NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT AND MINERAL RESOURCE
Transcription
NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT AND MINERAL RESOURCE
NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT AND MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE FOR THE THOR DEPOSIT, VIKING PROJECT White Bay Area, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada Prepared For Anaconda Mining Inc. By David A. Copeland, M.Sc., P. Geo Shane Ebert, Ph. D., P. Geo. Gary Giroux, MASc., P. Eng. Effective Date: August 29, 2016 Publication Date: August 29, 2016 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Contents 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 12 Reliance on Other Experts .......................................................................................................... 14 Property Description and Location ............................................................................................. 15 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 General ........................................................................................................................................ 15 Confirmation of Title .................................................................................................................. 16 Agreements with Other Parties ................................................................................................... 16 Summary of Exploration Title Information ................................................................................ 17 5.0 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography ............................... 19 5.1 5.2 Accessibility................................................................................................................................ 19 Physiography and Climate .......................................................................................................... 19 5.2.1 5.2.2 5.3 Physiography....................................................................................................................... 19 Climate ................................................................................................................................ 19 Infrastructure and Local Resources............................................................................................. 20 6.0 History......................................................................................................................................... 21 6.1 6.2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 21 Historical Exploration ................................................................................................................. 24 6.2.1 6.2.2 6.2.3 6.2.4 6.2.5 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 8.0 9.0 Exploration Programs Completed Prior to 1987 ................................................................. 24 Exploration Programs Completed Between 1987 and 1990 ............................................... 24 Exploration Programs Completed Between 2006 and 2007 ............................................... 24 Viking Property Exploration Between 2008 and 2011 ....................................................... 24 Kramer Property Exploration Between 2009 and 2013 ...................................................... 26 Geological Setting and Mineralization ....................................................................................... 27 Lithotectonic Subdivisions Relative to the Viking Project ......................................................... 27 Regional Geology of White Bay Area ........................................................................................ 29 Property Geology ........................................................................................................................ 31 Description of Mineralization Styles .......................................................................................... 33 Description of the Thor Deposit.................................................................................................. 34 Other Mineralized Trends ........................................................................................................... 41 Deposit Type ............................................................................................................................... 44 Exploration.................................................................................................................................. 45 9.1 9.2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 45 Viking Property ........................................................................................................................... 45 9.2.1 2007-2008 Exploration Programs ....................................................................................... 45 3 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 9.2.2 9.2.3 9.2.4 9.3 2009 Exploration Program .................................................................................................. 46 2010 Exploration Program .................................................................................................. 49 2011 Exploration Program .................................................................................................. 52 Kramer Property.......................................................................................................................... 56 9.3.1 9.3.2 9.3.3 10.0 2009 Exploration Programs ................................................................................................ 56 2010 Exploration Program .................................................................................................. 57 2012 and 2013 Exploration Program .................................................................................. 57 Drilling ........................................................................................................................................ 59 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 General .................................................................................................................................... 63 Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 63 Comments on Core Recovery ................................................................................................. 64 Viking Property Drilling ......................................................................................................... 64 10.4.1 10.4.2 10.4.3 10.4.4 10.5 2008 Drilling Program ........................................................................................................ 64 2009 Drilling Program ........................................................................................................ 65 2010 Drilling Program ........................................................................................................ 65 2011 Drilling Program ........................................................................................................ 66 Kramer Property Drilling ........................................................................................................ 73 10.5.1 2010 Drilling Program ........................................................................................................ 73 10.5.2 2013 Drilling Program ........................................................................................................ 73 11.0 Sampling Preparation and Security ............................................................................................. 75 11.1 11.2 11.3 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 Drilling and Trenching Programs............................................................................................ 75 Sample Preparation and Analyses ........................................................................................... 75 Security for All Northern Abitibi Programs............................................................................ 76 Data Verification ......................................................................................................................... 77 Review and Validation of Project Data Sets ........................................................................... 77 Site Visit by the Authors ......................................................................................................... 77 Quality Control and Quality Assurance (QA/QC) .................................................................. 78 12.3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 78 12.3.2 Certified Reference Material Program ................................................................................ 78 12.3.3 Blank Sample Programs ...................................................................................................... 79 12.3.4 Quarter Core Duplicate Split Program ................................................................................ 80 12.3.5 Check Sample Programs ..................................................................................................... 80 13.0 Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing ........................................................................... 81 14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate ......................................................................................................... 82 14.1 14.2 14.3 Data Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 82 Composites.................................................................................................................................. 86 Variography ................................................................................................................................ 87 4 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 14.4 14.5 14.6 14.7 14.8 15.0 16.0 16.1 Block Model............................................................................................................................ 88 Bulk Density ............................................................................................................................... 88 Grade Interpolation ..................................................................................................................... 89 Classification............................................................................................................................... 90 Model Verification ...................................................................................................................... 93 Adjacent Properties ..................................................................................................................... 96 Other Relevant Data and Information ......................................................................................... 97 Environmental and Surface Title Liabilities ........................................................................... 97 17.0 Interpretation and Conclusions ................................................................................................... 98 18.0 Recommendations ..................................................................................................................... 100 19.0 References Cited and Selected References ............................................................................... 101 20.0 Statements of Qualifications ..................................................................................................... 104 APPENDIX 1 – LISTING OF DRILL HOLES ........................................................................................ 107 APPENDIX 2 – SEMIVARIOGRAMS ................................................................................................... 111 APPENDIX C – CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSONS ...................................................................... 118 5 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL List of Figures Figure 1: A map showing the location of the Viking, Kramer and staked licences in relation to White Bay and the communities of Pollards Point and Sop’s Arm .............................................................................. 15 Figure 2: Lithotectonic Subdivisions of the Northern Appalachians .......................................................... 28 Figure 3: Regional Geology Map of the Southern White Bay Area ........................................................... 30 Figure 4: Viking Property Geology Map .................................................................................................... 32 Figure 5: Au Soil Map with Rock Samples > 1 g/t ..................................................................................... 34 Figure 6: Thor Trend Drill Hole Location Map .......................................................................................... 36 Figure 7: Cross Section A-A' Thor Vein..................................................................................................... 37 Figure 8: Cross Section B-B' Thor Trend ................................................................................................... 38 Figure 9: Surface Map of the Thor Vein Prepared by Northern Abitibi ..................................................... 39 Figure 10: Orientation Diagram for the Thor Trend Quartz Veins ............................................................. 40 Figure 11: A) High-grade Thor Vein exposed at surface. B) Low-grade sheeted vein zone hosted in granite. C) Close up of quartz-sulfide vein with gold grains. D) Close up of a sulfide rich portion of the Thor Vein. .................................................................................................................................................................... 41 Figure 12: Photos from the Viking Trend. A) View of Viking Pond looking south which parallels the Viking Trend (located on the left side of the photo). B) Trench 25 looking west. Note the strong quartz veining throughout the outcrop. C) Close up of Trench 25 showing the strong-sheeted veining and subordinate conjugate vein set. D) and E) Laminated quartz vein containing wallrock parallel rock fragments and iron carbonate +/- feldspar. The wallrock surrounding the quartz vein is soft and strongly sericite altered...... 42 Figure 13: Location of 2007 to 2009 trenches along the Thor Trend ......................................................... 48 Figure 14: Simplified geology of the Thor Trend ...................................................................................... 