NEWSLETTER - Huntington Hospital

medical staff
July 2015
NEWSLETTER
Inside this issue:
From the President
From the President
A Bit of Fitness or Wearable Medical Devices
Summary of the Minutes
“Big brother is watching you.”
- George Orwell
Hello All Pediatricians
Like gravity, Moore’s law has remained a constant. It is the
observation put forth, originally in 1965, by Gordon
Moore, co-founder of Intel, that the number of transistors
in an integrated circuit would double approximately every
two years. This has allowed greater miniaturization and
capability with smaller and more portable devices, such as cell phones, over the
last few decades. This advancement has also opened the door for the creation of
wearable medical devices that may provide: monitoring of chronic conditions,
home based health care, instant athletic performance data, evaluation of rehabilitation goals, medication compliance or reaction, and telemedicine with remote
access to health care. We are entering a terra nova with the expanding use and
utility of these devices in medicine.
The first true wearable medical device was the Holter monitor, which allowed for
data acquisition that could be reviewed to aid in establishing cardiac diagnosis.
With the explosion in technology over the last twenty years and the incorporation
of applications that were previously limited to programs such as NASA, for astronaut monitoring, and the U.S. Army, for its Land Warrior Program, a host of new
technologies have become available to the consumer (Fotiadis, Constantine, and
Likas). The “wearable’s” market is rapidly expanding with 50,000 apps already
available and Credit Suisse estimating its financial worth at 3 to 5 billion dollars per
annum (Standen). In addition, large corporations, like Apple, see the benefit and
potential financial reward of this new market and are partnering with both Epic
continued on page 3
Board Meeting
As provided by the Bylaws of the Governing
Body and as the designated sub-committee
of the Governing Board the following items
were presented and approved by the Medical
Executive Committee of June 1, 2015 and by
the Governing Board on June 25, 2015.
volume 53, issue 7
Administrative
Reports
Please go to SharePoint→
Medical Staff Services →
Board Approved Items →
2015 and select June 2015
to see:
continued on page 2
Celebrating Milestones
From Physician Informatics
Cerner Training
From the Clinical
Documentation Specialists
1, 3
1-2
4
4
5
5
5-6
Bioethics Corner
7-9
The Doctor-ComputerPatient Relationship:
A New Paradigm
10
Revised IR/Rad Procedure
Consent Process
11
Physicians Inspiring Donors:
Dr. Sunil Hegde
9
Getting to Know Your
Medical Staff Leaders
11
Huntington Hospital
Cancer Center
12
New Heart Failure
Monitoring Solution
13
CME Corner
12
Dr Ohanian Honored with
Stroke Hero Award
13
Medical Staff
Meeting Calendar
CME Calendar
14
15
medical staff newsletter
Medical Staff Appointments
Chon, John, DO
Emergency Medicine
100 West California Boulevard
Emergency Department
Pasadena, CA 91109
Tel: (626) 397-5111
Fax: (626) 397-2981
Parihar, Jaspreet, MD
effective 8/1/2015
Urology
1500 East Duarte Road
Duarte, CA 91010
Tel: (626) 218-0521
Fax: (626) 301-8285
Derebery, M. Jennifer, MD
Otolaryngology
2100 West Third Street
Los Angeles, CA 90057
Tel: (213) 483-9930
Fax: (213) 989-7473
Schwartz, Marc S., MD
Neurosurgery
2100 West 3rd Street
Los Angeles, CA 90057
Tel: (213) 353-7067
Fax: (213) 484-5900
Fischel, David, DO
Internal Medicine
100 W. California Blvd.
Internal Medicine
Residency Program
Pasadena, CA 91109
Fax: (626) 397-2950
Stefan, Michael R., MD
Internal Medicine
2100 West Third Street
Suite 260
Los Angeles, CA 90057
Tel: (213) 484-2957
Fax: (213) 484-2970
Garimella, Sree N., MD
Internal Medicine
207 S. Santa Anita Avenue
Suite 205
San Gabriel, CA 91776
Tel: (626) 795-2244
Fax: (626) 254-8250
Luxford, William M., MD
Otolaryngology
House Clinic
2100 West Third Street
Suite 111
Los Angeles, CA 90057
Tel: (213) 483-9930
Fax: (213) 989-7473
Minasyan, Lilit, MD
Ophthalmology
625 S. Fair Oaks Avenue
Suite 240
Pasadena, CA 91105
Tel: (626) 817-4747
Fax: (626) 817-4748
2
Medical Staff Resignations
• Carvajal, Sam, MD – General Surgery –
effective June 30, 2015
• Chang, Laura, MD – Internal Medicine –
effective June 30, 2015
• Dikranian, Hagop, MD – Urology –
effective September 30, 2015
• Kolb, Bradford, MD – Obstetrics & Gynecology –
effective August 31, 2015
• Manrique, Oscar, MD – Plastic Surgery –
effective June 30, 2015
• Matthews, Ray, MD – Cardiology –
effective June 30, 2015
• Ong, Oliva, MD – Ophthalmology –
effective July 31, 2015
• Prabharasuth, Derek, MD – Urology –
effective June 30, 2015
• Sheng, Alexander, MD – Physical Med &
Rehab – effective June 25, 2015
• Tamayo, Joana, MD – Obstetrics & Gynecology –
effective August 31, 2015
medical staff newsletter
From the President
continued from page 1
and the Mayo Clinic to create a product, termed
HealthKit, which would integrate wearable devices
and the medical world (HCRI).
