2010 Water Quality Report - Frederick County Sanitation Authority
Transcription
2010 Water Quality Report - Frederick County Sanitation Authority
Water Hardness Water Hardness provided by the Sanitation Authority is hard at an average of 297 ppm or 17.35 grains The water (1grain = 17.118 ppm) and can be expected to cause calcium buildup and glassware spotting. This is an The water provided by the Sanitation Authority is hard at an average of 297 ppm or 17.35 grains aesthetic problem, but it has no harmful health effects. Water hardness is not regulated by the Virginia (1grain = Department of17.118 Health ppm) (VDH).and can be expected to cause calcium buildup and glassware spotting. This is an aesthetic problem, but it has no harmful health effects. Water hardness is not regulated by the Virginia Department of Health (VDH). Water Conservation Message… Water Conservation Message… rainfall during 2010 was The region’s average. The Authority recommends all customers conserve water, especially during the hottest periods of the summer when demands are the greatest. The region’s rainfall during 2010 was average. The Authority recommends all customers Should conditions become serious, voluntary conservation measures will be implemented and in the conserve water, especially the during the hottest periods of impose the summer when demands are the greatest. event of a water emergency, Sanitation Authority will mandatory water restrictions as Should conditions become serious, voluntary conservation measures will be implemented and in the outlined in the Authority’s Water Conservation policy. For more information or a copy of the policy, event 540-868-1061, of a water emergency, Sanitation Authority will impose mandatory water restrictions as telephone or visit ourthe website at www.fcsa-water.com. outlined in the Authority’s Water Conservation policy. For more information or a copy of the policy, telephone 540-868-1061, or visit our website at www.fcsa-water.com. Lead and Copper Lead and Copper If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and components If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant associated with service lines and home plumbing. women and youngCounty children. Lead in drinkingiswater is primarily from materials and drinking components The Frederick Sanitation Authority responsible for providing high quality associated with service lines and home plumbing. water, but cannot control the variety of materials used in plumbing components. When your water has Frederick County Sanitation is responsible for providing highyour quality drinking been sitting The for several hours, you can minimizeAuthority the potential for lead exposure by �lushing tap 15 to water, but cannot control the variety of materials used in plumbing components. When your water 30 seconds or until it becomes cold or reaches a steady temperature before using water for drinking or has been Ifsitting hours, you can potential for lead exposure �lushing your tap 15 to cooking. you for are several concerned about leadminimize in your the water, you may wish to havebyyour water tested. temperature waterexposure for drinking 30 seconds or until it becomes coldtesting or reaches a steady Information on lead in drinking water, methods, and steps you canbefore take tousing minimize is or cooking. If you are concerned about lead in your water, you may wish to have your water tested. available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline or at http://www.epa.gov/safewater/lead. Information on lead in drinking water, testing methods, and steps you can take to minimize exposure is available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline or at http://www.epa.gov/safewater/lead. Only Tap Water Delivers Only Tap water Water Delivers As your provider, we’re constantly monitoring the condition of our water distribution infrastructure. We repair what we can and replace what we must. It’s a signi�icant expense, but it’s an As your water provider, we’re constantly monitoring the condition of our water distribution investment worth making. infrastructure. Wedelivers repair what canjust andsafe replace whatwater. we must. It’s a signi�icant expense, but it’s an morewe than drinking It delivers public health protection, Our tap water investment worth making. support for the economy, and the quality of life we enjoy. Our job is to ensure that your water keeps water delivers than It’s justall safe drinking water. It delivers public health protection, Our tap part of the commitment to serve you and everyone �lowing not only today but well into more the future. support for the economy, and the quality of life we enjoy. Our job is to ensure that your water keeps in our community. �lowing not only