From the Idea to a Patent www.bardehle.com

Transcription

From the Idea to a Patent www.bardehle.com
From the Idea to a Patent
www.bardehle.com
2
Content
5
1. What is a patent?
5
2. When is an idea an invention?
5
2.1. Patentability
6
2.2 Novelty
7
2.3 Inventive Step
7
3. How can I apply for a patent?
8 4. How does the granting procedure work?
10 5. How can I protect my idea in other countries?
10
5.1 European Patent Application
11.
5.2 Patent applications in other countries
12
5.3 Strategic considerations
12 6. Summary
3
Introduction
Anyone who has an innovative idea should
consider filing a patent application to safeguard
the rights to the idea. However, it is a long way
from the idea to a patent. Not all ideas can
be protected by a patent and the examination
procedures at the Patent Offices are in many
cases time-consuming and complex. This is
where our Patent Attorneys will assist you. They
check whether the idea is in general patentable,
they will draft a patent application, and they
will represent the inventor extensively in front
of the Patent Offices to protect the idea in the
best possible way. Furthermore, they assist the
inventor when others infringe the patent and
offer products or use methods falling within the
scope of the patent.
4
The following pages will give inventors
who were yet not involved with patents a
first overview over the patent application
proceedings. It will be explained what
kind of protection is achievable with a patent, and the requirements which an idea
has to fulfil to get a patent. Moreover, the
examination procedure at a Patent Office
and examples of strategies for patent
protection abroad are explained.
2. When is an idea an invention?
Basically, an idea needs to fulfil three requirements before a patent can be granted.
The idea must be in a field in which patent
protection is possible. In addition, the idea has
to be new, as well as inventive, i.e. not-obvious.
All of the three conditions will be explained
below in more detail.
2.1 Patentability
1. What is a patent?
A patent gives its owner the exclusive right to
use the invention protected by the patent for
a period of up to 20 years. In other words, the
patent owner (within the territory of the state
that has granted the patent) has a monopoly,
which means the right to prevent others from
commercially using the invention protected by
the patent.
This right can be economically very valuable,
because the owner can limit who is using the
patented item or the patented method. For
example, the inventor can ensure that the
patented idea can only be realised by using
items or methods only offered by himself. The
patent owner may also grant the right of use to
others, however, this grant may be subject to
licensing fees. Thereby, the inventor participates
on the commercial success of another company
based on the idea.
Not all ideas can be protected by patents.
Essentially, only those ideas are patentable
that fall within a technical field. Moreover, the
German Patent Law and the European Patent
Convention explicitly exclude some areas from
patent protection.
Exclusivity for up to 20 years
This area includes, among other things, plant or
animal varieties, as well as in essence biological
processes for the production of plants or animals. Excluded are furthermore, methods for
treatment of the human or animal body by
surgery or therapy and diagnostic methods
practised on the human or animal body.
Hard exclusion criteria
Further areas are excluded by the German
Patent Law and the European Patent Convention, if the subject matter relates to the area
“as such”. This includes discoveries, scientific
theories and mathematical methods, aesthetic
creations, schemes, rules and methods for performing mental acts, playing games or doing
Soft exclusion criteria
5
business, as well as programs for computers and
representations of information.
A search is worthwhile
The wording “as such” does not generally exclude
inventions in this area. For example, if an idea
affects a scientific theory, which is applied technically in a certain machine or in a procedure, the
idea can by all means be patentable. A similar
problem also exists for programs used in data
processing units. If the program is based on
technical considerations or a technical problem
is solved by the program, it is not any longer a
program for data processing units “as such” and
it falls in principle in a patentable area.
The decision to determine whether the idea
belongs to a patentable area can be very difficult. Because considerable economical advantages may be associated with the patent, it is
worthwhile to have this question clarified by
our Patent Attorneys. They can not only clarify
whether the idea is in general patentable; they
are also able to show alternatives on how the
idea can be protected.
2.2 Novelty
To gain protection by a patent the idea needs
also to be novel. The novelty, required by the
patent law, is an absolute novelty with regards
to all publications made worldwide and all
disclosures made before the day of the patent
application. That includes also publications and
disclosures made by the inventor.
Worldwide disclosure
6
In general, it is advisable to get an overview
of the relevant state of the art before a patent
application is filed. Such a patent search should
be always conducted by a Patent Attorney.
However, the inventor can also do a first search
to get a first overview. By using the internet, it
is often possible to gain information about the
companies working in this area. Patent offices
are mainly using published patent applications and patents to determine the patentability of an idea. Therefore, a search in patent
databases might be useful. The German Patent
and Trademark Office (http://depatisnet.
dpma.de) and the European Patent Office (
http://worldwide.espacenet.com) offer access
to such databases free of charge. A search can
be performed by typing in keywords to find
documents which may already describe the
idea or similar approaches.
Afterwards the search results must be compared
to the own idea. If none of the found documents
shows all the features of the idea, the idea can
be considered at least as novel with respect to
the results of the search. In doubtful cases a
Patent Attorneys should do the comparison.
