2005 - Shepton Mallet Town Council

Transcription

Minutes of the Planning Recommendations Committee Meeting held on
Tuesday 20 December 2005 in the MDC Committee Room, Cannards
Grave Road, Shepton Mallet.
Present:
Chairman - Cllr T Fone
Cllr’s Bartlett, Cann, Inchley, Marsh, O’Connor, Robinson and Shearn.
One member of the public, Mr Terry Marsh, and no members of the press were in attendance.
127.
Public Forum
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Bartlett, by unanimous vote, that the
meeting is adjourned for the purpose of transacting the matter of public forum.
Application No. 118803/000 – 8 Kyte Road – Mr Terry Marsh, the applicant, provided a
summary of his application for the erection of a dwelling, outline, which was identical to the one
recently granted to No. 4 Kyte Road, but which involved a larger plot. Regarding the covenant,
he would be writing to the Trustees of the Recreational Ground Trust (Collett Park) and would
expect the same response that had been afforded to the applicants of No. 4 Kyte Road in that
the Town Council and Trustees did not have any interest in the address or area in question.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Bartlett, by unanimous vote, that the
meeting now be brought back into session.
128.
Apologies for absence
Cllrs Champion (family), Jeremiah (family), Lockey (family), Lovell (community) and Manvill
(family)
Resolve: by a unanimous vote that the above Apologies are accepted.
129.
Members Declarations of Interest
Application 118803/000 – 8 Kyte Road – All members declared a Personal & NonPrejudicial Interest in the matter due to the fact that the applicant was a fellow councillor, with
the exception of Cllrs Inchley, O’Connor and Marsh who all declared a Personal & Prejudicial
Interest in the matter, and would leave the room when the matter was being considered. and
Cllr Robinson who also declared a Personal & Prejudicial Interest in the matter, as she was a
close neighbour of the applicant,
Application 118804/000 – 9 Bishop Cresent – Cllr Fone declared a Personal & NonPrejudicial Interest in the matter as the applicant was an associate.
Application 085172/007PG29 – 17 Waterloo Road – Cllr Inchley declared a Personal &
Prejudicial Interest in the matter and would leave the room at the appropriate point.
Tesco 106 Monies – Cllr Inchley declared a Personal & Prejudicial Interest in the matter as he
had complained to a third party as to how the 106 money had been arranged.
Resolve; by a unanimous vote that all declarations are noted and recorded.
130.
Minutes
The Minutes of the Meeting held on the 29 November 2005 were considered for accuracy and
content.
Resolve; Proposed by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that the Minutes of the Planning
Recommendations Committee made at the meeting held on the 29 November 2005, be
approved as a true record and signed by the Chairman.
1
131.
Matters Arising
No matters were raised.
132.
a)
Plans: 118803/000
Dahm
Mr & Mrs T Marsh,
8 Kyte Road
Erection of dwelling – outline (DEL)
Outline
Cllrs Marsh, Inchley & O’Connor then left the meeting. The Clerk
bought to the Chairman’s attention the fact that the meeting was now
not quorum and that the only option, given the required timescale by
the District Council, was for the Chairman and Vice-Chairman, in
consultation with the Clerk, to make an executive decision and report it
to the January meeting of Council. All members still at the meeting
agreed to this course of action and the matter was deferred.
Resolve:
By unanimous vote, that the matter be deferred.
Cllrs Marsh, Inchley & O’Connor then rejoined the meeting.
b)
c)
118804/000
Mrs K Taylor
Mr & Mrs B
Applegate,
9 Bishop Crescent
Single storey rear extension (DEL)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Bartlett, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous
vote - Recommend Approval.
085172/007
PG29
Jarrold
Mr B C Tothill,
17 Waterloo Road
Works to Ash tree in a Conservation
Area (DEL)
Full
CA
Tree
Works
Cllr Inchley then left the meeting.
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Bartlett, seconded by Cllr Robinson, by unanimous
vote - Recommend Approval, subject to agreement of the MDC Tree
Officer.
Cllr Inchley then rejoined the meeting.
d)
e)
049235/015
PG29
Jarrold
Mr M G Ash,
The Old Surgery,
Leg Square
Felling of Mountain Ash and works to
a Cedar and Ornamental Cherry tree
in a Conservation Area (DEL)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Shearn, seconded by Cllr Marsh, with a vote of 6 For &
1 Abstention - Recommend Approval.
106151/012
Kimberley
Brothers Drinks
Co. Ltd.,
Commercial Road
Variation of condition 11 on consent
106151/009 – to allow HGVs to enter
& leave the premises between 7am &
7pm Mon to Fri, retain Sat hours
8am-1pm (DEL)
CA
Felling
Trees
Variat’n
of Condit’n(s)
Members’ initial consideration was that the application should be
rejected. It was considered that the applicant had let everyone down
and had not managed within existing conditions, and complaints had
been received from neighbours. Members were much concerned that,
although the sound levels of lorry movement were minimal, this
application would cause loading of the lorries to start early and finish
later, and in which case would involve the noise of forklifts, which was
shown on the survey to be quite prominent. The vote to recommend
Refusal of Permission was proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr
Inchley, with a vote of 3 For & 5 Against, and was subsequently lost.
2
Resolve:
f)
g)
012580/029
Taylor
Proposed by Cllr Shearn, seconded by Cllr Cann, with a vote of 6 For &
2 Against - Recommend Approval, subject to a strong requirement that
this must be vigorously and robustly enforced. A strong rider needs to
be attached to the condition stating that this should be for an initial 6month period and reviewed to ensure successful management and
compliance with the new conditions, and that further consultation
takes place with neighbours of the premise.
Bridgeman Ltd
Land rear of 1416 High Street
Demolition of Building (del)
LBCdemolit
ion
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Robinson, seconded by Cllr Cann, by unanimous vote
- Recommend Approval.
012580/030
Taylor
Bridgeman Ltd
Land rear of 1416 High Street
Erection/Replacement
Building
form 2 x 2-bed flats (Del)
to
Full
Members raised concern as to this development possibly compromising
future developments to the Little Ostry site and that also there was nil
parking facilities provided.
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Bartlett, seconded by Cllr Marsh, with a vote of 6 For &
2 Abstentions - Recommend Refusal of Permission. The development
compromised future development to the rear of the property in Little
Ostry and there was a total lack of any car parking facility for this
development.
133.
MDC Decisions not in accord with SMTC Recommendation
a.
105678/003 Former Salvation Army Hall, Board Cross – Conversion of existing to
form two dwellings - SMTC Proceed 8/11/05, MDC Refused
b.
018603/001 - 37 Garston Street – Erection of satellite dish to front elevation - SMTC
Proceed 30/8/05, MDC Refused
c.
10052/001PG29 - 85 Finch Close – Proposed Felling of 2 trees covered by TPO
M202 - SMTC Refused 27/9/05, MDC Split Decision issued
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Cann, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that the matter
is noted.
134. SCC Plan Ref PC/030955/013/LE – Erection of Chain Link Fencing, Shepton
Community Infants School, Waterloo Road
An application for consultation purposes had been received directly from Somerset County
Council.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Cann, by unanimous vote, recommend
application should be approved.
135.
Tesco 106 Monies
A summary had been received from Les Kimberley of Mendip District Council regarding the very
complex agreement and conditions for provision of the 106 monies arising from the
development in Townsend, and members were requested to note the content especially the
Council’s Resolve to relocation of the War Memorial. Cllr Bartlett requested that the Clerk obtain
an e-file copy and distribute to members.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Cann, by unanimous vote, that the above matter is noted.
3
136.
Confidential Session - Swimming Pool
The Chairman requested members to consider a late item as a matter of urgency which
required resolve to the District Council prior to 3 January 2006, and that the matter should be
dealt with confidentially.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Cann, by unanimous vote, that the above
matter receive consideration and that the Committee move into Confidential Session. At this
point in time there were no members of the public or press in attendance.
Members were provided with an update from the Chairman of the Council, and the Clerk,
regarding the confidential meeting which took place with the District Council on Friday, 16
December 2005, regarding scope of the project and contractual matters.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Cann, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, 7 For & 1 Against, that Council
had previously resolved to fund the project to a capital sum of £350,000, but that the additional
sum held in the budget heading arising from interest accruing up to the full total of the fund,
which was estimated to balance as at 31 March 2006 in the region of £375,000, is, in principle,
allocated to the project but that, when the contract is finalised, the Town Council wish to
resolve a list of enhancement items which may have been excluded from the final scope of the
project to which the extra funding would allow for their inclusion within the project. However
the Council would require a comprehensive list and individual costings for the items which the
Project Board were proposing to omit due to their current budget limitation.
137.
Agenda Matters for the Next Meeting
Members were informed that the next meeting is to be included within the pilot of meetings to
take place between January and May 2006, the first of which would be included within full
Council on 3 January 2006 at The Salvation Army Rooms. No matters were raised.
Resolve: by unanimous vote that the matter is noted
The Chairman thanked members for their attendance and closed the meeting at 8.00pm.
Councillor R Champion
Signature______________________
Chairman
Date_________________ ______2006
4
Minutes of the Planning Recommendations
Committee Meeting held on Tuesday 11 January
2005 in the MDC Committee Room, Cannards
Present: Chairman - Cllr R. R. Champion
Cllrs Fone, Gilham, Lockey, Lovell, O’Connor and Shearn.
The following members also attended the meeting at 7.35pm, following a prior meeting
with MDC Cabinet Board: Cllrs Bartlett, Inchley and Jeremiah.
Janet Wilson, Planning Services Manager, Mendip District Council
One member of the public and no members of the press were in attendance.
136. Apologies for absence
Cllrs Bartlett, Inchley and Jeremiah provided their Apologies that they would be late due to attendance at
a prior MDC Cabinet Board meeting, regarding matters relating to the Swimming Pool. Cllr Marsh also
provided her apologies (work).
Resolve; by a unanimous vote that the above Apologies are accepted.
137.
Public Forum
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote, that the meeting is adjourned for the purpose
of Public Forum.
Development Land at Maxwell Road/Westway Lane
Mr Stride informed the meeting that the saga with development by Her Majesty’s Prison Service had been
on-going since the Year 2000 and the previous MDC Officer, Mr Derek Hooper, had been dealing with the
matter and ensured that each area of development would be dealt with separately. Mr Stride also
confirmed that removal of the footpath and felling of trees would have to take place to accommodate the
development and hoped that he could see the true current position tonight with Janet Wilson in
attendance.
Possible Unauthorised Development of Compton Road
Mr Stride had previously reported to the Council, which had been passed on to MDC, that it appeared that
there was a development going on within Compton Road which included services and development of
foundations, of which he was certain that no planning authorisation had been given, and he requested
Janet Wilson to look into the matter.
There being no other speaker in Public Forum, it was proposed by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote, that
the meeting now be brought back into session.
138.
Application No. 049286/006 – Bristol & West – Cllr Gilham declared a Personal, Non-Prejudicial Interest
as he was a customer, and Cllr Inchley declared a Personal, Non-Prejudicial Interest due to his father
being a customer.
Application No. 113576/004PG29 – Mr C Bounds, 57 Barrington Place – Cllr Gilham declared a Personal,
Non-Prejudicial Interest as the applicant is a social contact.
Resolve; by a unanimous vote that all the above declarations are noted and recorded.
1
139. Janet Wilson, Planning Services Manager – MDC – Planning Policy/Delegation Criteria and MDC
Decisions Not in Accord with SMTC Recommendations
The Chairman welcomed Janet Wilson to the meeting and confirmed that the majority of matters to be
discussed had been advised previously. He wished discussion to be conducted in an informal manner in
lieu of, say, a formal speech and questions thereafter, which was unanimously agreed.
There followed a one-hour discussion with members. Previous applications which were not in accord with
SMTC’s recommendations were discussed as followed:a)
York House Development – SMTC considered it was an over-crowded, over-prominent
environment and representative of a fire hazard due to restricted access.
b)
Waterloo Road School – Application refused on grounds of stonework finish.
c)
Longbridge Development – Refused by MDC.
SMTC had requested a brief to cover all the above three applications. Janet Wilson provided reasons for
each of the decisions and considered that, as the decisions had now been made, it would be a good
exercise to review the procedures and communication between all parties. Janet Wilson then provided
suggestions of the Town Council liaising directly with MDC Case Officers and improvement of
communication between both the Councils. Janet further advised the meeting of future e-commerce
initiatives and improvements to systems and databases, both in the short and long term. In essence,
where the Town Council raised concerns/objections in reference to an application then the Town Council
should get involved, and keep involved, throughout the consultation and decision-making processes.
The Chairman raised further Planning Applications which had caused concern and which were not in
accord with SMTC’s recommendations, and received the following explanations from Janet Wilson:
a)
Henley Rise – dormer windows – Janet considered that this was a design issue and if the District
Council had refused, she considered that it would not stand up if it went to Appeal. The decision
had been delegated to Ward Members and perhaps the Town Council should foster better liaison
with Ward Members.
b)
CCTV – Police Station – Janet confirmed that it was within a Conservation Area and that these
areas had concerns in design terms.
c)
NatWest Bank – Disabled Access – Janet confirmed that insufficient information had been
provided by the applicant and, despite requests, no additional information had been forthcoming.
Cllrs Bartlett, Inchley and Jeremiah then joined the meeting.
d)
Woodland Farm Development – Janet confirmed that the District Council had to take in previously
approved applications, and only had to make a decision on review of proposed amendments.
e)
Highwayman Public House/Housing Development in the Car Park – Janet Wilson confirmed
that this was outside policy development area.
f)
10 Nightingale Close – Conservatory – The Chairman informed that this matter was now going to
appeal and, again, queried why MDC had granted applications for much the same development on
similar properties on the same estate. Janet Wilson could not comment on this matter without
further information and, again, requested Town Council to interact with Case Officers.
g)
Westway Lane/Maxwell Road Development – Janet confirmed that Simon Gale, the Case Officer,
was aware of the Town Council’s concern and there had been no information yet provided back to
the Town Council, and Janet confirmed that she will request Simon Gale to liaise with the Clerk
next week on the matter.
h)
Millbrook Lorry Park – Janet Wilson again confirmed that she was unable to comment as she did
not have the facts with her at this point in time, but would look into the matter and inform the Clerk.
Janet Wilson and members at the meeting then had brief discussions regarding concerns as to MDC’s
Scheme of Delegation regarding planning matters.
The Chairman thanked Janet Wilson for her attendance and discussions, comments of which were
supported by all members at the meeting. Janet Wilson then left the meeting.
2
140.
Minutes
The Minutes of the Meeting held on the 14 December 2004 were considered for accuracy and content.
Cllr Inchley indicated correction to a spelling error on Minute No. 134.1, whereby the “r” had to be
removed from the spelling of “Kyte Road”.
Resolve; Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote, that the Minutes of
the Planning Recommendations Committee made at the meeting held on the 14 December 2004, be
141.
Matters Arising
142.
1.
Plans: 049286/006
Resolve:
2.
118110/000
Bristol & West,
2 no. new shopfront windows allowing
Bristol & West, 32 High
change of entrance for disabled access Full
Street
(DEL)
Proposed by Cllr Bartlett, seconded by Cllr Lockey, with a vote of 7 For & 0
Against - Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed. Council
considered that disabled access is most desirable for the community.
Mr N Coleman,
59 Cornwall Road
Erection of antenna on existing mast (DEL)
Full
The Chairman considered that there was already a mast in situ and that the new
proposed mast could be reduced or taken down in stormy or severe weather.
3.
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Lockey, with a vote of 8 For & 1
Abstention - Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
110819/011
The Royal Bank of
Scotland,
Natwest, 25 High Street
Resolve:
4.
5.
6.
Internal and external alterations in
LBC –
association with the creation of a new
alter/
entrance including the erection of signage
extend
(DEL)
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
103894/001
Mr C Brown,
74 Shaftgate Avenue
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
104694/004
Mr K Newton,
The Old Rectory,
Church Lane
Erection of conservatory to rear (DEL)
Full
Single storey extension to provide orangery
(DEL)
Full
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Gilham, seconded by Cllr Lockey, with a vote of 8 For & 1
Against - Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
012580/024
Mr K Haskins,
Land and buildings at
café and garage
workshop (DEL)
Repair and rebuilding of café and garage
workshop (DEL)
Full
Members raised much concern and considered that the Committee should be
minded to refuse and that a Planning Brief was required for the whole area. If this
development was to proceed it would conflict with access to, and the viability of, any
future development in the adjoining area, which also included Little Ostry. Members
considered that the Council should ask for an extension to seek further information
from the Planning Case Officer at MDC and to defer the matter until the next
Planning Recommendations meeting programmed for 25 January 2005.
3
7.
8.
143.
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Gilham, seconded by Cllr Champion, by unanimous vote –
That the Committee is minded for the application not to proceed, however to
request MDC to undertake a Planning Brief for the whole area, including Little
Ostry, and to provide the Town Council with an extension of time to further
consider the application which would allow for discussions with MDC’s
Planning Case Officer, and for further consideration to take place at the next
meeting of the Planning Recommendations Committee programmed for 25
January 2005.
113576/004
PG29
Mr C Bounds,
57 Barrington Place
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Lovell, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should not be allowed to proceed. The Committee
could see no legitimate reason for felling of these trees.
026727/011
PG29
David Braybon,
Anglo Trading Estate
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, with a vote of 7 For &
2 Abstentions – That, upon site inspection, it was clear that this work had
already taken place. The Council deemed this to be a most serious matter,
especially within a Conservation Area, and to request the District Council to
take appropriate and decisive action and to further advise the Town Council
of their intentions.
Works to and felling of trees covered by
area TPO M343 (DEL)
TPO
Works
Felling of a Horse Chestnut tree in a
conservation area (DEL)
CA
Felling
Trees
The Chairman reported that, during his site visit with the Vice-Chairman, it appeared
that the work had already been undertaken and there were particles of sawdust in
the area on the Plan where the tree had been situated.
a) 105941/041 Tesco Stores Ltd, Mendip Avenue – Erection of temporary garden centre marquee
SMTC Proceed 1/12/04, MDC Refused
b) 111584/003PG29 C Sellar, 18 Tallowood – Felling of two Horse Chestnut Trees
SMTC Refused 1/12/04, MDC Granted
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that both the above matters are noted.
144.
Application No. 115820/001 Mr & Mrs Hoskins, 10 Nightingale Grove. – Appeal Against MDC’s
Refusal.
Members were informed that the Application was going to Appeal and comments had to be received by
18 January 2005.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that the Committee take no further action.
145.
Application No. 101205/002 Development to the Rear of 59 High Street, Shepton Mallet
MDC had advised, following granting of planning permission, that the development would now be 3 no.
2-bed courtyard dwellings. The previous proposal was for 2 no. 2-bed and 1 no. 1-bed courtyard
dwellings. At the same time the development would be given the name of “Park Court”.
Resolve: By unanimous vote, that the matter is noted.
146.
New Street Name – Blackberry Close, and Renumbering of Properties in Little Brookes Lane
Members were informed of the renumbering of existing houses in Little Brookes Lane and also a new
street name of Blackberry Close for 4 new dwellings.
Resolve: By unanimous vote that the matter is noted.
4
147. Formal Registration of Street Name – Buckler Way
Members were informed by MDC that the new access road to Shepton Mallet Community Hospital had
now been formally named Buckler Way. Members raised much concern that this did not read correctly
and that, at previous consultation, the Town Council had proposed, and indeed requested Mendip, that
this be called “Buckler’s Way”.
Resolve: By unanimous vote, that Mendip District Council is requested to re-name the access road to
Shepton Mallet Community Hospital to Buckler’s Way in agreement with the previous consultation and the
Town Council’s request following that consultation.
148. Griggs & Huntsman Site Regeneration Update
The Chairman confirmed to members that this matter had now been transferred from the Regeneration
Portfolio and was possibly due to be considered by Mendip in February, and that currently there was no
further information.
Resolve: by unanimous vote that the matter is noted and that the Clerk contact Les Kimberley at MDC for
further information and update as promised by Les when he attended the previous meeting of the
Planning Recommendations Committee held in November.
149.
Proposed Swimming Pool Upgrade to Lido
Cllr Inchley updated members to his attendance, along with two other members, at a concurrent meeting
of MDC Cabinet who considered the matter. He confirmed that the District Council had, by unanimous
decision, agreed with the proposal to progress and upgrade the current Outdoor Pool at Shaftgate Avenue
into a Lido facility, and that it would fund the capital cost in partnership with the funding by the Town
Council and that MDC would also undertake increased on-going revenue costs for the facility. The District
Council would now contact the Town Council in the near future to set up a Steering Group to work up
details of the scheme. Cllr Inchley informed the meeting that he had spoken at the meeting of the Cabinet
and made it clear to the District Council that the Town Council was looking for a quality scheme and that
the Town Council would not fund any current or on-going revenue costs applicable to the facility.
Resolve: by unanimous vote that the matter is noted.
150.
Date of Next Meeting
Programmed Tuesday 25 January 2005 at 7.00pm.
Councillor Mr R. R. Champion
Signature______________________
Chairman
Date_______________________2005
5
Committee Meeting held on Tuesday 25 January
Cllr’s Bartlett, Hurrell, Inchley, Jeremiah, Lockey, Lovell, Manvill, O’Connor T. and
Shearn.
No members of the public or press were in attendance.
Cllrs Cann, Fone, Gilham and Marsh (work), Cllr Lintern (family)
152. Public Forum
There being no members of the public in attendance, the Public Forum adjournment was not instigated.
153. Members Declarations of Interest
Application 114438/001 25 Cowl Street – Cllr Inchley declared a Personal & Prejudicial Interest as the
property may well be viewed from his residence and he would leave the meeting at the appropriate point.
Resolve; Proposed by Cllr Lockey, by a unanimous vote, that the declaration is noted and recorded.
154. Minutes
The Minutes of the Meeting held on the 11 January 2005 were considered for accuracy and content.
Resolve; Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote that the Minutes of
the Planning Recommendations Committee made at the meeting held on the 11 January 2005, be
155. Matters Arising
a)
Minute No. 142/6 - Application No. 012580/024 Haskins Land and Buildings at 14 Commercial
Road – Following the Application being deferred at the meeting of 11 January, due to insufficient
information, the Chairman had contacted the Planning Officer, Mr Sim Manley, through the Town
Council offices with the Clerk in attendance, and had received further information in that the
application was to repair and rebuild existing café and garage workshop, and therefore MDC could
see no reason why the application could be refused. Enquiries have been made with MDC
regarding Little Ostry development and they have advised that any development to Little Ostry,
access to which would be gained via Great Ostry, and that Somerset County Council had indicated
that they would refuse any possible access from this site directly onto Commercial Road, therefore
MDC considered that the Haskins application would not, therefore, land lock or be detrimental to
the future development of Little Ostry.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote, to recommend
that the application is allowed to proceed, as per existing use. The Council still wishes to raise
concern that access is still maintained for future redevelopment of the Little Ostry site.
b)
Minute No. 142/8 – Application No. 026727/011PG29 Anglo Trading Estate – Felling of Horse
Chestnut Tree – Following the Town Council’s concerns to the District Council that the application
had been submitted in retrospect, the tree had already been removed within a Conservation Area, a
detailed report of the account, in written format, was provided from MDC which the Chairman read
in full to members.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that the matter is noted.
1
c)
Minute No. 148 – Tesco’s Development – Griggs & Huntsman site - The Chairman confirmed
that an email had been received regarding progress to this application from MDC. Les Kimberley,
the Planning Officer, who had not heard back from County Highways regarding access and
transportation issues yet, and that Tescos had still not provided details regarding the retail impact
issues. He was unable to state at this point in time when he would be taking the application to the
MDC Planning Board.
