PHAI Species at Risk Report - Willow Beach Field Naturalists

Transcription

UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
SPECIES AT RISK DATABASE UPDATE
PORT HOPE AREA INITIATIVE
4.2.1
4.2.2
5.0
Port Granby Project..................................................................................... 4.5
Port Hope Project ........................................................................................ 4.7
REFERENCES.................................................................................................................5.1
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
FIGURES ..................................................................................................... B.1
APPENDIX B
TABLES ....................................................................................................... B.1
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Location of Project Areas
Port Granby Project Area
Welcome Long-term Waste Management Facility
Highland Drive Area Sites
Central Area Sites
Waterfront Area Sites - West
Waterfront Area Sites - East
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1:
Table 2:
Table 3:
Table 4:
Table 5:
ii
Summary of Ontario Regulation 242/08 exemptions that may be
applicable to PHAI activities ............................................................................ B.1
Potential SAR occurrences in proximity to PHAI Project Sites ...................... B.4
Potential SAR overlap with Project Activities and recommended
management measures ................................................................................... B.9
Potential species occurrence by site ........................................................... B.14
Potential PHAI Project Site overlap with SAR and SAR habitat ................. B.17
cm \\cd1220-f02\work_group\01609\active\60960861\reports\species at risk\rpt_60861_phai_sar_20140507_fin.docx
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Introduction
May 7, 2014
1.0
Introduction
Stantec Consulting Ltd. (Stantec) has been retained by Atomic Energy of Canada Limited
(AECL) to compile and update a Species at Risk (SAR) database for the Port Hope Area Initiative
(PHAI). PHAI is a joint initiative between the Government of Canada and affected Municipalities
for the cleanup and long-term, safe management of historic low-level radioactive waste in Port
Hope and Port Granby Ontario. The purpose of Stantec’s work is to identify SAR, or habitat for
SAR, that may occur in the various PHAI project sites and to facilitate authorizations, if required,
under the provincial Endangered Species Act (ESA) [Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR), 2007]
and federal Species at Risk Act (SARA) [Environment Canada (EC), 2002] to permit the PHAI
activities to be conducted in compliance with the ESA and SARA.
The current species at risk data base was compiled by contacting relevant agencies and
reviewing background data sources including previous reports completed for the PHAI.
The purpose of the current update is to address newly listed species, any changes in the
distribution of previously listed species and changes to regulations and implementation
procedures under the ESA and SARA.
The PHAI is comprised of two separate components, the Port Hope Project and the Port Granby
Project. The Port Hope Project will involve the removal of low-level radioactive waste from
several sites in the Town of Port Hope, for treatment and storage in a newly constructed
Welcome Long-term Waste Management Facility to the west of the Town. The Port Granby
Project is contained within a single contiguous area and will also involve the removal of low level
radioactive waste from existing treatment facilities and downstream areas for relocation into a
newly constructed long-term storage facility to the north. The regional location of the project
components is provided as Figure 1 (Appendix A). Individual project sites are shown on Figures 2
through 7 (Appendix A).
1.1
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OVERVIEW
Provincially, species are ranked by the Committee on the Status of Species at Risk in Ontario
(COSSARO). Once species are classified "at risk", they are added to the Species at Risk in Ontario
(SARO) List. Species are ranked as “extirpated” “endangered” or “threatened” and are
protected under the Endangered Species Act (2007) (ESA) from “harm or harassment”. The ESA
also prohibits damage or destruction of habitat for endangered or threatened species. What
type of protection it is provided depends mainly on when the species was added to the SARO
list and it’s whether or not a species specific habitat regulation has been adopted.
1.1
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Introduction
May 7, 2014
The ESA generally applies to all lands in Ontario, including private, provincial and federally
owned lands. In some circumstances the federal Species at Risk Act may be applied in place of
the ESA. In the case of the PHAI, the ESA would apply on all privately owned lands within the Port
Hope Project. It is our understanding from PHAI that it has been confirmed the ESA does not
apply to the federally owned lands on the Welcome, Port Granby and Highland Drive (Pine
Street extension) sites. In some cases, authorization can be obtained under the ESA to conduct
activities in protected habitat that would otherwise be prohibited under the Act. Typically, the
authorization would be obtained through an ESA permit. Types of ESA permits include Overall
Benefit Permit, where compensation measures are required to benefit the species; or Health and
Safety Permit, where the proposed activity is necessary for the protection of human health.
On July 1, 2013 the Ontario government revised Ontario Regulation 242/08 under the ESA,
providing a registration process as an alternative to permitting, in some specific cases. The
changes to the regulation are part of MNR’s new Modernization of Approvals approach, the
goal of which is to streamline authorization. For certain species and/or types of activities, the
regulation introduces a new compliance process, which replaces permit requirements with a
requirement to register activities with MNR on an online registry, and follow various prescribed
conditions.
The new registration process does not provide exemption from the ESA; commitments for
mitigation measures, compensation and monitoring are still required in most cases. The
compensation requirements under the registration process are similar (and in some cases more
stringent) than the conditions would be in an ESA permit. However, the main advantage to the
new process is the improved timelines.
The regulation contains 17 different exemptions which cover different activities and species.
Table 1 (Appendix B) summarizes those exemptions that may be relevant to the work being
completed through the Port Hope Area Initiative. It is possible that some activities may qualify for
more than one of the exemptions.
1.2
SPECIES AT RISK ACT OVERVIEW
The Species at Risk Act (2002) (SARA), under which species at risk in Canada are protected, is
administered at the federal level by Environment Canada and came into effect on June 5, 2004.
Federally, species are ranked by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada
(COSEWIC). Many, but not all, species that are proposed by COSEWIC as being at risk (i.e.
extirpated, endangered, threatened) are protected under SARA. Currently, there are several
species that have been recommended for threatened or endangered status by COSEWIC, but
have not yet been added to a schedule under SARA (e.g. Bobolink, Eastern Meadowlark, and
Little Brown Myotis). These species currently have no protection under SARA, until such time they
are added to Schedule 1.
1.2
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Introduction
May 7, 2014
SARA protects the individuals of threatened and endangered species, their residences and
Critical Habitat. Critical Habitat, as defined in Recovery Plans, may occur on both Federal and
non-Federal (provincial Crown or private) lands. Currently, none of the species potentially
occurring in proximity to the Port Hope or Port Granby sites have Critical Habitat definitions. As
such, only consideration for individuals of the species and their “residences” were included in this
report. Under SARA, “residence” is defined as a dwelling-place, such as a den or nest. For
example, the active nest of a Common Nighthawk would be the species’ residence and
therefore protected under SARA.
For most species, SARA only applies on federal lands, with the exception of aquatic species (as
defined by the Fisheries Act) and migratory bird species (as defined by the Migratory Bird
Convention Act). For aquatic and migratory bird species, SARA applies on private, provincial
and federal lands. For the purposes of the PHAI, lands owned by AECL should be considered
federal lands and thus SARA would apply to all federally listed species. For all other lands, SARA
would only apply to aquatic species and migratory birds.
The current work is intended to address SARA section 79 (2) and will outline the measures
necessary to allow the project to be carried out in a manner that will “avoid or lessen those
effects and to monitor them… in a way that is consistent with any applicable recovery strategy
and action plans”. Specifically, Section 4.2 of this report provides direction on when the
Canadian Wildlife Service should be notified or consulted, in compliance with Section 79 (1) of
SARA.
1.3
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Species at Risk Occurrences
May 7, 2014
2.0
A desktop review was undertaken to compile and update a Species at Risk
Database for the Port Hope Area Initiative by identifying which species at risk have
the potential to occur at the site level (within 1 km of the project sites), local level
(within 10 km of the project sites) and landscape level (within 100 km of the project
sites).
This exercise involved data gathering from provincial databases and previous
reports for the PHAI, including:
x
Natural Heritage Information Centre (NHIC) database
x
Atlas of Breeding Birds of Ontario (Cadman et al., 2007)
x
Atlas of Mammals of Ontario (Dobbyn, 1994)
x
Ontario Reptile and Amphibian Atlas (Ontario Nature, 2013)
x
Terrestrial Environment Baseline Characterization Study for the Port Hope Project
(AMEC, 2005 a);
x
Port Hope Project Terrestrial Environment Environmental Effects Assessment
Report (AMEC, 2005 b)
x
Terrestrial Environment Baseline Characterization Study for the Port Granby
Project (AMEC, 2006 a);
x
Port Granby Project Terrestrial Environment Environmental Effects Assessment
Report (AMEC, 2006 b)
x
Species-at-Risk Assessments Six (6) Road Allowances Port Hope (Public Works and
Government Services Canada (PWGSC) Ontario Region, 2013)
x
Port Hope Area Initiative Planning and Investigation Phase Species at Risk Plan,
prepared for PWGSC (Genivar, 2012)
The Species at Risk Branch of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) was
also contacted to obtain records of species at risk occurrences in proximity to the
project sites.
The updates to the SAR Database included the following information:
x
Species name (up-to-date common and scientific names);
x
Source of the record of the potential species ;
x
Geographic unit or sub-population, if relevant;
x
Federal and provincial designations, including G-rank and S-rank;
2.1
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
x
Known element occurrences overlapping with the site, or confirmed sightings;
x
Documented species range (derived from Ontario specific sources noted
above), including range within 100 km of the site.
Table 2 (Appendix B) provides a summary of the desktop review and changes to the
SAR Database.
Jefferson’s Salamander was identified in the background review of the Port Hope
Project Environmental Effects Assessment (AMEC, 2005 b). However, this appears to
be a misidentification of an historic record. The Port Hope and Port Granby sites are
outside of the known current and historic ranges of the Jefferson Salamander, and
the species was not identified by the Species at Risk Branch of MNR. As such, it is
recommended this species be removed from the SAR Database.
Snapping Turtle has been identified by NHIC as occurring in proximity to both Port
Hope and Port Granby sites. This species is listed by SARO and SARA as a species of
special concern. Species of special concern do not have protected habitat under
the ESA or SARA, and authorizations under the ESA or SARA would not be required
for Snapping Turtle. However, mitigation considerations have been provided for
special concerns species as part of recommended project due diligence.
Monarch is listed by SARO and SARA as a species of special concern and is likely to
occur on most of the project sites. Mitigation considerations for this species are
provided for project due diligence.
Several species that are currently listed as special concern are scheduled for
reassessment by COSSARO and/or COSEWIC in 2014. In order to allow for the
possibility that the status of these species could be changed to endangered or
threatened, these species have been considered in this report.
Butternut has been identified in the Port Hope Project Environmental Assessment as
occurring on or in the vicinity of some of the project sites. Detailed assessment of the
butternut and recommendations for mitigation has been addressed by Stantec
through two Butternut Health Assessments (submitted directly to the MNR) and
correspondence with PHAI. The details are briefly summarized in this report.
Forty-four (44) species have been included in the updated SAR Database (Table 2).
Of these, twenty (20) species have been identified as potentially occurring on, or in
proximity to, the Port Hope or Port Granby sites. Five (5) species are included in
anticipation of the results of their upcoming or recent assessments by COSSARO
and/or COSEWIC. The rationale indicating why species are expected to be on or in
proximity to project sites is summarized in Table 2 (Appendix B).
2.2
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Species at Risk Habitat Assessment
May 7, 2014
3.0
In order to determine the potential for these species to be present on the project sites, aerial
photography and the Ecological Land Classification (ELC) mapping from the Port Hope Project
Environmental Effects Assessment (AMEC, 2005 b) and Port Granby Project Environmental Effects
Assessment (AMEC, 2006 b) were reviewed. The aerial photography analysis and Stantec’s site
reconnaissance visits on September 17, 18, 19, 24 and 25, 2013, resulted in minor changes to the
AMEC ELC mapping. The site reconnaissance visits also provided an opportunity to confirm the
presence or absence of specific habitat niches or structures with the potential to support species
at risk on each site.
3.1
HABITAT DESCRIPTIONS OF EACH SPECIES
Habitat requirements for the 20 species at risk that may occur on, or in proximity to, the Port
Hope or Port Granby sites, as determined in Section 2.0, are summarized below.
3.1.1
Monarch
Provincial Status – special concern
Federal Status – special concern
Monarch (Danaus plexippus) is common throughout southern Ontario. Monarch may occur in a
variety of habitats, but is most commonly found in open fields or meadows with an abundance
of wildflowers. It may also be encountered in flower gardens in urban or suburban environments.
The host plants for Monarch larvae include species of milkweed; as such, habitats with
concentrations of milkweed represent the more important habitat for Monarchs in their southern
Ontario breeding grounds.
Monarchs from eastern North America overwinter in a mountainous region of central Mexico.
Forest degradation in the wintering grounds is considered the largest threat to the eastern
population of Monarchs.
Potential habitat for this species occurs at several of the sites as documented in Table 5. General