today but well into the future. It’s all part of the commitment to serve you and everyone in our community. Customer Participation Customer interested in learning more about Frederick County Sanitation Authority and water If you areParticipation quality or participating in the decision making process, there are a number of opportunities available. If you are interested in learning more about Frederick County Sanitation Authority and water Inquiries about water quality or about public participation and policy decisions can be made by calling quality oratparticipating in the making process, there are a number of opportunities the Authority 540-868-1061. Thedecision Frederick County Sanitation Authority board meets at 5:30 p.m.available. the quality about public participation and policyRoad, decisions can be by calling thirdInquiries Tuesday about of eachwater month at theorAuthority’s headquarters, 315 Tasker Stephens Citymade VA. Board the Authority at the 540-868-1061. The Frederick County Sanitation Authority board meets at 5:30 p.m. the public. sessions are open to third Tuesday of each month at the Authority’s headquarters, 315 Tasker Road, Stephens City VA. Board sessions are open to the public. Fre d e r i c k C o u n t y S a n i t a t i o n Au t h o r i t y Fre d e r i c k P. C oO.u nBtox y S1a8n7i t7a t i o n Au t h o r i t y W i n c h eP.sO. t e r,B ox VA 12827670 4 W i n c h e s t e r, VA 2 2 6 0 4 315 Tasker Road (I 81, Exit 310) Drive through window and 24 hour drop box for your convenience. 315 Tasker Road (I 81, Exit 310) Drive through window and 24 hour drop box for your convenience. Safe Water at Your Service Safe at Your Service are pleased to report that your drinking water meets all State and Federal Requirements administered by WeWater the Virginia Department of Health (VDH) Of�ice of Water Programs. This report summarizes the quality of water We are pleased to report that your drinking water meets all State and Federal Requirements administered by provided to our customers for calendar year 2010. It re�lects the efforts of our employees to supply safe drinking theIncluded Virginiaare Department of Health (VDH) of Water Programs. This the qualitysetofby water water. details about the source of Of�ice your water, what it contains, andreport how itsummarizes meets the standards provided to our customers for calendar year 2010. It re�lects the efforts of our employees to supply safe drinking state and federal regulatory agencies. water. Included details about the source your water, what itrequesting contains, and how it meetsisthe standards set by Although thisare information has always beenofavailable to anyone it, the Authority furnishing this state and federal regulatory agencies. report in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Additional information is available at Although this information has always available to anyone requesting theattempted Authoritytoisaccomplish furnishing this the Authority’s of�ice to address any special needs, been concerns or questions. The Authorityit,has report accordance the United Stateswhile Environmental this in a costinconscious andwith informative manner meeting theProtection guidelines.Agency. Additional information is available at the Authority’s of�ice to address any special needs, concerns or questions. The Authority has attempted to accomplish this in a cost conscious and informative manner while meeting the guidelines. Testing Your Water DuringYour 2010, Water the Authority’s laboratories at the Diehl and Anderson Water Filtration Plants ran more than Testing 60,000 process tests to insure your drinking water meets the Virginia Department of Health and the United States During 2010, the Authority’s laboratories at the Diehl and Anderson Water Filtration Plants ran more than Environmental Protection Agency standards. 60,000 process tests to insure your drinking water meets the Virginia Department of Health and the United States Environmental Protection Agency standards. Violations The Frederick Violations County Sanitation Authority is in full compliance with all water quality, monitoring, and reporting requirements and no violations occurred during calendar year 2010. The Frederick County Sanitation Authority is in full compliance with all water quality, monitoring, and reporting requirements and no violations occurred during calendar year 2010. No Cryptosporidium or Giardia NoACryptosporidium or Frederick GiardiaCounty Sanitation Authority voluntarily tested both source water lthough not required, the and the �inished treated water at the Diehl and Anderson Water Filtration Plants for cryptosporidium and giardia Although not required, the Frederick County Sanitation Authority voluntarily tested both source water during 2010, none was detected. and the �inished treated water at the Diehl and Anderson Water Filtration Plants for cryptosporidium and giardia during 2010, none was detected. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY’S SAFE DRINKING WATER HOTLINE 800-426-4791 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY’S SAFE DRINKING WATER HOTLINE 800-426-4791 Visit the Frederick County Sanitation Authority Website at www.fcsa-water.com Visit the Frederick County Sanitation Authority Website at www.fcsa-water.com Frederick County’s Water Sources Frederick County’s Water Sources 39% of the treated water provided by the Frederick County Sanitation Authority is taken from of the treated water provided theClearbrook Frederick County Sanitation Authority is takenas from 39% the Stephens City quarries, and 43% is taken frombythe quarries. The water is classi�ied a Stephens quarries, and 43% is the taken from the Clearbrook quarries. The water is classi�ied as a surface the water source.City The water taken from quarries is treated at the James H. Diehl Water Filtration surface The water taken from the Plant. quarriesThe is treated at the James H. Wateraddition, Filtration Plant and the water Jamessource. T. Anderson Water Filtration process consists of Diehl chemical Plant and the James T. Anderson Water Filtration Plant. The process consists of chemical addition, �locculation, sedimentation, �iltration to remove turbidity, chlorination to disinfect the water, and �luoride �locculation, sedimentation, �iltration to remove turbidity, chlorination to disinfect the water, and �luoride is added to help prevent tooth decay. 18% of the water provided in 2010 was purchased from the City of is added to help prevent tooth decay. 18% of the water provided in 2010 was purchased from the City of Winchester. This water is drawn from the North Fork of the Shenandoah River, a surface water source. Winchester. Thisthree watersources is drawn from the North Fork of the Shenandoah a surface water source. The waters from these are blended in the Sanitation Authority’sRiver, system and distributed to The waters from these three sources are blended in the Sanitation Authority’s system and distributed our customers. The Authority has 4.65 million gallons of storage, plus 4.35 million gallons into our customers. The Authority has 4.65 million gallons of storage, plus 4.35 million gallons in clearwell/�inished water tanks at the water plants. The table below lists only those water substances that had some level of detection. More than 100 substances were sampled for, but were not present or were below the detection limits. All drinking water, including bottled drinkingMore water, may expected contain at least small amounts of The table below lists only those water substances that had some level of detection. than 100reasonably substances be were sampledtofor, but were not present or some substances. The presence ofdrinking contaminants does not bottled necessarily indicate themay water poses a be health risk. to More information about contaminants and were below the detection limits. All water, including drinking water, reasonably expected contain at least small amounts of potential health effects can be obtained by calling THE AGENCY'S DRINKING WATER HOTLINE at some substances. The presence of contaminants does not ENVIRONMENTAL necessarily indicate the PROTECTION water poses a health risk. MoreSAFE information about contaminants and potential health cantheir be obtained THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY'S 800-426-4791 oreffects visiting website by at calling http://water.epa.gov/drink/hotline/index.cfm . SAFE DRINKING WATER HOTLINE at 800-426-4791 or visiting their Highest website at http://water.epa.gov/drink/hotline/index.cfm Highest Level Detected . Ideal Highest Highest Level Detected Level Sources Ideal Goals Water Sources Substance Level Sources of Allowed Goals Water Sources Substance Tested for Allowed of EPA’s EPA’s Contamination Tested for Diehl Plant Anderson Plant Miller Plant EPA’s EPA’s Contamination MCLG MCL Miller Plant Anderson Plant Diehl Plant MCLG clearwell/�inished water tanks at the water plants. Special Information for Immuno Compromised Special Information for Immuno Compromised Assessments SourceSource WaterWater Assessments Source water assessments for the Frederick County Sanitation Authority have been completed by ource water assessments for the Frederick County Sanitation Authority have been completed by Sthe Virginia Department of Health. These assessments determined that the Authority’s water sources, the the Virginia Department Health. These assessments determined water River, sources, thebe Stephens City andofClearbrook quarries as well as the Norththat