FBI-LEEDA Insighter Magazine, April 2015 Issue II

Transcription

April 2015 Issue II
IN THIS ISSUE:
dŚĞ>ĞǆŝĐŽŶŽĨ>ĞŐŝƟŵĂĐǇ
ŐĞŶĚĂŶŶŽƵŶĐĞĚĨŽƌ
ŽƵƌϮϰƚŚŶŶƵĂůǆĞĐƵƟǀĞ
dƌĂŝŶŝŶŐŽŶĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ
zŽƵƌĞƐƚůůǇŝŶƌĞĂƟŶŐ
ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇWĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƐ
Proud host of FBI-LEEDA’s
24th Annual Executive Training Conference
May 4-6, 2015 | Austin, Texas
DID YOU KNOW:
LifeLock partners with FBI-LEEDA, Inc. (Law
Enforcement Executive Development Association),
a non-profit training agency, to present educational
programs about identity theft and fraud across
the United States. Summits are open to law
enforcement, including chiefs, sheriffs, investigative
supervisors, fraud unit investigators, patrol officers,
community policing personnel, special agents, and
elected officials. Together, we have educated more
than 10,000 law enforcement officials representing
over 4,000 agencies in all 50 states.
FBI-LEEDA
FBI-LEEDA
Insighter
ϮϬϭϰͲϮϬϭϱǆĞĐƵƟǀĞŽĂƌĚ
WZ^/Ed
Sam Pennica, Director
Raleigh/Wake City County Bureau of Identification
3301 Hammond Road, Raleigh, NC 27603
Telephone: 919-255-7370
Email: [email protected]
&/Z^ds/WZ^/Ed
David Boggs, Chief
Broken Arrow Police Department
2302 S. First Place, Broken Arrow, OK 74012
Telephone: 918-451-8394
[email protected]
^KEs/WZ^/Ed
Paul Shastany, Chief
Stoughton Police Department
26 Rose Street
Stoughton, MA 02072
Telephone: 781-232-9311
[email protected]
d,/Zs/WZ^/Ed
Thomas Alber, Chief
Garden City Police Department
107 N. 3rd Street, P. O. Box 20
Garden City, MO 64747
Telephone: 816-773-8201
[email protected]
^Z'EddZD^
John Horsman, Chief
Delaware Capitol Police
150 MLK South
Dover, DE 19903
Telephone: 302-744-4385
[email protected]
W^dWZ^/Ed
Greg Hamilton, Sheriff
Travis County Sheriff’s Office
P.O. Box 1748, Austin, TX 78767
Telephone: 512-854-9788
E-mail: [email protected]
yhd/s/ZdKZ
Charles “Skip” Robb
FBI-LEEDA, Inc.
5 Great Valley Parkway, Suite 125, Malvern, PA 19355
Telephone: 1-877-772-7712
&/>//^KE
Shirley A. Hinton, Unit Chief
Law Enforcement Engagement Unit
Office of Partner Engagement - FBI HQ
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Room 6857
Washington, D.C. 20535
Telephone: 202 324 8599
&/ʹ>/ŶƐŝŐŚƚĞƌ͕ĂƉƵďůŝĐĂƟŽŶŽĨ&/ʹ>͕/ŶĐ͕͘ŝƐ
ƉƵďůŝƐŚĞĚĨŽƵƌƟŵĞƐĂǇĞĂƌ͘
DĂŶĂŐŝŶŐĚŝƚŽƌ͗:ƵĚǇWĂů
ƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚŝƚŽƌ͗>ǇŶŶtĞďĞƌ
ƌƚŝƌĞĐƚŽƌ͗:ƵĚŝƚŚ͘'ƌƵďď
ƉƌŝůϮϬϭϱͲ/ƐƐƵĞ//
&ĞĂƚƵƌĞƌƟĐůĞƐ͗
6|
The Lexicon of Legitimacy
– James E. Lukaszewski, ABC, APR
4|
8|
10 |
14 |
15 |
An Insider’s Look At Your Employee Assistance Program –
Larry Barton, Ph.D.
The Call of a Profession – Daniel T. Primozic, Ph. D.
Knock and Talk - Limited to Just the Front Door? – Eric Daigle, Esq.
Your Best Ally in Creating Community Partnerships – Judy Pal,
Director of Operations, FBI-LEEDA
Cyber Security Resources – SSA Brian Abellera, Cyber Division, FBI
20 | 24th Annual Executive Training Conference
May 4-6, 2015 in Austin, Texas
20
22
Announcement and Registration Update
Conference Agenda
dƌĂŝŶŝŶŐKƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ͗
18 | Summits and Seminars
18
25
23 |
24 |
Identity Theft – LifeLock® | Drug Diversion Summits – Purdue Pharma®
3SI Solving Crime Trends With Electronic Stakeouts
Three Steps to Trilogy
Supervisor Leadership Institute, Command Leadership Institute, and
Executive Leadership Institute
Training Opportunities
Leaders Without Titles, Internal Affairs Investigations, Media and Public Relations,
Distance Learning Online Training: Phase I Basic Supervisory Liability
and Phase II Advanced Supervisory Liability
40 | FBI-LEEDA POST Approvals by State
/ŶdŚŝƐ/ƐƐƵĞ͗
1 | FBI–LEEDA Executive Board
2 | President’s Message – President Sam Pennica
3 | The LEEDing Edge – Executive Director’s Report
5 | FBI–LEEDA Mission
11 | Regional Representative Program Update
17 | FBI–LEEDA/LifeLock Scholarship Program
26 | FBI–LEEDA Instructors
27 | Corporate Partnerships and Directory
30 | Training Graduates
35 | Welcome New Members
The FBI–>Ăǁ ŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚ ǆĞĐƵƟǀĞ ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ƐƐŽĐŝĂƟŽŶ ŝƐ Ă ƉƌŝǀĂƚĞ͕ ŶŽŶʹƉƌŽĮƚ
ŽƌŐĂŶŝǌĂƟŽŶĂŶĚŝƐŶŽƚƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚĞ&ĞĚĞƌĂůƵƌĞĂƵŽĨ/ŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶŽƌĂĐƟŶŐŽŶŝƚ͛ƐďĞŚĂůĨ͘
EĞŝƚŚĞƌƚŚĞƐƐŽĐŝĂƟŽŶ͕ŝƚƐǆĞĐƵƟǀĞŽĂƌĚ͕ŶŽƌŝƚƐƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟǀĞƐĞŶĚŽƌƐĞŽƌĂƐƐƵƌĞ
ƚŚĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞŶĞƐƐŽƌĂĐĐƵƌĂĐǇŽĨŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚďǇŽƵƚƐŝĚĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐĐŽŶƚĂŝŶĞĚŝŶ
ƚŚŝƐŽƌĂŶǇŽƚŚĞƌ&/ʹ>ƉƵďůŝĐĂƟŽŶ͘
FBI–LEEDAͻϱ'ƌĞĂƚsĂůůĞǇWĂƌŬǁĂǇ͕^ƵŝƚĞϭϮϱ͕DĂůǀĞƌŶ͕Wϭϵϯϱϱ
dĞů͗ϴϳϳͲϳϳϮͲϳϳϭϮͻ&Ăǆ͗ϲϭϬͲϲϰϰͲϯϭϵϯǁǁǁ͘ĩŝůĞĞĚĂ͘ŽƌŐ
www.fbileeda.org
1
President’s Letter
'ƌĞĞƟŶŐƐ͊
It’s hard to believe our 2015 conference is right around
the corner! If you haven’t had an opportunity to register
yet, now’s the time as space is limited at the host hotel
and rooms are going quickly.
If you haven’t attended one of our FBI-LEEDA conferences before, you are missing out on world-class speakers, highly informative educational opportunities, and
fantastic networking opportunities. We are one of the
very few conferences in law enforcement that covers
the cost of all meals, so this is a responsible use of your
training budget as well.
This year, we are covering timely and important issues such as risk mitigation, the reintegration of officers after military deployment, dealing with people in
crisis, and a session with one of the nation’s top crisis communicators who will speak on “the lexicon of
peace” and building trust within our communities. We
will tackle police technology and our duty of care to our
employees. As FBI-LEEDA espouses, the entire conference program is interlaced with leadership and management best practices.
You will find a number of new features for this year’s
conference, including two sets of track sessions, where
you will have the choice to attend one of three or four
different sessions, along with networking events each
night of the conference.
If that isn’t enough, the location of the conference –
Austin, Texas – should win you over. Austin, in the heart
of Texas, offers music, fantastic food, and some of the
best hospitality in the country. The Texas Department
^ĂŵWĞŶŶŝĐĂ
WƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚ͕&/ʹ>
of Public Safety, Travis County Sheriff’s Office, Austin
Police Department and Lakeway Police Department
will ensure that this is a conference to remember.
All the FBI-LEEDA instructors will be in attendance
as well, so this is a great opportunity to share what you
have implemented with your former instructors and
other members of your class who may be in attendance.
We have a record number of officers receiving their Trilogy Awards this year as well, a resounding message that
law enforcement understands and respects the importance of continual leadership learning.
With the rapidly changing face of our environment,
education couldn’t be more important. The way we
lead, the way we learn, the way we interact with our
communities all reinforce our primary mission of providing excellent service to our diverse communities.
With everything we are facing in law enforcement today, we strongly believe this conference will provide additional tools to help you to make the important decisions to ensure both you and your organization are the
best they can be.
See you in Austin!
^ĂŵWĞŶŶŝĐĂ
WƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚ͕&/ʹ>
ϮϬϭϰͲϮϬϭϱǆĞĐƵƟǀĞŽĂƌĚ
Pictured (left to right): Sam Pennica,
Charles “Skip” Robb, David Boggs,
Paul Shastany, Thomas Alber,
John Horsman, and Greg Hamilton.
Ϯ FBI-LEEDA Insighter
| April 2015
The LEEDing Edge
Executive Director’s Report - March 2015
As we often say in law enforcement, there are two
things police don’t like … status quo and change! Finding that balance between what is familiar and working,
and what needs to be improved or altered is both an art
and a science.
As we put together our upcoming conference in Austin, we strived to take the best of what had gone before,
and add elements from the comments and suggestions
you made after our last conference. Hence, you will notice some positive changes to our conference in May
starting with the official start of the event. Instead of
a Sunday night networking event, the conference officially begins Monday morning and our first networking
event will be Monday evening on the beautiful grounds
of the Renaissance Hotel. Our hosts have assured me
that the weather will be perfect (ed note – see the entire
conference agenda on page 22).
We scoured the country (and abroad) to bring you the
top experts in their fields. Some names you will recognize, like Gordon Graham speaking on risk mitigation,
Chief Roberto Villaseñor speaking on the issues law enforcement continues to deal with when it comes to immigration, and Chief Bill Blair from the Toronto Police
Service in Canada speaking on how police can better
deal with the mentally ill; while others may be new to
you, such as Jim Lukaszewski, one of the top minds in
corporate crisis communications and Dr. John Violanti
who has done extensive research on the mental health
of law enforcement officers.
We recognize that in our field, and within our own association, collaborative efforts produce greater results.
So, not only have we made changes to the conference,
but you will see some changes to our communications
with members as well, starting with the fact that The
Insighter will now be produced four times per year, we
ŚĂƌůĞƐZŽďď
ǆĞĐƵƟǀĞŝƌĞĐƚŽƌ
&/ʹ>
have included a guest columnist feature for members
to share their leadership insights, and our presence on
social media continues to grow by leaps and bounds.
We encourage you to get in on the conversation via
LinkedIn, Facebook and Twitter.
As you can see by the photos in the back of this magazine, our classes, which just three years ago numbered
less than 50, have more than doubled. This year, we are
on track to host more than 150 classes across the country, a huge accomplishment for the Board, our cadre of
instructors, and the staff right here at the ‘home office’.
We recently launched the new Supervisory Leadership
Institute booklet, to replace the handouts provided by
host agencies; and hope to have the new Command
Leadership Institute booklet complete by the fall, with
the Executive book out early in 2016.
Our focus on education includes aggressively pursuing POST accreditation in as many states as possible.
You can track our efforts on page 40, where we have
listed each state and where we are POST accredited.
You can help by offering to work in partnership with
us where needed, to earn accreditation in your state.
We are also continuing our discussions with numerous
universities and hope to announce a college credit option for our Trilogy courses in the near future.
As always, we are nothing without the ongoing support of our members and valued corporate partners.
We look forward to seeing you in Austin!
All the best,
Skip
www.fbileeda.org
3
An Insider’s Look At Your Employee
Assistance Program
Ͷ >ĂƌƌǇĂƌƚŽŶ͕WŚ͘͘
There are over 18,400 police departments in the United
States, and the vast majority of them employ less than
a dozen individuals, both sworn and civilian. Regardless of department size, law enforcement leaders work
to provide access to qualified counselors for the wide
range of urgent issues that employees may face.
While large departments may have a full-time clinical psychologist on staff for critical incident debriefings,
PTSD and depressive issues, as examples, our research
at The American College suggests that about 87% of
all departments outsource their employee assistance
program (EAP). Your EAP partner is a partner, but remember that they should never be your friend; an arm’s
length relationship with this vendor is always prudent
because they may have a legal need to contact an LEO
in your department if an employee shares a suicidal or
homicidal ideation, for example.
Although there are occasional exceptions to the design and protocol of EAP programs, most are for-profit
companies who operate 24/7 to support employees in
client agencies with a serious problem. According to
The EAP Roundtable, about 85% of cases are managed
by phone and about 13% of phone inquiries lead to an
in-person visit; the remaining 2% or so of calls may require immediate, in-patient psychiatric care.
&ŝƌƐƚ͕ what are some of the common reasons an officer may contact your EAP provider? Sharing issues with
their partner or commander is difficult when issues of
concern may include:
• Depression
• Marital or other relationship issues
• Financial distress
• Gambling or substance abuse issues
• Being a victim of physical abuse or stalking
^ĞĐŽŶĚ͕ you should encourage a representative of your
EAP provider to meet your senior leadership in the first