mitigation measures have been recommended in Section 4.0.
3.1.2
American Eel
Provincial Status – endangered
Federal Status – threatened- no schedule
American Eel (Anguilla rostrata) is known to occur in Lake Ontario and major watersheds
draining to Lake Ontario. The eel is not known from the Ganaraska River and is unlikely to be
encountered in the vicinity of any Project components.
3.1
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
3.1.3
Butternut
Provincial Status – endangered
Federal Status – endangered
Butternut trees (Juglans cinerea) are widespread throughout southern Ontario but are declining
due to the effects of butternut canker. Butternut occurs in a variety of habitats including
hedgerows, woodlands and forests. As a shade intolerant species, it is typically not found in
forest communities with closed canopies.
Butternut hybridizes with the related introduced species Japanese Heartnut. Butternut/Heartnut
hybrids can be common in urban environments. The hybrids are not afforded protection under
the ESA or SARA.
Potential habitat for this species occurs at several of the sites as documented in Table 5. Species
specific mitigation measures have been recommended in Section 4.0, and a detailed plan has
been prepared under separate cover.
3.1.4
Western Chorus Frog
Provincial Status – not at risk
Federal Status – threatened (Great Lakes / St. Lawrence - Canadian Shield population)
Western Chorus Frog (Pseudacris triseriata) inhabits a range of habitats including woodlands,
meadows, and agricultural lands. The species overwinters in terrestrial habitats under rocks, logs,
leaf litter and loose soil, or animal burrows. The eggs are laid in small clumps attached to
submerged vegetation usually in small or shallow aquatic habitats, mostly temporary ponds and
wetlands become dry up in the summer. During the non-breeding season, Western Chorus Frog
will often move into grassy or weedy fields (COSEWIC, 2008a).
Potential habitat for this species occurs at several of the sites as documented in Table 5.
General mitigation measures have been recommended in Section 4.0.
3.1.5
Snapping Turtle
Snapping Turtle (Chelydra serpentina) occurs in a variety of wetland habitats including ponds,
sloughs, streams, rivers, and shallow bays that are characterized by slow moving water, aquatic
vegetation, and soft bottoms. Females show strong nest site fidelity and nest in sand or gravel
banks at waterway edges in late May or early June (COSEWIC, 2008b).
3.2
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
Potential habitat for this species occurs at several of the sites as documented in Table 5.
General mitigation measures have been recommended in Section 4.0.
3.1.6
Blanding’s Turtle
Provincial Status – threatened
Federal Status – threatened
Blanding’s Turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) frequents lakes, ponds and marshes, and prefers
shallow water that is rich in nutrients, organic soil and dense vegetation. Adults usually occupy
open or partially vegetated sites, whereas juveniles occupy areas with thick aquatic vegetation.
Nesting typically occurs in dry conifer or mixed hardwood forests in loose substrates including
sand, organic soil, gravel and cobblestone, or along gravel roadways, up to 410 m away from
any body of water (COSEWIC, 2005).
Potential habitat for this species occurs adjacent to the East Beach Area. General mitigation
measures have been recommended in Section 4.0.
3.1.7
Eastern Hog-nosed Snake
Eastern Hog-nosed Snake (Heterodon platirhinos) requires well-drained loose or sandy soil; open
vegetative cover such as open woods; shrubland or forest edge; relatively close proximity to
water; and climatic conditions typical of the eastern deciduous forest. Eastern Hog-nosed Snake
is a wide ranging species often with home ranges up to 100 ha (COSEWIC, 2007 c). It requires an
abundance of toads as prey for adults as well an adequate supply of small amphibians such as
salamanders or spring peepers, to sustain hatchlings and juveniles (COSEWIC, 2007 c). Eastern
Hog-nosed Snake hibernates in mammal burrows, or in burrows of its own excavation (Rowell,
2012).
Potential habitat for this species occurs at the Alexander Street Ravine. General mitigation
measures have been recommended in Section 4.0.
3.1.8
Eastern Milksnake
Eastern Milksnake (Lampropeltis triangulum) utilizes a variety of habitats, including prairies,
pastures, hayfields, rocky hillsides and a wide variety of forest types. Ideal habitat is close to
water, and has suitable locations for basking and egg-laying; nesting sites may include compost,
manure piles, stumps, under boards, or in loose soil (COSEWIC, 2002).
3.3
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
As Eastern Milksnake is widespread and a habitat generalist, potential habitat for this species
could include any areas where natural vegetation occurs. Since its habitat is not yet protected
under the ESA, MNR has not developed guidance on how protected habitat for this species
should be identified, or if it could be refined beyond including all natural vegetation. For the
purposes of this project, the proposed remediation works are unlikely to negatively impact the
amount or quality of general habitat for this species. Impacts to specialized habitat may occur if
hibernacula or egg laying sites are damaged. As such, for the purposes of this update,
protected habitat for the Eastern Milksnake was considered to include potential hibernacula or
egg laying sites.
Potential habitat for this species occurs at several of the sites as documented in Table 5. General
3.1.9
Bobolink
Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus) nests primarily in forage crops with a mixture of grasses and
broad-leaved forbs, predominantly hayfields and pastures. Its preferred ground cover includes
grasses such as Timothy and Kentucky bluegrass and forbs such as clover and dandelion
(COSEWIC, 2010).
The Recovery Strategy for the Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus) and Eastern Meadowlark
(Sturnella magna) in Ontario (McCracken et al., 2013) suggests these species prefer to breed in
patches 5 ha or greater in size. Ontario Regulation 242/08 using 4 ha as a minimum patch size for
Bobolink habitat replacement. As such, for the purposes of this project, suitable habitat patches
over 4 ha in size were considered protected habitat for Bobolink. This approach is consistent with
the Recovery Strategy and the general approach MNR has been taken to identify the habitat of
Bobolink.
specific mitigation measures have been recommended in Section 4.0.
3.1.10 Barn Swallow
Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustica) nests on walls or ledges of barns as well as other human-made
structures such as bridges, culverts or other buildings. It feeds on aerial insects generally while
foraging in open habitat such as meadows, hay, pasture, or even mown lawn. Barn Swallow
frequently forages in woodland clearings, wetlands and open water where prey are abundant.
3.4
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
Potential habitat for this species is limited to industrial buildings at the waterfront sites.
3.1.11 Chimney Swift
Chimney Swift (Chaetura pelagica) is an aerial forager concentrated where insects are
abundant and suitable nesting habitat is present. It uses chimneys as well as walls, rafters or
gables of buildings and, less frequently, natural structures such as hollow trees, tree cavities and
cracks in cliffs for roosting and breeding (Cadman et al., 2007).
Potential habitat for this species is limited to industrial buildings at the waterfront sites.
3.1.12 Common Nighthawk
Common Nighthawk (chordeiles minor) prefers to nest in cleared areas with little to no
vegetation, and preferably gravel substrates. It has even been known to nest in cultivated areas
or along gravel roads. It is likely that habitat for this species is present at many of the Project sites.
3.1.13 Eastern Wood-Pewee
Provincial Status – no status
Federal Status – special concern- no schedule
Eastern Wood-Pewee (Contopus virens) typically breeds in deciduous and mixed woods. It
prefers open space near the nest, and is often found near forest edges, clearings, roadways,
and water (Cadman et al., 2007).
3.1.14 Grasshopper Sparrow
Federal Status – special concern-no schedule
Grasshopper Sparrow (Ammodramus savannarum) prefers relatively dry, sparsely vegetated
grasslands with short grasses and patches of bare earth. It can be found in large, rough
unimproved pastures and occasionally utilizes cultivated hayfields and cereal crops (Cadman et
al., 2007).
3.5
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
3.1.15 Red-headed Woodpecker
Red-headed Woodpecker (Melanerpes erythrocephalus) was a confirmed breeder in the Port
Hope area during the second OBBA atlas (Cadman et al., 2007). It prefers open woodland and
woodland edges and is often found in parks and golf courses.
Habitat is potentially present at several sites for this species in the Project area. Species specific
3.1.16 Wood Thrush
Wood Thrush (Hylocichla mustelina) prefers deciduous and mixed forests in southern Ontario,
ranging from small and isolated to large and contiguous woodlots. It prefers the presence of tall
trees and a thick understory for foraging activities and downed woody debris (Cadman et al.,
2007). Wood Thrush is somewhat area sensitive; Friesen et al. (1999) found that the species used
forest patches as small as 3 to 14 ha in size.
3.1.17 Eastern Meadowlark
Eastern Meadowlark (Sturnella magna) is a grassland species which typically occurs in
meadows, hayfields and pastures. However it will utilize a wider range of habitat than most
grassland species, including mown lawn such as golf courses and parks, wooded city ravines,
young conifer plantations and orchards. It is generally tolerant of habitat with an early
succession of trees or shrubs.
The Recovery Strategy for the Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus) and Eastern Meadowlark
(Sturnella magna) in Ontario (McCracken et al., 2013) suggests these species prefer to breed in
patches 5 ha or greater in size. Ontario Regulation 242/08 uses 4 ha as a minimum patch size for
requiring replacement of Eastern Meadowlark habitat. Therefore, for the purposes of this report,
3.6
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
suitable habitat patches over 4 ha in size were considered protected habitat for Eastern
Meadowlark. This approach is consistent with the Recovery Strategy and the general approach
MNR has taken to identify the habitat of Eastern Meadowlark.
3.1.18 Little Brown Myotis
Provincial Status –endangered
Federal Status – endangered- no schedule
Little Brown Myotis (Myotis lucifugus) is a widespread species commonly found roosting near
water bodies in the attics and roof crevices of buildings, under the loose bark on trees, or under
bridges (Eder, 2002). For hibernation the species typically migrates to find suitable caves or
mines.
Potential habitat for this species is limited to industrial buildings at the waterfront sites. Species
3.1.19 Northern Myotis
Provincial Status –endangered
Northern Myotis (Myotis septentrionalis) is a resident bat of upland forests of eastern North
America, which typically forages for aerial insects in the forest understory. Maternity roosts are
located under bark or in buildings, with young born in June and July, while hibernating colonies
typically reside in cave crevices (Reid, 2006).
3.1.20 Tri-coloured Bat
Provincial Status –no status
Tri-coloured Bat (Perimyotis subflavus) prefers partly open habitat such as fields bordered by
large trees or woodland edges, while avoiding denser or more open areas. It may roost in
leaves, caves or buildings, while maternity colonies are usually found in tree cavities or manmade structures. During winter it hibernates in caves and mines with high humidity (NatureServe,
2011).
3.7
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
3.2
SPECIES AT RISK HABITAT FOUND AT EACH SITE
Table 3 (Appendix B) provides a summary of what species may occur at each site. A description
of the species at risk habitat found at each site is provided below. Sites and site descriptions are
based on the mapping provided in AMEC 2005 b for Port Hope and AMEC 2006 b for Port
Granby. In some instances ELC descriptions have been refined or expanded based on Stantec
site reconnaissance in 2013.
3.2.1
Port Granby Project
The Port Granby Project is located west of Port Hope (Figure 2, Appendix A).
The lands include a large area, but only portions of the holdings shown on Figure 2 (Appendix A)
are slated for disturbance. The site of the New Wastewater Treatment Facility and LTWMF, to the
north of Lakeshore Road, consists of agricultural fields, with a hedgerow down the middle of the
site. The agricultural fields were not active in 2013, and had gone fallow, growing up with species
such as Horseweed (Conyza Canadensis), Yellow Foxtail (Setaria pumila ssp. Pumila) and Witch
Grass (Panicum capillare ssp. Capillare). The hedgerow consisted of Staghorn Sumac (Rhus
typhina), European Buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) and Lilac (Syringa vulgaris), with scattered
ash trees.
South of Lakeshore Road the East and West Gorges and Water Treatment Area is dominated by
cultural meadow (CUM1 and CUM1-1), cultural thicket (CUT1), mixed forest (FOM4-1), steep
bluffs along the lakeshore (BLO1) and a narrow strip of open beach at the bottom of the bluffs
(BBO1 along the lake). An important inclusion described but not mapped in AMEC 2006 b is a
small fen associated with the bluff habitat.
Other areas owned by the federal government adjacent to these sites include agricultural fields
(including some hayfields), meadows, forest, swamp and marsh. Watercourses occur in the
northwest, southwest and southeast portions of the federally owned lands.
3.2.1.1 New Wastewater Treatment Facility and Long Term Waste Management Facility
The agricultural fields on the proposed site of the Long Term Waste Management Facility
(LTWMF) are currently not suitable for Bobolink, Eastern Meadowlark or Grasshopper Sparrow.
The vegetation was too sparse and grass species present are not preferred by grassland birds.
There is potential that, if left fallow, these fields could succeed into suitable grassland habitat
within a few years.
Potential habitat for Monarch at the LTWMF would be limited to strips of fallow vegetation along
hedgerows.
3.8
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
As a habitat generalist, Eastern Milksnake may be present at the LTWMF; however, the fields at
this site provide limited potential for the species. As such, habitat for the Eastern Milksnake has
not been identified on this site.
3.2.1.2 East and West Gorges and Water Treatment Area
There was no evidence of seasonal flooding or habitats suitable for the Western Chorus Frog. This
species is not expected to be present.
Suitable habitat for the Monarch occurs throughout the East and West Gorges and Water
Treatment Area, within open habitats.
The East and West Gorges and Water Treatment Area lacked suitable wetland habitat for
Blanding’s Turtle and no suitable coastal marshes occurred within 2 km of the site. This species is
not expected to occur in immediate vicinity to the Port Granby project. Likewise, wetland
habitat for the Snapping Turtle was not present.
Port Granby is outside the known range of the Eastern Hog-nosed Snake, and this species is not
expected to be present.
As a habitat generalist, Eastern Milksnake may be present at the Port Granby site. This species
may occur in the treed areas close to the lake shore. However, potential hibernacula or egg
laying sites were not identified within the proposed work area.
No deciduous woodlands suitable for the Wood Thrush were present. However, treed areas and
thickets north of Lakeshore Road may provide suitable habitat for the Eastern Wood-Pewee.
Mature forest habitat is limited in the East and West Gorges and Water Treatment Area; mature
