1.05 MB - E. J. Moeran Database
Transcription
1.05 MB - E. J. Moeran Database
Orchestral music Moeran's output for full orchestra spans his entire output, and yet the sum total is not a huge amount of music. However, if it is lacking in quantity, it is certainly made up for in quality. Moeran had a wonderful gift for orchestration, and in listening one detects an easy, almost instinctive feel in the handling of the music. As such it may come as something of a surprise that he worked often so slowly on his orchestral music, and rewrote, reviewed and discarded ruthlessly anything he felt less than perfect. Farrago Suite (1932) R64 Symphony (1924-37) R71 Violin Concerto (1937-41) R78 Sinfonietta (1944) R83 Early works During the 1920's Moeran produced several works for orchestra: his first two Rhapsodies, the second of which was reworked nearly twenty years later; The "Symphonic Impression", In The Mountain Country, and "Two Pieces for Small Orchestra", Lonely Waters and Wythorne's Shadow. Of these last two there is some doubt as to the precise dates of composition, as they were published together in 1935, although there is evidence to suggest Lonely Waters perhaps dating originally from 1924. Symphony in G Minor Begun in 1924 but put to one side and not finally completed until 1937, the Symphony is regarded by many as the high point of Moeran's output. It is often a dark, brooding work stretching over four movements, yet contains a delightful Scherzo in the third movement in Moeran's own words: the sunlight is let in, and there is a spring-like contrast to the wintry proceedings of the slow [second] movement. Concertos Moeran's Violin Concerto is, for me, one of the great works of this genre. If there is one piece which justifies Moeran receiving greater recognition it is surely this - a work which can swing you from delight to tears in minutes. The Cello Concerto was one of Moeran's last major works, written for his wife - the cellist Peers Coetmore - in 1945, and stands as a robust and sweeping confirmation of his compositional brilliance. Search Search WWW Search Moeran E-Mail me: [email protected] Mailing List Archive The Worldwide Moeran Database ©2001 Andrew Rose Sinfonietta Moeran referred to the Sinfonietta, written in 1944, as something of an experiment: writing about the composition of the Cello Sonata perhaps two years later: I shall have to find a new idiom, as I did temporarily when I wrote the Sinfonietta. It is a three movement work in perhaps a neo-classical style, exuberant and brisk, with a degree of harmonic experimentation which adds interest without detracting from the beauty of the work. Cello Concerto (1945) R89 Serenade in G (1948) R95 Symphony No 2 (lost) R99 In The Mountain Country (1921)* R10 First Rhapsody (1922) R16 Second Rhapsody (1924/41) R26/R77 Rhapsody for Piano and Orchestra (1942-3) R79 (*included here as a suggested "Rhapsody No. 0") Lonely Waters (1924?) R27 Wythorne's Shadow (1931) R49 Overture for a Masque (1944) R82 Nocturne (1934) R70 = Full page available Other late works The Overture for a Masque was written in 1944 for Walter Legge, who was at the time commissioning works for wartime performances at concerts for troops. Despite Moeran's initial dismissal of the work in progress as "Legge's Overture", he slowly came round to enjoying the piece: I think it turns out to be quite a good little work - what you might call athletic in style...it takes the devil of a time to write out. The Overture followed the Rhapsody for Piano and Orchestra of 1942-3, where a pianist joins forces with the full orchestra for a single movement requiring great virtuosity of the soloist. Again Moeran's opinion of this work grew, from it contains more than its fair share of tripe to I find I was wrong, and I really think that after all it is a very good effort on my part. Others seem to agree, as this is now one of Moeran's most played works on the radio. The Serenade in G of 1947-8 was Moeran's last complete orchestral piece, with sections partly reworked from an earlier work which he withdrew. Based around Tudor and Baroque dance rhythms, it contains 6 or 8 short movements, depending on which version you listen to! "Lost" Works Other orchestral works have existed or been worked on by Moeran. Into this fall the Farrago Suite, part of which was to become integrated into the Serenade, a Fanfare for Red Army Day for a Royal Albert Hall concert in 1944 which has since disappeared, and the Second Symphony, fragments of which exist in various forms, but which he was unable to complete before his death. Farrago Suite (1932, withdrawn) R64 Published Withdrawn 1. Prelude 2. Minuet the composer insisted: "it doesn't exist..." 3. Rondino 4. Rigadoon Moeran wrote his suite Farrago in 1932, probably in response to Warlock's success with his Capriol Suite. However, Farrago was soon withdrawn, despite several performances at the time, including a BBC broadcast and a 1934 Proms outing. It sees Moeran writing in a pastiche English Renaissance and Baroque style (Warlock's suite was based on dance-tunes from 16th century composer Thoinot Arbeau). However, Farrago did not disappear completely, despite its composer later saying 'it doesn't exist' - two movements make a reappearance in the Serenade in G of 1948. Recordings BBC Radio Broadcast, 1994 Reviews July 1934 October 1934 Further Writing Programme notes etc. Serenade in G Audio Prologue Opening (MP3) Actually, to be more precise, the whole work was incorporated into the Serenade in its original eight-movement form, but when Moeran's publisher insisted he cut two movements out, Moeran decided to excise two of his Farrago movements, rather than lose any of his new work. The irony is that this then leaves the Serenade as perhaps a rather unsatisfying piece, somewhat more disjointed than Moeran originally intended. Fortunately for the Moeran listener, in 1990 Chandos decided to release a recording of the original full version of the Serenade, on CHAN 8808, and when in 1994 the original scores of Farrago were dusted off for an anniversary performance, it finally became possible to make a direct listening comparison between the two works. This is something which has eluded scholars for many years - no recording was ever made of the Farrago Suite, and Moeran may have gambled on few people with memories long and astute enough to spot his use of it in the new work. Whether there is any sleight of hand in the fact that the two excised movements from the Serenade had been given new names is impossible to say, though perhaps it is more than coincidence. In his book "The Music of E J Moeran", Geoffrey Self not only skips rather lightly over the Farrago, and also misses the fuller links between the two works. This is not surprising, as he noted at the time with regard to the two 'missing' Serenade movements: "These two movements are to be found...in the copy of the score deposited with the Grainger Museum in Melbourne, Australia." Thus Self had access to neither the missing Serenade movements nor to Farrago. Superficially the four corresponding movements seem identical. It is only in the finer detail and orchestration that one finds Moeran's revision, and a close score analysis would be required to pin down the changes precisely. This is not something I intend to do here. Instead, I offer you the chance to program your CD player to (almost) recreate the Farrago Suite from the Chandos Serenade recording, by matching up the movements as follows: Farrago Suite Serenade in G 1 - Prologue 1 - Prelude 2 - Intermezzo* 3 - Air 4 - Galop 2 - Minuet 5 - Minuet 3 - Rondino 6 - Forlana* 4 - Rigadoon 7 - Rigadoon 8 - Epilogue *Note - the two movements which Moeran withdrew, the Intermezzo and Forlana, both taken from the Farrago Suite. These programme notes from the 1934 Proms performance serve to throw further light onto Farrago: This Suite owes its title to the fact that when it was written, close on two years ago, - it was actually completed at the end of 1932 -, it was not originally the result of setting out to compose a homogeneous work. The last movement was composed specially for an amateur orchestra in Norwich who had asked Mr. Moeran for a piece of their own, and it was laid out with a view to the orchestra's rather modest attainments. The Minuet was not intended to be anything more than a pianoforte duet; it was composed in the first place for a friend and neighbour with whom Moeran plays four-handed music on the pianoforte. Although the Suite was written at odd times and with different purposes in view, eventually the four movements were put together for the Hastings Municipal Orchestra. It is scored exactly for their numbers, which accounts for there being only one oboe and two of the other wood-winds. It did not have its first performance at Hastings, however; an illness of Julius Harrison's had to postpone that. The first performance was actually at the B.B.C. studio concert under Julian Clifford, last year, and it was repeated there some three months ago. It was performed in Hastings, under Julius Harrison, in February of this year. Laid out for the moderate-sized orchestra of Beethoven's day, with only two horns and two trumpets and neither tuba nor harp, as the Suite is, the Minuet dispenses with trumpets, trombones and percussion, calling only on strings, wood-wind, and horns. Timpani are not used until the third movement, although in the Prelude there are tambourine, cymbals, side drum and xylophone. First Performance - Notes (1933) Published Withdrawn FARRAGO 1932 Orchestral Concert Friday 21st April 1933 8.0 pm, National Programme, BBC Orchestra (Section c) led by Marie Wilson. Conductor Julian Clifford. Recordings available [Suite Capriol - Peter Warlock] Reviews Farrago - E. J. Moeran (1st Performance) July 1934 October 1934 Further Writing Serenade in G The composer calls his work Farrago, which the Pocket Oxford tells us means medley or hotch-potch - harsh words for what is really a sequence of four short movements: Prelude, Minuet, Rondino and Rigadoon, joined together by association, but by no particular spirit of affinity one with another; it is dedicated to D.B. Wyndham Lewis, and is scored for a moderate orchestra. [Puck's Minute - H. Howells] [Procession] [Suite "Facade" - W. Walton] Audio Excerpts Recordings Proms - Programme Notes (1934) PROM CONCERT Thursday, 6th September 1934 First concert performance in London of Suite FARRAGO Programme note by D.M.C. Reviews Further Writing Audio 1. 2. 3. 4. Prelude Minuet Rondino Rigadoon E. J. Moeran began his first attempts at composition during his school days at Uppingham. But although he left school in 1912, it was not until after the war that he seriously took up the art of writing music, although he had spent a few months under the guidance of Sir Charles Stanford prior to joining the army in 1914. Thus it was that at the age of twenty-four he settled for a time in London and proceeded to study composition under John Ireland. Like many others others of the younger generation of English composers, his original work goes hand in hand with an enthusiasm for native folk music, that of Norfolk, where a good part of his life has been spent, has always attracted him specially, and much of his best-known music has a distinctively English flavour. All his work, whether owing anything to that influence or not, is instinct with the fresh wholesomeness which the rest of the world recognizes as typically English. This Suite owes its title to the fact that when it was written, close on two years ago, - it was actually completed at the end of 1932 -, it was not originally the result of setting out to compose a homogeneous work. The last movement was composed specially for an amateur orchestra in Norwich who had asked Mr. Moeran for a piece of their own, and it was laid out with a view to the orchestra's rather modest attainments. The Minuet was not intended to be anything more than a pianoforte duet; it was composed in the first place for a friend and neighbour with whom Moeran plays four-handed music on the pianoforte. Although the Suite was written at odd times and with different purposes in view, eventually the four movements were put together for the Hastings Municipal Orchestra. It is scored exactly for their numbers, which accounts for there being only one oboe and two of the other wood-winds. It did not have its first performance at Hastings, however; an illness of Julius Harrison's had to postpone that. The first performance was actually at the B.B.C. studio concert under Julian Clifford, last year, and it was repeated there some three months ago. It was performed in Hastings, under Julius Harrison, in February of this year. Laid out for the moderate-sized orchestra of Beethoven's day, with only two horns and two trumpets and neither tuba nor harp, as the Suite is, the Minuet dispenses with trumpets, trombones and percussion, calling only on strings, wood-wind, and horns. Timpani are not used until the third movement, although in the Prelude there are tambourine, cymbals, side drum and xylophone. More than that the Suite cannot well need by way of introduction; the names of the movements give sufficient clue to what an audience may look forward to hearing. Reviews There has been little to listen to lately, apart from public B.B.C. concerts and the opera relays. As far too many concerts continue to be broadcast, most of them are routine affairs, with rarely any distinction; sometimes even the orchestral playing is poor... Moeran's Farrago Suite is good fun, though not his best work; too much playing about the composer insisted: "it doesn't exist..." with a few patterns and those modalities which are still the bane of a lot of our native music. Wireless Notes by 'Audax' M/T July 1934 Critical attention tends naturally to be concentrated upon the work after the interval, for on practically every evening something new or unfamiliar or difficult is provided for our serious consideration after the unchallenging classics of the first part... The actual works have all been slight: a tiny homely suite by Moeran with a captivating finale. F.H. M/T Oct 1934 Serenade in G (1948) R95 Published Novello, 1953 1. Prologue 2. Intermezzo* "...the Serenade reminds me of a set of variations but with the theme omitted..." 3. Air 4. Galop Recordings **Ulster Orch., Handley ) (1990, CD *Northern Sinfonia, Hickox ) (1989, CD *Guildford Phil. Orch., Vernon Handley, Concert Artist LPA 2002 ) (1966?, LP **LSO, Basil Cameron (1948 broadcast, CD ) *Six movement version (as published) **Eight movement version (as written) Reviews Further Writing Audio Available from Amazon 5. Minuet 6. Forlana* 7. Rigadoon 8. Epilogue (*Withdrawn from published version) Completed in 1948, the Serenade in G was the last piece of orchestral music Moeran was to complete, and some cite it as evidence of his gradual decline. Certainly the piece shows little apparent effort to follow the innovations explored in preceding works like the Cello Concerto and the Sinfonietta - indeed four of the eight movements were plundered from an earlier piece, Farrago, written in 1932 and later withdrawn. It is important to point out here that the published version of the Serenade was in six movements, rather than Moeran's original eight - though not at the composer's instigation. After two initial Piano Arrangement performances of the full eight work (one of which was The composer and Oxford music academic Francis Pott has recorded by Lionel Hill and now appears on the Symposium CD alongside the Sammons Violin Concerto transcribed and arranged the Air from the Serenade for solo piano, and the Goossens Fantasy Quartet), Moeran's publishers insisted he removed two movements prior to and has kindly offered it to the site for download as an Adobe their accepting the work. Their feeling was that in its Acrobat (pdf) file. If you don't original form the work was simply too long (to quote have acrobat reader, it's free from another era - too many notes!). download from www.adobe.com. In my view this culling of the second and sixth Here's the piano score: movements, Air and Forlana, was detrimental to the work as a whole, and we can be grateful for the efforts Air (118 kb) of Vernon Handley and Chandos Records for restoring the Serenade to its full glory for their 1990 CD release. Lewis Foreman mentions in the sleevenotes: "Unfortunately the deleted movements underline the work's personality, and without them it is a much less characteristic score" - sentiments I'd wholeheartedly endorse. With four movements, the Intermezzo, Minuet, Forlana and Rigadoon (II, V, VI and VII), salvaged from the 1932 work and the other four written around them it's too easy to look for stylistic inconsistencies and argue the work's relative inconsequence. But perhaps in doing so one misses the beauty of the piece, especially in its full version. As much as one might like, for historical reasons, for Moeran to go out on a stylistic high, the truth is that the Serenade is not full of innovations. With a backward glance to the Tudor composers Moeran and Warlock had been fascinated by twenty years earlier, it is a work of lyrical beauty which instead clearly demonstrates that, even at this late stage in his life, and with the relative difficulties of the two major Cello works behind him, Moeran had not lost his ear for a good tune. One might even speculate that he wrote the Serenade as a respite from the mental struggles of the previous works. Moeran in November 1947 Perhaps in the age of the CD, rather than the 78 rpm disc, we are more forgiving of length. If we take Handley's Chandos interpretation as a guide, the full eight movements last a little under 24 minutes, yet Moeran's publisher's cuts