WINDOWS - Hardware

Goodbye, DSL and Cable!
Verizon’s new broadband will
give you a 15x speed increase!
Doom 3 Engine Tech-splanation!
How id’s 3D engine works, and why
its technology reigns supreme
The 10 Best Utilities
You’ve Never Heard Of!
MINIMUM BS • OCTOBER 2004
WINDOWS:
THE FUTURE
REVEALED!
Microsoft’s Top-Secret
3D Interface
The All-New ‘Castle’
Networking Scheme
Direct3D’s Shocking New Direction
AND MUCH MORE!
EXCLUSIVE HOW-TO:
Make WinXP work like Windows Longhorn in 4 easy steps!
DESKTOP
DEATHMATCH!
We use Doom 3
to benchmark six
high-end systems.
Don’t buy your next PC
until you read this!
“The most significant technological leap
in the 20-year history of Windows”
The Lab At Its Best
I
just built a Doom 3 gaming PC with two 36GB
Western Digital Raptor drives set up in a RAID 0
array. Seven days ago, I would have sworn up and
down that because of RAID, the level load times for id
Software’s latest version of Doom were significantly
faster than they were on a single-drive system of
similar configuration. In fact, when I entered the very
first level in the game, I found myself thinking, Man,
it’s amazing how big a difference a RAID array makes.
It turns out that I, like many, many other gamers
and PC manufacturers, was wrong. Level load times
in Doom 3—along with scores of other modern PC
games—are no faster with RAID than with a single
drive. In fact, in some cases, level load times are
actually slower with RAID than with a single drive!
The way we discovered this shocking revelation
is a shining example of the rapidity with which
information travels and cultivates change in modern times. It’s also an industry-wide testament to
the scientific method Maximum PC has espoused
since its inception.
We ship Maximum PC to the printer in sections;
each day we submit a new chunk of pages to our
production department, and from there it goes on
to the printer. On the second day of shipping pages,
Associate Editor Josh Norem literally stumbled upon
an Internet story on a hardware site that detailed a
finding in direct contrast to our long-held belief that
RAID 0 provides faster read times, and therefore
faster level loading times. If you’re a hardcore PC
user, it’s quite likely you hold this belief yourself.
Norem and Senior Editor Gordon Mah Ung
immediately set out to verify the results in a frenetic
three-day period of testing, speculation, and bickering. Adhering to the principles of scientific method,
which dictates thorough and repeated experimentation until one has validated or proved wrong the
hypothesis—in this case, that RAID 0 is no faster
than a single drive—the editors tested multiple system configurations with a slew of different games.
The results of their testing supported the reports we
originally read online. (For explicit details, turn to In
the Lab on page 72.)
Here’s where it gets interesting: as this finding
receives more attention, it could have industry-wide
ramifications, at least in terms of PC building for
gaming performance. For example, all six high-end
PCs in this month’s high-performance gaming PC
round-up use RAID 0. And while it’s important to
note that RAID 0 still delivers performance boosts in
certain non-gaming circumstances, this could force a
major rethinking of RAID philosophies. It makes me
wonder: Are there other commonly held misconceptions around PC performance? Just like the RAID 0
issue—time will tell.
—GEORGE JONES
[email protected]
Contents
Two words:
Hot Cubby.
Page 18
10.04
REGULARS
8 In/Out
You write, we respond
14 Quick Start
Get your
game on!
Page 24
PC previews, news, and factoids
24 Head2Head
This month: Mobile gaming devices
26 WatchDog
Maximum PC takes a bite out of bad gear
66 Ask the Doctor
Symptom, diagnosis, cure
68 How To...
This month: Add RAID drivers and SP2
to your original WinXP CD
Pyramid PC.
Page 120
72 In the Lab
A behind-the-scenes look at Maximum PC
product testing
120 Rig of the Month
It’s amazing what a person can
do with a PC!
REVIEWS
74 Handtop PC: Sony VAIO-U50
76 Videocard: Sapphire Toxic X800 Pro
76 Videocard: eVGA e-GeForce 6800 Ultra AGP
78 Pocket video recorder: Archos AV400
80 Dual-layer DVD burner: Lite-On SOHW-832S
80 Media streaming box: Pinnacle Show Center
82 USB 2.0 external drive: Iomega REV 35GB/90GB
82 USB 2.0 external drive:Transcend StoreJet 20GB
84 2.1 speakers: Klipsch ProMedia GMX A-2.1
84 2.1 speakers: Edifier S2.1D
85 Speaker headset: Altec Lansing AHS602
86 Digicam: Canon EOS ID Mark II
88 USB 2.0/FireWire external drive: Lacie Bigger Disk
88 MP3 player: Apple iPod
90 Mouse: Microsoft S+ark
90 Mouse: Logitech MX1000 Laser
92 USB network hub: Keyspan USB Server
92 Audio encoding app: Magix Music on CD & DVD
GAMES
Release
Notes
95 Singles: Flirt Up Your Life
95 Missing: Since January
OCTOBER 2004
MAXIMUMPC
5
Contents
MAXIMUMPC
EDITORIAL
George Jones
Katherine Stevenson
Gordon Mah Ung
Will Smith
Logan Decker
Josh Norem
Andrew Sanchez
Natalie Jeday
Boni Uzilevsky
Mark Madeo
Samantha Berg
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
MANAGING EDITOR
SENIOR EDITOR
TECHNICAL EDITOR
FEATURES EDITOR
ASSOCIATE EDITOR
EDITOR EMERITUS
OCTOBER
ART
ART DIRECTOR
ASSOCIATE ART DIRECTOR
PHOTO EDITOR
ASSOCIATE PHOTOGRAPHER
FEATURES
CONTRIBUTING EDITORS
E. Will Greenwald, Tom Halfhill, Tae Kim,
Thomas McDonald
CONTRIBUTING WRITERS
Omeed Chandra, Jason Compton
PRODUCTION
Richard Lesovoy PRODUCTION DIRECTOR
Dan Mallory PRODUCTION COORDINATOR
ADVERTISING
Chris Coelho PUBLISHER
Bernard Lanigan EASTERN AD DIRECTOR
646.723.5405
Dave Lynn WESTERN AD DIRECTOR
949.360.4443
Stacey Levy WESTERN AD MANAGER
925.964.1205
30
Windows Longhorn
Everything you need to know about
how Windows Longhorn could change
the way you interact with your PC.
Anthony Danzi EASTERN AD MANAGER
646.723.5453
Nate Hunt NATIONAL ACCT MANAGER
415.656.8536
Jose Urrutia ADVERTISING COORDINATOR
415.656.8313
Kathleen Reilly MARKETING MANAGER
The 10 Best
CIRCULATION
Tina K. Rogers
Mimi Hall
Angela Martinez
Janet Amistoso
Siara Nazir
CIRCULATION DIRECTOR
NEWSSTAND DIRECTOR
FULFILLMENT MANAGER
DIRECT MARKETING
SPECIALIST
ASSISTANT BILLING AND
RENEWAL SPECIALIST
BACK ISSUE REQUESTS
1.800.865.7240
REPRINTS PRINT AND DIGITAL
Reprint Management Services
Maggie French, 717.399.1900 x178
[email protected]
How to contact us:
All subscription Inquiries 800.274.3421 or
[email protected]
Editorial staff [email protected]
FUTURE NETWORK USA
150 North Hill Dr. Brisbane, CA 94005
415.468.4684 www.futurenetworkusa.com
Jonathan Simpson-Bint
Tom Valentino
Charles Schug
Holly Klingel
Simon Whitcombe
Chris Coelho
Steve Aaron
Jon Phillips
Brad Tolinski
Nancy Durlester
Richie Lesovoy
PRESIDENT
VICE PRESIDENT/CFO
VP/GENERAL COUNSEL
VP/CIRCULATION
PUBLISHING DIRECTOR (GAMES)
PUBLISHING DIRECTOR (TECH)
PUBLISHING DIRECTOR (MUSIC)
EDITORIAL DIRECTOR (TECH)
EDITORIAL DIRECTOR (MUSIC)
DIR. OF CENTRAL SERVICES
PRODUCTION DIRECTOR
Future Network USA is part of Future Network PLC
The Future Network produces carefully targeted special-interest
magazines for people who share a passion. We aim to satisfy
that passion by creating titles offering value for money, reliable
information, smart buying advice and which are a pleasure to
read.Today we publish more than 100 magazines in the US, UK,
France and Italy. Over 100 international editions of our magazines are also published in 31 other countries across the world.
The Future Network plc is a public company quoted on
the London Stock Exchange (symbol: FNET).
Roger Parry
Greg Ingham
John Bowman
NON-EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
GROUP FINANCE DIRECTOR
TEL +441225 442244
58
Doom 3
Find out what makes
the year’s freakiest
game tick in our
exclusive look under
the hood. Plus, our
definitive gameplay
review!
40
Desktop
Deathmatch
Six gaming PC
titans go head to
head: Watch the
competitors drop off
until only a single
winner
remains.
51 Utilities
We donned our pith helmets
and hacked through the darkest
corners of the Internet to find
10 unheralded utilities that no
power user should be without!
OCTOBER 2004
MAXIMUMPC
7
In/Out
������������������
���������������������������
�����������������������������
�����������������������������
�����������������������������������
�����������������������������������
�����������������������
�����������������������������
���������������������������
���������������������������
����������������
�����
�����
�
�����������
������������
������
������������
��������������
�����������������
��������
�������
������
���
��
�������
����
���� ��
����
�������������������������������������������������������������������������
DREAM MACHINE LETDOWN
I’ve been reading your magazine
for several years now, and I have
always enjoyed the reviews and
articles. I’m especially excited
about your Dream Machine
every year. This year however,
I was very disappointed in
some of the parts you chose.
For starters, the theme to me
seemed a cheap excuse to use
an Intel platform. A “futureproof” Dream Machine? If
I were building the best PC
possible, I would not think
about whether it would support
parts three years down the
road. For example, you stated
in your magazine that ISA slots
remained on motherboards for
years after components stopped
being made for them. Why
would PCI-E be any different?
Especially because I have a
feeling AGP graphics cards
will be made for many years
to come. DDR2? Currently,
miniscule advantages to DDR2
make it unnecessary, and the
availability and price of DDR2
memory don’t help.
Also, there’s no reason to go
with an Intel platform except for
the fact that it may overclock
more than an AMD—I’m sure
you’ve seen the performance
advantage of an AMD system
over an Intel system in games
such as Doom 3. And when I
read which graphics card you
picked, I could hardly sit still.
08
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
WISE WORDS FROM
THE SARGE
You write,
we respond
The nVidia-based
cards are currently
more future-proof
than any ATI
product, with Pixel
Shader 3.0 support
and SLI capabilities.
—RYAN FLAGLER
I must say, it was a
big letdown to see
that you dropped the
6800UE videocard
from your Dream
Machine just because
it took the extra
slots. I thought the
point of the Dream
Machine was to have
the best of the best—
with nothing holding
you back. The
6800UE was clearly
the better choice
then and definitely
now. I banish you to
the land of Fruitopia,
to make me juice.
I was well aware that optical drive
speeds today are high enough to
shatter a CD but I worried about it
happening to me about as much as I
worry about getting hit by lightning.
Well, it just so happens that I
came across a CD containing some
important data that had a tiny crack
(no more than a centimeter) starting
at the center of the disk. I figured,
what the heck, I’ll just drag off the
CD any files that the drive can still
read and burn a new CD with what
I salvaged. Imagine the look on my
face when I heard a sound like gunfire
and breaking glass coming from my
CD-RW drive. The enclosed image is
what came out of the drive when my
trembling finger hit Eject.
Fortunately, it was a cheap I/O
Magic Magicspin 52/24/52 and not a
prized possession like a Plextor DVD
writer. But I did want to put the word
out to anyone who might be tempted
to try to recover a cracked CD: slow
is better. Nero has a bundled program
called DriveSpeed that I know would
have helped. I hate hindsight.
—COLIN HART
SENIOR EDITOR GORDON MAH UNG
RESPONDS: So the backlash begins.
No, not against us, but PCI Express,
DDR2, and the Radeon X800. We’ve
been around long enough to have
seen this pattern before: “What?
Why use PCI when VL Bus cards
clock at 40MHz?”; “What? DDR is
a joke, why would I want that over
PC133?”; “What? Why bother with
AGP when PCI cards are just as fast
as AGP if not faster?”
We agree that AGP cards will
be around for many years to come
(shoot, you can still find PCI graphics cards), but we predict that the
ultra high-end cards will need PCI
Express in a mere 12 to 24 months.
Similarly, in 18 months DDR2 will
firmly occupy the high-end for both
AMD and Intel. Believe me, if we
could have secured a PCI Express
chipset and board for Athlon
64 FX and a CPU that supported
DDR2, we would have gone for it.
Unfortunately, that wasn’t the case.
And because the memory controller is embedded in the core of
Athlon 64 FX chips (one of the key
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
—SSG JEFFREY JONES
reasons they’re so freaking fast),
you would have to toss your motherboard and CPU to switch to DDR2 in
18 months.
As far as our choice of graphics
card, it was a close, close contest.
The 6800 Ultra and X800 XT Platinum
Edition were virtually deadlocked
on performance. We chose the
X800 based on its svelte formfactor
only—the cards performed about
the same.
FEATURES EDITOR LOGAN DECKER
RESPONDS: You have our sympathies.
Once you hear that awful sound, you never,
ever feel safe again in this world. But take
comfort in knowing that you may spare
countless others the same trauma. Your
suggestion of using DriveSpeed to back
up data from damaged discs is a great
one. For those who aren’t familiar with it,
DriveSpeed is a utility that comes with
Ahead’s Nero; it limits the read speed of
your optical drive. You can find it on the
installation CD, and also in the Nero directory on your hard drive under Nero Toolkit.
If you notice cracks or flaws on the surface
of a disc, use DriveSpeed to crank down
the speed of the drive as low as it will go
before attempting to back up the disc’s
contents. And while you’re at it, you may
want to put your pets in the other room.
ANOTHER WAY TO GET
‘TRUE’ SURROUND
multimedia 5.1 speakers and get
true surround sound? As long as
the speakers have discrete analog
inputs to front left and right,
center channel, rear left and
right, and subwoofer, all of the
decoding would then take place
in the soundcard. Creative says
the Audigy 2 ZS is able to decode
Dolby Digital (AC-3), DTS, and
every flavor of game surround
and enhancement I can think of,
such as DirectSound, OpenAL,
EAX, and A3D. Am I missing
something?
I have several questions
concerning PC sound, in
particular 5.1 surround sound.
In last month’s Dream Machine
article, you stated that the
Logitech Z-680 speakers were
selected in part because they
have both digital and analog
inputs. This was said to be
the only way to get “true 5.1
surround sound” from both
DVD movies and games. Because
you’re using an Audigy 2 ZS
Gamer soundcard, couldn’t you
just connect the analog outputs
from the soundcard to the
analog inputs of any amplified
ASSOCIATE EDITOR JOSH NOREM
RESPONDS: You’re not missing anything at all, Eric—you’re perfectly
correct. Because the Audigy 2 ZS
soundcard includes a hardware
decoder for Dolby Digital and DTS
audio streams, we could certainly
just plug the analog connectors
from the Logitech Z-680 into the analog connectors on the Audigy and
get discrete sound via the onboard
decoder. Though our write-up
certainly emphasized the presence
of both analog and digital inputs,
that was not the sole reason we
chose the Z-680 system. The primary
In/Out
reason was: When it comes to sound
quality, controls, and sheer sonic
power, the Logitech Z-680 simply has
no peer. Our write-up should have
been clearer on this point.
MAXIMUM PC = NO 10
VERDICTS?
I have read your magazine since
it was boot and I can’t remember
the last time you gave out a
Kick Ass/10 verdict in a review.
Maybe you never have. Do you
guys look at Playboy magazine
and say “Wow! Check out the 9
in this centerfold.” My take is
that you don’t want to upset any
potential advertisers by giving
the competition any legitimate
edge, so it’s 9s for everybody.
Did the Logitech Z-680 speakers
in your Dream Machine even
score a perfect 10 when you
reviewed them?
—ED
EDITOR IN CHIEF GEORGE JONES
RESPONDS: Ed, you’re dead wrong.
Over the course of the last nine
months, we’ve given five perfect 10
verdicts to products we’ve reviewed.
In fact, in our February issue alone,
we gave three—count ‘em, three—
perfect scores. And we did indeed
give Logitech’s Z-680 speakers a 10.
But with this said, there are many
more products that get 9 verdicts
with a Kick Ass award. The reason
is simple: The “perfect” product
is as rare as the perfect movie or
book, and we’re more finicky than
most when it comes to slight flaws
and defects. Oh, and regarding your
question about Playboy… we don’t
look at it. We read the articles.
ATI X800 XT PLATINUM
DISCONTINUED?
Today I got a call from PC
Connection, from whom I
ordered my ATI X800 XT
Platinum Edition, and was
informed that ATI will not be
manufacturing the X800 XT
Platinum Edition because of an
unexpectedly low number of
chips that have 16 actual working pipes. Is this true?
—WAYNE PATTERSON
LETTERS POLICY: MAXIMUM PC invites
TECHNICAL EDITOR WILL SMITH
RESPONDS: This sounded a little
fishy to us, so we contacted ATI
to find out the real story. We were
told: “ATI has not discontinued the
Radeon X800 XT Platinum Edition
as erroneously reported on some
web sites. We continue to ship
Radeon X800 products to customers
worldwide, including the Radeon
X800 XT Platinum Edition. Because
of the popularity and success of our
Radeon products, meeting the strong
demand is sometimes challenging.
However, rest assured, we will
continue to ship the Radeon X800 XT
Platinum Edition and our full family
of visual processors for gamers and
computer enthusiasts!”
PENTIUM M IS NOT CENTRINO!
In the August issue of Maximum
PC, you reviewed an Efficeonbased laptop—the Sharp Actius
PC-MM20. Roughly halfway
through the article, the
following was written: “But the
Efficeon’s competition isn’t the
Crusoe, it’s the ultra-low voltage
version of Intel’s Pentium M—
known as Centrino.”
This is not true! Pentium
Ms and Centrinos are entirely
different. Obviously, a Pentium
M is a CPU used in laptops.
Centrino, however, is wireless
technology. A quote from
Intel’s web site reads: “The Intel
Pentium M processor is a key
component of Intel Centrino
mobile technology…With Intel
Centrino mobile technology,
three components work
together to enable outstanding
mobile performance, extended
battery life, and integrated
wireless LAN capability in
thinner and lighter notebooks.
These components include the
Intel® Pentium® M processor,
the Intel® 855 chipset family,
and the Intel® PRO/Wireless
Network Connection Family.”
Please do not propagate the
idea that Pentium Ms are known
as Centrinos. This is not true!
your thoughts and comments. Send them to
[email protected]. Please include your full
name, town, and telephone number, and limit your
letter to 300 words. Letters may be edited for space
and clarity. Due to the vast amount of
e-mail we receive, we cannot personally respond to each letter.
10
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
—JAKE CAMPBELL
SENIOR EDITOR GORDON MAH UNG
RESPONDS: This is just semantics.
Pentium M is the low-power consumption CPU that Intel makes for
laptops. It’s basically a P-III core on
steroids and is one hell of a processor. Centrino is a combination of the
Pentium M processor, the 855GM/
PM/GME chipset, and one of Intel’s
wireless chipsets. Cynical folks
would say the Centrino label is just
a marketing method that helps Intel
squeeze more cash from its customers. This is because laptop makers
who build systems with the very fine
Pentium M CPU and 855 chipset but
opt not to use the Intel wireless chip
can’t call it a Centrino, even though
the only difference is the wireless
chipset—which many OEMs have
told us is no different than other
cheaper brands.
These same cynics shake their
heads when they see or hear about
people entering electronics stores
asking for Centrino notebooks,
because while Pentium M notebooks are just as good, it doesn’t
matter to some consumers, who
have been suckered by Intel’s hype.
From our perspective, whether you
buy Centrino or Pentium M, you still
end up with a fine CPU—one just
has a different sticker. ■
CUT, COPY, PASTE
➤ In “Browser Boosters” in
the August issue, we gave the
incorrect URL for Mozilla’s
update web site. The correct
URL is updates.mozilla.org.
➤ Last month in “Tomorrow’s
Players Today,” we incorrectly
reported Creative Labs Zen
Touch as having a 40GB capacity, when it has just a 20GB
internal hard drive.
➤ Argh! Our worst night-
mare as editors was realized when we saw that the
WeWa Stanchion MP3 player,
reviewed last month in the
“MP3 Player Showdown,” had
an incorrect accompanying
verdict. It should have received
a 7 instead of a 3. We are
humbled by the error.
MAXIMUMPC VERDICT: 7
COMING
NEXT MONTH
IN THE
LIGHTLY-HYPENATED,
REDUCED-VOWEL
NOVEMBER ISSUE OF
MAXIMUMPC
THE MODERN PC
BUILDING SPECIAL
Bob Dylan said it best
when he sang, “The times,
they are a-changin’.” This
couldn’t be more true of
PC building these days,
what with the advent of
DDR2, PCI Express, new
CPU sockets, and other
fancy, newfangled gadgetry. We’ll show you how to
pick the best components
at the best prices—and
teach you the new rules
of hardware installation.
Stay tuned!
MEDIA CENTERS GALORE
Editor in Chief George Jones’
home is literally flooded with
Media Center PCs from all the
major PC makers. Can the PC’s
foray into the living room compete with TiVo? Find out
next month.
TRAUMA KIT 2004
Next month, we’ll update
Maximum PC’s emergency toolkit. Everything you need to deal
with a PC disaster will be inside.
PLUS
Super reviews: Four affordable
printers duke it out for top inkbased honors, videocards, flatpanel LCDs, PDAs, MP3 players,
and Microsoft’s new Portable
Media Center.
QuickStart
The beginning of the magazine,
where articles are small
Verizon Rolls
out 5Mbps
Broadband
The copper stopper: Fiber
optic cables may be your
ticket to cheap broadband.
A fiber optic–based broadband alternative
may be coming soon to your apartment,
condo, or commune
Fashionistas love to flaunt their Prada shoes.
Pricing for 30Mbps/5Mbps will be
Rappers pile on the bling until their sparkle is
announced later.
blinding. Corporate honchos throw parties with
Data service packages include up
ice sculptures that pee vodka. So what do geeks do to establish
to nine e-mail accounts with 30MB of storage for the primary
their place on the food chain? They boast about their fat broadaccount and 10MB for each sub-account, an address book and
band connections.
calendar, 10MB personal web space, a web site building tool,
But pricey 1.5Mbps connections are looking mighty foolish
and access to newsgroups.
in Keller, Texas these days. That’s where Verizon first introduced
We’ve always said that bandwidth is like dollar bills—you
its fiber-to-the-premises (FTTP) broadband service, and it’s
can never have enough. If a year’s worth of ultra high-speed
hardly an emblem of privilege for the grossly wealthy. Instead,
broadband costs less than a pair of Prada shoelaces, so much
residents are capable of pulling down an astonishing 5Mbps for
the better.
as low as $35 a month.
Verizon is delivering these truly decadent
speeds using fiber-optic cables that transmit
SECONDS WITH VERIZON’S BROADBAND
voice, data, and video. And the company
5Mbps is a big trade-up from today’s swanky 1.5Mbps broadband connections.
tells us that speed isn’t the only advantage
Here’s how much faster you’ll get these non-copyrighted works available on
offered by fiber-optic transmission. Unlike
the Internet (assuming the server can deliver the goods at these rates as well):
cable, bandwidth isn’t shared among customers, and unlike DSL, you don’t have to
Internet download
1.5Mbps
5Mbps
be close to a central office (CO) to get optimal performance.
Microsoft Windows Service Pack 2
Verizon is calling its service Fios (pro(from www.microsoft.com, 266MB)
24 minutes
7 minutes
nounced FYE-ose, an incantation we’ve confirmed doesn’t open a portal to Hell), and is
already expanding its service to California
Human genome sequence data (from
and Florida. The pricing scheme, which the
UCSC Genome Bioinformatics, http://
company tells us is not merely an introductohgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/downloads.
1 hour, 22 minutes
24 minutes
ry offer, touts 5Mbps/2Mbps (downstream/
html, 894MB)
upstream) for $39.95 a month as a standalone package, or $34.95 a month as part of a
DVD Archive of 9400 classic texts (from
local and/or long-distance calling plan. You’ll
Project Gutenberg, www.gutenberg.
also be able to get a 15Mbps/2Mbps connec6 hours, 20 minutes
1 hour, 8 minutes
net/cdproject/, 4.1GB)
tion for $44.95 a month as part of a calling
package, or $49.95 a month stand-alone.
30
14
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
Quick Start
Introducing the AMD Sempron
▼
▼
FAST FORWARD BY TOM R. HALFHILL
AMD replaces its aging Duron fleet with a new set
of CPUs. Here’s a breakdown of the new line of
budget processors
NX: No Excuse
for Poor Security
AMD has finally replaced
its moribund budget Duron
brand with a CPU the company hopes will smack down
Intel’s low-cost Celeron family.
Sempron processors
(adapted from semper, the
Latin word for “always”), are
currently shipping in speed
ratings of 3100+, 2800+,
2600+, 2500+, 2400+, 2300+,
and 2200+. The chips themselves are based on two cores:
the older K7 core used in the
Athlon XP and the current K8
core used for Athlon 64 and
Athlon 64 FX.
Of the initial CPUs destined for the desktop, only
the 3100+ uses the K8 core
and fits into Socket 754
motherboards. Everything
else fits into Socket A mobos.
The 3100+ ticks along at
1.8GHz and features 128KB
L1 cache and 256KB L2
cache. (Current Athlon 64s
feature cache sizes of 512KB
and 1MB.) One distinct difference between the two CPU
types is 64-bit support; only
the mobile versions (3000+,
2800+, 2600+) will support
64-bit operating systems.
The fastest Sempron based
on the Athlon XP core, the
Sempron 2800+, clocks in at
2GHz and has 128KB of L1
cache and 256KB of L2 cache.
(In comparison, the fastest
Athlon XP, the 3200+, features 512KB of cache.) Socket
A Semprons will also be limited to 333MHz frontside bus
speeds, whereas the 3200+
supports a 400MHz frontside
bus. But don’t get hung up
on the clock frequencies and
cache sizes—AMD says clock
speeds and cache sizes may
vary within each family of
CPU, meaning the 3100+
could have a higher clock
speed and more cache at
some point in the future.
AMD says Athlon XP and
Socket A will be supported at
least through 2005, and while
there’s been considerable
speculation that the company
would dump the Socket 754
platform, officials say further
versions of Athlon 64 for the
platform are planned.
AMD and Intel are trumpeting a new security feature
built into their latest x86 processors: the NX bit. This
is like bragging about installing new locks on your
doors after having left the house wide open with a
sign out front announcing, “Burglars Welcome.”
The NX (No Execute) bit is a small but muchneeded improvement to PC security. Essentially, it
allows the processor to declare certain regions of
memory off-limits for program execution. If a program
tries to execute instructions stored in memory marked
with the NX bit, the processor’s memory-management
unit (MMU) will trigger an exception—a high-priority
error signal. The operating system will immediately
halt all other programs and terminate the offending
program, or ask if you want to terminate it.
The NX bit is a partial solution for viruses, worms,
and Trojan-horse programs that try to substitute their
own malicious instructions for genuine software code.
The attacking program invades your computer, usually
through infected e-mail, and most commonly tries to
exploit a vulnerability known as “buffer overflow.” A
buffer is a chunk of memory set aside for receiving or
sending data. By deliberately overstuffing it, the attack
overwrites some memory beyond the buffer with new
instructions. Later, when a trusted program accesses
that memory for a legitimate purpose, it is tricked into
executing the new instructions. Wham! Your computer
is now at the mercy of the attack program—unless
your system has protected the overwritten memory by
setting the NX bit. Note that the NX bit can’t prevent
the intrusion, but it can stop the sabotaged code from
running.
