Pre-Feasibility Study: Energy Efficiency Financing

Pre-Feasibility Study: Energy Efficiency Financing

KfW – German Bank for Reconstruction and Development
Pre-Feasibility Study:
Energy Efficiency Financing Facility for Ukraine
– Presentation at Capacity Building Seminar –
Kiev, October 7, 2004
Dr. Martin Kruska
EUtech Energie + Umwelt, Technik + Management GbR • Dennewartstraße 25-27 • D-52068 Aachen
Tel. (+49) 241 / 963-1980 • Fax (+49) 241 / 963-1981 • [email protected] • www.eutech.de
KfW‘s Objective & Fundamental Design
MainObjective
Objective
Main
ÖTo improve the (demand-side) energy efficiency in Ukraine through the financial
support of Energy Efficiency Investments
KfW – Pre-Feasibility Study: Energy Efficiency Funding in Ukraine
1
KfW‘s Objective & Fundamental Design
Framework
Framework
ƒ Ukrainian-German Governmental Agreement on Financial Cooperation
ƒ Art. 1 - 1c) Promotion of Energy Efficiency (…)
Loanor
orGrant?
Grant?
Loan
ƒ Loan element: Long term loans (3 to 5 years) at near-market rates
ƒ Grant element: Technical assistance (Consultancy, Training, Project Development)
ProjectComposition
Composition
Project
ƒ Loan component (FC means)
ƒ Grant component (Technical Assistance)
+ Investors‘ equity
KfW – Pre-Feasibility Study: Energy Efficiency Funding in Ukraine
2
Involvement of Institutions
German
Government
Investor / Client
EE-Project
KfW – Pre-Feasibility Study: Energy Efficiency Funding in Ukraine
3
Involvement of Institutions
German
Government
Fund Management
TAPartners
Fund Marketing
& Dissemination
Project Identification
Partner Bank
for Retail Banking
Investor / Client
EE-Project
KfW – Pre-Feasibility Study: Energy Efficiency Funding in Ukraine
4
Advantages for Stakeholders
Investors//Clients
Clients
Investors
ƒ Attractive financing options for Energy Efficiency Projects
ƒ Professional third-party assessment of technical and economical feasibility of the project
PartnerBanks
Banks
Partner
ƒ Attractive refinancing options
ƒ Technical assistance in developing new business activity
TA-Partner&&Dissemination
DisseminationPartner
Partner
TA-Partner
ƒ Opportunity to provide services to numerous clients
ƒ Participation in international project to promote energy efficiency
KfW – Pre-Feasibility Study: Energy Efficiency Funding in Ukraine
5
State of Project Preparation – Pre-feasibility Study
Objectivesof
ofthe
theStudy
Study
Objectives
ƒ Identification of the sectors best suited for EE financing support
–
Industry & private services
–
Communal services and enterprises
–
Residential sector
ƒ Identification of technologies, measures & projects
–
Potential
–
Investment Volume
–
Prospective Energy Saving & Emissions reduction
ƒ Identification of the appropriate financial instrument, e.g.
–
Credit Line
–
Guarantee Facility
ƒ Identification of Institutions suited for
–
Technical Assistance, Project Identification & Project Development
–
Retail Banking
–
Marketing & Dissemination
KfW – Pre-Feasibility Study: Energy Efficiency Funding in Ukraine
6
State of Project Preparation – Pre-feasibility Study
ProjectSteps
Steps&&Timeline
Timeline
Project
ƒ Country pre-selection process (end of 2003)
ƒ First fact finding mission July 2004
ƒ Preparatory Workshops (October 2004) for possible target groups
–
Industry
–
City and Town Administrations
–
Institutions and Organisations involved in energy efficiency (Consultants, ESCOs, NGOs)
ƒ Pre-selection of sectors and/or technologies until December 2004
ƒ Consecutive pre-implementation steps starting beginning of 2005
KfW – Pre-Feasibility Study: Energy Efficiency Funding in Ukraine
7
Objectives of the current workshop
Mattersto
todiscuss
discuss
Matters
ƒ Present situation of energy use and energy costs in industry
ƒ Typical potentials for energy saving in selected branches
ƒ Barriers to energy efficiency in industry
ƒ Political framework to promote and support energy efficiency in industry
ƒ Access to financing for energy efficiency projects
ƒ Demand for external advisory and consultancy services
Issuesto
todetermine
determine
Issues
ƒ Pre-selection of branches / sub-sectors
ƒ Eligible technologies & measures
ƒ Appropriate funding instruments
ƒ Institutions suited to provide expert support
KfW – Pre-Feasibility Study: Energy Efficiency Funding in Ukraine
8
Evaluation of Energy Efficiency Measures
Residential Sector
Industrial Sector
Municipal Sector
Energy-efficient household
appliances
Efficient electrical drives
Energy-efficient office appliances
Replacement of electric heating
systems
Efficient compressed air systems
Optimised air condition and
ventilation systems
Efficient lighting systems
Refurbishment/Replacement of
heating systems with
conventional technologies
Replacement of electric heating
systems
Refurbishment/Replacement of
heating systems with
conventional technologies
Replacement of windows
Thermal insulation of buildings;
Replacement of components /
units (single glazing, doors etc.)
Installation of heat meters
Heat recovery systems, Process
integration and thermal
integration
Efficient industrial furnaces, kilns
etc. or dryers
Efficient lighting systems
Refurbishment/Replacement of
heating systems with
conventional technologies
Combined heat and power
generation (CHP)
Thermal insulation of buildings;
Replacement of components /
units (single glazing, doors etc.)
