Phyllotaxis in Bryophyllum tubiflorum
Transcription
Phyllotaxis in Bryophyllum tubiflorum
Ada Bot. Neerl. 23(4), August 1974, Phyllotaxis in tubiflorum: P.H. Bryophyllum Morphogenetic computer and 473-492. p. studies simulations and A. Lindenmayer Hellendoorn Afdeling Theoretische Biologie and Botanisch Laboratorium, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht SUMMARY imperfect pairs, were introduced either to Observations and 1. transition and on the in also confirmed of phyllotaxis tricussate model that these of an inhibitor production and on the pseudo-bijugate, patterns: inverted helix. in changes Assumptions phyllotaxis apical surface, or due are alternatively to of structure the the latter supported apex was found assumption. for the necessary Mirror asym- computer simulation, observation. by INTRODUCTION there has been much discussion about theories of Although place where leaves proposed mechanical a in a new leaf nearest are theory 1907 van Iterson treatment regular of the primordia, like provided by circles Erickson cylinder The radii of cylinders, Each are of the two or Schwendener a primordium. new in which it applied cones, etc., recent This phyllotaxis. on to as he gave phyllotaxis. well resume mikroskopischa He described different as of mathematical van of shapes Iterson’s ideas is (1972). surfaces newly mordia which position 1878 “Mathematische und and and folioids. A Van Iterson assumed the on his of position (1966) Blattstellungen”, “regular point systems” point systems by the almost that (1868), namely leaf. In new phyllotaxis, which stated that fields of tension arise around published on is fixed arises, to control the turn anatomische Studien fiber circles axiom of Hofmeister is also the basis of Schuepp’s view theory In that and these primordia the accepted the apex, on three older 2. a computer of the first two leaves all botanists have 1. kinds imperfect trios, size. position the was of several helix, computed changing rates changing apical metry in exhibits tubiflorum Bryophyllum following properties (see fig. inserted for regular systems of touching 1): primordia the are same as those of young pri- already present; primordium is in contact with least at two older members (rule of Hofmeister); 3. The 4. Small primordia are irregularities laid down in like the eliminated during the continuous The ideas of van Iterson are the shape largest and growth found gaps between position of new te previous primordia ones; can be of the system. again in somewhat modified form in the 474 P. “first available cording this to space” theory apex above and between the that cycle, are gaps leaves In was occupied by 1913 Schoute by Schoute, the shape, Starting the 1. Each spheres primordia apex contains threshold, Each leaf 1. mordia Fig. a new centre 2. Example ona contact on a Ac- 1947). on the members in the top width and necessary a sequence, in which the several the position and shapes of those the diffusion theory, and like hypotheses at might first be develop directly which theory later Richards & Schwabe (1969). those new of organs Iterson van never touching. By starting in their advanced and touch each from some shape. right, Schoute stated : particular substance that inhibits the of development of a of cylindrical tor, produced by the a apex, where the primordium goes directly will into an influence of this inhibitor reaches a arise; inhibitor producing state, the inhibitor surrounding tissue; 1+2+3 phyllotaxis pattern following cylindrical Example on a a of the place each diffuses into the dia to 1934, leaves; low Fig. other The (1951) because of influence have 1933, from the fact that the axiom of Hofmeister is On 3. or depends another rejected following theory (fig. 2) new 2. their leaves Richards contact Schwendener should be other, only (1931, LINDENMAYER A. gap. proposed further elaborated to & Snow AND leaf arises in the first available space growing-point. leaves, new which border the According HELLENDOORN in the first space which attains both means only new existing distance below the necessary of Snow each hypothesis H. van Iterson. The circles are pri- apex. 1+2+3 phyllotaxis apex, while the primordia. pattern following circles represent the Schoute. The threshold points concentration are of primor- an inhibi- 4. From the leaves can cells topmost arise in only Schoute, however, computer simulation is work out found in kinds