Local residents F-L

Transcription

Local residents F-L

Local resident submissions to the Borough of Poole electoral
review
This PDF document contains 40 submissions surnames F-L.
Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between
bookmarks.
Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that
page, please scroll through the document.
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kingsley, Paul
12 December 2013 14:14
Fuller, Heather
FW: Broadstone/Creekmoor
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Flagged
From: Evison, Alison
Sent: 11 December 2013 17:04
To: Kingsley, Paul
Subject: FW: Broadstone/Creekmoor
From: Chris Faulder
To: Evison, Alison
Subject: Broadstone/Creekmoor
Hello Alison, I wish to express my opposition to the proposed boundary changes between Broadstone and Creekmoor wards which would see our road moved into Creekmoor ( Cowslip Rd ) I have lived in Broadstone all of my life,
I attended Broadstone schools, as do my children. We are registered with health services in Broadstone ( GP and Dentist) as well as using community facilities daily, shops, library,sports Centre, bank, building society etc) We are very much part of the community, my husband is a member of the Chamber of Trade and we wish to remain part of the community and be represented as such, we do not wish to be represented by councillors who do not belong to the community that we feel we belong to Best Wishes Christine Faulder 1
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Evison, Alison
07 January 2014 11:12
Kingsley, Paul
Fuller, Heather
FW: Broadstone Boundary Changes
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Flagged
From: Paul
Sent: 06 January 2014 12:13
To: Evison, Alison
Cc: 'Karen Foreman'
Subject: Broadstone Boundary Changes
Reference: To Local Government Boundary Changes Commission ‐ Broadstone To review officer Poole: My family have lived in Broadstone for over 17 years and wish to remain included within the Broadstone ward. We are all very much involved within the community both in a voluntary and business capacity and do not wish to be split from the existing area. Since leaving the Armed Forces where I served 24 years I particularly wanted to settle my family within a close community and have built up strong relationships with local sports clubs, (one of which I coached football for over 10 years) Chamber of Trade, Residents Association and medical services. As a family we actively fund raise and help support the local community via a monthly publication which my wife runs. We sincerely hope our situation is not compromised by any changes that would impact on any of the above. Yours Faithfully. Paul, Karen, Harriet & Matthew Foreman 1
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kingsley, Paul
16 December 2013 13:50
Fuller, Heather
Proposed Boundary Changes Broadstone
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Flagged
From: David Fox PCH
To:
Evison, Alison
Subject: Proposed Boundary Changes Broadstone
]
This is an email opposed to the proposed boundary changes. I am sure there is nothing new in it but I wish to add my voice to the vast majority of residents who wish to remain in the Broadstone Ward. I moved here in Feb 2002 because i wanted to live in Broadstone. It is great that Broadstone still has many smaller owned business’s and these keep going thanks to the support of local residents. School catchments was the original reason we moved here and now our children have grown up and are no longer at local schools, i have no intention of leaving Broadstone as it is a fantastic place to live with a real community spirit. It is my understanding that we still live in a democracy which would mean that the electorate decide on actions which have a personal affect therefore maybe this should be put to the vote. Of course this will not happen as the outcome would be obvious. I would urge the local council to be guided by what the residents of Broadstone want and not change these boundaries. Regards David Fox 1
Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal
Page 1 of 2
Poole
Personal Details:
Name:
JILL FRAMPTON
E-mail:
Postcode:
Organisation Name:
Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013.
Map Features:
Comment text:
Dear Sir or Madam I have been advised to email you w th my views on the redrawing of the local government ward boundaries. I am fully
aware of the need to adjust the sizes of some of the wards, I believe there is one in Poole that has just over 100 people in it. The costs of
'running' a councillor for that ward cannot be worthwhile. I can understand the need to even up the electorate and even reduce the
