Speech Sound Disorders: Let`s Get Practical Part 1 Perspectives on
Transcription
Speech Sound Disorders: Let`s Get Practical Part 1 Perspectives on
Speech Sound Disorders: Let’s Get Practical MYERS-BRIGGS PERSONALITY-TYPES http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgiwin/JTypes2.asp Wayne A. Secord The Ohio State University Presented for the SHAA March 2014 1 Phonological Disorders - Final Exam Part 1 1. Why do children make errors in their speech? 2. Let’s say you were asked to develop a phonological screening instrument and you could only use 10 processes. Which ones would you choose and why? 3. Imagine you have just assessed a four year old child who is almost totally unintelligible. Describe the top 10 questions you would ask to understand her phonological disorder. 4. You’ve just read an article entitled Phonological Disorders: Toward a Key Components Approach . It describes the 10 most important phonological components to be addressed in assessment and treatment. What are they? Why are they important? Perspectives on Intervention Phonological Development • • • • • • • • Foundations of Phonological Development Understanding Key Phonological Terms The First Year and Beyond Sounds, Structures, Processes Developmental Norms and Scales What, Where and the Problem Solving Process Key Phonological Components Revised Scale of Phoneme Development 3 Perspectives on Intervention PHONETIC Perspectives on Intervention PHONOLOGICAL Phonetic Perspective BASICS Phonological Perspective ASSESSMENT • Stresses output at the articulators • An Emphasis on “system” • Motor based • Linguistic-cognitive basis • Heavy behavioral influence • Heavy pragmatics influence • Focus on meeting a specific criterion • Focus on communication success 5 • Fill in the blank • Whole word transcription • Simplification all-ornone scoring • Complicated scoring • Phonemes are correct or incorrect • Score broad error patterns 6 1 Perspectives on Intervention Perspectives on Intervention PHONOLOGICAL PHONETIC PHONETIC PHONOLOGICAL INTERVENTION • Perfecting phonemes themselves • Phonemes are targets: • Generally shorter assessment • Generally longer assessment • Longer remediation • Shorter remediation • Patterns are: Based on normative studies Degree of visibility Inconsistency & Stimulability • Phonemes are trained in steps TIME • Facilitate emergence of patterns Phonotactic Feature driven Related to speech inertia FOR WHOM • Phonemes are a means to an end • Mild-Moderate • Severe - Profound Isolation - Conversation 7 8 Phonology Phonological Formal Phonological Representation Level • Perceptual Representation • Production Representation Phonetic Level • Auditory & Visual Mechanisms • Neurosensory System • Speech, Respiratory, & Phonatory • Mechanisms • PERCEPTION • PRODUCTION Phonological Processes • • • • Patterns of Sound Change Usually Simplifications Approximations of the Adult Form A “Problem Solving” Perspective – Features – Phonotactics – Contextual Influences (Inertia) Phonological Rules • • • • • Describe the Sound System of a Language Describe the Permissible Segments Describe the Allowable Syllable Structures Describe Allophonic Variation Describe How Sounds Combine for Meaning Phonological Development Prelinguistic (1 Month - 1 Year • Phonation Stage (Birth - 1 Month) – Reflexive Vocalizations (Crying, burping) – Nonreflexive (syllabic nasals/nasalized vowels) • Goo Stage (2- 3 Months) – Addition of back (velarlike) sounds to form some kind of CV sequences –These syllables are irregular and not adult-like 2 Phonological Development Continued... • Canonical Babling Stage (7 to 9 Months) • Expansion Stage (4 to 6 Months) – Often Called Period of Vocal Play – Addition of Fully Resonant Nuclei • • • • • – Change in Timing of CV’s (MoreAdultlike) – Babbling-Reduplications Mistaken as Words • Stops, Nasals, Lax Vowels are common • Sharp Place Shift (Decline in Velars) • Results in Increase in Labials & Alveolars Vowel-like elements Raspberries (labial trills) Squeals (high pitched sounds) Growls (low pitched sounds & Yells Similar to the Goo Stage but the timing is slower and not adult-like. Phonological Development Continued... Phonological Development Continued... • Variegated Babbling Stage (10 Mo. - 1 Yr.) • 1 YEAR TO 1 YEAR 6 MONTHS STAGE (The First 50 Word Period) – Features Non-reduplicated syllables and a – Wider Variety of Consonants & Vowels – Children Produce Long Strings of Syllables – Strings Often Referred to as Gibberish – No Real Words Yet – [p, b, t, d, k, g] ; [m, n] ; [w, j] ; [h, s] – Phonologically .. First Words Characterized as: • Simple Syllable Structure CV, VC, CVCV some (CVC) • Sound Repertoire limited usually to: – Stops, Nasals, Glides – These Sounds Dominated Late Babbling Period • Place of Articulation: – Labials and Alveolars – Preferred Vowels are: [i, a, u] Representative Early Words REPRESENTATIVE EARLY WORDS Juice Cookie Baby Bye-bye Ball Hi Car Water Eye Nose Mama DaDa Doggie Kitty That