remove seven and a quarter of this, almost a third of the whole. No wonder it has been so regularly written off since publication! The eight movements run through some quite different styles, sometimes clearly evoking Elizabethan dances, sometimes pure Moeranite lyricism. Perhaps this is therefore the greatest charge one can lay against the Serenade maybe it fails it is in the bringing together as a whole such disparate styles. Yet in experimenting with bringing together in one piece the Tudor-esque and the late Romantic, Moeran may have been trying to say something quite different. Whether anyone was listening is another matter. The full piece pans out as follows: I Prologue Allegro (Tudor, stately style) II Intermezzo Allegretto (total Moeran - bright, lyrical, into bittersweet, then jolly) III Air Lento (contemplative, pastoral, nostalgic) IV Galop Presto (galloping!, lively, vibrant) V Minuet Tempo di Minuetto (Tudor-esque lyrical theme worked into romantic hue) VI Forlana Andante con moto (gentle, pastoral, quite Moeranite) VII Rigadoon Con brio, ma tempo moderato (almost military/nautical) VIII Epilogue Allegro un poco maestoso (reprise of prologue) Listening to this piece over and over again the thought that strikes me is that, with its stylistic leaps and jumps, the Serenade reminds me of a set of variations but with the theme omitted. Confused? Well if you imagine the wild changes that run through Elgar's Enigma Variations, held together by that common melodical theme, you'll get a feeling for the changes than run through this work. Now take away the melodic theme, replace it with a themed opening and finish and 6 central movements that take a much more loose stylistic influence rather than any specific melody or harmony, and there's your Serenade. Each movement is short and sharp, each one fits within the boundaries of the piece, yet each is quite different to the others. I call it a kind of Theme and Variations, only one where the theme is merely the notion of a style base, rather than a full musical idea in the traditional sense. It is written in a popular idiom designed to go down well in the concert hall (as it initially did) - perhaps in this way it was even a pitch for his own Enigma Variations, a work to finally launch him into the mainstream as enigma had done 50 years earlier for Elgar, and surely coming close to delivering. So Moeran is perhaps playing with us with this piece to a degree. Certainly he has not been served well by the loss of two of his 'variations' for over forty years. As a final orchestral work to bow out with (unexpectedly, don't forget) the Serenade in G leaves us with its own enigmas about Moeran's true intentions for the piece. and what might have become of the major work he was working on concurrently, the elusive Second Symphony... How the Serenade and Farrago match up: Farrago Suite Serenade in G 1 - Prelude 2 - Intermezzo 1 - Prologue 3 - Air 4 - Galop 2 - Minuet 5 - Minuet 3 - Rondino 6 - Forlana 4 - Rigadoon 7 - Rigadoon 8 - Epilogue Symphony in G minor (1924-37) R71 Allegro Lento Vivace Lento - Allegro molto Published Novello, 1942 Recordings Ulster Orch., Handley ) (1987, CD New Philharmonia of London, Sir Adrian Boult, Lyrita SRCS 70 ) (1975, LP English Sinfonia, Neville Dilkes (1973, LP ) Hallé Orch, Leslie Heward, (1942, 78s, reissued on Dutton CDAX 8001 ) Reviews Gramophone magazine reviews Further Writing Moeran's own sleevenotes W H Mellers' attack Moeran and Stenhammer - two Symphonies too alike? Audio At Moeran.com: 1st movt. opening Available from Amazon "contains some of Moeran's darkest and most brooding moments" Moeran's only symphony was started in 1924, but abandoned and only taken up again ten years later, being finally completed in 1937. It contains some of Moeran's darkest and most brooding moments, and despite the levity of his brilliant (and it has been said, unique to British music) Scherzo, the final conclusion is one of bitterness. A variety of interpretation have been put on the symphony, including many references to a perceived similarity to Sibelius, and yet further examination by Geoffrey Self suggests Moeran is also passing comment on works by composers as diverse as Mozart, Brahms and Tchaikovsky. Ultimately, however, it is the firm fingerprint of Moeran himself which defines his longest piece of work. Unlike the Violin Concerto which followed it, and perhaps Real Audio offers answers to the questions posed in it, the evocations From the 1973 recording by Neville Dilkes and the English of landscape and mood are often so bleak as to suggest that in this work Moeran is for the first time confronting some of Sinfonietta, the opening of the first movement: his own darkest ghosts, those he has apparently avoided comment on in his music up to this point: his experiences of Allegro (1'01") the First World War. Without doubt Moeran had a particularly bad time during the war, and was left with a head injury which never allowed him to forget his trauma, and which probably contributed to his untimely death in 1950. However, during his time in military service he was also stationed in Ireland, and this gave him his first taste of the country he came to love so much. Thus the third movement, which itself is a brief interlude at less than half the length of any of the other movements, may in some way be representative of Moeran's place of escape during the war. Other pointers to this hypothesis can be heard in the end of the first movement, where after a long, brooding section carried by the horns an almost mechanistic rhythm breaks out, and the movement ends on a series of percussive strikes which might surely be representative of gunfire. During the second movement we hear an episode which, it has been suggested, is reminiscent of rippling water, seemingly offering a moment of calm in this dark and troubled music. Yet, if one is to push further the war idea, a re-examination of this section can also suggest the freedom of air flight: the twisting this beautiful and light section into something dark and sinister then becomes a commentary on humanity's ability to take a wonderful new invention and turn it to destructive use. Moeran had a love of all things mechanical, indeed, Lionel Hill described how Moeran could identify a steam locomotive by its sound alone, and one can only wonder at his feelings when such marvels of the age were put to wartime use. This idea of flight returns in the final movement, where a bitter wind seems to blow through the flutes, one which serves to heighten the tension slowly mounting in the tympani before finally breaking into the six percussive cracks of the end of the work. Geoffrey Self's analysis of the work in his book, The Music of E. J. Moeran comes to a similar conclusion, albeit through a different and more thorough musical analysis. He shows the use of a folksong, The Shooting of His Dear, to hold some of the melodic keys to the symphony, and in particular homes in on the line "for young Jimmy was a fowler". Self writes: "Could there not be a loose allegory here of a young soldier - Jack [Moeran} rather than Jim - called by duty to the war, his illusions of military chivalry and nobility to be shattered by the awesome reality of the sordid carnage and its bleak aftermath." In addition he believes the Symphony to be "some kind of Requiem or In Memoriam". Certainly its bleak outlook remains unresolved in this work, and perhaps one does need to look to Moeran's next major work, his Violin Concerto, begun almost immediately after the completion of the Symphony, to find Moeran's personal answers to the problems raised here. Click here for a print formatted version of this text Violin Concerto (1937-41) R78 Published Novello, 1950 Allegro moderato Rondo: Vivace - Alla valse burlesca Lento The Violin Concerto is without doubt one of Moeran's finest musical achievements, a work which truly deserves a place amongst the great works of history. And yet, its story is one of sorry neglect, with the only known recording prior to 1979 a privately cut set of 78's owned by Moeran's friend, Lionel Hill, recently made available on a CD transfer. One can only speculate at the different course history might have taken had a commercial recording been made during Moeran's lifetime, with the composer around to promote it surely it would now sit beside Elgar's Concerto in the repertoire. Recordings Albert Sammons, BBC SO, Boult, (1946 broadcast, CD ) Lydia Mordkovitch, Ulster Orch., Handley ) (1989, CD John Georgiadis, LSO, Vernon Handley, Lyrita SRCS 105 ) (1979, LP Reviews Gramophone Magazine reviews Further Writing Hubert Foss's thoughts prior to the premiere Musical Times, 1942 (descriptive article, August 1942) Musical Times, 1943 (analytical descriptive article, August 1943) Audio Albert Sammons full At Amazon.co.uk: 1st movt 2nd movt 3rd movt Moeran began work on his Violin Concerto almost as soon as the ink was dry on his Symphony, and it has been suggested that the work is in some way an answer to the questions raised in that work. It is certainly much lighter in spirit, a deliberate evocation of Moeran's beloved west of Ireland. Many commentators have drawn comparison with Elgar's Violin Concerto, suggesting this as a reference piece for the Moeran, and while there are parallels which one might draw in detailed analysis, they remain two quite different works. The Moeran Concerto has a joy to it, particularly in the evocation of Puck Fair in the second movement, a delightful frolic through the sights and sounds of that most famous of traditional Irish fairs. This is surrounded by two beautiful evocations of the landscape around Kenmare, County Kerry, with the first movement addressing Kenmare Bay, the last an autumnal scene along Kenmare River. In all three movements the clouds which gathered over the Symphony are lifted, and we find Moeran's personal answer to his demons. The tensions he builds up here do find resolution, in beauty, scenic grandeur (although not in the Elgarian sense at all) and thrilling excitement. MP3 Audio First Movement Lionel Hill's restored recording of Albert Sammons With its soaring solo lines, the violin enters almost and the BBC Symphony immediately, and completely commands the movement. The Orchestra under Boult in tone is one of exploration, of powerful scenery, of quiet 1946, the full piece: pools, rushing waterfalls, high peaks and gentle valleys. Moeran's musical language is very much his own, with only Allegro moderato a brief incursion of a folk-like melody, and yet the evocation of that area is near perfect. Rondo - Vivace Lento Second Movement From the opening fanfare we're immediately transported to a different place, and the soloist introduces us on a merry jig through the thrills and spills of the fair, with some fabulous technical fireworks thrown in, and an unmistakable See also full page item Irish flavour to the melodies and rhythms. Moeran's mastery of orchestral textures and possibilities is brilliant, as he effortlessly leads us from one scene to another, and one pictures the freewheeling joy and chaos, the people, old and young, the merry revellers, and the quiet corners, the beautiful people he loved so much. Listen out for what Geoffrey Self described as the rather tipsy waltz which makes a brief appearance towards the end of the movement! Third Movement The feeling here is often more of serenity, and although clouds appear to be gathering at the start of the movement, small rays of sunlight break through from time to time, sufficient to light the way, to pick out a path, holding our spirits up for a resolution of almost heart-rending beauty and ultimately autumnal tranquility. Here is Moeran's answer to life's problems, found in the country landscape he visited again and again, and where he found the inspiration for so much of his work. Click here for a print formatted version of this text " a delightful frolic through the sights and sounds of that most famous of traditional Irish fairs" Sinfonietta (1944) R83 Published Novello, 1947 Allegro con brio Tema con variazioni Allegro risoluto Recordings "The first performance of the Sinfonietta is fixed for the B.B.C. Symphony Concert on March 7th, with Barbirolli as guest conductor. Thank God we have escaped Boult for it!" LPS., Beecham (1946 broadcast, Digital restoration to ) download Moeran, Letter to Lionel Hill, 16th Dec 1944 The Sinfonietta, or "small Symphony" as Moeran occasionally referred to it, was a product of his rush of creativity in 1944 - his "bumper year" had also seen the completion of the Overture for a Masque and the cycle Six Poems by Seamus O'Sullivan. Northern Sinfonia, Hickox EMI CDM 7 64721 2 ) (1989, CD Bournemouth Sinf.. Norman Del Mar Chandos CHAN 8456 ) (1986, CD London Philharmonic, Sir Adrian Boult Lyrita SRCS 37 ) (1968, LP Philharmonia Orch., Sir Adrian Boult Carlton Classics (1996, from a 1963 BBC recording, ) CD Reviews Gramophone Magazine reviews Further Writing The Sinfonietta stands almost alone in Moeran's orchestral repertoire, a piece in which he quite deliberately attempts to forge new forms and develop new ideas - here more than anywhere is Moeran as innovator. Geoffrey Self describes clearly how at this stage in his life Moeran was somewhat isolated amongst his contemporaries style-wise, as one of the last of the 'true romantics', and suggests the Sinfonietta is Moeran's push 'to get up to date'. The Sinfonietta is scored for a small orchestra more akin to Real Audio From the Chandos recording that of late Haydn than the full romantic battery, and Moeran uses this comparitive leanness to achieve a sense of by Norman Del Mar and the clarity and space. Where other composers, and Moeran Bournemouth Sinfonia, the himself elsewhere, might be tempted to fill out or even pad opening to the final out their orchestration, Moeran frequently demands a movement: sparsity that illustrates true mastery of sonic space. Fifteen years later Miles Davis's jazz recordings turned to the same Allegro risoluto (30") philosophy - here what is left out can be as telling and important as what is played. The Sinfonietta is quite a concise work. Moeran is frequently notable for the economy of his developments and ability to say what needs to be said in a relatively compact manner. Thus his 'small symphony' lives up to this description not only in orchestration but also in duration, lasting a little over 20 minutes. Musical Times - 1950 MP3 Audio Lionel Hill's restored recording of Beecham and the London Philharmonic in 1947, the full piece: Audio Allegro con brio Tema Con Variazioni Allegro Risoluto Robin Hull - 1948 Full recording Extract Composed largely in Kington, close to the Welsh borders, the Sinfonietta also differs from Moeran's preceding major works in its general lack of 'Irishness' - indeed, Lionel Hill describes the first two movements as 'boistrously English in feeling', though there is perhaps something Irish in the liveliness of the third movement, which was mainly written in County Kerry. Lionel Hill recounts: "He took us out beyond Radnor by train, and thence by bus to a spot fromwhich we climbed up and up, seemingly aboove the world, until the ground flattened out to give us superb views for miles around in all directions. I remember Jack pointing and saying, 'Over there is Elgar country, and there, Housman country... The inspirations for my Sinfonietta came to me up here, See also full page item especially the middle movement, which should be played at a brisk walking pace - as we are doing now." Barry Marsh has suggested that further to this there is evidence in the final movement of the type of encounter Lionel Hill went on to describe - to paraphrase, he and Moeran were approached and wild mountain ponies, "prancing, frothing beasts", as he describes them, with no place to escape to. Fortunately they were left alone - Moeran was unconcerned, despite knowing of the deaths of previous walkers caused by these ponies, but Hill was pretty shaken. Could there be evocation of these wild ponies in the last movement? Barry elaborates and strengthens this thesis by bringing into play the bell-ringing figure heard in the same movement as a nod to A E Housman's poem, 'Bredon Hill' from 'A Shropshire Lad': In summertime on Bredon The bells they sound so clear; Round both the shires they ring them In steeples far and near, A happy noise to hear. [etc.] "The inspirations for my Sinfonietta came to me up here, especially the middle movement, which should be played at a brisk walking pace" Pete Lopeman wrote eloquently about the Sinfonietta on the Moeran mailing list: "The Sinfonietta's compact nature (in both form and orchestra size) makes it for me almost perfect (in a kind of Mozart/Haydn way). The opening movement's strong melody and rhythm carries me along all the way. It is landscape in music, it is colour in sound - loads of green and orange. The second movement is a brisk walk and even a jog (didn't EJM mention that it should be taken at a walking rhythm?) with the The landscape around New Radnor sights, sounds and open skies of Herefordshire. The third movement is like coming down from a long hill walk - trotting and tripping over one's feet when you can see the pub down below in the valley. EJM's masterly use of timpani (to me his signature) gives it urgency and strength. The final few bars which end the Sinfonietta have a comical sense which reminds me of Mozart's 'A Musical Joke' K.522.. I'm not sure about it being EJM's masterpiece (although that tag is attached to it, I know) but it's surely a beautiful piece which to me shows a mature and confident composer at ease with himself and the world." Cello Concerto (1945) R89 Published Novello, 1947 Moderato Adagio Allegretto deciso, alla