to view the Open Space Plan

Transcription

Town of Otis
2004
Prepared By
This document was prepared with funding from the Massachusetts Executive Office of
Environmental Affairs, Executive Office of Transportation and Construction, Department of
Housing and Community Development, and Department of Economic Development.
Town of Otis
2004
Prepared By:
This document was prepared with funding provided by the Massachusetts Executive Office of
Environmental Affairs, Executive Office of Transportation and Construction, Department of
Housing and Community Development, and Department
Acknowledgements
Members of Otis’s Community Development Advisory Committee who worked
tirelessly for over two (2) years to provide the town with a vision for the future in
Open Space, Transportation, Economic Development, and Housing. It should be
acknowledged that without the dedicated hours of assistance and technical
support by these Committee Members this report could not have been completed.
Community Development Advisory Committee
Harold Kobrin
Ralph Gleason, Sr.
Andrew Pyenson
Kevin Rocke
V. Vincent Lee
Brian Crandall
Thank you for helping identify and plan for Otis’s future!
Table of Contents
Introduction
1
Introduction
1-1
Executive Summary
2
Executive Summary
2-1
Community Setting
3
Community Setting
3-1
Open Space
4
Introduction to Open Space
Overview of Open Space and Recreation
OSRP Comment Section by BRPC
Open Space and Water Resource Maps
4-1
4-2
4-12
4-13
Housing
5
Introduction to Housing
Otis Housing Profile
Housing Suitability Map
5-1
5-2
5-21
Economic Development
6
Introduction to Economic Development
Community Recreation Center Project
Figures 1-4
Economic Suitability Map
6-1
6-2
6-9
6-13
Transportation
7
Introduction to Transportation
Bicycle/Pedestrian Transportation Plan
7-1
7-2
GIS Mapping
8
Introduction to GIS Mapping
Introduction to Development Suitability Maps
Base Maps
8-1
8-2
8-8
Appendix
9
A.1 Public Participation
9-1
Inserts
Action Map
2
Introduction
Introduction
1
1-1
Introduction to the Community Development Plan Program
On January 21, 2000, then Governor Paul Cellucci issued Executive Order 418,
a measure designed to help communities plan for new opportunities while
balancing economic development, transportation infrastructure improvements,
and open space preservation.
Technical assistance and grants of up to $30,000 were made available to assist
communities in producing Community Development Plans.
Community
Development Plans are intended to provide guidance as cities and towns
consider options and avenues for future development. The plans was to focus
on housing, economic and community development, transportation, and open
space. The plan was also to include strategies for how the community will
develop housing that is affordable to families and individuals across a broad
range of incomes.
Otis previously completed an Open Space Plan in 1991, an Economic
Development Plan in 1995 and Economic Development and Planning
Consistency Plan in 1998. The Town chose to participate in the Community
Development Plan (CDP) program as an opportunity to update portions of its
Open Space Plan and to address more specific planning issues that had been
identified in its two economic development plans. The Town’s chose to focus
most of its CDP resources toward a feasibility and conceptual design study for a
massive community center complex, which would serve as a community focal
point for recreational, cultural and civic pursuits. The community center was also
to be considered as key stimulus to the local economy by generating local jobs
and revenue for the Town. The community center complex is also envisioned a
system of walking and biking trails that would link the various community venues
in and around the proposed complex. The CDP was to also identify the
community’s affordable housing needs and opportunities. Finally the CDP would
also provide for modernized GIS maps of the towns resources and land uses and
considers suitability for future uses.
1-1
Executive Summary
Executive Summary
2
2-1
Executive Summary
The Community Development Planning process was directed by the Town’s
Planning Board acting as the Community Development Plan Advisory
Committee. Numerous other Town Boards and local residents participated at
various stages of the process, which lasted nearly two and one half years. The
Advisory Committee held 8 public meetings specifically related to the
development of CDP. The Berkshire Regional Planning Commission acted as
lead consultant in preparing the plan and providing staff support and technical
assistance and the GIS mapping components. Two other organizations, Clough,
Harbour & Associates (CHA) and UMASS- Amherst Environmental Institute
(UMASS) were principally responsible for preparing the Economic Development
Element (CHA), the Transportation Element (CHA) and portions of the Open
Space Element of the Plan (UMASS).
Housing Element
The housing profile and needs assessment indicated that Town of Otis,
like many other small towns in Berkshire County, does not have a single
family housing unit that qualifies for the Chapter 40B affordable housing
inventory. The assessment also indicated that about 38% of Otis
households are of low-moderate income. While the cost of existing
housing has been rising steadily, the increases are not as dramatic as in
other areas of southern Berkshire County. The cost of new homes being
built in Otis has risen significantly since the late 1990s. The assessment
also found that about 80 % of the homes in Otis are over 25 years old.
Overall, their a still a number of homes that are affordable across a broad
range of incomes. However, the affordability analysis did indicate some
gaps in affordability at the low and moderate-income levels. The Town
also has a small supply of rental units (about 6% of total housing stock)
that are affordable relative to rental units in neighboring communities.
The following recommendations were developed to expand affordable
housing opportunities in Otis:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Develop local capacity to address housing needs
Review local zoning to minimize barriers to affordable housing
Participate in Housing Rehabilitation Programs
Consider options for development of affordable rental housing
Consider options for development of affordable homeownership
options
Consider the adoption of the Community Preservation Act to
finance future affordable homeownership options
Apply for EO418 Housing recertification for Otis
Consider applying to DHCD’s Local Initiative Program (LIP).
2-1
Economic Development Element
The Economic Development Element focuses on the study the feasibility and
conceptual designs for the development of a large scale community center
complex. The proposed complex would be multi-phased and located on a 120
acre municipally owned site. It would include a 45,000 square foot community
center facility with numerous recreational, dining and community spaces. The
complex would also include several athletics fields for soccer, baseball and
softball. An indoor soccer field is also included as part of the conceptual plans.
The study estimates that the proposed complex would create 13 new full-time
equivalent (FTE) jobs across a broad range of income levels and skill sets. It
anticipates a number of other ancillary employment opportunities. The study also
concludes that the Town will generate significant income from the complex facility
rentals and activities. The indoor soccer field alone was estimated to generate
$80,000 to $120,000 a year in rental income.
In addition to the narrative report the study provides conceptual designs of a
community center complex master plan that illustrates all proposed structures,
athletic facilities and trails. The study also includes floor plans, building
elevations, an existing conditions plan, and a proposed trail system plan for the
entire community center complex.
The study recommends the following actions to move the project forward:
•
•
•
Conduct additional site assessment including geo-technical
investigation and topographic and boundary surveys.
Acquisition of an easement or parcel of land from an adjoining property
owner for access to Route 8.
Assess and evaluate the proposed development phases against the
budgeted available funding to determine a construction schedule.
Transportation Element
The transportation element of the Plan focuses on the development of a network
of proposed trails throughout the 120-acre community center complex linking all
buildings and outdoor facilities. The trail plan also provides for external linkages
to Farmington Elementary School, West Center Road Route 8 and proposed
connections to Otis Center and ultimately a connection to the Farmington River
Walk. This element of the plan includes a narrative report with an inventory of
existing conditions, analysis of community bicycling level of service (LOS),
recommended and alternative routes and recommended next steps. A proposed
trail system map is also provided with the proposed community center complex
overlaid for reference.
2-2
The proposed trails routes and alternatives are highlighted on the trail map and
described in the report narrative. The report recommends the following actions to
move the project forward.
•
•
•
•
•
Contact Berkshire Regional Planning Commission and Mass Highway to
request recommended improvements to Route 8
Pursue enhancement opportunities for the recommended improvements
Consider providing local matching funds to expedite completion of
improvements
Secure detailed cost estimates, which evaluate additional right-of-way
acquisition, wetlands disturbances, types of permits required and the
extent of improvements that would be required.
Consider pursuit of easements or acquisitions of lands from adjoining
property owners and school district to provide access to the southern
part of the site.
Open Space Element
This focus of this element was to provide open space mapping products
and to provide some efforts at updating the Town’s outdated Open Space
Plan (1991). The amount of CDP resources that were applied toward this
element were minimal. The Town did secure a larger grant from the former
Massachusetts Watershed Initiative (MWI) to have the UMASS
Environmental Institute conduct a complete update of the Town’s Open
Space Plan. The Environmental Institute assumed responsibility for
performing data collection, public outreach and drafting the plan. The
Berkshire Regional Planning Commission provided the mapping products
for this Open Space element and reviewed the initial draft and provided
input to the Environmental Institute for the finalized draft.
The Open Space element of this Plan includes excerpts from the draft Otis
Open Space Plan and the GIS Open Space mapping components. Some
of the key actions recommended in the draft Otis Open Space Plan are
noted below.
•
This element is not completed at the time this section was printed – As
soon as it is done this section will be reprinted to be inserted in the
place of this piece.
2-3
3
Community Setting
Community Setting
3-1
Community Setting
The Town of Otis is located in the southeast portion of Berkshire County. It is
bordered by the towns of Tyringham, Monterey, Becket, Sandisfield,Tolland and
Blandford. It is a town nestled quaintly along several lakes and ponds, against
gentle slopes of the Berkshire Range, and in the Farmington River Valley.
Otis was established as a town in 1810, from two towns Bethlehem and Louden.
Travelers seeking new land in Western Massachusetts settled the town for its
location along the Old Knox Trail also known as the Old Boston to Albany
Turnpike. Today, Otis has a population of approximately 1,360 people according to
the U.S. Census Bureau in 2000. The Town is continuing to grow with new homes
going in every year by both new residents and second homebuyers. Otis is a
desirable place to live for its short distance to Springfield and other metropolis
places. The Town of Otis has a diverse landscape with elevations rising to more
than 1,900 feet, a large water body reservoir, and open space lands. This Town is
a haven for outdoor recreation having pleasant forests, open fields, cool streams,
deep ponds and lakes, and nurturing wetlands. Along with natural elements the
Town has a ski resort, several campgrounds, and State Forest Preserves. The
natural setting, the small town laid back attitude, the small business enterprises
and recreation opportunities makes it a good place to live.
3-1
4
Open Space and Resource Protection
Inventory of Lands of Conservation Interest
Overview of Open Space and Recreation
OSRP Comments by BRPC
Open Space and Water Resources Map
4-1
4-2
4-12
4-13
Introduction to the Open Space Element
This focus of this element was to provide open space mapping products
and to provide some efforts at updating the Town’s outdated Open Space
Plan (1991). The amount of CDP resources that were applied toward this
element were minimal. The Town did secure a larger grant from the
former Massachusetts Watershed Initiative (MWI) to have the UMASS
Environmental Institute conduct a complete update of the Town’s Open
Space Plan. The Environmental Institute assumed responsibility for
performing data collection, public outreach and drafting the plan. The
Berkshire Regional Planning Commission provided the mapping products
for this Open Space element and reviewed the initial draft and provided
input to the Environmental Institute for the finalized draft. The Open
Space element of this Plan includes the Open Space Plan Summary,
Goals and Action Plan excerpted from the draft Otis Open Space Plan
prepared by the Environmental Institute.
4-1
OPEN SPACE AND
RECREATION PLAN
Town of Otis- Massachusetts
2004- 2009
TOWN OF OTIS, MA. Open Space and Recreation Plan 2004- 2009. First Draft
This project is funded by the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs.
Page 1 of 1
4-2
PLAN SUMMARY
This Open Space and Recreation Plan is an update of the one completed in
1991. As a joint collaboration between the Town of Otis and the Environmental
Institute, an appointed committee has discussed all the Sections included in this
document. The plan was funded by a State grant, as part of the Massachusetts
Watershed Initiative in 2003.
Among the most important needs addressed by this document is the necessity to
plan for sustainable recreational development, given the importance of tourism
for the town’s economy and its great environmental impact over natural
resources. The following are the most important concerns that the Open Space
and Recreation Committee has identified, reviewed and developed, to
concentrate its efforts:
•
•
•
To improve access to natural resources for all citizens in Otis, including
people with disabilities,
To improve recreational amenities, and
To protect the town’s water resources.
4-3
INTRODUCTION
When the Otis Selectmen elected to participate, they instructed a committee to
work with the Environmental Institute in the completion of this Open Space and
Recreation Plan. Following the guidelines designed by the previous plan, this is
an update that revises the sections that need adjustment, given the changes in
Otis over the last fourteen years. Furthermore, it formulates specific actions to
guide current recreation development of Otis, while protecting its natural
resources and open space.
Statement of purpose.