Installation of measuring
equipment
Installation of measuring
equipment
Modern control systems
KfW – Pre-Feasibility Study: Energy Efficiency Funding in Ukraine
● Very well suited
◐ Well suited
○ Not recommended
9
Compressed Air Supply Example: Remedy of leakage
ActualState
State
Actual
40
Kompressor 3
m³/min
Kompressor
2 for compressed air (some 100.000 €/a)
ƒ High
costs
Kompressor 1
ƒ Average compressed air demand: 15,4 m³/min
30
ƒ Maesurements show leakages of
9,4 m³/min (according to some 45.000 €/a)
20
durchschnittlicher
Average Consumption
Verbrauch
15,4
10
9,4
Leckageverluste
Losses from leakage
Montag
Dienstag
Monday
Tuesday
Mittwoch
Wednesday
Donnerstag
Samstag
Freitag
Thursday
Friday
Sonntag
Saturday
Sunday
0:00
18:00
12:00
6:00
0:00
18:00
12:00
6:00
0:00
18:00
6:00
12:00
0:00
18:00
6:00
12:00
0:00
18:00
12:00
6:00
0:00
18:00
12:00
Measure
Measure
6:00
0:00
18:00
12:00
6:00
0:00
0
ƒ Splitting of the mains in single lockable supply areas
ƒ Remedy of leakages (costs difficult to estimate)
– Pre-Feasibility Study:
Efficiency€/a
Funding in Ukraine
ƒ Potential KfW
cost-savings:
up Energy
to 35.000
10
Beispiel 1: Industriedampferzeuger – Eckdaten
Eckdatender
derAnlage
Anlage
Eckdaten
ƒ Thermische Leistung Qth:
30 MW (ca. 37 tDampf/h) (Anhang I: „Energiewirtschaft“)
ƒ Jahresnutzungsgrad ηeff:
85 %
ƒ Jahresvolllaststunden:
6.000 h/a
ƒ Emissionsfaktor (Erdgas):
0,2016 tCO2/MWhHu (UBA)
ƒ Brennstoffpreis (Erdgas):
25 €/MWhHu
Emissionsdaten
Emissionsdaten
ƒ Brennstoffeinsatz:
212.000 MWhHu/a
ƒ Gesamtbrennstoffkosten:
5.300.000 €/a
ƒ CO2-Emissionen:
42.700 tCO2/a
KfW – Pre-Feasibility Study: Energy Efficiency Funding in Ukraine
11
Beispiel 2: Produktionsanlage in der Papierindustrie
Eckdatender
derAnlage
Anlage
Eckdaten
ƒ Infrarottrockner zur schnellen Trocknung von Aufstrichen auf das Papier
ƒ Jahresproduktion:
100.000 t Papier
ƒ Emissionsfaktor (Erdgas):
0,2016 tCO2/MWhHu (UBA)
ƒ Brennstoffpreis (Erdgas):
25 €/MWhHu
Emissionsdaten
Emissionsdaten
ƒ Brennstoffeinsatz:
20.000 MWhHu/a
ƒ Gesamtkosten:
500.000 €/a
ƒ CO2-Emissionen:
4.000 tCO2/a
KfW – Pre-Feasibility Study: Energy Efficiency Funding in Ukraine
12
Thermal Integration –
optimal integration of heating and cooling processes
Recommended
Modification
Actual State
2,1 °C
0 °C
Pasteurised
Cream
Ice Water
3,9 °C
6 °C
Pasteurized
Cream
6 °C
Ice Water
ca. 30 °C !
3,9 °C
Cooling
Section
Partial Stream of Raw Milk
56,8 °C
Freezing
Section
Pre-cooling
Section
> 56 °C
53 °C
Exchange
Section
Plate Heat
Exchanger
56,8 °C
Cream from Separator
105 °C
Heating
Section
105 °C
102 °C
Exchanger
Section
Condensate
Steam
105 °C
109 °C
Heating
Section
Tank
(Feed)
from Pasteurizer
Condensa
te
Steam
105 °C
3,0 m3/h
to Pasteurizer
Cream
from
Seperator
KfW – Pre-Feasibility Study: Energy Efficiency Funding in Ukraine
13
Thermal Integration –
optimal integration of heating and cooling processes
ϑ
Q&zu , Rahm
[°C]
105,0
Q&zu , Milch
75,4
∆ϑmin
56,8
Potential / Saving
T€/a
MWh/a 1)
19
1140
∆ϑmin
6,0
4,0
1) Primary Energy
2) Relating to Actual State
Q&ab,Milch
Warming-up of ice water
from 0°C to 6°C
Q&ab, Rahm
% 2)
tCO2 /a
42%
250
∆ϑmin
H&
KfW – Pre-Feasibility Study: Energy Efficiency Funding in Ukraine
14
Optimisation of Cooling - Example: Milk processing 0,4
Presentstate
state
Present
ƒ Milk processing site
kWh
kWh
ƒ Condensing temperature
approx. 40 °C
0,312
ƒ Reduction of Condensing
temperature to 30 °C
Potential / Saving
MWh/a
63
1400
1)
%
2)
30%
t CO2 /a
906
Energieaufwand
am
Energy Demand
atVerdichter
Compressor
pro
Kälte
per kWh
kWh erzeugter
of produced
cooling
0,3
Measure
Measure
T€/a
NH3Compressionchiller
- 31 %
0,215
0,2
0,1
1) Primary Energy
2) Based on present state
0
-10
KfW – Pre-Feasibility Study: Energy Efficiency Funding in Ukraine
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
Verdampfungstemperatur t0
2
°C
4
15
Thank you for your attention!
Further Questions?
Dr. Martin Kruska
0241 / 963-1980
[email protected]
www.eutech.de
KfW – Pre-Feasibility Study: Energy Efficiency Funding in Ukraine
16