marcia In 1986, Lionel Hill wrote: "It is a complete mystery why this splendid Concerto has not been gratefully seized upon by today's cellists, whose repertoire is not extensive anyway. The work is in conventional sonata form and is one continuous paean for the cello, which is allowed to sing through the expert orchestration from start to finish, and is the final expression of all that Moeran had strived to say throughout his life." Recordings Raphael Wallfisch, Bournemount Sinfonietta, Norman Del Mar ) (1986, CD Peers Coetmore, London Philharmonic, Sir Adrian Boult Lyrita SRCS 43 ) (1970, LP Reviews Premiere, Dublin (1945) Hallé Orchestra (1946) Gramophone Magazine review Further Writing Moeran's Cello Concerto is without doubt one of his crowning achievements, and yet it can be a difficult work to get to love. It is one of those pieces which takes time to be assimilated, time to be loved. Perhaps the opening theme is less than welcoming? Or is it rather a work yet to be done full justice on disc? For it is truly a work of great beauty, and one worth perservering with if it does not initially appeal, for ultimately the rewards are fabulous. Moeran opens the Cello Concerto with a grim, jagged Real Audio From the Chandos recording melody which, if it lacks lyrical beauty, does suggest an elemental harshness - one can imagine wild walks over by Raphael Wallfisch and the wintry Kerry Mountains in a torment of passions as he Bournemouth Sinfonietta, the contemplates and questions his marriage to Peers soaring second movement Coetmore, for whom the concerto was written. This is theme: indeed stormy stuff, and Moeran's exquisite control of his orchestral forces allows the mournful cello to really sing out Adagio (30") its pain. And yet there is sunlight here, glinting occasionally through his clouds, bringing brief, hopeful moments before the clouds gather again, switching from the major back to the minor and the tempestuous forces of the full orchestra. From then on in Moeran's soloist is wracked with torment and questions, sometimes introspective, sometimes thrashing out, always with the near bitterness that cuts through this entire movement. The movement ends with a brush of cold air... Audio At Moeran.com: Excerpt arranged. This feeling is immediately picked up on the brooding, threatening opening to the second movement, which initally promises more misery, but just as one buttons down and prepares for the worst, Moeran's ability to bring light out of shadow is called to play in a theme of heart-breaking beauty. Geoffrey Self demonstrates in his book how the melody here has its origins in the first movement, yet the two could not sound or feel more different- someone in Hollywood should be using this to illustrate their great moments of loving passion! Here is the tender reward for the wild tempest of the first movement, music to melt the coldest heart, and again brilliantly scored and [Click on the picture above to enlarge the opening bars of the second movement, in Moeran's handwritten short score] The second movement ends with an extended section for Interview Read and listen to the solo cello which, in true Moeran style, sounds just like an interview by top British cellist age-old Irish folk tune, but is probably original. This links Paul Watkins on his own seamlessly into the final movement, where the orchestra picks up on the tune and lifts it into a rumbustuous theme recording of the Cello Concerto commissioned by for a constantly varied rondo finale. This Moeran intersperses with a variety of ideas - he wrote to Peers on the BBC for their Composer 4th May 1945: "the very nature of the main subject seems of the Week programmes to call for an insistence on the Rondo scheme. One is, I feel, the first time Paul had fully justified in interpolating all sorts of tunes provided the encountered the work: movement in bound together by the main idea which in the Paul Watkins case leads itself admirably to the purpose." Thus he is able to bring in all sorts of different meditations and episodes, and again the sun is shining - in a later letter he states: "I am longing to see what other ideas crop up as I forge ahead. I think working in bright daylight has more to do with it than anything, together with the pleasant outlook from the window facing me to the green lawn." Lionel Hill is correct when suggesting this is a wrongly neglected work. Geoffrey Self says much the same thing: "Arguably it is a work of such quality as to place it with the concertos of Dvorak and Elgar as the finest written for the instrument. Regrettably, it is hardly known." "Arguably it is a work of such quality as to place it with the concertos of Dvorak and Elgar as the finest written for the instrument. Regrettably, it is hardly known" Perhaps the first movement is too unwelcoming at times? And yet who could fail to be moved by the second? Here is a work which, perhaps more than any other (with the relative paucity of great repertoire works for cello and orchestra), deserves its place on the international stage and the radio playlists. And of course in your CD collection and heart... Symphony No 2 in E Flat (unfinished) R99 Published n/a "The Symphony is the devil of a job: I shall get it done it time, but the question of form and construction is causing me some trouble, as I am arriving at a single-movement work, or rather a continuous piece having all the ingredients of the usual movements..." Recordings Reviews Further Writing Audio Moeran Letter to Lionel Hill 18th March 1948 Moeran went to his grave without completing the symphony he'd been working on intermittently from 1945. After his death there is come confusion as to quite what happened to his remaining manuscripts, and it is quite possible that many were lost or mislaid; there was certainly a period of time where very little care seemed to have been taken over preserving Moeran's work. What does remain is largely held in an archive at the Victorian College of the Arts, Melbourne, Australia, including some sketches for the Second Symphony. Trying to piece together information about the work is difficult, and what I write here is largely assembled from the two currently available books on Moeran rather than from any 'inside' information. It seems the work started as a three movement piece Moeran wrote to Peers Coetmore on 7th January 1946: "The E flat Symphony progresses, but I am a bit stuck over the slow movement also about the finish of the first. However, I have all the material for it and it will only be a matter of time working it out." By mid-1947, he was still stuck, as L:ionel Hill recounted: "Jack and I were out for a walk...when he said 'I'd like your advice. I'm having a lot of trouble with my new Symphony, and its nearly driving me bats... It's the form of the work that worries me; the three movements don't cohere, so to speak - there's a lack of unity between them which is, to miy mind, artistically unsatisfying.' I thought for a minute and then said, 'Couldn't you make a one-movement work of it, Jack, like the Sibelius 7th?' We walked on in silence. I gave him a sidelong glance and saw he was deep in thought." At around this time Moeran commented briefly on his new symphony in a radio interview listen here. By September 4th, 1947, Moeran had a short score sufficiently advanced that he played the opening to Lionel Hill on the piano. Hill noted that it was in E flat, "'As in Elgar's Second,' said Jack, quietly. It began vigorously with high-flying trumpets, followed by a syncopated strings divisi - the instrumentation was visible on the score. Even on the piano it was breath-taking in its sweep, and I thought 'This will out-do the First Symphony if it continues like this.' I cannot recall how much of the work had been written, but I do remember what fine music it was." A letter quoted by Geoffrey Self sent from Moeran (working in Kenmare) to Peers on 8th March 1948 suggests that good progress was being made: "I can't write much because I am at the moment in a state amounting to stupour [sic] at the point I have reached in the symphony. It may be imperfect in its present form but I think that in the last pages which complete the first section, I have reached my high water mark. It is rather luscious and spring-like - or so I hope it will sound on the orchestra. And, incidentally, apart from the lovely Southern spring here, your gorgeous cello playing, on the instrument you are now using which I listened in to last week put me into such extasy [sic] that the next morning I really got going with a tune for cellos mostly in thirds and sixths. I've tried it out on one or two locals...they say it reminds them of all the Kerry tunes put together. The symphony is taking a peculiar form..." A few days later he was noting to Lionel Hill "P.S. New E Flat Symphony going strong", but this appears to have been "It began vigorously with high-flying trumpets, followed by a syncopated strings divisi - the instrumentation was visible on the score. Even on the piano it was breath-taking in its sweep" the last Hill heard from Moeran about it. Hill recalled that by 1950 "I was now becoming more worried about his memory. He seemed to forget quite recent event." In fact Moeran's physical and mental health appears to have been in decline for quite some time, probably exacerbated by his drinking. A "state of total breakdown" (Self) had been reached by October 1948, and Peers persuaded him to place himself under the care of a Dr Hazlett in Cheltenham. A proposed premiere of the Symphony by the Hallé Orchestra in the spring of 1949 was postponed. A letter to Peers from Cheltenham on 14th June 1949 suggests not only great compositional difficulties, but also some sort of commitment to continue medical care until he was 'cured' of his alcoholism: "...This symphony which I started perpetrating in Eire, and which I have been working on here, simply will not stand...I am not inclined to let go what I believe to be second rate. I shall have to scrap this symphony as it is now, nearly finished, and start again on something different... the 'venue' is wrong. If I were in Southern Ireland, I could work it Jack and Peers Coetmore out and finish is, but it is absolutely and irreconcilably impossible to do it here. It started by being Irish, and if I try and put it right here, it only ends up being pastiche Irish... There are only three alternatives, one is to tear it up and abandon the E flat symphony and the other is to go to Ireland and complete it, and the third is to write something else." By late 1949 Moeran seemed to be suffering from another breakdown and by December was receiving treatment from a Dr Groves. Work did continue fitfully on the symphony, and in 1950 he did finally make it to Ireland. But by now, as Moeran's health continued to deteriorate, it was too late, as Geoffrey Self sadly concludes: "He had achieved the conditions he thought necessary for the work needed to complete the Symphony - but it was too late, for he was now incapable of the sustained effort needed." It is interesting that Moeran had considered the work very close to completion, something confirmed by his close friend Pat Ryan, who discussed it with him at great length in the last few months of his life, as searches for it after his death have found little. John Ireland, examining the remaining sketches after Moeran's death, considered there to be too little material to attempt any kind of a completetion, an opinion reached by others since. It therefore seems that either a large amount has been lost, or that Moeran decided to destroy it himself to make sure it never resurfaced, something he had done throughout his life. Writing in the Forum here at The Worldwide Moeran Database, Barry Marsh noted "Sadly there can be no 'realisation' or 'completion', whatever the word for it these days. 550 bars of music exists in short score, but after only 9 pages the sketches become disjointed with little or no fragments to point a further way. The MSS that is now in the Victorian College of Arts, Melbourne arrived there after a series of blunders and misfortunes...". And so it seems we will never hear the music which, for a while at least, so enthused and fired Jack and Lionel up all those years ago. In The Mountain Country (1921) R10 Published OUP, 1925 Recordings Ulster Orch., Handley ) (1989, CD Reviews Further Writing Audio From Amazon.co.uk Excerpt In The Mountain Country was Moeran's first published orchestral work, and, as far as can be ascertained, his first attempt at writing any full orchestral piece. Remarkably for a piece so early in Moeran's output there are definite links to Ireland to be deduced, even if musically there are few clues. Moeran originally entitled the work "Cushinsheeaun: symphonic impression", which even if it shows nothing on the web search radar, if nothing else sounds Irish! (Actually, further research suggests Co. Mayo, which he first visited in 1918 - see Chronology. He also dedicated the work to the great Irish composer and conductor Hamilton Harty, whose persistence with Moeran eventually resulted in the magnificent triumph of the Symphony in G minor some sixteen years later. In Geoffrey Self's view, "In The Mountain Country reflects that nature-worship characteristic of other music of the period", citing Vaughan Williams' Pastoral Symphony as a near contemporary work, and suggesting a titular affinity at least with his "In The Fen Country", which one has to admit is pretty striking. But looking beyond timing and naming to the music itself we find something of a paradox. Moeran's two preceding works, the Piano Trio and the First String Quartet, are both works bursting with exuberant musical ideas and vibrant melodies, yet the present work shows none of this. As Self says, "the crippling handicap of the Moeran is the dullness of its principal idea." It's hard to put it any better. This master of the lyrical melody appears to come seriously unstuck here. And yet his orchestral writing The Mountain Country of County Kerry and textures, supposedly those of a first attempt, shows an amazing degree of mastery. Both in texture, harmony and counterpoint ideas it shows genuine invention and apparent expertise; if only the core material had matched up to the technique. Once again, Self puts this ultimately rather forgettable work firmly in its place: "...Moeran aspires to mountain music and his earth-bound and wooden little tune does not have in it the potential for ecstasy...and thus can never soar to reach that rapt contemplation of nature in solitary splendour which we would reasonably expect from the title." Perhaps he should have stuck to the more abstract Cushinsheean. ...his orchestral writing and textures, supposedly those of a first attempt, shows an amazing degree of mastery... Rhapsody No. 1 (1922) R16 Published Hawkes, 1925 Recordings Ulster Orch., Handley ) (1989, CD Reviews Further Writing Audio After the brilliantly-orchestrated but somewhat tunefully lacklustre first orchestral work, In The Mountain Country (a piece, incidentally, which Lewis Foreman described as "effectively Rhapsody No. 0") of 1921, Moeran really found his stride the following year with his First Rhapsody. Not only does this build on the technique of the earlier work, but melodically it is streets ahead, and writers such as Geoffrey Self feel it to be a superior work to the Second Rhapsody which followed it. This implies that here we have Moeran's finest orchestral writing prior to the Symphony of 1937. Moeran was still studying under John Ireland when he wrote the First Rhapsody, and it is to Ireland that the work is dedicated. Despite this, Self finds more of the influence of Delius, in particular the First Dance Rhapsody and Brigg Fair, and also that of Butterworth's Rhapsody A Shropshire Lad. Meanwhile, mining other influences, Foreman adds suggestions of Ravel, Bax and Frank Bridge. While it can be both fun and instructive to pick over the possible influences on an early work of a young student composer, it is important not to let this overshadow the fact that the First Rhapsody is very much a successful piece in its own right. Beginning somewhat mysteriously with a short introduction throwing snippets of melody around the wind instruments, a sharp suddent chord interrupts and a gentle rhythm starts underpin what is still clearly an opening preamble. Moeran seems to be warming us up for the main body of music which doesn't really get going until almost two minutes in. From here on we are into a set of Ireland and Moeran, 1922 variations around a lyrical modal melody clearly evocative of English folk music, which are the basis on which we are taken foward for a further ten minutes. That most diligent of music detectives Geoffrey Self can find no identifiable folk tunes that have been used in the piece - though the melodies Moeran creates were realistic enough to fool a Musical Times reviewer in 1925. Moeran was to become a master of exploring a lot in a relatively short time, as later orchestral works like the Sinfonietta and its near-contemporary, Overture to a Masque were to prove. Here he is quite successful in holding his ideas together, possibly more so than in the Second Rhapsody, and though his build-ups and climaxes have great power they can sometimes come more out of nowhere rather than out of a logical progression of the preceding music. Moeran is also keen to explore some of the more unusual time signatures, at one point simultaneously pitting a 5/8 bass against a 3/4 orchestra in a way which, remarkably, works quite brilliantly. As a showpiece for a young composer the First Rhapsody is a triumph - engaging melodies, warm pasoral lyricism, thrilling climaxes, and mysterious interludes. I leave