Forkthe ofAuthority’s the Shenandoah may Stephens City and Clearbrook quarries as well as the North Fork of the Shenandoah River, may susceptible to contamination because they are surface water sources exposed to a wide arraybeof susceptible to contamination they are surfacehydrologic, water sources exposed to a wide array of contaminants at varyingbecause concentrations. Changing hydraulic and atmospheric conditions contaminants atmigration varying of concentrations. Changing hydrologic, and atmospheric conditions promote contaminants from land use activities ofhydraulic concern within the assessment area. More promoteinformation migration may of contaminants from land use within the assessment area. More theactivities Authorityofatconcern be obtained by contacting 540-868-1061. information may be obtained by contacting the Authority at 540-868-1061. N/A N/A Beta/Photon Beta/Photon emitters emitters 00 50pCi/L* pCi/L* 3.13.1 pCi/L 50 pCi/L No No 2.7 pCi/L No NoNot Required Not Required No 2.7 pCi/L natural and man-made No of Decay Decay naturalof and man-made deposits deposits Alpha Alpha emitters emitters 00 pCi/L 1515pCi/L pCi/L 1.91.9 pCi/L No No Not Required 0.8 pCi/L No NoNot Required No 0.8 pCi/L No natural deposits Erosion ofErosion natural of deposits Combined Combined Radium Radium 00 55pCi/L pCi/L 2.12.1 pCi/L pCi/L No No No 1.6 pCi/L 1.6 pCi/L No NoNot Required Not Required No Erosion ofErosion natural of deposits natural deposits Fluoride Fluoride 44ppm ppm Quality of Your Drinking Water Your drinking water is routinely monitored according to Federal and State Regulations for a variety of contaminants. The table on the next page shows the results of our monitoring for the period our drinking water 31, is 2010. routinely monitored according to Federal and State Regulations for a Y January 1 to December variety of contaminants. table on table the next pagetesting showsdone the inresults our monitoring forDepartment the periodof Most of the The results in the are from 2010. of However, the Virginia January Health 1 to December 2010. for some contaminants less than once per year because the concentrations of allows us31, to monitor Most the results in arefrequently. from testing done 2010. the Virginia Department of these of contaminants dothe nottable change Some ofin our data, However, though accurate, is more than one year Health allows old. us to monitor for some contaminants less than once per year because the concentrations of regulatory We constantly monitor for various contaminants the water supplyis to meet all one these contaminants do not change frequently. Some of our data,inthough accurate, more than year requirements. The table lists only those contaminants that had some level of detection. Many other old. contaminants have been analyzed but were not present below the detection of the lab We constantly monitor for various contaminants in or thewere water supply to meet limits all regulatory equipment. requirements. The table lists only those contaminants that had some level of detection. Many other contaminants have been analyzed but were not present or were below the detection limits of the lab equipment. 4 4ppm ppm Nitrate Nitrate 10 ppm 10 ppm (as Nitrogen) Nitrogen) 10 ppm 10 ppm (as Barium Barium Total Organic Total Organic Carbon Carbon 2 ppm 2 ppm N/A N/A 1.06 1.06 ppmppm Highest 1.15 ppm Highest Highest 1.15 ppm Highest Avg. Avg. No Monthly Avg. Monthly Monthly Avg. No No Monthly Range 0.230.23 - 1.44ppm Range - 1.44ppm 2 ppm 2 ppm TT TT Range 0.25 -0.25 1.30 -ppm Range 1.30 ppm Range Range 0.50 - 1.28 0.50ppm - 1.28 ppm No No 2.662.66 ppmppm No No 1.42 ppm 1.42 ppm No 0.047 ppm No 0.063 ppm 1.15 Avg. for Yr. 1.15 Avg. for Yr. 1.00 - 2.02 range 1.00 - 2.02 range No Ratio of actual to require Ratioremoval of actual to No No 0.063 ppm No No No 0.031 ppm drilling wastes 2.16Avg. for Yr. 2.16Avg. 1.00 – 3.22 rangefor Yr. No 1.00 Avg. for Yr. for Yr. 1.001.00 - 1.00Avg. range No 1.00 – 3.22 of actual to range NoRatio requireRatio removal of actual to 1.00 - 1.00torange Ratio of actual require removal Ratio of actual to require removal 0.031 ppm require removal Soil runoff Soil runoff Erosion ofErosion naturalof deposits; naturalwater deposits; water additive which promotes teeth; additive which strong promotes strong teeth; No dischargedischarge from fertilizer aluminum fromand fertilizer and aluminum factories. factories. Runoff from fertilizer use; leaching from Runoff from fertilizer use; leaching from septic tanks; sewage; Erosion of natural septic tanks; sewage; Erosion of natural No deposits deposits Erosion of natural deposits, discharge Erosion of natural deposits, from metal refineries, discharge of discharge from metal refineries, discharge of No