CERtuS_D2.6_Regulation Improvements
Transcription
CERtuS_D2.6_Regulation Improvements
DELIVERABLE 2.6 PROPOSALS FOR REGULATION IMPROVEMENT Authors: Stella Styliani FANOU ENEA Pedro MOURA ISR Alessandra GANDINI, Rand EPPICH TECNALIA Evangelia GKLEZAKOU EUDITI CERtuS Grant Agreement Number IEE/13/906/SI2.675068 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final DELIVERABLE SUMMARY SHEET Deliverable Details Type of Document: Document Reference #: Title: Version Number: Preparation Date: Delivery Date: Author(s): Contributors: Document Identifier: Document Status: Dissemination Level: Nature of Document: Deliverable D2.6 Proposals for regulation improvement 0.1 February 13, 2015 August 05, 2015 Stella Styliani FANOU, ENEA Pedro MOURA, ISR Alessandra GANDINI, Rand EPPICH, TECNALIA Evangelia Gklezakou, EUDITI LTD Vito LEOTTA, Comune di Messina Pasquale TRIPODO, Comune di Messina templatedef Released X PU Public PP Restricted to other program participants RE Restricted to a group specified by the Consortium CO Confidential, only for member of the Consortium Report Project Details Project Acronym: Project Title: Project Number: Call Identifier: Project Coordinator: Participating Partners: Funding Scheme: Contract Start Date: Duration: Project website address: CERtuS Cost Efficient Options and Financing Mechanisms for nearly Zero Energy Renovation of existing Buildings Stock IEE/13/906/SI2.675068 CIP-IEE-2013 Stella Styliani FANOU, ENEA, Centro Ricerche Casaccia Via Anguillarese, 301 , 00123 S.Maria di Galeria (Roma), Italy [email protected] 01. ENEA – Agenzia nazionale per le nuove tecnologie, l'energia e lo sviluppo economico sostenibile – Italy 02. COMUNE MESSINA - Comune di Messina – Italy 03. ERRENTERIA – Errenteriako udala – Spain 04. CMC – camara municipal de coimbra – Portugal 05. ALIMOS – Dimos Alimou – Municipality of Alimos – Greece 06. ISR – Instituto de sistemas e robotica – Associacao – Portugal 07. ISPE – Intensa San Paolo Eurodesk S.P.R.L – Italy 08. ETVA VI PE – ETVA VI.PE. S.A. – Greece 09. TECNALIA – Fundacion Tecnalia Research & Innovation – Spain 10. EUDITI LTD – EuDiti – Energy and Environmental Design – Greece 11. INNOVA BIC – INNOVA BIC - Business Innovation Centre SRL – Italy 12. AaU SBi – Aalborg University – Denmark 13. ASSISTAL – Associazione Nazionale Costruttori di impianti e dei servizi di efficienza energetica ESCo e Facility Management– Italy Collaborative Project March 1, 2014 30 Months www.certus-project.eu CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 i DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final Deliverable D2.6: Short Description Short Description: This report describes and analyses the main regulatory / legislative barriers hampering the full and harmonious development of Energy Efficiency, RES , deep renovation and the rules on historic buildings in terms of applications of nZEB. Keywords:RES legislation, regulatory barriers, energy efficiency, renewable energy sources, protection rules of historic buildings, nZEB renovation, municipalities. Revision V0.1 V0.2 Date 24/09/2014 05/04/2015 Status Draft Draft Reviewer Stella Styliani FANOU Pedro MOURA Eva ATHANASSAKOS Stella Styliani FANOU Pedro Moura Organization ENEA ISR EUDITI LTD ENEA ISR V1.1 05/05/2015 Draft V1.2 15/06/2015 Draft TECNALIA Draft Alessandra GANDINI Rand EPPICH Evangelia GKLETZAKOU V1.3 25/06/2015 V1.4 20/07/2013 Draft Stella Styliani FANOU ENEA V2.0 23/07/2015 Advanced Draft V3.0 31/07/2015 Final Draft Evangelia GKLETZAKOU Pedro MOURA Alessandra GANDINI Stella Styliani FANOU Stella Styliani FANOU EUDITI ISR TECNALIA ENEA ENEA V4.0 03/08/2015 Final Draft Alberto SORACI Innova BIC V4.1 05/08/2015 Final Draft ETVA SA V5.0 05/08/2015 FINAL Kostas PAVLOU & George VARTHOLOMAIOS Stella Styliani FANOU EUDITI ENEA Description Template and ToC ToC Draft contribution of Portuguese part. Draft contribution of Spanish part Draft contribution of Greek part Draft contribution of Italian part and comments Inclusion of contributions and update Format. Sent to Review Committee Revision of the full contents. Quality control check Revision of the full contents. Quality control check FINAL Statement of originality This deliverable contains original unpublished work except where clearly indicated otherwise. Acknowledgement of previously published material and of the work of others has been made through appropriate citation, quotation or both. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 ii DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final TABLE OF CONTENTS CERTUS PROJECT IN BRIEF ........................................................................................................1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................2 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................4 2. OVERVIEW OF THE REGULATIONS REGARDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND PROTECTION RULES OF HISTORIC BUILDINGS ................................................................................................6 2.1. 2.2. 2.3. 2.4. 3. OVERVIEW OF THE CURRENT STATUS OF RENEWABLE ENERGY ...................................... 21 3.1. 3.2. 3.3. 3.4. 4. PORTUGAL ................................................................................................................... 41 SPAIN ......................................................................................................................... 43 GREECE ....................................................................................................................... 45 ITALY .......................................................................................................................... 46 OVERLAP WITH OTHER DIRECTIVES / LEGISLATIONS ....................................................... 50 5.1. 5.2. 5.3. 5.4. 6. PORTUGAL ................................................................................................................... 21 SPAIN ......................................................................................................................... 24 GREECE ....................................................................................................................... 30 ITALY .......................................................................................................................... 33 ISSUES WITH REGULATIONS, STANDARDS AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ............ 41 4.1. 4.2. 4.3. 4.4. 5. PORTUGAL ..................................................................................................................... 6 SPAIN ........................................................................................................................... 9 GREECE ....................................................................................................................... 14 ITALY .......................................................................................................................... 14 PORTUGAL ................................................................................................................... 50 SPAIN ......................................................................................................................... 50 GREECE ....................................................................................................................... 50 ITALY .......................................................................................................................... 50 CONCLUSIONS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................ 51 6.1. 6.2. 6.3. 6.4. PORTUGAL ................................................................................................................... 51 SPAIN ......................................................................................................................... 52 GREECE ....................................................................................................................... 53 ITALY .......................................................................................................................... 54 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................... 55 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... 57 CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 iii DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: OVERVIEW OF THE PORTUGUESE REGULATION ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY........................................ 6 FIGURE 2: OVERVIEWAND EVOLUTION OF THE ITALIAN REGULATION ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY ....................... 17 FIGURE 3: OVERVIEW OF REGULATION ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN THE SICILIAN REGION .............................. 18 FIGURE 4: OVERVIEW OF EVOLUTION ON ITALIAN LEGISLATION CONCERNING PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION OF CULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HERITAGE.................................................................. 20 FIGURE 5: PORTUGAL - AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURES FOR RES SYSTEMS ............................................... 21 FIGURE 6: PORTUGAL - DIVISION OF COMPETENCIES........................................................................... 22 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: PORTUGAL - TYPE OF RES USED, REQUIREMENTS AND POWER ................................................... 21 TABLE 2: SPAIN - TYPE OF RES USED, REQUIREMENTS AND POWER .......................................................... 24 TABLE 3: SPANISH RELEVANT REGULATION ........................................................................................ 29 TABLE 4: GREECE - PV INSTALLATION, REQUIREMENTS AND POWER ........................................................ 30 TABLE 5: GREECE - BIOMASS USE, REQUIREMENTS AND POWER............................................................ 30 TABLE 6: ITALY - TYPE OF RES USED, REQUIREMENTS AND POWER ........................................................... 34 TABLE 7: ITALY - AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF PLANTS POWERED BY RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES SYSTEMS ............................................................................... 36 TABLE 8: ITALIAN RELEVANT REGULATION ......................................................................................... 39 CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 iv DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS Acronym EeB EED EPBD EPC ESCO EU NEEAPs nZEB PPP RES VAT GWh RES-E RES-H&C RES-T RD&D DHW: EU ETS: Definition Energy-efficient Buildings Energy Efficiency Directive Energy Performance of Buildings Directive Energy Performance Contracts Energy Service Company European Union National Energy Efficiency Action Plans Nearly Zero Energy Building Public Private Partnership Renewable Energy Source Value Added Tax Gigawatt – hours Renewable energy sources for electricity Heating and cooling from RES Thermal from renewable energy sources Research, Development and Deployment Domestic hot water European Union Emissions Trading System. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 v DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final CERTUS PROJECT IN BRIEF Southern European countries undergo a severe economic crisis. This hinders the compliance to the latest Energy Efficiency Directive, demanding strict energy efficiency measures for the public sector. Investments required to renovate public buildings and achieve nearly zero energy consumption have long payback times. So the interest of financing entities and ESCOs is small, especially when banks have limited resources. Many of the municipal buildings in Southern Europe require deep renovations to become nZEB and this should not be regarded as a threat but rather as an opportunity for the energy service and the financing sector. The objective of the proposed action is to help stakeholders to gain confidence in such investments and initiate the growth of this energy service sector and nZEB sector with its correlated value chain. Municipalities, energy service companies and financing entities in Italy, Greece, Spain and Portugal are involved in this project. The plan is to produce representative deep renovation projects that will act as models for replication. Twelve buildings in four municipalities in each country have been selected. The partners will adapt existing energy service models and procedures and will work out financing schemes suitable for the 12 projects. Consequently, the partners will create materials, such as guides and maxi brochures, suitable to support an intensive communication plan. The plan includes four workshops with B2B sessions targeted to municipalities, ESCOs and financing entities. These actions shall be complemented by four training activities targeting municipal employees and the participation in international events targeting all stakeholders. It is expected that Project’s actions will have a significant impact by triggering investments in renovations to achieve nZEB and the uptake of the ESCO market in Southern European member states. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 1 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Southern European Countries have adopted in the last years different European directives on energy efficiency and on renewable energy systems in buildings even with delay concerning the nearly-Zero Energy Buildings, as Member States have deadline to increase the number of nZEB very soon: by 31 December 2020 and after 31 December 2018 all new buildings and all buildings occupied and owned by public authorities respectively must be nZEB. The review of the legislative framework concerning energy efficiency in buildings in Portugal, Spain, Greece and Italy consider to analyse the gap between the objectives and the ongoing development in each country, as well as the specific challenges that these countries have to overcome. Each country partner has followed its own line of exposition, which has not tried to be homogenized, as each country has its own specific regulatory / legislative procedures. The outlines of the report are as follows: Portuguese, Spanish and Italian results are aligned to draw attention to the current gap between disciplines that regulate energy efficiency interventions and integration of RES also on historic buildings, bound by the laws of protection. Contrarlily, the regulatory frame investigated by the Greek partners is applied to new – contemporary buildings, as the local treated buildings belong to the contemporary period. Results highlighted by the Portuguese overview show that there are no relevant environmental obstacles or regulatory gaps to the installation of energy efficiency technologies and renewable energy in buildings and its use in urban areas. The major obstacles to the use of renewable energy technologies and to the deep renovation of the building envelope are the protection rules in listed classified buildings. Other restriction to the large scale installation of renewable energy technologies regards the tariff, since the energy injected into the grid is penalized with a very low tariff. The study for energy efficiency regulations and RES integration in Spanish urban areas provides an overview on two sets of regulations -that which govern places of historic significance and those which deal with energy efficiency. The report concludes important, detailed and specific recommendations coming from the present study on regulations. It also, presents in detail on regional laws and regulations covering historic building protection in the Basque Country where the study was conducted. At national level it describes the gap between the environmental regulations and those regulations enforced to protect historic structures. The study presents an overview of the legislation pertinent to energy efficiency and integration of RES in buildings of Alimos municipality and discusses the problems and gaps identified along the renovation design of the three local case studies. It highlights important results and problems, as: (i) the main problem regarding the energy renovation of public buildings is that a renovation / construction contract is awarded based on the lowest price and not on the energy savings to be achieved (ii) there are many difficulties regarding the implementation of the renovation plans by means of an ESCO model due to bureaucratic procedures and partial implementation of the relevant legislation. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 2 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final Results presented by the Italian overview show obstacles and gaps and define some generic compensatory measures, as in Italy there are obstacles to the application of nZEB Directive depending by a set of rules that focused on other aspects than those of energy management of buildings. The report mainly focusses in the current urgent need which is a ‘one single Coordination composed of members of the relevant ministries and a legislative text on energy efficiency in buildings that also takes into account the historical buildings. More possible actions are mentioned as Declaratories, Training and other actions to increase the public awareness. The Deliverable include an overview of the relevant regulation/legislative framework of each participant country and notes the authorization procedures for construction and installation of plants powered by renewable energy sources systems. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 3 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 1. INTRODUCTION By 2020, the European Union aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by at least 20% compared to 1990 levels, increase the share of renewable energy in final energy consumption to 20%, and achieve a 20% increase in energy efficiency1. All EU countries must also achieve a 10% share of renewable energy in their transport sector.To achieve this, EU countries have 23 committed to reaching their own national renewables targets ranging from 10% to 49% , . They are also each required to have at least 10% of their transport fuels come from renewable sources by 2020. CERtuS consortium has recognized since the writing of the proposal that the European energy performance of buildings directive (EPBD) is the major regulatory instrument to make happen the ambitious targets for reducing carbon emissions from the building sector - approximately 90% by 2050. Member States ensured that by 31 December 2020 all new buildings are nearly zero-energy buildings; and after 31 December 2018, new buildings occupied and owned by public authorities are nearly zero-energy buildings. Member States shall furthermore draw up national plans for increasing the number of nearly zero-energy buildings and following the leading example of the public sector, develop policies and take measures such as the setting of targets in order to stimulate the transformation of buildings that are refurbished into nearly zero-energy buildings. In this context, analyse and compare information on the legislation pertinent to energy efficiency and integration of RES in buildings is very important. This is because a comprehensive framework of competencies and procedures is needed for the southern European member states which currently are preparing the regulation for the cost optimal levels of minimum energy performance and nZEB. It is important to understand the differences and similarities in the field of energy efficiency and RES as well the regulations regarding Energy Efficiency and protection rules of historic buildings, as half of the CERtuS case studies have a historic value and some of them are monuments. Scope of this document is to examine the more recent legislation in Portugal, Spain, Greece and Italy related to building sector as it represents of key importance for the fulfilment iof to energy efficiency and nZEB strategies. Main objective is to document proposals to regulators of the Mediterranean area on needed regulation improvements in order to facilitate nZEB renovations. In that area the problem of energy consumption is more complex because the airconditioning load is as important as the heating load and in some cases is more important. Furthermore, Southern European countries buildings’ energy needs depend on a high number of architectural parameters which have different effects on summer and winter loads. The law restrictions of the historic buildings in order to develop the local strategy and policy have been also taken in consideration. 1 National energy efficiency targets (http://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/energy-efficiency/energy-efficiency-directive) 2 From 10% in Malta to 49% in Sweden. 3 Renewable energy – National action plans (http://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/renewable-energy/national-action-plans) CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 4 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final The current report outlines the actual situation of each CERtuS country/municipality providing obstacles and gaps in the regulatory frame faced by the designers during the implementation of the renovation design. It is evident that each country partner has followed its own line of exposition, which has not tried to be homogenized as, each country has its own specific regulatory / legislative procedures and the work is deepening in different obstacles and gaps of each country regulatory frame trying to define compensatory measures (where possible) for each specific obstacle. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 5 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 2. OVERVIEW OF THE REGULATIONS REGARDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND PROTECTION RULES OF HISTORIC BUILDINGS 2.1. PORTUGAL Energy Performance of Buildings The Directive on Energy Performance of Buildings allowed the development of a legislative package in Portugal, which created a National System of Energy Certification and Indoor Air Quality in the Buildings (SCE), and revised building codes for residential and non-residential buildings. Figure 1 establishes the SCE timeline giving an overview on its implementation in Portugal. FIGURE 1: OVERVIEW OF THE PORTUGUESE REGULATION ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY The European Directive 2002/91/EC was transposed to the Portuguese national law on April 4th2006 by means of a legislative package composed of three Decree-Law, already mentioned in Figure 1. This Decree-law only made a partial application on the Directive, but in January 2009, the Portuguese Energy Performance Certification scheme comprised the full implementation of the EPBD, meaning that all the required buildings are now included: new buildings, major renovations, public buildings and all buildings when sold or rented. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 6 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final By December 2013, more than 600,000 Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) were issued on a web based central registration system4 that qualified experts must access and use to issue certificates, since the launching of the scheme in July 2007. About 80% of these EPCs took place after January 2009, for existing buildings, upon sale or rent. In this context, the State promoted, the energy efficiency of buildings and, in this way, acquired relevant experience, which resulted not only in the efficiency of energy certification system, but also in the diagnosis of aspects whose practical application is proved susceptible to improvement. With the publication of the European Directive 2010/31/EU from May 19th 2010 on the energy performance of buildings, the regime established by Directive 2002/91/EC was reformulated. Such Directive clarifies some of the principles of the original text and introduces new provisions aimed at strengthening the framework for promoting energy efficiency in buildings, in the light of the goals and challenges agreed by the Member States for 2020. The transposition into national law of European Directive 2010/31/EU created an opportunity to improve and systematize the scope of energy certification system and respective regulations as well as to align the national requirements with impositions of the Directive. Then, the Decree-Law 118/2013 from August 20th 2013 ensured not only the transposition of the Directive, but also the revision of the national legislation to include, in a single law which includes the System for Energy Certification of Buildings (SCE), the Regulation on the Energy Performance of Residential Buildings (REH), and the Regulation on the Energy Performance of Services Buildings (RECS). In general, the requirements for new buildings were tightened, promoting efficient envelops and introducing technical systems requirements. The contribution of renewable energy systems was also detailed and stimulated. It also defines nZEB and its requirements and transposes to the national legislation the aim to have nZEB in all new buildings after December 31st 2020 or after December 31st 2018 in the case of public buildings. However, the national plan for rehabilitation of buildings was not yet approved. Protection Rules of Historic Buildings According to its relative value, the immovable cultural heritage may be listed as bearing national interest, public interest or municipal interest. An asset shall be considered of national interest whenits protection and enhancement, in whole or in part, represent a significant cultural value for the nation. Any national interest property, be it a monument, a group of buildings or a site, is deemed to be a “national monument”. An asset shall be considered of public interest whenits protection and enhancement, though representing a cultural value of national importance, prove to be disproportionate under the protection system inherent to national interest classification. Assets shall be considered of municipal interest where their 4 www.adene.pt/sce CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 7 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final protection and enhancement, in whole or in part, represent a prevailing cultural value within the scope of a municipality. The administrative procedure for listing an immovable property is set in motion by the DGPC (Directorate General for Cultural Heritage5) in liaison with the cultural directorates for culture (according to their respective operation area). However, any natural or legal person can, under the law, submit an application for listing an asset. The listing of a cultural property as of national interest is a responsibility of the competent State authorities (the Council of Ministers) who will, for that purpose, issue a Government decree. Public interest classifications are the responsibility of the competent State authorities (the government department in charge of culture, which is currently the Secretary of State for Culture) or of the Autonomous Regions, if the property is located there. An ordinance will be issued for this purpose. Municipal interest properties are the responsibility of the municipalities even though the DGPC needs to issue a favourable report. In mainland Portugal, it is up to the DGPC to propose to the Government the listing of national interest and public interest assets. When the administrative procedure is set in motion, DGPC is to apply the definition of relevant cultural interest required for any national cultural heritage in pursuance with no. 3 of article 2 of Law no. 107/2001 of 8 September and the general criteria laid out in article 17 therewith. Decree Law no. 309/2009 of 23 October, which has been in force since 1 January 2010, regulates the procedure for listing property. Heritage listing extends its strategic scope through the creation of general and special protection zones, i.e., protection areas where no building works are authorised without prior consent from the competent cultural heritage authority. They may include non aedificandi areas (ZNA - where all types of construction are prohibited) which are meant to create buffer zones for minimising buildings impacts or safeguarding archaeological sites. Listed immovable properties may benefit from a special protection zone (ZEP), to be established by an ordinance, which is laid out at the time of the final decision for listing or within a period of 18 months from the date of publication of the final decision. This procedure is compulsory for monuments but optional for groups of buildings and sites (whenever it is deemed essential to ensure integration with the architecture, landscape and urban setting and also from the visual point of view). The effects of establishing a general protection zone or a provisional special protection zone on a listed property, for a national interest or a public interest property, will remain in force until the publication of the special protection zone. The special protection zone ensures the landscape and visual integration of a given property including the green areas that are relevant to the context. 5 www.patrimoniocultural.pt/ CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 8 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 2.2. SPAIN Construction is complicated. Each site is unique with its challenges and environment; numerous professions are involved that require coordination including engineers, architects, planners, multiple trades, workers and specialties. Construction is also expensive. It is made more complicated by two additional factors that are addressed in this report: Historic structures and their particular requirements and regulations Energy efficiency requirements and the existence of multiple layers of laws, regulations and standards These two factors must be balanced appropriately for a successful project. Some of the difficulties encountered to achieve this balance include respect for historic materials that perform poorly in terms of energy efficiency, installation of solar panels in confined city centres, and conflicting laws at different levels, or worse, a lack of regulations or guidance altogether. This last difficulty is important as regulations take time to implement and lag behind technological developments. This report will outline a method to tackle this challenge – it will work from the perspective of these two factors and from the top down to the bottom. Beginning with the international perspective and working to European standards, national regulations and finally local needs and measures. It will describe the gap between the environmental regulations and those regulations intended to protect historic structures. 1954 Hague Convention 1954 Hague Protocol 1999 Hague Protocol 7 July 1960 26 June 1992 6 July 2001 1970 Unesco Convention 1995 UNIDROIT Convention 10 January 1986 21 May 2002 1972 World Heritage Convention 4 May 1982 SPANISH STATE PARTY TO INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS RELATED TO HISTORIC STRUCTURES There is a set of evolving European standards, including the building industry, commonly called Euro Norms developed by CEN (European Committee Standardization). These Standards are intended to reduce costs, enhance performance, improve safety and ensure the compatibility of components, products and services. This one European Standard replaces 33 national standards and members are obliged to adopt each as a national standard. They also have to withdraw any existing national standard that conflicts. Therefore, one European Standard (EN) becomes the national standard in all 33 countries covered by CEN. The European Standards published by CEN are developed by experts, established by consensus and adopted by the Members. These standards are VOLUNTARY and there is no legal obligation to use them, however many contracts are written, particularly within the building industry, to make them mandatory. For example: CEN/CLC/TR 16567:2013 (WI=JW002002)Energy Efficiency Obligation Schemes in Europe - Overview and analysis of main features and possibilities for harmonization and CWA 16267:2011 (WI=WS057001) Guidelines for Sustainable Development of Historic and Cultural Cities – Qualicities. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 9 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement European Cultural Convention Final 4 July 1957 European Convention for the Protection of the Architectural 27 April 1989 Heritage European Convention on Offences Relating to Cultural Property - European Convention for the Protection of the Archaeological Signed on 16 January Heritage (revised) 1992 SPANISH STATE PARTY TO EUROPEAN INSTRUMENTS RELATED TO HISTORIC STRUCTURES For energy efficiency in buildings these mainly follow the European standards. For all the following technologies and installation size, local authorities always have direct competence in the licensing process: solar, solar thermal, bioenergy, biofuels, wind energy, geothermal energy and hydropower. In Spain, the implementation of the Directive on the Energy Performance of Buildings (EPBD) is under the responsibility of the Ministry of Industry, Energy and Tourism and of the Ministry of Public Works and Transport, with the contribution of the Institute for Energy Diversification and Saving (IDAE). The transposition of the EPBD into national laws consisted in the following timeline and Decrees: Royal Decree 314/2006, of the 17th of March, approving the Technical Building Code Royal Decree 47/2007, of the 19th of January, approving the basic procedure for the energy certification of new buildings Royal Decree 1027/2007, of the 20th of July, approving the Thermal Building Regulations Royal Decree 1826/2009, of the 27th of November, modifies the Thermal Building Regulations Royal Decree 235/2013, of the 5th of April 2013, establishes basic procedure for the Energy Efficiency Certification Buildings (transposes the recast EPBD) Royal Decree 233/2013, of 5th April, regulating the State Plan to promote rented housing, building renovation and urban renewal and regeneration 2013-2016. Ruling of 25 September 2013, of the Secretariat of State for Energy, publishing Ruling of 25 June 2013 of the Management Board of the Institute for Energy Diversification and Saving, which sets out the regulatory bases and the aid scheme announcement for the energy rehabilitation of the existing buildings in the residential sector. The Royal Decree 235/2013 transposed Directive 2009/91/EC into national law. The decree introduced a modification of the procedure for obtaining an energy efficiency certificate in buildings. As of June 2013, owners of buildings are required to present an energy efficiency certificate to buyers or renters of flats. The certificate, valid for 10 years, evaluates the efficiency level of the building in terms of energy consumption and CO2 emissions, and classifies the building through on a scale from A to G. The Institute for Diversification and Saving of Energy (IDAE) is an agency of the Ministry of Industry, Energy and Tourism. It contributes to achieve the objectives of Spain in improving CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 10 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final energy efficiency, renewable energy and other low carbon technologies, this is the strategic framework of its activity. Objective include 1) promoting the use of new technology, replacement for industry, agriculture, services, homes, buildings and transport areas. 