quarter to review utilization rates for 2014. By then, they
will know and should be willing to report how many
calls were generated by your employees by categories
during each quarter of the year; they can provide insight
ϰ FBI-LEEDA Insighter
| April 2015
on trends, time of year, shifts and rank of those seeking help. When an employee contacts EAP, their conversations and meetings remain confidential in terms
of identity, but the reason for their counseling, and the
number of in-person visits, is not confidential in nature.
dŚŝƌĚ͕here are some questions to ask your EAP provider. I assure you that they will not like some of them, but
you may have a fiduciary obligation as an LEO to ensure
that you ascertain updated answers every few years:
1.
How many other clients does your company
have in rotation with our department? (For
instance, it is not uncommon that the same
counselor answering the phone for your department may talk to a retail employee, airline pilot
or elementary school teacher in the same hour.
As a result, they are generalists at best. Most EAP
counselors will not be exclusively devoted to
your department.
2.
How many hours of training do your EAP counselors receive in advance before my officers are
allowed to speak with them? Do you verify the
education and qualifications of your counselors?
What kind of background checks are performed
on these individuals?
3.
I understand that some EAP counselors may be
studying for their master’s degree in sociology
or psychology while others must be a master’s
in social work (MSW) or a Ph.D. What are the
minimum education and working experience
credentials you require?
4.
What is the turnover rate of counselors who
work at your EAP organization? What percentage are full time vs. part time?
5.
Our employees see and witness some of the most
gruesome and challenging situations in society.
Like the military, their experiences differ tremendously from the population at large. If one of our
officers is sharing serious PTSD tendencies or
another clinical condition that requires accelerated care, what is the criteria used to encourage
them to seek hospitalization or a prescribing
therapist?
FBI–LEEDA
Mission
Statement
To advance the science and art of law
enforcement leadership and management;
ŬĞǇƉŚƌĂƐĞĨŽƌǇŽƵƚŽƌĞŵĞŵďĞƌŝƐdĂƌĂƐŽī͘
While you may not recognize that term, light bulbs
should go off if an EAP provider even contacts you as
an LEO and indicates that they are invoking a Tarasoff
warning. This refers to the landmark case, Tarasoff v. Regents Of the University of California, which led to a finding that counselors generally have a responsibility to
warn an employer, family member and/or others if an employee
shares suicidal or homicidal ide...Your EAP
ation. Understanding your duty
partner is a
to care and duty to supervise
is essential even though it may
partner, but
require that you ask sensitive
questions.
Don’t wait for a critiremember that
cal incident and a draining deposition to learn how you should
they should
govern an individual who makes
never be your
or poses an imminent risk.
“
In summary, the vast majority
of EAP providers are talented,
educated, focused and accomarm’s length
plished. There are a few amarelationship
teurs in any field of endeavor.
with this vendor When it comes to threats to self
or others, however, there is no
room for amateurs. You are payis always
ing a third party each month for
prudent...
professional EAP counseling.
Knowing what they do, and how
they provide this vital service
to your employees, is essential. The end result will be
a more informed, and engaged environment for your
officers.
friend; an
To develop and disseminate improved
administrative, operational and technical
practices to meet the needs of law enforcement
executives throughout the world;
To promote the exchange of information and
training for executives of law enforcement;
To actively seek the expansion of training
programs for law enforcement executives and
to encourage the participation of law enforcement professionals in future FBI–LEEDA
training.
Commemorative Glock
This special commemorative Glock is available
to FBI – LEEDA members only and is shipped
to Federal Firearms licensees only. Standard
delivery is 30-45 days after receipt of your order
with payment. Purchaser is responsible for cost
of the FFL transfer (if any), shipping, and any
applicable taxes. All prices include engraving –
can engrave up to three sides of the Glock.
&ŽƌŽƌĚĞƌƐƉůĞĂƐĞĐŽŶƚĂĐƚ͗
Todd R. Ackerman, Chief of Police
Marysville Police Department
207 South Tenth, Marysville, KS 66508
Tel: 785-562-2343 Fax: 785-562-3296
”
• (.40) 22, 23, 27 – $420.00
• (9mm) 17, 19, 26 – $420.00
• (.357 sig) 31, 32, 33 – $420.00
• (.45) 21, 30, 36 – $485.00
• Shadow Box
(engraved) – $100.00
Dr. Larry Barton teaches Threat Assessment at The FBI Academy in Quantico, VA
and can be reached through his web site, larrybarton.com
www.fbileeda.org
ϱ
ƌŝƐŝƐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƟŽŶ
The Lexicon of Legitimacy
Ͷ :ĂŵĞƐ͘>ƵŬĂƐǌĞǁƐŬŝ͕͕WZ
The leadership of every organization must implicitly or
explicitly recognize the ethical expectations of leaders
by everyone else inside and outside of the organization.
These expectations include:
why we do things. Who trusts someone who provides
key information after it’s needed? Other tactics to consider include:
1.
Asking for input. Troubled leadership
often has so much on their plate they resist
seeking other views, especially internally.
Ask for input, rebuild trust in return.
2.
Relentlessly answer questions. Answering
questions is the first requirement of leadership integrity. Answering questions is the
most powerful tool leadership has to build
trust. Questions answered settle people
down. Questions answered help people
refocus on what’s important.
3.
Really listen. Demonstrate that you have
heard. Change something meaningful
meaningfully.
4.
Stay in touch. Most problem remediation
strategies emphasize forgetting. Rebuilding trust requires that we remember.
5.
Speak their language. Tell stories that illustrate the behaviors expected of everyone
including leadership.
6.
Bring audiences into the decision-making
process, especially the victimized or
otherwise harmed. These people need
a platform to talk about their pain and
suffering and who caused it. The result
is trust or neutrality rather than anger
and contention.
• Find the truth as soon as possible: tell that
truth and act on it promptly.
• Promptly raise the tough questions and
answer them thoughtfully. This includes asking and answering questions yet to be asked
by those who will affected by whatever the
circumstance is.
• Vocalize core business values and ideals constantly. The values and ideals of an organization are those employees and others bring to
work every day.
• Walk the talk. Be accessible and help people
understand the organization within the
context of its values and ideals at every
opportunity.
• Help, expect and enforce ethical leadership.
People are watching, people are counting,
people know when there are lapses in ethics
and trust is broken.
• Be a cheerleader, model and teacher of ethical
behavior. Ethical behavior builds and maintains trust. In fact, to have trust in an organization requires that its leaders constantly
act ethically.
One of the serious collateral damages to crisis in law
enforcement is the trust loss in leadership. My definition of trust is ‘the absence of fear’. When trust is gone
or severely damaged, it is replaced by fear, uncertainty
and doubt. There is a strategy for sustaining trust which
is sensible, constructive, purposeful and effective, but
requires the systematic participation and example
through communication behavior by leadership. These
strategies include providing advance information about
6 FBI-LEEDA Insighter
| April 2015
Often one of the most serious ongoing challenges to
building trust and ensuring positive relationships with
your community and employees is what it takes to establish trust in the first place. It is by far easier to recognize the pattern of those behaviors and attitudes that
damage trust, or at least bring credibility into question.
Put in a more interesting way, trust is a fragile magical
The Lexicon of Trust
Building Concepts:
• dƌƵƐƚ͗
substance like the lignin in trees – it’s the glue that holds
the fiber of relationships together. Trust is the most fragile and vulnerable agent in a relationship.
Trust is fragile. Experience demonstrates that a bond
of trust, once broken generally makes re-establishing a
relationship tougher. The challenge is to identify those
behaviors and attitudes to avoid that can fracture the
bond of trust. These examples are generally pretty obvious, yet happen far too often:
1. Arrogance: The absence of empathy. Taking action
without consulting those directly or indirectly affected.
Making decisions unilaterally, without important input
from key partners.
2. Broken Promises: One of the crucial bases of trust is
that each party can rely on the commitments of the other, both implied and explicit. When those commitments
are broken without prior notification, understanding,
explanation, and warning, the first element of the relationship to suffer is trust. Losing the safety of commitment can call into question most other elements of the
relationship as well.
3. Chest Beating: The mindless, needless, and useless
flogging of reputation, achievements. Unwarranted
self-congratulatory, self-validating behavior puts distance between those who want to be trusted and those
who need to trust. It is a form of self-deception through
self-talk.
4. Creating Fear: This usually occurs when something
you do damages or threatens to damage someone’s core
values without their permission, knowledge, or participation. It could be the appearance of deception; it could
be the feeling of unreliability in the relationship.
(continued on page 19)
Generally the absence of fear; that
feeling of reliability and that adverse
situations, pain, or mistakes have
less impact or can be pre-empted if
there is a trusted relationship.
• ĂŶĚŽƌ͗
Truth with an attitude delivered very
promptly. Truth plus the facts, truth
plus some perspective, truth that reflects the value of other observations
on the same set of circumstances
and facts.
• ƌĞĚŝďŝůŝƚǇ͗
Always conferred by others on those
whose past behavior, track record,
and accomplishments warrant it.
• /ŶƚĞŐƌŝƚǇ͗
Uncompromising adherence to a
code of values with the attributes of
credibility, candor, and sincerity.
• ^ǇŵƉĂƚŚǇ͗
The ongoing, often continuous, verbalization of regret, embarrassment,
or personal humiliation, promptly
conveyed, i.e., feeling truly sorry for
someone who is experiencing pain,
but stopping short of taking on
that pain.
• ŵƉĂƚŚǇ͗
Actions that speak louder than
words ever can convey.
www.fbileeda.org
7
sŝĞǁŽŶƚŚŝĐƐ
The Call of a Profession
ͶĂŶŝĞůd͘WƌŝŵŽǌŝĐ͕WŚ͘͘
The task of defining a “profession” as distinct and separate from a mere “occupation” or “job” is not as easy as
it might first appear. After years of study, consideration,
and conversation with many people, what makes this
task difficult is that the term is both simple and complex, simultaneously and equally. Here I will share what
I have learned about the word and the people who yearn
to wear the title and long to do it justice.
Many of us want to see ourselves as professionals.
Those who want to be professionals apparently are unsatisfied seeing themselves as, to quote a line from Arthur Miller’s The Misfits, simply “working for wages,” As
it was with the characters in that play, to be occupied
with working for a paycheck doesn’t provide enough
meaning for our working lives: it does not allow us to
think that we are “making a difference” or fulfilling our
life purpose. Hence, we must be careful not to presuppose anything about ourselves and the nature of our
work on the basis of our desire for a higher occupational
meaning, but must look more closely at that word and
our true status in relation to it to determine whether we
deserve the title and the meanings it may offer.
The word “profession”1 comes to us from medieval
times, when a “professor” at one of the early Catholic
universities was required to unquestionably profess or
publicly declare his faith (usually not a problem then,
because those people were already clerics), and also be
able to profess a very high level of academic expertise in
some subject to be taught there. Hence, the word holds
the notion of a religious “calling” embedded within it:
the “professor” being called to the work by God.
The word has grown from those roots to the concept
of something more secular in nature, to those meanings that we now have for the term: “a calling requiring
specialized knowledge and often long and intensive
academic preparation; a principal calling, vocation, or
employment; the whole body of persons engaged in a
calling.” 2 Obviously, that definition makes it possible for
