maryland realtor - Maryland Association of Realtors
Transcription
maryland realtor - Maryland Association of Realtors
President’s Perspective Steve Meszaros MAR will soon unveil our redesigned consumer website, a user-friendly Our Annual Conference in Ocean City is September 13-15. We’re extend- site with information on every aspect of buying, selling and maintaining ing early bird registration to July 5. This year we have an exceptional a home in Maryland. Consumers will find useful information about line-up of classes and events. Challenging markets are the ideal time to programs and initiatives that are Maryland specific, as well as links to renew your networks, learn new ways to grow your business and find out the NAR new Houselogic website. the newest ideas in the industry. Can’t make it to all three days? We have both a “Monday and Tuesday Only” registration. Register Now: Economic Forecast www.mdrealtor.org. The economy continues to gather momentum, as does Maryland’s housing market. Anirban Basu, CEO of Sage Policy Group, writes about our market and how we compare regionally and nationally in a special feature beginning on page 12. The 2010 Legislative Session Read about REALTOR® Legislative successes on the bulletin board beginning on page 7. Vice President of Government Affairs Bill Castelli summarizes the bills considered by this year’s Maryland General Assembly and how they affect us. Are you a “leader of the PAC?” Look for your name on the RPAC list of contributors—if it’s not there, invest now. There is a convenient online auto-fill contribution form at www.mdrealtor.org under Government Affairs/RPAC. M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 3 June/July 2010 ! r a e Y a What 7 Features 7 What a Year! MAR 2010 Legislative Successes 12Economic Forecast Recovery Revs Up 12 table of contents 16Conference Registration Win Big in Maryland Real Estate 22 Homeownership Highlights Smooth Sailing Anyone? 26REALTORS® Political Action Committee of Maryland Leaders of the PAC: 2009 Edition Departments 26 3 PRESIDENT’S LETTER 5 MAR 2010 LEADERSHIP TEAM 32 COMMISSIONER’S CORNER Commission Considers New Law and Regulations 33MARYLAND REAL ESTATE COMMISSION NEWS Continuing Education and Teams Legislation Passed by General Assembly 34Snippets & Industry Tips 38 4 M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 35RESIDENTIAL SALES Old Habits are Hard to Break – Long-Established Trends Remain in Place 38FROM THE HOTLINE New Approach to Broker Compensation 2010 Maryland Association of REALTORS® Leadership Team Maryland Association of REALTORS® 200 Harry S Truman Parkway | Suite 200 Annapolis, MD 21401-7348 800.638.6425 | www.mdrealtor.org Steve Meszaros Cathy A. Werner President Long and Foster Real Estate, Inc. 802 Landmark Drive, Suite 111 Glen Burnie, MD 21061-9121 410.969.1005 Fax 301.694.4929 [email protected] President-Elect RE/MAX American Dream 9414 Belair Road Baltimore, MD 21236-1504 410.529.7900 Fax 410.529.7906 [email protected] Executive Leadership Team Steve Meszaros | President Cathy A. Werner | President-Elect Patricia A. Terrill | Secretary Carlton J. Boujai Jr. | Treasurer Iona C. Harrison | Immediate Past President Mary C. Antoun | Chief Executive Officer Editor Deborah L. Hager | [email protected] Advisory Committee Lee Hatfield | Chair Ken Montville | Vice Chair Advertising & Publication Design Patricia A. Terrill Carlton J. Boujai Jr. Secretary Prudential Carruthers REALTORS® 7500 Coastal Highway Ocean City, MD 21842-2937 410.524.7000 Fax 410.524.5695 [email protected] Treasurer Exit Realty Prosperity Group 5300 Westview Drive Suite 105 Frederick, MD 21703-8339 301.698.8700 [email protected] Art Comp & Design Alison Cooper | Senior Designer 1921 York Road, Timonium, MD 21092 410.252.4027 | www.acd1.com Mission Statement The Maryland Association of REALTORS® exists to support all segments of its membership and their specialties. The Maryland Association of REALTORS®, through collective efforts with local boards/associations and the National Association of REALTORS®: ■ Develops and delivers programs, services and related products that maintain and elevate the high standards of the real estate business and the professional conduct of its practitioners; ■ Assists members in ethically and professionally serving the public; ■ Promotes and preserves the right to own, transfer and use real property; and ■ Protects the right of members to conduct business within a framework of fair and reasonable laws and government regulations. In principle and in practice, the Maryland Association of REALTORS® values and seeks diversity and inclusive participation within the field of real estate and recognizes each member as a unique individual. Iona C. Harrison Mary C. Antoun Immediate Past President Pioneer Realty Inc. 7917 Declaration Lane Potomac, MD 20854 [email protected] Chief Executive Officer Maryland Association of REALTORS® 200 Harry S Truman Parkway, Suite 200 Annapolis, MD 21401-7348 800.638.6425 [email protected] Maryland REALTOR® (USPS 0016-017) is published bimonthly by the Maryland Association of REALTORS®, 200 Harry S Truman Parkway, Annapolis, MD 21401-7348. Periodical postage paid at Annapolis and additional mailing offices. Postmaster send address changes to: Maryland REALTOR ®, 200 Harry S Truman Parkway, Annapolis, MD 21401-7348. Member subscriptions of $3.81 are paid with annual dues. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information regarding the subject matter covered. It is offered with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional advice. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. Articles that appear in Maryland REALTOR® are an informational service to members. Their contents are the opinions of the authors alone and do not necessarily represent those of the Maryland Association of REALTORS®. Permission to reprint articles appearing in Maryland REALTOR® magazine must be requested in writing. Also include purpose for request. While this magazine makes a reasonable effort to establish the integrity of its advertisers, it does not endorse advertised products or services unless specifically stated. ©2010 Maryland Association of REALTORS®, Inc. M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 5 Affordable housing and taxes ! r a e Y a t Wha 2010 HB 244 – Tax Compliance and Administration Act of 2010 STATUS: DEFEATED Among other provisions, HB 244 would have required a tax withholding for Maryland residents when the net proceeds of sale exceed $250,000. The withholding rate would have equaled 3% plus the top marginal state income tax rate (6.25% currently), and applied to proceeds exceeding $250,000. If the property was a homeowner’s principal residence, the withholding rate would apply only to proceeds exceeding $500,000. sses e c c u S e v i t a l s i Leg mplished all of its AR) successfully acco ® ® tion of REALTORS (M 26,000 REALTOR The Maryland Associa for the 90-day session. Maryland’s sulted in such ities efforts re top legislative prior that their legislative g in ow kn ide pr ke members can ta ion taxes in short transfer and recordat positive outcomes: al ion dit ad m fro rs buye • s aving home Maryland; sales; fees from starting in sts for Critical Areas r fe ns tra te iva pr g • prohibitin out-of-pocket co sands of dollars in ptic system; • saving thou g operty fees place a failin se homeowners who re commercial business from additional pr d an rs ne ow • saving home gement; al property for stormwater mana money by switching them to semiannu erest on s se d earn int busines • s aving small they can better manage cash flow an tax payments so recognition their money; and on and statutory cti re di ar cle s am estate te • giving real . law r de un that affect property the bills considered te licensing. Note that of HB 869/SB 780 – Affordable y ar mm su a is Here esta Housing Land Trusts te contracts, and real me effective. ta es al re ip, rsh ne ow fore they beco be ls STATUS: PASSED – Effective October 1, 2010 bil n sig st mu the Governor HB 999/SB 686 – Stormwater Management Fee STATUS: DEFEATED Would have required all local governments in Maryland to levy a stormwater management fee on all residential and commercial property. Though the legislation never specified what rate a local government would have to charge, it required locals to set the commercial rate higher than the residential rate, and to base it on the commercial property’s impervious surface. The bill would have taxed all property, even property that did not produce stormwater runoff. HB 199/SB 520 – Homestead Property Tax Credit – Federal Government Employees STATUS: PASSED – Effective June 1, 2010 for tax years beginning after June 30, 2010 Extends the Homestead Property Tax Credit to federal employees stationed outside Maryland for a period not exceeding 6 consecutive years. When homeowners move back to Maryland, they may reclaim the credit, which will be calculated as if the credit had not been lost during the out-of-state residency. HB 590/SB 657 – Taxation of Forgiven Debt in Short Sales STATUS: PASSED – Effective upon Governor’s signature Clarifies that recordation and transfer taxes may not be imposed on forgiven debt in short sale transactions. Three counties (Anne Arundel, Prince George’s and Montgomery) began levying recordation taxes on forgiven debt in short sales at the end of 2009. MAR sought an opinion from Attorney General Doug Gansler regarding this practice. The Attorney General confirmed in his opinion that recordation taxes cannot be levied on the forgiven debt. HB 590/SB 657 strengthens this opinion and makes clear that the prohibition applies to transfer taxes as well. Authorizes affordable land trusts in Maryland. Permits land trusts to purchase and develop land and enter into land trust agreements with low to moderate income home purchasers. The agreements permit the land trust to sell property below market price. A land trust agreement must be provided to a prospective purchaser at least 15 days before the purchaser enters into a purchase contract for land trust property. Any purchaser who fails to receive this information may rescind the purchase contract. There are over 160 different land trusts in 38 states across the country. ition of Private HB 1298/SB 666 – Prohib Transfer Fees Governor’s signature STATUS: PASSED – Effective upon the residential property from Prohibits developers and sellers of the sale of residential on fee sfer imposing a private tran , private transfer fees are property. Similar to a ground rent restriction that requires a deed year typically created as a 99 r of the property every buyer to pay a fee to the original selle high as 1% of the as be can Fees . time the property transfers . price purchase urt Real Property SB 220 – Circuit Co t Fund en em ov Records Impr ED EAT DEF : STATUS able surcharge on each record Would have doubled the ted por sup has R MA ugh Tho ). instrument (from $20 to $40 e wer ds fun e past becaus surcharge increases in the ords Improvement Fund, Rec ty dedicated to the Real Proper merely replaced this legislation would have d for money taken out of the fun ons. rati ope nt general governme HB 1349 – Homeowner’s Property Tax Credit – Assessment Limit STATUS: PASSED – Effective June 1, 2010 for tax years beginning after June 30, 2010 Increases the maximum property assessment used in calculating the homeowner property tax credit from $300,000 to $450,000, and provides a costof-living adjustment in future years. HB 1266 – Income Tax – Homebuyer Tax Credit STATUS: NOT PASSED Would have enacted a state homebuyer tax credit against state income taxes for homebuyers and homeowners in Maryland. The legislation would have permitted a credit for 1% of the purchase price up to a maximum of $5,000 for new homebuyers, and 1% of the purchase price up to a maximum of $3,000 for move-up buyers. SB 683 – Property Taxes – Bicounty Commissions STATUS: PASSED – Effective June beginning after June 30, 201 1, 2010 for tax years 0. Applies the homestead tax cre imposed by bicounty commis dit to property taxes sions such as the Parks and Planning Commission in Pri Montgomery Counties. While nce George’s and principal homeowners are generally protected from large taxes, principal homeowner increases in property s sub levied by bicounty commission ject to property taxes s were not protected from increases in Commission pro perty taxes until this bill passed. M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 7 Real estate Brokerage and contracts ice – 60 Day Appeal HB 6 – Property Tax – Not 2010 1, ber STATUS: PASSED – Effective Octo to contain a notice informing the sale of racts cont l entia resid Requires all tax assessment of the property the e leng buyer of his/her right to chal ract must contain a statement in within 60 days of purchase. The cont wing: “If any real property is follo