number of wards accordingly, as this in itself would save our local council some money which could be channelled elsewhere. However I
am against any boundary change that will split commun ties or estates that were built as an entirety. I refer part cularly to my own
housing area wh ch is off Pinesprings Drive. I understand the proposal is to split this development in half, using Pinesprings Drive as the
boundary. Part of the LGBC guidance states that "Ward patterns should – as far as possible – reflect community interests and identities
and boundaries should be identifiable." Taking the guideline above t must follow that the spl tting of our Pinesprings development is a
misconceived idea which should not be allowed to take place. The Pinesprings development should be contained as a whole w thin an
electoral ward. Everyone living in this development dentifies themselves with Broadstone both emot onally and also physically by virtue of
their shopping, banking health services, sports facilities etc. A divis on such as that proposed would result in a diminution of our
community spirit. We certainly do not feel part of Creekmoor as we are geographically separated by areas of undeveloped land. We feel
this is the thin end of the wedge wh ch may later affect schooling and local government funding. I respectfully request that you reconsider
this proposal and keep the Pinesprings development whole and part of the Broadstone ward. Yours faithfully Jill Frampton
https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk//node/print/informed-representation/2725
17/12/2013
Page 2 of 2
17/12/2013
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Evison, Alison
07 January 2014 11:10
Kingsley, Paul
Fuller, Heather
FW: Broadstone/Creekmoor Ward Boundary
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Completed
From:
To: Evison, Alison
Subject: Broadstone/Creekmoor Ward Boundary
Dear Alison Evison
My husband and I moved to Broadstone with our 2 young sons in August 1986. We researched the area very
carefully, took advice from friends who already lived in Broadstone and made an informed choice to live in
Broadstone. We were welcomed by the Broadstone commumity, registered with the Doctors in the Harvey Practice,
joined the library, sent our sons to Springdale, Broadstone Middle and Corfe Hills Schools, use the local shops and
attend St John's Church. We bank in Broadstone, have our newspapers delivered from Broadstone News and use
the dry cleaners, hairdressers, pubs,cafes and restaurants. When our grandchildren visit, my son and daughter in law
take them swimming in the Sports Centre and to the soft play area. My husband is Chairman of the Broadstone
Royal British Legion Club. In short, we are Broadstone residents by choice and wish to remain so.
We are horrified to learn that Broadstone and Creekmoor Conservatives are proposing the boundary should be
moved so that our house in Twin Oaks Close would become part of the Creekmoor community. We are totally and
absolutely against this split.
We lived in West Way for 20 years and downsized to Twin Oaks Close seven and a half years ago, believing we
would still be living in Broadstone and would remain so till the end of our days. That is our wish - we do not want to
become absorbed into Creekmoor. We wish to continue to vote in Broadstone, for Broadstone Councillors.
I am registered disabled following a car accident in Sptember 1996 and my husband was treated for lung cancer 3
months ago. Medical continuity is essential for both of us and this is provided by the Harvey Practice in Broadstone;
any change would be devastating and detrimental to us both.
I trust I have managed to convey to you how deeply distressed we are about the propsed boundary move and have
given you clear reasons for our concerns.
I look forward to receiving your acknowledgement of this e mail and to your reassurance that the boundary will remain
unchanged.
Yours sincerely
Gilly French (Mrs)
1
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kingsley, Paul
17 January 2014 15:32
Fuller, Heather
FW: Proposed Boundary Changes
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Flagged
To: Kingsley, Paul
Subject: FW: Proposed Boundary Changes
From: Jack Gibbs
To: Evison, Alison
Subject: Proposed Boundary Changes
I am a resident of Broadstone, Dorset and I have been made aware of possible boundary changes
to the wards of Broadstone and Creekmoor.
I am totally opposed to these proposed changes and I set out some of my views hereunder, which