49 Figure 15: Location of 2010 Trenches ........................................................................................................ 50 Figure 16: Location of 2011 drilling, trenching, and IP survey .................................................................. 52 Figure 17: Plan Map 3D Chargeability Model at 50m depth ...................................................................... 54 Figure 18: Plan Map 3D Resistivity Model at 50m depth .......................................................................... 55 Figure 19: Kramer Area Drillhole and Trench Locations ........................................................................... 58 Figure 20: Thor Trend drillhole location map showing all drillholes to 2011 ............................................ 66 Figure 21: Plot of original versus check assays – drillholes 09VK-20 and 10VK-46 ............................... 78 Figure 22: Plan view showing Thor Trend (from Northern Abitibi Web Site)........................................... 83 Figure 23: Isometric view looking north showing the mineralized Thor solids ......................................... 84 Figure 24: Isometric view looking NW showing the Thor mineralized solids, drillholes and surface topography .................................................................................................................................................. 84 Figure 25: Lognormal Cumulative Frequency Plot for Au in Thor Mineralized Solids ............................. 85 Figure 26: Section 500617 E showing Kriged Au grades in estimated blocks and composite both colour coded ........................................................................................................................................................... 94 Figure 27: Section 500667 E showing Kriged Au grades in estimated blocks and composite both colour coded ........................................................................................................................................................... 95 6 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL List of Tables Table 1: Thor Trend - Mineral Resources as at December 30, 2011 .......................................................... 10 Table 2: Summary of Licences ................................................................................................................... 16 Table 3: Standard Claims Renewal Fees and Work Requirements............................................................. 17 Table 4: Historical Exploration on the Viking Project (1987 to 2013) ....................................................... 22 Table 5: Thor Trend – Mineral Resources as per the December 30, 2011 Mineral Resource Estimate ..... 25 Table 6: Select sample results from the 2008 trenching program at Viking ............................................... 45 Table 7: Select sample results from the 2009 trenching program ............................................................... 46 Table 8: March 2011 Thor Trend Inferred Mineral Resources ................................................................... 53 Table 9: Thor Trend - Mineral Resources as of December 30, 2011 .......................................................... 56 Table 10: Drillhole locations and parameters for the Viking Project ......................................................... 59 Table 11: Significant Drill Intercepts from the Viking Trend .................................................................... 67 Table 12: Significant drill intercepts from the Kramer Trend .................................................................... 73 Table 13: Certified standards used during the Viking exploration programs ............................................. 79 Table 14: Gold assay statistics inside and outside the Thor Mineralized Solids ........................................ 85 Table 15: Au Populations in Thor Mineralized Solids................................................................................ 86 Table 16: Capped Gold assay statistics inside and outside the Thor Mineralized Solids ........................... 86 Table 17: Gold 2.5 m Composite statistics inside and outside the Thor Mineralized Solids...................... 86 Table 18: Au Populations for 2.5 m Composites in Thor Mineralized Solids ........................................... 87 Table 19: Semivariogram Parameters ......................................................................................................... 88 Table 20: Specific Gravity Determinations ................................................................................................ 89 Table 21: Kriging Parameters ..................................................................................................................... 90 Table 22: Thor Trend Indicated Mineral Resources ................................................................................... 92 Table 23: Thor Trend - Inferred Mineral Resource .................................................................................... 93 Table 24: Thor Trend - Mineral Resources ................................................................................................. 98 Table 25: Budget for recommended work program inclusive of labour, logistics and geochemical analysis .................................................................................................................................................................. 100 7 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 1.0 Summary The Viking Project is held by Anaconda Mining Inc. and is located in the White Bay area of western Newfoundland, in the province of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. The Project consists of four mineral licences: 014079M, 019689M, 023770M and 023771M, totaling 6,225 hectares. The Project is accessible through truck roads off the main highway into Pollards Point (Route 420), which trends north off the Trans-Canada Highway west of Deer Lake, which hosts the nearest airport. Licences 014079M and 019689M were acquired from Spruce Ridge Resources through two option agreements dated February 5th, 2016, and include a 100% undivided interest in these mineral licences. Licences 023770M and 023771M were acquired through staking. Licence 014079M is subject to a 0.5% Net Smelter Royalty to Spruce Ridge Resources and a 2.5% Net Smelter Royalty to Altius Resources Inc. and a prospector, Paul Crocker. Licence 019689M is subject to a 2% Net Smelter Royalty to Spruce Ridge Resources and a 1% Net Smelter Royalty to Altius Resources Inc. The Spruce Ridge Net Smelter Royalty on Licence 019689M is capped at two and one-half million dollars ($2,500,000), after which, the Spruce Ridge Net Smelter Royalty will be reduced to 1%. A further 1.5% Net Smelter Royalty is granted to Altius Resources Inc. on an area of interest within 3 km of the combined licences 014079M and 019689M. There are no known risk factors that could affect access, title or Anaconda Mining Inc.’s ability to conduct the work required on the property. Bedrock geology on the property is characterized by ~1500 Ma granitoid gneisses that were intruded by both ~1980-1030 Ma granitoid bodies and late Proterozoic mafic and ultramafic dikes. Gold mineralization in the area was first explored by BP Selco Ltd. in 1986 and low-grade gold mineralization (<1.0 grams per tonne) occurring in altered gneisses and associated quartz veins was first encountered in drilling on the property by Noranda Exploration Company Limited in 1989. In 2007 Northern Abititbi Mining Corp. discovered high-grade gold mineralization (>20.0 grams per tonne) within quartz veins hosted by altered granitoid gneisses and intrusions. Subsequent trenching and sampling resulted in the discovery of the Thor Deposit, which was partially delineated through several core-drilling programs. Mineralization is typical of Orogenic style gold. Data presented in this Technical Report are verified in the field where possible and against logs or notebooks as well as assay certificates to assure high data quality. For core related data, following an original assessment, compiled digital databases undergo a second check for errors and inconsistencies using Geosoft Target software. All of the digital databases for core and channel samples related to the Mineral Resource Estimate have been constructed, reviewed, and checked by Author Ebert. All drillhole logs, assay certificates, and historic documents have been made available to Author Giroux who conducted the current Mineral Resource Estimate. The validated drillhole and trenching databases from the 2007 to 2011 programs on the Viking Project are considered to be accurate and acceptable for use in this Mineral Resource Estimate. For further verification, author Copeland conducted independent checks on select channel samples, drill collars, core and check assays. All data is considered accurate and acceptable. A drill core sampling in the Mineral Resource Estimate were subject to a Quality Control and Quality Assurance program. This included submission of blind blank samples, duplicate split samples of quarter 8 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL core, certified analytical standards and analysis of check samples at a third party commercial laboratory. Additionally, internal laboratory reporting of quality control and assurance sampling was monitored on an on-going basis during the course of the drilling. The results from the use of standards indicate sufficiently consistent variability to support the use of the assay data in the current Mineral Resource Estimate. The use of blind blanks in the analytical program indicate there are no significant or systematic cross-contamination effect is interpreted to be present in the Au data set. The results of the quarter core sampling show reasonable correlation in lower-grade samples. High-grade samples, however, can show considerable variability indicating a strong nugget effect as a result of coarse heterogeneous gold distribution in the high-grade veins. The check (pulp) sample program included samples submitted to a second laboratory and the results compare well with the original results and are interpreted to show acceptable confirmation of the dataset mineralization levels. In some of the higher-grade samples, however, the check samples show higher degrees of variation. This variation is attributed to the strong nugget effect seen within the high-grade veins. The majority of samples in the database are not strongly influenced by this nugget effect. Preliminary metallurgical test work was done on the Thor Deposit in 2010 and in 2015. The 2010 sample consisted representative drill core and was conducted by Met-Solve Laboratories Inc. of Burnaby, British Columbia. The work included screen analysis to determine average free gold particle size, preliminary grind size versus recovery studies, and determination of gravity recoverable gold percentage and gold recovery by bottle roll cyanide leaching. Results of the metallurgical testing showed that gold mineralization at the Thor Trend is not refractory and can be readily extracted by gravity or cyanide recovery methods. No significant metallurgical concerns were identified. Results included: gold recovery of 97% by cyanide leaching of a 59-micron grind size product, 70% of the gold is recoverable by gravity concentration methods at a 97-micron grind size, and higher gravity recoveries might be possible through process optimization. As part of its due diligence, Anaconda Mining conducted metallurgical testing in late 2015, which indicates that ore from the Thor Deposit could be processed at the Pine Cove Mill using current flotation and leach circuit configuration. The results of the study are based on a homogenized sample collected from two diamond drillholes. Bench scale test work, conducted by NB Research and Productivity Council, primarily focused on flotation, cyanide leaching and grinding to evaluate the response of the Thor Deposit material to the current plant flow sheet for the Pine Cove Mill. In a flotation test, using a grind of (80% passing) 150 µm, currently used for Pine Cove ore, the Thor Deposit sample attained 96.0% Au recovery in 4.4% of the mass at a grade of 35.12 grams per tonne Au in the rougher stage. In a bottle roll cyanidation test the current Pine Cove Mill, regrind size of (80% passing) 20 µm obtained 94.1% Au extraction without requiring accelerating reagents and consumed 1.1 kilograms per tonne NaCN compared to 3.6 kilograms per tonne for Pine Cove ore. A Bond Ball mill grindability test was performed utilizing a limiting screen size of 150 µm and indicated that the sample has a Bond Ball Work Index value of 18.5 kWh/t. A Technical Report authored by Shane Ebert and Gary Giroux, dated December 30, 2011, reported a Mineral Resource at cut-off grade of 0.2 grams per tonne Au with the Thor Deposit containing an Indicated Mineral Resource of 98,000 ounces Au (3,232,000 tonnes at an average grade of 0.95 grams per tonne) plus an Inferred Mineral Resource of 45,000 ounces Au (2,123,000 tonnes at an average grade of 0.66 grams per tonne). This Mineral Resource Estimate, established in the December 30th, 2011 report, remains valid as no additional material work has been conducted since the publication of that resource. The Mineral Resource Estimate is restated in this Technical Report using a cut-off grade of 1.0 grams per tonne. This cut-off grade is established based on Anaconda’s mining experience at its Pine Cove operation near Baie 9 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Verte, Newfoundland and Labrador where gold is mined using a cut-off grade of 0.7 grams per tonne. The Company will investigate leveraging the mill and tailings infrastructure at the Pine Cove site in any potential development of the Thor Deposit. Based on this 1.0 grams per tonne cut-off is considered reasonable. In accordance with Canadian Securities Administrators National Instrument 43-101 and the CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves the Thor Deposit Mineral Resource is stated at a 1.0 grams per tonne cut-off, as containing an Indicated Mineral Resource of 937,000 tonnes grading 2.09 grams per tonne and an Inferred Mineral Resource of 350,000 tonnes grading 1.79 grams per tonne and has an effective date of August 29, 2016. Results of the Mineral Resource Estimate are summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1: Thor Trend - Mineral Resources as at December 30, 2011 Au Cut-off (grams per tonne) Tonnes> Cut-off (tonnes) Grade > Cut-off Contained Au (grams per tonne) Ounces Au* Indicated 0.50 1,817,000 1.42 83,000 1.00 937,000 2.09 63,000 2.00 357,000 3.19 36,600 Inferred 0.50 847,000 1.15 31,000 1.00 350,000 1.79 20,000 2.00 94,000 2.90 8,800 *Mineralized domains are spatially constrained and capped. At a cut-off grade of 1.0 grams per tonne Au the Thor Deposit contains an Indicated Mineral Resource of 63,000 ounces Au (937,000 tonnes at an average grade of 2.09 grams per tonne) plus an Inferred Mineral Resource of 20,000 ounces Au (350,000 tonnes at an average grade of 1.79 grams per tonne). The current Mineral Resource Estimate was carried out by Giroux Consultants Ltd. of Vancouver, British Columbia and Independent Qualified Person Gary Giroux, P.Eng is responsible for the estimate. The Mineral Resource Estimate is based on a database containing 109 holes drilled into the Thor Trend totaling 15,574 m of diamond drilling, and 74 lines of surface channel samples cut from trenches using a diamond saw. Mineralization was constrained within 3D geologic solids built using Gemcom software. Some isolated high gold assays sit outside the mineralized solids and have not been included in the Mineral Resource Estimate. The distributions of gold within and outside the mineralized solids were examined using lognormal cumulative distribution plots and six overlapping gold populations were identified. Gold assays within the mineralized solid were capped at 66 grams per tonne Au while those outside the solid were capped at 4.0 grams per tonne Au. There is insufficient drill data at present to accurately model the highgrade zones along the Thor Trend so an indicator approach was used to model the high-grade. 