trees occur individually and in hedgerows. In southern Ontario, bats show a strong preference
for roosting in buildings or other structures. However, bat species at risk may occasionally roost in
tree cavities or under loose bark. In addition, bats may forage at the Port Granby site.
3.2.1.3 Other Areas Owned by the Federal Government
Butternut trees were observed on other areas owned by the federal government, including
hybrids and purebreds. The trees occurred outside the existing and proposed facilities, however,
so they are not expected to be impacted.
Monarch is likely to occur throughout the other areas owned by the federal government within
open habitats. As a habitat generalist, Eastern Milksnake may also occur within the meadows,
forest, swamp and marsh.
3.9
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
Two large areas of grassland habitat occur south of Lakeshore Road to the east and west of the
existing waste facility. These areas are likely to be used by Bobolink, Eastern Meadowlark and
potentially Grasshopper Sparrow.
Wetlands may provide habitat for Western Chorus Frog and Snapping Turtle. In particular,
Snapping Turtles would be expected to occur in wetlands associated with the watercourses.
Species at risk that may occur within the forested habitat include Eastern Wood-Pewee, Redheaded Woodpecker, Wood Thrush, Little Brown Myotis, Northern Myotis and Tri-coloured Bat.
3.2.2
Port Hope Project
3.2.2.1 Welcome Long-term Waste Management Facility
The Welcome site (Figure 3, Appendix A) contains disturbed areas from past industrial uses and
from more recent and ongoing activities associated with PHAI. Some previously disturbed areas
have succeeded into cultural thicket habitat. Mowed grassy areas occur in the southern portion
of the site. A treed areas comprised of mixed forest occurs along the western boundary and
extending into the site. A second tree area, comprised of mixed forest, deciduous forest and
coniferous swamp occurs along the northern boundary of the site.
An active water treatment facility is located in the northwestern corner of the site, which
includes several water treatment ponds.
Two butternut trees occur on the Welcome Long-term Waste Management Facility site. Both
were determined to be purebred. One occurs in the mixed forest in the western portion of the
site and one in the open disturbed central area.
Habitat for the Monarch would occur in pockets of meadow or thicket vegetation.
The swamp community on the Welcome site that contains standing water through the spring
(i.e. until mid-May) may provide suitable habitat for the Western Chorus Frog. As such, the
swamp on site should be considered protected residence under the SARA. There is also potential
for this species to breed within the disturbed areas, where seasonal flooding occurs. However,
the disturbed areas would likely not be included in the protected residence.
As a habitat generalist, the Eastern Milksnake may be present throughout the Welcome site.
However, if present, this species is most likely to be associated with the woodland areas. Logs
and stumps suitable for egg laying were observed in the woodland communities. Potential
hibernacula sites within the woodlands were not observed, but features such as animal burrows
may be present. The old foundations at the end of Baulch Road may also provide a potential
hibernacula site for the Eastern Milksnake.
3.10
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
The Welcome site generally lacks the sandy, well drained soils preferred by Eastern Hog-nosed
Snake. It is also unlikely this site, located adjacent to a 400-series highway, could maintain a
population of Eastern Hog-nosed Snakes. As such, this species is not expected to be present.
Given the managed nature of the water treatment ponds, it is not expected they will provide
high quality habitat for the Snapping Turtle; however there is potential the species could be
present.
The forest and swamp on the Welcome site may provide habitat for Wood Thrush, Eastern WoodPewee and Red-headed Woodpecker. Field surveys during the breeding bird season (i.e. June)
would be required to confirm the presence or absence of these species. However, a
conservative approach can be taken to assume habitat for these species is present.
The open grassy fields within the Welcome site have been maintained by mowing, with few small
pocket of unmown meadow habitat. During the September 24, 2013 site visit, these fields did not
appear to in a suitable state to provide habitat for Bobolink, Eastern Meadowlark or
Grasshopper Sparrow. However, records of Bobolink and Eastern Meadowlark have been made
in these areas in the past. Presence of these species may depend on annual maintenance of
the grasses on site.
Bat species at risk (Little Brown Myotis, Northern Myotis and Tri-coloured Bat) may be found in the
forest and swamp on the Welcome site. These bat species at risk may establish maternity roost
colonies in tree cavities. However, in southern Ontario, they show a strong preference for
roosting in buildings or other structures. A conservative approach can be taken to assume the
habitat for these species is present in the forest and swamp habitats on the Welcome site.
3.2.2.2 Highland Drive Sites
The Highland Drive Sites include sites along Highland Drive Area, Highland Drive South Ravine
and Highland Drive North (Pine Street Extension) (Figure 4, Appendix A).
The Pine Street Extension and the Highland Drive Area are dominated by cultural meadow
habitat (CUM1-1) largely surrounded by developed areas with deciduous forest (FOD4) and
Coniferous Forest (FOC4-2) to the north. Scattered shrubby and treed areas occur as inclusions in
the cultural meadow habitats, especially on the steeper slopes. A large wetland occurs to the
north of the Pine Street Extension sites.
The Highland Drive South Ravine site includes Cultural Woodland (CUW1) and Cattail Mineral
Shallow Marsh (MAS2-1) communities, surrounded by developed residential areas. The
vegetation communities in the Highland Drive South Ravine appear to be subject to various
levels of maintenance, including removal of downed woody debris, retention of ponded areas
in the marsh and some landscape maintenance.
3.11
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
Butternut has been identified in the Highland Drive South Ravine; including both hybrids and
purebreds.
Suitable habitat for Monarch occurs in open areas throughout the Highland Drive Area and Pine
Street Extension sites.
Eastern Milksnake can occur in a variety of habitats and may occur in the meadow of the
Highland Drive Former Municipal Landfill or the Highland Drive South Ravine. However, no
potential hibernacula or egg laying sites were identified within the proposed work area, in part
due to the apparent maintenance within the woodland.
Snapping Turtle may occur in the ponds within the Highland Drive South Ravine, or in the
wetlands to the north of the Pine Street Extension sites.
The maintained nature of the woodland in the Highland Drive South Ravine, with limited
understorey and removal of downed woody debris, would not be suitable habitat for the Wood
Thrush. However, the ravine does provide potential habitat for the Eastern Wood-Pewee.
Potential habitat for the Red-headed Woodpecker occurs at the woodland edges of the
Highland Drive Area and Pine Street Extension sites; although the potential for this species to
occur on the site is low.
The cultural meadow found at the Highland Drive Area and Highland Pine Street Extension sites is
greater than 4 ha in size and, therefore, could constitute protected habitat under the ESA for
Bobolink, Eastern Meadowlark and Grasshopper Sparrow.
Highland Drive South Ravine provides woodland habitat, where Little Brown Myotis, Northern
Myotis and Tri-coloured Bat may be found. These bat species at risk may establish maternity roost
roosting in buildings or other structures. It is expected that in an urban environment within the
Town of Port Hope, most bats will roost in buildings. Regardless, although the Highland Drive
South Ravine is not expected to support a maternity colony, individual bats may occasionally
roost in tree cavities or under loose bark. In addition, bats may forage in the ravine.
3.2.2.3 Central Area Sites
The Central Area includes both the Strachan St. Consolidation Site and the Lions Recreation
Centre Park (Figure 5, Appendix A).
The Strachan St. Consolidation Site is a maintained grass mound surrounded by a dry –fresh
Deciduous Forest (FOD4), and residential development.
The Lions Recreation Centre Park is a building and associated parking lot surrounded by fresh to
sugar maple deciduous forest (FOD 6-5) and fresh-moist willow lowland deciduous forest (FOD73).
3.12
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
The Central Area includes sandy soils with an exposed sandy slope west of the Lions Recreation
Centre. While the sandy habitat conditions appear suitable for Eastern Hog-nosed Snake, it is a
small habitat patch surrounded by urban area. Given that the habitat in the Central Area is
small, isolated and surrounded by urban development, it is not expected to support habitat for
Eastern Milksnake.
Butternut trees previously identified at this location were determined to be hybrids. As such, they
are not protected under the ESA or SARA.
Suitable habitat for Monarch occurs along the woodland edges of the Lions Club Recreation
Centre.
The Central Area contains relatively small, fragmented woodland communities surrounded by
residential development. These small, fragmented woodlands are not considered suitable for
Wood Thrush, however, they provide potential habitat for the Eastern Wood-Pewee.
The Central Area provides woodland habitat, where Little Brown Myotis, Northern Myotis and Tricoloured Bat may be found. These bat species at risk may establish maternity roost colonies in
tree cavities. However, in southern Ontario, they show a strong preference for roosting in
buildings or other structures. It is expected that in an urban environment within the Town of Port
Hope, most bats will roost in buildings. Regardless, although the Central Area is not expected to
support a maternity colony, individual bats may occasionally roost in tree cavities or under loose
bark. In addition, bats may forage in or near the small woodlands adjacent to these sites.
3.2.2.4 Waterfront Area Sites – West
The West Waterfront Area (Figure 6, Appendix A) includes the Port Hope Harbour, Centre Pier,
CN and CP Viaducts Area, Mill Street South (Firefighter’s Museum), West Beach Waterworks,
Alexander Street Ravine and Former Coal Gasification Plant.
The West Waterfront Area is predominantly comprised of industrial lands, including industrial
buildings (several of which are historical), storage yards, and the railway viaducts. It is Stantec’s
understanding that two buildings at the Mill Street South Site may be removed, but that no other
buildings are proposed for removal for the purpose of the low-level radioactive waste (LLRW)
remediation work. The shoreline within the industrial area is comprised of concrete and/or
armored walls. PHAI activities will include in-water works within the inner Port Hope Harbour.
Relatively natural habitats in the Waterfront Area include the Alexander Street Ravine and the
West Beach.
Industrial Area
The Industrial Area includes the Port Hope Harbour, Centre Pier, CN and CP Viaducts Area, Mill
Street South (Firefighter’s Museum) and Former Coal Gasification Plant.
3.13
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
Butternut on the Former Coal Gasification Plant and Mill Street South sites were determined to be
hybrids and therefore not protected under the ESA or SARA.
Chimney Swift may roost or nest where suitable structures (e.g. chimneys) occur on the industrial
buildings. In particular, the historical buildings may provide opportunities for nesting and or
roosting. However, the two buildings to be removed at the Mill Street South Site do not have any
chimneys or similar structures that could be used by Chimney Swifts. As such, no Chimney Swift
nest or roost habitat occurs directly within areas where PHAI activities are proposed.
The industrial buildings may also provide nesting sites for Barn Swallows. An inspection of the two
buildings on the Mill Street South Site on Sept 24, 2013 did not detect any evidence of past nests
of Barn Swallow. As such, no Barn Swallow nest habitat was identified at the site where PHAI
activities are proposed.
Common Nighthawk may nest within the industrial area, in particular if flat gravel roofs are
available. The two buildings the Mill Street South Site do not provide suitable, flat nesting
surfaces.
Little Brown, Northern Myotis and Tri-coloured Bats are likely to roost in some of the industrial
buildings in the Waterfront Area; in particular the historic buildings. Habitat assessment
conducted on September 24, 2013 found the two buildings on the Mill Street South Site provided
potential roost sites for bat species. However, field surveys in June would be required to confirm
whether bats are roosting in the buildings.
There is limited potential for American Eel or Snapping Turtle to occur, given the low quality
habitat in the harbour.
Alexander Street Ravine
The Alexander Street Ravine site is located in a dry to fresh Sugar maple oak deciduous forest
(FOD5-3) as mapped in AMEC 2005 b. The bulk of the area to be remediated is on steep slopes
and along the floodplain of a small creek upstream of the railway tracks. The area to be
remediated has been disturbed in the past and is dominated by younger trees and shrubs
including various willows, Manitoba maple and walnut hybrids.
Butternut trees previously identified at this location were determined to be hybrids. As such, they
are not protected under the ESA or SARA.
Suitable habitat for Monarch occurs along the woodland edges of the Alexander Street Ravine.
Eastern Milksnake can occur in a variety of habitats and may occur in the Alexander Street
Ravine. However, potential hibernacula or egg laying sites were not identified within the
proposed work area.
3.14
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
The Alexander Street Ravine is in a relatively large woodland bounded by residential
development a golf course and rail lines. The woodland surrounding the Alexander Street Ravine
site is generally mid-aged to mature with a well-developed understorey. It provides potential
habitat for both Wood Thrush and Eastern Wood-Pewee.
The Alexander Street Ravine includes woodland habitat, where Little Brown Myotis, Northern
Myotis and Tri-coloured Bat may be found. These bat species at risk may establish maternity roost
roosting in buildings or other structures. It is expected that in an urban environment within the
Town of Port Hope, most bats will roost in buildings. The Alexander Street Ravine is not expected
to support a maternity colony, however, individual bats may occasionally roost in tree cavities or
under loose bark. In addition, bats may forage in or near the woodlands that surround the
ravine.
West Beach / Former Waterworks
The beach habitat at the West Beach/Former Waterworks site is mapped in AMEC 2005 b as
Birch Shrub Fen (FES1-2) Mineral Treed Beach (BBT1) and Sea Rocket Sand Open Beach (BBO1-1).
These communities may provide suitable habitat for the Eastern Hog-nosed Snake. However,
there are no recent records of this species along the Port Hope shoreline (or elsewhere along the
Lake Ontario shoreline). Given that the site includes the public beach and parkland where
people frequent, it would be expected that if Hog-nosed Snakes were present at the West
Beach/Former Waterworks site there would be current records; in particular for an easily
recognizable species with characteristic defense displays. However, in the absence of targeted
surveys to confirm the presence/absence of Eastern Hog-nosed Snake, a conservative