Dirty Hot Shoe Hat All gone More No Up Eat Go Do Milk Cap • Juice /du/ • Cookie /tuti/ • Baby /bibi/ • • Mama /ma ma/ • All gone /dn/ • Dada /da da/ • More /mo/ Bye-bye /ba ba/ • Doggie /ddi/ • No /no/ • Ball /b/ Up /up/ • • Hi /ha/ • Kitty /tdi/ • Eat // Car /t/ • • • That /dæ/ Go /do/ Water /w w/ • • • Dirty /dudi/ Do /du/ • Eye /a/ Milk /m/ • • Nose /nou/ • Hot /ha/ • Cap /kæ/ • Shoe /tu/ • Hat /hæ/ From Owens, 2013 3 Phoneme Acquisition (as a rule!) Phonological Development Continued • Vowels are acquired by age 3 • Diphthongs are acquired by age 3 and 1/2 • Vocalic R (rhotacity) is acquired by 6 and 1/2 • After 1 and 1/2 Yrs: (Child’s 1st 50 Words) – – – – Things Become More Systematic, Less Variability A Significant and Ongoing Growth in Vocabulary Phonetic Forms Gradually Match Their Adult Targets Increased Vocabulary Forces the Child to Create a Rule Governed System Based on Phonemes – By Age 4, the Child has a Phonological System in Which Most Phonemes are Established • Manner of Articulation • Place of Articulation - Affricates - Dentals - Liquids - Palatals - Fricatives - Velars - Stops - Alveolars - Nasals - Labials • Word Position - Across Words - Clusters - Final - Initial • Great Individual Variation 20 Profile of Phonological Development Phoneme Acquisition (as a rule!) • Vowels are acquired by age 3 • Diphthongs are acquired by age 3 and 1/2 • Vocalic R (rhotacity) is acquired by 6 and 1/2 • Manner of Articulation Stage I (0;9 – 1;6) Speech Sound Development by Stage Stage II (1;6 – 2;0) • Place of Articulation - Affricates - Dentals - Liquids - Palatals Stage III (2;0 – 2;6) - Fricatives - Velars - Stops - Alveolars - Nasals - Labials m p b w m p b w f v Stage VI (3;6 – 3;4) (4;0 – 4;6) - Initial m p b w f v Stage VII (4;6 +) • Great Individual Variation Stage I (0;9 – 1;6) Stage II (1;6 – 2;0) Stage III (2;0 – 2;6) Stage IV (2;6 – 3;0) Stage V (3;0 – 3;6) Stage VI (3;6 – 3;4) (4;0 – 4;6) Stage VII (4;6 + ) Speech Sound Development by Stage m p b w m p b w f n t d s (l) m p b w f v n t d s z l (r) n t d s z l r j t d l (r) n t d t d s z l r k g hhH h H k g j hH hhH k g j hH hhH 22 Common Phonological Rules – Banana > /bnæn/ -> /næn/ n t d m p b w f v n t d k g h • Weak Syllable Deletion n t d m p b w n t d s z 21 Profile of Phonological Development n t d s (l) f Stage V (3;0 – 3;6) - Across Words - Clusters n t d m p b w Stage IV (2;6 – 3;0) • Word Position - Final m p b w • Final Consonant Deletion (CVC -> CV) k g – Dog > /d/-> /d/ h j t d t d – Duck > /dk/ -> /d/ k g hhH h H k g j hH • Reduplication (CVCV) – Same Syllable - Water > /wa wa/; Mommy > /ma ma/ – Same Consonant - Doggie > /gcgi/ (diminutive) – CVCV Construction - Duck > /dki/; Horse > /hti/ hhH From Owens, 1988 k g j hH hhH 23 4 Common Phonological Rules Common Phonological Rules • Velar & Palatal Fronting • Consonant Harmony - Cow /kau/ -> /tau/ --- Shoe > /u/ -> /su/ – Duck > /dk/ -> /k/ --- Gun > /n/ -> /nn/ - Go /o/ -> /do/ ----- Chair > /t/ -> /ts/ • Cluster Reduction • Gliding – Stop > /ta/ or /tap/; Tree > /ti/ – Lamp > /læmp/ -> /wæmp/ – Scratch > /skræt/ > /kæt/ -- East -> /it/ – Right > /rat/ -> /wat • Context Sensitive Voicing • Stopping – Prevocalic Voicing > /kp/ > /p/ - Shoe > /u/ -> /tu/ ---- fine > /fan/ -> /pan/ – Postvocalic Devoicing > /bd/ > /bt/ From Owens, 1988 Chronology of Phonological Processes 2;0 – 2;6 2;6 – 3;0 3;0 – 3;6 3;6 – 4;0 4;0 – 4;6 4;6 – 5;0 Syllable Structure Development 5;0 + Weak Syllable Deletion Final Consonant Deletion Reduplication Consonant Harmony Cluster Reduction - obstruent + - /s/ consonant Stopping / Fronting /k, g, Gliding /r/ /f/ /v/ / / / / /s/ /z/ / / , / Stage I Stage II CV (ma), CVCV (mama), (CVC) (mom) Stage III Stage IV CV (ma), CVCV(CV) (mama), (CVC) (mom) (CVCCV) (misty), (CVCCVC) (biscuit) Stage V Stage VI CV (ma), CVCV (mama), CVC (mom), CVCCV (misty), CVCCVC (biscuit), CVCVCV (puppy go), etc. Stage VII CCV (ski), CCVC (skip), CVCC (socks), CCVCC (spoons), etc. / /w/ Context-Sensitive Voicing 27 28 Representative Early Words REPRESENTATIVE EARLY WORDS Juice Cookie Baby Bye-bye Ball Hi Car Water Eye Nose Mama DaDa Doggie Kitty That Dirty Hot Shoe Hat All gone More No Up Eat Go Do Milk Cap • Juice /du/ • Cookie /tuti/ • Baby /bibi/ • Bye-bye /ba ba/ • Doggie /ddi/ • Ball /b/ • Hi /ha/ • Kitty /tdi/ • Car /t/ • • Mama /ma ma/ • All gone /dn/ • Dada /da da/ • More /mo/ • No /no/ • Up /up/ • Eat // • That /dæ/ • Go /do/ Water /w w/ • Dirty /dudi/ • Do /du/ • Eye /a/ Milk /m/ • Nose /nou/ • Hot /ha/ • • Cap /kæ/ • Shoe /tu/ • Hat /hæ/ 29 From Owens, 2013 5 Phonological Disorders in Children Phonological Disorders in Children Top 10 Targets to Assess & Treat Top 10 Things to Assess & Treat FIRST PRIORITY COMPONENTS (1-5) SECOND PRIORITY COMPONENTS (6-10) • • • Simple syllables (CV, VC) Syllables with final consonants (CVC) Front vs. back of mouth differences (Alveolars-Velars) • Acquisition of stridency (/s/, /f/, //, etc) • Glides vs. liquids (/w/ or /j/ for /r/ or /l/) • • • • • Syllables with initial clusters (CCV, CCVC) Syllables with final clusters (CVCC, CCVCC) Middle of the Mouth Productions (Palatal) Voicing contrasts Syllabic consonant contrasts - “Vocalic R” and /l/ -> /o/ Assimilations – Consonant Harmony problems 31 Stages of Development 32 Stages of Development Birth to 12 Months 2 - 5 Years Speech is well established Cooing and Babbling Trouble saying entire sound classes Vocal Practice Emergence of Processes Vocalizations Rarely Referential “Problem Solving” period 12 – 24 Months > 5 Years Speech Replaces gestures Speech = Speech Community Vocalizations for communication Some sounds not developed Creation of early vocabulary Some cluster problems remain Emergence of first sounds/syllables 33 Problems with unstressed syllables 34 INTERVENTION Birth to 12 Months Facilitate practice of vocal skills that serve as the basis for later speech development 12 – 24 Months Facilitate the acquisition of sounds and syllables in specific words 2 - 5 Years Facilitate the elimination of errors affecting whole or partial sound classes > 5 Years Eliminate errors on late developing consonants, clusters, and unstressed syllables in multisyllabic words 35 36 6 Age of Customary Production and Mastery of Consonant Sounds Age Phoneme 3.0 p, m, n, , f,w, h 3.6 4.0 j b, k, g, r, d 4.6 s, , t, 5.0 6.0 t, l, , v 7.0 , z, , d From C. Stoel-Gammon and C. Dunn (1985) Age of Customary Production and Mastery of Consonant Sounds Age < 2.0 Customary Production p, b, m, n, w, h Mastery > 2.0 t, d, k, g, > 3.0 f, s, l, r, j p, m, n, w, h > 4.0 v, z, , t, d b, d, k, g, f, j > 5.0 , > 6.0 Revised Scale of Phoneme Acquisition Hodson (1997) 12 – 18 Months – Recognizable Words – Consonant-Vowel (CV) Word Structures – Stops (/p, b, t, d, k, g/), Nasals /m, n, / – Glides (/w/, /j/ in CV structures 18 – 24 Months t, , r, l > 7.0 , , t, d > 8.0 v, , s, z – Communication with Words – Syllableness (CVCV and VCV) – Word-Final Consonants (VC and CVC) From C. Stoel-Gammon and C. Dunn (1985) 40 Revised Scale of Phoneme Acquisition Revised Scale of Phoneme Acquisition 4 – 5 Years 2 – 3 years – Contrasts and rapid expansion of phonemic repertoire – Posterior/Anterior contrasts – (Velars - /k, g/ to alveolars - /t, d/) – (Beginning to produce contrasts in CVC context – more motorically correct) – Stridents (s, z, , t, j, , f, v, s clusters) – Approximately 80% intelligible 3 – 4 years – “Adult like” speech – Omissions of consonants are rare – Simplification processes (e.g., stopping) suppressed 41 – Liquids acquired – /l/ 3 – 5 years including l clusters – /r/ 3 – 6 years including r clusters 5 – 6 Years – Stabilization of phonetic/phonemic inventory – All phones and allophones – Produced within “intelligible" limits 6 – 7 Years – Adult standard speech – Sibilants perfected • (i.e., without lisps) 42 7 Speech Sound Disorders: Let’s Get Practical Assessment and Intervention Gathering a Phonetic Inventory Assessment Procedures & Materials Top 10 Questions? • Sounds used correctly • Sounds used correctly in some contexts • Sounds that appear but are never produced correctly • Sounds that never appear WAYNE A. SECORD SHAA 2014 • 2 Top 10 questions to ask about a phonological sample! Top 10 questions to ask about a phonological sample! 3. What is the child doing to the sounds he doesn’t have (what’s the most obvious)? - Review the errors from question 2 1. What sounds can the child say meaningfully? - In most (all) contexts? - Consider these “in” the system - In some contexts inconsistently? - Consider these sounds “emerging” 2. What sounds are not said meaningfully in most contexts? (What doesn’t he have?) - Consider these “absent” from the system 4. Does the child present deletions? - Initial sounds? - Sounds in clusters? - Final sounds? - Whole syllables? • 3 • 4 Top 10 questions to ask about a phonological sample! Top 10 questions to ask about a phonological sample! 5. 6. Does the child substitute sounds? - Do the substitutions affect whole classes of sounds? - Do they affect partial classes of sounds? Does the child have contextual errors? - Voicing substitutions - Assimilation substitutions - Resonance effects • 5 7. ARE THERE ANY KEY COMPONENTS INVOLVED? First Priority Components • Simple syllables (CV, VC) • Syllables with final consonants (CVC) • Front vs. back of mouth differences (Alveolars/velars) • Acquisition of stridency (/s/, /f/, /S/, etc) • Glides vs. liquids (/w/ or /j/ for /r/ or /l/) • 6 www.superduperinc.com ©2014 Super Duper® Publications 1 Top 10 questions to ask about a phonological sample! 7. ARE THERE ANY KEY COMPONENTS INVOLVED? Second Priority Components • Syllables with initial clusters (CCV, CCVC) • Syllables with final clusters (CVCC, CCVCC) • Front vs. back (middle) of mouth differences (alveolars/palatals) • Voicing contrasts • Syllabic consonant contrasts - “vocalic R” - /l/ -> /o/ - Consonant Harmony problems Top 10 questions to ask about a phonological sample! 