non-religious people to see themselves as professionals
| April 2015
if they still see their work as special: a kind of calling. But
what can that mean without the religious overtones associated with the older definition?
It means that if you are called, you are drawn into the
kind of work that you have chosen by a motive unattached to just “making a living” (which is an honorable
quest in itself, without a doubt). You are guided into that
choice of work more from the “heart” than the “gut,” or
intellect. You see the work as
exceptionally worthy, perhaps
even as a sacred trust, because the work serves a purpose beyond yourself alone.
If you had enough money to
have the option, you would
choose to do the work without compensation, just because the work is good. You
would do it pro bono: for the
good. You would do it as a volunteer, so to speak. If you are
working in your “vocation,”
or your calling, you approach
your work with the attitude
just described. In fact, even
if you have not really chosen
the work you do, but needed
to take the job without much
or any choice, you can still approach the work with that attitude of a called professional because you have this high
integrity in your work ethic. If you approach your everyday job that way, in my view you have just as much of a
claim to a calling or vocation as those medieval clerics
who began the professions. I will explain why I think so.
A long time ago when I was a graduate student I had
the opportunity to question the deans of the professional schools at a university regarding what the term
“professional” really meant, and what were the real pro-
“
You are
guided into
that choice
of work
more from
the “heart”
than the
”
“gut” ...
ƌĞzŽƵůŝŐŝďůĞĨŽƌ
FBI–LEEDA
Life Membership
fessions. The deans of the school of medicine and of law
immediately piped up to proudly assert that there were,
in fact, only two real professions on this earth: oddly
enough, they claimed that those were medicine and law.
Being raw and green as I was, I asked why, if sheer membership in one of those magnificent professions was all
that is required for being rightfully called a professional,
how then is it possible for so many in those professions
to act so unprofessionally, unethically, and sometimes
even illegally. Unfortunately, that was the end of that
otherwise promising conversation. But it did have the
benefit of helping to formulate the stand I have taken
since then, every time I have spoken about this issue:
it is not the kind of work or occupation that you engage
in, but instead, it is the attitude with which you do that
work that makes you a professional or not. Legitimate
work is honorable to a greater or lesser degree. What
makes it greater or lesser is the attitude with which it is
done. And that attitude that marks that difference is one
of seeing and doing the work as a vocation, a calling.
So, I believe that the question of whether you are a
professional or are working in an occupation is settled
on the floor of whether you see the work as a calling or
a job that you must endure to have a living. A vocation
gives you a life filled with meaning: the meanings that
come along with “making a difference” by serving others
just because it is good to do so. Making a living occupies
your short time here with “working for wages.” I suppose that, in the end, it depends upon how you want it
to be, upon how you want to see and do it. But it makes
a difference in your work, in your life, in the lives of others, and what it all means.
1 Middle English professioun, from Anglo-French profession, from Late Latin &
Latin; Late Latin profession-, professio, from Latin, public declaration, from profit
eri. First Known Use: 13th century. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary
2 Ibid.
Any active member who has been a dues paying member in good standing for a period of not
less than ten (10) years and is retired from public
service may request life membership by writing
to the FBI–LEEDA President. Life members are
exempt from the payment of annual dues.
DĞŵďĞƌƐŚŝƉŚĂƐŝƚƐƉƌŝǀŝůĞŐĞƐ͗
Ͳ>ŝŶĞͲŽĨͲƵƚǇĞĂƚŚĞŶĞĮƚ
ͲEĞƚǁŽƌŬŝŶŐ
ͲdƌĂŝŶŝŶŐ
ͲDĞŵďĞƌƐŚŝƉŝƌĞĐƚŽƌǇ
If you are not sure of your eligibility, contact FBI–LEEDA Membership Services at
877-772-7712 or via email at [email protected].
FBI-LEEDA
Training Calendar
ŽŶǁǁǁ͘ĩŝůĞĞĚĂ͘ŽƌŐ
Get up-to-date information on FBI-LEEDA’s
training programs, summits and class locations
in one convenient place:
ǁǁǁ͘ĩŝůĞĞĚĂ͘ŽƌŐ
ͻ^ƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌ>ĞĂĚĞƌƐŚŝƉ/ŶƐƟƚƵƚĞ
ͻŽŵŵĂŶĚ>ĞĂĚĞƌƐŚŝƉ/ŶƐƟƚƵƚĞ
ͻǆĞĐƵƟǀĞ>ĞĂĚĞƌƐŚŝƉ/ŶƐƟƚƵƚĞ
ͻŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ>ĞĂƌŶŝŶŐ
ͻ/ŶƚĞƌŶĂůīĂŝƌƐ/ŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐ
ͻ>ĞĂĚĞƌƐtŝƚŚŽƵƚdŝƚůĞƐ
ͻDĞĚŝĂΘWƵďůŝĐZĞůĂƟŽŶƐ
ͻ&ƌĞĞ^ƵŵŵŝƚƐ
ͲWƵƌĚƵĞƌƵŐŝǀĞƌƐŝŽŶ
Ͳϯ^/ůĞĐƚƌŽŶŝĐ^ƚĂŬĞŽƵƚ
Ͳ>ŝĨĞ>ŽĐŬ/ĚĞŶƟƚǇdŚĞŌ
Dr. Daniel Primozic, is an author, editor, national and international speaker. He
holds a Ph.D. in philosophy and over his long career, has taught at many universities, as well as serving as Associate Director and Resident Ethics Scholar for ILEA.
While there, he developed, coordinated and taught courses in law enforcement
ethics and leadership and contributed to research and publication in those fields.
Dan is currently the curriculum manager for FBI-LEEDA.
www.fbileeda.org
9
'ĞŶĞƌĂůŽƵŶƐĞůhƉĚĂƚĞ
Knock and Talk - Limited to Just
the Front Door?
ͶƌŝĐĂŝŐůĞ͕ƐƋ͘
The United States Supreme Court held, in Carroll v. Carman,1 that a police officer was entitled to qualified immunity because the law was not clearly established as
to whether officers may utilize an entryway, other than
the front door, when entering a property and conducting an inquiry under the “knock and talk” exception to
the warrant requirement.
On July 3, 2009, the Pennsylvania State Police Department received a report that Michael Zita,
who reportedly stole a vehicle
and two loaded handguns, had
fled to the house of Andrew and
Karen Carman. Two officers, Jeremy Carroll and Brian Roberts,
responded to the Carman’s home
to investigate. As there was limited parking available in the area,
the officers parked in a spot at
the far rear of the property.
“
... the
“knock and talk”
exception to the
warrant requirement, which
allows officers
to knock on
someone’s
door, so long
as they stay
“on those
portions of [the]
property that
the general
public is
allowed
to go on.
When the officers exited their
patrol vehicles, and looked toward the house, they noticed
a small structure with its door
open and a light on. Officer Carroll believed an individual may
have been inside the structure,
and so he walked over and stuck
his head inside and announced
his presence. There was no one
inside the structure, however,
so both officers proceeded to
walk toward the house. Upon
approach, the officers noted a sliding glass door that
opened onto a ground-level deck. Officer Carroll believed that the door “looked like a customary entryway”
and decided to knock on it.
”
As the officers stepped onto the deck, a man came out
of the house and approached them in a belligerent and
angry manner. Both officer identified themselves, stated that they were looking for Michael Zita, and asked
the man for his name. Rather than respond, the man
turned away from the officers and appeared to reach for
his waist. Fearing the man was reaching for a weapon,
Carroll grabbed the man’s right arm. As the man twisted away from Carroll he lost his balance and fell to the
ground.
At that point a woman exited the residence and asked
what was happening. The officers explained the purpose of their presence. The woman identified herself as
Karen Carman, and identified the man as her husband,
Andrew Carman, and told them Michael Zita was not
at the residence. The officers asked for permission to
search the house, to which Mrs. Carman consented, and
after not finding Zita, left the residence. The Carman’s
were not charged with any crimes.
The Carman’s filed an action against Officer Carroll
under 42 U.S.C. §1983, alleging that Carroll violated
their Fourth Amendment rights when he unlawfully
entered their property by going into their backyard and
onto their deck without a warrant. Carroll argued that
his entry was lawful under the “knock and talk” exception to the warrant requirement, which allows officers to
knock on someone’s door, so long as they stay “on those
portions of [the] property that the general public is allowed to go on.”2 In response, the Carman’s argued that
visitors would have gone to their front door, rather into
their backyard and onto their deck, and therefore, the
“knock and talk” exception did not apply.
At trial, the district court instructed the jury that the
“knock and talk” exception “allows officers without a
warrant to knock on a resident’s door or otherwise approach the residence seeking to speak to the inhabitants, just as any private citizen might,” but that “officers
should restrict their movements to walkways, driveways,
porches and places where visitors could be expected to
go.”3 The jury returned a verdict for Carroll.
The Carman’s appealed the case to the Third Circuit
Court of Appeals, who reversed the district court’s decision and held that the Carman’s were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The Third Circuit Court held that
Carroll violated the Fourth Amendment law because the
ϭϬ FBI-LEEDA Insighter
| April 2015
;ĐŽŶƟŶƵĞĚŽŶƉĂŐĞϭϲͿ
FBI–LEEDA Regional Representative
Program Update
ͶDĂƌŬ^ƵůůŝǀĂŶ͕WƌŽŐƌĂŵŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŽƌ͕&/Ͳ>
FBI-LEEDA’s Regional Representatives are gearing up
for another busy training year with a full schedule of
upcoming training events. This year there are 27 LEEDS
programs and command colleges, in as many states,
around the country. Our Reps are poised to travel to
as many as possible and will introduce FBI-LEEDA’s
many member benefits and training initiatives to the
attendees.
This program has been very successful attracting
new interest in FBI-LEEDA. Hundreds of new members
have joined our organization each year as a result of the
Regional Representatives’ presentations at the various
training sessions. Each Rep serves as an ambassador
and works to promote FBI-LEEDA not only at the LEEDS
and command colleges, but also locally among state and
local law enforcement agencies in their own regions.
With the huge increase in the number of FBI-LEEDA
courses offered, we are delivering high caliber training
more frequently and to many more areas of the country.
Thanks to our Reps who are helping to get the word out
about our great organization!
12
2
8
3
7
9
10
9
1
6
4
5
11
ZĞŐŝŽŶĂůZĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟǀĞƐ
Region 8
Chief Joe Wellington
Region 1
Capt. Matthew Canfield
(ME NH MA RI)
Laconia (NH) Police Department, mcanfi[email protected]
Region 2
Chief Randy Szukala (Ret.)
(NY VT CT)
State of New York, [email protected]
Region 3
Capt. Steve Dembowski (Ret.)
(PA NJ DE)
werfi[email protected]
(WY UT CO
KS NM OK)
Chief Andy Robinson
Region 11
Assistant Director Frank Woodall
York (SC) Police Department, [email protected]
(TX LA)
Texas DPS, [email protected]
Region 5
Capt. Mike Wills
Region 12
Capt. Eugene Smith
(AL MS GA FL)
Biloxi (MS) Police Department, [email protected]
(WA OR ID MT)
Boise (ID) Police Department, [email protected]
Region 6
Chief Joe Monroe
Region 13
Connie Gautreaux
(MI OH KY TN)
University of Kentucky Police Department, [email protected]
(Latin
America)
Procuradoria General Dominican Republic, Connieatkinson216@
gmail.com
Region 7
Chief Joel Brumlik
(WI IL IN)
Winthrop Harbor (IL) Police Department, [email protected]
Region 4
(WV MD VA
NC SC)
(ND SD NE MN
IA MO AR)
Region 9
(CA NV AZ
HI AK)
Region 10
Gower (MO) Police Department, [email protected]
Sheriff Mark Pazin
Merced County (CA) Sheriff’s Office, [email protected]
Col. Richard Powell
Sedgwick County (KS) Sheriff’s Office, [email protected]
Program
Mark Sullivan
Coordinator FBI-LEEDA, [email protected]
www.fbileeda.org
11
ϭϮ FBI-LEEDA Insighter
| April 2015
sZd/^DEd
ůĞĐƚƌŽŶŝĐ^ƚĂŬĞŽƵƚƐhƐĞĚƚŽĚĚƌĞƐƐWĂƩĞƌŶƌŝŵĞdƌĞŶĚƐ
ͶDŝĐŚĂĞů'ƌĂũĞǁƐŬŝ͕ϯ^/^ĞĐƵƌŝƚǇ^ǇƐƚĞŵƐ
ƐƐŝƐƚĂŶƚŝƌĞĐƚŽƌ͕ƌŝŵĞŶĂůǇƐŝƐ'ƌŽƵƉ͕>ĂǁŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ
Police departments everywhere are faced with shrinking budgets and doing more work with less staff. In some cases,
technology helps them to be more efficient. Here are some examples of how Electronic Stakeouts helped law enforcement target, track, and arrest criminals.
ŽƌŽŶĂĚŽ ĞĂĐŚ͕ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͘ The community was
experiencing increasing in bike thefts. Residents
and business owners complained to the police chief
who in turn challenged his commanders to solve the
problem. After learning how effective electronic stakeouts had been for other police departments, the agency decided to address the problem using specialized
GPS units. In the first three months of deployment,
authorities made 16 arrests, significantly reducing the
