SCRS/2013/204

SCRS/2013/204
Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 70(6): 2856-2867 (2014)
ANALYSIS OF SMALL-SIZE FLEET FISHERY BASED
IN CABO FRIO CITY, RIO DE JANEIRO-BRAZIL (2003-2012)
E.G. Pimenta1, Y.C. Vieira2, T. Rodrigues3 and A.F. de Amorim4
SUMMARY
Multispecific small-fleet in Southwestern Atlantic (Cabo Frio City, Rio de Janeiro-RJ State,
Brazil) is comprised by small boats that catch 15% of RJ total yield. Stimulated by the
productivity caused by the upwelling water, landing facilities and Cabo Frio City industries,
since 2000, this fleet has been growing in number of boat reaching the number of 350 vessels in
2010. It represents an important fishing area off Rio de Janeiro State (22o S to 24o S and 40o W
to 44o W), and the total production from 2003 to 2012 was 2,752 tons. The target species was
mainly the dolphinfish using surface longline. The sailfish was also caught by surface longline
and the yellowfin tuna was captured basically by hand line, while the little tuna was mostly
caught by small purse seine. The analysis also includes length frequency of size distributioning
of the dolphinfish, sailfish, yellowfin and little tuna from 2003 to 2012.
RÉSUMÉ
La flottille plurispécifique de petite taille opérant dans l'Atlantique Sud-Ouest (ville de Cabo Frio,
état de Rio de Janeiro, Brésil) se compose de petits bateaux qui capturent 15% de la production
totale de Rio de Janeiro. Stimulée par la productivité causée par la remontée de l'eau, les
installations de débarquement et les industries dans la ville de Cabo Frio, depuis 2000 cette flottille
augmente en nombre de navires, atteignant le chiffre de 350 navires en 2010. Il s'agit d'une
importante zone de pêche au large de l'état de Rio de Janeiro (22o S à 24o S et 40o W à 44o W), la
production totale de 2003 à 2012 s'élevant à 2.752 t. L'espèce cible était principalement la
coryphène commune capturée à la palangre de surface. Le voilier était également capturé à la
palangre de surface et l'albacore à la ligne à main, tandis que la thonine commune était
essentiellement capturée par de petits senneurs. L'analyse inclut aussi la distribution des fréquences
de taille de la coryphène commune, du voilier, de l'albacore et de la thonine commune de 2003 à
2012.
RESUMEN
La pequeña flota multiespecífica del Atlántico sudoccidental (Cabo Frío, Río de Janeiro-Estado
RJ, Brasil) se compone de pequeños barcos que capturan el 15% de la producción total de Río
de Janeiro. Estimulada por la productividad causada por el afloramiento, las instalaciones de
desembarque y las industrias de Cabo Frío, desde 2000 esta flota ha ido creciendo en número
de barcos, alcanzando los 350 en 2010. Representa una importante zona de pesca en aguas del
Estado de Río de Janeiro (22o S a 24o S y 40o W a 44o W), y la producción total desde 2003
hasta 2012 fue de 2.752. La especie objetivo era principalmente el dorado usando el palangre
de superficie. El pez vela se captura también mediante el palangre de superficie, el rabil se
captura básicamente con liña de mano y la bacoreta se captura principalmente con pequeños
cercos. El análisis incluye también la distribución de la frecuencia de tallas del dorado, el pez
vela, el rabil y la bacoreta desde 2003 a 2012.
KEYWORDS
Capture fishing, Fishing gear, Multispecies fisheries, Catch composition, Commercial fishing
1
Professor, Universidade Veiga de Almeida-UVA\Laboratório de Avaliação de Recursos Vivos-LARV\GEPesca, [email protected]
UVA/LARV/GEPesca, [email protected]
3
Master Science Studant, Instituto de Pesca-IP, APTA-SAA, Santos (SP), [email protected]
4
Professor, Instituto de Pesca - IP, APTA-SAA, Santos (SP); [email protected]
2
2856
1. Introduction
The small-size fleet of Cabo Frio City, Rio de Janeiro-RJ State, Brazil represented 15% of RJ total yield
(Marques et al., 2000). The water high productivity, landing facilities around Araruama Lake and exportation
industries, Cabo Frio City has about 350 boats of small-size fleet. These boats usually ranging from 12 to 15
meters and under 20 TM, comes from another regions and States. This fleet during the year directs their fishery
to different fish species and use variety of equipments, mainly surface longline and hand line with live sardine as
bait (Pimenta et al., 2007).
Cabo Frio upwelling gives to the region high fishery productivity (Moreira-Silva, 1970). The oceanographic
conditions facilitate the fisherman of this fleet to catch many different species.