8. Do you need additional information? - Phoneme probes? - Consistency information - Facilitation contexts - Process probes? - Process occurrence - Process differentiation 9. Fine Tuning Influences? - Stimulability - Frequency of occurrence information - Oral/motor considerations • 7 • 8 • Top 10 Questions To Ask About a Phonological Sample Top 10 questions to ask about a phonological sample! 1. What sounds can the child say contrastively (meaningfully)? 2. What sounds are not produced meaningfully (not in the system)? 10. What does the system need the most? THE BILLY CRYSTAL QUESTION ! - What treatment target (s) will energize the child’s phonological system? 3. What’s he doing to what he doesn’t have? 4. Does the child have deletions (initial-final sounds, clusters, whole syllables)? 5. Does the child substitute sounds? 6. Does the child have contextual errors such as assimilations, voicing errors or resonance effects? 7. Are any of the “Key” Components affected (Top-10 Components) AND TOP-10 REVIEW -> 8. Do you need additional information from phoneme or process probes? 9. Fine Tuning Influences (stimulability, oral exam, sound frequence)? 10. The Billy Crystal Question • 9 • 10 Top-10 Targets to Assess & Treat FIRST PRIORITY COMPONENTS (1-5) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Simple syllables (CV, VC) Syllables with final consonants (CVC) Front vs. back of mouth (Alveolars-Velars) Acquisition of stridency (/s/, /f/, /S/, etc) Glides vs. liquids (/w/ or /j/ for /r/ or /l/) SECOND PRIORITY COMPONENTS (6-10) 6. Syllables with initial clusters (CCV, CCVC) 7. Syllables with final clusters (CVCC, CCVCC) 8. Middle of the Mouth Productions (Palatal) 9. Voicing contrasts 10. Vocalic R - /l/ -> /o/; Consonant Harmony Issues • 11 www.superduperinc.com ©2014 Super Duper® Publications 2 PCC (Percentage of Consonants Correct) Prognostic Factors • • • • • • • • Stimulability Consistency Types of errors Frequency of occurrence - See Table 1-1 Sensory – perceptual skills % of consonants correct Overall intelligibility CA vs. DA OTHER • • • • Family income level Intellectual ability Motor ability Multiple intervention agents Formula Total Number of Correct Consonants Total Number of Intended Consonants X 100 = PCC Level of Severity • 85% + = Normal Development • 65-86% = Mild to Moderate • 50-65% = Moderate to Severe • <50% = Severe • 15 Short Term Goals Long Term Goals STAGES 1 - 3 • Articulation and phonological development will be appropriate for the child’s chronological or developmental age. – Norms – Stages of development – Speech intelligibility – Severity of involvement STAGE 4 • Eliminate errors that adversely impact social, emotional or educational development. – Observation – Parent interview STAGE 1 • • Increase opportunities to vocalize Facilitate more advanced vocalizations STAGES 2 & 3 • • • • Reduce Homonym confusions Reduce variability in production Maximize established speech abilities Eliminate errors affecting sound classes • • • Facilitate late-acquired consonants Facilitate consonant clusters Facilitate unstressed syllables STAGE 4 www.superduperinc.com ©2014 Super Duper® Publications 3 Sample IEP Sample IEP Continued Present Level of Performance Instructional Objectives Continued • Susan’s speech is difficult to understand in conversation having an overall intelligibility of approximately 50%. • Process Specific Objectives: Annual Goals 1. • Susan will increase her overall intelligibility in conversation to 80% and in structured storytelling to 85%. Instructional Objectives 2. • Phoneme Specific Objectives: 1. Increase accuracy and fluency of /s/ in connected speech to 75%. Achieve a significant reduction in the deletion of final consonants • Fricatives from 80% to 25% • Affricates from 70% to 25% Achieve a significant reduction in gliding • /l/ from 90% to 30% • /r/ from 88% to 30% 2. Increase accuracy and fluency of /z/ in connected speech to 75%. Clinical Assessment of Articulation and Phonology Disclosure Statements (CAAP®-2) The presenter is an author for Super Duper Publications and receives royalty income from the CAAP, CAAP-2, and CAAP-2 “APP.” He also receives royalty income from S-CAT to be discussed later on in this presentation. Created by: Wayne A. Secord, Ph.D., CCC-SLP JoAnn S. Donohue, M.A., CCC-SLP Super Duper Publications has developed the assessment trademarked as the CAAP-2. This part of the presentation will focus primarily on the CAAP-2. and the S-CAT. Super Duper Resource: Clint Johnson, M.A., CCC-SLP Administer, Scoring Clinical Interpretation Articulation/Phonology: Impact on Education Why Do We Assess? Determine Eligibility Differential Diagnosis Ascertain Progress End Treatment • Intelligibility and speaker pitch appear to be variables that influence a teacher’s expectations of student’s academic, social, and behavioral performance. Overby, Carrell, & Bernthal, 2007) • Children with speech sound disorders are at risk for having delayed phonological awareness skills if they have poor