community’s bike thefts.
ŶĂůǇƐŝƐ͗ These two events have a common theme:
Crime analysts noted trends and used predictive
policing models to determine hot spots where “bait”
items could be deployed. More and more, law enforcement agencies are looking to replicate successful programs to reduce costs and promote efficiency. Gone are
the days of overtime budgets that allowed agencies to
conduct costly stakeout operations. That’s not to say
there won’t always be a need for stakeouts, but technology gives law enforcement ways to increase efficiency
and act as a force multiplier to enhance community policing objectives. The above agencies deployed
specialized GPS technology optimized for police operations to directly engage offenders committing crime.
Setting up electronic stakeouts is not difficult and can
easily be replicated by agencies when they identify
a crime pattern.
ĞůƌĂǇĞĂĐŚ͕&ůŽƌŝĚĂ͘ The City of Delray Beach registered a spike in scooter theft, which adversely impacted the part 1 crime statistics for the agency. Using intelligence led policing principles, the Criminal
Intelligence Unit forecasted future locations where
theft was likely to occur. The police department then
partnered with local motorsport dealerships to deploy
scooters in these locations containing GPS devices.
In the first week of deployment, the agency had two
activations. The first theft resulted in a quick recovery
by patrol officers, but it left the larger problem of determining where the stolen scooters were going unaddressed. A few nights later, the team had a second
hit. The agency modified its strategy and allowed the
unit to leave the city. The track data provided officers
the tactical high ground so they could shadow every
move the subject made. The device went stationary at
a residence in Miami-Dade County. Officers discreetly
watched the residence while they processed the information gained from the surveillance. Within a few
hours, they were notified that the unit was on the move
to a warehouse district near the Port of Miami. Several
agencies were involved in the apprehension which led
to the recovery of several stolen scooters destined for
a Caribbean Island. The operation that started as a
simple track and recovery resulted in the take down
of a major international stolen vehicle smuggling ring.
Since the arrests, scooter theft has virtually stopped in
the City of Delray Beach.
The pliable GPS devices can be easily hidden within most items targeted by thieves. These tactical deployments provide
situational awareness when a crime is being committed and have proven to be an important tool in active crime suppression units. With minimal effort, a small team can manage device deployment. Upon movement, event data is automatically
passed via the Internet to police dispatch for analysis. Dispatchers then communicate event data (direction, speed, heading and nearest street address) to responding patrol units to track and arrest the criminal.
3SI Security Systems is in a unique position to assist law enforcement with GPS operations. Our tracking program, actively
supported by over 5,000 agencies, addresses bank crime, pharmacy robbery, and other felony events. The Law Enforcement Division of 3SI trains agencies to be proficient in using track data to make arrests. That same training can be used to
address the kinds of criminal concerns that affect each community’s residents and business owners. The ESO® program
has proven to be effective in police departments across the nation leading to arrests for armed robbery, commercial and
vehicle burglary, and bike, laptop, metal, and UPS parcel theft. One department even attached a device to a credit card
skimmer leading to the apprehension of the suspects when they returned for the device.
Arrests of these career criminals will likely shorten crime cycles and prevent future crimes from occurring. Whatever is being stolen on a regular basis, there is likely a way to hide an ESO® device to create a 24/7 electronic stakeout. For only $1.65
per day per device the first year, and only $.56 per day per device every year after, the entire community benefits from successful operations boosting police legitimacy. What crimes will you solve with electronic stakeouts?
sZd/^DEd
www.fbileeda.org
13
DĞĚŝĂͬWƵďůŝĐZĞůĂƟŽŶƐ
Your Best Ally in Creating Community
Partnerships
Ͷ:ƵĚǇWĂů͕ŝƌĞĐƚŽƌŽĨKƉĞƌĂƟŽŶƐ͕&/Ͳ>
Does your department offer Citizen’s Academies? Many
of you will say yes and agree on the importance of hosting such training to allow your residents to understand
the hard work and decision-making skills your officers
require every day to do their jobs. Building community
partnerships by hosting these academies and creating
numerous community advisory boards is an excellent
building block for local support, but are we missing another audience? Absolutely! When is the last time you offered up such opportunities to the families of your own
members? Think about it for a moment.
Who are your department’s greatest cheerleaders? Answer: the loved ones of those who serve, their families
and close friends. So, what are we doing as law enforcement leaders, to provide this valuable ally tools to help
them support our mission? Unfortunately for most agencies the answer is ‘not enough’.
Many of you may be thinking that you (or your sworn
members) would not be amenable to including family in the police work environment. It’s understandable
that many officers consciously maintain a wide gap between work and family. However in this instance, we are
not talking about putting an officer on the road responding to calls for service with their family member in tow,
we are talking about allowing family members the same
courtesy we are providing members of the community,
in their own class, so they can ask questions and gain a
further level of comfort about what their loved ones are
doing 8-12 hours a day.
The result is a better-educated cadre of psychological
and tangible support for your cops. Armed with a better
understanding of what it takes to do the job, family members can then not only better support their loved one who
wears a badge, but many of these same folks partake in
social media, talk with their peers and colleagues, and
can spread the message about the good work your department is doing.
How else can we engage with this valuable group? One
need only look to what some of your units or squads are
doing. Host a family open house at your department on a
Sunday afternoon, have a family BBQ in the summer, or
make your awards ceremonies a dinner and dance event
for families to express their pride in their badge-wearing
loved ones. Some departments have even put together
a monthly family/retiree electronic newsletter that has
personnel news in it such as awards, reprints of letters
of thanks from the community, promotions, retirements,
and such. Even larger departments I have worked at instituted a practice of sending congratulations cards to
members’ when they have a new addition to the family.
One department created baby T-shirts with the words “I
love ‘agency name here’”. These small and truly inexpensive ways to create inclusion for your department’s greater family will result in untold rewards for your employees
and the community.
Finally, when a crisis hits, this group of supportive communicators can be a valuable ally. Share your messaging
with all your staff and encourage them to share it with
their families. We are no longer in a silo when it comes to
key message dissemination. Although the advent of social
media allows us to post our messages on our Facebook and
Twitter feeds, sometimes the third-party endorsement of
others speaking our messages for us go much further.
And when your department needs support, the extended
family of your department not only wants to help, but is
willing and able. Think of it as endorsed amplification.
&/Ͳ>ŽīĞƌƐĂǁĞĞŬͲůŽŶŐƚƌĂŝŶŝŶŐĐŽƵƌƐĞ͗
DĞĚŝĂĂŶĚWƵďůŝĐZĞůĂƟŽŶƐ͘
&ŽƌĚĞƚĂŝůƐǀŝƐŝƚ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĩŝůĞĞĚĂ͘ŽƌŐ
Judy Pal is the Director of Operations for FBI-LEEDA and its media and public
relations instructor. She has extensive crisis communications experience dealing
with sensitive and image-threatening issues including criminal conduct of police,
major crime investigations and natural disasters, having served as a PIO, Public
Affairs Manager and Chief of Staff with law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and
Canada.
ϭϰ FBI-LEEDA Insighter
| April 2015
&/hƉĚĂƚĞ
Cyber Security Resources
Ͷ ^^ƌŝĂŶďĞůůĞƌĂ͕
ǇďĞƌŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ͕&/
In 2013, International Association of Chiefs of Police
(IACP) conducted a survey with the law enforcement
community to identify their perceptions of the cyber security threat to their agencies. The results showed that
cyber attacks were seen as a real threat to their infrastructure and data. Despite this realization, many agencies were doing relatively little to mitigate the threat.
The impact of cyber threats on law enforcement agencies include:
• Loss of investigative data
• Compromise of agency’s Personally Identifiable
Information (PII)
• Loss of sensitive operational techniques and
sources
• Downtime-inability to complete mission
• Inefficient or nonexistent communication ability
• Embarrassment, bad press, etc.
• Loss of reputation and public trust in agency’s
abilities
Cyber Shield Alliance (CSA) is an FBI
cyber security partnership developed
by law enforcement for law enforcement to proactively defend and counter cyber threats against their networks and critical technologies. CSA
provides the following resources:
• Access to unclassified/LES cyber
security-specific controlled
website
• Up-to-date cyber intelligence
threat products
• Training opportunities
• Cost
CSA is available to any personnel responsible for establishing, implementing, and maintaining their agency’s
information network infrastructure and security such
as sworn law enforcement officers; law enforcement
agency IT staff; state, local, tribal and territorial (SLTT)
government IT staff working with law enforcement
agencies; and contractors hired as IT staff for law enforcement agencies.
ƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐĨŽƌĂĐĐĞƐƐ
ŵĂǇďĞƐƵďŵŝƩĞĚďǇǀŝƐŝƟŶŐ
ǁǁǁ͘ĐũŝƐ͘ŐŽǀŽƌĐĂůůŝŶŐϴϴϴͲϯϯϰͲϰϱϯϲ
• Opportunities to attend law
enforcement cyber security
events/conferences
• FBI cyber task forces and fusion
center Point of Contact (POC)
directories
• Cyber incident reporting tool
(eGuardian)
• Malware file analysis tool (Malware Investigator)
www.fbileeda.org
ϭϱ
;ĐŽŶƟŶƵĞĚĨƌŽŵƉĂŐĞϭϬͿ
'ĞŶĞƌĂůŽƵŶƐĞůhƉĚĂƚĞ
“‘knock and talk’ exception “requires that police officers
begin their encounter at the front door, where they have
an implied invitation to go. The Court also held that Carroll was not entitled to qualified immunity as his actions
violated clearly established law.4 Carroll appealed and
the United States granted certiorari, reversing the Third
Circuit’s finding that Carroll was not entitled to qualified
immunity.
In reaching its decision, the Supreme Court first discussed the theory of qualified immunity, which provided that “a government official sued under § 1983 is
entitled to qualified immunity unless the official violated a statutory or constitutional right that was clearly
established at the time of the challenged conduct.”5 The
Supreme Court noted that the Third Circuit Court of Appeals relied on a single case, Estate of Smith v. Marasco,6
to reach its conclusion that Carroll was not entitled to
qualified immunity.
The Third Circuit focused on the Marasco court’s
statement that an officer’s “entry into the curtilage after not receiving an answer at the front door might be
reasonable.” Based on this statement, the Third Circuit
found that the law was “clearly established” that, under
the “knock and talk” exception, officers must begin their
inquiry at the front door.
The Supreme Court stated that the Marasco decision
did not hold that officers are required to knock on the
front door before going onto other parts of the property
that are open to visitors. The Supreme Court found that
“Marasco simply did not answer the question whether a
“knock and talk” must begin at the front door when visitors may also go to the back door.”7
The Supreme Court found the Third Circuit’s stand
on the issue perplexing as other state and federal jurisdictions had leaned in the other direction, rejecting the
“front door” rule set forth by the Third Circuit.8 The decisions from these various jurisdictions found that it was
reasonable for officers to utilize entrances other than
the front door under certain circumstances, including
whether the entry was visible to, and used by the public. The Supreme Court reversed the holding of the Third
Circuit Court of Appeals, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with its opinion.
Law enforcement personnel should be mindful,
however, that this case does not settle the issue as to
