The European Board of Neurology UEMS/EBN From Training to CME
Transcription
The European Board of Neurology UEMS/EBN From Training to CME
The European Board of Neurology UEMS/EBN From Training to CME- quality circle ! Wolfgang Grisold (Vienna) Past president of the UEMS/EBN Chair of the examination committee Co- chair of the WFN education committee! [email protected] Examination UEMS: Chapter 6 Core Curriculum CME CPD EACCME Text Text Department visits „What are universities for ?“ The different concept of universities. “ UEMS-EBN ! • UEMS- Chapter 6. Defining the field • Core Curriculum. Defining the training content • National curricula ! The European Board Examination ! • UEMS EBN-EFNS-ENS (e-brain, movement society, ESO) 3 Step approach Concept with the educational department of the Ege university (Tr) 5 examinations (Milan, Geneva, Lisbon, Stockholm, Barcelona • Next examination : ENS/EFNS Istanbul 2014! Sources ! • Scientific panels of: ENS, EFNS; Movement Society, ESO • e-brain • Individuals ! Passing limit ! • Meeting one day before the meeting. • 7 Persons needed (additional night(s), flight) • Ege university (Flight, hotel) Pas sing • Meeting room • Catering! Passing Limit: Nedelsky, Angoff, methods Case Presentation EMQ: 100-150 scenarios S. Ayhan CALISKAN! • 2. EMQ: These one lead in, 8-20 options and 3-4 cases (with one correct answer) type questions could mainly test the learners' (students', candidate's) - Factual knowledge - Comprehension - Application of knowledge and - Problem solving (or clinical reasoning) abilities. Although MCQs and EMQs are testing the same levels of cognitive (knowledge) domain, EMQs are testing much higher levels (mostly clinical reasoning) as they have case scenarios in the EMQ sets. • Main advantages of EMQs: Testing higher levels of knowledge, especially clinical reasoning. Less possibility (<%20) to guess the correct answer by chance, easy to mark and results can be announced as fast as MCQs. Main disadvantages of EMQs: Difficult to write, relatively new for both candidates and faculty members. ! EMQ Oral Case Presentation ! • A case • A scientific work • 5 minutes (sharp) • Jury of 2 jurors! 2013 Examination results Passing Limit 60 & 65 % Passing Limit 2013- 30 candidates have been accepted, 29 of them attended the examination and 25 passed. Certificates: 10 diplomas und 15 fellowships Department Visit ! World Wide: ! • Europe (UEMS): Istanbul university • WFN: Truijillo (Peru)- South America • Rabat (Morrocco) - Africa! World Federation of Neurology –education committee! ! The WFN education committee adapted the UEMS/EBN based protocol for department visit, to establish Training centers for the WFN worldwide.! ! ! Two visits have been performed:! ! Truijllo (Peru) 2012! ! Traching center accrediation visit Rabat Morocco, 2013! ! Consisted of preparatory questionnaires (staff, residents, hospital management)! ! Basic medical data from the center, scientific output was obtained! ! In addition interviews with residents, teachers and hospital management were made! ! The department was visited, facilities examined.! ! A final report was issued.! The Rabat Visit! Report Evaluation Suggestion/recommendation Examination UEMS: Chapter 6 Core Curriculum CME CPD EACCME E-learning Accreditation Text Text Subspezialisation Department visits UEMS / EBN Quality circle Training Visitation Examination CME/CPD CME CPD EACCME E-learning Sub-spez- ialisation • Struhal W, Mellgren SI, Grisold W. Three important steps to European neurology harmoniza<on: core curriculum, visita<on program, European board examina<on. Eur J Neurol. 2013 Aug;20(8):e101-‐4. doi: 10.1111/ ene.12177 FiRh Examina<on of the European Board of Neurology Posted on July 26, 2013 • Authors: Wolfgang Grisold, Svein Mellgren and Ayahan Caliskan • -‐ See more at: hZp:// www.worldneurologyonline.com/ar<cle/fiRh-‐examina<on-‐of-‐the-‐european-‐board-‐of-‐neurology/#sthash. 4cv6N3lF.dpuf • Foto sources: UEMS/EBN, World Federa<on Neurology –educa<on commiZee