The FDA has stepped into the fray by stating that
it will continue to regulate devices that can be used
for the diagnosis or treatment of medical conditions; however, the FDA will not regulate “low-risk
devices” that are intended only to promote general
wellness, i.e. weight loss, stress management, or
physical fitness. This leaves the field wide open for
the acquisition and permutation of personal medical data with wearable technologies that can be
garnered for other uses such as blood pressure or
heart rate monitoring (Standen).
At the other end of all this technological wizardry
sits the doctor. The amount of data collected by
these devices is substantial, if not staggering.
Patients now can present spreadsheets of data to
be analyzed during their visits or request remote
evaluation and interpretation by a physician. This
could potentially bypass the need for physician led
patient examination and a potential loss of more
important subtle data that may not otherwise be
obtained by a device--in essence, possibly relegating
us to true data analysts like Maytag repairmen.
The advent of truly wearable electronic health care
devices has opened the door to many significant
advances in our understanding of disease processes,
appropriate intervention, preventative care, and
community wellness. Yet, like all new shiny technologies, the bugs need to be worked out of the system.
Physicians will need to educate their patients on the
appropriate uses and important data points and
guard against micromanagement and technological
perseveration. It will also be our duty to continue
to physically interact and guide our patients with
the healing touch that defines our profession.
James Shankwiler, MD
President of the Medical Staff
Works Cited
Fotiadis, Dimitrios I., Constantine Glaros, and Aristidis Likas. "Wearable Medical Devices." ResearchGate.
University of Ioannina, 8 July 2014. Web. 7 June 2015. <http%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2F
publication%2F228007289_Wearable_Medical_Devices>.
HCRI Staff. "Wearable Tech: Is 2015 the Year of Resurgence for Medical Device Innovation?" HCRI Network.
HealthCare Recruiters International, 12 Feb. 2015. Web. 07 June 2015. <http://www.hcrnetwork.com/
wearable-tech-is-2015-the-year-of-resurgence-for-medical-device-innovation/>.
Standen, Amy. "Sure You Can Track Your Health Data, But Can Your Doctor Use It?" National Public Radio.
NPR, 19 Jan. 2015. Web. 07 June 2015. <http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2015/01/19/
377486437/sure-you-can-track-your-health-data-but-can-your-doctor-use-it>.
volume 53, issue 7
3
medical staff newsletter
Hello all Pediatricians
HMH is opening a Bili (bilirubin) and weight
check clinic on Saturdays from 9 am to noon.
Clinic will be opening June 6, 2015 including
holiday weekends.
The clinic will be staffed by one of the Maternity
RN’s. The service will be provided to any infant
who is delivered at Huntington Hospital. The
pediatrician will pre-register the patient with
the maternity unit secretary.
There are a few steps and paperwork that will
need to be completed. We will need an order
from the pediatrician, which includes an order
for the outpatient visit, TCB, and weight check.
The primary care RN will provide instructions
to the patient on appointment time, arrival,
and place to check in.
On Saturday the patient will check in with the
LD secretary and have a seat in the LD waiting
room. The Maternity RN will greet the patient,
and take the patient to the HRIF (high risk
infant follow-up) clinic which is located in the
admitting department. The transcutaneous
bilirubin will be assessed along with the current
weight. The pediatrician will receive a phone
call from the maternity RN on the results of
the TCB and weight check. If the TCB is reading
greater than 12 mg the pediatrician will need
to order a TSB (serum bili). Serum bili results
will be called to the pediatrician once available.
The pediatrician will decide on discharging
patient home with further instructions of
follow up in the office or admit to NICU or
PEDs. The physician will contact the NICU or
PEDs department for a direct admission.
Thank you very much. If you have any further
questions please contact Rav at 626-397-3269
or Cathy at 626-397-3265
Ravinder Johl RN, BSN
OB Department Manager
4
Celebrating Milestones
The following physicians hit a service
milestone in the month of July. The Medical
Staff would like to recognize the following
physicians for their service and dedication
to Huntington Hospital.
