Provo Lakeview PKWY Phase 1 - Mountainland Association of

Mountainland MPO
[PROJECT PRIORITAZION
CONCEPT REPORT]
1.0 | Project Summary Information 2.0 | Project Scope 3.0 | Project Ranking 4.0 | Air Quality Report 5.0 | Project Cost Estimate 6.0 | Supplemental Information 1.0 | Project Summary Information 1.1 Project Name (35 letters max) Lakeview Parkway and Trail - Phase 1 1.2 Project Type Road ‐ New Construction 1.3 Limits (descriptions should be identifiable. i.e: intersections, place names, landmarks, 35 characters max) 3110 West / Mike Jense Parkway (Provo Airport) to Center Street 1.4 Project Description (summary of project) Construction of Phase 1 of the new
Lakeview Parkway roadway from the Provo City Airport north to Center Street,
including a ten foot bicycle/pedestrian trail on the westside of the roadway. Project
design plans, right-of-way design plans, and much of the envorinmental documentation
have been completed. 1.5 Sponsor (jurisdiction, agency name) Provo City 1.6 Contact Information Project Manager David Graves
Office Phone 801-852-6741 Cell Phone 801-376-2290 Fax 801-852-6730 Email [email protected] 1.7 Cost Estimate Total Project Cost $8,500,000 requested from non-federal funding source PE Cost $0 ROW Cost $1,500,000 Construction Cost $6,300,000 Funds already available to project $0 Soft Match proposed for project $0
MPO Concept Report | Spring 2014 1
Mountainland MPO
[PROJECT PRIORITAZION
CONCEPT REPORT]
1.8 Regional Significance Is project in MPO transportation plan? Yes Is project on a corridor on the Utah State Functional Class Map? Yes 1.9 Air Quality Benefit (summarize CM/AQ Report, NA for non‐CM/AQ eligible projects) NA MPO Concept Report | Spring 2014 2
Mountainland MPO
[PROJECT PRIORITAZION
CONCEPT REPORT]
2.0 | Project Scope Enter NA for answers to questions not applicable to your project. 2.1 Describe purpose and need of project. The purpose and need for the project would be to provide improved north-south multi-modal
transporation network connectivity, provide improved north-south access to planned
development in southwest Provo while minimizing traffic volumes on existing streets, and
provide improved northern area access to the Provo Airport. 2.2 Describe existing service/conditions Current condition along the proposed Lakeview Parkway Phase 1 alignment include; a two lane
30-foot wide asphalt roadway with no sidewalks or curb and gutter from Mike Jense Pkwy to
280 south along the existing 3110 West roadway. From 280 South to Center Street the proposed
alignment would proceed through existing farmland property. Currently, the existing two lane
3110 West roadway serves as the main north-south access to the Provo Airport from Center
Street. 2.3 Highway Project Information SR# or FA# NA - Provo City Road Beginning Mile Post Mike Jense Parkway End Mile Post Center Street Length of project 0.89 miles Existing number of Travel Lanes 0 to 2 Lanes Width of facility. 106-foot right-of-way; Includes four 12-foot travel lanes, 8-foot shoulders, and 10-foot trail Facility surface type. Asphalt roadway with asphalt trail 2.4 Transit / Pedestrian Facility Project Information Route# NA MPO Concept Report | Spring 2014 3
Mountainland MPO
[PROJECT PRIORITAZION
CONCEPT REPORT]
Length of project 0.89 miles What is the expected use of the facility or program? Shared use pedestrian/bicycle trail. What services are provided in the operating of this project? NA 2.5 Describe any equipment to be purchased (buses, ITS, etc.). NA 2.6 Describe how project is consistent with local plans. Part of the Provo City Transportation Master Plan 2.7 Describe how project is consistent with Utah County ITS plan. NA 2.8 If phased or segmented, describe how the phase has logical termini and what will future phases consist of. The project south terminus, at Mike Jense Parkway (Provo City Airport Entrance), is a
continuation of the Provo Westside Connector Project. The project north terminus, at Center
Street, is existing arterial/collector roadway that provides access from I-15 to the Provo City
Airport. It may be possible to separate Phase 1 into smaller segments to better meet funding
requirements. The project could look at right of way acquisition and partial width construction
to reduced the required funding amount. Phases 2 and 3 of the Lakeview Parkway would
construct a new roadway from Center Street to 2000 North with additional phases constructing a
new roadway from 2000 North to Geneva Road / University Pkwy in Orem. 2.9 Is project being coordinated with or constructed with a larger project? Yes. The project has been coordinated with the Provo Westside Connector Project and has / will
be coordinated with future Lakeview Parkway project phases. 2.10 Describe how project will alleviate congestion on this or other facilities. Upon full build-out of Lakeview Parkway, it is projected that it would allevieate traffic volumes
on Geneva Road and Center Street between 17% - 20% by 2040 and improve traffic time
between UVU and the Provo City Airport by 20%. Without the project, Lakeshore Drive daily
traffic volume are expected to increase by 160% by 2040.
2.11 Describe any traffic improvements. (i.e lanes, signal coordination, ITS, turn lanes, bus pullouts, etc.) This project will provide turn lanes at major cross streets and provide additional two vehicle
travel lanes than currently exists from the Provo City Airport to Center Street. 2.12 Describe any safety improvements for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. (i.e. raised median, MPO Concept Report | Spring 2014 4
Mountainland MPO
[PROJECT PRIORITAZION
CONCEPT REPORT]
channelization of turn movements, barriers, parkway strips, etc.) Upon full build-out of Lakeview Parkway, it is projected that it would allevieate traffic volumes
on Geneva Road and Center Street between 17% - 20% by 2040 and improve traffic time
between UVU and the Provo City Airport by 20%. Without the project Lakeshore Drive daily
traffic volume are expected to increase by 160% by 2040.
2.13 How are complete streets addressed with this project? (plan for pedestrians, bikes, transit, trails, ITS) The eight foot shoulder provides a place for accel/decel and potential future bus stop movements.
With this project, the new trail would provide a complete trail system from the University
Avenue Interchange to the Lakeshore Dr and Provo River Pkwy Trail head at Center Street. As
future phases are constructed the new 10 foot trail will provide complete connectivity from the
University Avenue Interchange to the Geneva Road Trail at University Parkway.
2.14 Describe traffic control changes at intersections. (include info to warrant changes) Traffic control would remain the same at the existing intersections. A new unsignalized
T-intersection will be constructed for 3110 West where it ties into the Lakeview Parkway
2.15 What right‐of‐way is already secured? Right-of-Way design plans have already been prepared for this project. No right-of way has been
secured for phase 1 other than what is already existing along the 3110 West corridor. Provo City
is currently in the proccess of securing right-of-way, from willing property sellers, for the
Lakeview Parkway Phase 2 segement.
2.16 What additional right‐of‐way is needed? From the completed right-of-way design plans, the project would require two full property takes,
6-acres of property aquisition, 3-acres of permanent easements, and 2-acres of temporary
easements along the corridor.
