• Brigil Homes - City of Ottawa

Transcription

• Brigil Homes
Noise Impact Assessment
Type of Document
Site Plan Submission
Project Name
Petrie’s Landing, Phase 2
Project Number
OTT-00214935-A0
Prepared By:
exp Services Inc.
100-2650 Queensview Drive
Ottawa, ON K2B 8H6
Canada
Date Submitted
December 2013
June 2014 (Revision 2)
exp Services Inc.
Brigil Homes
OTT-00214935-A0
June 2014
Brigil Homes
Noise Impact Assessment
Type of Document:
Site Plan Submission
Project Name:
Project Number:
OTT-00214935-A0
Prepared By:
exp
100-2650 Queensview Drive
Ottawa, ON K2B 8H6
Canada
T: 613 688-1899
F: 613 225-7337
www.exp.com
_______________________________________
Jason Fitzpatrick, P. Eng.
Project Engineer
Infrastructure Services
Date Submitted:
June 2014
____________________________________
Bruce Thomas, P. Eng.
Senior Project Manager
Infrastructure Services
exp Services Inc.
Brigil Homes
OTT-00214935-A0
June 2014
Legal Notification
This report was prepared by exp Services Inc. for the account of Brigil Homes.
Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it,
are the responsibility of such third parties. Exp Services Inc. accepts no responsibility for damages, if
any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this project.
exp Services Inc.
Brigil Construction Limited
Petrie’s Landing, Phase 2, Ottawa
OTT-00214935-A0
June 2014
Table of Contents
Page
1
Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1
1.1
2
References ............................................................................................................... 1
Sound Level Criteria .............................................................................................. 2
2.1
Vehicular Traffic Noise .............................................................................................. 6
2.2
Aircraft/Airport Noise................................................................................................. 7
2.3
Stationary Noise ....................................................................................................... 7
3
Traffic Information.................................................................................................. 7
4
Noise Prediction ..................................................................................................... 8
5
Summary of Results ............................................................................................... 9
6
Indoor Noise Control Measures .......................................................................... 10
7
Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................. 11
8
Recommendations ............................................................................................... 12
i
exp Services Inc.
OTT-00214935-A0
June 2014
List of Appendices
Appendix A – Figures
Appendix B – Architectural Drawings
Appendix C – Stamson Output
List of Tables
Page
Table 2-1: MOE and City of Ottawa Indoor and Outdoor Criteria for Noise From Traffic ...................2
Table 2-2: Outdoor, Ventilation & Warning Clause Requirements Road Noise, Daytime (0700-2300)3
Table 2-3: Ventilation and Warning Clause Requirements Road Noise, Nighttime (2300-0700) ........3
Table 2-4: Building Component Requirements Road Noise, Daytime (0700-2300)..............................4
Table 2-5: Building Component Requirements Road Noise, Nighttime (2300-0700) ...........................4
Table 2-6: Warning Clauses .......................................................................................................................5
Table 3-1: Traffic and Road Parameters (AADT Traffic Volumes) .........................................................7
Table 5-1: Location of Receivers ..............................................................................................................9
Table 5-2: Summary of Noise Results ......................................................................................................9
Table 5-3: Summary of Noise Levels at Building Facade .......................................................................9
Table 6-1: AIF Values and Typical Building Treatments for Road Traffic ............................................10
Table 7-1: Summary of Requirements ....................................................................................................11
List of Figures
Page
Figure 1: Overall Site Location Map ...................................................................................... Appendix A
Figure 2: Noise Source, Receiver Locations ........................................................................ Appendix A
ii
exp Services Inc.
OTT-00214935-A0
June 2014
1
Introduction
