InvestigateDaily

Transcription

InvestigateDaily

INVESTIGATE
HIGHWAY ROBBERY
Kiwi taxpayers get stung for
billions for motorway projects
that cost far less overseas. WHY?
NEW ZEALAND’S BEST NEWS MAGAZINE
Agenda 21
How the Government
is stitching up your
life on UN orders,
ahead of Rio+20
Fukushima
Growing fears Japan’s
reactor could poison
the world – what it
means to NZ
PistolPacking
Priest
We interview the
‘machine gun
preacher’
CURRENT AFFAIRS
TOYS, CARS,
FRANKLY-EXPRESSED
OPINIONS
Jun/July 2012, $8.60
& MORE
50%
Lower printing
cost vs
coLour Laser*
65773
HIS/contents
June/July 12 Issue 132 www.investigatedaily.com cover
12 RAW DEAL
EXCLUSIVE: We’re being told the cost
of a new harbour bridge or tunnel is
up to $5.6 billion. We’re told other
major infrastructure projects will
cost billions. So you’ll be shocked
when you see what people overseas
are paying. IAN WISHART has more
22 FUKUSHIMA
A viral email claims the stricken
Japanese reactor is poised to become
the most devastating nuclear incident
in Earth history. Worringly, they could
be right.
28 TOXIC TVS
It turns out the studies on flame
retardant chemicals added to
furniture and appliances were
flawed, that they might not work,
and your furniture might be toxic
HERS AGENDA 21
The UN wants to stitch up your life
at Rio+20, and NZ has played a
big role in laying the groundwork
12
HIS/contents
opinion
04 /EDITOR Speaks for itself, really
06 /COMMUNIQUES Your say
08 /EYES RIGHT Richard Prosser
10 /STEYNPOST Mark Steyn
action
36 /INVEST Peter Hensley on money
8
gadgets
38 The latest toys
39 The Mall
42 Online with Chillisoft
mindfuel
44 /BOOKCASE Michael Morrissey’s
Winter picks
46 /CONSIDERTHIS Amy Brooke
40
36
46
we protect your digital worlds
editor
Parliament and the media were rocked as
Internal Affairs staff testified how Yan had
boasted he had powerful MPs as friends
who would ensure he got citizenship
Possum in the headlights
I
4 HISMAGAZINE.TV June/July 2012
t has been fascinating to watch the
news media suddenly find their mojo over
Labour MP Shane Jones granting citizenship to an alleged Chinese criminal, Yang
Liu, aka Bill Liu, aka William Yan, aka Yan
Yong Ming.
It’s a story this magazine’s digital editions
broke four years ago, on the eve of the 2008
election. Surprisingly, after a one day flurry,
no major media except the Herald wanted
to dig deeper into why a Cabinet minister of
Jones’ experience would want to go directly
against official advice and award a New Zealand passport to a man already travelling on
fake Chinese passports and wanted in that
country for an alleged two hundred million
dollar fraud.
As the story developed, it turned out Jones
was not alone. Another Labour highflyer,
David Cunliffe, had also gone against official
recommendations and refused to revoke
Yan’s residency.
Yan, Investigate discovered, had donated
thousands of dollars to Labour and National
leading up to the election.
The murk got deeper when we found an
eight thousand dollar donation to Yan’s
good friend, Labour MP Dover Samuels,
made by one “Tamaki Wu” according to the
official donation records. The problem was,
what kind of Asian has a Maori first name?
Tamaki Wu’s address turned out to be a
house owned by Daniel Phillips, who just
happened to work as an advisor to Shane
Jones.
Adding to the murk, Daniel’s brother
Shane Phillips was working for Yan for a
$10,000 fee to get him citizenship.
For four years, Jones refused to answer
questions.
Then, late May, the court case from hell as
Yan Yong Ming stood trial for immigration
fraud.
Parliament and the media were rocked as
Internal Affairs staff testified how Yan had
boasted he had powerful MPs as friends who
would ensure he got citizenship regardless
of the Department’s concerns about Yan’s
background.
For nearly a week, Labour leader David
Shearer tried to tough it out, but in the end
he had no choice – calling in the AuditorGeneral to investigate the case and standing
down Shane Jones from his shadow portfolios in the meantime.
It’s taken four years, but the arrow Investigate magazine fired in October 2008 finally
found its target.
communiques
Volume 10, Issue 132, ISSN 1175-1290 [Print]
Chief Executive Officer Heidi Wishart
Group Managing Editor Ian Wishart
NZ EDITION
Advertising Josephine Martin
09 373-3676
[email protected]
Contributing Writers: Hal Colebatch, Amy
Brooke, Chris Forster, Peter Hensley, Mark Steyn,
Chris Philpott, Michael Morrissey, Miranda Devine,
Richard Prosser, Claire Morrow, James Morrow,
Len Restall, Laura Wilson, and the worldwide
resources of MCTribune Group, UPI and Newscom
Art Direction Heidi Wishart
Design & Layout Bozidar Jokanovic
Tel:
+64 9 373 3676
Fax:
+64 9 373 3667
Investigate Magazine, PO Box 188, Kaukapakapa,
Auckland 0843, NEW ZEALAND
AUSTRALIAN EDITION
Editor Ian Wishart
[email protected]
Tel/Fax:
1-800 123 983
SUBSCRIPTIONS
Online:www.investigatemagazine.com
By Phone:
Australia
1-800 123 983
NZ
09 373 3676
By Post:
To the PO Box
NZ Edition:$85;
AU Edition:A$96
Email:
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected]
All content in this magazine is copyright, and
may not be reproduced in any form without the
written permission of the publisher. The opinions
of advertisers or contributors are not necessarily
those of the magazine, and no liability is
accepted.
We take no responsibility for unsolicited material
sent to us. Please enclose a stamped, SAE
envelope. Inquiries in the first instance should be
made via email or fax.
Investigate magazine Australasia is published by
HATM Magazines Ltd
COVER: NEWSCOM/MAXPPP
THE GREAT DIVIDE
The Great Divide is the book that somebody had to write. The 1860 Kohimarama
Conference should be a landmark in NZ’s
cultural history, much more so than the
also-significant Treaty of Waitangi: An
Explanation by Sir Apirana Ngata. It beggars belief that these things are known
of by NZ-ers in such inverse proportion to
their importance. I for one knew nothing
of the Kohimarama Conference until I read
your book.
It is very interesting to discover that
such momentous factual information is
online in official archives for all to discover
for themselves, yet the people who are
allegedly the best experts that our public
money can buy, remain (prefer to remain?)
ignorant. The state of things in NZ today
is such that the continued existence of
inconvenient historical documents must
be in peril. Thankfully we have people like
you preserving copies.
I would add to your analysis, that the
fact that the famous Maori Battalions were
singing “For God, For King, and For Country” as their own song, that is, “The Maori
Battalion Song”, in the 1940-1945 war and
the song was popular for some time since,
seems to indicate that a significant grouping of Maori still appreciated Christianity
and the British Crown the best part of a
century after the Kohimarama Conference
should have established this..
You cut through more than a century
and a half of smoke and fudge to establish
the crucial points regarding Maori land
grievances. The Kohimarama Conference
of Chiefs main grievance concerned the
inability of Maori to negotiate creation of
title with the Crown and then sell their
own land direct to the end buyers, usually
new immigrants. But the principle held to
by the Crown was that the uplift in value
of land that the Crown was capturing, was
being used to build infrastructure, improve
the land, and fund further immigration;
without which the land would not be
increasing in value in the first place.
This is actually a well-established
economic principle that has guided policy
makers all over the world for two centuries
or more, and it is surprising that this point
has been so overlooked in the largely emotional arguments about our history.
It is also an eye-opener that the Crown
erred on the side of paying multiple claimants to the same parcel of land.
Your book hews to a just and fair line,
not excusing the government’s needlessly
heavy handed reaction and recourse to
military action. You note the tragic aspect
that overwhelming majorities of Maori
were sided with the Crown before the Land
Wars, but were justifiably disappointed
with the government’s actions at that
time and later. Your point is well made,
that this was a very bad testimony on
the part of longer-Christianised people to
recently-Christianised ones, which would
have tended to dim the very fine Christian
fervour that so many of the Kohimarama
Conference Chiefs displayed.
Phil Hayward, Lower Hutt
Poetry
A bad press
The rat has long had
a bad press. Yes,
but I’d miss him too,
a creature not all pest
surely, that has its own
purpose? Might
you and I be right,
if, grown in wisdom
we took less fright
perhaps be even a little glad
for a creature with a heart
that beats as does our own?
Discarding all prejudice,
should we aim to part with,
dispatch, punish
one who, like you and me
breathes to live? Not pity
a dying rat that balancing tail
and soft dark fur, so fittingly
fierce and brave, yet so very small
an enemy?
Ah, but life
itself lines up the rat
against the wall,
betrays the rat.
What if we spared them all?
Jenifer Foster
Comfort is...
simply another name for Stressless®
Seated in a Stressless® you’ll instantly recognise the true meaning of comfort.
It’s the way it glides back smoothly adding perfect support in all positions.
It’s how it gently swings – with effortless ease and stability. It’s the finest
leather covering the soft, yet supple cushion. And it’s how the adjustable
footstool completes the total feeling of relaxation, all the way down to
your feet. Every single detail is designed with your wellbeing in mind.
We recommend you try it.
100% MADE IN NORWAY!
Plus™ System
The patented Plus™
system provides
anatomically correct
lumbar support in
all positions and
automatically adjusts
the headrest as you
recline.
Sleep Function
The sleep function is
activated with one
simple movement to
lay the headrest flat.
THE ORIGINAL AND THE BEST SINCE 1971
Glide System
For unbeatable
comfort, you set the
Stressless® wheel
once and change
your sitting position
by using your body
weight.
Genuine Leather
Finest through dyed
and rich leather
carefully selected
to enhance the true
comfort and pleasure
of your Stressless®.
STRESSLESS®
Magic
Custom made to order. A wide range of
styles, leather colours, fabrics and wood
finishes are available, allowing you to
match the décor in your home. A selected
range is available for immediate delivery.
STRESSLESS® STUDIOS
DANSKE MØBLER
Auckland 983 Mt Eden Road, Three Kings. Ph 09 625 3900 • 13a Link Drive, Wairau Park. Ph 09 443 3045
501 Ti Rakau Drive, Botany Town Centre. Ph 09 274 1998 Hamilton 15 Maui Street, Te Rapa. Ph 07 847 0398
Taupo 29 Totara Street, Totara Point. Ph 07 378 3156 Hastings 810 Heretaunga Street West. Ph 06 876 1010
Lower Hutt Level 1, Harvey Norman Centre, 28 Rutherford Street. Ph 04 568 5001
NZ DISTRIBUTOR
Whangarei Fabers Furnishings Tauranga Greerton Furnishings Rotorua Van Dyks Gisborne Fenns
Napier Danks Furnishers New Plymouth & Hawera Cleggs Wanganui Wanganui Furnishers
Palmerston North Turnbull Furniture Masterton Country Life Furniture Wellington Fifth Avenue
Blenheim & Nelson Lynfords Christchurch D.A. Lewis • McKenzie & Willis Timaru Ken Wills Furniture
Dunedin McKenzie & Willis Queenstown & Invercargill H & J Smith
www.stressless.co.nz
HISMAGAZINE.TV June/July 2012 7
Richard Prosser
eyes right
When signs appear on our streets and shop
frontages in oriental characters alone, and
it is almost always the case that the alien
symbols of south and east Asia are
involved, then it is my belief that a line
has been crossed
Signs of the times
A
bout twenty-five years ago, if
memory serves correct, Portugal
banned the display of street signage
which had come to proliferate in its resort
towns, predominantly in English, and to a
lesser degree in German, and a couple of
other tourist-oriented languages.
The Portuguese had become rightly indignant about their own culture and language
being pushed aside in deference to the
convenience of a boorish and unappreciative
visiting minority.
I’m with the Portuguese on this one. I
don’t blame them one little bit for wanting,
even demanding, that their guests and visitors show a little respect for the prevailing
norms of the society which was their host.
The same can be said about New Zealand
today; and you know what, I’m saying it.
Recent comments concerning the number of
signs in Chinese adorning the main streets
of our largest city strike a chord with this
writer. There’s neither reason nor excuse
for it, and the various attempts at either, on
the part of assorted apologists, liberals, the
politically correct, and others weak of spirit
or thinking, only serve to reinforce the fact
that it shouldn’t be happening.
Your favourite commentator, as I have
remarked before, has about had a gutsful of
being continually required to put up with
our country and its unique culture being
denigrated right here in our own home, in
order that some real or imagined offence
taken on the part of some foreigner or
another might be placated.
Now don’t get me wrong; I don’t have any
real issue with signs and notices advertising
tourism businesses, or other ventures aimed
primarily at visitors, bearing a translation
in the furrin scribble peculiar to the target
market in question, so long as that translation is modest in size and placed subservient
to the primary tile, which should and must
be in English – and Maori as well, as far as
this writer is concerned – if it is going to
have anything else plastered on it.
But when signs appear on our streets and
shop frontages in oriental characters alone,
and it is almost always the case that the alien
symbols of south and east Asia are involved,
then it is my belief that a line has been
crossed.
This is New Zealand, not China or
Korea. We speak English here. Tourists and
migrants alike need to get that idea through
their heads, and so do the acolytes of global
apologism who seek to justify these insults
to our culture and heritage. Generations of
New Zealand soldiers did not go to fight and
die in foreign wars in foreign lands to see
the invaders of the future slip in unchecked
through the back door. They fought to
preserve the essence and character of the
New Zealand nation and way of life. I do feel
offended, insulted, and annoyed when I walk
down a street in my own country and feel
as if I have stepped into another land and
another world.
Foreign-owned tourist shops, with foreign
signs, and foreign staff, and where tourists
can buy goods in foreign currencies and the
profits all go back to some foreign country
or another, are something which seriously
sticks in my craw. Here in the South, where
New Zealand is overwhelmingly vanilla, I
have only seen it in Queenstown; but I know
that the practice proliferates in the North
Island, and I struggle to understand how it
manages to remain lawful.
Not all will agree, of course. There are those
amongst the more rabidly vitriolic leftists of the
blogosphere who regularly accuse your scribe of
xenophobia and worse, who will doubtless label
this commentary as being in a similar vein. It
appears lost on these challenged individuals
that in this democracy, people are allowed to
hold views which do not concur with their own.
Disagreeing does not make people mad or bad
by definition, though I have to say in my experience it is more generally those of a left-wing
persuasion who are the greatest opponents of
democracy, who have the most violent enmity towards other
folk holding dissenting opinions to their own, and who are
most steadfast in their belief that such views do not actually
have a right to be held, let alone heard.
As usual I am digressing just a little. My point is that there
is no reason that a person coming to a foreign land voluntarily
should expect that land to be the mirror of their own, and no
reason for politicians or the populace of the host nation to bend
over and accommodate any lack of preparation on the part of
new arrivals.
There is nothing stopping any tourist to any country from buying a phrasebook. There is, I would posit, an enormous requirement on the part of the intending immigrant, and the prospective
receiving Government both, to ensure that people desiring to
move their lives, businesses, and families, from one nation to
another, make certain the necessities of functional language have
been met before approval for any such move is given.
An “intention to study” is not good enough, in my book,
other than for those genuine refugees for whom we as a civilized nation provide haven, in accordance with our obligations
under various international treaties.
It is not good enough that this present Government is perfectly happy to sell New Zealand residency, including a passport, to any mainland Chinese immigrant who cares to front up
with $10 million, most likely accumulated from the exploitation
of slave labour in their own country, under the guise of the socalled “business migrant” scheme.
