to view the full presentation
Transcription
to view the full presentation
Innovative Use of Sliding Rail Shoring, Installation of Vertical Hanging Barriers, & Under Pinning SMART Remediation Toronto By: Gerry Parrott, P.Geo., QP & Shannon Marceau CLAYBAR January 2016 CONTRACTING INC. Topics • • • • • • • • Site Setting Objectives The Game Plan Constraints Scope Developed Shoring Options and Shoring Cost Evaluation What We Did, How It Worked, & Challenges Key Factors That Led to Success Site Setting • 1950s, two storey commercial/industrial building in an industrial subdivision in north Toronto • 700 m2 building occupied about a third of the 2.5 acre property • Location of a 24 hour, 7 day-a-week call-centre • Adjacent manufacturing buildings to the north and south, road to the east, residential to the west Site Setting Environmental Conditions • Table 3 (non-potable) site condition standards, medium and fine textured soils • COCs were BTEX and PHC fractions F1 to F3 • Free product observed in soil north and south of the building, but not under building • Perched water table (~2m) and deeper aquitard (~6m) that was historically breeched • Impact from 4, former USTs; 2 on the north side, 2 on the south side Objectives • Comply with TSSA Order to i) remove USTs, ii) delineate, and iii) implement remedial plan • Conduct work while operations (call-centre) continued • Remove as much source (impacted soil and groundwater) as possible and all free product • Prevent further migration off-Site The Game Plan • Our Game Plan, in a nut-shell: • Excavate impacted soil and groundwater around building, under footings, and ~1 m under building • Install property line barriers • Assess vapour intrusion risk • Conduct due diligence risk assessment • Sounds simple enough, right? Let’s see…. Constraints Constraints • Building could NOT be vacated (call-centre) • Free product under and adjacent to exterior of footings • How do we remove product with a +50 year old building that can’t be vacated? • Un-cooperative neighbours to the north and south = no access (and no off-Site investigation – but that’s another storey) • 6 m to north property line, then 4 m more to edge of building (~10 m wide strip) • 7.5 m to south property line, then 1 m more to edge of building (~8 m wide strip) • Deep excavation (up to 7 mbgs at some locations) Constraints • Free product adjacent footings Constraints • View of North laneway Scope of Work • Use a shoring system along property lines to facilitate excavation of impacted soil and groundwater beyond building footprint and up to property lines – but don’t go off-Site! • Install property line barriers – or don’t bother doing any work at all… • Underpin foundation and up to ~1m under building to remove liquid product • Conduct soil vapour intrusion assessment • Implement risk management plan after completion of due diligence RA Shoring Challenge • What shoring will work… • In the limited space available? • That allows us to install a liner along the property lines (81 linear metres)? • Up to 7m deep • That’s cost effective • And won’t hinder, and may even help us to install underpinning Shoring Options – Caisson Walls PROS CONS Liner easy to X Expensive install Good X Long duration structural support Tried and true X Need space X Have to go offSite X Part of wall will be off-Site Shoring Options – Lagging and Piling PROS CONS Liner easy to X Expensive install Good X Long duration structural support Tried and true X Need space X Have to go offSite X Tie backs offSite Shoring Options – Sheet Piling (Waterloo) PROS Built-in liner CONS X Expensive Easy to install X Long duration Good X Need space structural support Tried and true X Have to go offSite Shoring Options – Sliding Rail Shoring PROS CONS Can install liner X Depth limitations No need to access offSite* X Little structural support Quick Lowest cost Shoring Costs • Conventional shoring requires off-Site access • Even if that could have been addressed, the cost for 80 m of Caisson shoring was estimated to be ~$500k • Sliding Rail Shoring: $150k; < ½ the cost of conventional shoring Option Cost Caisson Walls $650/m2 + excavation costs Soldier Piling $550/m2 + excavation costs Sheet Piling $450 to $650 (Waterloo) + excavation costs Sliding Rail $150/m2 (including excavation costs!) What We Did • North portion completed December 2015 • Installed sliding rail shoring between building and property line to approx. 5 mbgs to 7.5 mbgs • Placed 2 cells in series to facilitate installation of liner What We Did https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MR53K4LcVA What We Did • Installing Liner What We Did • Liner Material (Paraseal R) • Self-sealing expandable layer of granular bentonite laminated to HDPE • Permeability 2.7x10-13 What We Did Excavated 23, 1.2 m wide slots below building foundation, and ~1m under building, in a piano key fashion, and backfilled with 10 MPa concrete Challenges and Solutions Challenge... • Deep excavation for sliding rail Solution! • Stripped top 2 m then started sliding rail Challenges and Solutions Challenge... • Installing posts causing too much vibration Solution! • Pre-drill posts Challenges and Solutions Challenge... • Very Soft Clay >5 mbgs bowing up from base of cells Solution! • Excavate last 2m in each cell under supervision of geotech engineer and backfill immediately after reaching target depth Challenges and Solutions Challenge... • How do we “hold up” soil behind footings and under floor slab when excavating under building Solution! • Install re-bar through foundation to hold up soil like a basket Challenges and Solutions Challenge... • How do we install the sliding rail on the property when the track is centred on the corner posts Solution! • Claybar modified the corner post rail system so panels slide on the outside of the posts Key To Success 1. Non-routine projects require a team of experts, not any one individual 2. Problems often have simple solutions if you think outside of the box and brainstorm with the Team 3. Never assume there aren’t any options – don’t settle for the status quo 4. The cost for up-front planning, strategizing and brainstorming can be the best money spent and ultimately, can save lots of $s in the end 5. Get a good team, with experience, and the willingness to be your Trusted Advisor Thank You – Questions? Gerry Parrott, P.Geo. T: 416 407 9769 Hemmera Shannon Marceau T: 416 819 7313 Claybar Contracting CLAYBAR CONTRACTING INC.