The aim of this paper was to characterize the multispecific small-size fleet and analyze mainly the dolphinfish,
yellowfin tuna, sailfish, little tuna and another fish fishery caught by Cabo Frio small-size fleet during 2003 to
2012 period.
2. Material and Methods
The statistics data were monthly collected during from 2003 to 2012 at the Cabo Frio Fishing Terminal and
fishery companies. The information about gear and boat size was based on interview of fishermen done by
graduate student, which registered the, boat name, data, number of fish and weight by specie or group of species.
Length and weight relationship, based on total weight were used for dolphinfish, sailfish, yellowfin tuna and
little tuna. The equation used for the grouped sex was as follow: dolphinfish Wt=0.3x10-5Lt3.183 (not published);
sailfish (Prager et. al., 1995), yellowfin tuna (Caveriviere, 1976) and little tuna (Rodriguez-Roda, 1966).
The analysis was made using the JMP Software (Version 10.0).
The small-size fishery was mainly concentrate off Cabo Frio City, Rio de Janeiro State, between the 22oS to
24oS and the 40oW to 44oW (Pimenta and Lima 2002). The collected data was based in the previous article as
Pimenta et al. (2007).
3. Results and Discussion
The analysis was based on 4,276 fishery trips information of 470 small boats basically using five kinds of gears
from 2003 to 2012. The gears used were surface longline (SLL), midwater longline (MLL), botton longline
(BLL), hand line (HL), botton hand line (BHL), small purse seine (SPS), trap (TRAP), and small gillnet (SGN).
The fishermen used live sardine as bait with hooks gears most of the time.
3.1. Characterization of small-size fleet equipments.
3.1.1. Surface longline (SLL), midwater longline (MLL) and bottom longline (BLL)
The longline is a device that uses a secondary main line and several attached to a hook and swivel. The longline
size and number of hooks depend of the boat size and could be used at surface, midwater or bottom according to
the fishery target. It can be fixed or drift . The vessel's longline puts the box in a position to launch, spare lines,
boxes with live bait, fish box, floats and others things. The launch of longlines according to boat, varies, being
done by the stern or the bow.
The surface longline is released in a time immersed depending on the number of hooks used. It has no
automation, so the release and hallowing is done manually.
The midwater longline is usually released on the slope with the aid of hydraulic winch.
The bottom line is released on sunrise and collected at sunset. Use about 400 circles hooks. The small fish
hooked were used for the bottom longline at night.
2857
3.1.2. Hand line (HL) and bottom hand line (BHL)
The hand line uses natural bait dead or alive, with one or more branch hooks. This gear is used when fishermen
are looking for school of fish. Generally 6 to 8 lines per boat, according to the size and number of fishermen.
The equipment consists of a nylon line of about 50 meters on their end and put a swivel with another secondary
line of a nylon or steel cable to prevent loss of the hook. The fisherman catching the fish when pulls it to the side
of the boat, where another fisherman with a stick pulled on board.
The bottom hand line using 6 main lines with 10 to 40 secondary lines and hooks per boat. The fishing operation
is performed during the day and the equipment consists of a monofilament line followed by a swivel, attached to
the monofilament line with a weight close to the hook. Along the main line are branch lines connected with
swivels.
3.1.3. Small purse seine (SPS) and trap (TRAP)
The small purseine consists of several pieces of net without node usually braided nylon mesh from 8 to 12
mm.The approach to the school of fish is made by one side, making up the siege with the rudder to port after
helping launch the boat. During the approach of the boat at the closing end of the siege, a cable is passed
polyethylene board the trawler when it starts closing the enclosure. It is made at night, with the arrival in the next
morning to the port and returning to fishing area in the afternoon. The sets are made close to the beach or rocky
shores with a duration which varies with the amount captured from 2 to 6 hours.
The trap is suitable for catching fish and crabs and it has the form of baskets constructed with metal and
surrounded by a net with an opening. The traps are placed at the bottom with bait in a single row of 10 cages
away from each other by 500 meters and connected by cable to a buoy with a flag that indicates their position on
the surface. The process of launching and gathering spends about one hour and the traps stay at place during the
day. Complementarily during the night, the crew fish with bottom line composed of braided nylon amended the
nylon monofilament by using a main line with many secondary up to 10 hooks. The small fish caught are
intended to be bait for the traps on the next day.