the as substantially the same form re the beginning of the next taxable transferred after January 1 and befo may submit a written appeal as to er own year to a new owner, the new re 60 days after the date of the a value or classification on or befo transfer.” HB 456 – Homestead Exemption – Bankruptcy STATUS: PASSED – Effective October 1, 2010 Increases the bankruptcy homestead protection from $5,000 to the federal homestead amount of $20,200. wledge HB 42 – Appraisers – Kno ate Est l Rea of ue Val of STATUS: DEFEATED appraisers Would have prohibited real estate appraiser the if l aisa appr an from conducting erty being prop the of price ng aski the knew appraised. ns hway Administration - Sig HB 216/SB 779 – State Hig STATUS: NOT PASSED in a any person unlawfully posting a sign Would have imposed a fine against g udin (incl s sign post to al illeg dy alrea is it state highway right-of-way. Although have ld wou n latio legis right-of-way, this real estate signs) in a state highway n of the state) to enforce the prohibitio lf beha (on ents rnm gove l loca allowed the r lowe to n latio legis the sponsor of the and collect fines. MAR worked with to sign, and to require local jurisdictions per $25 to sign per $100 fine from be d coul ls idua indiv three months so that forego collecting fines for the first ent. irem requ new the t abou educated diation HB 472 – Foreclosure Me 2010 1, July tive Effec – ED PASS STATUS: homeowners facing foreclosure. Establishes a mediation process for on detailing the lender’s efforts to Requires lenders to provide informati re. If the lender has not completed help the homeowner avoid foreclosu natives, the legislation provides a its consideration of foreclosure alter a foreclosure has been filed with the process for that to occur even after for foreclosure mediation if the court. Allows a homeowner to opt fairly considered for foreclosure was he he/s ve homeowner does not belie for housing counselors to assist ing alternatives. Provides additional fund homeowners. HB 1399 – Required Notice of Housing Counseling Programs and Services STATUS: PASSED – Effective January 1, 2011 contingent upon the adoption of regulations Requires lenders to provide borrower s written notice recommending that borrowers complete homebuyer educ ation or housing counseling and information about such programs. Lenders who must already refer borrowers to housing counseling are exempt. The law is effective January 1, 2011 contingent upon regulations being adopted before October 1, 2010 by the Departm ent of Development (DHCD). If the regulatio Housing and Community n is 2010, the law takes effect 60 days afte not adopted by October 1, r DHCD certifies adoption of the regulations to the Department of Legi slative Services. HB 711/SB 654 – Tenants in Foreclosure STATUS: PASSED – Effect ive June 1, 2010 Conforms tenant disclo sure legislation passed last year to the new federal Helpi ng Families Save Their Ho Act (Public Law No: 111-22). While Maryl mes and law required only that len ders and foreclosure pu rch give notice to tenants living in foreclosed pro asers perty, the federal law extends ten ant leases for at least 90 after a foreclosure sale. This law confor days ms Maryland disclosure to the federal law by inf the orming tenants of their rights under the federal law . M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 HB 406 – Real Estate Lice nsees – Services Provided through Teams STATUS: PASSED – Effective October 1, 2010 Regulates real estate teams and grou ps. Defines a real estate team as two or more associate brokers or licensed salespersons who work together on a regular basis to prov ide real estate brokerage services; who represent themselves to the publ ic as being part of one entity; and who designate themselves a collective name such as a team or group. Each team must designate a team leader with at least three years experience as a licensee. The team lead er is responsible for supervising other team members and ensuring that the team adheres to all office rules, practices, and procedures esta blished by the broker and/or branch office manager. Advertisemen ts for the team must include the name of the brokerage, the name of at least one licensed team member, and the telephone number of the brok er or branch office manager. age Brokers - Charges *HB 1254/SB 943 – Mortg 1, 2010 STATUS: PASSED – Effective October ices collect the actual cost of goods or serv Clarifies that mortgage brokers may ified spec law the ly, ious Prev on. applicati that are required to complete a loan it ct the actual costs of appraisals or cred only that mortgage brokers could colle the n latio regu by set t mus n latio l Regu reports. The Commissioner of Financia ers can be compensated. e brok goods and services for which mortgag Estate HB 1471 – Real sclosures Di – ts en em Settl ive July 1, 2010 ect Eff – D STATUS: PASSE of RESPA rules Makes a violation e of affiliated sur clo dis regarding the a violation of business arrangements ll. state law as we 8 HB 83 – Re al Agency and Estate Continuing Edu cation – B STATUS: PASSED roker Supervision – Effective for ne xt licensure rene after January 1, wal that occurs 20 on or Requires all re 12 al estate license es to take a th education course ree-hour contin in agency princip uing fifteen hours of education requ les and disclosure as part of ired for license course requirem the rene en license renewals t must be fulfilled once every wal. The agency fo th requires broker at occur after January 1, 2012 ur years after the s, br . Th a three-hour co anch office managers and team e legislation also urse le every four years. on the requirements of brok aders to complete er supervision Licensees with a once will be eligible gr aduate degree in for of continuing ed license renewal if they complet law or real estate ea uc broker, or a desig ation, as long as they are no total of 7.5 hours t a broker, asso nated branch of ciate licensees eligible fice manager or te fo class for the legi r the 7.5 hour requirement will am leader. Those substitute the ag slative update in ency alternating licen sing periods. HB 1291/SB 95 2– Home Sales – Di Residential sclosure of Utili ty Consumption STATUS: NOT PASSED Although MAR was oppo sed MAR met with the Maryl to the bill as introduced, an to find a workable sol d Energy Administration ution to providing uti information to consum lity ers workable solution, it wa . Though MAR found a s too late in session for changes to advance. the Insurers and HB 1470 – Title lation and Producers – Regu Reports ive July 1, 2010 STATUS: PASSED – Effect urance producer ins e titl a Clarifies that not required to file a is r cto tra con nt de en indep of surety bond, or letter blanket fidelity bond, l cia an Fin of t en rtm pa credit with the De r is providing escrow cto Regulation if the contra es on behalf of a vic ser nt me tle set or g closin ho is subject to those (w cer du pro title insurance . bonding requirements) common ownership communities mon Interest HB 1300 – Licensing for Com ers nag Community Ma STATUS: NOT PASSED se for managers of common Would have created a state-issued licen iums and homeowner omin interest communities such as cond required managers to have ld wou n latio associations. The legis training program and a plete hold specific designations and com have also created an ld wou n latio legis The certification exam. mission, to oversee com te esta oversight board, similar to the real ts. plain com er inist the industry and adm HB 842 – Condominium and Homeowner Association – Priority of Lien s STATUS: NOT PASSED Although MAR initially supported this legislation, which would have created a priority lien of up to 6 mon ths of assessments for condo and HOA foreclosed properties, we opposed the legislation as amended and sent to the Senate. The House amendm ent required all condo purchasers to pay a security deposit equal to two months of assessments. MAR was concerned about mandating an addi tional cash requirement at the settlement table for already difficult to sell properties. HB 460 – Condominium Bylaws – Surcharge on Assessments STATUS: DEFEATED Would have permitted a condominium bylaw to include an additional surcharge of 10% on each assessment for common expenses for owners whose units are leased or vacant. SB 212 – Prohibited Restrictions on Exercise of Free Speech STATUS: NOT PASSED Would have provided all common interest community residents with the same free speech rights as other private property owners regarding the display of noncommercial signs, posters, flags or banners. Currently, the law only allows candidate signs. land-use, property rights, and the environment dental Taking Permit for *HB 295/SB 1020 – Inci Puritan Tiger Beetle 2010 STATUS: PASSED – Effective April 13, Resources to issue a permit to an ral Natu of nt rtme Depa the ires Requ l taking of the endangered Puritan applicant that authorizes an incidenta ently, many homeowners are at Curr . Tiger Beetle in certain situations cliffs that are the Tiger Beetle’s risk because they cannot stabilize the these properties could collapse d, ilize habitat. If the cliffs cannot be stab into the Bay. vation Fund – HB 1352 – Forest Conser Contributions Rates 1, 2010 STATUS: PASSED -- Effective October st Conservation Act Establishes a higher fee under the Fore s. The fee for area ing fund ity prior of ide for projects outs than the fee set for such projects must be 20% higher These fees are paid projects inside priority funding areas. on site. loss tree when a project cannot mitigate uction Act HB 1041 – Lead Paint Red of 2010 STATUS: DEFEATED given community Among other provisions, would have homeowners sue to associations the legal standing , with the riors exte e hom on tions viola over lead paint . right to seek monetary damages Nitrogen Removal HB 62 – Septic Systems – Technology 1, 2010 STATUS: PASSED – Effective October ronment to provide grants for 100% Envi the of nt rtme Depa the Requires entional septic system and one conv a een betw of the cost differential when a homeowner is required to using nitrogen reduction technology Critical Areas. This legislation d’s ylan Mar in replace a septic system which did not provide a statutory clarifies the law passed last year, ts. The grants must be paid until gran ial rent diffe guarantee for the costaluated. 2012, when the program will be reev HB 1125 – Sto STATUS: NOT PA rmwater Managemen SSED BUT IMPLEM t EN The regulations , like the legisla TED BY REGULATION tion, grant a de final approval to velope ad far in the develo dress the large number of proj r three years to receive pment process bu ec t are now delaye ts which have advanced If the developer do d be start construction es not receive approval within th cause of the economy. re by new criteria. Th 2017, the project will likely ha e years, or has failed to e regulation also ve redevelopment clarifies the proc to start over under the proj ed created confusio ects must take under the law. ures and standards that n redevelopment. and uncertainty for many loca The original regulation l The regulations take effect on M governments supporting ay 4, 2010. property management rtment of HB 1377 – Depa cal Development Lo – Transportation s Review STATUS: DEFEATED t of ed the De pa rtm en Wo uld ha ve req uir e comment to a local vid Transportation to pro transportation element of the ing ard reg t governmen specific ve plan, site plans for the local comprehensi plats. n isio div sub al fin and t on projects, preliminary en rtm pa De input from the ed Would have required nn pla t, en pm elo dev e xed-us certain approvals of mi an d tra ns it- or ien ted un it de ve lop me nts development. HB 508/HB 672 – Interest Rates on Security Deposits STATUS: NOT PASSED Would have allowed interest rates on security deposits to be matched to federal reserve discount rates instead of a flat rate of 3%. Amendments MAR proposed would have given landlords the option of choosing a floating rate or using the flat 3% rate. rvices yland Legal Se SB 248 – Mar nd Corporation Fu tive July 1, 2010 fec Ef – ED SS m $25 to $55, PA : US STAT circuit court case fro r summar y a ng fili r fo fee e $5 to $8 fo Increases th Court cases from ict str Di r fo s from $10 to $18. e fe the for other civil case proposed even fee e th d an s, se ca roduced, ejectment islation which, as int rvices MAR opposed the leg ation also provides that the Legal Se it isl bm su leg st e Th mu s. s, steeper fee m these fee receives funding fro vember of each year. ich wh , on ati or rp Co No Judicial Branch in ne 30, its budget to the these fee increases will sunset on Ju n, tio ac er rth fu ut tho Wi 2013. HB 1382/SB 554 – Rental Housing – Lease Termination for Domestic Violence Victims STATUS: PASSED – Effective October 1, 2010 Allows a victim of domestic violence or sexual assault to terminate a lease