2.17 Describe utility work to be performed and indicate who will do the work. The Provo City Water Resources Division of the Public Works Department would coordinate
with the project contractor to install a new 12-inch water main loop within the project corridor.
The project would require relocation of (8) eight Provo City Power poles and approximately
1800-feet of aerial and buried electric lines. The project would also require relocation to existing
gas and communications lines. The project contractor will make all minor existing water, sewer,
and storm drain utility relocations as part of the contract.
MPO Concept Report | Spring 2014 5
[PROJECT PRIORITAZION
CONCEPT REPORT]
Mountainland MPO
2.18 What type of environmental work will most likely be needed? Categorical Exclusion 2.19 Facility Design Current Conditions Design Year 2040 Design Year w/o Improvements 3,000 20,000 20,000 Level of Service A A A Functional Class Arterial Complete Street
Aertial Arterial Design Speed 40 mph 45 mph Unchanged *Accident Rate NA NA NA Transit Ridership NA Potential Future
Transit Route NA Ped/Trail Usage NA 500 plus No Usage Park and Ride Usage NA Potential for
Future Usage NA Average Daily Traffic MPO Concept Report | Spring 2014 6
Mountainland MPO
[PROJECT PRIORITAZION
CONCEPT REPORT]
3.0 | Project Ranking The following categories will be used by MPO staff to score each project. The points associated with each category show what total points MPO staff can give. MPO staff’s recommendations will be made available to the MPO TAC Committee for their use in making final project selection recommendations. MPO staff ranking is a tool to aid the MPO TAC Committee in their final selection. The committee is not required to pick projects solely on MPO staff ranks. Please note, if questions pertinent to the project are not answered, zero points will be given. 3.1 Congestion Relief (25 Points) Explain if the project… a) Provides an alternate transportation facility that corrects an identified congested problem? It is projected that Lakeview Parkway would alleviate traffic volumes on Geneva Road
and Center Street between 17% to 20% by 2040 and improve traffic between UVU and
Provo City Airport by 20%. Without the project Lakeshore Drive daily traffic volumes
are expected to increase by 160% by 2040. In addition the wide shoulders and trail will
further reduce traffic project traffic volumes by encouraging other modes of travel as well
as provide opportunity for future transit routes along Lakeview Parkway.
b) Reduces congestion by reducing the number of vehicles. As walkers, bikers, and future transit alternatives are accomodated with the construction of Lakeview Parkway, the vehicle use will drop, thus reducing congestion. c) Reduces the need for additional highway lanes for peak hour capacity. The project was needed and designed to reduce the additional highway lanes to existing Geneva Road and Lakeshore Drive roadway facilities from UVU to the Airport. The Lakeview Parkway project will also provide better connectivity thus reducing the need to add additional lanes to existing indirect roadway aterials and collectors in western Provo. d) Increases the efficiency of transportation system through traffic management measures. New shoulders will add capacity to the right in and right out movements. e) Adds turning movements to relieve a congested intersection. The project provides right and left turn lanes for many of the side streets and intersections. Also the project provides a raised center median to control access and vehicle movments as well as control driveway access location to reduce/relieve congestion and improve safety. f) Design year number of users. Users include the average AADT for highways and users per day for transit, trails, and other projects. The 2040 design year estimates 20,000 AADT for Lakeview Parkway and 500 plus daily
trail / bicyle users. g) 2020 V/C data (computed by MPO staff) Click here to enter text. MPO Concept Report | Spring 2014 7
Mountainland MPO
[PROJECT PRIORITAZION
CONCEPT REPORT]
3.2 Mode Choice (25 points) Explain if the project… a) Benefits multiple transportation systems (transit and highway, pedestrian and transit). The project will provide connectivety between different modes of travel such as the trail system to the airport, provide additional improved secondary access to the airport, and further enhance future transit opportunities in western Provo and Provo City Airport transportation system. b) Promotes alternative transportation solution to SOV use. Current SOV will be reduced since this project will allow separated walking and biking from the arterial and would provide the ability for future bus transit facitilities with the 8' shoulders. c) Creates or improves linkages between transportation modes. With this project, the new 10‐foot trail would provide a complete trail system from the University Avenue Interchange to the Lakeshore Dr and Provo River Pkwy Trail head at Center Street. As future phases are constructed the new 10 foot trail will provide complete connectivity from the University Avenue Interchange to the Geneva Road Trail at University Parkway. In addition, the Lakeview Parkway provides improved secondary access to the Provo City Airport and provides the ability to easily add future transit facitilites along the west side of Provo City from Orem City to the Provo City Airport. d) Reduces physical, psychological, or economic barriers to carpool, bike, walk, or transit use. The project would provide a continuation of the Provo Westside Connector roadway and trail system which would connect the incomplete trail / pedestrain facilities from Mike Jense Parkway to Center Street. The 8 foot shoulders provide and promote safer bike use within the roadway. The Lakeview Parkway project substantially improves direct connectivity barriers and access to existing and future transit facitilities in western Provo which would promote usership of transit facilities. The project would provide additional improved mobiility and access to the Provo City Airport to support future Airport plans and development. e) Provides incentives to carpool, bike, walk, or transit use. Lakeview Parkway would substantially improve transporation system connectivity which would provide incentive for carpools, pedestrains and bicyclists, and transit use. Also, the new trail and wide shoulders would provide intensive for trail and bicycle users to use the facilities as well as provide incentives for future transit routes. 3.3 Environmental Quality (15 points) Explain if the project… a) Provides cost effective emission reductions (amount of reduction justifies cost). Qualitatively from a completed project traffic study, the project would reduce emmission by improving travel times between UVU and the Provo City Airport by 20% by 2040. b) Helps efforts to attain and maintain national air quality standards. This project creates elements found in facilities that maintain national air quality standards MPO Concept Report | Spring 2014 8
Mountainland MPO
[PROJECT PRIORITAZION
CONCEPT REPORT]
c) Minimizes environmental impacts or reduces existing impacts (e.g. air/water/noise pollution). As part of the initial completed project design, the preferred project alignment was selected to reduce envorinmental impacts to the existing and build environment. For instance, the selected preferred alignment, for all phases, has less than 1 acre of delineated wetland impact. d) Enhances the natural, cultural, or historic environment. The roadway has been designed to provide an inviting landscape, which affords a sense of safety to those using the facilities. The new roadway will stimulate economic activity and provide new community gathering places, and enhance exsiting Utah Lake recreational facilities. This project environmental process determined the project had little impacts to current site vegetation; historical, archeological, cultural, scenic, natural or recreational qualities. e) Mitigates invasive impacts to existing neighborhoods/commercial areas (minimal relocations). Through completed public involvment efforts and enviromental process the preferred Lakeview Parkway alternative was selected that reduced and mitigated invasive impacts to existing, planned, and neighborhoods/commercial developments and areass. 3.4 Safety (20 points) Explain if the project… a) Corrects/improves a verified or potential safety or accident problem. This project provides pedestrian facilities where currently none exist from Mike Jense Parkway to Center Street. The project controls and limits access locations on an aerial road. Seperates bike users from the vehicle travel lanes with the construction of 8‐foot shoulders and 10 foot trail. Provides new left turn lanes and wide shoulders for safer vehicle turn movements. b) Improves information/communications for traffic operations and emergency responders. Lakeview Parkway provides a improved secondary access to the Provo City airport and provides improved emergeny response times within west Provo City. c) Reduces severity of crashes. This project will reduce accident severity by separating the pedestrian/bicycle from the vehicle traffic. Improved intersections with left and right turn lanes, 8‐foot wide shoulders, limiting left turn movements with the raised center median, and controll of access location on the road will reduce the severity of crashes. d) Enhances safe movement of pedestrian, bicycle traffic. This project provides pedestrian facilities where currently none exists from Mike Jense Parkway to Center Street. Controls and limits access locations on an aerial road. Seperates bike users from the vehicle travel lanes with the construction of 8‐foot shoulders and 10 foot trail. e) Provides an intermodal safety improvement (e.g. separation of vehicles‐trains, vehicles‐