The purpose of this plan is to provide an
accurate and effective line of action and
orient future decision-making that
involves the current and future open
space and recreation needs of the
residents of Otis. This is structured
upon the Town’s efforts of the past,
including the Open Space and
Recreation Plan- 1991, the Zoning
Bylaws, as well as the important effort
that the Town Boards have developed
in this regard.
Planning process and public
participation.
This Open Space and Recreation Plan2004- 2009 officially began when the
Selectmen elected to participate. The
Environmental
Institute
and
the
Recreation Commission initially identified the general scope. Next, a survey was
mailed to approximately 50% of the households in town, asking residents about
the ways in which they value the land in their communities and the extent of
conservation and recreation needs. Unfortunately, this initiative received a very
low reply of 26 responses only, which could not be used as a scientific sample.
Nevertheless, this provided an initial image to precede the concepts developed
along the process of completing the plan.
This was discussed over a series of meetings held between the Open Space and
Recreation Committee and the Environmental Institute, which began on Tuesday
November 17th 2003, and was presented and approved in a public meeting on
June 14th 2004. This process included several formal and informal encounters,
which included a series of interviews with the Recreation Commission and the
Historical Society. This is the case with an event held on April 23rd 2004, where
members of the committee and the Environmental Institute joined members of
4-4
these two boards, and a member of the Knox Trail Snowmobile Club, for a walk
of the Knox Trail.
4-5
SECTION 7- ANALYSIS OF NEEDS.
Summary of Protection Needs
The Open Space and Recreation Plan has
underlined the importance of protecting the
existing natural resources in Otis. These
amenities have been identified as key
features that support the town’s rural
character. Water bodies, among other
resources, constitute one of the most
important open space landmarks in town.
The rich wildlife and scenic quality of the
Farmington River, among other major
bodies like Otis Reservoir, Big Pond, or
Benton Pond, have attracted for years
seasonal residents and other visitors.
Today, Otis is focused on growing as a
seasonal destination, being a very
important resource for the town’s economy;
shifting over the years, from agriculture to
provide seasonal residents and other
visitors with all the services they require. In
consequence, the committee has identified
the need to protect these bodies,
minimizing the impact that development
might have been exercising over them.
Summary of Community’s Needs
The Open Space and Recreation Committee
has emphasized the need to improve the
recreational opportunities in town, and thus, has
determined this as one of the plan’s primary
goals. In terms of public access, privately
owned waterfront properties along the
Farmington River, as well as in the other ponds,
have restricted the community’s access to the
water. At the same time, there are large
extensions of forestland, Otis State Forest,
Tolland State Forest, and Beartown State
Forest; properties that restrict in them some
recreational activities. Therefore, this plan looks
forward to determine strategies to enhance both
the community’s access to major water
resources, large areas of forested land, and
other natural resources, for all members of the
community,
including
populations
with
4-6
disabilities.
Furthermore, the committee has also identified a clear desire to fulfill present
needs for further open fields for active recreation. In addition, the Town of Otis
hosts scenic and historic landmarks of value not only to residents. Thus, the
need to highlight these landmarks, as day- use areas for tourists is apparent.
These resources include a variety of buildings and sites.
Summary of Management Needs
The strategies previously mentioned that relate to further acquisition, or changes
in land use, such as the future public beaches, require a specific land
management strategy. Therefore, the town needs to determine specific actions in
order to accomplish the goals aimed to fulfill the needs and requirements
expressed in terms of both access to natural resources, in this case of water
bodies, and/ or the improvement of the existent recreational facilities. For
example, the town needs a clear plan for the development of future open fields
for active recreation, or the preservation and recovery of historic landmarks like
the portion of the Knox Trail that crosses town. In consequence, a clear line of
action needs to de designed in order to determine potential grant or other
resources, other stakeholders that could be interested, and the corresponding
timeline.
Finally, the committee identified a need to improve the means by which Otis
accesses and retrieves information regarding its multiple open space resources
and recreational opportunities. It has discussed how to create ways for people to
access information about the town. A website has been thought to be a cost
effective and useful method for both collecting input from the community and
promoting day-use tourist amenities: recreational activities, history, private
businesses, and historic buildings, among other topics.
4-7
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES.
This section lists a detailed sequence of goals and objectives that describe the
strategy defined by the Open Space and Recreation Committee and the
Environmental Institute to accomplish the community’s envisioned purposes that
relate to open space and recreation in Otis.
Goal 1: IMPROVE ACCESS TO NATURAL RESOURCES FOR ALL CITIZENS
IN OTIS, INCLUDING POPULATION WITH DISABILITIES.
. To open a public beach on Otis Reservoir: Continue working with the State of
Massachusetts’ Department of Environmental Management (DEM) to trade a
town- owned land adjacent to Tolland State Forest. This parcel could be
exchanged for a state- owned waterfront property.
. To open a public beach on Big Pond: Continue the process of opening a public
beach on the town- owned waterfront property recently acquired in this pond.
. To open a public wildlife sanctuary: Continue the ongoing process of taking
possession of the wildlife sanctuary recently offered to the town.
. To preserve/ improve historic sites, like the portion of the Knox Trail that passes
through Otis, the CCC camps, and other significant structures.
Goal 2: PROVIDE/ IMPROVE RECREATIONAL AMENITIES
. To enhance recreation access to State- owned property.
. To develop the Otis website.
. To preserve/ improve historic sites, like the portion of the Knox Trail that passes
through Otis, the CCC camps, and other significant structures.
. To foster the development of recreation fields for active recreation.
Goal 3: PROTECT WATER RESOURCES IN OTIS
. To create a Lake Watershed District: This has to be part of a strategy to control
the water levels of the reservoir, among other issues.
. To continue with the process of well testing performed by the Board of Health.
. To encourage the pursue of studies to determine the status of water quality in
surface waters and underground supplies.
. To continue working with the Pond Association to designate Benton Pond as a
noncombustible waterway.
4-8
FIVE YEAR ACTION PLAN.
The following section describes alternative strategies to approach the goals
prioritized in this plan. Specific actions have been described to accomplish the
objectives listed. A proposed schedule has been included to assist the
implementation of this plan, which needs to be revised and adjusted by the party
instructed to monitor its implementation.
It is important for the town to consider who will be responsible for monitoring the
development of this in the future. Whether the ad hoc committee will continue
working on this, whether it requires to be expanded, or whether instead, the
different boards should be the ones to carry out the corresponding actions. This
document underscores that decision as the first step to carrying out the
implementation of this plan. As a result, the action plan does not assign any other
responsible parties.
Goal 1: IMPROVE ACCESS TO NATURAL RESOURCES FOR ALL
CITIZENS IN OTIS, INCLUDING POPULATION WITH DISABILITIES.
Objectives
Actions
Schedule
To open a public beach on Continue
the
ongoing 2004- 2006
Otis Reservoir
negotiations between the town
and
the
Department
of
Environmental Management to
exchange properties.
Develop a financial strategy for
building, adjusting the site.
Develop
a
management
strategy for maintaining the
site; lifeguard position, etc.
To open a public beach on Develop a financial strategy for 2004- 2006
Big Pond
building, adjusting the site.
Develop
a
management
site; lifeguard position, etc.
To open a public wildlife Continue the ongoing process 2004- 2006
sanctuary
of transferring property titles.
Develop
a
management
site.
To preserve/ improve Develop a design construction 2004- 2006
strategy to recover the Knox
historic sites
Trail.
Develop a managerial strategy
to implement the recovery of
the Knox Trail.
4-9
Goal 2: PROVIDE/ IMPROVE RECREATIONAL AMENITIES
Objectives
Actions
To enhance recreation Advertise
the
recreational
access to State- owned opportunities open to the public
property.
in State- owned land in town.
Submit a proposal to change
any other activities restricted in
State- owned land.
To develop the Otis Based on the initial model
website.
provided by the Environmental
Institute in July 2004, identify
the additional content to be
included in the website.
Develop
a
management
strategy
to
maintain
the
website; this may include a
voluntary
that
may
be
interested in gathering and
updating information, as well as
costs related with the hosting
and/
or
the
domain
(www.otis.com.)
To preserve/ improve Develop a design construction
historic sites, like the strategy to recover the Knox
portion of the Knox Trail Trail.
that passes through Otis
Develop a managerial strategy
to implement the recovery of
the Knox Trail.
Develop
a
management
strategy for other sites, like the
CCC camps for example.
To foster the development Develop a construction strategy
of recreation fields for for the facilities prioritized by
the recreation commission.
active recreation.
Schedule
2005- 2007
2005- 2007
2005- 2007
2005- 2007
2005- 2007
4-10
Goal 3: PROTECT WATER RESOURCES IN OTIS
Objectives
Actions
To
create
a
Lake Submit this recommendation to
Watershed District
the Planning Board, in order to
to seek further input.
To continue with the Cooperate with State agencies
process of well testing in the development of such
performed by the Board of water quality studies.
Health.
To encourage the pursuit
of studies to determine the
status of water quality in
surface
waters
and
underground supplies
To continue working with Develop a management plan to
the Pond Association to determine these restrictions.
designate Benton Pond as
a
noncombustible
waterway.
Schedule
2006- 2009
2006- 2009
2006- 2009
2006- 2009
4-11
Housing
Introduction to Housing
Otis Housing Profile
Housing Suitability Map
5
5-1
5-2
5-21
Introduction to the Housing Element
The Housing element for the Town of Otis includes a detailed inventory of
housing supply, anticipated demand and analysis of affordability. This
element provides documentation and analysis of a wide range of housing
data and provides a number of recommended local actions to promote
affordable housing opportunities in the Town of Otis. The data presented
includes discussion of local and regional demographics, economic issues
such as assessed values, market values and property taxes, housing
tenure, housing age and condition, vacancy rates, rental housing
availability, rental costs and other relevant information. A market based
affordability gap analysis is also provided.
5-1
Community Development Plan
2004 Housing Element
Town of Otis
This section examines the socio-economic trends in Otis and in the surrounding area of Berkshire
County, which affect housing supply and demand. Two of the trends found in this report are the
increasing age of homes and the lack of qualified 40B affordable housing. Proper maintenance of
homes built more than twenty-five years ago is crucial in preserving the quality and character of
the community. There are also other implications for the town regarding Chapter 40B housing.
As described below, without meeting the minimum affordable housing standard, a developer is
authorized to obtain a single comprehensive permit for construction of subsidized low- or modincome housing. In addition to the simplified process, if the town denies the permit, the developer
can appeal the decision to the state. It is very important for Otis to reach the required 10%
threshold in order to guide growth in its own way.
II. Housing Profile - Supply
A.
Current Housing Stock Statistics
Current Housing Stock
Source: Town Assessor’s Office 1/14/04
Table H-1: Current Housing Stock:
Single Family Homes
1419
Mobile Homes
Multi-Family
Accessory Land with Improvements
Multiple Houses on one parcel
Total Housing Stock:
31
13
87
40
1,590
Housing Tenure
Table H-2: Census Data: Housing Tenure in 2000 vs.1990
% Change
Housing Occupancy
Number % of
Number % of
in 2000
total,
in 1990
Total, 1990-2000
2000
1990
Seasonal
972
62%
961
68%
-6%
Year Round
476
30%
315
22%
+8%
Rental
91
6%
85
6%
0%
Vacant Units
33
2%
63
4%
-2%
-3.7%
% Year round
1.4%
5.1%
Homeowner Units Vacant
+1.3%
% Year round Rental
9.9%
8.6%
Units Vacant
Total Housing Stock:
1,572
1,424
+10.4%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Census
The majority of housing in Otis is seasonal, which makes up 62% of homes in town. Despite this
overwhelming statistic, there has been a slight increase in the number of year-round homes
between 1990 and 2000. The 8% increase could be attributed to aging vacationers that have
transitioned their summer homes into their year-round residence.
5-1
Chapter 40B Subsidized Housing Inventory
None (0) of the 600 year-round Housing Units listed by DHCD are Chapter 40B qualifying units.1
“Chapter 40B Units” are units considered affordable by low- and moderate-income households
with long-term restrictions that ensure that it will continue to be affordable. Chapter 40B
authorizes a housing agency or developer to obtain a single comprehensive permit for the
construction of subsidized low- or moderate-income housing. If a community, in which less than
10% of its total year-round housing stock is subsidized low- or moderate-income housing, denies
a comprehensive permit, or imposes conditions that make the project economically unviable, the
developer may appeal to the state Housing Appeals Committee for review of the local action.
More information can be obtained in Appendix A1, Comprehensive Permits (Chapter 40B).
The town of Otis needs approximately 60 qualifying units to meet the 10% threshold.
Property Values
In 2002, there were 1,400 taxable single-family parcels in Otis. The average assessed value of
these homes was $144,815. Otis ranks low in both Berkshire County and the entire state of
Massachusetts with regard to its tax rate. Last year’s tax rate of 9.08% was 27% lower than the
County average of 12.5%. The average single-family tax bill in 2002 was $1,297. This was over
