Meadowvale Wind Farm Site Considerations Report

Transcription

Meadowvale Wind Farm
Site Considerations Report
Prepared for:
SWEB Development LP
108F Trider Crescent
Dartmouth, NS B3B 1R6
Prepared by:
Stantec Consulting Ltd.
Suite 1 – 70 Southgate Drive
Guelph ON N1G 4P5
File No. 160960922
August 19, 2015
MEADOWVALE WIND FARM
SITE CONSIDERATIONS REPORT
Table of Contents
ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................... I
1.0
INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................1.1
2.0
METHODS .....................................................................................................................2.1
3.0
3.1
3.2
RESULTS ........................................................................................................................3.1
3.2.6 (A) MTCS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES CONFIRMATION ...................................... 3.1
3.2.6 (B) SITE CONSIDERATIONS INFORMATION .......................................................... 3.1
3.2.1
3.2.6 (b)(i)(2) Location and GPS Coordinates ......................................... 3.1
4.0
CLOSURE ......................................................................................................................4.1
5.0
REFERENCES.................................................................................................................5.1
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1:
Site, Connection Point and Point of Common Coupling
Approximate Coordinates .............................................................................. 3.1
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A:
Appendix B:
Appendix C:
Appendix D:
Appendix D1:
Appendix D2:
Appendix D3:
Appendix D4:
Appendix D5:
Site Considerations Mapping
Site Considerations Concordance Table
Team Qualifications
Supporting Information and Resources
Supporting Documentation for 3.2.6(b)(i)(1) – MTCS
Archaeological Site Confirmation
Supporting Documentation for 3.2.6(b)(i)(9) – National Parks,
Provincial Parks, and Conservation Reserves (15)(iii) – Wetlands,
(15) (ii) - ANSIs, and (15) (iv) – Approved Plans
Supporting Documentation for 3.2.6(b)(i)(13) – Operational and
Approved Wind Projects
Supporting Documentation for 3.2.6(b)(i)(15) (i) – Endangered or
Threatened Species
Supporting Documentation for 3.2.6(b)(i)(15) (iv) – Heritage
Resources
Abbreviations
ANSI
Area of Natural and Scientific Interest
CLI
Canada Land Inventory
IESO
Independent Electricity System Operator
LIO
Land Information Ontario
LRP I RFP
Large Renewable Procurement Request for Proposals
NHIC
Natural Heritage Information Centre
MOECC
Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change
MNRF
Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry
MTCS
Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and Sport
PSW
Provincially Significant Wetland
Stantec
Stantec Consulting Ltd.
SWEB
SWEB Development LP
i
Introduction
August 19, 2015
1.0
INTRODUCTION
Site Considerations Information is required as part of a proposal for the procurement of up to 565
MW of new large renewable energy projects as specified in Section 3.2.6 (b) of the Independent
Electricity System Operator (IESO)’s Large Renewable Procurement Request for Proposals (the
LRP I RFP).
Stantec understands that SWEB Development LP (SWEB) - (a joint venture between Scotian
Windfields Inc. and WEB Wind Energy) is considering applying for a contract with the IESO for a
proposed wind energy generating facility known as the Meadowvale Wind Farm (the Project)
located in the Municipality of Chatham-Kent, Ontario. The Project is proposed to consist of 6 to 9
turbines (18 - 19 MW total installed nameplate capacity), and ancillary infrastructure, including
access roads, collector lines/fibre optic cables, etc. The Site Boundary is generally bound by
Elbow Line and Base Line to the north, Oldfield Line to the south, between Fraser Rd and St. Clair
Road to the west, and past Prince Albert Road to the east (Appendix A).
SWEB has retained Stantec to compile the site considerations information into this report, which
includes the following sections:
•
A description of the methods used to obtain Site Considerations Information for the Project
area (Section 2.0);
•
Results of information obtained (Section 3.0);
•
Detailed maps of the Project and proposed connection line that identify the Site
Considerations Information (Appendix A); and,
•
A concordance table that relates the information required by Section 3.2.6 (b) of the LRP I
RFP to the information provided in this report, including the date on which the information
was obtained, the source of information, and the findings (Appendix B).
ks \\cd1220-f02\01609\active\60960922\site considerations\meadowvale\rpt_60922_meadowvale_site considerations_20150819_final.docx
1.1
Methods
August 19, 2015
2.0
METHODS
Site considerations information for the Project area was reviewed by Stantec staff (qualifications
for team members are provided in Appendix C) through accessing publicly available data and
information provided by SWEB. The following sources were accessed:
1. Government of Canada weather radar data (2015);
2. Land Information Ontario (LIO) digital mapping (2015);
3. Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) (2015);
4. Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and Sport (MTCS) (2015)
5. Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) Crown Land Use Policy Atlas (2014);
6. Natural Heritage Information Centre (NHIC) natural areas and species records search (2014);
7. Ontario Heritage Trust Online Plaque Guide (2015);
8. Parcel property data from SWEB (2015); and,
9. Parks Canada Directory of Federal Heritage Designations (2012).
The information collected included:
•
Boundaries of any municipality, geographic township, or unorganized territory;
•
Boundaries of First Nation Lands;
•
Highways and railways;
•
National parks, provincial parks, and conservation reserves;
•
Airports, aerodromes, and weather radars;
•
Property boundaries;
•
Permanent known waterbodies;
•
Location of other on-shore wind facilities (operating and with an approved Renewable
Energy Approval);
•
Crown lands;
•
Endangered and threatened species;
•
Provincially significant areas of scientific interest (ANSI);
•
Provincially significant wetlands;
•
Approved plans; and,
•
Recognized heritage resources.
2.1
Methods
August 19, 2015
This site considerations analysis is based on:
•
Mapping and project information provided by SWEB;
•
Topographic map data; and,
•
Publicly available information and published reference materials.
Changes to any of the information provided in these sources after the date these sources were
reviewed may result in changes to the site considerations information provided in this report.
2.2
Results
August 19, 2015
3.0
RESULTS
The Site Considerations Information requirements for the LRP I RFP are detailed in Section 3.2.6 of
the Rules.
3.1
3.2.6 (A) MTCS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES CONFIRMATION
On March 19 and April 13, 2015, MTCS was contacted regarding registered Archaeological Sites
within 250m of the Site (Appendix D1).
On April 23, 2015, confirmation was received from MTCS in the form of an email that no reported
Archaeological Sites are within 1 km of the Site however, they did attach a report with
appeared to document work within 50 m (Appendix D1). Stantec staff reviewed the report and
confirmed (on April 23, 2015) that no Archaeological Resources were identified within the
assessment (Appendix D1).
The proposed Connection Line, Connection Point and Point of Common Coupling for the Project
are located within the Site Boundary reviewed by MTCS.
3.2
3.2.6 (B) SITE CONSIDERATIONS INFORMATION
Detailed mapping showing a suitable and clearly-labelled scale with the site considerations
information found is provided in Appendix A. A concordance table listing the information
sources for each type of site consideration and the date the source was accessed is provided in
Appendix B.
3.2.1
3.2.6 (b)(i)(2) Location and GPS Coordinates
As shown conceptually in Appendix A, the approximate proposed Site, connection point and
point of common coupling coordinates are as follows:
Table 3.1:
Site, Connection Point and Point of Common Coupling Approximate Coordinates
Item
Easting
Northing
Datum
Site – North West Corner
386838
4713849
NAD 83 zone 17
Site – North East Corner
390928
4714831
NAD 83 zone 17
Site – South East Corner
393380
4712084
NAD 83 zone 17
Site – South West Corner
390559
4709605
NAD 83 zone 17
Proposed Connection Point
389092
4714945
NAD 83 zone 17
Proposed Point of
Common Coupling (PCC)
389235
4714036
NAD 83 zone 17
3.1
Results
August 19, 2015
The proposed Interconnection Line is also shown in Figure 1, Appendix A, and is estimated to be
1.134 kilometers long.
3.2
Closure
August 19, 2015
4.0
CLOSURE
This Site Considerations Report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of,
SWEB, and its representatives, for the Meadowvale Wind Farm. This review only represents the
information and literature available at the time of its preparation. The conclusions presented
herein represent the best judgment of Stantec Consulting Ltd. based on current knowledge and
standards. Stantec Consulting Ltd. attests that to the best of our knowledge, the information
presented in this report is accurate.
STANTEC CONSULTING LTD.
Andrea Terella
Junior Environmental Planner
Environmental Services
Tel: 519-780-8193
[email protected]
Kerrie Skillen
Project Manager
Environmental Services
Tel: 519-780-8143
[email protected]
4.1
References
August 19, 2015
5.0
REFERENCES
Canada Flight Source Supplement. Plews. 2015. Available at:
http://www.plews.ca/AirportsinCanada.htm. Accessed: April 2015.
Government of Canada. 2015. Canadian Weather Radar. Available at:
http://weather.gc.ca/radar/. Accessed: April 2015.
Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF). 2014. Crown Land Use Policy Atlas. Available
at: http://www.giscoeapp.lrc.gov.on.ca/web/MNR/NHLUPS/CLUPA/Viewer/Viewer.html.
Accessed: April 2015.
Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF), Land Information Ontario (LIO). 2015. Open
Data. Available at:
https://www.javacoeapp.lrc.gov.on.ca/geonetwork/srv/en/main.home. Accessed: April
2015; Re-Accessed: July 30, 2015.
Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF). 2014. Natural Heritage Areas. Available at:
http://www.giscoeapp.lrc.gov.on.ca/web/MNR/NHLUPS/CLUPA/Viewer/Viewer.html.
Accessed: April 2015; Re-Accessed: August 2015.
Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and Sport (MTCS). 2015. Available at:
http://www.hpd.mcl.gov.on.ca/scripts/hpdsearch/english/default.asp. Accessed: May
2015.
Natural Heritage Information Centre (NHIC). 2014. Natural Areas and Species records search.
Available at: https://www.ontario.ca/environment-and-energy/natural-heritageinformation-centre. Accessed: April 2015; Re-Accessed: August 2015.
Natural Heritage Information Centre (NHIC) - Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF).
2015. Queen’s Printer for Ontario. Available at:
http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/en/Business/NHIC/2ColumnSubPage/STDU_138222.html.
Accessed: August 2015.
Natural Heritage Information Centre (NHIC) - Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF).
2014. Queen’s Printer For Ontario. Available at:
http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/en/Business/NHIC/2ColumnSubPage/STDU_138222.html.
Accessed: April 2015.
Ontario Heritage Trust. 2015. Online Plaque Guide. Available at:
http://www.heritagetrust.on.ca/Resources-and-Learning/Online-Plaque-Guide.aspx and
http://www.ontarioplaques.com. Accessed: May 2015.