But while the NX bit sounds brilliant, it shouldn’t
be necessary. It’s a stopgap solution for sloppy
programming, obsolete programming languages, and
the shunning of features that were already built into
x86 processors more than 20 years ago.
Programmers deserve blame for writing crappy
code and for ignoring software tools that guard
against buffer overflows. The leading programming
languages for commercial software development
(C and C++) deserve blame because they lack the
safety of modern languages like Java and C#. And
the x86 vendors deserve blame because their early
processors, like the 8086 (1978) and 286 (1982), had
memory protection that could prevent these attacks—
but programmers didn’t like the restrictions, so later
x86 chips made the protection unnecessary.
We should be grateful for the NX bit, because it
will definitely help. But don’t be so grateful that you
kiss anyone’s feet.
Tom Halfhill was formerly a senior editor for Byte magazine and
now an analyst for Microprocessor Report.
2004
OCTOBER
2004
MAXIMUMPC
13
MAXIMUMPC
15
Quick Start
3
Introducing Tablet PC 2005
Install Service Pack 2 on your Tablet PC, and you get more than
a firewall and security updates—you also get updated and much
improved handwriting recognition software
The release of Service Pack 2 for Windows XP heralds the first update to Microsoft’s
Tablet PC software. At first glance, the changes appear no more than cosmetic, but
in fact Microsoft has made significant improvements to the way the OS recognizes
handwriting. Here’s what to look for!
1. Correcting your mistakes
If the tablet misidentifies
one of your words, you can
click on the word in the
input panel and make any
corrections. In this panel you
can also add any words that
aren’t in the dictionary to
your custom dictionary, which
1
3. Recognizing one word at a time
The new writing panel—where you can
write sentences in normal handwriting
for the tablet to recognize—gives you
immediate feedback regarding your
entry. Every time you write a word, the
tablet displays its interpretation of the
word underneath your handwriting.
4
2.Taking a page from the Pocket PC
One of our chief complaints with the original Tablet PC software is
that it completely ignored many of the features that make inputting
text on the Pocket PC quick and easy. The new improved character
recognizer makes it easy to write characters one at a time to ease
manual input of hard-to-recognize words, characters, or numerals.
4. Popping up all over the place
One of our favorite new features is the popup
input panel icon. Anytime you put your cursor
inside a box where you can write text, the input
panel icon pops up. Tap it, and your preferred
input panel pops up right at your cursor.
2
FUN-SIZE NEWS
16
LEGISLATION INDUCES VOMITING
Senators Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Patrick Leahy
(D-Vermont) recently proved that idiocy is indeed
bipartisan by sponsoring the Inducing Infringement
of Copyrights Act (also known as the INDUCE Act).
Under this sterling piece of legislation, it would be
a crime to aid, abet, or “induce” copyright infringement. Although the Electronic Frontier Foundation has
pointed out that this rather broad bill would make the
Apple iPod, Toshiba’s miniature drive in the iPod, and
even a review of the iPod subject to criminal penalty,
Hatch cheerfully promises that the bill is only intended to go after the “bad
guys,” such as the makers of file-sharing applications. If you believe him,
don’t call him at 202.224.5251, or Senator Leahy at 202.224.4242.
READY FOR THE BD-ROM?
The Blu-Ray Disc Association (BDA) has put its stamp
of approval on BD-ROM, the read-only disc specification intended for high-definition movie distribution that
uses Blu-Ray technology. Sony Pictures Entertainment
is the only major studio that has pledged support for the
standard, which isn’t surprising considering that Sony
is leading the charge of this nascent technology. BDROMs will soon be going head to head with three other
specs: HD-DVD (High Definition DVD) promoted by a group called the DVD
Forum, FVD (Forward Versatile Disc) from Taiwan, and EVD (Enhanced Video
Disc) from China.
SEAGATE CRANKS UP WARRANTIES TO FIVE YEARS
While other hard drive manufacturers are trimming the warranties for their
products, Seagate is moving in the opposite direction. As of June 1, any drive
made by Seagate is guaranteed for five years. This covers what Seagate
anticipates to be the expected “service life” of the drive. This doesn’t mean
that the company expects its drives to keel over after five years, but instead
represents the extreme upper-end of the amount of time most people will find
NAME THAT FERRET
If you hurry, you can make the September 30 deadline to go to
www.playitcybersafe.com, where you’ll be able to vote on a name
for the “copyright-crusading” ferret that’s used by the Business Software
Alliance to teach children about “the importance of protecting and respecting copyrighted works.” Sounds good to us, but shouldn’t the organization’s
mascot be an elephant, who never forgets about fair use rights?
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
the drive useful in speed and capacity.
Quick Start
+ GAME THEORY
BY THOMAS L. McDONALD
Doom and
Gloom
Doom 3 is a weird trip through the game design
Wayback Machine. Even with undeniably gorgeous
visuals cranked out by a videocard several times
more powerful than the computer I used to play the
original Doom, there is something so very 1994 about
the whole experience. Graphically, that 10-year gap
is the difference between Lascaux and DaVinci.
The game itself, however, is mired in a strange retro
sameness that mingles fan-service with current
first-person shooter trends to come up with… well,
very little, actually.
The whole experience is oddly jarring, as though
Doom 3 collided with the design doc for another
game. Unlike prior id Software games, there is
an attempt to create the active, heavily scripted
environments characteristic of modern shooters.
The integration of cutscenes is often breathtaking,
as third-person cinematics seamlessly segue into
first-person action set pieces. Moments of sustained
tension are punctuated by sudden terror, with a
pace that madly veers from frenzied run-‘n’-gun to
moody unease.
Yet, in no time at all, you begin to sense the
game’s patterns; even worse, you begin to anticipate
them. The event triggers are obvious and repetitive.
You don’t pick up anything without waiting for the
lights to go out or a hidden door to pop open and
unleash some nameless horror. After an hour or two,
this runs smack into the law of diminishing returns.
And, yes, it’s too damn dark. While the darkness
does create some moments of true fear, it creates
many more moments of pure frustration. An imp
charges, you clumsily switch from flashlight to shotgun, and you suddenly realize that until the imp fires
another blast, you won’t be able to see him at all.
Tense? Sure. Fair? Not so much, no.
Fans don’t want a Golden Oldies Revival. Action
games have gotten better, but instead of crafting a
contemporary, post-Half-Life-style action experience
from the ground up, Doom 3 feels more like a conventional id game with a storyline and triggered events
squeegeed over the surface. The result is a bit like a
little girl who gets into mommy’s makeup box.
None of this is really surprising. Id changed the
face of gaming once, and that was enough. Every
game since has been like a tech demo for a better
game, and we know that better games will come
from developers who take this engine and turn it
into something great. Think of id as Fender Guitars:
Only they can make a Stratocaster, but it takes
Clapton to make it sing.
The Strange World of USB, Vol. 2
What’s in your port?
“Only in Japan.” Or so we thought when we first showed you such freakish accessories as the USB-powered electric toothbrush and the USB-powered lap blanket (Quick Start, May 2003). But alas, the comfort, companionship, and hygiene potential of the USB port has made its way to the
States. Here are a few items that put the “universal” in the universal serial
bus.
The Mini Aquarium
Pets are great fun until they barf,
poop, or contract a raging case of
Ichthyophthirius around the fin. Well,
those are yesterday’s problems—these
feisty fish live entirely off the power of
your USB port! Fill the tank with water
and drop in the two, uh, artifishal buddies included in the box, and all day long
you can watch them float and frolic in
the ethereal glow of a bright blue LED
light. Create your own imaginary dialog
between the two, or dump in a batch of
Sea Monkeys for a startling desktop centerpiece. Distributed by the Delta Global
Crew (no relation to J. Crew).
$22, http://usb.brando.com.hk
Let’s see Nemo get out of
this one!
The Clean Ion
Air ionizers, we’re told, dispatch a stream
of negatively charged ions into the air,
which cling to airborne pollutants with
some mystical force. The weight of the
combined bulk pulls said pollutants down
to the nearest surface and away from
your delicate respiratory system. Does
the technique work? Europeans seem
to think so, but they smoke in elevators,
so we’ll take their medical advice with a
grain of salt. Nonetheless, the USB-powered air ionizer may at least bring some
peace of mind to obsessive-compulsive
hand washers and germophobes who
regard their office environs as being just
slightly less lethal than a gas chamber.
$30, www.thinkgeek.com
Does your cubicle meet the
air-quality standards of your
community?
The Hot Cubby
It’s a cup warmer. Does it really need a
fancy description? Even though it’s tailored with a cute slot for the cup handle,
don’t let that stop you from laying it flat
and using it to warm your Egg McMuffin,
or inserting it in each of your slippers
before getting out of bed. It’s just our
opinion, folks, but you may want to think
twice before tethering a hot cuppa joe to
your laptop.
$13, www.addlogix.com
Tom McDonald has been covering games for countless magazines and
newspapers for 11 years. He lives in the New Jersey Pine Barrens.
18
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
For external use only.
Quick Start
TechnoFile
Quick takes on technology trends
Belkin’s Trilingual Wireless Router
We wanted faster wireless network speeds,
and now we’ve got them. Unfortunately,
the trade-off has been multiple wireless
standards that aren’t compatible with
each other. And, as anyone with an 802.11b
device in an 802.11g home can attest, even
when these standards do cohabitate, data
transfer speeds plummet to the lowest standard attached to the network. Not cool.
Thankfully, Belkin is attempting to bring
us out of the Dark Ages of wireless networking. The company’s Pre-N Wireless Router
($180, www.belkin.com) is capable of working
with mixed 802.11b and 802.11g without
dropping speeds to the lowest common
denominator, and has the potential to reach
speeds up to 108Mbps using a technology called MIMO (Multiple Input Multiple
Output). MIMO is currently among the
technologies under consideration for use in
the 802.11n spec (hence the “Pre-N” badge)
and is a groovy front-runner thanks to its
increased compatibility, higher speeds, and
up to 200 percent increase in range over
802.11b or 802.11g.
Someday, Cat-5 Ethernet cable will
seem as quaint as rotary dial telephones.
Wethinks that day just got a lot closer.
The Pre-N Wireless Router allows
802.11b, 802.11g, and 802.11n
networks to live in harmony, without
collapsing to the lowest transmission
speed among them.
20
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
Head2Head
A showdown among natural PC competitors
THIS MONTH: Mobile Gaming Devices!
I
t’s ironic that even though we live in a fast-paced
society, waiting remains an unavoidable fact of life.
Whether it’s at the post office, the bank, or the DMV,
there will always come a time when you’re stuck in line
staring at the back of some stranger’s head watching
precious seconds of your life slip slowly down the drain.
This is why we never leave the house without taking
along some sort of gadget to keep us entertained;
playing a few rounds of virtual golf or listening to MP3s
makes the down time pass that much faster. This month,
we test two portable devices that will help you retain
your sanity when life inevitably grinds to a halt: the
Palm OS powered Tapwave Zodiac2 and the Nokia NGage QD. Which device, if any, should you slip into your
pocket before venturing out into the vast, unforgiving
world? Read on to find out.
—TAE K. KIM
TAPWAVE ZODIAC2
Productivity: There’s no contest here. The venerable Palm
operating system has powered handhelds and PDAs for a long
time and the number of available applications is staggering—you
can find software that will help you stay on top of everything from
your finances to your daily calendar. There’s even software available
to help keep your fantasy football team in check. Can the N-Gage
QD do that? Nope. Winner: Zodiac2
Unproductivity: This is one
category where the Palm OS’
pre-existing library of software
doesn’t help the Zodiac2.
Traditionally, PDAs and
handhelds weren’t intended
as gaming machines, so the
majority of available Palm
OS games are simplistic
time wasters that are no
more challenging than
the games that come
preinstalled with Windows.
The Zodiac2 does sport a
few first-rate titles, including
a port of id’s Doom 2 that plays
like a carbon copy of the original,
but when compared with the QD’s
impressive line-up, the Zodiac2’s
game library lacks both variety and
originality. Need further proof? According
to Tapwave’s web site, the number-one selling
Zodiac2 game is Duke Nukem Mobile. Yikes.
Winner: N-Gage QD
Output: “Wow!” was the first thing we said when
we saw the Tapwave’s gorgeous display: We definitely
weren’t expecting it to look this good. The 3.8-inch
backlit display is powered by ATI’s Imageon hardware
and offers up a resolution of 480x320 and 16-bit color
support. Everything from games to mundane tasks
like managing our social calendar became a
visually satisfying experience thanks to the
Zodiac2’s bright, crisp display. The only
problem: The reflective nature of the
screen made for some occasionally
nasty background glare. But this
is a minor complaint about what
is arguably the Zodiac2’s best
feature. Wow, indeed.
Winner: Zodiac2
Connectivity: Aside from
Bluetooth support and a USB
cable for wired syncing, the
Zodiac2 offers little by way of
connectivity options. We would
have appreciated a Zodiac2compatible Wi-Fi solution but none
were available at the time of this
writing. It’s possible one will present
itself in the future but until then, the NGage QD’s wireless nature easily wins this category.
Compared with the Zodiac2, it’s practically bristling
with options. Winner: N-Gage QD
MAXIMUMPC VERDICT
Input: The Zodiac2’s gorgeous screen is more than just a pretty face; it also functions as a touch
screen. You can use the included stylus to tap onscreen icons and enter text via the Graffiti handwritingrecognition software. The Zodiac2 also features a button layout that will feel immediately familiar to
any gamer who’s spent time holding a Gameboy Advance or PlayStation 2 controller. Unfortunately, we
were less than pleased with the Zodiac2’s slim formfactor; extended gaming sessions became a fingercramping ordeal as we struggled to find a comfortable grip. Regardless, while the N-Gage QD’s taco
shaped body is much easier to hold, the Zodiac2’s versatile touch screen and intuitive button layout give
it the edge in this category. Winner: Zodiac2
24
MAXIMUMPC OCTOBER 2004
RIDING THE WAVE
7
Beautiful screen, Palm functionality, and a great
library of apps.
DOING THE WAVE
Not-so-great library of games, and a lack of connectivity options.
$400, www.tapwave.com
NOKIA N-GAGE QD
Productivity: While the N-Gage QD is great for gaming, it
doesn’t really offer much to encourage productivity, aside
from making phone calls. It features a few built-in utilities,
such as a calendar for keeping track of daily events, but
it’s nothing you can’t find on the average cellphone. To be
fair, Nokia isn’t trying to position the QD as a productivity
tool, and the software library reflects this:
Almost all of the available titles are
entertainment oriented. Still, it
would have been nice if we could
do more with the N-Gage than
make phone calls and blast
aliens. Winner: Zodiac2
Output: When we first saw the N-Gage QD’s miniscule
screen, we blanched. Surely, Nokia didn’t expect us to play
games on that! True to the N-Gage’s cellphone roots, the
screen looks like a beefed-up cellular display and its specs
concur—the QD features a maximum resolution of just
176x208 and supports only 4,096 colors, which pales in
comparison to the Zodiac2. The limited resolution and color
support is noticeable in most games; blocky textures and
washed-out colors dominated our experience. But despite
these limitations, the QD does an admirable job of
delivering eye candy. Unfortunately, when
compared with the Zodiac2’s
screen, this eye candy
isn’t all that sweet.
Features: Zodiac2
Unproductivity: The
N-Gage QD scores a
significant victory over the
Zodiac2 with a large library
of entertaining titles from
established developers, EA
and Activision being the two
most prominent companies
to throw their hats into the NGage ring. Big-name (and vastly
more entertaining) franchises
such as Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater,
The Sims, and Tom Clancy’s Splinter
Cell are available, and a quick look
at the upcoming release roster reveals
more grade-A titles on the way.
Winner: N-Gage QD
Input: Because it doubles as a cellphone, inputting
information into the QD is a slow and methodical
process that requires multiple button presses just to
enter someone’s name. Anyone who’s become adept
at typing text messages on a cellphone will feel right
at home, but the process is constrictive and time
consuming. We also felt that the face buttons were
grouped too closely together, making it far too easy to
press the wrong one during intense gaming or frenetic
data entry. And forget about playing games on the QD
that require sophisticated controls—its button layout is
far too limited for anything that requires more than a
few simple presses. Winner: Zodiac2
MAXIMUMPC VERDICT
ENGAGED
7
Strong game library, easy connectivity, and integrated cellphone.
Connectivity:
While the QD’s
cellphone roots hurt
it in other categories,
they pay off here. The
cellphone portion of the
QD is strong thanks to
the T-Mobile service that
powered our review unit. The
QD also offers N-Gage Arena
as icing on the cake: It’s a service
that lets you download exclusive content
and connect and compete with other N-Gage
owners in a variety of games. Connecting to the
service is almost idiot proof and takes just a few
button presses. What’s more, the QD matches
the Zodiac2 by offering Bluetooth support. It’s
no joke: The QD is more connected than a
Hollywood agent. Winner: N-Gage QD
DIVORCED
Limited features, small screen, and cramped
button layout.
$180 w/out phone contract, www.n-gage.com
THE UPSHOT
W
hile the Zodiac2 scored more wins in the individual
categories, we’re going to give the victory to the
N-Gage QD for one simple reason: It has a much
better library of games. The Zodiac2 dazzled us with its gorgeous screen and intuitive button layout, but what’s the point
of having great hardware if you’re lacking the software to take
advantage of it? The N-Gage QD’s miniscule screen and limited
input options may pale in comparison but its rapidly growing
stable of first-rate titles and seamlessly integrated multiplayer
options make it the superior device for gaming on the go.
Still, despite its victory over the Zodiac2, the N-Gage
QD isn’t ready to be crowned the king of the portable gaming
mountain—that distinction still belongs to the Gameboy
Advance. While both the Zodiac2 and the N-Gage QD offer features that the GBA can’t match, Nintendo’s portable still
remains the best option for mobile gaming thanks to its
impressive library of titles and affordable price. For our money,
we’ll continue to carry our GBA for gaming and a separate PDA
and cell phone for everything else. This requires us to lug
around more than one device, but that’s a sacrifice we’re
willing to make. ■
OCTOBER 2004
MAXIMUMPC
25
WatchDogg
Say hello to Axl Huckleberry,
WatchDog of the Month.
Maximum PC takes a bite out of bad gear
THISMONTH: The WatchDog goes after...
>Microsoft >PayPal >Super MP3 Recorder/ SWReg.org
Who Is the Boss of Your OS?
DEAR DOG: This happened a few years ago
but I imagine it’s still a problem for some
users today. After purchasing a low-end
Micron system, the motherboard expired
one week after the warranty did. I replaced
the motherboard for $50 (who needs that
$100-$200 extended warranty?) and all was
fine for another six months.
One day I decided I needed a fresh install
of the operating system, so I backed up my
data files and wiped the drive. When I tried
to install the OS using the CD that came with
the Micron PC, I got a message informing me
that this was not the original computer and
therefore the OS would not install. I e-mailed
Micron for support and the reply was short
and to the point: “Go buy the operating system.” I tried fishing around Microsoft’s web
site for some support but found none.
Was there something in that license agreement stating that the OS was only good for
the life of the original components? Is there a
legal way around this or some other recourse?
— JON SHELDON
THE DOG RESPONDS: Unfortunately, it’s all a
mess, Jon. Here’s how it breaks down: When
Microsoft sells its operating systems, there are
several different levels of licenses. The most
common to the average consumer is the retail
version of the OS that you buy at CompUSA or
Best Buy. These boxed versions come on hologram CDs and once purchased, can be installed
on any machine of your choice (so long as its not
multiple machines).
Most power users, however, are familiar with
the “OEM versions” you can buy at your local
computer shop or swap meet. These usually
consist of a hologram CD, a thin pamphlet, and a
certificate of authenticity, or COA.
A third type of Windows CD that consumers may see is the direct OEM discs. These CDs
come from high-volume PC makers like Micron,
Dell, and Hewlett-Packard that have deals with
Microsoft, so they don’t have to include the hologram CD. They’re usually just silk-screened CDs or
DVDs with the company’s name on it. These discs
usually include a restore image, and in the past,
26
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
they’ve also included a full version of the OS.
While the retail and generic OEM discs
let you install the OS on any system, the
direct OEM discs usually contain safeguards
that prevent you from installing the OS onto
a motherboard that doesn’t identify itself as
being from the company. In your case, you
likely had a direct OEM CD that was keyed
to a DMI string in the motherboard. In other
words, you’re screwed.
If this makes it sound like it’s better to
buy from the little guys who include the
actual Windows XP hologram disc with
their systems, think again. That OS is still
technically tied to the OEM hardware, not
the end user. Microsoft enforces compliance with the big PC makers by requiring the OS to check the motherboard ID
before installing it (Microsoft considers a
motherboard the very heart of a PC). With
the small PC makers, Microsoft can do
the same by refusing to reactivate the OS
if the motherboard is different than the
original. The reason for all of this is cost,
of course. PC manufactures of all sizes
get price breaks from Microsoft. While a retail
version of XP Pro costs $200, the generic OEM
version costs just $90.
According to the advice offered on
Microsoft’s bulletin board: “Generally, you may
upgrade or replace all of the hardware components on your customer’s computer and the customer may maintain the license for the original
Microsoft OEM operating system software, with
the exception of an upgrade or replacement of
the motherboard. If the motherboard is replaced,
then a new computer has been created and the
license of a new operating system software
is required. Once the motherboard has been
replaced, you are not authorized to reinstall the
OEM Microsoft software that was originally preinstalled on the computer system.”
Not all hope is lost for hobbyists who enjoy
replacing motherboards every year. From what
the Dog knows, Microsoft rarely enforces its nonreactivation policy. So your odds are better if you
have a generic OEM copy of the OS as opposed to
a direct OEM disc from a large company such as
Dell or Micron. But if you’re really worried about
PayPal has agreed to pay consumers
who had their accounts frozen by the
company.
being cut off at the knees when you upgrade your
system, we recommend you buy the retail version, or switch to Linux. Woof.
PayPal Settles
with Consumers
DEAR DOG: I just received an e-mail from
[email protected] telling me I’m eligible
for a settlement from PayPal. But the e-mail
wants me to venture to a non-PayPal site to
make a claim. I’m a little leery about this. Is
it a scam?
I’ve heard about scams targeted at PayPal
users in order to get user names, passwords,
and such. I know this e-mail looks legit, but
in my mind, anybody can produce an e-mail
like this one.
—MIKE SWANSON
THE DOG RESPONDS: You can never
be too paranoid when it comes to
providing your password or other
sensitive information. In this case,
though, the e-mail is legitimate.
PayPal has agreed to settle two
class-action lawsuits filed in 2002.
The company allegedly violated the
federal Electronic Fund Transfer Act
by not providing fund statements in a
timely manner as the law dictates,
and inappropriately froze its customers’ accounts for days or weeks at a
time when cases of fraud were
Super MP3 Recorder: Good software but not such
alleged. The latter prevented congood service.
sumers from accessing funds that
23, 2004. Paper forms must be postmarked by
weren’t even in dispute. Yet, as one of the suits
November 1, 2004. For more information on the
alleged, PayPal kept the accounts open for depossettlement, visit: www.paypal.com/settlement or
its so it could continue to “derive economic benewww.settlement4onlinepayments.com.
fit from the deposits while preventing the customers from accessing even undisputed funds while
the investigation was pending.”
Not So Super MP3 Recorder
The suits also allege generally poor customer
DEAR DOG: I ordered the application Super MP3
service: “Plaintiffs further allege that PayPal does
Recorder from SuperMP3Recorder.com on June
not provide a toll-free customer service telephone
2, and when I ordered it I plainly stated that I
number, does not effectively publish the customer
would not buy it if I could not get a physical
service telephone number it does provide,
disc. I was told I could. After giving my credit
requires customers to report erroneous transaccard info I was sent a download link. I e-mailed
tions by e-mail while not providing a specific ethe company reiterating that I did not want a
mail address for that purpose, requires customers
download. After a week, I got a response telling
to provide numerous and burdensome personal
me I did not pay for the disc. I sent an e-mail
documents before it undertakes an investigation,
stating how much more I was willing to pay for
responds to e-mail inquiries with form letters,
the disc. I received no response. Finally, out of
refuses to provide details or explanations with
disgust at the lack of any customer service, I
respect to its investigations, and provides no prosent an e-mail canceling my order. I have sent a
cedure by which a customer can appeal the
total of six e-mails, all saved on my computer,
results of an investigation. Plaintiffs also allege
and so far have received no response.
that when customers are able to contact PayPal
The download link was sent via SWReg.org.
representatives, the representatives are combatI have given them almost two weeks to
ive and rude, refuse to answer specific questions,
remove the charge from my card and I have
hang up in the middle of phone calls, provide
heard nothing from either Super MP3
‘canned’ responses to individualized problems,
Recorder or SWReg. Can you help me?
require customers to fax information while providing inoperative fax numbers, and refuse to allow
— BILL WATSON
customers to speak to managers.”
One plaintiff in the original suit said that after
THE DOG RESPONDS: After repeated attempts to
two separate payments were withdrawn from his
contact SuperMP3Recorder.com, the Dog was unable
PayPal account without his permission, it took
to get a response beyond the standard canned ethree days to finally contact PayPal, and another
mail. Likewise, SWReg.org, which handles billing for
seven days for the cash to be refunded.
the company and several other shareware proFurthermore, the consumer was charged $208.50
grams, doesn’t like to share its e-mail address. So
by his bank because the missing funds lowered
the Dog advises you to call your credit card compahis account balance below the minimum required.
ny to dispute the charge. And don’t worry about
When the consumer asked PayPal to cover the
being blacklisted by SWreg. Because SWReg didn’t
bank charge, PayPal balked.
respond to your e-mails, you probably don’t want to
Without admitting any wrong doing, PayPal
do future business with the company or the compahas agreed to pay $9.25 million to people who had
nies it represents. In fact, the Dog thinks all
their accounts frozen. Consumers who opened
Maximum PC readers should avoid these two web
accounts between October 1, 1999 and January 31,
sites until they clean up their acts. n
2004, and who can prove their accounts were frozen or limited during the period are eligible for a
Got a bone to pick with a vendor? Been spiked
$50 settlement. Consumers who can prove that a
by a fly-by-night operation? Sic The Dog on
frozen PayPal account injured their business and
them by writing [email protected].
cost them more than $50 are eligible for more proThe Dog promises to get to as many letters as
vided they can show the damage. PayPal has set
possible, but only has four paws to work with.
aside $1 million for such claims.
The deadline to file a claim form is October
L
et’s get this out of the way right up
front: The next version of Windows—
code-named Longhorn—isn’t expected
to ship until sometime in 2006.
So why are we previewing it so early? And why should
you care?
The answer is simple: Microsoft’s top-secret sequel to
Windows XP promises the most significant technological
leap forward in the almost 20-year history of the venerable
OS. When it’s finally launched, Longhorn will be the most
demanding operating system Microsoft has ever released.
The new 3D user interface will even require a DirectX 9compliant videocard!
In addition, the next version of Windows will feature a
brand-new file system, some innovative new networking
options, and will likely integrate digital rights management
technologies from the BIOS level on up.
It’s clear that Longhorn—like every prior major revision of Windows—is a make-or-break OS for Microsoft. As
such, everyone wants to know what it looks like and how
it works. To find out, we scoured newsgroups, dug deep
into Microsoft’s developer web sites, read everything we
could find about Longhorn, and then tested the hell out
of an early alpha of the OS. Over the next eight pages,
we’re going to tell you everything we learned. And because
Microsoft has remained steadfastly mum about the 3D
interface, we consulted experts in the field for their predictions regarding Microsoft’s new take on the GUI.
As we delved into the details, we had a thought: Why
should we have to wait until 2006 to get all this new functionality? So we integrated all of the best user interface
improvements we’ve seen in Longhorn into Windows XP.
The result is an OS modification you can perform yourself that will make your version of Windows look—and
behave—like early versions of Longhorn.
