Sustainable production of microalgae biomass
Transcription
Sustainable production of microalgae biomass
Sustainable production of microalgae biomass - integrated waste conversion or genetic engineering Stefan Leu - MBL Global Climate Change – Our Worst Nightmare • Exponential growth of CO2 concentration drives exponential temperature increase. • Temperature increase is enhanced and accentuated by land use change (deforestation) and positive feedback mechanisms: Release of CO2 and Methane from thawing permafrost, lower ice albedo, increased exposed water surface, more irrigation etc. • The major negative feedback mechanism to greenhouse warming - cloud formation - is inhibited by deforestation. Biofuels as Mitigation Option? The poles are melting Recent Predictions Prediction 2008 Last Observation 2012 3.41 mio km2 IPCC IS wrong – but in the other direction!!! A 20 Mio km2 habitat disappears! And nobody has even started modeling the impact of that! Biofuels: Solution or Problem? Yield Consideration of Major Oil Crops: OIL CROP OIL YIELD PER HECTARE (KG) TIMES WORLDS CROPLAND Castor 1413 1.6 Sunflower 952 2 Safflower 779 3 Soy 446 4.5 Coconut, Jatropha 2689 0.8 Palm 5950 0.3 Algae (BGU estimate) 25000 0.06 Biofuels can provide either • • • • Environmental Macro-economic Socioeconomic Strategic benefits Best - all of them! But: They are not suitable to improve corporate profits! The Truth about Biofuels is more Complex Conventional Biofuels Competition for farmland Pressure on food prices Maize High water consumption Castor Toxicity Eutrophication Deforestation High carbon footprint Canola Jatropha Palm-Oil – Massive Deforestation Palmoil → Deforestation → Global Warming Example Jatropha – Tropical Savannas High inputs and pollution, poor yields! seeds in S’de Boker plantation in Rajastan Land type Area (mio km2) Natural Productivity (tons of carbon fixed per hectare and year) Fuel and yield (tons per ha / GJ per ha) % area of correspondin g ecosystem required to cover 2030 demand Tropical and subtropical evergreen forest 10.5 10.7 Palmoil biodiesel (5 / 189) 110%!!! Tropical and Subtropical Dry Forest 4.7 7.67 Jatropha biodiesel (1.5 / 56.7 ) 765%!! Tropical Savanna, Woodland 6.7 6.65 Cane-ethanol (4.34 / 116) 270 %!! Mid lattitude forests, abandoned croplands 14 5.30 Miscanthus cellulosic ethanol* (4.4 / 120) 95 %!! Warm Shrubland/grassl and or desert 33 1 – 3.50 Algaebiodiesel (20 / 756) 5.4 – 8.2 % Covering world fuel demand by conventional crops will require the whole available ecosystem areas; Only algae can do that on less than 10% of available dryland areas! Sapphire Energy Location Columbus, NM Feedstock(s) CO2/Algae/Sunlight/ Non-Potable Water Size 56 metric tons of CO2 per day; 300 cultivated acres 121 hectares Primary Products Capacity GHG Reduction Operations Jet fuel and diesel 1 million gallons per year of finished product 3.78 mio liters ~3000 tons per year 24 tons per ha 60-70% reduction compared to traditional fossil crude IS THAT SO? Phase 1 began with the inoculation of the first 100 acres of pond systems The true cost of oil to the US taxpayer • Including all of the following aspects to the price the individual US consumer pays at the pump makes the cost of a gallon of imported gas approximately $26 dollars. This amounts to about $15,400 per year for the average car in the US, or 70% of the median household income given 2.3 cars per household. • The true cost of importing oil to the US includes the following aspects: • The cost of the oil ($2.50) • Oil-related defense expenditures ($3.79) • The loss of domestic employment and related economic activity due to cash outflow for oil ($3.23) • The reduction in investment capital ($10.85) • The loss of local, state and federal tax revenues ($1.18) • The economic toll periodic oil supply disruptions impose on the domestic economy ($3.65) • Federal subsidies for oil & gas industry ($0.69) • The market cost of carbon ($0.18) Pricing shown per US tax payer; assumes $60 per barrel of oil and $20 per ton of CO2 Source: Testimony of Milton R. Copulos, President, National Defense Council Foundation, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, March 30, 2006; IMF, 2008; EIA; CleanTech Group, 2007; US Census Bureau; Experian Automotive; Paper presented to Congressional staff members by NDCF President Milt Copulos, January 8, 2007 (Source: http://www.sapphireenergy.com/learn-more/59518-the-true-cost-of-oil-to) Problems create opportunities • • • • • • Municipal waste Waste water Nutrient runoff Forestry residues Agricultural residues and manure Industrial CO2 emissions Water 800 - 1600 m3 evaporation per ton biodiesel, 2030 demand for liquid fuels would be 5.55 billion tons 5.55 bln times 1600 = 8800 billion m3 Recovery of 25% of projected water demand in the form of waste and drainage water would suffice to produce 20% of projected global fuel demand. 