2) Manage and track savings plans and national energy efficiency, 3) Promote efficient use of energy, 4) Collaborate with the European Commission and support the Spanish companies, 5) Offer integrated energy efficiency sectors that require a catalyst for implementation. Protection of historic sites LEY 16/1985, de 25 de junio, del Patrimonio Histórico Español (BOE de 29 de junio de 1985) (*). Introduction to Cultural Heritage management and the Ministry of Culture The Ministry has in its structure two Branches responsible for the protection and conservation of the Spanish Cultural Heritage, dependent on the Department of Fine Arts and Cultural Assets and Archives and Libraries. Office for the Protection of Historical Heritage. It is responsible for the implementation of the legal regime for the protection of Cultural Heritage. Besides this Branch it has associated coordination of the following organs: Spanish Historical Heritage Council. Coordinating body between the State Administration and the Autonomous Communities whose purpose is to facilitate communication and exchange of action programs and information concerning the Spanish Cultural Heritage. Board of Classification, Valuation and Export of Spanish Historical Heritage Assets. Gives advisory body attached to the Directorate General of Fine Arts and Cultural Assets and Archives and Libraries responsible for reviewing applications for export, import and acquisition of goods. Ley 16/1985 del Patrimonio Histórico Español, artículo 3. Regula la Junta de Calificación, Valoración y Exportación de Bienes del Patrimonio Histórico Español. Real Decreto 111/1986, artículos del 7 al 9. Real Decreto 111/1986, artículo 9.4. Comisión de Valoración. Board of Classification, Valuation and Export of Historical Heritage Assets It is attached to the Directorate General of Fine Arts and Cultural Assets and Archives and Libraries referee advisory body. The Board analyzes and issue proposals on: Applications for export of protected cultural goods. Applications for import of protected cultural property. Acquisition of cultural property by the State become part of the collection of museums, archives and state libraries. Evaluation Committee The Valuation Commission is an integral part of the Board. Valuing goods intended to be delivered to the State in payment of the tax debt. Make estimates that are necessary to implement building measures (laid down in Title VIII of Law 16/1985), in order to finance conservation works, maintenance and rehabilitation, as well CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 11 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final as protection and archaeological excavations in declared goods cultural interest The assessments necessary for the implementation of the aforementioned building measures (regulated in Article 74 of Law 16/1985). Ley 16/1985 del Patrimonio Histórico Español, artículo 3.Real Decreto 111/1986, artículos 2 a 6. Establishes the Historical Heritage Council. It is an organ of collaboration between the Government and the Autonomous Communities and is essentially intended to facilitate communication and exchange of action programs and information concerning the Spanish Cultural Heritage. The functions of the Spanish Historical Heritage Council are: • Know the state as well as regional, related to Spanish Historical Heritage, action programs and the results thereof. • Develop and adopt National Plans of Information Heritage, which are intended to foster communication between the different services and information needed to promote the development of scientific and technical research. • Develop and propose training and information campaigns on the Heritage activities • Report of the measures to be taken to ensure the necessary cooperation in order to fulfill international commitments made by Spain affecting Spanish Historical Heritage. • Report on the fate of the assets recovered from illegal export. • To issue reports on issues related to Historical Heritage that the president submit your inquiry. • Any other function that, within the framework of its competence, is attributed by any law or regulation. Legislación relativa a Garantía del Estado Ley 16/1985, de 25 de junio, del Patrimonio Histórico Español. Disposición Adicional Novena. Real Decreto 1680/1991, de 15 de noviembre, sobre Garantía del Estado para obras de interés cultural. 28Décret Royal 1680/1991, du 15 novembre, portant développement de la neuvième disposition additionnelle de la Loi 16/1985, du 25 juin, du Patrimoine Historique Espagnol, sur garantie de l’État pour les œuvres d’intérêt culturel Royal Decree 1680/1991, of 15th November, implementing the ninth additional provision of Law 16/1985, of 25th June of the Spanish Historic Patrimony, on State guarantee for works of cultural interest State Guarantee Definition State guarantee is a public insurance system by which the Spanish State is committed to ensuring interest Real temporary leasing for public display in some organizing institutions. Government Guarantee protects these works against the possible destruction, loss, theft or damage suffered in the period between the loan of the work and the time to return it to its owner by a type of insurance which covers the risks from the time of collection of the work in CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 12 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final their place of origin to the return of the same at the place designated by the lender, thus including transport and accommodation. The coverage provided by the State guarantee system operates identically to an extended insurance policy by an insurance company, covering all risks that may suffer the insured works. Ley 16/1985 del Patrimonio Histórico Español Ley 49/2002 de régimen fiscal de las entidades sin fines lucrativos y de los incentivos fiscales al mecenazgo Definition of patronage The concept of cultural patronage today includes the idea of social participation in the conservation and enrichment of Spanish Cultural Heritage. The needs of conservation and restoration required by the cultural heritage in Spain have confirmed that, despite the increase in the budgets of public administrations, private contributions are necessary to preserve them. Law 16/1985 on Spanish Historical Heritage includes a series of tax incentives in the field of Heritage, under Title VIII called "incentive measures". Law 49/2002 of taxation of non-profit entities and tax incentives for patronage aims to encourage patronage initiatives and promote the participation of civil society in the defense of artistic heritage in two ways: http://www.mecd.gob.es/cultura-mecd/areas-cultura/patrimonio/informacion-general.html BASQUE COUNTRY level It is also extremely important to mention the regional laws and regulations covering historic building protection at the local level, in this case where the study was conducted, in the Basque Country. This is governed by the Basque Country Law 7/1990 (de 3 julio 1990. Regulación del Patrimonio Cultural Vasco). This is usual in the case of Spain as more powers are devolved to the semi-autonomous regions such as the Basque Country. Similar protection laws also exist for Catalonia, Castille-la Mancha, Extremadura, to name a few. This is a critical point as the Basque Country has a special sensitivity toward their heritage and thus protection measures are more strictly defined and especially adapted to the region. Some of the elements covered include special recognition of structures that relate to Basque history, protection of the context and city centres. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 13 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 2.3. GREECE In Greece the basic law governing the construction of buildings is the “General Building Regulation” N.1577/1985 which was amended and supplemented with the N.2381/2000. The N.3661/2008 “Measures to reduce energy consumption in buildings and other provisions” incorporated the EU legislation regarding the reduction of the energy consumption in buildings, into the national one. In 2012 the N.4067/2012 “New Building Regulation” was published and it contains definitions and incentives for energy savings in buildings. The new definitions are semi-buried buildings, green roofs, double-skin facade, vertical gardens, etc. and the main incentives are the increase of built-surface ratio for buildings with very low energy consumption, the permission to add on existing buildings external insulation, passive solar systems and PVs with an extension of 15cm beyond the legal building line and the exclusion of the structures which reduce the energy consumption from the total allowed construction area. Afterward, in order Greece to be consistent with the EU regulations, in 2010 the new regulation regarding energy performance in building (KENAK) was published. This law, in addition to the definition of the requirements for the new and refurbished buildings, establishes also the need of the energy performance certification. Any building or part of a building needs to be certified in order to be rented or sold. Also, according to this certification the energy renovation of a building can be funded under several national programs. Recently, it was published the latest Law 4122/19-02-2013 “Energy Efficiency of Buildings” which foresees the revision of the minimum requirements through a cost optimum calculation methodology. In order the national legislation to be fully consistent with the Directive 2010/31/EU on the Energy Performance of Buildings (EPBD), Greece has to define the levels of nZEB and according to the new Directorate of Energy Policy and Efficiency of the Ministry for Environment, the relevant regulation is expected to be issued by the end of 2015. Regarding the transposition of the latest Directive 2012/27/EU on Energy Efficiency (EED), Greece has prepared a draft law in September 2014 that been commented, but its approval from the parliament is still pending. 2.4. ITALY Bridging the current gap between disciplines that regulate energy efficiency interventions on historic buildings and monuments, bound by the laws of protection, it is an ambitious and difficult question. To date, in all the legislative provisions related to energy saving there are provisions designed to ensure exemptions for the architectural and monumental heritage. The use of these derogations for ignore the problem of energy efficiency of historic buildings, according to the Italian Ministry of Cultural Heritage and Activities and Tourism (Ministero dei Beni e delle Attività Culturali e del Turismo (MiBACT) “does not represent a good choice, we can say that the opposite holds true: interventions to improve energy efficiency of historic buildings (compatible with the cultural characteristics of the artifacts) is the first significant step towards CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 14 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final a real preservation of this heritage, so widespread, so fragile, so difficult and expensive to maintain”6 The Italian studies and projects addressing the issue of energy efficiency of historic buildings are meant to identify measures to improve performance of single parts of the ancient building, just as it is required by legislation. The issue of energy efficiency of historic buildings should be more contextualized and addressed in a manner consistent with their historical nature, not excluding innovations and additions but minimizing them, privileging authenticity and not replacement, as well minimal intervention, notoriety of the intervention and compatibility between new and ancient materials. In recent years regulations in Italy regarding historic buildings preservation and energy efficiency have changed profoundly both but still they are going on parallel lines which are rarely encountered. In this chapter are described the evolution of laws in Italy, concerning Energy Efficiency of buildings, in general, and preservation and protection of Cultural Heritage buildings. To take in consideration that Italian legislation underestimates the energy efficiency of historic buildings and legislates mainly on new buildings. Nevertheless, the design of new buildings and the refurbishment/restoration of the old ones require the same procedures and tools at architectural, structural, functional, technological, plant and equipment engineering level. Energy Performance of Buildings In the last ten years, many changes there have been in the field of energy efficiency. Accordingly with the National Energy Strategy, Italy adopted two key measures in 2014, outlining the path towards the challenging 2020 energy saving targets. The transposition of the Energy Efficiency Directive and the Italian Energy Efficiency Action Plan7provided a wide frame aimed at the removal of the barriers delaying the spread of the energy efficiency, at national as well as at local level. The Directive 2012/27/EU on Energy Efficiency, EPBD (Energy Performance of Buildings Directive) was approved in Italy by the Legislative Decree 102/2014 amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EC and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC. The Directive 2012/31/EU, also known as "EPBD recast", updated the principles relating the energy performance of buildings, was transposed in Italy by Decree-Law 63/2013, and converted with in Law 90/2013. In Italy, the regulatory frame for increasing energy efficiency of buildings is varied and the application of the European directives on the energy performance of buildings have a rather complex history that is not yet over, with significant differences between the different Regions 6 : Antonia Pasqua Recchia, Direttore Generale per il Paesaggio, Le Belle Arti, l’Architettura e l’arte contemporanea, Minister o per i beni e le attività culturali, “Problematiche e opportunità nell’uso delle fonti energetiche rinnovabili nel patrimonio storico monumentale”, Milano Fiera, 5 Ottobre 2011. 7 The Italian Ministry of Economic Development has published the National Energy Efficiency Action Plan 2014. The document, proposed by ENEA, outlines energy efficiency goals that Italy has planed to achieve by 2020 as well as running policy measures to chieve them. http://www.sviluppoeconomico.gov.it/images/stories/pubblicazioni/PAEE_2014.pdf CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 15 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final in terms of performance assessments, drafting the Energy Performance Certificate, and synergy with the regional legislation with regards to building upgrades. The decrees implementing Legislative Decrees 192/2005 and 63/2013, converted into law 90/2013, are the most important for the definition of criteria and procedures for nearly Zero Energy Buildings.To these decrees must be added the Legislative Decree 115/08 on Energy Efficiency and Energy Services and the Legislative Decree 28/2011 on renewables. Law 90/2013 for improving the energy performance of buildings: The Law introduces substantial changes to Legislative Decree 192/2005 in order to adapt it to the Directive 2010/31/EU. Among the main changes introduced, which will be subsequently subjects of specific implementing decrees of a technical nature, includes: Nearly zero energy building (nZEB): The law defines the concept of the boundary system, the energy produced in situ (energy produced or withdrawn within the boundary system) and the cost optimal level. From 1 January 2019 the new public buildings or occupied by the public administration must be nZEB; all other new buildings have to meet this requirement by 1 January 2021. Calculation methodology regarding the energy performance of buildings: it will be updated in reference to UNI TS 1130021 (parts 1 to 4) and Recommendation 14 of the Italian Thermotechnical Committee (CTI). Minimum energy performance. Will be defined according to technical and economic assessments result of applying a comparative methodology and updated every 5 years Energy Performance Certificate (EPA). The Law introduces an obligation for those who sell or rent a property to attach the EPA to the contract. Tax deductions. The law extended the deduction of 50% on refurbishment works, and brings the deduction for energy improvement from 55% to 65%. Urgent measures for the transposition of Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the council of 19 may 2010 on the energy performance of buildings for the definition of infringement proceedings by the European Commission, as well as other provision of social cohesion: Presidential Decree of the Republic 74/2013 on thermal systems: The Decree includes obligations and criteria to be applied to public and private building. Among these, they are highlighted the new limit values for all buildings concerning the indoor temperature for heating and cooling Presidential Decree 75/2013 on energy certification of buildings: The Decree enables as experts to entrust the building energy certification the following profiles: (i) Technicians with an appropriate qualification and eligible to practice, (ii) Energy service companies (ESCOs) operating accordance with the transposition and implementation of Directive 2006/32/EU on the end-use of energy efficiency and energy services. Following, Figure 2 provides a non-exhaustive overview and evolution of the Italian regulation on energy efficiency. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 16 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final FIGURE 2: OVERVIEWAND EVOLUTION OF THE ITALIAN REGULATION ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 17 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final Energy Performance of Buildings in the Region of Sicily It is also important to mention the regional laws of the Region of Sicily, where the case studies of the project were conducted. As general consideration, we must say that, in the last years, a number of regional laws focused on energy efficiency have been issued with the aim to complete the regulatory gap that for years has characterised the national legislation in the field of energy efficiency. Italian Regions have proceeded autonomously to legislate creating a regulatory framework extremely varied. In the specific, for the Region of Sicily the main set of regional regulations are described and provided bellow: FIGURE 3: OVERVIEW OF REGULATION ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN THE SICILIAN REGION In addition the Italian Ministry of Economic Development launched the platform of Sustainable Energy Efficiency Municipalities (CSE)8, which allows municipalities to apply for non-refundable funds directed to projects for energy efficiency improvement or production by means of renewable sources. These projects will concern municipality buildings located in Convergence Regions (Campania, Calabria, Sicily and Puglia). Protection Rules of Historic Buildings The key document of the Italian legislation is made up by the New Heritage and Landscape Codex of 2004 which includes and rationalises all the preexisting multilayers and multifaceted Italian legislation regulating the preservation and protection of cultural heritage from the first laws n°1089 (Law 1089/1939 and Law 1497/1939) up to the more recent legislation. The Codex was adopted through the Delegated Decree 42/2004, according to Law 137/2002. It is made up by 184 Articles and refers to the entire Cultural Heritage sector, both tangible and intangible, mobile or immobile. The new Codex updates the definition of cultural heritage 8 CSE: Comuni per la Sostenibilità e l’Efficienza Energetica. Programming 2007- 2013, but still are paid. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 18 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final goods, (including the neglected by the previous legislation intangible heritage) and updates as far as regards the concept of safeguard, from the last century to the present days. Moreover it disciplines all the functions pertaining to the Italian Cultural Heritage, under the concept of protection, valorisation, management, national and international circulation of cultural goods, etc. – as well as to the landscape. It is based on article 9 of the Italian Constitution according to which the republic promotes the development of culture and safeguard of the landscape and of the historical and artistic heritage of Italy. The Codex was further modified by Leg. Decrees 156/2006 (corrective and supplementary provisions to Delegated Decree 42/2004 in relation to cultural heritage) and 157/2006 (corrective and supplementary provisions to Delegated Decree 42/2004 in relation to landscape) which excluded the possibility to hand over the management of public cultural property to the private for-profit. Further changes introduced by Leg. Decrees 62 and 63/2008 (respectively devoted to the heritage and landscape) may be summed up as follows9: landscape: new definition of "landscape" in line with the European Convention ratified in 2004; safeguard primarily entrusted to the Sovrintendenze10 – acting in cooperation with the regions and local authorities – endowed with stronger powers with regard to landscape planning restrictions and the granting of permits; and heritage: new dispositions to prevent the improper alienation of public private property, through the reintroduction of the safeguard measures envisaged in Pres. Decree 283/2000; a more efficient coordination between EU regulations, international agreements and Italian legislation regarding the international circulation of cultural objects, which cannot be considered ordinary "goods". Recently, through the Ministerial Decree of 29 August 2014, the legislator downgraded the powers formerly granted to the Soprintendenza. In the future their decisions, if contested, could be reversed to the newly created Regional Commissions for Cultural Heritage, which have the final say in these matters. In Italy, the regulation of urban-historical aspects is worked out at Municipal level. Such system is traditionally connected to two complementary planning tools: the Technical Implementation Norms of the Municipal General Urban Planning and the Municipal Building Regulation. It is right at this level that a substantial lack of updating of the regulatory and planning tools can be found, especially in the energy sector. 9 Cultural policies and trends in Europe, Italy 10 peripheral offices of the Italian Ministry of Cultural Heritage and Activities and Tourism CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 19 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final A complete list of Italian legislation concerning preservation and protection of Cultural and Environmental Heritage is shown below: FIGURE 4: OVERVIEW OF EVOLUTION ON ITALIAN LEGISLATION CONCERNING PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION OF CULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HERITAGE CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 20 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 3. OVERVIEW OF THE CURRENT STATUS OF RENEWABLE ENERGY 3.1. PORTUGAL 3.1.1. TYPE OF RES USED , REQUIREMENTS AND POWER Errore. L'origine riferimento non è stata trovata. presents the type of RES to be used in each building, as well as its requirements and power. Source Requirements Power (kW) Photovoltaic Elementary School of Solum 16.92 kWp Panels attached to the roofs of buildings The panels must be installed with the same inclination and orientation of the roofs to do not alter the shape of the buildings. Municipal House of Culture 181 kWp Panels attached to structures The panels must be installed in structures with a tilt of 30º, oriented to south, but keeping the orientation of the building (azimuth of 20º) in order to minimize the visual impact of the PV panels. Coimbra Town Hall 126 kWp Solar Tiles The solar tiles should have an appearance identical to the tiles in use in the roofs of the building in order to minimize the visual impact. TABLE 1: PORTUGAL - TYPE OF RES USED, REQUIREMENTS AND POWER 3.1.2. AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURES AND DIVISIONS OF COMPETENCIES The authorization procedures for on-grid renewable energy (RE) systems installation are presented in Figure 5. For off-grid systems at the moment there is no regulation enforced. FIGURE 5: PORTUGAL - AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURES FOR RES SYSTEMS CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 21 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final Despite of looking to be rather complicated, the process runs with little or almost no problems. The procedures are quite transparent and all players known exactly what their role is. The process starts with the online registration of the RE system into a web platform (www.renovaveisnahora.pt) where the RE system and energy source are registered. Afterwards, the systems owner must pay a fee to validate the registration, this fee includes all costs with permits, system inspection and certification. Later the process supervisor – DGEG (General Directorate for Energy and Geology) analyses the registration request according to the local electrical grid technical features. If accepted (otherwise the registration data must be corrected) the process moves forward to power allocation stage where the nominal power of system is considered in the national balance of power generation. After this stage and considering the system is already installed by a qualified company, using the certified and authorized equipment according to the Portuguese technical rules for electrical installations, the system is ready to be inspected by an independent entity. In this stage there are two possibilities: system is reproved and corrections or changes are in order or it is approved and ready to be commissioned. Figure 6 presents the division of competencies between the different entities involved in the process. As mentioned before, DGEG supervises the process and CERTIEL (Association for the certification of electrical installations) is the communication channel between entities. CERTIEL also makes the bridge with the systems owner or the companies who installs the system. CERTIEL also recognizes which companies are qualified for installing RE Systems (according to their technical capability), which entities are qualified to perform system inspection and certification (ISQ - Institute of Welding and Quality and LIQ - Laboratory Quality Industrial). Regarding large systems (above 5.75 kW) DGEG sends its own technicians to perform the inspections and certifications. Regarding the system commissioning for on-grid systems CERTIEL makes the connection between the system owner and the Portuguese Electrical Utility Company- EDP to connect the system to the national grid. For off-grid systems the installation company is responsible for the commissioning. FIGURE 6: PORTUGAL - DIVISION OF COMPETENCIES CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 22 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 3.1.3. RELEVANT REGULATIONS The legislation for RE systems can be found at the same website where the systems registration is made, but the direct link is: http://www.renovaveisnahora.pt/web/srm/legislacao. In this location all relevant legislations is available (only in Portuguese) for the following RE sources: Solar, wind, biomass, biogas and hydro. The legislation is presented in different types of documents: Decree-Law, Regional Decree-law (for Madeira Islands), Ordinances and DGEG official statements. Some examples of such legislation are presented below: Decree-Law 363/2007 from 2 of November – First definition of legal regime applicable to production of electricity from renewable sources. Regional Decree-Law 16/2008/M from 6 of June – Adapts to the Madeira Island the Decree-Law 363/2007 legal regime for the production of electricity through small production units. Decree-Law 118A/2010 (Recast of Decree-Law 363/2077) from 25 of October – Simplified the legal regime applicable to the production of electricity through small production units. Decree-Law 34/2011 from 8 of March – defines the legal regime applicable for the production of electricity through medium production units (up to 250kW). Decree-Law 153/2014 from 20 of October – Established the legal regime applicable to production of electricity designed for self-consumption and grid injection from renewable source, through small production units. Ordinance 15/2015 from 23 of January – Defines de tariff for On-grid RE production systems whose sources are: solar, wind, biomass, biogas and hydro. Ordinance 60-E/2015 from 2 of March – Defines de communication procedure regarding off-grid systems, to be reported to DGEG and determines the rates mentioned in Decree-law 153/2014. Other forms of regulation are enforced in the Portuguese electric sector such as: Technical regulations for low voltage electrical installations (http://www.certiel.pt/web/certiel/instalacoes-de-utilizacao) DGEG Approved connection schemes for On- grid renewable energy systems (http://www.renovaveisnahora.pt/web/srm/solucoes-de-ligacao) CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 23 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 3.2. SPAIN 3.2.1. TYPE OF RES USED , REQUIREMENTS AND POWER The types of RES used include mainly wind and solar. There are RES of biomass, hydro and solid waste power sources but these are in less frequent use. For urban areas the type of RES used is almost always solar. The city centres of Spain are some of the densest in all of Europe therefore wind power can only be used with rural communities or wind farms created in the countryside and power transmitted. Source PHOTOVOLTAIC Thermal BIOMASS Requirements & The price regulation system is currently phased out through Real Decreto-ley 9/2013. The reason for this suspension is traced in the preamble of RDL 1/2012. A different regulation that had previously suspended the support schemes, before their final phasing out: RD 6/2009 established that by 2013 a part of the consumers’ electricity bill (the “peajes the acceso”) should be able to fully balance the costs incurred by the State arising from the support scheme. It was deemed, however, that the situation would not have allowed this goal to be reached by 2013. For this reason, and together with the high growth of RES-E in the past years, even beyond the set goals, all support schemes for RES-E were blocked. See above Power (kW) 6.5% 3,787 MW installed at the end of 2010 installed 2010 electricity generation was 825 MW (533 MW of solid * biomass, 115 of waste and 177 of biogas). WIND See above 22.3% 23 GW installed capacity 51,439 GWh annual production HYDRO POWER See above 19.5% 3887 billion KWs GEOTHERMAL See above 93 billion KWS TABLE 2: SPAIN - TYPE OF RES USED, REQUIREMENTS AND POWER CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 24 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final Renewable energy in Spain represented 42.8% of total energy generation in 2014. Overall 27.4% of Spain's electricity was generated from wind and solar in 2014. Spain has set the target of generating 45% of its energy needs from renewable energy sources. Spain is the world's fourth biggest producer of wind power and in 2014, the installed capacity was 23 GW and the annual production was 51,439 GWh, a share of total electricity consumption of 21.1%. Most of the RES came from wind and solar. This ambitious goal was set with several regulated and voluntary schemes. The main support scheme (the “Régimen Especial”) operated until the end of 2011 and was suspended at the beginning of 2012. As of now, no other support schemes for RES-E are in place. A tax regulation system for investments related to RES-E plants is in place. RES-E operators are entitled to grid connection, priority dispatch against the grid operator. Furthermore, a plant operator is entitled against the grid operator to an expansion of the grid, if the expansion is required for his plant to be connected to the grid. When clustering the different types of 11 support mechanisms available to electricity from renewable energy sources (RES-E ), a fundamental distinction can be made between direct and indirect policy instruments. Direct policy measures aim to stimulate the installation of RES-E technologies immediately, whereas indirect instruments focus on improving long-term framework conditions. Besides regulatory instruments, voluntary approaches for the promotion of RES-E technologies also exist, mainly based on consumers’ willingness to pay premium rates for green electricity. Further important classification criteria are whether policy instruments address price or quantity, and whether they support investments or generation. Policies for training and certification of solar panel installers are in place. Buildings should satisfy a minimal solar contribution of warm sanitary water. An overarching RD&D12 plan is in place that directs support to RES-E, RES-H&C13 and RES-T14. In Spain, the generation of electricity from renewable sources is mainly promoted through a price regulation system. Plant operators may choose between two options: a guaranteed feed-in tariff and a guaranteed bonus (premium) paid on top of the electricity price achieved on the whole sale market. 11 RES-E: Electricity from Renewable Energy Sources 12 Research, Development and Deployment 13 RES-H&C: Heating and Cooling from Renewable Energy Sources 14 RES-T: Thermal from Renewable Energy Sources CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 25 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 3.2.2. AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURES AND DIVISIONS OF COMPETENCIES Brief description of authorization procedures and divisions of competencies regarding RES General framework in the field of authorization Article 91. Conditions of licenses and concessions. 1. The Minister of Finance, at the proposal of the Directorate General of State Property, approve terms and conditions for the granting of licenses and authorizations of certain assets and rights of State Property, to be published in the "Official Gazette categories the State. " 2. In the absence of conditions, concessions and authorizations shall be those established by the holder Minister of the department to which the goods are affected or dependent public bodies which are the owners or have them assigned. These conditions may be broad in scope, for certain categories of licenses and concessions to competition department, or set for specific cases, and require approval in any case, prior favorable report of the Minister of Finance, which will also be mandatory and binding when It is intended to derogate from the conditions generally approved by it. 3. The conditions for the granting of licenses and concessions should consider the imposition of accessory holder such as the acquisition of securities obligations, the adoption and maintenance of certain corporate requirements, or other similar nature, where it is deemed necessary for reasons public interest. 4. Authorizations and concessions that qualify for occupation of public property necessary for the execution of a contract shall be granted by the Administration to be the owner, and is considered ancillary to that. These authorizations and concessions will be linked to the contract for the purposes of granting, duration and validity and transferability, subject to the approval and reports referred to in previous sections of this article. It will not be necessary to obtain these authorizations or concessions when the contract to enable the occupation of public property. Article 92. Authorizations. 