Will the general public upgrade their PCs and make the
move to Longhorn en masse despite the demanding system requirements and DRM foibles? Or will they instead
stick with WinXP? Maybe PC users will take another path
altogether and move to Linux or Mac? Turn the page to
get your Longhorn on, then chime in on whether or not
you plan to make the Longhorn leap by e-mailing us at
[email protected].
—BY WILL SMITH, JOSH NOREM, AND JASON COMPTON
Everything
We Know
About
g
WINDOWS
LONGHORN
Microsoft’s sequel to Windows XP could be the most
revolutionary OS yet. Maximum PC investigates
Longhorn’s 5 most significant innovations
OCTOBER 2004
MAXIMUMPC
31
WINDOWS LONGHORN
T
o date, we know of five major changes to Longhorn: a new, improved 3D
user interface, a new database-like
file system, features that will make gaming
more accessible and convenient,
revamped digital rights management
(DRM), and a recently announced “Castle”
feature, which is an interesting and easy
new way to share user profiles and data
across small home networks. All this new
technology makes Longhorn the biggest
operating system upgrade since Windows
2000. Let’s start with the 3D user interface.
Introducing Avalon
Longhorn’s 3D graphical user interface,
code-named Avalon, could revolutionize the way you access your PC. As you
might imagine, Microsoft has kept the
details regarding Avalon under tight
security (to read about how it might
look, turn to page 34), but we know this
much: Avalon isn’t just a 3D GUI for
Windows. It’s actually a whole new way
to draw user interfaces for applications—
in 3D and 2D.
Currently, programmers of non-Avalon
Windows applications create their interfaces using a special program called a form
designer. Using this form designer, every
single button and field is associated with a
function in the program. Then the form is
saved as part of the application. In WinXP
Say goodbye to the old, flat Alt-Tab experience. The new 3D task switcher lets
you see the contents of your windows while you flip between them.
3D content drawn by a Direct3D-compatible
3D accelerator requires a totally different
set of programming rules, so programmers
have thus far been unable to add 3D effects
and elements to a 2D user interface.
With Avalon, user interfaces (and even
some simple programs) will be written
Goodbye Direct3D—Hello
Windows Graphics Foundation!
Because Longhorn throws out the old-fashioned 2D Windows
Desktop in favor of a new, 3D-rendered Desktop (every Window
will literally be a 3D object!), it’s crucial that Windows’ 3D-rendering pipeline be rock solid.
This is where the Windows Graphics Foundation comes in.
In some ways, WGF is nothing more than the next version of
Direct3D, but it sports a lot more functionality than earlier, gaming-oriented versions of Direct3D. No longer is speed the primary
concern; with WGF, reliability and stability are vital.
Until 2002, most graphics processors were designed with
a singular task in mind: running games as quickly as possible.
Multitasking, recovering from crashes, and being a responsible
Windows citizen were minor concerns compared with the
almighty frames-per-second. But because the 3D-rendering pipeline is going to be responsible for the brunt of Windows’ force, it
must be subtly reshaped now—before Longhorn ships in 2006. In
32
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
using a new language called XAML—
extensible application markup language.
This means that instead of using an esoteric program designed specifically to create user interfaces, developers will be able
to write and edit XAML files with a simple
text editor. Even cooler, the Avalon XAML
particular, there are two new improvements to the graphics pipeline that Microsoft must perfect if WGF is to be ready on time.
First, the driver and graphics card must work together to
provide seamless fault recovery. If the video driver crashes, it
needs to restart and resume operation without missing a beat.
Similarly, if a 3D application crashes, Windows needs to be able
to recover and quickly resume operation. Forcing the user to
restart Windows because of a graphics crash is not an acceptable
solution, as people familiar with Windows 3.1 and Windows 95
can attest.
Second, the GPU needs to be accessible to multiple apps.
There needs to be a way for the OS to schedule batch processing on the GPU. Ideally, the OS will be able to add graphics
tasks to a queue, and possess the flexibility to preempt less
important tasks (like re-rendering a background window) for
more important tasks (like redrawing the foreground window)
whenever necessary.
WGF 1.0 should also give game developers new levels of
flexibility such as we’ve come to expect from major new revisions of Direct3D.
designs from Microsoft that benefit from a
blend of 2D and 3D rendering, but the AltTab interface pictured on the previous page
makes us feel optimistic. It remains to be
seen how Microsoft will integrate the
Avalon functionality into the main OS.
WinFS: Find Your
Files Fast
The most obvious change to
Longhorn’s UI is the Sidebar.
Think of it as a system tray on
steroids. It adds all sorts of nifty
features, like an integrated RSS
feed reader!
code can describe and enact both 2D elements and 3D elements at the same time.
One of the really handy side benefits
of using XAML for application interfaces
is that programmers can embed the
actual code a program needs into the
XAML file itself. Therefore, anyone with
a text editor, like Notepad, can write programs—complete with a flashy user interface—using any language that Longhorn
supports, without the need for an expensive software development package like
Visual Studio. Nifty, eh?
We’ve yet to see any user interface
You type a phrase into Google, press
Enter, and the answer to your query pops
up in less than half a second. It begs the
question: If Google can search thousands
of terabytes of data on the entire Internet
so quickly, why does it take 20 minutes
for Windows to search the files stored
on your hard drive? The short answer
is that Google searches through wellordered databases to find an answer,
and Windows has to search through
each individual file. WinFS—Longhorn’s
brand-new filing system—will bring the
raw speed and convenience of database
searches to Windows.
How does it work? A database file
system is a pretty simple concept, and
has been tried before (the first OS we
tested with a database-driven file system was BeOS in 1999). In Microsoft’s
implementation, a next-gen SQL server
layers on top of a NTFS disk. When you
save a file to certain directories—any
folder in the My Documents tree would
be fair game, but beyond that the files
that will be part of WinFS are unknown—
the OS will automatically index its contents and save it to the database.
How does this benefit the end user?
Right now, if you want to find an Outlook
contact, you have to open Outlook and
use the built-in search function. With
WinFS, you’ll be able to open a Windows
search dialog and simply type in the
contact’s name. Even better, not only
will you find the contact, but you’ll also
find all the relevant e-mails, any Word
documents and Excel spreadsheets that
include the contact’s name, and any digital photos bearing that name in the metadata—all in a fraction of a second. Such
is the power of WinFS.
Get the Newbies Gaming
According to Microsoft, one of the primary
goals of Longhorn is to make PC gaming
more accessible to the masses. While
Maximum PC readers have no problem
getting their game on (hopefully), playing
games in Windows requires more understanding than, say, playing on a console.
The Longhorn team aims to change this by
stealing the best things about console
gaming and integrating them into the
Windows OS.
The central improvement is a My
Games-type of gaming portal, which will
grant access to every installed game from
one handy spot. The games portal, which is
still unnamed, sits in the Start menu. When
you click the Games icon you’ll see a list of
every game on your system. Clicking a
game will give you access to your save
files, any available patches, and even metadata about the game, such as the publisher’s web site and the game’s ESRB rating.
Heck, Microsoft is even setting up a
Windows Update-style repository for all
patches and game updates, which will conveniently download the latest fixes for all
your games when your system is idle.
Longhorn will also let parents limit the
games their children can play, either by
The new games interface gives you
access to every game installed on your
system at once. You can see whether
there are patches to download, the
rating of each game, and even manage
your saved games.
rating or on a game-by-game basis. For
instance, you can specify which accounts
have permission to play which games
using the Games interface when you’re
logged in as an Administrator. Prohibited
games are blocked at the file system level
on a user-by-user basis. Not only will the
shortcuts to the games be removed from
little Timmy’s menus, he won’t even be
able to see their directories!
‘Improving’ Digital
Rights Management
High on our Longhorn watch list is
Microsoft’s enhanced and comprehensive-sounding DRM technology, which is
rumored to unite software-based digital
rights management with lockouts at the
hardware level. The new technology—formerly code-named Palladium and now
called the Next-Generation Secure
Computing Base for Windows—promContinued on page 35 Ë
OCTOBER 2004
MAXIMUMPC
33
WINDOWS LONGHORN
Using the backs and sides of open
windows
How Will Longhorn’s
3D Interface Work?
How does any 3D interface work,
for that matter? We take a look
at 6 early experiments by Sun
and Microsoft that represent
the beginning of a new breed of
graphical user interfaces
Apple has been dabbling in simulated
3D desktop coochie-coo ever since the
introduction of OS X, but to date the
company’s implementation hasn’t extended
beyond mere window dressing. Right now,
the most encouraging projects in 3D-aware
desktops are Microsoft’s Avalon interface for
the Longhorn operating system, and Sun’s
Looking Glass, an interface layer for Linux
and Solaris machines that can be pounded
into Windows with the right rubber mallet.
We take an early look at each in order to gain
some insight into how the introduction of
the third dimension can and will affect our
computing experience at the OS level.
Improved Alt-Tab selectors
One thing Sun and Microsoft agree on is
that we need a better way of selecting and
moving between multiple open windows.
Both Avalon and Looking Glass have their
own versions of an Alt-Tab selector that
displays a cascading, angled view of the
available windows and provides much
more information than a brief icon list can.
Using this display method allows Windows
to reside in the background yet remain
“glanceable.” Today’s 3D hardware makes
such tricks a snap. “[Microsoft] is finally
rendering the OS and all the windows
on the hardware [GPU], and I think that’s
phenomenal, and about time,” says Robert
McLaws, operator of LonghornBlogs.com.
One of Sun’s most striking usages of 3D
in Looking Glass involves the designers’
attempts to stretch the boundaries of usable
space within the OS. Two concepts are being
explored: providing a “sticky pad” for notes
and/or application details, and displaying
user preferences on the back or side of
each open window. Rather than opening a
new preferences window, users can “flip”
the window around, make changes and
adjustments, and then flip
it back with the touch of the
mouse or keyboard. In a 3D
environment, windows will
have more surface area so
information such as a file
name or processing status
could even be stored on the
“side.” Ideally, this would
even apply to existing
applications that haven’t
been recoded.
introduce all kinds of wacky environmental
effects into this 3D space, from windows
that flutter in the breeze (calling the users’
attention, perhaps, to an application error) or
even disappear behind a thick fog.
“They’re trying to make it smoother.
Things don’t just disappear, they fade in,
and they will be real objects on the desktop
that you can move around,” says Adam
Kinney, an online community manager
for Xamlon, a developer of Longhornspecific applications. When Maximum PC
Dynamic wallpaper
It’s subtle, but significant.
Looking Glass has already
done away with static
desktop wallpaper, allowing
a series of images, and even
Angling windows in a 3D space is an improvement
panoramas, to be loaded and
over minimizing them; the window takes up less
panned through with mouse
space, but you can still see what’s on it.
clicks. Upload a panorama of
the Piazza San Marco in
Venice and you could be
working right in the center of it—without
interviewed Kinney, he told us that his most
being hassled by tourists and pigeons. This
recent Longhorn build (subject to change,
feature is, of course, largely decorative, but
of course) introduced new documents
it does suggest possibilities for the future—
half-tilted into the background that turned
you could be surrounded by a 360 degree
to gradually settle into a standard viewing
virtual desktop with pictures of loved ones,
perspective.
open documents, and a live video feed of
Vector-based graphics
your cat, for example.
The Longhorn desktop will be vector-based
Functional special effects
rather than bitmap-based, meaning that as
Microsoft has demonstrated loads of fancy
resolution and zoom increase, everything
effects being considered for implementation
will look just as good, not blocky and
in Longhorn, but it’s still unknown exactly
aliased. The vector approach will also
what Avalon is expected to do. We know
allow the creation of far slicker program
you’ll probably be able to manipulate
interfaces, because a vector drawing will
application windows in a 3D space, possibly
be easily exportable to a Longhorn-specific
pivoting them at will in any direction.
program. “Today, a graphic designer goes
We also know you’ll probably be able to
into Illustrator or Photoshop, [draws an
Mac Designer Says: Death to the GUI!
All this talk about introducing 3D into Windows and Linux horrifies
Jef Raskin. Designer of the original Macintosh, Raskin wants to do
away with the iconic (figuratively and literally) personal computer
GUI that dates back to the very computer he helped create. “I think
windows were basically a mistake. It looks slick and seemed neat,
but now it’s a nuisance.”
His new concept, The Humane Environment (THE), eliminates
most of the graphical trappings of two decades of GUI theory in
34
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
favor of moving through a 3D landscape that represents a user’s
file system. Filenames would be largely eschewed in favor of
database-driven searches (“Do you have to remember a URL to find
something? Google indexes every word in everything!” he says.) His
vision is unlikely to cause reverberations at Microsoft, Apple, or the
KDE and GNOME interface teams any time soon, but Raskin says
he’s hopeful the concepts will soon appear in wearable computing
devices. For more information, browse to humane.sourceforge.net.
Continued from page 33
Looking Glass is toying with putting
application preferences on the flipside of a
window as displayed here. The result: easy
access and considerably less screen clutter.
interface,] prints it out, and a [programmer] has to take
that image and try to make it work,” says Kinney. The
key to bridging the gap between concept and execution
is extensible application markup language (XAML), a
new method of describing GUI creation that will save
programmers from having to hack elegant designs into
rigid, resolution-specific code.
Re-learning not required
Although the changes will be significant, don’t worry—
the next iteration of your operating system won’t
demand head-mounted displays or radical new file
system metaphors. The development of the 3D interface
“isn’t going to turn on a dime,” says Juan Carlos Soto,
director of Sun’s software technology office. Sun’s
Looking Glass, for example, is being developed so all
its features work with a standard two-button mouse
and keyboard. Nor is there any reason to fear a radical
new paradigm in file organization. “People think they’re
going to see a [fully] 3D desktop,” says McLaws. “They
expect to have icons stacked deep into infinity and to
reach out with a hand and grab something off the shelf,
and that’s not necessarily the case.”
Like SpaceMonger on steroids, File System
Visualizer for Linux (available now) gives you
a 3D perspective of your entire hard drive. It’s
a beautiful fly-over at night.
ises to protect user data (your
e-mail), corporate data (your
company’s files), and commercial data (digital music you
downloaded from a publisher)
from the hardware level up, giving only trusted hardware and
software access to such data.
Yeah. Go back and reread
that last sentence. Note that
there’s no mention of a “trusted
user.” This could mean that if
a content provider who you
purchase protected music files
from dictates that your hardware MP3 player isn’t “trusted,”
you won’t be able to play
those files on that MP3 player.
Furthermore, because the DRM
status of your players and files
can be updated whenever you
connect to the Internet, a player
that’s trusted today could
become untrustworthy tomorrow. And trusted hardware isn’t
limited to MP3 and video players—it could also include optical drives and hard drives.
It’s not all doom and gloom,
however. Microsoft has
pledged that Palladium will be
an opt-in system, and that PCs
will ship with Palladium disabled at both the hardware and
software levels.
Without technology like
Palladium, it’s unlikely that content providers will ever allow
high-quality audio and video to
legally reside on your PC. Thus
we foresee Palladium being a
mandatory requirement if you
want to install, say, an HDTV
tuner or DVD-Audio player in
the new version of Windows.
The Castle: Home
Networking Taken
to the Next Level
Even if you don’t know it,
there’s a pretty good chance
your office uses roving
Windows profiles. No matter
where you are in your office,
you can sit down at a free
computer, log in, and access
the same Windows Desktop, email, and installed applications
that you do everywhere else.
Unfortunately, unless you want
to endure the hassle of setting up a Windows server and
domain, there’s no easy way to
replicate this functionality for
home users. This is why we’re
so excited about Longhorn’s
Castle feature—it allows multiPC homes all the benefits of
Continued on next page Ë
Longhorn also includes context-sensitive popups for many types
of documents! Images, text documents, and even music files have
special, easy-to-read popups that inform you of the files’ contents
without having to open it.
OCTOBER 2004
MAXIMUMPC
35
WINDOWS LONGHORN
Continued from previous page
Maximum PC’s
Longhorn Edicts
The editors ring in with their
must-have features for the next
version of Windows
George Jones: I feel like the powerconservation features of Windows
just don’t work
the way they
should. Clicking
the hibernate
button is a
sure-fire way
to bomb out
my machine,
and that’s just
not acceptable.
Furthermore,
I’m sick of
seeing the crappy three-year old
nVidia drivers every time I log in
to Windows Update. I want to see
the latest—too hot for Doom 3—
Detonator drivers!
Katherine
Stevenson:
One thing that
Longhorn must
fix is its terrible
Wi-Fi support.
I’m sick of my
wireless network connection dropping
out all the time
for no apparent
reason.
Will Smith: Finding and installing
new applications is ludicrously easy
on most Linux distros these days.
Microsoft needs
to make finding
new apps and
loading them
on a PC as easy
as emerge does
on Gentoo or
apt-get does
on Debian.
I’m sick of the
Installshield
installer.
36
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
Also, many people who’ve been
running Windows for a year or two
have dozens of apps running in their
system trays. I want Microsoft to
acknowledge that the craplets that
every company feels is necessary to
install are a problem, and give normal users an easy way to get rid of
them forever.
Gordon Ung:
I’d like to see
Longhorn finally
support the autorotation flag in
JPEGs so all the
pictures from
my digital camera don’t have
to be manually
rotated. While
you’re at it, how
about fixing the mixer so you don’t
get blasted out of your chair by the
Windows boot sound just because
you increased the volume for a DVD.
Josh Norem:
It’s absolutely
crucial that
Microsoft make
the Windows
Update service
easily accessible to people
who don’t use
Internet Explorer.
Remove the
dependence on
IE-only ActiveX controls!
Logan Decker: An operating system
should first and foremost take care
of administration and management
of files and resources for the user,
and Windows
XP still demands
too much housekeeping from us.
For instance, I’d
love to see the
next version of
Windows be able
to do what the
Mac has been
able to do for
years—maintain
shortcuts so that even if the files or
executables they point to are moved,
the shortcuts still work.
roving profiles without the hassle of
administering a Windows domain.
The Longhorn Castle is a mini domain
of sorts for home networks, and does
not require a server. Whenever you
set up a new computer on your home
network, you’ll add it to your castle.
Machines in a particular castle will automatically synchronize user information—
usernames and passwords—as well as
the actual content of the user profiles.
That means your bookmarks, e-mail, and
application settings will automatically
be shared between all the computers on
your home network. Newer games that
store save games and user data in the
Documents and Settings tree of the hard
drive will also be automatically synchronized across your home network. Pretty
convenient, huh?
So, Where Do We
Stand Now?
That’s it—everything we know about
Longhorn, packaged into one tidy and
exhilarating magazine article. The upshot
is that there’s a lot of exciting new
technology in development, and a lot
of very cool features to look forward
to in Microsoft’s nascent, next-gen OS.
We admit to being concerned about
Palladium’s impact on our digital media
desires, but with more than 18 months
until launch, it’s really too early to make
any judgments—or cast any aspersions.
Rest assured that we’ll keep you posted.
And you can expect full Longhorn
hands-on testing sometime next year,
when the first beta ships. ■
One of Microsoft’s goals with Longhorn
is to make information more accessible.
To wit, many of the new sidebar widgets
include popup windows of their own. This
one shows the last few system notifications
we received.
Turn WinXP into Longhorn
Here are 4 steps you can take today to make Windows XP look and function like Longhorn
SmartBarXP
SmartBarXP is a freeware
utility that replicates
the upcoming Windows
Longhorn “sidebar.” This
is sort of like a vertical
Taskbar, but the primary
difference is that the
Taskbar is used to display running applications
whereas SmartBar can
be used to display a wide
range of data, such as
system performance, news
feeds, the time, and more.
It works by hosting numerous “panes,” each of which
you can configure to display practically any information your heart desires.
The best part is that the
bar is 100 percent customizable, so you’re not forced
into displaying a clock or
stock ticker, for example,
if you don’t want to. Plus,
you can make it auto-hide,
or set it to have a custom
level of transparency (in
the above screenshot, its
set to about 30 percent).
www.smartbarxp.com
WindowBlinds with
Longhorn Theme, New
Bliss Wallpaper
Windows Media
Player 10 with
Compact Skin
If you want XP to look and feel like
Longhorn (at least in its present implementation), install a Windows skinning
utility such as WindowBlinds. Although
we’re generally wary of intrusive software like this (it re-skins your entire OS,
including folders, menus, windows, etc),
we have experienced little trouble using
WindowBlinds’ Longhorn Slate 4051
skin, which is a dead ringer for the beta
versions of Longhorn thus far. It literally
transforms XP into an entirely new-looking OS, complete with Longhorn-like
menus, windows, and more. The only
thing missing is the 3D interface. The
new skin combined with this Longhorn
beta version of the all-new “Bliss” wallpaper, makes it look exactly like you’re
running Longhorn. Fool your friends!
The beta version of Windows
Media Player 10 (the final
version should be available
by the end of the year) was
designed with Longhorn in
mind, so it’s not surprising
that, when combined with the
“Compact” skin, Media Player
10 perfectly matches the Slate
skin we’ve seen in the early
versions of Longhorn. There’s
a good chance WMP will be
completely revved by the time
Longhorn comes out, but until
then this is as close to “nextgen” as you can get.
dtSearch
Longhorn’s upcoming Windows File
System (WinFS) will reportedly allow contextual searches as well as the ability to
scan your entire system in seconds thanks
to its database structure. But here’s a news
flash: You can get this functionality now
using dtSearch, a powerful filing system
Maximum PC discovered as a way of quickly searching through all the content from
our issue archives. Once dtSearch scans
the files and directories you specify, it creates an index that allows it to retrieve files
instantly. It not only pulls up file names
but also words within the individual files
too, and you can search using more than
two dozen different search methods including fuzzy searching (for animal pictures),
Boolean queries, and more. Sounds familiar, right?
www.dtsearch.com
www.microsoft.com/wmp
www.windowsblinds.net
OCTOBER 2004
MAXIMUMPC
37
OUR MISSION:
Find the best gaming pc ever built
Benchmarks
3DMark 2003
3DMark 2003 CPU
3DMark 2003 (1600x1200, 4xAA)
40
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
AquaMark 3 GPU
AquaMark 3 CPU
AquaMark 3 OV
Doom
Doom
Doom
Doom
3
3
3
3
(1280x1024)
(1280x1024, 4xAA)
(1600x1200)
(1600x1200, 4xAA)
Far Cry (1280x1024)
Far Cry (1600x1200)
by mankind
LINE ‘EM UP AND
SHOOT ‘EM DOWN!
Only the strongest, fastest PCs
survive in Maximum PC’s high-end
DESKTOP DEATHMATCH BY GORDON MAH UNG
Does your PC make Far Cry look
the system at or near the price pre-
more like a PowerPoint presenta-
sented here.
tion than a 3D shooter? Are you
Rule #3: If the machine is
playing Doom 3 at camera-phone
overclocked, it has to be mighty
resolutions?Then it’s time to beef
stable—or there would be hell
up with a new PC. And we’re not
to pay.
talking about the $1,000 rig you
We also enforced a stringent
can buy at the warehouse club
deadline for our desktop death-
along with a year’s supply of paper
match. Companies that missed our
towels, cashews, and athletic
cutoff date missed the opportunity
socks. Nay. This is Maximum PC,
to participate. The reason for this
bud. The big leagues. And for
is that, in the past, vendors have
today’s games, you need some
pushed us for “one more day” to
serous firepower.
get the extra part or driver build that
To find the fastest gaming PC
Jedi Academy (1600x1200, 4xAA)
Halo 1.013 (1600x1200, 4xAA)
UT2003 Fly By (1600x1200, 4xAA)
would give their PCs the edge.
in town, we challenged six top PC
Finally, while other magazine
makers to send us the most powerful
roundups of this type are annual
gaming PCs they could assemble.
events that are announced well
While we pretty much let the ven–
beforehand and planned for
dors go plumb crazy with whatever
months, we gave each vendor
specs and overclocking they wanted,
only about two weeks to configure,
we did have several rules:
build, and test the machines
Rule #1: Whatever you see here
you see here. In our minds, this is
must be available for sale to the
the fairest test of each manufac-
public. Prototype hardware was
turer’s PC-building capabilities;
acceptable, but the vendor had
allowing months of notice lets
to promise to offer production
the biggest vendors stockpile the
units by the day this issue hits
fastest parts.
newsstands.
Rule #2: Vendors had to deliver
So who makes the fastest gaming PC in town? It’s time to find out.
OCTOBER 2004
MAXIMUMPC
41
BESTGAMINGPCS
ABS ULTIMATE X6
With a reputation for providing quality parts
at low prices, ABS isn’t typically mentioned
in the same breath as Falcon Northwest,
Voodoo, and Alienware. Knowing this, ABS
played it straight and down the middle with
its Ultimate X6 PC, one of only two Intelequipped rigs in the deathmatch. A 3.4GHz
Pentium 4 Extreme Edition fills the SocketT
riding on an Asus P5AD2 motherboard.
Like the Falcon rig, the Ultimate X6 features forward-looking PCI Express support,
Corsair Micro DDR2, the de rigueur Western
Digital Raptor RAID array, and nVidia’s
GeForce 6800 Ultra. ABS chose not to overclock the CPU and videocard; the latter runs
the default clock speeds: 400MHz in the
core and 1100MHz memory. As one of two
systems that don’t include a soundcard, ABS
can argue that the onboard Intel HD Audio
implementation is at least spec’d to support
24-bit/96KHz audio.
The X6’s Lian Li PC-V1000 case really
stands out. Screaming “G5 envy,” the PCV1000 is durably constructed and features
an inverted motherboard design that places
the GPU upside down in an effort to increase
the cooling of the videocard. With the exception of the sharp, serrated edges, we like the
case—it offers slots for no less than six hard
drives, space ABS takes advantage of by
That’s no G5, it’s an ABS!
42
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
supplementing the Raptor’s fast but sparse
140GB with a 200GB Maxtor drive.
Aside from slightly sluggish performance, our main criticism of the X6 is
that its wiring job and other pre-shipping
preparations could be better. We were completely puzzled and annoyed by the lack
of USB support; it appears that someone
in manufacturing disabled the USB ports.
Compounding this problem, the BIOS is
password-protected.That’s not a good sign.
Despite these shortcomings, the Ultimate
X6’s boasts an impressive price-to-performance ratio. Overall, it’s a great value. But
the P4 Extreme is clearly outclassed by the
Athlon 64s and the highly overclocked P4 in
Falcon Northwest’s Mach V.
ABS ULTIMATE X6
MAXIMUMPC verdict .......... 7
$3,300, www.abspc.com
the card back to its stock 425MHz core
and start all over again, which was a tad
bit annoying, to say the least.
With its CPU and videocard back to
stock speed, we didn’t think the F:2 had
much of a chance, but Voodoo fooled us.
The machine managed to win the Jedi
Academy test (which previously caused
it to crash), one of the Doom 3 tests,
and one of the Far Cry tests. That’s pretty
damned impressive.
The system itself is state of the art
with its Socket 939-based Athlon 64 FX53. Unlike Velocity Micro and Alienware,
Voodoo opted to pair the GeForce 6800
Ultra with a new MSI K8N Neo 2 motherboard featuring the nForce3 Ultra chipset.
This also might explain the performance
results. Even at its stock speeds, the F:2
managed to pull a few wins away from all
the other machines here.
For a machine made in a week and
a half, the F:2 is a beaut. The case is
VOODOO RAGE F:2
INTERCOOLED
Of all the participating vendors, we suspect our short deadline may have put
the worst crimp on Voodoo. Known as
one of the trendsetters in PC design
and appearance, Voodoo’s motto for
its high-end machines has long been,
“It’ll be ready when we finish it.” The
company’s sensitivity to strict deadlines would certainly help explain the
Voodoo Rage F:2’s mixed results.