approach is recommended as discussed in Section 4.0 of this report.
Suitable habitat for Monarch occurs throughout the site.
Eastern Milksnake can occur in a variety of habitats and may occur in the West Beach area.
However, potential hibernacula or egg laying sites were not identified within the proposed work
area.
3.2.2.5 East Beach Area
The East Beach Area (Figure 7, Appendix A) includes the Chemetron Lagoon, the Sewage
Treatment Plant and the Sewage Treatment Plant Temporary Storage Site.
The cultural habitat surrounding the Chemetron Lagoon is not mapped in AMEC 2005 b but it
was observed in 2013 to be a small area of meadow with scattered shrubs. The Sewage
Treatment Plant bunker is covered in opportunistic weedy species such as pigweed and the
temporary storage site is covered with a tarp and devoid of vegetation. There is no natural
habitat that could be potential SAR habitat associated directly with these sites.
3.15
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
There is shallow marsh (MAS2-1) and open water (SAF1-3) habitat adjacent to the remediation
sites. Open marsh habitat provides potential habitat for the Blanding’s Turtle. While Blanding’s
Turtle will use dug ponds, the Chemetron Lagoon is not considered suitable habitat. The habitat
on the East Waterfront Site itself is unlikely to be of suitable size to support a Blanding’s Turtle
population. No large coastal wetlands, suitable to support a population, occur within 2 km of the
site. Therefore, it is unlikely that Blanding’s Turtle would occur at the East Waterfront Site.
However, in the absence of targeted surveys to confirm the presence/absence, a conservative
approach is recommended and the marsh and surrounding upland habitat should be assumed
to be habitat for the Blanding’s Turtle.
The shallow marsh (MAS2-1) and open water (SAF1-3) habitat adjacent to the remediation sites
may also provide habitat for the Snapping Turtle.
The marsh, thicket and small patches of meadow would provide suitable habitat for the
Monarch.
Chorus Frog habitat may be present in the marsh and swamp habitat to the east of the
Chemetron Lagoon. The lagoon itself is too deep and lacks suitable egg laying sites to provide
viable breeding habitat for Chorus Frogs. The meadows surrounding the lagoon do not include
the wet depressions that would be required to support Chorus Frog breeding habitat. Any use of
the proposed rehabilitation site by Chorus Frogs would be limited to transient foraging. To be
conservative, exclusion fencing and animal encounter management measures are
recommended.
Eastern Milksnake can occur in a variety of habitats and may occur at the East Waterfront Site.
However, potential hibernacula or egg laying sites were not identified within the proposed work
area.
The scattered trees at the site provide potential habitat for the Red-headed Woodpecker;
although the potential for this species to occur on the site is low.
No mature forest habitat occurs at the East Waterfront Site; however trees occur individually or in
hedgerows. In southern Ontario, bats show a strong preference for roosting in buildings or other
structures. However, bat species at risk may occasionally roost in the Waterfront East Site in tree
cavities or under loose bark. In addition, bat may forage at the site, in particular near the open
marsh.
3.16
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Regulatory Consideration and Recommended Approach
May 7, 2014
4.0
The following sections provide approaches on how to address species at risk and their habitat
through the ESA and SARA. The ESA would apply to all non-federal lands on which Port Hope
and Port Granby Project activities are proposed. The SARA would only apply on the Welcome
Long-term Waste Management Facility, the highland Drive (Pine Street extension) and the Port
Granby site; federal lands that are owned by AECL.
4.1
RECOMMENDED APPROACH BY SPECIES
No habitat for the Chimney Swift or Barn Swallow is anticipated to be impacted by the Port
Hope or Port Granby Projects. As such, recommended regulatory approaches for these species
have not been included.
4.1.1
Monarch
The monarch is listed a special concern both federally and provincially. As such, the species and
its habitat are not protected under the SARA or ESA.
Management considerations for the Monarch would include retaining areas that provide
foraging habitat for adults or food plants (i.e. milkweed) for larva. Given habitat for the Monarch
is widespread, it is not critical to protect the full extent of suitable habitat on each site. However,
to the extent possible, area of meadow with wildflowers could be retained; this may include
retaining portions of meadow habitat at the edges of work spaces.
4.1.2
Butternut
Hybrid butternuts are not protected under the ESA or SARA. As such, no SAR authorization is
required to remove these trees.
Where purebred butternuts occur on federal lands, authorization under the SARA is required. This
would be in the form of a SARA permit and would likely require compensation measures (i.e.
butternut plantings).
Where purebred butternuts occur on private lands, authorization under the ESA will be required.
Under the provincial process, butternuts are assessed into one of three categories: 1) Unhealthy,
2) Healthy and 3) Achievable. Category 1 trees can be removed without an ESA permit.
However, a permit under the ESA is required to remove category 2 or 3 threes. Alternatively,
there is a registration process under Ontario Regulation 242/08 which can be used to remove 10
or fewer Category 2 trees. Regardless of the permitting or registration process, compensation
measures would be required (i.e. butternut plantings).
4.1
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
The permitting process to remove butternuts is further detailed in the Butternut Health Assessment
Reports.
4.1.3
Western Chorus Frog
The provincial and federal approaches to the status of the Western Chorus Frog differ. Federally,
the Great Lakes/St. Lawrence – Canadian Shield population is a threatened species. Provincially,
the species is considered not at risk. Sub-populations of the species are also not recognized
provincially. As such, this species is only protected under the SARA and only on federal lands.
Currently, the Western Chorus Frog does not have Critical Habitat as defined by a recovery
strategy or in an action plan. As such, only the “residence” of the species would be protected
under the SARA. In the case of the Western Chorus Frog, the residence could be considered the
wetland where it resides and breeds. Targeted surveys conducted in April could be used to
confirm presence/absence of the species. However, in the absence of surveys, the conservative
approach is recommended by assuming all wetland communities on federal lands may provide
protected habitat for the Western Chorus Frog. As such, encroachment into wetland habitat
should be avoided. Exclusionary fencing (i.e. silt fencing) is recommended along wetland
boundaries, between the work sites and wetlands; both to protect the natural areas and
prevent frogs from entering the work sites. If works are to take place in early spring, fencing
should be in place prior to the Western Chorus Frog nesting period (i.e. March 1st).
Where encroachment into wetland habitat cannot be avoided, targeted surveys to determine
presence/absence are recommended. If presence is confirmed, consultation with Canadian
Wildlife Services is recommended to discuss authorization (i.e. permitting) under the SARA.
4.1.4
Snapping Turtle
Snapping Turtle is listed a special concern both federally and provincially. As such, the species
and its habitat are not protected under the SARA or ESA.
Management considerations for the Snapping Turtle include habitat protection and measures to
avoid incidental mortality. To the extent possible, all works should take place outside of
wetlands and watercourses; as these areas may provide habitat for Snapping Turtles. Silt fencing
is recommended between along the wetland boundary, between the work sites and wetland
habitat to avoid encroachment or siltation into the wetlands. Fencing should be in place prior
to the Snapping Turtle nesting season (i.e. May 15th). The silt fencing will also act as an
exclusionary barrier to prevent Snapping Turtles from entering the worksite, to avoid incidental
mortality.
Where in water works are required, a turtle rescue within the worksite should be undertaken.
Turtle rescues should only be undertaken by a qualified biologist with applicable wildlife permits.
4.2
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
4.1.5
Blanding’s Turtle
Blanding’s Turtle is not expected to be found on the federally owned lands; as such, a
recommended approach under the SARA is not applicable.
Blanding’s Turtle receives general habitat protection under the ESA. MNR has developed a
General Habitat Description for Blanding’s Turtle, which protects wetland habitat, nesting sites
and hibernation sites. A buffer of up to 250 m of upland habitat around the wetland habitat is
also included in the protected habitat.
Works with wetland habitat where Blanding’s Turtles that has the potential damage the habitat
and therefore should be avoided. If works within the wetland cannot be avoided, further
consultation with MNR is recommended to ensure appropriate authorization under the ESA.
Authorization under the ESA would likely involve registering under the Threats to Health and
Safety – Not Imminent exemption (Table 1, Appendix B) in Ontario Regulation 242/08.
Some activities could occur within upland buffer, if measures were put in place to protect the
function of the habitat and the turtles themselves. In the case of PHAI activities, the rehabilitation
of industrial sites adjacent to wetlands is unlikely to damage the habitat, as industrial sites would
be of limited value to Blanding’s Turtles. The primary concern during the PHAI activities would be
protection of any turtles that may enter work sites. As such, exclusionary fencing (i.e. silt fencing)
is recommended between the work sites and wetland habitat; both to protect the natural areas
and prevent turtles from entering the work sites.
4.1.6
Eastern Milksnake and Eastern Hog-nosed Snake
Eastern Hog-nosed Snakes are not expected to be found on the federally owned lands, as such,
a recommended approach under the SARA is not applicable.
Eastern Hog-nosed Snake receives general habitat protection under the ESA. Where the species
may occur, work should be limited in natural areas such as beach habitat, wetlands or
woodlands. Exclusionary fencing (i.e. silt fencing) is recommended between the work sites and
the natural areas; both to protect the natural areas and prevent snakes from entering the work
sites.
Eastern Milksnake is currently not protected under the ESA or SARA, but is expected to be
reassessed in 2014. Should it be added to a schedule under SARA, the species’ residence (i.e.
egg laying sites and hibernacula) would become protected. If Eastern Milksnake was to be
added to the SARO List under the ESA, it would receive general habitat protection. It is currently
unclear what approach MNR may take in habitat protection for this species, as it is a habitat
generalist. Should Eastern Milksnake be added to the SARO List, further consultation with MNR is
recommended. However, it is anticipated that measures to protect individuals of the species,
their egg-laying sites and hibernacula should ensure compliance with the ESA.
4.3
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
4.1.7
Bobolink, Eastern Meadowlark and Grasshopper Sparrow
Bobolink, Eastern Meadowlark and Grasshopper Sparrow are currently not on a schedule under
the SARA. As such, no authorization under the SARA would be required for these species at this
time. It is unknown when they will be added to a SARA schedule and receive protection.
However, should they receive protection under the SARA during PHAI activities, the mitigation
measures for vegetation clearing discussed below should satisfy the requirements of the SARA.
Under the ESA, habitat for Bobolink and Eastern Meadowlark is currently protected. Both have
general habitat protection. Grasshopper Sparrow is currently not at risk in Ontario, but may be
added to the SARO list in the near future. As it has similar habitat requirements to Bobolink and
Eastern Meadowlark, it has been included here. Based on the habitat assessments conducted in
September 2013, no protected habitat for these species was identified within any of the work
sites. As such, no authorization under the ESA is required for habitat removal.
However, there is potential for the open fields in the Welcome and Port Granby Long-term
Management Facilities to regenerate into suitable habitat, if current land management
practices (i.e. mowing and agricultural crop production) were to be discontinued. Likewise,
should the field be converted into hay product, the open fields would also become protected
habitat. In the event fields are allowed to regenerate into Bobolink and Eastern Meadowlark
habitat, authorization under the ESA would be required to remove the habitat for subsequent
works. Such authorization under the ESA would likely involve registering under the Bobolink and
Eastern Meadowlark exemption (Table 1, Appendix B) in Ontario Regulation 242/08. The
authorization under the ESA would require habitat compensation measures.
Although small habitat patches (less than 4 ha) are not considered protected habitat under the
ESA, Eastern Meadowlark will sometime use such small habitat patches. If nesting in such small
habitat patches, the nest itself would be protected under the ESA. To avoid incidental damage
to an Eastern Meadowlark nest, wherever works in grassy areas are proposed the vegetation
should be stripped outside of the Eastern Meadowlark breeding season, which occurs from April
1 to July 31.
4.1.8
Wood Thrush and Eastern Wood-Pewee
Wood Thrush and Eastern Wood-Pewee are currently not protected under the ESA or SARA.
Wood Thrush has been assessed by COSEWIC as threatened; it is unknown when the species
may be added to a schedule under the SARA. Eastern Wood-Pewee has been assessed by
COSEWIC as special concern, so federally it would not receive protection.
Both Wood Thrush and Eastern Wood-Pewee were assessed by COSSARO in 2013, but the results
of the assessment have not yet been made public. However, it is expected, one or both of these
species may be added to the SARO list in 2014. If the species were to be designated as
threatened or endangered in Ontario, they would receive general habitat protection. This could
occur as early as spring 2014.
4.4
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
If and when these species receive habitat protection, removal of portions of suitable woodland
habitat would require authorization under the ESA. Authorization under the ESA would likely
involve registering under the Threats to Health and Safety – Not Imminent exemption (Table 1,
Appendix B) in Ontario Regulation 242/08.
4.1.9
Little Brown Myotis, Northern Myotis and Tri-coloured Bat
Little Brown Myotis and Northern Myotis are protected under the ESA; both receive general
habitat protection. Federally, Little Brown Myotis, Northern Myotis and Tri-coloured Bat have
been assessed by COSEWIC as endangered, but have not yet been added to a schedule under
SARA. As such, they currently receive no legal protection federally.
Limited tree removal is not expected to damage or destroy habitat for bat species at risk. In
particular in urban landscapes where roost sites are abundant and not a limiting factor in the
local landscape. In most cases, bats are expected to be using buildings as maternity roosts, over
tree cavities. Likewise, limited tree removal is not expected to negatively impact the foraging
opportunities at any particular site; bats typically prefer to forage in forest edges or clearings as
opposed to dense cover.
Although bat habitat is not expected to be impacted by limited tree clearing, there is a risk of