3.1.4. Small gillnet (SGN)
A small gillnet consists of a rectangular net positioned vertically in the water. The target species are gilled and it
usually operates in half water on the surface, drifting or anchored to the substrate. They are formed by
rectangular panels of net connected end, whose length and height vary with the species to be captured. Each
piece of net is mounted on two cables, with a top of the cable floats called floats and bottom weights with a
number, called the cable leads. The wire cloth is soft and barely visible in the water. The small gillnet stay in the
water about 12 hours, and can be placed on the surface, midwater and bottom. The launch is performed by the
stern when there is no wind then they are dropped following the direction of the currents.
3.2. Characterization of the multispecific small-size fleet
The total production of the multispecific small fleet based in Cabo Frio City from 2003 to 2012 was 2,752 tons.
The 15 top species listed in this study represented 78.7% of yield totaling 2,166 tons. The species were the
dolphinfish-DOF (Coryphaena hippurus); bigeye tuna-BET (Thunnus obesus); albacore-ALB (Thunnus
alalunga); yellowfin tuna-YFT (Thunnus albacares); blackfin tuna-BLF(Thunnus atlanticus); skipjack tuna-SKJ
(Katsuwonus pelamis); little tuna-LTA (Euthynnus alletteratus); frigate tuna-FRI (Auxis thazard); sailfish-SAI
(Istiophorus platypterus); swordfish-SWO (Xiphias gladius); white marlin-WHT (Kajikia albida) and blue
marlin-BUM (Makaira nigricans); shortfin mako-SMA (Isurus oxyrinchus); blue shark-BSH (Prionace glauca);
tiger shark-TIG (Galeocerdo cuvier).
Analyzing fleet of Cabo Frio and Angra dos Reis (RJ) with emphasis on small purse seine between 1996 and
1998, Magro et al. (2002) observed from registers of 8,476 landings as much higher species diversity in Cabo
Frio than Angra dos Reis. Nevertheless, it was noted a decline in total production of Cabo Frio directly linked to
the decline in the number of active boats, which fell from 70 in 1996 to 62 in 1997 and just 50 in 1998, totaling
138 vessels (MAGRO et al., 2002). On the other hand, in the present study data were obtained from 470 boats
between 2003 and 2012, involving all fishing gear but possibly showing a growing in number of small fleet in
Cabo Frio.
It was observed that between 2003 to 2012 period, the main gear were surface longline-SLL, which represented
63.3% of the total weight caught and hand line-HL with 7.7% (Figure 1).
2858
Based in Cabo Frio City it was observed that the small-size fleet was 61.9% ocasionaly; 15.6% were Cabo Frio
resident, 12.3% had low dependency and 10.2% had high dependency. Only about 25% remains this fleet in
Cabo Frio all year round (Figure 2).
The boat sizes distribution was 73.6% between 11 to 15 meters long, 13.2% between 6 to 10 m, 12.4% higher
then 16 m and 8% lower then 5 m (Figure 3).
Jablonski (1997) analyzed the multispecific fleet of Cabo Frio and Arraial do Cabo (RJ), and between the years
1985 and 1995 the production of Cabo Frio represented on average 17% of total production in the state of Rio de
Janeiro. Between 1990 and 1996, the dolphinfish represented only 5% of the total catch in that period when the
fleet was headed for sardines (Jablonski, 1997).
Among the species listed in the present study, the dolphinfish was the most frequently captured, totaling 1,428 t
and representing 51.8% of the total yield for the hole period. The sailfish reached 250 t (9.1%), the yellowfin
tuna 187 t (6.8%) and the little tuna 128 t (4.6%). The total yield by the main species is represented in Figure 4.
It could be observed that the dolphinfish was the target species of the fishery, however some may have directed
the fleet to the sailfish. The analysis of Itaipava’s fleet in southern Brazil between 2001 and 2005 showed that
the dolphinfish represented 94% of the total catch from surface longline (Dallagnolo and Andrade, 2008).
The dolphinfish and sailfish were caught almost exclusively by surface longline-SLL (Figures 5 and 6). On the
other hand yellowfin tuna was captured basically by hand line-HL (Figure 7). The little tuna was mostly caught
by small purse seine-SPS, nevertheless also surface longline-SLL and small gillnet-SGN (Figure 8).
On surface longline-SLL fisheries, the main species were dolphinfish (1.408t - 80.8%) and sailfish (t 249.7 14.3%) (Figure 9). These data are very different from large scale surface longline, for example the japanese
longliners fleet in Brazil, as described by Silva (1994) from 1977 to 1991 that catched 24.7% of bigeye tuna,
20% of yellowfin and just 1% of sailfish. On the other hand, as described on the present study, according to
Pimenta et al. (2007) the surface longline small fleet of Cabo Frio has the dolphinfish as a target species.