Based on the experience, the Patent Attorney
is better able to asses if a remaining difference
between the idea and the search result is
relevant to the patent law and thus is able to
determine, whether there is a possibility to get
the patent granted.
2.3 Inventive Step
However, the novelty of an idea on its own is
not sufficient. The idea must also be inventive.
This third and most difficult obstacle can only
be solved, if it was not obvious at the day of the
application to a person skilled in the relevant
technical field to alter the current state of the
art, such that the new idea would evolve. The
Patent Offices have created various methods and
criteria to assess this question. By using these
methods and criteria, a Patent Attorney can
determine if the new idea will be likely regarded
as inventive by the Patent Office with regards to
the publications found in the patent search.
3. How can I apply for a patent?
In order to apply for a patent, it is necessary to
submit a patent application. The patent application is a written document in which the idea
is described.
A patent application usually consists of three
parts: the patent claims, the patent description,
and one or more drawings. A patent claim
defines in one sentence one or more features
of the item or the method to be protected.
Thus, the patent claim determines the extent
of protection for the future patent. The patent
description and the drawings illustrate in general as well as in detail the invention using one
or more specific examples, like in a technical
manual.
The drafting of the patent application should be
left to a Patent Attorney. The patent application
is the most important document for the protection of the idea. Based on this document, it
is examined whether the idea is a patentable
invention. Furthermore, the chosen wording in
the patent application could determine whether
the product or the method of a competitor falls
within the scope of the patent. It is afterwards
mostly not possible to correct mistakes made
during the patent application. For example, if
important aspects with regards to the patent
law are neglected in the patent claims or in
the description, it may enable the competitors
to easily bypass the patent. Hence, the patent
protection would loose its protecting effect.
During examination, the Patent Office may
find further relevant documents for the patent
application that were not known to the author
of the patent application. This also needs to be
taken into account while preparing the patent
application, since it might be necessary to
further specify the invention using additional
features to distinguish the invention from the
state of the art. These features need to be described in the filed original patent application
either in the patent description, in the drawings,
or in the patent claims. It is not possible to add
further features once the patent application is
submitted.
The most important document
Obviousness
Patent application
7
4. How does the granting procedure
work?
Request for examination
After the patent application is filed, the relevant
Patent Office will conduct a patent search and
subsequently inform the applicant about the
result. Based on this result, the applicant can
decide if it is promising to further prosecute the
patent application. For this, the applicant has to
apply for examination of the application and has
to pay a corresponding fee.
Response letter
After filing a request for examination, the
examiner compares the content of the patent
claims with the documents found in the search.
If the examiner reaches the conclusion that the
patent cannot (yet) be granted, the examiner
will prepare a report in which the examiner
explains and discusses the reasons why the
patent application failed. The applicant has to
reply to the report by either fixing the faults in
the application, or by convincing the examiner
through valid reasoning that the technical
considerations and valuations of the examiner
are inapplicable or the alleged faults are irrelevant with regards to the patent law.
Depending on whether the application was submitted to the German Patent and Trademark
8
Office or to the European Patent Office, certain
particularities may arise. The German Patent
and Trademark Office grants the applicant a
time frame of seven years, beginning from the
date of submitting the application, to request
examination. The European Patent Office
will not grant the applicant such a long time
period for responding. The deadline for filing
an examination request expires already six
months after the publication date of the patent
application together with the corresponding
search report, i.e. approximately two years after
the application was submitted.
It may be necessary to limit the patent claims
in a response to an office action. This is often
necessary since at first it is tried to claim as
much as possible of the invention. However,
if the result of the patent search by the Patent
Office is that something similar was already
published, but the invention shows significant
differences, it makes sense to narrow the patent
claims so that the patent claims clearly express
the differences. One should exercise restraint in
doing that because it is important to limit the
invention not more than necessary, since too
many limitations might enable competitors to
bypass the patent by just minor alterations.
The following diagrams illustrate the
proceedings at the two Patent Offices:
If the first, or one of the following responses
succeeds to convince the examiner, a patent will
be granted. Otherwise, the application will be
rejected. Since the Patent Offices‘ capacities are
well taken up, it normally takes a couple of years
until the patent gets granted or rejected.
German Patent and Trade Mark Office:
Application
Date
SearchReport
(optional)
Publication of the
Patent Application
(after approx. 18
months)
Examination
Request
1st Office
Action
1st Response
Granting of
Patent (?)
Application
Date
Publication of the
within seven
yearsApplication
Patent
(after approx. 18
SearchReport
months)
(optional)
Examination
Request
1st Office
Action
1st Response
Granting of
Patent (?)
Application
European
Date
Application
Date
Publication of the
within seven years Patent Application
SearchReport
approx. 18
with a Written
Patent
Office: (after
months)
Opinion
Examination Request
and 1st Response
Granting of Patent (?)
Publication of the
Patent Application
(after approx. 18
months)
Examination Request
and 1st Response
Granting of Patent (?)
SearchReport
with a Written
Opinion
9
5. How can I protect my idea in other
countries?