pedestrian). MPO Concept Report | Spring 2014 9
Mountainland MPO
[PROJECT PRIORITAZION
CONCEPT REPORT]
The construction of a 7‐foot parkstrip separates roadway users from pedestrian/trial users. The 8‐foot wide shoulders provide seperation from vehicle and bike users and provides opportunities for future bus transit facilities locations away from vehicle travel lanes. 3.5 Other Considerations (15 points) Explain if the project… a) Effectively distributes funding throughout the MPO area. This project has regional significance by connecting Geneva Road in Orem City through the west side of Provo City to the I‐15 interchange at University Avenue. The project not only benefits Provo City, but benefits all communities in Utah County by improving travel times, access, and safety to a significant regional transporation hub and recreational facilities (Provo City Airport and Utah Lake recreation area). The project also provides for a future transit corridor to these facilities. b) Phases project in a manner that the MPO can use limited funds efficiently. Because of the project size and future funding consideratrions, the Provo City portion of Lakeview Parkway project was designed in three separate project construction phases. Also, with the Lakeview Parkway Phase 1 design and right‐of‐way documents being completed, the project scope can further be reduced based on available project funding. This could include such options as builidng a reduced half‐width roadway for phase 1 and/or securing necessary right‐of‐way for the project. Mutiple options could easily be vetted based on available funding. c) Cost effectiveness is appropriate for the amount of improvement made. Yes. d) Benefits transportation users from adjacent municipalities. The project would benefits all communities in Utah County by improving travel times, access, and safety to a significant regional transporation hub and recreational facilities (Provo City Airport and Utah Lake recreation area). e) Is supported by elected officials. The project is supported by elected officials MPO Concept Report | Spring 2014 10
Mountainland MPO
[PROJECT PRIORITAZION
CONCEPT REPORT]
4.0 | Air Quality Report All projects that are eligible for CM/AQ and CM/AQ‐PM2.5 funds must complete this report. These funds are eligible for projects and programs countywide. 4.1 Eligibility CM/AQ funds can only be used for projects and programs that a direct benefit to air quality can be demonstrated. Highway expansion, such as new single occupancy vehicle lanes, is not eligible. Turn lanes at congested intersections, transit programs, pedestrian and trail projects, signal modernization, ITS, and IM programs are typical eligible CM/AQ projects. 4.2 CM/AQ Program The purpose of the CM/AQ program is to fund transportation projects or programs that will contribute to attainment or maintenance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in Ozone (O3), Carbon monoxide (CO), Particulate Matter – 10 microns (PM10), and PM2.5 non‐attainment and maintenance areas. The city of Provo is a maintenance area for CO and Utah County is a non‐attainment area for PM10 and PM2.5. 4.3 Completing this Report All projects eligible for CM/AQ funds must complete this report. Completing this report can be quite technical, Susan Hardy, Air Quality Coordinator at Mountainland, can help with filling out this report. Contact her at 801/229‐3842 or [email protected] 4.4 Quantitative Analyses A quantitative assessment of how a proposed project or program is expected to reduce emissions is important to assist in selecting the most effective use of this fund. List below all travel benefits directly related to this project. Air quality benefit calculations must utilize Mobile 6. The air quality analysis should include assessing emission reductions of transit, traffic flow improvements, ITS projects and programs, ridesharing, bicycle and pedestrian improvements. Complete at least one of the sections below. If quantitative analyses cannot be done, do a qualitative assessment in 4.3. a) Vehicle Miles Traveled Number of Vehicle Miles Traveled reduced (VMT): Click here to enter text. Average distance of trips reduced: Click here to enter text. Emission reduction per average weekday: Click here to enter text. b) Idling Time Average idling time per vehicle reduced: Click here to enter text. Number of vehicles with reduced idling time: Click here to enter text. Emission reduction per average weekday: Click here to enter text. C) Vehicle Speed Average change in vehicle speed (speed before and after): Click here to enter text. Number of vehicles affected: Click here to enter text. Emission reduction per average workday: Click here to enter text. MPO Concept Report | Spring 2014 11
Mountainland MPO
[PROJECT PRIORITAZION
CONCEPT REPORT]
4.5 Qualitative Assessment Although a quantitative analyses of air quality impacts is required whenever possible, some improvements may not lend themselves to rigorous quantitative analysis, because of the projects characteristics or because practical experience is lacking to adequately analyze the project. In these cases, a qualitative assessment based on a reason and logical examination of how the project or program will decrease emissions and contribute to attainment or maintenance of a NAAQS is appropriate. Click here to enter text. MPO Concept Report | Spring 2014 12
Mountainland MPO
[PROJECT PRIORITAZION
CONCEPT REPORT]
5.0 | Project Cost Estimate To development a project cost estimate, please supply a detailed cost breakdown of your unit costs, inflation, equipment, right‐of‐way, contingency, etc. To do so, use the Concept Costs Estimate Excel form provided by UDOT (available on Mountainland.org website). Non‐construction projects such as equipment purchases, operations, administration programs, studies, etc. can use other methods to show their estimated costs. All sheets or methods used should be submitted as part of the Supplemental Information accompanying the Concept Report. 5.1 Cost Summary Summarize the information from the Costs Estimate Excel form or other method. Enter NA for items that do not apply to the project. a) Preliminary Engineering Completed b) Environmental Work Completed c) Construction $6,300,000 d) UDOT Review (project cost <$500k = $5k, >500K = $10k) $0 e) Construction Engineering $700,000 f) Subtotal $7,000,000 g) Inflated Cost Factor (inflate to year of construction) None h) Total Cost $7,000,000 i) Non‐MPO Funds Available to Project Unkown at this time j) MPO Federal Funds Request (includes 6.77% local match) $8,500,000 - It would be requested that
the funding for this project come from 3rd quarter cent sales tax for Utah County 6.0 | Supplemental Information Please submit any supporting documentation including maps, diagrams, charts, cost estimates, etc. that will allow MPO and UDOT staff and any Technical Advisory Committee to make an informed decision regarding the proposed project. Keep Supplemental Information submittals to 8 pages total. 6.1 Concept Report Submittal In order to facilitate the distribution of the Concept Reports and any supplemental information, all Concept Reports shall be combined with any supplemental information and saved in PDF format as one document. Please note that this might create a large data file that might be too large to emailed. Plan accordingly to submit your report in electronic format (CD, DVD, Flash Drive) by the required due date. Concept Reports are due by Thursday 24 April 2014 at 6pm. 6.2 Contacts, Questions For help with the Concept Report or questions, please contact: Shawn Eliot, AICP 586 East 800 North, Orem, UT 84097 p.801/229‐3841 f.801/229‐3801 email [email protected] MPO Concept Report | Spring 2014 13
1580 W
1480 W
Lakeview Parkway and Trail
1380
W
1600 W
BUSINESS PARK DR
UNIVERSITY PARKWAY
LAKEVIEW PARKWAY
EXTENSION TO BE
STUDIED BY OREM CITY
1330 S
Agricultural
Protection
Area
Alignment Concepts
OREM
Selected Option
UTAH COUNTY
Orange Option Alternative
N
GE
Natural Resources
AR
EV
Agriculture Protection Area
D
Wetlands
ConservationEasements
§
¦
¨
Taylor
Conservation
Easement
15
Cultural Resources
OREM
2000 S
Historic Road
2000 N
PROVO
Proposed
Villages at
Celebration Development
X
Historic Sites
Utilities
3200 W
Gas Line
Unincorporated
Utah County
Power Transmission Lines
Municipal Boundary
Utah Lake
Lakeview
Elementary
School
0
500
1,000
Feet
Despain
Conservation
Easement
BLB Drywall
Wetlands
Mitigation Site.