d)
Minute No. 139g - Westway Lane/Maxwell Road Development – The Chairman confirmed that
the Clerk had now received a plan showing two of the development areas off Westway Lane, where
the identical planning number had been provided, which provided part explanation. However, Janet
Wilson still had more details to report, which hopefully would follow at a later stage, to the Planning
Committee’s enquiry as to the HM Prison development off Maxwell Road which had been granted
by Mendip and development was proceeding. However, the main correction was: had the 106
Agreement been achieved and instigated to allow for the widening/upgrade of Maxwell Road?
156. Plans: a)
b)
025543/004
(MDC -Mrs
G Walker)
J H Haskins & Son
Ltd.,
4 High Street
Creation of new entrance & access to
existing first floor flat (DEL)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed. It was understood that
there was an entrance, much as proposed, some time previously.
114438/001
(MDC – Mrs
E Taylor)
Mr M Shepherd,
25 Cowl Street
Full
Full
Cllr Inchley left the meeting having previously declared an Interest in the
matter.
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Lovell, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed. Materials are to be inkeeping with existing properties within Cowl Street.
Cllr Inchley then returned to the meeting.
c)
d)
118119/001
(MDC Mr C
Langford)
Coxley Developments
Renovation and replacement of shopfronts
Ltd.,
(DEL)
Full
7, 9, 11 Town Street
The Chairman apologised on behalf of the Clerk that the Full application
relating to Coxley Developments Ltd had been omitted from the Agenda.
However, as the Listed Building application had been provided on the Agenda
he proposed that both applications be dealt with this evening, which was
unanimously agreed by all members.
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed. The application was
provided with a quality specification and that the Town Council fully support
the Heritage Scheme and pass on thanks to Kim Winter and her team at MDC.
118119/001
(MDC Mr C
Langford)
Resolve:
Coxley Developments
Renovation and replacement of shopfronts LBC
Ltd.,
(DEL)
alter/
7, 9, 11 Town Street
extend
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed. The application was
provided with a quality specification and that the Town Council fully support
the Heritage Scheme and pass on thanks to Kim Winter and her team at MDC.
2
157. MDC Decisions not in accord with SMTC Recommendation
Application No. 067047/013 Focus Retail Warehouse at Fosse Lane – The above planning application
had been granted by MDC on 4 February and they had provided information that they had No Objection
to proposal to amend the plans to increase the height of the building roof and eaves by 400mm and
additional fenestrations, on the south elevation.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote that the matter is noted.
158.
Next Meeting of Properties Portfolio – Clash with Planning Presentation for the Redevelopment of
Haskins Town Centre Properties
The Chairman confirmed that most members should now have received an invite to a presentation by
Haskins regarding redevelopment proposals for many of their Town Centre properties, and this was due
to take place at the same time as the next meeting of the Properties Portfolio. Members considered it
imperative that all members attend the presentation and public consultation regarding Haskins proposals.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that the Properties
Portfolio meeting programmed for the 8 February 2005 be delayed with a start time of 8.00pm to enable
members to attend the Haskins Redevelopment Presentation which was due to start at 6.30pm on the
same day.
159. Confidential Session
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that, as no members of the Press or the Public were
present, the meeting would continue in Confidential Session.
The Chairman of the Council, Cllr Inchley, reported to members on internal personnel matters.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote, that further advice
is obtained from the relevant bodies and authorities following which appropriate action is to be undertaken
by the Clerk in consultation with, and in the attendance of, one female member of the Council.
160. Programmed Tuesday 15 February 2005 at 7.00pm.
Signature______________________
Chairman
Date_______________________2005
3
Committee Meeting held on Tuesday 15 February
Cllr’s Bartlett, Fone (7.05pm) , Gilham, Hurrell, Inchley, Lockey, Lovell, Manvill, Marsh,
O’Connor T. and Shearn.
Cllr Jeremiah
Resolve; by a unanimous vote that the above Apology is accepted.
162. Public Forum
Resolve; by a unanimous vote that the meeting be adjourned for the purpose of Public Forum
117988/001 36 Westfield. Mr Mike Harris remained concerned as to the proposed development; although
the number of properties had been reduced he would still be amazed to see the finished product.
Resolve; by a unanimous vote that the meeting be brought back into session.
Cllr O’Connor declared a personal and non prejudicial interest in all planning matters on the agenda.
Application 103735/015 – Cllr Marsh declared a personal and prejudicial interest due to her employment
with Mendip Primary Care Trust and would leave the meeting at the appropriate point.
Application 117988/001 - Cllr Gilham declared a personal and prejudicial interest due to a relative living
opposite and would leave the meeting at the appropriate point.
Application 112445/001 - Cllr Inchley declared a personal and prejudicial interest due to living in view of
the property in question and would leave the meeting at the appropriate point. Cllr Lockey declared a
personal and non-prejudicial interest in the matter.
Application 118175/000 - Cllr Inchley declared a personal and prejudicial interest due to view of the
property in question from a relative’s residence and would leave the meeting at the appropriate point.
164. Minutes
The Minutes of the Meeting held on the 25 January 2005 were considered for accuracy and content.
Resolve; Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Bartlett by unanimous vote that the Minutes of the
Planning Recommendations Committee made at the meeting held on the 25 January 2005, be approved
as a true record and signed by the Chairman.
166. Plans: a)
103735/015
(Mr L
Kimberley)
Mendip NHS PCT,
S/M Community
Hospital
Amended layout for Car Park (DEL)
Resolve:
Cllr Marsh having declared an interest earlier then left the meeting.
Full
The Clerk informed of verbal concern received regarding the orginal stone wall with
the boundary of the site and Forum Lane which was now being used as a retaining
1
wall due to a change in gound level. Members considered adequate parking for the
facility was essential.
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
Cllr Marsh then rejoined the meeting.
b)
117988/001
(Mr S
Manley)
Resolve:
c)
112445/001
PG29 (Mrs Y
Jarrold)
Resolve:
d)
067348/001
(Mr S
Manley)
Resolve:
e)
118175/000
(Mrs E
Taylor)
Resolve:
CCA Fine Homes Ltd.,
36 Westfield
Demolition of existing bungalow
replacement with 3 bungalows (DEL)
&
Full
Cllr Gilham having declared an interest earlier then left the meeting.
Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Manvill, by a vote of 9 For and 2
Against - Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed. However
concern as to possible on street parking directly on this busy highway junction.
Cllr Gilham then rejoined the meeting.
Mr G Murray,
Felling of Sycamore tree identified as T18
9 Willow Drive
of TPO M1098 (DEL)
TPO
Felling
Cllr Inchley having declared an interest earlier then left the meeting. Cllr lockey did
not speak or vote thereon.
Proposed by Cllr Champion, seconded by Cllr Gilham, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be refused. No reason for felling, no damaged to
wall was viewed during site visit.
Mr D Wright,
Erection of dwelling and garage (DEL)
Land to the rear of
Full
Oakleigh, Victoria
Grove
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Lovell, by a vote of 9 For and 2
Against - Recommend proposal should be refused. This Council is against
backland development, should this proposal be allowed to proceed the area will be
over developed and the site entrance area if far too narrow.
Mr D Norman,
1 Princes Road
Siting of satellite dish (DEL)
Full
Cllr Inchley having declared an interest earlier then left the meeting.
Proposed by Cllr Gilham, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by a vote of 6 For, 1
Against and 2 Abstentions - Recommend proposal should be allowed to
proceed. Subject to standard size and design satellite dish being used also to
enquire reason for application and concern as may be within Conservation Area.
f)
113894/000
(Mrs K
Taylor)
Resolve:
N F McEwan,
4 Tipcote Hill
Reinstatement of railings and gate (DEL)
g)
076296/022
(Mrs K
Taylor)
Haskins Group of
Companies,
50 High Street
Change roofing materials on rear of 48, 50
& single storey rear projections. Replace
UPVC window first floor rear. Replace
UPVC rainwater goods. Demolish rear
chimney on single storey projection.
Remove signage (DEL)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Gilham, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
067790/006
(Mr C
Langford)
Mrs M Dale,
Woodbourne House
h)
LBC –
alter/
extend
Proposed by Cllr Bartlett, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed. Quality Specification.
Renewal of consent 067790/005 (outline
erection of a detached dwelling & garage)
(DEL)
LBC –
Alter/
extend
Renewal
2
i)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote –
Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed. Renewal of application.
067900/021
(Mr L
Kimberley)
Coxley Developments
Conversion of existing house into 3 flats
Ltd.,
and erection of 1 new flat (DEL)
Full
The Fives, Church
Lane
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Inchley , by unanimous vote –
Recommend proposal should be refused. No materialistic change from the
previous application, this Council wishes the existing family house to remain in the
Town Centre, which is in close proximity to the Church.
Resolve:
167. Transfer of Justices Licence - The Crown Inn, 1 Draycott Road
Application for Transfer of Licence to be heard at Frome Magistrates Court on 8 March 2005 at 10.00am
due to building works taking place at the Town Hall, Wells.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Lockey by unanimous vote that the matter is
noted.
168. Temporary Road Closure, Coombe Lane. For 4 weeks starting 21 February to allow highway
improvements and drainage works to be carried out.
169. Griggs / Huntsman and Haskins Redevelopment Update
There was no additional information regarding the Tesco proposals, a successful and well attended public
consultation meeting regarding Haskins redevelopment had taken place on the 8 February, the hosts,
LPC Town and Country Development Consultants had provided documentation and requested comment
from the Town Council within the next 14 days.
Resolve: by a unanimous vote that the Council return the following comments to LPC;
The Town Council welcome investment in Haskins and the Town. The link between Haskins and the
existing High Street was most desirable. It was hoped that the development would attract Quality and
Premium retailers to bring shoppers into the Town. Concern was raised at the drastic reduction in car
parking spaces. A high quality and sympathetic development with Little Ostry would add value to the
Town Centre however SCC had previously indicated that they would oppose any access to Little Ostry
directly off of Commercial Road.
It was considered imperative that this major redevelopment of the Town Centre and that of the Tesco
application should be combined in one Planning Brief to cover all areas. It is essential that joined up
proposals are submitted which should also include Quality Buildings and realignment of the Highway at
Townsend.
Resolve: by a unanimous vote that the Town Councils consideration in the matter are copied to the
Senior Planning Officer at MDC and Tesco’s agents GL Hearn requesting a joined up Planning Brief for
all areas and that Les Kimberley is requested to attend a future meeting of the Town Councils Planning
Committee to consider the matter further.
170. Road Naming – Norah Fry Development
Stephen King from MDC had today provided a plan and requested urgent consideration of names for
roads within the new development. He considered that names should reflect the heritage of the site.
Resolve: by unanimous vote that the proposed names of “Westend Court”, “Norah Fry Avenue”,
“Bowditch Close” and “Union Street” are used.
3
171. Expansion of the Conservation Area
Kim Winter MDC provided a draft document for consideration and comment before submission to her own
Council. The document proposed considerable expansion to the existing Conservation Area which would
also include Collett Park. The purpose of the expansion was to protect additional historic and heritage
parts or the Town and at the same time support a future THI bid for funding.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Lovell, Seconded by Cllr Marsh by unanimous vote that the Council, in
principle, support the proposed expansion of the Conservation Area but may wish to comment further
when all members have had the opportunity to appraise the very detailed documentation. Kim Winter is to
be thanked for her efforts in this area and to provide the Councils support towards a future and hopefully
successful THI bid.
Cllr Inchley requested members to consider that, in view of the nature of the business to be transacted, it
was advised in the public interest that the press and public be excluded and that they be instructed to
withdraw.
Cllr Gilham declared a personal interest in the matter of Staff Appraisals and left the meeting.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote, that the meeting now
move to Confidential Session, and that the public and press be excluded and instructed to withdraw,
which received compliance.
Staff Appraisals – Cllr Inchley updated members confirming that the Administration Assistant had
received an Appraisal and that the Clerk would also receive an Appraisal this Thursday 17 February
2005. The outcomes and relevant Action Plans would be reported to Council at the March meeting.
Covenant – 4 Kyte Road. Cllr Inchley updated members with progress and confirmed a meeting with the
District Valuer on Friday 18 February, which the Clerk would also attend.
173. Date of Next Meeting
Programmed Tuesday 8 March 2005 at 7.00pm.
Signature______________________
Chairman
Date_______________________2005
4
Committee Meeting held on Tuesday 8 March 2005
in the MDC Chamber, Cannards Grave Road,
Shepton Mallet .
Cllrs. Bartlett, Inchley, Jeremiah, Lockey, Lovell, Manvill, Marsh, O’Connor T. and
Shearn.
174. Public Forum
As there were no members of the public present there was no Public Forum.
Cllrs Fone (work), Gilham (family), Hurrell (work).
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote that the above
Apologies are accepted and recorded.
a) No. 118217/000PG29 - Collett Park and Covenants Relating to Collett Park - Members
collectively made a declaration as to a Personal and Prejudicial Interest in the matter as each
member of the Town Council is a Trustee but that dispensation has been afforded in the matter from
the Standards Committee in July 2003 for the life of the current Council (until April 2007).
Cllr O’Connor declared a Personal & Non-Prejudicial Interest in all matters on the Agenda.
b) No. 118256/000 – Cllr Inchley declared a Personal & Prejudicial Interest in the matter as the
proposed extension was in view of his residence, and he would duly leave the room at the
appropriate point.
177. Minutes
The Minutes of the Meeting held on the 15 February 2005 were considered for accuracy and content. At
the meeting of the Town Council held on 1 March 2005 members considered that Minute No. 166, item d,
should be amended to record a vote of 9 For & 2 Against in lieu of the unanimous vote as recorded in the
draft Minutes.
Resolve; Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote, that with the
amendment to the vote recorded on Minute No. 166, item d, with a vote of 9 For & 2 Against, that the
Minutes of the Planning Recommendations Committee made at the meeting held on the 15 February
2005, be approved as a true record and signed by the Chairman.
179. Plans: a)
118217/000
PG29
Jarrold
Shepton Mallet Town
Council,
Land at Collett Park
Works to a Copper Beech (T67) and a
Beech (T68) covered by TPO M1247 (DEL)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Lovell, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, with a vote of 7 For & 1
TPO
Works
1
b)
034960/017
Williams
Resolve:
c)
117618/000
Manley
Resolve:
d)
e)
f)
DL & SM Dennett
Construction of an extension to an existing
Land Adjoining Unit 20
car park (Retrospective) (DEL)
Full
& Brewery Lane
Proposed by Cllr Lovell, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, with a vote of 7 For & 1
Against - Recommend proposal should be refused. The Committee is against
retrospective Planning Applications and also removal of trees without prior
consent.
Coxley Developments
Redevelopment to form 2 flats (DEL)
Ltd
Full
6 & 6A Peter Street
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Lovell, with a vote of 7 For, 0
Against & 2 Abstentions - Recommend proposal should be refused. The
Committee feel too many one-bedroom flats are already within this location,
and, although they welcome the tidying-up and a more pleasing visual effect,
this development should consist of one family residence.
117953/000
Manley
C & W Sellar
18 Lower Charlton
Tallowood
Erection of dwelling (DEL)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, with a vote of 7 For & 3
Against - Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed. Details appear
satisfactory and not overlooking existing properties, and also appears in
accord with street scene.
118250/000
Walker
Mr S Payne,
21 Churchill Road
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Lovell, seconded by Cllr Manvill, with a vote of 7 For, 0
Against & 2 Abstentions - Recommend proposal should be allowed to
proceed. The Committee consider that concerns may well be raised by
neighbours due to possible loss of light.
118256/000
Taylor
Mr & Mrs T Rossiter,
58a Cowl Street
Full
2 storey extension to side and rear (DEL)
Construction of new raised roof
insertion of 3 rooflights to rear (DEL)
and
Full
Full
Cllr Inchley, having previously declared a Personal & Prejudicial Interest earlier,
then left the meeting.
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Lovell, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
180. 067900/019 - 10 Town Street - Amended Application
The Committee was requested to note and make comment if required regarding a previously Resolved
Application which had now received amendments involving detailed issues discussed with both Les
Kimberley and Kim Winter, Heritage Officer, at MDC.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that the matter is noted with no further comments
to be made.
Planning Application No. 113576/004PG29 – Mr C Bounds, 56 Barrington Place – Regarding felling and
works to trees covered by a TPO, the Town Council had recommended not to proceed on 12 January,
however the Application had been granted by the District Council.
2
182. Temporary Road Closure – Lower Lane and Longbridge – The Chairman reported this matter had not
been placed on the Agenda but had already been confirmed at the March meeting of Council, and the
road would be closed for 28 days starting 14 March 2005 to enable bridge maintenance works to be
carried out.
183. Griggs & Huntsman Site Update – The Chairman reported that there was no further update until at least
the end of March 2005.
184. Date of Next Meeting
Programmed Tuesday 29 March 2005 at 7.00pm.
The Chairman then thanked members for their attendance and informed that the Planning matters had
now been concluded, however the Chairman of the Council requested members to consider a confidential
matter of an urgent nature. The Chairman of the Council, Cllr Inchley, then assumed chairmanship of the
meeting.
Resolve: by unanimous vote, that the Council now move to Confidential Session, and, as there were no
members of the public or press present, there was no requirement for anyone to withdraw.
Collett Park Covenant – 4 Kyte Road
Members considered written legal advice received today.
Resolve: by unanimous vote that the Clerk is instructed, on behalf of the Council, to seek further advice
from the Town Council’s Insurers and that a formal response letter is sent on behalf of the Town Council
to the occupiers, Messrs Vincent, of 4 Kyte Road, constructed in a conciliatory tone, portraying legal
advice received today, and setting out a timetable for a further response currently upheld awaiting further
information from the District Valuer.
The meeting then closed at 8.50pm.
Signature______________________
Chairman
Date_________________ ______2005
3
Committee Meeting held on Tuesday 29 March
2005 in the MDC Chamber, Cannards Grave Road,
Shepton Mallet .
Cllr’s Bartlett, Fone, Gilham, Hurrell, Inchley, Jeremiah, Lockey, Lovell, Marsh(7.05pm),
O’Connor T. and Shearn.
No members of the public or press were in attendance. Emergency and evacuation
procedures were informed to all in attendance. The Chairman also informed of a clerical error with
numbering on the agenda in that item Number 2 had been duplicated over two different agenda items.
186. Public Forum
No members of the public were present.
Cllrs Cann (holiday) and Manvill (health).
No declarations were made.
189. Minutes
The Minutes of the Meeting held on the 8 March 2005 were considered for accuracy and content.
Resolve; Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr O’Connor by a unanimous vote that the Minutes of
the Planning Recommendations Committee made at the meeting held on the 8 March 2005, be approved
191. Plans: a)
b)
c)
118275/000
Walker
Mr Ward,
15 Westfield
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Gilham, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed subject to existing and
matching materials to be used for all elevations.
116963/000
Taylor
Mr M White,
4 Amulet Way
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, seconded by Cllr Hurrell, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
030903/014
Taylor
Mr R Winsborough,
Demoliton of part of existing building and
Winsboroughs Fish &
erection of convenience store (DEL)
Full
Chip Restaurant,
Whitstone Road
Proposed by Cllr Bartlett, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by a vote of 9 For, 0
Against and 1 Abstention, Recommend proposal should be allowed to
proceed.
Resolve:
Two storey side extension & erection of
detached garage to rear (DEL)
Erection of car port (DEL)
Full
Full
1
d)
118290/000
Jarrold
Mr & Mrs T Hartnett,
19 Hawthorn Crescent
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Gilham, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
e)
030904/001
PG29
Jarrold
Resolve:
Mr J Henley,
Rogate, Leg Square
Felling of Sycamore tree in conservation
area (DEL)
f)
101512/004
Langford
Mr C Wilson,
10 High Street
Conversion of first & second floor to 4 no.
flats (DEL)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr O’Connor , by a vote of 10 For, 2
Against- Recommend proposal should be refused. The Town already has an
excess of one bedroom flats and this proposal should be redesigned to
deliver three two bedroom flats in total.
101512/003
Langford
Mr C Wilson,
10 High Street
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr O’Connor , by a vote of 10 For, 2
Against- Recommend proposal should be refused. The Town already has an
excess of one bedroom flats and this proposal should be redesigned to
deliver three two bedroom flats in total.
106472/004
Langford
Mr S Bailey,
13/15 Town Street
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Gilham, seconded by Cllr Hurrell, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
106472/003
Langford
Mr S Bailey,
13/15 Town Street
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Gilham, seconded by Cllr Hurrell, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
PC/030607/0
06/LE
SCC
Bowlish County Infants
School
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Gilham, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
102345/002
Taylor
Mr & Mrs T Catley,
51 Coombe Lane
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote –
Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
g)
h)
i)
j)
k)
Two storey side extension & conversion of
garage to ancillary accommodation (DEL)
Full
CA
Felling
Trees
Proposed by Cllr Shearn, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by a vote of 11 For, 0
Internal & external works in association
with the conversion of first & second floors
to 4 no. flats (DEL)
Conversion of rear section to ground floor
flat and internal alterations to existing shop
unit (DEL)
Proposed alterations and improvements to
existing shop premises and change of use
to rear into ground floor flat (DEL)
Renewal of planning permission for siting
of temporary classroom E428
Full
LBC –
alter/
extend
Full
LBC –
alter/
extend
Renewal
Full
192. Kline Holdings Planning Application – 2 Waterloo Road, 20 Flats. The Chairman informed that the
previous application considered on 14 September 2004, recommended for refusal by this committee and
it had been understood received granting of permission from MDC. However this was not the case and
the application had been refused. Re-application had now been received and would be agendaed for the
consideration of the next meeting of this Committee. Members requested the Chairman for a response
from MDC to this Council’s request for a Planning Brief to cover the various recent applications for this
area of the Town.
Resolve by unanimous vote that the matter is noted and the Chairman would chase up MDC for a
response in the matter of the Planning Brief.
2
193. Public Entertainment License Application – The Market Place (May Day Event) Late application
received with limited (14 days) response time.
Resolve; Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr O’Connor by a vote of 8 For, 0 Against and 1
Abstention, Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
a. 112445/001PG29 – Mr G Murray, 9 Willow Drive – Felling of Sycamore Tree
SMTC – Recommended Not to Proceed , MDC Granted
b. 067348/001 – Mr D Wright, Land to the rear of Oakleigh, Victoria Grove – Erection of dwelling and
garage
SMTC – Recommended Not to Proceed, MDC Granted
Resolve: by unanimous vote that the above matters are noted.
7.
Renewal of Justices Licence - Tesco Store, Shepton Mallet
To be held at the Court House, Town Hall, Wells at 10.00am on Tuesday, 12 April 2005.
195. Road Closure Order - May Day Street Party, Monday 2 May 2005
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote that the matter is noted.
196. Agenda Matters for the Next Meeting
The next meeting programmed Tuesday 19 April 2005 at 7.00pm.
The Chairman thanked members for their attendance and closed the meeting at 7.40pm
Signature______________________
Chairman
Date_______________________2005
3
Committee Meeting held on Tuesday 19 April 2005
in the MDC Committee Room, Cannards Grave
Road, Shepton Mallet.
Cllr’s Bartlett, Fone, Jeremiah, Lovell, Manvill, O’Connor, Robinson and Shearn.
Mr & Mrs S Cansfield (members of the public) and no members of the press were in
attendance.
197. Public Forum
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote, that the meeting
be adjourned for the purpose of transacting Public Forum.
Application No. 118327/000 – 12 Collett Avenue – Mr Cansfield provided a detailed summary of his
Planning Application, which is item no. 6a on the Agenda. He informed that he was aware of a Restricted
Covenant relating to Collett Park but considered that his proposals did not in any way conflict. He had
worked with the District Council from the very beginning and had received Officer’s support and opinion to
his application. Also his visual design, to include velux windows, had been upgraded to dormer windows
at the District Council’s request.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, seconded by Cllr Lovell, by unanimous vote, that the meeting now