Brigil Homes retained exp Services Inc. to undertake a noise impact assessment in support of a site plan
application for a proposed condominium development project, Petrie’s Landing, Phase 2 (Tower B),
located at 8911 North Service Road in the City of Ottawa, Ontario. Refer to Figure 1 in Appendix A. The
site is adjacent to Highway 174 which transitions from a four-lane divided to a two-lane undivided highway.
The site is subjected to noise generated from vehicular traffic travelling along Highway 174. No additional
noises are expected from aircraft/airport, rail or stationary sources.
This report studies noise levels using prediction modeling of volumes generated by vehicular traffic, at the
proposed building site. The study was conducted in accordance with the Ontario Ministry of the
Environment (MOE) and the City of Ottawa Noise Control Guidelines. From the results abatement
measures were proposed to help lower the noise to an appropriate level.
This noise impact study was prepared to address the following conditions as identified in the City of
Ottawa’s Noise Control Guidelines:
Where a new development is proposed within 100m from the right-of-way of an existing or
proposed road arterial, major collector or bus Transitway, 250m of an existing or proposed
highway, light rail transit corridor or a secondary main railway line, or 500m from the right-of-wayof a freeway or 400-series provincial highway or a Principal Main railway line, the City will require a
noise study to be prepared.
1.1
References
A summary of the documents that were referenced during the preparation of this report include the
following:
•
Ontario MOE publication LU-131, Noise Assessment Criteria in Land Use Planning, and
accompanying Annex, dated October 1997.
•
Noise Control Guidelines for New Developments Adjacent to Existing and Proposed Regional
Roads and Transitways prepared for the former Regional Municipality of Ottawa Carleton (RMOC)
dated August 21, 1992.
•
City of Ottawa Transportation Master Plan, Nov 2008
•
City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Control Guidelines, May 10, 2006.
•
Building Practice Note (BPN 56), Controlling Sound Transmission into Buildings, National
Research Council Canada, dated Sept 1985.
1
exp Services Inc.
OTT-00214935-A0
June 2014
2
Sound Level Criteria
The requirements outlined per the Ministry of Environment (MOE) and the City of Ottawa Guidelines, both
have indoor and outdoor sound level limitations generated from road traffic, a summary is provided in
Table 2-1.
Table 2-1: MOE and City of Ottawa Indoor and Outdoor Criteria for Noise From Traffic
Location, Space & Time Period
Equivalent Level Leq (dBA)
Indoors
Night-time 23:00 to 07:00
sleeping quarters of residences, hospitals, schools, nursing /
retirement homes, daycare centers, etc.
40
Nighttime 23:00 to 07:00, sleeping quarters of hotels/motels
45
Daytime 07:00 to 23:00, living / dining areas of residences, hospitals
schools, nursing/retirement homes, daycare centers, theatre, places of
worship, libraries, individual or semi-private offices, conference rooms,
reading rooms.
45
General offices, reception areas, retail stores, etc.,
Daytime 07:00 to 23:00
50
Outdoors
Daytime 07:00 to 23:00, Outdoor Living Areas (OLA)
55
Sounds are measured in decibels (dB). To better represent human hearing, very-high and very-low
pitched sounds are adjusted or “A-weighted” (dBA). Therefore, traffic noise in this report is measured as
dBA. Since roadway traffic fluctuates it is convenient to describe the noise generated in terms of an
equivalent 24-hour sound level (denoted as Leq). MOE Guidelines require that traffic noise be evaluated
in relation to specific locations during certain time periods.
In general, noise level predictions are for:
•
outdoor living areas, such as backyard of a residential homes or shared recreational areas, during
the day, and
•
indoor areas: living/dining areas during the day and bedrooms during the night-time.
A summary of these requirements are shown in Tables 2-2 through 2-5.
2
exp Services Inc.
OTT-00214935-A0
June 2014
Table 2-2: Outdoor, Ventilation & Warning Clause Requirements Road Noise, Daytime (0700-2300)
ASSESSMENT
LOCATION
Outdoor Living
Area (OLA)
Plane of Living
Room Window
Leq (16 hr) (dBA)
VENTILATION
REQUIREMENTS
OUTDOOR CONTROL
MEASURES
WARNING
CLAUSE
Less than or
equal to 55
N/A
None required
Not required
Greater than 55
less than or
equal to 60
N/A
Control measures /
barriers not required
but could be considered
Type A
Greater than 60
N/A
Control measures /
barriers required to reduce
below 60 dBA, as close to
55 dBA as technically,
economically and
administratively feasible
Type B
Greater than 50
less than or equal
to 55
None required
N/A
Not required
N/A
Type C
N/A
Type D
Greater than 55