10 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Drillhole assay samples were composited into 2.5 m intervals and a block model with 5m x 5m x 5m block size was created. Grades for gold were interpolated into all blocks, by a combination of Ordinary and Indicator Kriging. North-south cross sections showing the kriged block Au grades and drillhole composites were produced to validate the block model and in general the block grades match the composite grades well and there is no indication of bias present. A follow up program of surface exploration is recommended including 7000 m of diamond drilling, channel sampling and mapping, at a cost of approximately $1 million Canadian. Several IP anomalies remain to be drill tested, including an anomaly which occurs immediately south of the Thor Trend resource. Anaconda began exploration activities on the Viking Project in August of 2016 with the goal of discovering new gold deposits on the property and expanding existing deposit, with a focus on outlining the potential for significant mineral expansion and grades higher. At the time of writing, Anaconda had conducted geological mapping and initiated surface sampling on the Kramer and Viking Trends and began drilling to the north of the Mineral Resource outlined in this Technical Report. The Company plans to conduct preliminary studies on the potential development of the Thor Deposit with an emphasis on the potential to leverage existing infrastructure at the Pine Cove Mill site approximately 180 km by road from the Viking Project. These studies will be on going as drill results are available from the current exploration program and future mineral estimates become available. 11 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 2.0 Introduction The purpose of this NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate (“Technical Report” or “Report”) is to support the disclosure of Mineral Resources at the mineral project referred to as the Viking Project (the “Project”), controlled by Anaconda Mining Inc. (“Anaconda” or the “Company”) and located in north western Newfoundland, in the province of Newfoundland and Labrador. This Report describes the Viking Project and a Mineral Resource Estimate for the Thor Deposit (“Thor Deposit”). The Report was prepared by D. Copeland, S. Ebert and G. Giroux on behalf of Anaconda to comply with technical reporting and disclosure requirements set out under National Instrument 43-101 (“43-101”). The Report is considered to be in accordance with Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves Definitions and Guidelines (“the CIM Standards”). Author D. Copeland is an independent qualified person working on behalf of Anaconda. Author S. Ebert is an independent qualified person and former officer and a director of Northern Abitibi Mining Corp. (“Northern Abitibi” or “NA”), the company that conducted much of the work on which this Report and Mineral Resource Estimate is based. Author G. Giroux is an independent qualified person and is responsible for section 14.0 of this Report covering the Mineral Resource Estimate. Mr. Ebert and Mr. Giroux are the authors of the previous Technical Report on a portion of the Viking Project containing the Thor Deposit as described below. Mr. Copeland and Mr. Ebert are responsible for the remaining sections of the report. Much of the information and figures contained in this Report have been taken from historic reports and parts have been taken directly from previous Technical Reports titled “MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE FOR THE THOR TREND GOLD DEPOSIT NORTHERN ABITIBI MINING CORP.”, dated March 2nd 2011, authored by M.P. Cullen and M. Harrington of Mercator Geological Services and “MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE UPDATE FOR THE THOR TREND GOLD DEPOSIT, WHITE BAY AREA, NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR, LATITUDE 49o 42’ N, LONGITUDE 57o 00’ W” dated December 30, 2011 and authored by Dr. Shane Ebert, P. Geo. and Gary Giroux, P. Eng. MASc. Terms of reference were established through discussions between Anaconda representatives, Mr. Copeland, Mr. Ebert, and Mr. Giroux in August of 2016. It was determined that an updated description of the Viking Project was required and that the Mineral Resource Estimate published in December of 2011 remains valid since no material work has been conducted on the deposit since that time. The Mineral Resource Estimate presented here is based upon validated results for all core drilling completed by Northern Abitibi during the 2007 through 2011 period as well as validated results for channel sampling along the Thor Deposit during that same period. The Mineral Resource Estimate is based on a database containing 109 holes drilled into the Thor Deposit totaling 15,574 m of diamond drilling and 10,522 assays for gold and 74 lines of surface channel samples cut from trenches using a diamond saw totaling 385 assays for gold. Hard copy and/or digital records of the 2008-2011 drilling and trenching program results, as well as digital elevation files and geological reports, were delivered to Mr. Giroux by Anaconda for purposes of the resource estimation program. This included complete drill logs, drill plans, assay records and laboratory records for drilling and channel sampling completed by the Company, as well as geological reports covering all exploration programs. Based on the preceding, Mr. Giroux assembled and validated a digital drilling and channel sampling database upon which the three-dimensional Mineral Resource Estimate block model for the Thor Deposit was developed. Mineralization was constrained within 3D geologic solids built using Gemcom software. Drillhole assay samples were composited into 2.5 m intervals and a block model with 5m x 5m x 12 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 5m block size was created. Grades for gold were interpolated into all blocks, by a combination of Ordinary and Indicator Kriging. Mr. Copeland has visited the Viking Project most recently between August 8th and 15th, 2016 and has validated the location of drill collars and channel sample locations at both sites. Mr. Copeland has also validated drilling associated with the Thor Deposit through the visual inspection of core and through geochemical analysis of select samples. Mr. Copeland has also extensively mapped the trenched exposures at the Kramer Property and reviewed the Kramer diamond drill core. Mr. Ebert has been involved in all aspects of the Viking exploration programs carried out from 2007 to 2011 inclusive and has several months of field experience on the Viking Property, and is familiar with all aspects of the geology of that licence, drilling, trenching, and sampling programs carried out between 2007 and 2011. Mr. Giroux has not visited the property. 13 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 3.0 Reliance on Other Experts The information in this Report was prepared by, or under the supervision of Mr. Copeland P.Geo. and Mr. Ebert, P.Geo. The Mineral Resource Estimate was prepared by Mr. Giroux, P.Eng. The independent qualified persons have relied on information provided by Anaconda concerning the legal status of claims that form the Viking Project. Effort was made by Mr. Copeland to review the information provided for obvious errors and omissions; however, Mr. Copeland shall not be held liable for any errors or omissions relating to the legal status of mineral claims described in this Report. Copies of mineral tenure documents were reviewed by Mr. Copeland and a verification of claim title was performed using the Mineral Rights Inquiry form found on the Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Natural Resources webpage. Operating licences permits, and work contracts were not reviewed. Mr. Copeland has not verified the legality of any underlying agreements that may exist concerning the licence or other agreements between third parties, but has relied on, and believes they have a reasonable basis to rely upon, Anaconda to have conducted proper legal due diligence. Select technical data, as noted in the report, was provided by Anaconda; Mr. Copeland and Mr. Ebert have relied on the integrity of such data. Mr. Copeland and Mr. Ebert have assumed and relied on the fact, that all the information and existing technical documents listed in Section 19 (“References Cited and Selected References”) of this Report are accurate and complete in all material aspects. While the authors carefully reviewed all available information presented to them, the principal authors cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness. In particular the authors are relying on work previously completed by Northern Abitibi and Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. (“Spruce Ridge)” as presented and verified in the “NI 43-101 compliant reports entitled MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE FOR THE THOR TREND GOLD DEPOSIT NORTHERN ABITIBI MINING CORP.”, dated March 2nd 2011, authored by M.P. Cullen and M. Harrington of Mercator Geological Services and “MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE UPDATE FOR THE THOR TREND GOLD DEPOSIT, WHITE BAY AREA, NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR, LATITUDE 49o 42’ N, LONGITUDE 57o 00’ W” dated December 30, 2011 and authored by Dr. Shane Ebert, P. Geo. and Gary Giroux, P. Eng. MASc. All statements and opinions expressed in this document are given in good faith and in the belief that such statements and opinions are not false and misleading at the date of this Report. 14 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 4.0 Property Description and Location 4.1 General The Viking Project includes 6,225 ha of prospective geology located adjacent to the community of Pollards Point and extending south and southwestward approximately 8-10 km. The project consists of four mineral licences: 014079M (“Viking Property”), 019689M (“Kramer Property”), 023770M and 023771M (Figure 1). The Viking and Kramer properties were acquired from Spruce Ridge, through two option agreements dated February 5th, 2016 and include a 100% undivided interest in these mineral licences. Licences 023770M and 023771M were acquired through staking. The project area is located within NTS sheets 12H10 and 12H11. At the effective date of this Report mineral licence 023770M and 023771M were registered to Anaconda Mining Inc. and mineral licence 14079M and 19689M were registered to Spruce Ridge. Table 2 and Figure 1 present details of the Viking Project exploration holding. Figure 1: A map showing the location of the Viking, Kramer and staked licences in relation to White Bay and the communities of Pollards Point and Sop’s Arm 15 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Table 2: Summary of Licences Licence Holder 014079M Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. Anaconda Mining Inc. Anaconda Mining Inc. 019689M 023771M 023770M 4.2 No. Claims Date Issued Anniversary Date Work Requirements 36 28-Jun-02 28-Jun-17 $43,200 by June 28 2021 125 22-Nov-16 22-Nov-16 $25,000 by Nov. 22, 2019 25 29-Feb-16 28-Feb-21 $5,000 by March 1, 2017 63 29-Feb-16 28-Feb-21 $12,600 by March 1, 2017 Confirmation of Title The Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Natural Resources (“NLDNR”) online claims registry system showed that a registered option agreement between Spruce Ridge and Anaconda for both the Viking and Kramer licences enables Anaconda to conduct work on the properties currently registered in the name of Spruce Ridge. The remaining two licences are confirmed to be in the name of Anaconda Mining Inc. All claims were in good standing. Surface rights to lands in the property area are held by the province of Newfoundland and Labrador and Anaconda has established access agreements and permits to these lands, as necessary, to allow exploration activities to be carried out. It is understood that these agreements provide permission to complete drillholes, trenches and access roads required by the Company. The Viking Project does include and boarder tributaries of licenced salmon rivers as well as Pine Martin habitat. These characteristics do not interfere with the completion of future exploration or development projects and at the time of writing Anaconda has received exploration permits to conduct exploration activities. There are no First Nations or other aboriginal groups that currently have land claims on the Viking Project. 