MasteringChemistry with Knewton Adaptive

Transcription

MasteringChemistry with Knewton Adaptive
MasteringChemistry with Knewton Adaptive Follow-Up
School Name
Hudson Valley Community College, Troy, NY
Course Name General Chemistry I
t
Course Format Lecture and lab
Key Results The introduction of new concepts prior to lecture increased student engagement and
participation, and the addition of prelecture and Knewton Adaptive Follow-Up assignments
resulted in higher exam averages.
Submitted by
Donna Barron, Assistant Professor
Course materials
Introductory Chemistry (custom), Tro
About the Course
Hudson Valley Community College serves approximately
13,000 students each semester. Eight out of 10 students
come from the immediate, capital region, and approximately
50 percent are enrolled part-time.
General Chemistry I is taken primarily by science, health,
and engineering majors planning to transfer to a four-year
institution. The course covers atomic structure, chemical
bonds, reactions and equations, properties of gases and liquids,
and changes in state, solutions, and stoichiometry.
Challenges and Goals
According to Assistant Professor Donna Barron, students often
do not understand the learning process and tend to employ
the same type of passive learning they did in high school versus
taking responsibility for learning and practicing problem solving
outside of class. When students don’t take responsibility for
learning concepts on their own, it impacts the type of activities
that can be done during class time.
Barron also observes that students tend to stop listening when
they hear new words or terms they don’t recognize. For students who haven’t prepared, that can be much of the content
covered in class. “If a student’s attention is lost, they’ll miss out
on information they need to succeed in the course,” she says.
She assigns MasteringChemistry homework to introduce
30 • www.masteringchemistry.com
content to students prior to class and to help them become
familiar with concepts on their own time. Barron hypothesizes
that this helps students come to class with a better understanding of what they don’t know, and that as a result of
redesigning the course to include Knewton Adaptive Follow-Up
(AFU) assignments and prelecture work, student learning will
increase.
Implementation
Barron implemented MasteringChemistry in 2009 so she could
offer her students online homework with immediate feedback
and grading. MasteringChemistry homework was due after
the chapter lecture and tended to include activity and tutorial
questions. As Barron became more knowledgeable about how
to use MasteringChemistry to enhance learning, she made
changes to her implementation to flip the classroom.
In spring 2013, Barron added MasteringChemistry prelecture
homework assignments: short, untimed assignments due before
lecture designed to help increase student awareness about
new topics and to identify student misconceptions and areas
of misunderstanding. Barron tells students it is okay to be
confused after doing the homework because the concepts will
become clear during class.
In spring 2014, Barron assigned both MasteringChemistry
prelecture and postlecture homework, and offered optional
Knewton Adaptive Follow-Up exercises for extra credit. AFU
exercises are designed to help students fill in any gaps in their
understanding, so each assignment is generated from a student’s
performance on their MasteringChemistry parent homework.
MasteringChemistry with Knewton Adaptive Follow-Up: Hudson Valley Community College
76%
80%
67%
Average Final Exam Score
70%
80%
Average Final Exam Score
64%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
79%
***
70%
58%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0%
Spring 2012
postlecture HW
Spring 2013
pre- and postlecture HW
Attempted or tested
out of ≤ 4 AFUs
Spring 2014
pre- and postlecture HW, AFU
Knewton Adaptive Follow-Up Performance
MasteringChemistry Implementation
Using MasteringChemistry in these ways has freed up class time
and enabled Barron to integrate more active learning exercises,
to address specific misconceptions, and to explore real-life
applications. Time lecturing on theory has been reduced, and
Barron no longer uses PowerPoints—class time is used for
discussions, problem solving, and learning games.
Assessments
37.5 percent
Exams (three)
25.0 percent
Lab
25.0 percent
Final exam
12.5 percent
MasteringChemistry
120
100%
80%
**
*
*
100
Average Quiz Score
Students automatically received extra credit for AFU assignments if they earned at least 80 percent on MasteringChemistry
postlecture parent homework. Students who earned less than
80 percent were required to complete the AFU assignment
to earn extra credit. AFU assignments were available starting
with Chapter 6; there were seven AFU assignments available in
spring 2014.