LAKEVIEW PARKWAY
PHASES 2 AND 3
LAKEVIEW PARKWAY
PHASES 2 AND 3
P
Pr
ov
Ri v
vo R
ive
r
er
RV Lak
C a esid
mp
e
gro
un
o
ro
d
CENTER ST
Airport
Related
LAKEVIEW PARKWAY
PHASE 1
Sunshine
Greenhouses
Provo
Municipal
Airport
0
I
500
1,000
Feet
PHASE 1 SUMMARY OF ITEMS
ITEM NUMBER
BUBBLE
NUMBER
1
2
3
120
121
122
MOBILIZATION
PUBLIC INFORMATION SERVICES
TRAFFIC CONTROL
4
123
SURVEY
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
1
1
1
LUMP
LUMP
LUMP
$604,950.00
$60,500.00
$60,500.00
$
$
$
604,950
60,500
60,500
1
LUMP
$60,500.00
$
60,500
APWA SPEC
SECTION
APWA STD.
PLAN NO.
GENERAL
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
REMOVALS
13,851
11
2,500
2
25
REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT
REMOVE TREE
REMOVE FENCE
REMOVE SIGN
REMOVE GATE
10
6
REMOVE BUILDING AND FOUNDATION
11
12
7
8
REMOVE CONCRETE
RELOCATE MAILBOX
13
14
15
16
17
124
49
48
115
25
2
19
7
ROADWAY
4,717
2,191
82,950
1
1,778
DUST CONTROL AND WATERING
ROADWAY EXCAVATION
EMBANKMENT (BORROW)
GEOTECHNICAL INSTRUMENTATION
BONDED WEARING COURSE
SQ YD
EACH
FT
EACH
FT
$
$
$
$
$
9.00
400.00
1.00
100.00
5.00
$
$
$
$
$
124,659
4,400
2,500
200
125
SQ YD
EACH
$
$
$
50,000.00
9.00
150.00
$
$
$
100,000
171
1,050
1000 GAL
CU YD
CU YD
LUMP
TON
$
$
$
$
$
25.00
9.00
22.00
21,000.00
90.00
$
$
$
$
$
117,925
19,719
1,824,900
21,000
160,020
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
80.00
30.00
23.00
3.00
15.00
11.00
2,000.00
610.00
1,500.00
500.00
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,018,800
378,510
186,392
16,146
144,900
84,623
30,000
3,050
4,500
1,500
EACH
EACH
FT
SQ YD
$
$
$
$
$
2,500.00
2,000.00
500.00
10.00
20.00
$
$
$
$
$
7,500
10,000
3,500
86,800
16,420
FT
FT
FT
FT
FT
FT
FT
EACH
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2.00
2.50
4.50
6.50
2.50
5.00
2.00
200.00
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
16,614
24,833
4,145
4,180
32,040
8,895
3,200
$
210.00
$
420
$
175.00
$
700
$
125.00
$
125
$
80.00
$
320
$
400.00
$
400
$
250.00
$
500
$
150.00
$
600
$
250.00
$
750
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
20.00
805.00
20.00
600.00
200.00
250.00
35.00
37.00
40.00
55.00
65.00
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30,960
4,025
10,700
3,600
600
250
64,925
15,503
53,880
85,475
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
80.00
400.00
420.00
700.00
3,000.00
5,000.00
4,000.00
5,000.00
3,000.00
4,000.00
500.00
3,000.00
3,500.00
5,000.00
2,000.00
400.00
50.00
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
53,200
2,000
840
12,000
70,000
8,000
9,000
8,000
2,500
42,000
17,500
50,000
4,000
2,400
28,650
EACH
EACH
FT
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
5.00
4,000.00
350.00
33.00
200.00
800.00
3,000.00
5,000.00
65.00
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,585
12,000
11,200
891
4,800
2,400
9,000
1,430
02 41 13
02 41 13
02 41 13
33 41 00
02 41 13
02 41 13
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
03 30 04
31 25 00
31 23 16
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
33 41 00
EACH
FT
EACH
EACH
$
$
$
$
1,250.00
1.50
50.00
80.00
$
$
$
$
5,000
13,854
950
240
31 25 00
31 25 00
31 25 00
31 25 00
EACH
18
14
HOT MIX ASPHALT (3/4-inch)
12,735
TON
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
15
16
24
10
11
12
19
22
23
UNTREATED BASE COURSE
GRANULAR BORROW
STABILIZATION-SEPARATION GEOTEXTILE
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER TYPE E
CONCRETE CURB TYPE Q
FLARED DRIVEWAY APPROACH
PLOWABLE END SECTION
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS RAMP
DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
12,617
8,104
5,382
9,660
7,693
15
5
3
3
CU YD
CU YD
SQ YD
FT
FT
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
28
17
ASPHALT DRIVEWAY
3
EACH
29
30
31
32
18
13
21
114
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
GRAVEL DRIVEWAY GRADING
RIGHT-OF-WAY FENCE
SUBGRADE STABILIZATION
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
4-INCH SKIP WHITE STRIPE
4-INCH SOLID WHITE STRIPE
8-INCH SOLID WHITE STRIPE
12-INCH SOLID WHITE STRIPE
4-INCH SOLID YELLOW STRIPE
4-INCH DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPE
4-INCH SOLID AND BROKEN YELLOW LINE
PAVEMENT MESSAGE
41
28
SIGN TYPE A-1, 40 INCH X 30 INCH
2
EACH
42
29
SIGN TYPE A-1, 30 INCH X 36 INCH
4
EACH
43
30
SIGN TYPE A-1, 24 INCH X 30 INCH
1
EACH
44
31
SIGN TYPE A-1, 18 INCH X 30 INCH
4
EACH
45
32
SIGN TYPE A-1, 72 INCH X 36 INCH
1
EACH
46
33
SIGN TYPE A-2, 36 INCH X 36 INCH
2
EACH
47
34
SIGN TYPE A-2, 18 INCH X 18 INCH
4
EACH
48
35
SIGN TYPE A-1, 36 INCH X 36 INCH
3
EACH
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
66
68
69
70
71
72
74
75
76
77
78
80
81
82
5
7
8,680