whether the “knock and talk” exception to the warrant
requirement allows officers to utilize any entryway to a
residence. Rather, the case does find that officers are not
required to start their inquiry at the front door. Based
on the Supreme Court’s reasoning in this decision, and
its review of other court holdings, it does appear that
the court will consider several factors when deciding
whether an officer’s actions in deciding to utilize an
entryway other than the front door are reasonable, including: the path taken by the officer, the layout of the
house, whether the entrance was visible to and used by
the public, whether it was a route visitors would be expected to take, etc.
| April 2015
OLARSH
I
CH
P
S
FBI–LEEDA/LifeLock
Scholarship
Program
FBI-LEEDA
Given the possible ramifications to law enforcement,
this case is one that law enforcement should keep an eye
on, particularly since any further decisions on this issue
may have a wide-spread impact on law enforcement
practices.
(Endnotes)
1 135 S.Ct. 348
2 Id. at 349
3 Id. at 350
4 Id.
5 Id. (quoting Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 131 S.Ct. 2074, 2080 (2011)
6 318 F.3d 497 (C.A.3 2003) (two police officers knocked on Smith’s front door
and, upon receiving no response, went into the backyard, with one entering the
garage. The court stated that the officers’ “entry into the curtilage after not receiving an answer at the front door might be reasonable.” The case was remanded for
further proceedings as the district court had not discussed the layout of the subject
property and the position of the officers; and did not discuss whether the officers
followed an open path to the backyard, which may have suggested reasonableness. The case was remanded for further proceedings.)
7 Carroll, 135 S.Ct. at 351
Each year, the FBI-LEEDA/LifeLock
scholarship program offers five $1,000
scholarships. The scholarships are awarded
at the Annual Executive Training Conference.
The guidelines for eligibility are listed below.
®
BASICS
Applications for the 2016-2017 academic school year
are now being accepted. Your application must be
postmarked by March 25, 2016 in order for your application to be considered. FBI–LEEDA selects final
candidates based on the following criteria:
• Eligibility • Quality of application
• Commitment to leadership
WZKs/^/KE^
An individual may receive only one scholarship award
of $1,000 per year from FBI–LEEDA/LifeLock. FBI–
LEEDA will make the scholarship award payment to
the recipients school on or before August 1. An applicant may re-apply each year providing eligibility
requirements are fulfilled.
8 See United States v. Titemore, 437 F.3d 251 (C.A.2 2006) (officers approached
two doors, one a traditional door opening to the driveway, the other a sliding
glass door that opened onto a small porch. The officer chose to knock on the slider
door. The court rejected the argument that the officer entered the property without
a warrant in violation of the 4th Amendment, explaining that the sliding glass
door “was a primary entrance visible to and used by the public); United States v.
James, 40 F.3d 850 (1994) (officers approached a duplex with multiple entrances,
bypassing the front door, and used a paved walkway along the side of the duplex
leading to the rear side door. The court found that the officers did not violate the
4th Amendment, explaining that the rear side door “was accessible to the general
public and was commonly used for entering the duplex from the nearby alley”);
United States v. Garcia, 997 F.2d 1273, 1279-1280 (C.A.9 1993) (“If the front and
back door of a residence are readily accessible from a public place, like the driveway and parking area here, the Fourth Amendment is not implicated when officers go to the back door reasonably believing it is used as a principal entrance to
the dwelling”); State v. Domicz, 188 N.J. 285, 302 (2005) (“when a law enforcement
officer walks to a front or back door for the purpose of making contact with a
resident and reasonably believes that the door is used by visitors, he is not unconstitutionally trespassing on the property”)
>/'//>/dz
This publication is produced to provide general information on the topic presented. It is distributed with the understanding that the publisher (Daigle Law
Group, LLC.) is not engaged in rendering legal or professional services. Although
this publication is prepared by professionals, it should not be used as a substitute
for professional services. If legal or other professional advice is required, the services of a professional should be sought.
Application, essay questions, and high school verification forms are available on the Members Only web
page of the FBI–LEEDA website: www.fbileeda.org.
Attorney Daigle practices civil litigation in federal and state court, with an
emphasis on municipalities and public officials. His area of focus is civil rights
actions, including police misconduct litigation and employment actions. He is an
FBI-LEEDA instructor and serves as its General Counsel.
To be eligible, you must be the child or grandchild of a
member of FBI-LEEDA who is an Active or Life member. You must be enrolled or be accepted by an undergraduate at the time you submit the application. You
must maintain a 3.0 cumulative grade point average
for three years to be eligible to submit an application.
You must have graduated from high school prior to
disbursement of funds.
,KtdKWW>z͗
Applicant must provide the following items:
• Application • Transcript
• Answers to essay questions
• High School Verification Form
• Documentation of acceptance to College/University
Send your completed application to:
FBI–LEEDA
Executive Board Scholarship Program
5 Great Valley Parkway, Suite 125
Malvern, PA 19355
www.fbileeda.org
17
Training Seminars
Download the
FBI-LEEDA app
'KdK'KK'>W>zKZd,WW^dKZ
/Ed/dzd,&d
FBI–LEEDA and LifeLock®, present one- and
two-day summits on Identify Theft, its economic, personal and employment impacts.
The Summit is open to all law enforcement
personnel and addresses a range of identity
theft issues presented by distinguished law
enforcement personnel with specialized skills
and experience in identity theft, high technology crimes and fraud.
Get connected to FBI-LEEDA training
classes, locations, accommodations, and
instructors - share class photos, connect
with other attendees, post to social media
and register from within the app.
Check our website for dates, locations and
to register for this FREE law enforcement
training, or contact:
Paige Hanson (Tel:) 480-457-2108
e-mail: [email protected], or
Mark Sullivan (Tel:) 913-238-2745
e-mail: [email protected]
Zh'/sZ^/KE
FBI–LEEDA and Purdue Pharma are expanding the Drug Diversion Summits. These are
FREE interactive summits covering local area
specifics involving drug diversion crime. Local
case studies are presented along with information on specific law enforcement resources
available in your area and how to access these
resources. An enhanced RxPATROL® program
is introduced as well. RxPATROL® is a collaborative effort between industry and law enforcement designed to collect, collate, analyze and
disseminate pharmacy theft information.
Visit our website for upcoming dates and
information on these one-and two-day programs. To host a summit, please contact:
Elizabeth Percheson (Tel:) 203-588-7817
email: [email protected]
| April 2015
KtE>KEKtͲWZWZ&KZ
h^d/EKE&ZEhWd^
Access important event information including session details, speaker bios, locations
and more.
>Z^t/d,Khdd/d>^
We are very grateful to have
Dr. Sampson teach our class. I
learned so much about myself
and ways I dealt and will deal
with officers in my department.
– ^Őƚ͘:ĂŵĞƐĂďƵ͕
,ĂƌǀĂƌĚWŽůŝĐĞĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ
SAFE, SECURE,
INNOVATIVE
Working with law enforcement to deter phone theft and
offer a safe, secure place to recycle used electronics.
THREE HIGH-RESOLUTION CAMERAS
THUMBPRINT SCANNER
DEVICE CAPTURE & TRANSACTION REPORTING
ID SCANNER
30 DAY HOLD
nd their associated logos are trademarks of Outerwall Inc. or its subsidiaries. 6921.0115
;ĐŽŶƟŶƵĞĚĨƌŽŵƉĂŐĞϳͿ
ƌŝƐŝƐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƟŽŶƐͲdŚĞ>ĞǆŝĐŽŶŽĨ>ĞŐŝƟŵĂĐǇ
5. Deception: Misleading intentionally through omission, commission, negligence, or incompetence. In a
relationship, deception creates a feeling of separation
and distance. Deception also creates a sense of disappointment because the individual, product, company,
or organization failed to recognize that, at the very least,
there should be a sense of candor between the parties
no matter what the circumstance.
6. Denial: When mistakes are made, errors in judgment
occur, a product under-performs, or there is a negative
surprise, failing to promptly come forward and relate
the circumstances candidly, with empathy for those
who are affected, changes a relationship of trust into
one of suspicion and caution.
7. Disparagement: Any time you hear the phrase, “They
have their own agenda,” or “He’s uninformed,” or “It’s
politically motivated,” you immediately suspect that
the exact opposite is true, and you’re likely to be right.
All critics and opponents have friends elsewhere. Some
of those friends are your friends as well. Victory is never achieved through disparagement. Disparagement
causes suspicion, damages relationships, and creates
permanent critics. Enemies accumulate.
James E. Lukaszewski, ABC, APR, Fellow PRSA is widely known as America’s Crisis
Guru®. He is a speaker, author, lecturer and ethicist. His latest book is Lukaszewski on Crisis Communication, What Your CEO Needs to Know About Reputation
Risk and Crisis Management. He is listed in Corporate Legal Times as one of “28
Experts to Call When All Hell Breaks Loose,” and in PR Week as one of 22 “crunchtime counselors who should be on the speed dial in a crisis.” In 2013 and 2014, he
was named one of the “Top 100 Thought Leaders in Trustworthy Business Behavior” by Trust Across America.
>ĞĂƌŶŵŽƌĞĂďŽƵƚŚŽǁƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞĂ
͞>ĞǆŝĐŽŶŽĨWĞĂĐĞ͟ǁŝƚŚŝŶǇŽƵƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇ
ĂƚƚŚĞ&/Ͳ>ϮϰƚŚŶŶƵĂůǆĞĐƵƟǀĞdƌĂŝŶŝŶŐ
ŽŶĨĞƌĞŶĐĞŝŶƵƐƟŶ͕dĞǆĂƐ͘
:ŝŵ>ƵŬĂƐǌĞǁƐŬŝǁŝůůƐƉĞĂŬtĞĚŶĞƐĚĂǇ͕DĂǇϲĂƚϭϬ͗ϭϱĂ͘ŵ
FBI-LEEDA
www.fbileeda.org
19
FBI-LEEDA
The 2015 FBI-LEEDA 24th Annual Executive
Training Conference is shaping up to be one of
our best yet. In response to members’ input, we
have made some changes to the conference to
make it an even better experience for delegates.
Concurrent breakout sessions covering assorted issues
Motivational and special guest speakers covering best practice management
and leadership topics including:*
•
•
•
•
•
•
Gordon Graham, risk mitigation guru
Jack Enter, leadership author
Jim Lukaszewski, crisis communications expert
Dr. Jim Violanti, expert on police suicide
Randy Watt, speaking on leadership under pressure
Emmett Spraktes, covering how best to reintegrate citizen soldiers back to civilian
law enforcement operations after long-term deployments
Networking opportunities - morning, noon and night
Local entertainment, and of course - real Texan BBQ!
* Subject to change
| April 2015
Conference Registration
$425 . . . FBI-LEEDA member rate
• $500 . . . Non-member/Criminal Justice guest rate
•
Registration is open now. Look for regular updates coming
to you via email, and visit our conference website at
You must register for
the conference before
booking a hotel room
at the conference rate.
www.fbileeda2015.com
www.fbileeda.org
21
FBI-LEEDA
DKEz͕
Dzϰ
ŽŶĨĞƌĞŶĐĞŐĞŶĚĂĂŶĚĚƵĐĂƟŽŶĂůdƌĂŝŶŝŶŐ^ĞƐƐŝŽŶƐ (Tentative)
Opening Ceremonies
Trilogy Award Presentations
Exhibitors and Networking
hd/KE>dZ<^^^/KE^
Intelligence-Led Policing – presented by Jim Wolfinberger, Motorola Solutions
Identity Theft – presented by LifeLock
Using GPS Technology to Combat Crime – presented by 3SI Security Systems
Hand-held Electronics Thefts – presented by ecoATM
Our Noble Profession – Chief (Ret.) Neil Rossow, Flatrock (MI) P.D.
Seven Rules of Admiral Hyman Rickover – Gordon Graham, Lexipol
Reintegration of LEOs after Military Deployment – SSG (Ret.) Emmett Spraktes, Author of
the book Selfish Prayer
Networking BBQ Event
dh^z͕
Dzϱ
Police Encounters with People in Crisis – Chief William Blair, Toronto Police Service
hd/KE>dZ<^^^/KE^
Conflict Resolution – Dr. Kim Miller
Active Shooter Presentation – Presented by the FBI
Immigration Issues for Law Enforcement – Chief Roberto “Taz” Villaseñor, Tucson P.D.
Managing Your Media Messaging By the Numbers – Judy Pal, FBI-LEEDA
Walking the Narrow Road of Leadership – Jack E. Enter, Author, Challenging the Law
Enforcement Organization
Dinner and Entertainment – Ho-down at the Oasis, Sheriff JB Smith, Austin, Texas
tE^z͕
Duty of Care – Dr. John Violanti, University of Buffalo
Dzϲ
The Lexicon of Peace – James E. Lukaszewski, Ridall Group, America’s Crisis Guru®
How Quickly Things Change: The Effects of Technology in Law Enforcement – Chief Ray
Schultz (Ret), Albuquerque Police, presented by TASER