of able more work to theory some tip pseudo-bijugate, the on of this theory so new geometrical of the have (1973) theory attempted computer. theory the to constant are phyllotaxis for at least helix, patterns has tubiflorum transition imperfect pairs, basis of on consequences Bryophyllum each of which well, as of the apex. his out Harv.. tubiflorum phyllotaxis patterns, of nodes: inhibitor diffuses an precise and realistic of this applies Bryophyllum apex under the needed. Veen & Lindenmayer consequences The present paper of the region a not was constructions. To obtain to 475 BRYOPHYLLUM TUBIFLORUM PHYLLOTAXISIN some several number imperfect trios, tricussate, and inverted helix (see fig. 3 and 4). “Pseudo-bijugate” designates normal bijugate of about angle whorl are In a very few starting Because deviates a in somewhat from helix with a in which pattern other and is which a the three leaves each helix is the divergence whorl of characterized a 60° turns by its the direction of the transition helix. to the cases which whorl. The inverted previous opposite becomes phyllotaxis tetracussate a pattern directly decussate pattern. of the needed for is 120° from each the to direction which is after the pattern 135°. “Tricussate” located with respect a The transition pattern pattern. different phyllotaxis Bryophyllum tubiflorum is an and patterns propagation (vegetative embryos of the rather produced are on short the adult interesting and useful plant for work on time leaves) changing phyllotaxis patterns (see fig. 5). From the computer simulations (Veen and Lindenmayer) described transitions can of the inhibitor production increase of apex size be (the about brought size of the apex during development by a by a it was predicted 10-fold decrease remaining constant), factor of about 3/2 (the or that in the by an inhibitor production remaining constant). Out of symmetry considerations which Lindenmayer two had leaves in order that the ated. Namely, wise, all one needs subsequent bijugate different levels always mirror symmetry Accordingly, a. b. c. the by will be be mirror Two leaves on mirror formulated by Veen and without mirror symmetry. symmetric pattern. If symmetric. the was initial arrangement of the first and then the tricussate patterns be gener- of different sizes and 180° or 6). symmetry requirement starting condition a stages with the observed helical transition situation would a be fulfilled to same one If and this would one starts opposite they level, start but not with with will 180° does one two Other- not agree leafthe leaves on still have mirror opposite, also have {fig. 6). one needs as minimum starting conditions: Two initial leaves, The leaves must production rates The leaves The leaves two are be must not leaves not on on for the in the different levels or on the same level with different inhibitor, be 180° figure same opposite. 6c just fulfil these level and are not requirements: 180° opposite. the two initial Alternately, they 476 P. H. HELLENDOORN Fig. 3. Cortex stripe of Bryophyllum tubiflorum (tricussate). Fig. 4. Cortex stripe of Bryophyllum tubiflorum (inverted helix). AND A. LINDENMAYER PHYLLOTAXIS IN Fig. 5. Plantlets could be In on this 477 BRYOPHYLLUM TUBIFLORUM on a the fully same research grown leaf of and abaxial Bryophyllum tubiflorum (adaxial view). level but have differentrates of inhibitor production. the starting patterns have been studied on conditions for this plant, the and the of generation phyllotactic following questions have been asked : Are the first leaves two different in age; or different on the leaves are on levels; the the influences of the leaves different (is fig. 5). areas Are the first of the apex in in order of about 2. to 3 find /2 out leaves plants 180° opposite with different the bigger not? or same same than the but age other)? (See Furthermore, phyllotaxis patterns level but are also the surface have been studied during development with a factor phases. METHODS Organisms Bryophyllum tubiflorum house of the Botanical Garden in South Africa, experiments * leaf whether the apex increases AND The crassulacean in one on level and of the between the decussate (bijugate) and tricussate MATERIALS 2.1. two the leaves are same The valid and was Kalanchoe name of this used for most daigremontiana species of physiological literature Utrecht, use the is Kalanchoe synonym B. Harv.