1. Authorizations are granted directly to the petitioners who are eligible, unless, for any reason, you would find limited number, in which case it will be based on competition and if this is not appropriate, for not having assessed special conditions on applicants by lottery, if not otherwise had established in the conditions governing them. 2. Do not be transferable granting authorizations for which should be taken into account personal circumstances authorized or whose numbers be limited, unless the conditions for which are governed admit transmission. 3. The authorizations shall be granted for a specified period. Its maximum term, including extensions, is four years. 4. Authorizations may be unilaterally revoked by the granting authority at any time for reasons of public interest, without generating entitled to compensation when they are incompatible with the general conditions approved subsequently produce damage in the public domain, preventing its use for activities greater public interest or affect the general use. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 26 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 5. Permits may be free, with consideration given or conditions, or be subject to the fee for private use or special use of public domain assets of state regulated in Chapter VIII of Title I of Law 25/1998, of 13 July, amending the Legal Regime of the State and Local Fees and of Reordering property contributions for public, or to the charges under special rules. They are not subject to the fee when the private use or special use of public property is not always entails an economic utility for unauthorized or person, even having this utility, utilization or exploitation involving conditions or considerations for the beneficiary to nullify or do it irrelevant. It shall be recorded in the cases mentioned in the previous paragraph, that fact in the contract documents or clauses of the authorization. 6. The applicant for authorization for private use or special use of public domain, whatever the economic scheme which is applicable to them, may be required to guarantee, in the manner deemed most appropriate, the use of the property and its replacement or repair, or damages, in case of disturbance. The recovery of expenses incurred, when exceeded the guarantee, will be paid by way of urgency. 7. Without prejudice to the other points that may include general or specific conditions, the licensing agreement for use of goods and demaniales rights include at least: a) The rate of use of property or right. b) The economic system of authorization is subject. c) The security to be provided, where appropriate. d) The assumption of costs of maintenance and repairs, taxes and other taxes, as well as the commitment to use good by quality and delivering it in the state in which it is received. e) The commitment of prefetching at his expense on how many licenses and permits require the use of the good or the activity performed on it. f) The assumption of the liability of the occupation, to mention, if any, of the obligation to formalize the timely insurance policy, bank guarantee or other adequate security. g) The acceptance of the unilateral revocation, without the right to compensation, for reasons of public interest in the cases provided for in paragraph 4 of this article. h) The booking by the ministry or agency ceding the power to inspect the property subject to authorization, to ensure that it is used in accordance with the terms of the authorization. i) The term extension and subrogation regime that, in any case, require prior authorization. j) The causes of extinction. 8. Nothing in this provision shall apply to the special use authorizations under Article 90 of this law, which is not incompatible with its object and purpose. Article 95. Competition for the granting of licenses and concessions. Concessions and authorizations on goods and rights demaniales State Assets is otor Garan by holders of ministers departments that are affected, or appropriate management or administration or by the presidents or directors of government agencies that have assigned or whose assets belong. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 27 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final Authorization procedures Summary of policies Training programs for installers. The national system of qualification and professional formation (NSQPF) provides a structured framework for the provision of vocational training also for energy. Certification Programs for RES installations. As regards certification, an obligation to be certified is in place for solar thermal panels to comply with international standards. RD&D Policies. National plan of scientific research, development and technological innovation 2013 – 2016 is the programming instrument that establishes goals and priorities of the national research policy in the mid-term. The plan covers very different areas and topics. One of its strategic actions is “Energy and Climate Change”. Building obligations. With respect to buildings and RES, it is stated in the technical building code that all new buildings or buildings undergoing major renovation in which there is demand for warm sanitary water / air conditioning of a covered swimming pool must satisfy some of this demand through solar thermal installations. This is an obligatory certification for solar thermal panels to comply with international standards UNE-EN 12975 and UNE-EN 12976. Specifically, UNE-EN 12975 applies to solar panels with liquid cooling systems and UNE-EN 12976 applies to prefabricated thermal solar panels. Addressees, This scheme applies to producers of solar collectors. Competent authority: The Ministry of Industry, Energy and Tourism. Technologies: All policies apply to solar thermal. The NSQPF also applies to PV installations and wind power plants. The national plans of R&D do not specify technologies, but only types of projects. It is possible that technologies are specified in the single calls under the R&D plan. 3.2.3. RELEVANT REGULATIONS Year Regulation 2002 Qualifications L 5/2002 (Ley 5/2002, de 19 de junio, de las ALL of professional Cualificaciones y de la Formación Profesional -Law training 5/2002 of June 19 of qualifications and professional formation) 1980 Rules and technical instructions for PV installation 2013 2016 Title Area of application /Source ORDEN 28/07/1980 (Orden de 28 de julio de 1980 por Solar PV la que se aprueban las normas e instrucciones técnicas complementarias para la homologación de los paneles solares. Plan Nacional de Investigación Científica, Desarrollo e ALL Innovación Tecnológica (2013 – 2016) - National plan of scientific research, development and technological CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 28 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final innovation 1986 Environmental Impact Assessment Royal Decree 1302/1986 are modified. Makes clear that in assessing foreseeable direct and indirect effects of a project on population, flora, fauna, soil, air, water, climatic factors, landscape and material assets, including heritage artistic and archaeological, the interaction between all these factors will necessarily take into account; are specified more precisely the powers of the environmental agency in the environmental impact statement, and the scope of the compulsory report of the autonomous communities in the environmental assessment of plans and environmental projects is set, in which the competence to give the impact statement environmental for the State, when those involving special conservation areas of the autonomous region 2006 National Building Code CTE (Código Técnico de la Edificación) ALL In the Normative on Solar Energy in Spain Chapter 3, Article 7 Exceptional criteria for solar thermal and photovoltaic 7.1. Solar thermal and photovoltaic solar facilities must provide input and / or electrical power fixing minimum for each case Annexes of this Ordinance. Nevertheless, it may reduce or replace the solar contribution justifiably indicated in Annex II and the electric power indicated in Annex III, always trying to close as possible, in the following cases: a) When the energy supply of hot water is covered by leveraging other renewables, cogeneration process or residual energy sources from the installing heat recovery outside the own generation of heat from the building; b) When the estimated electricity production would correspond to the minimum power is covered by the use of other renewable energy sources; c) When the building site does not have sufficient access to sunlight for external barriers same; d.) In the rehabilitation of buildings, where there are no limitations due to correctable configurationpreexisting building or urban protection rules which apply to him; e) In new buildings, where there are irremediable limitations arising from the rules planning that prevent completely and clearly the arrangement of the collection surface required; f) When so determined by the competent body that must rule on Artistic Historic protection. TABLE 3: SPANISH RELEVANT REGULATION CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 29 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 3.3. GREECE 3.3.1. TYPE OF RES USED , REQUIREMENTS AND POWER Under the current project different RES systems (PV, wind turbines, geothermal systems, biomass and, solar heating and cooling systems) were investigated in order to be integrated into the three buildings. Small wind turbines have very little opportunity in the Greek urban areas, particularly due to the disturbance they cause on the neighboring buildings and the reduced wind potential. The geothermal heat pump, although very efficient, is difficult to be installed in a dense built environment. This is due to a lack of space, and, in the case of Alimos City Hall, there was a lack of space to accommodate the drilling rig. Also, innovative technologies that could contribute in achieving nZEB levels are still new on the market and costly. An example of this situation is the high price of solar cooling due to low market penetration. The use of DHW15 according to Greek regulation, assumed as negligible for buildings of the tertiary sector and, for this reason, the installation of solar heating systems were not investigated. The most suitable and feasible solution for these buildings is the roof PV system. More specific the details for the proposed RES for the three buildings of Alimos Municipality which were examined, are described below. Requirements Power (kW) City Hall The PV panels will be placed nearly due south with a fixed slope of 25°. The system will be connected to the low voltage grid via three-phase power. Environmental Services Office The PV panels will be placed due south with a fixed slope of 25°. The photovoltaic system will be connected to the low voltage grid via three-phase power. Municipal Library The PV panels will be placed in the south-facing with a fixed slope of 25°. The photovoltaic system will be connected to the low voltage grid via three-phase power. 15.26 kWp Source Photovoltaic 26.7 kWp 5.76 kWp TABLE 4: GREECE - PV INSTALLATION, REQUIREMENTS AND POWER Requirements Power (kW) Municipal Library The old heating system will be transformed to a new Pellet boiler. 75 kW Source Biomass TABLE 5: GREECE - BIOMASS USE, REQUIREMENTS AND POWER 15 DHW: Domestic Hot Water CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 30 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 3.3.2. AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURES AND DIVISIONS OF COMPETENCIES PV In order to get the approval to install PV <500 kWp an application is submitted to the HELLENIC ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION NETWORK OPERATOR S.A (HEDNO) and afterward HEDNO issues the Connection Offer. The owner of the PV system submits the approval of the small-scale works which is prerequisite in order for the Connection Contract to be signed. The procedure is completed with the award of the Power Purchase Agreement. For PVs <500 kWp there are two levels of compensation. The self-production is offset by consumption during the year (net-metering) Compensation with feed-in-tariff (FiT) For PVs 500 kWp to 1 MWp there is only the compensation with feed-in-tariff. The licensing procedure is the same as above. For PVs≥1 MWp there is only the compensation with feed-in-tariff. Extra licenses which are required are the Production and Installation Licences. Wind Turbine Regarding small wind turbines, the upper limit for the installed power into urban area is 20 kW. An application has to be submitted to the HELLENIC TRANSMISSION SYSTEM OPERATOR S.A (HTSO) in order to be issued the offer for the Connection Terms. The approval of the offer and the small-scale works permission, are prerequisites in order to be signed the Connection Contract. Biomass The use of biomass for the heating the buildings, has no major legal restrictions. Regarding the fuels, they have to be certified according to ΕΝ 14961−1. Additionally, the biomass based heating systems have to satisfy all the provisions of ΕΝ 303.05 in order to be achieved their proper operation. Geothermal The installation of a Geothermal Pump is allowed after getting the permission from the Region where the property belongs. The relevant law contains some restrictions regarding the permitted distance of the installation from other infrastructures, buildings, etc. However, the permitted distance from the existing neighbouring buildings, from the main underground pipelines and from medium voltage electricity distribution lines can be reduced for installations inside the urban area. These exceptions make feasible the use of geothermal into dense built environments, like Alimos Municipality. In order to choose the optimum type of RES for these specific buildings, a study was undertaken. The results show that there are no legal restrictions and the final choice mainly based on the optimum combination of performance and cost. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 31 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 3.3.3. RELEVANT REGULATIONS The regulations regarding the use of RES as well as the energy efficiency in buildings can be found in the website of the Ministry of Reconstruction of Production, Environment & Energy (http://www.ypeka.gr/Default.aspx?tabid=285&language=el-GR) and the Hellenic Electricity Distribution Network Operator S.A (http://www.deddie.gr/el). The following is a selection of most pertinent legislation: New Building Regulation L.4067, Greek Government Gazette Α΄79/9.04.2012 Net – Metering Ministerial Decision ΑΠΕΗΛ/Α/Φ1/οικ. 24461/30.12.2014 08/05/2015 start of implementation N.3468/06 (Greek Government Gazette Α' 129/27-6-06): “Production of electricity from renewable energy sources and combined heat and power high performance and other provisions.” Ν. 3175/2003 (Greek Government Gazette Α' 207/29-8-03), “Use of geothermal potential, district heating and other provisions” Ministerial Decision 13068/2009, “Installation permission for the exploitation of the heat of the geological formations and water” (Greek Government Gazette Β’ 1249/24.06.2009) Joint Ministerial Decision Supplement of the Special program, Greek Government Gazette B’ 1557/22.9.2010 “Integration PV into buildings” Approval of Special Terms regarding the installation of PV systems and solar systems on buildings and plots outside the city plan and in settlements, Greek Government gazette Issue for Compulsory Expropriations and Urban Planning matters (AAΠ) 376/6.9.2010 N.3851/10 (Greek Government Gazette Α' 85/4-6-10): “Accelerating the development of Renewable Energy to address climate change and other provisions governing the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Environment, Energy and Climate Change.” Amendment of the Joint Ministerial Decision, Greek Government Gazette Β’ 2317/10.08.2012 “Pricing of electricity produced from PV systems” Amendment of paragraph1, article 6 of the Greek Government Gazette Β΄583/14.04.2011 (Greek Government Gazette Β΄14/11.01.2012) “Green roofs” N.4014/2011, Greek Government Gazette A’ 209/21.09.2011 “Environmental licensing of project and activities” Amendments of Special Terms for the installation of PV systems and solar systems in fields, plots and buildings, Greek Government Gazette Β΄583/14.04.2011 Approval of Special Terms for the installation of PVs and solar systems in fields, plots and buildings outside the city plan, Greek Government Gazette Β΄1556/22.09.2010 CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 32 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 3.4. ITALY 3.4.1. TYPE OF RES USED , REQUIREMENTS AND POWER Errore. L'origine riferimento non è stata trovata. presents the RES used in the building sector, as well as its requirements and power. Source PV BIOMASS, LANDFILL GAS, RESIDUAL Requirements16 Power (kW) PV systems attached to or integrated into the buildings’ roofs (their regulation under the Legislative Decree n. 387/2003) (i): Photovoltaic systems must have the same inclination and the same orientation of the roof pitch and their equipment and components should not change the shape of the buildings. (ii) The surface of the photovoltaic system must not be bigger than the surface of the roof. Additional conditions: PHV systems cannot be installed in the attributable to the Cultural Heritage and Landscape area (New Heritage and Landscape Codex of 2004, Delegated Decree 42/2004) any PHV systems installed on existing buildings or their appurtenances, not located in historic centers (their regulation under the Legislative Decree n. 387/2003) Details and limits regarding installation (heights, distances, etc.), follow the urban planning laws and are regulated by the Interministerial decree April 2, 1968, n. 1444 http://www.ambientediritto.it/Legislazione/URBANISTICA/DM1968 %20n.1444.htm (available only in Italian language). PHV systems compatible with the trade of net metering, not