5.1
References
August 19, 2015
Parks Canada. 2012. Directory of Federal Heritage Designations. Available at:
http://www.pc.gc.ca/apps/dfhd/default_eng.aspx . Accessed: May 2015.
5.2
APPENDIX A:
SITE CONSIDERATIONS MAPPING
17LH8815
17LH8915
r Ro ad
Rive
Li
4720000
Cuthbert Road
Brigden Road
ne
17LH9210
17LH9109
sh
Bu
n
Li
e
Geographic
Township
of CHATHAM
n
io
Un
n
Li
Provincial Park
Québec
e
Project
Location
C
ek
n
Li
e
e
dg
He
r
da
Ce
Li
ne
un
Co
vi
try
ew
n
Li
e
b
Al
tR
er
e
or
m
y
a
ne
Li
396000
Toronto
New York
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N
2. Base features produced under license with the Ontario Ministry of
Natural Resources and Forestry © Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2015.
August 2015
160960922
Figure No.
1
1
2
1:65,000
d
oa
392000
Ottawa
Notes
Client/Project
Cl
ce
0
Dover
Centre
Ontario
SWEB Development LP
Meadowvale
in
Pr
388000
Oak Ridges Moraine - Planning
Area
Coordinates NAD 83 UTM Zone 17
Connection Point
Easting- 389092
Northing- 4714945
Proposed Point of Common Coupling (PCC)
Easting- 389235
Northing- 4714036
Site Boundary Coordinates
North West Corner- 386838, 4713849
North East Corner- 390928, 4714831
South East Corner- 393380, 4712084
South West Corner- 390559, 4709605
Michigan
ar
Ranki n C
r e ek
Baldoon
Niagara Escarpment Planning
Boundary
Municipal Boundary - Lower Tier
17LH9312
Be
National Park
Provincially Significant Life
Science ANSI
e
ttl
Li
Johnsto
n
Deyo's
Woodlot
Cr
ld
O 17LH9311
y
lle
va
n
e
re
G
Lake Simoce Watershed
Boundary
Geographic Township
Boundary
ad
Ro
y
Ba
ne
Li
ell
17LH9211
d
w
Max
ld
fie
a
Ro
384000
t
es
W
Greenbelt - Outer Boundary
NHIC 1km Grid Square With
Threatened or Endangered
Species Records
Oldfield
17LH9110
Crown Leased Land
First Nations Reserve
ir
380000
Rankin
Creek
is
w
Le
ne
Li
c
tri
ec
l
E
ad
Ro
Goose
Lake
Club
House
Pond
St. Clair
Marsh
Complex
17LH9212
ne
e
Lake St.
Clair
Li
in
South
Pond
17LH9111
Maxwell
Creek
17LH9213
Electric
L
ar
Be
MUNICIPALITY OF
CHATHAM-KENT
Geographic
Township
of DOVER
Little
Bear
Creek
17LH9009
ad
Ro
e
in
17LH9010
n
w
Crown Land
Provincially Significant Earth
Science ANSI
a
Cl
St
An
Trail
ne
s South
17LH8910
17LH9011
to
rk
Co
ne
Li
Conservation Reserve
(Regulated)
Watercourse (Intermittent)
Baseline
rt
be
Al
ad
Ro
St
Line
Conservation Area
Municipal Boundary - Upper Tier
ce
in
Pr
Walpole
Island 46
Tupperville
ad
ro
17LH8911
17LH9112
17LH9012
Weather Radar (MNRF)
Watercourse (Permanent)
de
Si
17LH8811
n
oo
ld
Ba
17LH8912
e
0
#
Features Searched But Not
Found within 5km of Site
Boundary
Transmission Line
!
re
nt
Chenal Ecarte
Marsh (SC 18)
17LH8812
n
Li
East Lake St Clair Wind Farm
Major Road
Ce
op
Lo
17LH8712
w
do
ea
M
le
va
d
oa
North
St Annes
17LH8913
R
er
as
Fr
e
ag
17LH9113
Historic Site
Highway
er Line
re
North
rit
He
Z
!
Waterbody
Constructed and/ or Approved
Wind Turbines
Railway - Operational
Glasgow
17LH9013
Proposed Point of Common
Coupling
Airport/Runway/Aerodrome
Location
"
)
17LH8813
L
ar
Be
W:\active\60960922\drawing\MXD\SiteConsiderations\Meadowvale\160960922_Site_Considerations_Meadowvale_20150817.mxd
Revised: 2015-08-17 By: dharvey
4708000
4712000
Highwa 4 0
y
Lo
ng
Ro
ad
17LH8713
ne
Li
Wooded Area
Proposed Connection Point
Parcel Boundary
Minor Road
CSX Transportation
17LH9114
Site Boundary - 5km Buffer
Features within 5km of Site Boundary
Geographic
Township
of DAWN
17LH9015
17LH8914 17LH9014
Provincially Significant Wetland
Proposed Interconnection Line
(1.134 km Long)
k
ee
17LH8613
17LH8814
"
6
"
)
Sydenham
River
th
rkwea
Sta
Site Boundary
Site Boundary- 120m Buffer
4716000
e
in
River L
"
6
WALPOLE
ISLAND
±
Legend
4712000
Gillard
4716000
North
John Park Line
17LH8714
TOWNSHIP OF
DAWN-EUPHEMIA
McCreary Line
Queen Street
17LH8614
COUNTY OF
LAMBTON
East
Otter
Creek
Geographic
Township
of SOMBRA
et Duke Street
tre
17LH8715
400000
4708000
Wallaceburg
S
Langsta ff Line
CSY7
WALLACEBURG (SYDENHAM
DISTRICT HOSP) (Heli)
Murray Street
Agnes Street
Syne River
Marshes
(SC 17)
t
ee
Str
on
Selkirk Stre et
Dufferin Avenue
Kent Line
West Otter
Creek
Chicken
Island
(SC 19)
Otter
Creek
N e ls
Running
Creek
Dufferin Avenue
TOWNSHIP OF
ST. CLAIR
West Otte
r Cr
Kimball Road
Forhan Street
Highway 40
4720000
Stewart Line
North
Sydenham
River
tt
E a t O Cr eek
s
Whitebre ad Line
396000
Dawn Valley Road
392000
Mandaumin Road
388000
eek
384000
er
380000
400000
Title
km
Site Considerations & Project Layout
APPENDIX B:
SITE CONSIDERATIONS
CONCORDANCE TABLE
Appendix B
SITE CONSIDERATIONS INFORMATION – CONCORDANCE TABLE
Site Consideration
MTCS Archaeological
Sites Confirmation
Section
Reference
3.2.6 (a)
(i) and (ii)
Requirement
The Registered Proponent must have provided evidence that they have received the
MTCS Archaeological Sites Confirmation.
Information Source
MTCS (2015)
Date Obtained
April 2015
The requirements of Subsection 3.2.6 (a) shall be satisfied by the registered Proponent’s
inclusion of a copy of the MTCS Archaeological Sites Confirmation in the proposal. The
MTCS Archaeological Sites Confirmation may be in the form of an email or other written
correspondence from MTCS.
Findings
On March 19 and April 13, 2015, MTCS was contacted regarding
registered Archaeological Sites within 250m of the Site (Appendix D1).
On April 23, 2015, confirmation was received from MTCS in the form of
an email that no reported Archaeological Sites are within 1 km of the
Site however, they did attach a report with appears to document work
within 50 m (Appendix D1). Stantec staff reviewed the report and
confirmed (on April 23, 2015) that no Archaeological Resources were
identified within the assessment (Appendix D1).
The Connection Line, Connection Point and Point of Common
Coupling for the Project are located within the Site Boundary reviewed
by MTCS.
Detailed scale maps of
the Site
3.2.6 (b)
(i) (1)
Suitable and clearly labelled scale used. Identifies: the Site, and if the Site is constituted by
more than one (1) non-contiguous Properties, a scale map showing the outer boundary of
the entire Site must be included.
SWEB
May 2015
The Site (as per the definition in the LRP I RFP) is shown on Figure 1,
(Appendix A).
Coupling for the Project are located within the Site Boundary shown on
Figure 1 (Appendix A).
Detailed scale maps of
the Connection Line and
Connection Point
3.2.6 (b)
(i) (2)
The proposed Connection Line and Connection Point, showing the length of the proposed
Connection Line, the GPS coordinates for the Site and the Connection Point, and any
other TS (or associated feeder) or the Circuit connected to the IESO-Controlled Grid that is
closer in geographic proximity to the Site than the proposed Connection Point.
SWEB
May 2015
The Site, Connection Line, Connection Point and Point of Common
Coupling are shown on Figure 1(Appendix A).
Key Features of the
Project
3.2.6 (b)
(i) (3)
To the extent available, the proposed location of key features of the Project such as
access roads, internal driveways, Generating Equipment, structures, transformers, inverters
and communications towers.
SWEB
N/A
The location of key features of the Project is shown on Figure 1
(Appendix A).
The boundaries of any Municipality and Unorganized Territory in which the Site or the
proposed Connection Line is to be located, in whole or in part, including the identity of
each such Municipality and, if applicable, Unorganized Territory.
LIO (2015) – Municipal
Boundary – Upper Tier
and District, Municipal
Boundary – Lower Tier
and Single Tier
April 2015
The boundaries of any First Nation Lands on which the Site or the proposed Connection
Line is to be located, in whole or in part, including the identity of the First Nation Lands and
the corresponding First Nation Community.
LIO (2015) ) – Indian
Reserve
April 2015
Boundaries of any
Municipality and
Unorganized Territory
3.2.6 (b)
(i) (4)
Boundaries of First
Nations Lands
3.2.6 (b)
(i) (5)
The Site is located in the Geographic Township of Chatham, within the
Municipality of Chatham-Kent as shown on Figure 1 (Appendix A).
The Site is not located on or abutting a property on which a First
Nations Reserve is located, as shown on Figure 1 (Appendix A).
However, Walpole Island 46 under Walpole Island Indian Reserve was
identified within 5km of the Site.
Boundaries of any
Geographic Township
3.2.6 (b)
(i) (6)
The boundaries of any geographic township (identified pursuant to the Territorial Division
Act, 2002, SO 2002, c 17, Schedule E) in which the Project or the proposed Connection
Line is to be located, in whole or in part, including the identity of each such geographic
township.
LIO (2015)Geographic Township
Improved
April 2015
The Site is located in the Geographic Township of Dover and
Geographic Township of Chatham, within the Municipality of
Chatham-Kent as shown on Figure 1 (Appendix A).