Australia is apparently now so concerned about undesirable migrants entering the Lucky Country through the wideopen back door of our special relationship, that noises are
being made, at high Government level, about that relationship
potentially being curtailed, unless New Zealand undertakes
to do something about the number and quality of second-rate
foreigners being granted easy and unjustifiable access to this
country, and by extension to Australia.
Do New Zealanders really want to see an end to 170 years
of automatic right of entry, work, and residence in Australia,
because the sell-outs of this Government and its free-market
mates are so keen to gift our nationality and the reputation it
has earned this past century and a half, to any non-English
speaking wanna-be migrant with a fat bank balance?
Do New Zealanders really want to
see an end to 170 years of automatic
right of entry, work, and residence
in Australia, because the sell-outs
of this Government and its freemarket mates are so keen to gift our
nationality and the reputation it has
earned this past century and a half, to
any non-English speaking wanna-be
migrant with a fat bank balance?
Acceptance of foreign language signs on our streets is another
manifestation of the same malaise. Perhaps manifestation
is not the right word. Perhaps “infestation” would be more
appropriate.
Tell me, please, you tourists, you migrants, you free marketeers
and so-called business people, and you sycophants and suck-ups
and apologists for them all, what on earth makes you think you
have the right to dictate to me, that I should have to put up with
seeing my culture denigrated because one bunch of outlanders or
another can’t be bothered, and don’t have the respect, to learn the
language of my country before they come here?
Why should I, as a respectful tourist and traveler, have to
accept a lesser standard of compliance in my own country than
I afford to my hosts when I journey abroad?
Foreign signs on our streets and businesses are the thin end of
a wedge which includes Sharia Law, female circumcision, and the
abortion of baby girls, and I for one do not want a bar of any of it.
Those who are genuine about wanting to assimilate with New
Zealand culture, and who want to become real citizens and
unabashed New Zealanders, will have no issue with displaying
– and reading – their signs in English. Genuine open minded
tourists looking for the real New Zealand experience will feel
the same way. The rest, I would suggest, are probably people
who we don’t want here anyway.
Richard Prosser is an Investigate columnist, MP and author of
Uncommon Dissent: The Evolution Of A Kiwi Nationalist
Mark Steyn
steynpost
How does she know she’s a Cherokee
maiden? Well, she cites her grandfather’s
“high cheekbones,” and says the
Indian stuff is part of her family “lore”
Fauxcahontas and the melting pot
H
ave you dated a composite
woman? They’re America’s hottest
new demographic. As with all the
really cool stuff, Barack Obama was doing it
years before the rest of us. In Dreams from
My Father, the world’s all-time most-unread
bestseller, he spills the inside dope on his
composite white girlfriend:
“When we got back to the car she started
crying. She couldn’t be black, she said.
She would if she could, but she couldn’t.
She could only be herself, and wasn’t that
enough...”
But being yourself is never going to be
enough in the new composite America.
Earlier this month, in an election campaign
ad, Barack revealed his latest composite girlfriend – “Julia.” She’s worse than the old New
York girlfriend. She can’t even be herself. In
fact, she can’t be anything without massive
assistance from Barack every step of the
way, from his “Head Start” program at age
3 through to his Social Security benefits at
the age of 67. Everything good in her life she
owes to him. When she writes her memoir,
it will be thanks to a subvention from the
Federal Publishing Assistance Program for
Chronically Dependent Women but you’ll
love it: Sweet Dreams From My Sugar Daddy.
She’s what the lawyers would call “non composite mentis.” She’s not competent to do a
single thing for herself – and, from Barack’s
point of view, that’s exactly what he’s looking
for in a woman, if only for a one-night stand
on a Tuesday in early November.
Then there’s “Elizabeth,” a 62-year-old
Democratic Senate candidate from Massachusetts. Like Barack’s white girlfriend, she
couldn’t be black. She would if she could,
but she couldn’t. But she could be a composite – a white woman and an Indian woman,
all mixed up in one! Not Indian in the sense
of Ashton Kutcher putting on brownface
makeup and a fake-Indian accent in his
amusing new commercial for the hip lo-fat
snack Popchips. But Indian in the sense of
checking the “Are you Native American?”
box on the Association of American Law
Schools form, which Elizabeth Warren did
for much of her adult life. According to her,
she’s part Cherokee and part Delaware. Not
in the Joe Biden sense, I hasten to add, but
Delaware in the sense of the Indian tribe
named in honour of the home state of Big
F**kin’ Chief Dances With Plugs.
How does she know she’s a Cherokee
maiden? Well, she cites her grandfather’s
“high cheekbones,” and says the Indian
stuff is part of her family “lore.” Which was
evidently good enough for Harvard Lore
School when they were looking to rack up
a few affirmative-action credits. The former
Obama Special Advisor to the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau and former
Chairperson of the Congressional Oversight
Panel now says that “I listed myself in the
directory in the hopes that it might mean
that I would be invited to a luncheon, a
group, something that might happen with
people who are like I am,” and certainly
not for personal career advancement or
anything like that. Like everyone else, she
was shocked, shocked to discover that, as
The Boston Herald reported, “Harvard Law
School officials listed Warren as Native
American in the ‘90s, when the school was
under fierce fire for their faculty’s lack of diversity.”
So did the University of Texas, and the University of Pennsylvania. With the impertinent jackanapes of the press querying
the bona fides of Harvard Lore School’s first Native American
female professor, the Warren campaign got to work and eventually turned up a great-great-great-grandmother designated as
Cherokee in the online transcription of a marriage application
of 1894.
Hallelujah! In the old racist America, we had quadroons and
octoroons. But in the new post-racial America, we have – hang
on, let me get out my calculator – duoettrigintaroons! Martin
Luther King dreamed of a day when men would be judged not
on the colour of their skin but on the content of their greatgreat-great-grandmother’s wedding license application. And
now it’s here! You can read all about it in Elizabeth Warren’s
memoir of her struggles to come to terms with her racial identity, Dreams From My Great-Great-Great-Grandmother.
Alas, the actual original marriage license does not list GreatGreat-Great-Gran’ma as Cherokee, but let’s cut Elizabeth Fauxcahontas Crockagawea Warren some slack here. She couldn’t
be black. She would if she could, but she couldn’t. But she could
be 1/32nd Cherokee, and maybe get invited to a luncheon with
others of her kind – “people who are like I am,” 31/32nds white
– and they can all sit around celebrating their diversity together.
She is a testament to America’s melting pot, composite pot,
composting pot, whatever.
Just in case you’re having difficulty keeping up with all these
Composite-Americans, George Zimmerman, the son of a
Peruvian mestiza, is the embodiment of endemic white racism
and the reincarnation of Bull Connor, but Elizabeth Warren,
the great-great-great-granddaughter of someone who might
possibly have been listed as Cherokee on an application for a
marriage license, is a heartwarming testimony to how minorities are shattering the glass ceiling in Harvard Yard. George
Zimmerman, redneck; Elizabeth Warren, redskin. Under the
Third Reich’s Nuremberg Laws, Ms. Warren would have been
classified as Aryan and Mr. Zimmerman as non-Aryan. Now
it’s the other way round. Progress!
Coincidentally, the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission last week issued an “Enforcement Guidance” limiting the rights of employers to take into account the criminal
convictions and arrest records of job applicants because of the
“disparate impact” the consideration of such matters might
have on minorities. That’s great news, isn’t it? So Harvard Law
School can’t ask Elizabeth Warren if she’s ever held up a liquor
store because, if they did, the faculty might be even less Cherokee than it is.
My colleague Jonah Goldberg wrote the other day about Chris
Mooney, author of The Republican Brain, and other scientific
chaps who argue that conservatives suffer from a genetic cognitive impairment that causes us to favour small government. In
other words, we’re born stupid. So, thanks to gene sequencing,
we now know why conservatives aren’t as smart as, say, Pete
Stark, the nigh-on-half-a-century Democrat congressman who
believes that Solyndra, which is based in his district, is an automobile manufacturer: “I wish I had a big enough expense allowance to get one of those new ‘S’s’ that Solyndra’s going to make
n Cliff Owen/NEWSCOM
Elizabeth Warren will be ahead of you
checking the “right-wing madman”
box on the grounds that she gets her
high cheekbones and minimal facial
hair from Genghis Khan
down there, the electric car,” he told The San Francisco Chronicle this month. “My 10-year-old is after me. He no longer wants
a Porsche. He wants Dad to have an ‘S’ sedan.” Pete sounds so
out of it, you have to wonder if maybe he’s 1/32nd Republican on
his great-great-great-grandmother’s side.
But, if conservatives are simply born that way, shouldn’t they
be covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act and the
Equal Employment Opportunities Commission?
Aw, don’t waste your time. Elizabeth Warren will be ahead
of you checking the “right-wing madman” box on the grounds
that she gets her high cheekbones and minimal facial hair from
Genghis Khan. And “Julia” will be saying she was born conservative but thanks to Obama’s new Headcase Start program
was able to get ideological reassignment surgery. And Barack’s
imaginary girlfriend will be telling him that she’d be left if she
could, but she’s right so she can’t, but she’d love to be left. So he
left her.
Good thing the smart guys are running the joint.
© 2012 Mark Steyn
BRIDGING
FINANCE
ARE WE PAYING FAR TOO MUCH
FOR INFRASTRUCTURE?
We need major investment in new roading infrastructure, but are New
Zealanders being unwittingly fleeced of billions in the process? That’s the
question IAN WISHART attempts to answer as he compares the cost of
Auckland’s proposed new harbour crossing with similar projects overseas
Y
ou hear the numbers being batted around in the news so much
that it’s easy to become immune
to them: $3.9 billion, $5.6 billion, $6.7 billion. They represent
various costings for either a new harbour
bridge for Auckland, or a harbour tunnel.
Throw in government reports of either
$2.8 billion for the Waterview tunnel first
proposed for Helen Clark’s Mt Albert
electorate, or $1.4 billion for a surface
motorway on the same route (and eventually $1.4 billion for a tunnel again, at half
the original planned length). Then add
$2.4 billion for the proposed central rail
tunnel, $2.5 billion for a highway between
Pakuranga and Onehunga. If your eyeballs aren’t rolling around in your head
by now like the lemon icons on a onearmed-bandit at Sky City, you’re probably
already comatose.
It’s like Monopoly, but without the
chance of picking up a Community Chest
card advising “Congratulations, bank
makes $15 billion error in your favour”.
With all this expenditure planned, teams
of boffins and corporates are drafting proposals suggesting taxpayers and road users
share the capital cost burden, with flat rate
tolls as high as $8 per trip being considered
for any vehicle using the motorways.
With all this money potentially being
sucked out of the public’s pockets each
day, you’d hope we were getting the best
possible prices on our infrastructure
projects, wouldn’t you?
Maybe, maybe not.
A comparison by Investigate magazine
of New Zealand infrastructure costs
compared with similar projects in Asia,
the US, Australia and Europe raises questions about just how much fat is built into
the project budgets.
To set the scene, let’s examine some of
the biggest engineering marvels of the
last two decades.
SUTONG BRIDGE, CHINA
At 8.2 kilometres long, this cablestayed bridge spans China’s Yangtze
River between Shanghai and Nantong, and became the largest bridge
of its kind in the world. The Sutong’s
two towers are 306 metres high,
almost as tall as the Sky Tower. It’s a
six-lane motorway, like the proposed
Auckland Harbour crossing, and was
built by Chinese construction companies with assistance from Western
engineering firms.
The industry magazine Road
Traffic Technology quotes the total
cost of the bridge at US$751 million (NZ$1bn), and describes how
it was financed by a combination
of tolls and taxpayer contributions.
This figure is backed up by one of
the German companies involved in
the construction, which reported
a “total cost” of the Sutong Bridge
at US$726 million. The less reliable
Wikipedia “estimated” a total cost of
US$1.7 billion but now appears to
have been well off the mark. It took
five years to complete, and opened
in mid 2008.
MILLAU VIADUCT, FRANCE
At 2.4 kilometres long, the Millau
Viaduct is similar in length to the
proposed second Auckland crossing, but far more complex in terms
of its engineering. The highway
sits a whopping 270 metres above
ground – nearly 900 feet – and
would be like building a bridge from
fifty metres above the observation deck of the Sky Tower across
to the North Shore and staying at
that height all the way across the
harbour. Officially, the Millau is the
12th highest bridge in the world, but
its towers make it the tallest, at 343
metres (the Sky Tower reaches 328
metres).
You would think all that engineering came at a huge cost – particularly if you are working on New Zealand prices – but the French brought
it in for only 400 million euros
(NZ$674 million) and it opened eight
years ago after only three years in
construction.
AKASHI BRIDGE, JAPAN
A 4.4 kilometres in length, it is four times longer than the existing Auckland Harbour Bridge and is officially the longest
suspension bridge in the world. It straddles the Akashi Straits, where the sea is more than a hundred metres deep. By
comparison, the Waitemata Harbour is less than 16 metres deep in most places. Additionally, the Akashi Bridge is in
Japan’s ‘Typhoon Alley’ where wind speeds can reach 290 km/h, and it is seismically active. To combat these engineering challenges, massive concrete towers were driven deep into the sea floor, and there’s enough steel cable in this one
bridge alone (300,000 kilometres of it) to stretch nearly all the way to the moon (343,000 km at its closest point), or put
another way it could encircle the earth seven times.
Like the proposed Auckland crossing, this bridge is a six-lane motorway. At the time of its completion in 1998 it cost
around NZ$5 billion. It is nearly twice as long as the proposed Auckland crossing and far more challenging from an
engineering perspective, required to withstand magnitude 8.5 earthquakes, 300 km/h hurricanes and monster tidal
flows that rise and fall at a flow speed of nearly five metres per second.
ORESUND BRIDGE, SWEDEN
At more than 16 kilometres in length,
this combined bridge and harbour
tunnel route is visible from far above
the earth. It links the Swedish city of
Malmo with Denmark across the Baltic Sea. It carries two railway tracks
and four lanes of traffic, and begins
with an eight kilometre bridge from
Sweden out into the Baltic, before
dipping under the sea at the official
marine border between both countries as a tunnel for the remainder of
the journey. The total cost of the project, built in just four years, was NZ$8
billion for the 16 km of bridge and
undersea tunnel combined. A toll of
NZ$67 per car trip finances the project. It is strong enough to withstand
Baltic winter storms and ice buildup,
and it allows trains to travel at speeds
of up to 200 km/h.
YEONGJONG BRIDGE, SOUTH KOREA
Another Asian monster, at 4.4 kilometres long, built by Samsung. This one is
a double decker, carrying six lanes of traffic upstairs, and a further four lanes
of traffic downstairs alongside a double-track railroad. The bridge is not only
designed to withstand hurricane force winds, but earthquakes and a daily tidal
rise and fall of nine metres. It’s much longer than the 2.6 km Auckland Harbour
Bridge option, and with ten vehicle and two train lanes also significantly larger
than the six lanes of traffic proposed for Auckland. While the Auckland bridge
has been costed at NZ$3.9 billion ($1.5 bn per km), however, this Korean giant
came in at NZ$1.8 billion, or $413 million a kilometre – less than a third of the