be brought back into session.
Cllrs Gilham (family), Hurrell (health), Inchley, Lockey and Marsh (all work commitments)
a) Application 118327/000 – 12 Collett Avenue & Application 118217/000PG29 - Granting of
Permission to works on trees covered by TPO in Collett Park - Members collectively made a
declaration as to a Personal and Prejudicial Interest in the matter as each member of the Town Council
is a Trustee but that dispensation has been afforded in the matter from the Standards Committee in
July 2003 for the life of the current Council (until April 2007). Also Cllr Robinson declared a further
Personal & Non-Prejudicial Interest in the matter being a neighbour of the premises in question, and
this follows guidance from Vivien Pay, the Monitoring Officer at the District Council.
b) Town Council Planning Recommendations – Cllr Robinson, following advice from Vivien Pay, the
Monitoring Officer at the District Council, declared a Personal & Non-Prejudicial Interest in all matters
on the Agenda in her dual role as District Councillor and a member of the Planning Board at the District
Council, and that she would continue to attend meetings of the Town Council’s Planning
Recommendations Committee, declaring her interest as a member of the District Council’s Planning
Board, and would continue to speak and vote on matters on the Agenda but with the reservation that
further consideration would then take place at the District Council at a later date when further
information may well be available.
Resolve; by a unanimous vote that all declarations are noted and duly recorded.
200. Minutes
The Minutes of the Meeting held on the 29 March 2005 were considered for accuracy and content.
Resolve; Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah , seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote, that the Minutes of
the Planning Recommendations Committee made at the meeting held on the 29 March 2005, be
1
202. Plans: a)
b)
118327/000
Jarrold
Mr & Mrs S Cansfield,
12 Collett Avenue
New roof to provide first floor rooms in roof
& detached double garage (DEL)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, with a vote of 7 For, 0
Against & 2 Abstentions - Recommend proposal should be allowed to
proceed, subject to details within the proposals not being in conflict or
breaching Restricted Covenants applicable to No. 12 Collett Avenue.
012580/024
Manley
Mr K Haskins,
Land & buildings at 14
Commercial Road
Repair & rebuilding of café & garage
workshop as amended by letter & plan
rec’d 22.3.05 (DEL)
Full
Full
Members were somewhat disappointed that, despite several requests to the District
Council, a Planning Brief had still not been put in place for this development. The
majority of members considered that this Application would reduce the options
available to re-develop the derelict land within Little Ostry.
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Champion, seconded by Cllr Robinson, with a vote of 6 For
& 3 Against - Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
The two members of the public then left the meeting.
c)
034618/008
Kimberley
Kline Holdings
2 Waterloo Road
Demolition of existing building and erection
of 18 Flats (DEL)
CA
Two letters of objection to the proposals had been received from residents adjoining
the site. A detailed report had been compiled by the Chairman and read to all
members at the meeting by the Vice-Chair Cllr Fone (copy attached to these
Minutes). Members raised concern as to the limited on-site car parking space
available and the access through the already-congested Lower Lane.
d)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Shearn, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be refused for the reasons of overdevelopment.
034618/009
Kimberley
Kline Holdings
2 Waterloo Road
Demolition of existing building and erection
of 18 Flats (DEL)
Full
Two letters of objection to the proposals had been received from residents adjoining
the site. A detailed report had been compiled by the Chairman and read to all
members at the meeting by the Vice-Chair Cllr Fone (copy attached to these
Minutes). Members raised concern as to the limited on-site car parking space
available and the access through the already-congested Lower Lane.
e)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Shearn, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be refused for the reasons of overdevelopment.
042180/005
Taylor
Mr & Mrs Leijerfelt
Single storey extension to sides (DEL)
The Castle, Coombe
Full
Lane
Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, seconded by Cllr Shearn, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
Resolve:
f)
118333/000
PG29
Jarrold
Resolve:
Parsons Tree Surgery
76 Cowl Street
Felling of 2 Cupressus and works to a
Pussy Willow in Conservation Area (DEL)
CA
Felling
Trees
Proposed by Cllr Lovell, seconded by Cllr Manvill, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
2
g)
118337/000
Arnold
Resolve:
h)
115491/001
PG20
Jarrold
Mr C Hiscox
First floor extension to South elevation and
Hillview Cottage,
erection of conservatory to South elevation Full
Cannards Grave
(DEL)
Proposed by Cllr Manvill, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
Mr Bowden
44 Willow Drive
Fell Sycamore tree covered by TPO M1098
(DEL)
TPO
Felling
The Chairman and Vice-Chairman had both visited the site and could see no reason
for felling of the Sycamore tree in question.
i)
j)
k)
l)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Champion, by unanimous vote - Recommend proposal
should be refused. Following a site visit there appeared to be no reason for
the felling of this tree.
117917/000
Jarrold
Resolve:
Miss ML Brownlow &
Erection of conservatory to rear and
Mr J Redpath
erection of 1.8m high boundary wall Full
25 Trajans Way
fronting the highway (DEL)
Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed, subject to the proposals
not being in breach of any open plan legislation or restriction applicable to
this site.
101205/003
Baker
PFA Properties Ltd
Rear of 59 High Street
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Lovell, seconded by Cllr Shearn, with a vote of 6 For, 2
Against & 1 Abstention – Recommend proposal should be allowed to
proceed.
101123/001
Taylor
Mr & Mrs Doyle
113 Whitstone Road
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, seconded by Cllr Bartlett, by unanimous vote –
118344/000
Williams
JS Bloor Swindon Ltd
Plot 272, Phase 3B,
Field Farm
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Champion, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote –
Recommend proposal should be refused. The applicant should continue to
market the current building and facility for sale or let until the complete
development by Bloor Ltd on the Field Farm estate was completed and at that
point, if not sold or let, then the applicant should re-apply.
Erection of 3 dwellings (Amendment to
previous consent) to include a larger first Full
floor element (DEL)
The Committee had previously resolved a recommendation to allow this proposal to
proceed. An amendment had been received to include a larger first floor element,
the content of which was unclear.
First floor extension (DEL)
Change of use from shop with flat over to
dwelling unit (DEL)
Full
Change
of Use
a)
067900/21 The Fives, Church lane, Coxley Developments – 15/2 SMTC Not Proceed, to be kept
family house and not flats, MDC Granted Permission
b)
034960/017 Land adjoining Unit 20 & Brewery Lane, DL & SM Dennett – 8/3 SMTC Not
Proceed, Against retrospective applications, MDC Granted Permission
c)
117953/000 18 Lower Charlton – Erection of dwelling – 8/3 SMTC to Proceed, MDC Refused.
3
204. 118217/000PG20 Granting of Permission to works on trees covered by TPO in Collett Park
205. Griggs & Huntsman Site Regeneration Update – The Clerk updated members following a meeting with
Mendip District Council.
Resolve: by unanimous vote that the above matter is noted.
206. Planning Board Agenda Circulation – An enquiry from MDC had been received as these were now
available from their website.
Resolve: by unanimous vote that, if required, the Town Council could access the Agendas from the MDC
website.
207. Street Naming & Numbering of Development at Field Farm – Addresses of Thorne Lane, Whiting
Close and Walnut Grove had been proposed for part of the Field Farm development.
208. Agenda Matters for the next Meeting
The next meeting is programmed Tuesday 10 May 2005 at 7.00pm, which would be the AGM, and no
matters were raised.
Councillor
Signature______________________
Chairman
Date_______________________2005
4
Committee Annual General Meeting held on
Tuesday 10 May 2005 in the MDC Committee
Room, Cannards Grave Road, Shepton
Mallet.
Present:
Chairman - Cllr R. Champion
Cllrs Bartlett (arrived late from Area Board), Fone, Jeremiah (07.04pm), Lockey, Lovell,
Marsh, O’Connor and Shearn.
1.
Election of Chairman
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Fone, by unanimous vote, that the current
Chairman, Cllr Champion, is re-elected. Cllr Champion then accepted the continued office and chaired
the meeting.
2.
Election of Deputy Chairman
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Champion, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote, that the current
Vice-Chairman, Cllr Fone, is re-elected.
3. Public Forum
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Shearn, by unanimous vote, that the meeting be
adjourned for the purpose of transacting Public Forum.
Possible Illegal Building for Residential Use – 37 Compton Road – Mr Stride raised concern that to
date there had been no response from the District Council despite himself raising the point with the Clerk.
Latest information that he had was that it may come under “permitted development”, which did not require
planning permission, and he was very concerned that this would now open the floodgates for anyone to
do much the same thing, and wondered where the Council was going now with the matter.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Lovell, by unanimous vote, that the meeting now
be bought back into session and that the matter relating to 37 Compton Road on the Agenda be bought
forward and dealt with as Next Business.
4.
37 Compton Road – Possible Illegal Building for Residential Use
The Clerk had previously obtained a response from Mendip District Council which appeared to confirm
that it was a “permitted development” and did not require planning permission subject to a set criteria.
Members raised concern regarding possible concrete base of the building, and indeed how far the
extended family should expand to, whether total services were being provided within the building and if
the occupants were all subject to Council Tax. Several members considered that it appeared that there
was a loophole in legislation and that the Council should raise the matter with the MDC Planning
Department requesting them to lobby and progress the matter to raise the appropriate legislation required
to close the loophole, and that this matter also be copied to the Member of Parliament.
The Clerk confirmed that he had requested a formal response from the District Council in the matter and
also for them to stipulate legislation or guidance notes which permitted this type of development.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Lovell, seconded by Lockey, by unanimous vote, that the Town Council raise
its concerns and highlight what appears to be a loophole in legislation to the Planning Department at the
District Council, requesting they progress the matter to close the loophole with appropriate legislation,
and at the same time the matter be copied to a Member of Parliament.
1
5.
Cllrs Bartlett (attendance at Area Board but would attend later), Inchley (family), Manvill (family) and
Robinson (attendance at Area Board).
6.
No Declarations were submitted.
7.
Minutes
The Minutes of the Meeting held on the 19 April 2006 were considered for accuracy and content.
Resolve; Proposed by Cllr Lovell, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote, that the Minutes of the
Planning Recommendations Committee made at the meeting held on the 19 April 2006, be approved as a
true record and signed by the Chairman.
8.
Matters Arising
a) Road Closure – May Day Street Party – Belated information had been received and had now been
approved, albeit that the event had now taken place.
b) Previous Application – 12 Collett Avenue – Cllr Shearn updated members that District Cllr Paul
Treby was now progressing the matter.
Resolve: That the matter is noted.
9.
Plans: a)
b)
A11085/000
Langford
Focus DIY,
Fosse Lane
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
118351/000
Arnold
Mr & Mrs Bradley,
5 Four Acres, Tadley
Full
Acres
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
Resolve:
c)
d)
Erection of shop signage (DEL)
Two storey side extension (DEL)
Advertisement
118353/000
Walker
Mr N Parfitt,
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
107863/006
Baker
Mr & Mrs C R Perkins,
New Row Farm, Yelling
Mill Lane, Downside
Conversion of barn to dwelling (DEL)
NB Development within Oakhill Parish,
access road within Shepton Parish
Full
Full
The Chairman informed that the development was within the neighbouring parish of
Oakhill, however the access road was within Shepton’s parish and therefore
requested members to consider access details only.
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Champion, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed in respect of access
arrangements and highway matters only.
2
e)
118358/000
Walker
Resolve:
f)
g)
h)
117953/001
Langford
Mr & Mrs M Kail,
87 Mason Way
First floor rear extension & formation of a
tiled roof to existing single storey rear Full
extension (DEL)
Proposed by Cllr Lovell, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
Resolve:
C & W Sellar,
Erection of a dwelling (DEL)
18 Tallowood, Lower
Full
Charlton
Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Shearn, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be refused. The Planning Committee support
the District Council in their refusal of the previous application for the reasons
of detriment to the visual amenity of the locality and lack of privacy for
neighbouring dwellings.
118374/000
Arnold
Mr D Cheatham,
18 Southfield Road
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
118376/000
Arnold
Mr S Coat,
51 Bishop Crescent
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, with a vote of 7 For & 1
Single storey rear extension to replace
existing conservatory (DEL)
First floor extension to front & erection of
conservatory to rear (DEL)
Full
Full
Cllr Lovell then left the meeting due to a previous appointment and Cllr Bartlett
joined the meeting from MDC Area Board.
i)
118377/000
Walker
Mr T Allen,
18 Misburg Close
Resolve:
Proposed by Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by
unanimous vote - Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
104871/011
PG29
Jarrold
Resolve:
Mr D Reed,
3b Waterloo Road
104694/005
Jarrold
Mr K Newton,
The Former Rectory,
Church Lane
m)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Shearn, by unanimous vote –
Recommend proposal should be refused. This proposed development is not
in keeping with current materials, design or character of the existing building
and would spoil a lovely building.
n)
104694/006
Jarrold
Mr K Newton,
Erection of single storey extension (DEL)
LBC –
The Former Rectory,
Alter/
Church Lane
extend
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Shearn, by unanimous vote –
Recommend proposal should be refused. This proposed development is not
in keeping with current materials, design or character of the existing building
and would spoil a lovely building.
j)
k)
l)
Resolve:
Works to trees covered by TPO M1125
(DEL)
Full
TPO
Works
Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed and that works are
progressed as per recommendations.
Erection of single storey extension (DEL)
Full
3
10.
118256/000 – Mr & Mrs T Rossiter, 58a Cowl Street - SMTC Recommended to Proceed, MDC Refuse
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote, that the matter is noted.
11.
Notice of Appeal – 094388/003ENF & 094388/004ENF – Ham Mill, Bowlish
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote, that the matter is noted.
12.
Notice of Appeal Decision Relating to 36 Nightingale Grove – Felling/reduction of Lime Trees
The Chairman informed that the Secretary of State dismissed the Appeal for the height reduction of the
trees by 35%. He allows the Appeal and grants consent for the felling of one Lime tree on land at 36
Nightingale Grove subject to conditions.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote, that the above matter is noted.
13.
Street Naming – Norah Fry Development
Members were informed that previous recommendations from the Planning Committee had now been
accepted and dwellings within the development had been named Bowditch Close and Fry’s Walk.
14.
Proposed Tesco Development
The Clerk informed members as to contact made in the last week period by both GL Hearn, Tesco’s
agents, and also the District Council. Within the amended proposals there may be consideration as to
moving of the Cenotaph, albeit only by several metres, and it was hoped that the new application would
be received in the next two week period, which would then be programmed for consideration at the next
Planning Committee meeting programmed for 31 May 2005. It was envisaged that Mr Les Kimberley,
Senior Planning Officer at MDC, would also be able to attend and after this meeting it was hoped that the
application would then be heard by the District Council at its Planning Board to be held in June 2005. The
Chairman informed members that the Clerk would inform members as soon as plans were received and
requested members to attend the office at their convenience shortly after for a preview of the plans and to
enable collation of any questions to be submitted to Les Kimberley prior to the next meeting.
15.
The next meeting programmed for 31 May 2005. No matters were raised with the exception that Cllr
Marsh provided her Apologies for the next meeting.
The Chairman thanked members for their attendance and for voting him as Chairman of the Planning
Recommendations Committee for a further year, doing a job he thoroughly enjoyed. The meeting was then
closed at 7.55pm.
Councillor R. Champion
Signature______________________
Chairman
Date_______________________2005
4
Committee Meeting held on Tuesday 31 May 2005
in the MDC Council Chamber, Cannards Grave
Cllr’s Bartlett, Gilham, Inchley, Jeremiah, Lovell, Manvill, O’Connor and Shearn.
Mr Les Kimberley (Senior Planning Officer MDC), Catherine Parker (GL Hearn)
14 members of the public and 2 members of the press were in attendance.
16.
Public Forum
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Shearn, by unanimous vote, that the meeting be
adjourned for the purpose of transacting Public Forum.
Tesco Stores Limited – Application No. 118085/000 & 001
Mr Clive Pearson raised concern mainly relating to transport to and from the site, and also the media
news regarding Tescos with profit margins up and an increased spread of product lines. Indeed, the firm
was doing well and, in their words, providing customers with choices, but in his view Tescos were not
interested in regeneration of Shepton Mallet. He raised further concern regarding the possibility of the
pharmacist facility at Tescos which would certainly have an impact on the two existing ones, especially
Boots in the town centre.
Mr Taffy Stride informed that he had attended the exhibition at the Huntsman site and made proposals to
Tesco’s agents GL Hearn. At that exhibition he had received an understanding from Hearns that
consideration of his proposals would be included, and he raised concern that there had been very little
uptake or inclusion of his proposals. Mr Mike Harris wished that Tescos had made further considerations
regarding the Cenotaph and that more attention should be paid to the Westfield end, and indeed if a
roundabout was to be installed at Hitchen Lane this would need purchase of land from adjoining
properties, and also raised concern that this was a very dangerous junction. Mrs Joyce Weir, whose
residence was a cottage on the ex-Huntsman roundabout, was very concerned at the increased traffic on
all approach roads that would use this main roundabout into the site, and that a large quantity of the
beautiful trees would be felled, and would therefore much against the proposals. Mr Payne raised the
question as to the reason why Tesco wished to move from their existing location?
Mr Graham Brown spoke, in principle, for support of the development of the site by Tescos, but raised
objection to the western side of the site where 63 new dwellings would be erected, with all access via the
Hitchen Lane junction with West Shepton where the intention was to put down, what could be classed as
a spot-paint roundabout, which would provide no safety improvements. He raised concern that Hitchen
Lane had not been included within the development nor any upgrade. He had resided in the area for the
last 20+ years and currently there was no drainage to the highway, there were only pavements over 50%
of Hitchen Lane and the lighting was below standard. At the same time St Celia’s Nursing Home was
directly on the junction which used Hitchen Lane for overspill parking and the sight lines to the east of the
junction were totally unacceptable due to buildings. He requested the applicant to consider upgrade of
Hitchen Lane for full adoption by Somerset Highways and possible integration with the proposed
development. On the eastern end of the site he raised concern regarding no forethought or protection for
the Cenotaph, and indeed the Cenotaph would now be isolated on an island. He also raised concern as
to the integration of the development with the existing retail area. The current town centre was already
split by a main east-west route, being Paul Street and Commercial Road, and with the Tesco
development a further split would take place via the very busy Townsend road, and deemed that both
Tesco’s and Haskins should collaborate together to join up the retail centres.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, seconded by Cllr Shearn, by unanimous vote, that the meeting now
move back into closed session.
17.
Cllrs Cann (holiday), Fone (work), Hurrell (health), Lockey (family emergency) and Marsh (holiday)
Resolve: by a unanimous vote that the above Apologies are accepted and duly recorded.
1
18.
Application 118415/000 – Victoria Fountain – Members collectively made a Declaration of a Personal &
Non-Prejudicial Interest in the matter, as the Town Council was the owner of the Victoria Fountain and the
applicant, in respect of Listed Building Consent.
All Planning Matters – Cllr Robinson declared a Personal & Non-Prejudicial Interest in all matters on the
Agenda, as she was currently a member of the District Council Planning Board, but would continue to
speak and vote thereon.
19.
Minutes
The Minutes of the Meeting held on the 10 May 2005 were considered for accuracy and content.
Resolve; Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah , seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote, that the Minutes of
the Planning Recommendations Committee made at the meeting held on the 10 May 2005, be approved
20.
Matters Arising
Minute 4 – 37 Compton Road – Planning “Loophole” Regarding Wooden Structures
The Chairman confirmed an acknowledgement from the Right Honourable David Heathcoat-Amory, MP
who is taking up the matter as requested by the Council. Members raised much concern that the loophole
should be investigated without delay, both by the District Council and Central Government, via the Office
of the Deputy Prime Minister. Members raised points of concern such as whether the additional people in
residence would be paying Community Tax, if the family in the main residence moved out what would
happen to the structure and occupancy, and whether any of the neighbours had received prior
consultation.
The Clerk confirmed that interim and supporting information had been received from the District Council
which confirmed that it was permitted development, in that an occupier could develop a wooden structure
upto 50% of their garden size for the purpose of providing suitable accommodation for a member or
members of their immediate or distant family, without the requirement for planning permission. One
member raised that they hoped this information was indeed kosher and that the District Council had
checked this thoroughly.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Shearn, seconded by Cllr Inchley, with a vote of 8 For, 1 Against & 1
Abstention that the Chairman, in consultation with the Clerk, investigate the matter and once again raise
the concerns and, should there be a legal loophole then the matter should be reviewed and closed as
soon as practical, and that letters to this effect should be sent to both Mendip District Council and Central
Government, via the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and copied to the MP, the Right Honourable
David Heathcoat-Amory.
21.
Planning Application No. 118085/000 & 001 – Tesco Development Plans for the Huntsman/Griggs
site
Mr Les Kimberley provided a detailed presentation as to the key issues within the application, and that the
matter would be further considered by the District Council’s Planning Board due to meet on 15 June
2005. The Tesco store development would double the floor space of the existing Fosse Lane facility, with
a breakdown of approximately 67% in convenience goods and the remaining 33% in comparison goods;
again this is approximately double the output of the existing store. There would be a further 5 other nonfood retail outlets each of 10,000 sq ft. Changes had been proposed to the Station Road junction, which
was now two-way and would be providing access for service and delivery vehicles only. The bus stops
had been relocated. The pub restaurant had no vehicular access or parking adjacent to the existing
residential properties. There had been footpath improvements to the Townsend side of the development
to allow ease of access to the existing High Street retail area. Two crossings had been proposed, one
being a pelican crossing at Townsend and a further puffin crossing at West Shepton on the Huntsman
side. Although there had been some delay, he had now received Highway’s comments/response and an
informal view, after an initial look at the revised plans, appeared to be that they had no objection,
although a safety audit may pick up specific issues. However there was a requirement for a 106
Agreement to fund highway alterations.
2
With regard to the Retail Impact Study, Mendip had commissioned Nathan Litchfield Consultants to carry
out a study, the essence of which had worked out a spending profile of the catchment area and they had
also looked at tests set out by Central Government, one of which is that retail should be within the centre
of the community and that, although there was not enough scope within the town, there was opportunity
for increased retail development within the district. However, if permission was granted there would be no
opportunity for further retail development within Shepton for the next 5 years. The report highlighted that
there would be a loss of some 18% turnover to the existing retail sector, but they felt this was not
sufficient to cause closure of businesses. They had reviewed the area and there were no other
reasonable sites available which would support non-food retail. Mr Kimberley did raise concern that the
linkage with the existing town centre was very important and highlighted the considerable loss of mature
trees. Many trees would be lost to the southern boundary, the Station Road boundary and also the
boundary between the ex-Griggs and Huntsman sites and, although the scheme would include
landscaping, the new trees would take some 40-50 years to mature.
Mr Kimberley then provided a list of contributions to the community that Tesco had proposed to support.
There then followed consideration by members with questions and answers to both Les Kimberley and
Catherine Parker to a list of points as summarised:









Agree, the Hitchen Lane junction was unacceptable and this must be addressed;
The Townsend roundabout was currently dangerous and there were tight angles for vehicular
access from Cannards Grave;
Cannards Grave road would be best to sweep to the western side of the Cenotaph and that the
existing proposals were unacceptable;
The Hitchen Lane mini-roundabout proposal was very dangerous and presented a hazard to both
pedestrians and vehicles, and that the access to Hitchen Lane should be via the main Huntsman
roundabout.
There appeared to be a lack of consideration to the pub/restaurant car parking facility;
There was concern as to the possibility of an additional pharmacy facility, which may result in
possible loss of the town centre facility in Boots;
It appeared that Tesco had a “scorched earth” policy and mature and magnificent trees would be
lost;
This could be a very good opportunity for Shepton Mallet, or could be a catastrophe;
The proposals should be ripped up and Tesco requested to re-think;
The site should embrace Shepton and should make a lasting impression on the town.
Catherine Parker highlighted that the units had been sited to the back to enable the car parking to be
nearest to the existing town centre, and that car parking would be free for everyone including those using
the existing town centre. The mixed-use development had already been agreed by Mendip in 2003 and
that already there was considerable financial cost to be incurred by Tesco in relocating from their existing
store and also giving up (A1) retail use of the existing site.
The Chairman then concluded that Tesco talked a lot about travel plans, cycle routes etc but
unfortunately their highways proposals would split the retail town centre once again. The applicants
should consider Shepton Mallet and he would like to see a road around the rear of the site to the south,
and that the Townsend highway be closed therefore joining up with the existing retail centre. There would
indeed be additional traffic and pedestrians using the site, given that Tesco expected to double their
output and that would in fact imply double the traffic.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, that the meeting now be adjourned for
the purpose of Public Forum relating to the Tesco application, as requested by members of the public in
Public Forum.
Mr Taffy Stride once again raised concern that Tesco appeared to be only interested in themselves and
were taking nothing on board regarding previous consultations and proposals. Here was a golden
opportunity for Highways to take heavy traffic out of the area and he raised concern as to the ownership
of the land where the bus stops/shelters were proposed. He raised much disappointment that a
community centre had not been included within the development.
Mr Mike Harris raised concern to Council that they should not look at this as two separate planning
applications, both proposals were linked, and if the Council should agree to the Outline Proposal and then
the Full Application for Tesco then there was no room for any amendment to the Hitchen Lane residential
development.
Mrs Weir enquired if the Tesco facility was likely to be a 24 hour facility and the response was that this
was unknown. She raised much concern regarding the speeding traffic, which needed calming in the
West Shepton area between Hitchen Lane and the ex-Huntsman roundabout, which was also very narrow
3
and sometimes necessitated HGVs to mount the pavements. Finally she raised much concern as to the
loss of trees.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that the meeting now
be bought back into closed session.
One member then summarised matters and considered that yes, in principle, the Council should agree,
however Tescos had completely failed in embracing the town and providing comprehensive and design to
deal with the problems. He raised concern as to:





The infrastructure and highways to the junction of Hitchen Lane and Hitchen Lane itself;
The West Shepton and Townsend roads;
The requirement for further pedestrian-controlled crossing in Old Market Road;
The requirement for the Cenotaph and the Cannards Grave/Station Road junction;
The unacceptable loss of mature trees with no imagination to the site and what appeared to be a
“scorched earth” policy;
The quantity of non-food retail area was too high
Catherine Parker made a final response in that informing that Tesco did look at the possibility of running a
highway to the south of the site but this was deemed not feasible. She also highlighted that the
requirement for the family restaurant/pub was what the town had requested and indeed the District
Council.
One member considered that all parties should meet in a closed room, hammer out all the problems
which were not insurmountable and remain until a satisfactory conclusion had been achieved.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Gilham, with a vote of 9 For & 1 Against, that the
previous resolve of the Town Council made at the meeting of the Planning Recommendations Committee
held on Tuesday, 30 November 2004, be reaffirmed in that the Town Council is not against the Tesco
development in principle, but object to the current application. Further consideration and amended
proposals should be resubmitted to include the following considerations:a)
Reconsider Shepton 21’s proposals to extend the whole site to the east to incorporate Station
Road and provide a visible connection and open views down the existing retail High Street, with
possible re-routing of the A371 directly through the centre of the site and to the rear of the site;
b)
The applicant should look to embrace the town on all boundaries of their site, and 106
Agreements should be put in place to ensure that this did occur, and make a positive and lasting
impression on the town;
c)
Further consideration should be given to proposals and ideas obtained via public exhibitions and
consultations which had taken place earlier, especially relating to the Cenotaph, Townsend
roundabout, inter-linking with existing retail area and provision of a Community Hall-type facility
within the proposed development site.
d)
Any provision to providing a closer link with the existing High Street retail was most desirable;
e)
Integration and upgrading of Hitchen Lane highway should be included within the proposals;
f)
Tesco appeared to have a “scorched earth” policy regarding trees and there was much concern
regarding protection of the existing trees and landscaping;
g)
The Town Council considered that decision makers from the applicant, and their agents, should
meet with senior and appropriate members of both the District and Town Councils to consider all
the matters raised with a view to obtaining a satisfactory design and proposals which would be
acceptable to all parties, including the wider community, and to ensure that the applicant is fully
aware of the expression of the Town Council and its community.
The meeting was then adjourned by the Chairman for a two-minute welfare break and, during this, all
members of the public and the press left the meeting not to return. Following the welfare break the
Chairman called the meeting back into session.
4
22.
Plans: a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
117618/001
Taylor
Resolve:
Coxley Developments
Redevelopment to form 2 flats (DEL)
Ltd.,
Full
6 & 6a Peter Street
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, with a vote of 8 For & 1
Abstention – Recommend proposal should be refused. The Town Council
objects, as it has previously done so, and considers that there are sufficient
1-bed residences available within the town. Community development should
provide family accommodation.
118098/000
Arnold
Mr & Mrs P Gaines,
107 Finch Close
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Bartlett, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
113338/001
Taylor
Mr M Higgins,
29 Elm Way
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Lovell, with a vote of 6 For, 2
Against & 1 Abstention - Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed,
although the Town Council raises concerns regarding retrospective
applications.
112519/001
Taylor
Mr & Mrs Reynolds,
20 Elm Way
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Gilham, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
118397/001
Arnold
Mr & Mrs C R Keevil,
Land east of Bodden
Lane (OS Field 4900)
Erection of single storey garage/store
attached to side of dwelling (DEL)
Erection of conservatory (retrospective)
(DEL)
Erection of livestock building (DEL)
NB Prior approval not required
Permitted Development
Full
Full
Full
–
Full
The Clerk confirmed that late information received from the District Council was that
this application did not require planning permission as it was already permitted
development.
f)
Resolve:
By unanimous vote - that the matter is noted.
118410/000
Arnold
Mr T Maxwell,
Erection of double garage (DEL)
The Barn, Brewery
Full
Lane
Proposed by Cllr Champion, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
Resolve:
g)
118415/000
Taylor
Shepton Mallet Town
Council,
Victorian Fountain,
Market Place
Provision of new lantern & alterations to
surrounding paving (DEL)
LBC –
Alter/
extend
All members, having previously declared an interest in the matter, considered that
the Town Council, as owners of the structure and also the applicant in respect of
Listed Building Consent, defer any decision in the matter and leave to the
consideration of Mendip District Council.
h)
Resolve:
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Gilham, seconded by Cllr Inchley, with a vote of 7
For & 2 Against - that the Town Council, as owners of the structure and also
the applicant in respect of Listed Building Consent, defer any decision in the
matter and leave to the consideration of Mendip District Council.
118390/000
PG29
Jarrold
Mr I Diamond,
13 Dukes Field, Tadley
Acres
(DEL)
TPO
Works
5
i)
23.
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Gilham, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, with a vote of 8 For & 1
Against - Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed, subject to
limiting the proposed crown thinning to a maximum of 15%.
067626/011
PG29
Jarrold
Resolve:
Parsons Tree Surgery,
Park House, Park Road
(DEL)
TPO
Works
Proposed by Cllr Gilham, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote –
Recommend proposal should be refused, the Town Council see no reason for
the works and existing trees should continue to be preserved.
101512/003 & 101512/004 Mr C Wilson, 10 High Street
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote, that the matter is noted.
24.
Street Naming & Numbering of Development at Field Farm
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that the matter is noted and, given that the Town
Council has now achieved Quality Council Status, it should consider taking on the function of street
naming and that the matter be agendaed for the next meeting for the Community & Leisure Portfolio.
25.
Dismissal of Appeal Decision – 115820/001 - 10 Nightingale Grove – Retrospective Erection of
Conservatory
26.
The Highwayman Inn – Transfer of Licence to be heard at The Court House, Wells at 10am on 14
June 2005
27.
High Street South Highway Works – Public Notice & Consultation Plan
Public Notice and Consultation Plans were available at the Town Council offices and representations
were invited by the 15 June 2005
28.
Procedures for Responding to Planning Applications
An information sheet had been received from SALC, which had been considered by the Chairman.
29.
The next meeting is programmed for Tuesday 21 June 2005 at 7.00pm.
6
The Chairman thanked members for their lengthy considerations and attendance and closed the meeting at
9.13pm.
Signature______________________
Chairman
Date_______________________2005
7
Committee Meeting held on Tuesday 21 June 2005
in the MDC Council Chamber, Cannards Grave
Cllr’s Bartlett, Fone, Inchley, Jeremiah, Manvill, Shearn and Taylor.
Three members of the public and no press were in attendance.
The Chairman opened the meeting, welcoming members and the general public. A brief was provided on Heath
& Safety requirements including emergency evacuation and assembly point procedures. A further brief was
provided as to the use of the Induction Loop facility for users of hearing aids and use of the microphones was
emphasised. The meeting was also informed that the meeting would be audio-taped for internal use only.
30.
Public Forum
Application No. 026727/012 PG29 – Felling of 18 Corsican Pine Trees at the Anglo Trading Estate
Mr Ken Marable and Mr Derek Ball, both of Shaftgate Avenue, raised support for the above application,
highlighting their concerns regarding damaged drains, foundations to their properties and to possible
damage to properties/injuries to persons should one or more of the trees come down for whatever
reason. The trees were currently considered to be in excess of 100ft high and there are concerns
regarding to safety matters, especially in high winds, whereby there is a possibility that if one did fall it
may fall on houses on properties on both sides of the street, and therefore they were in favour of the
proposal of felling.
Application No. 118085/000 & 001 - Tesco Stores Limited
Mr Taffy Stride raised concern as to what he considered to be a wrong decision made by the District
Council regarding this application last Wednesday, and also raised concern as to what appeared to be a
duplicate application (No. 118085/002), which was before the Committee for decision this evening.
Matters from Previous Minutes Relating to 37 Compton Road
Mr Taffy Stride updated members and confirmed that the development work was currently at a standstill.
31.
Cllrs Lockey, O’Connor and Robinson tabled their Apologies to the Clerk for matters relating to family. Cllr
Inchley then submitted Apologies for both Cllr Cann and Gilham. Members raised concern that the
Apologies had not been submitted within the correct procedures, and the Clerk was requested to highlight
the requirement for Quality Council Status whereby each and every member of the Council was required,
at each meeting where they were provided with an Agenda/Summons, that each individual member is to
table their Apologies prior to the meeting directly to the Clerk, the Chairman of the Council or the
respective Chairman/Portfolio Holder of the meeting concerned. There was a requirement of Quality
Council Status that this procedure is carried out in respect of every meeting.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Shearn, seconded by Cllr Manvill, with a vote of 5 For & 0 Against, that the
Apologies are accepted for those members that applied the correct procedure and tabled their Apologies
previously to the Clerk or Chairman of the Council/Committee.
On this occasion this would be in respect of Cllrs Cann, Hurrell, Gilham, Lockey, Marsh, O’Connor and
Robinson.
32.
Application 118452/000 – 1 Norton Close – Cllr Inchley declared a Personal & Prejudicial Interest in the
matter, due to being a co-worker of the applicant, and would leave the meeting at the appropriate point.
Blocked Drains – 5, 6 & 7 Field View, Shepton Mallet – Cllr Fone declared a Personal & Non-Prejudicial
Interest being a neighbour of those involved.
1
33.
Minutes
The Minutes of the Meeting held on the 31 May 2005 were considered for accuracy and content.
Resolve; Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, seconded by Cllr Manvill, by unanimous vote, that the Minutes of
the Planning Recommendations Committee made at the meeting held on the 31 May 2005, be approved
34.
Matters Arising
a)
Minute 4/Minute 20 - 37 Compton Road, Development within garden
The Chairman confirmed that two letters had been received from the Local MP and was also of the
opinion that the development work had ceased, for whatever reason. The contents of the letters
received dated 9/6 and 16/6 were read to members, which appeared to indicate that Mendip District
Council had made the correct interpretation of the law, in that it was “permitted development” and
the MP confirmed that it appeared that Mendip was bound by the Central Government
Development Order. He confirmed that it was difficult to get these Orders amended but would use
this as an example in any future debate on the subject. He noted that the Town Council had written
to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and he was of interest to see this reply as and when
received. The Council’s request was for the MP to be more proactive rather than wait for future
response from the ODPM.
Resolve: by unanimous note that the matter is noted.
b)
International Treatment Centre – Invitation had been received from the Project Group for Council
to be provided with an update and briefing. The facility would be accepting its first outpatients from
18 July and first inpatients from the 15 August. The request was for members to be provided with
an update and briefing and also to attend an Open Day, which was likely to take place on a
Saturday in early August.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Shearn, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that this Town
Council would wish to take up the invitation and offer of a briefing, along with the opportunity to
attend an Open Day due to take place on a Saturday in early August.
35.
Plans: 1.
094215/002
PG29
Jarrold
Resolve:
Mr D Clowes
23 Coombe Lane
Felling of 2 sycamore, 1 conifer and 1 ash
trees in a conservation area (DEL)
CA
Felling
Trees
Proposed by Cllr Champion, seconded by Cllr Shearn, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be refused. The Committee see no reason for
felling and consideration should be given towards pollarding the trees, which
appeared to be also stablising the embankment.
2.
026727/012
PG29
Jarrold
Mr D Foley
Anglo Trading Estate
Fell 18 Corsican Pine Trees covered by
TPO M1173 (DEL)
TPO
Felling
The Chairman confirmed that he had visited the site and both him and the ViceChairman were in support for the felling of these trees, subject to landscaping
requirements.
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Champion, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed, subject to the bushes
and shrubs below the tree line remaining and that a suitable landscaping plan
is put in place.
2
3.
4.
5.
6.
118430/000
Jarrold
M Durston
4 Somerville Close
Resolve:
Abstention - Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
114767/001
Walker
Mr W Tully
28 Berrymans Close
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
118433/000
Boustead
Mr W Pickford
5 Roundwell Close
Resolve:
101835/003
Arnold
Mr T Kingstone
57 Town Lane
Resolve:
7.
107130/002
Walker
Resolve:
8.
106714/030
Williams
Resolve:
9.
118452/000
Boustead
First floor extension over existing garage
and extension to porch (DEL)
Demolition of existing garage and erection
of single storey extension (DEL)
Full
Full
Erection of conservatory ro rear (DEL)
Full
Removal of existing pointing & replace with
traditional lime pointing & replace 2 soft Listed
wood windows with hard wood to front Building
(DEL)
Property Holdings,
Renewal and alterations to existing flat roof
Royal Mail Group PLC
(DEL)
Full
1 Town Street
Bloor Homes Swindon
Field Farm
Hard landscaping to form square with
obelisk shelter feature, piers and wall Full
(DEL)
Proposed by Cllr Bartlett, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
Mr G Jackson,
1 Norton Close
Insertion of
(BOARD)
dormer
window
to
rear
Full
Cllr Inchley, having declared a Personal & Prejudicial Interest in the Matter then left
the meeting.
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, seconded by Cllr Manvill, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
10.
118085.002
Kimberley
Tesco Stores Ltd,
Outline – demoliton of existing buildings
Land to the South of
and redevelopment of site for retail
Townsend, West of
Outline
Station Rd & East of
Possible duplicate to previous
Hitchin Lane
The Chairman confirmed that planning permission had already been granted by the
District Council, subject to conditional meetings and considerations, in which the
Chairman confirmed that he was involved, and that he would advise as and when
progress is made. Cllr Inchley enquired as to why and how Somerset County
Council Highways had approved the Tesco plans and had not raised objection to
anything. He considered that the Town Council should write to County Council
highlighting this fact and requesting their reasons as to why they deemed the
proposals to be acceptable.
The Chairman confirmed that this is one of the many issues to be discussed during
considerations with Tesco following the granting of planning permission. However
3
several members raised concern that, now that Tesco had received their
permission, there was no hold over them to make them carry out any further
requirements.
Resolve:
That the previous Resolve to the Outline Application 118085/000 is copied and
endorsed for this application, and that the Town Council write to Somerset
Highways seeking an explanation and reasons for Somerset County Council’s
decision for supporting the application without raising any objections or
concerns. Also to enquire as to why they deem these proposals acceptable.
The previous Resolve of the Planning Committee held on 31 May 2005, Minute
No. 21, be reaffirmed, whereby the Town Council was in support of the
application in principle, but required a list of considerations to be made first.
6.110134/006
Foster
Resolve:
36.
nd
Ms S Lord & Mrs J
Internal alterations to form 2 floor letting
LBC –
Watchman,
room with en suite shower room (DEL)
Alter/
Bell Hotel, 3 High
extend
Street
Proposed by Cllr Champion, seconded by Cllr Inchley, with a vote of 5 For & 3
Abstentions – Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
7.105678/002
Taylor
C & G Johnson,
Renwal of consent 105678/001 –
Ex Salvation Army Hall, conversion of hall to dwelling (DEL)
Renewal
39 Board Cross
This application was for renewal of previous consent which was due to run out in
August 2005.
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote –
Blocked Drains – 5, 6 & 7 Field View, Shepton Mallet
The Chairman confirmed that he had received a letter of complaint from a resident of Field View giving a
total lack of satisfactory performance from Somerset Highways and he had recorded his contact with
them on several occasions without resolving the matter. Several members considered that the gulleysucker had been in the area this week and that this matter may now have been dealt with although they
could not be sure.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that the Town
Council forward the complaint to Somerset Highways, raising concern as to why repeated complaints had
to be tabled without response and to enquire if the actual complaint regarding blocked drains outside No.
5, 6 & 7 Field View had now been rectified and, at the same time, a copy was to be sent to the County
Councillor Stephen Robinson requesting his intervention in the matter.
37.
Transfer of Justices Licence a) Transfer of Licence relating to The Crown Inn, Draycott Rd - To be heard at Town Hall, Wells at
10am on 12 July 2005.
b) Transfer of Licence relating to The King William, West Shepton – To be heard at Frome
Magistrates Court at 10am on 12 July 2005.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that both the above matters are noted.
38.
Speed Restriction – A371 Fosse Lane
Somerset Highways had invited comments to proposals for a 30 mph speed limit adjacent to Mendip
Avenue and the new Focus Superstore.
4
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Bartlett, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote, that the Town
Council has no objections to the proposals for a 30mph speed limited on the A371 at Fosse Lane adjacent
to Mendip Avenue and the new Focus Superstore, and that the matter of the previously requested speed
limits to Whitstone Road and Charlton Road as you enter from Doulting, be placed on the next Agenda for
the Community & Leisure Portfolio for further consideration.
39.
The next meeting is programmed for Tuesday 12 July 2005 at 7.00pm. No matters were raised.
Councillor R.R. Champion
Signature______________________
Chairman
Date_______________________2005
5
Committee Meeting held on Tuesday 12 July 2005
Present: Chairman - Cllr Champion
Cllrs Bartlett, Fone, Hurrell, Inchley, Jeremiah, Marsh, O’Connor, Shearn and Taylor.
40.
Public Forum
Resolve: Proposed, by unanimous vote, that the meeting be adjourned for the purpose of transacting
Public Forum.
a) 37 Compton Road – Possible Illegal Development – Mr Taffy Stride raised disappointment at the
response from the District Council regarding this matter, and that it was classed as lawful, permitted
development, which was a statement that he was unable to come to terms with.
b) Tesco Plans – Mr Taffy Stride stated that it was unbelievable what had transpired in the last week
and also confirmed that more revelations would be forthcoming.
c) Application 109666/007 44 Compton Road – Mr Taffy Stride requested Council to consider
rejection of this application. In the past several applications had been put forward and conditions had
already been broken, which also included the embankment which now encroached approximately 2
feet on to the pedestrian highway. He considered that the next step, after removing the trees, would
be to remove the embankment and then provide an extension, both upwards and outwards to the
existing building. He considered that the matter should be reported to the Ombudsman who should
investigate the District Council, as the majority of employees at the District Council use the services
of this business and therefore had a vested interest.
The Chairman thanked Mr Stride for his comments, which were noted.