45 Years (on staff 07/1970)
Joseph A. Oliver, MD – Gynecology
30 Years (on staff 07/1985)
Michael J. Gurevitch, MD – Pulmonary Disease
25 Years (on staff 07/1990)
Edward A. Helfand, DPM – Podiatry
David A. Voron, MD – Dermatology
20 Years (on staff 07/1995)
Mayer Y. Rashtian, MD – Electrophysiology
10 Years (on staff 07/2005)
Kjell N. Hult, MD – Anesthesiology
Kevin O. Lawrence, MD – Physical
Med & Rehab
Stefanie L. Lehfeldt, MD – Anesthesiology
Viguen G. Movsesian, MD – Psychiatry
Shanika D. Perera, MD – Anesthesiology
Vyshali S. Rao, MD – Interventional Cardiology
Corrections
From the January newsletter:
40 Years (on staff 01/1975)
Joseph A. Oliver, MD – Gynecology
From the April newsletter:
15 Years (on staff 04/2000)
J. Gordon McComb, MD –
Pediatric Neurosurgery
Henry H. Tsai, MD – Obstetrics & Gynecology
Roger C. Yang, MD – Emergency Medicine
medical staff newsletter
From Physician Informatics
Celebrating our Surgeons:
So far, we have achieved our goal of a compliance rate
of 90% or better on the Joint Commission mandated
hard stop for the Informed Consent/Attestation note in
the Operating Room. We would like to thank all of you
for cooperating with the process and for achieving such
a high compliance in a short period of time.
An issue with compliance fallouts now is the accuracy of
the H&P attestation choices made by the surgeons – we
are working diligently with surgeons on this.
In October 2014 the Surgery Committee recommended as
an action item that informed consent be documented in
a separate Informed Consent/Attestation note in Cerner.
This was approved by the Medical Executive Committee
in November 2014.
A few surgeons are not completing the informed consent
portion of this Note, choosing to leave the informed
consent attestation in their H&P, progress note or elsewhere, if at all. The nurses are getting confused about
what is complete and have trouble finding the informed
consent, as previously, on paper, it was all in one place.
As always they are also required to document that this
is present as part of the pre-op check list.
In the past an informed consent has been required prior
to a procedure, but there has not been a hard stop if
it was not located in the separate Informed Consent/
Attestation note. Please be prepared to work with the
nurses and support teams in ensuring completeness
of this portion of the Informed Consent/Attestation
note before your patient can be brought back to the
operating room.
We thank you again for your positive attitude and
cooperation with this process.
Dr. David Lourié, MD, Physician Champion,
Vice-Chair Quality Management
Steven Battaglia, MD, Chair Dept of Surgery
James Shankwiler, MD, President Medical Staff
volume 53, issue 7
Cerner Training
Do you still have questions about Cerner or
want some additional training? The Cerner
Fundamental Refresher classes are offered
Monday, Wednesday and Fridays throughout
May at 8:30 a.m. and 1:30 p.m. Please register via bookeo.com/huntingtonhospital or
call ext. 2500.
From the Clinical
Documentation Specialists
What is Clinical Document
Improvement (CDI)
Clinical documentation is pivotal in
determining and supporting medical
necessity. Hospitals throughout the
country employ Clinical Documentation
Improvement Specialists (CDIS), who
review the patient record to facilitate an
accurate representation of healthcare
services through complete and accurate
reporting of diagnoses and procedures.
CDIs provide feedback in the form of a
written query or electronic message. At
Huntington, the queries are found in the
Message Center of Cerner.
The queries are designed to ensure that
all documentation is of high quality and
paints a true picture of the care being
provided to the patient, and is a proper
reflection of the RAMI (risk adjusted mortality index) that determines the hospital
and provider’s profile/health ratings.
When proper documentation is made, it
leads to the proper code, DRG, Severity
of Illness (SOI) and Risk of Mortality
(ROM) and makes the patient record
more impervious to auditor oversight.
continued on page 6
5
medical staff newsletter
From the Clinical Documentation Specialists continued from page 5
How to Respond to a Query:
1. Queries are sent to your Message Center in Cerner. They are located in the General Messages
folder and can be filtered by the Subject “CDI Query”.
2. To respond directly to a query from the Message Center:
Select “Reply” > Enter your response > Select “Send”.
3. To respond to the query from within the patient’s record: Go to “Documentation” > Open the
query, select “Modify” > Enter your response as an Addendum, select “Sign”.
The CDI team is here to assist you with your documentation needs.
Please feel free to call us if you have any questions.
Karen Beal, RN, BSN, CCDS, ext. 2024
Maria Gilda Villanueva, CCDS, ext. 3665
Theresa Cardona, RN, CCDS, ext. 3787
Gabriella Pearlman, MD, CDI Physician Advisor &
ICD10 Champion, ext. 5183
6
medical staff newsletter
Bioethics Corner
Wendy Kohlhase, Ph.D.
Ext. 2036
An Official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM Policy Statement: Responding to Requests
for Potentially Inappropriate Treatments in Intensive Care Units
Published June 1, 2015 in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
An ad hoc committee of The American Thoracic
Society composed of nineteen healthcare clinicians
has been meeting over the past several years to
discuss the issue of how to best manage requests
by patients or surrogates for treatments that the
clinicians believe should not be provided; treatments
the ad hoc committee defines as “potentially inappropriate.” The ad hoc committee focused on
cases presenting to the ICU. The purpose of establishing the ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM Policy
Statement is to provide recommendations on both
preventing and managing these cases in the ICU.