The most of hand line-HL captured were yellowfin tuna (161 t, 75.8%), the blackfin tuna (22.5 t, 10.6%) and
also the dolphinfish (8.5 t, 4%) (Figure 10).
In the samll purse seine the main species was little tuna (62,2 t, 68,6%), frigate tuna (22,5 t, 24,8%) and skipjack
tuna (5,5 t, 6%) (Figure 11). Magro et al. (2002) studied the small purse seine fishery of Cabo Frio between
1996 and 1998 and observed that the little tuna represented just 6,7% of total capture in 1996, 6,5% in 1997 and
2,6% in 1998. The small purse seine fleet seems to had changed the target species that was sardine on the period
studied by Magro et al. (2002).
3.3. Length frequency of size distribution of main species
Length classes of dolphinfish, sailfish, yellowfin tuna and little tuna were shown in Figures 12, 13, 14 and 15.
We observed that the highest frequency of dolphinfish individuals was in the class of 100-105 cm. However, the
capture of individuals smaller than 65cm was also representative. Gadoni et al. (2011) analyzed the dolphinfish
capture off Southern Brazil between 1971 to 2010 and the most important length classes were 91-100 cm and
101-110 cm, quite similar to the present study and showing that the most frequent sizes have not changed too
much since 1971. However, another important length class was from 55 to 60 cm, the smallest individuals
catched between 2003-2012. According to Beardsley (1967) the size of first maturity is 42.5 cm for males and 35
cm for females from individuals from Florida. Bentivoglio (1988) described this size of 52.8 cm for males and
49-52 cm for females (Gulf of Mexico). Beardsley (1967) also observed that the size class at 100% maturity for
females was 55 cm. Perez et al (1992) reported the size class at 100% maturity for females from Puerto Rico as
60 cm. So that it is possible to infer that there is a high probability that the smallest dolphinfish individuals were
already mature and that is why this species did not show an intense decline along the years, even catching small
ones.
The most of specimens captured of sailfish in the period studied were from 160 to 170cm, the yellowfintuna
from 110 to 120cm and little tuna had the highest frequency observed between 40 and 45cm.
Figures 16, 17, 18 and 19 indicate the frequency of capture of different length classes of dolphinfish, sailfish,
yellowfin tuna and little tuna at intervals during the period 2003-2012. The species that showed the highest
2859
selectivity to the gear was the sailfish, which had the majority of individuals captured in the same class. The
other species were captured in different length classes.
References
Araújo, J.M. and Pimenta, E.G. 1995. Condicionantes socioeconômicas provenientes do movimento migratório
de embarcações pesqueiras no Município de Cabo Frio - RJ. Relatório Técnico do Projeto Marlim.
Beardsley, G.L.Jr. 1967. Age, growth and reproduction of the dolphin, Coryphaena hippurus, in the Straits of
Florida. Copeia,1967: 441-451.
Bentivoglio, A.A. 1988. Investigations into the growth, maturity, mortality rates and occurrence of the dolphin
(Coryphaena hippurus, Linnaeus) in the Gulf of Mexico. M.Sc. thesis, Universi- ty College of North
Wales, Bangor, UK. 37 pp.
Caverivière, A. 1976. Longueur prédorsale, longueur a la fourche et poids des albacores (Thunnus albacares) de
l’Atlantique. Cah. ORSTOM, ser. Océanogr., 14(3): 201-208.
Dallagnolo, R. and Andrade, H.A. 2008. Observações a respeito da pescaria sazonal de dourado (Coryphaena
hippurus) com espinhel-de-superfície no Sul do Brasil. B. Inst. Pesca, São Paulo, 34(2): 331-335.
Gadoni, T.B.; Fernandes, C.A.S.; Arfelli, C.A.; Pimenta, E.G.; and Amorim, A.F. 2011 Análise da captura de
Coryphaena hippurus (Perciformes, Coryphaenidae), no Sudeste e Sul do Brasil. Resumos expandidos da
10ª Reunião Científica do Instituto de Pesca, São Paulo, 7 a 8 de dezembro de 2011.
Jablonski, S. 1997. A pesca em Cabo Frio e Arraial do Cabo. Análise das estatísticas de desembarque. Fundação
Instituto de Pesca do Estado do Rio de Janeiro – FIPERJ.
Magro, M.; Moreira, L.H.A. and Cardoso, L.C. 2002. Estrutura e dinâmica da frota pesqueira de cerco atuante
em Angra dos Reis e Cabo Frio (Rio de Janeiro - Brasil). In: Análise das principais pescarias comerciais
do Sudeste-Sul do Brasil. Vol. 1. REVIZEE – Score Sul. p.180-222.