Resolve: Proposed, by unanimous vote, that the meeting be brought back into Closed Session.
41.
Cllrs Gilham, Lockey, Lovell and Manvill (all family commitments) and Robinson (MDC Area Board)
42.
a) Application No. 109666/007 44 Compton Road – Cllr Champion declared a Personal & Prejudicial,
being a neighbour of the applicant, and would duly hand over the Chair and leave the meeting at the
appropriate point. Cllr Jeremiah also declared a Personal but Non-Prejudicial Interest in the matter as
his residence was in the same road, and he would continue to speak and vote on the matter.
b) Proposed Brief/Development of Little Ostry – Cllr Marsh declared a Personal & Prejudicial Interest
in the matter and would leave the room if needed, as her son was involved in development of the
area.
43.
Minutes
The Minutes of the Meeting held on the 21 June 2005 were considered for accuracy and content. The
Chairman confirmed that amendments, which had been agreed by Council on 5 July, had now been put in
place and Cllr O’Connor, being on holiday at the previous meeting, requested clarification as to the
requirement of amendments to Apologies, which was duly provided by the Clerk.
1
Resolve; Proposed by Cllr Champion, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that the Minutes of
the Planning Recommendations Committee made at the meeting held on the 21 June 2005, be approved
44.
Matters Arising
a)
37 Compton Road – Possible Illegal Development –The Chairman read to members letters
received from Mendip District Council and the Government of the South West on this issue, all of
whom once again confirmed and provided evidence that it was indeed permitted development.
However, the matter was still being progressed by the Member of Parliament.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote, that the matter is noted, and the meeting
move to Next Business, after expressing disappointment in the matter.
b)
Petticoat Lane – Unsafe Wall – A response letter had been received from the Service Manager,
Building Control of Mendip District Council confirming that, in Mendip District Council’s
consideration, the wall was indeed safe and there were no implications to the health & safety of
members of the public or users of the adjacent footpath.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, with a vote of 8 For, 1 Against & 1
Abstention, that the Town Council, in alliance with members of the public, still deemed this wall to
be unsafe and that the only way forward is to call for the District Council to clear up the unsightly
mess of this wall and the adjoining area, as indeed the District Council’s policy was “cleaner, safer
streets”, and this footpath provided the main ancillary route from the Commercial Road car park
directly into the town centre.
45.
Recommendations Criteria
Mendip District Council have provided a revised breakdown of allocated criteria for recommendations
from consultees such as the Town Council to planning applications which were now required to be given
one of three criteria as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Recommend approval and provide reasons for same;
Recommend refusal of permission with reasons for same;
Recommend that the decision be left to the Planning Officer following consultation responses;
In addition to a resolve of either 1, 2 or 3 above general observations should be provided if needed
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Champion, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that the matter is
noted and that the Town Council will comply with the District Council’s recommendations criteria for
planning applications.
46.
Plans: a)
b)
c)
114443/001
Arnold
Ms J E Ayton,
12 Chestnut Parade
Erection of conservatory (DEL)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Hurrell, by unanimous vote Recommend approval. This proposal will not adversely affect other adjoining
residents.
118483/000
Taylor
Mrs E Howell,
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Hurrell, by unanimous vote Recommend approval - in keeping.
105941/042
Taylor
Delacamp (UK) Ltd.,
Fosse Lane/Mendip
Avenue
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Champion, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote Recommend approval but to ensure that the installation does not cause any
light pollution.
Demolition of existing garage and carport &
erection of 2 storey side extension & single
storey rear extension, with garage to front
(DEL)
Proposed external lighting to entrance
façade and goods in area (DEL)
Full
Full
Full
2
d)
030931/015
Langford
PFA Properties,
21 High Street
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote Recommend approval, however the Town Council suggest that the applicant
also looks to upgrade lower level finishes to the shop front, which are
deemed unsatisfactory.
e)
030931/016
Langford
PFA Properties,
21 High Street
f)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote Recommend approval, however the Town Council suggest that the applicant
also looks to upgrade lower level finishes to the shop front, which are
deemed unsatisfactory.
g)
034713/008
Taylor
Mr V Gashi,
Petrol Station,
Cannards Grave
Resolve:
Recommend approval. The Town Council, however, raise concern and
request the District Council to take account of environmental considerations,
chemicals which may be used and also water run-off.
118496/000
Arnold
Mr D Gilson,
49 Barrington Place
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote Recommend approval. The proposal appeared to have no adverse effect on
adjoining properties.
112902/005
Jarrold
C & J Johnson,
41 Board Cross
h)
i)
Resolve:
j)
k)
Alteration to shop front (DEL)
Alteration to shop front (DEL)
Retrospective – Change of use from petrol
filling station to carwash (DEL)
Full
Listed
Building
Change
of Use
Full
Renewal of Planning Consent 112902/002
– Demolition of existing garage wall &
Renewal
erection of garden room, car port & porch
(DEL)
Proposed by Cllr Champion, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote Recommend approval. This property already has planning permission and
this is just a renewal application.
106714/031
Jarrold
Bloor Homes Swindon
Plot 5, Field Farm
Insertion of roof light to end elevation (DEL)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Bartlett, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote Recommend approval. Proposal appears to have no adverse effect on
adjoining properties.
109666/007
Jarrold
Mrs E Garland,
44 Compton Road
Removal of condition No. 1 from planning
ref. No. 109666/003 (remove row of conifer
trees along northern boundary of site)
(DEL)
Full
Remova
l of
Conditio
n(s)
Cllr Champion handed over the Chair to his deputy, Cllr Fone, and duly left the
meeting, having declared an Interest previously. Members debated previous
applications regarding these premises and the points raised in Public Forum. They
considered that the trees should not be felled for no good reason and, indeed, the
trees were there to protect the privacy of adjoining properties and should stay.
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote Recommend refusal of permission. A replacement landscaping scheme had
not been put in place with the application to uphold the amenity of the area
and to protect adjoining properties. A replacement landscaping scheme is
paramount to this application.
Cllr Champion then rejoined the meeting and reassumed Chairmanship.
3
l)
47.
110030/022
PG29
Jarrold
Street & Landscaping
Services,
Barrington Place
(Runaway Hill)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Hurrell, by unanimous vote –
Recommend approval subject to agreement and approval of MDC’s Tree
Officer.
m)
101285/009
PG29
Jarrold
Resolve:
Works to trees in Conservation Area (DEL)
CA Tree
The Hollies, Leg
Works
Square
Officer.
n)
101285/010
PG29
Jarrold
The Hollies, Leg
Square
Resolve:
Officer.
TPO
Works
(DEL)
TPO
Works
a) 104694/005 & 006 Mr K Newton, The Former Rectory, Church Lane
b) 117618/001 Coxley Developments Ltd, 6 & 6a Peter Street
c) 117953/001 C & W Sellar, 18 Tallowood
d) 094215/002PG29 Mr D Clowes, 23 Coombe Lane
Resolve: by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that the above matters are noted.
48.
Maintenance and Handing Over of Balancing Ponds – Bloor Homes Estate
The Chairman provided a summary of events which had now been going on for several years, which was
totally unsatisfactory, and also read a copy letter of complaints received from adjoining residents. One
member considered that this matter should be raised at the next meeting with the Chief Executive of the
District Council to once again highlight the frustrations of the Town Council with being unable to fully
resolve the issue.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote, that this matter is a
Mendip District Council issue and that all details are to be passed to the Ward Members to take up the
matter, and if any further complaints or queries are raised by members of the public to the Clerk, then
they are to be directed to District Ward Councillors.
49.
Tesco Development Proposals
The Chairman read a letter received from a resident of Victoria Grove giving his consideration that Tescos
had indeed made some amendments already in respect of public safety and hoped that the matter could
be concluded without further delay. The Chairman updated members with progress to his participation
within the District Council’s Working Party who were negotiating directly with Tesco. Members
unanimously hoped that the Chairman would provide a strong argument and put forward the strength of
feeling, both in the Town Council and the community. Two points needed to be made in that Sheptonians
did not want the majority of trees to be felled and they do not want the roundel or pagoda-type building
proposed anywhere near the Cenotaph monument.
Resolve: by a unanimous vote that the matter is noted and Cllr Champion continue to attend the working
group due to meet this Friday 15 July 2005 to put the Town Councils consideration forward in a robust
manner.
4
50.
Proposed Brief - Development to Little Ostry
An invitation had been received from Les Kimberley of the District Council for the Town Council to provide
a public platform for a consultation regarding proposals to work up the brief for this area. The Chairman
provided a short appraisal of the layout drawing, a copy of which had previously provided to all members
of the Council. He had a further document which he would appraise and report to the next Planning
meeting, and that two projected dates for the public consultation had been provided in September for
agreement by both Mendip and the consultants.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that the Town Council is happy to facilitate a
public platform for consultation regarding proposals to work up a brief for the development of Little Ostry,
and they look forward to a positive solution for this area which had been derelict for numerous years.
51.
Road Closures
Hard copy consultation information had been received from Somerset Highways regarding temporary
closure of the A361 Charlton Road from outside No. 40 to the junction with the A37 Kilver Street, a
distance of 160 metres for a one-week period from 25 July 2005. A further email correspondence had
been received informing of a road closure within the same week from the A361 which was planned to go
from Victoria Grove to the junction of the A37, and also within that email was a further temporary Road
Closure of the A361 on the 1 August 2005, which runs along Cannards Grave Road, stretching from
Compton Road down to the Cenotaph.
Members raised much concern regarding these Road Closures where it appeared that inappropriate, nonformal and, in some cases non-existent, consultation information was being provided by Somerset
Highways regarding Road Closures. Indeed, several members had received complaints regarding works
to Fosse Lane which had already been advised but that the working times of operation had not been
informed to residents when work commenced planing off the highway at 7.00am on a Sunday morning,
and also it was thought that work would be taking place overnight.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that the matter is handed directly to the Portfolio
Holder for Somerset County Council, raising all the respective issues and demanding that the Town
Council and its community required good, prior notice of any Road Closures and also any works which
were deemed to take place outside the normal working day Monday to Friday.
52.
Proposed Meeting of the Five Towns – Chairman and Clerk with the Chief Executive and Leader of
the District Council
A meeting had now been confirmed for Monday, 1 August 2005 at 2.30pm which both the Chairman and
Clerk would attend. Mendip District Council had proposed a list of items for discussion, which included:a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Improving the relationships between Parish and the District Council;
What issues would your Town Council like at Area Boards?;
What major problems would you like the District Council to help you with?;
Highlight any major problems that MDC would like Parish Council’s help with;
Suggestions for environmental improvements.
The Chairman requested members to “put on their thinking caps” and provide constructive comments in
order that the Chairman and Clerk could go to this meeting fully prepared.
Resolve: by unanimous vote, that the matter is noted.
53.
The next meeting programmed for Tuesday 26 July 2005 at 7.00pm. No matters were raised.
Signature______________________
Chairman
Date_______________________2005
5
Committee Meeting held on Tuesday 26 July 2005
Cllr’s Bartlett, Cann, Fone, Hurrell, Inchley, Jeremiah, Lockey, Lovell, Manvill, O’Connor,
Robinson, Shearn and Taylor.
45.
Public Forum
As there were no members of the public present there was no requirement for Public Forum.
46.
Cllrs Gilham and Marsh (Work)
47.
Cllr Robinson declared an Interest on all matters on the Agenda due to her role as an MDC Councillor on
the District Council Planning Board, and wished members to note for this meeting and all future Town
Council Planning Committee meetings that, although she would express her views here at the Town
Council Planning Committee meetings she would keep an open mind and will reconsider at the District
Planning Board and take into account all relevant evidence and representations.
Resolve; by a unanimous vote that the above declaration is noted and recorded.
48.
Minutes
The Minutes of the Meeting held on the 12 July 2005 were considered for accuracy and content.
Resolve; Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote, that the Minutes of
the Planning Recommendations Committee made at the meeting held on the 12 July 2005, be approved
49.
Matters Arising
a)
Tesco Planning Application – The Clerk read to members a letter received from the Right Hon.
David Heathcoat-Amory, MP, thanking the Council for their views regarding the Tesco application.
He raised particular concern to ensure that any development helps the town centre and the viability
of its trade and commerce, and therefore noted the comments with interest which would be most
useful in continuing discussions. A copy of a letter had also been received via Les Kimberley,
Principal Planning Officer at the District Council, reporting back to Mrs Joy Stride’s “Save our
Trees” campaign, which confirmed their understanding of concern regarding the trees on the Tesco
site, and confirming that an environment impact assessment was not necessary as the application
did not meet the test set out in the guidance requiring formal assessment. Nevertheless he
confirmed that all the issues would be properly assessed and considered. English Nature had been
consulted by the applicants prior to submission and they had requested a bat survey which had
been completed and there was deemed to be no significant indication of the presence of bats.
However, he was now consulting with English Nature to ensure that they had no other concerns.
b)
Little Ostry Development – The Chairman confirmed that he had carried out an appraisal of the
draft proposals for the site, which included work in three phases, and that they were still awaiting
dates back for the consultants to visit and provide further public consultation. However, this matter
had now been overridden by an application being received for development of Phase I of the works
and this would require consideration by the Planning Committee at its next meeting programmed for
2 August.
1
c)
Balancing Ponds, Field Farm – The Clerk read to members an update from Rob Thurston of
Mendip District Council following the matter now being taken up by District Councillor Stephen
Robinson. An email confirmed that the operation of the Balancing Ponds appeared to be working to
requirements and it was confirmed that MDC would now proceed with adoption. It was hoped that
adoption could take place quite quickly but the speed is somewhat determined by the legal process.
d)
International Treatment Centre – The Chairman confirmed that the Open Day had now been
organised for Saturday, 6 August 2005. The doors would be open at 1.30pm until 3.30pm and that
guided tours would take place approximately every 30 minutes, although there was some confusion
that a press release had indicated that the facility may open at 1.00pm.
e)
Presentation from the Boundary Committee – The Chairman confirmed that this would take
place at the District Council on Thursday, 28 July at 6.00pm where all Parish Councils were invited
to attend. It was very important that members attempt to attend this meeting as recommendations
may be made regarding Parish and Town electoral arrangements.
Resolve: by unanimous vote, that all the above matters are noted.
50.
Plans: 1.
2.
117784/001
Taylor
Mr Maundrill,
10 Clover Ground
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote Recommend approval. Reason – Acceptable development.
105061/007
Taylor
Mr & Mrs D W Minns,
Alterations to existing garage, erection of
The Priory, Draycott
open porch & stone wall adjacent entrance Full
Road
(DEL)
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote Recommend approval. Reason – Acceptable development.
Resolve:
3.
105061/008
Taylor
Resolve:
4.
Full
Mr & Mrs D W Minns,
Erection of open porch to kitchen door, LBC –
The Priory, Draycott
alterations to garage & entrance wall (DEL)
alter/
Road
extend
Proposed by Cllr Shearn, seconded by Cllr Hurrell, by unanimous vote Recommend approval. Reason – Acceptable development.
106714/032
Williams
Bloor Homes
(Swindon)
Field Farm
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Manvill, by unanimous vote Recommend the decision be left to the Planning Officer following
consultation responses. However, the following matters required clarification
and further information from the District Council:
a)
b)
c)
5.
Erection of 55 dwellings with associated
roads, parking and garages (DEL)
Reser’d
Matters
Please explain application type (Reserved Matters);
The Town Council raises concern as to play areas and open space on this
complete housing development and therefore require details as to the
strategy and provision for this very large residential development
regarding play areas and public open spaces and when this provision
would be delivered;
Confirm the furthest southern boundary towards Cannards Grave
roundabout where current Permitted Development was to finish.
Confirmation was required as this would be the line on the drawing
running level with the boundary of the Gore End farm buildings.
111584/004
PG29
Mr Madgett,
16 Tallowood
Works to lime tree (T1) covered by TPO
M1183 (DEL)
Resolve:
TPO
Works
2
6.
51.
A05279/012
Taylor
Mrs S Chivers,
Unit 4, 64 High Street
Erection of non illuminating projecting sign
(DEL)
Resolve:
Advertis
ement
a) Twinning Event – Monday, 1 August 2005
The Clerk requested members to confirm the number of members and their partners who would be
attending this event in order to assist catering arrangements.
Resolve: by unanimous vote that the matter is noted. Cllrs Hurrell and Champion tabled their
Apologies. Cllrs O’Connor, Manvill and Robinson confirmed their attendance along with their partners.
b) World War II Event – Sunday, 14 August 2005
Cllr Lovell provided members with an update of the organisation of the event. The order for the
catering arrangements had now been made and all matters were in hand, with Cllr Inchley confirming
that he would assist with laying out the tables etc on Saturday, 13 August. The Chairman confirmed
that she had been invited to lay a wreath with members of the British Legion prior to the church
service at 10.40am, which would take place at the Cenotaph. It was agreed that all members would
collectively arrange to meet at the Cenotaph in time for the laying of the wreath ceremony at 10.40am
and from there they would then attend the church service as an organised group. All members were
requested to support the event.
c) Payment for Suppliers to Both the Above Events
The Clerk requested members to consider authorisation for the raising of cheques for payment prior
to the events and, in any event, prior to the World War II Veterans’ Event due to the recess period
and the office closure, or failing same for members to agree payment terms with suppliers.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that all the above matters are noted and that
executive powers are afforded to the Chairman and Vice-Chairman of the Council, in consultation
with the Clerk, to agree and make any authorised payments to suppliers of these two events during
the Council’s recess period, and that the matter be reported to the September meeting of Council.
52.
The Clerk confirmed to members that the Planning meeting scheduled for 2 August 2005 was quite full
with contentious issues such as the revised Tesco application and the Little Ostry Phase I development