* from a of the was 12) experiments. R. Hamet et we collected in 1939 For one of the Perr. de la Bathie, obtained tubiflora (Harv.) tubiflorum obtained from the green- clone (Bt R. Hamet. also followed Since most that usage. authors 478 Fig. P. 6. Starting conditions a. Two leaves on different b. Two leaves on c. Two leaves not from the the same the HELLENDOORN AND A. LINDENMAYER for the first two leaves. levels and 180° same on H. level same opposite, but not 180° level greenhouse and not was opposite, opposite. 180° taken. This species has decussate constant a phyllotaxis. For the (Bt 7) in Spain, shape same was the experiment and Kalanchoe used. This of Kalanchoe hybrid (B species between 7) x daigremonticma (Bd Bryophyllum tubiflorum obtained from C. 1), Gomez-Campo has the property that the leaves have and daigremontiana the exactly nearly phyllotaxis same the Bry- as ophyllum tubiflorum. 2.2. was cortex possible stripes the of Preparation From as to see made are the Elongation complete 9b). of leaves position graph on with plantlets days. After 7 vertical line and a (fig. 7, paper 3 and 4). Cortex plant. by separating The scars were position of them. by pin pricks through visible second leaf a days of sections the through Kalanchoe plantlets basal was fixed in FAA The sections were plate and one were were pair were observed plate and made of the and daigremontiana put in under first a inter- (according to their Jensen plantlets hybrid 1962) on of a of the were photographed. first internode are One shown here Bry- micro- and embedded stained in orcein that contained acetic acid orcein. Afterwards the sections the basal along it Gomez-Campo the whole vascular bundles in the leaf sections of 10 micron thickness The material paraffin. 2% practically for internode elongation. ophyllum tubiflorum, and stem method of C. the plantlets Transverse tome. frozen a The central and darkness for 7 of to of leaves of of internodes Preparations node stripes recorded was plantlets stereomicroscope in stem. references for the Rather young 2.4. position by cutting each central bundle 2.3. cortex prepared according from the cortex taken stripes (45%) photograph of (figs. 8, 9a and PHYLLOTAXIS IN 479 BRYOPHYLLUM TUBIFLORUM Fig. 7. Detail of a cortex Fig. 8. Plantlet Fig. 9a. Transverse section through the Fig. 9b. Transverse section through stripe. with basal plate (BP) and first intemode first intemode the basal plate of (FI) of Bryophyllum tubiflorum. Bryophyllum tubiflorum. 480 P. Geometrical 10. Fig. 2.5 construction Determination of To estimate the of the leaves of the first the middle-lines this project pair into two this pair The leaf pairs. tubiflorum from of plants the Zenker of in the fixation graphed. the same is the the through From this centre. it is the possible of the centre by drawing Now it is with plate centre medium orcein stains made of transition (fig. 11a, b, zone The sections nuclear d). were apices zone, to to possible four vascular measure the apices for was tricussate was live by were hr. measured with a the taken mea- fixed and stained in orcein and material. Afterwards primordia Bryophyl- ascertained The 1962) from in the The material was primordia. Jensen to c, age. This plastochron (according paraffin (52°C). The were in the of the youngest visible between the youngest visible apical in were photosurface planimeter. RESULTS 3.1. Observations the cortex meaningfully may be (angles) the the section of the first internode bijugate phase, nearly lengths embedded in On references for the as find can find the to of the different ages sections apical and in the inverted helix suring 3. one pairs. between the first four leaves. Preparation phase LINDENMAYER needs one used). If, be taken, Transverse sections of 10 micron thickness lum A. primordia growth, pairs (because crossing point section of phase cannot are transverse the of angles in the first bundles in the (Jig. JO). centre bundles of the first angles pair the vascular position second and third 2.6. divergence centre HELLENDOORN AND of the centre of the first two leaf between the second and the third leaf centre leaf apical for the estimation H. on stripes horizontal measured because in the irregularly elongated. were 3, 4, 7 and 12) cortex only plotted, bijugate phase it will From distances case fig. (divergence 12, in which be apparent that there is into the transition zone angles) can be of vertical distances the internodes (see a the horizontal distances gradual transition from also Gomez-Campo 1974). PHYLLOTAXISIN BRYOPHYLLUM 481 TUBIFLORUM Fig. 11a. Transverse section through a bijugate apex Fig. 11b. Transverse section through a tricussate Fig. 11c. Transverse section througha transition apex of Fig. lid. Transverse section through an inverted of apex helix Bryophyllum lubiflorum. of Bryophyllum lubiflorum. Bryophyllum lubiflorum. apex of Bryophyllum lubiflorum. 