4.3 Agreements with Other Parties As per the option agreement signed on February 5th, 2016: to earn a 100% interest in the Viking Property, the Company is required to make aggregate payments to Spruce Ridge of $300,000 over a five-year period based on milestones to production ($25,000 paid at closing) including a final payment of $175,000 upon commencement of commercial production. The Company can pay all option payments at any time during the option period to earn its 100% interest. In addition, the Company granted warrants to Spruce Ridge to purchase 350,000 common shares of Anaconda at an exercise price of $0.10 per share, expiring three years from the Effective Date of the agreement. Further, the Viking Agreement provides for a 0.5% Net Smelter Royalty (“NSR”) to Spruce Ridge on the sale of gold from the Viking Property. As per the option agreement signed on February 5th, 2016: to earn a 100% interest in the Kramer Property, the Company is required to make aggregate payments to Spruce Ridge of $132,500 over the five-year period, beginning with an initial payment of $12,500 on closing with increasing payments on the anniversary of the Effective Date. The Company also issued 250,000 common shares to Spruce Ridge and a 2% NSR to Spruce Ridge on the sale of gold from the Kramer Property. The NSR is capped at two and one-half million dollars ($2,500,000), after which, the NSR will be reduced to 1%. Anaconda is required 16 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL to spend a total of $750,000 in qualified exploration expenditures on the Kramer Property during the option period. As per the NSR agreement with Altius Resources Inc. (“Altius”) on February 5th, 2016: two previous NSR agreements held by Altius and a prospector, Paul Crocker, in relation to Viking Property, will be terminated upon Anaconda earning its 100% interest in the Viking Property and/or the Kramer Property. These agreements will be replaced by new NSR agreements that stipulate that the Company will pay Altius a 2.5% NSR granted on the Viking Property, a 1% NSR granted on the Kramer Property and a 1.5% NSR granted on an area of interest within 3 km of the combined Viking and Kramer Properties. 4.4 Summary of Exploration Title Information Mineral exploration licences in Newfoundland and Labrador are issued under the province’s Mineral Resources Act (1990 and as subsequently amended) (“the Act”) and provide a licencee with exclusive right to explore for specified minerals within the licenced area for a period of 5 years, subject to terms and conditions of the Act. An exploration licence can consist of up to 256 mineral claims. Individual claims held under a mineral exploration licence measure 16.188 hectares in surface area (~forty acres) and are renewable on a yearly basis. Maintaining claims in good standing from year to year requires filing of scheduled annual renewal fees and documents for each exploration licence as well as meeting minimum yearly work commitment and reporting requirements. A $60/claim staking fee consists of a $10/claim staking recording fee and a $50/claim staking security deposit. The staking security deposit is refunded upon submission and acceptance of the report covering the first year work requirements. A mineral exploration licence is issued for a term of five years. However, a mineral exploration licence may be held for a maximum of twenty years provided the required annual assessment work is completed and reported upon and the mineral exploration licence is renewed every five years. Under normal circumstances, fees and minimum work requirements set out under the provision of the Act vary according to the year of licence issue and are summarized in Table 3. Table 3: Standard Claims Renewal Fees and Work Requirements Year of Issue 1 2 3 4 5 6 through 10 11 through 15 16 through 20 Assessment Expenditure Required $200 per claim $250 per claim $300 per claim $350 per claim $400 per claim $600 per claim $900 per claim $1200 per claim Renewal Fee $25 per claim/year 5 $50 per claim/year 10 $100 per claim/year 15 In each year of the licence, the minimum annual assessment work must be completed on or before the anniversary date. The assessment report must then be submitted within 60 days after the anniversary date. If a report cannot be completed and submitted on schedule, a partial report acceptable to the Mineral Claims Recorder may be submitted and a (Condition 3) sixty day extension of time applied for in order to submit the completed report. The partial report, at a minimum, must contain a title page, a table of contents, a brief 17 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL description of work completed and an estimated statement of expenditures. Excess assessment work completed in any one year can be is carried forward for a maximum of nine years and it is automatically credited to the licence. Excess assessment work credit is the amount of work completed and reported above what is required to be done during any twelve-month period of the licence. When a licence holder is unable to complete the assessment work required to be done in any twelve-month period, an application for a (Condition 2) twelve-month extension of time in which to complete the work may be approved. An extension of time does not relieve a licence holder from performing and reporting the assessment work for the ensuing twelve months on schedule. An extension of time (Condition 2 extension of time) requires that the licence holder post a security deposit in the form of cash, cheque or an irrevocable letter of credit for the amount of the deficiency. The security deposit must be delivered to the Mineral Claims Recorder prior to the anniversary date of the year for which the extension is requested. When the deficient work is completed and accepted, the security deposit will be refunded, otherwise, the security deposit will be forfeited. For map staked licences, a (Condition 2) twelve month extension of time for the first year will result in the staking security deposit of $50 per /claim being refunded. Where approved work cannot be completed in any year and the delay is caused by environmental considerations imposed under the exploration permit, the requirement for delivery of the security deposit for a (Condition 2) twelve month extension of time shall be waived at the request of the licencee. Any person who intends to conduct an exploration program on a staked or licenced area must submit prior notice with a detailed description of the activity to NLDNR. An exploration program that may result in major ground disturbance or disruption to wildlife or wildlife habitat must have an Exploration Approval from the department before the activity can commence. An exploration licence conveys an exclusive right to explore for named minerals but does not provide certainty with regard to land access or ownership of minerals. Access to lands is at the discretion of surface titleholders and a Mining Lease or Special Mining Lease must be granted by the government to establish ownership of Mineral Resources for which production is planned. Mining activities can only be initiated after an Environmental Approval has been granted and various permits relating to industrial, environmental and engineering aspects of the proposed mining operation have been obtained. 18 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 5.0 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography 5.1 Accessibility The Viking Project is located approximately 12 km southwest of the community of Jackson’s Arm, White Bay, on NTS map 12H/15. The area is accessed by paved provincial Route 420 that intersects the TransCanada Highway approximately 55 km to the south. Deer Lake Airport, with daily scheduled flight access to St. John’s, Halifax, Toronto and other domestic locations, is located roughly 120 road km south of Jackson’s Arm via Route 420 and the Trans-Canada Highway. From Route 420 an access road and trail extends from the paved highway for a distance of approximately 2.5 km to the central Thor Deposit area where a core logging and storage facility has been established. Other trails suitable for movement of heavy equipment extend from this area to the various drilling and trenching sites on the property. Core logging and sampling facilities are located immediately east of the Thor Deposit on the access road. The property is accessible from mid-May to December for most exploration work and snow clearing along the access road from Route 420 would allow winter access to the deposit area. Diamond drilling and ground geophysics could be carried out year-round but could be hampered by extensive snow cover. Work programs requiring access to bare ground surfaces and outcrops would typically be restricted to the May through late November period. 5.2 Physiography and Climate 5.2.1 Physiography Topography in the Viking Project area is moderate, with forested hillsides and local rock escarpments, rising from the ~ 120 m above sea level (“ASL”) elevation of adjacent Route 420 to ridge-top plateaus such as that in the Thor Deposit area that occurs at an elevation of about -480 m ASL. The project area is strongly incised by major east and northeast trending stream valleys that are further dissected by northwest trending secondary valleys. Moderate slopes and flat hilltops characterize most of the area and the majority of the property can be easily accessed for exploration purposes. Locally steep slopes and rock escarpments prevent easy exploration access in some areas. Numerous small ponds and lakes are also present. Glacial overburden and thin soils occur throughout this area are generally shallow, making trenching a viable exploration option. Bedrock exposures are typically isolated and irregular. Well-developed coniferous forest cover characterizes the major northeast trending stream valleys and sparser tree cover interspersed with small barren patches occurs on intervening ridges. 5.2.2 Climate The Viking Project is situated in the White Bay area of northwest Newfoundland where northern temperate zone climatic conditions prevail. Winter conditions, expected from late November through to late March, include freezing temperatures and substantial snowfalls. Summer conditions prevail from late June through early September and typically provide good working conditions for field parties. Spring, and fall seasons experience cool temperatures with frequent periods of rain. 19 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL The following climate information is an average of those reported for Sop’s Arm, White Bay during the 30-year period ending in 2000 and generally characterizes seasonal precipitation and temperature trends in the area. The average August daily mean temperature for the reporting period was 15.5 ºC with a corresponding extreme maximum temperature of 32 ºC. Average daily winter temperature for February was -8.4 ºC with a corresponding extreme minimum being -33.5 ºC. Mean annual temperature is 3.5 ºC, mean annual snowfall is 273 cm and mean total annual precipitation is 958.7 mm. 5.3 Infrastructure and Local Resources Basic support infrastructure is present in the area, with Route 420 passing within 1 km of the eastern property boundary and the Trans-Canada Highway and Deer Lake Airport located within a highway travel radius of less than an hour. Basic support services such as motel accommodations, a grocery store and fuel stations are present in Pollards Point, less than 12 km from the field area, and access to contract heavy equipment services typically used in forestry road building and domestic construction markets is also possible. The nearest communities providing medical, scheduled airline and broader support services are those in the Deer Lake–Corner Brook area, located approximately 100 km and 140 km by highway, respectively, to the south. The provincial Crown controls holds most the regional surface and timber rights in this part of Newfoundland and Labrador and access to areas for mineral exploration purposes is generally straight forward, consisting of notification and authorization as required under provincial legislation. 20 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 6.0 History 6.1 Introduction The history of reported mineral exploration on the Viking Project is relatively short and spans the period between 1986 and 2013. Portions of the underlying discussion are taken directly from Cullen and Harrington (2011) and Ebert and Giroux (2011) with little modification (Table 4). 21 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Table 4: Historical Exploration on the Viking Project (1987 to 2013) Viking Property Historical Work Year Company Work 1987 BP Line cutting and soil sampling, Resources prospecting, geological mapping and airborne magnetics and VLF-EM 1987Noranda Prospecting, geological 1988 mapping, rock and soil sampling 1989 Noranda systematic soil and rock sampling, prospecting, geological mapping, diamond drilling, ground magnetics, VLF and IP surveys 1990 Noranda Additional line cutting, soil and rock sampling, ground magnetic, VLF and IP surveys, and diamond drilling 2006 Altius Data compilation, drill core Minerals review and rock sampling Trenching Drilling Highlights Definition of broad gold-in-soil anomaly Viking Trend anomaly identified 2007 Northern Abitibi Road building, prospecting and trenching 6 trenches (TR-1 to 6) 2008 Northern Abitibi Trenching, diamond drilling, geological mapping 20 trenches (TR-7 to 26) 2 holes - 243.2 m (SM-89-1 and 2) 45 m of altered granite assaying 0.56 gram-per-tonne (“g/t”) Au over 5.3 m; discovery of the Viking Trend 1 hole - 110.4 m (SM-90-1) Discovery of the Thor Trend; SM90-1 assays 0.17 g/t Au over 20 m Assays up to 26.6 g/t Au from Viking Trend, traced zone of mineralization over 200 m 22 10 holes - 575 m (08VK-01 to 10) Re-discovery of Thor Trend; assays up to 2.2 g/t Au over 7 m in trenches. Drill assays up to 33.74 g/t Au over 5.75 m (08VK-01); 5.12 g/t Au over 23 m (08VK-03) NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 2009 Northern Abitibi Trenching, diamond drilling, geological mapping 15 trenches (TR-27 to 41) 35 holes - 3,612.6 (09VK11 to 45) Expansion of the Thor Trend; 2.8 g/t Au over 57.4 m (09VK-14); 4.1 g/t Au over 18.2 m (09VK-19) 2010 Northern Abitibi Trenching, diamond drilling, rock and soil sampling 13 trenches (TR-42 to 54) 58 holes - 9,734.8 m (10VK-46 to 103) Expansion of the Thor Trend; 1.8 g/t Au over 32 m (10VK-60) 2011 Northern Abitibi Trenching, diamond drilling, IP surveying 8 trenches (TR-55 to 62) 25 holes - 4,698.2 m(11VK-104 to 128) Initial and Resource Update for the Thor Trend 62 trenches 131 holes - 18,974.2 metres Trenching Drilling Totals Kramer Property Historical Work Year Company Work 1987 BP Line cutting and soil sampling, Resources prospecting, geological mapping and airborne magnetics and VLF-EM 2009 Spruce Road building and prospecting Ridge Resources Highlights Definition of broad gold-in-soil anomaly Discovery of mineralized bedrock with assays up to 49.8 g/t Au and 111.2 g/t Ag at Kramer 2010 Spruce Ridge Resources Prospecting, Trenching and diamond drilling 4 trenches 6 holes - 600 m (KR-10-01 to 06) 0.39 g/t Au over 7.2 m (KR-10-07) and up to 32.10 g/t Au over 0.18 m in trenches 2010 Spruce Ridge Resources Trenching and diamond drilling Expand existing trenches; 5 new trenches 8 holes - 1,000 m (KR-1007 to 14) 1.12 g/t Au over 20.05 m including 3.78 g/t Au over 5.15 m (KR-10-07) testing of the Kramer, Whiskey Jack and Quartzite prospects 2013 Spruce Ridge Resources Diamond drilling Totals 14 holes - 2,051.8 m (KR10-15 to 28) 9 trenches 28 holes - 3,651.8 metres 23 Drillhole KR13-17 assayed 25.41 g/t Au over 0.50 metres NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 6.2 Historical Exploration 6.2.1 Exploration Programs Completed Prior to 1987 Prior to 1987, there is no record of industry-sponsored work in the area of these claims. A detailed compilation of significant mineral exploration activity in the area is presented in Churchill and Voordouw (2006). 