Complaint Handling and Managing Employees

Comments

Transcription

Complaint Handling and Managing Employees
Complaint Handling and
Managing Employees
Assistant Commissioner
Paul Carey APM
NSW Police Force
National Investigations Symposium 2012
So far…..
• Nearly 40 years with NSWPF
• Assistant Commissioner – Professional
Standards
• Police Commander since 1995
• Counter Terrorism Commander
• Deputy Commissioner
• Worked, visited and spoken Nationally and
Internationally
NSW Police Force
• 150 years old
• State organisation providing all facets of
modern policing services
• 16,000+ sworn police officers
• 3,500 unsworn officers
• In 500 locations across the State
• Operating 24 x 7
NSW Police Force - Complaints
• Defined by Part 8A of the Police Act 1990
• Current approach comes from the Wood
Royal Commission recommendations
• Annually 5,000 – 5,500
• 65% complaints from the public
• 35% generated internally
What complaints?
• Operational issues attract attention
• Eg Use of Tasers, Pursuits, Major
operations, Major arrests, Major incidents,
Major events.
• The ‘business’ attracts complaints.
• Wicked questions
• People are employed to do certain things.
• We check, write policy, flag failures, call to
account.
• Implement good governance.
• Provide for improvement.
• There is a culture at work.
But……
• Do we explain what we do, how we do it,
why we do it (or don’t do it) in detail.
• Is it transparent?
• What are the facts?
• What is the evidence?
• Has it been reviewed?
• If there are a thousand tasks, processes,
•
•
•
strategies actions a investigator can take to
investigate a homicide (justifiable or
unjustifiable).
The results of those tasks undertaken are clear
and articulated.
The ones that aren’t undertaken are less clear.
This creates a void for those who review or have
an interest.
How does NSWPF manage?
• Oversight by NSW Ombudsman and the
Police Integrity Commission.
• Majority (80+%) managed locally.
• Complaints system managed centrally.
• Large central Command PSC – 240 staff.
• Supported by decentralised specialist staff
and ‘portfolio’ holders.
How do we do it
• Complaints are assessed or triaged.
• They can be declined, resolved or formally
investigated including criminal
investigations.
• Proper assessment, early contact, identify
issues and resolution streams.
Some facts
• NSWPF found interesting things.
• We were in fact being unfair to our own officers.
• We were imposing sanctions on poorly informed
•
•
benchmarks
We didn’t engage with the officer very much,
post investigation.
It could’ve been interpreted that the process
was being used as punishment.
• Woods said…Remedial rather than
punitive, however those that grossly
offend against proper standards should
expect nothing less than an early exit…
• We should work with people
• We should agree on a way to improve
Help
• Information is important
• Communication is more important
• Initial training, ongoing training
• Monitor progress
• Quality decisions
Help cont..
• Engage early – College, reinforce
• Workshops
• Bi annual conferences
• ‘Help’ available, helps everyone.
Ethics and Standards
• Socrates .. “What ought one to do…”
• Standards set from the top
• Oath of Office
• Statement of Values
• Code of Conduct
• Professional Standards
• Expect the unexpected from those you least
expect it.

Similar documents