I hope will be taken into consideration:(1) I live in Broadstone and wish to be part of that community - NOT Creekmoor.
(2) My late wife and her family came from Broadstone and I was married in Broadstone.
(3) I go to church in Broadstone.
(4) My doctor's surgery is in Broadstone
(5) My bank is in Broadstone.
(6) I am a member of the Royal British Legion, Broadstone Branch.
(7) I shop in Broadstone and support local businesses there.
(8) Public transport serves residents going to Broadstone - there are no services to Creekmoor.
(9) I use the library in Broadstone.
(10) I don't go to Creekmoor, I have no reason to do so.
I understand that the reason for these proposed boundary changes is that there are not enough
residents in Creekmoor to support the existing three councillors. In that case, reduce the number
of councillors there to two. Furthermore, if necessary, increase the number in Broadstone from
three to four and split Broadstone into two wards, East & West, thereby keeping the Broadstone
community intact. This has been done in surrounding areas of Poole, in Hamworthy, Canford
Heath and Branksome. I believe this would be an acceptable solution to all concerned.
I hope this shows the depth of feeling about these proposed changes among the residents of the
Pinesprings area of Broadstone, where I reside and that the Commissioners will take these views
into consideration when making their decision.
Thank you for taking time to read this.
Yours faithfully,
1
Page 1 of 2
Poole
Personal Details:
Name:
Eunice Gibson
E-mail:
Postcode:
Organisation Name:
Map Features:
Comment text:
I understand having received a flyer through the door today regarding boundary changes that Sundew Road, currently in the Broadstone
Ward of Poole is one of the roads under considerat on to be moved into the Creekmoor Ward. I have lived in Sundew Road for 20 years
almost as long as the road has been in existence. My husband and I feel that this would be retrograde step. We consider ourselves very
much part of the Broadstone community and have done all the years we have lived in Sundew Road. We shop in Broadstone and use all
the local facilities including the Post Off ce and eat in the local restaurants. My husband us a member of Broadstone Golf Club and I belong
to the Broadstone Choir. Broadstone has such a lot to offer and is a lively community. We also feel there would be a strong sense
amongst other residents that property values would decrease as Creekmoor is qu te frankly less 'posh'! What would be the impact for
families w th children of school age? Currently they can access the very good schools in Broadstone. Parents would not be happy to have
this choice removed. We actually made a consc ous decis on 20 years ago to move out of Creekmoor into our current house to 'move up'.
I feel I belong to Broadstone! Thank you for considering my views.
12/12/2013
Page 2 of 2
12/12/2013
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kingsley, Paul
12 December 2013 14:13
Fuller, Heather
FW: Broadstone/ Creekmoor Boundary Change
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Flagged
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Evison, Alison Sent: 11 December 2013 09:33 To: Kingsley, Paul Subject: FW: Broadstone/ Creekmoor Boundary Change ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Eric Gurney Sent: 10 December 2013 21:40 To: Evison, Alison Subject: Broadstone/ Creekmoor Boundary Change Review Officer(Poole) Local Government boundary Commission for England Layden House 76‐78 Turnmill Street London EC1M 5LG 10 December 2013 Dear Sir We have been residents of Broadstone for over forty years of which twenty two years we have lived in Twin Oaks . We go to St John's Church Broadstone and on days when we vote at Council and Close Government elections we can from the shops go round the corner and vote. Broadstone has an excellent shopping centre including two super markets. We have a good bus service to take us to that area. Creekmoor is virtually non existence for shopping and very difficult to access from here due to the relief road severing us from Creekmoor. We are registered with the doctors' practice in Broadstone and this would cause a great deal of stress to change. If this decision is made to change the boundary it will cause a lot of people including us a great deal of problems. Yours faithfully Eric Gurney 1
‐‐‐ This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com 2
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kingsley, Paul
16 December 2013 13:34
Fuller, Heather
FW: Boundary changes
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Flagged
To: Kingsley, Paul
Subject: FW: Boundary changes