6.2.2 Exploration Programs Completed Between 1987 and 1990 In 1987, BP Resources Canada Limited (“BP”) undertook a program of line cutting and soil sampling and defined a broad, moderate gold-in-soil anomaly in the eastern part of the claim block. In 1988, BP conducted additional line cutting, grid mapping, prospecting, took 267 additional soil samples, and conducted a helicopter borne magnetic and VLF-EM survey. They outlined a 200 m x 500 m gold-in soil anomaly with values ranging between 100 and 200 parts per billion that was open to the west and south. In 1987 and 1988, Noranda Exploration Company Limited (“Noranda”) conducted large programs of prospecting, mapping, and rock and soil sampling on claims adjacent to this held by BP. In 1989, Noranda completed additional soil and rock samples, prospecting, geological mapping, diamond drilling, ground magnetics, VLF and IP surveys. Two diamond drillholes (SM-89-1 and SM-89-2) totalling 243.2 m were also completed. Drillhole SM-89-1 intersected 45 m of altered granite within which a grade of 0.56 g/t Au over 5.3 m was returned that corresponded with a weak Induced Polarization (IP) anomaly. This anomaly showed increased strength towards the southwest, possibly indicating that intensity of gold mineralization might also increase in this direction. Hole SM-89-2 returned a high of 0.61 g/t Au over 0.5 m from altered granite. In 1990, Noranda completed a small program of line cutting, soil sampling, magnetometer, VLF- EM and IP surveying and drilled one diamond drillhole (SM-90-1). The hole was drilled to a depth of 110.4 m and the best intersection was 0.17 g/t Au over 20 m. 6.2.3 Exploration Programs Completed Between 2006 and 2007 In 2006, Altius acquired the Viking claims and conducted a comprehensive data compilation and review. Historic information was compiled in digital format to support further assessment using a geographic information system. Altius conducted field visits to the property, collected 42 rock samples for analyses, and examined historic drill core from the property. In 2007, Altius completed an airborne magnetic, electromagnetic and radiometric survey over the Viking claims as part of a larger 1916.2 line km survey (Thurlow and Churchill, 2007). In 2007, Northern Abitibi optioned the property from Altius and results of subsequent work programs carried out by Northern Abitibi are reported below and in report section 9.0. 6.2.4 Viking Property Exploration Between 2008 and 2011 24 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL From 2007 to 2011, Northern Abitibi completed soil sampling, prospecting, IP geophysical surveying, excavation of 62 trenches (TR1 to TR62), road building (6.5 km), and 18,624.6 m of diamond drilling in 128 drillholes (Cullen and Harrington, 2011; Ebert and Giroux, 2011). The work resulted in outlining several areas of gold mineralization on the property including the Thor, Viking, Asgard, Thor’s Cross and Odin’s Triangle Trends. Work as resulted in initial and updated NI43-101-compliant resources on the Thor Deposit in 2011. The initial Mineral Resource Estimate on the Thor Deposit was completed for Northern Abitibi by Mercator Geological Services Limited in March 2011 and resulted in an Inferred Mineral Resource containing 6,284,000 tonnes grading 0.61 g/t Au (123,242 ounces) using a 0.2 g/t Au cut-off. In this initial estimate high-grade domains are spatially constrained and capped at 28 g/t Au and low-grade domains were capped at 5 g/t Au (Cullen and Harrington, 2011). Follow-up work in 2011 by Northern Abitibi included 8 trenches (trenches 55 to 62) and drilling and additional 25 holes totaling 4,698.2 m. This resulted in an updated Mineral Resource on December 30, 2011, for the Thor Deposit (Ebert and Giroux, 2011). Results of the December 30, 2011 Mineral Resource Estimate are summarized in Table 5 below. At a cut-off grade of 0.20 g/t Au the Thor Trend Deposit contains an Indicated Mineral Resource of 98,000 ounces Au (3,232,000 tonnes at an average grade of 0.95 g/t) plus an Inferred Mineral Resource of 45,000 ounces Au (2,123,000 tonnes at an average grade of 0.66 g/t). These new results represent a 55% increase in grade over the previous estimate and a 16% increase in contained ounces. Approximately 80% of the contained gold ounces were upgraded from the Inferred to the Indicated category. Table 5: Thor Trend – Mineral Resources as per the December 30, 2011 Mineral Resource Estimate Au Cut-off (g/t) Tonnes> Cut-off (tonnes) Grade > Cut-off Au (g/t) Contained Ounces Au* Indicated 0.10 3,593,000 0.87 100,000 0.20 3,232,000 0.95 98,000 0.50 1,817,000 1.42 83,000 1.00 937,000 2.09 63,000 2.00 357,000 3.19 36,600 3.00 147,000 4.33 20,500 Inferred 0.10 2,459,000 0.59 47,000 0.20 2,123,000 0.66 45,000 0.50 847,000 1.15 31,000 1.00 350,000 1.79 20,000 2.00 94,000 2.90 8,800 3.00 29,000 4.10 3,800 25 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL *Mineralized domains are spatially constrained and capped. The exploration work completed by Northern Abitibi is presented in greater detail in section 9.0 below. Northern Abitibi sold the rights to the Viking Property to Spruce Ridge in 2012. 6.2.5 Kramer Property Exploration Between 2009 and 2013 During the summer 2009, workers constructing an access road to the Viking Property uncovered a zone at least 30 m in width within altered granite containing at least three quartz-sulfide rich veins measuring up to 30 cm in width and locally carrying fine visible gold. Grab samples returned assays grading up to 49.8 g/t Au and 111.2 g/t Ag. Since 2009, Spruce Ridge has completed prospecting and geological mapping, excavated 9 large trenches and drilled 28 diamond drillholes totalling 3,651.8 m (Table 4). Exploration work has led to the discovery of the Kramer, Kramer Northeast, Quartzite, Whiskey Jack and Discovery zones. Gold mineralization is currently outlined over a strike length of 1.3 kilometres. On February 5, 2016, Anaconda optioned the Viking and Kramer Properties from Spruce Ridge, consolidating both properties into one project. 26 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 7.0 Geological Setting and Mineralization 7.1 Lithotectonic Subdivisions Relative to the Viking Project Williams (1979) proposed a five part litho-tectonic framework for the Northern Appalachian orogen and, although subsequently modified, this basic framework can still be usefully applied (e.g. Williams et al., 1988, van Staal and Fyffe, 1991, van Staal, 2006). Figure 2 outlines the five major litho-tectonic zones, these being from west to east, the Humber, Dunnage, Gander, Avalon and Meguma zones. Evolution of these major zones reflects development and destruction of the Lower Paleozoic Iapetus Ocean through sequential closure that incorporated two major stages of arc-related rifting, with staged subsequent accretion and superimposed structural modification of accreted terranes (van Staal, 2006). Summarily, the Humber Zone reflects the early Paleozoic continental margin sequence of cratonic North America that was deposited on and adjacent to late Precambrian (Grenvillian) basement. The Dunnage Zone adjoins to the east and is comprised of remnants of Iapetan oceanic crust plus some accreted fragments of associated back-arc basins and volcanic arc complexes. These record earliest increments of Iapetan closure that correlate with the initial pulses of the Late Ordovician Taconic Orogeny. The Gander Zone consists predominantly of sedimentary sequences plus remnants of subduction-related back-arc volcanic sequences that accumulated oceanward of the opposing Iapetan passive margin. Volcanic arc complexes developed as a result of eastdirected subduction and this culminated in full ocean closure during the final, Late Ordovician phase of the Taconic Orogeny. Van Staal (2007) inferred presence of a narrow micro-continental block of sialic crust within the Iapetan ocean basin that separated the major arc complexes, all of which were telescoped and accreted during late Ordovician through early Silurian time. The adjoining Avalon and Meguma Zones to the east were subsequently tectonically assembled within the orogen by Mid Devonian time. The Viking Project occurs within Long Range Inlier basement orthogneisses of the Humber Zone that immediately adjoin the structural boundary between that zone and Dunnage Zone sequences to the east. 27 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Figure 2: Lithotectonic Subdivisions of the Northern Appalachians 28 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 7.2 Regional Geology of White Bay Area Figure 3 presents regional geology of the southern White Bay area as interpreted by Knight (2007). The oldest mapped units in the area are those assigned to the Long Range Massif or Inlier, which are mainly ~1500Ma granitoid gneisses (Owen, 1986; Kerr, 2006). Younger granites (~1030-980 Ma) intruded these gneisses as did late Precambrian (~613Ma) ultramafic and mafic intrusions associated with the Long Range Dike complex. In the Viking Property area, these younger granites are mapped as the Main River Pluton, which is correlated with the ca. 1036 Ma Apsy Granite that occurs several km to the northeast. Humber Zone Sedimentary sequences of Cambro-Ordovician age unconformably overly basement rocks of the Long Range Inlier and were in part allocthonously transported westward over the Inlier by late Ordovician tectonism. The eastern edge of the Inlier in this area was intruded by the Silurian Devil’s Room Granite (425± 10 Ma) and Taylor Brook layered gabbro (430.5±2.5 Ma). The Doucers Valley Fault marks the eastern limit at surface of Inlier sequences in this area and is interpreted to have accommodated substantial amounts of both strike-slip and reverse slip motion beginning in late Silurian time and continuing episodically until early Carboniferous time (Kerr, 2006). Deering (1989) considered this fault in the Viking area to be comprised of at least two or three parallel, steeply east-dipping main structures with secondary splays crossing the Long Range Inlier and showing association with gold mineralization. This fault zone is considered to mark a major tectono-stratigraphic break within the Appalachian orogen and to have a complex reactivation history throughout Paleozoic time. Predominantly sedimentary sequences of the, Silurian Sop’s Arm Group occur east of the Doucers Valley Fault, along with a significant area of late Precambrian granite of the Gull Lake Intrusive Suite and a lesser area of Carboniferous Anguille Group sedimentary rocks (Figure 3). Westward structural imbrication of Sop’s Arm Group strata during later tectonism is well recognized (e.g. Kerr, 2006). 29 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Figure 3: Regional Geology Map of the Southern White Bay Area 30 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 7.3 Property Geology Figure 4 presents a simplified interpretation of Viking Property geology that is based on outcrop mapping, trench mapping, and drillhole geology. The dominant rock types present are feldspar augen gneiss, granite gneiss, diorite and gabbro. The augen and granite gneisses form part of the Main River Pluton and are intruded by younger diorite and gabbro dikes and sills considered to be associated with the Long Range Dyke complex. In the Thor Trend area pink potassium-feldspar augen structures that show strong shape fabrics at cm scale and occur in a fine grained matrix of biotite, white feldspar, and quartz. Foliated, fine to medium grained, white to beige granite that locally shows gneissic fabric cross cuts the augen gneisses and contains up to 5% biotite in unaltered areas. Locally the granite gneiss has a very fine-grained aplitic texture and contains pods of quartz-feldspar ± biotite pegmatite. Fabric development in the granite gneiss can be subtle. Both granite gneiss and augen gneiss are locally cut by pegmatite veins up to 50 cm thick. Mafic intrusive rocks also occur on the property and are characterised by fine to medium-grained diorite to coarse gabbro that locally contains 50% to 70% amphibole. The mafic intrusions generally show distinct chilled margins at contacts with augen gneiss and granite gneiss but also locally show strong effects of shearing and associated fabric development along contacts. Topographic trends in the property areas are dominated by regional scale northeast trending stream valleys that mark major shear zone trends crossing the metaigneous rocks of the area. Property scale mapping indicates that these features are secondary splays of the major north-northeast striking Doucers Valley Fault that follows the Doucers Valley topographic lineament and passes immediately adjacent to the eastern margin of the Viking claims. Several secondary splay structures have been defined to date on the Viking Property and both can be traced as topographic features to points of respective intersection with the Doucers Valley Fault. In addition to these major splays, detailed mapping along the Thor Trend has shown that north-south trending zones of shearing are also present on the property and that these, as well as some members of the northeast splay set of structures, have been the focus of extensive alteration associated with both low- and high-grade styles of Au mineralization on the property. 