it though to Peter Warlock, writing in 1924, to provide a final alternative interpretation: "...the principal theme of his first orchestral 'Rhapsody' which presented by the bassoon in its upper octave - will always appeal to the ribald as the ideal tune for all Limericks" Beginning somewhat mysteriously with a short introduction throwing snippets of melody around the wind instruments... Rhapsody No. 2 (1924, revised 1941) R26/R77 Published Hawkes, 1925 Chester, 1941 (rev.) Recordings Ulster Orch., Handley ) (1989, CD London Philharmonic, Sir Adrian Boult, Lyrita SRSC 43 ) (1970, LP Reviews Proms 1929 Further Writing Audio At Moeran.com: Excerpt Moeran's Second Rhapsody was commissioned in 1923 by the Norfolk and Norwich Centenary Festival for 1924, and received its debut performance under Moeran's baton just two months after the composer had conducted his first Rhapsody at the Proms, in October and August 1924 respectively. Yet the second Rhapsody was not heard again for five years, and he came back to revise it in 1941. This short history suggests that perhaps not all is right with this work. indeed, Geoffrey Self goes so far as to say "It is a flawed work. Its textures are crude...attempts made at polyphony betray an uncertain apprentice hand". Yet in 1929 the Manchester Guardian was to write that it "made a good impression on the Promenaders tonight...there is so much to listen to in this work". Well in both cases some selective quotation seems to Real Audio perhaps mask the truth - see the full reviews and you'll see From the Chandos recording what I mean. The Second Rhapsody is a very interesting by Vernon Handley and the work for Moeran scholars, and contains some fabulous Ulster Orchestra, the writing and melodies for listeners. By the time of his mature wonderful central theme: works, Moeran was a master at encapsulating broad ideas and themes in a tight space, knitting together the logical Rhapsody 2 (30") threads of his musical argument in a way he explored in a 1931 article, John Ireland as Teacher. But here we find the younger Moeran struggling somewhat. In that article on Ireland he wrote: "All the music which has escaped consignment to the shelf has been inherently logical. Music, without logical continuity and shape, is lifeless from its inception." Perhaps this is a lesson he had already learned. Perhaps in learning that lesson he realised the value of stalling work on the symphony he'd begun in the same year as he'd premiered the Second Rhapsody, to return to it many years later, ready at last to do his material justice. As I said earlier, the Second Rhapsody does possess some fine musical ideas. The central, broad slow melody is undoubtedly one of Moeran's finest, and bursts from the surrounded music like sunlight on a summer's day - a section of this is illustrated here. The work sees some of Moeran's earliest genuine Irish influence, at times unable to stop itself from leaping into a spontaneous jig. And there's the Norfolk influence there too. It is a work bursting at the seams with creativity - too much so. He's often so keen to show us his next great idea that we seem to say goodbye to the last idea too quickly. Just as you're wondering where one theme is going to lead something else starts bubbling under until it bursts through and shoulders the last out of the way. In the push for each idea to get to the front for a place in the spotlight the joins start to show. The Second Rhapsody is one of the earliest examples of a musical form Moeran was to make one of his Jack Moeran, late 1920's trademarks - the Rondo. Yet here he's still wrestling with the idea, and it seems to have got the better of him somewhat. In summary, the Second Rhapsody has all the ingredients the more mature Moeran could have mixed to create a particularly wonderful musical cake. Yet the less experienced hand, whilst making a fair stab at it, let it sink a little in the oven and singed the edges a bit. It still tastes great, but lacks the presentation skills of the master chef. It would be eleven years before he published another full orchestral score. As a postscript, Moeran returned to the work in 1941 and revised it for a somewhat smaller orchestra. Whether this was for musical or financial reasons (he was being courted by another publisher at the time) is hard to say - perhaps he thought it had enough in it to merit a second look. The central, broad slow melody is undoubtedly one of Moeran's finest... Rhapsody for Piano and Orchestra (1942-3) R79 The Rhapsody in F sharp minor* for Piano and Orchestra is almost, but not quite, Moeran's Piano Concerto, written shortly before the Sinfonietta which wasn't quite his Second Symphony. It was written as a Proms commission (following an earlier suggestion from Arnold Bax that Moeran write something for piano and orchestra) for the pianist Harriet Cohen to play. It was first performed at the Royal Albert Hall on August 19th, 1943, a concert later reflected on by Lionel Hill: Published Chester, 1943 Recordings Margaret Fingerhut, Vernon Handley, Ulster Orchestra: "I waited impatiently until at last Miss Cohen entered to applause and sat down at the piano, adjusted her stool, looked to the conductor - and the Rhapsody sprang to life. 1 - c/w Symphony 2 - c/w Rhapsodies 1 & 2 & In The Mountain Country (1989, CD ) John McCabe, New Philharmonia Orch., Braithwaite: Lyrita SRCS 91 ) (1977, LP Reviews Further Writing "New Music" by Robin Hull (1946) Audio At Moeran.com: Excerpt "I had studied the piano reduction score of this work during Real Audio From the Chandos recording previous weeks; nevertheless, I was captivated by the triple-time entry of the cellos and double basses, followed by Margaret Fingerhut with by the piano's dramatic statement of the first theme, and as Vernon Handley conducting the performance continued I became enthralled by the spell the Ulster Orchestra, the that this composer could weave. There was a juxtaposition opening: of violence and lyricism that I was later to know was typical of the man himself. There was also a pervading sense of Piano Rhapsody (30") nostalgia for the pastoral scene of long ago - something whose roots lay deeper than folk music itself." Geoffrey Self points out that Moeran, despite initial scepticism, grew to quite enjoy the work himself - unlike some of its contemporaries. Having writen in October 1943 "to my certain knowledge, it contains more than its fair share of tripe", eleven months later he was to confess "I find I was wrong, and I really think that after all it is a very good effort on my part. It seems now so virile and logical." Written with a wartime audience in mind, the piece is both immediately accessible and requiring of considerable showy virtuosity. Geoffrey Self calls it a 'large-scale waltz', albeit one for which the composer claimed to have found the inspiration in the 'four-ale bars of Kerry'. Certainly for an unchallengng, attractive introduction to Moeran's music, this fifteen minute piece is hard to beat. As Self notes: "for this work and one or two others of about the same time, there was to be a looseness of construction and relaxation of manner which was not inappropriate to the aim - a popular work for the delectation of Proms audiences in wartime." This 'looseness' was to be significantly tightened up when he came to the Sinfonietta of 1944. *Note - from Barry Marsh: "Barry Collett, conductor of the Rutland Sinfonia, performed the Piano Rhapsody with Margaret Fingerhut in Leicester in Pianist Harriet Cohen EJM's Centenary Year 1994. Both came to the firm conclusion that the piece should be re-titled 'Rhapsody in F sharp minor' - indeed a study of the score would seem to support this, that much of the music veers towards the minor, rather than major keys." "I was captivated by the triple-time entry of the cellos and double basses, followed by the piano's dramatic statement of the first theme, and as the performance continued I became enthralled by the spell that this composer could weave" Lonely Waters (1924/31?) R27 Published Novello, 1935 Recordings *Ann Murray, English Chamber Orch, Tate ) (1987, CD Ulster Orch., Handley ) (1989, CD (*includes vocal coda) Reviews Further Writing Audio At Moeran.com: Vocal coda From Amazon.co.uk Excerpt Of Moeran's shorter pieces for orchestra it is Lonely Waters which gets the rave reviews. Warlock described it as "a very attractive piece for small orchestra", Geoffrey Self calls it "a near-perfect miniature" and for Lionel Hill it was the spur to his first making contact with Moeran and later became the title of his book describing his friendship with the composer. Hill wrote "In retrospect it seems poetically right that Jack should have met his death in 'some lonely waters'. This beautiful work was the cause of our friendship, and somehow his end was foreshadowed in its dying cadence. Of all his output this is the one work which I can only occasionally bear to hear." Lonely Waters has proved difficult to tie to any particular date - thought Warlock refers to it in 1924 it has also been dated at 1930-31 by Hubert Foss in his "Compositions of E J Moeran" of 1948. Geoffrey Self seems to plump for the work being substantially revised at the later point from an earlier work, citing the harmonic and structural treatments as being too advanced for Moeran's earlier style. The piece lasts for around nine and a half minutes, and is built around a Norfolk folk song already included in the 1923 collection Six Folksongs from Norfolk. Moeran wrote two alternative endings for Lonely Waters, though made clear his preference for the solo voice rather than cor anglais. Alas all too frequently it seems the latter is easier to get hold of, though it is possible to find a recording with Ann Murray singing the unaccompanied lines towards the end of the piece heard in the audio clip on this website: So I'll go down to some lonely waters Go down where no-one shall me find Where the pretty little birds do change their voices And every moment blow blustering wild The song originated in Moeran's visits to remote Norfolk pubs collecting and notating the songs still sung there in what was already a dying oral tradition. With this in mind Moeran stated "...it should be understood that the singer need not be a professional one...anybody with a clear and natural manner of singing may sing the verse." For Self the music is in some ways reminiscent of the style of Vaughan Williams' Pastoral Symphony of 1922. It certainly has an especially pastoral, romantic, almost tragic air to it's nostalgic melancholy. It is easy to understand how hearing the music could bring a tear to the eye of Lionel Hill as he recalled the loss of his good friend. Lonely Waters was published alongside Wythorne's Shadow as Two Pieces for Small Orchestra, despite having very little in common, either musically or in orchestral requirements. One may wonder whether the association actually does each individual work a disservice. "somehow his end was foreshadowed in its dying cadence" Whythorne's Shadow (1926-31?) R49 Published Novello, 1935 Recordings English Chamber Orch, Tate ) (1987, CD Ulster Orch., Handley ) (1989, CD Reviews Further Writing Audio From Amazon.co.uk: Excerpt "This piece is based on a part-song by Thomas Whythorne published in 1571. The nature of the present work cannot be better expounded than by quotation of the poem of Whythorne's song. As thy shadow itself apply'th To follow thee whereso thou go And when thou bends, itself it wry'th Turning as thou both to and fro: The flatterer doth even so; And shopes himself the same to gloze, With many a fawning and gay show, Whom he would frame for his purpose" from Moeran's preface to Whythorne's Shadow According to Barry Marsh's meticulous chronology, Moeran began work on a short piece for small orchestra in 1926 while living in Eynsford with Peter Warlock. The previous year, Warlock had transcribed, edited and published Whythorne's As Thy Shadow Itself Apply'th, reviving the maligned Elizabethan composer's reputation, and providing the inspiration for one of Moeran's few compositions of the time. Unfortunately we will never hear the original version written at Eynsford. In mid-January, 1929, Moeran left England with Warlock and a group of friends for France and an expedition to visit Delius. According to Eric Fenby, however, Moeran was 'mislaid' on the way, and almost certainly never met his hero. He also managed to end up drunk in Brussels, as Warlock soon after related: "his last composition...was unfortunately not picked up by the kindly Brussels gendarme who found its composer in a state of beatific coma in the gutter some years ago; and nothing more has been heard of it since that occasion". Warlock did not live to see the resurrection of Whythorne's Shadow that emerged in 1931, and it is impossible to say how closely it resembles the original. If the forward-looking String Trio might be seen as an elegy to Warlock, Geoffrey Self suggests that Whythorne's Shadow is Moeran's almost nostalgic 'In Memoriam' to his friend. The music begins gently in a very formal evocation of the original harmony, and moves gradually through rondo form, to become what Self entitles "Warlock's Shadow", its final chromaticism soaked in the harmonies both composer friends had loved in the 1920s. Christopher Palmer, in 1976, wrote "What he does here, in fact, is to gather together in a single brief movement the whole complex chain of technical affinities relating Delius, the folklorists and the Elizabethans. Here is the English Delius movement in a nutshell." The piece is coupled with Lonely Waters as "Two Pieces for Small Orchestra", and invariably the two appear together in recordings. Yet there is little to link the pieces even the orchestral requirements are different - and it seems the association is one of publishing convenience rather than musical affinity. Here is the English Delius movement in a nutshell... Overture For A Masque (1944) R82 Published Joseph Williams, 1949 Recordings Ulster Orch., Handley ) (1987, CD London Philharmonic, Sir Adiran Boult Lyrita SRCS 43 ) (1970, LP Reviews Further Writing Audio Blast Legge, his overture must wait... ...honestly, I wish the overture were finished with, and I were onto something else... ...it is not my top notch... ...now that it's getting into full score, it is turning out really well... ...I think it turns out to be a good little work what you might call athletic in style... from Moeran's letters to Peers Coetmore, Nov. 1943 - Feb. 1944 Overture for a Masque was commissioned by Walter Legge in 1943 for the Entertainments National Service Association (ENSA), Moeran being one of several composers asked to write music for performance at concerts for troops during the Second World War. It comes at a time when Moeran was at a musical peak, was falling in love with Peers Coetmore (and consequently would rather have been writing cello pieces for her), and was approaching a level of output not seen since his earliest work some twenty years earlier. It would be a mistake to suggest that he was churning work out, but certainly this was a fertile and productive time for him, coming hot on the heels of the Rhapsody for Piano and Orchestra and immediately before the Sinfonietta and Cello Concerto. Andrew Burn, in his sleevenotes for the Chandos release, suggests "It is first and foremost a work designed to entertain...and with its exuberant syncopated rhythms and sparkling orchestral textures it does just that", a sentiment Geoffrey Self appears to agree with - it is, he says, "perfectly tailored to its function...