First, the GeForce 6800 Ultra had
problems running at its overclocked
speed of 439MHz. While it ran 3DMark
2003 fine, we experienced
corruption and crashing
in Jedi Academy and
Doom 3. That just
goes to show you
that even a watercooled CPU and
videocard can have
problems. To complete our tests, we
were forced to knock
Voodoo’s laser-cut cases
are damned sexy
based on a Lian Li frame, and the paint
job is about as good as it gets, with a
sparkling metallic black exterior that is
gratifyingly smooth to the touch and a
brilliant red interior. In the past, Falcon
Northwest’s paint jobs have generally
been regarded as the best in the biz, but
we think Voodoo is catching up. Other
cosmetic touches that impressed us: a
matching aluminum bezel for the 12x
Plextor drive, laser-cut side panels, and
rubber feet bearing the Voodoo symbol.
The F:2’s biggest weakness is that at
stock speeds it couldn’t top the
Alienware system’s performance.
While it did manage to pick up a few
gold medals in our rigorous suite of
Lab tests, it places behind the other
two water-cooled rigs. It is, however,
amazingly quiet.
VOODOO RAGE F:2 INTERCOOLED
MAXIMUMPC verdict ........ 6
$5,000, www.voodoopc.com
Falcon, Alienware, or Voodoo, you could
buy two 6800 cards, a new motherboard
that supports SLI, and even a better CPU. Of
course, this doesn’t really make a whole lot
of sense because you could just start with
those parts in the first place.
One other nice touch is the NEC ND2510A. Of the vendors here, only Zeus
and Falcon chose to include dual-layer,
dual-format burners. It’s not essential
in a gaming rig, but dual layers should
be a standard spec for today’s high-end
machines. We also continue to love
Cooler Master’s Wave Master case.
Furthermore, because the Tsunami isn’t
overclocked, it turned out to be the quietest machine in the bunch.
Unfortunately, for the purposes of
this story, frame rates matter more
than anything else, and the Tsunami
just isn’t capable of running with the
big dogs. Coupled with the poor wiring
job—a loose cable was used to wrap the
main wiring trunk—and lack of decent
onboard or outboard audio, the Tsunami
needs a serious overhaul.
ZEUS TSUNAMI M-6
ZEUS TSUNAMI M-6
MAXIMUMPC verdict
5
........
As the only PC here equipped with an ATI
$2,600, www.zeuspc.com
Radeon X800 Pro (not even an X800 XT
Platinum Edition), Zeus PC’sTsunami M6 is like a guy who walks into a gunfight
equipped with a spork.The fact that Zeus
PC also chose to forego the Athlon 64 FX
in favor of the budget buyer’s favorite, the
Athlon 64 3800+, doesn’t help.
In benchmarks you can probably
imagine where the Zeus’ hardware
ranked. And heck, you don’t even get a
soundcard with theTsunami M-6. While
games such as Doom 3 don’t actually support any DirectSound3D sound acceleration a la Creative Labs’ Audigy 2 series or
nVidia’s nForce chipset, we’d still like better
DACs than the Asus A8V’s 18-bit onboard
RealTek units.
So what’s positive about the Ultimate
M6?That depends on how you look
at it. If you’re expecting balls-out
gaming speed, you’re out
of luck. But if you think
of theTsunami M-6 as a
The Tsunami got washed away in a storm of
“fixer-upper,” you might
faster, albeit pricier, gaming rigs.
be onto something,
because theTsunami’s
price is a modest
$2,600. For the extra
cash you’d save by
not buying from
a boutique PC
maker such as
BESTGAMINGPCS
VELOCITY MICRO
GAMER’S EDGE FX
It’s hard to believe that Velocity Micro has
gone from kitchen-table PC maker to highend contender in just a few short years.
The company definitely seems to “get” PCbuilding.The understated-looking Gamer’s
Edge FX is a great example.
Even though it lacks a laser-cut door,
exotic water-cooling, or a fancy-pants paint
job, a large number of people in our office
love this system’s looks. Using the same
Lian Li chassis as the Voodoo case, Velocity
Micro’s presentation eschews ostentatious
over-the-top adornment in favor of a unified,
utilitarian theme.
Internally, an overclocked Athlon 64 FX-53
is paired with an Asus A8V Socket 939 motherboard, a pair of Raptors, an overclocked
GeForce 6800 Ultra card, and 1GB of DDR400.
Unfortunately, like the Voodoo Rage F:2,
the Gamer’s Edge experienced a few hiccups
during Lab tests, forcing us to reset the CPU
clock speeds to stock levels just to install
certain applications. And even then, we
experienced odd video corruption. After a full
system restore and some troubleshooting
assistance from Velocity Micro, we were
able to get the Gamer’s Edge FX’s GeForce
card running at its original OC’d speed of
440MHz and were also able to bump the CPU
clock back to 2.47GHz. Everything worked
fine except for our Jedi Academy test.
Ultimately, no matter how we tested it, the
Gamer’s Edge never hit the frame rates we
expected. It’s not clear to us—or the company—what the hell went wrong.
At press time, Velocity Micro officials told
us they were a week away from implementing
a water-cooling solution, which would make
for a much quieter system than the current aircooled, overclocked configuration is capable
of. As it stands, the Velocity Micro is one of the
loudest in the group.
One thing we love about the Gamer’s
Edge FX is its price. At $3,600, it gives you 95
percent of the performance afforded by the
top-tier systems here at just two-thirds the
cost. Unfortunately, performance and stability matter more than anything else in this
deathmatch. Just as we dinged the Voodoo
Rage F:2 for forcing us to tinker, we have to
do the same with the Gamer’s Edge FX.
VELOCITY MICRO GAMER’S EDGE FX
MAXIMUMPC verdict ........ 6
$3,655, www.velocitymicro.com
FALCON NORTHWEST
MACH V ICON EXOTIX
Mach V Exotix offers a dual-layer burner.
The exotic, hot-rod-worthy paint job,
dubbed “Red Death,” received mixed
reviews from our staff. Not everyone went
for the Khmer Rouge motif (a pile of skulls
painted along the side of the case), but
gamers who get a kick out of shot-gunning
zombies will dig it.
Of the six boxes here, only the ABS
Ultimate X6 and this Mach V are truly forwardlooking. While there’s no real indication that
PCI Express graphics cards offer better performance, we’re certain that in 12 to 24 months
(around the time you’ll want to replace your
videocard), you’ll be kicking yourself if you
haven’t invested in the technology.
Finally, of all the overclocked boxes in this
roundup, the Mach V gave us the least problems on boot.The machine booted quickly
and ate its way through the benchmarks
without a single crash or glitch.The Mach V
smoked all others in AquaMark 3 and was
one of just three machines here to break 13K
in 3DMark 2003. Let’s just say the Mach V’s
only real competition came from Alienware.
Our only qualm with the Mach V is its
hefty price. We’re used to seeing big price
tags on systems, but this pushes the top
end at $7,300. (You can shave a grand off the
price if you forego the paint job.) Regardless,
Falcon Northwest continues to impress us
with its technical prowess. If money is no
object, this is clearly the PC for you.
Falcon Northwest likes to say it was the
very first US company to build PCs that
cater to gamers. This is a legitimate claim,
and as such, the old-time gaming PC shop
has an arsenal of tricks in its toolbox. A
shining example of Falcon’s prowess is
the Mach V Icon Exotix.
Instead of using the popular Athlon 64 FX,
FALCON NORTHWEST MACH V ICON EXOTIX
Falcon attempted to out-muscle its competitors with a highly overclocked Pentium 4.
........
How high? How does 4.28GHz sound?That’s
$7,300, www.falcon-nw.com
well beyond the clock speed we hit with
last month’s overclocked Dream Machine
2004 (which ran at 3.97GHz). But Falcon has
two advantages:The first is a new customdesigned water-cooling scheme that vents
hot air out the top of a Silverstone Nimiz
case through a massive radiator.The second
is the base CPU. We started with a 3.6GHz
Pentium 4 in the DM2004; Falcon started with
a 3.8GHz P4 for this monster rig.You haven’t
heard of a 3.8GHz P4? Neither had we until
Falcon’s PC arrived.
The 4.28GHz P4 is locked into a
SocketT in an Asus P5AD2 Premium
mobo that’s stuffed with 2GB of
DDR2.This is the same board we
used in the Dream Machine, and it
continues to wow us with its dual
GB LAN and onboard Wi-Fi. Storage
is handled by a pair of Western
Digital Raptors and a single WD
The paint job is called “Red Death” and
features a subtle pile of human skulls.
250GB drive. Falcon ditched the
mobo’s onboard 24-bit audio in
favor of the Audigy 2 ZS.
The Gamer’s Edge FX has strong aesthetic
One nice touch we appreappeal even though it lacks the exotic paint
ciate: like the Zeus PC, the
and flashy looks of some other rigs here.
44
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
MAXIMUMPC verdict
9
BESTGAMINGPCS
ALIENWARE
AURORA ALX
Although Alienware is one of the oldest
and most respected names in performance-gaming PCs, the company has had
Aurora’s Predator case is certainly
unique but a little under built.
a tough time shaking the “mainstream”
label slapped on it a couple of years ago.
To say the company is a little touchy
about the mainstream moniker is an understatement. As a countermeasure, Alienware
has introduced its new ALX series of
machines, which are intended to help it
reclaim any hardcore ground lost to Falcon
Northwest and Voodoo PC.
Although we hoped to see a rig with
Alienware’s upcoming dual-videocard solution, the company instead sent us an Athlon
64 FX-53 in a new proprietary water-cooled
ALX case. When we posted the machine and
saw that the Athlon 64 FX-53 had been overclocked from 2.4GHz to 2.6GHz, we knew the
Aurora ALX would be a formidable force.
And Alienware didn’t just overclock the CPU;
it also took the GeForce 6800 Ultra from a
stock clock of 425MHz to 450MHz.
In terms of specs alone, the Aurora outclocked every other Athlon 64 and GeForce
6800 Ultra in the roundup. Of course, the real
showdown occurs in our Lab’s benchmarking
tests, and in that respect the Aurora and
Athlon 64 FX didn’t disappoint.The Aurora
won no fewer than nine of our benchmark
rounds with its 2.6GHz FX. Although the
Mach V closely nips at its heels, the Aurora/
AMD combo simply outran the crowd.
The machine itself is built on an Asus
A8V board in Socket 939 trim and comes
with 1GB of DDR400 RAM, a Raptor RAID,
Audigy 2 ZS, and a Plextor PX-712A and
Premium CD-RW drive.
The Aurora’s water-cooling system lets
you manually choose between three fan
speeds to meet your conditions. While it’s
very quiet on the lowest setting, the fan
churn of the highest setting made it the
loudest machine in our deathmatch.
The case itself is a slight modification to the standard Alienware Predator
case, with a little extra headroom for the
water-cooling and blue LED (which tells
you what temperature the proc is running
at) embedded in the system’s “forehead.”
While we still love the unique look, we
weren’t too happy with our review unit. We
found the small side-cover difficult to close,
and the front-door latch broke the second
day of testing. Our ultimate chassis for
this rig would be the Predator case cast in
aluminum; while expensive, that would be
one hell of an enclosure.
Despite our kvetches, it was clear during
testing that this deathmatch would boil
down to a battle of two: Alienware vs.
Falcon Northwest. Read on to find out
which company wins.
ALIENWARE AURORA ALX
MAXIMUMPC verdict ......... 9
$5,000, www.alienware.com
How We Test: Gaming Performance PCs
Because this PC shootout is all about gaming
performance, we threw out the usual suite
of benchmarks. SYSmark 2004 remained
in its jewel case and we gave both Adobe
Premiere and Photoshop the week off. We
focused our testing on games, games, and
more games.
For our tests we tapped the old standby
3DMark 2003. Although once the target of
considerable and quite controversial “optimizing,” 3DMark 2003 remains a valid benchmark of a 3D card’s performance because,
while it leans on the CPU somewhat, it’s
mostly a GPU test. We ran it at the default
resolution of 1024x768 as well as 1600x1200
with 4x antialiasing on. We ran and reported
the CPU portion of the test as well. We also
used AquaMark 3 as a DX8.1 test; we ran
the default test, recorded the default score,
and also broke down the individual GPU and
CPU scores.
Jedi Academy continues to be a CPU-limited benchmark even at 1600x1200 resolution with 4x AA enabled. Halo is the opposite
46
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
of Jedi and mostly taps the GPU core. We
ran our standard custom demo at 1600x1200
without AA enabled. UnrealTournament
2003 is an oldie but still quite telling as an
overall system benchmark. (You know these
boxes are fast when they can break 200fps at
1600x1200 with 4x AA on.)
We were excited to see how this batch of
PCs fared with Far Cry, the summer’s sleeper
hit, and a game that brought many a system
to tears with its heavy-duty GPU requirements. We ran Far Cry at 1280x1024 and at
1600x1200. For the most part, it runs fast if
you have a fat 16-pipe GPU.
Our final performance benchmark was
Doom 3—the game people have waited
years for. As a technical tour de force, people
are building whole systems around this one
game’s system requirements and recommendations. We ran the standard timedemo
at 1280x1024 and 1600x1200 with 4x AA
enabled and disabled. For the most part,
Doom 3 almost exclusively tests the GPU.
Last, we performed the first annual
Maximum PC “Hot Box” test. Any high-performance machine can function in the 68º F
environment of our Lab, we reasoned, but
how about in a typical house on a balmy
summer day?To find out if these systems
could handle extreme temperatures, we
locked all six in a tiny room heated to
90º F and ran CPU Burn-In, which constantly
cranks FPU intensive chores through the
chip. We thought we’d break at least one
of the overclocked systems, but after six
hours in the sweatbox, we broke the room
instead. Our demo room couldn’t handle
the power requirements of our machines
as they warmed up. Why did they last six
hours? We suspect that as the cumulative
heat increased inside the machines, the
power efficiency on the power supplies
dropped. While it’s disappointing that we
couldn’t bring any of the PCs to their knees,
it’s comforting to know that all of these rigs
can operate full-bore in 90 degree ambient
temperatures without any data corruption.
BESTGAMINGPCS
Conclusions
and Benchmarks
overclocked videocards slowed the others
down just enough for the stock Voodoo to
breeze by.
Unfortunately, the Voodoo system’s initial stability issues dropped it to third place,
leaving it to either Alienware or Falcon to
claim victory.
At one point, Alienware’s Aurora looked
like the sure winner based on the merits of
its superior performance numbers across
multiple categories. But as we considered
its busted front door, flimsy side-panel
door, and the fact that its plastic case just
doesn’t feel as solid as the Mach V, we
began leaning toward the Falcon, despite
its second-place performance. But alas,
while we’re not like other magazines that
get overly concerned with price, the fact
that Falcon’s Mach V costs $2,300 more than
the Aurora while losing in nine benchmarks
ultimately hurt it.
Both machines are freaky-fast, but only
THE WINNER—
BY A HAIR!
It’s funny how two completely different
CPUs, chipsets, and systems could produce such similar benchmark results. While
Alienware placed first in more categories—nine, to be exact—Falcon Northwest’s
system was really close behind. In fact, in
three tests—AquaMark’s GPU and CPU
tests, and Doom 3 at 1600 x 1200—the Mach
V out-muscled all the contenders, including
Alienware’s Aurora. Likewise, Voodoo’s Rage
F:2 managed to outscore the Falcon and
Alienware systems in three benchmarks—
Jedi Academy, Doom 3 at 1280x1024, and
Far Cry at 1280x1024. How is this possible?
We suspect it’s a function of the nForce3
Ultra chipset—or errors produced by the
FALCON NORTHWEST:
MR. CONGENIALITY
When we held our staff-wide secret ballot
to decide which of our six contestants was
easiest on the eyes, the results were close.
Initially, it was a three-way tie between
Falcon Northwest’s Mach V, Velocity Micro’s
Gamer’s Edge FX, and Voodoo’s Rage F:2.
After considerable debate and a controversial run-off, the Mach V’s professionallooking cherry-red custom paint, ghoulish
Khmer Rouge overtones, and back-lit lasercut front panel punched the majority of our
staff’s buttons. n
MAKE
ALIENWARE
FALCON NORTHWEST
ZEUS
ABS
VELOCITY MICRO
VOODOO
MODEL
Aurora ALX
Mach V
Tsunami M-6
Ultimate X6
Gamer’s Edge FX
Rage F:2 Intercooled
CPU
2.6GHz Athlon 64 FX-53
4.28GHz Pentium 4E
2.4GHz Athlon 64 3800+
3.41GHz Pentium 4EE
2.47GHz
2.46GHz
RATED CPU
2.4GHz Athlon 64 FX-53
3.8GHz Pentium 4E
2.4GHz Athlon 64 3800+
3.4GHz Pentium 4EE
2.4GHz Athlon 64
FX-53
2.4GHz Athlon 64
FX-53
MOTHERBOARD
ASUS A8V
ASUS P5AD2 Premium
ASUS A8V
ASUS P5AD2
ASUS A8V
MSI K8N Neo
CHIPSET
VIA K8T800 Pro
Intel 925X
VIA K8T800 Pro
Intel 925X
VIA K8T800 Pro
nForce3 Ultra
PSU
PC Power TurboCool 510
Deluxe
Enermax 550
Antec TruePower 550
Antec TruePower 480
Enermax 500 watt
Voodoo Enermax 600
Noise Taker
1GB DDR400
RAM
1GB DDR400
2GB DDR2 / 533
1GB DDR400
1GB DDR2 / 533
1GB DDR400
GPU MAKE/MODEL
GeForce 6800 Ultra
GeForce 6800 Ultra Express
ATI Radeon X800 Pro
GeForce 6800 Ultra Express
GeForce 6800 Ultra
GeForce 6800 Ultra
GPU CLOCKS
450 / 1100
440 / 1100
547 / 1100
440 / 1100
440 / 1180
439 / 1100
HD
2 WD 740GD
2 WD 740GD
250GB WD SATA
2 WD 740GD
2 WD 740GD
200GB Maxtor
2 WD 740GD
2 WD 740GD
HD CONFIGURATION
RAID 0
RAID 0
RAID 0
RAID 0
RAID 0
RAID 0
OPTICAL 1
Plextor Premium CD-RW
Sony DRU-700A Toshiba
M1712
NEC ND-2510A
JLMS-HD1665
Lite-On SOHC-5232K
Plextor PX-712A
OPTICAL 2
Plextor PX-712A
—
—
Plextor PX-712A
Lite-On SHOW-1213S
—
AUDIO SYSTEM
SB Audigy 2 ZS
SB Audigy 2 ZS
Onboard
Onboard
SB Audigy 2 ZS
SB Audigy 2 ZS
3DMARK 2003
13514
13429
11715
12104
13042
12736
3DMARK 2003 CPU
1176
1138
736
993
1067
1134
3DMARK 2003 (1600X1200, 4XAA)
5595
5434
4616
4969
5448
5161
AQUAMARK 3 GPU
10917
10782
8748
9642
10497
9978
AQUAMARK 3 CPU
11112
11622
9922
9973
10292
11468
AQUAMARK 3 OV
73209
73661
60723
65001
69527
69542
JEDI ACADEMY (1600X1200,
4XAA)
143.3
140.1
113
118
89
143.5
HALO 1.013 (1600X1200, 4XAA)
71.3
69.11
54.0
59.06
68.9
64.07
UT2003 FLY BY (1600X1200, 4XAA)
230
223
143
205
220
214
DOOM 3 (1280X1024)
83.4
86.3
57.8
77.1
86
87.3
DOOM 3 (1280X1024, 4XAA)
57.6
57.2
35.7
52.7
55.9
54.7
DOOM 3 (1600X1200)
72.0
72.2
44
65.3
70.6
70.0
DOOM 3 (1600X1200, 4XAA)
43.8
43.3
26.3
40.1
42.4
41.1
FAR CRY (1280X1024)
74.2
74.5
57
62.5
71.5
76
FAR CRY (1600X1200)
68.8
67.2
57.2
58
65.2
65
PRICE
$5,000
$7,300
$2,600
$3,300
$3,655
$5,000
*Winning scores are bolded
48
one can be declared winner. So, at the end
of all our testing and judging, we deem
Alienware’s Aurora the superior PC and
winner of our 2004 Desktop Deathmatch,
with Falcon’s Mach V a very close second.
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
T
S
E
B
0
1
E
H
T
r
e
v
e
N
e
v
u
o
Y
s
e
i
t
Utili
!
f
O
d
r
a
e
H
S
E
S
S
E
C
E
R
E
H
T
N
I
DEEP WIINTTHERNET, BEYORKNADNUTMHBEER
OF THOEF UNSUSPECTING EYUETSI,LILTUIES THAT HAVE
SCOPELE-KNOWN SOFTWARE
ere too
w
e
W
?
l
a
c
i
t
e. Skep
f
i
l
r
OF LITT
u
o
y
is mission.
th
e
g
h
n
it
a
w
h
s
c
u
o
d
t
THE POWER-in-Chief George Jonensctainsgkaepplications the atteenctati-on
-enha
our exp
when Editor
process. But
obscure PC
luin the
ll for giving
a
t that the vo
enthusiasts
e
is
C
’r
x
P
e
e
f
o
w
ly
s
,
ib
e
e
s
v
r
s
li
Su
g the
could po
and enrichin
,
hile utilities
e
w
v
h
r
rt
e
o
s
w
e
y
d
n
ma
they
ed
know of?
fter all, how
dy
darn
odest. A
didn’t alrea
d, we’ll be
e
e
C
d
P
In
tions were m
.
M
d
n
U
u
XIM
hat’s
ty we fo
brains at MA
by the boun
s toolbox. W
r’
d
e
s
le
u
b
rminous PC
m
e
u
h
w
o
d
ed an
e
in every p
were shock
cluded on th
in
don’t belong
re
re
a
e
h
m
d
e
Truth is, we
te
th
n
r all of
es prese
e! (Demos fo
esome utiliti
e
w
fr
a
OREM
y
0
ll
1
ta
e
to
th
if
BY JOSH N
m are
e
—
th
f
o
o
tw
t
ing for?
more, all bu
are you wait
t
a
h
w
o
S
.)
D
Maximum C
OCTOBER 2004
MAXIMUMPC
51
10
Unheard of
Utilities
RSS Bandit
Get the news as it happen
One of the greatest inventions of our time is the RSS
feed. There are different interpretations of the acronym,
“rich site summary” and “RDF site
summary” being the most common, but
what you need to know is that an RSS
feed is a synopsis of a web site’s most
current content. For instance, all the
major news sites typically offer an RSS
feed that includes the major headlines of
the day, and the feed is updated as new
stories are posted. It’s similar to a stockticker in that it feeds real-time information about any changes or updates made
to a web site. There are numerous utilities
available to manage these streams, but
none are as elegant as RSS Bandit.
This utility’s interface is similar to
Windows Explorer, with the names of the
feeds on the left and the contents of the
feed on the right, and a pane window that
displays a particular article. Although the
application comes configured to manage
The Bandit has found the feed, so now
select a category, and the feed will be
added to the list for updates.
To get started, simply type in the URL
of a site that has an RSS feed—the
software will find it for you. You can
even type in the name of the site’s
author and it will find a feed (if one is
available, of course).
the feeds of several popular sites, you can
add your own feeds as well. You can even
search for feeds via keyword, which is one
of our favorite features because it simplifies the often-arduous process of locating
feeds. Once you have several feeds, you
need only select how often they’re updated.
A small popup window (which you can
toggle on or off) will appear on your desktop whenever new content has been added
If you don’t know of any exact feed
locations, you can search by keyword.
We did a search for “PC Hardware” and
it came up with what you see here.
to any of your favorite sites.
If we weren’t so enamored of RSS
Bandit, we’d say its ease of use was
insulting to our intelligence. Plus it’s
totally free, and uses just 3MB of system
memory. Free, www.rsbandit.org
App Rocket
Organize your desktop’s mess
Our work PCs are so cluttered
with files and shortcuts that
on several occasions we’ve
demanded (to nobody in particular) a utility that can help us find items
on our desktop. Someone was listening,
apparently, because AppRocket is the utility
we’ve long been wanting.
Launch this little rocket and it quickly
scans the most common locations for files
and folders and creates a comprehensive
index. Then, when you’re ready to do a
search, just start typing the folder or file
name you’re looking for and you’ll instantly
be presented with a list of files that match
up. If you want to find a file named “kitten,”
for example, just type it in and all matches
will appear in a drawer below. If you want
to adjust your Display Settings in the
Control Panel, just type “D-I-S” and the link
appears. It’s easily the fastest way to find
anything on a PC that we’ve ever used.
And that’s just the half of it. Once you
find what you’re looking for, you can either
open it by clicking within the app, or use
the arrow keys to navigate up or down
folder levels. AppRocket can even display
ID3 information for your MP3 files, and is
52
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
configured to perform web searches for
a dozen popular reference sites such as
Google, Dictionary.com, Amazon.com, a
stock watch, and more. You can also add
any folder to its index, remove file extensions you don’t want included in your
searches, and customize the appearance
of the interface to suit your tastes.
In the end, we dig AppRocket so much
because we’ve never seen anything like
it. It’s a heck of a lot easier to use than
Windows’ search function and faster than
Explorer too. Free 30-day trial/ $18,
www.candylabs.com
When you open AppRocket, it provides
a helpful crib sheet to get you started.
With AppRocket highlighted, we type
in K-I-T-T and the following appears.
By default, as soon as you move the
cursor away from the list of files
and click on another document the
application slides out of sight like an
auto-hide taskbar.
If you want to reduce or increase the
locations included in searches, it’s
easy to accomplish.
AM-DeadLink
Inactive bookmarks begone
You know the drill: You
come across an awesome Flash-based web site
with badgers bouncing up and
down, and you bookmark it. And you
keep doing this for every fun site you
stumble upon until eventually it takes
10 minutes to scroll through the whole
lot of ‘em. Then one day you try to
launch the badger site to show a friend,
and the link is dead. You click another
link and it’s dead as well. AM-DeadLink
solves this problem by detecting dead
links and duplicates in any browser,
including Opera, Netscape, Mozilla, and
Internet Explorer.
Operation is simple. Just select your
browser from a drop-down menu and
hit the “check” button. All links are
pinged and a status message is displayed next to each bookmark. Once
dead links are detected, it takes a mere
two clicks to eradicate them from your
bookmarks folder, allowing you to keep
things nice and tidy. A split-pane view
allows you to visit bookmarked sites
within the application, so you can also
weed out sites that are working but no
longer of interest to you. On top of all
that, DeadLink will make a backup file of
your bookmarks, for safe keeping.
Free, www.aignes.com
Once you’ve found your bookmark file,
DeadLink will display its contents.
Next hit the green checkmark button
to begin the validation process.
Once you open DeadLink and select
your browser, it will look for the
bookmark.htm file in the default
location. (Warning: For Firefox, the
utility defaults to the wrong location,
so you’ll actually have to browse to
C:/Documents and Settings/Username/
Application data, etc. in the utility’s
dialog box—and you’ll have to be
able to view hidden files to see this
directory.)
Once the utility has pinged all your
bookmarks, it presents you with an
easy-to-read display of which links
work, and which don’t.
Autopatcher XP
Get WinXP updates offline
Not a day goes by, it seems,
without some new virus or
bug or wormhole threatening
the integrity of Internet Explorer
or Windows XP, so we rely on Windows
Update to save us from possible doom.
But what do you do with a fresh install
of XP, prior to all the essential updates?
Do you really want to go online without
any of the security patches installed? Are
you mad? Luckily, there’s Autopatcher
XP. It combines all the available fixes and
updates into an ISO file that you can run
Upon initialization, Autopatcher
scans your Registry just like Windows
Update does to determine what fixes
your PC needs.
prior to connecting your PC to
the Internet. Thus you’re able
to perform a complete install
offline so your PC is up-to-date
and protected before you venture onto the web.
The only requirement for
running this utility is that you
have Service Pack 1 installed,
so the best way to proceed
is to download both SP1 and
Autopatcher and burn both to
CD, so you can update any
PC with just one disc. When running, it
works just like Windows Update, meaning it looks at your PC’s Registry and
presents a list of
fixes that should be
installed. Once you
select the ones you
want, simply run it and
doggone it if your new
XP install isn’t up to
date before you even
hit the Information
Super Highway’s
onramp. Free, www.