50% below the state median of $2,717, ranking Otis 324th of 340 in the state. The town’s tax rate
has been consistently and significantly lower than the state median. Otis’ tax rate has also
increased at a much slower pace than the state median, as shown in Chart H-1.
Chart H-1: Single Family Tax Bill Local Vs. State
Chart H-1: Otis
Average Single Family Yearly Tax Bill
3,000
$
2,500
2,000
Otis Single Family
Tax Bill
1,500
State Median Tax
Bill
1,000
500
19
92
19
94
19
96
19
98
20
00
20
02
0
Year
Source: MA Dept of Revenue
1
Massachusetts DHCD Inventory of CH40B Subsidized Housing Inventory through April 24, 2002
5-2
Property Value vs. Market Value
Table H-3: Annual Single Family Home Statistics
Average
Total
Assessed
Average
Median
Number
Value
Sales Price Sales Price of Sales
Year
1999
139,795
142,371 134,950
93
2000
140,432
159,553 139,900
84
2001
144,467
151,902 128,000
91
2002
144,068
224,940 218,500
61
2003
144,815
201,272 184,500
50
Sources: Assessed Property Value Data: Massachusetts Department of Revenue
Sales Data: Warren Information Services
Chart H-2: Single Family Housing Assessed Value vs.
Sales Price 1994-2001
250,000
Average Sales
Price
225,000
Average New
Home Value
Value($)
200,000
175,000
Median Sales
Price
150,000
Average
Assessed Value
125,000
100,000
75,000
1994
1997
2000
2003
Year
Sources : MA Dept of Revenue- Avg Assessed Value
MISER Information Services- Avg New Home Value
Warren Information Services- Avg & Median Sales Price
5-3
Chart H-3: 2000-2003 Otis Single Family Housing
Sales by Price
120
103
Number of Sales
100
71
80
56
48
60
40
20
$1
29
K-
$2
ov
42
er
K
$2
42
,0
00
9K
12
-$
0K
$8
be
lo
w
$8
0,
00
0
0
Price Range
Source: Warren Information Services
Local Educational Expenditures
Each year, the Department of Education reports community educational expenditures. The Net
Average Membership Pupils is the number of students residing in Town, averaged over the entire
year. The number includes pupils from the Town enrolled in local and regional schools, and those
being tuitioned to out-of-town schools. The number does not include non-residents. Cost per
pupil is based on the DOE integrated operating costs. The DOE integrated operating cost is one
of the most widely accepted measures for comparing educational spending among communities.
It reflects the community’s share of regional school spending as well as that of its own local
schools. The figure does not include capital outlay and construction costs. The following chart
shows the total number of membership pupils, and calculated operational costs per pupil for the
Town from 1997-2002. It also includes school expenditures as a percentage of all town
expenditures from the general fund on government operational costs excluding capital outlay and
construction costs.
Table H-4: Educational Expenditures 1995-2000
Year
Net Avg.
Membership
Pupils
Education spending
as % of all Town
expenditures
Cost Per
Pupil
1997
232.5
54.57
6,663
1998
182.1
51.46
8,114
1999
217.1
43.64
7,147
2000
208.7
51.53
8,419
2001
224.3
55.57
8,776
2002 not available
53.79
not available
Source: Massachusetts Department of Revenue
School Cost Per
Capita
2,074
2,263
2,074
1,751
1,896
1,759
5-4
In 2001, the cost per pupil was $8,776, which was high in relation to the Berkshire County
average of $7,831. In 2002, 53.79% of town expenditures went toward educational purposes,
which was on average with the countywide average of 54% educational spending. The
percentage of town expenditures spent on education is approximately 5% higher than the state
average. The DOR lists the Town’s 2002 per-capita spending on education to be $1,759.
Despite a higher percentage of overall expenditures, this figure is $500 less than the state
average.
Source: Massachusetts Dept of Revenue
B. Current Development Practices and Available Land
Development Patterns and Constraints
Otis is a hilly, heavily forested rural area with many streams, lakes and ponds that provide a
variety of year round recreational opportunities and make is a very popular location for second
homeowners, vacationers and retirees. Otis Reservoir, the second largest lake in the state and
the Farmington River, flowing through the middle of town, provide excellent angling and other
water sport activities.
Approximately 1,751 acres, or 7% of the total area of the town is considered developed. 5,034
acres, or 21% of the town is permanently protected open space. According to the 2000 Buildout
analysis conducted by Berkshire Regional Planning Commission, approximately 10,712 acres,
44% of the town, is potentially developable land that is currently undeveloped. The 2000 BRPC
Buildout Analysis lists limitations on septic systems near wetlands, and high infrastructure costs
compared to low land costs as the primary setbacks to future development.
In addition to the two primary zoning districts (Residential and Village, see Local Zoning
Provisions), Otis also has a Floodplain District with regulations requiring a special permit for
development in flood hazard areas. The town has Stream and Pond Protection regulations that
allow no septic or leach fields within 100 ft. of streams and ponds greater than two acres in area.
It also has Site Plan Review regulations, but does not have its own Wetlands regulations.
Source: BRPC 2000 Buildout Analysis
Construction Trends & New Construction
Table H-5:
New Construction Values 96-01
Total Single-Family Avg New
Units Built
Home Value
Year
1997
7
136,786
1998
13
97,846
1999
5
224,149
2000
10
152,900
2001
22
170,623
2002
2003
28
217,179
Source: Massachusetts Institute for Social and
Economic Research (MISER) State Data Center
5-5
13
10
7
5
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
$450
$400
$350
$300
$250
$200
$150
$100
$50
$0
Thousands
New Houses
22
Average Value($)
New Construction of Single Family
Housing 1995-2000, New Houses &
Average Values
Single
Family
Houses
Constructed
Average
Value of
New
Construction
Sources: MA MISER Data Center Annual New Construction Reports
Local Zoning Provisions
Otis is divided into three primary zoning districts. There is one residential zone, R-40, which comprise a
majority of the town, a small Village District and an overlay Floodplain District. The following table
summarizes the zones and their provisions:
District
Minimum
Lot Size
Minimum
Frontage
Residence R-40
1 acre
150’
35’
Village V-1
20,000 (sq
ft)
60’
35’
Allowed Residential Uses
District
Allowed Uses by Right
Residence R-40
Ÿ1 or 2 Family Dwelling
ŸAccessory apt
ŸBed and Breakfast
Village
Ÿ1 or 2 Family Dwelling
ŸPersonalized Service
Shops
ŸSpecialized Retail
ŸBusiness or Professional
Max.
Height
Allowed Uses by Permit
Sawmill, commercial
dog kennel, veterinary
hospital
Golf course, ski facility,
riding stable, other
recreational facilities
Retail and consumer
service establishments
Cottage Industries
Public Utilities
Light Industrial
Convenience Stores
Restaurants, excluding
drive-thru
Lodging
Bed and Breakfast
5-6
Offices
Cottage
Multi-Family Dwellings
Subject to ZBA approval
ŸAgriculture
ŸForestry and nursery
ŸRecreation
ŸConservation
ŸWildlife Management
ŸTemporary NonResidential Structures
Floodplain
Source: Town of Otis Ordinance, ordinance.com 1/26/04
Utilities
Source: BRPC Data Book 2001
The town of Otis has no municipal water or public sewer system. However, there is a limited
wastewater treatment service area in the town’s Main St. Village District. Western Massachusetts
Electric Company provides electricity service for the Town. There is no gas service in town.
Verizon provides the town with telephone service. Trash disposal is done at the Town Transfer
station, however trash pick-up service is provided privately for a fee.
C. Current Housing Conditions
Nearly 80% of Otis homes are more than 25 years old. As a house reaches the 25-30 year mark,
repairs to the roof, paint, siding, etc, need to be completed. Housing Rehabilitation Assistance
Programs are available for these home improvements through MassHousing, and are discussed
later.
Age of Housing Stock
Housing Units
Chart H-4: Otis Housing Units - Year Built
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
515
286
Pre-1940
355
413
Housing - Year Built
194019601959
1979
Year
19801999
Source: US Census 2000
5-7
Structural Violations
The Building Inspector had no violations to report. However, the town was very busy last year, in terms of
growth and rehabilitation. In 2003, there were 28 new single-family housing permits issued, totaling
$6,081,000. There were 4 permits for homes to be demolished and then rebuilt. 42 permits were issued for
alterations, renovations, or decks. 26 permits were issued for accessory apartments, as well as 26 permits
for new pool construction, windows, or siding.
Health Violations
None to Report
III. Housing Profile – Demand
A.
Population Statistics
Historical Population Counts
Otis has seen a significant increase in its population over the past 30 years. Between 1970 and 1990, the
town has seen an average increase of 14%. Despite a declining County population, 7% over the past 25
years, Otis witnessed a 27% increase between 1990 and 2000 alone.
Table H-6: Historical Population Counts
Berkshire County
Town
820
963
1,073
1,365
1970
1980
1990
2000
149,402
145,110
139,352
134,953
Source: BRPC 2001 Data Book Census Figures
Population By Age
The number of school age children has remained constant over the past ten years. However, the
rest of the population has seen significant increases (Chart H-5).
Chart H-5: Population By Age 1990, 2000.
Chart H-5: Otis
Population by Age 1990,2000
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
75
298
53
156
75+
55-75
487
617
377
375
25-54
0-24
1990
2000
Year
Source: US Census Bureau
5-8
Economic Statistics:
Local Household Income Levels
Chart H-6: Household Income Levels, 2000
Compared to Berkshire County Non-Metro Median
High Income
32%
Middle Income
30%
Low Income
23%
Moderate
Income
15%
Low Income = Up to 50% of
Median
Moderate Income = 50-80%
of median
Middle Income = 80-150% of
median
High Income = Over 150% of
median.
Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 - Households
DHCD - Berkshire Non-Metro Median Income
•
•
Berkshire Non-Metro Median Income is $47,000
Otis Median Household Income is $51,488
Local Employment
It is worth noting that the services industry has seen a steady growth over the past 5
years. This could be attributed to summer vacationing seen in town.
Table H-7: Employment and Wages in Otis
Agriculture
Avg
Total
Forestry Govern- Const- ManufacAnnual EstablishAnnual
Fishing
ment
ruction
turing
Wage
ments
Total
Payroll
Trade Services
Year
1986 $2,722,000 $15,291
38
178
0
41
51
Conf
29
24
1987 $3,176,800 $16,044
43
198
Conf
44
49
Conf
39
30
1988 $3,629,100 $15,443
47
235
Conf
43
57
32
54
32
1989 $3,453,135 $14,388
46
240
Conf
Conf
35
Conf
66
48
1990 $3,459,550 $16,242
41
213
Conf
Conf
30
Conf
50
45
1991 $3,296,058 $17,817
37
185
Conf
Conf
28
Conf
47
29
1992 $4,144,886 $18,926
38
219
Conf
Conf
31
Conf
40
36
1993 $3,979,195 $18,170
40
219
Conf
Conf
28
Conf
37
35
1994 $3,952,267 $18,047
41
219
Conf
Conf
27
Conf
39
33
1995 $3,686,775 $16,607
46
222
8
67
27
Conf
56
31
1996 $3,701,320 $17,377
46
213
9
70
25
Conf
49
25
1997 $4,015,757 $19,307
41
208
Conf
70
28
Conf
39
30
1998 $4,720,605 $19,507
44
242
6
78
32
Conf
48
42
1999 $5,916,680 $21,594
46
274
7
90
31
Conf
49
61
2000 $6,304,361 $22,435
50
281
7
81
33
Conf
65
57
2001 $6,944,832 $23,622
46
294
7
84
38
0
0
58
Source: MA Department of Employment and Training
5-9
C. Market Trends for Housing
In recent interviews with the Berkshire Eagle, (Housing Demand Up, Supply Down June 11,2002), real
estate agents have seen an increase in demand and a reduction of supply throughout Berkshire County.
Realtors from Great Barrington, Otis, Lenox and Pittsfield commented that prices are higher than last year
and “the top end of the market is very strong.” In the short term, there appear a combination of factors
increasing real estate investment, such as a low interest rate and a lack of confidence in investing in the
stock market. Longer-term factors influencing the Otis real estate market is a marked trend for high
demand and higher real estate prices for higher-end homes - most notably high-end second homes currently being experienced in South County. Realtors noted a strong desire of their clients to live in areas
close to Lenox, Tanglewood, and Great Barrington for their cultural attractions and restaurants. The
national association of Realtors currently (January, 2004) lists 15 houses for sale in Otis with an average
sales price of $427,200. The lowest priced property was listed at $159,900, while the highest priced was
2
$879,000, and the median listed price was $350,000.
Rental Housing
Fair Market Value Rents for Otis 2003
0 Bedroom
413
1 Bedroom
502
2 Bedroom
592
3 bedroom
4 bedroom
812
973
Source: Dept. of Housing and Community Development
3
Census 2000 shows a 7% increase in year round rental units from 1990-2000. Census 2000 also shows a
dramatic, 38% increase in median contract rent within Otis from 1990 to 2000 increasing from $438 per
month in 1990 to $603 in 2000. Otis is on the low end of rental rates, but the town falls between its
surrounding towns with regard to the rates average increase in price. Tyringham, Becket, and Sandisfield
all have median contract rents higher than Otis. Monterey is the only town surrounding Otis with its median
rent equaling that of the town. Despite the town’s rent being the lowest in the area, only Becket and
Sandisfield have higher rate increases.
IV.
Gap Analysis
Housing Affordability Methodology
The housing affordability study was conducted to determine whether or not the “typical” family in Town
could actually afford to buy a home in Town at current market values. According to HUD guidelines
housing is considered to be affordable when monthly mortgage payments comprise no more than twentyeight percent (28%) of a household’s total monthly income.
The typical family was defined as a household with an income equal to the median estimated income of the
Berkshire County Non-Metro value. The Town’s median housing price was presented as determined from
sales data provided by Warren Information Services, while the Department of Housing and Community
Development provided an estimate of the Town’s median income for 2003.
Maximum price affordability levels were determined by an average of mortgage loan qualification
calculations provided by local mortgage lenders. The analysis was based on a 5% down payment with no
points. Calculations incorporate a mortgage interest rate of 6.25%, compiled as an average of current rates
offered by local lending institutions at the time of the report. The results estimate a maximum housing price
with monthly payments that are no more than 28% of the household income.
2
3
Information from http://www.realtor.com August 5,2002
US Census Bureau, 1990 & 2000 Census
5-10
Chart H-8: 2003 Affordability Matrix
Income Level
2003 Household
Income Limits
28% of
Monthly
Income
Calculated
Maximum
Affordable
Sales
Price
Average
Sale Price in
Affordability
Range
Number of
2003 Sales
at
affordability
level
Number of
Households
in 2000
% of Total
Households
in 2000
% 2003
Sales
Affordable
to these
households
Affordability
Gap
Berkshire County Non-Metro Median
$47,000
$1,097
$161,600
$99,950
23
270
48%
48%
0%
Otis Median Household Income
$51,488
$1,200
176,782
99,950
23
270
48%
48%
0%
Low income - up to 50% of Median