if granted a final protective or peace order by a court. As introduced, the legislation would have created a new protected class for domestic abuse and sexual assault victims for all housing. That provision was dropped. SB 243 – Housing Dis crimination – Source of Income STATUS: DEFEATED Would have created a new pro tect income.” The bill would hav ed class for “source of e forced landlords to accept federal Section 8 vouchers despite the fact that the federal program is volunt ary. Unlike most forms of payment, a Section 8 vou cher requires a landlord to comply with the federal regulations governing the program. Those regulation s impose even greater costs and duties on landlords, such requirements and lease term as special inspection s. HB 1153/SB 50 4 – Lead Dust Testing STATUS: DEFEATED Would have required lan dlords and property managers to conduct a dust the full risk reduction test and complete standard of units subject to Marylan d’s Prevention law. Un Lead Poisoning der current law, a landlord is required to perform either a dust test or the full-risk red uction standard. M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 9 commercial HB 484/SB 1083 – Payment Schedu Semiannual le – Small Busin ess Property STATUS: PASSED – Effect ive October 1, 2010 for years beginning after tax June Requires local governm 30, 2011. ents to provide a sem iannual payment schedule for Currently, local governm small business property. en semiannual payments ts are only required to offer for residential property . A sm business property is de fined as a property ass all igned a commercial use code by Assessments and Tax the State Department of ation and for which annual property taxes do not exceed $50,000. munities Act HB 475 – Sustainable Com 2010 1, June tive Effec – ED PASS STATUS: Heritage Structure Rehabilitation Tax Extends for three years the Maryland munities Tax Credit. The bill permits Credit, renamed the Sustainable Com as transit oriented development, BRAC certain non-historic structures (such credit (10 percent of rehabilitation enterprise zones) to claim a reduced a credit for 20 percent of certified claim still can s costs). Historic structure ns d be claimed for historic renovatio costs, and a 25 percent credit coul so ed, capp is its cred Funding for the which comply with LEED certification. it. cred the not every eligible property will receive Benchmarking for HB 985/SB 713 – Energy Commercial Buildings STATUS: NOT PASSED mercial buildings to pass on utility Would have required state and com ronmental Protection Agency. Would usage information to the Federal Envi over 10,000 square feet to disclose ings have required commercial build e than 2,000 square feet. The bill benchmarking data to lessees of mor state building and commercial to would have initially applied only but would have phased-in other buildings over 150,000 square feet, re feet by 2013. squa commercial buildings over 50,000 mit Extensions HB 1344 – Construction Per STATUS: NOT PASSED s the current tolling of Would have extended by two year its. Under current law, construction and development perm 1, 2008 through June ary Janu from d such permits were tolle clarified language also 30, 2010. The legislation would have its and approvals, perm ent rnm gove in the law relating to local . and included grading permits as well HB 1163 – Economic Development – Enterprise Zones STATUS: PASSED – Effective October 1, 2010 Clarifies that a county may have no more than two enterprise zones designated in a calendar year. The prior limit was no more than one enterprise zone designated in a year. HB 620/HB 5 Elements a 97 – Condo and HOAs nd Implied – Common Wa STATUS: PASSED – Effective Octo rranties be Requires certain r 1, 2010 st common elemen ructural elements of a build ing to be consid ts in residentia ered warranty on co l mmon elemen condominiums, and extends ts. The bill condominium the byla requ common elemen ws to designate certain stru ires residential ts, ctu an amendment such as floors, roofs, foundations ral elements as to the bill to cla , etc. MAR propos rif apply to commer ed y that such a lim cia flexibility regard l or mixed-used developments itation should not which need addi ing the designatio tiona bill exempts only solely co n of common elements. Howeve l r, the mmercial cond requirements. omin Th elements to the e bill extends the initial wa iums from the rran long Council of Unit Ow er of three years or two years ties on common after an independ ners is establish ent ed. ement Districts HB 1182 – Business Improv 2010 1, ber Octo tive STATUS: PASSED – Effec establish Business Authorizes local government to allows the local bill The s). (BID Improvement Districts if at least 80% of only government to approve such a district tion of the BID. crea the ove appr and its businesses sign off located in the es pani The BID can impose taxes on the com s. BID to fund its operation Occupancy Multiple eters – 8 3 1 1 M r HB – Master (sunsets afte Buildings – Effective July 1, 2010 ED STATUS: PASS al ) cy residenti June 30, 2013 new multiple-occupan for heating, at Clarifies th y use a master meter if the Public a es buildings m d air conditioning servic master meter e an , th on at ti th ila ed nt ve on is satisfi ergy over the energy si is m m Co e Servic al s of en a net saving om individu will result in ould have resulted fr in the rent ed w saving that utility bill must be includ e er. metering. Th subject to a master met its for those un miscellaneous HB 993 – Use of Wireless Communication Devices in Motor Vehicles STATUS: DEFEATED Would have prohibited the use of all wireless communication devices in motor vehicles, even hands-free devices. Although this bill did not pass, the Legislature did pass SB 321, making use of a hand-held cell phone while the vehicle is moving illegal. The violation is a secondary offense, meaning that a driver cannot be pulled over solely for using a hand-held phone. SB 321 is effective October 1, 2010. With the conclusion of the legislative session, Maryland legislators now turn their attention to the statewide elections in the fall. The Maryland primary election is September 14th and the general election is November 2nd. The two most important actions that you can take this year as a REALTOR® member in advancing a positive legislative agenda is registering to vote and voting! REALTORS® are the largest professional trade association in Maryland, and our political influence is strengthened when our members exercise their voting rights. * Indicates a bill that has been signed by the Governor as of the date this article was written. All other bills listed have only been passed by the Maryland General Assembly and must still be signed by the Governor to take effect. 10 M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 Simply the Best Commission Program in Maryland! 100% Only $99 per month 85% No monthly fee Call Today (866) 987-3937 Benefits: ■ No minimum sales quota ■ Commission paid in 48 hours ■ E & O Insurance only $180 per year ■ A single admin/transaction fee only $395 ■ All listing, advertisement leads go directly to the responsible agent ■ Free in-office copies, phone & fax ■ Conference rooms/General use computers ■ Free online contract forms ■ Free business cards ■ Free marketing on all listings ■ Full Broker support, training and mentor program ■ NO Desk Duty! All leads from listings go directly to the listing agent ■ Recruiting Bonus ■ Open your own Branch Office Where the Traditional Office meets the Virtual Office. We take full advantage of technology so there is no need to ever visit the office. Work from anywhere in Maryland! www.DouglasRealty.info • Office (410) 255-3690 NEW OFFICE: 2608 Mountain Rd. Suite #7 Pasadena MD 21122 Economic Forecast Anirban Basu Recovery Revs Up Good News for the State’s Housing Market Economy Expanding as Predicted. Will the Run Last? Labor Statistics (April 2nd) met most economists’ expectations, with private sector job growth totaling 123,000 in March. The economy continues to gather momentum, as does The Case for the Next Prolonged Expansion Cycle - Revisited Maryland’s housing market. Presuming that mortgage rates remain well behaved for the balance of the year, Maryland’s housing market stands to experience ongoing improvement, even if federal tax credits expire in accordance with the current schedule. Though we continue to await first quarter Gross Domestic Product (GDP) data, it is clear that the nation has strung together three consecutive quarters of growth, including 5.6 percent growth on an annualized basis in the fourth quarter of 2009. Employment is now expanding; the unemployment rate has been steady at 9.7 percent for the past 3 months, down from a high of 10.1 percent in October 2009. The latest monthly establishment-based employment report from the Bureau of 12 M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 A close inspection of fourth quarter 2009 GDP reveals a promising shift away from pure dependence upon government spending to a broadening economic expansion. For example, according to the Commerce Department’s second GDP report published on March 26th, 2010, nonresidential fixed investment rose 6.5 percent during the fourth quarter of last year, the first positive quarter since the second quarter of 2008. Nonresidential equipment and software was up 18.2 percent on an annualized basis, indicating that IT is emerging as one of the economy’s primary drivers in the recovery. That helps explain why the San Francisco Bay area is now experiencing one of the nation’s fastest expansions in median home sales prices. Of central importance is the ongoing rebound in retail sales and consumer confidence. Year-over-year sales growth is now positive, though the comparison months were of course in the immediate aftermath of the financial crisis that began in September 2008. This is not intended to imply that we anticipate an especially brisk recovery. We do not, and many of the reasons we have cited in earlier reports remain firmly in place. These include tight credit, an unsettled federal policymaking environment, and subdued expansion in various parts of the world. Double-digit or near double-digit unemployment rates for months to come, and the expectation that policy support for the economy will begin to wane within the next twelve months, also play heavily into our forecast for a slower recovery. In fact, policy support for government sponsored economic stimulus will begin to wane well before the end of this year. As of this writing, Federal Reserve purchases of collateralized mortgage backed securities have been over for a few weeks, which implies that the era of ultra-low mortgages may soon be coming to an end, though for now low rates remain firmly in place. Given the ongoing scrutiny of internal operations, there will also likely be calls by the federal government for Freddie and Fannie to slow down their purchases of mortgages. In the words of Wells Fargo economists, “We are not expecting a double dip recession, but do expect growth to remain relatively modest through 2011.” We generally concur, as we anticipate that consumer spending and business fixed investment will remain somewhat steady over the next five quarters. One of the other reasons to believe in the sustainability of the nation’s nascent recovery is the recent performance of financial markets. On March 9, 2009, the Gross Domestic Product, Annualized Quarterly Dow Jones Industrial Average reached a Percentage Change, Q1 2001 – Q4 2009 cyclical low 6,547.05 after dipping to an intraday low of 6,469.95. Since that time, stock prices have enjoyed a roughly 70 percent retracement, replenishing wealth and signaling confidence in corporate earnings. The fourth quarter GDP report was consistent with the notion of rising profits, which may be just enough to keep the recovery going into and through 2011. Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis National Nonfarm Employment Net Change, February 2006 – March 2010 In many ways the recovery that began during the summer of 2009 is quite ordinary. As with typical recoveries, financial markets were first to begin recovery, followed by GDP growth. Now comes the final big piece in the puzzle: job growth. And the data are unmistakable – job growth is on the way, though unemployment will remain much higher than customary levels. In January the nation gained 14,000 jobs (revised estimate), and then lost almost precisely that number of jobs one month later. In March, the nation added 162,000 jobs, the first six-digit increase for the U.S. economy since November 2007. Through March, unemployment has remained steady at 9.7. States with the lowest unemployment rates tend to be natural resource intensive and are Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics (based on payroll survey) M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 13 Economic Forecast Continued from page 13 Comparison of Unemployment Rates by State, February 2010 STATE: UR: STATE: UR: STATE: UR: NORTH DAKOTA 4.1 ARKANSAS 7.7 NEW JERSEY 9.8 NEBRASKA 4.8 TEXAS 8.2 GEORGIA 10.5 SOUTH DAKOTA 4.8 MAINE 8.3 OREGON 10.5 KANSAS 6.5 ALASKA 8.5 TENNESSEE 10.7 VERMONT 6.6 NEW MEXICO 8.7 KENTUCKY 10.9 IOWA 6.7 WISCONSIN 8.7 OHIO 10.9 OKLAHOMA 6.7 NEW YORK 8.8 ALABAMA 11.1 HAWAII 6.9 PENNSYLVANIA 8.9 N. CAROLINA 11.2 MONTANA 6.9 CONNECTICUT 9.1 ILLINOIS 11.4 NEW HAMPSHIRE 7.1 DELAWARE 9.2 MISSISSIPPI 11.4 UTAH 7.1 MISSOURI 9.4 D.C. 11.9 VIRGINIA 7.2 ARIZONA 9.5 FLORIDA 12.2 LOUISIANA 7.3 IDAHO 9.5 CALIFORNIA 12.5 MINNESOTA 7.3 MASSACHUSETTS 9.5 S. CAROLINA 12.5 WYOMING 7.5 WASHINGTON 9.5 R. ISLAND 12.7 MARYLAND 7.7 WEST VIRGINIA 9.5 NEVADA 13.2 COLORADO 7.7 INDIANA 9.8 MICHIGAN 14.1 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Maryland’s Housing Market arguably less susceptible to real estate speculation. States with the highest unemployment rates tend to have suffered significantly from de-industrialization and/or have disproportionately bad residential real estate markets. Thanks in large measure to ongoing federal government expansion, Virginia and Maryland continue to boast relatively low unemployment rates. In March, Maryland added more jobs than any other state-- 35,800 in March, a 1.4 percent expansion in jobs over the course of 31 days. That is simply remarkable, even though March’s performance was inflated by the re-emergence of jobs lost in February due to the snowstorms, as well as temporary Census Bureau hiring. The gains were broad enough to indicate that the state’s labor markets are beginning to mend in earnest, which is good news for the Maryland’s housing market. For months, the state’s housing market has been rebounding even in the absence of employment growth, as homebuyers have found ways to avail themselves of low mortgage rates, FHA financing and tax credits. With job growth set to accelerate, we expect the state’s housing market will continue to heal. 14 M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 Due largely to significant sales volume growth over the past year, inventory of unsold homes continues to trend lower. As of March, the state’s active inventory as reported by MRIS and Coastal was 42,753, down from 45,738 one year earlier. Unit sales are up more than 29 percent on a year-over-year basis. In both Montgomery and Howard counties, it appears that equilibrium has been achieved and home prices are set to rise. Active inventory in Montgomery County is less than six months and just above that level in Howard County, based on March sales. Progress continues in virtually every other county as well, including Prince George’s, where unit sales were up 99 percent on a year-over-year basis in March and active inventory has dwindled from 6,985 in March of 2009 to 5,623 one year later. No county appears to have benefitted as much from the firsttime homebuyer tax credit as Prince George’s County. That said, the recovery is far from complete. On a year-over-year basis, median and average sales prices in Maryland are down 8 percent. In March 2009, the average price in Maryland stood at nearly $300,000. One year later, it had fallen below $275,000. Moreover, with mortgage delinquencies still high, large number of homeowners well underwater and many investors still struggling, there remain homes in or close to foreclosure, and homes that owners want to sell but are hesitant to put on the market. While it is very difficult to know with any elevated level of accuracy the size of this “shadow inventory,” it is likely that that inventory will continue to suppress home price increases in many submarkets for months to come. Still, the bulk of news on the housing front is positive. Mortgage rates remain consistent and March pending unit sales were more than solid. In March 2009, there were 5,298 pending sales statewide. One year later, the corresponding monthly figure was 7,707, an increase of 45 percent. While it is true that a significant fraction of this performance is due to the impact of federal tax credits, there appears to be an underlying momentum in the state’s housing market that is unrelated to the tax credits and can therefore be sustained even after the tax credits lapse. Looking Ahead The last few months have been surprisingly good. As of this writing, the Dow Jones Industrial has rebounded to above 11,200 (the Dow began the year at 10,430). This run-up has been supported by a now-expanding U.S. economy, increasing corporate earnings and renewed confidence among investors. Industrial production is on the rise, with double-digit gains in output in high technology over a recent three-month period and 8.7 percent gains in manufacturing ex-high-tech. The Institute for Supply Management’s non-manufacturing index rose in February to 53.0, the highest level since October 2007. dollar will trend modestly higher, not just against the Euro but against most major currencies. The notion is that U.S. economic expansion will attract foreign direct investment, which in turn will create demand for the dollar and lift the greenback. However, a modest uptick in the value of the dollar is not inconsistent with the notion that this will be a year of export growth in America. The general rebound in economic activity has helped to sustain corporate earnings growth. Pre-tax corporate profits rose 8 percent to a seasonally adjusted $1.5 trillion annual rate during the fourth quarter, compared to the third quarter of last year, according to the Commerce Department. After-tax profits were up 23 percent on a year-over-year basis during last year’s final quarter, and most expect encouraging news on the profits front during the first quarter of the current year. Consumer spending has also been stronger than many had anticipated, and the rebound in the stock market has certainly helped. Retail sales rose solidly during the first quarter, including among luxury retailers. Realtors and others Our concerns revolve largely around the second half of 2010 and 2011. As should not lose stimulus impact ebbs, interest rates This is very good news for national and rise, past tax cuts lapse and state and sight of the fact that the housing market local housing markets. Realtors and local governments begin to curtain was most active when financial markets others should not lose sight of the fact expenditures in earnest, the economy that the housing market was most active will become increasingly vulnerable. were performing well. In October of 2007, when financial markets were performing Indeed, as we move through 2010, well. In October of 2007, the Dow Sage is looking to a number of key the Dow Jones Industrial Average sat Jones Industrial Average sat above economic variables to determine our above 14,100 for a time, which meant that 14,100 for a time, which meant that 2011 forecast. The first is the many households enjoyed plenty of performance of financial markets, many households enjoyed plenty of liquid wealth. Though this in and of itself which have recently done more than a did not fully shield the housing market passable job in predicting the liquid wealth. from downturn, the presence of financial trajectory of the economy. The Dow wealth helped to establish a floor below Jones Industrial Average peaked at which the housing market could not fall. However, by March of 2009, the index had 14,164.53 on October 9th, 2007 before beginning what was then a slow, steady lost more than half of its value, and the loss in financial wealth served to batter descent. Two months later, the economy was in recession. More recently, the market housing markets across the nation as families collectively lacked the wherewithal to has been trending higher on low volatility. Perceptions of risk have abated massively participate in a housing market that had begun to offer historically attractive in recent weeks and if economic data continue to be strong and largely unidirectional, purchase opportunities. Tighter credit also ensued as institutions labored to preserve the market liftoff could continue. That could create enough wealth and confidence capital. The loss in financial wealth also hammered away at household confidence, to allow for a sustained economic recovery into and beyond 2011. a necessary ingredient for robust sales of big ticket items such as homes. However, there does remain a risk of a double-dip recession, or at least a period of It is true, however, that there are global headwinds. Economic activity in the Euro below average growth in 2011. Were that to occur, the momentum now being countries is no longer in decline, but the upturn in activity remains subdued and experienced in Maryland’s housing market would likely be interrupted as job growth much of the focus remains on budgetary issues in Greece, Portugal and other sputters and unemployment edges higher again. If mortgage rates were to rise European nations. From the perspective of U.S. exports, this is problematic, because during the balance of this year and into next year, and tax credits lapse, the loss in it creates the possibility that the dollar will appreciate, albeit perhaps just gradually. housing market momentum could become more severe than many observers The U.S. dollar trended lower for much of last year, which helped position America’s presently forecast under their baseline scenarios. In other words, the drama economy for renewed export growth. Many economists believe that this year the continues. M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 15 PRESENTS 2010 ANNUAL CONFERENCE AND TRADESHOW September 13–15, 2010 Roland E. Powell Convention Center Ocean City, Maryland 5(*,67(521/,1( Complete Schedule and Course Descriptions www.mdrealtor.org 16 M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 2010 Conference Sponsors Conference Sponsors Main: MRIS & MetLife Home Loans Frederick County Association of REALTORS® Golf Tournament Longest Drive—Men Garrett County Board of REALTORS® Rookie REALTOR® Society Luncheon Main: Howard County Association of REALTORS® Patron: MHREIA Closest to the Pin—Men Pete O’Donnell, MetLife Home Loans REALTOR® Business Center Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Hotel and Condo Rental Information Discounted rates for 2010 Conference Registrants and Exhibitors are provided at the following hotels and condos in Ocean City, Maryland. The reservation deadlines vary and may be as early as August 12, 2010. (Be sure to mention the Maryland Association of REALTORS® when making your reservations.) The Roland E. Powell Convention Center is located at 4001 Coastal Highway and Bayside right before 41st St. Rates listed below do not include any tax: Atlantic Oceanfront 4501 Atlantic Ave. 410-289-6424 Rates: $79–$139 per night, plus tax (based on view) Clarion Resort 10100 Coastal Hwy. 800-638-2100 Rates: $119–$269 per night, plus tax Coconut Malorie 200 59th St. 800-767-6060 Rate: $99 per night, plus tax Courtyard by Marriott 2 15th St. 410-289-5008 Rates: $99 per night, plus tax Fenwick Inn 13801 Coastal Hwy. 800-492-1873 Rate: $59, per night, plus tax (based on view) Tees Martha Lessner, REALTOR® Holly Hart, Prosperity Mortgage Bay Area Association of REALTORS® Grand Hotel 2100 Baltimore Ave. 800-447-6779 Rates: $110–$150 per night, plus tax (based on view) Hilton Suites Ocean City Oceanfront 3200 N. Baltimore Ave. 410-289-6444 Rates: $209–$289 per night, plus tax (based on view) Holiday Inn Hotel and Suites 1700 Baltimore Ave. 866-627-8483 Rates: $189–$259 per night, plus tax (based on view) Holiday Inn Oceanfront 6700 Coastal Hwy. 800-638-2106 Rates: $114–$179 per night, plus tax (based on view) Princess Bayside 4801 Coastal Hwy. 800-854-9785 Rates: $59–$79 per night, plus tax (based on view) Princess Royale 9100 Coastal Hwy. 410-524-7777 Rates: $99–$179 per night, plus tax (based on view) Tidelands Caribbean 5th Street 877-365-6962 Rates: $79–$109 per night, plus tax (based on view) Condo Rental Information Ocean City Rental Management Office 7501 Coastal Hwy. 410-524-0900 M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 17 Education Course Summary COURSE REGISTRATION Course registration is REQUIRED at the time of Conference Registration. MAR does not guarantee class availability if classes are not selected at the time of registration. Please complete one form per attendee. Classes are available on a first-come, first-served basis. Additional courses, changes and/or filled class status will be posted under Annual Conference items online www.mdrealtor.org. Eligibility for continuing education (CE) credits: You MUST arrive on time to the class. Arrive early for session check-in. No CE credit will be given once the class has begun. NO GRACE PERIOD. NO EXCEPTIONS. Full session attendance is required. CE will not be given unless