[and] demonstrates...his thorough professionalism." Self goes on to suggest the orchestration as a response to the Russian school, particularly Tchaikovsky, and perhaps some Stravinskian rhythmic syncopation, to which I might add the occasional fleeting shadow of Prokofiev. The Overture is assembled as a Rondo, one of Moeran's favourite musical structures, and this allows for a wide range of different musical emotions and textures to be explored in its compact ten minute duration, from the majestic opening fanfare through the inspirationally dramatic, hints of far away lands (my Prokofiev moment is followed by an oboe which perhaps suggests the Orient), some defiantly pastoral English lyricism, a vigorous march, and that's only the first three minutes! Whether or not Moeran deliberately set out to invoke specifics images memories or thoughts in the minds of his audience, most of whom would be fighting far away with little chance of seeing home and their loved ones in the foreseeable future it's difficult when listening to the Overture not to associate almost all of the music with a mental progression of images. There's even a menacing central section which would perfectly fit a reel of Hitler at his most menacing before the British boats, planes and troops march in to sort him out... Unlike contemporaries like William Walton, who became heavily involved in writing music for propaganda films during the war, this was something Moeran never attempted. Listening to the Overture for a Masque, one can only believe that film music would have suited Moeran's style down to the ground, if not his temperament! "It is first and foremost a work designed to entertain...and with its exuberant syncopated rhythms and sparkling orchestral textures it does just that" Nocturne (1934) R70 Published Novello, 1935 Grez-sur-Loing 3.1.1935 My Dear Moeran, The poem is beautiful and I am sure it must have inspired you to give the best and most intimate and tender...you have in your heart. Please dedicate it to the memory of Frederick, it is a tribute which I know would have given him great pleasure. Recordings Hugh Mackey, Ulster Orch., Renaissance Singers, Vernon Handley ) (1990, CD Reviews Further Writing Audio Jelka Delius. The Nocturne stands at a crossroads in Moeran’s career as a composer. Before Delius died in 1934 Moeran had already accepted a commission from the Norwich Philharmonic Society, but seems to have been stuck for an idea until the poet Robert Nichols gave him some lines from an unfinished verse drama entitled ‘Don Juan Tenorio, the Great’. Why this should have happened remains unclear, unless it is reasonable to speculate that within the framework of Don Juan’s ‘Address to the Sunset’ lies Nichols’s own eulogy for Delius - he knew Delius well. It is essentially a poem of twilight, evoking much of the atmosphere that is to be found in Delius’s own settings of texts by Nietzche and Walt Whitman. But how did Nichols want Moeran to respond? It is indeed rare that any composer should so quickly put aside work on a symphony in order to satisfy the plea of a poet to set his words to music; yet throughout the late summer and autumn of 1934 Moeran took up residence in Nichols’s own Sussex home so that he might complete the Nocturne. Once finished, he sent the piece to Delius’s wife Jelka, receiving in turn what seemed to be the ultimate approval. There is evidence to support the fact that it was much needed. From his student days at the Royal College of Music Moeran had fallen in love with with the music of Delius and, in the company of Philip Heseltine [AKA Peter Warlock], himself a Delius ‘disciple’, he had the opportunity of visiting Grez on at least two occasions. It is, perhaps, a telling reflection on Heseltine’s relationship with his friend that Moeran, always the less dominant of the two but probably the one with more humility, was left to be ‘mislaid’ (Heseltine’s own word) in a taxi and so never got to meet his idol. Fate was to deal a crueller blow in 1929, when, with the invitation to meet Delius at Beecham’s Delius Festival in London accepted, Moeran suffered an injury which was to confine him to bed for the next eighteen months. It became a time of self-appraisal, of realising that the years spent with Heseltine, although fun, had rendered him creatively sterile. The sudden death of Heseltine in 1930 was a bitter blow, but, in retrospect, the answer to Moeran’s dilemma - how to go about re-establishing the reputation that he had made over six years earlier on the British musical scene. "Delius would have loved to set Robert Nichols’s poem. Moeran does not, however, try to tell us how Delius would have done it", wrote the critic Basil Maine after the first performance of the Nocturne in 1935. In the 1933 Songs of Springtime Moeran had already written a kind of ‘choral chamber music’ but here the treatment is broader, the canvas a larger one. Although the work is short, it encapsulates much of what was to come - the Symphony, the two concertos and the 1939 choral suite Phyllida and Corydon. In Moeran’s words, "The Nocturne should be regarded as a kind of tone poem evolved around Nichols’s lines, from which both its form and inspiration have been derived. As a preliminary to hearing this music, the listener is advised to read the poem carefully through, allowing its mood and meaning to sink in, rather than to attempt to follow it in performance as a literal line by line "setting" of the words." Exquisite stillness! What serenities Of earth and air! How bright atop the wall The stonecrop’s fire and beyond the precipice How huge, how hushed the primrose evenfall! How softly, too, the white crane voyages Yon honeyed height of warmth and silence, whence He can look down on islet, lake and shore And crowding woods and voiceless promontories Or, further gazing, view the magnificence Of cloud- like mountains and of mountainous cloud Or ghostly wrack below the horizon rim Not even his eye has vantage to explore. Now, spirit, find out wings and mount to him, Wheel where he wheels, where he is soaring soar. Hang where now he hangs in the planisphere Evening’s first star and golden as a bee In the sun’s hair - for happiness is here! Robert Nichols "It is essentially a poem of twilight, evoking much of the atmosphere that is to be found in Delius’s own settings of texts by Nietzche and Walt Whitman" (Address to the Sunset, from ‘Don Juan Tenorio, the Great’) Notes by Barry Marsh Symphony in G Minor R71 www.gramophone.co.uk There are four reviews of Symphony recordings in the Gramofile records on the net since 1983, of which only the Chandos disc is currently in print. However, copies of the previous releases may still be tracked down. Note that the two reviews of the Heward recording refer to two difference transfers, before and after the introduction of digital restoration technology. ...tense anxiety that often disrupts from beneath the surface... Chandos CD CHAN85770 (Ulster Orchestra/ Handley) Published April 1988 With all its echoes of Sibelius and Vaughan Williams (even, in the finale, of Elgar), its fondness for atmospheric episodes and its not-quite-symphonic form (a cruelly severe musical surgeon could probably chop a couple of minutes from each of its movements; the main meat of the opening Allegro is not so much a development of its material as a fantasia based primarily on its first subject group), Moeran's Symphony ought to have faded long ago. This performance proves that it has not, and suggests that its enduring strength lies not in its rich lyricism, nor its vivid land- and seascape imagery but in the tense anxiety that often disrupts them from beneath the surface. ...It scarcely needs me to add that here is a wonderfully vital and heartfelt performance of a fine symphony... ...an electrifying It is a First Symphony by a composer in his forties who had not written a major orchestral work performance, recorded in an before, and was rather unsure of his ability to write this one (it took him a decade to complete). electrifying quality of It is a flawed work, its recourses to Sibelian models are at times almost blatant, its changes of richness and clarity... direction can seem random, but in a good performance (and this is a very good one) the violently abrupt closing chords of the finale sound like a culmination of those many earlier moments of shadow, unease or apprehension, which can now be seen as far more essential than the warm richness of the first movement's 'second subject' (deliberately under-used?) or the Irish jig that seemed intended as the main matter of the finale itself (and besides, what a very preoccupied jig it is). The Symphony is closer to school-of-Bax than to school-of-Vaughan Williams, in fact, despite a franker use of folk-inspired or directly folk-derived material than was generally Bax's practice, and it is a Baxian disquiet that gives the work its urgency. MEO HMV LP ED290187-1 English Sinfonia/Dilkes Published December 1984 Search Search WWW Search Moeran E-Mail me: [email protected] Mailing List Archive The Worldwide Moeran Database ©2001 Andrew Rose At the time of the writing of this symphony the more familiar of Moeran's music (the Norturne, the Songs of Springtime) was lyric, nostalgic, delighting those listeners who enjoyed 'evocations of the English countryside', and arousing rather less interest among those who did not. New worlds, for the composer, were disclosed by the symphony's first performance in 1938: here was a new, powerful symphonic voice, and it was not for nothing that in 1942 the symphony was chosen for the first British Council supported record (beating Belshazzar's Feast, no less, to the post). I do not think I ever heard those early Moeran records (Halle/Heward—HMV C3319/24, 1/43) at the time—though WRA's review of them fell out of my score just now. I do know, though, that the newer recording now reissued expounds the symphony's breadth of vision quite marvellously: an electrifying performance, recorded in an electrifying quality of richness and clarity. Not quite of balance, the woodwind sometimes having difficulty in projecting their solos. This last detail is not the case at all in the two short pieces, I think with (very properly) fewer strings used. These were among the Moeran music of the 1930's familiar to the original enthusiasts; newer listeners will readily see how unprepared earlier audiences were for the symphony. But Moeran's older and newer listeners alike must now rate this issue an entirely treasurable one. MM HMV LP EM290462-3 Hallé Orch/Heward Published August 1985 Heward had directed the first performance of the Moeran Symphony in 1938 and for years later the work was chosen by the British Council for its first venture into the sponsorship of recordings. Moeran himself attended the sessions and observed how ill Heward was in his last work for the gramophone, but there is no sign of any weakness in a gloriously impassioned and glowing account of the score. AS Dutton Laboratories CD CDAX8001 Hallé Orch/Heward Published May 1993 In 1942 the British Council decided to sponsor recordings of British music, and Moeran's Symphony was the first work to be chosen. Leslie Heward had conducted the first performance in 1938, but at the age of 45 he was now mortally ill with tuberculosis, and time was running short if his authoritative interpretation was to be preserved. At the autumn recording sessions in Manchester both Moeran and the producer Walter Legge were alarmed by Heward's poor physical condition, but somehow he fought off pain and fatigue to create a performance which deeply impressed the composer. It became the most important recording left by a highly sensitive musician of whom Sir Adrian Boult wrote, "There was no one to touch him, in my opinion; he'd have gone a long way, if he had lived." Legge also admired Heward greatly, describing him as "musically speaking, the most satisfying conductor this country has had since Beecham". It scarcely needs me to add that here is a wonderfully vital and heartfelt performance of a fine symphony. Large-scale recordings had retreated to the provinces in the face of the enemy bombing of London, and whilst it is true that the Halle were no longer quite the body they had been under Harty, they played their hearts out for Heward. The original recording was dry and lacking in range: EMI's own LP transfer (8/85—nla) was very serviceable, but Michael Dutton has opened up the sound in a remarkable fashion. There is now increased tonal depth, more warmth in the strings and a new solidity in the bass. Here is a case of new technology being put to very best artistic use. AS All reviews ©Gramophone Magazine, Haymarket Publishing Symphony Sleevenotes Moeran's own sleevenotes from the HMV recording of the Symphony released in 1943: Published Novello, 1942 Recordings Ulster Orch., Handley (1987, CD) New Philharmonia of London, Sir Adrian Boult, Lyrita SRCS 70 (1975, LP) English Sinfonia, Neville Dilkes (1973, LP) Hallé Orch, Leslie Heward, (1942, 78s, reissued on Dutton CDAX 8001) Reviews This symphony was completed early in 1937 and received its first performance at a Royal Philharmonic Society concert at Queen's Hall, London on 13th January 1938 under the conductorship of Leslie Heward. It may be said to owe its inspiration to the natural surroundings in which it was planned and written. The greater part of the work was carried out among the mountains and seaboard of Co. Kerry, but the material of the second movement was conceived around the sand-dunes and marshes of East Norfolk. It is not 'programme music'- i.e. there is no story or sequence of events attached to it and, moreover, it adheres strictly to its form. It is scored for a moderate sized orchestra (double wood-wind). I Allegro. The Symphony opens without any preamble with the Real Audio From the 1973 recording by principal subject of the first movement, given out by the Neville Dilkes and the English violins. In the fourth bar of this there is a figure of four Sinfonietta, the opening of semiquavers which subsequently plays an important part. Special notice may be taken of the downward leaps at the the first movement: end of the theme. Presently there appears a fanfare-like Allegro (1'01") motive on the horns, with which is combined the first subject fortissimo on strings. This very soon reaches a slight climax, ending with the downward leap. The music gradually quietens and slows down, a good deal being heard of the semiquaver figure, and we arrive in B major for the second subject. This is a long-drawn-out tune of lyrical character. It continues unbroken almost to the double bar, just previous to which part of the first subject is alluded to on solo violin and horn. W H Mellers' attack The development is ushered in by the semiquaver figure on a clarinet. The tempo becomes Allegro molto, the pace is set by a rhythmic figure on the strings, over which the semiquaver figure, now inverted, is treated at some length on the wood-wind, later in combination with the first subject in augmentation on bassoons and horns. There is a big climax leading to what amounts to the return and recapitulation. This is brief and quiet, the component parts of the first and second subjects and the horn fanfare being dovetailed in succession contrapuntally. Audio A lengthy coda concludes the movement, during which the rhythmic figure from the double bar assumes importance on the brass, and the inverted semi-quaver figure now augmented to crotchets is further developed by a solo horn over string accompaniment. Further Writing At Moeran.com: 1st movt. opening Available from Amazon 11 Lento. The slow movement, which is in B minor, is based entirely on four motives which are given out at the start in quick succession. The first is an undulating one on cellos and basses, the second follows immediately on low flutes and bassoons, the third in canon on all four wood-wind sections, and finally a three-bar motive on divided cellos. The foregoing material occupies the first seventeen bars. These four motives are subsequently developed and combined in various ways until the second of them gradually attains final supremacy in what may be described as a variation of it in the form of a broad twelve-bar melody, appearing unostentatiously first of all on cellos and basses against running thirds on the wood-wind. This is repeated on violas, cellos and horn, a climax is led up to by the fourth motive, in which the first is thundered out by brass and wood-wind in combination with the tail-end of the second on drums and brass instruments. The music quietens, and once more the broad melodic variation of the second motive comes back into its own, played by the upper strings with the first motive in the bass. The movement closes with a brief glimpse of the third motive on the clarinets. III Vivace. The key is D major, the sunlight is let in, and there is a spring-like contrast to the wintry proceedings of the slow movement. The construction is so simple that detailed analysis would be superfluous. The main ingredients are the long oboe tune with which the movement commences, and the subsequent broader melody for strings with its appendage of a dancing or, more truly, jumping motive on wood-wind instruments. Eventually, a burst of sharp crescendo chords on the brass leads up to a sudden brief climax, after which the first oboe is left over and hangs on to recall a fragment of his original subject over mysterious murmurings on muted violas and cellos, and the movement comes to an end, 'snuffed out', as it were, by a passing cloud. IV Lento - Allegro molto. The Finale is preceded by a slow introduction of twenty-four bars in which the downward leap from the beginning of the Symphony is much in evidence. The germ of the second subject of the Finale is heard on the horns and there is a serene and peaceful melody on the strings which provides complete contrast to the sudden wild mood of the ensuing Allegro molto. Here the tempo becomes a quick three-in-a-bar, and violas give out the first subject proper, which is in the rhythm of a triple jig. This is worked up to a climax on all the strings, underneath which the trombones come in with a short passage of sharp rising "It may be said to owe its inspiration to the natural surroundings in which it was planned and written" chords of the sixth, at the close of which the downward leap appears for the last time, to be swept aside by the subsidiary first subject. This is a soaring motive on violins and violas treated canonically with its second half on cellos, bases and tuba, which last-mentioned instrument now makes its first appearance in the Symphony. A rhythmic bridge passage makes way for a climax in which the jig-like first subject is heard in two forms of augmentation, first on horns against staccato chords and then further stretched out on trombones against rushing scales on the strings and wind. Another climax heralds the second subject, given out on oboes and bassoon over a monotonous pedal figure on drums, harp and basses. This alternates with a broad, march-like theme for strings and an attendant canon for horns and basses, but eventually tails off on violins and violas, the concluding harmonic progression forming the germ on which is built up a long, rushing string passage. Over this appears first the jig-like tune, then a persistent development of the subsidiary first subject, which now assumes ascendancy. Presently the second subject makes several tentative experiments and eventually, after what has been a combination of working out and return from preceding material, appears in its final recapitulatory position, now in seven-four time. The tempo slackens and the coda or, more properly, the epilogue, takes place for forty bars, all of which, except the last two, are on the tonic pedal of G. Here there is quiet retrospection of the march-like theme on the violas, introduced by its attendant canon on the upper wood-wind. The semiquaver figure from the first movement is recalled in its inverted form, a final crescendo leads to the conclusion, and the Symphony ends with a series of six crashing chords. Click here for a print formatted version of this text Wilfred Mellers - not a fan... I am grateful to Pete Lopeman for not only digging out and typing up "...the chaos of these two articles, but also providing linking commentary. W H Mellers E. J. Moeran's Symphony..." was not a great lover of Moeran, and these are certainly the most hostile criticisms I've seen yet. Yet with almost sixty years gone since the later article was written, are his arguments still relevant? You decide. "... composers like Moeran succeed only in writing pretty Pete Lopeman comments: They are both written by W. H. Mellers, a pretty pastiche..." music critic for Scrutiny. It is worth noting that Scrutiny was founded and edited by the great English literary critic and Fellow of Downing College, Cambridge University, F.R.Leavis - one of the great supporters of traditional culture and high art and fervent opponent of popular ephemeral arts. Scrutiny ran from 1932 until 1953, and was very much in the editorial grip of Leavis (a right-of-centre Liberal) who was following in the cultural tradition of Wordsworth, Matthew Arnold, W H Mellers and T.S.Eliot who all opposed the erosion of fine culture by mass culture in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. There are two articles by Mellers whose extracts are below; the first is a general criticism of the Moeran/Warlock/Delius influences. 