accidental harm to individuals of the species during tree clearing activities. As such, tree
clearing should be avoided from May 1 through August 30, when bats may use trees as roosts.
Where removal of buildings is required, targeted surveys are recommended to determine if the
building is used as a maternity colony for bat species at risk. Such surveys would take place in
June, during the maternity season for bats. If the timelines of the Project do not allow for surveys
to take place in June, a conservative approach could be taken to assume the buildings provide
habitat for bat species at risk. If assumed to be habitat, authorization under the ESA would be
required prior to removing the buildings. It is recommended the Threats to Health and Safety –
Not Imminent exemption (Table 1, Appendix B) in Ontario Regulation 242/08 be used. To use this
exemption, a Notice of Activity Form must be submitted to MNR online. Measures must be put in
place to minimize impacts to the species (i.e. remove buildings between October 1 and March
31 when bats would not be present). Habitat compensation (i.e. installation of bat boxes) would
also be required in the local landscape.
4.2
RECOMMENDED APPROACH AT EACH SITE
4.2.1
Port Granby Project
The Port Granby Project is located on federally owned lands and, therefore, SARA is applicable;
however, the ESA does not apply on these lands.
4.5
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
4.2.1.1 New Wastewater Treatment Facility and LTWMF
If current agricultural practices continue in the fields on the LTWMF, they would not provide
protected habitat for Bobolink, Eastern Meadowlark or Grasshopper Sparrow.
To the extent possible, meadow habitat could be maintained along edges of the facility for the
Monarch.
4.2.1.1 East and West Gorges and Water Treatment Area
The Eastern Milksnake may occur on the LTWMF. Although the habitat of this species is currently
not protected under the SARA, the following mitigation is recommended:
Exclusionary fencing should also be used around work sites, to prevent Eastern Milksnakes from
entering the work sites.
To the extent possible, parcels of meadow habitat could be maintained for the Monarch.
The Bobolink, Eastern Meadowlark and Grasshopper Sparrow are not yet listed under SARA and
therefore the habitat is not currently afforded protection. Regardless, to avoid harm to active
nests, the following mitigation is recommended:
x
Strip grassy vegetation outside of the breeding bird season (i.e. April 1 to July 31).
Wooded areas provide potential habitat for the Eastern Wood-Pewee. This is a species of
special concerns and currently not on a schedule under SARA, as such the habitat for Eastern
Wood-Pewee is not protected. Regardless, to avoid harm to active nests, the following
mitigation is recommended:
x
Conduct tree removal outside of the breeding bird season (i.e. April 1 to July 31)
Potential habitat for bat species at risk is present at the Port Granby site, including mature trees
that occur individually and in hedgerows. The Little Brown Myotis, Northern Myotis and Tricoloured Bats are currently not on a schedule or protected under the SARA. Regardless, the
PHAI activities are not expected to damage the habitat; specifically the availability of roost sites
and foraging opportunities would not be negatively affected. However, to avoid harm to
individuals of the species during PHAI activities, the following mitigation is recommended:
x
Conduct any required tree removal outside of the bat active season (i.e. April 1 to
September 30).
4.2.1.2 Other areas owned by the federal government
No activities are proposed on other lands owned by the federal government. As such, no SARA
authorizations would be required for these lands.
4.6
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
4.2.2
Port Hope Project
4.2.2.1 Welcome Long-term Waste Management Facility
The Welcome Long-term Waste Management Facility is located on federally owned lands and
therefore SARA is applicable; however, the ESA does not apply on these lands.
Butternut on the Welcome site would be protected under the SARA. As such, removal of the
trees would require permitting under the SARA. Permit requirements may require compensation
plantings. It is expected that the PHAI coordinate the ESA and SARA requirements as
recommended in correspondence.
To the extent possible, parcels of meadow habitat could be maintained for Monarch.
The swamp community on this site may provide habitat for Western Chorus Frog and could
constitute protected “residence” of the species under the SARA. Western Chorus Frogs may also
occur where flooding occurs in the disturbed areas. Although the disturbed areas would likely
not constitute protected habitat, works in these areas in early spring could result in harm to the
frogs or tadpoles. The following mitigation measures are recommended to avoid harm to
Western Chorus Frog or its habitats:
x
Install exclusionary fencing between work sites and the swamp habitat. The fencing is
intended to protect the habitat from encroachment and to prevent frogs from entering the
work site;
x
Avoid works in flooded portions of the disturbed areas in early spring (March through May). If
works in these areas cannot be avoided in the early spring, exclusionary fencing should be
installed prior to March to prevent frogs from entering the area; or
x
If targeted surveys were completed in April and found the species was absent from the site,
the mitigation above would not be required.
If works in confirmed or potential habitat for the Western Chorus Frog cannot be avoided,
Canadian Wildlife Services should be consulted, in accordance with Section 79 (1) of the SARA.
Eastern Milksnake may occur on the Welcome site, including potential egg laying sites and
hibernacula. Although the habitat of this species is currently not protected under the SARA, the
following mitigation is recommended:
x
Install exclusionary fencing between work sites and the woodland habitat. The fencing is
intended to protect the habitat from encroachment and to prevent snakes from entering
the work site; and
x
Avoidance of the old foundations found at the end of Baulch Road; it is located just inside
the project fencing. To determine if the foundation is used a hibernacula for snakes, surveys
could be completed in April to look for emerging snakes. Alternatively a habitat assessment
4.7
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
could be completed; foundations could be excluded as potential habitat if there were no
entry points below the frost line. In the event hibernaculum is confirmed, site specific plan
should be developed to avoid the hibernacula or consider compensation in the immediate
area.
x
If the foundations cannot be avoided, targeted surveys in April are recommended to ensure
these structures are not being used as hibernacula by Eastern Milksnake.
Snapping Turtle has limited potential to occur within the water treatment ponds. If any in-water
works that could harm turtles are to take place, a turtle rescue should be considered.
Wooded areas on the Welcome site provide potential habitat for the Wood Thrush, Eastern
Wood-Pewee and Red-headed Woodpecker. Red-headed Woodpecker and its residence (i.e.
active nest) are currently protected under the SARA. Habitat for the Wood Thrush and Eastern
Wood-Pewee are currently not protected under the SARA. In the event they are added to
schedule 1 of the SARA, the Wood Thrush and its residence would receive protection. It is
Stantec’s understanding that encroachment into the forest and swamp communities will not be
required for the construction of the long-term storage facility. As such, no direct impact to the
habitat of Wood Thrush, Eastern Wood-Pewee or Red-headed Woodpecker is anticipated. If
encroachment into woodland cannot be avoided, further consultation with Canadian Wildlife
Services is recommended, in accordance with Section 79 (1) of the SARA.
The Bobolink, Eastern Meadowlark and Grasshopper Sparrow are not yet listed under SARA and
therefore, habitat for these species is currently not afforded protection. Regardless, to avoid
harm to active nests, the following mitigation is recommended:
x
If current mowing practices continue, begin in the spring before the start of the breeding
season (i.e. April 1st).
x
Where mowing has not occurred, strip grassy vegetation outside of the breeding bird season
(i.e. April 1 to July 31).
Potential habitat for bat species at risk is present within the wooded areas on the Welcome site.
The Little Brown Myotis, Northern Myotis and Tri-coloured Bats are currently not on a schedule or
protected under the SARA. Regardless, it is Stantec’s understanding that encroachment into the
forest and swamp communities will not be required for the construction of the long-term storage
facility. However, if tree removal is required outside of the wooded areas, the following
x
4.8
September 30).
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
4.2.2.2 Highland Drive Sites
Highland Drive Area and Highland Drive South Ravine occur on privately owned lands and as
such the ESA applies. The SARA would not apply on these sites that are off federally owned
lands. The Pine Street Extension sites occurs on federally owned lands and therefore SARA is
applicable; however, the ESA does not apply on these lands.
Purebred butternut trees occur on the Highland Drive South Ravine. As there are less than ten
Category 2 trees that will be impacted by the proposed works, authorization under the ESA
could be obtained under Ontario Regulation 242/08. Further details on the registration process
are provided in a Butternut Health Assessment Report completed under separate cover.
Although no protected habitats for Eastern Milksnake were identified within the Highland Drive
Area, there is potential for individuals of these species to occur. To avoid harm to individuals of
the species during PHAI activities, the following mitigation is recommended:
x
Install exclusionary fencing between work sites and natural areas (i.e. wooded areas), to
avoid Eastern Milksnakes entering work sites.
Snapping Turtle has the potential to occur in the ponds and marsh habitat within the Highland
Drive South Ravine and the wetland to the north of the Pine Street Extension sites. Although the
habitat of this species is not protected, the following mitigation measures are recommended:
x
Install exclusionary fencing between work sites and the wetland habitat. The fencing is
intended to protect the habitat from encroachment and to prevent snakes from entering
the work site. Fencing should be installed prior to the turtle nesting season (i.e. May 15th);
and
x
If in-water works are required, conduct a turtle rescue to remove Snapping Turtles from the
site prior to commencement of the works.
Potential habitats for Bobolink, Eastern Meadowlark and Grasshopper Sparrow occur on the
Highland Drive Area and Pine Street Extension Sites. On the federally owned Pine Street
Extension Site, these species are currently not protected under SARA. Regardless, to avoid harm
to active nests, the following mitigation is recommended:
x
If current mowing practices continue, begin in the spring before the start of the breeding
season (i.e. April 1st).
x
Where mowing has not occurred, strip grassy vegetation outside of the breeding bird season
(i.e. April 1 to July 31).
On the privately owned Highland Drive Area, the following approach is recommended for
Bobolink and Eastern Meadowlark:
4.9
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
x
Conduct breeding bird surveys in June to determine the presence of these species;
x
If present, authorization under the ESA would be required. Authorization could be obtained
under the Ontario Regulation 242/08 for Bobolink and Eastern Meadowlark; and
x
Develop a management plan for Bobolink and Eastern Meadowlark, including habitat
compensation.
The Highland Drive South Ravine provides potential habitat for Eastern Wood Pewee. Habitat for
this species is currently not protected under the ESA. In the event it is added to the SARO List as
threatened or endangered, authorization under the ESA would be required and further
consultation with MNR would be recommended. It is anticipated authorization under the ESA
would utilize the Threats to Health and Safety – Not Imminent exemption (Table 1, Appendix B) in
Ontario Regulation 242/08.
Potential habitat for the Red-headed Woodpecker occurs on the Pine Street Extension sites. As
federally threatened species this species and its residence (i.e. active nest) is protected under
the SARA. As such, the following mitigation measures are recommended:
x
Retain mature trees were possible; and
x
Where tree removal is required, conduct outside of the breeding bird window (i.e. April 1 to
July 31).
Potential habitat for bat species at risk is present within the Highland Drive South Ravine. The
x
September 30).
4.2.2.3 Central Area Sites
Central Area Sites occur on privately owned lands and as such the ESA applies. The SARA would
not apply on these sites that are off federally owned lands.
To the extent possible, parcels of meadow habitat could be maintained for the Monarch.
Wooded portions of the Central Area provide potential habitat for the Eastern Wood-Pewee.
Habitat for this species is currently not protected under the ESA. Should it become listed under
the SARA as threatened or endangered, authorization under the ESA would be required and
further consultation with MNR would be recommended. It is anticipated the authorization under
the ESA would utilize the Threats to Health and Safety – Not Imminent exemption (Table 1,
Appendix B) in Ontario Regulation 242/08.
4.10
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
Potential habitat for bat species at risk is present within treed portions of the Central Area. The
x
September 30).
4.2.2.4 Waterfront Area Sites – West
The Waterfront Area Sites are on privately owned lands and as such the ESA applies. The SARA
would not apply on these sites that are off federally owned lands.
Industrial Area
American Eel and Snapping Turtle are not expected to be present within the Port Hope Harbour,
as such, no specific mitigation measures are recommended.
Barn Swallow, Chimney Swift and Common Nighthawk, which may breed on/within buildings on
the Centre Pier, are not anticipated to be impacted by PHAI activities. As such, no specific
mitigation measures are recommended.
Buildings on the Mill Street South site may provide protected habitat for bat maternity habitat for
Little Brown Myotis, Northern Myotis and Tri-coloured Bat. If feasible, targeted surveys for bat
species at risk are recommended for the buildings on the Mill Street South site. Surveys should be
conducted in June. If timing of Project does not allow for the targeted surveys in June, a
conservative approach of assuming presence is recommended. If the buildings are assumed to
be habitat, authorization under the ESA would be required, utilizing the Threats to Health and
Safety – Not Imminent exemption (Table 1, Appendix B) in Ontario Regulation 242/08. Following
this process, the following actions would be required.
x
Register Activity with MNR (submission of a Notice of Activity Form);
x
Complete a Mitigation Plan;
x
Remove buildings outside of bat active season (i.e. April 1 through September 30); and
x
Install compensation habitat on site (i.e. bat boxes).
If it is decided to utilize the exemption, Stantec could assist with completing these actions.
The site assessment did not find any evidence of Barn Swallows nesting in the buildings on the Mill
Street South site.
4.11
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
Eastern Milksnake may also occur in the Alexander Street Ravine. Although the habitat of this
species is currently not protected under the ESA, the following mitigation is recommended:
x
Exclusionary fencing should also be used around the work site in the Alexander Street Ravine,