482 Fig. P. 12. Cortex stripe measurements Fig. 13a. Normal Fig. 13b. Plantlet after 7 Fig. 14. 3.2. In plantlet Elongation of Elongation all cases elongated the on of angles between of Bryophyilum days pair experiments basal plates leaf plate on on of the that for A. LINDENMAYER Bryophyllum tubiflorum. Bryophyilum tubiflorum. of Bryophyilum very tubiflorum. young plantlets (fig. plantlets which the side of the smaller leaf after 7 that the tissue of the pairs AND tubiflorum. of darkness of the second leaf HELLENDOORN H. days bear the first of darkness. 13) two This leaves means side in younger. Indeed, the plate is growing PKYLLOTAXISIN in size the during but leaves of the second leaf 3.3. of the of the first leaf of different ages; are 483 TUBIFLORUM development the leaves treatment plate, BRYOPHYLLUM pair Measurements of plantlet. pair it is furthermore, exactly are angles the on without the Therefore, located are the on dark on the from fig. 14 that the apparent level. same between the level same first leaf two pairs {table 1) The values of the mean “one-sided” and one opposite, 180°, and the to the observed values fact that of the position each exact of centre of Kalanchoe between only the the hybrid, two leaves in contrast 6°, tion helix, apical = 1.580 = 1.242 tricussate/bijugate = 1.966 helix/tricussate were to draw values in 180° deviates about primordia by 1. The /rd r = t chapter apex been apex diffusion areas are as of the from 180° and in 14°. The latter angle bijugate phase, transi- follows: 2 y/ areas (rt /r d 1.966 this research printed. be This , r = radius) agrees with the 1.4. was carried by the primordia, through for place on that out a was in connection with the based particular inhibits the 15 fig. the one of theory of substance, development of which new is leaf the apex. developing approximated by leafinitiation take simulation theory; namely, assumptions can two angle 1.257 = since diffusion Some of the first the tubifiorum on has the Bryophyl- indicate that In in plantlets conclusions. leaves in their outputs produced Since the between the Bryophyllum by exactly. valid two angle large, and that the and also the computer simulations, obtained by Veen and Lindenmayer. the calculated simulations Computer As stated in the first Schoute, values (table 2) tricussate/bijugate apical computer prediction, 3.5. same, daigremontiana ones and inverted helix phase tricussate/transition The ratio of mean apical mean transition/bijugate inverted The areas ratios between the tricussate be found between the first deviate from to the differs from the with the values nearly impossible possible Kalanchoe in mean a 180° exactly not the value of the standard deviation. Estimation of pairwise plants angle lies “One-sided” mean cannot was seemed hybrid which appear The mean is cutting daigremontiana. considerably exceeds 3.4. first about by it size, and in the tubifiorum leaves same calculated both in were pair The standard deviation is rather vascular bundle it is clear that the Namely, lum of the nearly sides. “Two-sided” transverse a leaf under 180° into its mirror value above directly. method used for the three kinds of were the two on angle all values. over If manner. asymmetry by translating averaging by averaging due have can obtained were in the table, angles, given “two-sided” a the theoretical model cylinder the surface of the and the were: processes cylindrical section, leading to 484 Table P. 1. Angles between the first Bryophyllum 2 AND A. LINDENMAYER leafpairs. tub. Kalanchoe daigr. daigr. Hybrid Hybrid 193 293 84 O 0 180 265 86 0 191 191 273 93 93 0 182 182 269 82 0 180 180 269 89 0 156 233 53 53 0 172 265 85 0 180 278 96 0 0 208 305 86 0 195 287 96 0 188 279 90 0 185 242 0 172 274 108 0 186 186 256 103 0 195 273 273 111 0 160 278 89 0 184 184 202 202 91 0 200 259 105 0 143 250 91 0 188 270 270 91 0 153 237 88 0 180 180 277 76 0 191 191 207 106 0 191 278 73 73 0 200 259 101 101 0 187 297 92 0 205 205 290 106 