participant is a paid registrant for the 2010 Conference once the class begins. It is your responsibility to return all CE cards at the end of each class. In anticipation of newly enacted MD REC requirements, you may be required to provide your MD REC License # and photo ID to gain class admittance. MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 13 *Subject to MD RE Commission approval Course Time Course Title Course Speaker 8:30–10:00 AM Fair Housing Today 1.5 hours, Fair Housing CE* Deborah Hutson 8:30–11:45 AM Legal & Legislative Roadmap 3 hours Legal / Legislative CE* MAR Legal Affairs Team 8:30–11:45 AM 15 Legal “HOT” Topics 3 hours, Legal / Legislative CE * Al Monshower, Esq. MAR General Counsel 8:30 AM–5:00 PM NAR GREEN Residential Real Estate Elective Course 5 hours, Professional Enhancement CE* Terry Watson 8:30 AM–5:15 PM Credit Smart 6 hours toward WHC Certification Steve Pearson & Jim Harris 8:45 AM–12:00 PM EXTRA-ORDINARY Service—Creating & Implementing An Exceptional On-going “Service Package” 3 hours, Professional Enhancement CE* Ed Hatch 8:45 AM–5:15 PM Leasing & Tenant Representation 6 hours, Professional Enhancement CE* Byron Smith Sr. Esq., CCIM, CRB 10:00–11:00 AM MRIS—A Sure Bet MRIS Staff 10:30 AM–12:00 PM Taxes Linda DeMarlor 2:00–5:15 PM Complete Automation 3 hours, Technology CE* Amy Cherow 2:00–5:15 PM Ethics 3 hours, Ethics CE* Deborah Hutson 2:00–5:15 PM FHA–203k 3 hours, Professional Enhancement CE* Everett Sands 2:00–5:15 PM Group Investing in Commercial Real Estate 3 hours, Professional Enhancement CE* Byron Smith Sr., Esq., CCIM, CRB 2:30–5:45 PM Distressed Property—Go to Settlement, not Court 3 hours, Legal / Legislative CE* Charles A. Kasky, Esq. 3:30–4:30 PM MRIS—A Sure Bet (REPEAT) MRIS Staff TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER, 14 *Subject to MD RE Commission approval Course Time Course Title Course Speaker 8:30–11:45 AM Contract Pitfalls & Risks 3 hours, Legal / Legislative CE* Charles Kasky, Esq. 8:30–11:45 AM Things Mom Didn’t Teach You about Business Planning! Gee Dunsten 8:30 AM–12:00 PM NAR GREEN Commercial Elective Terry Watson 9:00–10:30 AM Fair Housing Today (REPEAT) 1.5 hours, Fair Housing CE* Deborah Hutson 9:00–11:15 AM Maximizing Financing Strategies for Buyers 2 hours, Professional Enhancement CE* Steve Pearson 9:00–11:00 AM Extreme Customer Satisfaction Amy Cherow 10:30–11:30 AM MRIS—A Sure Bet (REPEAT) MRIS Staff 1:00–5:00 PM NAR Commercial GREEN Elective 3 hours, Professional Enhancement CE* Terry Watson 2:00–5:15 PM Agency Matters! 3 hours, Legal / Legislative CE* Charles Kasky, Esq. 2:00–5:15 PM What’s the Difference? Douglas Smith 2:00–5:15 PM Real Estate Service Strategies in the Information Age 3 hours, Technology CE* Amy Cherow 2:00–5:15 PM RESPA, It’s Changes & Legal “HOT” Topics 3 hours, Legal / Legislative CE* Celeste Filoia, Esq. Colette Massengale, Esq. 2:30–4:00 PM How to Comply—Maryland’s newest law regulating Septic Systems 3 hours, Professional Enhancement CE* William Castelli, Esq. Moderator 3:30–4:30 PM MRIS—A Sure Bet (REPEAT) MRIS Staff WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER, 15 8:30–10:00 AM Fair Housing 1.5 hours, Fair Housing CE* Ronald Anderson 8:30–11:45 AM Building Loyalty through Better Customer Service 3 hours, Professional Enhancement CE* Gee Dunsten 8:30–11:45 AM Ethics (REPEAT) 3 hours, Ethics CE* Deborah Hutson 8:30–11:45 AM Distressed Property—Go to Settlement, Not Court (REPEAT) 3 hours, Legal / Legislative CE* Charles A. Kasky, Esq. 10:30 AM–12:00 PM Preparing for the Appraiser 1.5 hours, Fair Housing CE* Ronald Anderson M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 19 Homeownership Highlights Fern S. Dannis Smooth Sailing Anyone? Most REALTORS® probably agree that in this market, patience and persistence prevail, and buyers must be able to shift, swerve and tack to sail home. Buyers and REALTORS® are braving unchartered waters: maneuvering through new federal programs/ regulations, changes to loan underwriting guidelines and the administrative bottleneck of modification requests and short sale proposals with banks or servicers. 22 M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 A good example comes from REALTOR® Jim Turner of Chesapeake Bay Realty. Jim represented a seller in a short sale. Countrywide Mortgage held the original loan of $310,000. When Bank of America (BOA) took over Countrywide, a major lapse in communication ensued. Neither entity could agree on which one would handle the transaction. BOA received five offers on the house in June 2009, ranging $225,000 to $140,000. As the Bank continually failed to respond to Buyers’ offers, new personnel were assigned to oversee the process. Employees continued to turn over faster than a small skiff in a storm, and things became even more stressful as November 2009 approached, when the initial deadline for the tax credit program would arrive. Finally, only one offer remained, at $185,000 the second lowest. “Jack,” a single man in his mid 20’s, was determined to stay aboard and buy the house. Coincidentally, Jack applied to BOA for his FHA mortgage, with a down payment of 2.75%. But BOA’s mortgage division was not allowed to talk to the short sale/loss mitigation division to work out details. A new review director was hired and countered Jack’s offer: $209,000 with 5.75% down, which allowed Jack to receive $6,000 closing cost assistance from BOA. Jack would have to get a gift from a family member to help with the additional down payment. As a result of the appraisal, Jack was forced to clean snow off the roof, repair shingles, fill the oil tank (so that pipes would not break), and repair plumbing. Termite problems were suspected, so a contractor’s report was required to verify that there was no real damage. An additional inspection report was required after the verification. “One would think the Buyer would request the Seller to make the repairs and pay for termite inspections and contractor reports,” observes REALTOR® Mr. Turner. “But in a short sale, the Seller presumably has insufficient funds, so the Seller’s lender dictates the settlement contributions.” Turner praised Jack for “going the extra mile” because he kept spending money without really knowing that he would get the house, still believing that his goal of homeownership was in sight. Finally, on January 2, 2010, Jack purchased the house for $209,000 from BOA. The Seller elected to pay a lump sum at settlement of $9,000 rather than sign a promissory note for the shortfall. Home at last! Fern Dannis, Director of Housing Programs for the Maryland Association of REALTORS® M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 23 MARYLAND OFFICES Annapolis 410-266-0600 Bethesda 301-961-6000 Canton 443-769-1700 Crofton 410-721-3711 Elkton 410-398-2401 Federal Hill 443-627-2900 Gaithersburg 301-948-4811 Harford County 410-879-3880 Howard County 443-325-7890 Ocean City 410-524-7000 Ocean City West 410-520-2600 Ocean Pines 410-208-3500 Pikesville 410-484-8322 Roland Park 443-573-0900 Salisbury 410-912-4700 Severna Park 410-647-8000 Silver Spring 301-879-2600 Towson 410-828-4700 VIRGINIA OFFICES Alexandria 703-836-1464 Fairfax/Oakton 703-691-7653 Hamilton 540-338-4171 Lake Ridge 703-497-7788 Leesburg 703-777-1250 Manassas/Gainesville 703-396-6000 Vienna 703-720-5560 Winchester 540-722-9300 D.C. OFFICES Capitol Hill 202-393-1111 Uptown 202-362-3400 Not All Companies Are the Same See how the other companies compare: Locally Owned and Operated Offices National Brand with 98% awareness TeamBuilder Bonuses for Helping the Company Grow 1,000’s of Sales Leads from Business Development Department First Class Office Facilities and Agent Workspace Full Time Non-competing Managers Comprehensive Ongoing Agent Training Programs PCR Company X _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ Sales Professional Services (Annual fee) _______ Legal Services (Annual fee) _______ Including 50% Company Paid Sphere of Influence Mail Program, Free Just Listed/Just Sold Mailing Program, Free Color Listing Brochures, Free Color House Business Cards, Free Customized Listing/Buyer Presentations, Free High Speed Color Copies, Free Post Yard Sign Installation, Free Wireless Office Internet Connectivity, Free Agent Web sites, Free Web Based Contact Management, Free 24/7 Home Watch Email System, Free Neighborhood Watch Email System, Free eCard Mailing System, Free Long Distance Calls, Free Scan to Email Service, Free Online Contracts and Forms Including $2,000,000 Errors and Omissions Coverage and Full Time In-house Legal Counsel “One Stop Shopping” through PCR Home Services Including Mortgage Services, Settlement Services, Warranty Services, Insurance Services, Property Management Services, Resort Management Services, Alternative Sales, Moving Services, Real Estate Exchange Services, Home Connections, Homebuyers Premium Rewards Package _______ With TeamBuilder, our sales associates who participate in the growth of our company will have the opportunity to receive: • 1% bonus on recruits GCI for life • 2 ½% bonus on sales associates own GCI for one year for productive recruits • Earn bonuses on more than one person with no limit • Bonuses paid quarterly • Bonuses count towards earned income for commission level determination under sales associate’s commission schedule An independently owned and operated member of The Prudential Real Estate Affiliates, Inc. Let’s Grow Together. www.PrudentialCarruthers.com Leaders of the PAC 2 0 0 9 edition Thank You to all our 2009 RPAC Contributors. Your support of RPAC demonstrates your insight about the importance of our efforts to support candidates who support our industry and our profession. Special thanks to the continued, generous support of RPAC Golden R Contributors for their extraordinary leadership and dedication. President’s Circle Sustaining Golden R Those REALTORS® who are major donor contributors AND pledge $2,000 direct-candidate contributions. F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F Mary Antoun William Armstrong Carlton Boujai Rick Brown Bonnie Casper Adam Cockey Gloria Farrar Iona Harrison John Harrison Al Ingraham Ilene Kessler Carole Maclure Steve Meszaros Joanne Poole Dale Ross Cathy Werner Wayne Wyvill Golden R Contributors Thank You Golden and Sustaining Golden R Association Contributors! F Mary Antoun F Greater Baltimore Board of REALTORS® F Maryland Association of REALTORS® F Iona Harrison F John Harrison F Carole Maclure F Greater Capital Area Association of REALTORS® F Prince Georges County Association of REALTORS® 26 Ilene Kessler Cathy Werner Wayne Wyvill Alan Ingraham J. Thomas Carruthers, III Jay Webster Adam Cockey Dale Ross Joan Ryder Crystal R Contributors F Harford County Association of REALTORS® F Howard County Association of REALTORS® Sustaining Crystal R F Marc Witman F William Yerman F Gloria Farrar Sterling R Contributors The RPAC Trustees would like to recognize first-time Sterling R Contributors for their generous contribution of $1000 to RPAC in 2009. Thank you for your support! F F F F F F F Timothy Blanchfield James Blaney Mary Calder Bill Cook Brian Donnellan William Fox Elizabeth Gray Realtor Party ® VOTE M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 ACT INVEST F F F F F F F F Sydney Harrison Richard Rall, Jr. Marilyn Rhodovi Mary Sherrock P. Joy Siegel Kenneth Smallwood Lee Tessier Anthony Williams Multi-Year Sterling R Contributors The RPAC Trustees would further like to recognize our MULTI-YEAR STERLING R CONTRIBUTORS for 2009 and thank them for their support! F F F F F F F F F F F F Barbara Baumler – Two-Time Sterling R Russell Boyce – Two-Time Sterling R Richard Brown – Two-Time Sterling R Bonnie Casper – Two-Time Sterling R Julian Coiner – Two-Time Sterling R Adrian Hunnings – Two-Time Sterling R Patricia Long – Two-Time Sterling R Fred Pumphrey – Two-Time Sterling R Stephanie Rall – Two-Time Sterling R Southern Maryland Association of REALTORS® – Two-Time Sterling R Charlie Windsor – Two-Time Sterling R Tim Wood – Two-Time Sterling R F Ron Bowers – Three-Time Sterling R F David Charron – Three-Time Sterling R FFrederick County Association of REALTORS® – Three-Time Sterling R F Janice Kirkner – Three-Time Sterling R F Shirley Matlock – Three-Time Sterling R F David Mcllvaine – Three-Time Sterling R F Dennis Melby – Three-Time Sterling R F Bob Simon – Three-Time Sterling R F F F F F F F Michael Cerrito – Four-Time Sterling R Joanne Darling – Four-Time Sterling R Daniel Early – Four-Time Sterling R Bud Humbert – Four-Time Sterling R Steve Meszaros – Four-Time Sterling R Jill Pogach Michaels – Four-Time Sterling R Kenneth Montville – Four-Time Sterling R F F F F F F F F F Carlton Boujai – Five-Time Sterling R James “Bud” Church – Five-Time Sterling R Carroll County Association of REALTORS® – Five-Time Sterling R Coastal Association of REALTORS® – Five-Time Sterling R