speech perception abilities and/or relatively poor receptive vocabulary. (Rvachew & Grawburg, 2006) www.superduperinc.com ©2014 Super Duper® Publications 4 Articulation/Phonology: Articulation/Phonology: Impact on Education Impact on Education Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts: Speaking & Listening Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts: Speaking & Listening Kindergarten: CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.K.6 Speak audibly and express thoughts, feelings, and ideas clearly. Grade 1: CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.1.4 Describe people, places, things, and events with relevant details, expressing ideas and feelings clearly. Grade 2: CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.2.4 Tell a story or recount an experience with appropriate facts and relevant, descriptive details, speaking audibly in coherent sentences. Grade 3: CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.3.4 Report on a topic or text, tell a story, or recount an experience with appropriate facts and relevant, descriptive details, speaking clearly at an understandable pace. Common Core State Standards English Language Arts, 2010 Grade 4: CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.4.4 Report on a topic or text, tell a story, or recount an experience in an organized manner, using appropriate facts and relevant, descriptive details to support main ideas or themes; speak clearly at an understandable pace. Grade 5: CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.5.4 Report on a topic or text or present an opinion, sequencing ideas logically and using appropriate facts and relevant, descriptive details to support main ideas or themes; speak clearly at an understandable pace. Grade 6: CCSS.ELA-Literacy.SL.6.4 Present claims and findings, sequencing ideas logically and using pertinent descriptions, facts, and details to accentuate main ideas or themes; use appropriate eye contact, adequate volume, and clear pronunciation. Common Core State Standards English Language Arts, 2010 Phonology/Articulation in the School Setting A Thorough and Efficient Articulation Assessment Should: From ASHA “If acquisition of adequate and appropriate communication skills are a required part of your school's academic standards and curriculum and considered to be a basic skill necessary for all children attending school, then children with a speech or language impairment have a disorder that adversely affects educational performance. Although state or local school education agencies may apply different interpretations to "adversely affects educational performance," they cannot deny a child with a speech or language impairment services under IDEA just because they do not have a discrepancy in age/grade performance in an academic subject-matter area.” • Assess production of all English consonants. • Assess consonants in increasingly complex contexts. • Differentiate an articulation impairment from a phonological impairment. • Differentiate motor production from motor planning. Dublinske, S. “Adversely Affects Educational Performance” Policy 1980-2002; Nothing Has Changed.” Retrieved from: http://www.asha.org/SLP/schools/prof-consult/adverselyaffects/ Clinical Assessment of Articulation and Phonology – 2nd Edition (CAAP-2®) • Ages 2;6 – 11;11 • Norm referenced (provides standard scores, percentile ranks, age equivalents) • Assesses articulation and phonology • 15-20 minutes to administer • Checklist approach to assessing phonological processes virtually eliminates need for phonetic transcription • Available in traditional print form or via iPad® Why Develop the CAAP-2®? • Re-norm the assessment to reflect current U.S. census data. • Extend the age limits of CAAP to 11;11. • Discontinue the use of the error difference score. • Include children with speech delays and differences in the sample (n=7%). • Update the stimulus picture “computer.” • Run new validity and reliability studies. • Create an iPad® app that automatically generates scores. www.superduperinc.com ©2014 Super Duper® Publications 5 CAAP-2 Technical Characteristics • Sample Size: 1,486 children between the ages of 2;6 and 11;11; closely resembles 2013 U.S. Census Data. • Test-retest correlations were significant beyond p<.01 for raw scores, standard scores, and percentile ranks. • Concurrent validity comparing CAAP-2 to the GFTA-2 and the KLPA-2 were beyond p<.01 for all raw scores, standard scores, and percentile ranks. • Inter-examiner reliability coefficients were perfect (1.00) for Articulation Inventory and above .99 for the Phonological Process Checklist. What Does the CAAP-2® Assess? Articulation Inventory (continued): • Most consonant sounds are tested twice – once in initial position and once in final position; a few sounds are tested twice in initial position or twice in final position if the sound does not commonly occur in both positions. • Three sections: Consonant Singletons, Cluster