolkata
NSCBIA Kolkata
NSCBIA Kolkata
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
26
4
1
2012
2004
2003
Installed 13
Installed 05
Installed
PNQ
Pune Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
2
2008
Installed 08
RPR
Raipur - AAI Non-Metro
AAI
T3-9
2
2013
DGS
RCH
Ranchi - AAI Non-Metro
AAI
T3-9
2
2013
DGS
SXR
SXR
Srinagar Airport
Srinagar Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
2
2
2012
2008
Installed 13
Installed 08
SRT
Surat - AAI Non-Metro
AAI
T3-9
2
2013
DGS
Tirupati - AAI Non-Metro
AAI
T3-9
2
2013
DGS
Trichy Airport
Airport Authority
T3
2
2008
IXE
TRP
TRZ
Indonesia
Japan
TRV
Trivandrum Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
5
2008
Installed 08
UDR
Udaipur Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
2
2008
Installed 08
VDR
Vadodra - AAI Non-Metro
AAI
T3-9
2
2013
DGS
VNS
Varanasi Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
2
2008
Installed 08
VTZ
VTZ
Vizag Airport
Vizag Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
1
2
2013
2008
DGS
Installed 08
BTH
BTH
Batam Airport
Batam Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
2
2
2002
2002
Installed
Installed
DPS
Bali Denpassar Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
6
2000
Installed
BEJ
BEJ
Berau International Airport
Berau International Airport
Thorindo
T3
T3-9
1
1
2012
2010
KDI
Kendari Airport
Thorindo
T3-9
2
2013
DGS
UPG
UPG
Makassar International Airport
Makassar International Airport
T3-9
T3-9
3
2
2011
2010
Installed 10
SUB
SUB
Surabaya International Airport
Surabaya International Airport
T3
T3-9
7
4
2012
2010
+ GOS
Installed 10
CJIA
Central Japan Intl Airport
T2-27NRT
23
2002
Inst. 04 + GOS
T2-27
8
2013
VDGS
20
2
2008
2006
2000-5
2005
2005
2004
2002
2000
Airport Authority
HND Haneda
NRT
NRT
NRT
NRT
NRT
NRT
NRT
NRT
Tokyo/Narita Airport
Tokyo/Narita Airport
Tokyo/Narita Airport
Tokyo/Narita Airport
Tokyo/Narita Airport
Tokyo/Narita Airport
Tokyo/Narita Airport
Tokyo/Narita Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T2-27NRT
T2-27NRT
12
27
13
6
6
Kazakhstan
ALA
Almaty Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
4
2003
Installed
Malaysia
KBR
Kota Bharu Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
1
2012
Installed
Page 90 of 94
T2-27NRT
T2-27NRT
T2-27NRT
T2-27NRT
T2-27NRT
Installed 09
Installed 06
GOS
Installed 05
Installed 05
Installed 04
Installed
Installed
BKI
BKI
BKI
Kota Kinabalu Airport
Kota Kinabalu Airport
Kota Kinabalu Airport
Wee Hock
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
1
2
3
2012
2000
1998
Installed
SBU
Sibu Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
6
2010
Installed
TGG
Kuala Terengganu Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
2
2006
Installed 07
KCH
KCH
KCH
Kuching Intl Airport
Kuching Airport
Kuching Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
9
3
4
2006
2005
1998
Installed 06
Installed 05
Installed
LBU
Labuan Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
1
2006
Installed 07
MDL
Mandalay Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
6
1999
Installed
RGN
Yangon International Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
4
2005
Installed 06
KHI
Karachi Airport (JIAAP)
Airport Authority
T3
6
2011
VDGS
MUX
Multan International Airport
Airport Authority
T1
2
2012
VDGS
Philippines
MNL
Manila International Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
7
1997
Installed
Russia
DYR
Anadyr Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
2
2004
Installed 04
DME
Moscow/Domodedovo
Airport
Moscow/Domodedovo
Airport
Moscow/Domodedovo
Airport
Moscow/Domodedovo
Airport
Airport Authority
T3-15
8
2006
+ GOS
Airport Authority
T3-15
2
2004
+ GOS 2006
Airport Authority
T3-15
7
2004
+ GOS 2006
East Line Group
T3-15
10
2003
+ GOS 2006
Moscow/Sheremetyevo
Airport
Moscow/Sheremetyevo
Airport
Airport Authority
T2-18
30
2007
+ GOS
Airport Authority
T3-9
9
2007
Installed 07
VKO
VKO
VKO
Moscow/Vnukovo Airport
Moscow/Vnukovo Airport
Moscow/Vnukovo Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
2
3
1
2006
2003
2003
Installed 06
Installed
Installed
SIN
Singapore/Changi Airport
Changi Airport
Goup
GOS
1
2013
GOS serving
up to 100
Myanmar
Pakistan
DME
DME
DME
SVO
SVO
Singapore
Installed
DGS units
VDGS
Installed 06
Installed 06
Installed 06
Installed 05
Installed
Installed
SIN
SIN
SIN
SIN
SIN
SIN
SIN
Singapore/Changi Airport
Singapore/Changi Airport
Singapore/Changi Airport
Singapore/Changi Airport
Singapore/Changi Airport
Singapore/Changi Airport
Singapore/Changi Airport
CAG
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
T1-42
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
87
15
9
23
24
21
16
2013
2006
2006
2006
2004
2001
1997
South Korea
SEL
SEL
Seoul/Kimpo Airport
Seoul/Kimpo Airport
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Inductive
Inductive
8
2
1987
1985
Sri Lanka
CMB
Bandarnaike Intl Airport Col.