B.1
Appendix B Site Considerations Information – Concordance Table
August 19, 2015
Site Consideration
Highways
Railways
National Parks, Provincial
Parks, and Conservation
Reserves
Airports, Aerodromes,
and Weather Radars
Section
Reference
3.2.6 (b)
(i) (7)
3.2.6 (b)
(i) (8)
3.2.6 (b)
(i) (9)
3.2.6 (b)
(i) (10)
Requirement
Information Source
Date Obtained
Any “highway” (as defined in the Highway Traffic Act, RSO 1990, c H.8) crossing or located
within five (5) kilometres of the Site or the proposed Connection Line, including the
location, name and number of each such highway.
LIO (2015) - – Ontario
Road Network
Segment with Address
April 2015
Any “railway” (as defined in the Canada Transportation Act, SC 1996, c 10) crossing or
located within five (5) kilometres of the Site or the proposed Connection Line, including
the location and name of each such railway.
LIO (2015) - ORWN
Track
April 2015
Any national park (identified in Schedule 1 of the Canada National Parks Act, SC 2000, c
32), provincial park or conservation reserve (identified pursuant to the Provincial Parks and
Conservation Reserves Act, 2006, SO 2006, c 12) located within one hundred and twenty
(120) metres of the Site or the proposed Connection Line, including the location and
name of each such park or conservation reserve.
LIO (2015) ) – Provincial
Park Regulated; MNRF
(2014)
Any airports, aerodromes and weather radars located within five (5) kilometres of the Site
or the proposed Connection Line, including the location and name of each such airport,
aerodrome and weather radar.
Airports and
aerodromes: LIO (2015)
– Airport Official,
Airport Other
Findings
All “highways” located within 5 km of the Site, are identified on Figure 1
(Appendix A).
CSX Transportation railway is located within 5 km of the Site, as shown
on Figure 1 (Appendix A).
April 2015:
August 2015
There are no National Parks, Provincial Parks or Conservation Reserves
with 120 m of the Site, as shown on Figure 1 (Appendix A),
(Appendix D2).
April 2015
The Wallaceburg (Sydenham District Hosp) (Heli) Helidpad is within 5
km of the Site, as shown on Figure 1, (Appendix A). There are no
weather radars within 5 km of the Site.
Plews (2015) - Canada
Flight Source
Supplement (2015)
Weather radars: LIO Monitoring Stations
(2015)
Property Boundaries
Permanent Known
Waterbodies
Location of Other OnShore Wind Facilities
3.2.6 (b)
(i) (11)
3.2.6 (b)
(i) (12)
3.2.6 (b)
(i) (13)
The Property boundaries for each Property on which the Site is located, each Property that
Abuts Property on which the Site is located, each Property where the proposed
Connection Line will be situated, and each Property that Abuts a Property where the
proposed Connection Line will be situated.
SWEB
Any Permanent Known Water Body located within one hundred and twenty (120) metres
of the Site or the proposed Connection Line, including the location and, if applicable, the
common name associated with each such Permanent Known Water Body.
LIO (2015) – OHN –
Waterbody, OHN –
Small Scale
waterbody, OHN –
Small Scale
Watercourse, OHN Watercourse
April 2015
If the Project is to utilize On-Shore Wind as its Renewable Fuel:
Ministry of the
Environment and
Climate Change
(MOECC 2015)
April 2015
i. the location of any other Renewable Generating Facilities that utilize On-Shore Wind as a
Renewable Fuel that have been constructed and are located within five (5) kilometres of
the Site clearly identifying the location of each turbine; and ,
ii. the location of the Project site boundary for any proposed but unconstructed
Renewable Generating Facilities that utilize On-Shore Wind as a Renewable Fuel that are
May 2015
The Property boundaries for each Property on which the Site is located,
and each Property that Abuts Property on which the Site is located, is
shown on Figure 1 (Appendix A).
All permanent known water bodies within 120 m of the Site are shown
on Figure 1(Appendix A).
All other existing and proposed Renewable Generating Facilities
located within 5 km of the Site are shown on Figure 1 (Appendix A, with
coordinates provided in Appendix D3). These include: East Lake St.
Clair Wind Farm.
MOECC correspondence (Appendix D3) refers to Marsh Line Wind
Farm however it is located more than 5 km from the Site.
B.2
Site Consideration
Section
Reference
Requirement
Information Source
Date Obtained
located within five (5) kilometres of the Site and which have received a Renewable
Energy Approval as indicated at www.ontario.ca/environment-and-energy/renewableenergyprojects- listing.
Crown Lands
3.2.6 (b)
(i) (14)
If the Project is to be located on provincial Crown lands (in whole or in part):
i. the boundaries of each Property on which the Site is located, and that Abuts the
Property on which the Site is located; and,
ii. every Provincial Crown Land Lease located on a Property on which the Site is located,
and that Abuts the Property on which the Site is located.
Endangered and
Threatened Species
3.2.6 (b)
(i) (15) (i)
Within a Natural Heritage Information Centre (NHIC) one (1) kilometre grid square which
contains an “Endangered” or “Threatened” species observation record (protected
pursuant to the Endangered Species Act, 2007, SO 2007, c 6).
Findings
MNRF (2014); LIO
(2015) – Crown Land
MNR Non Freehold
Disposition, Crown
Land Use Planning
Area (CLUPA) –
Provincial, Crown land
– MNR Unpatented
Land, Crown Land Use
Planning Area (CLUPA)
- Overlay
April 2015
NHIC -MNRF(2014);
NHIC -MNRF(2015)
April 2015;
August 2015
The Site is not located on Crown Land, as shown on Figure 1 (Appendix
A).
NHIC grid squares containing records of Threatened or Endangered
Species were found overlapping the Site, as shown on Figure 1
(Appendix A). These are detailed in Appendix D4 (NHIC table
documenting what was reported).
Provincially Significant
ANSIs
Provincially Significant
Wetlands
Approved Plans
Recognized Heritage
Resources
3.2.6 (b)
(i) (15) (ii)
3.2.6 (b)
(i) (15) (iii)
3.2.6 (b)
(i) (15) (iv)
3.2.6 (b)
(i) (15) (v)
Within one hundred and twenty (120) metres of a provincially significant area of natural
and scientific interest.
Within one hundred and twenty (120) metres of a known provincially significant wetland.
LIO (2015) – ANSl MNRF
(2014)
LIO (2015) – wetland;
MNRF (2014)
Within or Abutting an area designated in the plan approved under the Niagara
Escarpment Planning and Development Act, the plan approved under the Oak Ridges
Moraine Conservation Act, 2011 and O. Reg. 142/02, the plan approved under the
Greenbelt Act, 2005, and the Lake Simcoe watershed (as defined in the Lake Simcoe
Protection Act, 2008).
LIO (2015); MNRF
(2014)
Within or Abutting a recognized heritage resource (including Properties protected under
the Ontario Heritage Act, RSO 1990, c O.18, Properties included on a list or register of
heritage resources maintained by the Municipality, Properties that are the subject of a
local or provincial plaque, or Properties that are set aside as a national historic site of
Canada under Section 42 of the Canada National Parks Act, SC 2000, c 32).
Ontario Heritage Trust
(2015); Parks Canada
(2015); MTCS (2015);
National Historic Sites
and Monuments Board
of Canada (2015;
Municipality of
Chatham-Kent (2015).
April 2015; July
30, 2015;
August 2015
There are no Provincially Significant ANSIs within 120 m of the Site, as
shown on Figure 1 (Appendix A), (Appendix D2).
April 2015; July
30, 2015;
August 2015
There are no Provincially Significant Wetlands within 120 m of the Site,
as shown on Figure 1 (Appendix A), (Appendix D2).
April 2015;
August 2015
There are no areas designated by these approved Plans within or
abutting the Site, as shown on Figure 1(Appendix A), (Appendix D2).
May 2015
No properties were identified by the Municipality as Registered and/or
Designated within the Study Area, as shown in Figure 1 (Appendix A).
The Site is not located on or abutting a property on which a provincial
plaque is located, set aside as a national historic site of Canada, within
a heritage zone of a municipality or official plan (Appendix D5).
B.3
APPENDIX C:
TEAM QUALIFICATIONS
Kerrie Skillen M.E.S.
Project Manager
Kerrie is a Project Manager with Stantec’s Assessment, Permitting and Compliance team. She has over eight
years of experience in environmental management, managing and leading tasks for large and smallscale
environmental assessments and permitting projects in the renewable energy, industrial, municipal and waste
sectors. Kerrie has extensive experience in permitting and approvals for wind, thermal treatment and waste
projects in Ontario. Kerrie has been involved in REA applications for wind projects for the last three years,
including acting as Project Manager for the Amherst Island Wind Energy Project. Kerrie also led the completion
of an EA Screening and ECA applications (Waste and Air) for the Algonquin Power Energy from Waste facility in
Brampton, Ontario. The project included leading the completion of writing and filing the final EA document
with the Ministry of the Environment, writing and filing an ECA (multimedia) and all consultation activities.
She is experienced in coordinating large multidisciplinary teams; acting as the primary liaison with clients,
regulatory agencies, the public, and Aboriginal communities; and leading complex projects through the
regulatory approvals process. Her key skills include project management; coordination, preparation and review
of key project documents; permitting; and the implementation of stakeholder consultation and Aboriginal
engagement programs.
Kerrie’s experience has assisted her in developing strong working relationships with government agencies such
as the Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Natural Resources.
EDUCATION
Masters in Environmental Studies (Environment and
Resource Studies), University of Waterloo, Waterloo,
Ontario, 2004
B.A. (Hons) in Geography and Business
Administration, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo,
Ontario, 2001
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Assessment, Permitting and Compliance
City of St.Thomas Community Recycling Centre
Environmental Compliance Approval (Waste), St.
Thomas (Senior Environmental Planner)
Led interaction with the MOE in Toronto and London District Office. Communicated project need, timelines and arranged presubmission consultation following MOE requirements.
* denotes projects completed with other firms
Belleville Waste Management Facility
Environmental Compliance Approval (Multi
Media), Belleville, Ontario (Senior Environmental
Planner)
Supported the submission of the ECA Application for the Belleville Waste Management Facility. Provided technical direction on how to prepare the multimedia application to meet MOE requirements. Provided senior and technical review of the ECA application and consultation activities. Acted as the liaison between the project and the MOE prior to submission.
Environmental & ECA (MuliMedia) Service
Expansion, Brampton, Ontario (Project Manager /
Technical Lead)
Project Manager for the project, which included completion of an Environmental Screening report and amendment to the ECA (multimedia) for Algonquin Power’s EFW Facility in Brampton, Ontario. Project included consultation with agencies, public, First Nations and Aboriginal communities. Two public open houses were held as part of the project. The ECA application required extensive consultation with the MOE in regards to the current CofA for Waste and Air and successful completion of the ECA submission package.