Huntington has progressed away from using the
term “futile” treatment and currently uses the
terms “medically ineffective” and “medically nonbeneficial” treatment to remain consistent with
CA Probate Codes that pertain to this subject.
The ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM Policy Statement, however, encourages the use of the term
“potentially inappropriate” treatment. In addition,
Huntington’s “DNAR/Withholding and Withdrawing
of Life-Sustaining Treatment” policy # 8740.050
describes procedures on responding to requests
for medically ineffective or non-beneficial treatment (section IV of the policy). The procedure
described in Huntington’s policy is quite similar to
the process described in the ATS/AACN/ACCP/
ESICM/SCCM Policy Statement in regards to
conflict resolution. Of note, Huntington has not yet
endorsed or implemented the ATS/AACN/ACCP/
ESICM/SCCM Policy State mentor its recommendations, but is circulating this information for
review and input.
The following are highlights of the ATS/AACN/ ACCP/
ESICM/SCCM Policy Statement recommendations:
volume 53, issue 7
Recommendation 1- Institutions should implement
strategies to prevent intractable treatment conflicts, including proactive communication and early
involvement of expert consultants.
1. Collaborative decision-making is a fundamental
aspect of good medical care and is therefore a
valuable ethical goal to foster. The ad hoc committee specifically recommends efforts to teach
clinicians end-of-life communications skills,
including strategies to achieve shared decisionmaking conflict resolution skills, and skills to
emotionally support surrogates.
2. Once conflicts become intractable, there are
only “second best” resolution strategies which
are likely to be protracted and burdensome to
all parties involved.
3. Most disagreements in ICUs arise not from the
intractable value conflicts, but from breakdown
in communication interventions. Evidence suggests
that most clinician-patient/surrogate conflicts
can be resolved through ongoing communication or with the help of expert consultants, such
as ethics or palliative care consultants.
4. The committee recommends increased efforts
to teach clinicians end-of-life communication
skills, including strategies to achieve shared
decision-making, conflict resolution skills, and
skills to emotionally support surrogates facing
difficult decisions.
5. Clinicians and Administrators should ensure that
reliable systems are in place to achieve timely,
effective clinician-surrogate communication.
6. Hospitals should implement strategies to identify
and intervene on growing conflict in the ICU by
continued on page 8
7
medical staff newsletter
Bioethics
continued from page 7
encouraging involvement of individuals skilled
in negotiation and communication, such as ethics
or palliative care consultants or social workers
and chaplains.
Recommendation 2– The term “potentially inappropriate” should be used, rather than “futile” to
describe treatment that should have at least some
chance of accomplishing the effect sought by
the patient, but clinicians believe that competing
ethical considerations justify not providing.
Clinicians should communicate and advocate for
the treatment plan they believe is appropriate.
Requests for potentially inappropriate treatments
that remain intractable despite intensive communication and negotiation should be managed by a
fair process of conflict resolution.
1. The word “inappropriate” conveys more clearly
than the word “futile” or “ineffective” that the
assertion being made by clinicians depends both
on technical medical expertise and a value-laden
claim, rather than strictly a technical judgment.
2. The word “potentially” signals that the
judgments are preliminary, rather than final,
and require review before being acted on.
3. The ethical concerns that may be raised to
justify the refusals include concerns that treatment is highly unlikely to be successful, is
extremely expensive, or is intended to achieve
a goal of controversial value.
4. Several considerations justify a procedural
approach to conflict resolution, rather than
giving all decision-making authority to either
surrogates or individual clinicians.
5. Hospitals should develop and adopt conflictresolution processes that contain the seven
characteristics detailed below:
a. Enlist expert consultation to aid in
achieving a negotiated agreement
b. Give notice of the process to surrogates
c. Obtain a second medical opinion
d. Provide review by an interdisciplinary
hospital committee
e. Offer surrogates the opportunity for
transfer to an alternate institution
8
f. Inform surrogates of their opportunity
to pursue extramural appeal
g. Implement the decision of the
resolution process
6. Management of time-pressured decisions
a. When time pressures make it infeasible
to complete all steps of the conflictresolution process and clinicians
have a high degree of certainty that
the requested treatment is outside
accepted practice, they should refuse
to provide the requested treatment
and endeavor to achieve as much
procedural oversight as the clinical
situation allows.
Recommendation 3– There are two less-common
situations for which the committee recommends
different management strategies.
1. Requests for strictly futile interventions- the
term “futile” should only be used in the rare
circumstances that an intervention simply cannot accomplish the intended physiologic goal.
a. This narrow definition is used because
it highlights a basic distinction between
interventions that cannot work [futile
treatment: performing CPR on a patient
with signs of irreversible death, ie. rigor
mortis] and those that might accomplish
the desired physiologic effect but raises
countervailing ethical concerns [potentially
inappropriate treatment- example:
performing CPR on a critically ill patient
with widespread metastatic cancer.