'Delius and Peter Warlock' Scrutiny, Vol V, No 4, Cambridge, March 1937. 'Delius has nothing whatever to offer to the composer of the future those composers who, like E.J. Moeran, try to follow him succeed only in writing pretty pretty pastiche - and the last thing one would say about Delius's best and most typical music would be that it was pretty pretty. The only composer who is supposed to have derived from Delius and who has composed music of any lasting significance is Peter Warlock.' (p.390) Search Search WWW Search Moeran E-Mail me: [email protected] Mailing List Archive The Worldwide Moeran Database ©2001 Andrew Rose So now we know what Mellers thinks about Moeran's general On Mellers now abilities as a serious composer; what is his opinion of the then Pete Lopeman: " I think in newly-released Halle/Leslie Hewerd/HMV recording of the G minor hindsight, as it were, that Symphony? This extract comes from: maybe Mellers was swept along by the tide of `New English Music' Scrutiny Vol. XI, No 3, Cambridge, Spring Modernism and expected 1943. p. 174. Moeran's music to either take up the blatantly Modernist `How impossible it is to merge so restricted a dialect [Mellers' dialect refers to Finzi's use of folk-song which he acclaims] either cause or keep itself firmly in the Finzi/ into a vitally contemporary speech or into the main European Rubbra/RVW camp, which traditions is revealed clearly in the chaos of E. J.Moeran's obviously it did neither, much Symphony - the lack of adequate formalization and the intermittency of its textural interest - for while this work no doubt to Mellers' annoyance." contains material for three or four rural elegies of about four minutes each it is as a "modern" symphony an anachronism. The Dr Bruce Polay: "Mellers' kind of success that is possible for a contemporary composer in writings ARE dated and certainly not amongst the this vein is indicated by the yearning anguish which is given to most authoritative -- at least the first movement's modal, folksong first subject by a sinuous twist of rhythm and tonal centre at the end of the phrase; but it that was my view from the historical research I did in is not the kind of virtue that can be developed to symphonic proportions. This first movement has climaxes in plenty, it stops prep for my analytical and starts with no doubt all kinds of thematic inter-relations, but research." it has no emotional growth because there is a fundamental cleavage between the folksong and Delian elements and the attempt at modernity - a cleavage still more patent in the ostensibly "tragic" finale with its melodramatic metrical ferocities out of Walton's Symphony, its canon on the brass from Vaughan Williams's Fourth. Potentially the most interesting movement is the lento, which begins well in the Baxian manner, a wild "celtic" lament with surging strings and chromatically gurgling woodwind; but here again it lacks direction, and it takes Delius at his best to doodle around and get away with it. Nothing could be further from either the concentrated evolution of a lyrical idea in Rubbra's symphonies, or the sharp lucidity of the articulation of the sound pattern in Copland's sonata, than this verbose, opulent, wailing, provincial music.' One wonders what Peter Warlock would have made of his friend's music being described as `opulent, wailing, provincial music'! Who was Wilfred H Mellers? Find out more here. (Sample quote: "Rarely has such erudition been joined with such a degree wisdom and insight." Hmmm...) Moeran and Stenhammer: Two Symphonies too alike? An article drawn from the Moeran mailing list. It's a question which has dogged Moeran's music for many years - is it too derivative? Is Moeran's own voice sometimes lost beneath his influences? Does he wear his heart too much on his sleeve? One case in point is the apparent similarities between Moeran's Symphony and Wilhelm Stenhammer's 2nd Symphony. Stenhammer (1871-1936) was a Swedish composer who owed something to Sibelius, as did Moeran. His Second Symphony, written in 1915, was in G minor, as is Moeran's. And even the most untrained ear can hear immediately the four note motif from Moeran's Symphony (Self's Cell A) occur prominently in almost exactly the same rhythm towards the beginning of Stenhammer's 2nd. Moeran's 4 note motif in isolation... ...and in context (from Geoffrey Self's "The Music of E J Moeran") Search Search WWW Search Moeran E-Mail me: [email protected] Mailing List Archive Yet looking beyond this particular motif, other striking similarities in the two pieces have been detected, especially in the two respective opening movements. Taking part in a debate on the Moeran mailing list, here is composer and Oxford academic Francis Pott discussing the Symphonies and more: To name but a few 'coincidences': (a) Stenhammar fig. 1 (Gehrman score): woodwind figure strongly resembles ostinato patterns in Moeran's development. (b) repeated quaver G minor triads at fig. 16 (Stenhammar), plus inversion of his initial rising fifth so that the theme now matches the opening of Moeran's... The Worldwide Moeran Database ©2001 Andrew Rose (c) leading up to fig. 29: reduction to a double bass quaver ostinato: see -very curiously, though this time coincidentally! -figure 29 also of Moeran... This leads back, in both cases, to development of the ostinato figure. (d) Stenhammar at fig. 36 (recap. of main theme) plonks in a sudden resounding tonic major chord. Moeran does it first time around, at bar 8 of figure 2, to inevitably similar effect. These are just a few. I make no suggestion of a close stylistic affinity (Stenhammar's overall conception owes plenty to Bruckner's Fifth, especially in the finale, and that's a long way from Moeran). The veneration in which Stenhammar held Sibelius MIGHT be significant: while one has to believe that Moeran's innocent perturbation was genuine when ('pace' Bax's obit.) told that he'd cribbed from Tapiola (which Bax does no less obviously, and consciously as well, in his Sixth Symphony, scherzo reprise), the possibility must remain that if he DID ever hear the Stenhammar it might have been the Sibelian tendencies in it that filtered selectively through to him, without his necessarily even realizing that's what they were?.. You can't ignore Moeran's own Sibelian tendencies (see also Symphony/slow movt), and they are strikingly at odds with most other composers in Britan at the time in their personal effect (though I've often wondered whether he knew and was symphonically influenced by Hadley's 'The Trees So High' - many similarities, including taste for the minor root chord with added sharpened sixth - see first 'big' thematic development in Moeran's slow movt). No, Stenhammar is not lightly dismissed, however hard you try! If coincidence, it's a big one. No true composer models himself entirely - sometimes even consciously - on one thing or person. Who knows how much undiagnosed effect there is in Moeran's Symphony - or other works - of his enthusiasm for Haydn, for example? But I bet it's there. My old composition Stenhammar is not lightly dismissed, however hard you try! If coincidence, it's a big one... teacher Robin Holloway used to say that composing was a matter largely of 'digging into what you already have': the fact that it's been sloshing around in your head with everything else, like several lunches in your stomach, will mean that what eventually gets regurgitated (excuse horrible image!) will have your stamp on it, if you're worth your salt (which EJM definitely is -and so for that matter is Stenhammar: still much underrated). People are too black-and-white about influences, and I tend to trust fellow composers on the subject because they usually seem to have learnt by experience not to be! Finally, just as a real bit of mischief, try comparing the oboe themes (both in A minor) from the slow movt of Stenhammar's FIRST Symphony and the Minuet from EJM's Serenade... Coincidence? Probably this time, yes, and the resemblance is not THAT close: but if an influence IS conscious - as it may be - then decency requires at least a judicious amount of disguise... People bang on about EJM's Cello Concerto slow movt being so close to Brahms 2nd Piano Concerto, Elgar's Cello Concerto, etc (not to mention Dvorak in the Finale). Not many seem to have commented that the slow movt theme's first seven principal notes exactly shadow the slow movt of Elgar's VIOLIN Concerto. How conscious/subconscious/judiciously or injudiciously 'disguised' is that? Influence is a very slippery subject. Dismiss Stenhammar and others at your academic peril! Continuing on this theme, Jonathan Cook went on to make the following comments: After spending 2 years contemplating the subject of Moeran and his influences whilst at Oxford in the early nineties, I can honestly say there are reams to be written on the subject. Francis has mentioned Elgar and Stenhammer, there is also Walton (Portsmouth Point as I recall), of course Sibelius and most importantly for me the whole area of Moeran's relationship with folksong. I partly subscribe to Self's ideas of there being 'cells' in Moeran's compositional style, but take this proposition further (more when I have had chance to revisit my earlier work) tracing motivic constructs through folksong and into other's compositions. It is easy to see the folksong link as 'quaint' but not 'real' music. The effort Moeran invested in the Folksong & Dance Society and work he did for their publications, let alone his exposure to the medium in his formative years in Norfolk (and later in Ireland), to me justify this subject for serious discussion alongside proper comparisons with the works of Elgar, Bax, Sibelius etc etc. So is there a conclusion to be drawn from this? It seems impossible to prove absolutely one way or another that Moeran knew the Stenhammer 2nd Symphony. Francis Pott's arguments do seem pretty convincing and watertight, yet others have rejected the idea outright: in his book "The Music of E J Moeran", Geoffrey Self reduces the whole idea to a footnote where he mentions a letter on the subject from Colin Scott-Sutherland. In conversation with me in 2000 it is still a connection he vehemently rejects, as does Barry Marsh. So for now I'll take the easy way out and reserve judgement - I really don't know the Stenhammer well enough to comment. You could try getting hold of a copy of the Stenhammer and draw your own conclusions - click here - and then join the debate on the Moeran Mailing List - see the links above left. Violin Concerto R78 www.gramophone.co.uk There are two reviews of Violin Concerto recordings in the Gramofile records on the net since 1983, both of which are currently in print. Not included is a review of the excellent John Georgiadis recording with the LSO under Vernon Handley on Lyrita vinyl - an LP well worth tracking down. Chandos CHAN8807 Mordkovitch/Ulster Orch/Handley Published September 1990 I still have a clear recollection of hearing the Prom broadcast of the first performance of Moeran's Violin Concerto in July 1942 when Arthur Catterall was the soloist. It swept me off my feet and for days afterwards I was haunted by it. The spell, I fear, has not survived the passing of nearly 50 years, in spite of my hearing several excellent performances by the Halle in the Barbirolli era. Today I would rate the Cello Concerto much higher among English concertos and in Moeran's own works. What captivated me at first, of course, must have been the finale and in particular its last five minutes, a most moving elegy which Lydia Mordkovitch plays very beautifully on this excellent new recording. Generally, though, the work is too long and diffuse and there is too much rather self-conscious Irish-jiggery. But if this doesn't worry you and you can surrender to its rhapsodic musings and gusts of passion and forget its obvious debt to Elgar and Delius, then this is as good a performance as you could wish, recorded with the clarity and fidelity that are the hallmark of Chandos recordings. The Ulster Orchestra plays superbly, so that Moeran's attractive and colourful scoring gets its full due; and, of course, Vernon Handley is a sympathetic interpreter. MK Symposium mono (Full price) (CD) SYMCD1201 Sammons/BBC SO/Boult Published May 1999 Search Search WWW Search Moeran E-Mail me: [email protected] Mailing List Archive The Worldwide Moeran Database ©2001 Andrew Rose We owe a huge debt of gratitude to Lionel Hill (from whose private collection the present triptych was quarried) that he managed to persuade his father-in-law, the great Albert Sammons, to take up a work he was surely born to play. For those who love Moeran’s Violin Concerto as much as I do, hearing this glorious broadcast performance with Sir Adrian Boult and the BBC SO from April 1946 will be an intensely moving experience. Sammons plays with great poetry and sweetness of tone, while Boult’s masterful accompaniment is a model of enviable cogency and scrupulous sensitivity. In his booklet-essay, Hill (whose close friendship with Moeran is touchingly annotated in Lonely Waters; Thames: 1985) describes how ‘over the following months I moved Heaven and Earth to get HMV or Decca to record a performance with Sammons and Barbirolli – all to no avail.’ That same year, Sammons gave his last concert performance ever (of the Elgar) before he contracted the Parkinson’s disease that was to blight the remaining 11 years of his life. AA All reviews ©Gramophone Magazine, Haymarket Publishing ...It swept me off my feet and for days afterwards I was haunted by it... ...Moeran's attractive and colourful scoring gets its full due... ...Sammons plays with great poetry and sweetness of tone... From The Listener, July 3rd, 1942 Moeran and the English Tradition By HUBERT FOSS The first performance of Moeran's Violin Concerto will be broadcast on July 8 at 8.0 p.m. (Home Service) THE second phase of what we might call 'the English revival' in composition kept very closely to its own lines of development. The Russian ballet might reveal new exotic charms, Stravinsky could thunder his practical theories of aural values across a world willing for novelty. Schönberg from another angle of approach could attract attention for the very unattractiveness of his intellectual sounds But the still young - at least not more than partially adult - spirit of English musical composition was affected by two quiet separate elements - English folk-song, and what is called too vaguely 'old music'. There is room for a study in detail of how English movements in music have nearly always followed, and neither kept pace with nor anticipated, the literary movements of the country. For example, into this second phase we are discussing, there came a new Wordsworthism: a spirit of nature that is not in the least naturalistic. It is a form of musical contemplation from the soil upwards: the peaceful growth of the plant is philosophically as important as its flower, and indeed it might be said that English music has not been content, not even sometimes willing, to pluck the flowers and make them into a lover's garland. There has been a neglect of the very thing which by his mastery of it made Stravinsky successful: effect. For effect is (dare I say?) effective and so successful, catching, compelling. To read the scores of Cowen and Mackenzie, Stanford and Parry, alongside the scores of Warlock, Vaughan Williams, and Butterworth, is to read two groups of completely different prose styles. The later group shows no more sincerity of intention, but it shows a far greater critical sense of musical values, and of the absolute truth of the musical phrases it writes down. From phrase-making in a conventional manner we proceed to the delicate management of a pithy and flexible language. The English musical tongue has become a real national medium again; but from its very truthfulness it is not compelling. And, in the state of apathy towards native-born music which has been our musical heritage since Purcell, this music, lacking compulsion, has no chance of attack, adopting a defensive, almost entrenched position, while