31 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Figure 4: Viking Property Geology Map 32 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 7.4 Description of Mineralization Styles Gold occurrences have been identified at various locations throughout the Viking Project but have been noted mostly on the Viking and Kramer Properties to date, and all can be classified as having examples of both the low-grade disseminated style and high-grade vein style of mineralization. To date, exploration programs have investigated bedrock Au mineralization through focused trenching and core drilling programs in six main areas, these being the Thor Trend, the Viking Trend, the Asgard trend the Odin’s Hammer area and the Thor’s Cross area (Figure 5). The Thor Trend is the most important and best defined of these mineralized areas. Mineralization is best developed within the granite and augen gneiss units. Mineralization occurs within the mafic unit as fairly restricted high-grade zones and as narrow, 1.0 to 2.0 m wide sericite-pyrite altered shear zones with minor quartz veining. Two dominant styles of gold mineralization are observed on the property. The first style consists of quartz veins containing 2% to 5% sulfides, dominantly pyrite-galenachalcopyrite-sphalerite and minor visible gold. These veins range from centimetres to about 2 metres in width and the continuity along strike has not yet been determined. Gold grades within these veins range from less than 1 g/t to 335 g/t. In the White Bottom Pond area gold-bearing quartz-sulfide veins generally trend roughly E-W (100 to 110 degrees) and N-NW. At the Viking zone, large quartz-sulfide veins exposed in trench 25 trend north-south (180 degrees). The Thor Vein consists of a strong zone of quartz-sulfide veining localized around a fold nose. The second main style of mineralization consists of tan to orange weathering, sericite-pyrite and locally carbonate altered rock with minor quartz veinlets. These zones generally have a fissile appearance and contain a strong cleavage and slickensided surfaces oriented in several directions. This style of mineralization is hosted in both augen gneiss and granite. Large zones (100’s of metres to over 1000 metres in strike length) of sericite-pyrite-quartz-carbonate alteration trending northeast (around 60 degrees) occur in the Viking area. In the White Bottom Pond area, similar zones trend west to northwest (100 to 165 degrees) and the main Thor Trend strikes roughly north-south. Chip sampling across this style of mineralization at Trench 1 returned 2.2 g/t Au over 7 metres. In addition to the 2 main styles of mineralization described above, narrow, shallowly dipping sericite-pyrite+/-quartz altered shear zones within mafic rocks locally contain 1 to 8.5 g/t Au, and quartz +/- feldspar veins associated with granite and aplite have returned trace to 0.285 g/t Au. Zones of granite gneiss with 2% to 5% disseminated pyrite with our without base metal sulfides also occur and are known to contain low-grade gold values. 33 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate Thor’s Cross Asgard For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Figure 5: Au Soil Map with Rock Samples > 1 g/t 7.5 Description of the Thor Deposit Gold mineralization and associated alteration within the Thor Trend have been defined to date through geological and analytical results obtained from 8,348 assay composites derived from Northern Abitibi diamond drilling and trenching datasets. Figure 6 shows the distribution of drillholes along the Thor Trend and shows the location of the cross sections A-A’ and B-B’ shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8. Figure 7 provides a cross section through the high-grade Thor Vein and shows the halo of lower-grade mineralization that surrounds the high-grade shoot. Figure 8 shows a more typical section across the Thor Trend illustrating both high and low-grade styles of mineralization. The Thor Trend consists of mesothermal style quartz ± iron carbonate ± sulfide veins and stockworks hosted by altered Precambrian intrusive rocks. Surface mapping and drill core observations show that quartz veins within the Thor Trend commonly contain 2% to 5% total sulfides consisting of pyrite, galena, chalcopyrite or sphalerite, and locally show trace amounts of visible gold. Distribution of quartz veins and/or associated vein arrays is irregular along the 600 metre length of the Thor Trend that is the focus of this Report and correlation of individual veins and arrays over substantial distances is difficult. The Thor Vein, the best-mineralized discrete vein identified to date, measures from a few centimetres in thickness near its strike extremities to approximately 4.0 m at its widest area. The vein strikes east-west across the dominant north-south strike of the Thor Trend alteration zone 34 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL and dips at approximately 70 degree to the south. Other cross-trend quartz vein arrays are present within the Thor Trend and occur as discrete entities. In contrast, low-grade Au mineralization defined by drilling and trenching along the trend shows substantive strike and dip continuity at a low Au threshold value such as 0.10 g/t Au. Gold grades within the quartz veins range from less than 1 g/t Au up to 335 g/t Au and sheeted or stockwork vein sets surrounding high-grade veins typically contain 0.5% - 2% pyrite-galenachalcopyrite-sphalerite along with minor visible gold. Iron carbonate is locally present in both high-grade veins and in mineralized vein stockworks. High-grade veins ranging from a few 10’s of centimetres to a few metres in width are common and are typically surrounded by a halo of veinlets containing lower-grade mineralization. At outcrop scale, veins and veinlets typically display en-echelon, and pinch and swell patterns and can occur in multiple orientations. Some high-grade quartz veins are localized at fold noses. High-grade veins occur in all 3 of the main rock types (granite, augen gneiss, diorite) whereas larger lowergrade zones of mineralization are best developed within the granite and augen gneiss units, and poorly developed within the diorite. Figure 9 presents a detailed geological plan of the Thor Vein’s surface expression. The Thor Vein is well defined and continuous to a depth of at least 170 metres below surface and 10 additional discrete higher-grade mineralized zones that are characterized in part by vein arrays and stockworks have been identified along the Thor Trend. Some of these show steeply south plunging geometry similar to the Thor Vein but others trend north-south and are broadly parallel with the steeply east dipping main structural grain within the alteration zone. Barren quartz veins also occur in the area. Figure 10 shows vein strike orientations from surface mapping and these identify a prominent NE trending set of veins, a strong E-W set of veins and subordinate NNE-trending veins. Vein dips are commonly to the south and east. Figure 11 shows photographs of mineralization and alteration from the Thor Trend. 35 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Figure 6: Thor Trend Drill Hole Location Map 36 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Figure 7: Cross Section A-A' Thor Vein 37 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Figure 8: Cross Section B-B' Thor Trend 38 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Figure 9: Surface Map of the Thor Vein Prepared by Northern Abitibi 39 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Figure 10: Orientation Diagram for the Thor Trend Quartz Veins 40 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Figure 11: A) High-grade Thor Vein exposed at surface. B) Low-grade sheeted vein zone hosted in granite. C) Close up of quartz-sulfide vein with gold grains. D) Close up of a sulfide rich portion of the Thor Vein. 7.6 Other Mineralized Trends Five other gold bearing mineralized trends have been discovered on the Property in addition to the Thor Trend. These are the Viking Trend, Thor’s Cross, Asgard Trend, Odin’s Hammer and Kramer. Results of trenching, sampling and core drilling, in these areas have demonstrated that both higher-grade quartz vein and disseminated low-grade styles of Au mineralization are present. The Viking Trend was investigated by nine drillholes during 2010 and 3 drillholes during 2011. These returned significant intervals of altered and quartz-sulfide veined augen gneiss, foliated granite and deformed mafic rocks. Photographs from the Viking Trend are shown in Figure 12. Trenching along Viking has returned low Au grades ranging between 0.10 and 0.40 g/t over continuously sampled intervals of up to 40 m, and high-grade results including a grab sample from a large boulder of altered granite from the northeast end of the Viking Trend, which returned 12.0 g/t Au, and a channel sample grading 9.9 g/t Au and 52 g/t Ag over 1.4 m. This northeast trending zone of anomalous Au in soil geochemistry results appears to be related to a moderately east-dipping reverse fault, which splays into the Doucers Valley Fault. 41 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Figure 12: Photos from the Viking Trend. A) View of Viking Pond looking south which parallels the Viking Trend (located on the left side of the photo). B) Trench 25 looking west. Note the strong quartz veining throughout the outcrop. C) Close up of Trench 25 showing the strong-sheeted veining and subordinate conjugate vein set. D) and E) Laminated quartz vein containing wallrock parallel rock fragments and iron carbonate +/- feldspar. The wallrock surrounding the quartz vein is soft and strongly sericite altered. At Kramer, a 30 m wide alteration zone has been discovered in Precambrian granite hosting quartz-sulfide stockwork and locally carrying fine visible gold. Subsequent trenching and rock sampling has verified the existence of multiple broad zones (5 to 30 m) of alteration and stockwork quartz/sulfide veins, stringers and fracture fillings. These alteration zones are similar in style to that observed at Thor and other prospects on 42 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL the Viking Property. At Kramer, the host rock to mineralization and alteration is variable, where fracture and alteration zones transect the Precambiran-Cambrian unconformity with mineralization hosted locally within younger Cambrian quartzite and argillites. This is similar to the host rock environment as observed to the north at Kermode’s Rattling Brook Gold Deposits. The work completed to date at Kramer has outlined a near surface, open ended, north to northeast trending zone of intrusion hosted gold mineralization, comprising high-grade precious metal veins as well as associated lower-grade haloes. The mineralized area, which encompasses the Kramer, Whiskey Jack, Quartzite and Discovery Zones, has been established over an area measuring a minimum of 1300 m in length and 100 m in width and remains open to the northeast and southwest. 43 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 8.0 Deposit Type The tectonic setting, host rocks, vein and alteration characteristics at the Viking Project are consistent with an orogenic or mesothermal style of mineralization for both the veins and related stockworks. The deposit host similar characteristics as numerous intrusive hosted gold deposits in Proterozoic or Archean granitegreenstone terrains worldwide. These deposits typical have temporal overlap with large-scale regional metamorphic events, associated intrusive activity, and often show a strong structural control on high-grade shoots. These deposits typically have a substantial down dip plunge extent to the mineralization which is seen on the high-grade Thor Vein to the limits tested by drilling. Mineralization and alteration along the Viking Trend contains much higher Te-Bi-Mo-Se-Tl-W than mineralization along the Thor Trend. This trace element association is typical of reduced intrusion related gold deposits (e.g. Lang et al., 2000), and some orogenic gold deposits (Groves et al., 2003), and the origin of this zone remains uncertain. 44 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 9.0 Exploration 9.1 Introduction Systematic exploration has been carried out on the Viking (2007 to 2011) and Kramer (2009 to 2013) Properties by previous owners Northern Abitibi and Spruce Ridge. The bulk of this exploration work has been fully disclosed in previous reports by Cullen and Harrington (2011) and Ebert and Giroux (2011) and associated mineral assessment reports on file with the Department of Mines and Energy, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. The work is summarized in this section, with particular focus on prospecting, trenching, channel sampling and geological mapping. Details of the diamond drilling programs on each property are presented in section 10.0 below. 9.2 Viking Property 9.2.1 2007-2008 Exploration Programs In 2007, Northern Abitibi constructed a 6.5 km long access trail from the west side of the property and excavated 6 trenches (Trenches 1 to 6). A total of 40 rock chip and grab samples were collected and four gold bearing areas were identified. Assay results ranged from below detection (5 parts per billion) to a maximum of 246.6 g/t Au from Trench 1. Chip samples from Trench 1 returned 2.2 g/t Au over a sampled interval of 7.0 m. Trench 6 of the program uncovered a portion of the northeast striking Viking Trend and exposed sericite-carbonate altered fine-grained granite containing sheeted and stockwork quartz veinlets with 1-3% pyrite-chalcopyrite-galena. Three samples from these boulders returned 1.1 g/t Au, 2.2 g/t Au, and 26.6 g/t Au and similar altered boulders and subcrop were traced intermittently for over 200 metres along a prominent linear feature that measures approximately 900 m in length. In 2008 an additional 1.9 km of access trail was completed, 20 more trenches (Trenches 7 to 26) were excavated, and 10 holes for 575 m of drilling were completed. A total of 247 rock samples were taken and several zones of high-grade and low-grade gold mineralization were identified. Results of the trench sampling are shown in Table 6. Table 6: Select sample results from the 2008 trenching program at Viking Location Trench 1 Description Granite with irregular quartz-sulfide veins Width (m) Au g/t 0.5 79.5 Trench 14 Folded quartz veins in sericite altered augen gneiss 1 84.4 Trench 14 Folded quartz veins in sericite altered augen gneiss 2 7.7 Trench 14 Sericite altered augen gneiss with quartz veins 9 0.5 Trench 15 Augen gneiss with quartz veinlets and pyrite 1 1.1 Trench 16 Sericite-pyrite altered augen gneiss 1 1.7 Trench 16 Sericite-pyrite altered augen gneiss with quartz veins 8 0.8 Trench 18 Sericite-pyrite altered augen gneiss with quartz veins 0.8 2.0 45 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Trench 20 Sericite-pyrite altered augen gneiss grab 2.3 Trench 23 Boulder of granite cut by quartz veinlets grab 3.3 Trench 7 Quartz boulder with sulfides grab 314.1 Trench 7 Granite cut by thin quartz veinlets with abundant pyrite 1.0 35.0 Trench 7 Sericite-pyrite altered augen gneiss with quartz veinlets 1.0 2.7 Trench 7 Sericite-pyrite altered augen gneiss with quartz veinlets 1.3 2.1 Trench 7 Silicified and sericite altered granite and augen gneiss 4.0 1.2 Trench 9 Quartz-sulfide vein grab 335.4 Trench 9 Trench 9 Same quartz-sulfide vein as above 0.6 metre wide quartz sulfide vein 0.75 grab 308 18.6 Trench 9 Same quartz-sulfide vein as above grab 16.4 Trench 9 Sericite altered rock with quartz veinlets 1 8 Trench 9 Sericite-carbonate altered rock with quartz veinlets 2.2 7.9 Trench 9 Sericite-carbonate altered rock with quartz veinlets 4 1.9 The zones targeted by the 2008 drill program had never been drill tested previously, and zones of very significant gold mineralization were confirmed in the exploration drilling and are summarized in section 10.0. 