2. Requests for legally proscribed or legally
discretionary treatments
a. Legally proscribed treatments are those
that are prohibited by applicable laws,
judicial precedent, or accepted public
policies. Example- A surrogate of a patient
requests that physicians expedite liver
transplantation by circumventing existing
organ allocation practices; the clinician is
justified in refusing the request.
continued on page 9
medical staff newsletter
Bioethics continued from page 8
b. Legally discretionary treatments are
those treatments for which there are
specific laws or polices that give
physicians permission to refuse to
administer them. Example- State
probate statutes that allow physicians
permission to forego CPR and other
procedures in strongly defined
circumstances.
Recommendation 4– The medical profession should
lead public engagement efforts and advocate for
policies and legislation about when life-prolonging
technologies should not be used.
1. Developing clear societal policies and legislation
about the appropriate boundaries of medical
practice near the end of life would foster
transparency in limit setting and may allow
more efficient resolution of individual cases.
2. Informed patients must partner in developing
substantive policies and legislation because
they will experience the effects of such decisions
and because the boundaries of acceptable
medical practice require value judgments that
go beyond the expertise of clinicians.
3. Public engagement should have a goal of
eliciting informed, considered judgments from
key stakeholders to promote input into policy
development.
See site link for abstract and access to full text:
http://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1164/
rccm.201505-0924ST?journalCode=ajrccm#.
VXT-30YjnV8
Physicians Inspiring Donors: Dr. Sunil Hegde
Grateful patients make generous donors and, according to nationwide data,
physicians are overwhelmingly influential to a donor’s decision to make a gift
to the hospital.
Each year, charitable support for Huntington Memorial Hospital fills the
ever-widening gap between revenue and expenses, helping to pay for the critical
programs, facilities and services that today’s informed patients demand. The
Office of Philanthropy at Huntington Hospital is grateful for the exceptional
physicians who help us engage potential donors.
Dr. Sunil Hegde speaking at
Dr. Sunil Hegde, Medical Director of Rehabilitation Services, has assisted the
a check presentation by the
office of philanthropy in several important ways. Recently, by authoring a mail
Flintridge La Canada Guild
appeal requesting funds for the NeuroRehab Center, Dr. Hegde helped to secure
last spring.
nearly $600,000 from more than 800 community donors, which will directly
benefit Rehabilitation Services and the patients Dr. Hedge and his colleagues are serving. Additionally,
Dr. Hedge has helped the office of philanthropy cultivate meaningful relationships with donors and prospective
donors which will continue leading to charitable donations to Huntington Hospital.
The Office of Philanthropy is exceedingly grateful to all our physician-partners – like Dr. Sunil Hegde – who
go above and beyond the call of duty to engage donors in a meaningful way and help us transform grateful patients into generous donors. We look forward sharing more stories about physicians inspiring donors
in future issues of this newsletter.
If you would like more information about working with potential donors, please contact Tracy Smith
at 626-397-3241 or [email protected].
volume 53, issue 7
9
medical staff newsletter
The Doctor-Computer- Patient Relationship: A New Paradigm
The traditional interaction between doctors and
patients included an empathetic association
attained by a face to face interaction. This contributed to the assessment of the person's condition
and in turn an increased compliance in accepting
and following medical advice. Over the last five
decades, it was recognized that a disease is not
only a disruption of bodily functions produced by
an external factor, but rather a constellation of
symptoms, where other elements such as anxiety,
despair, socio-economic issues, family matters,
emotional derangements and personal issues,
among others, play a significant role in causation
and outcome. In other words: context is as important as etiology. When these and other elements
are being taken into consideration the disease
becomes part of the totality of the patients' life
situation. It is no longer a bacteria that produces
an infection, but a myriad of other factors that
contributes to its occurrence; which explains why
only some exposed to a same agent become sick
and also the variation in severity and response
to treatment.
When medical technology moved forward, and
doctors became overwhelmed by the demands
of their profession, the face- to- face interaction
between patients and physicians became less
common. This was recognized by Medical Schools
and health agencies, which added to their curricula subjects to foster patient-centered attitudes.
They started teaching medical students and
physicians the significance of non-verbal communication, body language, empathy, the concept of
transference and contra-transference, social and
family issues, patient satisfaction, compliance,
psychosocial problems, health outcomes, coping
strategies, stress management and the variables
in the physician decision actions. In spite of these
efforts, many doctors are failing patients by not
attending to their emotional needs. In contrast,
other care providers have what it takes to make
patients happy. I have seen this as a leader of
Balint's groups. Michael Balint was the pioneer in
the understanding of doctor-patient relationship
10
and wrote a seminal book "The Doctor, His Patient
and the Illness". He taught practitioners the skills
to improve the care of their patients by incorporating the psychological aspects of the disease. In
my fifty years of practice I came to recognize
those physicians who provide effective and
competent care with a human touch. In almost all
the cases they have an innate ability to connect
with patients and their milieu or have learned
the importance of bonding with the infirm at an
emotional level.