From: R HALL
To: Evison, Alison
Subject: Boundary changes
Thank you and councillor Mike Brooke for alerting us of the proposed boundary changes.Both my wife and
myself are disappointed that this subject is once again on the agenda.There are so many reasons why we all
wish to remain part of Broadstone having lived at this location for over 20 years,all of our
communications,banking,shopping,insurance and the community which we are an integral part of is
important to us and we do not wish to become part of Creekmoor.Regards Richard and Julie Hall,
1
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Evison, Alison
07 January 2014 11:10
Kingsley, Paul
Fuller, Heather
FW: Broadstone Boundary Changes
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Flagged
From: JOHN HARRIS
To: Evison, Alison
Subject: Broadstone Boundary Changes
We have received notification that the official view of the Borough of Poole for the creation of a Broadstone
East and a Broadstone West will now be submitted to the Boundary Commission. We fully support this
proposal to be included in the Broadstone Wards as this seems a logical and simplistic boundary between
the Broadstone Ward and the Creekmoor Ward.
We shop in Broadstone, our Doctor, Dentist, Bank etc. is in Broadstone and our two children were
Christened in St. Johns and the daughter was married in the same Church in Dunyeats Road. It seems a
shame that Party Political Policies come in to this, we have only received correspondence from the Parties
which are submitting the Councils' proposals nothing from the Party who did not support these
proposals. We thought that Councillors expressed the views of the people they represent, in this case this
has not completely taken place.
If Creekmoor cannot support three Councillors reduce it to two and increase the Broadstone Ward to four A
SIMPLISTIC SOLUTION!
Diana & John Harris
1
Page 2 of 2
22/11/2013
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Judy Butt
06 January 2014 01:30
Reviews@
John Rampton; Leslie Burden; Judy Butt
RE: CREEKMOOR AND BROADSTONE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOROUGH OF POOLE
Dear Sirs Please find as below an e‐mail from residents regarding the Boundary review as above. I would be grateful to receive safe receipt of the above Many thanks Cllr Judy Butt ________________________________________ Thelma Hendy You replied on 02/01/2014 16:02. Sent: 02 January 2014 13:49 To: Judy Butt Attachments: Dear Judy I had a visit from one of my neighbours regarding the name change/boundary change for Creekmoor. This area has been known as Creekmoor for as long as I can remember and was born and brought up in Poole and we should stick with it, it would also mean a lot of expense for Council Tax payers to put all these new complicated plans into place that the Broadstone lot are suggesting. I have seen your plans and agree that we have to balance numbers and what you have suggested looks like simple solution, whilst the Broadstone one looks like they want to take us over, why would they do that? Please can you let the boundary people know that we do not want massive changes. Speak soon Best Thelma 1
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Judy Butt
06 January 2014 02:07
Reviews@
Dear Sirs Please find as below an e‐mail from residents regarding the Boundary review as above. I would be grateful to receive safe receipt of the above Many thanks Cllr Judy Butt ________________________________________ CHANGING OUR CREEKMOOR NAME TO BROADSTONE Graham Hil
You replied on 02/01/2014 16:38. Sent: 02 January 2014 12:25 To: Judy Butt Attachments: Dear Judes Me and Karen have just seen the 3 different plans for the new boundaries. Thanks for explaining what needs to happen with the numbers and everythin. We understand why but please can you speak with the boundary people and ask them not to make the huge changes that the broadstone councillors want, it is crazy, making huge bits of Creekmoor into broadstone. Me and Karen and my neighbours are all very unhappy with these people how dare they try to change things behind our backs. We want our Creekmoor to stay as it is. With the roads at the top of Hillbourne and Waterloo coming back into Creekmoor that makes sense, my friend in Edwina Drive is more than happy with that as I am sure the other people will be, there homes are in hillbourne and waterloo anyway so its just common sense to bring them back into creekmoor. Please do all you can to stop this stupid plan to split creekmoor and broadstone into three, for what purpose, do they think they will get more votes, they don't seem to care that it's peoples lives and homes they are messing with, we are not directly affected but we will not sit by and see others upset and cast out of an area they have known for decades and decades. Thanks Judes, keep us posted Graham and Karen CREEKMOOR!!!!!! 1