AASL
T3-9
9
2006
+ GOS
Thailand
CNX
CNX
CNX
CNX
Chiang Mai Airport
Chiang Mai Airport
Chiang Mai Airport
Chiang Mai Airport
Gemini
Airport Authority
Airport Authority
Dan-Thai Equipment
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
T2-18
1
2
2
1
2012
2005
2005
2004
Installed 06
Installed 06
Installed
DMK
Don Muang Airport Bangkok
Airport Authority
T3-15
6
2001
+ GOS
HDY
HDY
Hat Yai Airport
Hat Yai Airport
Airport Authority
T2
T3
3
4
2012
2012
KKC
Khonkaen Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
1
2003
Installed
KBV
Krabi Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
1
2005
Installed 05
BKK
BKK
New Bangkok Intl Airport
New Bangkok Intl Airport
Airport Authority
Bangkok
T2-18
T2-18
66
93
2005
2004
+ GOS
+ GOS
HKT
HKT
HKT
HKT
Phuket Airport
Phuket Airport
Phuket Airport
Phuket Airport
T2
7
2012
Dan-Thai Equipment
Airport Authority
T2-18
T2-18
1
2
2004
1999
Installed 04
Installed
PHS
Phitsanulok Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
1
2005
Installed 05
URT
Surat Thani Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
1
2005
Installed 05
UTH
Udon Thani Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
1
2005
Installed 05
Cam Ranh
Airport Authority
T3-9
1
2009
Installed 09
T3-9
4
2010
Vietnam
DAD
Da Nang International Airport
Page 92 of 94
SGN
SGN
SGN
Ho Chi Minh City Airport
Ho Chi Minh City Airport
Ho Chi Minh City Airport
SAA
SAA
SAA
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
8
1
1
2005
2002
2001
Inst. 05 + GOS
Installed
Installed
HAN
HAN
HAN
HAN
HAN
HAN
HAN
Noibai International Airport
Noibai International Airport
Noibai International Airport
Noibai International Airport
Noibai International Airport
Noibai International Airport
Noibai International Airport
ARINC/ACV
VDT
VTD
ShinMaywa Pte Ltd
ShinMaywa Pte Ltd
ShinMaywa Pte Ltd
Airport Authority
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
T1
T3-9
T3-9
T3-9
18
2
1
4
14
1
2
2013
2013
2012
2012
2012
2008
2006
+ GOS
Tan Son Nhat Airport
Airport Authority
T3-9
8
2006
Installed 06
Number of systems in order or in operation in Asia
1745
+ GOS
+ GOS
Installed 08
Installed 06
Summary
Number of systems in order or in operation in North America
721
Number of systems in order or in operation in South America
165
Number of systems in order or in operation in Oceania
227
Number of systems in order or in operation in the Middle East
1192
Number of systems in order or in operation in Europe
2478
Number of systems in order or in operation in Africa
117
Number of systems in order or in operation in Asia
1745
Total number of systems in order or in operation
6645
Page 94 of 94
Check in to the future
How many aircraft can your
airport handle today?
Can this number be increased
without adverse effects on the
airport’s safety level?
It is a known fact that traffic
volume will rise in the foreseeable
future. More movements will
demand monitoring of the entire
airport. Requirements will be
sharpened and the development
of an integrated system
controlling not only ground
movements but also air traffic
close to the airport is of the
highest interest.
The International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO) already
describes A-SMGCS, Advanced
Surface Movement Guidance and
Control System, as the answer to
the future modern airport need to
control the entire airport space in
one superior system.
To a larger extent than today’s
systems, A-SMGCS will rely on
automated processes to give both
pilots and traffic controllers exact
information about positions and
directions. Safegate Group
delivers complete A-SMGCS
solutions already, as well as all
vital parts relating to it.
Safegate Group can check your
airport into the future
– today!
India
[email protected]
+91 11 4106 1545
Singapore
[email protected]
+65 6289 6893
Finland
[email protected]
+358 (0)20754 7700
Malaysia
[email protected]
+60 32 011 3522
Spain
[email protected]
+34 917 157 598
China
[email protected]
+8610-85275297
France
[email protected]
+33 (0)1 42 99 60 40
Qatar
[email protected]
+974 436 9628
UK
[email protected]
+44 (0)208 573 0384
Dubai
[email protected]
+971 4 452 75 75
Germany
[email protected]
+49 (0)4121 464 303
Russia
[email protected]
+7 495 917 4614
USA
[email protected]
+1 763 535 92 99
Safegate Group HQ
Djurhagegatan 19
SE-213 76 Malmö, Sweden
Phone: +46 (0)40 699 17 00
Fax: +46 (0)40 699 17 30
E-mail: [email protected]
Brazil
[email protected]
+55 11 2137 4405
Australia
[email protected]
+61 (0)3 9720-3233
Austria
[email protected]
+43 316 429961
Safegate Group offers solutions for increased safety, efficiency and environmental benefits to airports worldwide. The company was founded in 1973 and has its
headquarters in Malmö, Sweden. Safegate Group has more than 70 partners around the globe in order to be close to its customers.
Earlier members of Safegate Group include Thorn AFL and Idman, who both have over 40 years of experience in airfield lighting solutions for airports and
heliports. The latest member of Safegate Group is Avibit, a leading provider of next generation software applications and integration of efficient air traffic control
systems. Safegate Group’s complete range of products and services, a “one-stop shop”, provides solutions to customers and airborne travellers around the globe.
www.safegate.com