Now when you go
autopatcher.com
The program then presents you with
a hierarchical list of recommended
updates so you can choose which
fixes to install.
online your PC is sound as a pound!
OCTOBER 2004
MAXIMUMPC
53
10
Unheard of
Utilities
Express WebPictures
Easily extract a URL’s image archive
Whether you like to collect
anime, 3D games, kitten
pics, or some other class
of digital imagery, we’re
sure you’ve experienced the
hassle of wading through scads of thumbnails and then saving larger versions to a
folder somewhere on your PC. This is why
Express WebPictures makes us so happy.
Simply point the application to a particular
web site and like a giant binary vacuum it
downloads all of the site’s images and/or
videos and deposits them in a file on your
PC named after the URL. During testing we
were able to downloaded 464 videos equaling 1.94GB from a “crazy video” archive on
the net. You think you’d want to download
that many videos manually?
You can start the app manually or
leave it running in the system tray, which
automates the process. Either way, you
just have to start a new project, enter the
URL, define the terms and types of files,
and then let EWP do its thing. It notifies
you when downloading is complete, and
includes an image viewing program that
functions similarly to ACDSee.
All in all, this utility is easy to use, blazing quick, and does an excellent job of
organizing its tasks. It even works on password protected sites. Free 30-day trial/ $40,
www.neowise.com
To get started, open the program and
select New Project. Then simply paste
the URL of the site from which you’d
like to download and click Next.
In the second step you can specify the
extent of your download. Shoot, you
can download every image on a site, if
that’s your fancy.
Finally, select the kind of files you’d
like to download and put the utility
to work. When the downloading is
complete, you’ll be notified. You can
also browse the images in the utility’s
main interface area.
Restoration
Dig into your Recycle Bin’s refuse
We’ve all experienced that
sinking feeling upon realizing that a file we were looking all over for was in the Recycle Bin—
which we just emptied! No worries. As
you may or may not know, emptying files
from the Recycle Bin merely removes any
outward visual reference to them within
Windows, but files still exist until they are
overwritten by other files. Because of this,
it’s often possible to recover deleted files,
and Restoration is the best utility we’ve
found for the job.
The key is to not lollygag. You have a
much better chance of recovering a file if
it’s been recently deleted, simply because
there’s less chance it’s been overwritten.
Just select the drive the file was on and
the utility will show you all the files that
have been deleted, allowing you to restore
the one you’re looking for.
Other restoration utilities perform the
same function, but they’re either more
difficult to use or cost money. Restoration
is so effective because it cuts to the chase
and gets the job done quickly.
Free, geocities.jp/br_kato
54
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
The restoration process begins by selecting the drive that housed the file you
erased. In this screenshot, we selected
C: and clicked Search Deleted Files.
Once we located our file, we clicked
“Restore by Copying” and were
prompted to save it to a location of
our choosing.
You’re discouraged from
resaving data to the
same drive from which it
was deleted, but we had
no problems doing so
during testing.
MP3 Album
Art Downloader
The name of the app says it all
Sure, adding album art to your
MP3 folders isn’t as high on the
priority list as, say, performing a clean
install of Windows, but MP3 Album Art
Downloader (clever name, that) makes
the process so effortless you’d be a fool
not to use it.
Just unzip the utility to the folder that
contains your music and let it run. It looks
This is what our music folder looks
like before putting the utility to work.
Those bland folders simply must go!
at your music files, then zooms over to
Amazon.com and grabs the associated
album art, and then deposits the files into
your music folder where it will show up
in Thumbnail view. (Note: You must
Once you’ve downloaded the MP3AAD
file (or found it on the CD included
with this magazine), just extract it to
the root of your music folder. Next,
simply open that folder and run the
utility. It will automatically scan your
entire collection and download all the
attendant album art.
enable Thumbnail view for the images to
appear). The only other way to perform
this task is to do so manually, the tedium
of which goes without saying.
Admittedly, MP3AAD isn’t 100 percent
perfect, and occasionally either misses
folders entirely or downloads the wrong
artwork. Still, its accuracy is good enough
for us, and the time it takes to correct the
mistakes is inconsequential given the time
it saves in the first place.
Free, http://str8dog.com
Voila! Our previously nondescript
folders now look like miniature CD
cases. It’s an MP3 folder to be proud of!
Slimserver
Stream MP3s over the net
Streaming music over the
Internet is nothing new,
but Slimserver eliminates
all the guesswork, which is why it’s one
of our newfound favorite utilities. You
might be asking, “But Maximum PC,
isn’t that the software that comes with
the Slim Devices Squeezebox?” Why,
yes, yes it is, but you don’t need the
hardware to use the application! It’ll
work on any PC, and can be up and
running in no time.
Install Slimserver on the PC that holds
Once it’s installed on the host
computer, just open the stream on a
second computer by typing in the URL
followed by “:9000/stream.mp3.”
all your music.
During installation
you’ll point the utility
to your music folder
and it’ll catalog all
of your music. Once
installation is complete, simply run the
application and it
turns your computer
We’re up and running. The music on
the host PC appears on the left side,
and the current playlist appears on the
right. It’s so easy, anyone can do it!
Next, pop open your web browser and
type http://youripaddress:9000 to take
control of the music. You can browse
by artist, genre, and more, set up
playlists, and stream music anywhere,
even over a broadband connection.
into a streaming music server. Now, while
using a different computer at, say, work
or a friend’s house, just launch the MP3
player and point it at the stream. Similarly,
you can manage the playlists via any web
browser. And all this functionality can be
yours in just a few minutes, making it much
easier to use than the streaming apps
we’ve diddled with in the past.
Free, www.slimdevices.com
OCTOBER 2004
MAXIMUMPC
55
10
Unheard of
Utilities
commercial DVDs onto
DVD Shrink aSqueeze
single disc
We’ve reviewed a lot of DVD
backup utilities over the past
year or so, but none are
as handy as our freeware
favorite, DVD Shrink. If
you’ve ever tried to back up
a DVD you own, you know
how tricky the process can be. The average commercial DVD is an 8.5GB duallayer disc, which means most movies
don’t fit on a puny 4.7GB DVD+R.
(Dual-layer writable discs are just now
becoming available and will alleviate
this problem, but for now dual-layer
burners and media are
rare and pricey.) With DVD
Shrink, though, you can
remove all the unnecessary
items from a DVD such as
subtitles or the director’s
commentary, and then compress the remaining contents to a manageable size.
We’ve sampled a lot
of DVD backup utilities in
our day, and DVD Shrink
is by far the easiest we’ve
used. Plus it’s freeware and
Once you start the utility, you will see the contents
is regularly tweaked and
of your DVD. The main elements appear on the left
updated by the author. It’s
(menus, movie, extras) with their contents on the right. one app we wouldn’t want
Select what you don’t want, and set the appropriate
to be without.
compression level.
Free, www.dvdshrink.org
Select a folder in which to save the
final, compressed contents of the disc
and click OK.
Once you’ve made your selections,
run the utility to compress the video
and save it to the designated file. You
can enable Video Preview to watch
the progress.
GSpot Codec
Information Appliance
Find the codecs you need to play digi video and sound
There’s nothing more
frustrating than waiting patiently while
you download a new video clip dubbed
“The funniest thing ever!” by some message board maven, only to hit “play” and
This is the screen that appears once
the utility loads. Click the “…” next
to the Path bar to locate the file you’d
like examined.
56
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
get just the sound, or worse, no video or
sound. This is the tragic consequence of
a missing codec. But how do you know
which codec to add to your media player
in order to play the video or audio (or
both)? Enter GSpot.
Discovering the elusive codec is as
simple as loading the app, pointing it
at the file in question, and clicking the
Next, select the video and click Open.
render button. Mystery solved. This utility tells you the name of the codec being
used for both audio and video. If it’s
unable to render the file, it tells you in
plain English why.
GSpot gets our endorsement because
it’s the only utility we know of that performs this valuable function, and if an
alternative does exist, we doubt it’s as
easy to use or as splendidly useful.
Free, www.headbands.com/gspot n
Finally, click Render and watch
the results appear onscreen. If the
rendering is successful (and it usually
is), you can “click for more details” to
find out everything you need to know.
MAXIMUM PC SPECIAL REPORT.......A MAXIMUM PC SPECIAL REPORT.......A MAXIMUM PC SPECIAL REPORT.......A MAXIMUM PC SPECIAL REPORT.......A MAXIMUM PC SPECIAL REPORT
THE SECRET WORLD OF
We explain how gaming’s
most sophisticated 3D
engine works
BY WILL SMITH
B
y now you already know the obvious:
Doom 3 is supremely entertaining and
represents a massive technological leap.
But how does the engine work? And how will it
run on your system? In a brazen effort that justifies
the countless hours we’ve spent playing one of the
year’s biggest games, Maximum PC explains it all
in exquisite technical detail!
ECIAL REPORT.......A MAXIMUM PC SPECIAL REPORT.......A MAXIMUM PC SPECIAL REPORT......A MAXIMUM PC SPECIAL REPORT......A MAXIMUM PC SPECIAL REPORT......A MAXIMUM P
OCTOBER 2004
MAXIMUMPC
59
W
ithout a doubt, Doom 3 is the most
technically advanced PC game
ever built. From the revolutionary
graphics engine to the hyper-realistic physics model, the game surpasses all others in
its real-world mimicry—if you call a demoninfested base on Mars the real world, that is.
What’s really amazing about id Software’s
tremendous effort isn’t the raw power of the
engine, or the incredible amount of art that
was created for the game, or even the hyperrealistic shadows. No, what amazes us is the
wide spectrum of hardware that the game
actually runs well on. You can run Doom
3 on hardware that’s positively ancient by
Maximum PC standards and still get decent
frame rates. Granted, you’re not going to
be able to run it with all the whiz-bang features turned on. In fact, you won’t be able
to experience many of the most visually
impressive effects. But at least you’ll be able
to play.
Before we jump into our review of Doom
3 the game, let’s deconstruct every single
aspect of the astounding engine powering it.
Follow along and we’ll tell you exactly how
it all works.
stresses the hell out of any videocard—from ancient, barely
supported GeForce4-era cards
to the latest, greatest Radeon
X800 and GeForce 6800
boards, which can’t even run
the game at its highest possible detail levels. What requires
all this pixel-processing power?
Shadows and normal maps.
The secret to the game’s
verisimilitude is its hyper-realistic lighting model, courtesy of
stencil shadows. Drawing stencil shadows is easy—the hitch
is that it places a tremendous
Shadow Volumes
In this very simple
map, we can
see some basic
shadows. The
invisible shadow
volumes fill the
area between the
white platform
and the floor
(outlined in
yellow). Doom 3
draws shadows
anywhere those
volumes intersect
polygons.
You Can See Your Doom Coming
The most discussed aspect of Doom 3
is John Carmack’s very next-gen graphics engine. Making full use of the latest in
programmable shader technology, Doom 3
Lab Tests: How Will
Doom 3 Run on My
Computer?
Not sure your PC can pass muster
for Doom 3? It’s time to find out—
we ran a battery of Lab tests to
find out which components work,
and which components don’t
To determine what hardware works best
in Doom 3, we performed three rounds
of tests. First, we tested videocards to
see exactly how fast different generations
of hardware could run Doom 3. To keep
everything even, we tested three GeForce
60
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
The cacodemon’s energy weapon creates a space- (and mind-) bending effect
on impact. The secret? Two words: programmable shaders.
videocards in our Athlon FX-51 zero-point
rig: an old GeForce4 MX 460, a GeForce4
Ti 4600, and a GeForce 6800 Ultra, as
well as a Radeon 9800 XT. We tested the
6800 and the 9800 XT in high-quality
mode at 1280x1024 with AA disabled, the
4600 board at 800x600 in medium-quality, and the MX board at a pokey 640x480
in low-quality mode. (If you’re interested
in seeing how Doom 3 looks on different
generations of graphics hardware, turn to
page 62.)
Second, we wanted to find out how
dependant Doom 3 is on CPU speed and
type, so we tested it with three different
CPUs: an Athlon XP, a Pentium 4, and an
Athlon FX. All the CPU tests were run
with a GeForce 6800 Ultra card, to isolate
the variables as much as possible. The
results surprised us, and they’ll definitely
surprise you, too.
Finally, we dug up three systems from
our vault to see how Doom 3 handles a
variety of hardware. The three test systems—a Pentium 4 2GHz with 512MB of
RAM and a GeForce3, an Athlon XP 3200
with a 1GB of RAM and a Radeon 9800
Pro 256MB, and an Athlon FX-51 with
1GB of RAM and a GeForce 6800 Ultra—
represent state-of-the-art hardware from
more than two years ago, one year ago,
and the present, respectively.
We measured frame rates by running
the demo1 using the initial release of
Doom 3. To test your own rig, open the
console by pressing Ctrl+Alt+~ and then
type “timedemo demo1.”
burden on your system’s videocard and
CPU. Let’s take a look at how stencil shadows (sometimes called shadow volumes)
work so you can understand why drawing
them is so hardware intensive.
Check out the screenshot on the preceding page. The red cube represents
a light source. The area under the cube
should be lit, but there’s a platform
between the light and the floor. You know
the area under the platform will be shadowed, but how can you describe this in a
simple computer program? It’s easy. Think
of the light as being the apex of a pyramid
and the four edges of the platform’s top
as lines that intersect the pyramid’s four
walls. The area inside the pyramid will be
illuminated, except for the area beneath
the platform, which will be shadowed.
This is precisely how Doom 3 handles
shadows. In our pyramid example, the
engine actually draws an invisible polygon
where the shadow appears. The engine
draws shadows on any object that enters
the invisible volume polygon. The trick is
that Doom 3 draws these invisible shadow
volumes for every light source and every
object in the game. Even with just two or
three light sources, the number of invisible
polygons quickly gets out of hand—they
may be invisible, but they still consume
precious GPU resources. Considering that
everything from the swinging light to the
muzzle blast of your shotgun is a light
source, that’s a lot to draw.
Do I Look Normal to You?
Dynamic shadows don’t account for all of
Doom 3’s eye candy. Normal maps are also
used to add an extra level of detail to the
character models and lots of the game’s surfaces. Here’s how they work.
Bump maps have been used in games
for a long time now. They’re nothing more
than simple grayscale textures that encode
the height of each pixel on the texture. When
VIDEOCARD TESTS
One clever advancement found in Doom 3 is interactive, in-game GUIs that are
similar to Flash animations. When you approach one, your weapon drops and
is replaced by a cursor that lets you punch in codes as if you were standing in
front of the terminal.
applied to an otherwise flat surface, they
convey the illusion of depth. However, bump
maps have a problem. Because they only
modify the height of a flat surface and don’t
actually modify the geometry of the surface, collision and clipping problems occur
when you use bump maps on polygons that
move—like the polys in a human face.
The solution to this problem is the
normal map, which contains not only the
height of each individual pixel on the base
surface, but also encodes the direction
that each pixel is facing. With this information, a modern GPU can actually draw the
model with the extra polygons described
by the normal map, and clipping and polygon collision are no longer a problem.
Game designers can create a model with
CPU TESTS
GeForce 6800 Ultra (1280x1024 HQ)
81.1 fps
Athlon FX-51
81.0 fps
Radeon 9800 XT (1280x1024 HQ)
33.0 fps
Athlon XP 3200
64.4 fps
GeForce4 Ti 4600 (800x600 MQ)
30.0 fps
Pentium 4 2.0GHz
33.4 fps
GeForce4 MX 460 (640x480 LQ)
13.4 fps
As you can see, there’s a huge performance difference between the old, fixedfunction GeForce4 MX card and the stateof-the-art 6800 Ultra. Not only do you get
a massive performance increase, you also
run at a much higher quality level, with
high resolution textures and much more
nuanced shadows. The Radeon 9800 XT
performed well, but the eight-pipeline card
couldn’t keep up with the 16-pipe 6800.
The results of the CPU tests are quite
surprising. The Athlon XP—an underperformer by today’s standards—performs
admirably. It’s able to keep up with the
CPU-heavy physics and sound engines,
unlike the slow 2GHz Pentium 4 we tested.
SYSTEM TESTS
Athlon FX-51, GeForce 6800 Ultra
81.0 fps
Athlon XP 3200, Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB
48.8 fps
Pentium 4 2GHz, GeForce3 Ti 500
25.1 fps
millions of polygons, then run it through a
filter in their 3D modeling software that will
convert the high-poly model to a low-poly
model and a normal map. In Doom 3, normal maps and 6,000 poly models are used
to draw monsters that appear to have all the
complexity of the high-res originals!
Oh Shaders, How I Love Thee!
The final stroke in the Carmackian trifecta of
3D engine design are the dozens of little
shader effects strewn liberally throughout
the game. The shockwave effect that occurs
near a rocket or grenade explosion, the
shimmer of heat around steamy pipes, and
the melting-away that claims so many corpses are all created with simple pixel and ver- Ë
What’s surprising is that the high-end
system is nearly twice as fast as the midrange rig. The lesson is one Maximum PC
has preached for years: New hardware
gives you a huge performance boost,
even compared with a system that’s only
about a year old.
This means that, in order to get the
most Doom 3 performance for your buck,
you should: upgrade your videocard first,
your CPU second, and your memory
third. You should also remember that
pairing an uber-powerful videocard with a
slow-ass CPU will limit your in-game performance, although not as much as we
would have expected.
OCTOBER 2004
MAXIMUMPC
61
Physics
tex shader programs: small programs that
can modify data at different points in the
3D pipeline. Readers familiar with previous
Maximum PC articles on 3D engines, listen
up: We told you that programmable shaders could result in more than fancy-looking
water and waving grass!
It’s fairly obvious that realistic physics
modeling is one of the next major frontiers
in game design. Nearly every game available today—from first-person shooters to
real-time strategy games—uses some form
of physics engine. In making Doom 3, id
Software chose to create its own, rather
than using a popular off-the-shelf physics
engine like Havoc or MathEngine.
Doom 3’s physics engine doesn’t push
the envelope in a big way—it doesn’t really
distinguish itself from middleware physics
engines—but it at least delivers everything
we’ve come to expect from Havoc-based
games, including ragdoll physics that
produce incredible dynamic death animations, realistic fire physics, and many of
the weapon effects. Note that the in-game
physics in Doom 3—like most other games
that claim “real-physics”—are in fact
approximations of real-world physics calculations. Don’t use Doom 3 to model your
senior thesis, physics students.
Can You Hear Me Now?
Doom 3’s sound engine has been the subject of much controversy. Unlike most
games’ sound systems, Doom 3 shuns the
Windows-only DirectSound API in favor of
a more general, host-based approach.
Performing all the 3D sound calculations
on the CPU offers several benefits: The
game isn’t hindered at all by the limitations
of DirectSound, and the developers can
programmatically modify in-game sounds.
In addition to creating a variety of sounds
for each type of object—some bullet
impacts have seven different sound variations—the engine can also modify sound
But How Does It Look on My GeForce MX?
We show you how Doom 3 looks on a variety of videocards
In a laudable move, id programmed Doom 3 to run on
hardware that predates the millennium. We’re talking
GeForce3s here, people! This made us wonder: What’s
DirectX 7
Here, using the GeForce4
MX, the weaknesses of a
fixed-function pipeline card
are readily apparent. Look at
how blown-out the light on
the left wall is, and notice the
low-resolution textures on
the zombie’s back. Detail is
sacrificed to accommodate a
mere 64MB of video memory.
DirectX 8
the trade-off in visual quality as you step down in GPU
technology? To answer the question, we ran Doom 3
on several different videocards.
DirectX 8
DirectX 9
For the purposes of our tests—to best demonstrate the
difference between videocards—we custom-built a basic
Doom 3 map with a few enemies and some dynamic lights.
This shot was taken at the High Quality setting on a
DirectX9-class nVidia GeForce 6800 Ultra card with 4x AA
turned on. Note the smooth, rounded shadow edges and the
different shades of dark inside the shadows.
DirectX 7
Using the GeForce4
Ti card, the zombie
looks almost the
same as with more
powerful DirectX
9 cards. However,
we had to turn
off antialiasing
to improve
performance.
MAXIMUMPC
SEPTEMBER 2004
Our pal the spider looks
pretty good with a DirectX
8-level card, such as the
GeForce4 Ti. The only
difference between it and
the DX9-level spider is the
lower-resolution textures
required by the 128MB
card.
The spider produced by
the DX7-level card—a
GeForce4 MX—is not a
pretty sight. His shadow
is very simple, and the
shadows don’t interact.
Note that there are no
shades of gray in his
shadow—the floor is
either entirely black or
its normal color.
on the fly using small sound shaders.
We’ve heard id uses sound shaders to create even more variation in the frequently
repeated sound effects.
The result is that playing Doom 3 with
an above-average 5.1 speaker rig is truly
a religious experience. You hear the world
come alive all around you. We frequently
heard audio cues in the game that gave
us advance warning of some hellspawn’s
ambush, and the creepy-crawly tip-tip-tap
of the spider demons still gives us chills. ■
Maximum PC presents 7 quick tips
for maximum performance
➤ Enable triple buffering in the OpenGL control
panel of your videocard’s display properties. This
will give you better visual quality with no loss of
frame rate.
Doom 3: The Maximum
PC Verdict
Our take: A huge leap for 3D
engines is just a small leap for
the FPS genre
One week prior to Doom 3’s release, it
felt like the night before Christmas at
the Maximum PC office. We all upgraded
our rigs with beefier processors and
next-generation videocards. And with
everything benchmarked and thoroughly
broken in, we went to sleep each night
with visions of imps and cacodemons
dancing in our heads.
Once the game arrived and we began
playing, we were overwhelmed by
mixed emotions. Indeed, Doom 3 looks
absolutely amazing, and we’re pleased
to see a game actually justify the
immense amount of time we’ve spent
upgrading our systems. On the other
hand, while it’s extremely scary at times,
the gameplay follows a basic formula
that consists of wandering through dark
hallways while enemies teleport into
the room when you trigger invisible
switches. This pattern repeats itself
throughout the game’s 20-odd hours
of gameplay, and because the enemies
use the same attack methods, the only
thing that really changes is the teleport
locations. This “surprise!” formula goes
from surprising to annoying real quick.
Despite its repetitive nature, combat still
feels satisfying and, like the game itself, is
easily the most intense action we’ve
experienced on a PC in a long time. The
sensation of the weapons combined with
almost-nonstop action and 5.1 surround
sound put you right in the middle of a
scarily realistic environment. And although
you fight the same enemies over and over,
the tension persists as baddies leap out at
you from behind closed doors, claw at
your face, and scream and writhe as you
send them back to hell.
There’s a story in the game, but
unfortunately you’re forced to read about
it in e-mails you find on dead bodies,
which consequently brings the game’s
frantic pace to a crashing halt. While it’s
nice to see an id game with a story, we
can’t help but deem this a pretty lazy way
to drive a plot.
Multiplayer is also included, but out of
the box, it’s a half-baked affair. Matches
are limited to four players per map, and
only five maps are included. As of this
➤ Fix the game’s nasty visual tearing and corrup-
tion by enabling VSync in the “advanced” video
options. Even if you have it enabled in your videocard settings, the game can overrule this setting,
so it must be set in-game.
➤ If you are running dual displays, killing the sec-
ond monitor when firing up Doom 3 will drastically
increase your frame rates.
➤ Download the latest drivers for your videocard.
As an example, Lab testing has shown frame rate
improvements ranging from 10 to 20 percent using
the beta 4.9 Catalyst drivers.
➤ Open the console (CTRL+ALT+~) and type “r_
gamma 1.3” This cranks up the gamma a smidge,
making the game appear crisper and a touch
brighter, but still keeps it dark enough to remain
consistent with how it’s supposed to look.
➤ To run the included Doom 3 benchmark, open
the console and type “timedemo demo1” and be
sure to run it twice, ignoring the first score.
➤ To enable the frame counter open the console
and type “com_showfps 1”.
writing, we’ve encountered several bugs
in the process of joining online servers.
But when we could connect, we had a
blast. The action feels as fast, furious, and
nail-biting as it did back in the old-school
days of original Doom.
And yet, despite all its flaws, we
simply could not stop playing the
single-player campaign. If it weren’t for
our sore necks and frazzled nerves, we
would have finished it in our first sitting.
Doom 3 is clearly the best single-player
game id has ever made. It’s just too bad
the game doesn’t bring as many new
ideas to the FPS genre as it does to the
world of 3D rendering.
—JOSH NOREM
by
MAXIMUMPC VERDICT
a
ow
e
ct.
o
or
Doom 3 Tweaking Tips
DOOM
8
Incredible graphics, intense action and fun weapons.
GLOOM
Gameplay is repetitive and feels dated, very basic
multiplayer, and plot revealed through e-mails.
Unfortunately, Doom 3’s AI is pretty basic—monsters use the same attack
methods every time you encounter them.
$55, www.doom3.com
OCTOBER 2004
MAXIMUMPC
63
Ask the Doctor
Symptom
Diagnosis
Cure
NO MORE FLOPPIES
Have we come to the point
where a PC can be built
without a floppy drive? I want
to build an Athlon 64 system
housed in Antec’s Aria SFF
case, but I’m wondering how I
would apply BIOS updates and
the like without a floppy drive.
Can I use a USB key drive or a
CF card instead?
—DAVID ROWELL
First, you can indeed build a PC
without a floppy drive (even with
RAID support, if you read this
month’s how-to section). But if the
motherboard you use requires that
you boot to a floppy to update the
BIOS, your hands are tied. Most
modern motherboards support
Windows-based BIOS updates
though, and some also have the
software to rewrite the BIOS
installed in the motherboard. But
even if you’re dependant on a floppy, it needn’t dictate the makeup of
your PC. You could simply use a USBbased floppy to boot (for some motherboards only), or you can just keep a
floppy drive loose on a cable in your
tool kit. When you have to update the
BIOS, just crack the case open, plug
in the floppy and run the update.
WAITING IS THE
HARDEST PART
I have a quick question for you:
How much longer will it take
for things like DDR2 and PCI
Express to arrive? I’m interested
in building a new system and
want to integrate these new
technologies, but I want to
know how long I’ll have to wait.
—SPC ANDRES D. HUNTER
10TH MOUNTAIN DIV, IRAQ
DEFEATED BY DEFRAGGING?
I feel I do a pretty good job of taking care of
my computer. In particular, I’ve scheduled a
daily defragging of my hard drive to keep all
my files nice and tidy on the disk. I’ve noticed,
however, that the more often I do that, the
further out the paging file seems to move.
Because the drive performs best near the center,
wouldn’t this hurt my performance? It would
seem I’m defeating the purpose of defragging
if the page file gets moved further and further
out. Is there a way to reverse this problem?
Should I defrag less often?
—DANIEL WONG
Frequent defragging isn’t harmful to your drive, so
defrag as often as you like. As far as the page file is
concerned, this is something of a can of worms, so
we’ll take it one issue at a time.
First, when you defrag within Windows, the
page file is not defragged, because the page file is
locked by Windows while the OS is running. The
only way to defrag the page file is to use a thirdparty app like Diskeeper (www.executivesoftware.
com) and to select a boot-time defrag, which
defrags the page file prior to loading Windows.
Interestingly, Diskeeper doesn’t touch the page
file during normal, in-Windows defrags, but during boot-time operation it moves the page file to
the front of the drive platters. Also, according to
Diskeeper the difference in performance between
a page file residing at the front, center, or end of a
drive’s platter is negligible, at best.
So even though the page file isn’t being moved
by the defrag software, it’s still possible the page file
LYING DOWN ON THE JOB
Doctor, I have a system in a tower
case and I want to know if I can
lay it on its side and run it that
way. Can I damage my system by
doing this?
—ISSAC SMITH
The wait is over. DDR2 and PCI
Express motherboards for Intel
CPUs should be on the market by the
time you read this. AMD CPUs supporting PCI Express aren’t expected
for another month or two. AMD has
also been mum about its support for
DDR2, but the Doc believes AMD
is just waiting for higher-speed
grades of DDR2 before it supports
the new memory standard.