located in historic centers and installed on existing surfaces or their appurtenances (Legislative Decree n. 387/2003) PHV systems with panels installed on the buildings with total area not exceeding the area of the roof, which do not fall in the previous cases (Legislative Decree n. 387/2003) 0-200 kW any any PHV modules are placed on the buildings; The total area of PHV any panels must not be bigger than the one of the rooftop of the building on which the modules are placed Additional conditions: none Systems operating in cogeneration mode up to 50 kWe (micro 0-50 kW cogeneration) Legislative Decree n. 387/2003 Systems installed in existing buildings, must: 0-200 kW 1) comply with existing volume and surfaces; 16 Ministry of Economic Development, Ministerial Decree 10-9-2010, Linee guida per l'autorizzazione degli impianti alimentati da fonti rinnovabil CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 33 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement GASES FROM PURIFICATI ON PROCESSE S AND BIOGAS WIND HYDRO POWER AND GEOTHER MY Final 2) do not involve changes to the intended use; 3) do not involve the structural parts of the building,; 4) do not increase in the number of building units; 5) do not increase urban parameters. Systems operating in cogeneration mode up to 50 kWe Systems supplied by biomass 50-1000 kW 0-200 kW Systems supplied by landfill gas, residual gases from purification processes and biogas Individual wind power generators installed on the existing buildings roof tops must have : overall height not exceeding 1.5 meters and diameter not exceeding 1 meter. Additional conditions: systems cannot be installed in the attributable to the Cultural Heritage and Landscape area (New Heritage and Landscape Codex of 2004, Delegated Decree 42/2004) Anemometer towers for temporary measurements (up to 36 months, removable structures) Additional conditions: systems cannot be installed in the attributable to the Cultural Heritage and Landscape area (New Heritage and Landscape Codex of 2004, Delegated Decree 42/2004 Anemometer towers for measurement (over 36 months) Additional conditions: systems cannot be installed in the attributable to the Cultural Heritage and Landscape area (New Heritage and Landscape Codex of 2004, Delegated Decree 42/2004 0-250 kW Hydroelectric and geothermal systems installed in existing buildings, must: 1) comply with existing volume and surfaces, 2) do not involve changes to the intended use 3 do not involve the structural parts of the building, 4) do not increase in the number of building units 5) do not increase urban parameters Systems supplied by hydraulic source 0-200 kW any any any 0-100 kW TABLE 6: ITALY - TYPE OF RES USED, REQUIREMENTS AND POWER 3.4.2. AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURES AND DIVISION OF COMPETENCIES The European Directive 2009/28 / EC, in order to encourage the development of renewable energy sources, has required to Member States to ensure that the authorization procedures are proportionate and necessary, as well as streamlined and expedited at the appropriate administrative level. The approval of the Italian guidelines17 for the authorization of plants powered by renewable sources and the Legislative Decree 28/2011 transposing the Directive 17 approved by the Ministerial Decree of 10 September 2010 CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 34 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 2009/28 / EC in responding to this task, have redefined the whole picture of permits for installations of Renewable Energy Sources in Italy. The Legislative Decree n. 387 of 2003 represents the juridical reference that governs the modalities and procedures for the obtainment of authorizations needed for the construction and installation of plants powered by Renewable Energy Sources. The formal procedures envisaged by the current legislation for the construction and management of plants using renewable sources are three18: Single Authorization Simplified procedure habilitation Communication to the Municipality The following scheme summarizes the authorization process: AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OFPLANTS POWERED BY RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES SYSTEMS SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE HABILITATION 19(PAS) COMMUNICATIONTO THE MUNICIPALITY The procedure was introduced by article 12 of Legislative Decree 387/2003. The procedure was introduced by article 6 of Legislative Decree 28/2011. The procedure was introduced by article 11 of Legislative Decree 115/2008 and it was expanded by the law 73/2010 Region or delegated Province Municipality Municipality The procedure lasts up to 90 days The procedure is applied through the mechanism of tacit consent rule: if 30 days after the presentation of the simplified procedure it has not been received any notification / communication by the municipality, is possible the commencement of the work The works may start within 30 days after the notification to the municipality. APPROVAL PERIOD COMPETENCY REGULATIONS SINGLE AUTHORIZATION 18 GSE, Gestore Servizi Energetici, Autorizzazioni per gli impianti alimentati da fonti rinnovabili, article available in Italian language, http://www.gse.it/it/EnergiaFacile/Autorizzazioni/Pagine/default.aspx 19 Simplified Procedure Habilitation: Procedura Abilitativa Semplificata (PAS) CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 35 SYNOPSIS DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final Source Power (kW) Source Power (kW) PHOTOVOLTAIC & Thermal >20 kW PHOTOVOLTAIC & Thermal < 20 kW BIOMASS WIND >200 kW >60 kW BIOMASS WIND <200 kW <60 kW HYDRO POWER >100 kW BIOGAS >250 kW Legislative Decree 387/2003 HYDRO POWER < 100 kW BIOGAS <250 kW Legislative Decree 387/2003 TABLE 7: ITALY - AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF PLANTS POWERED BY RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES SYSTEMS Authorisation Procedures for construction and installation of plants powered by renewable energy sources systems in the Region of Sicily20 Hereinafter, the paragraph focuses on some examples of authorisation procedures in the Region of Sicily, as the Italian legislation differs from Region to Region 21even with the presence of equal production plants. The Single Authorization Procedure is under the competence of Region. The thresholds power above which it is necessary having the single authorization is as follows: Photovoltaic > 1 MW Hydroelectric > 1 MW Wind- power > 60 kW Biomass >1 MW Biogas >1 MW Geothermic >1 MW Below the above thresholds is sufficient the Simplified Procedure Habilitation or the Communication, for which the competence belongs to the municipalities. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC PLANTS In the case of plants subject to Environmental Impact Assessment22 and to Incidence Assessment23 the competence belongs to the Region. The following types of plants fall within the discipline of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) or the Incidence Assessment (IA). PHOTOVOLTAIC HYDROELECTIC WIND- POWER Plants > 1 MW (IA) Plants > 100 kW (IA) Plants > 1 MW (IA) Integrations > 200 Procedures with l/s (IA) the participationof the Ministry of Cultural Heritage (EIA) BIOMASS Plants > 50 MWt (IA) Plants> 150 MWt (EIA) GEOTHERMY Investigation permissions (IA) 20 http://www.gse.it/it/EnergiaFacile/Autorizzazioni/Pagine/Sicilia.aspx According the Constitutional Law n°. 3/2001, the State and the Italian Regions competing in drawing up relevant regulations. Specifically, the State determines the basic principles, while the Regions and Autonomous Provinces legislate in accordance with the State guidelines. 22 Environmental Impact Assessment: Valutazione di Impatto Ambientale (commonly VIA) 23 Incidence Assessment: Verifica di Assoggettabilità (commonly VA) 21 CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 36 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 3.4.3. RELEVANT REGULATIONS In the last years several law changes affected the overall renewable energy sector in Italy. In the section "Regulations" of the Ministry of Economic Development web site are available all appropriate legislation related to the energy sector. All specific regulations regarding the use of RES as well as the energy efficiency in buildings can be found in the website of ENEA. http://www.sviluppoeconomico.gov.it/index.php/it/normativa http://enerweb.casaccia.enea.it/enearegioni/UserFiles/Fontirinnovabili/datigenerali/datigener The recent Italian regulatory framework is already complex. It starts with the Legislative Decree 192/2005 (later amended by Legislative Decree no. 311/2006) and that is enriched by the Regulations regarding the methods of calculation and the minimum requirements (DPR 59/2009) and finally by the Guidelines on the energy certification expressed by DM 26/06/2009. Underneath, the table provides the most recent legislative framework with comments on the recent changes in this legislation. Year Regulation Comments 2005 Legislative Decree n. 192 / 2005,amended by Law 90/2013 o Implementation of Directive 2002/91 / CE on the energy performance of buildings. o o o o 2013 Presidential Decree 74/2013 Regulations governing the practice, management and control of thermal plants for heating and cooling. o o New methodology for calculating the energy performance of buildings and the ‘reference building’24; New minimum energy performance requirements that promote the cost optimal levels; Definition of "nearly zero energy building" and drafting of their implementation strategy. From 1/1/2021 all new buildings must be nZEB (the buildings of Public Administration since 2019); Upgrading the energy performance certification system of buildings25.The preparation of the EPA is required in the case of construction, sale or lease of a building or a building unit, as well for all buildings occupied by the Public Administration; Adoption of measures to establish a regular inspection of heating and air conditioning systems of buildings. The practice, management, control and maintenance of thermal plants as well the compliance with all laws are levied by the "plant manager", who is the owner, those who occupancy the building unit, or the administrator in case of multistory buildings; A booklet is foreseen for the air conditioning plants system. The rule also says that the booklets and reports on energy efficiency will be drawn up by decree no later than 1 July 2013. 24 according to the building type and climatic zones 25 Energy Performance Certificate (EPC): Attestato di Prestazione Energetica, Energy (APE) CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 37 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement o o Presidential Decree 75/2013 o The Regulation on Accreditation of Italian Energy Certifiers o o o 2010 Ministerial Decree 10/9/2010 Guidelines for the authorization of plants powered by renewable sources and technical guidelines for such plants 2013 26 Law Decree Final The legislator considered necessary to create a register of the plants in order to carry out inspections and controls. The inspections are planned giving priority to installations which not received the inspection report for energy efficiency, or who have a seniority over 15 years, The Presidential Decree 75/2013 allows to carry out the business of Energy Certification for qualified personnel (with a degree in architecture, engineering, agriculture, forestry, or with a diploma in industrial or land surveyor) who have attended a specific 64 hours long training course, the contents of which are fixed by the Attachment no.1 to the DPR and that will be promoted by public entities, universities and professional associations. Some categories are exempted from the course: the technicians (recognized by their own College or Register) already in possession of a professional qualification related to the design of the buildings and of the plants serving the buildings themselves. If, however, the technician does not have all of the necessary skills, it will be obliged to work in partnership with another skilled engineer. The Certifiers shall state not to have conflicts of interest with the designers, the builders and the manufacturers of the equipment involved in the construction or in the renovation of the building to be certificated. Finally also some public bodies (accredited to perform inspection activities in buildings and facilities), as well as Energy Service Company (ESCo), can carry out energy certifications. o The Italian Guidelines for the authorization of plants powered by renewable sources regulate the procedures for projects installing and operating plants fueled by renewable recourses and ancillary works. o The decree was issued in implementation of Legislative Decree29 December 2003n. 387, concerning implementation of Directive 2007/77/EC on promotion of electricity produced from renewable energy sources, art. 1226 o The text explains the different types of authorization processes (i.e.: free building activity, commencement notice or unique procedure) in relation to the complexity of the intervention and the context in which the project is located differentiating for each energy source category (solar, biomass-gas landfill-biogas, wind, hydro and geothermal). Article 5: Obligations concerning nearly-zero energy buildings: art. 12: Rationalisation and simplification of procedures. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 38 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final o from 31 December 2018, all new buildings, occupied and/or of property of public administration, including schools, must be nearly zero energy buildings; Urgent measures for o since 1 January 2021, this provision will be extended to all the transposition of new buildings; Directive 2010/31 / EU of the European o before 31 December 2014, there is the obligation to define Parliament and of the the Action Plan for the promotion of nearly zero energy Council of 19 May buildings approved by Decree of the Minister of Economic 2010 on the energy Development. 63/2013 and Law 90/2013 performance of buildings to the definition of infringement proceedings launched by the European Commission as well as other provisions on social cohesion 2014 Legislative Decree 102/2014 Implementation of Directive 2012/27 / EU on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125 / CE and 2010/30 / EU and repealing Directives 2004/8 / CE and 2006/32 / EC Action Plan: o Strategy for energy improvement of Italian building stock27 o Energy improvement plan for Central Public Administration28: for the implementation of this plan, it was established a control booth chaired by the Ministry of Economic Development and involving the Italian Ministry of the Environment and Protection of Land and Sea. 29 o Action plan for the nearly zero energy buildings , which should include, among other things, the following elements: the definition of nearly zero energy buildings to different types of buildings and quantitative indicators of primary energy consumption (kWh / m² year); policies and financial arrangements and other measures to promote nearly zero energy buildings including information relating to national measures for the integration of renewable sources in the buildings, in agreement with EU directive 2009/28/CE and Legislative Decree 28/11 ; the identification, in specific cases and in accordance with cost-benefit analysis on the economic lifecycle, of the unenforceability or its partial application; the intermediate objectives of improving the energy performance of new buildings by 2015 (Decree 90/13). TABLE 8: ITALIAN RELEVANT REGULATION 27 strategy for energy improvement of Italian building stock: strategia per la riqualificazione energetica del parco immobiliare nazionale (STREPIN) 28 energy improvement plan for Central Public Administration: Piano riqualificazione energetica per Pubbliche Amministrazioni Centrali (PREPAC) 29 Action plan for the nearly zero energy buildings: Piano d'azione per gli edifici a energia quasi zero (PANZEB) CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 39 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final Derogations Currently under definition phase They are excluded from the application of the minimum energy performance requirements: the retrofit of building envelope which involves finishing layers, internal or external, irrelevant from the thermal point of view (such as painting), or the renovation of plasters covering a surface less than 10% of the gross building surface the interventions of ordinary maintenance on existing thermal plants. The U-values are increasing by 30% in the case of retrofit of the opaque envelope, which foresee internal and/or cavity thermal insulation, regardless of the size of the involved area National incentives 30 Fund for Energy Efficiency: Fund provided by legislative decree 102/2014 in energy efficiency of buildings) Tax deduction 65%: Measures to promote energy efficiency in buildings or apartments. 