Moderate income – up to 80% of
Median
$23,500
$548
$80,700
$54,250
9
132
23%
19%
4%
$37,600
$877
$129,200
$75,300
15
217
38%
31%
7%
Middle Income –up to 150% of Median
$70,500
$1,645
$242,300
$131,700
33
385
68%
69%
-1%
High Income- up to 150% of Median +
$70,501 +
$1,645 +
Over
$242,300
$201,272
48
565
100%
100%
0%
Calculated
Maximum
Affordable
Sales
Price
Average
Sale Price in
Affordability
Range
Number of
2003 Sales
at
affordability
level
Number of
Households
in 2000
% of Total
Households
in 2000
% 2003
Sales
Affordable
to these
households
Affordability
Gap
Income Level
Low income - up to 50% of Median
Moderate income – 50 to 80% of
Median
Middle Income –80 to 150% of Median
High Income- over 150% of Median
2003 Household
Income Limits
28% of
Monthly
Income
0-$23,500
0-$548
$54,250
9
132
23%
19%
4%
$549-$877
$0-80,700
$80,701$129,200
$23,501-$37,600
$103,300
6
85
15%
12.5%
2.5%
$37,601-$70,500
$878-$1,645
$129,201$242,300
$175.500
18
168
30%
37.5%
-7.5%
$70,501 +
$1,645 +
Over
$242,300
$349,800
15
180
32%
31%
1%
Sources: Income Limits – DHCD
Max Afford. Sales Price – Legacy Bank (Legacy-Banks.com)
Avg Sales Price, Number of Sales – Warren Information Services
Number of Households – 2000 Census
5-11
Affordability Findings
The Gap Analysis shows that Otis has had a tremendous surge in income-specific, available
housing over the past four years. However, the past two years have seen significant gaps across
all income levels. This is a trend that needs to be looked at more carefully to ensure housing is
available, as real estate prices rise.
2000-2003 Otis Affordibility Gap for Low-Mod and Median
Income Households
30
20
Low Income
Gap %
10
Moderate Income
0
-10
2000
2001
2002
-20
2003
County Non-Metro
Median
Middle Income
-30
-40
Year
VI. Existing Publicly and Privately Financed Housing Programs
A.
Affordable Homeownership Assistance Programs
Good Samaritan Homeownership Program
Berkshire County Towns participate with Berkshire Housing Development Corporation, Berkshire
Fund, Inc., and nine local lenders with the Good Samaritan Homeownership program described
below. The participating lenders include Berkshire Bank, Legacy Banks, Pittsfield Cooperative
Bank, Lee Bank, Lenox Savings Bank, Adams Co-operative Bank, So. Adams Savings Bank,
Hoosic Bank and Greylock Federal Credit Union.
The Good Samaritan Homeownership program, which received a Federal Home Loan Bank
Affordable Housing Program Grant for $96,000 in 1999 to assist low-income households with
down payment and closing cost assistance. This program is available to income eligible residents
throughout the County and more than 175 families have bought homes through the program in
the past 10 years. Participating lenders provide a first mortgage equal to 80% of the purchase
price, Berkshire Fund provides a second mortgage equal to 15% of the purchase price, and the
buyers provide a 5% down payment. The banks also purchased more than $1.6 million of low
interest bonds to fund the down payment pool.
USDA Rural Housing Service Loan Guaranty Program
This program is a federally funded program from the Department of Agriculture (USDA)/Rural
Housing Service. This program is available to all borrowers seeking mortgages throughout
Berkshire County, with the exception of the City of Pittsfield. Through the Guaranteed Rural
Housing Loan Program, moderate-income earners can qualify for existing single-family mortgages
without a down payment. This program is currently available at Lee Bank.
5-12
MassHousing General Lending Program – 1St Time Homebuyers
MassHousing partners with Lee Bank, Berkshire Bank, and Legacy Banks to assist credit-worthy,
low and moderate income, first time home buyers whose income and home purchase price fall
within federally-set guidelines with financing and educational assistance.
In the last 5 fiscal years (from 1997-2001), Otis residents have received loans totaling $90,000.
Source: MassHousing Stats
As of October 23, 2003, eligibility requirements for MassHousing programs in Otis are:
Source: http://mhfadata.com/limits_results.asp
Table H-9: Income Limits For MassHousing Programs
Income Limits
Acquisition Cost Limits
1 - 2 Persons $ 72,400
New Construction
Existing Housing
3 or More
$ 83,200
Single Family
2 Family
$277,100
n/a
Single Family
2 Family
3 Family
4 Family
$277,900
$256,600
$310,600
$361,200
B. Housing Rehabilitation Assistance Programs
Source: MassHousing Use Figures for FY96-01 – and
Additional MassHousing Programs
MassHousing Septic Repair Loan Program
The Septic Repair Loan Program is a statewide program established under Chapter 708 of the
acts of 1966 of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts that is funded by MassHousing and
available locally at Lee Bank. The MassHousing program offers reduced interest rate loans of
$1,000 - $25,000 to cover costs associated with the upgrade of a failed sewage disposal system
within the meaning of Title 5. Homeowners may qualify for 0%, 3% or 5% interest rates based on
household income (see chart H-10). Repairs are for owner-occupied primary-residences only, not
for second homes. The program is popular and several such loans are given out every year
throughout the county. Few local applicants have failed to qualify. The Average Loan amount for
a Septic Repair Loan has been relatively high, as the program’s closing cost requirements have
discouraged smaller value loans. The program began with a $13 million State grant; it is
considered successful; and is expected to continue with self-sufficient funds from loan payments.
Chart H-10: Income Limits for Septic Repair Loans in Berkshire County
Loan Rate
1-2 person family
3 or more persons
0%
$23,000
$26,000
3%
$46,000
$52,000
5%
$92,000
$104,000
MassHousing Home Improvement Loan Program
Local residents are also eligible for participation in the Home Improvement Loan Program at
MassHousing. This program is available through Lee Bank, and residents of other towns in
Berkshire County have participated. The program offers financing for income-eligible
homeowners to repair their homes. Eligible properties are one-to-four family properties and
residential condominiums, and the residence must be the borrower's principal residence for
5-13
minimum of one year. The maximum loan amount is $5,000 - $25,000 for loan terms of 5 to 15
years.
In the last five fiscal years, no local residents of Otis have participated in the Home Improvement
Loan program. For more information on this program, contact MassHousing or Lee Bank.
Source: MassHousing Use Figures for FY96-01.
MassHousing Get the Lead Out Loan Program
MassHousing’s Get The Lead Out Program provides low cost financing to owners of 1–4 family
properties to remove lead paint and reduce the possibilities of lead poisoning among children.
Owner-occupants who meet the income requirements (see Chart H-9) are eligible for a 0%
deferred payment loan not due until the sale or refinancing of the property. Non-profit
organizations are eligible for 0% fully amortizing loans on properties that are being rented to
income eligible households. Investor owners are eligible for 3% fully amortizing loans on
properties that are being rented to income eligible households
In the past five fiscal years, no residents of Otis have participated in this program.
For more information on this program, contact MassHousing or Lee Bank.
DHCD Community Development Funds for Housing Rehabilitation
The Town does not currently participate in Housing Rehabilitation programs.
IV.
Recommended Actions
The following actions are recommended in order to meet the housing needs of Otis
residents.
Recommendation #1:
In order to pursue residential development, the community would benefit from some type
of formalized local organization that may both add to and benefit from the efforts
conducted by housing organizations working regionally. A local group or committee, for
example, needs to be involved in decision-making regarding housing development: where
does it take place, who is an appropriate developer for Town-owned property, what type
of housing should be developed and who should it serve. Such a group should determine
how these questions are answered within the town, and how the town may benefit from
and contribute to efforts being conducted in the surrounding region.
A local group dedicated to housing could take the form of a Town Committee, Housing
Partnership, Housing Trust or other organizational structure. The following is a list of
tasks the committee might be responsible for:
• Determine what type of local organization is most appropriate for Otis.
• Establish such local housing organization.
• Newly established housing committee should work with the Town Administrator and
Selectboard to:
⇒ Pursue rental housing development as described below.
⇒ Conduct a survey of local residents and employers regarding need for affordable
homeownership opportunities
⇒ Work with the Town to identify state and municipally owned land including tax title
properties appropriate for development
⇒ Continue to develop working relationships with regional and sub-regional Housing
5-14
Development Agencies/Organizations -, e.g. BHDC, Community Development
Corporations, Construct Inc. etc…
For more information, see Appendix A5, Getting Started: Building Local Housing
Partnerships and A4, Excerpt from Taking the Initiative: A Guidebook on Creating Local
Affordable Housing Strategies (CHPA).
Recommendation #2:
Review Local Zoning to minimize barriers to affordable
housing
While the Town’s zoning by-law has some components friendly to residential
development, a review and update may find areas for improvement. Currently, the zoning
by-laws are designed mostly for single-family residential development. Minimum lot size
is one acre for single-family homes. There are strict regulations restricting more than one
principal building per lot. Possible actions include:
• Review Land Suitability Maps and local parcel maps to determine if current zoning
accurately reflects existing conditions and current Community Values with regard to
housing
• Review sections of Zoning by-laws related to housing, particularly section 5 regarding
Intensity Regulations and consider how these by-laws may be modified to be more
conducive to the production of affordable housing.
• If a local affordable housing committee of some type is created, this group should
work closely with the Planning Board to develop appropriate zoning strategies based
on the results of the items noted above.
Recommendation #3:
Participate in Housing Rehabilitation Programs
The data indicates the need for rehabilitation to address general rehabilitation needs.
Programs currently available have been well subscribed. Participation in affordable
rehabilitation programs will assist low and moderate-income households including elders
to maintain their properties. Below is a list of actions which could be taken to ensure the
town is taking advantage of programs offered to the community.
• Continue to make local residents aware of MassHousing’s Septic Repair Loan
Program.
• Continue to work with Berkshire Housing to apply for CDBG funds for rehabilitation
grants and loans.
• Pursue new rehabilitation funds, which may become available.
• Often elders, who may need assistance most, with rehabilitation, are reluctant to
participate in loan programs – even deferred payment loan programs. Whatever type
of housing committee is developed should work with the Council on Aging to
determine the need for grant programs and/or technical assistance for elder
households. If such need is identified, the committee and COA should identify sources
of grant funds, such as foundation funding to provide such grants.
Recommendation #4:
Consider options for development of affordable rental
housing
Otis has limited rental housing and no MGL Chapter 40 B housing as of January 2004.
There is a significant amount of accessory apartments in Otis. Conforming some, or all,
of these apartments to Chapter 40B units, will contribute considerably to meeting its
requirement and help insulate the community from outside interference in residential
development. In order to pursue rental housing development, the Town should consider
the following:
5-15
•
•
•
•
Establish local organization such as a Housing Committee, Partnership or Trust to
ensure local voice in decision-making. See Recommendation # 1 above.
Continue to work with BHCD to develop mixed-use rental housing. Working with
nonprofit partners will assist the community in securing the grant resources needed to
make the development affordable at no cost to the Town.
Identify “no cost” local resources that can make the project work such as State-, or
Town- owned land that can be used for rental development.
Work with nonprofit developer to identify grants and low-interest or deferred payment
loans for rental development. Possible sources include:
⇒ U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Programs: Section 202
Elderly
Housing Program, Section 811 Housing for Persons with Disabilities
⇒ U.S Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service Program
⇒ Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development Programs:
Affordable Housing Trust Fund (with MassHousing), HOME, Housing Stabilization
Fund,
Housing Development Support Program, Local Initiative Program and Section 8
Housing
Voucher Program.
⇒ Massachusetts Housing Partnership loan programs
⇒ Federal Home Loan Bank’s Affordable Housing Program
See Appendix A2, Affordable Housing
Recommendation #5:
Consider options for development of affordable
homeownership options
There are limited year round properties affordable to moderate income households and
which are not in significant need of rehabilitation. Development of affordable
homeownership opportunities will help maintain a population of families with younger
children in the community. Development of affordable homeownership units will also help
the community meet its MGL C.40 B requirements.
• Ensure local banks continue to participate in MassHousing’s lending programs.
• Conduct a survey to identify need for affordable homeownership. The survey should
be a task
of the Town’s new housing committee (see Recommendation #1 above).
• If a need is identified, pursue development in a manner similar to that described for
development of rental housing.
• Consider other low-cost models such as working with Habitat with Humanity or
pursuing
development with the local vocational school programs.
See Appendix A3, Affordable Homeownership and Rehabilitation Options
Recommendation #6: Consider the adoption of the Community Preservation Act to
finance future affordable homeownership options in Otis
The Community Preservation Act will give approximately $25 million of State funds to
local municipalities every year to put towards creation and support of affordable housing,
conservation, and historical preservation. The State monies will match funds gained if a
town elects to raise its taxes by up to 3%. Use of these funds is determined locally. In
5-16
Berkshire County, Stockbridge and Williamstown have elected to participate in the
provisions of the Community Development Act, enabling them as the only two
municipalities able to receive state funds from a pool of funds designed to serve all 32
Berkshire County municipalities.
Recommendation #7:
Apply for EO418 Housing Recertification for Otis