106 0 232 311 130 0 180 255 75 75 0 196 286 86 0 204 284 90 0 188 273 79 79 0 0 195 266 96 0 150 268 88 0 203 270 100 100 0 155 266 91 0 0 182 287 77 0 175 175 263 90 90 0 175 274 94 0 200 286 86 0 196 285 92 0 192 284 112 0 176 175 260 97 0 180 180 270 89 89 0 172 294 90 0 177 177 292 94 0 160 257 75 75 0 165 165 264 74 74 0 190 190 259 112 0 190 190 284 88 88 0 176 274 86 0 194 194 265 85 85 0 184 261 261 106 106 0 184 184 296 91 0 191 191 266 111 179 267 87 0 186 266 100 0 203 291 87 0 191 279 99 0 171 248 248 68 0 0 175 260 260 100 100 0 190 293 90 90 0 197 197 289 109 0 176 268 77 0 180 180 268 80 80 0 182 271 271 69 0 194 194 292 94 0 170 170 284 284 97 0 0 185 259 81 81 0 200 261 77 0 171 233 233 76 0 219 291 291 111 0 158 277 78 78 0 0 179 266 89 0 169 257 88 0 200 275 275 78 78 0 0 180 180 266 266 88 88 0 181 181 262 78 0 179 261 77 0 180 275 95 0 176 270 89 89 0 192 192 272 90 0 182 182 269 89 0 185 258 94 94 0 178 240 81 0 168 233 233 90 0 180 180 280 90 0 190 190 285 113 0 171 290 290 84 0 180 180 269 91 0 172 172 278 89 89 0 180 180 255 101 101 0 174 273 91 0 180 180 274 274 94 0 193 283 101 101 0 181 261 93 0 172 265 85 85 0 186 279 95 95 0 158 253 253 72 0 183 265 90 0 172 172 264 95 95 0 200 200 284 103 122 2 2 1 first first second leafpair leafpair leafpair HEIXHNDOORN O 0 1 first H. mean value 1 122 1 2 2 first first second leafpair mean ■sided one-sided one- value one-sided 194.125° ± 194.125° ± 11.428° two-sided two-sided 184.041° 0 ± 18.383° ± 54 54 122 2 2 1 1 first first second leafpair mean value one-sided 186.366° 186.366° ± 6.903° ± 6.903° 193.846° 193.846° ± ± 9.396° two-sided two-sided two-sided 182.122° ± 9.147° 184.000° ± 184.000“ ± 16.248° PHYLLOTAXIS IN Table 2. The 485 BRYOPHYLLUM TUBIFLORUM areas ofapices (in microns) of Bryophyilum tubiflorum. decussate decussate transition transition 65 helix helix tricussate inverted helix 121 220 220 51.3 93 105 171 58.8 98 125 165 90 90 118 132 121 121 56.3 121 135 111 91 86 145 117 50 36.3 36.3 120 120 111 89 89 130 97 113 68.8 68.8 86 91 170 71.3 71.3 81 143 176 77 96 150 150 192 192 67.5 67.5 97 102 143 65 97 98 130 130 51.3 87 128 158 73.8 85 85 115 53.8 78 78 143 143 71.3 116 116 138 41.3 76 125 53.8 96 121 78.8 112 143 63.8 86 132 132 60 158 158 56.3 132 132 152 101 115 118 128 128 116 136 133 135 value mean value 62.62 2. mean value 12.96 12.95 The cells lar 3. ± are 99.20 ± 99.20 approximately Every cell has 8 substance Q1 representing = C 0 + Q = a used AC„ center = X are version value value 154.79 ± arranged on a D for 29.71 rectangu- = = following the diffusion of the inhibitor of two-dimensional Pick’s S C, + (1-9X-D) equation, C 0 o cell, C„ diffusion-coefficient, In this model the a. size and equation an digitized inhibitor concentration concentration in = same 17.28 neighbours. Lindenmayer i X of the mean 123.16 123.16 ± ± grid. Veen and where mean value 16.01 16.01 = in the i-th cell, C = 0 previous inhibitor concentration in next decay-coefficient. values can be The width of the apex: number of cells varied; along inhibitor center circumference of apex, cell, 486 P. b. The leaf value: the black by d. The diffusion The e. in A. LINDENMAYER the primordia primordium arises, a new coefficient, coefficient: the decay AND squares), The threshold value: the value below which c. HELLENDOORN concentration of inhibitor substance 15 represented (in figure H. inhibitor decays at rate a proportional its to concentration in every cell except the leaf primordia, f. The the In growth takes growth rate: place by adding new at rows the top rim of cylinder. 15 each number figure letter represents or centration of the inhibitorin a rounded-off value for the con- cell. a The program Blokco 28 for the computer simulations was written in ALGOL A. by H. Veen, Philips the program In a Bryophyllum computations the were rather bijugate pattern has been obtained: the and width ==0.15(15% X =1/18 bijugate to should hypothetical ly, remain printing more 50 every realistic Although symbol (since does not did In the improve. not was original values in fig. Although decrease to a to and T More changed a are change by relative ratio for order D/X. In make to printed symbol improved. continuous continuously with the simulation this helix. was cell con- a new a factor is 7/12 done at of the Similar- 15 the width of the merely of its the result presentation height). phyllotaxis of Bry- The transition