Over the last several years the introduction of
electronic medical records (EMR) has become
part of the standard of care. It has been designed
to collect data to improve the quality of care,
prevent medical errors, improve care coordination,
diminish health risks and expand best practices.
According to a recent paper published in the
New England Journal of Medicine it is an effective
tool in providing better quality care. Although
this may be indisputable, what has not been taken
into consideration is the role that the computer
has in interfering with the long-established
doctor-patient relationship. The eye contact, the
appreciation of the body language, non-verbal
gestures, and the reception and acknowledgment
of patient's emotions is greatly diminished. It is
now the notebook, the laptop or the computer
that requires the physician's attention in detriment
to the patient. Is no longer the doctor's brain
asking questions but rather the software used by
practitioner that formulates all the queries. As the
doctor enters all the data, the interaction between
two human beings is sent into exile. Perhaps a
new application may be developed which will
order the doctor to stop gazing at the keyboard,
look at the patient, smile, note the color of the eyes,
elicit her/his preoccupation about the disease and
show genuine sympathy and compassion.
David S. Cantor MD
Past President of Medical Staff 2003-2004
Huntington Memorial Hospital
medical staff newsletter
Getting to Know Your Medical Staff Leaders
Douglas Willard, MD has been a member of the Department of Medicine, Emergency
Medicine Section, since 1988. He is the Chair of the Emergency Medicine Section
for the term 2015-2016. Dr. Willard is board certified in Emergency Medicine and
Internal Medicine.
Dr. Willard was born and raised in Southern California. He obtained his MD degree
in 1979. He completed his Medical Internship at Harbor-UCLA in 1980, followed by
Residency training in Internal Medicine/Emergency Medicine at Huntington Hospital from 1980 to 1983.
He stayed on at Huntington to complete his Fellowship training in Liver Diseases from 1983 to 1985.
Dr. Willard exclusively practiced primary emergency medicine since 1985, and has been a full-time staff
emergency physician at Huntington since 1992. Dr. Willard has served on the Trauma Services Committee
in the past and currently serves on the Quality Management Committee.
Dr. Willard is married and has twin 19-year old sons who have finished their freshman year in college.
Dr. Willard enjoys reading non-fiction, including history, philosophy and current events. For regular
exercise he enjoys walking. He relaxes with the family golden retriever and tangerine cat. His favorite
spectator sport remains baseball.
Revised IR/Rad Procedure Consent Process
The “IR gen” order power plan and the informed consent workflow for radiological procedures have been revised. This new workflow and power plan will go live throughout the
hospital in Cerner on July 21st. The changes will optimize safety, standard of care practices,
and continue to maintain patient rights regarding procedure consent processes. The patient
will no longer sign the informed consent on the floor. The patient will sign the informed
consent in the Radiology department after speaking with the Radiologist performing the
procedure. After discussing the recommended procedure and options with the patient, the
ordering physician will place a “request” in Cerner, which should be entered as “IR procedure request”. There are new required fields in the power plan that must be addressed before signing. This power plan will be an “automatic initiate” after signing. The requisition
for the order will print in the Radiology department and at that juncture, the Radiologist will
determine the appropriate modality for the request (ie, CT, U/S, fluoro, etc.). If a patient is
incapacitated/medicated and cannot consent, the next of kin or designated DPOA will need
to be contacted ahead of time by the floor RN or ordering physician to ensure their availability for the procedure consent. The nursing staff and physicians will receive the Cerner
update and appropriate training as deemed necessary by the Cerner support staff before
the go live date. Please be patient while we adjust to this new workflow.
Wafaa Alrashid, MD
volume 53, issue 7
11
medical staff newsletter
Huntington Hospital Cancer Center
Receives National Outstanding Achievement
Award from American College of Surgeons’
Commission on Cancer
Award recognizes cancer programs that achieve excellence
in providing highest quality care to cancer patients
The Huntington Memorial Hospital Cancer Center (HHCC) was recently presented with the
2014 Outstanding Achievement Award by the Commission on Cancer (CoC) of the American College
of Surgeons (ACS). HHCC is one of a select group of only 75 U.S. health care facilities with accredited
cancer programs to receive this national honor for surveys performed last year. The award acknowledges cancer programs that achieve excellence in providing quality care to cancer patients. “A cancer
diagnosis is among one of the most challenging experiences a patient can face,” said Howard Kaufman, MD,
medical director of HHCC. “This accreditation, in combination with the Outstanding Achievement
Award, validates the exceptional care our team of physicians and nurses provides to help improve the
quality of life for our patients during this difficult time.”
HHCC cancer program was evaluated on 34 program standards categorized within four cancer
program activity areas: cancer committee leadership, cancer data management, clinical services, and
quality improvement. The cancer program was further evaluated on seven commendation standards.
All award recipients must have received commendation ratings in all seven commendation standards,
in addition to receiving a compliance rating for each of the 27 other standards.
CME Corner
Please note Second Monday and Medical Grand Rounds will resume
in September.