cost but delivering double the capacity, including rail.
LOETSCHBERG RAIL
TUNNEL, SWITZERLAND
In a country ringed by granite, you’d
expect the gnomes of Zurich to be
good at tunnelling and they are. This
33 km railway tunnel opened in 2007
and is officially the world’s longest
land tunnel, and allows high speed
passenger trains to fly through the
ground beneath the glacier-covered
mountains at Ferrari-like average
speeds of 240 km/h. It’s a single
rail line, meaning trains have to be
staggered for inbound and outbound
use of the tunnel, but nonetheless it’s
an impressive feat to punch a 33 km
hole through solid rock and still have
change from NZ$5 billion. Auckland’s proposed harbour tunnel, only
2.8km, is budgeted at $5.6 billion.
DUBLIN SEA PORT TUNNEL, IRELAND
In a bid to cut a bottleneck route into Ireland’s main port, the Dublin authorities constructed a 5.6km four lane road,
including “1.9 km of twin cut and cover tunnels, 2.6km of twin bored tunnels and 1.1 km of surface road along with
associated interchanges and infrastructure,” reported Road Traffic Technology. In other words, it’s quite a bit like the
Auckland project although with two fewer lanes and twice as long. The construction cost NZ$1.2 billion for all of the
above, and it opened in 2007 at the height of the Irish economic boom. A toll of between NZ$5 and NZ$20 is levied on
all private cars and light vehicles using the tunnel (depending on the time of day). Trucks, ironically, are allowed to use
the tunnels toll-free.
The relatively cheap construction price (when compared to the smaller Auckland harbour tunnel proposal) included
the purchase of not one but two TBMs, or tunnel-boring machines. The largest machine, nicknamed “Grainne”, was
156m long and weighed 1,600 tonnes. It chewed through solid rock at the rate of 10 metres a day and spat out 500,000
cubic metres of stone in its wake. The second machine, nicknamed “Meghan”, was smaller and given the task of boring
through boulder-ridden clay deposits, managing to dig out 71,000 cubic metres of earth.
I-710 FREEWAY,
LOS ANGELES
Not yet constructed, this project has
been costed at less than NZ$240
million for every kilometre of triplebore motorway tunnel, giving a
total project cost of NZ$658 million for a 2.8 km stretch equivalent
to the Auckland harbour tunnel
requirement.
AIRPORT LINK, BRISBANE
At 15 kilometres long, this combined motorway, busway and tunnel system also includes 25 new bridges. Nearly six
kilometres of the route is through twin underground tunnels. All up, for the entire package, the bill is around NZ$400 million
per kilometre, or $6 billion for the whole thing. Due to open this coming month, the project as a public private partnership
turned into something of a disaster under former Queensland Labor premier Anna Bligh. Small mum and dad investors
who’d been encouraged to underwrite the project took a bath when the value of stocks slipped to only 0.1c per share, the
lowest price possible on the ASX short of being declared officially dead. Media reports focussed on the massive consultancy fees being charged to the project by companies involved in the construction consortium BrisConnections, and it was
quickly shortened to “BrisCon” by a sceptical media. Even so, on a per kilometre basis the Brisbane Airport Link project is
far cheaper than many of the transport projects mooted for Auckland.
GOTTHARD BASE TUNNEL,
SWITZERLAND
Another massive rail tunnel system,
this time totalling a whopping 57
kilometres beneath the Swiss Alps.
It’s a twin-bore system allowing for
high speed rail traffic both ways, and
it cost less than NZ$13 billion, or only
NZ$222 million per kilometre of twin
bore tunnelling which, again, would
equate to only NZ$621 million for the
2.8 km of tunnel needed to cross
Auckland Harbour, not $5.6 billion.
This Swiss project also involved multiple TBM boring machines.
I-45 PARKWAY TUNNEL
SYSTEM, HOUSTON, TEXAS
They’re still arguing about the proposed 50km long i-45 in Houston
and it is still on the drawing board,
but its costs are a lot cheaper than
Auckland. The plan is for two large
tunnels, each capable of carrying six
lanes of traffic using a double decker
configuration, and with provision for
rail as well. Houston authorities have
costed one of the six lane tunnels
at US$160 million per mile, equating
to NZ$130 million a kilometre. This
would equate to NZ$363 million for
the 2.8 km harbour tunnel.
SMART TUNNEL,
KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA
This ten kilometre long tunnel is the
longest multipurpose tunnel in the
world. Multipurpose because apart
from providing underground roading,
it also serves as a massive stormwater
drain during flash floods. The tunnel
is designed so that watertight gates
can shut the tunnel to traffic and allow
stormwater to fill it up and drain away.
Four kilometres of the ten includes
roading for cars and light commercial
vehicles. It took only four years to
build using two TBMs, and cost only
NZ$700 million for the whole thing.
With all the fuss around “buy New
Zealand made”, particularly in a recession, you can see why the Government
appears to be relying on trusted and
proven NZ construction companies for
much of our roading infrastructure,
including the proposed harbour crossing.
However, given the prices these
projects are being built for overseas, it
begs the question whether relying on
local firms for specialised infrastructure
in New Zealand isn’t simply a form of
expensive corporate social welfare. The
construction companies have been big
donors to political parties, and with
multi-billion dollar contracts in the offing for what now appear to be relatively
small and simple construction projects,
you can understand why they might be
feeling generous. It’s taxpayers and road
users, however, who will be ultimately
footing the bill.
The Waterview tunnel, for example, has
just commenced construction in Auckland and will link up State Highway 16 to
the airport bound State Highway 20 with
the use of a motorway and 2.5 km long
tunnel beneath Waterview. The budget
for that tunnel is NZ$1.4 billion, or $560
million per kilometre to construct. That’s
an awful lot more expensive than the $130
million a kilometre they are budgeting
for in Houston, or the $222 million per
kilometre the Swiss are paying to punch a
twin bore tunnel through the bedrock of
the Swiss Alps.
Why so expensive down under?
One Australian commentator claims
his country suffers the same mysterious
problem:
“It is in the interests of the powerful
Melbourne road lobby to make public
transport projects appear more expensive
than they are,” argues Public Transport
Users Association spokesman Tony Morton in a web missive entitled “Common
Urban Myths About Transport”.
“Private operators and suppliers also
find it in their interest to inflate project
costs, as it boosts their prestige to preside
over a big-ticket project, and perhaps
because of the old rule that the more
money there is floating around, the more
likely it is to wind up in one’s own pocket!”
In Washington State in the US, the
government ordered a comparative study
in 2002 of highway construction costs
across the US, with a view to getting a
much better feel for genuine road construction costs. It examined the project
cost of building a mile long, four lane
freeway interchange, in 27 states across
America. The figures are an education.1
In 2002 dollars, the final project cost
for a mile (1.6km) of four lane freeway
built from scratch in the US was an average of US$9 million, or US$5.6 million
per kilometre. Some states could do it for
less, some for more, but that’s the average
four-lane motorway construction price in
the US for 2002.
In Arkansas, the state government
issued a costs guideline for road design
engineers in 2009 for freeway construction showing that a six lane freeway in
urban areas should cost US$8 million
per kilometre (roughly NZ$10.3m), while
a four lane freeway through rural areas/
mountains should cost slightly less. 2
In the Canadian province of Ontario,
two new four-lane highways were
punched through at an average cost
in 2011 dollars of NZ$12 million per
kilometre.
Back here in New Zealand however,
the proposed Puhoi to Wellsford four
lane extension will cost taxpayers and/or
road users a seemingly stunning NZ$45
million per kilometre. At 38 kilometres,
the motorway extension is budgeted in
today’s money at $1.7 billion, whereas in
the US that same freeway would arguably
cost less than NZ$400 million.
This is not to say that outliers don’t
exist. Everywhere you look around the
world you can find a project that seriously
blew its budget and cost far more to build
than the average. Nonetheless, New Zealand’s figures seem routinely high rather
than occasional.
One New Zealand construction consultant – preferring to stay anonymous
because of his position - told Investigate
the price differentials between New Zealand and overseas were stunning.
“I can’t think of a good reason why
another Auckland Harbour Bridge
should cost $3.9 billion, if a similar size
bridge overseas can be built for $200 to
$400 million.
“Sure, you might have to bring in some
of the big structural segments in from
overseas if you couldn’t make them here,
and the overseas experts are expensive,
but at most that might add 50% to the
cost of a job.
“Our sub-contractors and workers are
paid stuff-all, so our labour costs are
internationally competitive.
“The only thing that could be a factor is
New Zealand’s seismic requirements.”
We considered that aspect, but in the
highly seismic Japanese landscape, the
massive Akashi Bridge has been built
to withstand an 8.5 magnitude earthquake – far bigger than anything likely
to hit Auckland. In fact, while the Akashi
megalith was being assembled, it was
rumbled by the massive Kobe earthquake
of 1995 that killed six thousand people
and shifted the bridge towers so much
that the bridge had to be lengthened.
Likewise, the giant Yeongjong Bridge
that Samsung built in Korea is made to
withstand tough natural forces as well,
and came in for a fraction of the proposed Auckland crossing price, so it’s
hard to see how New Zealand’s geotechnical problems are so unique that they
justify exponentially higher project fees.
Not that you are likely to see a second
harbour bridge. The preferred option for
NZTA is to keep the existing harbour
bridge as the only surface structure,
and drill a tunnel instead. Two harbour
bridges side by side would look naff, they
told journalists. They did consider building a new six lane bridge for $3.9 billion
and then demolishing the old one, but
there would be no net capacity gain and
the cost of demolishing the old bridge
would have to be added on.
However, if the budgets were re-examined in light of what the Asians in particular have been able to build, you could
probably have a spectacular new 12 lane
harbour bridge with trains, and demolish
the old bridge, and probably still come
away with more than a billion dollars in
loose change.
Planning is still at an early stage, no
design drawings have been released, and
even the preferred options are still up
for discussion, which means costs are
indicative, not set in concrete and tied
to a specific design. There’s still a chance
then, that some tough questions from the
community could have an impact on this
debate, and other major infrastructure
projects elsewhere in New Zealand.
Discrepancies in the project costs may
also be the product of a process that
works back from the benefits. To get a
road infrastructure project approved in
New Zealand, a benefits-to-costs ratio
greater than 4 has to be shown. In other
words, if you are pitching billions of dollars in benefits, project costs can be up to
one quarter of those. A study by Waikato
University’s Arthur Grimes and Yun
Liang in 2008 estimated the $366 million
spent extending the Auckland Northern
Motorway from Tristram Avenue right
up to Silverdale over a period of years had
generated more than $2.3 billion in economic benefits to the country, thus more
than justifying the expenditure.
The problem, as it appears to Investigate, is that massive fees are being built
into infrastructure projects that taxpayers then become liable for through government borrowing, or which motorists
will be pinged for in tolls every day for
thirty years, driving up the cost of living.
The companies given the right to operate these new roads and structures stand
to make a fortune, while the contractors
who build them will also be paid handsomely in comparison to their overseas
counterparts.
This apparent major discrepancy in
roading infrastructure project costs has
apparently gone relatively unnoticed
in New Zealand, and that could be for
manager for Auckland and Northland,
Tommy Parker, told Investigate.
“This is a usual procedure undertaken
by the NZTA for its large transport projects, and certainly for one on the scale of
an additional crossing of the harbour.
“The costs for a tunnel and a bridge are
based on conceptual designs for a crossing and are indicative. They were one
part of a series of studies investigating an
additional harbour crossing. The studies
are part of the first stage of a detailed and
extensive process for a complex project. They are published on the AWHC
website.
“There is a strong preference from
Auckland Council for a tunnel. It will
publish its Auckland Plan shortly and
its preference for the tunnel reflects the
community feedback it received on this.
will be NZ workers skilled in tunnelling.
“Other factors that will impact on the
prices include the final design of a tunnel.
Talk to date is of four single bored tunnels
– two each for road and rail – but other
options could include “double-decker”
tunnels carrying traffic on two levels.
“The tender process to select a consortium to construct the additional crossing
will also influence the final price.
“Construction of an additional harbour
crossing is several years away, but planning and design work does have to start
now on such a complex project – that is
why the first indicative costs, and other
economic and technical data, have been
collated and published by the NZTA.
Further work in these areas is underway.
“The next immediate next step in this
long-term project is to protect the route
The companies given the right to operate these new roads and
structures stand to make a fortune, while the contractors who
built them have also been paid handsomely in comparison to their
overseas counterparts
a number of reasons. Environmental
groups who don’t like road construction
are not likely to query the published high
costs of highway construction, because
it weakens the argument for public
transport if road building turns out to
be much cheaper. In fact, many environmental websites happily quote the highest
per kilometre costs for roadbuilding that
they can lay their hands on, for precisely
that reason. Nor are governments and
contractors likely to blow the whistle on
what appears to be a mutually-beneficial
working relationship.
It may be, as we have said earlier, that
there are genuine justifications for why
infrastructure costs in New Zealand are
much higher than they are overseas. The
NZ Transport Agency says there might be
such justifications.
“The AWHC (additional Waitemata Harbour crossing) cost estimates were prepared
in accordance with the NZTA cost estimation manual and based on the conceptual
design developed to date. As part of this
process the estimates were independently
peer reviewed,” NZTA’s state highways
“It is difficult to compare like for like
with tunnelling projects in NZ (few tunnels are constructed here) and overseas,
particularly when it comes to economy
of scale.
“The NZ Transport Agency will get a
much more accurate picture of costs to
tunnel under the Waitemata Harbour from
the Waterview roading project underway in
west Auckland. The NZTA is constructing
5km of motorway – 3 lanes in each direction – and half of it will be underground
at a depth of up to 40 metres. The Tunnel
Boring Machine for this project is currently
being built in Germany.
“Waterview’s total cost is $1.4b – NZ’s
largest-ever roading project. The cost
includes the two tunnels. This reflects the
way tunnelling technology is changing
rapidly overseas, and the impact those
changes can have on prices.
“When the time comes to start construction of the additional harbour crossing the
NZTA will be in a strong position to get
best value for dollar. It will have the benefit
of learning from Waterview and boring
tunnels in Auckland conditions, and there
across the Waitemata Harbour. The NZ
Transport Agency’s predecessor, Transit
NZ, lodged Notices of Requirements with
the old Auckland and North Shore City
Councils to protect the route in 2009.
Auckland Council now has responsibility
for the legal and planning process around
consents for the Notices of Requirement,”
NZTA’s Parker said.
It sounds promising, but you’d think
the peer-reviewers on costings would have
been aware of the prices of similar projects
overseas, because price estimations have a