Tom Earnest – Five-Time Sterling R John Hurt – Five-Time Sterling R Creig Northrop – Five-Time Sterling R Susan Pruden – Five-Time Sterling R Ashley Richardson – Five-Time Sterling R FAlease Bowles – Six-Time Sterling R FMelvina Brown – Six-Time Sterling R FCecil County Board of REALTORS® – Six-Time Sterling R FMike Moran – Six-Time Sterling R Local Board that exceeded their 2009 RPAC Goal Pictured left to right: Paula Ruckelshaus (President of Bay Area Association of REALTORS), and Steve Meszaros (MAR President) Mid-Shore Board of REALTORS Pictured left to right: Sigrid Hayward (Local RPAC Chair- Mid-Shore Board of REALTORS- Local Board that exceeded their 2009 RPAC Goal), Steve Meszaros (MAR President), and Jennifer Williams (President of Mid-Shore Board of REALTORS- Most Improved Local Board- Dollar Percentage & Local Board with Greatest per Capita RPAC Participation) Committees who had 100% RPAC Participation in 2009 Pictured left to right: Melvina Brown and Tim Wood (Local RPAC Trustees), Steve Meszaros (MAR President), and Bea Rogers (Vice Chair of Annual Conference Committee) M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 27 Leaders of the PAC Continued from page 27 FShelly Murray – Six-Time Sterling R FTom Quattlebaum – Six-Time Sterling R FRon Deem – Eleven-Time Sterling R FJody Landers – Eleven-Time Sterling R FJack Bannister – Seven-Time Sterling R FBuzz Mackintosh – Seven-Time Sterling R FBarbara Miles – Seven-Time Sterling R FPatty Smallwood – Seven-Time Sterling R FReal Estate Million Dollar Association of Baltimore – Fourteen-Time Sterling R FGeorgiana Tyler – Fourteen-Time Sterling R FCindy Ariosa – Eight-Time Sterling R FBoyd Campbell – Eight-Time Sterling R FAnne Cooke – Eight-Time Sterling R FWes Foster – Eight-Time Sterling R FAlex Karavasilis – Eight-Time Sterling R FJoanne Poole – Eight-Time Sterling R FMichael Yerman – Nineteen-Time Sterling R FJan Hayden – Nine-Time Sterling R FJeanne Turnock – Nine-Time Sterling R FWilliam Armstrong – Ten-Time Sterling R FMary Lou Kaestner – Ten-Time Sterling R FJudy Morri – Ten-Time Sterling R FNancy Simpers – Ten-Time Sterling R FHarold Huggins – Seventeen-Time Sterling R FNancy Hubble – Twenty-Time Sterling R FWomen’s Council of Baltimore – Twenty-Time Sterling R FDistinguished Sales Club of Prince George’s County – Twenty-Two-Time Sterling R FWomen’s Council of PG – Twenty-Two-Time Sterling R Capital Club FCheryl D Abrams FPhyllis Adam FJeff Sussman (Advantage Title Company) FJeanie Ahearn FRonald A Anderson FJean R Andrews FFrederick W Archer FJenni Koontz (Associates Title Services, Inc.) FBrian D Austin President’s Circle Members Pictures left to right: JoAnne Poole, Gloria Farrar, Cathy Werner, Carole Maclure, Steve Meszaros (MAR President), Ilene Kessler, and Adam Cockey 28 M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 FMichael M Ball FWendy I Banner FKathleen F Beadell FKacem Benali FJames H Billingslea Jr FMelissa K Bishop FRusling D Blackburn FSharon L Blackett FBrenda Blaney FJames M Blaney FGwenn Bockelmann FCarole L Bowen FJohn P Bragale FMargaret R Breerwood FLynette L Bridges-Catha FDamian E Buckley FCam A Bunting FTracy Burke FSara Lou L Cardwell FWilliam A Castelli FRobert R Castro FCollette B Cavegn FAnita M Centofanti FMichael Christofaro FMichael M Cohen FJames M Coley Jr. FAndie J Corby FSara Demb FRobert R Denny FAnthony R. DeVol FF Ruth Dickie FGary H Ditto FSheila J Dodson FConnie Dube FArthur H Dunning FMelinda L Estridge FGregory J Ford FJohn A Ford FJoe Fraser FLeslie G Fulford FCarl S. Gewirz FElizabeth A Gilliland FSharyn Goldman FRobert Ruggieri (Goldstar Select Realty, LLC.) FLisa C Griggs FSusan E Hale FEdward G Haraway FSteve Harper FJames R Haskins FMynor R Herrera FBarry Hess FDebora E Hileman FGregg B Holland FMark S Holloway FThomas H Hough FJoanie M Hynes FDonice M Jeter FMarla Johnson FGuy D Josey FVera Fontana (Keller Williams Realty Consultants) FRoberta D Kimball FBob Kimball FRichard E Kinard FEleanor S Kott FTicia M Kouvaris FYvonne Hardy (Lakeside Title Co.) FAnthony C Launi FLewis F Laws FMichael E Leaf FScott M Lederer FMary A Lee FBobby Lee FJohn L Lesniewski FThomas P Levin FCarol Ann Little FSteve Lowe FTyna Lucke FDiane M Mahaffey FSanthy Mallios FDiane M Marsden FCynthia A Massari FDouglas W McClive III FMichael McGreevy FSharon A McKenna FFrank A McKnew FAli Mansouri (Metropol Realty, Inc.) FDeborah A Meushaw FDeAnna W Miller FKaren Miller FShannon Miller-Lutz FDeborah Milliner FAlexandra Miskimon FDonna Moffett FLinda A Moran FEldad Moraru FLeRoy S Morton FNnaemeka A Obiegbu-Chima FPeter O’Donnell FLynn Boynton (Olde Key Title, LLC.) FMartin D O’Toole Jr FSharon Owens FMargaret C Poss FStephanie H Rall FRobert G Ramoy FKelly Renfro FSuzanne Reynolds FWillie M Rhone FNed Rich FAmy Ritsko-Warren FSilvia S Rodriguez FNoni Rondeau FRandall M. Rothstein FBrian Austin (Royal Realty, LLC.) FBradley J Rozansky FJoseph Rubin FDiana Rucci FElaine W Sawyer FNancy L Schwiesow FMartin M Signore FSelena Smart FAnthony SOS FJohn W Steffey Sr. FCraig J Strobel FRonald L Sullivan FPatricia A Terrill FJudy C Tyree FJuan A Umanzor Jr FWilliam Van Horn FVictor D Watson FShelley Weatherholtz FPatrick A Weed FNorman P Wehner FJason Weszka FBruce C Whitcomb FCathy L. Willet FPhilip L Wineman VII FTim Winter FTammy L Wood $99 Club FKimberly M Adkins FJeff Sussman (Advantage Title Company) FRoselyn Agee FEugene S Albert Jr FLewie A Aldridge III FJacqueline Alexander FAllan P Amernick FWilliam A Ampofo FLeon W Andris FJeffrey Annis FJohn F Argentino FDouglas J Ashley FBenjamin Atha FSteve L Atkocius FJeffrey P Aumiller FBarry B Bailey FSusan K Balderson FCynthia L Barron FDebbie Baxter FWilliam F Beauchamp FLinda D Bennett FJoel D Berger FStuart A Berman FJanet L Bernard FDonald Berry FDan G Betsher FDawn Bever-Stewart FDonald L Biedenback FSally A Bielaski FDouglas C. Bigelow FDiane R Blake FCarolyn Blanchard-Cook FHarry W Blondell FGary Bockelmann FNancy Boehmer FWilliam H Bohn FSterling E Bollinger Jr FAchala Bonde FJason Borowy FRobert L Bostick FWilliam G Bowen FNancy S Bowlus FPamela A Boyle FFred C Brand FPatricia M Breidenbach FG V Brenneman Jr FDonald N Briggs FTimothy A Brinkman FJonathan R. Bromberg FMaria A Brown FMelissa A Brown FHollis T Brown FDawn C Brown FStacy E Brunner FLeo A Bruso FCynthia N Buniski FJohn M Burgess FRobert C Burkheimer FLynne Burklo FF(Chip) Burnett FW Corey Burr FWilliam E Burris FLinda V Burton FSuzanne Burton FVilna Byers FDeborah Cain FDesiree A Callender FSonatta S Camara FLisa S Cameron FBoyd J Campbell FMichelle Campbell FJ. J Casey FChris P Centineo FJoan W Cerveny FLane A Chaisson FLin Chen FWilliam M Chesno FHerbert E Chisholm FJann Clark FGarnett Y Clark Jr. FThelma K Clark FWm N Clark FKathleen M Clark FColdwell Banker Residential Brk. FBernadette L Cole FJohn A Coller FJohn J Collins FSharon M Connell FRobert M. Connelly FWilliam J Connor FCarolyn T Cook FPeter S Copenhaver FJeffrey Coppage FConcetta B Corriere FLou Ramsay Cotta FDean E Cottrill FJames B Coulter Jr. FGerald A Cousineau Jr. FNeda R Cox FDaniel F Craney FCarol Sue Crimmins FMartin J Cronin FGeorge H Cronin FJennifer L Cropper-Rines FChristopher T Cull FMark Cunningham FRosalie D Curran FSharon Curtiss FAlan F Dalton FTerence F Daly FJ. Nicholas D’Ambrosia Sr. FScott Danko FFern Dannis FRhonda C Darden FMatthew Dattilio FAnn B Davis FAnita T Davis FHerbert A Davis FKatherine A Davis FMichael D Davis FRobert L Davis Jr FElsie L Davison FJoyce L Deale FRachel A DeHanas FMichael Demyan FJohn H Denick FMartin C Dennis FDiane Y Derr FJonathan W Dey FKevin J Dey FJames C Diamond FDenise M Diana FLinda C Dieter FStanley Dill FAnngellic W Dinkins FBarbara Discenza FJames F Dixon FGertrude O Douglas FPatricia A Dowtin FTillie A Doyle FBetty A Drury FJulie P Duley FJohn T Dunnigan FJohn Dwyer Sr FBonnie G Dypsky FMaureen A Earp-Wood FCatherine Ebersberger FJames K Eder FJean M Elden FChris Jett (Elite Marketing & Sales, LLC.) FMary Ann Elliott FClausen Ely III FKira Epstein FNorma S Epstein FNancy S Erickson FVernon L Esham FPaul Kouvaris (Excello West Extermination Co, Inc.) FRoger N Fairbourn FTerri Farri FPaul L Faulstich Jr. FKevin P Fay FJames Fegan FPaul J Fenton FFrank G Ferguson FMarianne S Ferguson FSteve L Ferguson FMargaret M Finn FSam S Fisher FWilliam J Fitzgerald FDaniel Walsh (Flat Rate Real Estate, Inc.) FCarl T Franzen FLeonard I Frenkil Sr. FCandice L Friday FMartin Friend FMark C Fritschle FTim Gallagher FThomas F Gallagher FCarol J Gamble FGeorgeanna Garceau FOscar R Garcia FJoan E Gardiner FLuciano Gargano FMarianne V Garrison FMichael C Gary Sr. FRichard E Gatchell FMary E. Gawler FAgha K Ghahari FCarolyn Gibbs FChristine A Giglio FTony S Giglio FSharon P Gilkey FKevin E Gilligan FJennifer Glass FMalicka O Gnon-Konde FRobert R Golden M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 29 Leaders of the PAC Continued from page 29 FAshton G Gonella FMichael P Goodfellow FKevin R Goodnight FJudith A Gordon FSylvia Gorman FChase C Gove III FJohn J Grady III FNolen J Graves FChristine L Gray FWilliam D Gray FMike Graziano FRebecca F Greco FElizabeth A Green FJanet J Greene FCharles M Gregg FLinda S Gregg FDeborah K Grimm FHarold C Groom FJames O Gross FKatie E Grove FMary M Groven FAudrie M Gue FAlice Guy FCraig Harshman (Hagerstown Management Corp.) FSayed A Haghgoo FAlan Halle FPeter A Hamelman FMary C Hamersley FMary Ann Hand FMarie A Hardin FDarlene Harenberg FMelvin F Harf FPhillip E Harkins Sr FRonald E Harman FMarvin W Harmon FThomas Harner FVernell E Harris FShari L Harris FTheo Harris FJohn A Harrison FKristen L. Hart FElizabeth M Hays FSigrid S Hayward FIrene E Heller FCarol Henry FDessie Herbert FElsie M Herbst FKarol A Hess FJoseph B Higdon FWanda J Higgs FGwendolyn Hill FKim A Hills FHelen G Hillstrom FSharon K Hiner FHistoric Highlands Assn FLawrence J Hogan Jr. 30 M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 FPatricia Cucchiella (Home Realty, LLC.) FJames B Hooper FLucia P Hopkins FClarence E Horst FH. L. (Chip) Hosford Jr. FIrma D Houck FSara L Hourihan-Taylor FAndrea R Howe FEdward B Howlin Jr. FJoan P Hozik FLarry R Hudson FStacey Hughes FJudy Ann Ingram FIan Parrish (Investors United Real Estate School) FJudith E Isom FDeborah J Iversen FSubbarayudu Jakkampudi FGary L James FAntoinette M Jarboe FAnanda Jayakody FFrank P Jenkins FRobin L Jerkins FVeronica A Jessamy FAnn F Johnson FKathy D Johnson FRobert L Johnston FSharon S Johnston FCandice E Jones FR Bruce Jones FDenise Jones FFlorence L Jordan FAbraham Joshua FRose Marie Jung FPatrick J Kane FDarlene E Kegel FPaula Kelley FEdwin L Kelly FHeidi S Kenny FPritinder Khara FWilson S Kidwell FChang K Kim FKristin L King FEdisel D King FFred T Kirsch FPeter J Klebenow FClark Q Kline Jr. FSusan Klukas FLeah D Knoerlein FSusan M Knott FJay S Ko FElaine S Kogan FMark K Konka FPaul Kouvaris FCheryl T Krebeck FPaul C Lancaster FLandmark Community Newpapers of MD FAnnette E Lane FTraudel Lange FRobert L Langley Sr. FJoan Sharon S Lanier FCynthia M Lantz FR. James Latham Jr FJoseph Laumann FLeigh Lawson-Everstine FWilliam D Leager FCarol A Leal FRonald L Leonard FThomas R Leverance FCassandra Lewis FDenise M Lewis FReuben F Lilly Jr FArlene O Linn FMary Llewellyn FFredericka A Lloyd FSandra M Lofgren-Sargent FRobert B Long FJeremy Loomis FTheresa D Looney FJoseph T Loverde FSteve Lowe FRobin S Lower FRobert J Lucido FFreda K Lusby FJoseph Lynch FVaughn H Lynch Jr FMarvin Lynn FMichael J Lyons FSydney L Machat FPaul R MacKenzie FAndrew V Mackintosh FJames R Mackintosh FDennis P Maguire FConstance G Manger FWalter C Mann FJohn S Margelos Sr. FWilliam H Marquess 4 FAaron J Marsh FGilbert D Marsiglia Sr FWilliam E Martin Jr FJudith I Martinak FPaula Martino FGrace P Masten FChristine P Master FJames E Matthews FJeffrey A Matthews FBarbara C Mattingly FBetsy W Matz FLynn Mauk FAaron M Max FMontgomery McCausland FPatrick McClary FDavid D McCollough FWilliam D McCool FVernee J McFarlin FAngela F McGhee FLillie McHale FMichael J McKenna Jr FTerrence L McKenzie FLinda McKinnon FJoan McLernon FChristopher D McMahon FRuth E Means-Grove FSusan B Megargee FHarold R Mertz FCarole J. Milan FSusan Miller FKandi Miller FBrent C Miller FKimberly Mills FJoseph J Minieri FBryan Mobley FScott Mona FThomas P Monahan FPaul E Monger FSandra N Monger FBrenda A Monshower FAllison D Mooney FLeonard Morrell FConstance J Morrissette FStephen Lovellette (Mortgage One, LLC.) FCynthia G Moses FMichael J Muren FSharon Murphy FDennis C Murphy FElizabeth U Murphy FRichard R Murtagh FKaren F Myers FStephanie Myers FSusan Myszkowski FPaul C Nam FBarbara Neville FPhyllis Newman FErnest Knight (Next Century Realty, Inc.) FKimberly Ann Nicholson FZitella A Nickel FVernon J Nily Jr FJude C Njong FDonna M Norris FMark Nosal FZlatko Novacic FKim A Nunnally-Williams FMichael P O’Brien FCristina L O’Bryhim-Curtis FJohn Michael OConnell FJeffrey