Figure 2. Average Final Exam Scores by Knewton Adaptive Follow-Up
Performance, Spring 2014 (Completed ≤4, n = 17; Attempted all/Missed one,
n = 7; Error Bars = Standard Error, Significance p < 0.001)
Average Exam Score
Figure 1. Average Final Exam Scores by Implementation, Spring 2012–14
(2012, n = 30; 2013, n = 27; 2014, n = 24; Error Bars = Standard Error)
Attemped, tested out of all,
or missed 1 AFU
rR²
==
0.9278
0.86095
80
60%
60
40%
40
20%
20
0%
0
1
0%
2
3
20%
4
40%
5
6
60%
Quiz
Traditional
classroom
MasteringChemistry
7
80%
8
Average
100%
120%
Flipped classroom
Points
Figure 3. Correlation of MasteringChemistry Homework Points to Average
Exam Score, Spring 2014 (n = 24)
Results and Data
To understand the impact of the changes made to the course,
final exam averages from the spring semesters in 2012, 2013,
and 2014 were evaluated. Figure 1 shows a significant increase
in the final exam average in spring 2014. To assess whether
optional Knewton Adaptive Follow-Up assignments had an
impact on learning, spring 2014 student data were split into two
groups: those who tested out of, attempted all, or skipped only
www.masteringchemistry.com • 31
MasteringChemistry with Knewton Adaptive Follow-Up: Hudson Valley Community College
“Just as the name suggests, [MasteringChemistry] helped me master chemistry.
I wish I had this kind of program for every class.”
—Student
Conclusion
Additional analysis of the spring 2014 exam results explored
the correlation between MasteringChemistry homework
scores and average (of three) unit exam scores. Figure 3 shows
a strong correlation between MasteringChemistry points and
the average unit exam score (r = 0.9278). Although not shown
here, there was also a correlation between MasteringChemistry
homework scores and final exam averages, with r = 0.8253.
This correlation includes only students who took the final exam.
Since the latest redesign, Barron reports a trend toward higher
exam scores for students who do the MasteringChemistry
homework and Knewton Adaptive Follow-Up sets. To further
promote this trend, Barron plans to continue offering AFU
extra-credit assignments, but will raise the test-out score from
80 to 95 percent to encourage topic mastery.
t
one AFU assignment (out of seven); and those who attempted
or tested out of four or fewer AFU assignments. All students fell
into one of those categories. Figure 2 shows that students who
attempted all AFU assignments or skipped only one AFU assignment had significantly higher final exam averages (p = 0.0004).
This analysis includes only students who completed the course
by taking the final exam.
MasteringChemistry was initially adopted to address student
engagement and preparedness, but has since evolved from
postlecture homework only to the use of both pre- and postlecture homework, plus Knewton Adaptive Follow-Up extracredit assignments to address individual student remediation
needs.
The Student Experience
Barron reports a change in student attitude toward online
homework, and student feedback indicates that many students
understand the benefit of doing it. She says that students
enjoy class more since the implementation of prelecture
MasteringChemistry homework, and that class participation
increased. Students recognize the topics being discussed, and
the work in class clarifies any concepts they didn’t understand
on the homework.
In a spring 2014 survey, students were asked about the
MasteringChemistry assignments. Comments include:
•
“Just as the name suggests, [MasteringChemistry] helped
me master chemistry. I wish I had this kind of program
for every class.”
•
“I could rework the problems for test review.”
•
“[MasteringChemistry] was a great overall tool. It allowed
me to focus on what was important in each chapter. The
rework for practice was an excellent way to check my
understanding of topics when studying for exams.”
32 • www.masteringchemistry.com
PearsonCourseConnect.com