huge bearing on public input and comment on different proposals. If the cost
estimates are way off the mark, the entire
debate can be wrongly skewed. Taxpayers
and road users are, then, entitled to ask the
question: are we getting bang for buck?
Only time and further heavy scrutiny
may provide the answer.
References
1. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/biz/
construction/pdf/I-C_Const_Cost.pdf
2. http://www.arkansashighways.com/
roadway_design_division/Cost_per_Mile_
JULY_2009.pdf
FUKUSHIMA’S
Are the public
DEADLY being kept in
SECRET the dark?
WORDS BY IAN WISHART
I
f you’ve been anywhere near the
internet in recent weeks, a viral
email on the Fukushima nuclear
disaster may have crossed your
path:
“I’m interrupting our normal
email schedule to bring you an urgent
alert that makes everything else seem
insignificant by comparison. The issues of
GMOs, fluoride, food freedom and vaccines won’t matter at all if we don’t solve
this far bigger issue that threatens human
civilization: Fukushima reactor No. 4.
“Right now, the reactor’s spent fuel
pool is just one earthquake away from
a structural failure that could set off a
chain of events leading to the release of
anywhere from 10 times to 85 times the
Cesium-137 released in the Chernobyl
disaster.
“Such circumstances caused one of
Japan’s former ambassadors to make the
following extraordinary statement:
“ ‘It is no exaggeration to say that
the fate of Japan and the whole world
depends on No. 4 reactor.’ - Mitsuhei
Murata, Former Japanese Ambassador
to Switzerland and Senegal, Executive
Director, the Japan Society for Global
System and Ethics.
“A failure of the reactor -- and the
subsequent catastrophic release of
Cesium-137 -- would decimate human life
across North America, killing off crops,
polluting groundwater, causing widespread infant stillbirths and unleashing an explosion in cancer rates. North
America could become uninhabitable by
humans for centuries.
“Cesium-137 has a half-life of 30 years,
meaning that if North America is blanketed with a layer of radioactive dust in
2012, that radioactivity will still be half
The cesium-137, the radioactive component
contained in these assemblies, present at the
site is 85 times larger than the amount released
during the Chernobyl accident
as strong in the year 2042. It will drop by
half again by the year 2072. By the year
2102, it might be low enough to where
humans could start to re-colonize the
continent, but even then, rates of cancer
and birth defects would likely be off the
charts.
“Yet, as we speak, the mainstream
media is running a total media blackout
on this story. Governments are pretending there is no problem, and the corporations that built these nuclear facilities
(like GE) are quietly running disinfo
campaigns to convince everybody there
is no problem.”
The words in bold were added by the
emailer for effect, but if the substance of
the email is true, little emphasis is actually needed.
Numerous Investigate readers have
asked the magazine to look into the issue,
and we have: the threat appears to be real,
but there are differing views on the severity of the threat.
Canada’s state-owed CTV published
a story late May, warning “the worst
nuclear storm the world has ever seen
could be just one earthquake away from
reality. The troubled Reactor 4 at the
Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant is at
the centre of this potential catastrophe.”
The Canadian TV report is anchored
on comments from US-based nuclear
engineer Arnie Gundersen, who has
visited Fukushima and argues that 1,535
spent fuel rods in Reactor 4 are in danger
of being exposed to air and catching
fire. The nuclear heat would set off, he
says, a chain reaction causing what CTV
described as “a massive oxygen-eating
radiological fire that could not be extinguished with water.”
As Gundersen describes it, “The health
consequences of that are beyond where
science has ever gone before.”
Environmentalists have been quick to
seize on warnings that Fukushima may
be on the verge of becoming a global
disaster.
“The highly radioactive spent fuel
assemblies [at Fukushima] … present a
clear threat to the people of Japan and the
world,” wrote diplomat Akio Matsumura
on May 11.
“Reactor 4 and the nearby common
spent fuel pool contain over 11,000 highly
radioactive spent fuel assemblies, many
of which are exposed to the open air. The
cesium-137, the radioactive component
contained in these assemblies, present at
the site is 85 times larger than the amount
released during the Chernobyl accident.
Another magnitude 7.0 earthquake
would jar them from their pool or stop
the cooling water, which would lead to a
nuclear fire and meltdown. The nuclear
disaster that would result is beyond anything science has ever seen. Calling it a
global catastrophe is no exaggeration.”
Matsumura points out that Japanese
seismologists are currently predicting
a 90% probability of a magnitude 7 or
higher earthquake in the Fukushima
region within the next three years, as part
of the aftershock pattern from the magnitude 9 that caused the tsunami. With
a massive crack already, the building
housing Reactor 4 is considered unlikely
to survive another decent rumble.
After the tsunami the Japanese Government played down the risks of nuclear
catastrophe and has continued to do so.
A “roadmap” for cleaning the stricken
site issued in December last year by the
Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO)
provides for a carefully stage-managed
ten year operation to remove the fuel
rods. Order and routine may appeal to
the Tokyo boffins, but United States senator Ron Wyden, who led a fact finding
mission to Fukushima, argues they simply don’t have the luxury of ten years.
“Given the compromised nature of
these structures due to the events of
March 11, their schedule carries extraordinary and continuing risk if further
severe seismic events were to occur.”
The United States has good reason to
worry. Wind and sea currents put the US
directly in the line of nuclear fire if Fukushima goes up. Flotsam from the tsunami
is already washing up in the US, and prevailing northern hemisphere windflows
would put radioactive fallout across the
US within days to weeks of a meltdown.
Those same prevailing winds would cross
the Atlantic to Britain and Europe.
A
kio Matsumura says Japan simply
isn’t taking the threat, and its
international obligations, seriously
enough. Leaving the cleanup to the privately owned power companies, he says,
is unfair and foolish in the extreme:
“Has the government of Japan and
other world leaders considered the facts
above that would lead to a global catastrophe, and do they have a clear strategy
to prevent this worst case scenario? Are
there any means to shorten the period
for the completion of removal spent fuel
from all of the pools, in particular of
Reactor 4, within two years or so? Are we
able to trust such extraordinary tasks to
TEPCO and the private sector?
“I believe that the government of Japan
should lead the way and embrace all
means at its disposal in order to prevent
a disaster that would affect our dozens
of generations of our descendants. In
this context, I cannot help but consider
the role of the military in addition to the
international technical support team.
They possess the technological and
logistical capacity that a company such as
TEPCO does not.
“Deploying the Japanese self defense
force (military) inside the country’s borders
would be an incredibly controversial political decision, but the political fallout for the
government from this step would pale in
comparison to having such an immense
global catastrophe occur on its watch.”
Part of the problem is logistical.
TEPCO knows what it has to do – move
the spent fuel rods to safe containment
– but the crane capable of lifting the 100
tonne fuel rod assembly was destroyed in
the tsunami and a new one has to be built
on site. Problem? Radiation exposure to
workers who, the closer they get to the
reactor buildings, can only work between
a matter of seconds to a matter of minutes. Hence the long time frame.
Nature, however, is no respecter of
schedules. A ten year programme to
secure the Fukushima reactors is a long
time for TEPCO engineers to be hanging
their posteriors in the wind, tempting fate.
There are further reasons to feel concerned, however.
GreenPlanetFM host Tim Lynch wrote
this on April 26:
“Peter Daley from Caloundra in
Queensland, is the researcher who blew
the whistle on the radiation cloud over
Australia that then carried on over to
the South Island of NZ, passing over
Dunedin.
“Back on the 8th of January of this
year Peter had programmed his new high
tech Geiger counter to sound an alarm if
radiation far above background radiation
was measured.
“The alarm went off at 6.30 pm measuring 0.80 microsieverts, which was eight
times over the average level of radiation
in the atmosphere and enough for him
to stay indoors and close all the windows
then call his friends to do the same.
“Following this another person in
Byron Bay in Northern New South Wales
measured this same spike as well as
another in Melbourne Victoria.
“Then across the Tasman Sea to NZ,
another researcher in Dunedin who was
involved in nuclear sciences went out
with a cloth and wiped all the rain drops
off his car that was outside, he then put
his geiger counter against the cloth to
have it instantly burst forth with a sharp
staccato reading. Visual observation saw
peaks reach an incredible 1.89 uS/Hr!
“So, what is going on here?
“From many accounts the inevitable is
happening. The nuclear radiation from
the crippled Japanese, Fukushima power
plant in the Northern Hemisphere has
breached the equatorial belt and seeped
into the Southern Hemisphere and now
this contamination is gradually raining down on us from within the upper
atmosphere.”
T
he reason for the hemispheral
breach appears to have been the La
Nina climate system, which sucked
radioactive vapour across the equator.
The existence of a radioactive cloud was
confirmed by the Australian government in January, but there were assurances the level of radioactivity recorded
was unlikely to pose any health threat
to humans. As Australian Radiation
Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency
senior environmental scientist Marcus
Grezechnik told Queensland’s Sunshine
Coast Daily:
“It is not seen as a big increase although
it is higher than average. To put everyone’s
mind at ease, even if you were receiving
that dose every hour for a full year you
would have less dose than one CAT Scan.”
Grezechnik told journalists that
radioactive fallout from Fukushima had
been recorded only “once” over Australia,
which is slightly at odds with the official
New Zealand position that radiation cannot reach us:
“Any nuclear power plant accident in
the Northern hemisphere (including
Japan) will not result in the deposition
of radioactive material in New Zealand
because of global atmospheric circulation
patterns,” the ESR’s senior medical physicist Tony Cotterill told Investigate.
“In the lower atmospheric zone called
the troposphere, where any radioactive material would be carried to from a
nuclear power plant accident, except at
the equator there is little mixing of air
masses between the Northern and Southern hemispheres. This can be contrasted
with past above ground nuclear weapons
testing where the force of the explo-
sions forced radioactive material into
the higher atmospheric zone called the
stratosphere where there is much greater
mixing of the two air masses.
“The Institute of Environmental Science and Research (ESR) has access to the
internationally collected data from air
monitoring stations of the Comprehensive
Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organisation
(CTBTO) two of which are in New Zealand, but there are many others around
the world designed to track long range
releases of radioactive material. Monitoring data from these have confirmed that
no air borne radioactive material released
during the Japanese nuclear emergency
has reached New Zealand.”
While Australia has admitted there
was a radioactive cloud over Queensland
of some kind, New Zealand’s ESR is adamant the Dunedin readings are wrong
and it never came here:
“There is no credible evidence to
suggest a cloud of airborne radioactive
material has passed over New Zealand
as a result of the Fukushima accident.
There is little or no chance of any released
radioactive material from the Fukushima
accident reaching as far south as New
Zealand,” says Cotterill.
New Zealand Department of Conservation researchers have been checking
migrating bird colonies – like sooty shearwaters – to see if they’ve become radioactive from flying through Japanese waters.
To date, no traces of radioactive birds have
been found, but the numbers of shearwaters who’ve returned to New Zealand
is down around 30% and those who have
arrived back are in bad condition.
N
ew Zealand authorities have, like
their Japanese counterparts, tended
to play down any safety risks from
Fukushima. They may be correct that
radiation leakage so far has been minor. But
that doesn’t mean people can breathe a sigh
of relief and move on. A full nuclear fire at
the Fukushima reactor would be something
the world has never seen, and likely to spew
huge amounts of Caesium-137 and Strontium into the atmosphere.
“The no. 4 [coolant] pool is about 100
feet above the ground, is structurally damaged and is exposed to the open elements,”
Robert Alvarez, a former senior adviser at
the US Department of Energy, told Akio
Matsumura in an email. “If an earthquake
or other event were to cause this pool to
drain this could result in a catastrophic
radiological fire involving nearly ten times
the amount of Caesium-137 released by the
Chernobyl accident.”
And that’s just from one reactor pool. If
the fire spread to other nearby reactors in
the plant, it’s not hard to extrapolate the
figures.
“It is no exaggeration to say that
the fate of Japan and the whole world
depends on No. 4 Reactor,” another former Japanese diplomat, Mitsuhei Murata,
wrote in an April letter to UN SecretaryGeneral Ban Ki-moon.
The problem appears to be one of
perception, and it’s political. The people
making the noise on the issue are environmentalists and global governance
adherents, whose other hats include
encouraging greater UN control over
national issues. The spectre of an out-ofcontrol nuclear fire raging that “could
make North America uninhabitable for
decades” is exactly the kind of headline
those lobby groups want. Yet in this case,
they do appear to have a point. These
same people who brought you the new
Ice Age in the 70s, a nuclear winter in the
For all of the cosmetic work going on at
Fukushima, the reality is a radioactive
nightmare and severely damaged containment
facility that is, as everyone knows, vulnerable
to further geological stress
80s, acid rain in the nineties and global
warming in the noughties, may have
repeatedly cried wolf, but perhaps this
time with good reason.
After all, it’s not as if a half-exploded
nuclear reactor leaking radiation can in
any sense be described as a routine work
environment or “totally under control”.
For all of the cosmetic work going on at
Fukushima, the reality is a radioactive
nightmare and severely damaged containment facility that is, as everyone knows,
vulnerable to further geological stress.
The NZ National Radiation Laboratory, part of ESR, seems content with the
Japanese plan:
“The International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA) is reporting that the
situation at Fukushima while it remains
serious continues to improve,” says ESR’s
Cotterill.
“There are concerns that reactor four’s
spent fuel storage pool could be further
damaged in a major aftershock. However,
the IAEA is reporting that the plant’s
operator are [making] progress [in] their
roadmap to recovery which includes
strengthening reactor four’s spent fuel
pool, and a plan to remove the fuel from
the pond.”
If it does go bang, the solution for New
Zealand households might be to invest in
a household Geiger counter, ensure you
use iodised table salt for all your cooking,
and keep an eye out for signs that any of
your kids glow in the dark.
Or, as nuclear engineer Arnie Gundersen put it, “We are all in a situation of
having to pray there’s not an earthquake. And there’s the other half of that,
which is pray to God but row towards
shore. And Tokyo’s not really rowing
toward shore right now,” Gundersen told
Canada’s CTV this month.
How TOXIC
Is Your TV?
The con surrounding flame
retardant chemicals
We’ve all purchased furniture or appliances advertised as fireretardant, assuming we’re doing the right thing. But extensive
research has shown the chemicals are toxic, and worse, they
don’t appear to work at slowing down fires. The Chicago
Tribune’s SAM ROE & PATRICIA CALLAHAN broke the story
T
wenty-five years ago, scientists gathered in a cramped government
laboratory and set fire to specially designed chairs, TVs and electrical
cables packed with flame retardants. For the next half-hour, they carefully measured how much the chemicals slowed the blaze.