Continued Certification gives the town preferential status when applying for $45 million in grant
opportunities available annually by the State.
Recommendation # 8; Consider applying to DHCD’s Local Initiative Program (LIP).
This program allows municipalities to document local program efforts to address
affordable housing and allows any units created or documented under the local program
to be counted toward the Chapter 40B affordable housing inventory.
5-17
Introduction to Economic Development
Community Recreation Center Project
Figures 1-4
Economic Suitability Map
6
6-1
6-2
6-9
6-13
Introduction to the Economic Development Element
The economic development element for the Town of Otis
focuses on a feasibility and conceptual design study for a
massive community center complex, which would serve as a
community focal point for recreational, cultural and civic
activities. The community center is also anticipated to be a key
stimulus to the local economy by generating several local jobs
and additional revenue for the Town. This includes a narrative
report and provides conceptual designs of a community center
complex master plan that illustrates all proposed structures,
athletic facilities and trails. This element also includes floor
plans, building elevations, existing conditions plan, and a
proposed trail system plan for the entire community center
complex.
6-1
I.
COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER PROJECT
A.
INTRODUCTION
The Town of Otis Community Development Plan Committee (the Committee) has
received funding from Department of Housing and Community Development,
Executive Office of Environmental Affairs and Executive Office of Transportation and
Construction to evaluate the potential development of a 120 acre town owned parcel
for a community recreation facility. The Berkshire Regional Planning Commission
(BRPC) has administered the project and the funding.
Located between Route 8 and West Center Road, north of the Farmington River
Elementary School, the Site has 2,300 feet of frontage on West Center Road and no
frontage on Route 8. A portion of the Site is presently used for the Town transfer
station located on West Center Road.
Background
The Site uses were developed based on input received from the Committee and
public input via a series of community workshops. A community survey was
conducted as part of the Economic Development and Planning Consistency Study in
1998, which discussed, among other things, the need for a Community Recreation
Center. At that time there was community support for the development of a
community center that would offer a variety of activities to a diversified user group.
Based on community feedback, the Committee proposes to develop the Site to serve
numerous user groups and provide a variety of passive and active recreational
activities. Three conceptual sketches were reviewed by the Committee showing
various schematic layouts for the Site. The schematic layouts reflected a varying
number of uses, field layouts and amount of the Site to be developed. After several
meetings with the Committee a Preferred Alternative was agreed upon. The Preferred
Alternative is a compilation of the three original sketches and is shown in Figure 1 –
Otis Recreation Center. It is envisioned as a multi-phased project which would be
implemented as funding becomes available.
The Committee believes there is a need for this type of facility in Otis to provide a
community gathering point where a number of users and activities could be served.
The Committee has indicated, through its numerous discussions and meetings, that
there is support for this project and that it is a local priority for the Town of Otis.
B.
PROJECT FACILITIES
The Committee has concluded that the recreational facility should serve a number of
users with varied interests and levels of ability. The goal is to provide a facility that
would host youth programs as well as activities of interest to seniors and all age
groups in between.
Outdoor Components
Proposed outdoor recreation components of the Site would include two NCAA
regulation size soccer fields, three tennis courts, two baseball fields, two softball fields
and a trail network meandering through the Site. The soccer fields could be overlaid
6-2
with U-8 or U-10 fields (smaller fields for 8 and 10 year old soccer leagues placed
perpendicular so that two fields fit on one regulation size field) to maximize youth
soccer programs. The tennis courts and soccer fields would be accessible from Route
8. The baseball and softball fields would be located on the western portion of the Site
and accessed from West Center Road.
Two points of access to the different venues would reduce traffic congestion during
periods of peak usage. Parking areas would be provided in close proximity to each
use. The trail network would interconnect the various uses on Site with the
elementary school, Route 8 and West Center Road. The conceptual plan has
considered the extensive wetland areas throughout the Site and the areas with
significant slopes that would be a deterrent to field development.
It is envisioned that the recreation facilities would be used year round with the trail
network used for cross country skiing and the tennis courts flooded to provide for a
skating rink.
Indoor Components
The indoor recreation components would consist of a community recreation center
and an enclosed soccer field for year round use. The proposed recreation center
would contain a pool, sauna, whirlpool, a full size basketball court with half court
overlays, 2 handball/racquetball courts, an aerobics room, weight training room,
meeting rooms, kitchen and staff offices. Locker rooms would be provided for men,
women, boys, girls and a handicapped/family changing room would be available.
The building would be approximately 45,000 SF and centrally located on the Site.
Figures 2 and 3, Floor Plan and Building Elevation, respectively, show a conceptual
community recreation center layout and design. The indoor soccer field, enclosed
with a tension fabric structure, would provide for a year round practice facility and
possibly generate revenue for the Town if it were leased to private users. Both
facilities would be accessible from Route 8.
C.
SITE SUITABILITY
The Committee contemplated two sites for the development of a community
recreation center, one on a parcel of land located behind the Town Hall in Otis Center
and one on the land located off of Route 8 by the Farmington Elementary School.
Land behind the Town Hall was dismissed because the Route 8 acres parcel offer
better access, was a larger site and provide added benefits by its proximity to the
school. The Committee agreed that the Route 8 site near the school was preferable
for several reasons.
The preferred Site is presently undeveloped and zoned R-40, Residential, which
allows “Municipal or governmental use including, but not limited to, municipal
buildings, libraries, parks, playgrounds, or other facilities owned or operated by a
Town agency”. Therefore, the proposed uses would be permitted by right. An AT&T
easement bisects the parcel and at this time potential development constraints
related to the easement are unknown.
6-3
Environmental Conditions
Topography varies throughout the Site from relatively flat areas to rolling terrain to
areas which are very steep (Figure 4 – Existing Conditions Plan). The Site generally
slopes from northwest to southeast and is densely vegetated by deciduous and
evergreen trees. Soil types are also variable ranging from sandy loam on the eastern
part of the Site to extremely stony soils on the western part of the Site. In conjunction
with the variable soils, the soil drainage characteristics vary from well drained to
poorly drained soils.
There is no public water supply or sanitary system at or near the Site. An on-site
septic system would need to be designed to serve the recreation facility. A well(s)
would also need to be drilled and developed to provide a potable water supply for
domestic use and the pool.
Prior to any development of the Site it is recommended that a detailed site analysis
be completed which would evaluate the site specific soil types, depth to bedrock and
ability to produce the required water supply.
The Site contains several wetlands, which have been preliminarily identified through
field reconnaissance and aerial photographic interpretation. The wetlands have not
been delineated or survey located but appear to extend generally in a north/south
direction. Based on the preliminary wetland limits, it appears that approximately 30%
or 40 acres of the Site could be designated wetlands.
Transportation Issues
The preferred means of access to the Site is from Route 8 at the Farmington
Elementary School due to its proximity to Otis Center, the elementary school and the
proposed recreation building. Route 8 is a local connector road and therefore more
accessible to a greater regional area. Since the Site has no direct frontage on Route
8, an easement for access or acquisition of land would need to be obtained from an
adjoining landowner.
West Center Road would also provide site access since the Site has direct frontage,
however it is a rural road with no shoulders and the distance to Otis Center is much
greater. From the intersection of Routes 8 and 23 East the distance to site access on
Route 8 is approximately 4,800 feet while the distance to the Site along West Center
Road, from the same intersection, is approximately 5,500 feet to the first proposed
driveway and 6,400 feet to the northernmost driveway as shown on Figure 5 –
Proposed Otis Trail System. The intersection of West Center Road and Route 23 is a
“Y” configuration and the sight distance looking from West Center Road eastbound on
Route 23 and appears limited.
Figure 2 shows access to the Site from both roads with Route 8 serving a majority of
the proposed uses and West Center Road serving the baseball and softball fields.
The intent is to reduce traffic congestion in and out of the Site during periods of peak
use. Construction of a through street to connect the two roads was considered and
dismissed due to cost, topographic constraints and the amount of wetlands which
would be disturbed.
6-4
D.
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
Development of the 120 acre Site would potentially involve reviews by the following
federal, state and local agencies prior to any construction occurring.
Federal and state
•
Massachusetts Highway Department – Curb cut permit on Route 8
•
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection – Massachusetts
Environmental Policy Act (MEPA)
•
U.S Army Corps of Engineers – Wetlands review
Town of Otis
•
Building Department – Building permit
•
Planning Board – Site plan review
•
Board of Health – Septic system review and water supply
•
Conservation Commission – Wetland review if within 200 feet of a wetland
•
Department of Public Works – Curb cut permit on West Center Road
The following documents would likely govern construction and land development
within the Town.
Federal and State
E.
•
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
•
Massachusetts State Building Code, 6th edition; 780 CMR – State Board of
Building Regulations and Standards
•
Wetlands Protection Act Regulations (CMR 310), Massachusetts Department
of Environmental Protection
•
State Sanitary Code, Massachusetts Department of Public Health
•
401 Water Quality Certification Regulations, 314 CMR 9.00
•
Surface Water Quality Standards, 314 CMR 4.00
•
Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act Regulations, 301 CMR 11.00
COST ESTIMATE
A preliminary budget for the project is approximately $16 million. A breakdown by
phases is as follows:
Action
Preliminary Budget
Wetland delineation
$ 20,000
Soil borings and geotechnical investigation
$ 25,000
Boundary and topographic survey
$ 40,000
6-5
Water supply and septic system investigations
$ 75,000
Additional environmental studies
$ 50,000
Total Site Investigation Costs
$210,000
It is anticipated that the community recreation center and related site improvements
would be developed in three phases as follows:
Phase 1
Component
Estimated Cost
Indoor Soccer Field (tension fabric structure)
$4,500,000
3 tennis courts (no lighting)
$
100,000
1 baseball field (no lighting, no irrigation)
$
200,000
Community recreation center – 45,000 SF
$ 8,000,000
Parking areas (73,000 SF) and access roads (1,700
LF) from Route 8 – asphalt
$
200,000
Site work and utilities
$
200,000
Multi-use trails (2,500 LF)
$
25,000
Design, legal, and permitting
$ 1,500,000
Total Phase 1 Costs
$14,725,000
6-6
Phase 2
Component
Estimated Cost
2 Soccer fields (no lighting, no irrigation)
$200,000
Parking area (30,000 SF) - asphalt
$100,000
Trails – 2,000 LF – stone dust
$ 20,000
Site work
$100,000
$ 50,000
Total Phase 2 Costs
$470,000
Phase 3
Component
Estimated Cost
2 Softball fields (no lighting, no irrigation)
$200,000
1 Baseball field (no lighting, no irrigation)
$100,000
Parking area (27,000 SF) and access road (700 LF)
from West Center Road - asphalt
$200,000
Multi-use trails (1,500 LF)
$ 15,000
Site work
$100,000
$ 75,000
Total Phase 3 Costs
F.
$689,000
ECONOMIC STIMULUS AND JOB CREATION
The project would result in a stimulus on the Town of Otis economy and provide a
potential revenue source for the Town. Economic stimulus would be realized through
job creation. Aside from the jobs that would be created by construction, operation of
the community recreation center could result in the following jobs:
•
Program staff to conduct the various activities such as swimming teachers,
aerobics teachers, and coaches; 6 FTE (full time equivalents) positions are
projected.
•
Administrative staff to oversee operations of the facility such as programming
schedules, budget and day to day administration; 3 FTE positions are
projected
•
Maintenance staff for inside maintenance of the facility and pool and outdoor
field maintenance of mowing, fertilizing, striping fields, setting track for cross
country skiing, etc; 4 FTE positions are projected.
The thirteen FTE positions would be available to a diverse population ranging from
experienced and certified instructors and administrators to college or high school
students working in part time positions.
The project has the potential to serve as a significant revenue source for the Town of
Otis through rental of the community center facilities. While the Committee envisions
the project would primarily serve Town residents, they expect to rent facilities, when
6-7
not in use by the residents, to neighboring towns, local clubs, school districts and
organizations. The indoor soccer field offers the greatest potential of all facilities
included within the recreation center.
Based on research by the Committee, there is only one indoor soccer field in western
Massachusetts, which is located at the University of Massachusetts campus in
Amherst. Consequently, the field is in great demand with school and organizations
throughout the region using the facility during winter months. Assuming the Town
would rent the indoor soccer field for an average of $400 for a two hour block 200300 times a year, the Town could realize a revenue stream of $80,000 to $120,000 a
year.
The facility would also generate revenue from membership fees. A review of fees for
annual memberships charged by similar facilities in the area (Berkshire South