Design with community in mind
Project Manager
Landspreading Facility Environmental Compliance
Approval (Waste), Corunna, Ontario (Senior Waste
Discipline Lead)
Discipline lead for preparation of an ECA (Waste) to amend the Certificate of Approval (C of A) (now known as Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA)) for a Waste Disposal Site for NOVA Chemicals’ Landspreading Facility at the NCCL Corunna petrochemical facility. The project included preparation of a draft ECA application, with required supporting documents (ex: Design and Operations report etc) and consultation with the MOE including their technical reviewers. Project design changes resulted in cancellation of the ECA application (Jan 2014).
Renewable Energy
Grand Renewable Energy Park, Haldimand County,
Ontario (Environmental Planner)
Environmental Planner for the preparation of a Renewable Energy Act (REA) application for a 250 MW solar and wind farm project in Haldimand County, Ontario. Tasks included preparation of REA reports including incorporation of technical studies into REA reports.
Port Dover & Nanticoke Wind Project, Haldimand
County, Norfolk County, Ontario (Environmental
Planner)
Environmental Planner for the preparation of a Renewable Energy Approval (REA) for a 104.4 MW wind project in Haldimand and Norfolk Counties, Ontario. Tasks included preparation of REA reports including incorporation of technical studies into REA reports. Capital Power received its Renewable Energy Approval (REA) for the Project on July 17, 2012.
St. Columban Wind Project, Seaforth, Ontario
(Environmental Planner)
Environmental Planner for the preparation of a Renewable Energy Approval (REA) application for a 33MW wind project near Seaforth, Ontario. Tasks included supporting preparation of REA reports, attending Public open houses, and responding to MOE technical questions.
Cedar Point Wind Energy Project, Lambton County,
Ontario (Project Manager)
Project Manager for the completion of the REA Application. Tasks include responding to MOE technical comments, responding to stakeholder questions and comments, preparing permit applications, supporting the Leave to Construct application, and conducting the assessment for project modifications.
Amherst Island Wind Energy Project, Amherst Island,
Ontario (Project Manager)
Kerrie is currently the Project Manager for the project, which has included preparation and submittal of a Renewable Energy Approval application for a proposed 75 MW wind farm on Amherst Island, Ontario. Tasks include client and project management, coordinating a multidisciplinary team, meeting with agencies, primary author of REA reports including Consultation Report, completion of an extensive consultation program, and permitting. The project is currently under MOE Technical Review. Some unique features of the proposed project include a submarine cable line, potential siting of infrastructure on public and private land, and completing an underwater archaeological assessment.
Environmental Assessment
Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference
Additional Solid Waste Disposal Capacity, County
of Brant, Ontario (Consultation Lead)
Leading the consultation efforts for the EA Terms of Reference which includes development of the project contact list, notifications to agencies and stakeholders, coordinating Public Information Centers, and reviewing and responding to stakeholder comments.
Project Manager
Cambridge Energy Centre Environmental
Assessment, Cambridge, Ontario (Environmental
Assessment Coordinator)
Kerrie was the Environmental Assessment Coordinator and Project Management Assistant for completing an Environmental Screening and Review for the development, construction, and commissioning of a simple cycle, natural gasfired peaking electricity generation plant in Cambridge, Ontario. The project followed the Ministry of the Environment’s Environmental Screening and Review Process for electricity projects under the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act, Electricity Projects Regulation 116/01. Kerrie coordinated all aspects of the ESR, wrote the ESR report incorporating all necessary technical studies, and oversaw the completion of the Record of Consultation.
Durham York Residual Waste Study, Durham
Region, York Region, Ontario (Environmental
Assessment Planner)
Kerrie was actively involved in the completion of an Individual EA for the selection of the “preferred” post
diversion waste residuals processing system as well as a site for the required facility. Kerrie coordinated study teams and document development within Stantec.
Waste Management
Collection Operations Review, Oshawa, Ontario
(Project Coordinator)
Kerrie was the Project Coordinator for the evaluation of collection operations for the City of Oshawa. The project includes a fourweek time and motion study, observing the collection of organics and garbage along low, medium and high density routes. The project will compare collection productivity to industry standards and make recommendations for process, equipment and worker efficiencies.
Effectiveness and Efficiency Fund Project Summary,
Toronto, Ontario
Completing a report summarizing the City of Toronto’s “Next Generation” Blue Box collection container pilot study, which was to primarily test a cartbased system for recyclables.
Alternative Fuels Demonstration Project,
Bowmanville, Ontario
Project support for two demonstration projects which will test the use of alternative fuels to supply energy for the cement manufacturing process. The proposed alternate fuels are residual materials generated by an existing composting facility and recycled paper mill.
GreenCart Program Implementation, Halton
Region, Ontario (Project Coordinator)
Project Coordinator for the Region wide rollout of a source separated organics program for single family residential units. Duties included project task coordination, assisting communications between the Region and contractors, overseeing GreenCart deliveries and supervising doortodoor canvassing of approximately 130 000 households.
Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference, Shell
Canada Products, Sarnia, Ontario
Kerrie assisted in the preparation of the Terms of Reference for the EA Study for a proposed new refinery. Specific duties included completion of background documents regarding relevant environmental regulations and approvals, a record of public consultation events, and incorporating feedback from key stakeholders into the Terms of Reference. The Approved Terms of Reference provided a framework for the preparation of the Environmental Assessment.
Environmental Assessment Study, Sarnia, Ontario
Kerrie assisted with the coordination and management of the Draft Environmental Assessment for Shell Canada Products Proposed Refinery Project. Kerrie was specifically involved in the evaluation of the Project and writing the EA submission within regulated timelines.
City of Toronto Recycling Container Pilot Study,
Toronto, Ontario (Field Supervisor and Project
Coordinator)
Field supervisor and project coordinator for the completion of a recycling container pilot study to assess the advantages and disadvantages of four different curbside recycling container systems including, biweekly blue box, weekly blue box, bi
weekly blue bag, and biweekly blue cart collection. The study reviewed the set out data of over 2400 households, 16 times throughout the course of the project. The City of Toronto will use the data to plan improvements for its existing single family residential curbside recycling program.
Project Manager
City of Toronto Residual Waste Study, Toronto,
Ontario
Kerrie assisted in the preparation of the Terms of Reference for an EA Study to determine the preferred means of managing the city’s postdiversion residual waste.
NiagaraHamilton Joint Environmental Assessment
Disposal Study (“WastePlan”), Ontario
Kerrie was actively involved in the completion of an EA for the development and identification of a preferred longterm disposal alternative for wastes remaining after diversion in Niagara Region and City of Hamilton. The study analyzed a variety of “Alternatives To” including mechanical biological treatment, landfill and thermal processes and has made a draft recommendation for Thermal Treatment, with Recovery of Energy followed by Material Recovery from Ash/ Char.
Norfolk County Solid Waste Management Master
Plan Review, Norfolk County, Ontario
Kerrie was involved in the preparation of a Solid Waste Management Master Plan (SWMMP) for Norfolk County. The SWMMP will identify a preferred longterm solid waste management system to manage wastes generated over a 25
year planning horizon. The primary tasks being completed include a review of waste diversion and disposal alternatives, both collections and processing, a review of current policies, and partnership arrangements, and the development of a waste management steering committee to guide the review process.
Project Manager
PUBLICATIONS
Presentation. Implementing Cart Base Collection
Systems.. Canadian Waste and Recycling Expo,
2008.
Presentation. City of Toronto Single Family Cart
Program: Pilot Studies & City Wide Roll Out.. Ontario
Recycler Workshop, 2008.
Andrea Terella B.A. (Hons)
Andrea began working at Stantec in 2010 as a member of the Transportation group, in 2012 she transferred to
the Environmental Services Assessment, Permitting and Compliance team. As a Junior Environmental Planner,
Andrea has working knowledge of Ontario’s Environmental Assessment Act, and the Renewable Energy Act.
Andrea has worked on several projects assisting, including linear facilities, with permitting, planning and
consultation. More recently, Andrea has undertaken the coordination and management of the StakeTracker
program on a variety of projects across Canada. She has experience in managing StakeTracker entries in
order to organize stakeholder consultation records of communication, as well as identify concerns and the
linkage to mitigations proposed.
Andrea's project experience also includes working on Class EA’s for transportation projects, including co
ordination of stakeholder consultation; managing agency and public correspondence; participating public
consultation events; providing support in the review and evaluation of design alternatives; and working with the
project team to produce final project documentation (Transportation Environmental Screening Reports,
Environmental Screening Documents, and Design & Construction Reports).
Andrea is currently working towards obtaining a Certificate of Environmental Practice, specializing in
Environmental Restoration, Mitigation and Remediation, through Royal Roads University.
EDUCATION
Certificate, Mohawk College of Applied Arts,
Hamilton, Ontario, 2009
B.A. (Hons), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario,
2009
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Oil & Gas
Energy East Pipelines, Ontario (Junior Environmental
Planner)
Andrea is responsible for managing StakeTracker entries which assisted in the organization of records of correspondence for the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) and First Nations communities within Ontario, in order to ensure consistency with TransCanada protocols and meet regulatory requirements from the National Energy Board (NEB).
Prince Rupert Gas Transmission Project, British
Columbia (Junior Environmental Planner)
Andrea is responsible for managing StakeTracker entries for First Nations communities’ correspondence within Ontario, in order to ensure consistency with TransCanada protocols and meet regulatory requirements from the National Energy Board (NEB). Andrea completed detailed desktop research on past First Nation assertions and work on drafting Community Profiles and Summaries.
Enbridge Integrity Dig Program, Ontario (Junior
Environmental Planner)
Andrea performed analysis of aerial imagery, site mapping, water well records, species at risk records and soils data to complete Environmental Clearance Memos for various mile posts along the pipeline. Andrea helped with the permitting process for watercourse crossings in consultation with the local conservation authority. She also helped with pre
screening for environmental clearances, Permit to Take Water and Conservation Authority Permitting.
Power
David Brown Solar Park, Ontario (Junior
Andrea helped with drafting the Renewable Energy Approval (REA) reports, including incorporating edits from the project manager and client. She assisted in drafting letters to Aboriginal communities and other stakeholders, and drafting the Consultation Report. She assisted with editing, formatting, printing and distributing of the final REA reports to the Ministry of Environment. Andrea also worked with the Raisin Region Conservation Authority and the Ministry of Transportation (MTO), to assist with the permitting process for construction work.
St.Columban Wind Project, Ontario (Junior
Cedar Point Wind Project, Ontario (Junior
Andrea help to organize mail outs for project notifications and advertising in local newspapers for various project milestones.