It was one of the largest studies of its kind, and the chemical industry
seized upon it, claiming the results showed that flame retardants gave
people a 15-fold increase in time to escape fires.
Manufacturers of flame retardants would repeatedly point to this government study
as key proof that these toxic chemicals – embedded in many common household items
– prevented residential fires and saved lives.
But the study’s lead author, Vytenis Babrauskas, told the Chicago Tribune that
industry officials have “grossly distorted” the findings of his research, which was not
based on real-world conditions. The small amounts of flame retardants in typical
home furnishings, he said, offer little to no fire protection.
“Industry has used this study in ways that are improper and untruthful,” he said.
The misuse of Babrauskas’ work is but one example of how the chemical industry
has manipulated scientific findings to promote the widespread use of flame retardants and downplay the health risks, a Tribune investigation shows. The industry has
twisted research results, ignored findings that run counter to their aims and passed off
biased, industry-funded reports as rigorous science.
As a result, the chemical industry successfully distorted the basic knowledge about toxic
chemicals that are used in consumer products and linked to serious health problems,
including cancer, developmental problems, neurological deficits and impaired fertility.
Industry has disseminated misleading research findings so frequently that they
essentially have been adopted as fact. They have been cited by consultants, think
tanks, regulators and Wikipedia, and have shaped the worldwide debate about the
safety of flame retardants.
One series of studies financed by the
chemical industry concluded that flame
retardants prevent deadly fires, reduce
pollutants and save society millions of
dollars.
The main basis for these broad claims?
A scientific report so obscure that it is
available only in Swedish.
When the Tribune obtained a copy
and translated it, the report revealed that
many of industry’s wide-ranging claims
can be traced to information regarding
just eight TV fires in western Stockholm
more than 15 years ago.
A
lthough industries often try to
spin scientific findings on the
safety and effectiveness of their
products, the tactics employed by flame
retardant manufacturers stand out.
Tom Muir, a Canadian government
research analyst for 30 years, called the
broad claims based on the eight Stockholm TV fires “the worst example I have
ever seen of deliberate misinformation
and distortion.”
The American Chemistry Council, the
leading trade group for the industry, said
flame retardants are safe products that
help protect life and property. “ACC’s
work is grounded in scientific evidence,
as we believe regulatory decisions related
to chemistry must be evaluated on a
scientific basis,” the trade group said in a
written statement.
But when the Tribune asked the trade
group to provide research that showed
flame retardants are effective, the council
initially provided only one study – the
one Babrauskas wrote and now says is
being distorted by industry.
Later, in response to additional questions from the newspaper, the trade
group highlighted a different study as
evidence that flame retardants work well:
research based largely on the obscure
Swedish report.
In reviewing key scientific studies and
analyses behind the chemical industry’s
most common arguments, the Tribune
identified flaws so basic that they violate
central tenets of science.
When Babrauskas and his team of
scientists began their pioneering research
in 1987, it was well-established that flame
retardants slowed fires – at least when massive amounts were packed into products.
Less clear was what that meant in terms
of precise gains in fire safety. Seeking
answers, the chemical industry commissioned Babrauskas’ team at the National
Bureau of Standards to conduct one of
the first large-scale studies on the effectiveness of flame retardants.
The industry, Babrauskas said, wanted
to know what would happen if the most
potent and expensive chemicals were
embedded in common items, such as TV
cabinets and upholstered chairs. The industry picked out the flame retardants to be
used, and Babrauskas’ team began custombuilding the household items to be tested.
Working out of a yellow-brick laboratory with a large chimney, the researchers
set fire to each item and then, in what
Babrauskas called the “grand finale,”
ignited a room full of samples containing
large amounts of retardants and a room
of items containing none. Among the
conclusions: The room of flame retardant
samples would provide people 15 times
more escape time than the other room.
The results weren’t surprising. More
noteworthy was the way industry characterized the results.
Industry trade groups have regularly
asserted that household products, such as
TVs, offered a 15-fold escape time if they
contained flame retardants. “This should
allow sufficient time for the fire brigade
to reach your place before it is too late,”
states the website of the Bromine Science
and Environmental Forum, an industry
group based in Brussels.
Babrauskas calls such claims “totally
bogus” because the amounts of flame
retardants in the burned samples in his
tests were so much greater than what is
found in typical consumer items.
“Where you would see them is in the
aviation industry, NASA, naval facilities
– the market where there is no sensitivity
to dollar costs,” he said.
In fact, as Babrauskas explicitly noted
in his study, research shows that the flame
retardants in household furnishings such
as sofas and chairs do not slow fire.
For example, many couches, love seats
and chairs sold nationwide contain flame
retardants to comply with a California
rule on flammability of home furnishings. But studies by the U.S. Consumer
Product Safety Commission have concluded that this standard provides no
meaningful protection from deadly fires.
The standard requires that raw foam
withstand a candle-like flame for 12
seconds. But, Babrauskas said, upholstered furniture is covered with fabric,
and if the cover ignites, the flames from
the fabric quickly grow larger than that
of a candle and overwhelm even flameretardant foam.
“The fire just laughs at it,” Babrauskas
said.
The bottom line: Household furniture often contains enough chemicals
to pose health threats but not enough to
stem fires – “the worst of both possible
worlds,” according to Babrauskas.
Babrauskas, who spent 16 years as a
fire scientist at the National Bureau of
Standards, now known as the National
Institute of Standards and Technology,
said he didn’t know the chemical industry was misrepresenting his study until
two years ago when a scientist at the
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
in California contacted him. Babrauskas
addressed the distortion in a paper he
presented last year at an international
conference. But the industry continues to
misquote his work.
In its written statement, the chemistry
council said the group has not mischaracterized Babrauskas’ study, saying the group
has stated the research shows flame retardants “can provide” a 15-fold escape time.
Babrauskas, now a consultant, said
industry is being “flat-out deceptive” and
should stop misrepresenting his work
in order to sell more flame retardants.
“I don’t want to be part of anything that
willfully and needlessly poisons the
planet,” he said.
The study written in Swedish is so
obscure you won’t find it online or among
the millions of papers listed in government and industry databases. American
Chemistry Council says it doesn’t have a
copy. Even the chemicals’ most vocal critics say they have never seen one.
Yet the paper about electrical fires
in Sweden has had significant influence, thanks to the chemical industry’s
manipulation of its findings.
The Tribune obtained a copy of the
study from the only library in the world
Leading the search were three people
with close industry ties: an executive with
flame retardant maker Albemarle Corp.;
a public relations specialist with a unit of
Burson-Marsteller, a global PR firm; and
Margaret Simonson, a fire scientist at a
leading research institute in Sweden.
The trio was collecting statistics on
electrical fires when some data in the
Swedish study caught their eye: Western Stockholm, with 265,000 residents,
experienced 32 electrical fires in a twoyear span. Of those 32 fires, eight – or 25
percent – were caused by TVs.
A basic principle of science is that
broad conclusions should not be based
on small or unrepresentative samples.
Flip a coin five times and it might land on
heads each time. But you couldn’t then
conclude that 500 coin flips would always
come up heads.
Yet the three industry researchers used
the 25 percent figure to estimate that
Europe as a whole – a region of roughly
Household furniture often contains
enough chemicals to pose health threats
but not enough to stem fires – “the worst
of both possible worlds”
believed to have one, the National Library
of Sweden, and had it translated. The
50-page report, written by a Swedish federal board, estimated the total number of
electrical fires in Sweden by analyzing the
causes of all fires in and around western
Stockholm in 1995 and 1996.
The report’s main conclusion – that
electrical fires in Sweden were less common than previously thought – was
relatively insignificant. But a chemical
industry team zeroed in on a tiny portion
of the report and used it to manufacture
several flimsy arguments for why flame
retardants are good for society.
At the time the Swedish report was
published, in 1997, environmentalists in
Europe were raising concerns about flame
retardants in TVs and other electronics.
The chemical industry began searching
for evidence that the benefits of flame
retardants in those products outweighed
any risks.
500 million people – had experienced 165
TV fires per million sets annually.
That rate, the researchers wrote, was
far higher than the U.S. rate, which they
put at five TV fires per million sets. And
because the outer plastic casings of U.S.
televisions typically contained flame
retardants, while European sets did not,
the researchers concluded that the “dramatic difference” in TV fire rates was due
to the chemicals.
When the researchers published their
figures in 2000 in a peer-reviewed journal, one of the authors listed was the PR
specialist.
Simonson, the fire scientist, went on
to write several additional papers – all
funded by the flame retardant industry
– that also relied on the eight fires as support for her broad conclusions.
For example, in a 2002 study that
looked at the environmental impact
of TV sets, Simonson concluded that
sets with flame retardants actually are
responsible for lower emissions of certain
hazardous pollutants over their lifetimes
than TVs without retardants. This is
primarily because, she wrote, TVs with
retardants are involved in fewer and
smaller fires, so they produce less smoke.
Industry has repeatedly pointed to
this study in addressing environmental
concerns about flame retardants.
Simonson’s figures have been quoted
far and wide. European regulators
credited her statistics for prodding some
international TV manufacturers to add
flame retardants to sets sold in Europe.
O
ne of the few to question Simonson’s studies has been Tom
Muir, a retired federal analyst
for Canada’s environmental protection
agency.
He translated bits of the Swedish study
to English but said he couldn’t entirely
understand Simonson’s methodology.
In an interview with the Tribune, Muir
said the studies appeared to be “an
elaborate, manufactured platform of
assumption strings and assertions and
extrapolations.”
When the Tribune provided Muir with
a complete translation of the Swedish
study as well as Simonson’s responses
to the newspaper’s questions about her
methods, Muir was even more critical.
“It’s worse than I thought,” he said,
noting that Simonson repeatedly estimated crucial statistics when solid data
did not exist. “She’s just making these
numbers up.”
Also critical of Simonson’s calculations
is the author of the Swedish study that
Simonson relied on in her work.
Ingvar Enqvist said in an interview
that he did not know Simonson and the
chemical industry were relying on the
eight TV fires mentioned in his report
as the basis for sweeping claims about
the benefits of flame retardants, a fact
he called “a little peculiar.” He also said
Simonson shouldn’t extrapolate the eight
fires to all of Europe, given the vast differences among the countries.
Simonson, who now uses her maiden
name and goes by Margaret Simonson
McNamee, is a research manager at
the SP Technical Research Institute of
Sweden. She denied Muir’s accusation of
fabricating numbers but acknowledged
using many statistical extrapolations and
assumptions because, she said, solid data
were scarce.
“We certainly did the best that
we could given the data
that we had available,”
she said. She said a
British study had
found similar
TV fire rates in
various European
countries, so she
thought it was fair to extrapolate the
blazes in Sweden to all of Europe.
Simonson emphasized that her methods were transparent, allowing critics to
redo her studies with different numbers
if they like. “Part of the scientific process
is having a dialogue and not necessarily
being in agreement with your peers,” she
said.
Besides receiving industry money for
her research, Simonson chairs the science advisory committee of the National
Association of State Fire Marshals, a
group of American public officials that
has worked closely with the chemical
industry to push for wider use of flame
retardant products.
But Simonson said she has never
skewed findings to suit industry needs.
“Marketing material is something that
they produce themselves,” she said. “Our
research was independent research.”
Muir disagrees. “She’s never erring on
the other side,” he said. “Her numbers are
always pointing in the same direction –
in industry’s favour.”
When chemicals receive bad publicity,
industry has a go-to person: Dennis
Paustenbach.
A veteran toxicologist and
industrial hygienist, he has
sided with industry on some of
the most controversial health
issues. Working for tobacco
industry lawyers, Paustenbach
disputed federal regulators’ conclusion
that second-hand smoking causes lung
cancer in adults. His industry-supported
work was used to cast doubt on the risks
of some occupational exposures to benzene and asbestos.
“Industry loves him,” said Peter
Infante, a former senior administrator
with the U.S. Occupational Safety and
Health Administration. “They know what
answer they are going to get. Nothing is
ever harmful.”
For the makers of flame retardants,
Paustenbach helped interpret data about
whether a widely used retardant posed a
risk to children.
In 2002, concerns had been growing
about a flame retardant known as deca
that was being added to TVs and other
electronics. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency wanted more information
about possible health risks to children,
and chemical manufacturers volunteered
to collect data and present them to an
EPA-sponsored panel of industry, government and university researchers.
For help, the chemical makers hired
Exponent Inc., a California-based scientific consulting firm where Paustenbach
served as vice president. After analyzing
various ways children might be exposed
to deca, including inhaling dust and
chewing on consumer products, Paustenbach’s company wrote a 123-page report
concluding the chemical posed little risk.
But its conclusions had a weak foundation: They were based to a large degree on
a study of serum samples collected from
just 12 adult blood donors in Illinois in
1988. Again, the chemical industry used a
small sample to reach a broad conclusion.
In the Illinois blood study, researchers from the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention and Stockholm University found that five of the 12 serum
samples had detectable amounts of deca.
But when Paustenbach’s firm wrote up
its report for the chemical industry, it
flipped the findings around, emphasizing the seven samples where none of the
chemical was detected.
“Given that the majority of serum
samples tested had non-detectable levels
of (deca), it is most likely that the majority of the U.S. population has very low, if
not zero, exposure,” the report states.
The industry’s report also concluded –
In 2002, concerns had been growing about
a flame retardant known as deca that was
being added to TVs and other electronics.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
wanted more information about possible
health risks to children
contrary to the conclusion of the Illinois
blood donor study – that no further evaluation of the flame retardant was warranted.
When the EPA panel of researchers reviewed the industry report, many
members objected. They said the risk to
the nation’s children should not lean so
heavily on just 12 blood samples, let alone