821
SIGNING AND STRIPING
8,307
9,933
921
643
12,816
1,779
0
16
REMOVE CULVERT
REMOVE HYDRAULIC STRUCTURE
REMOVE CONCRETE LINED DITCH
RAISE FRAME TO GRADE
REMOVE AND SALVAGE SCREW GATE AND FRAME
REMOVE PIPE OUTFALL
15" RCP
18" RCP
24" RCP
30" RCP
42" RCP
48" RCP
19" X 30" ELLIPTICAL RCP
15" PIPE OUTFALL
18" PIPE OUTFALL
36" PIPE OUTFALL
CATCH BASIN - SINGLE GRATE
CATCH BASIN - DOUBLE GRATE
4' X 6' CLEANOUT BOX - TYPE B
5' x 5' DIVERSION BOX
3' X 3' PRECAST BOX
4' X 4' PRECAST BOX
CONCRETE DITCH TO PIPE TRANSITION
4' DIA PRECAST MANHOLE
5' DIA PRECAST MANHOLE
6' DIA PRECAST MANHOLE
24" SCREW GATE AND FRAME
24" HAND SLIDE GATE AND FRAME
CONCRETE LINED DITCH
78
83
EARTH DITCH
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
84
85
86
102
116
117
118
119
4' X 4' IRRIGATION DIVERSION BOX
30" FRAME AND COVER - TYPE A
12" RCP
8" X 18" HAND SLIDE GATE AND FRAME
47 3/4" GRATE AND FRAME (VANE GRATE)
OPEN CURB CATCH BASIN IN TYPE Q CURB
INLINE CHECK VALVE
14" X 23" ELLIPTICAL RCP
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
STABILIZED ROADWAY ENTRANCE
SILT FENCE
GUTTER INLET BARRIER - FIBER ROLL
DROP INLET BARRIER - FIBER ROLL
DRAINAGE
1,548
5
535
6
3
1
1,855
419
1,347
0
1,315
1,300
665
5
2
0
4
14
2
0
3
2
5
14
5
10
2
6
573
317
3
32
27
24
3
3
0
22
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL
4
9,236
19
3
01 71 13
01 31 13
01 55 26
01 71 23
01 71 24
FT
EACH
FT
EACH
EACH
EACH
FT
FT
FT
FT
FT
FT
FT
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
EACH
FT
FT
02 41 14
02 41 13
02 41 13
02 41 13
02 41 13
02 41 13
02 41 19
02 41 14
32 01 07
31 23 16
31 05 13
31 24 01S
32 13 14S
32 12 05
32 12 16.13
32 11 23
31 05 13
31 05 19
32 16 13
32 16 13
32 16 13
32 16 13
32 16 14
32 16 14
32 12 05
32 12 16.13
32 16 13
32 11 23
32 31 14S
31 05 19
205
209
221
235
238
32 17 23
32 17 23
32 17 23
32 17 23
32 17 23
32 17 23
32 17 23
32 17 23
32 01 05
32 17 24S
32 01 05
32 17 24S
32 01 05
32 17 24S
32 01 05
32 17 24S
32 01 05
32 17 24S
32 01 05
32 17 24S
32 01 05
32 17 24S
32 01 05
32 17 24S
360
323
323
315
315
331
332
332
332
341
341
613
613
302
613
309
126
122
90
91
94
95
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
PIPE INLET BARRIER - FIBER ROLL
CHECK DAM - FIBER ROLL
10
EACH
1,241
FT
LANDSCAPING
CLEARING AND GRUBBING (PLAN QUANTITY)
14
ACRE
STRIP, STOCKPILE, AND SPREAD TOPSOIL (PLAN QUANTITY)
66,201
SQ YD
CONTRACTOR FURNISHED TOPSOIL
4,009
SQ YD
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
9,867
SQ YD
WOOD FIBER MULCH
5
ACRE
DRILL SEED
5
ACRE
BROADCAST SEED
2
ACRE
UTILITIES (SEE SEPARATE SPREADSHEET FOR BREAKDOWN)
NEW BETTERMENTS BY PROVO CITY
1
LUMP
RELOCATIONS
1
LUMP
$
$
100.00
4.00
$
$
1,000
4,964
31 25 00
31 25 00
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,500.00
2.00
4.00
1.50
730.00
500.00
300.00
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
49,000
132,402
16,036
14,801
3,819
2,616
612
31 11 00
31 11 00
31 05 13
31 25 00
31 25 01
32 93 13
32 93 13
$
$
713,790.00
248,750.00
$
$
713,790
248,750
$
$
$
$
6,370,838
700,792
7,071,631
9,970,999
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL FOR FUNDING
10% CONTINGENCY
C.E. COST
2013 TOTAL
2018 TOTAL
RIGHT OF WAY
TAKES
6.00
ACRE
$
120,000.00
$
720,000
FULL TAKE LAMB PROPERTY
1.00
EACH
$
163,500.00
$
163,500 ty Assessor's Information
FULL TAKE MANGINI PROPERTY
1.00
EACH
$
200,700.00
$
200,700 ty Assessor's Information
PERMANENT EASEMENTS
3.00
ACRE
$
75,000.00
$
225,000
TEMPORARY EASEMENTS
2.00
ACRE
$
15,000.00
$
30,000
R/W CONSULTANT COSTS
DAMAGES
21.00
21.00
EA
PARCELS
$
$
2,000.00
5,000.00
$
$
$
42,000
105,000
1,486,200
RIGHT OF WAY TOTAL
I D A H O
Garden
Snowville
15
42
City
BEAR
LAKE
STATE OF
142
84
91
218
Smithfield
30
89
RICH
30
UTAH
LOGAN
RANDOLPH
30
Tremonton
23
38
165
16
101
83
BOX ELDER
CACHE
Woodruff
39
BRIGHAM
CITY
GREAT
15
North
Ogden
WEBER
SALT
OGDEN
Roy
W Y O M I N G
MORGAN
Clearfield
84
LAKE
Henefer
Kaysville
MORGAN
MANILA
80
Echo
DAVIS
FLAMING
GORGE
43
66
Farmington
COALVILLE
Bountiful
DAGGETT
S U M M I T
65 Wanship
44
150
SALT
LAKE
189
191
201
80
SALT LAKE
Wendover
138
U I N T A H
Kamas
Park
City
111
DUCHESNE
36
Grantsville
112
Sandy
HEBER
Neola
121
35
WASATCH
H
Lehi
TA
199
36
191
87
Orem
Roosevelt
208
40
88
45
L
A
K
E
PROVO
Myton
40
UT
AH
Springville
U
Dugway
Jensen
R
E
V
I
R
DUCHESNE
Spanish Fork
6
Payson
68
Bonanza
G
R
E
E
N
73
T O O E L E
Naples
Riverton
TOOELE
PROVO CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
VERNAL
191
Santiquin
Eureka
PROJECT LOCATION
89
15
Scofield
J U A B
Fountian
6
Helper
Green
132
CARBON
Fairview
Clear Creek
PRICE
East
Carbon
132
Levan
P
E
T
E
116
Moroni
125
28
Delta
Wellington
Pleasent
29
191
GRAND
Castle
Dale
MANTI
10
Cisco
Thompson Sp.