drilling wastes 0.96 ppm 0.96Highest ppm Highest 1.53 ppm 1.53 ppm 0.047 ppm No Avg Avg No No Monthly Monthly Regulated at the Customer’s Tap No Naturally present in environment Naturally present in environment require removal Regulated at the Customer’s Tap City of Winchester Frederick County Sanitation Authority AL Lead Lead Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL) Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL) are set at very stringent levels by the U.S. Environmental water each day throughout the a 70-year life span. EPA generally setsaverage MCLs atadult levelsdrinks that will result Protection Agency. In developing standards, EPA assumes that the two litersinofno adverse health effects for some contaminants for a one-in-ten-thousand to one-in-a-million chance water each day throughout a 70-year life span. EPA generally sets MCLs at levels that will result in noof having the described health effect for other contaminants. adverse health effects for some contaminants for a one-in-ten-thousand to one-in-a-million chance of having the described healthDrinking effect for other contaminants. Quality of Your Water Violation Violation Violation TT, 1 NTU TT, 1 NTU Max Day 0.07 NTU Max Day 0.10 NTU max, 0.3 Max Day 0.19 NTU Max Day 0.07 NTU 0.10 NTU max, 0.3 Max Day 0.19 NTU NoMax Day No No No No 100% <0.3 NTU 95% of the <0.3 NTU 100% <0.3 NTU 100% <0.3 NTU 95% of the 100% 100% <0.3 NTU 100% <0.3 NTU time time Turbidity Turbidity Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL) Protection In developing the standards, assumes that the average adult two liters of M aximumAgency. Contaminant Levels (MCL) are set EPA at very stringent levels by the U.S.drinks Environmental Regulated at the Water Filtration Plant Regulated at the Water Filtration Plant Violation Violation Violation may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water thanthethegeneral general Some people population. Immuno-compromised persons, such such as persons withwith cancer undergoing chemotherapy, population. Immuno-compromised persons, as persons cancer undergoing chemotherapy, personspersons who have organorgan transplants, people withwith HIV/AIDS or or other immune who undergone have undergone transplants, people HIV/AIDS other immunesystem system disorders, some elderly persons and infants can be particularly at risk from infections. disorders, some elderly persons and infants can be particularly at risk from infections. These people shouldshould seek advice aboutabout drinking water fromfrom their healthcare providers. These people seek advice drinking water their healthcare providers. The The Environmental Protection Agency and the Centers for Disease Control guidelines on appropriate means Environmental Protection Agency and the Centers for Disease Control guidelines on appropriate means lessen of infections by Cryptosporidium and other microbiological contaminants available to lessentothe riskthe of risk infections by Cryptosporidium and other microbiological contaminants areare available 800-426-4791 or or their their website website the EPA’s Drinking Hotline from from the EPA’s Safe Safe Drinking WaterWater Hotline at at800-426-4791 http://water.epa.gov/drink/hotline/index.cfm or Centers the Centers for Disease Control 800-232-4636oror or the for Disease Control at at 800-232-4636 http://water.epa.gov/drink/hotline/index.cfm their website http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/water.html. their website http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/water.html. MCL Copper Copper 0 0 0 0 Total Coliform Bacteria 0 Total Bacteria Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Total N/A Total Coliform Trihalomethanes Haloacetic Acids (TTHM) (HAA5) 0 N/A N/A Haloacetic Acids N/A Chlorine MRDLG (HAA5) 4 mgl AL 15 ppb 15 ppb 1.3 ppm 1.3 ppm One Positive Per month One Positive 80 ppb Per month Average for year 80 ppb Average for 60 ppb year Average for year 60 ppb Average MRDLfor year 4mgl Frederick CountyTotal Sanitation Authority 90th Percentile Detection exceeding AL Total 90th Violation Percentile Detection exceeding AL 4.27 ppb 1 4.27 ppb 0.176 ppm No No 0 Violation Percentile Detection exceeding AL 2.9 ppb No 0 City of Winchester Total Percentile Detection Total 90th exceeding AL Violation 1 0.176 ppm 90 th 2.9 ppb 0.445 ppm No 1 0 0.445 ppm in Violation the Distribution System None Detected None Detected 20.10 ppb Average for year Range 10.0 – 50.0 ppb 20.10 ppb Average for year Range 10.0 – 50.0 ppb 12.84 ppb Average for year Range 6.8 - 24.0 ppb 12.84 ppb Average for year 2.44 6.8 mgl- 24.0 ppb Range Average for year Range 0.4 – 3.8 mgl Violation23.68 ppb Average None Detected for year No No No No Corrosion of household plumbing NoCorrosion