samples from adults, who tend to be less
vulnerable to chemical exposure. Some
members also noted the samples were
collected in 1988, when levels of deca in
the environment might have been lower.
Industry officials “were trying to pull a
fast one,” recalled panel member Ruthann Rudel of the Silent Spring Institute,
an environmental research organization.
Publishing a paper in a peer-reviewed
journal lends the results more credibility.
Paustenbach and five others wrote up the
report as a scientific paper, but they did
not note the panel’s criticism.
The paper was then published in the
Journal of Children’s Health – a year-old
publication edited by Paustenbach.
In an interview, Paustenbach said it
was appropriate to publish the report in a
journal that he edited. He also defended
the report’s use of the small sample of
Illinois blood donors to cast doubt on the
health risks of deca. “We did the best job
we could with the available data,” he said.
Paustenbach is now president and
founder of ChemRisk, a San Franciscobased consulting firm, and an adjunct
professor of toxicology at the University
of Michigan. Regarding criticism of his
work for industry on controversial topics,
he said: “It’s unfortunate there is such
polarization in the environmental sciences on views on chemicals.”
After years of insisting deca posed
little health risk, the chemical industry in
2009 reached an agreement with the EPA
to phase the chemical out of products
nationwide.
The journal that Paustenbach edited
folded a few months after the questionable paper was published. Paustenbach
said it closed because of competitive
pressures.
It was in existence less than two years.
drive
barry spyker
Its performance on the road is
remarkable and, as marketing folks like to say,
it exceeded my expectations. I was not ready
for a BMW-like kick, but I got one
Range Rover Evoque
unexpectedly stunning
M
an alive! Land Rover has
thrown us a real curve ball here.
When is the last time we saw
a Land Rover, or any SUV for that matter,
with head-turning looks and spunky performance – on the road and off? How about a
Land Rover with a race-inspired powertrain
– yet it’s a 4-cylinder engine that could get
nearly 30 mpg on the highway?
And a sexy colour palette, topped by a
full-length sunroof?
The 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
is all new and appears to be an instant hit.
That’s appropriate: The lime green test
car was more a beach star than a mountain
climber. It elicited a nod, smile and thumbsup from two young dudes in a soupy Subaru.
Evoque has stunning looks: This crossover
SUV has 19-inch wheels in sparkle-finish
alloy, sleek lines and twin rectangular
exhausts. Its compressed, Dodge Magnumlike roof looks like it was smashed into the
rear cabin. That, by the way, shortens up on
the rear-window height and slightly compromises visibility.
Add a devilish grille and steeply raked
windshield and you have a bold and daring
design, far better than the boxy LR2 that
Evoque replaces.
Does it perform as well its looks advertise?
Oh, yeah.
Its performance on the road is remarkable and, as marketing folks like to say, it
exceeded my expectations. I was not ready
for a BMW-like kick, but I got one.
It’s quick, and it only has a 2.0-litre,
4-cylinder engine – yes, a Land Rover with a
4-banger. But it’s turbocharged and puts out
240 hp and 250 pound-feet of torque. With
the help of direct fuel injection and twin
variable-valve timing, this little powerplant
jolts you to 100 km/h in just over 7 seconds,
the sort of performance once the reserve of
V12 Jaguars and Ferraris a generation ago.
It feels even quicker. More important, it’s
as agile as a big cat chasing down a zippy
impala. It’s nearly as nimble as a roadster,
handling corners flat and with a tacky grip.
Opt for the Adaptive Dynamics system,
and the suspension adjusts for even crisper
handling. Rotate to Sport, and the Evoque is
good clean fun.
A six-speed automatic tranny, controlled
with a rotary dial (think Jaguar), takes
Evoque swiftly and evenly up the dials.
Steering is on the heavier side but responsive
and precise.
All-wheel drive is standard and, while I
did not take the Evoque off road, it comes
with Land Rover’s Terrain Response system.
Like its big brothers, the system has settings to regulate the engine, suspension and
traction to handle various off-road environments. It also has a hill-descent feature.
Motor Trend said it easily climbed rocks
the size of watermelons and countered holes
that could bury a wheelbarrow.
On the road, where most of us will be,
expect mileage figures in the mid to high teens around town,
and high 20s on the highway.
Entering the Evoque at night offers a nice novelty: A small
spotlight – featuring a Batman-like outline of Evoque’s profile
– so one can ensure not to step into something before getting in.
Wouldn’t want to track anything into this sweet cockpit with
is two-tone colour scheme and elegant, soft-touch materials.
The layout of instruments and dials is neat and similar to the
Range Rover Sport. The touch-screen controls are a breeze to
use, if a bit sluggish.
I loved the navigation system’s “take-me-home” button.
Unfortunately, even after programming in my home address, it
would have gotten me hopelessly lost had I not known where I
was going. Human 1, nav system 0.
Headroom and legroom are decent, especially up front. I
strongly suggest choosing the four-door model over the coupe:
The rear door is a must for easier access, and it’s more accommodating for passengers back there.
Stowage space is even less accommodating, dead last in the
luxury compact SUV segment. Still, I found it deep enough
even for larger suitcases.
Evoque keeps passengers safer with impact beams in all
doors. Seven air bags include front and side curtain bags. Traction and stability control are standard.
Safety options include adaptive headlight that look around
corners and front and rear parking sensors.
Evoque comes in a two-door coupe and a four-door, which I
once again highly recommend. An SUV without the functionality of four doors will disappoint – you don’t realize how often
you’ll want access to the midsection of the vehicle.
Both body styles come in the base plus and premium. The
plus is loaded, though: Standard are 19-inch wheels, the Terrain
Response system, the parking sensors, panoramic sunroof,
Bluetooth, 11-speaker sound system.
Opt for the premium and you get extras like blind-spot
warning, 360-degree camera system for parking and 17-speaker
sound system.
Then you can choose between two design themes: The
Dynamic and Prestige. The Dynamic gets sportier colors and
trim and offers a rear skid plate. The Prestige gets a bit classier
with richer leather inside and more seat adjustments.
And that’s what the Evoque is all about. Badged as a Range
Rover, it’s more about style and fun than sloshing through mud
and bounding over rocks.
Still, don’t let this mini Rover fool you. It’s said to be a gutsy
compact off-roader, and it’s fun to drive, too. A bit pricey,
maybe, but all in all there’s a lot of bang for the buck here.
invest
peter hensley
If you own your assets jointly then those
assets automatically go to the surviving
partner. They don’t get tied up in the estate
process. Assuming Michael arranges a new
will then his estate will only deal with
stuff he owns in his own name
Need for proper planning
A
s was their custom Jim and
Moira would lend a sympathic
ear to all who called at their door.
The circumstances varied but most would
receive, along with the words of wisdom,
a cup of tea, biscuit and a chat. Hospitality
would be stepped up for family and close
friends who could expect a full meal consisting of several courses.
The topic of “the chat” varied immensely
– but the majority who sought their counsel left richer. It was as if Jim and Moira
energized their guests with words of
encouragement.
The universe had been kind to their family. Over the years hard word and diligence
had been rewarded handsomely. Generations
had transferred the baton with a semblance
of order in that no one in living memory had
passed before their time. It was almost as
if they had been blessed in a most obscure
manner. It was with this thought that Jim
prepared the table in the conservatory for
afternoon tea.
Friends of cousin Christopher had recently
been advised of a medical prognosis that
translated into less than 12 months to live
for him. Christopher had suggested they call
on Jim and Moira whom they had met once
before.
Jim was a little dubious about the visit and
said to Moira, “What can we do, we are not
in the medical profession?”
Moira responded tersely, “There’s a lot we
can do. Offer moral support, be a sympathic
sounding board. We have a huge advantage
over their close friends.”
Jim always enjoyed discussing topical
issues with Moira as she had a unique ability
to distil facts, blend an element of understanding, mix in empathy and deliver a
response which suited the circumstances.
“What would that be?” Jim asked
inquisitively.
“We are not emotionally involved” Moira
said.. “That allows us to be objective and
practical.”
Jim hadn’t thought of that.
Moira continued, “I know you hadn’t
thought about that, but you have other talents and that’s why, even though you annoy
me sometimes, I still love you.”
Jim was chuffed. He and Moira had been
together so long he had stopped counting.
Their hard work had been rewarded and
their family had prospered, both financially
and emotionally. Their three children had
each procreated and some of their grandchildren were approaching university. He
knew every-one had to die at some stage, yet
he never had to face it head on. His siblings
had dealt with the details when his parents
died, similarly when his in-laws had passed
over. It was a sobering thought, and whilst
he was looking forward to hosting afternoon tea, there was a part of him that was
apprehensive.
Jim was finishing off his chores and didn’t
hear the bell announcing the arrival of their
afternoon guests. He was too busy listening to the cry of the scavenging sea gulls
from the beach. Moira brought the visitors
through to the conservatory.
They each commented favourably on
the aspect and view before taking a seat at
the set table. Jim arranged a hot drink for
everybody and made sure there was an ample selection of home
baking.
Moira broke the awkwardness by asking in her usual manner,
“How can we help you today?”
Michael sat quietly as Margaret said in a soft voice, “Michael’s
been told by the doctors that his life expectancy is less than 12
months and most likely six. He and I are keen to make the most
of the time left. Your cousin Christopher suggested that you
may be able to assist us and so that is why we are here today.”
Jim noticed that Moira directed the next question to Michael
and asked “What have you sorted so far?”
Jim also noticed that Michael was pleased to be included in the
conservation and he said “I would prefer to have no service at all,
but if we have to have one, then I would make it family only.”
Moira responded, “We have a friend who is an undertaker
and he told us recently that an increasing number of people are
requesting just that. I do admire you for sharing that with us,
but that is not what I meant. Have you made any adjustments to
your financial affairs ?”
Moira said “One advantage that we have is that whilst we are
supportive of your situation, we are not emotionally involved.
The obvious question is have you recently drafted a valid will?”
Margaret blurted out “Michael doesn’t have a will. He had one
before we got married, but he never got around to signing a new
one. It is a such an obvious thing and I never thought about it.”
Jim, thinking he had better contribute to the conservation
and said “Marriage cancels out all wills, so that should be on
top of your things to do. Should you die without a will the State
decides who shares in the estate.” Jim went on to set their minds
at ease. “If you own your assets jointly then those assets automatically go to the surviving partner. They don’t get tied up in
the estate process. Assuming Michael arranges a new will then
his estate will only deal with stuff he owns in his own name.”
Moira added “Do you have any life insurance, and assuming that
you have a mortgage will it be enough to extinguish the debt?”
Michael said “Yes, not only that, as I was the main income
earner we took out extra insurance and insured my salary. I
wasn’t happy about paying the extra premiums, at the time but I
sure am pleased now. Margaret will be debt free and have about
half a million in the bank. She should be fine”.
Moira shook her head and said “It’s not enough, she will have
to go back to work at some stage.
Michael looked shocked.
Moira continued ”Think about it Michael, at bank rates that
will generate less than half the average wage.”
Margaret said, “Michael, Moira’s right, I had worked it out. I
am already working part time, so increasing my hours won’t be
a problem. ”
Jim was pleased the awkwardness had vanished and the conversation continued well into the afternoon. It became apparent
that Michael had been dabbling in the stock market and held
some shares in his own name. He questioned Moira about the
viability of the Euro continuing and was pleased to hear that
she was optimistic about the world’s financial future.
With Moira’s help they established a bucket list and were
quite surprised as to the number of items on it already. Jim
noticed that their guests energy levels had increased and whilst
Michaels prognosis had not altered, their focus had changed
and they were looking on the bright side.
Copyright © Peter J. Hensley January 2012.
This article is meant to be Class Advice and a copy of Peter Hensley ’s
disclosure statement is available on request and is free of charge.
HIS/gadgets
EPSON EB-485Wi
Offering simultaneous dual pen
interactivity, access to all the resources
on your laptop, network and the
internet, and instant capture of added
content and notations – all without
an interactive whiteboard – the
EB-485Wi makes learning more
meaningful and fun. Installation is
easy and fast with no driver software
to install on networked computers and
no need to calibrate: this projector auto calibrates
delivering highly accurate, fast response and reliable
performance. To ensure low cost of ownership the EB-400
Series has an estimated lamp life of up to 4,000 hours and
a replacement cost of only $129RRP, and a high efficiency
electrostatic filter with an estimated maintenance cycle of
up to 5,000 hours.RRP $3,699
www.epson.co.nz
HTC One X
Minimalist design meets a 4.7-inch infinity screen with smoothly rounded
piano-gloss sidewalls, a curved back so it’s easy to hold, and a unified shell for
increased durability. Brace yourself for lightning-fast web browsing, remarkable
picture quality and seamless gaming visuals thanks to the powerful quad-core
processor. You’ll love the minimalist design and the camera that captures
every moment (even in low light) with crisp, vivid, beautiful photos. It also lets
you take a photo while shooting HD video. Plus, with Beats Audio you hear
authentic, deep sound with true, finely-tuned details.
www.htc.com
Logitech UE
Air Speaker
The Logitech UE Air Speaker with
Apple’s AirPlay technology harnesses your
home Wi-Fi network to stream uncompressed
audio from your iPad, iPhone, iPod touch or laptop.
Just dock your iPad, iPhone or iPod device and
follow the simple on screen instructions. Stream
tunes from your iPad, your friends’ iPhones or your
laptop – no pairing required. Now there’s never
a reason for the music to stop. Pop open the
hideaway drawer to reveal the Apple Dock
Connector and charge your iPad or iPhone
when it’s low on power or to play music
from your iPod classic.
www.logitech.com
ION Air Pro
New ION Air PRO is one of the first Smart phone
compatible action cameras that allows users to shoot
high definition video and share in real time via social
networking sites. So now, your latest ski run can be
uploaded to your Facebook page before you’ve even
taken off your ski boots! This clever electronic device
comprises two parts: the ION Air Pro action camera
and mini tripod, which when fitted with the detachable
accessory – ION the GO WiFi PODZ, enables users
to replay video footage and seamlessly transfer it to
YouTube, Facebook or the Internet without the need of a
computer or cables.
www. iontheaction.com
HIS/mall
Panasonic Lumix GF5
The sleek Panasonic Lumix GF5 is a stylish camera
designed to produce professional image quality and Full
HD video from an ultra-compact body. Small enough to fit
easily into your pocket or handbag, and with the Worlds
Fastest Autofocus, you’ll never miss the action with this
interchangeable lens LUMIX G system camera. Offering
crisp and detailed pictures and HD video with the brand
new high-sensitivity 12.1 megapixel Live MOS image
sensor, the LUMIX GF5 is the perfect camera for people
who want great results with beautiful design. It produces
stunning image quality even in low light conditions and