Andrea helped to develop consultation materials, including display boards, contact lists, questionnaires for the public, as well as drafting letters for notification of public meetings to project stakeholders. Andrea assisted with liaison with client in order to fulfill client requests.
Whittington Wind Project, Ontario (Junior
Andrea helped to organize mail outs for project notifications and advertising in local newspapers for project milestones.
White Pines Wind Project, Ontario (Junior
Napier Wind Project, Ontario (Junior Environmental
Planner)
Andrea participated in the public meeting by helping the project team set up and organize the event. She also assisted with editing, formatting, printing, quality control and distributing of the final Renewable Energy Approval (REA) reports to the Ministry of Environment (MOE).
Andrea helped to organize contact lists for mail outs of the project notifications. She assisted in drafting letters to Aboriginal communities and other stakeholders, and drafting the Consultation Report. She participated in public meetings by helping the project team set up and organize the events. She assisted with editing, formatting, printing and distributing of the final REA reports to the Ministry of Environment.
Amherst Island Wind Project, Ontario (Junior
Andrea helped to organize contact lists for mail outs of the project notifications. She assisted with pulling together the consultation materials for the public meeting and made edits to the materials as directed by project managers and the client. After the public meeting, she summarized the correspondence received from the meeting and worked with project managers on responses. She assisted in drafting letters to Aboriginal communities and other stakeholders, and drafting the Consultation Report. She assisted with editing, formatting, printing and submission of the final Renewable Energy Approvals (REA) to the Ministry of Environment (MOE).
Grand Valley Phase III Wind Project, Ontario (Junior
Andrea helped to organize contact lists for mail outs of the project notifications. She assisted with pulling together the consultation materials for the public meeting and made edits to the materials as directed by project managers and the client. She assisted in drafting letters to Aboriginal communities and other stakeholders, and drafting the Consultation Report. She assisted with editing, formatting, printing and submission of the final Renewable Energy Approvals (REA) to the Ministry of Environment (MOE).
Bridges
Rehabilitation/Replacement of Six Structures,
Highway 7 & Highway 35, East Region, Ontario
(Assistant Environmental Planner)
Andrea helped to develop and organize contact lists for mail outs for project notification to the public and stakeholders. She drafted the consultation materials for the public information center and made edits to the materials as directed by project managers and MTO. After the Public Information Centre (PIC), she summarized the correspondence received from the meeting, drafted a PIC Report and worked with project managers on responses. She provided assistance to complete the ESD required by the MTO for a Class EA Group C project.
Replace Westminster Drive Underpass, Highway
401, West Region (Assistant Environmental Planner)
Andrea helped with the notification to the public and stakeholders. She drafted the consultation materials for the public information centers and made edits to the materials as directed by project managers and MTO. After the Public Information Centre (PIC), she summarized the correspondence received from the meeting and worked with project managers on responses. She provided assistance to complete the Transportation Environmental Screening Report required by the MTO for a Class EA Group B project.
Mining
Premier Gold Mines, Ontario (Junior Environmental
Planner)
Andrea was responsible for the coordination and tracking of water sampling data and field programs. She also worked with project managers to revise and update the project schedule as needed.
Highway and Transportation
Route Planning Study, Highway 11/17, Northwestern
Region, Ontario (Assistant Environmental Planner)
Andrea helped with the notification of the public and stakeholders. She participated in completing a survey at Kakabeka Falls Provincial Park to aid in the determination of route alternatives. She drafted the consultation materials for three series of the public information centers and made edits to the materials as directed by project managers and MTO. Andrea participated in the public meeting by helping the project team set up and organize the event. After the Public Information Centres (PICs), she summarized the correspondence received from the meetings, drafted a PIC Report and worked with project managers on responses. She provided assistance to complete the Transportation Environmental Screening Report (TESR) required by the MTO for a Class EA Group A project.
Daniel (Dan) L. Harvey BES (Hons.), CEAM
GIS Specialist
Dan Harvey completed his education at Lakehead University where he received an Honors Bachelor in
Environmental Studies and Geography (BES (Hons.)), as well as a Certificate in Environmental Assessment and
Management (CEAM). Dan has since worked as a GIS professional for various government and private clients
including the Canadian Forest Service, and Wilderness Vegetation Management.
Dan has considerable experience in applying GIS to Environmental Assessment projects across a wide variety of
development areas, including the Ontario Renewable Energy Approval Process, Proposed Aggregate Sites,
Mining, Petroleum Pipelines and Infrastructure, Electrical Transmission Lines, and Highway Development.
Dan is proficient in various geomatics and graphics programs, including: ESRI ArcGIS 10.1, ESRI Arc GIS online,
PCI Geomatica, CorelDRAW 11, Adobe Photoshop CS4, AutoCAD, Spay Advisor DSS system, a variety of
Automated Guidance and Flow control systems for spray applications and he also has experience in use of
GPS devices.
Dan also has experience in Integrated Pest Management, and he has the following exterminator’s licenses in
Ontario and Manitoba: Landscape, Greenhouse, Aerial, Industrial and Forestry.
EDUCATION
BES (Hons.), Lakehead University / Honors Bachelor
in Environmental Studies and Geography, Thunder
Bay, Ontario, 2007
CEAM, Lakehead University / Certificate in
Environmental Assessment and Management,
Thunder Bay, Ontario, 2007
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Cement / Aggregates
Broomburg PitRegion of Waterloo LIO Swoop 2
Woodland Comparison (GIS Project Lead)
Performed an analysis of all LIO woodlands in the Region of Waterloo and compared them with SWOOP 2 2010 orthographic imagery; new areas were added and removed when required. This exercise was undertaken to develop a more accurate estimate of percent of woodland coverage for the Region of Waterloo
Oil and Gas Pipelines
Genesis Pipeline Extension Project, Sarnia, Ontario
(GIS Project Lead)
Assisted in mapping the proposed gas pipeline. Established several alternative pipeline routes and scenarios. Created mapbooks illustrating environmental constraints along each of the potential routes, including aquatic, natural environment, and geophysical constraints. Performed various spatial analyses on the various routes to quantify the potential effect of each route on the existing natural and socioeconomic environments in order to assist with the route selection process
Enbridge Wall to Wall Survey (GIS Project Lead)
Performed a "heads up" digitizing exercise for all of Enbridge’s customers in the GTA to determine if pavement covered the entire space between buildings over the existing delivery pipeline at residential and commercial client addresses, thereby creating an impermeable surface. This was done to assist Enbridge with maintenance schedule updates and emergency response planning
Proposed Acton Quarry Extension, Dufferin
Aggregates, Acton, Ontario (GIS Project Lead)
From 2008 onward, was responsible for mapping and analysis of environmental setbacks and impacts of the proposed aggregate licence extension area, under the Aggregate Resources Act. Prepared maps of the proposed extension area for review by government agencies, and the joint agency review team
Daniel (Dan) L. Harvey BES (Hons.), CEAM
GIS Specialist
Renewable Energy
Grand Valley Phase 3 Wind Power Project (GIS
Project Lead)
Completed Preliminary Site Design as well as a detailed anthropogenic and environmental constraints analysis using publicly available base data as well as field verified data. Supervised and coordinated GIS work on all aspects of the project, including the Natural Heritage Assessment, Cultural Heritage Assessment, Socio Economic Assessment, and Water Assessment
Adelaide Wind Project (GIS Project Lead)
Completed preliminary site design and planning, and was responsible for site plan versioning and distribution to the client, subconsultant, and various internal clients. Facilitated various GIS mapping and analytical deliverables required for the Renewable Energy Application. Provided field technicians with GIS support and worked closely with the client to develop site plan. Completed all GIS deliverables associated with the Natural Heritage Assessment including extensive ELC mapping, wetland and wildlife habitat dataset and all associated spatial analyses
White Pine Wind Farm (GIS Project Lead)
Created a spatial geodatabase to assist with the development and approval of a 29 turbine wind farm. Supervised and coordinated GIS work on all aspects of the project, including the Natural Heritage Assessment, Cultural Heritage Assessment, SocioEconomic Assessment, and Water Assessment. The project included a complex Natural Heritage Assessment involving the creation of an extensive ELC database covering (3300 ha), using "heads up" digitizing techniques, which was then implemented to classify wildlife habitat for a variety of endangered and threatened species in order to assess the potential effect of the project
Cedar Point Wind Energy Project, Lambton County,
Ontario (GIS Project Lead)
Completed preliminary site design and planning, and was responsible for site plan versioning and distribution to the client, subconsultant, and various internal clients. Facilitated various GIS mapping and analytical deliverables required for the Renewable Energy Application. Provided field technicians with GIS support and worked closely with the client to develop the site plan
Mining
Capre/Victor Baseline Aquatic Assessment, Vale
Canada Limited, Sudbury, Ontario (GIS Project
Lead)
Provided GIS support for the Aquatic Assessment including tasks such as bathymetry mapping and aquatic sampling mapping
Hardrock Environmental Baseline, Premier Gold
Mines Limited, Geraldton, Ontario (GIS Project
Lead)
Provided GIS support to a wide variety of disciplines involved in the Environmental Baseline study including; Hydrogeology, Aquatic Biology, Surface Water, Archeology, Terrestrial Biology and Assessment and Compliance
Environmental Assessment
Hardrock Environmental Assessment, Geraldton,
Ontario (GIS Project Lead)
Coordinated and lead all GIS work for the coordinated Federal and Provincial EA process. This included GIS based metrics, analysis and map creation in support of all Stantec discipline involved in the EA process including; Archeology, Cultural Heritage, Aquatic Biology, Terrestrial Biology, Hydrology, Geo Chemistry, Land Use Planning, Hydrogeology, Acoustics, Air Quality and Traditional Land Use.
APPENDIX D:
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
AND RESOURCES
APPENDIX D1:
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR
3.2.6(B)(I)(1) – MTCS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE
CONFIRMATION
Terella, Andrea
Subject:
Attachments:
FW: Request for information of archaeological resources within 250m of 4 proposed
wind energy projects under LRP RFP
P007-059_P007-307-2011_St12_Weiss Lands_RC_6Jun2011.pdf; DateReadme-gn-na.txt;
Updated Disclaimer for all register reports.doc
From: Archaeological Sites (MTCS) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 12:08 PM
To: Figura, Arthur
Subject: RE: Request for information of archaeological resources within 250m of 4 proposed wind energy projects
under LRP RFP
Arthur,
No reported sites are showing up within 1 km of this one, however, the following report appears to document work
within 50 m so I thought I’d send it along.