zone, for instance, (see figs. manner means factor same L/T. graphical of the the if the leaf 3/2, concentrations figure the 122 for has been calculated values for provides only observations a more a of the from gradually good approximation a it could still be exactly correspond the leaf value in the width of the leaf values in vary results twice via inhibitor in each rather than 25. This array size is this simulation is ophyllum tubiflorum, to L only provide symbols, of almost two step) computations 70 pattern. This tenfold constant. with added. was inhibitor and the simulation actually time per after 1/70, = programmed trijugate starts trijugate pattern a increase of the width of the apex the simulation can arrays is of was to an correspond value (L) changing phyllotaxis 0.4 = row 12 for the the pattern centrations of the to Electrologica 25 cells = G rate in over D threshold concentration T leaf value the on were: W coefficient diffusion coefficient The out (inhibitor producing factor), proceeds then goes The parameters for this simulation growth of approximation accurate tubiflorum decay carried of Utrecht. Further information about University leaves of different leaf values opposite a at be found in Veen & Lindenmayer (1973). can 15 fig. with while the X-8 computer (2 3 and 4). By attempting than in this simulation the that after each units per irregular new intervals growth step line (see added). list of leaf 15). it is possible to improve the original simulation by varying the PHYLLOTAXIS IN Fig. 15. BRYOPHYLLUM Simulation of phyllotaxis Each symbol standing for W 25, = D = .15. X = 487 TUBIFLORUM of Bryophyllum tubiflorum by inhibitor concentration 1/18, T = .4. G = 1/70, L was x = printed 200, L 2 Veen and Lindenmayer. double. = 122, L decreases to 12. 488 Fig. 16. First column. 489 Fig. 16. Simulation of phyllotaxis of Bryophyllum tubiflorum 51 W G and = = with width asymmetry of 7 °. 51, D = 1/70, .019, = Ldecreases X = 300, L T 1/36, 2 = = .4, 185, to 12. Computation(corresponding growth) begins at the first column and ends bottom at the to of the top of the second column. N, B. Due to an error out, in line 66 shown in a the in the faulty position. It appear two spaces to the Second print- righthand column. leaf is should right. 490 P. other in that be reached is can for instance the experimental more useful Therefore, a 4. is more to to If 360°). X a more a A. for possible angle disappeared. pattern less variable asymmetry or been tried. zone between than in the regular asymmetry change to needed for such not are simulation, line 77 and 159. The it angle, smaller to the results Although taken, was According they This latter simulation is in better agreement with the LINDENMAYER bigger asymmetry angle and vary the asymmetry has long computer time {fig. 16). far with respect case be able The smallest pseudo-bijugate results with width of 51 because of the so 14° (1/25 then the 28°, to 25 cells. namely AND HELLENDOORN of the simulation is the small width used shortcoming another variables, the simulation, H. to seems angles. final yet, positive are stripes cortex transition helix in this simulation. previous CONCLUSIONS We conclude from the can results that sumed in the computer simulation is realised in the asymmetry of the apex size crease conditions which fulfilled. In the first and in the second plants, actually several of the are place the place, occurs during development plants of in these we as- the mirror in- predicted plants. In summary, 1. the first same two leaves age, thus of the they might exert Bryophyllum tubiflorum different influences on the are not of the following primor- dia; 2. the first two leaves of the 3. the apical a points during development tubiflorum 1 and with a are 180° not 2); factor 1.966 from bijuby factor of about 1.4. It is in a increases area Bryophyllum follows from tricussate and the radius and circumference of the apex increase to gate of plants opposite (mirror asymmetry a important plant is not jugal multiple first starting If the to the into the plant a different type, which is rate are due to by necessity to phyllotaxis not simply be mirror asymmetry in the are of the tetracussate could be assumed mostly the can plants then under the of the not to the in of the rate to starting leaf, the not cotyledons starting single cotyledon, dicotyledonous multiples must leaves for a phyllotaxis phyllotaxis patterns and leaves