offers intuitive functionality to suggest the best settings no
matter where you are.
www.panasonic.com
Toshiba Excite 13
Delivering more screen real estate than any other tablet on the market,
the Excite 13 tablet offers a big, bright, higher resolution display,
while delivering more room for everything else – from sharing photos
and web browsing to playing games and watching movies with a
group. With a 13.3-inch diagonal AutoBrite LED Backlit display with
10-finger touch support, the tablet boasts a cinematic 16:9 aspect
ratio and 1600x900 native resolution, perfect for watching HD movies
and videos. A four-speaker sound system with exclusive sound
enhancements by Toshiba and SRS Labs delivers amazing audio and
an included tablet stand makes it easy to prop up on a table, kitchen
countertop or coffee table to share videos with friends and family.
Extremely power efficient, the Excite 13 tablet is targeted to deliver up
to 13 hours of battery life and seven days of stand-by.
www.toshiba.com
HP ENVY 14 Spectre
For some, the day never stops. That’s why
we gave the HP ENVY14 Spectre, a premium
Ultrabook, a long-lasting battery. Go up to 9.5
hours1 without recharging. And feel the kind
of freedom that only ENVY affords. Get all you
need with this new Ultrabook with the optimal
blend of responsiveness, stunning visuals,
mobility, and style. Powered by visibly smart
Intel Core processors, experience the joy of
performance that keeps up with you. A full 14”
screen fit inside a 13.3” notebook. It sounds
impossible. It looks phenomenal. We stretched
the display so you can stretch your creativity.
www.hp.com
STREET by 50
Headphones
Bring your music with you in
luxurious style with STREET by 50 OverEar Headphones, designed in collaboration
with international recording artist, entrepreneur,
and philanthropist, 50 Cent. These over-the-ear
headphones feature a detachable cord for tanglefree street-wear and transport, plus enhanced bass
and ultra plush memory foam ear pads to ensure a
comfortable ride no matter where your music takes
you. STREET by 50 professionally tuned wired
headphones are tough, rugged and durable –
producing the clearest highs and Enhanced
Bass for any genre of music you prefer.
www. smsby50.com
tech
LANDLINES ARE STILL LIFE LINES FOR MANY WORDS BY KIM ODE/MCT
D
ust always needs a place to
land. Take the record turntable,
rarely used, but there when you
want to listen to some classic vinyl. Or
the transistor radio. The sound quality is
awful, but it’ll come in handy if a storm
knocks out the power. The telephone?
Well, every once in a while, it does ring.
Sometimes you might even see it sporting a blinking light – if you ever looked.
“We got rid of our land line a couple of
years ago because no one would listen to
the messages,” says Deb Balzer, a publicist
by trade. “We actually would have disagreements or discord because no one would
listen to the messages, let alone pick up the
phone. All of our friends have our cell, so
we’d assume if someone was calling the
house, it was a telemarketer or worse.”
Pity the telephone.
In New Zealand, mobile usage is now
110% of the population, thanks to some
people now operating accounts on more
than one network.
Those kind of stats make the cellphone
the most popular electronic gadget
owned by adults in the United States,
according to the Pew Research Center’s
Internet and American Life Project. No
wonder that by December 2010, three of
every 10 U.S. homes had only wireless
telephones – an increase of more than 3
percent in that year alone, as reported by
the National Center for Health Statistics.
Also: Even in homes that still have a
traditional phone, one in six of them
received all or almost all of their calls on
mobile phones.
But there are reasons people keep a
land line (which is a classic retronym, or
term for something devised after a similar, but newer, thing has come into use).
Jan Russell says her household keeps
its land line because they have two young
boys “and we wanted to make sure that
they could call 111 if something were to
happen to us or their 78-year-old grandpa
who lives with us.”
Russell raised a common concern:
whether in emergencies, a cellphone could
provide a location, especially if the caller
can’t do so, or whether roaming affects
that. The good news is that most cell- and
smartphones now have GPS, or global
tracking features. You can be tracked
whether you like this “feature” or not.
Still, when time is of the essence,
people worry that a cellphone might not
be charged, the call might get dropped
or that they might not even be able
to find it. As with TV remotes, a cellphone never seems to be in the same
place twice. It may be in the bottom of
a cavernous purse, forgotten in the car
(not that anyone used it there), or simply
away with its owner, leaving a household
incommunicado.
In this new world, “household”
becomes an operative term. Back in the
day, a phone number connected you to
everyone who lived under one roof. Now,
callers to homes without a land line need
to decide whose cellphone is the best way
to contact a family.
In some households, land lines may
follow the arrival of children, especially
when parents don’t want every homework
question or “come out and play” call
coming in through their cellphones.
When Amanda Lancette and her husband set up housekeeping, each used their
own cellphones. “People could contact us
directly and we didn’t miss having a land
line at all,” she said. When they bought a
desktop computer in 2000, however, they
needed a land line for dial-up Internet.
With a baby in 2005, it made even more
sense to keep the phone for her mother-inlaw, who cared for the baby.
“If we did get rid of our land
line again, our (cell) phones
would certainly become community property,” said Lancette.
“We already have the issue of missed
texts and things because the boys are
playing apps on our phones.” Still, once
the boys are old enough to have cell-
phones, she says they’ll likely drop the
land line.
Some people, such as DeAnn Player,
keep a land line because “bundling”
services helps reduce the cost of the cable
bill. “The only time it rings is when it is
a bill collector for whoever used to have
the number,” Player said. “I couldn’t call
home if I wanted to – I have no idea what
the number even is.”
Still, there’s life left in the landline
concept even now. American Richard
Anderson has a cellphone, but still uses
a land line because technology enables
him to treat POTS as PANS – or his Plain
Old Telephone System as Pretty Amazing
New Stuff. (We’re not saying that either
of these acronyms has caught on, just that
they exist, LOL.)
When Anderson’s land line rings, he
and his wife get alerts with caller ID on
their iMacs, iPods and iPads, and on
the TVs with cable boxes. “Also, when
someone leaves a voice message, Comcast
sends a text translation of the voice message, along with a .wav file to listen to,
and an e-mail to both my wife and me,
which we can read on our iDevices or any
PC hooked to the Internet.” For Anderson, this all is more economical than if he
and his wife each had smartphones with
data plans, adding that this enables them
to “buy a lot of iStuff.”
At the very least, an old-fashioned telephone can double as a sort of retro chic
design element. Balzer said she keeps a
1950s-era black rotary phone on her desk
even after she shut off the service. “Now,”
she said, “it’s simply artistic!”
HAS YOUR GET UP AND GO
WITH AGE OUR
CARDIO VASCULAR
AR
SYSTEM TENDS TO
SLOW DOWN LOSING
SING
SOME EFFICIENCY
CY
ALONG THE WAY
Y
SPECIAL OFFER:
ks
1 pack delivered for $45 or 3 pac
delivered for $85
0800 567 800
To place your order either phone
.nz
or go online at www.pharmahealth.co
T
his can result in less oxygen
and nutrients being delivered
to muscle groups and organs,
particularly in times of physical
exertion. This can impact on our lives in
various ways. Commonly people feel less
energetic; many just feel like they are
slowing down. Some find it takes longer
to do the things they do every day.
A natural plant-based product,
CardioMax® WS® 1442, 450 mg may
offer a solution. CardioMax® has been
shown to support physical activity for
those who are prone to fatigue.(1) It
enhances overall physical activity by
supporting a healthy heart and cardio
vascular system.(1)
A 2008 Cochrane review states
WS® 1442 extract has significant
benefits, when compared with placebo,
as an adjunctive treatment.(2) Another
study in 2003 showed that the use
of CardioMax® increases maximum
workload.(3)
CardioMax® is rich in anti-oxidants,
helps maintain normal and healthy
blood pressure and pulse rate.(4)
ports
In summary CardioMax® supports
and helps maintain overall good
a
health as well as a healthy heart and
b for
ble
cardiovascular system. It is suitable
all adults who want to care for and
protect their heart health.
o for
ons
There are no contra-indications
CardioMax® with prescription heart
medication. It has an excellent safety
profile and a high level of tolerance.(5)
It is manufactured and marketed in
Germany as Crataegutt® by Dr. Willmar
Schwabe Pharmaceuticals. Last year this
No 1 selling German natural heart care
product had German sales in excess of
1,000,000 packets.
Recommended by doctors and
cardiologists
g
around the world.
Supplementary to and not a replacement for a healthy diet.
If symptoms persist see your healthcare professional. Read the label and only use as directed.
e
ed.
Distributor: Pharma Health NZ Ltd. Your Health. Nature’s Power.
PO Box 15-185, Auckland 0640. Ph: 0800 567 800.
www.pharmahealth.co.nz Information: Email [email protected]
1. Pittler et al Cochrane Library, 2008, Issue 1. 2. Cochrane Collaboration review (Issue 1, 2008). 3. Commission E. Monograph on crataegus folium.
The Complete German Commission E Monographs, Therapeutic Guide to Herbal Medicines. Blumenthal. 4. The American Journal of Medicine Vol 114
4
June 2003. 5. Eichstadt et al (perfusion) 2001.
TAPS NA 4580
online
with chillisoft
accessing viral content through
social media. When a large volume of
content is available around a news story
from many sources, the spread of malware and viruses also increases. If you see
a story or photo on a social network that
seems suspicious or too unbelievable to
be true, trust your gut. If you want to be
sure, run an Internet search of the story
and access it directly from a reputable
source instead of clicking through via a
social network.
5. Watch for Twitter direct message spam. We’ve all seen strange
tweets that appear to be a friend warning us of a “bad blog post” or “hilarious
photo.” If you receive a tweet that seems
out of character or suspicious, avoid
clicking on the accompanying link, as the
account may be compromised. Avoiding
links spread by these breached accounts
will help avoid exposing
your log-in credentials
as well. Also, be a good
citizen of the online world
and politely notify the
account-holder that his or
her account may have been
breached to further help mitigate the
damage.
SEVEN WAYS TO PROTECT YOUR
SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS WORDS BY AMY GUTH/MCT
L
et’s not kid ourselves: The
world is a complicated place and
plenty of brilliant minds are
on both sides of the law. Just when we
think we’ve armed ourselves with smart
passwords and digital savvy, scammers, spammers or hackers figure out
yet another way to throw a wrench into
things.
Here are a seven simple ways to protect your social media accounts from
the most common issues while being a
good neighbour to people in your social
networks:
you store your password someplace safe
so you can remember it.)
passwords will contain a combination of
upper- and lower-case letters, symbols
and numbers, are at least eight characters, do not spell anything and are not
used on other accounts. Better to have
“fhs239(ASTERISK)(GY9&mjg” as a terribly inconvenient password and never
have an account breach than to have an
easily remembered password and have
your account compromised. (Just be sure
recently-updated security features, be
sure to upgrade all browsers on your
computer to the most recent version. The
reason this is important: current browsers will have more up-to-date security
features to help fortify any weak points
within that browser that may be an access
point. Spending a few minutes with this
task now can save a lot of headache later.
1. Update accounts with unique,
complex passwords. Ideally, updated
2. Review apps and add-ons
regularly. Be sure to review all apps and
add-ons associated with your social media
accounts at regular intervals, as each app
and add-on is a potential access point for a
security breach. Remove apps and add-ons
you no longer use. In the event of a compromised account, immediately revoke
access of apps and add-ons to further
protect your accounts. Always use strong,
unique passwords for apps, add-ons and
other account extensions, too.
3. Make sure your browsers are
current. To ensure access to the most
4. Use common sense when
6. Watch for Facebook “like”
scams. Facebook will generally alert you
via a pop-up window and ask you to confirm your actions if it is not confident in a
link you are accessing. If you have already
mistakenly clicked on a link that added
to your “likes and interests” on Facebook, you will need to edit your interests
on your profile and remove any links to
spam sites you may have acquired. Do
this by selecting “edit my profile” by your
profile image. Next, click “likes and interests” and remove anything suspicious. If
you see something strange coming from
the Facebook account of someone else,
you know what I’m going to say: be a
“Facebook friend” in the best sense and
let the account-holder know.
7. Make sure your anti-virus software is current. Enough said.
Ultimately, the common-sense rules
that apply to living also apply here: If you
see something weird, speak up. If someone is in trouble, give them a hand. If it’s
too good to be true, it very well may be.
Take time to care for yourself and your
things.
From the director of Monster’s Ball and The Kite Runner
Hope is the greatest weapon of all
Based on the story of Sam Chides
and his efforts to save
children brutalised by the LRA
ON BLU-RAY & DVD APRIL 11
©Roadshow Entertainment 2012
bookcase
BOOKS EDITOR | michael morrissey
Challenging The Sign
THE SIGN: The Shroud of Turin and
the Secret of the Resurrection
Thomas De Wesselow
Viking, $37
It seems only yesterday that I
was reading in my Commentary
on the Catechism that there were
two Rationalist (ie secular/heretical) explanations for Jesus’s Resurrection: the Swoon theory and
the Hallucination theory. The
Swoon theory has a battered,
scourged and crucified Christ
lurching out of the tomb thereby
laying the foundation for the
“myth” of his Resurrection.
Even that arch theological nineteenth century sceptic David
Strauss thought this argument
weak. The Hallucination theory
has it that Mary Magdalene, Peter, Doubting Thomas not to
mention Paul plus 500 witnesses were all hallucinating. Perhaps
they had had a magic mushroom omelette before breakfast or
had been drinking too much red wine?
The atheists too have been bringing up some supposedly
heavy artillery – The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins and
God is Not Great by Christopher Hitchens. Both works are
energetically shallow but have enjoyed considerable current
popularity because of the prestige of their not unintelligent
though ultimately dumb authors. Dawkins is a prime case of
scientific arrogance. He thinks science has revealed how the
universe works and in his view no God is needed to create it.
Apart from Dawkins’s foolishly confident atheism, students
of the history of science may recall that around 1890 scientists
thought they had successfully grasped the grand plan of the
universe and all they had to do was colour in a few remaining
spaces. Yeah, right.
The late nineteenth century scientists thought they had the
universe sussed until Einstein came along. Placing this presumptive scientific attitude in a wider context, imagine if in
Galileo’s day (early 17 th century) scientists thought they
knew how the universe operated after the intrepid Italian had
gleefully discovered the four moons of Jupiter with the newly
invented telescope.. At the latest count, the number of Jupiterean moons is 66. The point at issue is that in five hundred years
time, our contemporary science will seem as primitive to the
scientists of 2600 AD as the science of Galileo’s time now seems
to us. Dawkins should grab his pension, have a gin and tonic
and shut up about God. Every time he opens his mouth, he puts
his foot in it deep enough to lethally damage his tonsils, not to
mention his larynx.
Theologians (who should know better) have had their faith
white-anted either by the Devil (the father of fibs) or through
their own arrogance – Bishop Spong and Lloyd Geering are
prime examples. These know-all dog collars have taken a soft,
watered down, milquetoast view of Jesus Christ and God. In
Geering’s not unsophisticated view, delivered in a slipper-soft
