nagpur bench writ petition no. 609 2015

Transcription

nagpur bench writ petition no. 609 2015
WP.609.15
…
C
ou
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT NAGPUR, NAGPUR.
rt
1
WRIT PETITION NO. 609 / 2015 ig
h
Ku. Shital D/o Laxman Nannaware Aged about 24 years, occu; student
R/o Ward No.15, Near Narayan Niwas
Wani, Tah.Wani ,Dist. Yavatmal.
v e r s u s
The State of Maharashtra
Through its secretary
Department of medical Education
Mantralaya, Mumbai­32.
2)
The Directorate,
Medical Education and Research
Mumbai Saint George Hospital Compound
Government Dental College
Building , 4th floor, Near Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus
Mumbai.
B
om
ba
y
H
1)
...PETITIONER. 3)
The Dean
Shri Vasantrao Naik Government Medical College, Nagpur.
4)
The Registrar,
Maharashtra University of health Sciences, Wani Road, Mharsul, Nashik­4.
4)
The Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee,
Irwin Chowk, Amravati. ...RESPONDENTS
::: Downloaded on - 31/03/2015 09:06:35 :::
WP.609.15
rt
2
C
ou
…........................................................................................................................
Mr. Ram Parsodkar, Adv.for petitioner
Mrs.Rashi Deshpande, AGP for R­1 to 3
Mr. J. B. Jaiswal, Adv. for respondent no.4 Mr. A.M.Deshpande, Adv.for respondent No.5
............................................................................................................................
ig
h
CORAM: B.R.GAVAI &
Mrs. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATED : 4th March, 2015.
ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per B.R.Gavai, J. ) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The petition is H
1.
heard finally with the consent of the learned counsel for the ba
y
parties.
2.
Petitioner has approached this Court since the om
petitioner has not been issued internship certificate and the degree certificate of M.B.B.S. Though the caste claim of the petitioner B
is pending before the respondent no.5­Committee, the petitioner has already completed M.B.B.S. course and also completed the internship. In that view of the matter, though directions have been issued by this Court to the respondent no.5­Committee to decide the claim of the petitioner the claim is not yet decided.
::: Downloaded on - 31/03/2015 09:06:35 :::
WP.609.15
3.
rt
3
Petitioner cannot be penalised on account of non­
C
ou
action of respondent no.5. In that view of the matter, rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (i). Writ Petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
JUDGE
B
om
ba
y
sahare
JUDGE
H
ig
h
Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms.
::: Downloaded on - 31/03/2015 09:06:35 :::