If you would like a copy of you CME credit report please contact Maricela Alvarez via email at
[email protected]
MEDICAL GRAND ROUNDS
Topic:
Stroke Prevention
Speaker:
Arbi G. Ohanian, MD
Date:
September 4, 2015
Time:
Noon – 1 p.m.
Place:
Research Conference Hall
Audience: Neurology, Internal Medicine &
Primary Care Physicians
Methods:
Lecture
Credits:
1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™
12
SECOND MONDAY
Topic:
Hyperthyroidism
Speakers: Charles F. Sharp, MD
Date:
September 14, 2015
Time:
Noon – 1 p.m.
Place:
Research Conference Hall
Audience: Endocrinology, Internal Medicine,
& Primary Care Physicians
Methods:
Lecture
Credits:
1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™
medical staff newsletter
Huntington Memorial Hospital
Becomes First in the San Gabriel Valley to Offer
Patients a New Heart Failure Monitoring Solution
Implantation of a new miniaturized, wireless monitoring sensor to manage heart
failure (HF) is a new technique now available at Huntington. The CardioMEMS
HF System is the first and only FDA-approved heart failure monitoring device that
has been proven to significantly reduce hospital admissions when used by
physicians to manage heart failure. The CardioMEMS HF System features a
sensor that is implanted in the pulmonary artery (PA) during a procedure to directly Dr. Vyshali S. Rao,
measure PA pressure. Increased PA pressures appear before weight and blood Interventional
pressure changes, which are often used as indirect measures of worsening heart Cardiologist
failure. The new system allows patients to transmit daily sensor readings from their
homes to their health care providers allowing for personalized and proactive management to reduce the
likelihood of hospitalization.
“CardioMEMS is an exciting and valuable tool and we are proud to bring this specialized care to our patients
and the community,” said interventional cardiologist Dr. Vyshali S. Rao. The CardioMEMS sensor is designed
to last the lifetime of the patient and doesn’t require batteries. Once implanted, the wireless sensor sends
pressure readings to an external patient electronic system. The CHAMPION trial studied the effectiveness
of the system in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification System class III heart
failure patients who had been hospitalized for heart failure in the previous 12 months. Results of the trial
demonstrated a statistically significant 28 percent reduction in the rate of heart failure hospitalizations at
six months, and 37 percent reduction in heart failure hospitalizations during an average follow-up duration
of 15 months. Roughly 1.4 million patients in the U.S. have NYHA Class III heart failure, and historically
these patients account for nearly half of all heart failure hospitalizations. According to the American Heart
Association, the estimated direct and indirect cost of heart failure in the U.S. for 2012 was $31 billion and
that number is expected to more than double by 2030.
For more information, visit http://www.heartfailureanswers.com/.
Dr. Arbi Ohanian
Honored with Stroke Hero Award from
the American Stroke Association
Arbi Ohanian, MD, medical director of Huntington Memorial Hospital’s
Primary Stroke Center, was recently honored with the American Stroke
Association’s Stroke Hero Award. Dr. Ohanian received this award
after being nominated by Tammy Rocker, American Heart Association
Senior Vice President. “We are proud to honor Dr. Arbi Ohanian for his
exemplary service supporting stroke survivors as they work to beat
stroke,” said Ms. Rocker.
volume 53, issue 7
13
medical staff newsletter
July 2015 Medical Staff Meetings
monday
tuesday
wednesday
-1-
- Noon
CME Committee - CR-8
- 12:15 p.m.
OB/GYN Peer Review CR 5&6
- 12:15 p.m.
OB/GYN Dept CR 5&6
- 5:30 p.m.
Medical Executive Board Room
-6-
-7-
- 8 a.m.
QMC Pre-agenda CR-C
-13-
-14-
-20-
-21-
- Noon
- Noon
Transfusion Subcommittee - Critical Care Section N/S Room
CR 5&6
- 12:30 p.m.
Ophthalmology Sct CR-8
- 9:30 a.m.
SCAN Team - CR-10
- 10:30 a.m.
PMCC - CR-10
- 8 a.m.
Emergency Medicine
Sct - ED Conf. Room
- 12:15 p.m.
Urology Section - CR 5&6
- Noon
Psychiatry Sect. CR 10
- Noon
GME East Room
14
-27-
- 5:30 p.m.
Surgery Committee CR 5&6
-28-
- 7:30 a.m.
Interdisciplinary Practice CR-C
- Noon
General Surgery Section CR 5&6
- 5 p.m.
Robotic Committee CR 5&6
thursday
-2-
- 8 a.m.
Neurology - CR 8
- Noon
Medicine Committee N/S Conf. Room
-8-
-9-
-15-
-16-
- 6:30 a.m.
- 10 a.m.
Anesthesia Sct - CR-7
PICU/Peds QI - Noon
CR 2
QM Committee - 12:15 p.m.
East Room
OB/GYN Committee - 5:30 p.m.
CR 5&6
Neonatal/Pediatric
- Newsletter Submission Surgical Case Review CR-10
- 7:30 a.m.
Cardiology Section Cardiology Conf. Room
- 12:15 p.m.