66
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
By default, the
Windows’ page
file constantly
grows and
shrinks to suit
its needs. This
results in fragmentation of the
page file as well
as files in its
proximity.
In the 1980s, conventional wisdom
held that you should format the hard
drive in the position the system
would be used in. If you, say, kept
your tower on its side, you were
supposed to reformat the drive in
that orientation. Whether that was
true or not, today’s hardware has
no such restrictions that the Doctor
knows about. You should be fine,
could move slowly across the drive if it’s constantly
being expanded and then compacted by Windows.
This happens because by default Windows has a
minimum and a maximum value to use for the page
file, and as it swaps content in and out of this area
the size dedicated to this process expands and then
shrinks, which can lead to the page file moving
across the drive like a snail.
To thwart this process, you need to specify the
same amount of storage space for both the minimum
and maximum amount of space to be used for the file
by doing the following: Right-click My Computer,
select Properties, Advanced, and then under
“Performance” select Settings, Advanced, and under
“Virtual memory” click the Change button. Then
simply enter the same value for the maximum and
minimum (between one and a half and two times the
amount of system memory is ideal) and click “set.”
This is actually a pretty good practice for anyone, as
it prevents the page file from getting fragmented in
the first place.
assuming you’re not blocking any
vents and your optical drives are
capable of being run on their sides
(even so, you may get a few more
scratches on optical discs from
spinning down with the optical
drive on its side).
FAN-TASTIC QUESTION
The article about the 15 common
PC upgrade mistakes in your July
issue was very helpful but I had a
question about mistake #11: How
can I tell if my case fan is facing
the wrong way? Should certain
fans direct airflow in certain
directions or does it not matter?
—RICH FLOYD
Generally, you want a well-designed
airflow plan. For most ATX cases, the
conventional wisdom has been to
suck air in the front and blow it out
the back. You want as much air as
possible moving through the case to
keep your hardware cool. If your system is running too hot and the CPU
is overheating, you should consider
reversing the airflow so you suck
cool air in the rear so the processor
gets the coolest air possible. You
should then vent air out the front of
the machine.
SOME SOUND ADVICE
I’m obsessed with high-quality
sound and recently bought a
new pair of speakers that are
absolutely great, but the problem
is that when I play my MP3s
the sound crackles and pops. I
think the culprit might be the
onboard RealTek AC97 on my
motherboard. Is there anything I
can do to fix the problem? I’m on
a tight budget so I’m hesitant to
purchase a stand-alone soundcard,
but if I’m forced to go that route,
are there any quality, value-priced
5.1 channel soundcards out there
you could recommend?
—MARCEL DORMA
HARD OF HEARING
I jog regularly in Central Park
and always take some music
along to keep me going, but
the volume levels are never
loud enough. I’ve tried using
both an MP3 player and my
Samsung SPHi-700 phone.
I have tried to enhance the
audio levels of my WMA and
MP3 files via MP3Gain but
the audio becomes static or
noisy. Is there a way for me to
enhance the audio level of a
song without distorting it?
—ALEX
You should have no problems playing
MP3 files on a properly configured
system, even if it’s using lowly
onboard audio. The crackling is likely
the result of a device that’s hogging
the PCI bus. You may first want to
check your device manager to see
if everything is configured correctly
and there are no conflicts. You may
also want to try removing your PCI
cards (NIC, RAID, modem) to see if
that clears up the problem. Of course,
also make sure you have the latest
drivers and BIOS for the motherboard
and sound device. And get the latest
drivers for all your hardware devices
(NIC, RAID, modem) as that may correct any problems. Finally, if you’re
really into high-quality sound, you
shouldn’t be running onboard audio.
Consider Creative Lab’s Audigy 2 ZS
(about $85) or M-Audio’s Revolution
7.1 card (about $75.) Both feature
high-quality 24-bit components
and because they’re off the motherboard, they’re less prone to the
noise that most onboard AC97 components demonstrate.
DEFRAGGING RAID
I’ve got two Western
Digital Raptors in a RAID 0
configuration and was curious
as to how defragging affects
performance. Whenever I have
the defrag utility analyze my C:
drive, there’s always an inordinate
amount of info on the latter half
and I want to know if the cleanup
process sends all the data to a
single drive, negating the benefit
of splitting the labor, or does it
clean everything up and keep data
spread across the two drives?
In a word, no. MP3s, as you
probably already know, are compressed by throwing out a certain
amount of audio data in order to
reduce the file size. You can use a
program like MP3Gain to increase
the volume a little bit, but you
can’t crank an already compressed file to Dr. Feelgood levels
without some consequences.
You have some options,
though. You can rip your CDs over
again and use an audio-editing application to increase the
A RAID array is effectively a single
drive as far as your defragmenting
software is concerned, so we recommend treating it just like a single
hard drive and defragging relatively
often (at least once a month). When
you perform this task, the software
treats the two drives’ data stripes
just like bits of data on a single
drive and rearranges them in order
to be as contiguous as possible for
optimal performance. We’re not sure
what’s causing you to think most
of the data is residing on only one
drive, but that would never happen
with a RAID array and is physically
impossible because RAID striping
works by dividing data into blocks
and divvying it up between the
two drives. In RAID, data is always
spread across both drives by the
RAID controller.
On a semi-related note, be very
careful running RAID 0 because it
doubles your chances of suffering
drive failure and losing all your
—MIKE FONTANA
Is your Dream Machine turning into a nightmare? Are you waking up in a cold sweat because your PC can’t cope with today’s
hardware? Look to the west, my sons and daughters, for the
Doctor is here to save you. E-mail all your PC problems to
[email protected], and if your problem is dire enough,
the Doc will come to the rescue.
volume of each track
(look in the Help file
for “volume increase”
or “gain” control)
before compression.
But that’s a drag.
You can also buy
better headphones.
Sony’s MDR-EX70LP
and MDR-ED268LP
series earbuds ($50,
www.sel.sony.com)
pump incredibly
juicy bass from even
weak-sounding, poorly
compressed tracks,
while remaining light
enough to be comfortable for jogging. Even
better, Shure’s E3c earbuds ($100,
www.shure.com) provide a better
fit, blocking out more outside noise
and thus reducing the amount of
volume you need.
You also have the option of
buying a louder MP3 player. The
iPod gets brutally loud (fun fact:
European iPods are quieter, for
sensitive European ears). And if the
iPod still isn’t loud enough for you,
crank it up with euPod, a third-party
data. In general, you should never
keep anything on a RAID 0 array that
you would mind losing.
TO RAID OR NOT TO RAID
I’ve recently gotten into video
editing and now want to
upgrade to a dual SATA drive
configuration. Everything I read
about video editing says the ideal
situation is to have two hard
drives with the OS loaded on
one drive and the video files on
another. How does this compare
with a RAID 0 configuration that
has two (or more) partitions?
—FRED WILSON
Because you’re doing video editing with your PC, a RAID 0 configuration is ideal for this purpose. As
you are probably aware, streaming video requires some serious
horsepower, especially if you’re
trying to render multiple streams
at once. If your hard drive can’t
write as fast as the speed of the
incoming video stream, the result
is dropped frames, gaps in audio,
and jerky performance. This scenario is highly unlikely in a RAID
0 setup, as both drives can handle
an obscene amount of bandwidth
(more than 100MB/s sequential
There’s no easy way to
increase the volume of your
MP3 files, but you can get a
louder MP3 player. The iPod
is one of the loudest players
we’ve ever tested.
hack available for free at www.
espen.se (keep in mind that there’s
an inverse relationship between
volume and battery life).
Finally, you could go get a
hearing exam at the free clinic.
reads for late-model hard drives!)
and are thus totally capable of
handling any major spikes in
throughput as well as multiple
streams simultaneously. The only
problem with the RAID 0 approach
is it doubles your exposure to
catastrophic data loss, so you’ll
need to run frequent backups.
UPDATING DRIVERS
AUTOMATICALLY
Do you know of a way I can
automatically detect the
hardware in my system and
locate the correct or updated
drivers for the components? I
recently reformatted my hard
drive to reinstall Windows 98
and it’s a pain to have to hunt
down the drivers I need.
—TODD
That would sure be swell, wouldn’t
it? Unfortunately, we know of no
such beast, and we’d be very cautious if we found someone advertising such a service. A site that would
install new drivers when Windows
is freshly installed could also install
all sorts of nasty malware when your
computer is at its most vulnerable,
before the firewall and antivirus software are onboard. n
OCTOBER 2004
MAXIMUMPC
67
How To...
A step-by-step guide to tweaking your PC Experience
UPDATE YOUR
Windows XP CD
Add RAID drivers and
Service Pack 2 to your
original Windows CD!
By Omeed Chandra
MAXIMUMPC
TIME TO COMPLETION
2:30
HOURS
MINUTES
T
hink of how you treat a brand-new car: You
cherish and pamper it at first. You even give up
your Sunday afternoons to wash and wax it by
hand. Your heart skips a beat whenever you see that
gleaming steel beast waiting for you in the parking lot.
A newly installed version of Windows XP can
inspire similar devotion. Not only do you thrill at its
pristine condition but you patiently, and even eagerly
download all the latest patches from Windows Update
so as to keep your OS shipshape.
But over time, most of us begin to take that new car—
or that clean WinXP installation—for granted. As it accumulates miles and wear and tear, your erstwhile pride
and joy becomes just another drain on your wallet—and
Ingredients
Windows XP CD
Internet connection
CD burner
ISO Buster (www.isobuster.com)
Nero 5.5.9.0 or newer (www.nero.com)
STEP 1
Collect the Necessary Files
Before getting started, we’ll need to download the full, stand-alone
installation of Service Pack 2 (as opposed to performing a webbased upgrade). Go to download.microsoft.com and look under the
Windows XP section.
While you’re at it, grab the latest drivers for your RAID or
Serial ATA controller. If you add them to your install CD, you
won’t need to use an old-fashioned floppy drive to install
Windows. For an add-in RAID or SATA card, look for the drivers
on the web site of your controller chip’s manufacture. Some of the
most popular controllers are made by Promise (www.promise.com),
Intel (www.intel.com), Silicon Image (www.siliconimage.com), and
HighPoint (www.highpoint-tech.com). If your controller is integrated
onto your motherboard, hit up your mobo manufacturer’s web site.
68
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
your time. Hand-washing, you discover, just isn’t worth
the effort anymore. In its place: a quickie car wash at the
local gas station. If only there were a simple wash-andrinse equivalent for WinXP.
Guess what? Such a thing does exist. It’s called a
Windows XP reinstall—and the quickest, easiest method
for reinstalling is to create an up-to-the-minute Windows
XP setup CD with the latest Service Pack and drivers
preinstalled (aka “slipstreamed”), so you won’t have to
spend half your life on Microsoft’s Windows Update web
site. As always, Maximum PC is here to show you how
it’s done. Heck, we’ll even help you add RAID or Serial
ATA controller drivers to your CD so you won’t need a
floppy drive (or the F6 key) to install Windows.
You can roll your RAID
drivers into your XP
install disc by
slipstreaming.
STEP 2
Update Your Setup Files
Our next objective is to extract Service Pack
2 to a folder so we can update our existing
Windows setup files. Open the command
prompt by clicking Start, Run, and typing
cmd.exe. Use the change-directory command to navigate to the folder where you
just saved the SP2 executable in the previous step. (The syntax for change-directory is cd <path>, so if you saved the SP2
executable to, say, C:\Downloads, you
would type cd C:\Downloads to go there.)
Extract the SP2 files by typing xpSP2 –x,
where xpSP2 is the name of the SP2 executable you downloaded. When prompted
for a destination to extract the files to, enter
C:\xpSP2.
Once the files have been extracted,
insert your Windows XP CD into an
optical drive and copy its entire contents
to a different folder on your hard drive.
To keep it simple, use C:\xpsetupcd as
the folder. Now, return to the command
prompt and type the following command: C:\xpSP2\i386\update\update
Service Pack 2’s built-in updater makes
it easy to patch your original Windows
setup files with Microsoft’s latest code.
/s:C:\xpsetupcd. This will update your
existing Windows setup files with the
new code contained in Service Pack 2. A
message box will pop up to notify you
when the process is complete.
STEP 3
Add Your RAID/SATA Drivers
We’re now ready to add RAID/SATA controller drivers to our CD (if you don’t want
to do this, skip ahead to the final step).
Open the folder to which you copied your
Windows XP CD (C:\xpsetupcd) and create
a subfolder called $OEM$.Then, create a
subfolder of $OEM$ called $1 and a subfolder of $1 called drivers.The resulting
path should be C:\xpsetupcd\
$OEM$\$1\drivers. This is where
Windows Setup will look for drivers that
aren’t contained in its standard driver
library. For organizational purposes, make
a subfolder within drivers named for
the type of driver it will contain—for
instance, create a RAID folder for RAID
drivers or an SATA folder for Serial ATA
drivers.You can use any name, as long as
it has fewer than eight characters.
With the aforementioned folder
structure in place, copy the Windows XP
RAID/SATA drivers directly into the folder
you created above (we used C:\xpsetupcd\
$OEM$\$1\drivers\RAID). If your drivers
came in a self-extracting executable
rather than a zip file, you may be able to
extract its contents manually by opening
it in a program like WinRAR (available
at www.rarsoft.com). (Alternately, you can
run the self-extracting executable, then
dig around in your system’sTEMP directory—usually C:/Documents and Settings/
YourUsername/LocalSettings/Temp until
you find the right directory). Finally, locate
the SYS file for your RAID/SATA controller
from among the files you just extracted;
it should be named after your specific
controller (e.g. fasttx2k.sys for a Promise
Adding RAID or Serial ATA drivers to your
Windows CD will save you the trouble of
using a floppy disc to manually install
them every time you reformat.
FastTrakTX2 RAID controller).The drivers
for different operating systems may be
split into distinct folders, so make sure
you find the SYS file that’s intended for
Windows XP. Once you find the SYS file,
copy it to the i386 folder of your Windows
CD (C:\xpsetupcd\i386).
STEP 4
Introduce Windows to Your Drivers
Now that we’ve added our RAID/SATA
driver files to the mix, we need to tell
Windows Setup about the existence of
these drivers and how to use them. But
unless you happen to have this information memorized—and if you do, this
might be a good time to turn off your
computer and spend some time in the
real world—you’ll need to look it up in
your driver’s INF file. This file is usually
found in the same place as the SYS file
you located in the previous step and will
probably have the same name, albeit
with an INF extension. Open the INF file
in Notepad and copy the PCI identifier
string, which is a series of characters
beginning with “PCI\VEN”—for instance,
PCI\VEN_105A&DEV_3376. There
may be other text on the same
line as the identifier string; if this
is the case, start at the first occurrence of PCI\VEN and copy the
text up to but not including the
first period (or the end of the line,
whichever comes first).
Next, open TXTSETUP.SIF
Somewhere in the depths of your RAID/SATA
(situated in C:\xpsetupcd\i386)
controller’s INF file lurks the fabled PCI identiand paste your PCI identifier
fier string.
string under the [HardwareIds
Database] section of that file. At the end
3376 = “fasttx2k”. Note: If your
of the string, add an equal-sign followed
driver’s INF file contains multiple PCI
by the driver name in quotes. In the case
identifier strings, copy all of them into
of our Promise RAID controller, the
TXTSETUP.SIF. Now scroll down to the
resulting line is: PCI\VEN_105A&DEV_
Continued on page 70Ë
OCTOBER 2004
MAXIMUMPC
69
STEP 4 (Continued from page 61)
[SourceDisksFiles] section of TXTSETUP.
SIF and add the following text: driver_
filename.sys = 1,,,,,,_x,4,1
where driver_filename.sys is the name of
your RAID /SATA driver’s SYS file. Note
that you should include the .sys here.
Then, under the [SCSI.Load] section,
enter: driver_filename = driver_
filename.sys,4. Once again, driver_
filename is the name of your driver’s SYS
file. Note the lack of a .sys suffix on the
left side of the equal-sign.
Finally, in the [SCSI] section of the file,
add the following: driver_filename =
“RAID/SATA Device Name”
You can enter whatever you want
for “RAID/SATA Device Name,” but we
recommend using a meaningful description (such as the name of your RAID/
SATA controller). Finally, save and close
TXTSETUP.SIF.
STEP 5
Create a Customized Setup Routine
You’re almost there. In this step, we’ll make
a file called WINNT.SIF in the i386 folder
of our Windows setup files (C:\xpsetupcd\
i386).This file can be used to create an
unattended installation routine—a subject
beyond the scope of this how-to—but
we’ll simply use it to point Windows to the
drivers we’ve slipstreamed. Create WINNT.
SIF and enter the following:
[Data]
AutoPartition=0
MsDosInitiated=”0”
UnattendedInstall=”Yes”
[Unattended]
UnattendMode=ProvideDefault
OemPreinstall=Yes
OemSkipEula=Yes
NoWaitAfterTextMode=1
NoWaitAfterGUIMode=1
WaitForReboot=”No”
TargetPath=\WINDOWS
DriverSigningPolicy=Ignore
OemPnPDriversPath=
WINNT.SIF is a powerful file that
allows you to customize and automate
many parts of the Windows installation process.
[GuiUnattended]
OEMSkipWelcome = 1
[UserData]
ProductKey=
FullName=””
OrgName=””
You’ll need to customize the
OemPnPDriversPath line by entering the
path to the INF file for your RAID/SATA
driver (for instance if your drivers are in
C:\xpsetupcd\i386\$OEM$\$1\drivers\RAID
use: OemPnPDriversPath=drivers\
RAID\FastTrack\WinXP).
There are a few other fields you may
want to customize before you close WINNT.
SIF. Type your product key, name, and
company name in the ProductKey,
FullName, and OrgName fields, to avoid
having to enter them during setup. And if
you’d like to install Windows to a folder
other than C: WINDOWS, edit the
TargetPath field as needed.
STEP 6
Prepare Your Bootable CD
Our next task is to extract the boot image from our original
Windows XP disc so we can use it to make our slipstreamed CD
bootable as well. With your original XP CD inserted, launch ISO
Buster and select “Bootable CD” from the left pane. In the right
pane, right-click Microsoft Corporation.img and choose “Extract
Microsoft Corporation.img.” Extract this file to the folder where
you copied your XP setup files (C:\xpsetupcd).
Fire up Nero Burning ROM (or EZ CD Creator, or any other
CD burning app) and go to the New Compilation window (click
“Close Wizard” if Nero’s wizard comes up). Select “CD-ROM
(Boot)” from the left pane and open the Boot tab. For “Source
of boot image data” choose “Image file” and use the Microsoft
Corporation.img file you just extracted. Check “Enable expert
settings...”, and set “Kind of emulation” to “No emulation” and
“Number of loaded sectors” to 4. (These instructions will vary if
you use another application, of course.)
Next, head over to the ISO tab and set “File/Directory name
length” to “ISO Level 2.” Ensure that “Format” is set to “Mode
1” and “Character Set” to “ISO 9660,” and make certain all four
checkboxes on this tab are checked (“Joliet,” “Allow pathdepth
of more than 8 directories,” “Allow more than 255 characters
in path,” and “Do not add the ‘;1’ ISO file version extension”).
Finally, click the Label tab and set the “Volume Label” field to
70
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
Make your slipstreamed Windows CD bootable by extracting
the boot image from your original Windows CD and feeding it
to Nero.
the value used by your original Windows XP CD—this is the
name that appears next to your CD-ROM drive in My Computer
when your XP CD is inserted.
At this point, we’re almost ready to rock. Click the “New”
button to open the Nero File Browser, and then locate the folder
where you copied your Windows XP CD. Open the folder and
add its entire contents to your CD image. When you’re all set,
mash the “Burn” button and bask in the glory of your shiny new
slipstreamed Windows XP CD, complete with RAID/SATA drivers
and Service Pack 2! n
In the Lab
A behind-the-scenes look at Maximum PC testing
The Case Against Raid 0
An Internet brouhaha surrounding RAID 0 performance spills
into the Maximum PC Lab—and produces shocking results
F
or years, striping together two or
more hard drives in a RAID 0 array
has been the power-user’s configuration of choice. Using two drives instead
of one, with both drives sharing the
workload, can result in an astounding
performance increase over a single drive
thanks to the drives’ ability to execute
tasks in parallel. Benchmark numbers
have backed this up; sequential read
speeds typically jump from 50-odd MB
per second for late-model SATA drives to
more than 100MB when configured in
RAID 0.
Lately, however, two well-known
hardware sites (Anandtech.com and
Storagereview.com) have come down
hard on RAID 0’s desktop performance.
This summer, both sites posted stories
claiming that, for single-user workloads
and gaming, these gains in data transfer
rates are either nonexistent or so minimal as to not be worth the extra cost
and risk levied by RAID 0. Obviously,
this contention flies in the face of
conventional PC-enthusiast orthodoxy
(notice that all six gaming rigs in this
month’s Desktop Deathmatch feature
use RAID 0), creating a firestorm of
discussion within the PC hardware community. In the interest of peer review,
we decided to investigate further with
our own extensive battery of Lab tests.
Our findings: RAID 0 provides performance benefits over a single drive,
but primarily in the realm of sequential
transfers such as video editing or other
apps that require more bandwidth.
RAID also delivers improved scores in
the Application Index of the hard drive
benchmark H2benchw—a test based on
real-world usage patterns for a desktop
user. But what about the loading of
huge maps in 3D games? That would
surely be faster with RAID, right?
To find out, we coupled a 3.2GHz
Pentium 4 with an Intel 865/ICH5
chipset, to which we connected in turn
a single boot drive, a bootable RAID 0
array, a nonbootable single drive, and
72
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
nonbootable RAID array using
the same drives. The tests consisted of launching a new singleplayer campaign in three different
games—Far Cry, Doom 3, and
Battlefield 1942.
Much to our surprise, we found
minimal performance benefits
from our RAID array. And, in
some cases, we even saw a slight
decrease in performance! This verdict remained consistent regardless of the configuration we used.
The startling results prompted
us to extend our tests to a bevy
of different drives with varying
performance capabilities, including an external FireWire drive, a
4,200rpm laptop hard drive, a PCI
RAM disk, a 7,200rpm USB drive,
and even a 15K SCSI drive. We
also tried both a host-based SATA
RAID controller card and a parallel
Running several hard drives in RAID 0 boosts
ATA RAID card with an onboard
sequential read speeds, but Maximum PC Lab
CPU. RAID or no RAID, in almost
tests indicate that for games, using a single
all instances, game-level loading
drive is usually faster.
times hardly wavered.
How is this possible? We suspect (and our test with the RAM
disk seemingly confirms this) that
expensive way to obtain a small perfortoday’s games are far more CPU depenmance advantage, but this has always
dent in terms of mission and level loadbeen the case. As stated earlier, we
ing. This means that more time is spent
were genuinely surprised by our game
decompressing levels, textures, and
loading tests, and have tempered our
sounds than reading from the disk. To
enthusiasm for RAID 0 in light of these
determine just how important the CPU
results. Rest assured, we’ll continue
is in loading levels, we switched from
to investigate ways desktop users can
a 3.2GHz Pentium 4 to a 2.0GHz chip,
maximize the performance of their storand saw the level load time increase by
age subsystems and will bring you more
14 seconds!
information in future issues.
So why does everyone swear RAID
feels faster? All we can say is that
seat-of-the-pants computing
DARE TO COMPARE: Game Level Load Times
sometimes flies in the face of
RAID ARRAY
SINGLE DRIVE
facts. We were taken aback by the
results, but we’ll freely admit that
Doom 3 (secs)
38
35
the RAID world is round even
Far Cry (secs)
21
21
though most of us thought it
Battlefield 1942 (secs) 22
22
was flat.
As it stands, RAID 0 is an
* Maxtor DiamondMax 10 hard drives were used to perform these tests.
Reviews
HP Bluetooth Folding Keyboard
Crate Expectations
No matter how far handwriting recognition advances, and no
matter how cute ‘n’ convenient built-in keypads get, neither
technology can approach the utility and familiarity of the
classic keyboard. Toting around your
old Microsoft Natural Keyboard may be
out of the question, but not so with HP’s
Bluetooth Folding Keyboard. Only slightly
larger in its folded state than a couple
of Pop-Tarts, the keyboard opens into a
comfortable typing surface that’s just shy
of full-size. Nice touches are the inverted-T
arrow keys, and a handful of hotkeys for
launching applications. Although the foldout tray was designed by HP for its own iPaq, the keyboard will work
with any Bluetooth device. In fact, the hotkeys worked just fine with our
Dell Axim X30. The best part, naturally, is that there are no wires. $130,
&
www.hp.com
WireWeight Your Mouse
If you’re still a wired-mouse kind of person, you’ve no doubt become
annoyed, frustrated, and even emotionally distraught by the frequency with which your mouse cord gets jammed and tangled like a
garden hose.
WireWeight’s unique solution lets you keep that cord where it
belongs. And it looks cool, too. The 8-ounce brass weights—which
come in black, chrome, and nickel finishes—sandwich the cord like a
yo-yo and let you set the amount of cord slack you want. One word of
warning, though: Keep the weight away from the edge of your desk
or face the peril of the device being yanked from your machine. $12,
For the “Gaming PCs” story this month, we
purchased a truck load of surplus crates
on the cheap from the U.S. government.
www.wireweight.com
Best of the Best
As of October, 2004
After last month’s major hardware regime change, October is relatively uneventful. PCI Express graphics
cards are still hard to come by so we’re not recommending one for now. And, while we had originally
scheduled a review of a Socket 939 nForce3 Ultra board this month, technical issues necessitated its
delay. We’re working with the maker to resolve the problems, but we realize we can’t delay a recommendation in this category any longer. So for now, Asus’ A8V with its VIA K8T800 Pro chipset (which
received a 9 verdict in August 2004) is our pick. And Klipsch is back—its 2.1 speaker rig has overtaken
Logitech’s. Finally, we’ve also added both analog and USB headset picks to our list—thanks to readers
for writing in on that one.
High-end videocard:
nVidia GeForce 6800 Ultra
LCD monitor:
Dell 2001FP
Pocket PC PDA:
Dell Axim X30
Budget videocard:
ATI Radeon 9800
High-end CRT monitor:
NEC FE2111 SB
Palm OS PDA:
Palm Tungsten C
Do-everything videocard:
All-in-Wonder Radeon
9800 Pro
Socket 478 Pentium 4
motherboard: Abit IC7-MAX3
7.1 speakers:
Creative Labs 7.1
Gigaworks S750
Soundcard:
Sound Blaster Audigy 2
ZS Platinum
Serial ATA hard drive:
Western Digital 740GD
Raptor
Parallel ATA hard drive:
Maxtor DiamondMax 10
DVD burner:
Sony DRU-700A
Socket 939 Athlon 64
motherboard: Asus A8V
Deluxe
Athlon XP motherboard:
Asus A7N8X Deluxe
Rev. 2.0
Portable MP3 player:
Apple iPod 40GB
Photo printer:
Canon i9900
On closer inspection, it turned out
the crates were from a military base
somewhere in New Mexico.
5.1 speakers:
Logitech Z-680
4.1 speakers:
Logitech Z-560
2.1 speakers:
Klipsch GMX A-21
Analog headset:
Sennheiser PC-150
USB headset:
Plantronic DSP-500
Our current gaming favorites: Doom 3, Bad Mojo, Ground Control II: Operation Exodus,
Planetside, City of Heroes
Once we opened the crates, we discovered
that 3D shooters accurately simulate reality:
Huge-ass crates really do contain small
packs of ammunition!
OCTOBER 2004
MAXIMUMPC
73
Reviews
Sony VAIO-U50
d
b
The future of handhelds? We think so
W
6.5”
4.25“
4.375
The VAIO-U50
particularly
sparkles in
portrait mode,
thanks to the
four-way D-pad
for navigation
and scrolling
within web
pages.
e’ve seen and even previewed
a few prototypes of palm-top
PCs capable of running the
full desktop version of Windows XP,
but whenever we ask for reviewable
units, all we hear are crickets chirping.