Green River
50
70
EMERY
137
Mayfield
RI
VE
R
S
A
N
Huntington
89
Gunnison
50
Ferron
100
FILLMORE
Crescent Jct.
Salina
SEVIER
159
10
31
Emery
N
E
E
R
G
70
257
LAKE
Meadow
Sigurd
RICHFIELD
O
D
A
R
O
L
O
C
Kanosh
119
SEVIER
21
128
24
24
MOAB
Monroe
Cove Fort
118
25
W A Y N E
Bicknell
P I U T E
Hanksville
191
1377 SOUTH 350 EAST
PROVO, UTAH, 84606
(801) 852-6740
46
24
62
89
153
R
E
V
I
R
LOA
Marysvale
Milford
BEAVER
Torrey
Junction
21
BEAVER
Minersville
62
95
Antimony
12
SAN
20
GARFIELD
130
JUAN
MONTICELLO
Boulder
I R O N
PAROWAN
P
O
W
E
L
L
Escalante
56
143
Cedar
12
City
56
Tropic
89
14
666
276
Panguitch
95
275
Blanding
148
PROVO LAKEVIEW
PARKWAY AND TRAIL
95
Enterprise
276
Bluff
261
15
WASHINGTON
18
17
ST.
163
K A N E
9
Mt.Carmel Jct.
GEORGE
89
Hurricane
RI
VE
R
SAN
L
A
K
E
N E V A D A
50 Holden
6
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Sunnyside
124
Ephriam
Hinckley
MILLARD
123
Mt.
A D O
C O L O R
NEPHI
J
U
A
N
262
Mexican
Hat
191
163
59
KANAB
A R I Z O N A
(MIKE JENSE PARKWAY TO CENTER STREET)
APRIL 2013
INDEX TO SHEETS
DESCRIPTION
SHEET NUMBER
N
15
I-
CENT
ERST
REET
PROJECT LOCATION
WY
PK
E
S
EN
J
E
K
MI
LOCHNER
1245 East Brickyard Rd
Salt Lake City, Utah 84106
Phone: 801.415.5800
Fax: 801.415.5850
www.hwlochner.com
PROJECT NO. 14028
P1-1
TITLE SHEET/INDEX TO SHEETS
P1-1A
SHEET KEY
P1-1B
HORIZONTAL CONTROL
P1-1C
GENERAL NOTES / LEGEND
P1-1D
SEAL SHEET
TS-P1-01 TO TS-P1-04
TYPICAL SECTION
DT-P1-01 TO DT-P1-05
DETAIL SHEET
PV-DT-P1-01 TO PV-DT-P1-03
PAVING DETAIL SHEET
DT-APWA-1 TO DT-APWA-6
STANDARD APWA DETAILS
GT-DT-P1-01 TO GT-DT-P1-02
GEOTECHNICAL DETAIL
GT-P1-01 TO GT-P1-04
GEOTECHNICAL PLAN
PP-P1-01 TO PP-P1-10
ROADWAY PLAN AND PROFILE
DD-P1-01 TP DD-P1-05
DRAINAGE DETAIL
DR-P1-01 TO DR-P1-10
DRAINAGE PLAN AND PROFILE
DP-P1-01 TO DP-P1-04
DRAINAGE PROFILE
EC-P1-01 TO EC-P1-10
EROSION CONTROL
UT-P1-01 TO UT-P1-05a
UTILITY
UT-DT-P1-01 TO UT-DT-P1-03
UTILITY
SS-P1-01 TO SS-P1-05
SIGNING AND STRIPING
LT-P1-01 TO LT-P1-07
LIGHTING
SG-P1-01A & SG-P1-S1
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
RW-P1-A1
RIGHT-OF-WAY
RW-P1-01 TO RW-P1-05
RIGHT-OF-WAY
HORIZONTAL CONTROL
LAKEVIEW PARKWAY AND TRAIL
PROJECT NO: 14028
BEGIN PROJECT
N
CENTER STREET
STA. 0+00.00
N. 7256084.44
E. 1580184.32
FEET
0
200
400
0
+
0
0
PROJECT NO: 14028
PT 141+44.
34
00
140+
END PROJECT
LAKEVIEW PARKWAY
STA. 145+00.00
N. 7256143.27
E. 1580656.38
PI
3
+
7
0
.
0
0
GP
PROJECT NO: 14028
GP
N 4102’28.22" E
01
V
L
M
15+00
END PROJECT
M SD
M
50
+2
4.
90
M
PT
51
P
+
I
51 62.
11
+
9
8.
51
CENTER STREET
STA. 12+70.00
N. 7256077.83
E. 1581454.26
10
WEST
M SD
M SD
M
1
0
L
U
C
PROJECT NO: 14028
M SD
M SD
M
1
2
+
3
4
LAKEVIEW PARKWAY STA. 114+94.48 =
550 SOUTH STA. 13+50.00
N. 7253428.95
E. 1581436.47
10+00
3
1
31W0
1
P
C
L
AKEVI
EW PARKWAY
PT 13+81.
26
1
1
+
1
1
0
7
+
.7
0
0
5
P
C
0
+0
0
13
PC 125+69.
73
125+00
120+00
550 SO UTH
110+00
105+00
100+00
P
T
13
2+
5
7.