R O’Connor FDeborah S O’Hara FMichael Oleru FJoseph Olmedo FJosephine G O’Neel FJohn C ONeill FRita R Orcino FRichard B Orr FJoan Ostenso FMarlene E Ott FSue D Pakulla FDavid D Palmer Jr FChristina J Palmer FNicholas Pantoulis FSandra S Parker FBonnita A Parks FIrene B Parrish FCharles Parrish FBarbara Passwater FMichael W Patrick FStephen T Paul FErin M Phelps FVeera Phillips FJohn F Pilkins Jr. FMark A Pine FRonald B Pitt FCraig B Pittinger FJoan Pittroff FCharles J Plunkert FDoug Poole FChristina M Poss FStephen J Potorti FA. John Price FSue Stouffer (Quad State Realty, Inc.) FThomas S Rafailides FJohn B Ragusa FShoeleh Rahnama FRick Saylor (RCS Home Inspections) FNancy M Reed FL. Fitzhugh Reese FJohn E Reid FWalter A Reiter Jr. FJanet Reynolds FBrian T Ridgway FWilliam B Rinnier Jr FGayle Roberts FLois G Robins FJames J Robinson FJames C Robinson FKaren Rogers FMichael J Rogers FSally Rogers FKaren L Rohrbaugh FEdward D Rollins III FSusan M Rosko-Thomas FLarry E Roth FPatricia A Rowe FJames L Roy FRobert C Ruggieri II FMaryann L Rush FSherri J Russell FMary Betsie Russell FSandy L Sadler FElisabeth Salchow FBelinda Sanders FBrenda K Sarver FRobert F Sass FGeorge R Savani FPatricia M Savani FSuzanne Schaefer FTazuko O Schmitz FMel Schneider FLouise Schultz FCarol A Scibelli-May FGene J Sementilli FRobert T Sheets Jr FJames W Shelton Jr FJonathan Shively FPaul Kouvaris (Signs, Signs, Everywhere Signs, LLC.) FJohn Sikorski FMarvin Simmons FVito Simone FLinda F Simpson FAlfred L Singer FSarah L Sinnickson FElizabeth A Skidmore FJim Skirven FJeffrey Z Slavin FMark D Sloan FBrenda C Small FAndre P Smith FPatricia B Smith FBianca M Smith FDouglas M Smith FTodd M Snook FRoseAnn C Spalt FLisa M St. Clair FDebbie Stallings FCharlene Stammer-Connery FGlenn B Staples FRobert Caspar (Steamboat Associates, LLC.) FMarvin Steen FCarl V Stein FStuart J Stern FConnie M Stommel FGregory M Stone FPamela D Stone FDavid Straitman FStephen W. Stran FJoan M Strang FJulie K Strohman FHenry A Strohminger III FDavid H Stromberg FMax Sweet FJudy H Szynborski FDoannie A Tambascio FJohn W Tauber FBosley C Tawney FRonald G Taylor FMaria A Terry FDavid L Therrien FTimothy K Thomas FEdward D Thomas FRhoda Toback FKeely E Tolley FKaren J Towne FKevin M Tracy FLeland B Trice FEvelyn K Trimbath FBeth Truman FScott D Tucker FKevin Turner FWilliam J Turner FJessica L Turowski FChad Tyler FPatrick Ulrich FMonica S Valentine FHarry D Van Mater FDavid R Vane FJames F Velich FTeresa Bradford (Versatile Homes, Inc.) FPeter R Vidi FJohn Von Paris FPam J Wadler FAnnette M Wagner FGary W Waicker FDaniel Walsh FJames D Ward Jr FElinor W Warring FBarry P Waterman FMareen D Waterman FBarbara C Watkins FJeffrey M Weese FEdward T Wehnert Jr. FMichael C Weisner FDavid J Weiss FWilliam G Weissgerber Jr. FNicole Werner-Jantz FBrent Whalen FBarbara L Whaley FBarbara F Whitaker FCharles W White FEdward A White FJerry D Whitlock FNancy A Wiest FShirley M Wigglesworth FPaul L Wildey FKevin A. Wiles FFarone Williams FKennita L Williams FJennifer Williams FHarlan C Williams FMark F Wilson FLinda F Wilson FRobert Wilson FSandra K Wing FRalph W Winkler FRichard A Winkler FWilliam R Wootan FHugh H Wyble FJohn F Yarish FJacqueline L Yates FZhiwei Yu FJ. Gary G Zentgraf FDarlene Zepp FSteven S Zimmerman FRonald F Zimmerman Congratulations to ALL REALTOR® Local Boards / Associations that exceeded their 2009 RPAC Goals! Anne Arundel County Association of REALTORS® Bay Area Association of REALTORS® Carroll County Association of REALTORS® Cecil County Board of REALTORS® Coastal Association of REALTORS® Fredrick County Association of REALTORS® Garrett County Board of REALTORS® Greater Baltimore Board of REALTORS® Harford County Association of REALTORS® Historic Highlands Association of REALTORS® Howard County Association of REALTORS® Mid-Shore Board of REALTORS® Pen-Mar Regional Association of REALTORS® Prince George’s County Association of REALTORS® Southern Maryland Association of REALTORS® M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 31 Commissioner’s Corner Mark Feinroth, Esquire Commission Considers New Law and Regulations At the April Real Estate Commission meeting, discussion centered on the Commissioners discussed these public comments and asked counsel to proposed continuing education regulations and legislative action taken draft several modifications to the proposal for review at the May meeting. during the 90-day session of the Maryland General Assembly. We expect the Commission to publish the revised proposal in the Maryland Both the Commission’s legislative proposals were passed and, at this writing, the Governor is expected to sign them. With regard to the new law mandating agency law and, for brokers, broker supervision, the Register later in the Spring or early Summer. There will be another public comment period as well. We believe that the proposed regulation will be adopted as a final regulation this year. Commission will design a standard outline and curriculum for both. The When the final regulation is adopted, it is likely to require licensees to law goes into effect for license renewals beginning in January 2012. The produce picture identification to enter a continuing education class for Commission will appoint a workgroup of Commissioners, educators and which the licensee expects to receive credit. This provision is in response licensees to design the two classes so that the courses will be available at to a number of accounts of serious problems with individuals signing into least six months prior to the January 2012 implementation date. continuing education classes for licensees who were not present. The The Teams and Groups legislation, effective October 1, 2010, may require some teams and groups to modify signs, business cards or other advertising materials. The new law mandates that real estate teams use names Commission feels strongly that in the interests of the integrity of the CE system, licensees must identify themselves when taking continuing education courses. connected to their affiliated brokerage that must not suggest the team is Watch for emails and articles in future editions of the Maryland a free standing brokerage. Advertisements for the team must include the REALTOR® for updates on these issues. If you have any questions, please name of the brokerage, the name of at least one licensed team member feel free to contact me at [email protected]. . and a telephone number of the broker or branch office manager. In the hope that any economic impact on licensees can be kept to a minimum, the Commission plans wide promotion of the new requirements through emails to licensees, newsletters and the MAR magazine. On the regulatory side, the Commission has spent more than a year developing a regulation to strengthen the effectiveness of continuing education and formally adopt many long-standing policies on course conduct. A proposed regulation was published on February 26 in the Maryland Register; mandatory comment period closed on April 15. MAR submitted written comments, as did some private education providers. 32 M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 Mark Feinroth, Esquire is the Director of Legal and Regulatory Affairs for the Maryland Association of REALTORS® Maryland Real Estate Commission News Katherine Connelly Continuing Education and Teams Legislation Passed by General Assembly Two legislative proposals offered by the Maryland Real Estate Commission HB 406 allows the Maryland Real Estate Commission to regulate real were approved by the Maryland General Assembly and expected to be estate brokerage practiced by agent teams and groups. The new law defines signed into law by Governor O’Malley shortly after this edition of the a real estate team as two or more associate brokers or licensed salespersons Maryland REALTOR® goes to print. Both bills become effective October who: 1, 2010. Work together on a regular basis to provide real estate brokerage HB 83 requires all real estate licensees to take a three-hour continuing services; and, Represent themselves to the public as being party of education course in agency principles and disclosures under category A of one entity; and, Designate themselves by a collective name such as a the fifteen hours of education required for license renewal. The requirement team or group. will be effective with licenses renewed starting in January 2012. Brokers, branch office managers and team leaders must also complete a three-hour Each team must designate a team leader who has at least three years course on the requirements of broker supervision. Both the agency and experience as a licensee. The team leader is responsible for supervising broker supervision course requirements must be fulfilled before license other team members and ensuring that the team adheres to all office rules, renewal in 2012 or 2013, and then once every four years thereafter. The practices and procedures established by the broker or branch office Commission plans to design standard agency and broker supervision manager. Teams must use team names that are directly connected to the courses that will meet the new requirement. name of the brokerage to which the licensees are affiliated, and the name may not use terms that suggest it is a brokerage unto itself. Advertisements Licensees with a graduate degree in law or real estate will be eligible for for the team must include the name of the brokerage, the name of at least license renewal after completing 7.5 hours of continuing education, if they one licensed team member and a telephone number of the broker or branch are not licensed as a broker or an associate broker or salesperson designated office manager. as team leader or branch office manager. Such a licensee will be required to complete an agency or legislative update class in alternate renewal years For additional information regarding implementation of the new beginning in January 2012. legislation, please feel free to contact the Maryland Real Estate Commission at http://www.dllr.state.md.us/license/mrec/ or [email protected]. Katherine Connelly is the Executive Director of the Maryland Real Estate Commission. For more information, visit http://www.dllr.state.md.us/license/mrec. M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 33 Snippets It’s now OFFICIAL E-signed third-party documents, including real estate contracts, are now being accepted by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). Create your own "blog" Express your ideas to the world and invite responses. This service is high quality, and it's free!* https://www.blogger.com/start Anywho Anywho is a great online phone book and people-finder sponsored by AT&T. Use the Yellow Pages for businesses, the White Pages for people, and the Reverse Lookup if all you have is a phone number.* http://www.anywho.com/ The Internet Movie Database (IMDB) The Internet Movie Database (IMDB) is a movielover's paradise! Discover every movie your favorite actor/actress has been in, discover every actress/actor in your favorite movie! All the facts about all the films will be found here.