Regional Community Center, Dalton CRA and Pittsfield YMCA) varies as follows:
• Family - $660 – 750
• Adult – $438 - 550
• Senior - $360 - 500
• Youth – $180 - 183
• Single parent - $537 – 600
Assuming there are 1,000 members from Otis (based on a 2000 Census population
of 1,365) and assuming the membership categories are evenly distributed, it is
possible that the facility would generate between $435,000 and $516,500 in annual
membership fees.
The other facilities contacted rely on other types of funding in addition to user fees.
Dalton CRA receives funding from the Town, United Way, memberships and fees,
donations and endowments. Berkshire South Regional Community Center relies on
membership fees, United Way and its annual fundraising campaign, it is not
supported by taxes. The Pittsfield YMCA relies on membership fees and fundraising
campaigns.
G.
RECOMMENDED NEXT STEPS
The recommended next steps would be as follows:
•
Additional site assessment should be undertaken including a geotechnical
investigation and topographic and boundary survey as outlined above. This
information would provide for further refinement of the conceptual site plan
and cost estimates.
•
Acquisition of an easement or parcel of land from an adjoining landowner for
access to Route 8 should be pursued.
•
The proposed development phases should be assessed and evaluated
against the budgeted available funding to determine a construction schedule.
6-8
Transportation
Introduction to Transportation
7
7-1
7-2
Introduction to the Transportation Element
The transportation element of the Plan focuses on the development of a
network of proposed trails throughout the 120-acre community center
complex linking all buildings and outdoor facilities. The trail plan also
provides for external linkages to Farmington Elementary School, West
Center Road Route 8 and proposed connections to Otis Center and
ultimately a connection to the Farmington River Walk. This element of the
plan includes a narrative report with an inventory of existing conditions,
analysis of community bicycling level of service (LOS), recommended and
alternative routes and recommended next steps. A proposed trail system
map is also provided with the proposed community center complex
overlaid for reference.
7-1
Town of Otis, Massachusetts
A.
INTRODUCTION
The Committee also received funding to assess bicycle and pedestrian access routes
within Otis Center including the Site of the community recreation center. The Site has
direct frontage on West Center Road and the Committee would like to obtain an
access easement or acquire a parcel from an adjoining land owner for access to
Route 8. It is envisioned that Route 8 would be the primary site access for vehicles
and trucks while pedestrians and bicyclists could access the Site using the most
convenient trail in the network.
B.
EXISTING CONDITIONS INVENTORY
An inventory of existing bicycle and pedestrian routes was conducted in Fall 2003. In
Otis Center there is an existing, but limited, sidewalk network. The longest
continuous segment is along the east side of Route 8 from Route 23 East and
extending north to the church, approximately 1,500 feet in length. South of the Town
Hall and several businesses, there is a 4’ gravel walk in front of the residences
fronting on Route 8.
Route 8 southbound at Route 23 East intersection –
no shoulder and no sidewalk
Route 8 and Route 23 intersection at entrance to
Town Hall – crosswalk needs repainting
At the intersection of Route 8 and Route 23 East a four foot wide walk wraps around
the corner at the Fire Department. At the intersection of Route 23 West and Route 8,
there is a gravel walk on the west side of Route 8 that begins at the cemetery and
extends south approximately 900 feet to the Post Office. In the segments where no
walk is present pedestrians must use the shoulder of the road.
7-2
Route 8 southbound from Route
intersection – existing gravel sidewalk
23
West
Route 8 northbound toward Route 23 West
intersection – narrow paved shoulder
There are crosswalks at the intersection of Route 23 East with Route 8 and on Route
8 from the church to the Post Office. Beyond Otis Center there are no designated
pedestrian facilities.
Route 8 southbound from Church at Post Office
crosswalk – crosswalk needs repainting
Route 23 East at Route 8 intersection – sidewalk at
Fire Department on far side of intersection
There are no designated Bicycle Routes in the vicinity of Otis Center. Bicyclists must
follow the same rules of the road as vehicles. The roads from Otis Center to the Site
were evaluated to determine if they were acceptable for bicyclists. Route 8 is the
main thoroughfare through Otis and north to the project Site. It is a two lane highway
with 12 foot wide travel lanes and a variable shoulder width of one foot to four feet.
There is no curb except in front of the Post Office and the posted speed limit is 45
m.p.h. There is a double yellow line in the center and a single white line to define the
travel lane from the shoulder.
In Otis Center, there are areas with four foot wide shoulders and then gravel areas
adjacent, which may be used for parking, although there were no vehicles parked
during the site visit. Heading north on Route 8 there was a one to two foot wide
shoulder and then grass. There are curb cuts for driveways but the only major
intersection is Route 23 West at Route 8 near the cemetery. The pavement on Route
8 appeared to be in good condition with no major cracks or potholes.
7-3
Route 8 southbound north of the Route 23 West
intersection – narrow shoulder and guide rail near
shoulder
Route 8 northbound near the church looking toward
Route 23 West – narrow paved shoulder and gravel
adjacent
In some areas there are guide rails adjacent to the narrow shoulder. The topography
in Otis Center is relatively flat however heading northbound on Route 8 it becomes an
uphill ascent. There are areas adjacent to the guide rails which have a steep drop off
or there are culverts and/or wetlands.
Route 8 northbound out of Otis Center – narrow
paved shoulder
Route 8 northbound out of Otis Center – pavement
is generally in good condition
West Center Road is a rural road that is 20 feet wide overall, has no shoulders and a
double yellow line in the center but no pavement markings along the edges. The
pavement was cracked along the edges and appeared to be in fair condition. There
was no posted speed limit in the vicinity of the project Site.
7-4
West Center Road southbound from Transfer Station
driveway – no delineated shoulder, road is narrow,
pavement is cracked
West Center Road northbound from Transfer Station
driveway - no delineated shoulder, road is narrow,
pavement is cracked
Figure 5, Proposed Otis Trail System, illustrates the existing conditions and
recommended improvements to improve pedestrian and bicycle access along these
corridors.
The Bicycling and Walking Transportation Plan prepared by the BRPC contains a
map entitled Crashes Involving a Bicycle or Pedestrian, 1990-1999 which indicates
that during this period there were no incidents within the Town of Otis. Most conflicts
were in the western, more populated, portion of the County.
C.
COMMUNITY BICYCLING LEVEL OF SERVICE
The methodology to determine the Level of Service (LOS) for bicycling is based on
the Bicycle Compatibility Index (BCI) which evaluates the capability of roadways to
accommodate both motorists and pedestrians using geometric and operational
characteristics such as lane width, speed and volume of traffic. The BCI is
subsequently reviewed against the LOS designations to determine a compatibility
level with LOS A being an extremely high compatibility between motorists and
bicyclists and LOS F being an extremely low compatibility.
The formula devised to determine the BCI is as follows:
BCI=3.67 - 0.966BL - 0.41BLW - 0.498CLW + 0.002CLV + 0.0004OLV + 0.022SPD
+ 0.506PKG -0.264AREA + AF where:
BL = presence of a bicycle lane or paved shoulder 0.9m (3’) no = 0, yes = 1
BLW = bicycle lane (or paved shoulder) width in m (to the nearest tenth)
CLW = curb lane width in m (to the nearest tenth)
CLV = curb lane volume vph in one direction
OLV = other lane(s) volume – same direction vph
th
SPD = 85 percentile speed of traffic km/h
PKG = presence of a parking lane with more than 30% occupancy no = 0, yes = 1
AREA = type of roadside development residential = 1, other type = 0
AF = t + p + rt where:
t = adjustment factor for truck volumes = 0
p = adjustment factor for parking turnover = 0
rt = adjustment factor for right turn volumes = 0
Results for Route 8
north of Route 23
0
0.6
3.3
137
0
87
0
1
0
7-5
Therefore:
BCI=3.67 - 0.966(0) - 0.41(0.6) - 0.498(3.3) + 0.002(137) + 0.0004(0) + 0.022(87) +
0.506(0) -0.264(1) + AF (0)
3.67 – 0 – 0.246 -1.643 + 0.274 + 0 + 1.914 + 0 – 0.264 + 0 = 3.70 BCI
The BCI value of 3.70 was compared against the LOS designations to determine that
the LOS on Route 8 is LOS D – Moderately Low. This means that experienced
bicyclists would probably be comfortable using this route but that casual, less
experienced cyclists and children would not. Significant improvements would need to
be made to Route 8 to obtain a LOS C which is considered the least acceptable
design level for casual cyclists.
The BCI was calculated for Route 8 only because there were no AADT (average
annual daily traffic) traffic counts available for the other streets in Otis. It is assumed
that Route 8 is the main thoroughfare in Otis and therefore illustrates the “worst case”
scenario.
BRPC provided BCI and LOS calculations
as follows:
• West Center Road
• Route 8 north of study area
• Route 8 south of study area
• Route 23 west of Route 8
for other areas in the vicinity of the project
BCI
BCI
BCI
BCI
3.09
2.56
2.64
2.16
LOS C
LOS C
LOS C
LOS B
The BRPC Plan included steep slopes and crash locations into its consideration of
LOS for the Bicycling & Walking Transportation Plan which is not included in the BCI
methodology. The map entitled Bicycling Compatibility and Steep Slopes, Berkshire
County, MA states that Route 8 through Otis is a LOS C – Moderately High
compatibility for bicyclists which is reflected in the above calcualtions.
The Bicycling & Walking Transportation Plan evaluated the demand for pedestrian
and bicycle improvements based on the following criteria:
•
Densely developed residential areas
•
Commercial land uses
•
Roads within 1 mile of a school, neighborhood park or major destination
•
The number of households without a vehicle
Pursuant to the Bicycling & Walking Transportation Plan, the Town of Otis is not
among the areas considered highest priority for bicycling and walking investments. In
conjunction with the Farmington River Elementary School, if the community recreation
facility is constructed, the Town would meet one of the four criteria used to establish
the need for improvements.
7-6
D.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Figures 2 and 5 illustrate a network of trails throughout the 120 acre park with
connections to West Center Road, Route 8 and the Farmington Elementary School.
Connection of this network to Otis Center would make the park more accessible to
users who do not, or chose not, to drive (ie. children) and therefore Route 8, in its
present condition is not suitable for this need.
Alternative routes to Otis Center have been considered and are identified on Figure 5
- Proposed Otis Trail System. Among the alternatives considered are providing a trail
along Route 23 East to West Center Road. The primary concern with this alternative
is the width of West Center Road, the unevenness of the pavement edges and the
lack of shoulders. Although it is appears to be a rural road there is likely additional
traffic generated as a result of the Town transfer station on West Center Road.
Obtaining an easement from landowners to access the Site approximately 1,800 feet
from the intersection with Route 23 would reduce the distance pedestrians and
bicyclists would travel on West Center Road. The easement would be approximately
350 feet in length to reach the southwestern corner of the Town lands.
Another option would be to obtain an easement from the school district on lands near
the Otis Highway Department. This would provide access to the Site from Route 8
approximately 2,800 feet from its intersection with Route 23 West and reduce the cost
of improvements required on Route 8. The easement would be approximately 700
feet in length and would access the southeast corner of the Site.
Obtaining an easement from AT&T to use the existing utility easement located north
of the Farmington Elementary School would provide a link to the proposed internal
trail system as well as the two roads bordering the Site. The AT&T parcel bisects the
Site from Route 8 to West Center Road, providing a through connector for
pedestrians and bicyclists and direct access to the community building, tennis courts
and soccer fields. This option would not reduce the travel distance on Route 8 from
Otis Center but it would reduce the distance traveled on West Center Road to
approximately 3,000 feet from the intersection of Route 23 West and West Center
Road.
Improvements for pedestrian and bicycle use on Route 8 in Otis would provide a link
for a larger, regional user base to communities north and south of Otis as well as to
the community recreation facility.
Figure 5 identifies improvements that would be required along Route 8 to make it
more user friendly for pedestrians and bicyclists. The sidewalk in Otis Center on the
east side of Route 8 should be completed and a crosswalk added at the entrance to
the Town Hall complex. The existing crosswalks should be re-striped. Heading north
on Route 8 it is recommended that the shoulders be widened on each side of the
road. This would be the most economical alternative in lieu of constructing a
separate multi-use pathway. Shoulder widening may involve additional right-of-way
acquisition, wetlands disturbance, extension of existing culverts and filling of some
7-7
low areas. Any improvements would require approval from the Massachusetts
Highway Department (MHD).
The Farmington River Walk, on the east side of Route 8, at the intersection of Route
8 and Route 23 West, should be incorporated into any future improvements as a link
to the overall trail system.
Although the ability to acquire easements from adjoining landowners is unknown at
this time, a possible long range scenario for implementation of the trails plan would
be as follows:
E.
•
Obtain an easement from the School and construct the trail between the Site
and Route 8 thereby reducing trail length on Route 8
•
Complete the trail along Route 8 from Otis Center to the new school trail
•
Obtain an easement from AT&T for interconnection between Route 8 and
West Center Road.
•
Complete trail along Route 8 from the school trail to the Site driveway
RECOMMENDED NEXT STEPS
The recommended next steps would be as follows:
•
The Board of Selectmen should contact BRPC and MHD to request
improvements to Route 8.
•
The Board of Selectmen could pursue enhancement opportunities for the
recommended improvements.
•
The Board of Selectmen could consider providing matching funding for
improvements to expedite completion.
•
A detailed cost estimate should be completed which evaluates whether
additional right-of-way would need to be acquired, identifies the amount of