9.2.2 2009 Exploration Program During 2009 Northern Abitibi completed 3,612.6 m of diamond drilling in 35 holes, excavated 15 new trenches (trenches 27 to 41), carried out geologic mapping, and constructed a 2.5 km long access road directly connecting the Thor Trend area to Highway 420 on the east side of the claims. Select results from the 2009 trenching program are summarized in Table 7 and the location of 2009 and earlier trenches along the Thor Trend are shown in Figure 13. The 2009 trenching program continued to define known zones of gold mineralization and significantly expand the Thor Trend. Table 7: Select sample results from the 2009 trenching program Location Trench 9 Trench 9 Trench 9 Trench 9 Trench 9 Trench 9 Trench 9 Trench 9 Trench 9 Description New Thor exposure – quartz sulfide vein New Thor exposure – quartz sulfide vein New Thor exposure – quartz sulfide vein New Thor exposure – quartz sulfide vein New Thor exposure – quartz sulfide vein and wall rock New Thor exposure - altered veined granite New Thor exposure – quartz sulfide vein New Thor exposure – quartz sulfide vein Thor Zone – average of 61 mineralized channel samples 46 Width (m) 0.4 0.62 0.8 0.5 1.6 Au g/t 98.5 60.4 41.3 30.3 25.2 1.0 0.6 0.5 22.9 22.2 13.2 13.0 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Location Trench 27 Trench 27 Trench 27 Trench 28 Trench 28 Trench 28 Trench 28 Trench 28 Trench 28 Trench 28 Trench 28 including Trench 28 including Trench 30 Trench 30 Trench 30 Trench 30 Trench 30 Trench 30 Trench 30 Trench 31 Trench 31 Trench 31 Trench 32 Trench 32 Trench 33 Trench 33 Trench 33 Trench 33 Trench 33 Description 20 cm quartz-sulfide vein in altered augen gneiss Altered quartz veined granite Altered granite and augen gneiss Quartz sulfide vein in altered granite Quartz sulfide vein in altered granite Quartz sulfide vein in altered granite Quartz sulfide vein in altered granite Quartz sulfide vein in altered granite Altered granite with quartz veins Altered granite with quartz veins Altered granite with quartz veins Altered granite with quartz veins Altered veined granite Sheared altered granite with quartz veins Quartz sulfide vein Quartz sulfide vein Quartz sulfide vein in altered gneiss Altered silicified augen gneiss Altered veined augen gneiss Altered veined augen gneiss Altered and veined granite and augen gneiss Altered veined granite Altered veined granite Altered veined granite 20 cm quartz vein 20 cm quartz vein Quartz-sulfide vein Quartz-sulfide vein Altered mafic and granite Altered augen gneiss Altered augen gneiss Width (m) 0.4 Au g/t 9.4 0.7 8.1 grab grab grab 0.9 2.0 1.1 1.0 6.4 1.0 5.2 1.1 grab grab grab 0.65 4.0 2.1 0.8 1.2 1.0 7.05 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.3 2.6 2.0 1.3 5.4 1.0 120.1 57.8 37.1 19.0 14.6 8.2 7.0 5.1 13.4 4.3 12.8 148.1 83.0 44.3 21.0 12.7 8.6 3.9 13.2 10.4 2.0 1 0.9 30.1 10.4 1.1 1.4 1.0 A simplified geologic map of the Thor Trend is shown in Figure 14. The dominant rock type in the area consists of a package of foliated augen gneiss and fine-grained felsic granite. This granitic package is inferred to be Proterozoic in age, belonging to the Grenvillian age Long Range Inlier. These rocks are cut by a shallow north-dipping dike or sill of diorite to gabbro (locally amphibolite). The diorite dike has chilled margins, is weak to moderately foliated, and could be related to a Grenvillian age mafic intrusive event, or perhaps to the Precambrian (~613Ma) Long Range Dikes. 47 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Figure 13: Location of 2007 to 2009 trenches along the Thor Trend Alteration and mineralization at Viking cut and post-date the diorite dike. On the east side of the sheet an inferred Ordovician to Cambrian age package of meta-sedimentary rocks sits unconformably over the Grenvillian granitic rocks and mafic dikes. These rocks consist of a pebbly sandstone with rounded pale blue quartz pebbles (2 to 10 mm) in a sand size quartz rich sandstone. This pebbly sandstone in inferred to sit at the main unconformity and is on the order of 5 to 15 m wide. Zones of gold mineralization are known to occur within this quartz rich sandstone on the Viking Property. East of this unit is a fine-grained strongly deformed phyllite, and then a package of gray limestone and dolomite. Shearing and deformation within the phyllite unit suggest a major strand of the Doucer’s Valley Fault passes through it. The mapped zone of alteration and quartz veining (yellow dashed line on Figure 14) define a north-south trending zone at least 1000 metres in length that is termed the Thor Trend. Several smaller zones of east- 48 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL west and northwest trending alteration following localized shear zones appear to intersect or bleed off of the main north-south zone. Figure 14: Simplified geology of the Thor Trend 9.2.3 2010 Exploration Program During 2010 Northern Abitibi completed a total of 9734.8 m of diamond core drilling in 58 holes (holes 46 to 103), completed 13 trenches (trenches 42 to 54), took 819 surface rock, and 243 soil samples, and completed substantial surface geological mapping (see Figure 15). A high-resolution elevation survey using a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) Sensor has been flown over the project in combination with highresolution (15cm) Ortho imagery. 49 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Figure 15: Location of 2010 Trenches The trenching and mapping programs significantly expanded the geologic knowledge of the property and uncovered mineralization in numerous areas outside of the Thor Trend. A total of 5 major exploration targets with significant size potential have been identified on the property, including the Thor Trend. These additional targets include the Asgard Trend, Thor’s Cross, Odin’s Triangle, and the Viking Trend. There remains excellent potential to discover additional significant exploration targets in areas of the Viking Property that have seen limited exploration work to date. All 5 of the large exploration targets at Viking coincide with gold-in-soil anomalies, most coincide with airborne geophysical magnetic lows as the Thor Trend does, and all have been partially exposed by trenching. Each are briefly described below. Thor Trend The Thor Trend is a north-south oriented mineralized zone that has been traced by trenching and sampling for 1500 m and it remains open to the north and south. Drilling shows the north part of the Thor Trend has excellent potential to host bulk minable style gold mineralization in a zone that is at least 600 m long (and 50 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL open to the north), 30 to 80 m wide, and at least 200 m deep (open at depth). Numerous zones of high-grade mineralization have been intersected along the Thor Trend and these continue to be evaluated for their underground minable potential. Asgard Trend The Asgard Trend is a north-south oriented mineralized zone located 250 m east of the Thor Trend. The zone has been traced for 400 m by trenching and remains open to the north where strong gold-in-soil anomalies continue for an additional 500 m. Trenching has exposed zones of sericite-pyrite alteration and quartz veining with widths of 20 to 40 metres. Trench 47 exposes several zones of alteration within an area 80 m wide. Surface sampling has identified both high-grade and low-grade gold mineralization along this trend. Two samples from an exposed quartz-sulfide vein returned 18.5 and 42.9 g/t Au. Thirteen samples returned gold values between 0.6 and 1.9 g/t Au, and approximately 144 samples returned gold values below 0.4 g/t. Thor’s Cross Thor’s Cross is a 1000 m long east-west trending zone of alteration and gold mineralization that intersects the central part of the Thor Trend. On the west side the Thor’s Cross zone intersects Odin’s Triangle and possibly the Viking Trend in an area where the controls on mineralization are still under investigation. Thor’s Cross is approximately 30 to 50 m wide and consists of pyritic granite and augen gneiss with variable sericite alteration and minor quartz veining. Surface sampling on the eastern side of Thor’s Cross, surrounding the Thor Trend, has returned modest gold grades up to 0.6 and 0.9 g/t Au, whereas sampling on the west side of Thor’s Cross has returned higher-grades, up to 2.3 and 8.7 g/t Au. Odin’s Triangle Odin’s Triangle contains several zones of alteration and mineralization within an area roughly 500 m by 350 m. The area is intersected by Thor’s Cross on the east side and the Viking Trend on the west side. The geometry, controls, width, and grades of mineralized zones within the triangle remain poorly defined. A north-south orientation, parallel to the Thor and Asgard Trends, is possible. Surface sampling at Odin’s Triangle has returned a high of 26.6 g/t Au, with several samples ranging from 0.5 to 3.3 g/t Au. Viking Trend The Viking Trend is a northeast-oriented zone that has been partially traced by soil data, airborne magnetics, and surface mapping and sampling over a strike length of 3000 metres. Large quartz-sulfide boulders are abundant at the southwest end of the Viking Trend along the southeast shoreline of a lake, and historic sampling in this area has returned several samples grading from 0.5 to 6.9 g/t Au over an area 600 m long. Trenching in the area in 2009 exposed quartz sulfide veins and stockwork in outcrop, and limited sampling returned grades up to 2.2 g/t Au. Trenches 51, 52, and 53 have been excavated in the central part of the Viking Trend and have intersected zones of alteration and low-grade mineralization with up to 1.0 g/t Au. Trench 44, located at the far northeast end of the Viking Trend, has exposed variably altered rocks over a 51 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 40 m wide zone. Channel sampling at trench 44 has encountered elevated gold values up to 0.9 and 1.0 g/t Au. 9.2.4 2011 Exploration Program In March 2011, an initial Mineral Resource Estimate was completed for the Thor Trend Deposit by Cullen and Harrington (2011). During May to August 2011 Northern Abitibi also completed 8 trenches (trenches 55 to 62), 4,698.2 m of drilling in 25 holes (holes 104 to 128), and an IP survey over the Property. A map showing the location of 2011 drilling and trenching and the IP survey location is shown in Figure 16. Figure 16: Location of 2011 drilling, trenching, and IP survey In March 2011 a Mineral Resource Estimate was completed on the Thor Trend based on all of the drilling up to 2010 (holes 1 through 103), and numerous surface channel samples. The resource estimation project was carried out by Mercator Geological Services Limited (Mercator) of Dartmouth, Nova Scotia and Independent Qualified Person Michael P. Cullen, M.Sc., P. Geo. conducted the resource estimation. This initial Mineral Resource Estimate is described in detail in the 2011 Technical Report by M. Cullen, and M. Harrington titled “MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE FOR THE THOR TREND GOLD DEPOSIT NORTHERN ABITIBI MINING CORP.”. Modeling was performed using the Gemcom Surpac® 6.1.4 modeling software package with grades estimated by inverse distance squared interpolation from 1.0 metre 52 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL down hole assay composites combined with surface channel samples. Block size was 5 metres (x) by 5 metres (y) by 5 metres (z) with sub-blocking at 2.5 m (x) by 2.5 m (y) by 2.5 m (z). Nine discrete high-grade gold solids were modeled that typically grade in excess of 2.0 g/t Au and these occur within a large alteration halo characterized by gold levels between 0.05 g/t and 1.0 g/t Au. Two lowgrade solids and a peripheral domain were incorporated in the block model. For high-grade mineralization values were capped at 28 g/t and for low-grade mineralization, values were capped at 5 g/t. All resources were assigned to the Inferred category and are summarized in Table 8. At a 0.2 g/t Au cut-off, an Inferred Mineral Resource of 6,284,000 tonnes grading 0.61 g/t Au was determined (123,242 ounces). Table 8: March 2011 Thor Trend Inferred Mineral Resources Threshold 0.10 0.20 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 3.00 Tonnes (Rounded) 11,710,000 6,284,000 1,738,000 577,000 371,000 265,000 155,000 Au g/t 0.39 0.61 1.41 2.92 3.87 4.72 6.33 Grams 4,566,900 3,833,240 2,450,580 1,684,840 1,435,770 1,250,800 981,150 Ounces* 146,829 123,242 78,788 54,169 46,161 40,214 31,545 *High-grade domains are spatially constrained and capped at 28 g/t gold. Low-grade domains capped at 5 g/t gold. During May to August 2011 Northern Abitibi completed 8 trenches (trenches 55 to 62) testing areas to the north of the Thor Trend, along the Viking Trend and within Odin’s Triangle. Zones of alteration and minor gold mineralization were uncovered to the north of the Thor Trend, whereas more significant zones of mineralization were uncovered along the Viking Trend and at Odin’s Triangle. Three trenches were completed along the northeastern end of the Viking Trend, located roughly 2 kilometres west of the Thor Trend. A new zone of alteration and mineralization has been uncovered over an area 400 m long by 100 m wide and the zone remains open along strike. Surface sampling indicates the entire zone contains anomalous gold with values ranging from trace to 1 g/t, and several high-grade gold veins were identified. Channel sampling across the higher-grade veins has returned values of 9.9 g/t Au and 52 g/t Ag over 1.4 m, 5.2 g/t Au over 1 metre, 3 g/t Au and 17.3 g/t Ag over 1.1 m, and a grab sample of a mineralized vein returned 10 g/t Au and 8.1 g/t silver. A grab sample from a large boulder of altered granite from the northeast end of the Viking Trend has returned 12.1 g/t Au. Trenching of an induced polarization geophysical anomaly in the central part of the Viking Property has encountered a high-grade zone grading 5.5 g/t Au over 1.3 m. This mineralized zone occurs within a larger 50-metre wide zone of pyrite-bearing alteration containing gold values ranging from trace to 1.9 g/t. Prospecting has discovered a new area of mineralization located 100 m