to prevent Eastern Milksnakes from entering the work sites.
The Alexander Street Ravine provides potential habitat for the Wood Thrush and Eastern WoodPewee. Habitat for these species is currently not protected under the ESA. Should they become
listed under the SARA as threatened or endangered habitat protection under the ESA would
come into effect. It is not known when the change in status for these species may occur, but
could be as early as spring 2014. Tree clearing after this time, would likely require authorization
under the ESA and further consultation with MNR would be recommended. It is anticipated the
authorization under the ESA would utilize the Threats to Health and Safety – Not Imminent
exemption (Table 1, Appendix B) in Ontario Regulation 242/08.
Potential habitat for bat species at risk is present within the Alexander Street Ravine. The PHAI
activities are not expected to damage the habitat; specifically the availability of roost sites and
foraging opportunities would not be negatively affected. However, to avoid harm to individuals
of the species during PHAI activities, the following mitigation is recommended:
x
September 30).
West Beach / Former Waterworks
The West Beach/Former Waterworks site provides potential habitat for the Eastern Hog-nosed
Snake, although it is unlikely to be present. If it were present, the PHAI activities would not be
expected to significantly impact the habitat. Activities would not take place in the open beach
habitat, but in the adjacent treed area, parkland and industrial area. Some removal of trees
and brush will also be required in the wooded area, however; the temporary disturbance is not
anticipated to damage the habitat. To take a conservative approach, the following mitigation
measures are recommended:
x
Install exclusionary fencing between work sites adjacent to the beach habitat. The fencing
is intended to protect the habitat from encroachment and to prevent snakes from entering
the work site;
x
Following works, it is recommended logs and/or brush piles that were cleared from the site
be added back to the site to augment the habitat;
4.12
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
x
Following works, bank stabilization measures (e.g. re-plantings) should be undertaken to
prevent erosion of the slope.
4.2.2.5 East Beach Area
The East Beach Area occurs on privately owned lands and, as such, the ESA applies. The SARA
would not apply on these sites that are not federally owned lands.
Potential habitat for Blanding’s Turtle occurs in the marsh habitat. The Chemetron Lagoon is not
expected to be suitable for Blanding’s Turtle, given the lack of vegetation and the level of
contamination. Upland habitat surrounding the marsh would be included in the protected
habitat. However, the PHAI activities are not expected to damage or destroy the function of this
upland habitat, given it is currently industrial lands of low quality to turtles. The following
mitigation measures are recommended:
x
Install exclusionary fencing between work sites adjacent to the marsh habitat. The fencing is
intended to protect the habitat from encroachment and to prevent turtles from entering the
work site; and
x
Exclusionary fencing should be installed before May 1 (i.e. prior to the turtle nesting season)
of the year works are proposed, to prevent turtles from attempting to nest in the Temporary
Storage Site.
Protection of Snapping Turtle, Western Chorus Frog and their habitats are addressed through the
mitigation measure above.
Eastern Milksnake may occur in the East Waterfront Site. Although the habitat of this species is
currently not protected under the ESA, the following mitigation is recommended:
x
Exclusionary fencing should also be used around the work sites, to prevent Eastern Milksnakes
from entering the work sites.
Potential habitat for the Red-headed Woodpecker occurs on the East Beach Area. As
provincial species of special concern, its habitat is not protected under the ESA. Regardless, the
following mitigation considerations are provided:
x
Retain mature trees were possible; and
x
Where tree removal is required, conduct outside of the breeding bird window (i.e. April 1 to
July 31).
Potential habitat for bat species at risk is present within the Waterfront East Site. The PHAI
activities are not expected to damage the habitat; specifically the availability of roost sites and
foraging opportunities would not be negatively affected.
4.13
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
May 7, 2014
However, to avoid harm to individuals of the species during PHAI activities, the following
x
September 30).
4.14
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
References
May 7, 2014
5.0
References
AMEC Earth & Environmental. 2005 a. Terrestrial Environment Baseline Characterization Study for
the Port Hope Project. March 2005.
AMEC Earth & Environmental. 2005 b. Port Hope Project Terrestrial Environment Environmental
Effects Assessment Report. March 2005.
AMEC Earth & Environmental. 2006 a. Terrestrial Environment Baseline Characterization Study for
the Port Granby Project. June 2006.
AMEC Earth & Environmental. 2006 b. Port Granby Project Terrestrial Environment Environmental
Effects Assessment Report. June 2006.
Cadman, M. D., D.A. Sutherland, G.G. Beck, D. Lepage, A.R. Couturier. 2007. Atlas of the
Breeding Birds of Ontario, 2001-2005. (eds) Bird Studies Canada, Environment Conada,
Ontario Field Ornithologists, Ontario . Ministry of natural resources, and Ontario Nature,
Toronto, xxii + 134pp
COSEWIC 2002. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the grey fox Urocyon
cinereoargenteus interior in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in
Canada. Ottawa. vi + 32 pp.
COSEWIC 2002. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Milksnake Lampropeltis
tirangulum in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada.
Ottawa. vi + 29 pp.
COSEWIC, 2005. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Blanding's Turtle
Emydoidea blandingii in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in
Canada. Ottawa. viii + 40 pp
COSEWIC. 2007 a. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Chimney Swift Chaetura
pelagica in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada.
Ottawa. vii + 49 pp.
COSEWIC. 2007 b. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Common Nighthawk
Chordeiles minor in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in
Canada. Ottawa. vi + 25 pp.
COSEWIC. 2007 c. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Eastern Hog-nosed
Snake Heterodon platirhinos in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife
in Canada. Ottawa. viii + 36 pp
5.1
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
References
May 7, 2014
COSEWIC. 2007 d. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Red-headed
Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus in Canada. Committee on the Status of
Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 27 pp.
COSEWIC. 2008a. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Western Chorus Frog
Pseudacris triseriata Carolinian population and Great Lakes/St. Lawrence – Canadian
Shield population in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in
Canada. Ottawa. vii + 47 pp.
COSEWIC. 2008b COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Snapping Turtle Chelydra
serpentina in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada.
Ottawa. vii + 47 pp.
COSEWIC. 2010. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus in
Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. Vi +
42pp.
COSEWIC. 2011 a. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica in
Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. ix + 37
pp.
COSEWIC. 2011 b. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Eastern Meadowlark Sturnella
magna in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa.
x + 40 pp.
COSEWIC. 2012. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the American Eel Anguilla rostrata in
Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. x + 109
pp.
Dobbyn, J. 1994. Atlas of Mammals of Ontario. Federation of Ontario Naturalists.
Eder, T., 2002. Mammals of Ontario. Lone Pine Publishing, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. pp. 184.
Friesen, L., M.D. Cadman, and R.J. Mackay. 1999. Nesting success of neotropical migrant
songbirds in a highly fragmented landscape. Conservation Biology 13: 338-346.
Genivar Inc. 2012. Port Hope Area Initiative Planning and Investigation Phase Species at Risk Plan
121-22094-02-rev3. Prepared for Public Works and Government Services Canada.
Peterborough, ON. 13 pp. + attachments.
McCracken, J.D., R.A. Reid, R.B. Renfrew, B. Frei, J.V. Jalava, A. Cowie, and A.R. Couturier. 2013.
Recovery Strategy for the Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus) and Eastern Meadowlark
(Sturnella magna) in Ontario. Ontario Recovery Strategy Series. Prepared for the Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, Ontario. viii + 88 pp.
5.2
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
References
May 7, 2014
NatureServe. 2011. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application].
Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available
http://www.natureserve.org/explorer. (Accessed: January 25, 2012).
Ontario Nature. 2013. Ontario Reptile and Amphibian Atlas. Available online:
http://www.ontarionature.org/protect/species/herpetofaunal_atlas.php
Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) Ontario Region. 2013. Species-at-Risk
Assessments Six (6) Road Allowances Port Hope. Port Hope Area Initiative. Environmental
Services, PWGSC Ontario Region. Official Use Only 4501-03710-041-000. EDRMs#982118v3.
July 15, 2013. 9 pp.
Reid, F. 2006. The Peterson Field Guide Series: A field guide to mammals of North America, 4th
ed. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York, New York. 579 pp.
Rowell, J.C. 2012. The snakes of Ontario: Natural History, Distribution, and Status. Art Bookbindery.
Canada. 411 pp.
5.3
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Appendix A:
Figures
4875000
ay 2
Hig hw ay
2
er
iv
Highway 2
ad
2
Port Granby Creek
705000
Port Granby,
Project Area
Ro
e
y
n
Co u
2
o ad
ty R
n
Co u
ty R
o ad
2
nty
R
R oa
1
o un
d 2C
y 40
hw a
C ou
Hig
a
ty R
o ad
2
n ty
Co u
d2
R oa
n
Co u
ty R
2
G
an
ara
s k oa d
aR
ive
r
2
o ad
ty R
n
Co u
ty R
o ad
2
n
Cou
North Ganaraska River
ty R
oad
2
sh or
La ke
ad
e Ro
h
Ma rs
y
h
Ma rs
Co
un
t
Dale
2
d
oa
d
d
e R oa
d
ely
oad
Jo c
Choat
eR
e
sh or
La ke
Ro
ad
715000
d
e
et
S tre
riv
nd D
elyn
Joc
a
Hig hl
et
tre
Ch oa
te R o
ad
R oa
Dale
R oa
d
r S tr
Pete
0
Da
oa
le R
to nv
Ne w
ille
d
d
R oa
r S tr
Pete
W ard S t re et
oad
ne
pho
Tele
eet
d
Roa
720000
2,600
m
4875000
720000
Waterfront Area
Sites - East
1:55,000
1,300
eet
Da le
±
TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON
Te lep h one R
Waterfront Area
Sites - West
Central Area Sites
ad
Ro
ad 28
Co unty Ro
nS
Dale
Highland Drive
Area Sites
Dale
Choat
d
R oa
Lake Ontario (lac Ontario)
oa
715000
Ganaraska River
d
Ro a
R
R oa
ore R
Lakesh
d
Ro a
Lak esho r e Ro ad
o ad
Mar sh R
Welcome Long Term
Waste Managment Facility
n
Co u
710000
o ad
th
MUNICIPALITY OF PORT HOPE
Nor
d
Roa
401
ty
Lin
Co un t
r
710000
son
y
hw a
un
6T h
a
r
65
kin
Dic
Hig
Co
Gan
i ve
oad
outh
et S
MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
Hig hw
Ganarask a R
aR
rask
Gana raska Rive
Jo hn St
re et
705000
ty R
4870000
n
Cou
th
W:\active\60960861\drawing\MXD\Terrestrial\ReportFigures\SARreport\160960861_Fig1_Location_20140508.mxd
Revised: 2014-05-08 By: cweeks
4865000
r
iv e
S tre
or e
e
Hop
S ou
La
ke
sh
65
Stree t
oad
oad
yR
On tario
k
as
10
ge
65
ad
ty R
oad
rr
nbe
Cra
Ga
n
Cou
ty R
k
Ro
n
Cou
oad
yR
Cr
ee
nty
Cou
4870000
5
rr
nbe
Cra
d
Roa
4865000
6
ad
Ro
28
n
Gle
k
"
10
28
e
Ros
k
"
k
"k
"
k
"k
"
R
28
oad
ty R
d
R oa
k
"
k
"
5
d6
R oa
ty
ty
n
Cou
ilton
Ha m
k
"
n
Cou
ilton
Ham
k
"k
"
n
C ou
oad
d
R oa
d
R oa
k
"
k
"k
"
"
k
" k
nty
Cou
Legend
Wooded Area
Waterbody
Municipal Boundary
Watercourse
Railway
Local Road
Major Road
Highway
Title
1
Location of Project Areas
Figure No.
Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.
Port Hope Area Initiative
May 2014
160960861
Base features produced under license with the Ontario Ministry of
Natural Resources © Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2014.
Client/Project
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N
2.
STUDY AREA
ONTARIO
QUEBEC
Large Scale Low Level RadioactiveWaste
and Industrial Waste Sites
1.
Notes
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Project Area
KEY MAP
k
"
ar
Ga n
R
nty
Cou
ilton
Ham
d
R oa
d
R oa
703500
703500
704000
d
Roa
704000
ke
La
e
Ro
704500
or
sh
704500
ad
705000
705000
705500
d
R oa
705500
0
Ro
t er
cas
Lan
ad
706000
1:10,000
250
706000
500
m
±
4866500
4866000
4865500
4866500
4866000
4865500
tt
Ellio
W:\active\60960861\drawing\MXD\Terrestrial\ReportFigures\SARreport\160960861_Fig2to7_PortHope_20140508.mxd
4864500
4865000
sR
4865000
holl
Nic
4864500
ne
wnli
t To
Eas
oad
Orthoimagery © First Base Solutions, 2014.
Imagery Date: 2008, 2012.
3.
Title
Port Granby Project Area
2
Figure No.
May 2014
160960861
Client/Project
2.
STUDY AREA
ONTARIO
QUEBEC
1.
Notes
Waterbody
Watercourse
Road
Railway
Port Granby Project Area - Approximate
KEY MAP
Legend
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
hw
Hig
01
ay 4
713000
713000
1
y 40
hwa
Hig
713500
713500
Mar
sh
d
Roa
0
hR
714000
h
Hig
±
401
way
nd
Bra
oad
220
m
4871000
4870500
4871000
4870500
lc
Bau
hR
1:4,500
110
714000
lc
Bau
oad
d
Roa
3.
Title
Welcome Long Term Waste
Managment Facility
3
Figure No.
May 2014
160960861
Client/Project
2.
STUDY AREA
ONTARIO
QUEBEC
1.
Notes
Waterbody
Watercourse
Road
Contour
Welcome pipeline
Long-Term Waste Management Facility
KEY MAP
Legend
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
716000
716000
4871000
4870500
e
re
St
t
dD
rive
stnu
Che
t Hil
l
tre
et
et N
tre
ort
lS
Hil
t
rS
eS
Pin
e
Stre
t on
Bru
u
mo
Sey
No
eet
rt h Str
Cra
ig
Stre
n Str
716500
ord
f
Bed
eet
Str
lan
Highland Drive South Ravine
h
Hig
Highland Drive
Roadbed
w
Bro
t re
vil
Highland Drive Landfill
Pine Street North Extension
Temporary Storage Site
et
0
h
Nort
80
et
1:3,500
Stre
717000
717000
±
160
m
3
4871000
4870500
716500
t
o
Ye
Cu
S tr
eet
nd
mb
erla
St
re
et
in
e
Ca
ro
l
ree
Martha St
Cavan Street
eet
h
et
Title
Highland Drive Area Sites
4
Figure No.
Client/Project
May 2014
160960861
3.
2.
STUDY AREA
ONTARIO
QUEBEC
1.
Notes
Waterbody
Watercourse
Road
Contour
Approximate areas of low level waste removal
KEY MAP
Legend
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
t
tree
Sh
out
et S
h
urc
Ch
h
m
Tho
tre
S
as
et
t
tree
aS
Juli
Li
H
ttle
op
716500
eet
S tr
e
tre
sS
ma
am
o
Th
rh
Du
m
Tho
tree
S
as
t
ml
Bra
S
ey
e
t re
eet
S tr
eet
S tr
u
Aug
h
rn
ou
erb
an
eet
S tr
Strachan Street
Consolidation Site
rd
eS
Pin
eet
Str
ach
Str
lS
Hil
et
Stre
n
ma
n
iva
Sull
er
Hag
fo
Gif
ort
sta
et
Stre
s
Ros
Str
eet
h
Lions Recreation Centre Park
Walton Street
tN
out
t
ree
t
et S
tre
t
ut S
ee
Str
eS
Pin
o
Rid
ld
Ba
win
tree
S
rles
Cha
t
0
tree
a
Juli
tree
S
on
nS
e
Lan
t
Bru
716500
t
rse
Do
t
om
Th
tre
tre
ou
S
et
est
1:2,500
60
W
eet
S tr
ve
Browns Dri
South Street
m
717000
120
±
717000
et
John Street
w
Bro
4870000
S tre
an
Cav
S
as
et
t
eet
S tr
eS
et
tre
th
4870000
Title
Central Area Sites
5
Figure No.
May 2014
160960861
3.
Client/Project
STUDY AREA
ONTARIO
QUEBEC
2.
1.
Notes
Road
Contour
KEY MAP
Legend
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
t So
tree
4869500
to
Vic
an
Stre
et
lga
S
t
ree
r St
ur n
bo
her
eet
S tr
n
iva
fa
Tra
ach
Str
Sull
et
tre
eS
am
t
d Stree
Haywar
Hay Street
Water Works Site West
Pointer Lane
rsh
Ma
t
rse
Do
est
Former Coal
Gasification Plant
Park Street
W
eet
S tr
t
ee
t
717000
treet
717000
Water Works Site East
Str
tree
716500
t
Harris Street
Elizabeth Street
t
tree
ta S
gus
eet
S tr
Au
rd
et
Catherine Stre
eS
oat
Ch
rh
Du
eet
S tr
Strachan Street
Consolidation Site
fo
Gif
et
John Stre