application and that, in consultation with the Chairman of the Council and due to public interest in both
these applications, the Planning Committee meeting for 2 August 2005 would commence at 7.00pm, and
that the full Council meeting for the same date would be held at 8.00pm or on completion of the Planning
meeting to be held at the same venue.
The Chairman tabled his Apologies for the next meeting due to family commitments, thanked members for their
attendance and closed the meeting at 7.40pm.
Signature______________________
Chairman
Date_______________________2005
3
Committee Meeting held on Tuesday 2 August 2005
in the Council Chamber, Cannards Grave Road,
Shepton Mallet .
Present: Vice-Chairman - Cllr Fone
Cllr’s Bartlett, Hurrell, Inchley, Jeremiah, Lockey, Manvill, Marsh, O’Connor T. Robinson,
Taylor and Shearn.
Mr Les Kimberley (Principle Planning Officer MDC) – Sue Ross (GL Hearn) – PC Hawkins of the public and 1 member of the press were in attendance .
17 members
A brief was provided on Health & Safety requirements including emergency evacuation and assembly point
procedures. A further brief was provided as to the use of the Induction Loop facility for users of hearing aids
and use of the microphones was emphasised. The meeting was also informed that the meeting would be
audio-taped for internal use only.
53. Public Forum
Resolve; Proposed by CCI, Seconded by TO, by a unanimous vote that the meeting be adjourned for
Public Forum to be transacted
Tesco Application - 12 members of the public spoke on the matter, 9 of which afford strong objection to
the proposals on matters relating to loss of mature trees (1700 signature petition), loss of wildlife haven
with no Environmental Impact Study being undertaken, unacceptable highways, unacceptable pedestrian
links with existing retail areas, possible loss of trading to existing retailers and no safety measures to
provide protection of the current setting or against vehicular damage to the Cenotaph. The remaining
speakers were in support of the application and some of the concerns raised, however they considered
the town was being sentimental and perhaps negative on the issue.
Resolve; Proposed by CCI, Seconded by TO, by a unanimous vote that the meeting now be brought
back into closed session.
Cllrs Cann, Champion, Gilham and Lovell (all family commitments)
Application 107695/005, 2 Back Lane. Cllr Manvill declared a Personal and Non-Prejudicial Interest as
she was known to the applicant.
56. Minutes
The Minutes of the Meeting held on the 26 July 2005 were considered for accuracy and content.
Resolve; Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote, that the Minutes of the
Planning Recommendations Committee made at the meeting held on the 26 July 2005, be approved as a
true record and signed by the Chairman.
57. Matters Arising
Petticoat Lane – Confirmation letter received from Tracy Arrons, MDC.
Resolve; that the matter is noted.
1
58. Plans: a)
118085/000
Kimberley
Tesco Stores Ltd,
Townsend, West of
Hitchin Lane
Outline – demolition of existing buildings
and redevelopment of site for retail (Use
Class A1) Family Restaurant / Pub (Use
Class A3) Petrol Filling Station, Residential
development (Use Class C3)
Revised drawings
Outline
Members debated the amended plans in some depth. Input including questions and
answers were afforded to both Les Kimberley of MDC and Su Ross of GL Hearn
(Tesco Agent). Letters were read from the public and a report from Cllr Champion in
his absence. The revised guidelines regarding 106 monies was also explained. A
recorded vote was called for by Cllr Lockey. Members considered that there was
very little positive progress or differential between this and previous applications.
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by a recorded vote of; 10
For (Cllrs Bartlett-Fone-Hurrell-Inchley-Jeremiah-Lockey-Manvill-O’ConnorShearn & Taylor) 1 Against (Cllr Marsh) and 1 Abstention (Cllr Robinson)that
the Committees previous resolve of Minute 21 on the 31 May 2005 is reaffirmed as follows;
that the Town Council is not against the Tesco development in principle,
but object to the current application. Further consideration and amended
proposals should be resubmitted to include the following considerations:a)
Reconsider Shepton 21’s proposals to extend the whole site to the
east to incorporate Station Road and provide a visible connection and
open views down the existing retail High Street, with possible rerouting of the A371 directly through the centre of the site and to the
rear of the site;
b)
The applicant should look to embrace the town on all boundaries of
their site, and 106 Agreements should be put in place to ensure that
this did occur, and make a positive and lasting impression on the
town;
c)
Further consideration should be given to proposals and ideas
obtained via public exhibitions and consultations which had taken
place earlier, especially relating to the Cenotaph, Townsend
roundabout, inter-linking with existing retail area and provision of a
Community Hall-type facility within the proposed development site.
d)
Any provision to providing a closer link with the existing High Street
retail was most desirable;
e)
Integration and upgrading of Hitchen Lane highway should be
included within the proposals;
Tesco appeared to have a “scorched earth” policy regarding trees and there
was much concern regarding protection of the existing trees and
landscaping;
b)
118085/001
Kimberley
Tesco Stores Ltd,
Townsend, West of
Hitchin Lane
Full – demolition of existing buildings and
redevelopment of site for retail (Use Class
A1) Family Restaurant / Pub (Use Class
A3) Petrol Filling Station, associated car
parking, landscaping and highways works
Revised drawings
Full
Members debated the amended plans in some depth. Input including questions and
answers were afforded to both Les Kimberley of MDC and Su Ross of GL Hearn
(Tesco Agent). Letters were read from the public and a report from Cllr Champion in
his absence. The revised guidelines regarding 106 monies was also explained. A
recorded vote was called for by Cllr Lockey. Members considered that there was
very little positive progress or differential between this and previous applications
2
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by a recorded vote of; 10
For (Cllrs Bartlett-Fone-Hurrell-Inchley-Jeremiah-Lockey-Manvill-O’ConnorShearn & Taylor) 1 Against (Cllr Marsh) and 1 Abstention (Cllr Robinson)that
the Committees previous resolve of Minute 21 on the 31 May 2005 is reaffirmed as follows;
that the Town Council is not against the Tesco development in principle,
but object to the current application. Further consideration and amended
proposals should be resubmitted to include the following considerations:b)
Reconsider Shepton 21’s proposals to extend the whole site to the
east to incorporate Station Road and provide a visible connection and
open views down the existing retail High Street, with possible rerouting of the A371 directly through the centre of the site and to the
rear of the site;
f)
The applicant should look to embrace the town on all boundaries of
their site, and 106 Agreements should be put in place to ensure that
this did occur, and make a positive and lasting impression on the
town;
g)
Further consideration should be given to proposals and ideas
obtained via public exhibitions and consultations which had taken
place earlier, especially relating to the Cenotaph, Townsend
roundabout, inter-linking with existing retail area and provision of a
Community Hall-type facility within the proposed development site.
h)
Any provision to providing a closer link with the existing High Street
retail was most desirable;
i)
Integration and upgrading of Hitchen Lane highway should be
included within the proposals;
Tesco appeared to have a “scorched earth” policy regarding trees and there
was much concern regarding protection of the existing trees and
landscaping;
c)
d)
012580/025
Kimberley
Langdale Western Ltd,
Mac-Hire, Great Ostry
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote Recommend Refusal of Permission – 4 storey over-development out of
character and over looking adjacent properties. Design is totally unacceptable
and not inkeeping with Conservation Area. There is a requirement for a
comprehensive application for the completed proposed redevelopment area
and access to the site should be from Commercial Road with its wider
highway, current 20mph speed and HGV restrictions
012580/026
Kimberley
Langdale Western Ltd,
Resolve:
e)
034861/004
Taylor
Demolition of existing tool & plant hire shop
& workshops (DEL)
CA
Redevelopment involving demolition of
existing tool & plant hire shop & workshop
and erection of 14 apartments together with Full
access, car parking, landscaping &
associated works (DEL)
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote Recommend Refusal of Permission – 4 storey over-development out of
character and over looking adjacent properties. Design is totally unacceptable
and not inkeeping with Conservation Area. There is a requirement for a
comprehensive application for the completed proposed redevelopment area
and access to the site should be from Commercial Road with its wider
highway, current 20mph speed and HGV restrictions
Mr CR & Mrs HE
Glasspool
30 Cowl Street
Erection of double garage (DEL)
Full
3
f)
g)
h)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, seconded by Cllr Bartlett by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
112902/006
Taylor
C & G Johnson,
41 Board Cross
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Bartlett, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
107695/005
Taylor
Mr & Mrs C Stilton
2 Back Lane, Downside
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
116041/000
Dahm
Mendip District Council
Land at Yeomanry Way
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Shearn, by a vote of 6 For, 4
Against and 2 Abstentions – Recommend proposal should be allowed to
proceed.
Demolition of existing garage wall and
erectionof car port, porch & garden room
(DEL)
Erection of single storey rear extension
(DEL)
Outline residential development (BOARD)
LBC
aletr/ext
end
Full
Outline
a)
118/452/000 1 Norton Close, Insertion of Dormer window to rear-SMTC Proceed, MDC Refused.
60. Transfer of Justices Licence - The Highwayman Inn – To be heard at the Court House, Wells on
Tuesday 13 September 2005 at 10am.
61. Road Closure – Shepton Mallet Carnival – 7 / 9 November 2005
Resolve: by unanimous vote, no objection and that the matter is noted.
The next meeting, programmed during the recess period for Tuesday 16 August 2005 at 7pm and the
venue yet to be agreed.
Councillor Champion
Signature______________________
Chairman
Date_______________________2005
4
Committee Meeting held on Tuesday 16 August
Present: Chairman - Cllr R Champion
Cllr’s Bartlett, Fone, Inchley, Jeremiah, Lockey, Lovell, Manvill, Marsh, O’Connor and
Shearn.
1. Public Forum
Latest details regarding the Tesco’s development were requested.
2.
Cllrs Cann, Gilham and Robinson (family).
3.
None declared.
4.
Minutes
The Minutes of the Meeting held on the 2 August 2005 were considered for accuracy and content.
Resolve; by unanimous vote, that the Minutes of the Planning Recommendations Committee made at the
meeting held on the 2 August 2005, be approved as a true record and signed by the Chairman.
5.
Matters Arising
6.
Plans: 1.
113651/000
PG29
Jarrold
Resolve:
Mr & Mrs J Brown
Felling of four Leylandi trees in a
CA
1 Forum Terrace,
conservation area
Felling
Bowlish
Trees
Proposed by Cllr Shearn, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote Recommend approval - Health & Safety reasons and trees are causing
problems to power lines.
a)
054101/009
PG29
Jarrold
Corp’ Director of
Works to five trees covered by TPO M1103
Children Services
(DEL)
TOP
St Pauls C of E Junior
Works
School, Paul Street
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, with a vote of 6 For, 4
Against & 1 Abstention - Recommend approval – Safety of school children.
Resolve:
b)
c)
A11091/000
Langford
Focus DIY
Fosse Lane
Erection of shop sign (DEL)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Bartlett, by unanimous vote –
Recommend approval – Customer information.
067047/015
Taylor
Blackfriar
Developments – Focus
Store, Fosse Lane
Retrospective
lighting (DEL)
installation
Advertis
ment
of
external
Full
1
d)
7.
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote Recommend approval – Customer safety.
118587/000
Walker
Mr F Robins
9 Yeomanry Way
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote Recommend approval – This would remove another vehicle from the road.
Change of use from open space to
residential curtilage and formation of
parking bay (DEL)
Change
of Use
109666/007 Mrs E Garland, 44 Compton Road – Removal of previous condition and row of conifer trees
– SMTC Objection (No Landscape plan + concern future development) MDC Granted but please note
conditions.
Resolve: by unanimous vote that the matter, and conditions, are noted.
8. Delegation of Planning Functions
Cllr Champion to report back at the next full Council meeting scheduled for 6 September 2005. One
member questioned the viability of having an unqualified person as a planning officer.
9. Road Closure – Shepton Mallet Fun Run – Sunday, 18 September 2005
10. Proposed Re-development of Little Ostry, Langdell Estates
Members were informed that a presentation would be provided to the next meeting of Council to be held
on Tuesday, 6 September, by Mr Ian Thomas, the Managing Director, and supporting staff from his
company regarding their re-development proposals.
The next meeting programmed for Tuesday 6 September 2005 at 8.00pm, or on completion of the full
Council meeting to be held at the same venue prior to this meeting. No matters were raised. It was
requested that members note and support the Best Kept Allotment Awards due to be presented on this
date at 6.30pm outside the Council Chamber.
The Chairman thanked members for their attendance and closed the meeting.
Signature______________________
Chairman
Date_______________________2005
2
Committee Meeting held on Tuesday 6
September 2005 in the MDC Council Chamber,
Cannards Grave Road, Shepton Mallet.
The meeting started on the closing of the Town Council meeting at 9.25pm.
Cllr’s Bartlett, Cann, Gilham, Inchley, Jeremiah, Lockey, Lovell, Manvill, O’Connor, Shearn and Taylor
One member of the public and no press were in attendance.
75.
Public Forum
Tesco Car Wash Application - Mr Mike Harris raised concern as to the fact that Tesco’s already had a
car wash facility and had now been granted planning permission to relocate, and it appeared that they
may well be trying to put out of business the manned car wash at Cannards Grave. The Chairman
thanked him for his comments which were noted.
76.
Cllrs Fone (family), Hurrell (health) and Marsh (family)
Resolve: by a unanimous vote that the above Apologies are accepted and duly recorded.
77.
Application 101423/007 – Mr Stevens, Woodville – Cllr Bartlett declared a Personal, Non-Prejudicial
Interest in the matter as she was a neighbour of the applicant.
Application 059264/001 – Mr Marsh, 39 High Street – Cllr Champion declared a Personal, Non-Prejudicial
Interest in the matter as he was a Director of Milliner Court positioned adjacent to applicant’s site.
78.
Minutes
The Minutes of the Meeting held on the 16 August 2005 were considered for accuracy and content.
Resolve; Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that the Minutes of
the Planning Recommendations Committee made at the meeting held on the 16 August 2005, be
approved as a true record and signed by the Chairman. Thanks was recorded to Cllr Marsh for taking the
Minutes of the meeting during the Clerk’s absence.
79.
Matters Arising
Delegation of Planning Functions – The Chairman provided his consideration following appraisal of the
letter received from Frome Town Council.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote, that the Town
Council take no further action unless further information comes forward.
80.
Plans: a)
b)
118622/000
Taylor
Mr & Mrs Philips
25a Finch Close
First floot extension over existing garage
and ground floor extension (DEL)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Gilham, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote Recommend Approval.
118617/000
Mr & Mrs M Cocks
79 Beech Avenue
Erection of first floor extension over
existing garage, erection of conservatory
and single storey extension to rear (DEL)
Full
Full
1
c)
d)
e)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Gilham, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote Recommend Approval.
118543.000
Foster
Mr C Race
28 Webber Road
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Shearn, by unanimous vote –
Recommend Approval.
105941/043
Taylor
Tesco Stores Ltd
Mendip Avenue
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Cann, with a vote of 11 For & 1
Objection - Recommend Approval.
085708/002
Boustead
Mr & Mrs D Chayter
4 Fosse Lane
Resolve:
f)
101423/007
Taylor
Resolve:
g)
018603/001
Foster
i)
Full
Two storey side and single storey rear
extension, alteration to existing access Full
(DEL)
Proposed by Cllr Gilham, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote Recommend Approval.
Mr P Stevens
Woodville, Bowlish
Full
Lane
Proposed by Cllr Shearn, seconded by Cllr Robinson, with a vote of 11 For, 0
Against & 1 Abstention – Recommend Approval.
Erection of satelite dish to front elevation
(DEL)
118548/000
Jarrold
Mrs Robertson
54 Whitstone Road
Erection of two storey side extension to
form granny annexe (DEL)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Gilham, with a vote of 5 For, 4
Against & 1 Abstention - Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
059264/001
Foster
Mr N Marsh
Extension of existing offices (DEL)
Rear of Denelas
Full
Bakery, 39 High Street
Proposed by Proposed by Cllr Gilham, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by
unanimous vote - Recommend Approval.
Resolve:
j)
Erection of car wash (DEL)
Full
Mr & Mrs SJ Holcombe
37 Garston Street
Resolve:
h)
059264/001
Foster
Resolve:
LBCalter/ext
end
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Robinson, with a vote of 10 For &
2 Against - Recommend Approval.
Full
Mr N Marsh
Extension of existing offices (DEL)
LBCRear of Denelas
alter/ext
Bakery, 39 High Street
end
Proposed by Proposed by Cllr Gilham, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by
unanimous vote - Recommend Approval.
k)
112760/001
PG29
Jarrold
Resolve:
David Braybon
Fell Eucalyptus tree and Thuja in a CA
Old Manor House, Ham
Conservation Area (DEL)
Felling
Lane, Bowlish
Trees
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, with a vote of 11 For, 1
Against – Recommend that the decision be left to the Planning Officer, along
with MDC’s Tree Officer.
l)
116322/001
Taylor
Mrs K Hearne-Williams
Land Adjoining 1 The
Batch
Change of use os highway verge to garden
area, one parking space and erection of
wall and railings (DEL)
Change
of Use
2
Council had already agreed the conditions set within the planning application
through a Stopping Up order already agreed with the applicant and County Council.
Resolve:
m)
116041/000
Planning
Proposed by Cllr Champion, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote –
Recommend Approval.
MDC - Land at
Amendments to Outline application – A pair
Yeomanry Way
of semi detached properties and one
detached dwelling with parking (site &
access to be determined at this stage
Outline
(BOARD)
2/8 SMTC resolved previous application
should proceed.
Several members considered that the matter should be recommended not to
proceed, however this vote was lost.
Resolve:
81.
Proposed by Cllr Bartlett, seconded by Cllr Shearn, with a vote of 7 For, 4
Against & 1 Abstention – Recommend Approval.
30mph Speed Limit Proposals to Whitstone Road
Plans and variation order had been received from Somerset County Council.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote, no objection. Cllr
Shearn requested that speed limits be applied to the next relevant Portfolio meeting.
82.
Tesco Stores Application – Government Office of the South West
Members were informed of a response letter received from the Government Office of the South West
confirming that the planning application would not now be called in. Cllr Bartlett raised concern that she
understood it was an MDC stipulation that the current Tesco retail site be downgraded to non-retail use
following their relocation.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Bartlett, seconded by Cllr Gilham, with a vote of 11 For & 1 Against, that the
Town Council write to Mendip District Council to clarify if this was indeed a stipulation from the District
Council or, failing same, was it a proposal by the applicant, Tesco’s, with reference to the omission of ongoing retail use to the existing site, and that the Town Council request Mendip District Council to
reconsider the clause and that it should allow continued retail use with the possible clause of non-food
criteria.
83.
Statement of Community Involvement for Planning – Somerset County Council
The statutory document relating to issues and options had been received from SCC.
84.
Transfer of Licence – Co-op, High Street
The meeting was informed that the matter was to be heard in the Court House, Wells on Tuesday, 13
September 2005 at 10.00am.
Resolve: by unanimous vote – No objection.
85.
Notice of Appeal – 1 Norton Close
Cllr Inchley then left the meeting. The Chairman informed members of a Notice of Appeal with the
invitation to submit comments if required.
Resolve: by unanimous vote that the matter is noted and the Town Council would not comment any
further.
3
86.
The next meeting programmed for Tuesday 27 September 2005 at 7.00pm. No matters were raised.
The Chairman thanked members for their attendance, apologised for the late closure of the meeting and
