Dr Prashant Desai INMAS Meeting 22 February 2014

Transcription

Dr Prashant Desai INMAS Meeting 22 February 2014
Dr Prashant Desai
Director – Medical Affairs
Janssen, Johnson & Johnson Ltd
INMAS Meeting
22nd February 2014
22-Feb-2014
INMAS meeting
2
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed in this
presentation are solely those of the
presenter and do not necessarily reflect
the opinions of any specific company
22-Feb-2014
INMAS meeting
Credibility a quality of being believable
or trustworthy
3
22-Feb-2014
INMAS meeting
4
Credibility, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder
People decide whether and how much they trust you
Snap judgments based on first impressions
22-Feb-2014
INMAS meeting
5
Credible content
What you say
• Is my content relevant to the audience?
• Have I included relevant stories and examples?
• Are there enough facts to support my case (but
not too much to bore the audience)?
How you say
Gavin Meikle. Presentation skills – how to establish credibility with your audience. 16-Jul-2013
22-Feb-2014
INMAS meeting
6
Building credibility
6 “I’s” of credibility
•
•
•
•
•
•
Ideation – bring something new
Information – accurate and relevant
Influence – preparation and confidence
Integrity – be yourself
Impact – memorable message
Ignition – trigger an action
Scott Schwertly. How to build credibility with your audience. 19-Aug-2013
22-Feb-2014
INMAS meeting
7
Credible authority
Establish your area of expertise
Know what you are talking about
Establish facts – verbally and visually
Avoid hidden agendas
Do not pretend to know
Be yourself
Sticking to what you commit
Conviction and enthusiasm
EG Sebastian. How to be viewed as a credible authority on your topic – the criticality of credibility. 23-Jun-2011
22-Feb-2014
INMAS meeting
8
Broad principles
General
• Declaration of conflict of interest
• Respecting privacy related to personal data
• Support the appropriate use of medicines
Accurate
• Data, charts, and graphs provided should be the same as
those in the original document
• Comparisons, when done, should comply with the
statistical significance of any difference observed in
results
• Quotations, when used, should be exactly reproduced
and translated according to the authors’ opinion
22-Feb-2014
INMAS meeting
9
Broad principles (2)
Balanced
• Information shared should not be distorted and/or exaggerated
• Comparisons, if shown, should not be disparaging, and stuck to the original
intent of the author of the article
Completed
• Adequate information on a presented clinical study should be provided to
determine the quality of the study and the value of its results
Updated
• Generally, updated or latest information should be provided unless using
references for a historical perspective
Reliable
• Information discussing extrapolation to patients should be done cautiously
because it may require confirmation with additional clinical studies
22-Feb-2014
INMAS meeting
10
Broad principles (3)
Substantiated
• Bibliographical references should be provided to allow the audience to
verify information
• High-quality papers, published in peer-reviewed journals and well
accepted by the medical community, enhance the credibility
• Abstracts should only be used as a reference when the entire article is
not available
• Abstracts referring to clinical studies older than one year should be
used very cautiously
• Websites may be used for substantiation as long as they provide welldocumented and controlled information
• As information posted on websites changes very quickly, the date when
the site was last accessed should be provided in the reference
• Articles accepted for publication (and not yet published) may be used
only in cases where no published article is available and always very
cautiously
22-Feb-2014
INMAS meeting
11
Classification of Evidence
Sources of Evidence
Meta-analysis of multiple well-designed controlled studies
Well-designed randomized controlled trials
Well-designed non-randomized controlled trial (quasiexperiments)
Observational studies with controls (retrospective studies,
interrupted time-series studies, case-control studies, cohort
studies with controls)
Observational studies without controls (cohort studies without
controls and case series)
Classification
1A
1
2
3
4
22-Feb-2014
INMAS meeting
12
Establishing credibility
Your credibility depends on
• Personal credibility
• Expertise
• Audience’s judgment
Establishing credibility
• Trust your audience, like your audience, respect your
audience
• Give or show how they will benefit from your
presentation
• Use evidence that they find credible
Christopher Witt. How to establish credibility in a speech or presentation. 19-Dec-2013
22-Feb-2014
INMAS meeting
13
Maintaining credibility
Set standards
Be responsive
Keep in touch
Christopher Witt. How to establish credibility in a speech or presentation. 19-Dec-2013
22-Feb-2014
INMAS meeting
You
Your content
Forum – organization and audience
14
22-Feb-2014
INMAS meeting
15