716500
Smith Street
Elias Stre
et
yw
Ha
ard
Str
eet
Centre Pier Temporary
Storage Site
Viaducts Area
Lent Lane
do
or a
Eld
4868500
4869000
reet
Queen St
ee
t
h
Centre Pier
Industrial Waste
717500
w
Cald
0
tree
t
Eas
ell S
t
ree
St
set
Dor
717500
Madison Street
Mill Street
South Site
t
tree
on S
erts
Rob
South
Mill Street
rS
tr
King Street
Al
ex
an
de
eS
Pin
John
S
t
er
Pet
1:5,500
130
eet
S tr
t er
Shu
eet
St r
±
122 Peter Street
260
m
o
et S
4869500
4869000
o
Th
e
tre
sS
ma
out
Stre
4868500
tS
tree
e
Hop
uth
ce
Pla
S
ria
uth
3.
Title
Waterfront Area Sites - West
6
Figure No.
May 2014
160960861
Client/Project
2.
STUDY AREA
ONTARIO
QUEBEC
1.
Notes
Waterbody
Watercourse
Road
Railway
Contour
KEY MAP
Legend
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
718500
718500
S ou
4870000
oa d
nR
Gle
e
Ros
rs
Do
th
et
te
Pe
st
et
t re
rS
Ea
eet
S tr
Str
Chemetron Lagoon
e
Lak
eet
719000
Sewage Treatment Plant
Temporary Storage Site
Sewage Treatment
Plan Storage Cell
719000
0
1:2,500
60
120
m
±
4870000
3.
Title
Waterfront Area Sites - East
7
Figure No.
May 2014
160960861
Client/Project
2.
STUDY AREA
ONTARIO
QUEBEC
1.
Notes
Waterbody
Watercourse
Road
Railway
Contour
Approximate areas of low level waste
KEY MAP
Legend
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Appendix B:
Tables
Removal, harm or
transplantation of 10 or fewer
healthy butternut trees.
Does not apply to butternuts
that show signs of potential
resistance to canker (as
determined during a Butternut
Health Assessment).
The exemption can only be
used once at the same site (i.e.
NOT INCLUDED:
Removal of less than 30 ha of
grassland habitat (e.g.
hayfields, pasture, fallow,
meadow)
Must occur outside of breeding
season (May 1 to July 31)
Maintenance, replacement or removal of buildings or other
structures used by Barn
Swallows
Only allowed outside of
breeding season or by installing
netting prior to breeding
season to exclude birds
Minimize adverse effects to species and habitat
Butternut health assessment
conducted 30 days prior to removal of tree(s) to allow MNR a site visit
Replace butternut seedlings within 3
years with ratio described in
regulation (dependent on size of
tree removed, up to 20 seedlings)
Minimize adverse effects to species and habitat
Replace habitat removed within
same ecoregion within 12 months of start of activity
New habitat location must be
chosen prior to construction
New habitat must be managed as
grassland (could include seeding,
mowing, tending, delayed hay
cutting, and reduced grazing)
Minimize adverse effects to species
and habitat
Must replace active nests with nest
cups within 1 km
Specific guidelines for new
structures to hold nest cups
Compensation Requirements
Butternut
Bobolink and Eastern
Meadowlark
Barn Swallow
Construction
Activities Included
B.1
Butternut health assessment
report provided to MNR prior to
removal
Monitor and tend/replace as
needed butternut seedlings
weekly between May 15-Sept 20
in first growing season, and as
needed in second growing
season
Keep maintenance record of
tending activities
Create mitigation plan before
commencing activity (to be
provided to MNR upon request)
Monitor replacement habitat
annually for bird use and plant
growth for 5 years following
activity, with a written
commitment to continue
managing habitat for 20 years (or
until original habitat is restored)
Monitor annually for 3 years
following activity
Monitoring and Reporting
Summary of Ontario Regulation 242/08 exemptions that may be applicable to PHAI activities
Exemption Type
Table 1:
Appendix B Tables
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
B.2
Newly-listed and transitional
species
Exemption applies to 5 species
listed in Jan 2013 (i.e. Little
Brown Myotis, Northern Myotis,
Yellow-breasted Chat, Pugnose
Minnow or Silver Chub) or the
60 transitional species (consult
with Stantec for which species
apply).
Projects not following above
timelines
Maintenance and repair of
pipelines
and habitat
Restore, create, or enhance habitat
for species affected
Must avoid carrying out activity in
habitat while it is being used for “life
processes” including hibernation
and reproduction (timing windows
would be species specific).
NOT INCLUDED:
Applies to construction of a
hydrocarbon line or station
under the authority of the OEB if:
- The order is made before or within 2 years of the
effective date
- The construction is started
before the effective date or
no later than June 30, 2015
(or within 5 years of the order
if it was made after June 30,
2010 – for 5 species below)
occasional removal of
butternuts for maintenance of
a pipeline not eligible).
Activities Included
Create mitigation plan within 2
years of registration with MNR (to
be provided to MNR upon
request)
Monitor annually for 5 years the
effects of activity on species and
the effectiveness of any steps
taken to minimize adverse effects
on species
Exemption Type
Table 1:
Appendix B Tables
May 7, 2014
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Work undertaken to prevent
contamination of earth, air or
water
Work to maintain, repair,
remove or replace
infrastructure, including oil and
gas pipelines
Relocation or extension of the
area of a structure or
infrastructure.
Does not apply to 8 species of
plants (Bird’s foot Violet,
Bluehearts, Forked Threeawned Grass, Heart-leaved
Plantain, Juniper Sedge,
Spotted Wintergreen, Virginia
Goat’s-rue, Virginia Mallow).
NOT INCLUDED:
and habitat
Cease work in area if SAR is
encountered until animal leaves
area (re-location may be
warranted in some situations)
Timing restrictions while habitat is
used for “life processes” including
hibernation and reproduction
(timing windows would be species
specific).
Threats to health and safety –
not imminent
Repair/Replace/Maintenance
Activities Included
B.3
only if activity involves upgrade
or removal of a structure or
replacement of an entire
structure.
Keep records of monitoring efforts
(species-specific) to ensure
mitigation plan is being carried
out
Keep schedule and records of
work relating to maintenance,
repair, replacement, or upgrade
of infrastructure
Exemption Type
Table 1:
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Acipenser fulvescens
Lake Sturgeon
NHIC/SARP
Platanthera leucophaea
Eastern Prairie Fringed
Orchid
Epiaeschna heros
Pieris virginiensis
Swamp Darner
West Virginia White
B.4
NHIC
Bombus affinis
Rusty-patched Bumble
Bee
S3
S2S3
S1
S4BS2N
S2
END
G3G4
GU
G5
G3
G4
G4
SC
NAR
END
SC
END
NAR
END
G3G4T3 END
G3G4TN THR
R
G4
SARO
Status
PWGSC
NHIC
PWGSC
Sanaus plexippus
Monarch
Insects
NHIC
Carex oligocarpa
Eastern Few-fruited
Sedge
S3
EA/MNR/NHIC/ S3?
SARP
Juglans cinerea
S3
SNR
Butternut
PWGSC
MNR/NHIC
S1?
S-Rank G-Rank
Panax quinquefolius
Great Lakes Upper St.
Lawrence River
SARP
Source
American Ginseng
Plant Species
Anguilla rostrata
Latin Name
Sub-population (if
relevant)
Potential SAR occurrences in proximity to PHAI Project Sites
American Eel
Aquatic Species
Common Name
Table 2:
Appendix B Tables
May 7, 2014
NAR
NAR
END
SC
END
NAR
END
END
THR
THR
COSEWI
C Status
Change in
Database
N/A
N/A
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
N/A
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
X
X
No Change
New Species
X
X
X
X
Within
10km
X
Within
100km
X
X
X
X
X
Project
Within
Known
Range
Distance of Element Occurrence to Project
Within 1km
New Species X
No Change
No Change
New Species
No Change
No Change
No
New Species
schedule
No
No Change
schedule
SARA
Status
Species of special concern do not have
protected habitat under the ESA or SARA.
No records in Port Hope or Port Granby
Species does not have status either federally
or provincially, not carried forward.
Record from NHIC was historic (1963). Port
Hope and Port Granby are outside the
current known or expected range of this
species. Not carried forward.
Carried forward for mitigation consideration.
The local occurrence of Eastern Prairie
Fringed Orchid in the Port Hope area is
historic. The Ontario Recovery strategy
(OMNR 2010) considers this population
extirpated. Not carried forward.
Species does not have status either federally
or provincially, not carried forward.
Potential habitat present at one or more
project sites. Carried forward for mitigation
consideration, also addressed through
Ontario Regulations in its own report.
Habitat is restricted to high quality
deciduous forests- no habitat present in
project locations. Species not carried
forward.
There are no recent records of the Lake
Sturgeon in the Ganaraska River or in Lake
Ontario in proximity to the Port Hope or Port
Granby sites. Records were from NHIC and
dated pre-1946, not carried forward.
Known from Lake Ontario - not known from
Ganaraska River, potential habitat present
at one or more project sites. Carried
Forward for mitigation considerations.
Notes
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Pseudacris triseriata
Western Chorus Frog
Sternotherus odoratus
Thamnophis sauritus
Graptemys geographica
Chelydra serpentina
Eastern Musk Turtle
Eastern Ribbonsnake
Northern Map Turtle
Snapping Turtle
Childonias niger
Dolichonyx oryzivorus
Black Tern
Bobolink
S3
S3
MNR/NHIC/SA S4B
SARP/PWGSC S3B
MNR/OBBA/SA S4b
RP
MNR/NHIC/
S3
SARP/PWGSC
NHIC
NHIC/SARP
NHIC/PWGSC S3
MNR/NHIC/SA S3
RP
Hirundo rustica
Barn Swallow
Birds
Lampropeltis triangulum
Eastern Milksnake
S3
MNR/SARP
Heterodon platirhinos
Eastern Hog-nosed
Snake
S3
MNR/NHIC/PW S3
GSC
ORAA/SARP
S2
G5
G4
G5
G5
G5
G5
G5
G5
G5
G4
G5
G5
S-Rank G-Rank
Emydoidea blandingi
Great Lakes Upper St.
Lawrence River
EA
Source
Blanding's Turtle
Reptiles
Ambystoma
jeffersonianum
Latin Name
Sub-population (if
relevant)
Jefferson Salamander
Amphibians
Common Name
Table 2:
THR
SC
THR
SC
SC
SC
THR
SC
THR
THR
NAR
END
SARO
Status
THR
NAR
THR
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
THR
THR
END
END
COSEWI
C Status
No Change
New Species
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
Species
Removed
Change in
Database
No
N/A
Newly Listed
No Change
No
Newly Listed
schedule Species
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
SARA
Status
X
X
X
Within 1km
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Within
10km
X
X
Within
100km
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Project
Within
Known
Range
B.5
Suitable habitat not found at any project
sites. Not carried forward.
consideration.
Carried forward for mitigation consideration.
Species recently assessed and status may
change. Suitable habitat is not present at
the project sites for this species. Not carried
forward
Suitable habitat is not present at the project
sites for this species. Not carried forward
Species scheduled for reassessment in 2014
which may change status. Potential habitat
present at one or more project sites so it is
carried forward for mitigation consideration.
MNR has records of this species in proximity
to the Town of Port Hope. Carried forward
for mitigation consideration
consideration.
consideration.
Assumed to be previously mis-identified
record. Project sites are outside known
range of this species. Not carried forward.
Area. No suitable habitat present at any
project sites. Not carried forward.
Notes
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Sturnella magna
Camprimulgus vociferus
Contopus virens
Eastern Meadowlark
Eastern Whip-poor-will
Eastern Wood-Pewee
OBBA
SARP
S4B
S4B
MNR/NHIC/SA S4B
RP
SARP/PWGSC S4B
B.6
S4B
G5
G5
G5
G5
G5
G5
G5
G4
G5
SC
THR
THR
SC
THR
THR
SC
SARO
Status
Ammodramus
savannarum
OBBA
Chordeiles minor
Common Nighthawk
MNR/SARP/PW S4BS4N
GSC
S3B
S4B
S-Rank G-Rank
Grasshopper Sparrow
Chaetura pelagica
Chimney Swift
PWGSC
SARP
RP
Source
SARP/PWGSC S4B
Setophaga cerulea
Cerulean Warbler
Sub-population (if
relevant)
Golden-winged Warbler Vermivora chrysoptera
Wilsonia canadensis
Latin Name
Canada Warbler
Common Name
Table 2:
Appendix B Tables
May 7, 2014
SC
THR
SC
THR
THR
THR
THR
END
THR
COSEWI
C Status
Change in
Database
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No
New Species
schedule
Sch. 1
No
Newly Listed
schedule Species
Sch. 1
No
Newly Listed
schedule Species
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
schedule Species
SARA
Status
X
Within 1km
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Within
10km
Within
100km
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Project
Within
Known
Range
Species scheduled for reassessment by
COSSARO in 2014 which may change status.
project sites so it is carried forward for
mitigation consideration.
Despite the historic record within 10 km,
according to surveys of the OBBA the range
of this species no longer overlaps with the
project area. The project area is also
lacking in suitably shrubby habitat preferred
by this species. Not carried forward.
Species scheduled for reassessment by
COSSARO in 2014 which may change status.
project sites so it is carried forward for
mitigation consideration.
Suitable habitat is not present at the project
sites for this species. Not carried forward.
consideration.
Common Nighthawk prefer to nest in
cleared areas with little to no vegetation,
and preferably gravel substrates. They have
even been known to nest in cultivated areas
or along gravel roads. It is likely that habitat
is present at the sites for this species. Carried
forward for mitigation consideration.
consideration.
This species prefers large tracts of mature
deciduous forest or swamps. Suitable
habitat is not present at project sites so it is
not carried forward.
This species prefers moist mixed deciduousconiferous forests with a well-developed
understorey. This habitat is not present within
the project area so the Canada Warbler is
not carried forward.
consideration.
Notes
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
SARP/PWGSC S4B
Colinus virginianus
Melanerpes
erythrocephalus
Asio flammeus
Hylocichla mustelina
Coturnicops
noveboracensis
Northern Bobwhite
Red-headed
Woodpecker
Short-eared Owl
Wood Thrush
Yellow Rail
Myotis lucifugus
Little Brown Myotis
S4B
AMO
G5
G5
G5
G5
G4G5
G4
S4B
S4B
S5
G5
G5
G4
G5
S2N S4N G5
NHIC/PWGSC S1
NHIC
OBBA
PWGSC
S1
EA/SARP/NHIC S3B
PWGSC
Urocyon
cinereoargenteus
Grey Fox
Mammals
NHIC/SARP
Lanius ludovicianus
Loggerhead Shrike
migrans
Ixobrychus exilis
S2B
Least Bittern
NHIC
Rallus elegans
SHB
S-Rank G-Rank
King Rail
NHIC/SARP
Source
Ammodramus henslowii
Latin Name
Sub-population (if
relevant)
Henslow's Sparrow
Common Name
Table 2:
END
THR
SC
SC
SC
END
END
THR
END
END
SARO
Status
END
THR
SC
THR
SC
THR
END
END
THR
END
END
COSEWI
C Status
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
New Species
No Change
Change in
Database
No Change
New Species
No
Newly Listed
schedule Species
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
No
Newly Listed
schedule Species
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
Sch. 1
SARA
Status
X
Within 1km
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Within
10km
X
X
Within
100km
X
X
X
X
X
X
Project
Within
Known
Range
B.7
May roost and forage in project locations,
carried forward.
Records in southeastern Ontario are historic
and sparse. Pelee Island believed to have
only breeding population in Ontario. Not
carried forward.
Suitable habitat is present at one or more
project sites and species is scheduled for
assessment in 2014. Carried forward for
mitigation consideration
Red-headed Woodpecker were confirmed
breeders in the Port Hope area during the
second OBBA atlas. It prefers open
woodland and woodland edges and is
often found in parks and golf courses.
Habitat is potentially present for this species
in the project area, carried forward.
Northern Bobwhite occurrence is historic,
last recorded by NHIC in 1853. Species not
carried forward.
Last recorded occurrence of a Loggerhead
Shrike in the project area is historic (NHIC in
1984), and there is a lack of suitable habitat
in the project area. Species not carried
forward.
There is no suitable marsh habitat within the
project area. Species not carried forward.
Local occurrence of the King Rail in the
project area is historic, last recorded for the
NHIC in 1986. No habitat present in the