of household plumbing systems, Erosions of natural deposits. No systems; Erosion of natural deposits; Corrosion of household plumbing leaching from wood preservatives 0 No Violation Naturally present in environment Naturally present in environment 23.68 ppb Average for year Range 6.2 - 74 ppb No By-product of drinking water chlorination 19.56 ppb Average for year 2.19 mgl Range 7.4 – 70.0 ppb No 19.56 ppb Average for year Range 7.4 – 70.0 ppb Average for year Range 0.4 - 3.4 mgl No By-product of drinking water chlorination No No 2.44 mgl 2.19 mgl Chlorine MRDLG MRDL * The MCL for beta particles is 4/mrem/year. EPA considers 50pCi/L to be the levelAverage of concern forfor betayear particles. No Average for year No Definitions: 4 mgl 4mgl Range 0.4 – 3.8 mgl Range 0.4 3.4 mgl In the table above and elsewhere in this report, you will find many terms and abbreviations you might not be familiar with. The following definitions are provided to help you better understand these terms. * systems; Erosion of natural deposits; leaching from wood preservatives Violation Range 6.2 - 74 ppb No Corrosion of household plumbing systems, Erosions of natural deposits. 1 Regulated in the Distribution System NoneRegulated Detected Violation No By-product of drinking water chlorination By-product of drinking water chlorination By-product of drinking water chlorination By-product of drinking water chlorination • for MCL Contaminant Level - the highest level of contaminant thatof is concern allowed infor drinking water. MCLs are set as close to the MCLGs as feasible using the best available treatment technology. The MCL beta Maximum particles is 4/mrem/year. EPA considers 50pCi/L to be the level beta particles. • MCLG Maximum Contaminant Level Goal - The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MGLGs allow for a margin of safety. Definitions: • MRDL Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level – The highest level of disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants. In the table above and elsewhere in this report, you will find many terms and abbreviations you might not be familiar with. The following definitions are provided to help you better understand these terms. • MRDLG – Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal – The level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLG’s do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control • MCL Maximum Contaminant Level - the highest level of contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to the MCLGs as feasible using the best available treatment technology. microbial contaminants. •• MCLG Maximum Contaminant Level - The of a contaminant in drinking water there is no or expected NTU - Nephelometric Turbidity Unit - A Goal measure of level the clarity of water. Turbidity in excess of 5below NTU iswhich just noticeable toknown the average person. risk to health. MGLGs allow for a margin of safety. •• MRDL Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level – Theabsorbed highest level ofbody. disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants. mrem/year - Millirems per yearA measure of radium by the •• MRDLG – Maximum Disinfectant Level Goal The level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLG’s do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control pCi/L - Picocuries per Residual liter - A measure of radioactivity in –water. microbial contaminants. • ppm - Parts per million - One part per million corresponds to 1 drop in 16 gallons • NTU Nephelometric Turbidity Unit A measure of the clarity ppb - Parts per billion - One part per billion corresponds to 1 dropof in water. 15,750 Turbidity gallons. in excess of 5 NTU is just noticeable to the average person. • mrem/year - Millirems per year- A measure of radium absorbed the body. AL - Action Level - The concentration of a contaminant that triggers by treatment or other requirements which a water system must follow. Action levels are reported at the 90th percentile for homes at the greatest risk. TT -Treatment Technique - A-required process intended to in reduce the level of contaminant in drinking water. • pCi/L - Picocuries per liter A measure of radioactivity water. N/A Applicable. • ppm- Not - Parts per million - One part per million corresponds to 1 drop in 16 gallons • ppb - Parts per billion - One part per billion corresponds to 1 drop in 15,750 gallons. • AL - Action Level - The concentration of a contaminant that triggers treatment or other requirements which a water system must follow. Action levels are reported at the 90th percentile for homes at the greatest risk. • TT -Treatment Technique - A required process intended to reduce the level of contaminant in drinking water. • N/A - Not Applicable.