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Evison, Alison
07 January 2014 16:38
Kingsley, Paul
Fuller, Heather
FW: boundary changes Pinesprings
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Flagged
From: john hodgson
To: Evison, Alison
Subject: boundary changes Pinesprings
ease except this as a statement of Objection to any changes to the existing boundary,
I have lived at my present address for 23-1/2 years at
My family were the third family to take up residency on this development, we have been happy living
here in Broadstone, There was a time a few years back when some one who really did not know what they
were doing attempted to put us all in to the Creekmoor, but thanks to objections raised this was over ruled
and we stayed were we belonged in
when I choose this house to move to in 1990 we did for very good reasons, these reasons have not
changed over the years. My family and I Do Not Want TO Live In Creekmore.
We are Part of the Broadstone ward and we will use what ever means are available to stay under and a
member
of Broadstone, our standards of living, our Residents Association and Neighbourhood watch schemes
cater for all of the residents and what other problems would becoming part of creekmore coming to my door
Please note that this e-mail represents all the residents in this house and deserves consideration.
J T Hodgson
M E Hodgson
S M Hodgson
1
Page 1 of 2
Poole
Personal Details:
Name:
Brian Hollocks
E-mail:
Postcode:
Organisation Name:
Map Features:
Comment text:
Consultation on new ward boundaries for Poole My wife and I have lived in the Merley & Bearwood Ward of Poole since 1994. Throughout
that time we have been satisfied both with our council representation, and the Ward boundaries. Most boundaries of Merley [including
with it Oakley and Canford Magna] are naturally defined: the North by the River Stour, the South by Delph Woods etc, and the West by
the route of the old Roman road. Residents of Bearwood would have more insight into the Easterly boundaries of the Ward. We have no
specif c proposals for change. However,we have heard rumours of a propos t on to move the Ward from Poole to Bournemouth Council.
Such a change would be wholly inappropriate for Merley; there is no natural or social link of the area to Bournemouth. Many local people
rarely, if ever, go there; indeed the main connecting bus serv ce [4d] was w thdrawn for lack of use. The Ward should remain as part of
Poole. [Nb: Should Bearwood residents hold the opposite view then perhaps this is indicative that the Ward should be split, Merley to
Poole and Bearwood to Bournemouth, w th a division to the East of Canford Arena and Canford Golf Club and allocat on of councillors.]
Professor & Mrs B W Hollocks
06/01/2014
Page 2 of 2
06/01/2014
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kingsley, Paul
16 December 2013 13:38
Fuller, Heather
FW: Proposed Boundary Change
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Flagged
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Chloe Hooper Sent: 14 December 2013 09:47 To: Evison, Alison Subject: Proposed Boundary Change Dear Alison, Thank you for raising the proposed boundaries change to our attention, I strongly oppose this proposal of changing to the Creekmoor ward. As part of the younger community within Broadstone, I would be hugely saddened to leave Broadstone where I have attended Broadstone schools and regularly use Broadstone's library's, shops and churches as I have grown up and still currently do so. Kind Regards, Chloe Hooper 1
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Judy Butt
06 January 2014 01:36
Reviews@
________________________________________ Dear Sirs Please find as below an e‐mail from residents regarding the Boundary review as above. I would be grateful to receive safe receipt of the above Many thanks Cllr Judy Butt ________________________________________ Change of name Megan Hooper You replied on 02/01/2014 16:38. Sent: 02 January 2014 12:25 To: Judy Butt Attachments: Dear J butt, A local neighbour has informed me of a possible change of name for some of Creekmoor. Can I please raise my concern about this. I do not want to loose any of our local ward councillors, should this happen. I object to it happening. Yours Karen hooper of 1
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kingsley, Paul