Project Area. Species not carried forward.
The record for this species in the NHIC is a
historic occurrence (1962), and suitable
habitat for this rare species is not present at
the project sites. Not carried forward.
Notes
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Perimyotis subflavus
Tri-coloured Bat
Sub-population (if
relevant)
AMO
AMO
Source
S3?
S3?
G5
G4
S-Rank G-Rank
END
SARO
Status
END
END
COSEWI
C Status
B.8
NHIC - Natural Resources Information Centre Database (MNR)
EA - Port Hope Area Environmental Assessment (2006) and Port Granby Environmental Assessments (2008)
MNR - Ministry of Natural Resources information request.
ORAA - Ontario Reptile and Amphibian Atlas
OBBA - Ontario Breeding Bird Atlas
AMO - Atlas of the Mammals of Ontario
SARP - Species at Risk Plan by GENIVAR
PWGSC- Species-at-Risk Assessments: 6 Road Allowances Port Hope PHAI
Sources of Information
S1: Critically Imperiled—Critically imperiled in the province (often 5 or fewer occurrences)
S2: Imperiled—Imperiled in the province, very few populations (often 20 or fewer),
S3: Vulnerable—Vulnerable in the province, relatively few populations (often 80 or fewer)
S4: Apparently Secure—Uncommon but not rare
S5: Secure—Common, widespread, and abundant in the province
SX: Presumed extirpated
SH: Possibly Extirpated (Historical)
SNR: Unranked
SU: Unrankable—Currently unrankable due to lack of information
SNA: Not applicable—A conservation status rank is not applicable because the species is not a suitable target for conservation activities.
S#S#: Range Rank—A numeric range rank (e.g., S2S3) is used to indicate any range of uncertainty about the status of the species
S#B- Breeding status rank
S#N- Non Breeding status rank
?: Indicates uncertainty in the assigned rank
G1: Extremely rare globally; usually fewer than 5 occurrences in the overall range
G1G2: Extremely rare to very rare globally
G2: Very rare globally; usually between 5-10 occurrences in the overall range
G2G3: Very rare to uncommon globally
G3: Rare to uncommon globally; usually between 20-100 occurrences
G3G4: Rare to common globally
G4: Common globally; usually more than 100 occurrences in the overall range
G4G5: Common to very common globally
G5: Very common globally; demonstrably secure
GU: Status uncertain, often because of low search effort or cryptic nature of the species; more data needed.
T: Denotes that the rank applies to a subspecies or variety
Q: Denotes that the taxonomic status of the species, subspecies, or variety is questionable.
END – Endangered
THR - Threatened
SC - Special Concern
NS - Not yet on a schedule under SARA.
Species Ranks
SARO - Species at risk in Ontario List under the ESA
SARA - Species at Risk Act
DEFINITIONS
Myotis septentrionalis
Latin Name
Northern Myotis
Common Name
Table 2:
Appendix B Tables
May 7, 2014
Change in
Database
No
Newly Listed
schedule Species
No
Newly Listed
schedule Species
SARA
Status
Within 1km
Within
10km
Within
100km
X
X
Project
Within
Known
Range
carried forward.
carried forward.
Notes
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Port Granby, Welcome,
Highland Drive Sites, Central
Sites, Waterfront Area
Port Granby, Welcome,
Waterfront Area: in Lake
Ontario
East Beach Area, wetlands
Welcome Waste
Management Area, East
Beach Area
ESA Obligations
Due Diligence Measures
Species and its residence
Ontario Regulation 242/08
requirements (BHA , notice of
impact form and replacement
plantings) to be applied to
retainable trees. ESA
requirements deemed to
satisfy SARA requirements.
B.9
Harm to species and damage Potential habitat adjacent to
Exclusionary measures used
between work site and
wetlands, avoid work in
wetlands when possible. When
unavoidable complete
targeted surveys to determine
presence/absence.
As a species of special
Retain parcels of meadow
concern, it receives no
habitat where possible.
species or habitat protection.
No ESA obligations.
Not at risk under the ESA. No
protected under SARA.
ESA obligations.
Residence likely to be applied
to breeding and overwinering
habitat. Permit required to
work in residence of the
species.
No SARA obligations.
Species protected under
Harm to species and damage
SARA. Permit required to harm to habitat (general)
or remove a tree; may require prohibited. Permit or
compensation
registration required to
remove healthy trees;
compensation plantings
required.
Currently not listed on a
Harm to species and damage Sediment and erosion control
Schedule under the SARA. No to habitat (general)
measures around terrestrial
SARA obligations.
prohibited. Permit or
site.
registration required for
activities that damage
habitat.
SARA Obligations
Blanding's Turtle
Reptile Species
Western Chorus
Frog
Amphibian Species
Monarch
Insect Species
Butternut
Plant Species
American Eel
Potential Habitat within
Project Area
Potential SAR overlap with Project Activities and recommended management measures
Aquatic Species
Species
Table 3:
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
B.10
No SARA obligations.
No ESA obligations.
No ESA obligations but may
change following
reassessment.
Potential habitat in project
location - sediment and
erosion control, animal
exclusion and encounter
management measures. If inwater works required, conduct
turtle rescue.
Potential habitat in project
locations - avoid work in
woods and install exclusionary
fencing; animal exclusion and
encounter management
measures.
Harm to species and damage Records in the Port Hope
to habitat (general)
Area; animal exclusion and
encounter management
measures will be employed
activities that result in harm to around suitable habitat.
species or damage to habitat.
East waterfront sites - sediment
and erosion control, animal
exclusion and encounter
activities that result in harm to management measures
species or damage to habitat.
ESA Obligations
North Area, Waterfront and
Waterfront East Areas,
Welcome Waste
Management and Port
Granby.
Snapping Turtle
to nesting and overwinering
species.
Waterfront area: West
Beach/Former waterworks
No SARA obligations but may
change following
reassessment.
to nesting and overwinering
species.
SARA Obligations
adjacent to the project area
Project Area
Eastern Milksnake North Area, Waterfront and
Waterfront East Areas,
Welcome Waste
Management and Port
Granby.
Eastern Hognosed Snake
Species
Table 3:
Appendix B Tables
May 7, 2014
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Residence likely to be applied prohibited. Permit or
to nesting site. Permit required registration required for
to work in residence of the
species.
habitat.
Residence likely to be applied species or habitat protection.
to nesting site. Permit required No ESA obligations.
species.
Industrial buildings in the
Waterfront Area
Waterfront Area
Common
Nighthawk
habitat.
Chimney Swift
Schedule under SARA. No
SARA obligations.
Waterfront Area
habitat.
ESA Obligations
Barn Swallow
SARA obligations.
SARA Obligations
North Area, Welcome Waste
Management, and Port
Granby
Project Area
B.11
No habitat for the Common
Nighthawk is anticipated to
be impacted by the Port
Hope or Port Granby Projects
No habitat for the Chimney
Swift is anticipated to be
impacted by the Port Hope or
Port Granby Projects
No habitat for the Barn
Swallow is anticipated to be
impacted by the Port Hope or
Port Granby Projects. If a nest
is encountered no damage
during the breeding season
Habitat present in the
absence of mowing activities,
remove vegetation outside of
breeding season (May 1 to
August 31). Registration /
compensation would only be
required if current
management were to be
discontinued on provincial
land.
Bobolink
Bird Species
Species
Table 3:
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
North Area, East Beach Area, Species and its residence
Clear trees outside of
Welcome Waste
Residence likely to be applied species or habitat protection. Aug 31)
Management and Port
to nesting site. Permit required No ESA obligations.
Granby
species.
Red-headed
woodpecker
B.12
Special concern and currently Currently not a species at risk.
not listed on a Schedule under No ESA obligations but may
SARA. No SARA obligations.
change following
reassessment.
Granby
Grasshopper
Sparrow
required if current
discontinued.
Forest edge species, habitat
protection starts when its
listed, clear trees outside of
Aug 31)
Special concern and currently Currently not a species at risk.
not listed on a Schedule under No ESA obligations but may
SARA. No SARA obligations.
change following
reassessment.
North Area, Central Area,
Welcome Waste
Management and Port
Granby
required if current
discontinued on provincial
lands.
Eastern WoodPewee
habitat.
ESA Obligations
SARA obligations.
SARA Obligations
Granby
Project Area
Eastern
Meadowlark
Species
Table 3:
Appendix B Tables
May 7, 2014
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Welcome Waste
Management, Port Granby,
Waterfront Area: Alexander
Street Ravine.
Project Area
All sites
All sites
Northern Myotis
Tri-coloured Bat
SARA obligations.
SARA obligations.
SARA obligations.
All sites
Little Brown
Myotis
SARA obligations.
SARA Obligations
Currently not a species at risk.
change following
reassessment.
habitat.
habitat.
Currently not a species at risk.
change following
reassessment.
ESA Obligations
B.13
May roost and forage in
project locations - habitat not
critical or limiting - remove
trees or buildings outside
breeding period - survey for
presence prior to disturbance
Habitat protection starts when
its listed, avoid disturbing
forested areas, clear trees
outside of breeding season
(May 1 to Aug 31)
Mammal Species
Wood Thrush
Species
Table 3:
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
B.14
X
X
Eastern Milksnake
X
X
X
X
X
Snapping Turtle
X
X
X
Bobolink
X
X
X
X
Eastern Meadowlark
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Eastern Wood-Pewee
Common Nighthawk
Chimney Swift
Barn Swallow
X
Highland Drive South
Ravine
X
X
X
Highland Drive Area
Welcome Long-term
Waste Management
Facility
X
X
Other Area owned by
federal government
adjacent to these sites.
Port Hope Project
X
American Eel
New Wastewater
Treatment Facility and
LTWMF
X
Butternut
X
Monarch
East and West Gorges
and Water Treatment
Area
Port Granby Project
Western Chorus Frog
Potential species occurrence by site
Blanding’s Turtle
Table 4:
Appendix B Tables
May 7, 2014
Grasshopper Sparrow
X
X
X
X
Red-headed
Woodpecker
X
X
X
Wood Thrush
X
X
Little Brown Myotis
X
X
X
X
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Northern Myotis
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Tri-coloured Bat
American Eel
Butternut
X
X
Former Coal Gasification
Plant
X
X
X
West Beach Waterworks
Mill Street South
(Firefighter's Museum)
CN and CP Viaducts
Area
Centre Pier
Port Hope Harbour
X
Bobolink
X
Barn Swallow
X
X
Chimney Swift
X
X
X
X
X
Snapping Turtle
X
Common Nighthawk
Lions Club Recreation
Centre
X
Eastern Milksnake
X
Eastern Meadowlark
X
X
Monarch
X
Eastern Wood-Pewee
Strachan Street Ravine
Highland Drive North
Sites (Pine Street
Extension)
Western Chorus Frog
Blanding’s Turtle
Table 4:
Grasshopper Sparrow
X
Red-headed
Woodpecker
X
Wood Thrush
X
Little Brown Myotis
X
X
X
X
X
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Northern Myotis
X
X
X
X
X
B.15
X
X
X
X
X
Tri-coloured Bat
B.16
East Beach Area
(Chemetron Lagoon and
STP Site)
Monarch
X
X
Eastern Milksnake
X
Snapping Turtle
X
Eastern Wood-Pewee
Eastern Meadowlark
Common Nighthawk
Chimney Swift
Barn Swallow
Bobolink
Butternut
American Eel
X
Western Chorus Frog
Blanding’s Turtle
Table 4:
Appendix B Tables
May 7, 2014
Red-headed
Woodpecker
X
Little Brown Myotis
X
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Northern Myotis
X
X
Tri-coloured Bat
Wood Thrush
Grasshopper Sparrow
Field Studies
Habitat Present
Species Present
Field Studies
Habitat Present
Species Present
Field Studies
Habitat Present
Species Present
Field Studies
Habitat Present
Species Present
Field Studies
Habitat Present
Species Present
Field Studies
Habitat Present
Species Present
Field Studies
Habitat Present
Species Present
Field Studies
Habitat Present
Species Present
X
Western Chorus Frog
Reptiles
West Virginia White
Amphibians
Swamp Darner
Rusty-patched Bumble Bee
Monarch
Eastern Musk Turtle
Lake Sturgeon
Plant Species
American Eel
X
X
X
X
X
Eastern Ribbonsnake
X
X
X
X
X
Northern Map Turtle
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Butternut
X
Insects
X
X
X
X
Blanding's Turtle
X
X
Eastern Milksnake
X
Snapping Turtle
X
American Ginseng
Aquatic Species
Mill Street South (Firefighter's
Museum)
CN and CP Viaducts Area
Centre Pier
Port Hope Harbour
Waterfront Area
Welcome Waste Management
Facility
Welcome
Other areas owned by federal
government adjacent to these
sites.
New Wastewater Treatment
Facility and new LTWMF
East and West Gorges and
water treatment areas
Port Granby
Eastern Few-fruited Sedge
Potential PHAI Project Site overlap with SAR and SAR habitat
Eastern Prairie Fringed Orchid
Table 5:
Bobolink
Black Tern
Barn Swallow
X
Canada Warbler
X
Cerulean Warbler
X
Chimney Swift
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Common Nighthawk
X
X
Eastern Meadowlark
X
X
X
X
X
X
Eastern Wood-Pewee
X
X
X
X
X
X
Grasshopper Sparrow
X
X
X
X
X
X
Red-headed Woodpecker
X
X
X
X
Wood Thrush
X
X
X
X
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Little Brown Myotis
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
B.17
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Northern Myotis
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Tri-coloured Bat
Grey Fox
Yellow Rail
Mammals
Short-eared Owl
Northern Bobwhite
Loggerhead Shrike
Least Bittern
King Rail
Henslow's Sparrow
Golden-winged Warbler
Birds
B.18
Field Studies
Habitat Present
Species Present
Field Studies
Habitat Present
Species Present
Field Studies
Habitat Present
Species Present
Field Studies
Habitat Present
Species Present
Field Studies
Habitat Present
Species Present
Field Studies
Habitat Present
Species Present
Field Studies
Habitat Present
Species Present
Field Studies
Habitat Present
Species Present
Field Studies
Habitat Present
Species Present
Swamp Darner
Rusty-patched Bumble Bee
Monarch
Blanding's Turtle
X
Snapping Turtle
Bobolink
Common Nighthawk
Chimney Swift
Cerulean Warbler
Canada Warbler
Black Tern
Barn Swallow
Birds
Northern Map Turtle
Eastern Ribbonsnake
Eastern Musk Turtle
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Grasshopper Sparrow
Wood Thrush
Mammals
Short-eared Owl
Northern Bobwhite
Loggerhead Shrike
Least Bittern
King Rail
Henslow's Sparrow
Golden-winged Warbler
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Yellow Rail
X
X
X
Grey Fox
X
X
Red-headed Woodpecker
X
Little Brown Myotis
X
X
X
X
X
Eastern Meadowlark
X
X
X
X
X
Eastern Wood-Pewee
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Eastern Milksnake
X
X
Reptiles
X
X
X
X
X
X
Amphibians
X
X
Western Chorus Frog
X
West Virginia White
Insects
Butternut
American Ginseng
Lake Sturgeon
Plant Species
American Eel
Aquatic Species
Highland Drive North Sites (Pine
Street Extension)
Highland Drive Area
Highlands Drive Area
Lions Club Recreation Centre
Strachan Street Ravine
Central Area
Former Coal Gasification Plant
West Beach Waterworks
East Beach Area (Chemetron
Lagoon and STP Site)
Eastern Few-fruited Sedge
Potential PHAI Project Site overlap with SAR and SAR habitat
Eastern Prairie Fringed Orchid
Table 5:
Appendix B Tables
May 7, 2014
UNRESTRICTED
4500-03710-REPT-001
Northern Myotis
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Tri-coloured Bat

PHAI Species at Risk Report - Willow Beach Field Naturalists

Transcription

Similar documents

Brochure - Habitat for Zoomanity A Life Science Webquest

The truth about… The truth about… habitats

September 2007 - Laughing Rock Technology

Chamise Chaparral - Nature Bytes Video

June 2007 - Laughing Rock Technology

January 2014 - St. Joseph Habitat for Humanity

Camp Shelby Conservation Programs

Habitat Hammerings - Northwoods Habitat for Humanity

2014_June_habitat Happenings Newsletter_WEB

Activity 22