voice – no fanatic he! – the eternal life promised by Christ exists
in the profane now and not in the Sacred Eternal Moment which
is only to be truly experienced after death. Geering has invented
his own theological time machine and it’s about as valid as a
grandfather clock that one day will fail to strike. In short, he is
saying Jesus Christ, the Second Person of the divine trinity made
Man, is no more than man. Heresy, anyone?
And let it be said that the Devil aka Satan is not a guy with
a red skin and a pair of horns but a spirit, i.e. a being with no
body and possessed of super human intelligence. He is said
capable of producing simulacra of human beings, taking over
human personalities without them being aware of it, interfering
with telecommunications, simulating fake telephone calls, and
warping human minds so that they think Christ is not God but
a feisty carpenter who got into trouble with the Romans and
that his Resurrection consisted of nothing more than a startling
image on a piece of cloth which we now know as the Shroud
of Turin. The scariest portrait of the diabolical is in The Devil
Rides Out by Dennis Wheatley published in 1935.
Heresy is just another name for lies or deviations from
theological truth. Atheists have their shrunken heads buried in
eschatological sand and yet one day, as St Paul says, they will
see clearly and not through a glass darkly.
Let us not forget that the nineteenth century was also ripe
with clever non believers – from the formidable but wrongheaded Nietzsche (God is dead!) to theologian David Strauss to
the vigorous rationalist Robert Ingersoll. And as well as God
deniers, we now have Holocaust deniers and moon deniers
who believe that a waving flag proves that a 3000-ton rocket
never lifted off from the John F Kennedy Space Centre and
never landed on the powdery surface of the moon. Historical
knowledge has become a moveable feast in which (to temporarily mix a metaphor), the goal posts are shifted without warning
every five minutes by either a deluded conspiracy blogger, or
what’s worse, by an academic with his brain on fire with a new
theory in which evidence is selected not according to scientific
principle but as tendentiously as a Nazi eugenicist arbitrarily
HIS/mindfuel
deciding who shall live and who shall die. The same sceptical
put-on (or put down) has been laid at Alexander the Great’s
feet (“He never existed!”) and I’m waiting with epistemological
dread for some ambitious academic on the make with a shock/
schlock horror theory to allege that Genghis Khan, Napoleon
Bonaparte and Adolf Hitler never existed. You read it here first.
Which brings us to Thomas de Wesselow, who, unlike the
Risen Christ he is so eager to consign to myth, presumably
exists. There is no doubt de Wesselow writes with considerable
intelligence, lucidity and with a plenitude of scholarly footnotes. However, the presentation of his evidence for a nonRisen Christ often uses tautologous or brutally reductionist
arguments that are as filled with holes as a kitchen colander.
In essence, de Wesselow’s thesis is simple – the Shroud of
Turn, widely considered a medieval forgery, is real and it was its
presence in the tomb that led Mary Magdalene, Peter plus the
apostles and disciples and later, Paul, to believe that Christ had
risen from the dead.
De Wesselow uses some straw man arguments, eg he presents
a weak case for the opposition then proceeds to knock it down
with triumphant gusto. The belief in the Shroud is characterised as being on a par with “silly-season subjects such as
Atlantis, yetis and UFOs”. Yet the author crows to the contrary,
the Shroud “very definitely exists”. If this is an argument for
authenticity, I am – to quote the unfailingly witty David Lange
– a six stone ballerina in a tutu. Nonetheless, as de Wesselow
gets into his laborious yet vigorous stride, his long and complicated arguments for the Shroud’s authenticity are convincing.
It’s the Shroud as Risen Christ that sticks in the craw.
His contention that images are often treated as living beings
seems weak in the case of the Resurrected Christ. When it
suits him, de Wesselow simply discards what the Bible says and
repeats ad nauseam his Shroud theory. His arguments are like a
gramophones stuck on a repeating chord. The testimony of the
risen Christ, he writes, hangs on a “slender thread”. What is so
slender about 500 witnesses?
De Wesselow repeats the unproven allegations that Jesus
came from a large family, that James was his brother rather
than his cousin, and that old Bloodline chestnut that Mary
Magdalene was Jesus’s widow – all of these contentions are
unoriginal and unproven.
When Luke refers to Christ eating a piece of broiled fish
– proof that the “spook” is very much flesh and blood, Wesselow calmly declares, “Obviously a great deal of the narrative – including the eating and speaking – is fictional.” Excuse
me? If the Deity exists and I, along with millions of Christians
affirm and believe He does, than why should a demonstration
of his physical return by eating a piece of fish be fictional? It is
only “fictional” because non believer de Wesselow believes it is
fictional. And this is hardly proof.
It is with St Paul that de Wesselow’s rampant scepticism
surges past the post like a stallion on steroids: “Paul then did
not see a bright light, did not fall to the ground, did not hear a
voice calling him, did not go blind, and did not get led away by
his companions:: these elements of Luke’s story all derive from
scriptures. If we bracket them out, we are left with virtually
nothing: the story is little more than a tissue of literary allu-
sions.” (Italics mine). But like most of de Wesselow’s arguments,
blind faith is required to sustain their unproven veracity while
proof is sadly lacking. The evidence of subsequent astronomical
observation supported Einstein’s theories; de Wesselow has no
evidence other than myopic declaration.
Here is de Wesselow at his most fatuous: “The conversion of
Paul is the single most striking proof of the reality of the Resurrection phenomena. Surely, only an ‘objective vision’ as startling
and incontestable as the Shroud could have transformed a rabid
inquisitor into a fervent heretic overnight”. Really? How about
the conversion experience as exactly described in the Bible?
Wouldn’t that be just as powerful if not more so than the Shroud?
De Wesselow stubbornly persists: “Paul’s words strongly suggest that what he saw was the Shroud.” I am waiting vainly for
proof of this preposterous claim. In like manner, de Wesselow
tells us, “There can no longer be any doubt the Shroud provides
a visible solution to the age-old puzzle of the Resurrection.” Of
course, if you are a believer, there is no puzzle. There is only
gratitude and awe.
De Wesselow’s theory is sometimes blatantly circular and
tautologous: “The Shroud has another major advantage: it takes
account of the Shroud.” The blatant circularity of this statement
makes it ludicrous. You cannot prove an assertion by merely
repeating the same assertion. This is logic-less logic.
What de Wesselow forgets overall, is that if God made the
universe, He can breach its rules any time He likes. He can
suspend the earth’s spinning, arrange virgin births and ordain
that the Son of Man return from the dead. De Wesselow’s
aggressive secularity omits the Divine. He treats the Bible as a
human document filled with human error which he alone has
the authority to correct. Maybe it is not erroneous at all, but
factual. In any event, de Wesselow’s theory about the Shroud
remains just that – a non sustainable theory.
Imagine two sardines arguing the pros and cons of the existence of a giant blue whale. Just as their erroneous arguments
for the non existence of such an improbable creature reach their
apogee, the tiny fish are swallowed whole and disappear into the
monster’s maw. In like manner, Christopher Hitchens, who I do
not believe to have been a bad man, rather a deluded and sincere
one, may even as we speak, be jostled by the company of benign
angels and enjoying a mercifully allotted measure of the Beatific
Vision to console him ever afterward for the pain of cancer....
now there’s a thought to heat the heart. Truly is the mercy of God
infinite. So even de Wesselow may come to believe in the risen
Christ who has warmed the world with his love – the Christ who
is infinitely more than an image on a Shroud.
What de Wesselow forgets overall, is that
if God made the universe, He can breach
its rules any time He likes. He can suspend
the earth’s spinning, arrange virgin births
and ordain that the Son of Man return
from the dead
consider this
amy brooke
The primary school years are the most
important to stimulate children’s intellectual
curiosity, awaken them imaginatively, and to
teach them, essentially, to be good people
“The Captain and the
Kings” long gone…
I
s it is no exaggeration that the greatest enemy for any prospect of a firstclass education for New Zealand children
– regardless of the usual excuses for some
succeeding more than others – ( ethnicity,
particularly activist Maori background, and
parents’ socio-economic status) has been the
bureaucracy of “professional” educationists misusing their positions to inflict their
socio-political agenda on our young.
This has now been the case for the past
50 years in this country. What was once a
well-thought, solidly-constructed, coherent curriculum underpinning all education
practice became subverted in the hands of
educational theorists who gained control of
the Department, now Ministry of Education,
headed by those responsible for forward
planning, many of whom openly described
themselves as neo-Marxist. Their names
can be found in the literature of the 60s
onwards.
Socio-economic status really has very little
to do with a child’s chances to succeed –
provided of course that it is taught enthusiastically and well. We should stress taught,
not diverted to flounder around accessing
the internet and having to perform tedious,
mind-numbing tasks such as embarking on
projects which relieve the teacher of the hard
work of actually teaching well-prepared lessons, following quality planning.
It is true that deadbeat parents are a great
hindrance to any child – and among these
can certainly be found, sadly, activist or
gullible Maori parents brainwashed by the
anti-European politicised Maori activists
of the 60s onwards, many of whom themselves had the advantage of scholarships and
university-backed education – today holding
lucrative political, professional, or mediacentred positions – but who did enormous
damage to disadvantaged Maoris by telling them to have nothing to do with the
“Pakeha” system of education. This ill advice
persists in the constant push to appropriate young part-Maori for Maori immersion
schools with their fantasy-Maori language
(how does one legitimately teach chemistry,
physics, math, microbiology, dentistry and
medicine in spurious, newly invented but
pseudo-Maori?).
The hijacking of our state schools by socalled education professionals – (I noted
when at university that these were very
largely students and staff, often earnest and
well-meaning, who would not have made
the grade taking the hard choices of far
more demanding courses – they were not,
essentially, rocket scientists) – was highly
destructive.
In the Twenties and Thirties when the
Training Colleges’ far more demanding
course requirements earned them a respect
equivalent to the universities, highly intelligent individuals with good degrees opted
for teaching as a genuine vocation. I recall
my father, John Mora, a gifted, well-loved
headmaster who had previously turned
down the opportunity to lecture at Canter-
HIS/mindfuel
bury University because of his genuine love for the young, his
appreciation of their vitality, intelligence, and enormous intellectual curiosity – all of which – like other highly enthusiastic
teachers – he thought it a joy to foster, to help them as far as
possible along their way.
When my parents taught at what were then the Native Schools
along the east coast of the North Island, his enjoyment of the
spontaneity and keen intelligence of the young Maori children
of the school-house Pa caused him many years later to proudly
recollect that they had sent as many promising youngsters as
possible down to the universities and training colleges. He also
deeply regretted the government decree (in response to the
senior Maori delegation that went to Parliament to request this)
that the children were no longer permitted to speak Maori at
school. His puzzled query to a local Maori elder, Sam Aupouri,
brought the response that the elders wished the children to gain
the same advantage as the other children from speaking English
as a first language. When my father enquired what would happen to Maori as a result, he was confidently informed that they
would teach the children Maori at home.
We know the result. All New Zealand taxpayers, of no matter
what ethnic descent, are forced to pay many millions of dollars
annually for the promotion of the far from authentic, newly
invented pseudo-Maori of minimal use to young Maori, now
used as tools by politicised iwi in their increasing push for separatism, media limelight, and ongoing taxpayer funding – provisions which formed no part whatever of the intentions behind
the signing of the treaty of Waitangi.
The failure rate of so many part-Maori children can be
directly attributed to the substantially inferior education foisted
on our young for decades now by the ministry, together with
the agenda of politicised Maori persuading parents to bypass
mainstream education – instead of joining those working to
re-establish a state education system to hold its own against
those countries performing far better. These did not include
other English-speaking countries such as the US, the UK, and
Australia – all of which inherited the consequences of education
becoming the tool of those interconnecting groups, worldwide,
which long recognised the most effective way to subvert and
bring down Western democracy was through the now wellquoted “long march through the institutions.”
However, the counter-revolution worldwide has now started,
with far more success than is happening in this country, whose
very smallness counts against it. There is no doubt that we have
lost the intellectual flower of the country, not only in education
but in the writers and artists in-groups dominated by the far
Left, well supported by their contrived government funding,
motivated by the politics of envy, and long working to bypass
or ostracise genuine talent. We are all well aware of how out of
touch are the leftist teachers unions, dominated by what can
best be described as Lenin’s useful fools, implacably opposed
still, to that rigorous quality education which gives all children,
as far as possible, an equal opportunity, from the age of five
upwards, each to achieve his or her potential to achieve.
In this respect, the primary school years are the most
important to stimulate children’s intellectual curiosity, awaken
them imaginatively, and to teach them, essentially, to be good
people, using all the tools available from the treasure house of
fascinating discoveries passed down through generations, and
in particular celebrating the best of the wonderful poetry and
literature which continually evokes joy in the minds of those
fortunate enough to have been given these gifts – when once we
did have quality education.
Its day has long passed. Contrast when children are allowed
to come in late to lessons…when a teacher can be faced with
a sexual harassment suit for asking a girl pupil what has kept
her…when children are allowed to chat pretty much unchecked
throughout lessons…a teacher allowed to make a generalised
appeal, but not to single out a talker by name...
With dumbed-down, politicised English classes having
become media studies under the excuse of “communications ”;
with teacher training focusing on the politics of race or gender
and class; when university graduates with Ph.Ds can’t spell,
punctuate correctly, or write a coherent essay, we are faced with
the social and economic costs, the intellectual impoverishment
of cheated individuals unable even to speak without sounding
uncouth, a universe of great writing and thinking long withheld
from them.
Our own counter-revolution is well overdue. But where, faced
with our also profoundly ignorant and under-educated teachers, are there now the genuinely knowledgeable to lead it?
© Amy Brooke
www.amybrooke.co.nz
www.100days.co.nz
www.summersounds.co.nz
http://www.livejournal.com/users/brookeonline/

InvestigateDaily

Transcription

Similar documents

December - Kiwi Muslim Directory

Tunnel Tour - Mersey Tunnels

0800 804 737 Email:[email protected]

Spring 2015 - Marlborough District Libraries

erspective - De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde

PA-MAN-CRAWL-00 (Crawl Tube)

March Intouch 2014 - New Zealand Tertiary College

Pioneering Oxy-Gasoline Cutting Systems

fireplace

Massive developments for Vuda, Fiji