wetlands that would be disturbed, identifies permits that would be required,
and the extent of improvements (fill, culverts, asphalt, etc.) that would be
required.
•
The Town could pursue easements or acquisition of lands from landowners or
the school district to provide access to the southern portion of the Site thereby
reducing the extent of improvements required along Route 8.
7-8
GIS Mapping
Base Maps
8
8-1
8-2
8-8
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are quickly becoming a staple of our
times. Defined broadly, GIS is a computer-based system “for capture, retrieval,
analysis, and display of spatial (locationally defined) data.” The essential
elements in this definition for local governments are “spatial” and “analysis”:
where are things, why do we want to know about them, and how can our
community use this information to make better decisions?
GIS is a system of computer software, hardware, data, and personnel to help
manipulate, analyze and present information that is tied to a specific location on
the earth. Aspects of GIS include:
Spatial location – usually a geographic location
Information – visualization of analysis of data
System – linking software, hardware, data
Personnel –the key to the power of GIS
GIS applies modern computer graphics and database technology to the efficient,
cost-effective management and planning of the local government’s assets. It
provides enhanced capabilities for data storage, retrieval, and analysis. GIS
does this by linking (1) maps and (2) databases. This marriage lets us easily
explore the relationship between (1) location and (2) information.
The real key for small city governments is that GIS quickly integrates information
with location. Through its use of computer technology, GIS provides a better,
faster, easier way for local officials to find answers to questions and carry out
analyses based on spatial relationships.
Berkshire Regional Planning Commission uses GIS in projects covering almost
all aspects of planning. This includes environmental, land use, community
development, transportation, economic and housing projects. BRPC uses our
GIS for map creation, data development and spatial analysis.
Throughout the Community Development Plan, GIS has been used to create a
series of base maps illustrating what is in each community and has allowed
community officials to determine where the most suitable locations are for
various types of development / preservation. Some communities also used
suitability maps to assist them in determine where the best locations for
development / preservation were. These suitability maps were created by
evaluating the importance of various environmental, housing, economic, and
transportation items and plotting the best and worst locations based on the
combination of all these factors. The final maps presented throughout the report
show the decisions that were arrived at by the community. In this section, the
base maps are presented as reference to show what is currently in the town.
The descriptions of the mapped items that you will find within these base maps
are listed below.
8-1
Description of Map Attributes
Environmental Resources
Drinking Water
Aquifers – shows medium and high yield aquifers as delineated by USGS Water
Resource Division. The original data is from the USGS 1:48,000 hydrologic atlas
series on groundwater favorability.
Interim Wellhead Protection areas – shows the primary, protected area for PWS
groundwater sources in the absence of an approved Zone II. The radius around
the well is determined by the pumping rate in GPM of the well. Wellhead
protection areas are important for protecting the recharge area around public
water supply (PWS) wells.
Lakes/Ponds Resource Area – shows a 100 ft. buffer around the lakes and
ponds that are on the USGS topographical maps. This buffer shows the area that
has an immediate impact of the lakes and ponds.
Outstanding Resource Water – shows waters which constitute an outstanding
resource as determined by their outstanding socioeconomic, recreational,
ecological, and / or aesthetic values and which shall be protected and maintained
as determined under Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards of 1995
Wellhead Protection Zone I – shows a 400 ft. buffer around public water supply
points.
Wellhead Protection Area Zone II – shows the primary, protected area for PWS
groundwater sources based upon the area of an aquifer which contributes to a
well under the most severe pumping and recharge conditions that can
realistically be anticipated. Wellhead protection areas are important for protecting
the recharge area around public water supply (PWS) wells.
Water Bodies and Protection Areas
FEMA 100yr. Floodplain – shows areas of possible risk associated with flooding.
This layer was created by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
from the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM)
Lakes / Ponds Resource Areas – 100 ft - shows a 100-foot buffer around lakes
and ponds that defines the resource area that contributes to the lake/pond. The
lakes and ponds are derived from USGS topo maps.
River Protection Area – 200 ft. – Shows a 200-foot buffer delineating the
resource area of perennial streams. These areas were created as an addition to
the long-standing Wetlands Protection Act. The law establishes protected
riverfront areas that extend 200 feet from the mean annual high-water line.
8-2
Surface Water Protection Area Zone A – shows land between the surface water
source and the upper boundary of the bank, the land within a 400 foot lateral
distance from the upper boundary of the bank of a Class A surface water source
and the land within a 200 foot lateral distance from the upper boundary of the
bank of a tributary or associated surface water body. These areas are included in
the Massachusetts Drinking Water Regulations as Surface Water Supply
Protection Zones.
Surface Water Protection Area Zone B – shows the land within one-half mile of
the upper boundary of the bank of a Class A surface water source or the edge of
the watershed, whichever is less. Zone B always included the land area within a
400 ft lateral distance from the upper boundary of the bank of the Class A
surface water source. These areas are included in the Massachusetts Drinking
Water Regulations as Surface Water Supply Protection Zones.
Wetland Resource Areas – shows a 100-foot buffer around wetlands that defines
the resource area that contributes to the wetland. The wetlands are derived from
USGS topographical maps.
Wetlands – shows wetlands derived from USGS topographical maps.
Soils / Geology
Excessively Drained Soils– shows soils that have too much or too rapid loss of
water, either by percolation or by surface flow. The occurrence of internal free
water is very rare or very deep. This layer was derived from the US Department
of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil
Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database.
Highly Erodible Soils – shows soils that are highly susceptible to erosion from
wind and/or water. This layer was derived from the US Department of Agriculture
(USDA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey Geographic
(SSURGO) database.
Hydric Soils – Soils that are wet long enough to periodically produce anaerobic
conditions, thereby influencing the growth of plants. This layer was derived from
the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation
Service (NRCS) Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database.
Poorly Drained soils– shows soils that do not lose water very rapidly. The
occurrence of free water is common. This layer was derived from the US
Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation Service
(NRCS) Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database.
Scenic Landscapes – shows areas identified as having distinctive or noteworthy
scenic landscapes as part of the Massachusetts Landscape Inventory Project,
Department of Environmental Management, 1981.
Slopes Greater then 15% - shows slopes that are greater then 15% based on
slope information derived from either 3 or 10-meter contours generated by
MassGIS
8-3
Biological
Areas of Critical Environmental Concern – shows the location of areas that have
been designated ACECs by the Secretary of Environmental Affairs.
This
designation requires greater environmental review of certain kinds of proposed
development under state agency jurisdiction with the boundary.
Contiguous Natural Lands – shows large, contiguous tracts of natural land.
“Contiguous” lands are defined to be at least 250 contiguous acres and “Natural”
lands are defined based on the land use codes for water, forest, shrubland,
pasture and wetland. The data is part of the Massachusetts Resource
Identification Project (MRIP).
Natural Land Riparian Corridors – shows contiguous natural lands within a 100meter corridor encompassing perennial streams and river features. These areas
within the riparian corridor remain in a “natural state”, potentially functioning as a
corridor for select species movement, as well as additional ecological purposes.
These data is part of the Massachusetts Resource Identification Project (MRIP).
NHESP BioMap Core Habitat - Depicts the most viable habitat for rare species
and natural communities. The polygons may consist of many individual species
or natural communities.
NHESP BioMap Supporting Natural Landscapes – buffers and connects the Core
Habitat polygons and identifies large, naturally vegetated blocks that are
relatively free from the impact of roads and other development. The quality of
undeveloped land considered in the landscape analysis was evaluated based on
four major components: natural vegetation patch characteristics, size of relatively
road less areas, sub watershed integrity, and contribution to buffering Bore
Habitat for plants and exemplary communities.
NHESP Estimated Habitats of Rare Wildlife – shows estimations of the habitats
of state-protected rare wildlife populations that occur in Resource areas. These
habitats are based on rare species records maintained in the Natural Heritage &
Endangered Species Program’s (NHESP) database.
NHESP Priority Habitats of Rare Species – shows areas that represent
estimations of important state-listed rare species habitats in Massachusetts.
These habitats are based in rare species population records maintained in the
Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program’s (NHESP) database.
Riparian Corridors – shows a 100-meter corridor, which encompasses perennial
streams and river features. The 100 meter buffer distance is a subjective value
derived from existing conservation plans, as well as current literature. The data
is part of the Massachusetts Resource Identification Project (MRIP).
Vernal Pools – shows a 100-foot buffer around NHESP Certified Vernal Pools.
Certified Vernal Pools are protected if they fall under the jurisdiction of the
Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act Regulations. They also are afforded
protection under the state Water Quality Certification regulations, the state Title 5
regulations, and the Forest Cutting Practices Act regulations.
8-4
Community
Developed
Commercial Land – shows land that is classified as commercial in the most
recent land use update.
Gravel Pits / Mining - shows land that is classified as Gravel / Mining in the most
recent land use update.
Industrial Land – shows land that is classified as industrial in the most recent
land use update. Industrial land is defined as Industrial, Mining, and Waste
Disposal.
Multi-Family Residential - shows land that is classified as Multi-Family residential
in the most recent land use update.
Residential Land – shows land that is classified as residential in the most recent
land use update. Residential land is defined as lots smaller then ¼ acre lots, ¼
to ½ acre lots, lots larger then ½ acre, and multi-family lots.
State Registered Historic Resources – shows land that is listed with the State
Register of Historic Places as being of historical interest.
Village / Commercial Centers – an area defined by the community as
representing the village or community center.
Non-Developed Land
Agriculture Land – shows land classified as agriculture in the most recent land
use update.
Land that is defined as agriculture is composed of cropland,
pasture, and woody perennial.
Agricultural Preservation Restriction Land – shows land that is permanently
protected as agricultural land due to an APR designation
Buildable Land – shows land that was determined to be buildable based upon
existing development, protection, and restricted land during the 1999/2000
Buildout Analysis
Forested Land – shows land that is classified as forest in the most recent land
use update.
Non-Protected Open Space – shows land that is classified as open space, but is
not permanently protected.
Partial Constraints – shows land that is buildable but is limited based on land
characteristics, such as slope, wetlands, and proximity to water.
Protected Open Space – shows land that is classified as open space and is
permanently protected.
8-5
Recreational Resources – shows land that is classified as recreational in the
most recent land use update.
Recreational land is defined as Participation
Recreation, Spectator Recreation and Water based Recreation.
Housing and Population Densities
Owner Housing Density – The percentage of housing that is owned by the
resident on a per acre basis. The values are derived from the Census 2000
data.
Population Density - The population of the census block on a per acre basis.
The values are derived from the Census 2000 data.
Rental Housing Density - The percentage of housing that is rented by the
resident on a per acre basis. The values are derived from the Census 2000
data.
Seasonal Housing Density - The percentage of housing that is seasonal on a per
acre basis. The values are derived from the Census 2000 data.
Infrastructure
Roads
Dirt / Unpaved Roads – roads that are considered dirt or unpaved based on the
latest MassHighway inventory.
Local Roads – roads that are considered local roads based on the latest
MassHighway inventory.
Minor Roads – roads that are considered collectors based on the latest
MassHighway inventory.
Major Roads / Highway Access – roads that are considered arterials or interstate
on the latest MassHighway inventory.
Other Transportation
Para Transit – This data layer is only useful for regional analysis. A town that is
a member of BRTA receives para transit
Transit access – roads that have existing BRTA bus service.
Rail Access – existing rail lines that are currently used.
Air Access – the area surrounding the airports that are considered part of the
airport complex.
Bike Trails – the Ashuwillticook bike trail from Lanesborough/Pittsfield line to
downtown Adams.
8-6
Utilities
Public Water – a line approximating the location of the public water lines. DPW
staff verified this data during the summer of 2001.
Sewer – a line approximating the location of the sewer lines. The DPW staff
verified this data during summer of 2001.
Solid Waste Facilities – Compiled by DEP to track the locations of landfills,
transfer stations, and combustion facilities.
Bureau of Waste Prevention
Major Facilities – facilities that are regulated by the DEP. These are considered
to have the greatest environmental significance. Facilities included are:
• Large Quantity Generators of Hazardous Waste
• Large Quantity Toxic Users
• Hazardous Waste Recyclers
• Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and / or Disposal Facilities
• Facilities with Air Operating Permits
• Facilities with Groundwater Discharge Permits
8-7
Appendix
A.1 Public Participation
9
9-1
Public Participation
Town Of Otis
Community Development Plan Committee
Notes on Community Center
Meeting held October 15th, 2002
Planning Board Members present:
Harold Korin, Ralph Gleason, Sr., Andrew Pyenson, Kevin Rocke, V. Vincent Lee, Brian
Crandall and Bryan Boeskin of BRPC.
The Town of Otis is considering the creation of a Community Center. This is a brief summation
of the topics discussed at the meeting.
1) Anticipated uses: The new community center will serve several functions, with anticipated space
for youth, seniors and families. There will also be space given for Sporting Leagues and Civic and
Community Organizations. Also given consideration will be the possible uses for such events of
Artistic and Cultural merit, although this is not a priority. The suggestions of applying the
Community Center for Educational and Governmental uses (office spaces, public meeting spaces
polling stations) were not looked upon as favorable. There are other facilities in the Town that
accommodate these uses. When a suggestion for "other" uses was brought up, possible uses such as
wedding receptions, family get- together and other social functions had been considered. The
possibility of renting the center for such occasions was also mentioned. Usage by other communities
in the regional area was suggested, which could be a potential source of revenue.
2) Facility Considerations:
Walking and biking trails, and a baseball and a soccer field along with the indoor amenities is
desirable. Athletic Fields may already be present; depending on select locations would be nice to
have.
An indoor pool with a glass enclosure was suggested which could be open for summer.
In the facility, ideas for community space, suggestions for the building to included a couple of multifunctional rooms, which could also be used as classrooms. An auditorium or theatre is not a high
priority. The provision of food service would be included, on a small scale, along with office spacein this case only one room would be needed which would be used for facility administration.
When asked about sports and recreational spaces and/or amenities that would be desired, several
were mentioned. Weight training and aerobic areas were brought up. Of playing courts, basketball,
volleyball, handball and racquetball were all mentioned. These would be preferably indoors. The
tennis courts would be located outdoors. For physical therapy, hot tubs and saunas were suggested,
along with a locker room with shower facilities. There was also the proposal of a game room and such
amenities could include video and pinball, billiards, ping-pong, air hockey, etc.
The preferred dimensions of the facility would be a one-story structure that would consist of a single
building.
3) Site considerations: The preferred site is 100-acre park on West Center and Route 8. This site is
in close proximity to the School and Route 8 and is adjacent to a local transfer station. An
alternate site is open land to the rear of the Town Hall. Both of these locations are town owned.
M:\Program Delivery\Otis\Planning\CDP Plan\Final Report\Public Participation\10-15-02 Minutes OTS.doc
Printed: 6/16/04
9-1
As of the meeting, there were not any foreseeable concerns with environmental issues, drainage,
wastewater disposal, as both sites have sewer accessibility.
4) Funding and Economic Considerations: The budget of the facility will be $8 million. This
estimate is based on the cost of a similar facility that just opened in Great Barrington. The
preferred strategy for ownership and operation would be a Town owned non-profit operation with
user fees.
•
Economic Development Benefits would be job creation associated with construction, staffing and
maintenance. This building would add the quality of life in the area, and lift the desirability of the
community, which could attract more businesses to the region. This facility should serve as an
economic anchor for other businesses and economic growth in the area.
•
The Town currently has about $60,000 earmarked for this project.
•
A Bond measure may be considered, but only for gap funding.
•
It is anticipated The Otis Woodland Trust and a coalition of other local organizations could also
raise up to $100,000.
M:\Program Delivery\Otis\Planning\CDP Plan\Final Report\Public Participation\10-15-02 Minutes OTS.doc
Printed: 6/16/04
9-2
Town of Otis Planning Board Meeting
November 12, 2002
Purpose:
To review CHA’s scope of services based on the Tasks assigned by BRPC in the
Community Development Plan Scope of Service for transportation issues and a feasibility study
for a community recreation facility.
Attending: Town of Otis: Hal Kobrin, Chairman; Ralph Gleason; Andrew Pyenson; Brian
Crandall; and Ray White; CHA: Scott Lewendon, Tom O’Brien, Kathy Simmonds.
Introductions were made by CHA. Hal Kobrin asked if Steve Wilson would be involved in the
project and spoke highly of Steve’s past involvement with the Town during the development of
their comprehensive plan several years ago. CHA explained that Steve is the project manager for
this job.
CHA asked if accident data was available for review. The Board suggested that Charlie Harner,
Chief of Police (413) 269-4825 be contacted for local data and that Mass Highway patrol be
contacted for accidents on Routes 8 and 23.
CHA asked where highway information could be obtained. The Board suggested that Highway
Superintendent Howard Moretz (413) 269-0101 be contacted.
CHA asked who should be involved as part of the committee. The general consensus by those at
the meeting was that they are the significant, representative stakeholders in the Town but that
probably the seniors and someone from Otis Woodlands should be notified.
The Board feels that the primary site for the recreation facility is on the parcel of Town owned
land adjacent to the school on Route 8. The access to the site is between the school and the
AT&T building and appears to be via an easement according to the tax maps. The Town owned
parcels are identified as Tax Map #10, parcel 16 (24.49 ac.) and parcel 17 (94.5 ac.). This site is
preferred due to its proximity to utilities and the school and the fact that the Town already owns
it. CHA will not pursue any other options with regard to another location for this facility.
The Board generally felt there was not a need for additional sidewalks other than to provide
access from downtown, where there are walks, to the future recreation facility on Route 8.
CHA asked what type of mapping would be made available for use during project development.
Hal Kobrin noted that the Town has a GIS system with highways, tax parcels and information
from BRPC. He will send CHA a disk with this data. CHA will also contact BRPC directly
(Mark Maloy (413) 442-1521) for relevant mapping that they may have available.
Hal Kobrin outlined his vision of the process as follows:
Ø A survey should be sent out to all residents (3,000 ϒ parcels) asking for their input on a
recreation facility and a bicycle/pedestrian path. The results of the survey conducted during
the Comprehensive Plan should also be included.
Ø Based on survey input, CHA would develop a conceptual design for the recreation facility
and bicycle network.
9-3
Ø
Ø
Ø
This information would be presented at a public meeting for their input.
Input received would be incorporated into the final conceptual design and report.
The final report would be presented at a public meeting.
CHA will compile information and prepare a draft survey for mailing by the Town. The draft
survey will be submitted for discussion at the next Planning Board meeting – December 9th. The
Board meets the second Monday of each month and would prefer that these meetings be
conducted on the same night.
9-4
Town of Otis
Community Development Plan Advisory Committee
TOWN OF OTIS
CDP MEETING
February 9, 2004 @ 7:00 PM
Otis Town Hall
Dear Otis Advisory Committee Member,
This letter is to inform you of the meeting of the Otis Community Development Plan Advisory Committee.
Listed below is a tentative agenda for the meeting.
Agenda
I.
Review and Discussion of Housing Profile and Data Analysis
II.
Discussion of Proposed Goals and Study Recommendations
III.
Site Identification Exercise
IV.
Other Business and Next Meeting.
Please review the attached items in preparation for upcoming meeting. If you have any questions
regarding this meeting or if you will not be able to attend please contact either Bryan Boeskin or Ben
McCrary at BRPC.
The phone number is (413) 442-1521, or you can email us at
[email protected] or [email protected].
Attachments
Draft Housing Data Profile
Getting Started: Building Local Housing Partnerships, (MHPF 1999)
Berkshire Planning Tools – Affordable Housing
Berkshire Planning Tools – Comprehensive Permits (Chapter 40 B)
Excerpted Materials from Taking the Initiative – A Guidebook on Creating Local Affordable Housing
Housing Site Identification Questionairre
9-5
Vision Statement
Otis, Massachusetts
The community vision for the future is to:
•
Guide and manage growth to ensure Otis preserves the present combination of environmental
assets, rural atmosphere and small town character that makes it a pleasant place to live.
•
Maintain and improve capital infrastructure by investing in public utilities, transportation
networks, schools and other public assets.
•
Maintain and improve its economic infrastructure by proactively identifying and cultivating
appropriate commercial opportunities that are consistent with the character of the
community.
•
Maintain and improve its social infrastructure by providing seniors, persons with disabilities
and citizens of low, moderate, and middle income with quality affordable housing
opportunities, access to quality education for their children, and access to recreational
opportunities.
9-6
Otis Assets and Liability Inventory
Core Element
HOUSING
Potential Assets
• Some new affordable
housing production
• Village zoning districts
Potential Liabilities
• Lack of affordable
housing for seniors
• Geographic terrain
limits developable land
area
OPEN SPACE AND
RESOURCE PROTECTION
•
•
•
•
TRANSPORTATION
•
•
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
•
•
•
•
22% of total land area is
state–owned/protected
Sewer service in town
center
Otis Reservoir as a
tourist draw
Easy Access to State
Highways
Good Road Conditions
and effective
maintenance
Well defined town
center
New school in town
center
Town center sewer
Otis Reservoir/summer
residents drive
economy
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Many small septic
systems on local
lakes/ponds
ANR development
trends
Pedestrian safety
issues on Route 8
Pedestrian access to
new school limited
Limited access to
public transportation
Few Retail Shops
Few Jobs available
locally
Summer residents drive
local economy
9-7
T
IN
YR
AM
GH
RO
AD
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Proposed Community Center
Existing Open Space
Berkshire
Regional
Planning
Commission
E8
Proposed Trail System
D
D
NR
OAD
D90
D
§
¨
¦
ROU
D
D
D
D
D
BLA
NDF
ORD
D
D D
ROA
D
D
OAD
LEE
WE
90
§
¨
¦
AD
D
D
D
TE 8
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
Feet
Massachusetts State Plane Meters
North American Datum 1983
0
:
/cdp/ots/projects/actionmap.mxd
June 9, 2004
This project was funded through a grant from the Massachusetts Executive
Office of Environmental Affairs, Massachusetts Department of Housing and
Community Development, and the Massachusetts Executive Office of
Transportation and Construction.
This map was created by the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission and
is intended for general planning purposes only. This map shall not be used
for engineering, survey, legal, or regulatory purposes.
MassGIS,
Massachusetts Highway Department, BRPC or the town may have supplied
portions of this data.
S T FEILD ROAD
90
§
¨
¦
Community Development Plan
Land Use Suitability
Action Map
ND
RO
Support Rehabilitation of Existing Housing
D
D
D
GRE
AT B
ARR
ING
TO
D
UT
RO
ALGERIE R
Town of Otis
Massachusetts
A
BL
RD
FO
Otis, Massachusetts
Open Space
The focus of this element was focused on two areas: one develop open
space and water resources maps detailing protected and unprotected
lands and lands suitable for development. Secondly to provide some
efforts at updating the Town’s outdated Open Space Plan (1991).
Some of the map products that were developed for the Open Space
Element were:
•
•
•
•
•
Biological Resources Map
Ecological Resources Map
Buildable Land Map
Open Space Map (Protected Lands)
Recreational Resources Map
Transportation
This section looked at the feasibility and conceptual designs for the
development of a large scale community center complex. The Complex
would include a 45,000 square foot community center facility with
numerous recreational, dining and community spaces. The complex
would also include several athletics fields both indoor and outdoor.
Recommended Actions:
• Conduct additional site assessment including geo-technical
investigation and topographic and boundary surveys.
• Acquisition of an easement or parcel of land from an adjoining
property owner for access to Route 8.
• Assess and evaluate the proposed development phases against the
budgeted available funding to determine a construction schedule
Housing
The transportation element of the plan focused on the
development of a network of proposed trails
throughout a 120-acre community center complex that
would link all the buildings and outdoor facilities
together.
This element addressed the fact that the Town of Otis
has no qualifying single housing units that fall under
Chapter 40B affordable housing.
The study’s main recommendations for improvements to the Town’s
transportation problems are:
Some of the key recommendations to allow for increased housing
opportunities are suggested below:
• Pursue enhancement opportunities for the recommended improvements
• Consider providing local matching funds to expedite completion of the
improvements for the trails
• Secure detailed cost estimates, which evaluate additional right-of-way
acquisition, wetlands disturbances, types of permits required and the extent of
improvements that would be required.
• Consider pursuit of easements or acquisitions of lands from adjoining
property owners and school district to provide access to the southern part of
the site.
•
•
•
•
Review local zoning to minimize barriers to affordable housing
Consider options for development of affordable rental housing
Consider the adoption of the Community Preservation Act to
finance future affordable homeownership options
• Consider applying to DHCD’s Local Initiative Program (LIP).

to view the Open Space Plan

Transcription

Similar documents

PORTRAITS of LIFT ENGINEERS - CIBSE Heritage Group Website

Tampines Town Council`s Audited Financial Statements, Auditors

Sembawang Town Council`s Audited Financial Statements, Auditors

PowerPoint bemutató

prime retail site

easyhiker.co.uk – 17settembre 2015 D for Domodossola By Michael

Rhinebeck Republican Committee

Jastrebarsko today - Grad Jastrebarsko

Coverage Map/Media Information

POOTATUCK LAND COMPANY SHEET 6