90% of developing World’s Water untreated! Conventional treatment costs energy, dissipates nitrogen and biomass! Acting now for establishing infrastructure!! Nutrient Run-Off and Dead Zones Many areas around the world are suffering from the problem of eutrophication. The Gulf of Mexico, Caspian Sea, Bering Sea and Arabian Sea. The Gulf of Mexico already has a huge Dead Zone which the scientists warn could expand further. Phytoplankton concentration along the North American Coastline Efficient Use Of Fertilizers Most fertilizers contain Phosphorus and Nitrogen on which these algae thrive hence it is that we use fertilizers that a) are biodegradable and b) contain lesser quantities of these elements. Also the farmers need to irrigate their lands in a scientific manner. Each crop requires a definite amount of water to give the best yield hence the farmers shouldn’t over-irrigate their lands since it could lead to more voluminous Integrated Algae Production Facility Sde Boker Harvesting Biogas CO2-nutrients 350 l tubular reactor 8 x 250 l raceways Greenhouse for inoculum Freshwater recycling 2 x 40 m2 raceways Panel reactors 1000 l 17 outdoor 370 L - 5cm panel outdoor 500 L - 7 cm panel (September 2012) (September 2012 ) 6 6 5 5 4 4 AFDW gr/L AFDW gr/L Hybrid cultivation 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 5 10 15 Days 20 25 0 5 10 15 20 25 Days outdoors cultivation of Nannochloropsis sp2 outdoors in a 5 cm panel (left, 0.27 g l-1day-1) and a 7 – 8 cm wide panel (right, 0.25 g l-1day-1) during September 2012. Record growth observed so far in small raceway ponds, early July 2013; the actual aerial productivity was about 28 g m-2 day-1 over 2.5 days; Large scale cultivation outdoors 400 l panel reactors (left) and the 5000 l raceway pond (partly shaded) growing Nannochloropsis sp2 outdoors. This hybrid approach can yield over 20 tons of biodiesel per ha and year! Integrated Resource Recovery Microalgae Nutrient, CO2, water and electricity supply from waste resources 2 Cultivation of Scenedesmus on Biogas Effluent A local Scenedesmus strain displays similar maximal growth rates in mBG11 as in conditioned 1:20 diluted biogas effluent. No bacterial or other contaminations were observed in the effluent during 10 days of cultivation, resources were exhausted after 6 days (picture right). 100 ha standard unit Inputs: • 20000 tons CO2 from gasification of 4000 tons algal residue and 10000 tons bio-waste; • All nitrogen and nutrient needs covered; • 3 mio cubic meters wastewater (50000 inhabitants plus corresponding industry and agriculture) Outputs: • to 15 Gigawatt-hours electricity (at 30% efficiency. bio-char or compost; • 7000 tons algae - ; 2000 tons fuel – 1000 ton high protein feed; • 100 units in Israel would cover 10 % fuel and 3% electricity demand; All technologies existing! Sustainable Sea Water Management • Biological Seawater treatment on site avoids any emissions, and safes infrastructure costs! • Evaporation compensated by wastewater; • 5 pond volumes capacity, 10 m deep = 2% of facility area! creates further opportunities and can contribute to culture thermoregulation! Cooling tower and cooling aggregate required for cooling of the panel reactors during spring, summer, and fall (in the background). LCA Impact of best practice analyzed Lardon et al 2009 Abiotic Depletion Eutrophication Global Warming Potential Emission of toxic substances into the environment Emission of toxic substances into the sea Preliminary impact analysis of our approach But we need real numbers from a significant pilot plant! Zero or negative: We recover more than we use! Negative: Negative: We avoid nutrient runoff from waste and waste water We avoid methane and N2O emissions; Strongly reduced; Only from Combusti on and materials Strongly reduced; Only from Combusti on and materials Negative: Our products reducing land use change 1:5 «World Overshoot Day»: After only eight months mankind has exhausted the resources earth can replenish in one year! There is no lack of resources, there is a lack of resource management (= “wild west” capitalism) Thank you for your attention