Depending on the economic significance of
the invention, it might be useful to obtain
patent protection outside of Germany too. A
few examples are described in the following
sections.
A European patent application may be submitted alternative or additional to a German patent
application. In the interest of simplification, the
Member States of the European Patent Organization gave the European Patent Office the
right to examine patent applications effectively
for all Member States.
As a result, the decision of a patent examiner
at the European Patent Office is binding for the
Patent Offices in the Member States. Following a
positive decision of the European Patent Office,
the applicant can have his patent to come into
force in every one of the Member States without
Application Date
10
Office Action
Response
© European Patent Office
5.1 European Patent Application
Member States of the European Patent Organization
having to go through an additional examination
procedure. The requirement for that is the payment of a corresponding fee, and some Member
States may also require a translation of the
patent.
Granting of Patent
Austria
Germany
France
Italy
Great Britain
Spain
Switzerland/Liechtenstein
Protection in a plurality of European countries
can be achieved by submitting a single patent
application to the European Patent Office. The
decision in which countries the patent is valid
can be postponed until the positive decision of
the European Patent Office to grant the patent.
5.2 Patent Applications in other countries
The applicant must at the latest 12 months
after filing the first patent application (e.g. in
Germany or to the European Patent Office) file
one or more applications in other countries
(USA, Japan, China, Korea) to gain patent
protection outside Europe. The Member States
will examine the application, as being submitted on the day of submission of the first patent
application, according to an international convention. As a result, the applicant is given the
opportunity to take up to one year to consider in
which countries the patent application should
be filed. Further, this gives the applicant more
time to consider the national requirements for
the patent application, especially to translate
the application into the respective official
language.
Within 12 months
USA
Application Date
in Germany
Japan
12 months
China
Korea
31 months
30 months
Application
Date
Priority
12 months
PCT
Application
USA
European
Patent
Application
China
Japan
11
The applicant can on top of the above 12 months
delay the process to have time considering in
which countries the application should be filed
to 30 or 31 months, after the first filing day. This
is possible with a so-called International Patent
Application (PCT Application).
Submitting the International Patent Application
creates a patent application that is valid in all
Member States. The requirement is that the
app-lication is transferred in time into national
law, i.e. in most countries within 30 months,
and in a few countries within 31 months.
Therefore, national requirements must be
fulfilled, e.g. the application must be available
in the national official language. Before that, a
national search report will be drawn up for the
International Patent Application and if applied
for, a pre-liminary examination conducted.
However, the result of this examination does
not have a binding character for national Patent
Offices. But it helps the applicant to decide
whether it makes sense to further prosecute the
application in the various countries.
5.3 Strategic considerations
The explained patent applications (at the
German Patent and Trademark Office, at the
European Patent Office, or internationally) can
be combined in various ways to meet the needs
of the applicant.
12
A single inventor or a start-up company with
limited financial resources and a degree of
uncertainty about whether and how the invention can be used in the future should (in a
first step) secure their rights through a German
application. Within the following 12 months
discussion with potential customers or investors
should follow in order to decide whether and
how the idea shall be further prosecuted. Depending on the decision, the applicant can,
for example, file a further application with the
European Patent Office or even an International
Patent Application.
If the applicant has at the time of filing already a good understanding of the market, it
is for example possible to submit directly a
European Patent Application and within the
next 12 months further applications in relevant
countries, e.g. the USA and China.
6. Summary
Anyone who has an innovative idea can protect
the idea effectively by means of a patent against
plagiarizers in Germany as well as abroad. However, it is necessary that the underlying idea is in
a patentable technical area and new, as well as
inventive with regards to the state of the art.
© 2013 BARDEHLE PAGENBERG Partnerschaft mbB
BARDEHLE PAGENBERG Partnerschaft mbB, Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte is a partnership of patent attorneys and attorneys-at-law
registered at Amtsgericht München, Partnership Registry No 1152.
Our offices act legally independent from the other countries‘ offices in
each country and are not liable for those.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means,
mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior
permission of the publishers.
Nothing in this publication constitutes legal advice.
BARDEHLE PAGENBERG assumes no responsibility for information
contained in this publication or on the website www.bardehle.com and
disclaims all liability with respect to such information.
10/2013
13
Contact
Munich
Prinzregentenplatz 7
81675 München
T +49.(0)89.928 05-0
F +49.(0)89.928 05-444
[email protected]
Dusseldorf
Breite Straße 27
40213 Düsseldorf
T +49.(0)211.478 13-0
F +49.(0)211.478 13-31
[email protected]
Paris
10 Boulevard Haussmann
75009 Paris
T +33.(0)1.53 05 15-00
F +33.(0)1.53 05 15-05
[email protected]
Barcelona
Avenida Diagonal 420, 1º1ª
08037 Barcelona
T +34.93.4 57 61 94
F +34.93.4 57 62 05
[email protected]
Milan
Viale Regina Margherita 35
20122 Milano
T +39.02 87 38 94 50
F +39.02 87 38 94 52
[email protected]
14
www.bardehle.com