Perez, R.N.; Roman, A.M. and Rivera, G.A. 1992. Investigation of the reproductive dynamics and preliminary
evaluation of land- ings data of the dolphinfish Coryphaena hippurus, L. Final Report for DingellJohnson Project F26-1. Puerto Rico Department of Natural Resources Fishery Research Laboratory,
Mayaguez, PR. 95 pp.
Pimenta, E.G. and Marques, F.R. 2000. Diagnóstico e Implantação de Sistema Municipal de Acompanhamento
do Setor Pesqueiro em Cabo Frio, COPPE/GEPESCA/UFRJ.
Pimenta, E.G. and Lima, G. 2002. Conteúdo Estomacal de Istiophoridae e Ictiofauna acompanhante entre
1995/2002 no litoral do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Programa de Desenvolvimento Pesqueiro/Prefeitura da
Cidade de Cabo Frio&Gepesca-Gente/COPPE/UFRJ- Relatório Técnico / Data:12/02/02.
Pimenta, E.G.; Vidal, M.; Lima, G. and Amorim, A.F. 2007. Analysis on billfish fishery off Rio de Janeiro State,
Brazil (2002-03). Col. Vol. of Sci. Pap., ICCAT, Madri, 60 (5):1571-75.
Prager, M.H.; Lee, D.W. and Prince, E.D. 1995. Empirical length and weight conversion equations for blue
marlin, white marlin, and sailfish from the North Atlantic. Bull. Mar. Sci., 56: 201-210
Rodriguez-Roda, J. 1966. Estudio de la bacoreta, Euthynnus alletteratus (Raf.), bonito, Sarda sarda (Bloch) y
melva Auxis thazard (Lac.), capturados por las almadrabas españolas. Invest. Pesq. 30: 247-92.
Silva, J.N.A. 1994. Tuna fishery in Brazil by leased Japanese longliner fleet from 1977 to 1991. Col. Vol. Sci.
Pap. ICCAT, Madri, 41: 180-188.
2860
Figure 1. Gear composition of Cabo Frio small-size fleet: SLL (surfice longline), HL (hand line), MLL
(midwater longline), BLL (botton longline), BHL (botton hand line), SPS (small purseine), TRAP (trap), and
SGN (small gillnet) from 2003-2012.
Figure 2. Resident dependency composition of Cabo Frio small-size fleet: high, low, ocasionaly and resident
(2003-2012).
Figure 3. Boat size composition of Cabo Frio small-size fleet: 5 meters long, 6 to 10 m, 11 to 15 m and higher
then 16 m (2003-2012).
2861
Figure 4. Species composition of Cabo Frio small-size fleet (2003-2012).
Figure 5. Dolphinfish weight composition by gear and year of Cabo Frio small-size fleet (2003-2012).
Figure 6. Sailfish weight composition by gear and year of Cabo Frio small-size fleet (2003-2012).
2862
Figure 7. Yellowfin weight composition by gear and year of Cabo Frio small-size fleet (2003-2012).
Figure 8. Little tuna weight composition by gear and year of Cabo Frio small-size fleet (2003-2012).
2863
Figure 9. Species weight composition by surface longline-SLL of Cabo Frio small-size fleet (2003-2012).
Figure 10. Species weight composition by surface handline-HL of Cabo Frio small-size fleet (2003-2012).
Figure 11. Species weight composition by small purse seine-SPS of Cabo Frio small-size fleet (2003-2012).
2864
Figure 12. Dolphinfish weight frequency distribution (centimeters) of Cabo Frio small-size fleet (2003-2012).
Figure 13. Sailfish weight frequency distribution (centimeters) of Cabo Frio small-size fleet (2003-2012).
Figure 14. Yellow fin tuna weight frequency distribution (centimeters) of Cabo Frio small-size fleet (20032012).
2865
Figure 15. Little tuna weight frequency distribution (centimeters) of Cabo Frio small-size fleet (2003-2012).
Figure 16. Dolphinfish length frequency distribution (centimeters) by periods of Cabo Frio small-size fleet
(2003-2012).
Figure 17. Sailfish length frequency distribution (centimeters) by periods of Cabo Frio small-size fleet (20032012).
2866
Figure 18. Yellowfin length frequency distribution (centimeters) by periods of Cabo Frio small-size fleet (20032012).
Figure 19. Litthe tuna length frequency distribution (centimeters) by periods of Cabo Frio small-size fleet
(2003-2012).
2867