closed the meeting at 10.00pm.
Signature______________________
Chairman
Date_______________________2005
4
September 2005 in the MDC Committee Room,
Cllr’s Bartlett, Fone, Inchley, Jeremiah, Lockey, Lovell, Manvill, O’Connor and Shearn.
87. Public Forum
Application 118641/000 – Erection of Detached Garage, Moulton Close - Mr Taffy Stride raised
concern that the proposed garage, with its entrance onto Westway Lane, will trespass over private land in
order to reach the highway. The Chairman thanked him for his comments which were noted.
Cllrs Hurrell (health), Marsh (work), Robinson (family) and Taylor (work).
Application 118641/000 – 3 Moulton Close – Cllr Lockey declared a Personal & Non-Prejudicial Interest in
the matter as his family live nearby. Cllr Inchley declared a Personal & Prejudicial Interest in the above
application as the applicant is known to him.
90. Minutes
The Minutes of the Meeting held on the 6 September 2005 were considered for accuracy and content.
meeting held on the 6 September 2005, be approved as a true record and signed by the Chairman.
91. Matters Arising
Planning Application 118584/000 54 Whitstone Road – Erection of two storey side extension to form
granny annexe (DEL) - Revised application. Ratification required to the executive decision made by the
Chairman of the Planning Committee to abide by the previous Resolve made 7 September 2005, with the
consensus of the Community & Leisure Portfolio at its meeting of 13 September, for the above revised
application to proceed.
Resolve: by unanimous vote that ratification be given to the executive decision made for the above
Application to proceed.
92. Plans: a)
b)
118635/000
Taylor
Mr & Mrs D Fleming,
1 Amulet Way
Erection of a dwelling (DEL)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Lockey, with a vote of 7 For, 1
Against & 1 Abstention - Recommend Approval – Subject to retention of
surrounding bushes and trees as desirable for street scene.
118633/000
Taylor
Mr & Mrs P Kelland,
56 Beech Avenue
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Bartlett, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote Recommend Approval.
Removal of existing & erection of a single
storey rear extension (DEL)
Full
Full
1
c)
d)
118634/000
Taylor
Miss Teasdale,
81 Beech Avenue
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote Recommend Approval.
118638/000
Taylor
Mr M Emery,
Demolition of outbuildings & erection of
Land adjoining 6 Old
Full
dwelling (DEL)
Wells Road
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote Recommend Approval.
Resolve:
e)
Erection of conservatory on rear elevation
(DEL)
Erection of a detached garage (DEL)
Full
118641/000
Taylor
Mrs M Farmer,
3 Moulton Close
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr O’Connor , seconded by Cllr Shearn, with a vote of 8 For & 1
Abstention – Recommend Approval. With regard to the point made in Public
Forum of encroachment onto public highway, not enough information is to
hand to make a clear recommendation. It is, however, recommended that the
panel fencing surrounding the proposed garage be retained.
Full
93. Late Business – Application No. 014359/018 – Framptons International Ltd.
The Chairman read out a letter received from Mendip District Council informing of the development of a
Noise Management Plan in order to overcome both existing problems at the site and those associated
with the proposed development. Members raised much concern over whether neighbours had been kept
fully informed and consulted.
Resolve: By unanimous vote that the above matter is noted, and that a Grievance Agreement should be
raised in order that neighbours are fully consulted, also that the 106 Agreement should be checked.
94. Somerset Minerals Local Plan
A copy of the above local Plan for 1997-2011, adopted in April 2004, is now held in the office.
95. Notice of Appeal – Planning No. 118452/000 – 1 Norton Close – Insertion of Dormer Windows
Members were informed that the above Planning Application has gone to the Secretary of State for
appeal. Any representations to be submitted no later than 7 October 2005.
The next meeting programmed for Tuesday 18 October 2005 at 7.00pm. No matters were raised.
Signature______________________
Chairman
Date_______________________2005
2
Committee Meeting held on Tuesday 18 October
Present:
Chairman - Cllr R Champion
Cllr’s Bartlett, Fone, Inchley, Lockey, Lovell, Marsh, O’Connor, Robinson, Shearn and Taylor
97.
Public Forum
Application 012580/026 – Langdale Western Ltd, Mac-Hire, Great Ostry – Mr Will Dunscombe raised
concern regarding various aspects of this amended application which included the height of the
apartments, which he felt would tower over adjacent buildings, problems with vehicular access to the site
and the design not being in-keeping with neighbouring properties. The Chairman thanked him for his
comments which were noted and informed members that a road survey CD compiled by Mr Dunscombe
would be available in SMTC offices for members to view if they so wished.
98.
Cllrs Hurrell (family) and Manvill (work).
Resolve: by unanimous vote that the above Apologies are accepted.
99.
None declared.
100. Minutes
The Minutes of the Meeting held on the 27 September 2005 were considered for accuracy and content.
meeting held on the 27 September 2005, be approved as a true record and signed by the Chairman.
102. Plans: a)
b)
c)
101069/013
PG29
Jarrold
Mr P Whitaker,
3 Park Road
Felling of Sycamore tree in Conservation
Area (DEL)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Robinson, with a vote of 9 For & 2
Abstentions - Recommend Approval.
110052/001
PG29
Jarrold
Mr E Pearce
85 Finch Close
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote Recommend Refusal of Permission – There appears to be no need for felling.
104871/012
PG29
Jarrold
Mr D Reed,
3b Waterloo Road
Resolve:
Felling of 2 trees covered by TPO M202
(Lanscaping scheme) (del)
Works to Lime tree covered by TPO M1125
(T1) (DEL)
CA
Felling
Trees
TPO
Felling
TPO
Works
1
d)
e)
012580/026
Kimberley
Langdale Western Ltd.,
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote Recommend Refusal of Permission – Members raised concerns regarding
design and vehicular access, and also felt that there should be more family
homes in the town as opposed to flats. Members were of the opinion that they
were unable to consider the application without details of Phases 2 & 3.
118678/000
Jarrold
J S Bloor (Swindon)
Retrospective installation of rooflight to end
Ltd
elevation (DEL)
Full
3 Blackberry Close,
Plot 5, Field Farm
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Bartlett, by unanimous vote Recommend Approval.
Resolve:
f)
105192/003
Boustead
Resolve:
existing tool and plant hire shop &
workshop and erection of 14 apartsments
together with access, car parking, Full
landscaping & assoc. works (revised
design as amended by letter & plans rec’d
12.9.05) (DEL)
The Chairman reminded members of the previous resolve of 2 August and that the
only amendment was in the roofwork, also that the developers had not yet
responded to requests for details of Phase 2 & 3. It was felt by members that this
needs to go back to basic consultation with Ward Members and Highways and a full
brief provided for the development.
Mr & Mrs H Latty,
Change of use to mixed use of A3 and A3
Change
Delicious Delicatessen,
to provide coffee shop (DEL)
of Use
36 High Street
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, with a vote of 8 For & 3
Abstentions - Recommend Approval.
103. Application No. 034618/008 – Development of 18 Flats at 2 Waterloo Road
The Chairman read to members a letter received from Les Kimberley, Principal Planner of MDC informing
that the Town Council’s comments regarding recommendation of refusal of the above application had
been considered, however the reasons for refusal were considered to have been overcome and the
application had now been approved.
104. Road Closure Orders
a) Remembrance Day Parade – 13 November 2005. The Chairman reminded members that there
would be a 2 minute silence at the Cenotaph at 11am on 11 November 2005.
b) Forum Lane – To be closed for 5 weeks from 10 October 2005
c) A371 Wells Road – To be closed for 6 weeks from 17 October 2005
Resolve: by unanimous vote that the above matters are noted.
The next meeting is programmed for Tuesday 8 November 2005 at 7.00pm. No matters were raised.
2
Signature______________________
Chairman
Date_______________________2005
3
November 2005 in the MDC Committee Room,
Present:
Chairman – Cllr R Champion
Cllr’s Bartlett, Jeremiah, Lockey, Lovell, Manvill and Shearn.
107. Public Forum
No members of the public were present.
Cllrs Fone (health), Inchley, Marsh (family), O’Connor (family), Robinson (work).
Application 085892/003 – 4 The Maples, Princes Road – Cllr Lovell declared a Personal & Prejudicial
Interest in the matter due to the applicant being a next door neighbour.
110. Minutes
The Minutes of the Meeting held on the 18 October 2005 were considered for accuracy and content.
meeting held on the 18 October 2005, be approved as a true record and signed by the Chairman.
112. Plans: a)
105678/003
Mr K Taylor
Mr & Mrs C Johnson,
Former Salvation Army
Hall, Board Cross
Conversion of
dwellings (DEL)
existing
to
form
two
Resolve:
Members raised concern regarding possible parking problems in the area.
Full
Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, seconded by Cllr Manvill, with a vote of 6 For & 1
Against - Recommend Approval.
b)
c)
067249/001
Foster
Mr Q Mendes,
6 Town Street
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Lovell, by unanimous vote Recommend Approval.
118724/000
Taylor K Mrs
Miss A Hayward
52 Garston Street
Resolve:
Change of use from A1 (retail) to A3
(restaurant) with alterations to rear (DEL)
Change
of Use
Erection of single storey rear extension and
escape stairs to porch and door at second Full
floor (DEL)
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote Recommend Approval.
1
d)
e)
118256/001
Taylor K Mrs
Mr & Mrs Rossiter
58a Cowl Street
Construction of new raised roof
insertion of roofligh to front (DEL
and
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote Recommend Approval.
085892/003
PG29
Jarrold
Mark Parsons Tree
Surgery
Ivy House, 4 The
Maples, Princes Road
Works to Sycamore and 3 Hazel Trees,
felling of Goat Willow and coppicing of
privet in a Conservation Area (DEL)
Full
CA Tree
Works
Cllr Lovell, having declared a Personal & Prejudicial Interest earlier in the meeting,
then left the room.
Resolve:
Cllr Lovell then re-joined the meeting.
f)
034618/010
Foster
Resolve:
Kline Holdings
Bridge at Lower Lane
Fixing of cables to listed structure (DEL)
LBCalter/ext
end
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, by unanimous vote Recommend Approval, subject to cable sheathing being in-keeping with
brickwork of the surrounding area, this being a Conservation Area.
a. 118638/000 Land 6 Old Wells Road, Demolition of outbuilding and erection of dwelling – SMTC 6/9
Proceed, MDC refused - 28/9 SMTC Proceed, MDC Refusal.
Resolve: by unanimous vote that the matter is noted. Requested that Somerset County Council be asked
to investigate possible provision of a roundabout at the Old Wells Road/West Shepton junction.
b. 034618/008 & 009 – 2 Waterloo Road, Demolition of existing building and erection of 18 flats –
SMTC 29/3/05 Recommend Refusal (Overdevelopment), MDC Granted.
114. Notice of appeal - Applications 012580/025 & 026 – Mac-Hire, Great Ostry (original application)
Notification received from Secretary of State for the Environment that appeals have been received from
Langdale Western Limited.
Resolve: by unanimous vote that the matter is noted and the Committee await further development.
115. Road Naming – Nalder Close – Bloor Homes Development
116. English Heritage – Proposed Listing of the War Memorial
The response letter drafted by the Clerk and previously provided to all members, providing information
and facts regarding the architectural and historic interest of the memorial, was felt to be a balanced and
unbiased report.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Champion, seconded by Cllr Bartlett, by unanimous vote, that the response
letter providing architectural and historic facts regarding the War Memorial is approved and sent to
English Heritage.
2
117. Remembrance Day
The Chairman reminded members that there would be a gathering at the War Memorial on Friday, 11
November at 11.00am, incorporating a 2-minute silence. There would also be a gathering on Sunday, 13
November at 10.30am which would be followed by a church service. Cllr Lovell informed that Whitstone
Community Concert Band would be presenting a Poppy Singalong at St Peter’s & St Paul’s Parish
Church on the evening of Friday 11 evening at 8pm.
The next meeting programmed for Tuesday 29 November 2005 at 7.00pm. No matters were raised.
Signature______________________
Chairman
Date_______________________2005
3
November 2005 at 7.00pm in the MDC
Committee Room, Cannards Grave Road,
Shepton Mallet .
Cllr’s Bartlett, Inchley, Jeremiah, Lockey, Marsh, O’Connor and Shearn.
One member of the public (Mr Will Dunscombe) and no members of the press were in attendance.
119. Public Forum
Application No. 012580/027 & 028 Langdale Western Ltd, Mac-Hire, Great Ostry – Mr Dunscombe
confirmed that he had reviewed the plans yet again and there was no change to previous plans. He was
somewhat disappointed that no issues raised by him had been addressed. There was no further
consultation or input from local residents and he hoped that the Committee would consider the application
and make the same decision as previous in that the application would not be allowed to proceed. The
Chairman thanked Mr Dunscombe for his comments which were noted and taken on board.
Cllrs Fone (work), Lovell (family), Manvill (family), Robinson (work), Taylor (work)
Application 102064/002 Shepton Mallet Outdoor Pool – All members at the meeting collectively
declared a Personal & Non-Prejudicial Interest in the matter as the Town Council was partnership-funding
the project but members would continue to speak and vote thereon.
Application 076562/006 East View, 7 Fosse Lane – Cllr Jeremiah declared a Personal & NonPrejudicial Interest in the matter as the applicant was known to him. Cllr Shearn also declared a Personal
& No-Prejudicial Interest in the matter.
Application 118743/000 16 High Street – Cllr Shearn declared a Personal & Non-Prejudicial Interest in
the matter as the applicant was known to him.
Application 118784/000 38 Garston Street – Cllr Inchley declared a Personal & Non-Prejudicial Interest
in the matter as the applicant undertook maintenance on his car.
122. Minutes
The Minutes of the Meeting held on the 8 November 2005 were considered for accuracy and content.
Resolve; Proposed by Cllr Bartlett, seconded by Cllr Shearn, by unanimous vote, that the Minutes of the
Planning Recommendations Committee made at the meeting held on the 8 November 2005, be approved
1
124. Plans: a)
b)
c)
118743/00
Arnold
Mrs N Forrest
16 High Street
Retrospective change of use of ground
floor of building from A1 to A3 retail (DEL)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Jeremiah, with a vote of 7 For, 0
Against & 1 Abstention - Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
067249/001
Foster
Mr Q Mendes
6 Town Street
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Inchley, seconded by Cllr Lockey, by unanimous vote Recommend proposal should be allowed to proceed.
112889/001
Langford
Mr Rogers
36 Whitstone Rise
Change of Use from a shop (class A1) to a
restaurant/take-away (class A3 & A5) and
alterations to the rear (DEL)
Change of use of annexe to residential
letting (DEL)
Change
of Use
Change
of Use
Change
of Use
Members raised much concern regarding this application as they had previously
received a Certificate of Lawfulness.
d)
e)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Jeremiah, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote Recommend application should not be allowed to proceed. There was strong
objection to this application and concern at the method which appeared to be
attempting to get around planning regulations. There was concern regarding
parking and emergency vehicle arrangements, it was considered backland
development “through the back door” and was non-compliant with the Local
Plan.
012580/027
Kimberley
Langdale Western Ltd
MAC-HIRE, Great Ostry
Demolish existing tool and plant hire shop
and workshop (class A1/B2) to facilitate
erection of building to accommodate 14
apartments (class A3) together with
access, car parking, and associated works
under a revised scheme (DEL)
Conserv
-ation
Area
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote Recommend application should not be allowed to proceed. The Town Council
do not wish the application to demolish existing to proceed until the redevelopment application is agreed and both Phases II & III details are known
and included within that application.
012580/028
Kimerley
Langdale Western Ltd
MAC-HIRE, Great Ostry
Resolve:
existing tool & plant hire shop & workshop
(class A1/B2). Erection of building to
accommodate 14 apartments (class C3) Full
together with access, car parking,
landscaping & associated works under
revised scheme (DEL)
Proposed by Cllr O’Connor, seconded by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote Recommend application should not be allowed to proceed. Resolve is as
previous at the August meeting, there appears to be no change to previous
submission, the four-storey development is out-of-character and overlooking
adjacent properties. Design is totally unacceptable and not in-keeping with
adjoining conservation area. There is a requirement for a comprehensive
application for the complete proposed re-development area. Access to the
site should be from Commercial Road with its 20mph and HGV restrictions
already in place.
2
f)
076562/006
Walker
Resolve:
g)
Mr & Mrs Harris,
Erection of conservatory to side (DEL)
East View, 7 Fosse
Full
Lane
101205/004
Arnold
Ayton Developments
Rear of 59 High Street
Removal of condition 02 from approval
101205/003 (age limit) (DEL)
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Bartlett, seconded by Cllr Marsh, by unanimous vote Recommend application should not be allowed to proceed. Existing
conditions should remain for protection to any previous purchasers of these
properties. The new building is only recently on the open market for sale and
should continue to be on offer on the open market with the existing
conditions.
Removal
of cond’ns
The Chairman/Clerk is requested to find out why this condition was imposed
in that properties could only be sold to purchasers over the age of 55 and to
inform the Committee for information purposes.
h)
102064/002
Kimberley
Resolve:
i)
j)
k)
l)
115025/001
Langford
Shepton Mallet
Forumation of Lido and refurbishment of
Outdoor Pool.
Full
pool and ancillary buildings (DEL)
Shaftgate Avenue
Proposed by Cllr Champion , seconded by Cllr O’Connor, with a vote of 7 For
& 1 Against - Recommend application should be allowed to proceed. The
existing play area, which is now taken in by the footplate of the new pool area
and which is outside proposed security fencing, should have play equipment
reinstated and maintained by Mendip District Council which would provide
valuable play area amenities for the local community.
Mr & Mrs D Winter,
34 Barrington Place
Resolve:
Single storey extension & garage
conversion with detached garage (close Full
to TPO M343) (DEL)
Proposed by Cllr Shearn, seconded by Cllr Lockey, with a vote of 4 For, 3
Against & 1 Abstention – Recommend application should be allowed to
proceed subject to development not causing damage to existing tree, or its
roots, and that this tree remains in situ in the future.
118703/000
Mrs K Taylor
Mrs Godden,
79 Finch Close
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Lockey, seconded by Cllr O’Connor, by unanimous vote –
Recommend application should be allowed to proceed.
118784/000
Mr & Mrs M Shepherd
38 Garston Street
Resolve:
Proposed by Cllr Champion, seconded by Cllr Lockey, with a vote of 6 For & 1
Against – Recommend application should be allowed to proceed.
085776/007
Arnold
Mr & Mrs Dennett,
Erection of garage (DEL)
Meadow View, Frog
Full
Lane
The Chairman requested the Committee to provide guidance for a late planning
application which was not on the agenda but on which he would wish their input and
would then make an executive decision before reporting to the next meeting of
Council on the matter.
Resolve:
Members raised concern as to the size of the construction, the finishes which
appeared to look much more like an industrial unit and for possible industrial
use. The application was for a garage but the dimensions showed that it could
almost be a warehouse. The matter is noted and the Chairman is to find out
more about the application and make an executive decision if required.
Erection of conservatory (DEL)
Retrospective erection of satellite dish
(DEL)
Full
Conservati
on Area
3
125. Road Closure Orders
a. Great Ostry – Closed one day starting 4 December 2005 to lay duct and associated works.
b. A371 Cannards Grave Road – Closed 3 days starting 5 December 2005 for tree works above both
carriageways.
Resolve: Proposed by Cllr Inchley, by unanimous vote, that the matter is noted.
The next meeting programmed for Tuesday 20 December 2005 at 7.00pm. No matters were raised.
Signature______________________
Chairman
Date_______________________2005
4

2005 - Shepton Mallet Town Council

Transcription

Similar documents

Ringmore Parish Newsletter July 2016

oce20614 Community News Oct 2015 Washington.qxp

now - Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead

1940-01-15 BCC Meeting Minutes

dante gb minutes oct 6 2014 1

Fetching stories… - Chronicle

Walkern Journal

© Galway County Council Archives

WE`RE FOCUSED ON YOU