less than or equal
to 65
Greater than 65
Forced air heating
with central air
conditioning
provision
Central air
conditioning
Table 2-3: Ventilation and Warning Clause Requirements Road Noise, Nighttime (2300-0700)
ASSESSMENT
LOCATION
Plane of
Bedroom
Window
Leq (8 hr) (dBA)
VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS
WARNING
CLAUSE
Greater than 50
less or equal to 60
Forced air heating, central air conditioning
provision
Type C
Greater than 60
Central Air Conditioning
Type D
3
exp Services Inc.
OTT-00214935-A0
June 2014
Table 2-4: Building Component Requirements Road Noise, Daytime (0700-2300)
ASSESSMENT
LOCATION
Plane of Living
Room Window
NOISE
SOURCE
Leq (16 hr) (dBA)
WARNING CLAUSE NOTICE
Less than or equal to 65
Building compliant with Ontario Building Code
Greater than 65
Building components (walls, windows, etc.)
must be designed to achieve indoor sound
level criteria
Road
Table 2-5: Building Component Requirements Road Noise, Nighttime (2300-0700)
ASSESSMENT
LOCATION
Plane of
Bedroom
Window
NOISE
SOURCE
Leq (8 hr) (dBA)
WARNING CLAUSE NOTICE
Less than or equal to 60
Building compliant with Ontario Building Code
Greater than 60
Building components (walls, windows, etc.)
must be designed to achieve indoor sound
level criteria
Road
The warning clauses referred to above are also shown in Table 2-6. Specifically, the warning clauses as
defined by the MOE and City of Ottawa (italic). Where applicable, these clauses are to be inserted on all
Offers / Agreements of Purchase and Sale or Leases to notify potential purchasers and tenants of these
environmental concerns.
4
exp Services Inc.
OTT-00214935-A0
June 2014
Table 2-6: Warning Clauses
WARNING CLAUSE
A
“Purchasers/Tenants are advised that sound levels due to increasing road traffic may occasionally
interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the Municipality’s and
the MOE’s noise criteria.”
“Purchasers/Tenants are advised that sound levels due to increasing (road) (Transitway) (rail) (air) traffic
may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the
City’s and the MOE’s noise criteria.”
B
“Purchasers/Tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the development
and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing road traffic may on occasions interfere with
some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the Municipality’s and the MOE’s
noise criteria.”
“Purchasers/Tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the development
and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing (road) (Transitway) (rail) (air) traffic may on
occasions interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the City’s
and the MOE’s noise criteria.”
C
“This dwelling unit has been fitted with a forced air heating system and the ducting etc. was sized to
accommodate central air-conditioning. Installation of central air-conditioning by the occupant will allow
windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within
the Municipality’s and the Ministry of Environment’s noise criteria. (Note: The location and installation of
the outdoor air-conditioning device should be done as to comply with the noise criteria of MOE
Publication NPC-216, Residential Air Conditioning Devices and thus minimize the noise impacts on and
in the immediate vicinity of the subject property.”
“This dwelling unit has been fitted with a forced air heating system and the ducting etc. was sized to
accommodate central air-conditioning. Installation of central air-conditioning by the occupant will allow
windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within
the City’s and the MOE’s noise criteria. (Note: The location and installation of the outdoor airconditioning device should be done as to comply with the noise criteria of MOE Publication NPC-216,
Residential Air Conditioning Devices and thus minimize the noise impacts on and in the immediate
vicinity of the subject property.”
D
“This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air-conditioning system which will allow windows and
exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the
Municipality’s and the MOE’s noise criteria.”
“This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air-conditioning system which will allow windows and
exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the City’s and
the MOE’s noise criteria.”
E
“Purchaser/tenants are advised that due to the proximity of the adjacent industry (facility) (utility), sound
levels from the industry (facility) (utility) may at times be audible”
5
exp Services Inc.
OTT-00214935-A0
June 2014
Results from the noise prediction modeled for the Plane of the Window (POW) during the daytime and
nighttime were used to determine the required building component requirements. Indoor sound levels can