16 December 2013 13:42
Fuller, Heather
Broadstone Ward Boundary Change
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Flagged
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Lauren Hooper
Sent: 14 December 2013 12:20 To: Evison, Alison Subject: RE: Broadstone Ward Boundary Change > Dear Alison, > > Thank you for raising our attention to the proposed boundary changes for Broadstone Ward. I am strongly against this proposal. > As a young member of the Broadstone community I have attended all Broadstone schools as well as utilising local shops and local businesses. Growing up in Broadstone I belonged to Broadstone contingents of Rainbows, Brownies and finally Guides. Now as a third year university student studying from my home in Broadstone, my connection to this community is as important as ever. Friends that also live within the proposed boundary change feel the same connection to the Broadstone community that we have always had, from the past 20 years of residence here. > > Thank you. > > Lauren Hooper > . > 1
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kingsley, Paul
16 December 2013 13:36
Fuller, Heather
Proposed boundary change - Broadstone Ward / information required for
arranging a petition urgent
Importance:
High
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Flagged
Categories:
Talk to Paul
From: Hooper, Barbara
To: Evison, Alison
Cc: Smith, Jim E (GE Capital); Ray Hooper
Subject: RE: Proposed boundary change - Broadstone Ward / information required for arranging a petition urgent
Importance: High
Dear Alison Firstly I would like to thank you for bringing the boundary review to our attention. It is very concerning that once again we are faced with the prospect of the boundary changing without any proper consultation with those residents affected. We feel very much part of the Broadstone community and very much wish to remain so. Our two daughters have been educated within the Broadstone school system and have also attended Broadstone rainbows, brownies and guides, together with kids club as they grew up. We always use the Broadstone shops, restaurants, leisure centre, library, hairdressers, cafes and other facilities so very much consider ourselves as part of this community which we would definitely not want to leave. We are also members of the Broadstone Residents Association and attend church in Broadstone. We are very proud to be part of this community. We very much oppose the proposal to move the boundary and make us part of Creekmoor. We had to deal with this several years ago and there was a huge opposition to the proposal where the residents arranged a petition; this time the time available makes this difficult but we are still trying to arrange this. Is there is any way the deadlines can be delayed so that the residents can fully voice their options on this, rather than the few days allowed for feedback on the current timetable? In terms of trying to arrange the petition, please can you advise which roads within the Pinesprings area are affected so that we can make sure we can cover them all? If we cannot get this organised in time for your meeting next week we will certainly arrange it over Christmas so that it can be presented to the Commissioners. Would it be best to send the petition to you or direct to the commissioners in London? 1
Everyone we have spoken to feels very strongly about this and the feeling that we are very much part of the Broadstone community is as strong as ever. Many thanks for your assistance in this matter. Regards Barbara Hooper and Ray Hooper 2
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kingsley, Paul
12 December 2013 14:02
Fuller, Heather
FW: Changes to the ward boundary between Broadstone & Creekmoor
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Flagged
To: Kingsley, Paul
Subject: FW: Changes to the ward boundary between Broadstone & Creekmoor
From: Sylvia Irvine
To: Evison, Alison
Subject: Changes to the ward boundary between Broadstone & Creekmoor
Dear Roy, Vikki and Mike,
I fully support your proposal to 'Keep Edwina Drive within the Broadstone ward boundary'.
When I bought this house 20 years ago, it was sold to me as being in Broadstone, and we were part of the
Broadstone community. We have remained part of the Broadstone community.
Once the building of houses was all finished, the connecting road between Edwina Drive and Twin Oaks
was permanently closed off and we were told we were now Poole. I would imagine this had some effect on
house prices in my road, as Broadstone always attracted a higher premium. This also made a difference to