* http://www.imdb.com/ *excerpted from www.100bestwebsites.org 34 M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 Extension of Tax Credit Deadlines for qualified military personnel For qualified service members who are ordered on a period of official extended duty, these dates are extended for one year. For these home buyers, the tax credit applies to sales with a binding sales contract in place on or before April 30, 2011 and closed by June 30, 2011. Visit for the overview http://www. federalhousingtaxcredit.com/service_mem.php Slideshare.com Upload and share your PowerPoint & Keynote presentations, Word & PDF documents on SlideShare. Add audio to make a webinar. Capture leads with your presentations. Tutorial available. Issuu.com Browse through magazines, artist’s portfolios, or upload your own created documents. A great place to gather publications and discuss topics you find interesting. Check it out! Residential Sales Anirban Basu Old Habits are Hard to Break – Long-Established Trends Remain in Place Units Sales Keep Rising, Sales Prices Keep Falling In a now-familiar pattern in Maryland, unit sales continued to race higher in March and April, while average and median sales prices continued to decline. This is frustrating, as a growing number of communities across the United States are reporting rising sales prices. The most recent release of the S&P Case-Shiller Home Price Indices indicates that for the first time since December 2006, the annual rates of change for the 10-City and 20-City Composites is up on a year-over-year basis (0.6%). However, gains remain uneven, with 11 of 20 cities experiencing year-over-year declines. Statewide, average sales prices declined 8.3 percent on a year-over-year basis in March, and 3.8 percent on that basis in April. Average sales price declined in 18 of Maryland’s 24 jurisdictions in April, most significantly in more rural environments such as Caroline (-29%), Talbot (-27%), Somerset (-26%) and Garrett counties (-25%). One can certainly speculate endlessly about why this occurred, but a likely explanation centers around two reasons. These counties are generally less oriented around first-time buyers than the more urban and populated jurisdictions in the Baltimore-Washington corridor, so they have felt less impact from demand induced by the tax credits. And the unusually tight credit for second homes would disproportionately affect these same counties. Both these factors could explain the substantial drop in average price. Six jurisdictions registered increases in average sales prices in April: Dorchester County (+67%), Carroll County (11%), Baltimore City (10%), Calvert County (4%), Harford County (3%) and Cecil County (1%). Common features among these markets are a bit more difficult to identify, but many stand to be heavily affected by base realignment activities now gathering steam in central Maryland, particularly Harford, Cecil and Calvert counties and Baltimore City. Carroll County is also likely to feel some effect by base realignment, though perhaps not as much. It is also likely that the first-time homebuyer tax credit was disproportionate in its effect in Baltimore City, Cecil and Dorchester counties, given the typical price points of housing there relative to neighboring jurisdictions. Thirteen of Maryland’s jurisdictions recorded declines in median sales prices in April, down from eighteen in March, suggesting that sales price momentum is building. The steepest declines were in Talbot (-36%), Caroline (-30%), and Garrett counties (-28%) in April; the likely causes are the same as those for average sales price dynamics. The largest increases in median sales price were in Baltimore City (17%), Carroll County (13%), and Kent County (9%). The increase in Kent County occurred, however, on the basis of just eight sales in April 2010, the same level as the March sales figure. As we’ve seen for many months, the ongoing housing market recovery has largely been reflected in unit sales increases. In March, unit sales were up 29 percent on a year-over-year basis statewide. In April, the gain approached 41 percent. Unquestionably, these sales gains reflect the impact of the first-time and move-up buyer tax credits. One of the questions that REALTORS® among others have asked is whether the momentum in the market for existing homes will be upset with the expiration of the tax credit program. Conventional wisdom is that the number of settlements will remain high through mid-year, and then begin to decline in the absence of tax credit inducements. That remains to be seen. For now, there is ongoing sales momentum, which helps stabilize sales prices and hammer away at the active inventory of unsold homes. The hope is that strong seasonal forces will support activity in July and August, and that buyers will remain interested in the Continued on page 36 M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 35 Residential Sales Continued from page 36 market thereafter as evidence of home price increases becomes more apparent. Rising home price trends would create a greater sense of urgency among buyers, many of whom have become accustomed to price declines and therefore have adopted a wait and see attitude, even in a buyer's market. Buyers may also be enticed into the market if there are emerging fears of mortgage rate increases, though for now mortgage rates remain well behaved. In April, counties posting the largest year-over-year increases in unit sales were Prince George’s (86%), Harford (79%), Dorchester (75%), Caroline (73%), Charles (65%), Cecil (51%), Talbot (46%), Baltimore (43%), Montgomery (41%) and Anne Arundel (34%). Many are directly impacted by base realignment and/or offer homes at prices attractive to first-time buyers , notably Prince George’s County. Only two counties recorded unit sales declines in April on a year-overyear basis: Kent (-20%) and Allegany (-10%). Given an average sales price of $98,500 and a median sales price of $93,000, Allegany County would appear to be precisely the type of market with most appeal to first-time buyers. It may be that the tax credits generated less impact on Allegany County over the past year because of a relative dearth of employment opportunities vis-à-vis other regional jurisdictions. 36 M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 Looking Ahead For now, the expectation is for ongoing recovery. Forward looking indicators remain positive. Pending sales in April were up 53 percent on a year-over-year basis. The corresponding statistic for March was 45 percent. Though it is true that pending sales were in many cases motivated by the impending expiration of the tax credits (eligible buyers had to be under contract by April 30th), the pending sales statistic is consistent with the notion that underlying demand for housing in Maryland is strengthening. Moreover, the active inventory of unsold homes fell below 44,600 in April, down from 46,117 a year earlier. In a number of jurisdictions, including Montgomery and Howard counties, the active inventory of unsold homes is now low enough to be consistent with equilibrium, implying that home prices are set to rise in those communities even in the absence of tax credits. Anirban Basu, Sage Policy Group, Inc. April 2010 vs. 2009 March 2010 vs. 2009 UnitsAverage Price County 2010 UnitsAverage Price 2009 Change County 2010 35 34.30% $104,317 $138,379 -24.60% Allegany 45 2009 Change 2010 2009 Change 2010 2009 Change Allegany 47 Anne Arundel 387 352 9.90% 339,069 380,072 -10.80% Anne Arundel 471 351 34.20% 341,207 349,031 -2.2% Baltimore City 421 369 14.10% 150,893 153,060 -1.40% Baltimore City 487 391 24.60% 157,771 143,319 10.1% Baltimore County 518 419 23.60% 258,642 270,312 -4.30% Baltimore County 625 436 43.30% 255,688 261,653 -2.3% Calvert 62 58 Calvert 77 58 32.80% 288,157 277,430 3.9% Caroline 21 14 50.00% 152,527 150,557 1.30% Caroline 19 Carroll 87 79 10.10% 283,540 287,323 -1.30% Carroll 125 112 11.60% 300,496 270,779 11.0% Cecil 51 50 2.00% 212,707 231,340 -8.10% Cecil 68 45 51.10% 231,195 228,053 1.4% Charles 113 92 22.80% 236,305 266,429 -11.30% Charles 142 86 65.10% 252,600 267,170 -5.5% Dorchester 16 17 -5.90% 143,529 154,234 -6.90% Dorchester 28 16 75.00% 244,523 146,432 67.0% Frederick 237 171 38.60% 259,627 262,235 -1.00% Frederick 257 203 26.60% 251,391 259,424 -3.1% Garrett 16 13 23.10% 404,031 341,531 18.30% Garrett 17 Harford 165 149 10.70% 246,224 265,754 -7.30% Harford 245 137 78.80% 261,685 254,756 2.7% Howard 230 177 29.90% 378,875 364,284 Howard 252 205 22.90% 387,340 390,821 -0.9% Kent 8 8 6.90% 286,288 309,577 -7.50% 4.00% 0.00% 324,781 361,000 -10.00% Kent 8 50 -10.00% $98,500 $114,028 -13.6% 11 72.70% 184,695 260,924 -29.2% 16 6.30% 332,294 441,150 -24.7% 10 -20.00% 205,125 234,480 -12.5% Montgomery 779 649 20.00% 399,723 412,552 -3.10% Montgomery 995 Prince George’s 756 380 98.90% 201,079 243,884 -17.60% Prince George’s 787 Queen Anne’s 34 21 61.90% 396,159 455,286 -13.00% Queen Anne’s 28 Somerset 16 7 128.60% 120,175 238,414 -49.60% Somerset 14 12 16.70% 128,850 174,552 -26.2% St. Mary’s 79 48 64.60% 272,501 304,167 -10.40% St. Mary’s 76 64 18.80% 264,399 299,185 -11.6% Talbot 27 18 50.00% 530,051 447,878 18.30% Talbot 32 22 45.50% 347,618 473,391 -26.6% Washington 91 82 11.00% 154,004 186,883 -17.60% Washington 101 80 26.30% 168,108 192,325 -12.6% Wicomico 58 37 56.80% 158,330 189,124 -16.30% Wicomico 59 49 20.40% 169,643 206,771 -18.0% Worcester 111 Total 105 5.70% 286,037 365,823 -21.80% 4,330 3,350 29.30% $274,142 $298,843 -8.30% Figures reflect resales and new properties. Residential resales are reported by MRIS ® and local boards MLS systems. Worcester 115 708 40.50% 422,642 426,182 -0.8% 424 85.60% 197,801 245,146 -19.3% 24 16.70% 327,493 344,975 -5.1% 100 15.00% 295,344 313,869 -5.9% Total 5,073 3,610 40.50% $283,154 $294,406 -3.8% Figures reflect resales and new properties. Residential resales are reported by MRIS ® and local boards MLS systems. M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 37 From the Hotline Charles A. Kasky, Esquire New Approach to Broker Compensation Q. No matter how much I read (and I really do read) about RESPA and administrative fees, my head keeps spinning. I don’t know what the law really requires, or whether a broker in Maryland can charge a fee. Recent articles seem to recommend a new approach to compensation. Is this permitted in Maryland and does it address my concerns? A. You are not alone. Even lawyers who specialize in Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) law are scrambling for answers. Early in 2009, a federal district court ruled in Busby v. JRHBW Realty, Inc. that an administrative fee of $149 paid by a home buyer to the broker that represented her was not sufficiently related to any specific settlement service performed for her benefit, resulting in a violation of Section 8(b) of RESPA. That section prohibits charging for “real estate settlement services” unless the fee charged is for “services actually performed.” The court found that the fee was an additional charge to the buyer to defray the overall costs of brokerage services, including the broker’s overhead and administrative costs. However, because the fee was separately itemized on the settlement statement from the percentage brokerage commission, and not specifically justified as compensation for other discrete “real estate settlement services” provided, the court viewed it as a duplication of the percentage commission charges, thereby rendering it an unearned fee in violation of RESPA. NAR then asked HUD, which enforces RESPA, for a clarification on the intent of Section 8(b). Earlier this year, HUD responded in a letter that although RESPA regulates how a real estate broker discloses its charges, it doesn’t regulate how those charges are determined. “The commission may be determined using a flat fee, a percentage of the sales price, or a combination of these methods,” HUD Counsel said. In January 2010, the MAR Listing Agreement and Buyer Representation Agreements were amended to address this development. Broker Compensation is no longer broken into component parts. The broker should simply specify what the compensation is in terms of percent of sales price, flat fee or some combination. Additionally, brokers should disclose fees and commissions as a single figure on the HUD-1 settlement statement. In summary, brokers should review how they characterize compensation. Placing separate labels on or disclosing components of compensation in different parts of the brokerage agreement exposes the broker to the allegation that each separately labeled charge represents a fee for a distinct service. Disclosure of the firm’s compensation should clearly indicate that both the percentage-based and the flat fee components represent payment for services provided by the brokerage. These combined amounts should be disclosed in the 700 section of the HUD-1 as the broker’s compensation. Finally, do not create the impression that any particular fee is for a separate service if that is not the case. If that is the case, ensure the charge is comensurate with the value of the service. Charles A. Kasky, Esquire, Vice President of Legal Affairs for the Maryland Association of REALTORS® Brokers should make clear that administrative fees are a part of the overall real estate commission and are tied to services performed. The key is to make sure that the commission figure on the HUD-1 lines up with the commission structure contained in the listing agreement or buyer agency agreement. FREE Legal Hotline 38 1-800-888-1272 • Monday, Wednesday and Friday • 10am – Noon and 2 pm – 4 pm www.mdrealtor.org • Complete an Online Form available in the Legal Hotline tab M A R Y L A N D R E A L T O R ® June/July 2010 7%)#(%243500/2439/5235##%33 4IREDOFHAVINGTO lNDYOUROWNWAY 7EICHERTPROVIDESALLTHERESOURCESYOUNEED TOBRINGINMOREBUSINESS !TTHEHEARTOFTHE7EICHERT$IFFERENCEAREOURUNIQUELYEFFECTIVESALESTOOLS.OOTHER COMPANYHASANYTHINGLIKEOURSTEPCUSTOMIZABLE,ISTING0RESENTATIONOURTURNKEYDIRECT MAILSOLUTIONOROURINDUSTRYLEADING/PEN(OUSE0ROGRAM )FYOUDLIKETOHEARMOREABOUTOURCLEARCONCISECUSTOMERFOCUSEDSALESTOOLSCALLA LOCAL7EICHERTAFlLIATEOFlCE7ETHINKYOULLBESURPRISEDATALLTHEGREATSUPPORTWECAN OFFERYOUHEREAT7EICHERT #OLUMBIA 7%)#(%242%!,4/23 .EW#OLONY %LLICOTT#ITY 7%)#(%242%!,4/23 #ATON0ROPERTIES /CEAN#ITY 7%)#(%242%!,4/23 "UYERS#HOICE %LDERSBURG 7%)#(%242%!,4/23 0ROPERTY#ONCEPTS 'LEN"URNIE 7%)#(%242%!,4/23 0LATINUM3ERVICE 0RINCESS!NNE 7%)#(%242%!,4/23 /N4HE%ASTERN3HORE (OMEOF5NLIMITED/PPORTUNITY %15!,/00/245.)49 %-0,/9%2 ¥7EICHERT2EAL%STATE!FlLIATES)NC)NDEPENDENTLYOWNEDANDOPERATED WWW7EICHERTCOMCAREERS