be significantly decreased depending on the architectural building materials used for the walls, windows,
and, and doors, etc.
2.1
Vehicular Traffic Noise
The proposed building is located within 500 meters from the right-of-way of an existing freeway and arterial
roadway and therefore per the City’s guidelines requires a noise study to be completed. From the Urban
Road Network (Map 5) of the Transportation Master Plan the site is adjacent to Highway 174, which is
designated as both a city freeway and arterial roadway. East of Trim Road Highway 174 changes from a
four lane grade separated freeway to a 2 lane undivided roadway as shown below.
Proposed
Tower 2
Refer to the Figure 2 in Appendix A for a plan illustrating the receiver locations used. Noise levels were
assessed for the south (facing Highway 174), west (towards existing Tower 1), and east faces of the
proposed building.
In general, noise levels are predicted for:
•
Outdoor living areas (OLAs) during the day;
•
Indoor living/dining areas during the day, and;
•
Bedrooms during the night time.
The proposed building has two common amenity areas that meet the definition of an outdoor living area;
one a ground level patio, and the second a roof-top patio.
6
exp Services Inc.
OTT-00214935-A0
June 2014
2.2
Aircraft/Airport Noise
The site is located inside the Airport Vicinity Development Zone and outside the Airport Operating
Influence Zone as per Schedule K of the Ottawa Official Plan. The site is outside both the 25 NEF and
NEP contours therefore noise from air traffic does not impact this site and will not be examined in this
report.
2.3
Stationary Noise
Typically industrial land uses can be a potential stationary noise source. For the proposed development, a
review of the potential industrial noise sources that could be generated by neighboring properties was
conducted. Based on the information reviewed it was determined that there were no stationary noise
sources.
3
Traffic Information
Traffic volumes used in this study were obtained from existing roadway information and from the City of
Ottawa’s Noise Control Guidelines. Highway 174 which is adjacent to the site transitions from a four-lane
divided highway to a two-lane undivided arterial roadway.
City of Ottawa Guidelines requires the use of an AADT of 18,333 veh/day per lane for freeways and
15,000 veh/day for 2-lane urban arterial roadways. Since Highway 174 transitions at the site location an
AADT of 35,000 veh/day, which is consistent with a 4-lane divided arterial was used as an average.
Noise generated from vehicular traffic along this section of the highway was assessed for its potential
noise impact. Traffic parameters used for the analysis are summarized in Table 3-1 below.
Table 3-1: Traffic and Road Parameters (AADT Traffic Volumes)
Traffic Parameters
Highway 174
Roadway Classification
4-lane city freeway & 2-lane undivided arterial
Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) (veh/day)
35,000
Posted Speed Limit (km/h)
90 km/h
7
exp Services Inc.
OTT-00214935-A0
June 2014
4
Noise Prediction
All noise levels have been predicted using MOE’s software and methodology. STAMSON Version 5.03
(1999), which is based on the Ontario Road Noise Analysis Method for Environment and Transportation
(“ORNAMENT”) Model, was used for all calculations in this report. Detailed output files are attached in
Appendix D for reference.
In addition to the traffic data that was used in the analysis, theoretical noise predictions were based on the
following information:
•
Truck traffic on all streets and roadways consists of 5% heavy trucks, 7% medium trucks, based
on City of Ottawa requirements.
•
The Day/Night split used for roadways and highways was 92% and 8% as per City of Ottawa
requirements.
•
Intermediate surfaces between the source and receiver locations were assessed as a reflective
ground surface.
•
Topography was assessed as flat/gentle slope.
•
Road pavement and road gradient was assessed as typical asphalt or concrete and flat grade.
•
The noise levels on the roof-top patio was taken at the east edge of the building which would
represent the worst case.
For all modeling with STAMSON, source and receivers were assumed to be elevated with a reflective
separating surface. This ensures that no ground absorption is applied to the prediction results. Therefore
when no ground absorption is applied, the predicted sound levels do not increase with the height of the
receiver, and the results are the same for all floors. This is a conservative assumption which simplifies the
prediction of sound levels on all floors. Noise levels were assessed at the building facade.
8
exp Services Inc.
OTT-00214935-A0