So when Maximum PC operatives
in Japan tipped us off
about Sony’s VAIOU50, we turned to
importer Dynamism.com
to arrange a test drive.
We’re so enamored
of Sony’s shiny little
bauble that we’re
hanging on to our
cargo pants just so
we’ll have a place
to keep it.
It’s bulky for a
handheld, but no
other handheld
busts out with
both 802.11b and
802.11g wireless
connections,
and the huge
6.5-inch screen
won’t force you
to view web pages as
a single, interminable column. You
can click on links with the pointing
stick (a—pictured above right) and
mouse buttons (b), or with the
included stylus. You can also click
on the Rotate button (c) to switch
the VAIO-U50 into portrait mode
for a full-page view (above left) and
use the extremely cool four-way
scroll button (d) to move around
within windows without having
to use scroll bars that may be off
screen. A Standby button puts the
VAIO-U50 to sleep and awakens it
in just seconds.
11.75”
A hinged middle lets you fold the keyboard for
easy transport.
74
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
a
f
c
e
Sony’s palm-top
PC may be expensive, but its
price could be offset by replacing your laptop, handheld,
and desktop, not to mention all the necessary software for each.
When you want a desktop
system, just drop the VAIO-U50
into its dock and connect it to your
external monitor and keyboard.
Although the native resolution is
fixed at 800x600, you can extend
this into a scrollable virtual desktop
of up to 1600x1200.
If you’re traveling or running
from the law, you can take along
the lightweight, sturdy, folding
USB keyboard (lower left) that has
its own pointing stick and mouse
buttons. There are even Memory
Stick and CompactFlash slots, a
handy Ctrl-Alt-Del button for crash
recovery that doesn’t require the
external keyboard, and utility buttons (e) for adjusting brightness,
volume, etc., without having to
drill through Windows XP menus.
This wee PC can even function
as a portable entertainment center;
imagine watching Scary Movie
on the beautifully sharp screen,
and pressing the Zoom button (f)
during Carmen Elektra’s epic sprinkler dash. You also get excellent
earbuds and a corded remote for listening to music. We found the battery life adequate—the VAIO-U50
is able to continuously play back a
movie at maximum brightness for a
little more than two and half hours.
In Standby mode, we’ve been able
to get as much as two days worth of
frequent use in between charges.
It shouldn’t come as a surprise
that this is not a gaming rig. Inside
is a 900MHz Celeron proc with
256MB of RAM (the VAIO-U70
upgrades you to a 1GHz Pentium M
with 1MB of L2 cache and 512MB of
RAM). Both models have a modest
20GB hard drive, and 64MB of
video RAM is shared with the main
memory. And although the VAIOU50 scored a humble 92 in SYSmark
2002, that’s only 9 points lower
than Sharp’s thin-‘n’-light Actius
PC-MM20 with a 1GHz Transmeta
Efficeon (reviewed August 2004).
For what it’s worth, the VAIO-U
seems extremely responsive, and
applications launched quickly even
when three or four were already
open and running.
For the time being, Sony is marketing the VAIO-U series only in
Japan (it’s available here in the US
through importer Dynamism.com),
so a number of software features,
such as a streaming media playback service, are unavailable. But if
you’re not a gamer and don’t mind
that the bulk of the VAIO-U50’s
documentation is in decorative but
unhelpful Japanese, dig into your
wallets: Sony has delivered the
palm-top PC that other companies
still have under lock and key.
—LOGAN DECKER
MAXIMUMPC VERDICT
MR. ROPER
9
With an external backup drive, it really can replace
your laptop and PDA.
MR. FURLEY
Tiny hard drive. Documentation and hardwaresetup config screens are in Japanese.
$1,900, www.dynamism.com
Reviews
Sapphire Toxic X800 Pro
Tremendous overclocking potential, but still falls
short on performance
L
ast month we tested the ATI-branded version of the X800 Pro, and it left us
wanting. ATI’s 12-pipeline design just couldn’t compete with nVidia’s
latest and greatest, even at much higher clock speeds. This month, we
investigate Sapphire’s solution to the problem, which includes a super-sized,
not-always-on fan and a massive two-slot heatsink.
Sapphire has a history of making silent, or near-silent videocards using
large, passive coolers instead of a smaller, noisier heatsink/fan. The Toxic X800
Pro continues this tradition. The aforementioned mondo heatsink connects to a
wind tunnel–type fan that exhausts hot air straight out of the back of the case.
The trade-off is a design that takes up two slots and fills a lot of space above
the AGP slot as well. What’s
interesting is that the Toxic’s
Sapphire Toxic Radeon X800 Pro
fan only runs when the card
10,602
3DMark 2003 Default Overall
reaches a certain temperature.
80.0 fps
3DMark 2003 Default Game 2
Running at the default over68.7 fps
3DMark 2003 Default Game 4
clocked speeds the card ships
3,661
3DMark 2003 High Quality Overall
at—475MHz core and 520MHz
19.8 fps
3DMark 2003 High Quality Game 2
memory—the cooling fan
31.5 fps
3DMark 2003 High Quality Game 4
47.4 fps
Halo
rarely saw action.
52.7 fps
Doom 3 demo1
Keen-eyed readers will
243.8 fps
UT2003 Flyby
remember that the default
61.3 fps
Far Cry 1.1
memory clock for the 256MB
All benchmarks are run on our Athlon FX-51 test beds with 1GB
of GDDR3 memory on X800
of memory. All tests are run at 1600x1200, except the default run
of 3DMark 2003, which uses all the default settings, and Doom
Pro boards is 450MHz, not
3, which is run at 1280x1024. President George Washington’s
“wooden” teeth were in fact made of hippopotamus ivory.
520MHz. Sapphire uses a
BENCHMARKS
eVGA e-GeForce 6800 Ultra AGP
A plain exterior hides ultra-fast performance
T
he eVGA e-GeForce 6800 Ultra AGP may look like a standard
nVidia reference design, but its plain exterior belies a
lightning-fast GPU. Once we got past the goofy image
silk-screened on the card’s fan, we were pleased to discover
that this nVidia-based board delivers where it counts.
The key to the eVGA’s power is the NV40 core running
at 400MHz paired with 256MB of GDDR3 SDRAM running at
550MHz. This GPU purred through all of our benchmarks with nary a
snag—posting scores even higher than the Leadtek GeForce 6800 Ultra
we reviewed last month, all thanks to nVidia’s 61.77 driver revision.
It’s worth mentioning again that nVidia was able to lower the power supply
requirements for the GeForce
6800 Ultra boards from a
whopping 480W to a more
12,257
3DMark 2003 Default Overall
reasonable 380W. To us, this
101.0 fps
3DMark 2003 Default Game 2
seemed too good to be true,
70.4 fps
3DMark 2003 Default Game 4
so we did extensive testing,
4,311
3DMark 2003 High Quality Overall
and managed to get the eVGA
28.0 fps
3DMark 2003 High Quality Game 2
31.1 fps
3DMark 2003 High Quality Game 4
board to work with an ancient
70.01 fps
Halo
PC Power and Cooling
83.2 fps
Doom 3 demo1
Silencer 275W power supply.
274.8 fps
UT2003 Flyby
It seems that nVidia’s refer63.4 fps
Far Cry 1.1
ence cooler design—which
All benchmarks are run on our Athlon FX-51 test beds with 1GB
the eVGA board uses—is quiof memory. All tests are run at 1600x1200, except the default
run of 3DMark 2003, which uses all the default settings, and
eter than the custom rig that
Doom 3, which is run at 1280x1024. A single hippopotamus
can eat 100 pounds of grass in a single night.
the Leadtek 6800 Ultra board
BENCHMARKS
76
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
The
Sapphire
Toxic Radeon
X800 Pro’s
massive twoslot heatsink
lets you overclock
the GPU and
memory to new heights.
Unfortunately, it still runs
slower than the GeForce
6800 GT.
small TSR program, called APE, to ratchet up
the memory clock when you start your system.
Without the APE program, the card runs at the standard default 475MHz/450MHz speeds.
Of course, with the fan barely turning at Sapphire’s default overclocked
speeds, we wanted to see if we could achieve even more substantial performance gains by cranking up the clocks a few more notches. We managed to
get the board up to 485MHz core and 550MHz memory long enough to post an
impressive 11,200 score in 3DMark 2003. That’s not too shabby!
Sadly, despite the great overclocking potential, this 12-pipe
board still can’t compete with
MAXIMUMPC
the 16-pipeline GeForce 6800 GT
DIAMOND
in most benchmarks. When you
The big, honking cooler makes this board a great
factor in the Sapphire’s higher
overclocker.
price tag—it costs about $70
RUBY
more than the 6800 GT—it’s
Takes two slots. The Toxic is still slower than the
impossible to recommend this
cheaper GeForce 6800 GT.
board over nVidia’s.
$470, www.sapphiretech.com
—WILL SMITH
VERDICT
6
Don’t be fooled
by the ugly bug
collector on the
cooler—this eVGA
GeForce 6800 Ultra
is a standard nVidia
reference design.
used. However, we were not able to
overclock the eVGA board as much as
we could Leadtek’s board. We could only
ratchet the eVGA GPU to 420MHz. Also,
beware: The eVGA card’s two-slot cooler does not
fit in most small formfactor cases.
The e-GeForce 6800 Ultra really shines when
you look at its performance in our standard suite of
benchmarks. It cranked out the highest score
we’ve ever seen in 3DMark 2003 on our zero-point test beds: 12,557. It also
excelled in Doom 3 with a very respectable 83.2fps in the demo1 benchmark.
These are the fastest numbers we’ve recorded from a 6800 Ultra board to
date, but when benchmarked
with the same nVidia drivers, the Leadtek board we
MAXIMUMPC
reviewed last month posted
XGA
similar scores. This means
Fastest videocard we’ve tested. Quiet cooling
that, other than the custom
solution.
cooler on the Leadtek board,
CGA
there’s absolutely no differTwo-slot cooling solution prevents use in small
ence between the eVGA and
formfactor boxes.
Leadtek boards.
$500, www.evga.com
—WILL SMITH
VERDICT
9
Reviews
Archos AV400 Pocket
Video Recorder
5”
Extreme viewing with TiVo to go!
78
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
3”
O
ur parents used to call television the “boob tube” and the
“idiot box,” yet, paradoxically,
the whole family always ended up
in front of it anyway. And now that
a preponderance of reality television
treats us to real-life boobs and true
idiots 24/7, we’re more hooked than
ever. Enter the Archos AV400 Pocket
Video Recorder, a device that can
record television programming and
play it back on the go with an integrated 320x240 color screen. Given
our nation’s growing dependence on
TV, it’s the kind of gadget that seems
essential—at least until we grow TV
tuners somewhere between the kidneys and pancreas.
The AV400’s predecessor, the
Archos’ AV300 series, was a portable video player with a proprietary connector that allowed you to
plug in optional accessories like a
rudimentary video recorder, a digital camera, and media card reader.
The AV400 series moves the video
recorder into the player itself, and
ditches the proprietary connector
for a convenient dock with S-video
and RCA (red, white, and yellow)
connectors. There are two methods
of programming the recorder:
You can use the device’s interface
to queue up tasks on the go, or
you can sign up for a free Yahoo
account and use its TV listings and
Calendar modules to create an
HTML file that can be imported
to the player. Both methods are a
pain, but are easier than programming ye olde VCR.
When sitting in its included
dock, the AV400 charges itself
and records scheduled programs
using MPEG-4 compression. At
the highest quality setting of
2,500kbps, the image on the
player’s 3.5-inch screen is gorgeous,
but the relatively low resolution of
320x240 looks a little nappy when
you connect the player to a larger
screen, such as an external monitor
or television. Although the AV400
has a relatively modest 20GB hard
Will portable media players based on Microsoft’s Portable Media
Center OS be able to match the slinkiness and versatility of the
AV400? Stay tuned—we’ll have the answer next month.
drive, that’s still plenty of room for
a handful of movies (at an overkill
size of 700MB each) and television
programs, with plenty of room left
over for thousands of MP3s. The
AV400 supports MPEG-4 compliant
video playback, including DivX
and Xvid, but not WMV.
No software is included to
decrypt your commercial DVDs for
transfer to the AV400 (which isn’t
surprising because said software is
now illegal). But if you just happen
to have DVDs that are ripped to AVI
or MPEG files sitting on your hard
drive, you can use the bundled
freeware app VirtualDub to convert
them for playback on the AV400.
This isn’t a simple task, though,
and neophytes will be horrified at
having to locate the proper codecs
on the Internet and then configure
them on their own.
Archos committed a careless
oversight by not including a kickstand with the AV400. As is, we
had to hold the unit or prop it up
against something during playback
when it wasn’t in its dock. Battery
life, on the other hand, gave us a
big fat smiley surprise. Although
Archos claims four hours of battery
life on a single charge, we found
this figure to be extremely conservative. We got 5:50 (hours:minutes)
of continuous playback from our
first charge! This absolutely stomps
anything offered by our PDAs and
other portable video players.
The AV400 may seem expensive,
but keep in mind that you get more
than just video and MP3 playback for
the money. A built-in CompactFlash
slot adds a humungous amount of
value for both casual and professional photographers by allowing
you to transfer photographs from
CompactFlash cards (and other
formats with an optional adapter).
At $550 for the 20GB model, the
Archos AV400 actually costs less
than many photo viewers with
smaller-capacity hard drives and no
video playback.
Such are the depths of our television addiction that we cannot afford
to miss even a few minutes of WalMart Shoplifters. Will Jennifer finally
get caught? Why is Bob stealing
lipstick? We need answers to these
questions ASAP, and Archos’ AV400
Pocket Video Recorder and player
makes that possible.
—LOGAN DECKER
MAXIMUMPC VERDICT
DRIVE-IN
9
It’s a VCR, MP3 player, photo viewer, and portable
video player that fits in your pocket.
DRIVE-BY
Converting video and scheduling recordings
require extensive legwork.
$550, www.archos.com
Reviews
THE BUNDLE
Writes to:
DVD+R DL
DVD+R SL
DVD-R
CD-R
Ahead Nero Express 6
Ahead Nero Vision Express
Ahead Nero BackItUp
Ahead Nero Showtime
Lite-On SOHW-832S Dual-Layer DVD Burner
Rewrites to:
DVD+RW
4x
DVD-RW
4x
CD-RW
24x
Oof! Lite-On stumbles at the gate, but may still take the lead
E
verybody knows that no matter what you do, the first pancake off the
grill is going to be the worst of the stack. But as long as you’re a halfway
decent cook the rest will be fine. That’s a gentle metaphor for Lite-On’s
first dual-layer DVD burner. It’s not outrageously slow, but it definitely falls
behind the curve of what we’ve come to expect from the company.
Dual-layer burners write at 2.4x speed to DVD+R media, and here the LiteOn does fine, taking 44:24 (min:sec) to burn our test disc—which is almost 30
seconds faster than the Sony DRU-700A dual-layer DVD burner we reviewed
in August. This isn’t a significant advantage, but we noted that after we initiated the burn, it took 38 seconds for the drive’s laser to begin firing, and nearly
a minute to write the lead-out necessary to “close” the burning session. This
suggests that Lite-On may be able to considerably shorten dual-layer burning
with some firmware work. (Like Plextor, Lite-On is very diligent about tweaking
firmware—even for older drives—and posting regular updates.)
Lite-On should also pick up the pace of burning to single-layer media. The
drive wrote 4.25GB
of data to an 8x
DVD+R disc in 10:11,
Average data transfer (MB/sec) 8.1
4.6
about a minute
Random/full-stroke seek (ms)
106/190
110/221
longer than Sony’s
Audio extraction (min:sec)
–
2:48
drive. DVD-R didn’t
Data DVD/CD burn (min:sec)
10:11 (DVD+R)
3:13
fare any better at
CPU utilization
16% (2x)
8% (8x)
10:41. Rewriteable
formats were a little
*The data CD burn test uses the bundled applications to create a 700MB
CD-R. The data DVD burn test uses the bundled applications to create a
faster; the fastest
4.25GB. The audio-extraction test uses a commercially stamped 74 minute audio CD. All tests were performed using Verbatim media.
was DVD+RW,
BENCHMARKS
DVD
CD
2.4x
8x
8x
40x
Reads:
DVD-ROM
CD-ROM
12x
40x
The 832S gets
a collective shoulder-shrug
for its slower-than-expected speeds, but knowing Lite-On, a
speed-improving firmware update is right around the corner.
clocking in at 13:56 to burn a full DVD.
Sadly, unlike other drives, Lite-On’s SOHW-832S isn’t able to burn at velocities above the disc’s officially rated speed, and our test dual-layer DVD-Video
demonstrated less compatibility with set-top players than Sony’s drive (working in three out of five players
compared with Sony’s four).
MAXIMUMPC
But at least buyers receive
Ahead’s Nero Express 6 suite
E-Z BAKE OVEN
with the drive; if you buy one,
Significantly less expensive than other dual-layer
we highly recommend scooting
burners.
DUTCH OVEN
over to the company’s web site
after you install the software to
Significantly slower than other dual-layer burners.
download the free upgrades.
$180, www.liteonamericas.com
—LOGAN DECKER
VERDICT
7
Pinnacle ShowCenter
This streaming box makes it harder than it
should be
Y
ou’ve heard the promise of the media server, haven’t you?
A PC squirreled away in some discreet location that’s dedicated to storing every CD, DVD, and image you own on its
massive hard drives, and from which you stream all your content to any
(or every) TV in your home courtesy of an Ethernet or Wi-Fi network. Sounds
great, but up ‘til now, the streaming boxes available to facilitate the process
have had limited video playback capabilities. Well, that’s no longer the case.
Pinnacle’s new ShowCenter is one of a new-generation of streaming
boxes that offer support for all the major video codecs—including DivX and
other MPEG-4-based formats. Unfortunately, the product suffers from a few
first-gen issues that mar an otherwise kick-ass product.
When you initially set up the ShowCenter software, it prompts you to
search for media files. Conveniently, we had all our digital photos, ripped
DVDs, and MP3 files stored on a single hard drive, so the server software
needed to search just that drive. After the three hours it took to chew
through our 1,500 digital photos, 25,000 MP3s, and handful of ripped DVDs,
we were able to fire up the ShowCenter.
Movie playback kicks ass. The image quality of our ripped DVDs was
indistinguishable from what you’d get with a midrange DVD player, complete
with 5.1 sound and flawless images. Music playback is acceptable. It’s easy
to play entire selections from an artist or a particular album, but you can’t
easily browse album titles from within the artist category.
The photo feature is a problem. Even if you have just a single image in a
folder—say, the album art that accompanies a collection of MP3 files—the
ShowCenter’s software will create a separate photo album for that one
80
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
A little nip ‘n’ tuck
to the server software, and Pinnacle’s
ShowCenter could be an irresistible product.
image. And there’s no way to prevent this from happening. With 3,000
albums in our music collection, each with a piece of art, you can imagine
the hell that is our photo album inventory. Our real photo albums are buried
amidst thousands of albums holding nothing more than CD cover art.
Our main gripe with the ShowCenter is the subpar server software
it comes bundled with. It’s slow and unwieldy when dealing with even
moderate-size media collections, and proved incredibly frustrating at
times.
Our other gripe is that
the ShowCenter’s remote is
MAXIMUMPC
uncomfortable and difficult
MP3
to use. The buttons you’ll
If you want to stream movies to your living room,
use most frequently are hidthis player will do the job.
den at the bottom of the unit,
WMA
and the buttons you’ll rarely
An uncomfortable remote, ill-conceived server softneed are in close proximity to
ware, and flawed photo browsing.
your thumb.
$300, www.pinnaclesys.com
—WILL SMITH
VERDICT
7
Reviews
11
”
Iomega REV 35GB/90GB USB 2.0
External Drive
A novel approach to removable storage that
fails to impress
Though the industry has largely abandoned the Zip drive and its ilk, Iomega
enters the scene with its all-new small-capacity REV drive, which uses
35GB removable hard drive cartridges. Unfortunately, while the REV drive
offers a compelling alternative to tape drives (not that many people use
them anymore), it faces much tougher competition from the recent spate of
external hard drives.
To its credit, the REV drive is a clever idea. Instead of using a removable tape cartridge like the older Zip drives, the REV uses a removable
miniature 35GB magnetic hard drive. The reason you see the number
“90GB” in the drive’s title is that it’s allegedly possible to fit 90GB on one
disk at the highest level of compression (2.6x). However, during testing
we were unable to back up a 73GB partition with compression set to
“high.” Your mileage may vary.
The main issues we have with the REV is its software is buggy and
it is extremely expensive. The product—which includes a single 35GB
drive—retails for $400, and a single 35GB replacement drive costs $60.
Compare this with a 300GB Maxtor One Touch, which costs $330. You’ll
see that by the time you have 300GB worth of REV disks you’ve coughed
up more than $800.
The REV drive is compelling if you don’t want to put all your eggs in one basket. You can hold images of your main drive on one disk, MP3s on another, and
so on. Aiding this effort is a software bundle that includes Norton Ghost for drive
4”
Iomega’s new REV
drive is clever because
it allows you to back up data onto miniature removable storage.
Unfortunately, it’ll put your bank account in the red quick.
imaging and a backup utility that lets you encrypt files and write-protect important data. We experienced a bit of weirdness during testing though, as Norton
treated the REV drive like it was a CD/DVD. Once we wrote an image to it we
couldn’t write anything else to the drive nor delete any files. It even asked us to
“insert another CD-R” when the drive filled up. That’s just sloppy. We also
couldn’t get drive compression to
work at all, and were bummed
MAXIMUMPC
that you need to install the
IOMEGA
Iomega software on a PC to use
Very quiet, great bundle, and small removable
the drive.
drives offer decent speed.
In the end, the REV drive
I.O.U.
is a slick concept that is held
An expensive proposition, and the bundled verback by its exorbitant price and
sion of Norton is old and wonky.
limited benefits over traditional
$400, ($60 for additional disks),
magnetic storage options.
www.iomega.com
—JOSH NOREM
VERDICT
5
Transcend StoreJet 20GB
The 20GB Apple iPod pictured here is a slick MP3 player that—oh wait—
this isn’t an iPod! The StoreJet sure fooled us upon first inspection. Same
ivory-colored plastic shell, same chrome siding, same clean design. And
because it’s a USB 2.0 drive, it even includes an all-white USB cable that
mimics the white earbuds included with the iPod. All in all, you could pose
with it and no one would know the difference—until they asked to have a
listen and discovered you had a USB cable in your ear.
The StoreJet looks like a solid white brick, with the exception of a
mini-USB port on its top and a red LED on the bottom that lets you know
the drive is connected and receiving power. It’s bus-powered, and
worked on each and every USB port and hub in the Lab without any
drama to speak of.
The internal 20GB Toshiba hard drive uses a single platter that rotates
at a lowly 4,200rpm, but the payoff is a drive that’s dead quiet. Because
of its slow rotational speed, it’s not a stellar performer, but in these types
of drives, performance takes a backseat to compatibility and portability.
Plus, seeing as no company makes a 7,200rpm 1.8-inch hard drive, this is
as good as it gets. Data transfer rates averaged about 10MB per second,
which is decent, but a lot slower than larger 7,200rpm external drives.
Transcend, the drive’s manufacturer, includes a limited version of a
backup utility named ExBoot that is practically worthless for a drive this
size. Who has a batch of files they need to back up routinely that is less
than 20GB? Nobody at Maximum PC, that’s for sure. ExBoot’s initial backup
routine wizard also proved maddeningly confusing. Its limited capabilities
only allow you to back up entire volumes instead of performing incremen-
82
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
3.7”
Not exactly a rocket, but it fits in your pocket
”
2.75
The StoreJet
comes with a rugged
carrying case that includes holes for the USB port and power
LED, so the drive can be sheathed at all times.
tal backups or backups of
certain folders.
Our advice: Ditch the software and use the StoreJet as
a sexy, portable hard drive.
For such simple functions, it’s
hard to fault. If you need even
more storage (we certainly
do), it’s also available in a
40GB version.
—JOSH NOREM
MAXIMUMPC VERDICT
IPOD
8
Attractive shell, decent capacity, and bus-powered.
IZOD
Slow rotational speed and unnecessary software.
$170, www.transcendusa.com
Reviews
Attention Geekers: Check
Out These Speakers!
Two sets of 2.1 speakers enter Maximum PC’s Thunderdome
H
ey, we’d all love to have a set
of 5.1 speakers, but cramped
quarters and crabby neighbors
can quickly spoil that party. Rather
than move to the country, a better
solution is to adopt a smaller, gentler 2.1 speaker system. This month
we take a look at two new systems
from industry-heavyweight Klipsch
as well as newcomer (at least to our
pages) Edifier. Both are impressive.
One is a wee bit more amazing than
the other.
—JOSH NOREM
Klipsch ProMedia GMX A-2.1
When Klipsch first released its GMX
series in early 2003, the speakers
were strictly digital, and thus offered
little value to PC owners (nForce
mobo users notwithstanding). The
lack of analog inputs angered us,
and as a consequence we gave the
GMX D-5.1 set a lowly verdict of 6.
We’d like to believe that, after reading our review, Klipsch’s CEO bellowed to his staff, “Correct this travesty at once!” resulting in the creation of the analog-only GMX
speakers pictured here. The GMX A2.1 system has now become the
benchmark for 2.1 excellence.
The primary difference between
the A-2.1 and the previous nonGMX model is an all-new two-way
satellite design that pivots on a
ball, so you can adjust them to
face up, down, left, or right. The
subwoofer is also an all-new design
with a rear-facing port that runs
the entire width of the enclosure;
as with the SWS Subwoofer and
the ProMedia Ultra 5.1, controls
are accessed via a large, discshaped pod. We’re not fans of the
pod for two reasons: It takes up a
lot of space and the headphone
jack is located on the rear, making
access difficult.
During testing, one acoustical
characteristic stood out: The sound
feels huge, especially considering this
is a 2.1 system. When we cranked up
these speakers, we felt like we needed
to take a few steps back to fully
appreciate the quality and quantity
of rich, luscious audio washing over
us. Sound is projected extremely
well, making for a sweet spot the size
of Montana. The subwoofer peters
out a bit at maximum volume, but
sounds deep without being boomy at
rational listening levels.
Edifier S2.1D
We’d never heard of Edifier before,
so when the Canadian company
offered us its finest 2.1 speaker system, we skeptically expected it to
suck, and therefore eagerly agreed
to a review. But lo and behold,
the S2.1D doesn’t suck. In fact, it’s
actually pretty darn good.
The S2.1D certainly looks nice,
sporting an aesthetic that’s classic
“Hi–Fi,” with MDF enclosures and
removable speaker grills for both
the satellites and subwoofer. Each
two-way satellite is spec’d to pump
out 20W apiece, with the 6.5-inch
subwoofer reported to deliver 40W
RMS. These numbers aren’t super
impressive, but what’s most important is how they sound. An interesting twist: These speakers offer
both analog and digital inputs,
including both coaxial and optical
(an optical cable is even included).
Controls are accessed via a wired
remote that lets you adjust volume,
bass, treble, loudness (think Hi-Fi)
and balance. The controls are easy
to use and we appreciate being
able to adjust both treble and bass.
Unfortunately, these speakers have
one fatal flaw—they lack a headphone jack. As apartment dwellers,
we use headphones frequently, so
this is a glaring omission.
In Lab tests, the speakers performed admirably. Compared
side-by-side with the Klipsch
speakers on this page, they offered
a bit more treble but not quite
as much bass. The result was
astounding high- and midrange
clarity at normal volumes, but a
lack of bass response at higher
Klipsch ProMedia
MAXIMUMPC VERDICT
MEOWERS
We weren’t big
fans of Klipsch’s
digital-only
GMX speakers,
but this new
analog version
is the dog’s
bollocks.
9
Fantastic fidelity and amazing power.
WOOFERS
Control pod is too big, and headphone jack is
hard to access.