55
S 8854’26.59" E
LAKEVIEW PARKWAY STA. 144+34.51 =
CENTER STREET STA. 4+72.20
N. 7256077.78
E. 1580656.46
M
10+00
M
LAKEVIEW PARKWAY STA. 131+77.27 =
3110 WEST STA. 9+29.51
N. 7255040.46
E. 1581192.31
02
LV
3110 WEST STA. 11+41.08 =
3110 WEST CUL-DE-SAC
STA. 49+69.40
N. 7255200.50
E. 1581330.67
M
LAKEVIEW PARKWAY
STA. 98+00.00
N. 7251734.46
E. 1581436.47
13
4+
5
7.
39
13
5
+
00
BEGIN PROJECT
P
C
550 SOUTH
STA. 10+00.00
N. 7253435.62
E. 1581086.53
PROJECT NO: 14028
CENTER STREET
5+00
BEGIN PROJECT
50
+0
0
S 5233’45.95" E
3110 WEST
CUL-DE-SAC
PROJECT NO: 14028
S 2603’02.13" W
S 2603’02.13" W
PROJECT NO: 14028
END PROJECT
END PROJECT
3110 WEST
STA. 16+00.00
N. 7255642.53
E. 1581408.40
3110 WEST CUL-DE-SAC
STA. 52+39.51
N. 7254973.91
E. 1581369.80
NO.
DATE
APPROVED BY
CURVE ID
PI STATION
LV-01
RADIUS
TANGENT
LENGTH
NORTHING
EASTING
129+43.23
711.00
373.50
687.82
7254877.69
1581436.47
LV-02
138+30.34
711.00
372.95
686.95
7255414.67
1580657.27
31W-01
12+55.33
4041’43.20"
371.00
137.59
263.51
7255286.20
1581406.25
CUL-01
51+06.77
7836’48.09"
100.00
81.87
137.21
7255116.99
1581439.74
REMARKS
DELTA
NAME
DATE
NMW
12/12
LOCHNER
PROVO CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DESIGNED BY:
1245 EAST BRICKYARD RD
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84106
PHONE: 801.415.5800
FAX: 801.415.5850
WWW.HWLOCHNER.COM
PROJECT NUMBER:
14028
PROVO LAKEVIEW
ENGINEERING DIVISION
HORIZONTAL CONTROL
1377 SOUTH 350 EAST
CHECKED BY:
SL
12/12
PROVO, UTAH 84606
SHEET NUMBER:
PARKWAY AND TRAIL
P1-1B
LAKEVIEW PARKWAY
ROADWAY
C
L
WEST
EAST
R/W
R/W
106’
62’
VARIES
44’
VARIES
PERMANENT SLOPE &
PERMANENT SLOPE &
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
UTILITY EASEMENT
UTILITY EASEMENT
(PSE)
(PSE)
20’
CLEAR ZONE
7’
TRAIL
PARK
SEE NOTE 10
STRIP
2’
8’
SHOULDER
12’
12’
TRAVEL LANE
2’
12’
TRAVEL LANE
TRAVEL LANE
8’
SHOULDER
6’
10.34’
0.83’
12’
TRAVEL LANE
MEDIAN
6’
SEE NOTE 8 21
12’
2’
0.83’
SEE NOTE 6 11
2’ 2’
C&G
10’
C&G
1’ 2’
21 SEE NOTE 8
11SEE NOTE 6
SEE NOTES 4 & 5
SEE NOTES 4 & 5
2%
SEENOT
E3
E3
SEENOT
1
:
6
2%
6
:
1
LL
FI
1
2:
2:
1
FI
LL
PGL AND AXIS
3 INCH 14
SEE NOTE
6 INCH 15
10
OF ROTATION
SEE PAVEMENT SECTIONS
2, 4 & 5
SEE PAVEMENT SECTIONS
SEE NOTES 2, 4, 5, & 9
(THIS SHEET)
EXISTING GROUND
(THIS SHEET)
DETAIL A
48
10
49
LAKEVIEW PARKWAY - TYPICAL SECTION
45 MPH
STA 101+39.78 TO STA 144+55.51
N.T.S.
10
CURB & GUTTER TYPE E
11
CONCRETE CURB TYPE Q
14
HOT MIX ASPHALT
15
UNTREATED BASE COURSE
GENERAL NOTES:
16
GRANULAR BORROW
1.
21
RIGHT-OF-WAY FENCE
24
STABILIZATION - SEPARATION GEOTEXTILES
UNTREATED BASE COURSE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER, CURB, AND
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS RAMPS WILL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF EACH
INDIVIDUAL ITEM. THIS WILL NOT BE PAID SEPARATELY. THICKNESS
OF BASE COURSE UNDER THESE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT APWA STANDARD DRAWINGS.
25
BONDED WEARING COURSE
2.
PLACE 4 INCHES OF TOP SOIL IN MEDIAN AND PARK STRIP. SEE
48
EMBANKMENT (BORROW)
49
ROADWAY EXCAVATION
DT-P1-01 AND DR SHEETS FOR MEDIAN DRAINAGE DITCH DETAILS.
6’
0.83’
3.
SEE PP SHEETS FOR SUPERELEVATION TRANSITION INFORMATION.
4.
PLACE DRILL SEED ON ALL SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER AND BROADCAST
6’
SEED ON ALL SLOPES 3:1 OR STEEPER. INCLUDING MEDIAN.
5.
10.34’
0.83’
PLACE WOOD FIBER MULCH ON ALL SLOPES FLATTER THAN 2:1 AND
EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS ON ALL SLOPES 2:1 AND STEEPER.
INCLUDING MEDIAN.
PAVEMENT SECTION 1
E3
SEENOT
STA 117+50.00 TO STA 122+50.00
SEENOT
E3
STA 138+50.00 TO STA 144+55.51
COURSE TYPE
25 BONDED WEARING COURSE
14 HOT MIX ASPHALT
15 UNTREATED BASE COURSE
16 GRANULAR BORROW
14 HOT MIX ASPHALT
15 UNTREATED BASE COURSE
0.75"
5.5"
SEE PP SHEETS FOR CURBING AND MEDIAN DIMENSIONS AT
8.
FENCE TO BE PLACED AT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND AROUND FEATURES
SUCH AS FIRE HYDRANTS AND WATER METERS. FROM STA. 101+39.78
TO STA. 115+23.67 OFFSET OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FENCE VARIES PER
THE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE (SEE RW SHEETS).
9.
SEE DR SHEETS AND DT-P1-01 FOR MEDIAN DITCH LOCATIONS AND
DETAILS.
PGL AND AXIS
8"
OF ROTATION
24"
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
ON SAME PLANE AS
SUPER ELEVATION
10. PAVED MULTI-PURPOSE TRAIL TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO MIKE JENSE
PARKWAY AS PART OF THIS PROJECT.
THICKNESS
0.75"
DETAIL A
5.5"
PHASE 1 GRADING NOTE:
12.5"
NO.