of low mainly For inhibitor pro- increase. be the have symmetric. higher indices, are the single starting have often position cotyledons or of inhibitordecay has mirror plants grown helix, phyllotaxis increase, to irregular phyllotaxis patterns plantlet a higher phyllotaxis system, a Monocotyledonous decussate, a or leaves), is fully obtain helix and the cussate into there have one, the apex has of pattern. tric. Otherwise the The previous decrease, (alternate ferent from order to position however, changes leaves. cotyledons phyllotaxis whose of the hypothesis duction has indices realize the consequences of these results. If the phyllotaxis changes diffusion The to constant, but which plants, are dif- of decussate. In be mirror asymme- phyllotaxis. Bryophyllum tubiflorum like the inverted pattern represent further interesting problems. Tetra- be considered as completely symmetric a at jugal doubling the beginning, of decussate, so the and from this pattern PHYLLOTAXIS the apex during development servations 491 BRYOPHYLLUM TUBIFLORUM IN fit this idea, circumference could increase because plants two pattern, in which the decussate pattern changed Plants with have imperfect it is obvious inverted helix an trios quickly and tricussate for hypothesis a a in hypothesis passed over. be tested to here becoming phyllotaxis, but constant Sometimes phase plants was in so too that the found with this too. apex increased after than the increases size, were present bigger case According being to constant by computer simulation. be said can one. plants. Furthermore, that the apex in this that the mean tetracussate a a tetracussate of the inverted helix is possible size before this would presented for area transitional tricussate while. This has still The results into times. The ob- considered in fig. 4 and table 2. These plants apical It is plants. would be phase pattern in which our that the much too directly different from those of the tricussate (table 2) of the tricussate area are two found with were they do to be in accordance with the diffusion not disprove the possibility of other of this work with advice and hypotheses. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We acknowledge gratefully technical and by suggestions by Prof. Dir. Madrid, Spain. C. the friendly Dr. R. Gomez-Campo, A travel grant and enthusiastic support Soekarjo, Limnologisch Instituut, Nieuwersluis, Institute Nacional de Netherlands Investigaciones Agronomicas, from Utrechts Universiteitsfonds to P. H. Hellendoom is also gratefully acknowledged. The following photographs Utrecht: The nal de figs. 5, 7, 8,13 photograph for were made by Miek made by Maria van Rheenen, Botanisch Laboratorium, and 14. figure lib was Investigaciones Agronomicas, Madrid, and Astrella the rest by Gomez-Campo, Institute Nacio- P. H. Hellendoom. 492 P. H. HELLENDOORN AND A. LINDENMAYER REFERENCES Erickson, R. O. Gazette (1972); The geometry ofphyHotaxis. (1974): Phyllotactic C. Gómez-Campo, A in patterns reappraisal. (Manuscript). Bryophyllum tubiflorum Harv. Botanical 135:49-58. Hofmeister, W. (1868): Allgemeine Morphologieder Gewdchse. Leipzig. Iterson, G. Jr. van, (1907): Blattstellungen. Gustav Jensen, (1951): Phyllotaxis: F. J. apex. Philos. — & W. ward Schuepp, W. O. Royal Plant (1966): Soc. und Its Meristeme. A W. H, Freeman quantitativeexpression London, Ser. B 235: S. iiber A treatise, Wachstum problem V A: and and Co., San Francisco. to and relation growth in the 509-564. of 79-116. growth and Academic Formbildung in den form. Press, In: New F. C. Ste- York. Teilungsgeweben hbherer Verlag, Basel. (1913): Beiträge zur Biattstellungslehre. Schwendener, Studien mikroskopisch-anatomische Jena. (1969): Phyllotaxis: Physiology , Birkhäuser J. C. Schoute, Trans. Schwabe (ed.). Pflanzen. Verlag, (1962); Botanical Histochemistry. W. A. Richards, Mathematische Fischer (1878): Mechanische Theorie Rec. Trav. Bol. Neerl. Blattstellungen. der 10:153-324. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig. Snow, M. Philos. — & Veen, — A. & R. Trans. Snow (1931, Royal Soc. (1947); On H. computer & A. Ser. B determination for phyllotaxis: of leaves. A on phyllotaxis, Parts I, II and III. 221:1—43,222:353-400,225:63-85. New Phylologisl 46: Lindenmayer, (1973) Manuscript, model Philadelphia. the 1933, 1935): Experiments London, network of part of M.S. automata. 5-19. thesis University of A. of H. Veen, A Pennsylvania,