June 2014
5
Summary of Results
A summary of predicted noise levels for various assessment locations is summarized below in Table 5-1.
Table 5-1: Location of Receivers
Receiver
I.D.
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Distance to Road
Centre Line
Hwy 174 (m)
Receiver Location
Tower B – West building façade at south corner of the building
facing existing Tower A. Plane of Living/Dining//Bedroom window.
Tower B – South building façade facing Highway 174
Plane of Living/Dining//Bedroom window.
Tower B – East building façade at south corner of the building
facing future Tower C. Plane of Living/Dining//Bedroom window.
Tower B – West building façade at north corner of the building
facing existing Tower A. Plane of Living/Dining//Bedroom window.
Tower B – East building façade at north corner of the building
facing future Tower C. Plane of Living/Dining//Bedroom window.
Outdoor Living Area (OLA) – ground level patio
Outdoor Living Area (OLA) – roof-top patio
126.26
119.21
118.25
163.85
156.17
152.92
141.76
Table 5-2: Summary of Noise Results
Assessment Location
A
B
C
D
E
F (OLA)
G (OLA)
Combined Equivalent Noise Level Leq (dBa)
Daytime (0700 to 2300)
Nighttime (2300 to 0700)
65.0
68.2
65.2
60.7
65.0
52.2
58.9
54.4
57.6
54.6
50.1
54.4
Table 5-3: Summary of Noise Levels at Building Facade
Façade Location
South Building Façade
(facing Highway 174)
West Building Façade
(facing existing Tower A)
East Building Façade
(facing Future Tower C)
Combined Equivalent Noise Level Leq (dBa)
Daytime
Nighttime
68.2
57.6
65.0 (front) to 60.7 (rear)
9
exp Services Inc.
OTT-00214935-A0
June 2014
6
Indoor Noise Control Measures
As the sound levels at the building facades exceed the requirements, building components treatment shall
be provided. The appropriate building components are selected on the basis of the Acoustic Insulation
Factor (AIF) which is related to the difference in indoor and outdoor levels. The Acoustic Insulation Factor
(AIF) needed to control the road traffic noise is calculated as follows:
AIF = Leq outdoor façade – Leq indoor + 10 log C + 2
Where
Leq outdoor façade
Leq indoor
C
=
=
=
Outdoor façade sound level
Indoor objective sound level
Number of building components forming envelope of room
(typically equals 3 for a corner room and 2 for other
rooms)
Table 6-1 below outlines the AIF required for various road traffic sound levels as well as the glazing
requirements to meet MOE guidelines. This table is provided to assist with determining the acoustical
insulation factor (AIF) needed for a typical unit, over a range of daytime and nighttime sound levels at the
building façade. The final window and wall treatments that will be required to meet the indoor noise level
requirements will be made by an a qualified acoustical engineer.
Table 6-1: AIF Values and Typical Building Treatments for Road Traffic
Daytime Façade
Sound Level
(dBa)
Nighttime
Facade Sound
Level (dBa)
Air
Conditioning
Requirement
AIF Required
Window
Treatment
Wall
Treatment
55 or less
50 or less
None
17 or less
None (OBC)
None (EW1)
56 to 65
51 to 60
Provisions
18 to 27
None (OBC)
None (EW1)
66 to 68
61 to 63
Required
28 to 30
None (OBC)
None (EW1)
69 to 70
64 to 65
Required
31 to 32
STC 31 to 32
None (EW1)
71 to 72
66 to 67
Required
33 to 34
STC 33 to 34
EW2
73 to 78
68 to 73
Required
35 to 40
STC 35 to 40
EW4
79
74
Required
41
STC 41
EW1R / EW5
4
5
Notes:
1. Source: “ Road and Rail Noise: Effects on Housing”, NHA 5156, 08/86 CMHC, 1986
2. Building treatment based on an assumed window / floor ratio of 25%, and wall / floor ratio of 80%.
3. AIF is based on 3 components (i.e. corner room location. For 2 components (i.e. only one exterior wall) AIF
would be 2 points lower.
4. OBC window: Requires Ontario Building Code compliant construction.
5. EW1
denotes a typical metal or vinyl clad siding exterior wall
EW1R
denotes an EW1 exterior wall with interior drywall mounted on resilient channels
EW2
denotes an EW1 exterior wall with an additional 25mm of rigid insulation
EW4
denotes a typical 20mm stucco clad exterior wall
EW5
denotes a typical brick veneer clad exterior wall
10
exp Services Inc.
OTT-00214935-A0
June 2014
7
Mitigation Measures
Table 7-1 below summarizes the requirements for ventilation, outdoor control measures and building
components for all assessment locations.
Using the summary results from Table 5-2 in conjugation with Table 6-1, the building components
requirements for the proposed Tower B are identified in Table 7.1 below.
Table 7-1: Summary of Requirements
Outdoor Living Area
Warning Clause
Required for
Ventilation
Building
Component
Required
Day
Night
Day
Night
Acoustic
Insulation
Factor
(AIF)
Required
1
D
C
NC
Comp
N/A
1
D
C
NC
-
N/A
1
D
C
D
-
N/A
1
C
E
-
N/A
1