AS PER GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT PREPARED BY RB&G
ENGINEERING, DATED JULY, 2012. EMBANKMENTS NEED TO BE
CONSTRUCTED TO THE TOP OF SUB-BASE (BOTTOM OF UNTREATED
BASE COURSE), THEN MONITORED FOR A PERIOD OF 60 DAYS PRIOR
TO PAVING.
DATE
APPROVED BY
REMARKS
NAME
DATE
NMW
12/12
LOCHNER
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROVO CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DESIGNED BY:
1245 EAST BRICKYARD RD
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84106
PHONE: 801.415.5800
FAX: 801.415.5850
WWW.HWLOCHNER.COM
7.
INTERSECTIONS.
STA 101+39.78 TO STA 117+50.00
STA 122+50.00 TO STA 138+50.00
25 BONDED WEARING COURSE
SEE PV-DT SHEETS FOR INTERSECTIONS DETAILS.
THICKNESS
PAVEMENT SECTION 2
COURSE TYPE
6.
14028
PROVO LAKEVIEW
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TYPICAL SECTION
1377 SOUTH 350 EAST
CHECKED BY:
SL
12/12
PROVO, UTAH 84606
SHEET NUMBER:
PARKWAY AND TRAIL
TS-P1-01
N
PROJECT CONTROL
LINE BEARINGS
TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST
PROJ
ECTNO:
1
4
0
2
8
ENDPROJ
ECT
L
AKEVI
EW PARKWAY
ST
A.
1
4
5
+
0
0
.
0
0
N.
7
2
5
6
1
4
3
.
2
7
E.
1
5
8
0
6
5
6
.
3
8
FEET
LAKEVIEW PARKWAY ALIGNMENT
0
N 00°04'12" W
D
M SS
GP
CHRI
ST
I
ANSON,
J
AYGRANT
&J
AYGRANT
S
E
C
T
I
O
NL
I
N
E
EPP
EPP
EPP
M SS
M SS
M SS
EPP
EPP
EPP
M SS
M SS
M SS
M SS
M SS
M SS
M SS
HI
NCKL
EY,
J
OHNMARI
ON
11
M
10B
M SD
EPP
EPP
EPP
4:E
12A
FOUND
WITNESS CORNER NW,
SECTION 10
N 7255132.399
E 1581375.136
EL 4493.473
EPP
EPP
1
NE
ON LI
4 SECTI
A
10A
6
24
M
M SD
M SD
M
3110 WEST
M SD
M SD
EPP
M
2:E
POE 16+00.
00
P
C
PT 13+81.
26
04
1P
-
B
7
26
19+44
15+00
1
1
+
1
7
.7
5
125+00
120+00
1
0
+
0
0
0
0
+
0
13
550 SOUTH
PC 125+69.
73
P
C
110+00
P
T
105+00
M
EPP
EPP
EPP
EPP
EPP
W
R
TBX
EPP
100+00
M
EPP
M
M SS
L
AKEVI
EW PARKWAY
5:E
EPP
SUNSHI
NE
GREENHOUSES
INC
EPP
19B
3
10
EPP
TBX
10
PI 11+19.15
M
19
M SS
E
N
I
NL
O
I
T
C
E
S
NOT FOUND
NW CORNER
4
9
RW-P1-05
9
9:E
EPP
J
ACOBSON,
DONNAC
C
OLDHAM,
KEITH W. & JAIME L
EPP
EPP
13:E
CHRI
ST
OF
F
ERSEN,
J
OHN&PAT
SY
13
4
+5
7
.
39
EPP
EPP
3:E
POB 9+61.58
9
SECTION 10
N 7252491.462
E 1581288.159
EL 4489.850
EPP
3:E
M SS
FOUND
1
WEST 4 CORNER,
EPP
PCS
I
NVEST
MENT
S,
L.C.
14:E
SUNSHI
NE
GREENHOUSES
INC
13
2
+5
7
.
55
M SS
JACOBSON, DONNA C
19A
EPP
EPP
J
OHNH.
HI
NCKL
EY
AND
NANET
T
EHI
NCKL
EYL
AMB
PT 141+44.
34
EPP
M SS
M SS
8
150+00
145+00
CENTER STREET
00
+
0
4
1
EPP
EPP
GP
MC COARD, PAUL RYAN
& HARRY GORDON
E
24A
EPP
M SS
E
EPP
15
L
AYT
ON,
MARKL
.
&DANAL
M SS
LAKEVIEW PARKWAY
STA. 98+00.00
N. 7251734.46
E. 1581436.47
SUNSHI
NE
GREENHOUSES I
NC
BEG. PROJECT
EPP
PROJECT NO: 14028
EPP
CURVE DATA
DELTA = 55°21'28"
D.O.C. = 08°03'31"
R = 711.00
L = 686.95
T = 372.95
P.I. STA. 138+30.34
N 7255414.669
E 1580657.274
25
M SS
D
17
EPP
N 55°25'40" W
EPP
C
E
N
I
L
.
C
0A
4
13
5
+
00
CURVE DATA
DELTA = 55°25'40"
D.O.C. = 08°03'31"
R = 711.00
L = 687.82
T = 373.50
P.I. STA. 129+43.23
N 7254877.695
E 1581436.467
320
NE
40AC.LI
B
NE
ON LI
SECTI
N 00°00'00" E
NE
40AC.LI
A
160
KUCI
NSKI
,
JOAN
MARIE
PHI
L
L
I
PS,
RUSSEL
LL
23:E
12B
RW-P1-03
RW-P1-02
RW-P1-01
20
22:E
HI
NCKL
EY,
J
OHNH.
LAMB, GENETTE
& NANETTE H
KILLPACK, REED M
& SHARI S
21:E
MCCOARD, PAUL & JENI
HI
NCKL
EY,
J
OHNH.
NE
40AC.LI
MANGINI, RAUL H
HI
NCKL
EYF
ARMS
L
I
MI
T
EDPART
NERSHI
P
16
18
E
N
I
L
.
C
0A
4
4
0A
C
.
L
I
N
E
ONAL EN
SI
G
S
R
No. 182770
EE
O
F
IN
E
4
0A
C
.
L
I
N
E
PR
NE
ON LI
SECTI
NE
40AC.LI
HINCKLEY, JOHN H
& JACKLYN S
SCOTT A.
HENDRICKS
ELECTRONIC
S
T
A
SEAL
H
TE
TA
OF U
04/04/2013
NO.
DATE
APPROVED BY
NAME
REMARKS
PROJECT NUMBER:
DATE
PROVO CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
1435 WEST 820 NORTH
DESIGNED BY:
KJ
1-28-13
PROVO, UTAH 84601-1343
801 374-5771
PROVO
801 521-5771
SALT LAKE CITY
14028
PROVO LAKEVIEW
ENGINEERING DIVISION
RIGHT OF WAY
1377 SOUTH 350 EAST
CHECKED BY:
SAH
1-28-13
PROVO, UTAH 84606
SHEET NUMBER:
PARKWAY AND TRAIL
RW-P1-A1