30 Energy Efficiency Certificates (“ Promoting efficiency in every final use, as well several technologies such as solar collectors, heat pumps, cogeneration etc. Enhance the energy savings achieved as a result of energy efficiency interventions. “Conto termico”: Decree 28 dicembre 2012 of Ministery of Economic Development. The aim is to promote and encourage energy efficiency in public buildings. The decree can also be used by private parties only for actions related to energy efficiency of plants. Energy Efficiency Certificates: Titoli di Efficienza Energetica (TEE) Certificati Bianchi CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 40 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement 4. Final ISSUES WITH REGULATIONS, STANDARDS AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES 4.1. PORTUGAL 4.1.1. ENVIRONMENTAL OBSTACLES AND GAPS IN THE REGULATORY FRAME Description of the problem/s There are no major environmental obstacles or gaps (for instance opposition of environmental groups) to the installation of energy efficiency technologies and renewable energy in buildings. Proposal/s None. 4.1.2. RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES OBSTACLES AND GAPS IN THE REGULATORY FRAME Description of the problem/s In classified buildings the protection rules usually impose strong limitations to the installation of renewable energy technologies. For instance, the regulation for the buildings inscribed on the World Heritage List of UNESCO in the property called University of Coimbra — Alta and Sofia (where the Coimbra Town Hall is included) allows the use of PV panels if integrated into the roof, but limits it to a maximum area of 3 m 2 by building. This maximum area is adequate for the small residential buildings in this property, but it is not adequate for large buildings such as the Town Hall, since this very small area of PV is not enough to have a relevant impact on the building’s energy performance and with such restriction it is not possible to achieve a nZEB level. Other restriction to the large scale installation of renewable energy technologies is the tariff. Nowadays the tariffs intend to promote the self-consumption of electricity, being the generation used to avoid consumption from the electrical grid. When the energy is injected into the electrical grid the tariff is very low and reduces the cost-effectiveness of the generation facility. In buildings with a high installed capacity in renewables the real-time generation can often be larger than the consumption and in this situation the surplus of energy must be injected into the grid with a low tariff (about 4 €c/kWh). Therefore, in buildings with enough RES generation to be considered a ZEB the cost effectiveness of the RES generation technologies will be low. Proposal/s Regarding the integration of PV panels in classified buildings, the maximum area should be defined in a percentage of the total roof area and not using a fix area to all buildings, therefore taking into account buildings with very different dimensions. The maximum area should also not be very restrictive if solutions to minimize its visual impact (such as solar tiles) are adopted. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 41 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final Regarding the tariffs for the PV generation, the energy injected into the grid will cause an increase of the costs of the grid management. Therefore, the actual solution to pay such energy with a price lower than the average price in the wholesale market is correct. Otherwise the extra costs in the grid management would be paid by the users without PV generation, creating an unfair cross-subsidisation. The solution to such problem is not a change in the actual tariffs, but a promotion of energy storage solutions to ensure a better local generation and consumption matching to avoid the injection of energy into the grid (in periods when the grid do not needed). Since such solutions still present very high costs, there is a need of financial support to energy storage technologies. 4.1.3. TECHNOLOGY – SPECIFIC OBSTACLES AND GAPS IN THE REGULATORY FRAME FOR APPLICATION AND USE IN URBAN AREAS Description of the problem/s There are no relevant specific obstacles and gaps to the use of efficient technologies (e.g. lighting or HVAC) in urban areas. Proposal/s None. 4.1.4. TECHNOLOGY SPECIFIC OBSTACLES AND GAPS IN THE REGULATORY FRAME CONCERNING THE DEEP RENOVATION OF BUILDING ENVELOPE Description of the problem/s In classified buildings the protection rules usually impose strong limitations to the renovation of the building envelop and openings. For instance, the regulation for the buildings inscribed on the World Heritage List of UNESCO in the property called University of Coimbra — Alta and Sofia (where the Coimbra Town Hall is included) does not allow the replacement of the windows by double glazed windows using standard solutions; because the original frame must be kept (the usual solution is to implement other window in the interior).Since these frames have to be specifically designed to this building, this cannot be ensured with standard solutions available in the market, and would have a high cost. Proposal/s The protection rules should allow the replacement of frames in order to ensure double glazed windows if the original material and design is kept. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 42 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 4.2. SPAIN 4.2.1. ENVIRONMENTAL OBSTACLES AND GAPS IN THE REGULATORY FRAME Description of the problem/s There are currently two sets of regulations – that which govern places of historic significance and those which deal with energy efficiency. The problem is that there is little overlap between the two. This creates gaps in the law and can lead to administrative issues as to what is more important- the historic integrity or energy efficiency and RES. Another very important issue with the current regulations is that incentives have been discontinued. Proposal/s Develop specific regulations, standards and good practice examples of energy efficient measures in historic structures at various levels. Propose regulations that exempt significant national or regional structures that are more concrete from energy efficiency requirements. Create an energy sharing market between new structures or existing structures that are not important historically with structures that are significant. A new structure therefore can exceed the regulations and “trade” the excess to historic structures to preserve their integrity. Re-start current incentives with a new focus 4.2.2. RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES OBSTACLES AND GAPS IN THE REGULATORY FRAME Description of the problem/s One of the most significant problems or obstacles related to renewable energy technologies in terms of historic structures is the restricted space in historic city centres, the small size of most structures and their locations. The location of historic city centres within valleys and unavailability of open space that blocks wind almost completely eliminates the possibility of wind power. This situation also seriously reduces the possibility of solar power. Most structures are small and with traditional roofs and the PV solar cells require large amounts of space. Solar power can be used for domestic hot water but these disrupt the skylines of most historic cities. Biomass heating and cogeneration for electricity is a viable option but the scale is limited and installation expensive. This is reflected in the gaps in the regulatory framework as the laws or structures are not in place to ´trade´ power easily or protect historic city centres. Proposal/s Develop an energy sharing market Invest in laws and regulations that promote technology such as micro wind RES or low transmission technology (wind or solar RES can be placed on other non historic structures or in the country side and the power transmitted) CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 43 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement 4.2.3. TECHNOLOGY – Final SPECIFIC OBSTACLES AND GAPS IN THE REGULATORY FRAME FOR APPLICATION AND USE IN URBAN AREAS Description of the problem/s Essentially these are the same as above. The same gaps and obstacles exist in the regulatory framework for applications in all types between energy efficiency in urban areas. Proposal/s See the section above 4.2.4. TECHNOLOGY SPECIFIC OBSTACLES AND GAPS IN THE REGULATORY FRAME CONCERNING THE DEEP RENOVATION OF BUILDING ENVELOPE Description of the problem/s In the Spanish National Renewable Energy Plan (PER) 2011-2020 With respect to technical or corresponding exemptions to implementing rules, the principle concern among these is focused on due causes the prohibition by installing collectors for Historical-protection standards heritage. This aspect becomes important in some regions, mainly in historic centres, reach an average penetration above 7%. The causes of exemption overproduction are less than 1% and shadows reached 3%. On the other hand, there is another kind of exemptions that has affected to a greater extent to penetration, in this case it comes to exemptions replacement by other renewable technologies as they can be biomass boilers, micro and geothermal heat pumps. The degree of penetration of such exemption is closely linked to the geographical area. Several factors affect the degree of penetration of each technology, as they are knowledge of the different agents involved in the execution of the building on the existence the possibility to perform this replacement in aid or subsidies that these technologies they can enjoy or other competitive advantages these might make against solar energy Thermal - With respect to the degree of non-compliance, this is incorrect focuses primarily on design and implementation facilities. It is estimated that production end would be affected around 90% of the estimated for this reason. Given the above limitations we must, of estimated evolution for energy solar resulting from the application of the CTE until 2020, the residential sector will be the main architect of growth and growth in the range for 2010-2020 will be 3.4 million m2 Proposal/s There is significant overlap at both the national Spanish legislation and the European legislation. This is because of the tight integration between the national and European levels. In drafting the European standards the decision makers are often in close consultation. Often there is a lag time before national endorsement but nevertheless there are many similarities – in both historic structure protection and energy policy. Where there is a large gap, as mentioned before, is between these two policies. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 44 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 4.3. GREECE 4.3.1. ENVIRONMENTAL OBSTACLES AND GAPS IN THE REGULATORY FRAME The design options that have been studied were developed in agreement with the current regulatory framework without facing any obstacle or gap. 4.3.2. RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES OBSTACLES AND GAPS IN THE REGULATORY FRAME Description of the problem/s The Ministerial decision ΑΠΕΗΛ/Α/Φ1/οικ. 24461/30.12.2014 for self-production does not foresee the installation of a photovoltaic system in another location than that of consumption (which is allowed by law N.3851/2010). Also a building owner, for example a public entity, cannot benefit from a surplus of generated electricity in one of the buildings to offset the consumption in another building. Proposal/s According to Hellenic Association of Photovoltaic Companies (HELAPCO), a virtual netmetering should be enabled, namely the correlation and offset of a consumption with the production from a PV system which is not located on the site where this consumption takes place. For this reason, it is proposed to amend paragraph 7 and 10 of art. 1 of Ministerial Decision ΑΠΕΗΛ/Α/Φ1/οικ. 24461/30.12.2014. 4.3.3. TECHNOLOGY – SPECIFIC OBSTACLES AND GAPS IN THE REGULATORY FRAME FOR APPLICATION AND USE IN URBAN AREAS The design options that have been studied were developed in agreement with the current regulatory framework without facing any obstacle or gap 4.3.4. TECHNOLOGY SPECIFIC OBSTACLES AND GAPS IN THE REGULATORY FRAME CONCERNING THE DEEP RENOVATION OF BUILDING ENVELOPE Description of the problem/s For any building project in the public sector a contract is awarded based on the lowest price offered. The procedure does not take into account any cost-effective indicator. This is not imposed by the legislation, but in practice an offer which does not ensure the lowest price, is very difficult to be approved. This practice does not facilitate the concept of the nZEB renovations, for which the financial appraisal is based on the life cycle cost of the renovation options. Proposal/s The regulation regarding the nZEB definition is expected to change the contract awarding method and introduce requirements that will take into account the energy conservation and the payback period. The same requirement will have to be adopted for the "Green Public Procurements" too, which up to now are optional and are not a priority for the Municipalities. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 45 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 4.4. ITALY 4.4.1. ENVIRONMENTAL OBSTACLES AND GAPS IN THE REGULATORY FRAME Description of the problem/s Italy has regulations of superordinate planning (such as the Landscape Plan, the Forestry Plan, etc.) compared to the Urban Development Plan31, which have the aim to protect the landscape, the environment and the territory. These different regulations provide rules that often create difficulties to the implementation of renewable energy sources and the development of new infrastructures, as there are interferences with technological networks. (i.e.: the Sicilian Landscape Plan- in some areas prevents the construction of networking infrastructure and / or connections for electrical energy distribution and / or new plants for energy distribution. Practically, it may be impossible the implementation of systems of autoproduction of electricity on some existing buildings (such as to classify the buildings as nZEB) due to the impossibility of achieving the necessary networking infrastructure for the connection Other environmental obstacles, or better constraints, deriving from: The Legislative Decree 42/2004 and subsequent modifications (New Heritage and Landscape Codex of 2004). 32 Eventual compatibility with the Area Plan for Parks Eventual effects with Sites of Community Importance33, Special Protection Areas34, 35 Special Conservation Areas It seems that territorial interests are placed on an antagonistic position in relation to Renewable Energy Sources plant’s construction and operation. On the other hand, the national level steadily supports RES plants’ development through incentives, and information and awareness campaigns. Basically, it is paradoxical that on one hand the National Energy Strategy, issued by the Ministry of Economic Development, requires the implementation of energy efficiency and autoproduction of energy (essential for achieving nZEB) while on the other hand, regulations like the Landscape Plan of Sicily Region do not allow, in some areas, the possibility of pursuing the national strategy. 31 32 33 34 35 Urban Development Plan: Piano Regolatore Generale (PRG) Area Plan for Parks: Piano d’area per I Parchi. Sites of Community Importance: Siti di Importanza Communitaria (SIC) Special Protection Areas: Zone di Protezione Speciale (ZPS) Special Conservation Areas: Zone Speciali di Conservazione (ZSC) CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 46 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final Proposal/s It would need a framework law, which establishes priorities and removes conflicts and overlaps between the instruments of environmental planning and protection. This law must refer to the insertion of technology inspired by the objectives of the national energy strategy, giving a uniform planning in various territories. In the case that Renewable Energy Sources plants construction and operation in some territories must be forbidden, the public authority needs to give an alternative, in order not to invalidated the homogeneity features of the national law underpinning the protection of other general values of the Italian legal order, such as for instance, the principle of competition on equal terms throughout the country. 4.4.2. RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES OBSTACLES AND GAPS IN THE REGULATORY FRAME Description of the problem/s In Italy there are obstacles or resistances deriving from environmentalist Institutions and/or Associations, able to create movements of opinion, which often fail to influence the decisionmakers for the authorization process, as the installation of wind turbines. For example, the construction of wind parks is often countered by environmental organizations that are able to affect the authorization process of projects. Proposal/s Launch a process of public awareness on the adoption of Renewable energy, and compare the benefits of Renewable Energy Sources with other, non-renewable sources. 