F (OLA)
Not
required
A
Receiver
Location
Warning
Clause
Required
Control
Measures
Required
A
-
N/A
B
-
C
G (OLA)
Notes:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Treatment
Window
Wall
28 to 30
None
(OBC)
None
(Min EW1)
Comp
28 to 30
None
(OBC)
None
(Min EW1)
NC
Comp
28 to 30
None
(OBC)
None
(Min EW1)
C
Comp
Comp
18 to 27
None
(OBC)
None
(Min EW1)
C
C
Comp
Comp
18 to 27
None
(OBC)
None
(Min EW1)
Not required
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Control
measures /
barriers not
required but
considered
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Areas identified as outdoor living areas are too small to be classified as outdoor amenity space.
Comp and NC denote, compliant and non-compliant, respectively.
OBC denotes required Ontario Building Code compliant construction.
EW1 denotes a typical metal or vinyl clad siding exterior wall.
The proposed building exterior front walls will be composed of brick and stone, therefore satisfy the wall
treatment requirement. Also, the proposed building is designed to have central air conditioning.
For the outdoor living area there is no requirement at the ground level patio (location F) , however the
noise level predicted for the rooftop patio is between 55 and 60 dBa. In this case the guidelines dictate
that barrier should be considered, but not required. As this outdoor living area is on top of the roof, glass
panels will be used as barriers (fence) for fall protection. The height of the barriers will be of standard
height, and not provide any noise attenuation at a person’s ear level. Therefore only a warning clause to
notify residents who use the rooftop patio will be used.
11
exp Services Inc.
OTT-00214935-A0
June 2014
8
Recommendations
We recommend that the Site Plan application for the proposed development be approved from a “Noise
Study” assessment perspective, based on the following:
For all Units
For all units with the building a Type “A” warning clause for their outdoor living area (OLA) or amenity
space located on the rooftop is required as follows:
Type A- Warning Clause (rooftop amenity space)
“Purchasers/Tenants are advised that sound levels due to increasing road traffic may occasionally
interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the City’s and
the Ministry of the Environment’s noise criteria.”
Units facing Highway 174
For all units facing Highway 174, the ventilation requirements for these units require a Type D warning
clause. The ventilation requirements are met as the entire building will have a central air conditioner on
the rooftop. Building components shall be designed to achieve the indoor sound level requirements. The
following Notices on Title shall be included in all Agreements of Purchase and Sale in accordance with the
terms specified by the Development Agreement:
Type D – Warning Clause
“This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air-conditioning system which will allow
windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are
within the City’s and the MOE’s noise criteria.”
“The Transferee covenants with the Transfer or that the above clause, verbatim, shall be included
in all subsequent agreements of Purchase and sale and deeds conveying the lands described
herein, which covenant shall run with the said lands and is for the benefit of subsequent owners of
the said lands and the owner of the adjacent road.”
In addition, a qualified acoustic consultant inspect the building plans for these units and certify that the
window and wall components selected for construction are adequate to meet the indoor noise criteria as
identified in this report.
For remaining units
All remaining units the ventilation requirements for these units require a Type C warning clause, with no
additional building components requirements. The ventilation requirements are met as the entire building
will have a central air conditioner on the rooftop. The following Notices on Title shall be included in all
Agreements of Purchase and Sale in accordance with the terms specified by the Development Agreement:
Type C – Warning Clause
“This dwelling unit has been fitted with a forced air heating system and the ducting etc. was sized
to accommodate central air-conditioning. Installation of central air-conditioning by the occupant
will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound
levels are within the City’s and the Ministry of the Environment’s noise criteria. (Note: The location
and installation of the outdoor air-conditioning device should be done as to comply with the noise
12
exp Services Inc.
OTT-00214935-A0
June 2014
criteria of MOE Publication NPC-216, Residential Air Conditioning Devices and thus minimize the
noise impacts on and in the immediate vicinity of the subject property.”