Regards,
Rob
From: Figura, Arthur [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: April-13-15 11:17 AM
To: Archaeological Sites (MTCS)
Cc: Skillen, Kerrie; Muir, Jeff
Subject: FW: Request for information of archaeological resources within 250m of 4 proposed wind energy projects
under LRP RFP
Importance: High
Good morning Rob,
I just received a confirmation that the project study area for Meadowvale location has been revised (reduced
in size, but include new parcels in the southeast corner – revised map attached).
Can you please include the attached revised Meadowvale project location in the analysis of the
archaeological resources within 250m.
Thank you kindly.
Regards,
Arthur
Arthur Figura, MA
Project Archaeologist
Archaeobotanist
Stantec
600 - 171 Queens Avenue London ON N6A 5J7
Phone: 519-675-6641
Cell: 226-927-1026
Fax: 519-645-6575
[email protected]
The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied, modified, retransmitted, or used for any purpose except with
Stantec's written authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies and notify us immediately.
1
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
From: Figura, Arthur
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 2:14 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Request for information of archaeological resources within 250m of 4 proposed wind energy projects under
LRP RFP
To Whom it May Concern,
Pursuant to the requirements of the current LRP|RFP submission process, please see the attached figures for
four proposed wind energy projects in the province of Ontario which are being proposed under the LRP 1
RFP. For each site, please provide preliminary information regarding whether there are any archaeological
resources within 250 metres of the project site (delineated in blue).
For your records, the proponent contact information is as follows:
Jason Parise
SWEB Development LP
Dartmouth, NS
B3B 1R6
Please contact me if you need more information.
Sincerely,
Arthur Figura
Arthur Figura, MA
Archaeobotanist
Stantec
Phone: 519-675-6641
Cell: 226-927-1026
Fax: 519-645-6575
[email protected]
2
Skillen, Kerrie
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Figura, Arthur
Thursday, April 23, 2015 12:37 PM
Skillen, Kerrie
Muir, Jeff
FW: Request for information of archaeological resources within 250m of 4 proposed
wind energy projects under LRP RFP
P007-059_P007-307-2011_St12_Weiss Lands_RC_6Jun2011.pdf; DateReadme-gn-na.txt;
Updated Disclaimer for all register reports.doc
Hi Kerrie,
See Rob’s email below. No archaeological resources were identified within the attached ARA’s assessment of
the Highway 40 Improvements.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Regards,
Arthur
Arthur Figura, MA
Archaeobotanist
Stantec
Phone: 519-675-6641
Cell: 226-927-1026
Fax: 519-645-6575
[email protected]
 Please consider the environment before printing this email.
From: Archaeological Sites (MTCS) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 12:08 PM
To: Figura, Arthur
Subject: RE: Request for information of archaeological resources within 250m of 4 proposed wind energy projects under
LRP RFP
Arthur,
No reported sites are showing up within 1 km of this one, however, the following report appears to document work within 50 m so I thought I’d send it along. Regards,
Rob
From: Figura, Arthur [mailto:[email protected]]
To: Archaeological Sites (MTCS)
1
Subject: FW: Request for information of archaeological resources within 250m of 4 proposed wind energy projects under
LRP RFP
Importance: High
Good morning Rob,
I just received a confirmation that the project study area for Meadowvale location has been revised (reduced
in size, but include new parcels in the southeast corner – revised map attached).
Can you please include the attached revised Meadowvale project location in the analysis of the
archaeological resources within 250m.
Thank you kindly.
Regards,
Arthur
Arthur Figura, MA
Archaeobotanist
Stantec
Phone: 519-675-6641
Cell: 226-927-1026
Fax: 519-645-6575
[email protected]
From: Figura, Arthur
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 2:14 PM
Subject: Request for information of archaeological resources within 250m of 4 proposed wind energy projects under LRP
RFP
To Whom it May Concern,
Pursuant to the requirements of the current LRP|RFP submission process, please see the attached figures for
four proposed wind energy projects in the province of Ontario which are being proposed under the LRP 1
RFP. For each site, please provide preliminary information regarding whether there are any archaeological
resources within 250 metres of the project site (delineated in blue).
For your records, the proponent contact information is as follows:
Jason Parise
SWEB Development LP
Dartmouth, NS
B3B 1R6
Please contact me if you need more information.
Sincerely,
Arthur Figura
Arthur Figura, MA
2
Archaeobotanist
Stantec
Phone: 519-675-6641
Cell: 226-927-1026
Fax: 519-645-6575
[email protected]
3
APPENDIX D2:
3.2.6(B)(I)(9) – NATIONAL PARKS,
PROVINCIAL PARKS, AND CONSERVATION
RESERVES (15)(III) – WETLANDS, (15) (II) ANSIS, AND (15) (IV) – APPROVED PLANS
Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry
Make-a-Map: Natural Heritage Areas
ANSIs, Reserves, Wetlands,
Management Areas
Notes: Enter map notes
Legend
5.4
0
2.70
5.4 Kilometers
This map should not be relied on as a precise indicator of routes or locations, nor as a guide
to navigation. The Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry(OMNRF) shall not be
liable in any way for the use of, or reliance upon, this map or any information on this map.
© Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2014
Scale: 1 : 106,393
Imagery Copyright Notices: DRAPE © Aéro-Photo (1961) Inc., 2008 - 2009
GTA 2005 / SWOOP 2006 / Simcoe-Muskoka-Dufferin © FirstBase Solutions, 2005 / 2006 / 2008
© Copyright for Ontario Parcel data is held by Queen’s Printer for Ontario and its licensors [2013]
and may not be reproduced without permission. THIS IS NOT A PLAN OF SURVEY.
APPENDIX D3:
3.2.6(B)(I)(13) – OPERATIONAL AND
APPROVED WIND PROJECTS
Terella, Andrea
From: Guido, Sandra (MOECC) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: April-23-15 1:06 PM
To: Harvey, Daniel
Cc: Santos, Narren (MOECC); Romic, Zeljko (MOECC)
Subject: FW: Request For Existing and Approved Wind Turbines- LRP
Hi Dan,
You have requested a list of adjacent wind farms to the following proposed LRP wind project:
Scotian Wind’s Meadowvale Wind Farm
Please find below a summary of the closest wind farms (within a 10km radius) to the nearest turbines and
distances based on the UTM coordinates provided by you and categorized by the proposed LRP wind project.
Legend
Projects in black are approved/existing adjacent wind projects.
Projects in Red and/or italics are LRP proposed wind projects from Stantec’s list
Meadowvale
East Lake St. Clair Wind Farm
Marsh Line Wind Farm
We recommend visiting MOECC’s website entitled “Access Environment” using the following link:
http://www.accessenvironment.ene.gov.on.ca/AEWeb/ae/GoSearch.action?search=basic
Here you can search for all MOECC issued approvals which will contain the UTM coordinates of approved wind
turbines.
It is also recommended to contact proponents of other wind turbine projects directly to obtain the most up-to-date
information of turbine coordinates. Direct consultation with the proponents of the other wind turbine projects is the
recommended course of action in order to meet the requirements of combined noise effects.
Please note the information above is only an estimate and based on projects that have been issued approvals and/or
draft site plans to date and based the proposed LRP projects provided by Stantec. It is recommended that
proponents/consultants check back with the MOECC closer to the date before issuing their draft site plan to ensure a
more accurate list of wind farms that would need to be considered. Also please note that for the much older projects
(2009 and earlier), some project names may have changed if/when they were acquired by other companies
(unfortunately this wouldn’t be reflected in the list above).
I trust this information is helpful. If you have any questions, please contact me.
1
Thank you,
Sandra
Sandra Guido
Senior Program Support Coordinator
Environmental Approvals Access and Service Integration Branch
Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change
2 St. Clair Avenue West, Floor 12A
Toronto ON M4V 1L5
Tel: 416-314-8350 Fax: 416-314-8452
From: Harvey, Daniel [mailto:[email protected]]
To: Guido, Sandra (MOECC)
Subject: Request For Existing and Approved Wind Turbines- LRP
Hi Sandra
Stantec has been retained to work on a number of Large Renewable Procurement (LRP) projects. Part of the
Site Considerations requirements is to identify all constructed wind turbines and approved but unconstructed
wind project boundaries within 5km of the proposed site boundary of the LRP projects. My colleague Sarah
Allen has be in touch with Maryanna Lewyckyj at REFO and she indicated that you would be a good point of
contact at the MOECC to provide the information we need. I have attached a spreadsheet with coordinates
for the study areas of 8 LRP projects and I am hoping that MOECC would be able to provide the locations all
constructed wind turbines and approved but unconstructed wind project boundaries within 5km of these
projects.
Please advise if you are able to provide this information and what kind of turnaround time you need.
Thank-you very much for your time and assistance with this.