Leadership Under Pressure – Assistant Chief (Ret.) Randy Watt, Ogden P.D.
Closing Reception and Banquet
Mark Q. Jones, Inspirational Speaker, Keynote Speaker
Oath of Office - FBI-LEEDA Board of Directors, FBI-LEEDA President
FBI-LEEDA Training
Three Steps to TRIL
FBI–LEEDA’s Trilogy program is a series
of three core education programs that
provide mid to upper-level management
intensive training in the latest management concepts and practices faced by
1
today’s law enforcement professionals.
ment experts with extensive leadership
experience that help engage and prepare
participants for command level positions.
Contact FBI–LEEDA at 877-772-7712
or email us at [email protected] for additional information concerning any of
these training opportunities or interest in hosting any of these programs in
your area.
SEMINAR REGISTRATION
IS OPEN TO ALL
LAW ENFORCEMENT –
SWORN AND PROFESSIONAL STAFF
You do not need to be a member of
FBI–LEEDA to attend a seminar.
Upon completion of all three Trilogy classes,
you will be honored among your peers during
the FBI–LEEDA 24th Annual Executive Training
Conference in Austin, TX, May 4-6, 2015.
Supervisor Leadership Institute
A cutting edge five-day program built especially
for first-line supervisors and middle managers
with the goal of enhancing leadership competencies. Attendees will be engaged in personality
diagnostics, leadership case studies, mentoring,
developing your people, performance management, risk management and leadership legacy.
The registration fee for Supervisor
Leadership Institute is $650.
These dynamic, cutting-edge courses
are taught by executive level law enforce-
GY
2
Command Leadership Institute
A dynamic and challenging five-day program
specifically designed to prepare law enforcement
leaders for command level positions. The Command Institute focuses on real life contemporary
and futuristic strategies and techniques for those
aspiring to command level assignments.
The registration fee for Command
3
Executive Leadership Institute
An innovative three and one half day program
designed for senior law enforcement executives
focusing on the emerging challenges facing our
profession. This highly interactive program follows the FBI-LEEDA “Cops Talking to Cops”
model of professional development, using a
wide range of source material and calls upon the
participant’s professional experience to facilitate
individual development and enrich the learning
environment.
The registration fee for Executive
www.fbileeda.org
Ϯϯ
Training Opportunities
Leaders Without Titles
,ŽǁƚŽ/ŶŇƵĞŶĐĞKƚŚĞƌƐtŝƚŚŽƵƚhƐŝŶŐƵƚŚŽƌŝƚǇͬ&ŽƌĐĞ
Many leaders are placed in positions of power due to connections, education,
personal charisma, experience, and/or socio-economic status. Although these criteria may have a correlation with leadership ability, they often leave out the fundamental criterion for being a good leader: a
person’s personal make-up, or characteristics, as a human being. A leader’s human inadequacies can often
lead to leadership failure. This class will explore the human attributes leaders should have before given the
formal authority.
The registration fee for the Leadership
and Leaders Without Titles is $550.
Ăůů&/ʹ>ĨŽƌƵƉĐŽŵŝŶŐĚĂƚĞƐĂŶĚůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐĂƚ
ϴϳϳͲϳϳϮͲϳϳϭϮŽƌĞŵĂŝůŝŶĨŽΛĩŝůĞĞĚĂ͘ŽƌŐ
Leadership and Management Seminar
WƌŽĐĞĚƵƌĞƐĨŽƌŽŶĚƵĐƟŶŐĂŶĚDĂŶĂŐŝŶŐ/ŶƚĞƌŶĂůīĂŝƌƐ/ŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐ
This three-day seminar is interactive and attendees participate in various scenarios presented by the
instructors.
Procedures for Conducting and Managing Internal Affairs Investigations focuses on ethics and integrity,
agency policies and procedures, the complaint process, investigation of personnel complaints, administrative law, and the interview process.
The registration fee for the Leadership
and Management Seminar is $300.
Media and Public Relations
FBI-LEEDA is pleased to present a five-day class on media and public relations.
Police cannot succeed without the support of the community they are sworn to
protect. The image of an agency as a professional and ethical organization is vitally important. By promoting a consistent, positive public image of your department, your community will come to perceive their
police as an agency they can depend on and trust.
Day 1 focuses on various key influencers and how to communicate with each. Day 2 and Day 3 deal solely on
traditional media relations and key messaging complete with active role play and a mock news conference,
Day 4 is spent entirely on crisis communications and a desk top crisis exercise, and the last day concentrates
on how to strategically use social media to improve and augment community relations. Class size is limited
to ensure individual participation in exercises. Participants are encouraged to bring a laptop, as writing
exercises will be assigned during class.
Participants will learn how to craft and deliver messages that will help create a positive public perception
and how to best utilize various forms of communication.
The registration fee for the Media
and Public Relations is $695.
Ϯϰ FBI-LEEDA Insighter
| April 2015
Distance Learning Online Training
&ůĞǆŝďůĞƐĐŚĞĚƵůŝŶŐͮEŽĐŽŵŵƵƟŶŐͮ>ĞĂƌŶǁŚŝůĞǁŽƌŬŝŶŐͮWĞĞƌƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ
Phase I ʹĂƐŝĐ^ƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌǇ>ŝĂďŝůŝƚǇ
Phase II ʹĚǀĂŶĐĞĚ^ƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌǇ>ŝĂďŝůŝƚǇ
FBI–LEEDA’s Basic Supervisory Liability is an online
instructor lead program offered to law enforcement
agencies. The four week course is accessible via the
Internet and is divided into four modules – each focusing on specific issues facing today’s law enforcement supervisors.
ŶƐƵƌŝŶŐīĞĐƟǀĞĂŶĚŽŶƐƟƚƵƟŽŶWŽůŝĐŝŶŐ
• Identify and analyze the legal standards applicable to
supervisory liability and how liability is established
FBI–LEEDA’s Advanced Supervisory Liability
supplements the Basic Supervisory Liability training. The goal of this enhanced program is to ensure
effective and constitutional policing through the
training of proper supervision standards which includes a review of the current legal standards, case
law interpretation, and common police practices.
• Identify and review the specific allegations that establish supervisor and municipal liability
• Module One: Supervision Pursuant to Proper Police
Practices
• Address legal standards applicable to basic internal
affairs functions and foundation
• Module Two: Current Trends in Law Enforcement
Supervision
• Focus on the constitutional use-of-force standards
and the interpretation of current case law to ensure
a level of liability protection
• Module Three: Use of Force Investigations
The Basic Supervisor Liability Program is recommended for all newly promoted and seasoned supervisors to equip themselves with the knowledge
of legal standards and best practices in protecting
themselves and their department from liabilities.
The registration fee for Basic Supervisory Liability
class is $350.
Supervisors are required to take the Basic Supervisory Liability course prior to enrolling in this training. The registration fee for Advanced Supervisory
Liability class is $350.
• Module Four: Conducting Internal Affairs Investigations
For registration and course details visit www.fbileeda.org or contact the FBI–LEEDA office.
ϯ^/KEz^hDD/d
Solving Crime Trends With Electronic Stakeouts
TRACKING AND APPREHENDING CRIMINALS
Learn how GPS technology can be a force multiplier
and help police set up electronic stakeouts that target
pattern crimes. This interactive event will help departments developing strategies to help solve these cases
and gain community support.
The summit will address a range of topics:
• Establishing Electronic Stakeouts
• Addressing Property and Violent Crime Trends
• Targeting Career Criminals
• Various Tracking Techniques
• Impact on Community Policing
This free course is designed for law enforcement
personnel only (must show ID) including officers,
supervisors, investigators and administrators.
Questions? Contact Mike Grajewski at
[email protected]
www.fbileeda.org
Ϯϱ
FBI–LEEDA Instructors
ĞĂŶƌŝƐƉ͕
&ĂĐƵůƚǇŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŽƌ
Ϯϲ FBI-LEEDA Insighter
| April 2015
ĂǀŝĚůůĞŶ
<ĞŝƚŚƵƐŚĞǇ
ƌŝĐĂŝŐůĞ
ZŽďĞǀŝŶĞ
:ĞŶŶŝĨĞƌ,ĂƌƌŝƐ
>ĂƌƌǇ,ŽƌĂŬ
ŶŶĞ<ŝƌŬƉĂƚƌŝĐŬ
ĂƌůŽƐDĂůĚŽŶĂĚŽ
:ƵĚǇWĂů
dŝŵWůŽƩƐ
dŽĚĚZĂĚĨŽƌĚ
dĞƌƌŝtŝůĨŽŶŐ
FBI-LEEDA Corporate Partners
DIAMOND
LEVEL
LifeLock
Contact: Paige Hanson, Manager of Educational Programs
CORPORATE
PARTNERS
PLATINUM
LEVEL
CORPORATE
PARTNERS
60 East Rio Salado Parkway, Suite 400
Tempe, Arizona 85281
Telephone: 480-457-2108
Facsimile: 480-907-2946
Purdue Pharma, LP
Contact: Rodney Benson, Director
Diversion Control Group & LELE Programs
One Stamford Forum
Stamford, Connecticut 06901
Telephone: 203-914-3685
ecoATM
Contact: Max Santiago, Director of Law Enforcement Relations
10121 Barnes Canyon Road
San Diego, California 92121
Telephone: 858-461-9968
Facsimile: 858-430-4292
D/ΘWh>/Z>d/KE^
The course was presented in a manner that stimulated
both thought and involvement. I have been fortunate to
attend several FBI-LEEDA trainings, and this was a great
example of an outstanding class and instructor.
– >ƚ͘<ĞǀŝŶ>ƵůůǇ͕
ƵŐƵƐƚĂWŽůŝĐĞĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ
www.fbileeda.org
Ϯϳ
GOLD
LEVEL
3SI Security Systems
Contact: Michael J. Grajewski, Assistant Director, Crime Analysis Group
CORPORATE
PARTNERS
101 Lindenwood Drive, Suite 200
Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355
610-280-2005
www.3sisecurity.com
V.H. Blackinton & Co., Inc.
Contact: Stacy Rochefort, Sales Support Manager
221 John L. Dietsch Blvd.
Attleboro Falls, Massachusetts 02763
Telephone: 508-699-4436, Ext. 149
Toll-free: 800-699-4436
Justice Federal Credit Union
Contact: Kathleen L. Taylor, Business Development Officer
5175 Parkstone Drive, Suite 200
Chantilly, Virginia 20151
Telephone: 7703-480-5300 Ext. 3148
Facsimile: 703-480-5400
Motorola Solutions
Contact: Clay Cassard
2120 W. Braker Lane, Suite P
Austin, Texas 78758
Telephone: 512-924-3891
Tiversa, Inc.
Contact: Scott Harrer, Brand Director
606 Liberty Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222
Telephone: 724-940-9030
Facsimile: 724-940-9033
Save the Date - May 4-6, 2015
Renaissance Austin Hotel - 721 Arboretum Blvd., Austin, TX 78759
Everything is bigger in Texas - Join us for a great lineup
of executive level training, social networking events and
nationally-known speakers who will discuss the many
contemporary and pressing law enforcement issues
facing our communities today.
| April 2015
FBI-LEEDA
SILVER LEVEL
CORPORATE
PARTNERS
5.11 Tactical
Contact: John Crist
4300 Spyres Way, Modesto, California 95356
Telephone: 209-527-4511
Email: [email protected]
American Military University
Contact: Timothy J. Hardiman, Manager, Law Enforcement Programs, APUS
10110 Battleview Parkway, Suite 200. Manassas, Virginia 20109
Telephone: 304-919-9051
E-mail: [email protected] www.amu.apus.edu/
TASER International, Inc.
Contact: Clay Wynn, VP, Media Accounts
17800 North 85th Street, Scottsdale, Arizona 85255
Telephone: 800-978-2737
E-mail: [email protected] www.taser.com www.evidence.com
Verizon Wireless
Contact: John G. Monroe, Program Manager, Corporate Security
3949 Pender Avenue, Suite 140, Fairfax, Virginia 22030
Telephone: 202-589-3747
BRONZE
LEVEL
CORPORATE
PARTNERS
Glock, Inc.
Contact: Bob Schanen
P.O. Box 1444, Brookfield, Wisconsin 53045
Telephone: 262-790-6823
National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB)
Contact: Ivan Blackman, Director of Vehicular Investigations
1111 E. Touhy Ave., Suite 400, Des Plaines, Illinois 60018
Telephone: 847-544-7042
Facsimile: 847-544-7101
Police & Sheriffs Press
Contact: Frank Raiford
P. O. Box 1489, Lyons, Georgia 30474
Telephone: 912-537-0780
Facsimile: 912-537-4894
RaSports, Inc.
Contact: Cary Fletcher
1860-D E. Miraloma Avenue, Placenta, California 92870
Telephone: 714-524-2300
Thomson Reuters - Clear
Contact: Daniel DeSimone, Sr. Director, Investigative Resources
1410 Springhill Road, Suite 450, McLean, Virginia 22102
Telephone: 703-219-2511 • Cell: 571-422-6548
www.clear.thomsonreuters.com
www.fbileeda.org
29
Training Graduates
SUPERVISOR LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE
Congratulations SLI
Pictured are the attendees from the
Savannah (GA), Supervisor Leadership Institute class held in November 2014. We would like to thank
Director D. Everett Ragan with the
Chatham-Savannah Counter Narcotics team for their hospitality.
Congratulations SLI
Pictured are the attendees from
the Chula Vista (CA), Supervisor
Leadership Institute class held in
November 2014. We would like to
thank Chief David Bejarano and
the Chula Vista (CA) Police Department for their hospitality.
Congratulations SLI
Texas City (TX), Supervisor Leadership Institute class held in December 2014. We would like to thank
Chief Robert J. Burby and the Texas City Police Department for their