Credentials Committee CRC
- 12:15 p.m.
Hem/Med Onc. CR-5
-22-
-29-
friday
- 6:30 a.m.
Anes Peer - CR-7
- Noon
G.I. Section - CR-10
- Noon
PT&D Comm - CR 5&6
- 3 p.m.
Neonatal QI - CR-10
- 6 p.m.
Bioethics - CR 5&6
-3-
July 4th Holiday
-10-
- 7:30 a.m.
Neurosurgery Sect CR 11
- Noon
Trauma Services CR B Wingate Bldg.
- 7:30 a.m.
Spine Committee CR-11
-17-
-23-
-24-
-30-
-31-
- Noon
Cancer Committee N/S Room
- 12:15 p.m.
Pediatric Committee East Room
- 5:30 p.m.
Metabolic & Bariatric
Surg. Committee - CR-10
medical staff newsletter
July 2015 CME Calendar
monday
tuesday
wednesday
thursday
-1-
-2-
-3-
-7-
-8-
-9-
-10- Noon - 1 p.m.
MDisc Breast Cancer Conf.,
Conf. Room 11
-14-
-15-
-16-
-17-
- Noon - 1 p.m.
MDisc Breast Cancer Conf.,
Conf. Room 11
-21-
- Noon - 1 p.m.
Radiology Teaching Files,
MRI Conf. Room
-23-
- 7:30 - 9 a.m.
Neurosurgery Grand Rounds,
Conf. Room 11
- Noon - 1 p.m.
MDisc Breast Cancer Conf.,
Conf. Room 11
- Noon - 1 p.m.
- Noon - 1 p.m.
Genitourinary Cancer Conf., Thoracic Cancer Conf.,
Conf. Room 11
Conf. Room 11
- Noon - 1 p.m.
Radiology Teaching Files,
MRI Conf. Room
-6-
- 12:15 - 1:15 p.m.
OB/GYN Dept. Mtg,
CR 5&6
-13-
-20-
-27-
volume 53, issue 7
friday
- Noon - 1 p.m.
- 7:30 - 8:30 a.m.
Radiology Teaching Files,
MKSAP,
MRI Conf. Room
Wingate Doctors' Lounge
- Noon -1 p.m.
General MDisc Cancer Conf.,
Conf. Room 11
- 4 - 5 p.m.
HMRI Lecture Series,
RSH
- 7:30 - 8:30 a.m.
- Noon - 1 p.m.
MKSAP,
Genitourinary Cancer Conf.,
Wingate Doctors' Lounge
Conf. Room 11
- Noon -1 p.m.
- Noon - 1 p.m.
General MDisc Cancer Conf., Radiology Teaching Files,
Conf. Room 11
MRI Conf. Room
- 4 - 5 p.m.
HMRI Lecture Series,
RSH
- 7:30 - 8:30 a.m.
MKSAP,
Wingate Doctors' Lounge
- Noon -1 p.m.
General MDisc Cancer Conf.,
Conf. Room 11
- 4 - 5 p.m.
HMRI Lecture Series,
RSH
-28-
-22-
-29-
- 7:30 - 8:30 a.m.
- 7:30 - 8:30 a.m.
Cardiac Cath Conf.,
MKSAP,
Cardiology Conf. Room
Wingate Doctors' Lounge
- Noon - 1 p.m.
- Noon -1 p.m.
General MDisc Cancer Conf., Radiology Teaching Files,
Conf. Room 11
MRI Conf. Room
- 4 - 5 p.m.
HMRI Lecture Series,
RSH
- Noon - 1 p.m.
Thoracic Cancer Conf.,
Conf. Room 11
-30-
-24-
-31-
- 7:30 - 9 a.m.
Neurosurgery Grand Rounds,
Conf. Room 11
- Noon - 1 p.m.
MDisc Breast Cancer Conf.,
Conf. Room 11
15
Medical Staff Administration
100 West California Boulevard
P.O. Box 7013
Pasadena, CA 91109-7013
ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED
Medical Staff Leadership
James Shankwiler, MD - President
Christopher Hedley, MD - President Elect
Harry Bowles, MD - Secretary/Treasurer
Thomas Vander Laan, MD - Chair, Credentials Committee
Gregory Giesler, MD - Chair, Quality Management Committee
Peter Rosenberg, MD - Chair, Medicine Department
Jonathan Tam, MD - Chair, OB/GYN Department
Mark Powell, MD - Chair, Pediatrics Department
Steven Battaglia, MD - Chair, Surgery Department
Newsletter Editor-in-Chief – Glenn D. Littenberg, MD
If you would like to submit an article to be published in the Medical Staff Newsletter please
contact Maricela Alvarez, 626-397-3770 or [email protected].
Articles must be submitted no later than the first Friday of every month.
2013 – 2014
Best Hospitals Report
# 5 Hospital in the
Los Angeles metro area
# 10 Hospital in California
# 33 Nationally in Orthopedics
# 44 Nationally in Urology