Words, Multisyllabic Words. • Includes an optional introductory story to increase attention and act as a “warm-up” activity before beginning the actual assessment. What Does the CAAP-2® Assess? Articulation Inventory: • Pre- and postvocalic consonant singletons • Cluster words containing S, R, and L in the initial position • Three- and four-syllable words • Postvocalic productions of R • Production of sounds in sentences (for children 5 years and older) What Does the CAAP-2® Assess? Phonological Process Checklists: • Final Consonant Deletion • Cluster Reduction • Syllable Reduction • Gliding • Vocalization • Fronting (velar & palatal) • Deaffrication • Stopping • Prevocalic Voicing • Postvocalic Devoicing Upgrade from CAAP To upgrade from CAAP to CAAP-2, all you need are: • New CAAP-2 Articulation Inventory Forms CAAP®-2 • • • • • • Kit Includes Examiner's Manual Stimulus Easel 50 Articulation Inventory Record Forms 30 Phonological Process Record Forms 5 colorful, foam, 4” CAAP® Pals Tote bag! • New CAAP-2 Phonological Process Checklist Forms • New CAAP-2 Examiner’s Manual (Use the Stimulus Easel, CAAP Pals, and tote bag you already have!) www.superduperinc.com ©2014 Super Duper® Publications 6 CAAP-2 App for iPad® CAAP-2 App for iPad® • Purchase the app from the • Integrated age calculator • Use paper Articulation Inventory Forms: • Electronic stimulus pictures - Purchase in-app & print from your iPad or - Purchase from Super Duper Publications • No need for paper Phonological Process Checklist – the Phonological Process Checklist is built into the CAAP-2 app! • Automatic calculation of Standard Scores, Percentiles, Age Equivalents • Generate Phonology Scores directly from the Articulation Inventory • Email or print summary reports • Electronic Examiner’s Manual in the app Administering the CAAP-2 Print Edition Consonant Inventory: Optional Story (Print Edition) Child looks at easel pictures and examiner reads the story to the child. ©2002 Super Duper® Publications Note: Examiner says: Examiner points to CAAP® Pals as named. Some days, Elba and Mack look at books together. Mack likes to point to the pictures and say what he sees. Elba loves to listen. Mack says, “That’s a train, and that’s a fire truck.” Elba and Mack want you to be their friend and look at some pictures with them. After you look at each picture, you say what you see. Elba and Mack will listen to you. Plate C 11 ©2002 Super Duper® Publications Consonant Inventory (Print Edition) (Print Edition) Plate 4 Examiner says, “What is this?” Dog /dͻg/ Prompt: “It says, ‘Woof, woof.’” ©2002 Super Duper® Publications Examiner says, “What is this?” If pictures fails to elicit the correct response, give the prompt. Examiner says, “It says, ‘Quack.’” If child does not response correctly following prompt, say the target word and have the child repeat it. Examiner says, “Say, ‘Duck.’” Plate 37 Examiner says, “What is this?” Dinosaur /daɪnǝsͻɚ/ Prompt: “It is a large animal that lived a long time ago.” ©2002 Super Duper® Publications www.superduperinc.com ©2014 Super Duper® Publications 7 Consonant Inventory (Print Edition) School-Age Sentences (Print Edition) • For children ages 5;0 to 11;11. • Articulation accuracy in sentences that vary in length (8 to 11 words) and complexity (number of syllables in the word, word shape, quasi-clusters at word junctures, later developing sounds and frequently occurring sounds, etc.). • May compare to Consonant Inventory. Some children who experience difficulty in speech motor planning may perform poorer on the sentences than expected. • Child repeats eight sentences. Examiner may give two repetitions per sentence. (Print Edition) School-Age Sentences (Print Edition) Examiner says: Say all the words I say. “The elephant plays her favorite computer game.” If the child does not say all of the words, say the sentence again and have the child repeat it. Examiner says: Remember to say all of the words. Say, “The elephant plays her favorite computer game.” (Print Edition) Transfer scores to the front of the Response Form. Look up Standard Scores, Confidence Intervals, Percentile Ranks, and Age Equivalents in the Norms Tables in the Examiner’s Manual (pp. 76-93). CAAP-2 Phonological Process Checklists Uses a Checklist approach to assess occurrence of ten common phonological processes. Two types of scores: • Simple percentage of occurrence (if process is ≥ 40% then that process is “active”). • Standard scores (mean = 100; s.d. = 15). Note: Only use phonology standard score if child has at least one process with a percentage of occurrence that is 40% or greater. www.superduperinc.com ©2014 Super Duper® Publications 8 CAAP-2: Phonological Process Checklists Ten phonological processes evaluated: • Final Consonant Deletion • Cluster Reduction • Syllable Reduction • Gliding • Vocalization • Fronting (Velar & Palatal) • Deaffrication • Stopping • Prevocalic Voicing • Postvocalic Devoicing Phonological Process Checklist I (Print Edition) Transfer