$150, www.klipsch.com
volumes. Furthermore, the satellites didn’t project sound as well as
the ProMedias, and the subwoofer
is just not quite as powerful as
we like—bass tones tapered off at
about 60Hz or so, and increasing
the volume all the way resulted in
distortion from both the satellites
and subwoofer.
The Edifier system isn’t quite as
powerful or as elegant sounding
as the ProMedia, but it is $50 less
expensive.
Edifier’s
speakers, which
cost just $105,
look and sound
like speakers
that cost twice
as much.
Edifier S2.1D
MAXIMUMPC VERDICT
HAWAIIAN WEATHER
8
Exceptional sound, plenty of input options, and
great value.
HAWAIIAN FOOD
Subwoofer lacks headroom, and a headphone
jack is not included.
$105, www.edifier.com
OCTOBER 2004
MAXIMUMPC
84
Reviews
Altec Lansing AHS602
This headset’s beauty is marred by a few ugly warts
W
hen we first received the Altec Lansing AHS602 headset, we
marveled at how attractive it looked in its packaging. We were
especially impressed by its large headphone speakers, comfortable looking headband, and shiny silver accents. Unfortunately, this
attraction quickly turned into horror when we extracted the AHS602 from
its packaging and discovered an inline remote the size
of a small Caribbean island attached to the headset’s
wiring. It’s not that we’re opposed to the idea of an
inline remote—when properly designed and implemented, it can be an indispensable feature—but this
one is way too clunky.
To be fair to Altec Lansing, a functional reason exists for the remote’s
presence and size. It not only contains the volume controls for the
headphone and the microphone, but also acts as the battery pack that
powers the headset’s integrated SRS Headphone technology. The SRS
effect is an audio enhancement standard that is supposed to improve
the listening experience in two ways: first, it adds spatial positioning to
simulate surround sound effects; and second, it bolsters the device’s
soundstage, leading to fuller-sounding audio.
This all sounds great in theory, but in practice the AHS602 falls short.
For instance, while the normal audio output of the AHS602 sounded
decent in our subjective listening tests, it left us disappointed with its
weak bass production. Activating the SRS effect did have a positive
effect on the audio output and led to greater fidelity and a discernible
surround sound field. Unfortunately, even with SRS on, the bass still left
something to be desired. We also noticed that the SRS rendered certain
The Altec Lansing AHS602’s
attractive styling can’t mask
its disappointing bass response
and imperfect audio output.
sound effects at high
volume—such as shotgun
blasts—intolerably harsh and
piercing to our ears. Furthermore,
raising the volume past the midway point made
the audio crackle in games like Doom 3.
Not everything about the AHS602 is disappointing. As we said,
remote notwithstanding,
it’s attractively styled, and
MAXIMUMPC
the microphone performed
DETROIT PISTONS
admirably in our tests,
offering good pickup and
Attractive design, and good microphone performance.
response. However, these
DETROIT TIGERS
positives don’t make up for
Anemic bass output, bulky remote, and imperfect
the AHS602’s lackluster audio
SRS effect.
performance.
$100, www.alteclansing.com
—TAE K. KIM
VERDICT
6
Reviews
Canon EOS ID Mark II
Dual CPUs make this the Ferrari of digicams
I
f Canon’s new pro-oriented
digital camera had a mantra, it
would have to be “I can’t drive
55,” because this Mk II follow-up
is easily the fastest camera the
Maximum PC Lab has ever seen.
Consider its burst performance:
It can shoot up to 40 shots at 8.5
frames per second at an 8.2-megapixel resolution. The next-closest
digital SLR body is Nikon’s D2H,
which buffers 40fps, but at just 4
megapixels. In contrast, the Mk II’s
predecessor—the EOS 1D—could
buffer only 20 shots. To capture
70 megapixels of data per second,
Canon has jammed roughly half a
gig of DDR RAM into the body.
Auto focus performance, which
was already outstanding in the
original 1D, receives a major
upgrade here thanks to dual
32-bit CPUs. Instead of using
a single CPU to run the focus
detection points and AF, the tasks
are now split between two RISC
chips. The resulting performance
is nothing short of astonishing.
We used the camera to shoot a
variety of scenarios from a soccer
game to a formal wedding, and
the Mk II tracked all our subjects
with aplomb.
Inside the Mk II is a Canondesigned and -fabricated CMOS
sensor that offers exceptionally
clean images at ISO speeds of
800 and higher. Although the
Mk II offers just 2 megapixels of
additional resolution, its photos
look significantly better and more
detailed than those taken with the
prosumer Canon EOS 10D, which
has a reputation for producing
amazingly clean, grain-free images
at high ISO ranges.
The other big news is that this
is the first digital camera we’ve
seen to feature a RAID approach
to storing photographs. Fill both
the SD and CF slots in the Mk II,
and the camera will write an image
to both cards. If one card is corrupted, you’ve got a full backup
on the other card. Or alternatively,
you can choose to use the second
card as auxiliary storage should the
primary card fill up. Unfortunately,
86
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
The Mark II is the first dual-processor digital camera we’ve seen,
and also features a RAID approach to data storage.
the interface for implementing
to photo printers. On the other
either option is clumsy. Finally,
hand, after lugging this tank of a
Canon fixed a flaw that plagued its
camera around for a month, we
earlier digicams: The Mk II will confound ourselves wishing Canon
tinue writing images even if the CF
had dumped its old nickel metal
door is opened during the process.
hydride batteries in favor of LiBut not all is perfect in Mark II
Ion. We understand the logic of
land. Our testing indicates that this
using the same battery that’s in
camera is particularly sensitive to
Canon’s two other pro bodies,
reds—if you overexpose a red object
but a Li-Ion would have defiin certain conditions, the colors turn
nitely lightened the load. With
practically fluorescent. This problem
its magnesium shell, battery, and
manifested itself most frequently
attached fast zoom, this camera
when shooting in late afternoon sun
should come with a chiropractor.
with the camera set to auto whiteBut hey, that’s the price you
balance. We corrected this relatively
pay for this much performance
minor problem by paying close
and durability.
attention to outdoor conditions and
—GORDON MAH UNG
the camera’s settings.
We also feel obliSPECS
gated to note that the
Resolution
8.2 megapixel (3504x2336 pixels)
camera appears to do
Lens compatibility
Canon EF system
very little sharpening
Shutter
30 sec. to 1/8000 sec. (including bulb)
of images by default,
X-sync
1/250
which can make the
Weight
54.8 oz. with battery
raw photo output feel
Continuous shooting 8.5 fps
a little soft. It’s likely
Burst rating
40 JPEGS at ISO 100 (20 in RAW mode)
Canon made this
Storage
Type I and II Compact Flash and Secure
choice because proDigital
fessionals and power
Auto focus system
45 AF points at 0 to 18 EV
users favor the more
Ni-MH good for 800 to 1200 shots
sophisticated post-pro- Battery
cessing and sharpening of Photoshop over
in-camera sharpening. The merits
MAXIMUMPC
of such a decision are
open to debate, but we would
4X5
have preferred a bit more autoA wonderful viewfinder and tons of speed make
the Mk II the top gun of digital cameras.
mated sharpening.
KODAK DISC
Unlike Nikon, which is waving
Feels like an Abrams tank slung around your neck.
goodbye to FireWire, Canon maintains FireWire A and now adds
$4,500, www.canon.com
a USB 1.1 port for direct output
VERDICT
9
Reviews
LaCie Bigger Disk
A humongous, no-frills hard drive that delivers the gigs
T
hink you have a big disk? So did we, until we received LaCie’s enormous Bigger Disk for review. It’s touted as the biggest disk drive
available, and we’re inclined to agree, though it’s actually four 250GB
drives spanned together in a nifty aluminum alloy enclosure as opposed to a
single terabyte disk. No matter, because it’s still the highest capacity external USB/FireWire hard drive we’ve ever seen.
If you’re unfamiliar with drive spanning, it essentially means that data
is written to one drive first until it is full, then the next drive, and so on until
the entire thing is full. If you’re worried about thermal issues, don’t be. The
Bigger Disk includes its own cooling apparatus that spins up and down as
needed to keep the drives cool. During testing there was an almost continuous stream of lukewarm air shooting out the exhaust port on the unit’s backside, and the aluminum shell’s temperature never became warm enough to
warrant concern.
So, what do you do with this drive? Say goodbye to capacity concerns and fill ‘er up. No backup software is included, because the drive
isn’t being marketed as such, so all you have to do is begin downloading,
ripping, and copying anything and everything in sight. We’ve found that
the LaCie Bigger Disk makes for an ideal media storage drive, as it can
store more than 100 hours of HDTV, 250 ripped DVDs, or literally tens of
thousands of MP3s and pictures.
In Lab tests, transfer speeds averaged a respectable 22MB per second
using the USB 2.0 interface. FireWire speeds were a smidge faster, though
we used the slower 400MB interface rather than the rare FireWire 800 ports
(of which there are two). There’s also an “auto on” function that intelligently
turns the drives on and off when necessary, but unfortunately it’s only avail-
No buttons,
software, or
gizmos adorn
LaCie’s Bigger
Disk—just 930GB of
storage waiting to be
deflowered.
able for Mac users.
While we’re impressed with the product’s capacity (a 1.6TB version is
also available), we’re disappointed that it doesn’t come
MAXIMUMPC
bundled with any software
TERABYTE
whatsoever. Given the Bigger
Huge capacity, and includes cooling fans.
Disk’s steep cost, some rudiOVERBITE
mentary backup or video-editNo software bundle.
ing software would have made
it a more compelling package.
$1,200, www.lacie.com
—JOSH NOREM
VERDICT
8
Apple iPod
The Lance Armstrong of MP3 players wins again
I
f you don’t like ballet, it’s likely that the only possible enjoyment you get
out of watching a performance is in wondering when one of the dancers is
going to screw up and land with a spectacular thud on the stage. It’s kind
of like that with Apple’s iPod: It’s a product so graceful and talented, we can’t
help but watch in mesmerized fascination to see how the next iteration will
screw it all up. But alas, Apple has once again pulled off another grand jete
that leaves us feeling breathless.
The major update to the 4G (fourth-generation) iPod is that the hardware
interface adopts the design of the iPod Mini, placing the four control buttons of
the 3G version—reverse, menu, play/pause, and fast-forward—directly on the
touch-sensitive click wheel. This design was a necessary space-saving innovation on the Mini, but it turned out to also be an improvement over the original.
Not only is it easier to control all the functions of the iPod with one hand, but
feeling the click of the iPod’s scroll wheel also gives you tactile feedback when
you press a button.
The other improvements are subtle, but nonetheless brilliant. If your headphones get snagged or yanked out, for example, the iPod graciously pauses
music playback. This feature also comes in handy when switching between
earbuds and external speakers or an FM transmitter. The 40GB model is slightly
thinner than the 3G 30GB iPod, but the 20GB we reviewed is even slimmer still.
Battery life has improved as well; in fact, it improved over the span of our tests,
initially lasting a little more than nine and a half hours, but eventually sustaining
slightly less than 12 hours (as advertised) as we were wrapping up testing.
Our gripes are pretty much the same ones we’ve voiced since the original iPod was released. We’d love to see a custom parametric equalization
option with at least five bands to tweak, and the option to associate custom
settings with specific songs and playlists. A removable battery would also
88
MAXIMUMPC
OCOTBER 2004
New to the fourthgeneration iPod:
improved battery life
and a brand-new,
easy-to-use interface
lifted directly from
the iPod Mini.
go a long way toward reassuring potential converts
about the iPod’s longevity. And
although the 4G iPod supports
Apple’s proprietary lossless
compression format, would
it kill Apple to support the
open-source OGG and FLAC
standards? We think not.
—LOGAN DECKER
MAXIMUMPC VERDICT
AN APPLE A DAY
10
An improved interface, better battery life, and
smaller size than previous models.
DOCTOR’S OFFICE
Still lacks parametric EQ, removable battery,
and open-source format support.
$300, www.ipod.com
Reviews
F
or some strange reason, mouse
manufacturers occasionally
confuse their product with
Adidas sneakers, and insist on
embellishing the PC peripheral with
fancy, industrial, “designer” features.
The Microsoft S+ark and Logitech
MX1000 Laser are two such examples. While one mouse emphasizes
form over function and falls flat, the
other melds funky flare with stunning performance.
—WILL SMITH
Microsoft S+ark
Normally, devices that are silver,
shiny, and lit in a fancy manner
make the Maximum PC Lab denizens hoot and holler like chimpanzees. Sadly, though, no number
of bells or whistles could save
Microsoft’s new unwieldy anachronism of a mouse from our wrath.
Problem number one: The
S+ark’s egg-shaped formfactor casually dispenses
with any and all
notions of ergonomic
efficiency. It looks
great on paper, but
it’s a pain in the
hand, especially
during long mousing
Fancy,
sessions. This is particunewfangled,
larly surprising coming from the
industrial design maker of the Intellimouse Explorer
only impresses
4.0—one of the most comfortable
us when it
mice we’ve ever tested.
complements
Problem number two: The
the function of
S+ark has fewer features than the
the device—not Intellimouse Explorer. It includes
impedes it.
just three buttons (if you count
the clickable scroll wheel), and the
scroll wheel is a standard design,
Microsoft S+ark
MAXIMUMPC VERDICT
APPLE IPOD
3
It works for righties or lefties!
NOKIA 3650
Uncomfortable design and over-sensitive buttons
suck. Where’s the tilting scroll wheel?
$40, www.microsoft.com
90
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
not the nifty new tiltable type
featured in the latest version of
the Intellimouse Explorer.
Problem number three: The
clickable area of the primary
mouse buttons is much too large.
On the S+ark, the buttons are
made of a solid piece of plastic, just
like many of the newer MX mice
from Logitech. But while Logitech
makes just the front third of the
mouse button clickable, the S+ark’s
buttons are clickable for almost twothirds of its length, making inadvertent—and inconvenient—clicks a
frequent problem.
The S+ark’s futuristic lighted tailstrip hardly makes up for its poor
ergonomics and unfortunate design.
The mouse has one positive attribute:
It’s ambidextrous. But if we were
southpaws, we’d learn to mouse righthanded before we’d use this product.
Logitech MX1000 Laser
We’ve been using optical sensor
mice for the better part of a decade.
Minor improvements to the optical
sensor technology have improved
resolution and update speeds, but
we’ve seen no real revolutions—
until now. Logitech’s latest offering,
the MX1000 Laser, represents
the first significant technological
advance since Microsoft released the
first optical mouse way back when.
Logitech’s secret is laser lights.
Instead of using a simple LED to
illuminate the surface beneath the
optical sensor, the MX1000 uses an
infrared laser. Logitech claims that
because the photons in a laser
beam are aligned, it produces a
sharper image than an LED. This
lets you mouse on less-detailed surfaces—like glass—that have previously been un-mouseable. It also
makes the mouse’s movements
more precise, which our Lab tests
corroborated.
The MX1000 is wireless, with
built-in lithium-ion batteries that
are good for three or four weeks of
regular use. We especially like the
battery meter, which tells you when
A laser sensor and
comfortable design
make the MX1000
a winner in our
book. Plus: It has a
battery meter!
your rodent needs
charging. During
testing, we found the
mousing motion so smooth it almost
felt as though the cursor was floating.
And while the super smoothness takes
a little while to adjust to, once we did,
we found it difficult to go back to a
standard optical mouse. The MX1000
is amply equipped with eight buttons
and a tiltable scroll wheel, although
only four of the buttons are comfortably usable for gaming.
With the MX1000’s low latency
and high degree of precision, Logitech
has produced yet another mouse
that’s suited for gamers. It’s expensive
for a device that will be regularly
exposed to the perils of a PC geek’s
desktop, so cost-conscious consumers
may want to hold out for the less
expensive wired version that’s
expected to ship in a couple months.
Logitech MX1000 Laser
MAXIMUMPC VERDICT
LASERS
9
Long-lasting Li-Ion battery, and top-notch opticalsensor precision.
TASERS
The battery isn’t user-replaceable.
$80, www.logitech.com
Reviews
Keyspan USB Server
A remote USB hub for your entire network
C
an’t afford an expensive networked printer, scanner, or
network-attached storage device? Then you should check
out Keyspan’s unique approach to networking your USB
devices. The company’s USB server gives you a workable alternative to good old-fashioned sneaker net.
In a nutshell, the Keyspan lets you share USB printers, scanners, and
peripherals across your network using a single four-port Fast Ethernet
device. And although Keyspan doesn’t say the device is designed for it, we
also successfully shared a Plextor external DVD burner, DiskOnKey USB
key, and USB-powered hard drive from the device.
While the USB Server is certainly useful, operation of the device could
be improved. To access a device on the network, you have to install client
software on each PC. To scan something, you have to manually go into the
client and connect the device. While it’s connected, no other computer can
access the scanner until you disconnect it. The same goes with printers—
although a new version of the software promises to connect and disconnect
printers on demand.
The weakest link of the Keyspan, though, is its speed. It’s limited to
12Mb/s Full Speed USB. That makes for some pretty painful wait times if
you’re trying to copy large files. Keyspan says cost is the reason for the
limitation. Hitting the maximum 480Mb/s USB speed would require a bigger
processor, which would boost the USB Server’s cost.
One advantage of the USB Server is that it transmits data back to the
computer in addition to receiving data, which is what makes it compatible
with scanners and sets it apart from a Wi-Fi server. The only problem is
that you can’t be sure it will work with all your devices. Keyspan should
Easily share your
USB printer and scanner on
your network with the Keyspan USB server.
have included a list of printers and other USB devices that have been
certified to work with the USB Server. As it stands, it’s a crap shoot. While
our Canon USB-powered
scanner worked, a USBpowered Pockey hard drive
MAXIMUMPC
did not.
USB 2.0
The USB Server may be a
Lets you eliminate some sneaker net tasks like
niche item, but we appreciate
printing and scanning.
its novelty. USB 2.0 support
USB 1.0
and more robust software
Too slow to support large data transfers; doesn’t
would only make it a more
support USB hubs.
promising category.
$130, www.keyspan.com
—GORDON MAH UNG
VERDICT
7
Magix Music on CD & DVD
Slow and buggy beats conceptually innovative
M
agix’s Music on CD & DVD is one of those ideas that is so simple,
you wonder why it wasn’t put into action sooner. Seeing as
most people have their living room DVD players hooked up to
multichannel speakers, why not harness the DVD deck’s power to play
digitally compressed music?
Many new DVD players are capable of playing MP3s, but the majority
out there still can’t. To get around this, Music on CD & DVD enables you
to encode your MP3, Ogg Vorbis, WMA, or WAV files to a standard MPEG
audio stream that any DVD can read. Special effects and Windows Media
Player-style visualizations can even be added to the DVD. (Of course, they’ll
eat up space on the disc.) With visuals and standard compression, we were
able to pack just less than four hours of music onto a disc. Magix trumpets
the ability to burn 100 hours of music onto DVD—if the files are saved as
MP3 data. Um, we could already do that with Nero.
One unique touch is that the program gives you the option of filtering
and re-encoding music for surround sound systems. With these effects in
place, songs are re-encoded at 384kbps; you have the option of lowering it
but not raising it.
While Magix gives you a ton of features and capabilities—you can
de-hiss, de-noise, and tweak other audio effects for songs—the program’s
interface is cluttered and awkward. We had to dig around to find the
features we wanted to adjust. Worse yet, even on our zero-point Athlon 64
FX-51, the encoding was painfully slow. A 2.8GHz Pentium 4B was equally
chuggy when encoding our compilations, making this operation more of an
afternoon or overnight affair, not something quickly performed on the fly.
Worst of all, however, is a nasty bug we encountered that prevented us from
92
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
Magix Music allows you to transfer hours of music onto
DVD and play it in your living room DVD deck.
successfully copying more than 40 of our test songs at a time. D’oh!
Music on CD & DVD is interesting because we haven’t seen a
commercial application
with this capability before.
MAXIMUMPC
Unfortunately, it has so many
rough edges that we’re forced
VINYL
to knock it down a few points.
Burns your music to DVDs that can be played on
Still, if you want to create
any DVD deck.
audio DVDs, this is the only
CASSETTE
A little buggy. Gave us problems after 40 tracks.
show in town.
—GORDON MAH UNG
VERDICT
$40, www.magix.com
5
Reviews
Singles: Flirt Up Your Life
If you thought gonorrhea was a drag, try this
If you can recall the crushing disappointment of hatching your first batch
of Sea Monkeys, you have a pretty good idea of the experience offered by
Singles.
The objective of Singles is simple. Through an interminable campaign
of mouse-clicking, you attempt to help two roommates overcome the
common-sense barrier of not sleeping together until they can no longer help
themselves, at which point they jump into bed for an embarrassing 22-second
grapple beneath the comforter. That’s it. Whee. Pass the champagne.
You begin by choosing two characters from a cast of 16—eight men and
eight women ranging from urban temp worker to goth weeny. They can be any
race as long as they’re Caucasian. You can put two guys or two girls together
as long as one of them is either James, the guy who “preferred dressing up
his sister’s dolls to playing with his toy train” or Shannon, the “professional
athlete.” Believe it or not, things actually go downhill from here.
The advertisements and promotional screenshots coyly suggest—without
ever actually saying so—that Singles is The Sims gone full-frontal, but don’t
believe it. The entire game revolves around dish-washing, teeth-brushing,
snack-feeding, and robotically ordering your characters to flirt with each
other over and over again until they feel comfortable revealing their naughty
polygons to each other. The game’s obsessive, single-minded purpose of
humping your roommate prevents it from even being an enjoyable sandbox
experience like the game it’s ripping off.
If you’ve seen a single episode of Sex in the City or Queer as Folk, you’ve
seen way more action than you’ll ever see here. In fact, it’s bizarrely tame for
an “adult” title. Where are the drunken antics that end up in accidental
homosexual experiences? Or the wild parties that begin with a hit of Ecstasy
and end in a palimony lawsuit nine months later? Strangest of all, however, is
the complete absence of any sense of humor or playfulness that might have
provided some relief from queuing up “sweet talk” orders for hours on end.
Things are heating up at the Olsen twins’ household.
Where’s the condom mini-game? Where are the challenging Sim City-style
disasters (“Psychotic Ex-Girlfriend!,” “Herpes Outbreak!”)? There’s not even
multiplayer—not even four-play!
We’ll concede that visuallyspeaking, Singles looks pretty
MAXIMUMPC
good. Your environment and
NVIDIA
furnishings are three dimensional,
You can’t contract venereal disease from just
and you’re free to pan around,
playing a game.
adjust the viewing angle, and
CHLAMYDIA
zoom in and out (no pun intended). On the other hand, the game is such a drag that
But so what? If sex were this
a clinic visit might be more fun.
boring, we’d choose abstinence.
$30, www.eidos.com
—LOGAN DECKER
VERDICT
3
Missing: Since January
An interesting premise leads to an uninteresting
adventure game
To paraphrase Mark Twain, reports of the adventure game’s demise have
been greatly exaggerated. Recent titles such as The Longest Journey and
Syberia 2 proved that there was still some fun to be had with point-andclick adventures, and genre stalwart The Adventure Company tries to keep
the ball rolling with its latest release: Missing: Since January. Previously
released in Europe by Ubisoft as In Memoriam, Missing is an interesting
and novel take on an established formula that ultimately falls short.
The premise of Missing revolves around the disappearance of a
journalist and his partner at the hands of serial killer. Named The Phoenix,
the murderer releases a CD-ROM that contains clues to the couple’s
whereabouts. This is where you come in. Gamers are challenged to
unlock the mystery by solving a series of puzzles using their wits, Internet
search engines, and their own e-mail accounts. Internet access is a game
requirement and is seamlessly integrated into the experience. Using
Google and other real-life Internet tools definitely makes the gameplay feel
more viscerally immersive, so much so that we believe it to be a glimpse of
the genre’s future.
Unfortunately, the rest of the experience isn’t as praiseworthy. The
majority of the puzzles are overly vague and teeth-gratingly difficult,
and the only reward for solving them is full-motion video clips that
are uninteresting and bland, despite the fine performances of the
featured actors. Even more disappointing is the game’s lackluster,
anticlimactic ending.
Missing: Since January is an interesting but flawed game that
This is one of the few puzzles in the game that didn’t
make us want to pull out our hair in frustration: To solve
it, simply drag the knife into the hand.
will appeal to hardcore
adventure gamers or those
with a strong interest in the
occult. Gamers who have
only a passing interest in the
genre, however, should turn
elsewhere for their pointand-click fix.
—TAE K. KIM
MAXIMUMPC VERDICT
FOUND MONEY
6
Interesting premise and good integration of the
Internet.
LOST KEYS
Uninteresting story, and overly difficult, vague
puzzles.
$20, www.theadventurecompany.com
OCTOBER 2004
MAXIMUMPC
95
Rig oftheMonth
W
hat’s the story behind
Egypt’s pyramids? How
were they built? Who
built them? Do they represent some
mysterious power source? And
what does any of this have to do
with David Prudenti? The first four
questions are up for debate; as
for Prudenti, the subject of Egypt’s
ancient monuments is of great personal interest and one he sought to
embody in his first custom-built rig.
Look closely, and you can see
why Prudenti calls the PC “an artistic
tribute to radical beliefs.” The toscale Plexiglas replica of Giza’s Great
Pyramid is guarded over by alienhead fan grills, and affixed to each
side of the case is a decal bearing
the image of an actual crop circle.
But the Pyramid PC also represents another philosophy: an adherence to careful planning. Prior to
constructing the real deal, Prudenti
created detailed blueprints in an
illustration program, followed by a
full-scale prototype made of cardboard. A good thing, too—as he puts
it: “When the prototype was about 90
percent complete, I discovered that I
had miscalculated the pyramid!”
THIS MONTH : David Prudenti’s Pyramid PC
Prudenti was determined to keep the PC
small, and it is, measuring 14.1 inches
on each side and just 12.9 inches
high. Still he took precautions:
“I decided to work on the case
from the inside out. I figured
if I made a measuring
mistake, it would be
easier to make the
outside bigger
than the inside
smaller.”
A Plexiglas base beneath the Pyramid is able to house the
majority of the PC’s components in a stacked configuration.
A vented, detachable capstone
forms the tip of the Pyramid. It
allows an interior fan at the top
of the PC to pull hot air up and
out of the case.
Glass hinges and glue hold the many individual pieces of Plexiglas
together. Two of the Pyramid’s sides open for access to the parts.
Internal clutter is managed with metallic-blue wire wraps.
MAXIMUM PC (ISSN 1522-4279) is published monthly by Future Network USA,
150 North Hill Drive, Suite 40, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA. Periodical class postage
paid in Brisbane, CA, and at additional mailing offices. Newsstand distribution is
handled by Curtis Circulation Company. Basic subscription rates: one year (12
issues) US: $20; Canada: $26; Foreign: $42. Basic subscription rates “Deluxe”
version (w/CD): one year (12 issues/12 CD-ROMs) U.S.: $30; Canada: $40; Foreign
120
MAXIMUMPC
OCTOBER 2004
If you have a contender for Rig of the Month, e-mail [email protected]
with high-res digital pics and a 300-word write-up.
$56. US funds only. Canadian price includes postage and GST (GST#R128220688).
Postmaster: Send changes of address to Maximum PC, P.O. Box 5159, Harlan, IA
51593-0659. Standard Mail enclosed in the following edition: None. Ride-Along
enclosed in the following editions: B, C, C1, C2, C3. Int’l Pub Mail# 0781029.
Canada Post Publications Mail Agreement #40043631. Returns: 4960-2 Walker
Road, Windsor ON N9A 6J3. For customer service, write Maximum PC, P.O.
Box 5159, Harlan, IA 51593-0659; Maximum PC, 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane,
CA 94005. Future Network USA also publishes PC Gamer, PSM, MacAddict,
and Official Xbox. Entire contents copyright 2003, Future Network USA. All
rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited. Future Network
USA is not affiliated with the companies or products covered in Maximum PC.
PRODUCED AND PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.