Dan Harvey
GIS Specialist
Stantec
70 Southgate Drive, Suite 1 Guelph ON N1G 4P5
Phone: (519) 836-6966 x211
Cell: (416) 605-6483
Fax: (519) 836-2493
[email protected]
2
Turbines within 5 km of the Project Site
Turbine_ID
Project_Name
LRP Project
T151
T138
T150
T145
T149
T103
T148
T156
T144
T147
T146
T142
T136
T130
T134
T119
T143
T120
T129
Meadowvale
Meadowvale
Meadowvale
Meadowvale
Meadowvale
Meadowvale
Meadowvale
Meadowvale
Meadowvale
Meadowvale
Meadowvale
Meadowvale
Meadowvale
Meadowvale
Meadowvale
Meadowvale
Meadowvale
Meadowvale
Meadowvale
Easting
390084
390544
389477
387204
389176
386830
388983
386636
386212
388253
388068
384664
385091
383748
384836
383748
386334
386134
385924
Northing
4705558
4705948
4706241
4708639
4709116
4709220
4709347
4709446
4709998
4710171
4710381
4710807
4711213
4711591
4711900
4711936
4712343
4712622
4712859
APPENDIX D4:
3.2.6(B)(I)(15) (I) – ENDANGERED OR
THREATENED SPECIES
MNR Status Rank
COMMON NAME
17LH8613
American Gromwell
American Lotus
Buttonbush Dodder
Crowned Beggarticks
Deer-tongue Panicgrass
Dense Blazing Star
Elusive Clubtail
Hairy Hawkweed
Honey-locust
Muskingum Sedge
Northern Bobwhite
Northern Fogfruit
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Tall Nutrush
17LH8614
American Gromwell
American Lotus
Buttonbush Dodder
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Elusive Clubtail
Hairy Hawkweed
Honey-locust
Muskingum Sedge
Northern Bobwhite
Northern Fogfruit
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Tall Nutrush
Tall Tickseed
17LH8712
American Gromwell
American Lotus
Buttonbush Dodder
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Hairy Hawkweed
Honey-locust
STATUS/RANK
(Y-Yes)
UNIDENTIFIED END
EXP
NAR
SC
THR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
COSEWIC Status Rank (Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada)
STATUS/RANK
(Y-Yes)
COMMON NAME
UNIDENTIFIED END
END, SC EXP
NAR
17LH8613
American Gromwell
Y
American Lotus
Y
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Elusive Clubtail
Y
Hairy Hawkweed
Y
Honey-locust
Y
Muskingum Sedge
Y
Northern Bobwhite
Y
Northern Fogfruit
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
Tall Nutrush
Y
17LH8614
American Gromwell
Y
American Lotus
Y
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Elusive Clubtail
Y
Hairy Hawkweed
Y
Honey-locust
Y
Muskingum Sedge
Y
Northern Bobwhite
Y
Northern Fogfruit
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
Tall Nutrush
Y
Tall Tickseed
Y
17LH8712
American Gromwell
Y
American Lotus
Y
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Hairy Hawkweed
Y
Honey-locust
Y
1
SC
THR
Y
Y
Y
MNR Status Rank
COMMON NAME
Northern Bobwhite
Northern Fogfruit
Painted Skimmer
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Tall Nutrush
17LH8713
American Gromwell
American Lotus
Buttonbush Dodder
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Hairy Hawkweed
Honey-locust
Northern Bobwhite
Northern Fogfruit
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Tall Nutrush
17LH8714
American Gromwell
American Lotus
Buttonbush Dodder
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Hairy Hawkweed
Honey-locust
Northern Bobwhite
Northern Fogfruit
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Tall Nutrush
17LH8715
American Gromwell
American Lotus
Brindled Madtom
Buttonbush Dodder
Crowned Beggarticks
STATUS/RANK
(Y-Yes)
UNIDENTIFIED END
EXP
NAR
SC
THR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
STATUS/RANK
(Y-Yes)
COMMON NAME
UNIDENTIFIED END
END, SC EXP
NAR
Northern Bobwhite
Y
Northern Fogfruit
Y
Painted Skimmer
Y
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
Tall Nutrush
Y
17LH8713
American Gromwell
Y
American Lotus
Y
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Hairy Hawkweed
Y
Honey-locust
Y
Northern Bobwhite
Y
Northern Fogfruit
Y
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
Tall Nutrush
Y
17LH8714
American Gromwell
Y
American Lotus
Y
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Hairy Hawkweed
Y
Honey-locust
Y
Northern Bobwhite
Y
Northern Fogfruit
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
Tall Nutrush
Y
17LH8715
American Gromwell
Y
American Lotus
Y
Brindled Madtom
Y
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
2
SC
THR
Y
Y
MNR Status Rank
COMMON NAME
Dense Blazing Star
Hairy Hawkweed
Northern Bobwhite
Northern Fogfruit
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Spotted Gar
Spotted Sucker
Spreading Chervil
17LH8811
American Gromwell
Buttonbush Dodder
Canvasback
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Hairy Hawkweed
Honey-locust
Northern Fogfruit
Painted Skimmer
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH8812
American Gromwell
Buttonbush Dodder
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Hairy Hawkweed
Honey-locust
Northern Bobwhite
Northern Fogfruit
Painted Skimmer
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH8813
American Gromwell
Buttonbush Dodder
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
STATUS/RANK
(Y-Yes)
UNIDENTIFIED END
EXP
NAR
SC
THR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
STATUS/RANK
(Y-Yes)
COMMON NAME
UNIDENTIFIED END
END, SC EXP
NAR
Dense Blazing Star
Hairy Hawkweed
Y
Northern Bobwhite
Y
Northern Fogfruit
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
Spotted Gar
Spotted Sucker
Spreading Chervil
Y
17LH8811
American Gromwell
Y
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Canvasback
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Hairy Hawkweed
Y
Honey-locust
Y
Northern Fogfruit
Y
Painted Skimmer
Y
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH8812
American Gromwell
Y
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Hairy Hawkweed
Y
Honey-locust
Y
Northern Bobwhite
Y
Northern Fogfruit
Y
Painted Skimmer
Y
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH8813
American Gromwell
Y
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
3
SC
THR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
MNR Status Rank
COMMON NAME
Hairy Hawkweed
Honey-locust
Northern Bobwhite
Northern Fogfruit
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH8814
American Gromwell
Buttonbush Dodder
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Northern Bobwhite
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH8815
American Gromwell
American Lotus
Brindled Madtom
Buttonbush Dodder
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Northern Bobwhite
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Spotted Gar
Spotted Sucker
Spreading Chervil
17LH8910
American Gromwell
Buttonbush Dodder
Canvasback
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Ghost Shiner
Honey-locust
Painted Skimmer
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
STATUS/RANK
(Y-Yes)
UNIDENTIFIED END
Y
Y
EXP
NAR
SC
THR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
STATUS/RANK
(Y-Yes)
COMMON NAME
UNIDENTIFIED END
END, SC EXP
NAR
Hairy Hawkweed
Y
Honey-locust
Y
Northern Bobwhite
Y
Northern Fogfruit
Y
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH8814
American Gromwell
Y
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Y
Northern Bobwhite
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH8815
American Gromwell
Y
American Lotus
Y
Brindled Madtom
Y
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Northern Bobwhite
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
Spotted Gar
Spotted Sucker
Spreading Chervil
Y
17LH8910
American Gromwell
Y
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Canvasback
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Ghost Shiner
Y
Honey-locust
Y
Painted Skimmer
Y
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
4
SC
THR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
MNR Status Rank
COMMON NAME
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH8911
American Gromwell
Buttonbush Dodder
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Painted Skimmer
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH8912
American Gromwell
Bobolink
Buttonbush Dodder
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH8913
American Gromwell
Buttonbush Dodder
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Northern Bobwhite
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH8914
American Gromwell
Buttonbush Dodder
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Northern Bobwhite
Prairie Milkweed
STATUS/RANK
(Y-Yes)
UNIDENTIFIED END
Y
Y
EXP
NAR
SC
THR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
STATUS/RANK
(Y-Yes)
COMMON NAME
UNIDENTIFIED END
END, SC EXP
NAR
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH8911
American Gromwell
Y
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Y
Painted Skimmer
Y
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH8912
American Gromwell
Y
Bobolink
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Y
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH8913
American Gromwell
Y
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Y
Northern Bobwhite
Y
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH8914
American Gromwell
Y
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Y
Northern Bobwhite
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
5
SC
THR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
MNR Status Rank
COMMON NAME
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH8915
American Gromwell
Brindled Madtom
Buttonbush Dodder
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Northern Bobwhite
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Spotted Gar
Spotted Sucker
Spreading Chervil
17LH9009
American Gromwell
Canvasback
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Painted Skimmer
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Swamp Rose-mallow
17LH9010
American Gromwell
Canvasback
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Ghost Shiner
Honey-locust
Painted Skimmer
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH9011
American Gromwell
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
STATUS/RANK
(Y-Yes)
UNIDENTIFIED END
Y
Y
EXP
NAR
SC
THR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
STATUS/RANK
(Y-Yes)
COMMON NAME
UNIDENTIFIED END
END, SC EXP
NAR
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH8915
American Gromwell
Y
Brindled Madtom
Y
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Northern Bobwhite
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
Spotted Gar
Spotted Sucker
Spreading Chervil
Y
17LH9009
American Gromwell
Y
Canvasback
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Y
Painted Skimmer
Y
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
Swamp Rose-mallow
17LH9010
American Gromwell
Y
Canvasback
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Ghost Shiner
Y
Honey-locust
Y
Painted Skimmer
Y
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH9011
American Gromwell
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
6
SC
THR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
MNR Status Rank
COMMON NAME
Honey-locust
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH9012
American Gromwell
Buttonbush Dodder
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH9013
American Gromwell
Buttonbush Dodder
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH9014
American Gromwell
Buttonbush Dodder
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Northern Bobwhite
Prairie Milkweed
Pronghorn Clubtail
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH9015
American Gromwell
Buttonbush Dodder
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Northern Bobwhite
Prairie Milkweed
17LH9109
American Gromwell
STATUS/RANK
(Y-Yes)
UNIDENTIFIED END
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
EXP
NAR
SC
THR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
STATUS/RANK
(Y-Yes)
COMMON NAME
UNIDENTIFIED END
END, SC EXP
NAR
Honey-locust
Y
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH9012
American Gromwell
Y
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Y
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH9013
American Gromwell
Y
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Y
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH9014
American Gromwell
Y
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Northern Bobwhite
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
Pronghorn Clubtail
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH9015
American Gromwell
Y
Buttonbush Dodder
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Northern Bobwhite
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
17LH9109
American Gromwell
Y
7
SC
THR
Y
Y
Y
Y
MNR Status Rank
COMMON NAME
Canvasback
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Painted Skimmer
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Swamp Rose-mallow
17LH9110
American Gromwell
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Ghost Shiner
Honey-locust
Painted Skimmer
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH9111
American Gromwell
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH9112
American Gromwell
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH9113
American Gromwell
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Prairie Milkweed
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH9114
American Gromwell
STATUS/RANK
(Y-Yes)
UNIDENTIFIED END
Y
Y
EXP
NAR
SC
THR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
STATUS/RANK
(Y-Yes)
COMMON NAME
UNIDENTIFIED END
END, SC EXP
NAR
Canvasback
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Y
Painted Skimmer
Y
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
Swamp Rose-mallow
17LH9110
American Gromwell
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Ghost Shiner
Y
Honey-locust
Y
Painted Skimmer
Y
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH9111
American Gromwell
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Y
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH9112
American Gromwell
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Y
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH9113
American Gromwell
Y
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Prairie Milkweed
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH9114
American Gromwell
Y
8
SC
THR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
MNR Status Rank
COMMON NAME
Crowned Beggarticks
Dense Blazing Star
Prairie Milkweed
17LH9210
American Gromwell
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH9211
American Gromwell
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH9212
American Gromwell
Dense Blazing Star
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
RESTRICTED SPECIES
17LH9213
American Gromwell
Dense Blazing Star
Prairie Milkweed
17LH9311
American Gromwell
Dense Blazing Star
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
17LH9312
American Gromwell
Dense Blazing Star
Pawpaw
Prairie Milkweed
STATUS/RANK
(Y-Yes)
UNIDENTIFIED END
Y
EXP
NAR
SC
THR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
STATUS/RANK
(Y-Yes)
COMMON NAME
UNIDENTIFIED END
END, SC EXP
NAR
Crowned Beggarticks
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Prairie Milkweed
Y
17LH9210
American Gromwell
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Y
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH9211
American Gromwell
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Honey-locust
Y
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH9212
American Gromwell
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
RESTRICTED SPECIES
Y
17LH9213
American Gromwell
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Prairie Milkweed
Y
17LH9311
American Gromwell
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
17LH9312
American Gromwell
Y
Dense Blazing Star
Pawpaw
Y
Prairie Milkweed
Y
9
SC
THR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
APPENDIX D5:
3.2.6(B)(I)(15) (IV) – HERITAGE RESOURCES
5/22/2015
S.W.E.B MEADOWVALE WIND PROJECT (160960922)
HERITAGE CONSULTATION TO SATISFY SECTION 3.2.6 (B) (I) (15) (V) OF THE IESO’S LRP I RFP
RULES
DIRECT CONSULTATION
MINISTRY OF TOURISM, CULTURE, AND SPORT
Contacted Deborah Hossack (5/12/2015): none identified (5/20/2015)
ONTARIO HERITAGE TRUST
Contacted Jeremy Collins (5/12/2015): none identified (5/22/2015)
MUNICIPALITY/TOWNSHIP
Contacted Ryan Jacques, Planner at the Municipality of Chatham-Kent (5/21/2015): none
identified (5/21/2015)
INDIRECT CONSULTATION
PLAQUES
Federal
Parks Canada: Two found in Chatham-Kent; none found within Study Area
Provincial
Ontario Heritage Trust: 25 found in Chatham-Kent; none found within Study Area
Municipal
Various: None
PARKS CANADA
National Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada: One National Historic Site found
in Chatham-Kent (Buxton Settlement); none within Study Area
Historic Places: None
Other: One Canadian National Railways found in Chatham-Kent (VIA Rail Station); none
found within Study Area
BURIAL SITE OR CEMETERY
None identified
TRAILS AND OTHER LOCAL RESOURCES
Historical Societies: N/A
Municipal Heritage Committees: N/A
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
House, Meghan (MTCS)
Sebele, James
Heritage Resources - Wind Farm Projects Chatham-Kent
Wednesday, May 20, 2015 3:23:39 PM
MTCS Information Request - Chatham-Kent - Meadowvale.msg
Hello James,
Thank you for contacting MTCS, Culture Division and your due diligence with
regards to Ontario’s cultural heritage resources.