4.4.3. TECHNOLOGY – SPECIFIC OBSTACLES AND GAPS IN THE REGULATORY FRAME FOR APPLICATION AND USE IN URBAN AREAS Description of the problem/s Often, for historical and architectural reasons, it is impossible to implement technologies for autoproduction from renewable energy sources integrated to the buildings. This entails the need to move the implementation of similar interventions in neighboring areas, in order to ensure the required production. However, the density of the urban area, often does not allow the construction of similar interventions in proximity to the consumption points. Proposal/s Oblige the municipalities, through the regulatory frame, to implement projects, in order to balance the effects of buildings emissions by the production of a quantity of electric power at least equal to the needs of building consumptions. Use contractual instruments to ensure the production of energy from renewable energy sources to an extent at least equal to the needs of the unit of consumption also in areas outside of the urban texture, but under municipal responsibility (Contracts of withdrawal and return the energy produced to the point of consumption). In similitutudine della normative europea ETS CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 47 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement 4.4.4. TECHNOLOGY SPECIFIC OBSTACLES AND GAPS IN THE REGULATORY FRAME Final CONCERNING THE DEEP RENOVATION OF BUILDING ENVELOPE Description of the problem/s The wealth of historical and artistic heritage of the Italian territory creates significant difficulties on the implementation of buildings' retrofit, as is very difficult guaranteed the building preservation and maintaining the values and the aesthetical characteristics of the historic buildings. In particular, the redistribution of internal volumes and the implementation of new technologies for external partitions, transparent and / or opaque, are in conflict with the concept of heritage conservation in accordance with its original conception. In addition, there is the obvious difficulty to apply technologies of energy self production from renewable sources in situ. Futhermore, there are difficulties in applying the deep renovation caused, in most cases, by a regulatory framework not well integrated and coordinated by a higher rule in the hierarchy and caused, also, by the lack of simplified procedures for projects on buildings’ energy efficiency. For example, projects like CERtuS case studies required a plurality of opinions and clearance, as: Civil Engineering; Superintendence for Environmental and Architectural Heritage; Fire department for the aspects of fire prevention; Manager of the electricity grid, for aspects of autoproduction production from solar energy; Technical Office of the Municipality for opinions and authorizations Etc. The execution of any work concerning Cultural Heritage buildings is subject to prior authorisation by the competent body of the Ministry of Cultural Heritage. These procedures are due to the need to verify and ensure whether works are realised according the measures of Legislative Decree 42/2004 and if have been obtained opinions regarding the landscape authorisation, according ex article 146, of Legislative Decree 42/2004. These processes of opinions and authorisations occur for each specific case without a procedure that frames the authorization process for projects of energy efficiency. This entails of delays, extending the authorization process, causing uncertainty in investment and removing the interest from potential private partners. It also increases the commitment of the designer resulting in increase of cost and making the process of renovation a complex process whilst this process could be standardized. Proposal/s Reduce significantly the number of actors involved in the authorization procedures CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 48 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final Create a legal framework through a catalogue of possible interventions (Guidelines), given the priority of strategic action for nZEB, which actually simplifies the authorization process by providing certainty with respect to response time and costs. The integration of Renewable sources requires a multi and inter -disciplinary project, careful to ensure the compatibility, reversibility and the integration of the intervention. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 49 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement 5. Final OVERLAP WITH OTHER DIRECTIVES / LEGISLATIONS (European/National level environmental protection; Energy Efficiency; Regional/local level/planning regulations) 5.1. PORTUGAL In Portugal there are no legislation at regional or local level with impact on the implementation of energy efficiency technologies and renewable energy in buildings. There are also no major overlaps between the European and national legislation. When overlaps exist they are just temporary, during the process of transposition of the European legislation to the national law. 5.2. SPAIN In Spain there are no legislation with impact on the implementation of energy efficiency technologies and renewable energy in buildings. There are also no major overlaps between the European and national legislation. When overlaps exist they are just temporary, during the process of transposition of the European legislation to the national law. 5.3. GREECE In Greece there is no legislation produced at regional or local level. The legislation is produced by the central Government only. Therefore, there is not any risk for overlaps. Regarding the overlaps between the European and national legislation, there may be minor ones for a very short period until the complete transposition of the European legislation in the national one. 5.4. ITALY In Italy there is a procedural overlap. The complexity of rules and processes leads to an actual overlaps of procedural modules in function of the plurality of required permissions. There are no major overlaps between the European and national legislation. When overlaps exist they are just temporary, during the process of transposition of the European legislation to the national law. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 50 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement 6. Final CONCLUSIONS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1. PORTUGAL In Portugal there are no relevant environmental obstacles or regulatory gaps to the installation of energy efficiency technologies and renewable energy in buildings and its use in urban areas The major obstacles to the use of renewable energy technologies and to the deep renovation of the building envelope are the protection rules in classified buildings. For instance, some regulations allow the use of PV panels if integrated into the roof, but limit it to a very small area by building. It is recommended to define the maximum area in a percentage of the total roof area and not to use a fix area to all buildings. The maximum area should also not be very restrictive if solutions to minimize its visual impact are adopted. It is also recommended to allow the implementation of changes in the building envelope using solutions to minimize the visual impact (using the original material and design). Other restriction to the large scale installation of renewable energy technologies is the tariff, since the energy injected into the grid is penalized with a very low tariff. This tariff scheme is correct in order to avoid an unfair cross-subsidisation between consumers, but it is recommended the promotion of energy storage solutions to ensure a better local generation and consumption matching to avoid the injection of energy into the grid. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 51 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 6.2. SPAIN Construction is already difficult but made more so with the addition of two additional aspects – historic structure conservation and energy efficiency. The combination of these two, often conflicting objectives can make projects exponentially more complex. That is what makes this project such a challenge. In order to tackle this challenge it was necessary to understand the in-place regulatory framework at multiple levels regarding the built environment – the purpose of this deliverable. The main recommendations that have come from this study for regulations: 1. Inform decision makers as to the current difficulties and importance of achieving both environmental and historic building protection 2. Create specific legislation that combines the two objectives: 3. Respect for historic structures and their environment 4. Protection of the environment through improved energy efficiency 5. Exceptions for nationally or regionally significant buildings from mandatory energy efficiency requirements 6. Special incentives should be created to accomplish both objectives 7. Currently such regulations do exist at neither the European nor National levels and this would close many gaps in the current legislation. 8. Increase knowledge of the existing regulations and how current or near term projects can utilize and combine both sets of regulations – even when there are conflicts or gaps 9. Build capacity and knowledge for existing practitioners (architects, engineers, clients) as well as constructors so that they may recognize when and where to make proper decisions. 10. Develop good practice examples and promote these examples that combine conservation and energy efficiency as standards. These examples should exist at several levels of historic significance from World Heritage status to local significance. And from nZEB to not so nearly ZEB. They should be appropriate to their application. 11. Establish an energy trading market between historic structures and non-historic structures. For example, a new or highly renovated building without historic significance can create excess capacity and this could be traded to structures with historic significance. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 52 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 6.3. GREECE The current document presented an overview of the legislation pertinent to energy efficiency and integration of RES in buildings. It also discussed the problems and gaps identified along the renovation design of the three buildings of Alimos municipality. The treated buildings are contemporary with an age of about 30 years. None of them is considered listed or designated with a special status. Therefore, the regulatory frame that was investigated applies to new – contemporary buildings as listed buildings are subject to a stricter legislation. From the nZEB renovation studies for the three public buildings, important results were drawn. The current laws for RES integration and energy interventions in buildings have been amended and supplemented significantly in order to promote energy savings in the built environment. For this reason, no major barriers and restrictions were faced during the renovation study as the current technical solutions are allowed to be integrated. However, in order to facilitate the achievement of very low energy consumption of conventional fuels, the Government should amend the relevant regulation to allow a “virtual” net-metering so that, buildings having the same owner (e.g. a Municipality) can compensate electricity demand among them if there is surplus of electricity generation. The electric grid should facilitate such an operation. The main problem regarding the energy renovation of public buildings is that a renovation / construction contract is awarded based on the lowest price and not on the amount of energy conservation. It is also important to note that there are many difficulties regarding the implementation of the renovation plans by means of an ESCO model due to bureaucratic procedures and partial implementation of the relevant legislation. The solution of these issues combined with the specific definition of nZEB will complete the legislation framework of the nZEB renovation not only in public but in private sector too. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 53 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 6.4. ITALY During last two years important European directives on energy efficiency and energy production from renewable sources have been adopted in Italy, but their full implementation depends on several implementing decrees that may delay or are issued with huge delay. Among these, the Ministerial Decree containing the roadmap to implement the objective of energy retrofit every year from 2014 to 2020 at least 3% of the floor area of the Public Administration buildings. According to the EC Directive 31/2010 the existing public buildings destined to energy savings renovation, often are in bad maintenance status and this do not facilitate their retrofit in terms of energy. Furthermore, the fact that big part of public buildings is historic and therefore listed complicates matters even more. This report gives an overview of the most important aspects that should be taken into account on the legal and regulatory framework, outlining obstacles and gaps and trying to define compensatory measures for each specific obstacle. What is currently needed and it is evident from the foregoing analysis is a single control booth composed of members of the relevant ministries and as the legislative text on energy efficiency in buildings, that also takes into account the historical buildings. In Italy there are obstacles to the application of nZEB Directive depending essentially by a set of rules that, until now, have focused on other aspects than those of energy management of buildings. It is therefore necessary to promote cultural integration campaign between the competent authorities issuing the permits, the central agencies and the citizens. Regarding the latter should be motivated the need to achieve nZEB buildings, not because it is required by law, but as an opportunity for the reduction of the management costs. Other possible actions could be: 36 Declarators: the definition of a coherent strategy setting out the priorities for the reduction of energy requirements of buildings and the ability to compensate, where the energy autoproduction is not feasible, through control systems based on the model of EU ETS36, in the within of each Municipality; Training: Launch a unique integration process between the authorization bodies by sharing specific objectives for energy efficiency, on the architectural heritage and landscape Popular: through specific actions to increase public awareness EU ETS: European Union Emissions Trading System. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 54 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final REFERENCES Energy 2020 A strategy for competitive, sustainable and secure energy. Directorate General for Energy, European Commission, 2011 https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/2011_energy2020_en_0.pdf Renewable energy, Moving towards a low carbon economy, Directorate General for Energy, European Commission, 2011 https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/energy-strategy/2020-energy-strategy C. Hudson, A. Schopp, K. Neuhoff, Financing of Energy Efficiency: Influences on European Public Banks’ Actions and Ways Forward, Berlin, May 2013 COHERENO- collaboration for housing nearly zero energy renovation, Barriers and opportunities for business collaboration in the nZEB single-family housing renovation market, August 2014 ECOFYS, Overview of Member States information on nZEB- Working version of the progress report-final report, October 2014. Ecorys, Ecofys and BioIntelligence, Study to Support the Impact Assessment for the EU Energy Saving Action Plan, 2010 Energy Efficiency Financial Institutions Group (EEFIG), Energy Efficiency – the first fuel for the EU Economy How to drive new finance for energy efficiency investments, 2014 EPEC, Guidance on Energy Efficiency in Public Buildings, May 2012 European Public, Cooperative and Social Housing Providers Working for a Fair Energy Transition, fair energy transiti0n t0wards nearly zer0 energy buildings, Progress Report, March 2013 Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, financing energy efficiency: forging the link between financing and project implementation, May 2010 NorthPass – Promotion of the Very low-energy house Concept to the North European Building Market, Barriers to implementation of very low energy residential buildings and how to overcome them, March 2011 SCI-Ntework, Procuring innovative and sustainable construction- A guide for European public authorities, 2012 SuPerBuildings, Conclusions about the performance levels of buildings considering the requirements of sustainable building and considering the economic and technological barriers and regional differences, June 2011 T. Tsoutsos, S. Tournaki, C. Avellaner de Santos, R. Vercellotti, Nearly Zero Energy Buildings Application in Mediterranean hotels, Energy Procedia 42 ( 2013 ) 230 – 238 ZEMedS -Zero Energy MEDiterranean Schools. www.zemeds.eu CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 55 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final 3ENCULT Project: http://www.3encult.eu/ EFFESUS Project: http://www.effesus.eu/ http://www.cne.es/cne/Home http://www.wind-energy-the-facts.org/introduction--types-of-res-e-supportmechanisms.html http://www.res-legal.eu/search-by-country/spain/summary/c/spain/s/rese/sum/196/lpid/195/ MINISTRY OF RECONSTRUCTION OF PRODUCTION, ENVIRONMENT & ENERGY HELLENIC ASSOCIATION OF PHOTOVOLTAIC COMPANIES http://helapco.gr Antonia Pasqua Recchia, Problematiche e opportunità nell’uso delle fonti energetiche rinnovabili nel patrimonio storico monumentale, Milano Fiera, 5 Ottobre 2011. ENEA, Documento di predisposizione del piano d’Azione per l’Efficienza Energetica 2014 http://www.sviluppoeconomico.gov.it/images/stories/documenti/PAEE2014_ENEA_4gi u_vers2003.pdf GSE,Gestore Servizi energetici, Il quadro autorizzativo per impianti di produzione di energia elettrica da fonti rinnovabili. Ricognizione della normativa nazionale e regionale article available in Italian language, http://www.gse.it/it/EnergiaFacile/Autorizzazioni/Documents/Autorizzazioni%20impia nti%20FER.pdf GSE, Gestore Servizi Energetici, Autorizzazioni per gli impianti alimentati da fonti rinnovabili, article available in Italian language http://www.gse.it/it/EnergiaFacile/Autorizzazioni/Pagine/default.aspx ENEA, Rapporto Annuale Efficienza Energetica, RAEE, 2015 http://www.enea.it/it/produzione-scientifica/pdf-volumi/raee-2015.pdf CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 56 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research leading to these results has received funding from the Intelligent Energy Europe Programme of the European Union under grant agreement IEE/13/906/SI2.675068. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 57 DeliverableD2.6 Proposals For Regulation Improvement Final Disclaimer The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither the EASME nor the European Commission are responsible for any use that may be made of the information. CERtuS– GA no. IEE/13/906/SI2.675068.DeliverableD2.6 58