which schools were available for people on Edwina Drive, with seniors needing to attend Poole schools
instead of Corfe Hills.
This latest proposed change to ward boundaries will presumably put these houses in Creekmoor - with a
probable further reduction in sale value - not sure of any further effect on schools, my children being long
since grown up, with children of their own.
Best regards, Sylvia Irvine
1
Page 1 of 2
Poole
Personal Details:
Name:
Daniel James
E-mail:
Postcode:
Organisation Name:
Map Features:
Comment text:
Dear sir I live in Hamworthy, having moved a few years ago from Creekmoor where I was born and grew up. I have recently been
informed of the proposed boundary changes affecting both wards, and would like to lend my support to the idea of merging the two
Hamworthy wards, which are naturally the same community and should never have been separated in the first place. By the same token,
I must object v olently to the plan by Poole Council to divide Broadstone and Creekmoor into three wards, paying absolutely no respect to
the natural and histor c community characters. Creekmoor and Hillbourne in particular are individual 'villages' which do not deserve to be
emasculated. I strongly support the proposal by Cllr Judy Butt to make minimal adjustments to the ward boundaries to preserve the
integrity of these areas. Regards Daniel James
09/01/2014
Page 2 of 2
09/01/2014
Page 1 of 2
Poole
Personal Details:
Name:
Georgina Jane
E-mail:
Postcode:
Organisation Name:
Map Features:
Comment text:
CREEKMOOR BROADSTONE BOUNDARIES BOP BOUNDARY COMMISSION REVIEW Miss Georgina Jane Dear
Sir I am wr ting to add my name to support the 2 proposals put forward by my Creekmoor Ward Cllrs. I was born in Creekmoor and have
just finished Univers ty and am now working in Poole. Creekmoor is an amazing place for young people to live. It has brilliant schools,
youth centres, and places to go to play and enjoy sports. We have excellent safe bus routes and thriving Commun ty Centre where you
can play badminton and enjoy many other activities. We have three Churches, one Cathol c which I attend and all w thin the core of
Creekmoor. As a young person I am really proud of our community and how friendly everyone is, whenever there is a problem every one
works together to sort t out. I would not want to live anywhere else in Poole I certainly do not want to Broadstone taking over our fab
Ward in any degree. Please do not allow this to happen and agree one of the two proposals put forward by my Creekmor Councillors
Thanks Georgina Jane
09/01/2014
Page 2 of 2
09/01/2014
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Evison, Alison
07 January 2014 11:19
Kingsley, Paul
Fuller, Heather
FW: Proposed Broadstone Boundary Changes
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Flagged
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Jack Jarvis Sent: 22 December 2013 14:54 To: Evison, Alison Subject: Proposed Broadstone Boundary Changes Just to say my wife and I are totally opposed to the proposed boundary change which would include us into the Creekmoor district. We have been here for 23 years and have established ourselves well, as part of the Broadstone community, including St Johns church, our doctors at Hadleigh surgery, the Legion etc etc! Broadstone is our "local" for just about everything! We feel part of and have contributed to this community for many years and would be so disappointed to be separated from it, and that's apart from any inconveniences we would incur. Hoping you will put forward our views. Yours sincerely Jack and Thelma Jarvis , Sent from my iPad 1
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Judy Butt
06 January 2014 00:29
Reviews@
CREEKMOOR AND BROADSTONE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOROUGH OF POOLE
Dear Sirs Please find as below an e‐mail from a resident regarding the Boundary review as above. I would be grateful to receive safe receipt of the above Many thanks Cllr Judy Butt ________________________________________ From: Sent: 04 January 2014 22:21 To: Judy Butt Subject: Re: CREEKMOOR AND BROADSTONE AND HAMWORTHY BOUNDARIES REVIEW BOROUGH OF POOLE Dear Judy, I have heard about the boundary changes, and wish to register our feelings that we want Creekmoor, not to be a part of Broadstone We in Creekmoor have very little in common with Broadstone, they have little in common with us. Creekmoor, Hillboure and Waterloo is a very quiet longstanding community and the proposals by the Broadstone Councillors to split us all up is unfair, no one has spoken to us about it. We support the proposals you are suggesting as this is just bringing back part of Hillbourne and Waterloo back into Creekmoor from years ago and is the least harm and a small change to both communities and won't disrupt and upset everyone. Please can you ensure you let the Boundary Commission know how I and my neighbours who I have spoken to feel about this. Many thanks John 1