information from Articulation Inventory to the Checklist. CAAP-2 Phonological Process Checklists Checklist I used to analyze process patterns based on child’s responses on the Articulation Inventory. It is done after the testing is finished. Checklist II (print version only) permits an active assessment of child’s phonological process patterns. Administer plates 45-69 and score the child’s sound changes as they happen. Phonological Process Checklist I (Print Edition) • Transfer # of yes responses and % of occurrence to front page of test form. • Total number of “yes” responses. • Look up Standard Score, Percentile rank, and Age Equivalent in the Norms Tables in the Examiner’s Manual (pp. 103-114). Administering the CAAP-2 App Edition (App Edition) • Use a printed Articulation Response Form to record response. or • Purchase in app and print from iPad or order from Super Duper Publications. www.superduperinc.com ©2014 Super Duper® Publications 9 (App Edition) Consonant Inventory On home page, tap Consonant Inventory to begin. Enter student’s name and birth date. Select options (Record Audio and/or Show Story Slides). Tap “Start” to begin. Consonant Inventory (App Edition) Consonant Inventory: Optional Story (App Edition) If the “Show Story Slides” option is enabled, story pictures are presented and the prerecorded story is “read” to the student by the iPad. Then, Swipe to the next item. Consonant Inventory (App Edition) Examiner says, “What is this?” If pictures fails to elicit the correct response, give the prompt or tap to have the iPad give the prompt. Examiner or iPad says, “A bird can live here.” If child does not respond correctly following prompt, say the target word and have the child repeat it. Examiner says, “Say, ‘Cage.’” • Write responses on the record form, even if recording audio in the app. • Tap the picture to have the additional prompt presented. • Swipe to next item. School-Age Sentences (App Edition) • Tap School-Age Sentences on home screen. • Enter student’s name, birth date, selection options (Record Audio, Show Story Slides), and tap Start. • Picture is presented on iPad. Examiner presents sentence, and student repeats sentence. If the child does not say all of the words, say the sentence again and have the child repeat it. • Mark any words with errors on paper record form. Scoring the CAAP-2 App Edition • • Tap “Score” on home page. • Tap “Load Student” to have Birth Date and Test Date entered from saved files or tap Birth Date and Test Date to enter information. • Tap “Score” to enter sound errors made. www.superduperinc.com ©2014 Super Duper® Publications 10 Scoring the Consonant Inventory App Edition • On Enter Results screen, tap on the target sound that was produced in error. Scoring School-Age Sentences App Edition • Tap Score from scoring screen. • Tap on the word to listen to the audio recording of child as needed. • Tap on words that contained an error or were omitted. • Tap on substituted sound or omission, distortion, or other. • Once errors are entered, tap Submit Score. • Once errors are entered, tap Submit Score. Scoring CAAP-2 App Edition CAAP-2 App Edition Summary Report Chronological age, raw score, standard score, confidence interval, percentile rank, and age equivalent scores are automatically calculated after errors are entered. Tap “View/Print Summary” to view a summary of all results, including the Phonological Process results! Reliability of Administering Stimulus Items Via the iPad • Multiple studies regarding reliability of presenting stimulus items digitally via iPad or computer have been conducted. • Study results indicate test reliability does not change when stimulus items are delivered electronically. (Bowers & Husingh, 2011; Strait et al., 2013; Waite et al., 2013) Test Interpretation: The Articulation Inventory • Step 1: Finalize All Record Form Information and Test Scores • Step 2: Complete the Consonant Singleton Summary and Consonant Singleton Index (completed automatically in the app edition) • Step 3: Review the Developmental Age Norms • Step 4: Analyze Performance on School-Age Sentences • Step 5: Other Considerations and Observations Rate Speech Intelligibility Other Observations www.superduperinc.com ©2014 Super Duper® Publications 11 Step 8 (Details) Test Interpretation: Phonological Process Data First Priority • Simple syllables (CV, VC) • Syllables with final consonants (CVC) • Front vs. back of mouth differences (alveolars/velars) • Acquisition of stridency (/s/, /f/, “sh”, etc.) • Glides vs. liquids (/w/ or /j/ for /r/ or /l/) • Step 6: Finalize all checklist information and percentages (completed automatically in app edition) • Step 7: Identify active processes (identified automatically in app edition) • Step 8: Focus on Phonological Processes that may hinder the development of key contrastive features Second Priority • Syllables with initial clusters (CCV, CCVC) • Syllables with final clusters (CVCC, CCVCC) • Front vs. back (middle) of