With respect to the study/project areas identified in the attached emails, please
be advised that we currently do not have any provincial heritage properties
identified in or adjacent to these areas. However, the subject lands or parts of
the subject lands may be owned or controlled by an Ontario Ministry or
Prescribed Public Body (PPB) on behalf of the Crown – the list of PPBs is
available as O. Reg. 157/10 (http://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/100157).
A Ministry or PPB may have responsibilities under the Standards and Guidelines
for Conservation of Provincial Heritage Properties (e.g. to undertake a cultural
heritage evaluation and/or heritage impact assessment).
Regards,
Meghan House MCIP RPP
Heritage Advisor
Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport
Culture Division | Programs and Services Branch | Culture Services Unit
401 Bay Street, Suite 1700
Toronto, Ontario M7A 0A7
416.314.7133
LOT 14, CON 1
LOT 15, CON 1
FRASER RD
WHITE RD
SANDHILL RD
WILLS ST
LOT 13, CON 1
ALBERT ST
AVE
MURRAY ST
N
HTO
UG
CEMETERY RD
NA
MC
WILLS ST
Inset Map
1:500,000
LOT 14, CON 1
175
MURRAY ST
LOT 4, CON 18
LOT 15, CON 1
175
LOT 16, CON 1
175
,
LOT 18, CON 1
LOT 17, CON 1
LOT 19, CON 1
LOT 20, CON 1
LOT 7, CON 17
5
17
!
,
LOT 21, CON 1
LOT 22, CON 1
LOT 23, CON 1
Area of Interest
BASELINE
LOT 6, CON 17
LOT 9, CON 16
LOT 3, CON 18
LOT 5, CON 17
LOT 8, CON 16
LOT 10, CON 15
175
B
EL
OW
LIN
E
LOT 4, CON 17
Sources: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, USGS, Intermap, iPC, NRCAN, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom, 2013
LOT 9, CON 15
LOT 6, CON 16
175
LOT 10, CON 14
LOT 3, CON 17
Wind Energy Project
LOT 8, CON 15
LOT 1, CON 18
NORTHEAST of St. Clair Rd
LOT 5, CON 16
Municipalitiy of Chatham-Kent, ON
LOT 9, CON 14
LOT 7, CON 15
LOT 2, CON 17
LOT 4, CON 16
E
RD
BO
North
LOT 6, CON 15
R
°
RD
LOT 8, CON 14
,
LOT 1, CON 17
LOT 3, CON 16
W
DO
A
E
LE
VA
LOT 5, CON 15
E
LI N
LOT 24, CON 17 EAST DIVISION
LOT 44, BALDOON STREET EAST
GE
TA
I
R
HE
E
LIN
,
LOT 7, CON 14
237.5 475
LOT 4, CON 15
)
"
LOT 1, CON 16
Track/Trail
Building (small)
Waterbody
Local Road
N
E
Driveway
Watercourse
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
Wetland/Bog
Major Road
Wooded Area
LOT 5, CON 14
18MW Wind Farm
CE
IN
PR
W
TO
K
R
CO
LOT 2, CON 15
AL
Nacelle Height: TBD
Rotor Diameter: TBD
Total Height: TBD
R
BE
TR
LOT 4, CON 14
LOT 6, CON 13
D
R
AI
CL
ST
1:12,000
Project Details
LOT 7, CON 13
LIN
1,425
Property Line
Project Area
LOT 3, CON 15
m
1,900
10m
Building (large)
LOT 8, CON 13
LOT 6, CON 14
950
Transmission Line
\
5
17
0
Legend
M
LOT 2, CON 16
Scale
SITE PLAN
A
FR
RD
R
SE
LOT 1, CON 15
RD
LOT 3, CON 14
5
17
LOT 41, BALDOON STREET WEST
,
LOT 5, CON 13
Revision History
LOT 2, CON 14
5
17
LOT 6, CON 12
L
BA
LOT 4, CON 13
ON
DO
Notes:
RD
All distances measured to the centre of the
proposed turbine base.
LOT 1, CON 14
Boundaries and dimensions subject to survey.
LOT 3, CON 13
N
BI
RO
LIN
LOT 2, CON 13
,
E
E
LI N
LOT 4, CON 12
I
DF
L
O
SH
BU
,
Project Location
D
EL
LI
NE
LOT 1, CON 13
LOT 5, CON 12
Drawn By:
JC PARISÉ
Contour Interval: 10m
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N
Projection: Transverse Mercator
Datum: North American 1983
Site Plan Data Sources:
Base features produced under license with
the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources
© Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2015.
LOT 3, CON 12
Date: 07/05/2015
W140004
C:\Ontario\MXDs\Development\Wallaceburg\Meadowvale_SP_A1_ProjectLocationSimple.mxd
LOT 2, CON 18
LOT 7, CON 16
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Ryan Jacques
Sebele, James
Rivard, Meaghan; Judy Smith; Bruce McAllister
RE: Request for Information - Municipality of Chatham-Kent - Soctian Windfields
Thursday, May 21, 2015 11:45:48 AM
image001.png
Meadowvale_SP_A1_ProjectLocation.pdf
James:
Regarding the Meadowvale Project:
There are no properties in within the Project Site that:
in respect of which a notice of intention to designate the property to be of cultural
heritage value or interest has been given in accordance with Section 29 of
the Ontario Heritage Act;
is designated by a municipal by-law made under Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage
Act as a property of cultural heritage value or interest;
is the subject of a municipal easement or covenant entered into under Section 37 of
the Ontario Heritage Act; and/or
is part of an area designated by a municipal by-law made under section 41 of the
Ontario Heritage Act as a conservation district.
The Chatham-Kent Municipal Heritage Register can be found on the Chatham-Kent
website.
Thank you,
Ryan Jacques
Planner
Municipality of Chatham-Kent
Phone: 519.360.1998 x3049
315 King Street West
Chatham, ON N7M 5K8
E-mail: [email protected]
www.chatham-kent.ca
From: Sebele, James [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: May-21-15 10:48 AM
To: Ryan Jacques
Subject: FW: Request for Information - Municipality of Chatham-Kent - Soctian Windfields
Hi Ryan,
Thanks for taking my call this morning. As discussed, I am inquiring about heritage resources in
the following three areas. I’ll keep the original email I sent a couple weeks below, just to have
some consistency in my request.
If you have any questions pertaining to my request, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Thanks,
-James
From: Sebele, James
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 1:50 PM
Cc: Rivard, Meaghan
Subject: Request for Information - Municipality of Chatham-Kent - Soctian Windfields
Hello,
I am contacting you today regarding heritage resources in the Municipality of Chatham-Kent,
Ontario.
Stantec Consulting Ltd. (Stantec) was retained by Scotian WindFields Inc. to complete a Cultural
Heritage Overview of the proposed installation of wind farms in the Municipality of
Chatham-Kent. These Overviews will be completed in order to satisfy the requirements of the
LRP|RFP Infosheet: Known Archaeological Resources and Recognized Heritage Resources
checklist for identifying recognized heritage resources for new wind projects.
The third proposed wind farm is south of the community of Wallaceburg and is roughly bounded
by St. Clair Road to the southwest, Elbow Line to the northwest, Baseline Road to the north, east
of Prince Albert Road to the northeast and Oldfield Line to the south. This project spans across
the following Lots and Concessions of the former Township of Chatham, now the Municipality of
Chatham-Kent:
Lots 2-7 of Concession 17
·
·
·
·
As part of the cultural heritage component, I am interested in protected or listed heritage
resources (properties, landscapes, or districts) within or adjacent to the proposed projects.
Are you aware of any municipal heritage interests within or adjacent to these areas?
For the ease of review, mapping has been prepared depicting the proposed project locations
(see attached). These maps appear in draft form and may contain confidential information not
yet released to the public. We ask that you maintain confidentiality while responding to this
inquiry.
Please let me know if I can provide any additional information or assist in the identification of
resources in any way.
Thank you in advance for the time.
Thanks,
-James
James Sebele, B.A.
Cultural Heritage Specialist Assistant
Stantec
49 Frederick Street Kitchener ON N2H 6M7
Phone: (519) 575-4224
Cell: (519) 532-8540
[email protected]

Meadowvale Wind Farm Site Considerations Report

Transcription

Similar documents

November 2015 - Meadowvale Minor Hockey Association

poolplayers.ca - CPA Southern Ontario

Playdium is pleased to present our new Education Program

UPCOMING DATES - Meadowvale Minor Hockey Association

UPCOMING DATES - Meadowvale Minor Hockey Association

Group of Seven in Ontario Parks

Section A2 - Event Advertisement

UPCOMING DATES - Meadowvale Minor Hockey Association

Technical Writing