hospitality.
FBI-LEEDA Trilogy Award
Any individual who has successfully completed
FBI-LEEDA’s Supervisor Leadership Institute,
Command Leadership Institute and Executive
Leadership Institute will receive the FBI-LEEDA
Trilogy Award.
This award is presented annually during the opening
ceremonies of FBI-LEEDA’s Executive Training Conference.
ϯϬ FBI-LEEDA Insighter
| April 2015
Training Graduates
SUPERVISOR LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE
Congratulations SLI
Raleigh (NC), Supervisor Leadership Institute class held in December 2014. We would like to
thank Director Sam Pennica
and the Raleigh/Wake City
County Bureau of Identification
(CCBI) for their hospitality.
Congratulations SLI
Yarmouth (MA) Supervisor Leadership Institute class held in December 2014. We would like to thank
Executive Director Dan Zivcovich
and Program Coordinator Kevin
Donnelly and the Municipal Police
Training Committee for their hospitality.
Congratulations SLI
the Georgetown (TX) Supervisor
Leadership Institute class held
in January 2015. We would like to
thank Chief Wayne Nero and the
Georgetown Police Department
for their hospitality.
FBI-LEEDA is now SOCIAL
Like us on Facebook:
Law Enforcement Executive
Development Association
Connect with us on LinkedIn:
FBI–Law Enforcement
Executive Development
Association
Follow us on Twitter:
@FBILEEDA
www.fbileeda.org
31
Training Graduates
COMMAND LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE
Congratulations CLI
Spokane Valley (WA), Command
Leadership Institute for Law Enforcement Executives class held in
December 2014. We would like to
thank Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich and
the Spokane Valley Sheriff’s Office
Congratulations CLI
the Virginia Beach (VA), Command
Leadership Institute for Law Enforcement Executives class held in
thank Captain Teresa “T” Orr and
the Virginia Beach Police Department for their hospitality.
Congratulations CLI
Pictured are the attendees from the Crowley (TX), Command Leadership
Institute for Law Enforcement Executives class held in January 2015. We
would like to thank Chief Luis Soler and the Crowley Police Department
^hWZs/^KZ>Z^,/W/E^d/dhd
Tim Plotts facilitates a very interactive
class, and uses technology to help the
learning environment. The videos, advice, techniques, and common sense
approach will help me as a supervisor to mentor young officer, which will
benefit our agency and ultimately our
community.”
– ^Őƚ͘ŽƌĞǇ^ĐŚŶĞĚĞŶ͕
ŶŬĞŶǇWŽůŝĐĞĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ
ϯϮ FBI-LEEDA Insighter
| April 2015
Training Graduates
EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE
Congratulations ELI
the Lexington (NC), Executive
Leadership Institute class held
in January 2015. We would like to
thank Chief Tad Kepley and the
Lexington Police Department for
their hospitality.
Congratulations ELI
the Merritt Island (FL), Executive
Leadership Institute class held in
November 2014. We would like to
thank Sheriff Wayne Ivey and the
Brevard County Sheriff’s Office for
their hospitality.
Congratulations ELI
Westfield (MA), Executive Leadership Institute class held in December 2014. We would like to thank
Executive Director Dan Zivcovich
and Program Coordinator Kevin
Donnelly and the Massachusetts
Police Training Counsel for their
hospitality.
Congratulations ELI
Augusta (MA), Executive Leadership Institute class held in December 2014. We would like to thank
Deputy Chief Jared Mills and the
Augusta Police Department for
their hospitality.
www.fbileeda.org
33
Training Graduates –
MEDIA AND PUBLIC RELATIONS
Congratulations MPR
the Hidalgo County (TX), Media
and Public Relations class held in
thank Sheriff Eddie Guerra and the
Hidalgo County Sheriff’s Office for
their hospitality.
KDDE>Z^,/W/E^d/dhd
It is always a privilege to come to an
FBI-LEEDA class and meet with and
learn from the experts who present the
material. The courses provide a huge
rejuvenation for me to return to my
job and make attempts to put the lessons learned into effect.
– ĞƚĞĐƟǀĞĞŶŶŝƐ͘'ĂƌƌĞƩ͕
tŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶŽƵŶƚǇ^ŚĞƌŝī͛ƐKĸĐĞ
yhd/s>Z^,/W/E^d/dhd
I feel that everyone should be required
to take these classes. This was my first
and won’t be my last. It completely changed my outlook on my job.
Thank you.
– WĂƚƌŽůŵĂŶ,ŝƌĂŵ^ƚƵŵƉ͕
<ĞǇƐĞƌŝƚǇWŽůŝĐĞĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ
Click on the link: Merchandise
Visit our
website for
quality logo
apparel and
promotional
products
from
RaSport
ZĞŵĞŵďĞƌƚŽƌĞŶĞǁǇŽƵƌ
ŵĞŵďĞƌƐŚŝƉƚŽĚĂǇ͊
Membership Renewal
Your 2015 FBI-LEEDA membership renewal invoices were sent in November. You can
submit dues payment by mail or renew online at www.fbileeda.org.
DDZ^,/W,^/d^WZ/s/>'^
If you have questions regarding your membership, please contact the FBI–LEEDA office at 877-772-7712 or [email protected]
ϯϰ FBI-LEEDA Insighter
| April 2015
Welcome New Members
dŽĚĚW͘ůůĞŶ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Merriam Police Department, Merriam, KS
ŽŶĂůĚ&͘ůůŝƐŽŶ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Quincy Police Department, Quincy, MA
:ĂŵĞƐ͘ŶŐƵŝĂŶŽ͕ĂƉƚĂŝŶ– University of Kansas Police Department, Lawrence, KS
,ĞŝŬŽƌƐŚĂƚ͕ŽƌƉŽƌĂů– Bonners Ferry Police Department, Bonners Ferry, ID
ŶƚŚŽŶǇD͘ǀĞƌǇ͕ĂƉƚĂŝŶ– Platte County Sheriff’s Office, Platte City, MO
dƌĞǀŽƌ:͘ĂůůĂƌĚ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Riverside Missouri Police, Riverside, MO
,ĞŶƌŝŬĂǇ͕^ĞŶŝŽƌĚǀŝƐŽƌ– Danish National Police, Copenhagen, Denmark
ŶŶĂͲ<ĂƌŝŶĞůĨƌĂŐĞ͕ŚŝĞĨ^ƵƉĞƌŝŶƚĞŶĚĞŶƚ– National Bureau of Investigation, Swedish Police, Stockholm, Sweden
dŝŵĞƐƐƚ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Latah County Sheriff, Moscow, ID
:ĂŶũƆƌŶ͕ŚŝĞĨ^ƵƉĞƌŝŶƚĞŶĚĞŶƚ– Copenhagen Police Department, Copenhagen, Denmark
ŽƵŐůƵŵĞ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Lewiston Police Department, Lewiston, ID
:ĂƐŽŶd͘ŽůůŚŽƌƐƚ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Newport News Police Department, Newport News, VA
<ŝĞƚŚĂŽŽŶĞ͕ĐƟŶŐƐƐƚ͘ŚŝĞĨŽĨWŽůŝĐĞ– ODU Police Department, Norfolk, VA
tĂĚĞ͘ŽƌĐŚĞƌƐ͕ĂƉƚĂŝŶ– Lenexa Police Department, Lenexa, KS
>ĞĞ:͘ƌŝƩŽŶ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Andover Police Department, Andover, MA
ŶƚŚŽŶǇ:͘ƌŝǆŝƵƐ͕ĂƉƚĂŝŶ– Lawrence Police Department, Lawrence, KS
^ƚĞƉŚĞŶt͘ƌŽǁŶ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Orange Beach Police Department, Orange Beach, AL
>ĂƌƌǇ͘ƵŶĐŚ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Smithville Police Department, Smithville, MO
<ĞǀŝŶ^͘ĂďƌĂů͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Saugus Police Department, Saugus, MA
ĂƌůĂ:͘ĂƌƚĞƌ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Thurston County Sheriff’s Office, Olympia, WA
ŚƌŝƐW͘ĂƐĂŐƌĂŶĚĞ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Eudora Police Department, Eudora, KS
ůĨƌĞĚ^͘ŚĂŶĚůĞƌ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Suffolk Police Department, Suffolk, VA
ŚĂĚůĂƌŬ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Salem Police Department, Salem, NH
ƌƚŚƵƌ͘ŽŶŶŽƌƐ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Saugus Police Department, Saugus, MA
DĂƩŚĞǁ͘ŽƵŶƚƐ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Sweetwater Police Dept, Sweetwater, TX
ƌĂĚůĞǇt͘Žǆ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Kootenai County Sheriff, Coeur d’Alene, ID
<ĞǀŝŶ͘ƌŝŵ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Leavenworth Police Department, Leavenworth, KS
DĂƌǇ͘ƌŝƐĂĮ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Winthrop Police Department, Winthrop, MA
EĂŶĐǇ:͘ĂůƌǇŵƉůĞ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Winthrop Police Department, Winthrop, MA
'ůĞŶŶ:͘ĂůƌǇŵƉůĞ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Holliston Police Department, Holliston, MA
ƌŝĂŶW͘ĂǁƐŽŶ͕ƐƐŝƐƚĂŶƚŚŝĞĨ– Hays Police Department, Hays, KS
ĂǀŝĚt͘ĞǀƌŝĞƐ͕ĂƉƚĂŝŶ– Emporia, Emporia, KS
^ƚĞƉŚĞŶD͘ŝŵŝŶŝĐŽ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– North Andover Police Department, North Andover, MA
<ĞŶŶĞƚŚŝŵŝƚƌǇ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Virginia Beach Police Department, Virginia Beach, VA
DĂƌŬŝǆŽŶ– Dallas District Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX
WĂƵů͘ŽƌƐĞǇ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– North Reading Police, North Reading, MA
'ĂƌǇƌƵŵŚĞůůĞƌ͕WƌŽŐƌĂŵDĂŶĂŐĞƌ– WA State Gambling Commission, Spokane, WA
www.fbileeda.org
ϯϱ
Welcome New Members
WĞƚĞƌ&ƌĂŶĐŝƐĚŐĞƩĞ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Newport News Police Department, Newport News, VA
WĞƚĞƌŬůƵŶĚ͕ĞƉƵƚǇŚŝĞĨ^ƵƉĞƌŝŶƚĞŶĚĞŶƚ– Danish Security and Intelligence Service, Copenhagen, Denmark
dŚŽŵĂƐ:͘ŶĐĂƌŶĂĐĂŽ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– North Reading Police, North Reading, MA
EŝĐŚŽůĂƐD͘&ŝƐĞƚ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Atkinson Police Department, Atkinson, NH
&ƌĞĚĞƌŝĐŬ&ŽƌŶŝ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Saugus Police Department, Saugus, MA
DŝĐŚĂĞů͘&ŽƐƚĞƌ͕ŽŵŵĂŶĚĞƌ– Federal Protective Services, Portland, OR
ƌŝĐ&ŽƵƌŶŝĞƌ͕ĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƟǀĞ^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Snohomish Sheriff/Snohomish Police Department, Snohomish, WA
ĂƚŚǇ&Žǆ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Washington Police Department, Washington, NC
ůǀĂƌŽ'ĂƌĐŝĂ͕WŽůŝĐĞŚŝĞĨ– Palm Valley Police Department, Palm Valley, TX
ĂǀŝĚ:͘'ĂƚĐŚĞůů͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Holliston Police Department, Holliston, MA
:ĂƌƌŽĚD͘'ŝůů͕WĂƚƌŽůŽŵŵĂŶĚĞƌ– Tonganoxie Police Department, Tonganoxie, KS
ƌŝĐ'ŝƌƚ͕ĞƉƵƚǇŚŝĞĨ– Hamilton Police Service, Hamilton, ON
DŝĐŚĂĞů:͘'ůĂƐĞƌ͕ŚŝĞĨŽĨWŽůŝĐĞ– Kenner Police Department, Kenner, LA
^ƚĞƉŚĞŶ'ŽƌĚŽŶ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Ogdensburg Police Department, Ogdensburg, NJ
DŽƌŐĂŶ'ƌĂŶƚ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Washington Fish and Wildlife Police, Yakima, WA
DŝĐŚĂĞů'ƌĂǇ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Germantown Police Department, Germantown, TN
DŝĐŚĂĞů'ƌĂǇ͕ǆĞĐƵƟǀĞŝƌĞĐƚŽƌ– Regional Training Center, San Diego, CA
ZŽďĞƌƚ'ƵŝůůĞŶ͕ĂƉƚĂŝŶ– San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, Chino Hills, CA
ƌŝĂŶ'ƵůƐďǇ͕ĞƚĞĐƟǀĞ^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Daphne Police Department, Daphne, AL
ĂǀŝĚ,ĂůĞ͕hŶĚĞƌƐŚĞƌŝī– Bonner County Sheriff’s Office, Sandpoint, ID
ůŝī,ĂůĞƐ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Washington Police Department, Washington, NC
:ƆƌŐĞŶ,ĂƌůĞǀ͕ŚŝĞĨ^ƵƉĞƌŝŶƚĞŶĚĞŶƚ– Western Copenhagen Police, Albertslund, Denmark
:ĂŶĞ,ĂƌǀĞǇ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office, Virginia Beach, VA
ZĞŽ,ĂƞŝĞůĚ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Virginia Beach Police Department, Virginia Beach, VA
ĂƌďĂƌĂ,ĂǇĞƐ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Kentucky State University, Frankfort, KY
<ĞǀŝŶ,ĞŝŶƐ͕ĂƉƚĂŝŶ– Myrtle Beach Police Department, Myrtle beach, SC
ůĂŶ͘,ĞƌĂůĚ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office, Birmingham, AL
ƌƚŚƵƌ'͘,ŝĐŬĞǇ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Winthrop Police Department, Winthrop, MA
'ĞŽƌŐĞ,ŝůů͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Lewiston Police Department, Lewiston, ID
ůĚŝƐ,ŝůŵĂƌƐĚſƫƌ͕^ƵƉĞƌŝŶƚĞŶĚĞŶƚ– Drugs and Organized Crimes, Reykjavik, Iceland
ŚĂƌůĞƐDŝĐŚĂĞů,ŝŶĞƐ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Coffee County Sheriff’s Office, New Brockton, AL
,ĞůŐĞdĂŶŐ,ŽůďĞŬ͕ŚŝĞĨ^ƵƉĞƌŝŶƚĞŶĚĞŶƚ– North Zealand Police, Denmark, Helsingor, Denmark
:ŝŵŵŝĞ>͘,ŽůůŽǁĂǇ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Arkansas City Police Department, Arkansas, KS
DŝĐŚĂĞů͘,ŽŽĚ͕^ƵƉĞƌǀŝƐŽƌǇ^ƉĞĐŝĂůŐĞŶƚ– FBI, Quantico, VA
tĞƐůĞǇ,ŽƵŬ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Douglas County Sheriff’s Office, Lawrence, KS
ĞƌĞŬ,ŽǁĞ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– North Reading Police, North Reading, MA
DĂƩ,ƵƚĐŚŝŶƐ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Spartanburg County Sheriff’s Office, Spartanburg, SC
| April 2015
ƌŝĂŶ:ĂĐŽďƐ͕ϮŶĚ>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Stafford County Sheriff’s Office, Stafford, VA
WŚŝůŝƉ:ŽŚŶƐŽŶ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Enforcement Program, Olympia, WA
Ž:ŽŶĂƐƐŽŶ͕^ƉĞĐŝĂůŽŶƐƵůƚĂŶƚ– Rigspolitiet HR Further and Advanced Training, Copenhagen, Denmark
ƌǇĂŶdŚŽŵĂƐ:ŽŶĞƐ͕DĂƌƐŚĂů– Texline Marshals Office, Texline, TX
:ŽƐĞƉŚ<ĞĂƟŶŐ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Salem Police Department, Salem, NH
ĂƌůW͘<ůĞŝŶ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– WA Department of Fish & Wildlife Police, Olympia, WA
DĂƌŬt͘<ŶŽůĞƐ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Winfield Police Department, Winfield, KS
EŝĞůƐ<ƌŽŵĂŶͲ>ĂƌƐĞŶ͕ĞƉƵƚǇŚŝĞĨ^ƵƉĞƌŝŶƚĞŶĚĞŶƚ– National Danish Police College, Brøndby, Denmark
WĂƵů>ĂĨĞƌƌŝĞƌĞ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Lowell Police Department, Lowell, MA
:ŽŚŶ^͘>ĂƌƐŽŶ͕ĂƉƚĂŝŶ– Shawnee Police Department, Shawnee, KS