mouth differences (alveolars/palatals) • Voicing contrasts • Syllabic consonant contrasts rhoticity, “vocalic R” /l/ vs. /o/ tied with assimilations – harmony problems Test Interpretation: Phonological Process Data • Step 9: Tie up loose ends • Step 10: Define the big picture: Review all test scores and determine severity. Determine what speech sounds are produced in error. Determine what characteristics of the child’s speech you notice the most. Review error types and patterns. Determine if additional information is needed. Make recommendations. Refer to Examiner’s Manual pp. 45-60 for details on the authors’ Ten-Step Test Interpretation Process. S-CAT < C-PAC TWCT > Test Interpretation: Additional Resources Additional resources in the Appendices of the Examiner’s Manual (pp. 119-132) and at www.superduperinc.com/CAAP/append: • • • • • • • Stridency Deletion Checklist Initial Consonant Deletion Checklist Backing Checklist Consonant Harmony Checklist Stimulability Assessment Summary Tables for /s/, /l/, /r/, and /ɚ/ Vowel Checklist CPAC Phoneme Probes • Consonant Sound Probes • Pretest and Post-test • All Consonant Sounds-Except /zh/ PostTest Only • Vocalic /r/ • All Vowel Sounds < S-PAC • All Diphthongs • 72 www.superduperinc.com ©2014 Super Duper® Publications 12 S-CAT • Sample Consonant Phoneme Probes • Summary of Contexts Assessed by S-CAT • What are facilitating contexts and Why? • Flowchart for Extension Testing • Process Probes • 76 Recording Responses on the S-CAT Traditional Scoring Notation Error Record • Distortion “x” • Substitution • Omission • Addition Substituted phone “-” Phonetic Contexts Assessed by CPAC Consonant Probes - /s/ probe examples Prevocalic Singleton Functioning before a vowel in a syllable seen saw “ + ” and added phone www.superduperinc.com ©2014 Super Duper® Publications 13 Phonetic Contexts Assessed by CPAC Consonant Probes - /s/ probe examples Postvocalic Singleton Prevocalic Cluster Functioning after a vowel in a syllable peace dice Phonetic Contexts Assessed by CPAC Consonant Probes - /s/ probe examples Postvocalic Cluster Two consonants functioning primarily as one before a vowel in a one-syllable word or context spoon stamp Phonetic Contexts Assessed by CPAC Consonant Probes - /s/ probe examples Prevocalic Quasi-Cluster (Syllable Juncture) Two consonants functioning primarily as one after a vowel in a one-syllable word or context wasp Phonetic Contexts Assessed by CPAC Consonant Probes - /s/ probe examples lost Phonetic Contexts Assessed by CPAC Consonant Probes - /s/ probe examples Functioning within a word before a vowel in the second syllable, adjacent to a postvocalic consonant in the first syllable of a two-syllable word knapsack outside Phonetic Contexts Assessed by CPAC Consonant Probes - /s/ probe examples Prevocalic Quasi-Cluster (Word Juncture) Postvocalic Quasi-Cluster (Word Juncture) Functioning across words before a vowel in the second word, adjacent to a postvocalic consonant in the first word Functioning across words after the vowel in the first word, adjacent to a prevocalic consonant in the second word. rib soup road sign face down toss good www.superduperinc.com ©2014 Super Duper® Publications 14 Facilitating Contexts Phonetic Contexts Assessed by CPAC Consonant Probes - /s/ probe examples WHY? Postvocalic Quasi-Cluster (Syllable Juncture) • A CONTEXT may be facilitating because it minimally interferes or competes with the error. – For example: /sp/ is good for /s/ because the sounds share few features or • A CONTEXT may be facilitating because it contains similarities between the error sound and its phonetic neighbors. – For example /s/ and /t/ have similar features, hence /st/ is a facilitating context Functioning with a word after a vowel in the first syllable, adjacent to a prevocalic consonant in the second syllable of a twosyllable word. whisper rooster CPAC Process Probes Type Probe Syllable Structure Processes • • • • Initial Consonant Deletion (ICD) Final Consonant Deletion (FCD) Cluster Reduction (CR) Syllable Reduction (SR) CPAC Process Probes Probe Number • Type • Probe • Assimilation Processes • Prevocalic Voicing (PV) • Postvocalic Devoicing (PD) • Consonant Harmony (CH) 1 2 3 4 • Probe Number 12 13 14 Substitution Processes • • • • • • • • • Gliding (GL) Vocalization (VO) Fronting (FR) of Velars (FV) Fronting (FR) of Palatals (FP) Backing (BK) Stopping (ST) Stridency Deletion (SD) Affrication (AF) Deaffrication (DF) 5 6 7 7 8 9 10 11 11 • 87 • 88 • 89 • 90 www.superduperinc.com ©2014 Super Duper® Publications 15 • 91 • 92 • 93 • 94 • 95 • 96 www.superduperinc.com ©2014 Super Duper® Publications 16 • 97 • 98 • 99 • 100 Questions? [email protected] Intervention for Speech Sound Disorders A Top-10 Approach • Part 3 - Next www.superduperinc.com ©2014 Super Duper® Publications 17
Similar documents
PHONOLOGICAL AWARENESS
and that they are still learning which sound sequences represent real words in English. PHONOLOGICAL AWARENESS
More information