Onondaga County (NY) Correctional Facility Re
Transcription
Onondaga County (NY) Correctional Facility Re
Onondaga County (NY) Correctional Facility Re-roof Project: Lessons Learned and Implications for Roof Design CRRC Membership Meeting June, 2013 Reno NV Michael D. Fischer Director Codes & Regulatory Affairs Project Background • Onondaga County Infrastructure – Storm-water Runoff and Sewer Capacity – County-Owned Buildings – Penitentiary Project Opportunity • Penitentiary Reroof – Cool Roofing – Vegetative Roofing – High R-Value Roof Assemblies • CDH Engineering – Hugh Henderson Bigger Picture Issues • Project Location – Climate Zone 5, South of Syracuse NY • Storm-water and Sanitary Capacity Issues • Energy Efficiency – Cooling vs. Heating • Building Performance Issues – Durability – Moisture Management – Maintenance Costs Aerial View of Campus Unit 4 Unit 3 Unit 2 Unit 1 Project Details • Location – Climate – Elevation • Building Size • Building Occupancy – Human Factors • Maintenance Project Details • Side-by-Side Comparison of Roofing Systems – – – – UNIT 1: EPDM w/ 4” of Foam Insulation UNIT 2: TPO w/ 4” of Foam Insulation UNIT 3: Vegetative Roof w/ 4” of Foam Insulation UNIT 4: TPO w/ 8” of Foam Insulation • Measured Performance Impacts – Thermal Transfer / Energy Cost Impacts – Water Retention Performance Roof Assemblies Approach • Install dataloggers to continuously monitor performance – Two independent locations on each roof – Collect data continuously at 15-minute intervals – Directly measure temperature differences through roof assembly – Direct measurement of HVAC energy use was not practical • Presentation and Analysis – Present data on internet (password protected) – Others can use data for independent data analysis Roof Sensor Location/Station Thermocouple TRO Thermocouple TRI Thermocouple TAI A & B Stations on Each Unit 1A 1B Sensors Installed During Construction Thermocouple Probe Insulation Board Thermocouple on Top of Insulation (station 1B) Indoor Thermocouple Vegetative Roof Instrumentation Point Description Instrument TRO Roof Temperature (on top of insulation, under roof brd) Roof Temperature (under roof insulation, above deck) Indoor Temperature (just below the roof) Type-T Thermocouple Type-T Thermocouple Type-T Thermocouple TRI TAI Point Description Instrument TAO Outdoor Temperature ISH Solar Insulation (horizontal) Green Roof Temperature (in middle of soil layer) Green Roof Moisture Content (in middle of soil layer) Rainfall Type-T Thermocouple Licor LI200x TGR MGR RAIN WF Water Flow from Green Roof Mockup Type-T Thermocouple Campbell Scientific CS616 Texas Electronics 525 Hydrolynx 5050 Eng Units ºF Locations ºF At each station ºF At each station At each station Eng Units ºF Locations W/m2 Station 2A ºF Station 3A 0-1 Station 3A Inches Station 2A Gal/h Station 2A Station 2A Heat Transfer Analysis TAO Veg roof (optional) Deck Board membrane Insulation Board Where: TRO Rinsulation - R-value for Insulation layer (ºF-h-ft2/Btu) q - Heat flux through the roof assembly (Btu/h-ft2) q Rinsulation TRI Concrete Deck TAI q = (TRI-TRO) Rinsulatiion Daily Heat Loss 60 Unit 1: 4 in, EPDM Impact of Snow Cover Unit 3: 4 in, Veg Unit 4: 8 in, TPO 40 Heat Loss (Btu/ft^2-day) Unit 2: 4 in, TPO 20 Heat Loss 0 Heat Gain -20 -40 0 20 40 60 Outdoor Temperature (F) 80 100 Monthly Heat Loss 1,400 Unit 1: 4 in EPDM 1,200 1,000 Unit 3: 4 in Veg 800 Unit 4: 8 in TPO 600 400 200 Heat Loss Heat Gain (200) (400) -10 De c -10 No v 0 t-1 Oc -10 Se p -10 Au g l-1 0 Ju 0 n-1 Ju 0 y-1 Ma 10 Ap r- r-1 0 Ma 0 Fe b- 1 n-1 0 (600) Ja Heat Loss (Btu/ft^2) Unit 2: 4 in TPO Heating Vs. Cooling Expense Water Retention Testing 100 80 60 1.0 Insolation (W/m^2) Ambient Temperature (F) Vegetative Roof Provides Evaporative Cooling 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 40 22: 0: 2: 4: 6: 8: 10:12:14:16:18:20:22: 0: 0.0 22: 0: 2: 4: 6: 8: 10:12:14:16:18:20:22: 0: 25 80 20 15 10 5 0 22: 0: 2: 4: 6: 8: 10:12:14:16:18:20:22: 0: Roof Temp (F) Soil Moisture Content (%) July 27, 2010 75 70 65 60 22: 0: 2: 4: 6: 8: 10:12:14:16:18:20:22: 0: Stormwater Management • Vegetative Roof Provided Manageable Stormwater Flow • Evaporative Cooling Effect • Some Thermal Effects • Maintenance Issues TBD Impact of Snow & Rain Temperature (F) 60 40 20 Ambient 0 30 Nov 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Dec Heat Loss (Btu/ft^2-h) Unit 1: 4 in, EPDM, Unit 2: 4 in, TPO, Unit 3: 4 in, Veg, Unit 4: 8 in, TPO 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 30 Nov 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Dec Water (inches) 0.25 Rainfall Drainage 0.20 0.15 Rain Snow (no drainage) 0.10 0.05 0.00 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 OC Conclusions From Jamesville • Reflective Roofing is Energy Neutral • Vegetative Roof Retains 75-80% of Stormwater – Additional Cooling Season Benefits • Insulation Saves Heating Energy • Additional Study Needed: – – – – Reflectance/Durability/Maintenance Vegetative Roof Maintenance Costs Building Performance Snow and Ice Effects The Cool Roofing Debate • Energy Efficiency – Heating vs. Cooling – Expanded Reflectance Requirements in Code • Heat Island Mitigation • Roof Assembly Performance and Durability – Condensation – Wetting/Drying Cycles Next Steps • Project Will Continue For Total of Six Years • Reflectance Measurements Will be Collected • Additional Consideration for Solar Effects and Accumulation of Snow and Ice Questions? Thanks to Hugh Henderson CDH Engineering Cazenovia, NY