frequently the international battle has moved its centre to another front. The result is for the English composer disastrous: his virtues are not noticed, his existence not believed in. He is hard put to it to get a hearing, much less a living, and as Alan Bush points out in the current issue of The Author, the English composer is the last person recognised by the English concert-goer. Search Search WWW Search Moeran E-Mail me: [email protected] Mailing List Archive The Worldwide Moeran Database ©2001 Andrew Rose I do not for one moment accept this popular neglect as a slur on English composition. I have my own beliefs, but they do not permit me such perspective of eye as will tell me whether the forty years of this century will live or not. I am convinced that musically, for England, they are years of splendid composing: and I am equally convinced that a majority of those who do not think so have not taken the trouble to know the music which they decry. Moeran's music has the firm, growing attractiveness of a tree. It is not difficult to neglect its existence for it does not command one's attention. The fault is not the composer's, for it is there, this music. The reference books say that Moeran's music is indebted to folk-tunes. Perhaps: but far less than Grieg's, or Falla's, or Dvorák's, whose local colour we extol. And as an actual fact, to what extent? There is the pentatonic scale, a scale without semitones. Moeran's harmony is in general based upon the tone, as Walton's finds its characteristic flavour from the semitone. Thus Moeran's dissonances are of mellower sound than Walton's; his harmonic scheme never deviates far from the pentatonic scale - he startles us by richness rather than surprise of sound. The English folk-idiom has persisted more in song than in dance, and the older instruments of the dance have not survived in their original shape - the rebeck is now the violin and the tabor is a charming archaistic revival. Moeran's music is therefore infected by song rather than by instrumental music. I personally perceived an advantage here. Years ago I pointed out that the viola part of 'Flos Campi' by Vaughan Williams is vocal, whereas the voice part in Hindemith's 'Marienlehen' derives from the viola. The opening of the second movement of Moeran's String Quartet is a song: it speaks from within, as song must. Not paradoxically, it may be said that to discover how small an extent Moeran's idiom is influenced by folk-song, the best way is to examine closely his folk-song arrangements: in particular 'The Little Milk-maid' and 'Down By The Riverside'. Here, with reverence, he makes the songs his own: they do not absorb him. And, in his original works, there is more trace of Irish influence than English in the dialect. Moeran's output is not very large. There are three outstanding chamber works of the early 1920's - a String Quartet, a Violin Sonata, and a Pianoforte Trio. The first two have moments of great noisiness, of a passionate and even violent statement. The Piano Trio comes from the time when Moeran was a prolific and continuous writer, of a flow that dried up as he matured: it represents in its published form a very reduced version of the original conception. The String Quartet does not fade in beauty by one shade of colour. The slow movement is as beautiful as ever, inspired by pure musicality of conception, expressed in a medium of lyrical style and precision of phrase very like that of the verses of A. E. Housman. The Violin Sonata is more rugged: it opens with what appears to be an epigram and turns out to be a dramatic speech: and in its last movement there is a variety of rhythmic excitements which are almost too much for the slender instrumental forces. Then Moeran gives us a number of lovely songs, where, for example in 'Come Away, Death', he shows that, though his technique is not creative but based on a traditional language, he has a precise and delicate ear for original sound and for exact "Moeran's music has the firm, growing attractiveness of a tree" registration. Perhaps his most perfect song is ' 'Tis time, I think, by Wenlock Town'. In a more dramatic way, the four James Joyce songs are of outstanding interest: they epitomise this philosophic attitude towards musical expression. Moeran is not a miniature painter: but he excels in swift development of big ideas in a small time-space. The contemplative Moeran, the composer who dreams his music irrespective of life's conditions, dreams it for long periods and writes it with 'emotion remembered in tranquillity', is seen again the the String Trio and the Duo for two violins. This management of stringed instruments dates from Moeran's schooldays at Uppingham. He revels in these difficult mediums: but he is nowhere trying to startle us with them. Yet the technical skill is such that one is agog to hear how he will treat the solo part in a violin concerto. Of the orchestral pieces, I like best the quiet, tender 'Thomas Whythorne's Shadow'. The Symphony has been played too seldom for me to know it: there is always in it, as there is in all Moeran's music, a purely musical, touching quality which defies analysis. It has the human tenderness of the country people, and a sense of the long endurance of the countryside. I have not assimilated it as a symphony: on another performance, I hope I should. And later there came two groups of part-songs, in longish cycles, 'Songs of Springtime' and 'Phyllida and Corydon'. They have a strange individuality: there is a personal flavour about them. I have often wished to get to know them by conducting them, which would be the way of finding out their worth. As English as this land, Moeran's music has, as Hadow said of Schumann, the power to make its hearers go on dreaming after the music has stopped. The nostalgic quality is healthy. It must be sought before it reveals itself. It does not display its charms in the limelight of the day. It is neither topical or fashionable. It does not shout. I would not call it masterly, certainly not masterful. But its singing quality is undeniable, something to treasure. Download this article as an Adobe Acrobat pdf file (138 KB) Moeran's Violin Concerto Mr. Moeran has pleasing THE general plan of E. J. Moeran's Violin Concerto is somewhat unusual. After the first things to say, and says them movement there comes a scherzo, and after the scherzo a Lento, with which the composition with a graciousness that is all ends. This is unusual but not revolutionary. As the most popular symphony of our time, the too rare in modern music Pathétique, ends with a slow movement there is no reason why a concerto should not follow so attractive a precedent. Indeed, Mr. Moeran is wise in refusing to write a final rondo if he feels, as a composer does feel, that he has said all that for the time he wants to say. The Concerto is also unusual in the construction of the first movement, and this innovation will not be accepted without some reservations. One of the themes, for instance, appears in the orchestra but not in the solo instrument, which is in keeping with the modern notion of a concerto as a composition not written solely to display a player's skill, but one in which the solo instrument is a very important, though not the only important, part. But if the plan implies a loss on the swings it provides compensations with the roundabouts. The limelight may not be constantly on the soloist, but that means not that it is dimmed; it means that it is shifted on to some other feature. In any case the solo is conspicuous enough and, as the exceedingly fine playing of Arthur Catterall showed the other night, as grateful to the player as it is satisfying to the listener. Mr. Moeran has pleasing things to say, and says them with a graciousness that is all too rare in modern music. He is modern enough in his technique but does not make a parade of modernity; he has the gift of lyrical expression, but does not make lyrical expression the sole aim of his composition ; his treatment of the orchestra is that of an expert but he doesn't make the orchestra ' dance,' as Verdi expressed it. The outcome of this happy combination of generous gifts and strict control, of a natural instinct controlled by knowledge and experience is very gratifying. For one thing it gives the Concerto a very original turn - not less original or striking because of the Irishness of the Scherzo and concluding Lento. The programme notes told us that the work was conceived in Ireland and that it might, therefore, bear the influence, conscious or unconscious, of Irish folk-song. That influence is felt but does not intrude. The music is not based on folk-song, and one is aware of it only as one might be aware of national characteristics in any other work which does not deliberately imitate a foreign idiom. Search Search WWW Search Moeran E-Mail me: [email protected] Mailing List Archive The Worldwide Moeran Database ©2001 Andrew Rose The brilliance of the Scherzo and the graver lyrical beauties of the last movement are significant, pointing to an artistic temper that is neither easily led into wild experiment nor afraid of novelty. The violin is an instrument that lends itself better than most to the mood of the scherzo. The comparative ease with which it can perform tricks, the variety of its 'coups d'archet,' open up great possibilities in that direction. Yet no concerto has ever tried to exploit them with the single exception of a Concerto of Vieuxtemps which is still taught to students-often omitting the Scherzo. Now moderns are showing a desire to explore this field. A few months ago Sir George Dyson charmed an audience with the Scherzo he had provided for his Violin Concerto, and now Mr. Moeran repeats the experiment with equal felicity. But above all things the violin is a lyrical instrument, and Mr. Moeran never allows himself to forget it. He has some very fine lyrical passages in the first movement, and the last abounds in phrases which have a most fascinating eloquence. Lastly his Concerto seems exceptionally well written for the soloist. The general tendency today is to write extremely difficult passages which never make the effect they should. Composers may say that the effect intended is, in fact, achieved and, of course, if the composer is satisfied, the critic should be silent, while players possessing a great technique will probably support the composer because they will be stimulated by the challenge to their powers. Thus all in the garden would seem to be lovely-but it isn't. The system is simply uneconomical. It predicates a maximum of effort with a minimum of effect. Such a combination has always been and ever will be uneconomical. Now there is nothing of the kind in the Moeran Concerto. The writing does here and there presume an unusual degree of ability in the player, but the reward is commensurate with the effort. After all, the greatest skill of the player is not apparent in triumphant progress through awkward double stops (of which the listener is totally unaware), but in the treatment of a noble passage. The greatest difficulty in Beethoven's Concerto is not in its scales and arpeggios but in the realization of the grave beauty of some extremely simple phrases of the Larghetto. F. B. Moeran's Violin Concerto By EDWIN EVANS Search Search WWW Search Moeran E-Mail me: [email protected] Mailing List Archive The Worldwide Moeran Database ©2001 Andrew Rose MOERAN is essentially a lyrical tone-poet. Whatever the degree of constructive skill displayed in his major works he is invariably at his best when moved to song. At such moments one forgets, as being of little importance, whether he has or has not satisfied all the postulates of musical architecture, in the sheer beauty of the lyrical expression. It is so, for instance, in the lovely concluding pages of his Symphony, in which one is content to be swayed by lyrical exaltation alone and cares little by what logical process that stage has been reached, though it will bear examination from that angle if one is that way inclined. It is in the very nature of such music to be, if not actually induced, at least profoundly affected, by the conditions under which it is created. This lends more importance than usual to the circumstances of time and place of composition. His Violin Concerto was begun on Valentia Island in 1938, the year after the completion of his Symphony, but whereas much of the latter was composed during the stormy winter months the first movement of the Concerto was written during the summer calm. The rest of the work was composed at Kenmare, South Kerry, which lies at the landward end of a long fjordlike inlet of the Atlantic. It was occasionally set aside while the composer was engaged on other work, notably the choral Suite 'Phyllida and Corydon' (1939), some songs, and the planning of instrumental works to follow, and was not completed until the end of 1941. So far as the composer is aware, no use is made of actual folk-tunes but, as he explains, he was living in the midst of a community where, apart from the radio, little else was to be heard. He was actually taking advantage of the opportunity to collect folk-songs in the district. It would therefore appear almost inevitable that the influence of folk music should assert itself, and unnatural on the composer's part to strive against it-for which, as we know from other works, he would have had little inclination. This influence is felt especially in the second movement, a Rondo, which expresses the spirit of the summer fairs of Kerry, and particularly of the famous Puck's Fair of Killorglin, which lies to the north, near Castlemaine Harbour and Dingle Bay. The retrospective third movement originated during the autumn of 1941. In its concluding pages it reflects the calm experienced in Southern Ireland at this season, before the gales begin to burst in from the Atlantic. The first movement, Allegro moderato (4-4) in G major, opens with: on the strings, joined at the third bar by clarinet. This short phrase, which is reserved for the orchestra and never given to the solo instrument, recurs frequently in the course of the movement, and returns to preface the epilogue which concludes the work. At the sixth bar the solo violin presents the main subject of the movement: In modified form this same theme is also the basic subject of the last movement. At its conclusion Ex. 1 is heard a tone higher, followed by a brief lyrical phrase which, although it is to recur at the very end of the movement, has otherwise no individual thematic importance, but like some others in the course of the work, may be considered an indication of mood. This leads immediately to a new subject: So far as the composer is aware, no use is made of actual folk-tunes but, as he explains, he was living in the midst of a community where, apart from the radio, little else was to be heard... in the continuation of which, after a recall of Ex. 2 by the orchestra, occur dance-like figures foreshadowing a mood which is to assert itself before the exposition is completed. After a cadenza based on Exx. 3 and 2, and ended by the orchestra with Ex. 1, a modulation to B minor introduces the second subject: This is followed by the anticipated change of mood in a tripping, dance-like, non-recurrent episode (12-8) , first on the wood-wind in imitation, then on the solo violin, towards the close of which Ex. 3 reasserts itself on the orchestra, to be extended in imitation in a tutti, concluding the exposition. As frequently in the works of contemporary composers, development and recapitulation are virtually one. The solo instrument muses rhapsodically, molto rubato, on Ex. 2, the orchestra interpolating Ex. 1, and continues to elaborate until the oboe interposes with a new non-recurrent lyrical phrase which the solo violin imitates an octave higher. This leads to a variant of Ex. 1 on the orchestra, followed by a cadenza and the return of the second subject, Ex. 4, on the clarinet, the solo violin taking over its second phrase. Ex. 1 in its original form and the lyrical phrase which preceded Ex. 3 bring the movement to a very quiet conclusion. The Rondo, Vivace in D (2-4, 4-4, 3-4) is largely based on various dance-rhythms all worked out to the unit of the quaver, which remains constant in spite of many changes of time-signature, and rhythmic combinations. It opens with the strings indicating the initial rhythm in triplets, trumpet and wood-wind adding a rising figure. At the seventh bar the horns give out marcatissimo a vigorous theme in a counter-rhythm: the strings continuing their figure. The solo violin then enters with a short bravura passage leading to: which is quickly carried to a climax. A more flowing theme in E minor, mostly in sixths, is presented by the solo violin against string tremolos, but otherwise the buoyancy continues. Soon, against the resumption of the initial rhythmic figure by the strings, the violin gives out: When this has been extended Ex. 6 returns in 3-4 time on tutti, followed by a new dance-figure which, when it reaches the solo violin, is completed as: There are references to material previously heard, notably Ex. 5. Then the flowing theme in sixths is extended by tutti with a lyrical continuation on the solo violin ending in another resumption of the initial rhythm. After a short cadenza the solo violin introduces yet another dance-rhythm, Alla Valse Burlesca, which is a variant of Ex. 7, and begins a coda based mainly on the initial rhythmic figure with Exx. 6 and 5. The last movement, Lento (3-4) in F sharp minor, concluding in D, is largely based on Ex. 2, which, however, is at first so modified that its identity is only gradually made clear as the movement proceeds. First the strings, joined