“The Transferee covenants with the Transfer or that the above clause, verbatim, shall be included
in all subsequent agreements of Purchase and sale and deeds conveying the lands described
herein, which covenant shall run with the said lands and is for the benefit of subsequent owners of
the said lands and the owner of the adjacent road.”
13
exp Services Inc.
OTT-00214935-A0
June 2014
Appendix A – Figures
exp Services Inc.
t: +1.613.688.1899 | f: +1.613.225.7330
2650 Queensview Drive, Unit 100
Ottawa, ON K2B 8H6
Canada
www.exp.com
BUILDINGS
INDUSTRIAL
EARTH & ENVIRONMENT
INFRASTRUCTURE
ENERGY
SUSTAINABILITY
exp Services Inc.
OTT-00214935-A0
June 2014
Appendix B – Architectural Drawings
E.B.
SPA
ELECTRICAL ROOM
POOL
GYM
E.B.
E.B.
E.B.
WOMEN
LOCKERS
MECANICAL ROOM
MEN LOCKERS
CLIENT Client
OUVRAGE Project
TITRE DU DESSIN Drawing Title
.
Petrie's Landing I, Phase 2
Roof plan
EMPLACEMENT Location
OTTAWA
DESSINE PAR Drawn by
A.B.
NO.PROJET Project No.
10557
VÉRIFIÉ PAR Checked by
ANT.C.
DATE (aa.mm.jj)
2013-09-19
RÉVISION Revision
--
ÉCHELLE Scale
1:200
NO. DESSIN Dwg Number
A205
23
renderings
PETRIE’S LANDING I Phase 2, OTTAWA
2013.10.04
36
RENDERINGS
2013.10.04
37
rooftop terrace sketch
2013.10.04
38
exp Services Inc.
OTT-00214935-A0
June 2014
Appendix C – Stamson Output
RRA
STAMSON 5.0
NORMAL REPORT
Date: 05-12-2013 12:16:34
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT
Filename: rrA.te
Description:
Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours
RRA
TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 64.96
(NIGHT): 54.35
Road data, segment # 1: RR174 (day/night)
----------------------------------------Car traffic volume : 28336/1232 veh/TimePeriod
Medium truck volume : 2254/98
veh/TimePeriod
Heavy truck volume : 1610/70
veh/TimePeriod
Posted speed limit :
90 km/h
Road gradient
:
0 %
Road pavement
:
1 (Typical asphalt or concrete)
Data for Segment # 1: RR174 (day/night)
--------------------------------------Angle1
Angle2
: -90.00 deg
0.00 deg
Wood depth
:
0
(No woods.)
No of house rows
:
0 / 0
Surface
:
2
(Reflective ground surface)
Receiver source distance : 126.26 / 126.26 m
Receiver height
:
1.50 / 1.50
m
Topography
:
1
(Flat/gentle slope; no barrier)
Reference angle
:
0.00
Results segment # 1: RR174 (day)
-------------------------------Source height = 1.50 m
ROAD (0.00 + 64.96 + 0.00) = 64.96 dBA
Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq
----------------------------------------------------------------------------90
0
0.00 77.22
0.00 -9.25 -3.01
0.00
0.00
0.00 64.96
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Segment Leq : 64.96 dBA
Total Leq All Segments: 64.96 dBA
Results segment # 1: RR174 (night)
---------------------------------Source height = 1.50 m
ROAD (0.00 + 54.35 + 0.00) = 54.35 dBA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------90
0
0.00 66.62
0.00 -9.25 -3.01
0.00
0.00
0.00 54.35
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Segment Leq : 54.35 dBA
Page 1
Page 2
RRB
STAMSON 5.0
NORMAL REPORT
Date: 28-11-2013 11:48:48
Filename: rrB.te
Description:
RRB
(NIGHT): 57.61
veh/TimePeriod
veh/TimePeriod
90 km/h
Road gradient
:
0 %
Road pavement
:
--------------------------------------Angle1
Angle2
: -90.00 deg
90.00 deg
Wood depth
:
0
(No woods.)
No of house rows
:
0 / 0
Surface
:
2
Receiver height
:
1.50 / 1.50
m
Topography
:
1
Reference angle
:
0.00
-------------------------------Source height = 1.50 m
ROAD (0.00 + 68.22 + 0.00) = 68.22 dBA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------90
90
0.00 77.22
0.00 -9.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 68.22
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Segment Leq : 68.22 dBA
---------------------------------Source height = 1.50 m
ROAD (0.00 + 57.61 + 0.00) = 57.61 dBA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------90
90
0.00 66.62
0.00 -9.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 57.61
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Segment Leq : 57.61 dBA
Page 1
Page 2
RRC
STAMSON 5.0
NORMAL REPORT
Date: 05-12-2013 12:17:23
Filename: rrC.te
Description:
RRC
(NIGHT): 54.64
veh/TimePeriod
veh/TimePeriod
90 km/h
Road gradient
:
0 %
Road pavement
:
--------------------------------------Angle1
Angle2
:
0.00 deg
90.00 deg
Wood depth
:
0
(No woods.)
No of house rows
:
0 / 0
Surface
:
2
Receiver height
:
1.50 / 1.50
m
Topography
:
1
Reference angle
:
0.00
-------------------------------Source height = 1.50 m
ROAD (0.00 + 65.24 + 0.00) = 65.24 dBA
---------------------------------------------------------------------------0
90
0.00 77.22
0.00 -8.97 -3.01
0.00
0.00
0.00 65.24
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Segment Leq : 65.24 dBA