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. 2
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Evison, Alison
07 January 2014 11:20
Kingsley, Paul
Fuller, Heather
FW: Ward boundary
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Flagged
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Sent: 22 December 2013 12:13 To: Evison, Alison Subject: Ward boundary I support the proposal to include my road within the Broadstone ward boundary. Joy Kerley Sent from my iPad 1
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kingsley, Paul
18 December 2013 13:36
Fuller, Heather
Boundary changes to Broadstone Dorset
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Flagged
‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐ From: George Llewellyn Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 12:50 PM To: Evison, Alison Subject: Boundary changes to Broadstone Dorset I am writing to you to advise you of my considerations regarding the boundary changes in our area of Broadstone Dorset. I live in Pinesprings and have done since it was built. It was initially built as part of Broadstone and has developed as an integral part of that area. Many of the links are with Broadstone and none with Creekmoor. Road system links naturally with the town and not Creekmoor. The people of Pinesprings have little or no reason to visit Creekmoor and therefore wonder why somebody in their infinite wisdom wishes Pinesprings should be part of that area Our buses run to Broadstone not Creekmoor. All of our local services such as doctors bank, library, postoffice etc are in Broadstone. You will be doing the residents of Pinesprings a great dis‐service if the boundaries are altered and drive a fissure through an established community. Please take note of these comments as the confidence in our current government is in need urgent repair. Yours faithfully George Llewellyn Sent from my iPad 1
Fuller, Heather
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Evison, Alison
07 January 2014 11:20
Kingsley, Paul
Fuller, Heather
FW: Boundary Ward Changes - Poole BC
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Flagged
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Brian Lloyd Sent: 21 December 2013 21:10 To: Evison, Alison Subject: Boundary Ward Changes ‐ Poole BC Dear Ms Evison, My wife and I would to make clear our desire to accept the proposed changes in the Broadstone Ward of splitting the ward into two separate sections, Broadstone( West) and Broadstone (East). The alternative of splitting the existing Broadstone Ward with some parts being moved into the Creekmoor Ward is unacceptable, particularly since I understand the Twin Oaks area, in which we now reside, would be separated from Broastone and included in Creekmoor. We have lived in Broadstone for nearly 33 years, the first 20 years living in the Northern section of the proposed Broadstone (East) and the last 13 years in the Twin Oaks area of Broadstone. We object strongly to any idea that my wife and I be split from the community in Broadstone in order to "equalise" the number of voters in the electoral wards of the Borough Council of Poole. Our community is Broadstone, we shop, attend our doctors surgery, are members of the Broadstone British Legion, use Broadstone Library three/four times per week, use the Broadstone Recreation Ground and children's play area for our children and now our grandchildren, for play, football and walks and take an active interest in matters effecting the Broadstone community. Our only interest in Creekmoor, is passing through it to get to the A35 when driving west! Yours sincerely, Brian and Carole Lloyd PS. Could the Boundary Commission explain why they allow political interference in their decisions which effect the right of voters to have fair elections both locally and more important, Nationally? > Sent from my iPad 1

Local residents F-L

Transcription

Similar documents

Untitled

10th Anniversary Celebrations at Broadstone Physiotherapy and

Quinsam Coal EXISTING CITY BOUNDARY PROPOSED

Report 114-2016 Changes to Oakham North West and Barleythorpe

August 2015

Pathway June 2014 for Peter - Broadstone United Reformed Church

Overview Presentation

Montana Inc Real Estate

here - Building on Buildings

Figure 5 TCE Concentrations in GW (1)