at the third bar by clarinet, announce a theme over which solo violin and clarinet alternate with soaring phrases derived from Ex. 2. Then a modulation to C minor brings another theme in sixths on the solo violin, but before long the influence of Ex. 2 reasserts itself, in D minor, in a form appreciably nearer to the original, with counter-phrases on the cor anglais. All the foregoing may be considered the first subject-group of the movement. The second subject-group follows, in D major, cantabile a molto tranquillo. First the orchestra unfolds a suave theme the initial phrase of which still retains a kinship with Ex. 2 ; then the solo violin re-enters with: After a climax an elaborate passage on the solo violin subsides pp into Ex. 1 on the muted strings, and the epilogue begins in autumnal calm. Against a murmuring background of strings, still muted, the solo violin resumes Ex. 9 and continues it with Ex. 2, which is now brought nearest to its original shape. The conclusion thus accords with the opening; but this appears to come naturally, as it were, without any deliberate restatement of the kind that is sometimes resorted to in the hope of establishing formal unity. The first performance of the Concerto was given at a Promenade Concert, July 8, 1942, the soloist being Arthur Catterall, to whom the work is dedicated and who has edited the violin part. Owing to the success of the Symphony, and perhaps also to curiosity having been stimulated by those who had had access to the score, it had been awaited with much interest. For once such anticipations were not disappointed and it was warmly welcomed-as well it might be, for the qualities it displays are never too prevalent in music generally, and solo concertos in particular, with their inherent temptation to virtuosity for its own sake, rarely prove so congenial to them. Sinfonietta R83 www.gramophone.co.uk There are three reviews of Sinfonietta recordings in the Gramofile records on the net since 1983, all of which are probably currently in print, though not all easily found. Not included is a review of the excellent Boult recording with the LPO on Lyrita vinyl dating from 1968. ...the diminutive title belies a work which is quite large-scale... Chandos CHAN8456 Bournemouth Sinfonietta/Del Mar Published September 1986 In the Sinfonietta the playing is again first rate, but the diminutive title belies a work which is ...It's a delightful work, quite large-scale, and which needs a bigger body of strings than the Bournemouth Sinfonietta eclectic like most of Moeran, possess. On Boult's 1967 Lyrita recording, with its pleasing Kingsway Hall acoustic, the LPO's but tautly and expertly full complement of strings makes a better effect and Sir Adrian's objective approach works well composed... in a delightful work which has a well-contrived blend of high spirits, charm and warmth of feeling. Del Mar points the reflective passages with his usual skill and sympathy: his tempos are on the whole faster than those of Boult and it is possible to think that he presses too hard in the lively episodes, which in the slightly over-reverberant acoustic become rather blurred and too much dominated by the Timpani. The new record is most welcome, however, for another viewpoint on the Sinfonietta and for the revelatory account of the Cello Concerto. AS EMI CDC7 49912-2 Northern Sinfonia/Hickox Published February 1990 A very pleasant disc of orchestral works by Moeran and Finzi, sensitively played by the Northern Sinfonia, and recorded straightforwardly, with no quirks, although the resonance of All Saints' Church in Newcastle upon Tyne sometimes blurs the timpani rolls. Richard Hickox has flair for this vein of British music and brings out both composers' considerable skill in the application of orchestral colours, mostly pastel shades in Finzi, but bolder in the Moeran pieces, which are among his more extrovert compositions. Moeran's Sinfonietta has been brightly recorded by Norman Del Mar for Chandos and anyone who possesses it needn't look further. It's a delightful work, eclectic like most of Moeran, but tautly and expertly composed in an honourable tradition of lighter music by British composers. I can't think why we don't hear it more often in the concert-hall—well, of course, I can think why: the chronic timidity of audiences and managements. Search Search WWW Search Moeran E-Mail me: [email protected] Mailing List Archive The Worldwide Moeran Database ©2001 Andrew Rose MK EMI CDM7 64721-2 Northern Sinfonia/Hickox Published August 1994 (Reissue, mid-price) In the case of the Sinfonietta, Hickox's comparatively bluff way with the outer movements has much in common with Del Mar's 1986 Bournemouth Sinfonietta version; the former is, however, more acutely responsive to the chimerical mood-changes of the central Theme and Variations. Let us hope that this, Moeran's centenary year, sees the restoration of Boult's pioneering Lyrita account (11/85—nla) of this lovely score (coupled, ideally, to that great conductor's superb recording of the Symphony in G minor). AA All reviews ©Gramophone Magazine, Haymarket Publishing Notes by Robin Hull Penguin Music Magazine (1948) Few orchestral works of recent times have enjoyed a more well-deserved success than E J Moeran's Sinfonietta, of which an excellent near-miniature score is now published. The score provides a capital instance of a work that won cordial opinions at the outset, and whose significance has been confirmed in the light of later performances. It was widely recognised from the first that what seemed to be occasional (though of course unconscious) echoes of Sibelius are purely incidental to a composer whose cardinal individuality is beyond dispute. Still, it is a point of elementary fairness to pin down what may strike the listener as Sibelian affinities, even if these amount to singularly little, and then give the chapter and verse to which any composer is entitled. It must suffice here to mention two examples. The first comes at Fig. 12 (1st mvmt.) where the woodwind phrases, whose material has already been introduced, crystallize in a manner which Sibelius has certainly made familiar. The second occures at Fig. 56 (3rd mvmt.) where the following run of semi-quavers may bring to mind a feature of the Sibelian method, though, one need scarcely add, nothing of any manner or matter except Moeran's own. The cumulative effect of such affinities strike me as almost negligible, and worth mentioning only because these points, if evident at first hearing, require that the perceptive listener shall place them in the correct perspective. For the rest, there is little need to stress the resounding originality of a work whose fame has become established far outside our own country. The 'Theme and Variations' (2nd mvmt.) have a richness and resource whose imaginative eloquence has seldom been exceeded by any composer in recent times. And the score, taken as a whole, proves yet again that, in the expression of sheer beauty, Moeran can bring to bear an inspiration reaching supreme heights. Penguin Music Magazine No. 5, 1948 New Music - Robin Hull Search Search WWW Search Moeran E-Mail me: [email protected] Mailing List Archive The Worldwide Moeran Database ©2001 Andrew Rose ...a richness and resource whose imaginative eloquence has seldom been exceeded by any composer in recent times... Moeran's Sinfonietta ...the harmony is active and This work of 1944 has taken some time to reach the high places, but may be said to have modern-sounding in a way arrived on January 25th when it was admitted to the Royal Philharmonic itself, with Sir Thomas that does not depend on Beecham conducting. It entered under a certain disadvantage, for the works to which it bore company were Berlioz's overture 'King Lear', Sibelius's fourth Symphony and Delius's first Dance manufactured discords; its resources are more varied Rhapsody, each an extreme example of individualism and remoteness from ordinary contacts; than that... whereas Moeran's work makes its communications on a plane we all know. Its originality is what may be called short-termed, and lies in the way things are kept going rather than in the shape and size of the things themselves. Sprightliness and colour can be simulated, and frequently are; to Moeran they come spontaneously. He has his own brisk gait and, especially in the variations of the second movement, his own intricacies of harmony and colour. Further, the harmony is active and modern-sounding in a way that does not depend on manufactured discords; its resources are more varied than that. Well invested incidents abound; and if they sometimes seem to hustle each other, that is a rare form of excess. From the manner of the scoring it was a likely guess that the players of the R.P.O. enjoyed their parts; and something to the same effect seemed to come from Sir Thomas, the conductor. His was indeed a remarkable evening's work, for he attended to each of the four works as if his whole career depended on it. W. McN. Musical Times Feb 1950 Search Search WWW Search Moeran E-Mail me: [email protected] Mailing List Archive The Worldwide Moeran Database ©2001 Andrew Rose Cello Concerto Premiere - Reviews Irish Times, November 26th 1945 Yesterday’s symphony concert in the Capitol Theatre, Dublin, included the first performance of Moeran’s cello concerto. The soloist, Peers Coetmore, gave a superb performance. Her tone was of an amazingly rich quality, and her expressive playing was exactly right for this lovely work with its delightful, almost song-like melodies woven into a pattern of rich colour. Irish Independent, November 26th 1945 A new work by E.J.Moeran was performed for the first time by Peers Coetmore, with the Radio Eireann Symphony Orchestra, in the Capitol Theatre. The composer has appreciated that the ‘cello is heard to best advantage in broad and flowing melody, and in the first and second movements the soloist was given many opportunities to display power, beauty and a variety of tone in smooth melodic playing. There is a fine cadenza at the end of the second movement, well in character, which was excellently played. Search Search WWW Search Moeran E-Mail me: [email protected] Mailing List Archive The Worldwide Moeran Database ©2001 Andrew Rose ...this lovely work with its delightful, almost song-like melodies woven into a pattern of rich colour... Cello Concerto Hallé Review, 1946 THE HALLE CONCERTS It is possible that the bright young people of our time, or at any rate those queer souls who are known (strangely enough) as the intelligentsia, would deny that composers who are so impulsive as to allow emotional feeling an equal place with intellectual effort when they write their music are modernists in the strict sense of the term. If that notion prevails Mr.E.J.Moeran, whose Violoncello Concerto was played at last night’s concert in the Houldsworth Hall, Manchester, would no doubt gladly disavow any connection with modern fashions in musical art. He is frankly and unashamedly prone to spontaneous emotional feeling and it is obvious that his impulses are never cooled down or diverted from their natural expression by anxiety about whether he is or is not true to up-to-date style. Yet it is no less obvious that Moeran has the modern harmonic technique at his finger-ends and when he likes, can be as free, daring, and ingenious in its use are most of the younger men. Whereas many composers who during their early years lived in the midst of the romantic movement in art reacted against the spell and sought to prove its illusoriness, Moeran is among those richer natures who combine present-day ideas with undisturbed attachment to and real feeling for traditional views. The occasional complexities of the ‘Cello Concerto which is highly original in thematical material and in the treatment of it, offer more difficulty to the performers than to listeners. As Mr.John F.Russell suggests in his analysis in the programme, Celtic influences as well as meditations on the English countryside have apparently had their effect on the work, though the composer perhaps remains sceptical about that matter. A deeply expressive adagio and a varied and picturesque finale are movements that will, we think, appeal to all tastes, and both these sections of the work show an inward cohesion which, in spite of rhapsodic passages, binds image to image in logical sequence. The soloist last night was Miss Peers Coetmore (Mrs.Moeran, the composer’s wife), and she gave us a delightfully spirited performance of the ‘cello music. The solo frequently explores the highest positions on the strings, and once or twice a slightly doubtful intonation was heard, but the general firmness and fluency of Miss Coetmore’s playing were as admirable as its interpretative range. Under Mr.Barbirolli’s sensitive direction the orchestral parts were finely suited to the work’s texture and to the style of the soloist. G.A.H. [review of the first Manchester/Halle performance of the Cello Concerto, 30 Oct.1946] Search Search WWW Search Moeran E-Mail me: [email protected] Mailing List Archive The Worldwide Moeran Database ©2001 Andrew Rose ...composers who are so impulsive as to allow emotional feeling an equal place with intellectual effort when they write their music are modernists in the strict sense of the term... Cello Concerto R89 www.gramophone.co.uk There is one review of Symphony recordings in the Gramofile records on the net since 1983, which is currently in print. The only other commercial recording, on a 1970 Lyrita LP, is by Peers Coetmore with Boult and the LPO. This is perhaps of historical interest only - there are severe flaws in the performance which make it an almost painful experience to hear. Chandos CHAN8456 Wallfisch/Bournemouth Sinfonietta/Del Mar Published September 1986 Written at the end of the Second World War, Moeran's Cello Concerto is a dark, sombre work, in which the prevailing feeling of sadness and regret is relieved only at the beginning of the last movement by an Irish reel-like tune, whose jauntiness soon however gives way to a more introspective mood similar in feeling to the material of the first two movements. It's an elusive piece, but repeated hearings reveal many passages of exquisite beauty, and it is good to have it in such a sympathetic and well-played performance as this. This 1969 Lyrita recording, by Moeran's wife Peers Coetmore, for whom the Concerto was written, gives an inadequate picture of the work, since her insight is not matched by playing of sufficient strength or skill. Raphael Wallfisch, on the other hand, plays with much beauty of tone and phrasing and Norman Del Mar obtains eloquent, high-quality playing from the orchestra. The new record is most welcome...for the revelatory account of the Cello Concerto. AS All reviews ©Gramophone Magazine, Haymarket Publishing Search Search WWW Search Moeran E-Mail me: [email protected] Mailing List Archive The Worldwide Moeran Database ©2001 Andrew Rose ...a dark, sombre work, in which the prevailing feeling of sadness and regret is relieved only at the beginning of the last movement... Reviews for the Second Rhapsody Proms Performance, 1929 Manchester Guardian 13/9/29 Mr. E.J.Moeran’s Second Rhapsody, which was heard at the Norwich Festival five years ago but has never been done in London, made a good impression on the Promenaders tonight, in spite of the fact that the composer is not a practised conductor. The work does not strike one as being firmly enough knit. It contains two kinds of music which will not quite blend into unity, though both are distinctly congenial to Mr.Moeran. At one moment he loves to be alone with nature and far from the tranquil places where Delius loves to linger; at the next he is eager to be in touch with the rich humanity that sings its chanteys in country taverns. The hearer is tossed from one mood to the other and back again until he feels the title of "rhapsody" to be an apology. But there is so much that is good to listen to in this work that one forgoes good form without insisting on excuses. E.B. Sunday Times 15/9/29 Mr.E.J.Moeran’s Second Rhapsody does not seem as well knit as some of his earlier work; its looseness of articulation was all the more evident in comparison with the Elgar violin concerto and the Introduction and Allegro for Strings. But Mr. Moeran has genuine imagination and a vision of his own. Daily Telegraph Mr.E.J.Moeran, whose Rhapsody No.2 also had its first concert performance in London, has won an established position amongst our younger composers, who are definitely English in outlook. This Rhapsody has a strain of originality differentiating it from other musical bucolics. H.E.W. The Times E.J.Moeran’s Second Rhapsody...owes its inspiration to folk-song. Its interest is melodic; the melodies are original, neo-modal, and beautiful. The work is of considerable length and has the strength of nationally tinged music. It ought to be heard again soon. Daily Mail The other new work was a rhapsody by Mr.E.J.Moeran, a much more serious aspirant, for his joking, what there was of it, was sad. If there is a human story behind his patchwork poem it is one of far-away things. Search Search WWW Search Moeran E-Mail me: [email protected] Mailing List Archive The Worldwide Moeran Database ©2001 Andrew Rose Observer 15/9/29 Mr.Moeran’s Second Rhapsody shows him continuing further on the same broad lines as in his former works. The themes of this Rhapsody are definitely in the folk-music language, and his treatment of them is definitely expressive, perhaps romantic, though with little or no rhetoric. It should at least be heard again. Reviews compiled by Barry Marsh If there is a human story behind his patchwork poem it is one of far-away things...