ĂƌŽůĞ>ĞǁŝƐůĂŶŬĞŶƐŚŝƉ͕ĂƉƚĂŝŶ– Germantown Police Department, Germantown, TN
:ŽŚŶ>ŝŶŐůĞ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Texas Department of Public Safety, Houston, TX
WĂƵůDĂŶŶŝŶŐ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Aquinnah Police Department, Aquinnah, MA
ZŽďĞƌƚDĂƌůĂŶĚ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Richmond Police Department, Richmond, VA
ZĞǇŶĂůĚŽDĂƌƟŶĞǌ͕ĞƚĞĐƟǀĞ– Lubbock Police Department, Lubbock, TX
DĂƌǇ͘DĂƫŶŐůǇ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Sedgwick County Sheriff’s Office, Wichita, KS
,ĂƌƌǇDĐƌŝĞŶ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Virginia Beach Police Department, Virginia Beach, VA
dƌĂĐǇD͘DĐƵůůŽƵŐŚ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Wyco Sheriff’s Department, Kansas City, KS
^ŚĂǁŶ͘DĐ,ĂůĞǇ͕hŶĚĞƌƐŚĞƌŝī– Reno County Sheriff’s Office, Hutchinson, KS
ĂǀŝĚDĐ>ĞŽĚ͕^ƉĞĐŝĂůŐĞŶƚŝŶŚĂƌŐĞ– U.S. EPA Criminal Investigation Division, Philadelphia, PA
ZŝĐŚĂƌĚZ͘DĞůůŽ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Hollis Police Department, Hollis, NH
hƌŝĞůDĞŶĚŽǌĂ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Yakima Police Department, Yakima, WA
ZŽďĞƌƚ:ŽŚŶDĞǇĞƌ͕ĞƉƵƚǇŚŝĞĨ– Kenner Police Department, Kenner, LA
dǇƐŽŶ:͘DĞǇĞƌƐ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Hutchinson Police Department, Hutchinson, KS
ĂŶĂE͘DŽŽĚŝĞ͕hŶĚĞƌƐŚĞƌŝī– Wilson County Sheriff’s Office, Fredonia, KS
:ĂŵĞƐDŽŽƌĞ͕KĸĐĞƌ– Yakima Police Department, Yakima, WA
ŶƚŚŽŶǇ͘DŽƌůĂŶŝ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– North Reading Police], North Reading, MA
ŽƌĞǇ:͘DƵƌƌŝƐŽŶ͕ŚŝĞĨ– Linn Valley Police Department, Linn Valley, KS
ZŽď͘DƵƌƌǇ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Lawrence Police Department, Lawrence, KS
:ŽŚŶ͘EĂĐŚƚŵĂŶ͕^ĞŶŝŽƌ^ƉĞĐŝĂůŐĞŶƚ– Kansas Bureau of Investigation, Garden City, KS
<ĞǀŝŶ>͘EĞǀŝůůĞ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Cass County Sheriff’s Office, Harrisonville, MO
dŽƌƐƚĞŝŶEŽƌŵĂŶ͕,ĞĂĚŽĨ^ĞĐƟŽŶ– National Bureau of Investigation, Stockholm, Denmark
dŝŵW͘K͛ƌŝĞŶ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Saugus Police Department, Saugus, MA
tĂƌƌĞŶ:͘K͛ƌŝĞŶ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Boxborough Police Department, Boxborough, MA
'ƌĞŐK͛EĞŝů͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office, Virginia Beach, VA
dŝŵŽƚŚǇ:͘K͛dŽŽůĞ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Framingham police Department, Framingham, MA
ůŝŌŽŶW͘KďůŝŶŐĞƌ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Edwardsville Police Department, Edwardsville, KS
www.fbileeda.org
37
Welcome New Members
&ƌĂŶŬKůƐĞŶ͕ĞƉƵƚǇŚŝĞĨ^ƵƉĞƌŝŶƚĞŶĚĞŶƚ– Nortern Jutland Police District, Himmerland, Hobro, Denmark
DŝĐŚĂĞůKůƐĞŶ͕ŚŝĞĨ^ƵƉĞƌŝŶƚĞŶĚĞŶƚ– Danish National Police, Copenhagen, Denmark
<ĞůůǇD͘KƟƐ͕ŚŝĞĨ/ŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƚŽƌ– District Attorney’s Office - 18th Judicial District - Wichita, Wichita, KS
:ŽŚŶE͘WĂƚŚŝĂŬŝƐ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Andover Police Department, Andover, MA
WĂƵůDĂƌŝŽWĂƚƌŝĂƌĐĂ͕WĂƚƌŽů– Framingham Police Department, Framingham, MA
'ƵǇůŝŽƚWĂƩĞƌƐŽŶ͕ĂƉƚĂŝŶ– Cranford Police Department, Cranford, NJ
>ĞĞWĞƚĞƌƐ͕ϮŶĚ>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Stafford County Sheriff’s Office, Stafford, VA
'ŽƌĚŽŶ͘WĞƩĞƌƐŽŶ͕ƐƐŝƐƚĂŶƚŚŝĞĨ– NCIS Norway (KRIPOS), Oslo, Norway
ŚĂŶƚŚƵWŚĂƵŬ͕^ĞŶŝŽƌŶĂůǇƐƚ– Roanoke Police Department, Roanoke, VA
dǇƌŽŶĞWŚĞůƉƐ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Winston-Salem Police Department, Winston-Salem, NC
sŝƌŐŝůWŝŶƚŽ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Hopi Resource Enforcement Services, Kykotsmovi, AZ
^ĐŽƩ͘WŽǁĞůů͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Newton Police Department, Newton, KS
DŝĐŚĂĞůZĂĚĨŽƌĚ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Stafford County Sheriff’s Office, Modesto, CA
Ŭŝŵ͘ZĞǇŶŽůĚƐ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Shawnee County Sheriff’s Office, Topeka, KS
DŝĐŚĂĞůZŝĐĐŝĂƌĚĞůůŝ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Saugus Police, Saugus, MA
^ĞůǁǇŶ>͘ZŽďŝŶƐŽŶ͕ĂƉƚĂŝŶ– 502d Security Forces Squadron, San Antonio, TX
^ƚĞƉŚĞŶW͘ZŽŐĞƌƌ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Winthrop Police Department, Winthrop, MA
WĂƚƌŝŬ^͘^ĂůŝŶŽ͕ŚŝĞĨ^ƵƉĞƌŝŶƚĞŶĚĞŶƚ– Swedish Security Service, Stockholm, Denmark
'ƌĞŐŐ͘^ĐŚŝīĞůďĞŝŶ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Baldwin City Police Department, Baldwin City, KS
<Ƶƌƚ^ĐŚǁĂŶ͕KĸĐĞƌ– Federal Way Police Department, Federal Way, WA
ŚĂƌůĞƐt͘^ĐŝĂĐĐĂ͕WĂƚƌŽůŵĂŶ– Amesbury Police Department, Amesbury, MA
ZŽŶĂůĚ͘^ĞůůŽŶ͕ŚŝĞĨŽĨWŽůŝĐĞ– Mansfield Police Department, Mansfield, MA
dŽŶǇ^ĞƌďĂŶƚĞǌ͕ŚŝĞĨ– Brownfield Police Department, Brownfield, TX
:ĂŵĞƐt͘^ŚĞƌůĞǇ͕hŶĚĞƌƐŚĞƌŝī– Leavenworth County Sheriff’s Office, Leavenworth, KS
ŚƌŝƐt͘^ŵŝƚŚ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Gladstone Police Department, Gladstone, MO
ƌĞŶĚĂŶůĞǆĂŶĚĞƌ^ŵŝƚŚ͕ĞƚĞĐƟǀĞ/ŶƐƉĞĐƚŽƌ– Queensland Police Service, Brisbane, Australia
dŝŵŽƚŚǇ͘^ŵŝƚŚ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Suffolk Police Department, Suffolk, VA
dĞĚ^ŶǇĚĞƌ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Boise Police Department, Boise, ID
>ĞŶĞ^ŽĞƌĞŶƐĞŶ͕ŚŝĞĨ^ƵƉĞƌŝŶƚĞŶĚĞŶƚ– Danish National Police, National Forensic Center, Glostrup, Denmark
ůǀŝŶ>͘^ŽǁĞƌƐ͕ĚƵĐĂƟŽŶWƌŽŐƌĂŵDŐƌ͘– Kansas Law Enforcement Training Center, Hutchinson, KS
zŽůĂŶĚĂ^ƉĂƌƌŽǁ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Wilmington Police Department, Wilmington, NC
<ĞŶ^ƉŝǀĞǇ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Virginia Beach Police Department, Virginia Beach, VA
:ŽĞ͘^ƚĂŶƚŽŶ͕///͕ĂƉƚĂŝŶ– Texas City Police Department, Texas City, TX
<ĞǀŝŶD͘^ƚĞĞůĞ͕ƐƐŝƐƚĂŶƚŚŝĞĨ– Kansas City Police Department, Kansas City, KS
ZŽďĞƌƚ͘^ƚĞƉŚĞŶƐ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Tewksbury Police Department, Tewksbury, MA
:ŽŚŶ^ƚĞǁĂƌƚ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Horry County Police Department, Conway, SC
ŚĂƌůŽƩĞ^ƚƵď͕ŽƵƌƐĞƐƐŝƐƚĂŶƚ– Danish National Police, Copenhagen, Denmark
| April 2015
:ŽƐĞƉŚdŚŝďŽĚĞĂƵ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– North Reading Police, Andover, MA
>ĂƵƌĞŶD͘dŝƌŽŶĞ͕KĸĐĞƌ– Amesbury Police Department, Amesbury, MA
DĂƌŬdŽĚĚ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Coeur d’Alene Police, Coeur d’Alene, ID
ĂƌůŽƐdŽƌƌĞƐ͕ĂƉƚĂŝŶ– Orange County Sheriff’s Office, Orlando, FL
<ĂƌĞŶtĂůůĂĐĞ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Hamilton Police Department, Hamilton, MA
ŚĂƌůĞƐtĂůůĂĐĞ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Hopkinton Police, Hopkinton, MA
:ĞītĂůƚŚĞƌ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Coeur d’Alene Police Department, Coeur D’Alene, ID
ƌĞƩtĂůƚŽŶ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Coeur d’Alene Police, Coeur d’Alene, ID
<ĞŶtĞĂƚŚĞƌŝůů͕ĞƉƵƚǇŚŝĞĨ– Hamilton Police Service, Hamilton, ON
DŝŬĂĞů,͘tĞƌŶ͕ŚŝĞĨ^ƵƉĞƌŝŶƚĞŶĚĞŶƚ– Copenhagen Police Department, Copenhagen, Denmark
dĂƚĞ͘tĞƐƚ͕ŚŝĞĨ– LaCygne Police, LaCygne, KS
:ŽŚŶtĞƐƚ͕ĂƉƚĂŝŶ– New Bern Police Department, New Bern, NC
:ŝŵtĞƐƚ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Wenatchee Police Department, Wenatchee, WA
ĞĐŬǇ͘tŚŝƚĞ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Birmingham Police Department, Birmingham, AL
&ƌĞĚ:͘tŚŝƚŵĂŶ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Russell County Sheriff, Russell, KS
:ĂŵĞƐ&͘tŝůůŝĂŵƐ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Tewksbury Police Department, Tewksbury, MA
ƌŝĂŶ>͘tŝůƐŽŶ͕ĂƉƚĂŝŶ– Lee’s Summit Police Department, Lee’s Summit, MO
ĂǀŝĚt͘tŝůƐŽŶ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Massachusetts State Police, Boston, MA
^ŚĂǁŶD͘tŽŽĚƐ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Tyngsborough Police Department, Tyngsborough, MA
ZŽŶtƌŝŐŚƚ͕ŚŝĞĨ– Seymour Police Department, Seymour, MO
<ŝƌƚ^͘zŽĚĞƌ͕^ĞƌŐĞĂŶƚ– Leawood Kansas Police Department, Leawood, KS
^ŚĂƌůĞŶĞĂĐŚĞƌůĞ͕ĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŽƌ– Colville Tribe Police Department, Nespelem, WA
ůŝīŝĞƐĞŵĞƌ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– Thurston County Sheriff’s Office, Olympia, WA
DĂƌŬ͘ŝŵŵĞƌŵĂŶ͕>ŝĞƵƚĞŶĂŶƚ– North Reading Police, North Reading, MA
yhd/s>Z^,/W/E^d/dhd
As a new chief I found the insights and
anecdotes to be invaluable. I have a
new understanding of the challenges I
face on a daily basis and feel prepared
to successfully meet those challenges.
Dean was an outstanding instructor.
– ŚŝĞĨƌŝĐ'ŝůůŝƐ͕
ŐĂǁĂŵWŽůŝĐĞĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ
www.fbileeda.org
39
FBI-LEEDA POST Approvals by State (as of December 30, 2014)
SLI
State/Class
CLI
ELI
IA
MPR LWT DLSL
DLASL
Alabama Peace Officers Standards & Training Commission
Alaska Police Standards Council
Arizona Peace Officer Standards & Training Board
X
X
Arkansas Commission on Law Enforcement Standards & Training
California Commission of Peace Officer Standards & Training
X
Colorado Peace Officer Standards & Training Board
X
Connecticut Police Officer Standards & Training Council
Delaware Council on Policing Training
District of Columbia Police Officers Standards & Training Board
Florida Criminal Justice Standards & Training Commission
Georgia Peace Officer Standards & Training Council
Hawaii (none)
Idaho Peace Officer Standards & Training
X
Illinois Law Enforcement Training & Standards Board
Indiana Law Enforcement Academy
Iowa Law Enforcement Academy
Kansas Commission on Peace Officers’ Standards & Training
Kentucky Law Enforcement Council
Louisiana Peace Officer Standards & Training Council
X
Maine Criminal Justice Academy
Maryland Police & Correctional Training Commissions
Massachusetts Municipal Police Training Committee
X
Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards
X
Minnesota Board of Peace Officer Standards & Training
X
X
Mississippi Board on Law Enforcement Officer Standards & Training
X
X
Missouri Peace Officer Standards & Training
X
X
X
Montana Public Safety Officer Standards & Training
Nebraska Police Standard Advisory Council
Nevada Peace Officers’ Standards & Training
New Hampshire Police Standards & Training Council
New Jersey Police Training Commission
New Mexico Law Enforcement Academy Boar
New York Municipal Police Training Council
North Carolina Law Enforcement Training & Standards
North Dakota Peace Officer Standards & Training
X
Ohio Peace Officer Training Commission
Oklahoma Council on Law Enforcement Education & Training
Oregon Department of Public Safety Standards & Training Certification
Pennsylvania Municipal Police Officers’ Education & Training Commission
Rhode Island Police Officers Commission on Standards & Training
South Carolina Law Enforcement Training Council
X
X
South Dakota Law Enforcement Officers Standards & Training Commission
Tennessee Peace Officers Standards & Training
Texas Commission on Law Enforcement
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Utah Peace Officers Standards & Training
Vermont Criminal Justice Training Council
Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services Standards & Training
X
Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission
West Virginia Law Enforcement Professional Standards
Wisconsin Law Enforcement Standards Board
Wyoming Peace Officers Standards & Training Commission
SLI - Supervisor Leadership Institute; CLI - Command Leadership Institute; ELI - Executive Leadership Institute; IA - Internal Affairs Investigations; MPR - Media
and Public Relations; LWT - Leaders Without Titles; DLSL -Distance Learning Basic Supervisor Liability; DLASL - Distance Learning Advanced Supervisor Liability
ϰϬ FBI-LEEDA Insighter
| April 2015
The FBI-LEEDA VISA® Rewards
Credit Card Offers—
0% APR* six-month
introductory rate
11.90% non-variable APR*
after six months
Exceptional Rewards
Justice for All
The Official Card of the FBI Law Enforcement Executive Development Association
80 YEARS.
$
80 DOLLARS.
Receive an $80 VISA statement credit
when you open a new card.**
Visit www.jfcu.org to apply online, or call
800.550.5328
Information contained in the brochure is current as of January 1, 2015 and is subject to change. Membership with Justice FCU must be established via a Share Account
prior to the approval of the FBI-LEEDA Visa card application. Subject to credit approval. *APR=Annual Percentage Rate. **FBI-LEEDA card must be used within the first
six months of opening the account or the $80 credit will be revoked. Justice FCU reserves the right to withdraw this offer at any time.
Federally Insured by NCUA.
www.fbileeda.org
C
&/ʹ>/ŶƐŝŐŚƚĞƌ
ϱ'ƌĞĂƚsĂůůĞǇWĂƌŬǁĂǇ͕^ƵŝƚĞϭϮϱ
DĂůǀĞƌŶ͕Wϭϵϯϱϱ
ƉƌŝůϮϬϭϱͲ/ƐƐƵĞ//

FBI-LEEDA Insighter Magazine, April 2015 Issue II

Transcription

Similar documents

NÄKYVÄ POLIISITYÖ IRC-GALLERIASSA

Term 4 2015

ITEM MOT 00-05141 Ammunition Purchase from Kiesler Police

Alphonse Bertillion - Hicksville Public Schools / Homepage

December - Texarkana Arkansas Police Department

Khalil Abd El

Run To Remember

Sunday Observer odd news

9-1-1 Emergency - Toronto Police Service

JONAKI Mar 2015