---------------------------------Source height = 1.50 m
ROAD (0.00 + 54.64 + 0.00) = 54.64 dBA
---------------------------------------------------------------------------0
90
0.00 66.62
0.00 -8.97 -3.01
0.00
0.00
0.00 54.64
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Segment Leq : 54.64 dBA
Page 1
Page 2
RRD
STAMSON 5.0
NORMAL REPORT
Date: 05-12-2013 12:17:58
Filename: rrD.te
Description:
RRD
(NIGHT): 50.11
veh/TimePeriod
veh/TimePeriod
90 km/h
Road gradient
:
0 %
Road pavement
:
--------------------------------------Angle1
Angle2
: 22.00 deg
66.00 deg
Wood depth
:
0
(No woods.)
No of house rows
:
0 / 0
Surface
:
2
Receiver height
:
1.50 / 1.50
m
Topography
:
1
Reference angle
:
0.00
-------------------------------Source height = 1.50 m
ROAD (0.00 + 60.72 + 0.00) = 60.72 dBA
---------------------------------------------------------------------------22
66
0.00 77.22
0.00 -10.38 -6.12
0.00
0.00
0.00 60.72
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Segment Leq : 60.72 dBA
---------------------------------Source height = 1.50 m
ROAD (0.00 + 50.11 + 0.00) = 50.11 dBA
---------------------------------------------------------------------------22
66
0.00 66.62
0.00 -10.38 -6.12
0.00
0.00
0.00 50.11
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Segment Leq : 50.11 dBA
Page 1
Page 2
RRE
STAMSON 5.0
NORMAL REPORT
Date: 28-11-2013 14:34:38
Filename: rrE.te
Description:
RRE
(NIGHT): 54.38
veh/TimePeriod
veh/TimePeriod
90 km/h
Road gradient
:
0 %
Road pavement
:
--------------------------------------Angle1
Angle2
: -90.00 deg
22.00 deg
Wood depth
:
0
(No woods.)
No of house rows
:
0 / 0
Surface
:
2
Receiver height
:
1.50 / 1.50
m
Topography
:
1
Reference angle
:
0.00
-------------------------------Source height = 1.50 m
ROAD (0.00 + 64.99 + 0.00) = 64.99 dBA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------90
22
0.00 77.22
0.00 -10.18 -2.06
0.00
0.00
0.00 64.99
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Segment Leq : 64.99 dBA
---------------------------------Source height = 1.50 m
ROAD (0.00 + 54.38 + 0.00) = 54.38 dBA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------90
22
0.00 66.62
0.00 -10.18 -2.06
0.00
0.00
0.00 54.38
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Segment Leq : 54.38 dBA
Page 1
Page 2
RRF
STAMSON 5.0
NORMAL REPORT
Date: 05-12-2013 12:15:55
Filename: rrF.te
Description: OLA
RRF
(NIGHT): 41.56
veh/TimePeriod
veh/TimePeriod
90 km/h
Road gradient
:
0 %
Road pavement
:
--------------------------------------Angle1
Angle2
: -90.00 deg
-40.00 deg
Wood depth
:
0
(No woods.)
No of house rows
:
0 / 0
Surface
:
1
(Absorptive ground surface)
Receiver height
:
1.50 / 1.50
m
Topography
:
1
Reference angle
:
0.00
-------------------------------Source height = 1.50 m
ROAD (0.00 + 52.16 + 0.00) = 52.16 dBA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------90
-40
0.66 77.22
0.00 -16.74 -8.32
0.00
0.00
0.00 52.16
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Segment Leq : 52.16 dBA
---------------------------------Source height = 1.50 m
ROAD (0.00 + 41.56 + 0.00) = 41.56 dBA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------90
-40
0.66 66.62
0.00 -16.74 -8.32
0.00
0.00
0.00 41.56
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Segment Leq : 41.56 dBA
Page 1
Page 2
RRG
STAMSON 5.0
NORMAL REPORT
Date: 05-12-2013 12:15:24
Filename: rrG.te
Description: OLA
RRG
(NIGHT): 48.29
veh/TimePeriod
veh/TimePeriod
90 km/h
Road gradient
:
0 %
Road pavement
:
--------------------------------------Angle1
Angle2
: -90.00 deg
-65.00 deg
Wood depth
:
0
(No woods.)
No of house rows
:
0 / 0
Surface
:
2
Receiver height
: 43.50 / 1.50
m
Topography
:
1
Reference angle
:
0.00
-------------------------------Source height = 1.50 m
ROAD (0.00 + 58.89 + 0.00) = 58.89 dBA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------90
-65
0.00 77.22
0.00 -9.75 -8.57
0.00
0.00
0.00 58.89
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Segment Leq : 58.89 dBA
---------------------------------Source height = 1.50 m
ROAD (0.00 + 48.29 + 0.00) = 48.29 dBA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------90
-65
0.00 66.62
0.00 -9.75 -8.57
0.00
0.00
0.00 48.29
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Segment Leq : 48.29 dBA
Page 1
Page 2

• Brigil Homes - City of Ottawa

Transcription

Similar documents

Pantallas Acusticas Pared Verde (EN)

common sound levels and the decibel scale

San Carlos, Mexico 2016

SQUID Sensors

it`s a communication gap

quietzone® noise control solutions

2. Ottawa Charter - Health and Human Development

Lâm Thị Diễm Khoa Điện tử - Viễn thông Trường Đại Học Khoa Học

P. Popesso on behalf of the PACS ICC

analysis of the background noise at the auxiliary seismic

Untitled