north-northeast of the Asgard trend near the eastern edge of the claim block. This zone is interpreted to represent the northern continuation of the Asgard trend. Sericite altered and pyritic-quartz veined granite has been found and sampling of outcrop from the zone has returned gold values up to 1.3 g/t opening up a new zone for further work. 53 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL In August 2011, a 13.8 line kilometre time domain pole-dipole 2D and 3D Induced Polarization/Resistivity survey was completed over the Viking Property. The field survey was conducted by Eastern Geophysical with results processed by processed and modeling by SJV Geophysical Consultants. A 50-metre electrode spacing was used and equipment included two ELREC IP-6 receivers, a Walcer TX KW10 transmitter, the Walcer MG-12, a 10 KVA generator and a Phoenix IPT-1 transmitter. The location of the survey lines is shown on Figure 16. Figure 17 shows a map with the modeled 3D chargeability data at 50 metres depth. Figure 18 shows a map with the modeled 3D resistivity data at 50 m depth. Figure 17: Plan Map 3D Chargeability Model at 50m depth 54 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Figure 18: Plan Map 3D Resistivity Model at 50m depth Several geophysical exploration targets have been identified including a 330 m long chargeability anomaly at the southern projection of the Thor Trend, which has not been tested by drilling. The chargeability anomaly is interpreted to be related to sulfide-bearing intrusive rocks and the target has significant potential to host additional gold resources along the Thor Trend. Several chargeability anomalies occur west and east of the Thor Trend and some correspond to mineralized surface exposures indicating potential for additional mineralized zones in these areas. The 2D geophysical results over the southern and western part of the property have identified 3 large chargeability anomalies with strike lengths up to 1000 m and widths up to 100 m. Drillhole 127 tested one of these anomalies and returned significant intersections of anomalous gold mineralization including 11.8 m grading 0.2 g/t Au from 43.2 to 55 m depth and 47.5 m grading 0.2 g/t Au from 85 to 132.5 m depth. This hole demonstrates that at least some of the chargeability anomalies are associated with gold mineralization and highlights the exploration potential of the area. 55 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL A second Mineral Resource Estimate was initiated by Northern Abitibi on December 30, 2011, following the completion of 20 additional drillholes into the Thor Trend (Ebert and Giroux, 2011). Results of the December 30, 2011 Mineral Resource Estimate are summarized in Table 9 below. Table 9: Thor Trend - Mineral Resources as of December 30, 2011 Tonnes> CutAu Cut-off off (g/t) (tonnes) Grade > Cutoff Au (g/t) Contained Ounces Au* Indicated 0.10 3,593,000 0.87 100,000 0.20 3,232,000 0.95 98,000 0.50 1,817,000 1.42 83,000 1.00 937,000 2.09 63,000 2.00 357,000 3.19 36,600 3.00 147,000 4.33 20,500 Inferred 0.10 2,459,000 0.59 47,000 0.20 2,123,000 0.66 45,000 0.50 847,000 1.15 31,000 1.00 350,000 1.79 20,000 2.00 94,000 2.90 8,800 3.00 29,000 4.10 3,800 *Mineralized domains are spatially constrained and capped. At a cut-off grade of 0.20 g/t Au the Thor Trend Deposit contains an Indicated Mineral Resource of 98,000 ounces Au (3,232,000 tonnes at an average grade of 0.95 g/t) plus an Inferred Mineral Resource of 45,000 ounces Au (2,123,000 tonnes at an average grade of 0.66 g/t). These new results represent a 55% increase in grade over the previous estimate and a 16% increase in contained ounces. Approximately 80% of the contained gold ounces were upgraded from the Inferred to the Indicated category. 9.3 Kramer Property Since 2009, Spruce Ridge has completed prospecting and geological mapping, excavated 9 trenches and drilled 28 hole totalling 3,651.8 m (Table 12 and Figure 19). Exploration work has led to the discovery of the Kramer, Kramer Northeast, Quartzite, Whiskey Jack and Discovery zones. Gold mineralization is currently outlined over a strike length of 1.3 kilometres. 9.3.1 2009 Exploration Programs 56 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL During the summer 2009, workers constructing an access road to the Viking Property uncovered a zone at least 30 m in width within altered granite containing at least three quartz-sulfide rich veins measuring up to 30 cm in width and locally carrying fine visible gold; grab samples returned assays grading up to 49.78 g/t Au and 111.2 g/t Ag (Froude, 2010). Follow-up work to the discovery included completion of a 157 line km airborne magnetic and VLF survey, prospecting and collection of 91 rock grab samples. The airborne magnetic data reveals the presence of several northeast to north trending linear anomalies that are interpreted to represent faults or shear zones cutting the underlying granite. These structures are similar to those on the Viking Property that are known to host gold. Based on the favourable results of the prospecting program led to excavation of two trenches at the Kramer discovery site and grab sampling of the outcrop. Trenching exposed a broad (up to 30 m) zone of altered and quartz veined granite gneiss. 9.3.2 2010 Exploration Program During 2010 additional prospecting and rock grab sampling (43 samples) was completed over the property resulting in the discovery of the Whisky Jack Prospect. Assays up to 8.06 g/t Au were obtained from prospecting (Froude 2011). Spruce Ridge completed extensive trenching (9 large trenches) of anomalous soil and rock samples over the Kramer Property, including the recently discovered Whisky Jack Prospect. The exposed bedrock was washed and 237 channel samples were collected. Channel sample results from Whiskey Jack include up to 45.16 g/t Au over 1.00 m from base metal rich quartz veining. At least three zones of fine-grained mineralized intrusive up to 10 metres in apparent thickness and of unknown strike length were exposed in association with the high-grade Whiskey Jack vein. The fine-grained zones all returned significant gold values including; 1.90 g/t Au average from 21 random 0.50 m long saw cut channel samples ranging from 0.189 g/t Au to a maximum of 6.11 g/t Au; and a second zone returned an average of 2.98 g/t Au from 14 random 0.50 m long saw cut channel samples ranging from 0.15 g/t Au to 11.19 g/t Au. The high-grade Kramer vein was exposed and sampled over a 70 metre length and includes saw cut channel sample assays up to 32.10 g/t Au and 31.79 g/t Au over 0.18 m (Froude, 2011). Spruce Ridge also completed 14 diamond drillholes (KR-10-01 to 14) totalling 1,582.2 metres. 9.3.3 2012 and 2013 Exploration Program During 2012, Spruce Ridge completed additional trenching and channel sampling generally following the trends of altered and mineralized shear/fault zones that transect the Kramer area. A total of 253 rock grab and channel samples were collected (Froude, 2013). In 2013, Spruce Ridge completed 14 diamond drillholes (KR-13-15 to 28) totalling 2,051.8 m at the Kramer Prospect (Froude, 2014). 57 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Figure 19: Kramer Area Drillhole and Trench Locations 58 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 10.0 Drilling A total of 22,607.50 m of drilling in 160 holes have been completed on the Viking Project to date, including 18,973.80 m in 132 holes at the Viking Property and 3,633.70 m in 28 holes at the Kramer Property (Table 10). The Mineral Resources presented in Section 14 rely on historical drilling data that has been verified and validated by Anaconda staff and contractors and has been subject of the previous report by Ebert and Giroux (2011). Table 10: Drillhole locations and parameters for the Viking Project Property Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Drillhole ID SM-89-1 SM-89-2 SM-90-1 08-VK-01 08-VK-02 08-VK-03 08-VK-04 08-VK-05 08-VK-06 08-VK-07 08-VK-08 08-VK-09 08-VK-10 09-VK-11 09-VK-12 09-VK-13 09-VK-14 09-VK-15 09-VK-16 09-VK-17 09-VK-18 09-VK-19 09-VK-20 09-VK-21 09-VK-22 09-VK-23 09-VK-24 09-VK-25 09-VK-26 09-VK-27 UTM83 Easting 498546.44 498786.32 498248.87 498241.70 500660.48 500659.89 500651.91 500659.89 500653.43 500680.56 500664.46 500661.66 500702.52 500692.89 500693.41 500706.05 500696.53 500695.55 500651.53 500647.26 500648.11 500652.31 500653.21 500622.91 500653.08 500652.63 500646.06 500647.74 500676.10 500653.08 UTM83 Northing 5503991.29 5504054.61 5503805.24 5503786.22 5504650.34 5504640.26 5504651.20 5504639.26 5504572.14 5504579.98 5504603.56 5504617.23 5504273.41 5504373.82 5504373.27 5504357.84 5504455.92 5504455.29 5504428.90 5504733.29 5504732.64 5504704.73 5504704.19 5504724.26 5504644.18 5504643.26 5504765.98 5504765.19 5504475.41 5504459.66 59 Elevation 389.00 427.00 384.00 440.71 440.69 440.61 442.00 440.61 442.12 434.66 437.36 438.51 376.99 397.66 397.30 388.57 419.35 419.31 424.39 443.04 443.08 442.39 442.31 444.61 441.22 441.07 443.64 443.62 428.47 432.69 Azimuth 335 335 330 0 0 0 0 0 35 320 160 175 340 320 320 320 230 230 50 76 300 300 300 120 20 0 300 300 310 50 Dip -50 -50 -45 -45 -60 -60 -45 -90 -45 -45 -45 -60 -50 -45 -70 -65 -45 -70 -45 -44 -65 -45 -65 -45 -60 -90 -45 -65 -45 -45 Depth 125.60 117.20 110.40 89.50 55.00 40.00 64.50 71.00 58.00 35.00 38.00 67.50 56.50 57.50 67.50 130.50 111.00 211.00 99.00 76.00 59.00 55.00 110.00 61.00 50.00 50.00 63.20 62.00 118.00 70.50 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Property Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Drillhole ID 09-VK-28 09-VK-29 09-VK-30 09-VK-31 09-VK-32 09-VK-33 09-VK-34 09-VK-35 09-VK-36 09-VK-37 09-VK-38 09-VK-39 09-VK-40 09-VK-41 09-VK-42 09-VK-43 09-VK-44 09-VK-45 10-VK-100 10-VK-101 10-VK-102 10-VK-103 10-VK-46 10-VK-47 10-VK-48 10-VK-49 10-VK-50 10-VK-51 10-VK-52 10-VK-53 10-VK-54 10-VK-55 10-VK-56 10-VK-57 10-VK-58 10-VK-59 10-VK-60 10-VK-61 10-VK-62 10-VK-63 UTM83 Easting 500652.21 500621.49 500645.64 500645.43 500633.71 500574.91 500633.49 500632.89 500632.79 500620.28 500604.96 500611.82 500661.84 500661.25 500657.59 500658.09 500693.94 500640.10 500623.24 500560.52 500619.54 500550.61 500673.97 500636.40 500643.91 500583.49 500611.70 500587.17 500586.41 500612.08 500597.85 500584.40 500676.80 500597.39 500669.36 500646.79 500622.45 500596.82 500596.37 500629.82 UTM83 Northing 5504459.11 5504392.95 5504628.91 5504628.45 5504665.28 5504753.72 5504665.07 5504600.66 5504600.26 5504593.90 5504525.47 5504473.80 5504363.29 5504362.73 5504296.82 5504296.82 5504136.26 5504282.09 5504704.53 5504659.01 5504629.37 5504581.48 5504604.63 5504576.91 5504520.18 5504469.24 5504428.55 5504229.52 5504228.39 5504428.13 5504367.29 5504230.75 5504313.70 5504366.75 5504249.59 5504229.91 5504331.02 5504313.52 5504313.10 5504216.36 60 Elevation 432.62 420.55 441.24 441.19 441.32 449.43 441.26 439.14 439.14 439.60 450.08 446.05 401.34 401.65 386.99 386.99 354.73 386.87 440.71 449.76 442.19 448.51 437.51 442.01 446.83 446.07 432.16 385.27 385.14 432.28 417.54 385.24 387.17 417.47 378.85 373.63 402.19 400.87 400.73 372.81 Azimuth 50 50 20 0 90 120 90 24 0 0 90 90 50 50 50 50 50 50 43 48 50 50 225 0 0 50 49 50 50 49 50 50 50 50 50 50 49 50 50 50 Dip -65 -45 -73 -90 -45 -75 -70 -73 -90 -90 -60 -50 -50 -70 -50 -70 -50 -70 -51 -62 -50 -70 -45 -90 -90 -70 -51 -50 -70 -50 -70 -50 -50 -65 -50 -50 -50 -50 -70 -50 Depth 92.00 157.00 56.00 71.00 100.00 245.00 77.00 119.00 122.00 140.00 170.00 98.00 95.00 65.00 96.40 125.00 196.00 137.00 74.00 200.00 80.00 212.00 47.00 215.00 206.00 272.00 167.00 194.00 269.00 198.00 239.00 98.60 89.00 272.00 161.00 171.90 161.00 197.00 260.00 185.00 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Property Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Drillhole ID 10-VK-64 10-VK-65 10-VK-66 10-VK-67 10-VK-68 10-VK-69 10-VK-70 10-VK-71 10-VK-72 10-VK-73 10-VK-74 10-VK-75 10-VK-76 10-VK-77 10-VK-78 10-VK-79 10-VK-80 10-VK-81 10-VK-82 10-VK-83 10-VK-84 10-VK-85 10-VK-86 10-VK-87 10-VK-88 10-VK-89 10-VK-90 10-VK-91 10-VK-91A 10-VK-92 10-VK-93 10-VK-94 10-VK-95 10-VK-96 10-VK-97 10-VK-98 10-VK-99 11-VK-104 11-VK-105 11-VK-106 UTM83 Easting 500578.19 500678.15 500600.38 500655.63 500599.21 500604.42 500703.97 500635.63 500756.48 500635.63 500756.48 500613.74 500774.58 500661.69 500668.54 500661.69 500668.54 500661.69 500581.12 500327.79 498410.45 500504.21 498420.57 500580.15 498097.20 498096.57 500591.50 498066.86 500619.81 498025.42 500842.19 498025.42 500648.21 500597.96 498232.96 499838.86 500646.50 500585.10 500629.00 500577.00 UTM83 Northing 5504518.06 5504197.77 5504114.37 5504731.09 5504114.93 5504751.98 5504270.16 5504935.35 5503782.38 5504935.35 5503782.38 5505005.72 5503737.38 5504407.28 5504217.11 5504407.28 5504217.11 5504407.28 5504605.91 5504229.55 5503977.56 5504607.32 5503976.96 5504730.23 5503766.35 5503765.58 5504844.34 5503715.51 5504859.49 5503676.34 5504809.71 5503676.34 5504524.79 5504534.39 5503581.24 5504554.88 5504589.50 5504571.50 5504536.00 5504493.00 61 Elevation 455.23 364.10 376.65 442.94 376.73 447.29 376.86 444.40 341.57 444.40 341.57 442.73 334.53 415.50 367.66 415.50 367.66 415.50 443.83 428.81 383.00 454.37 383.31 447.76 384.88 384.90 442.77 384.86 438.06 383.13 409.46 383.13 446.44 450.27 389.37 478.37 440.80 443.00 446.30 457.70 Azimuth 50 50 50 230 345 50 230 50 50 50 50 52 50 12 207 12 10 12 41 193 45 50 290 50 35 35 50 35 50 333 49 22 50 50 330 330 50 30 50 50 Dip -70 -50 -50 -65 -50 -50 -57 -50 -50 -70 -70 -50 -50 -45 42 -70 -70 -86 -65 -50 -45 -60 -45 -65 -45 -70 -70 -70 -50 -45 -45 -45 -70 -67 -45 -45 -70 -70 -70 -70 Depth 278.00 221.00 215.00 170.00 101.40 110.00 161.00 164.00 165.50 209.00 191.00 176.00 146.00 65.00 52.00 88.10 93.00 104.00 206.00 110.00 140.00 261.50 146.00 50.00 125.00 137.00 168.50 152.00 128.00 154.30 193.00 130.00 113.00 176.00 257.00 263.00 94.00 232.00 169.00 282.00 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Property Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Viking Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Drillhole ID 11-VK-107 11-VK-108 11-VK-109 11-VK-110 11-VK-111 11-VK-112 11-VK-113 11-VK-114 11-VK-115 11-VK-116 11-VK-117 11-VK-118 11-VK-119 11-VK-120 11-VK-121 11-VK-122 11-VK-123 11-VK-124 11-VK-125 11-VK-126 11-VK-127 11-VK-128 KR-09-01 KR-10-02 KR-10-03 KR-10-04 KR-10-05 KR-10-06 KR-10-07 KR-10-08 KR-10-09 KR-10-10 KR-10-11 KR-10-12 KR-10-13 KR-10-14 KR-13-15 KR-13-16 KR-13-17 KR-13-18 UTM83 Easting 500620.00 500613.00 500598.00 500568.90 500624.20 500601.70 500571.70 500592.90 500587.00 500595.00 500680.00 500641.00 500567.00 500508.00 500529.00 500552.00 498575.00 498623.00 498715.00 499924.00 500422.00 500581.15 501287.19 501314.19 501280.19 501280.19 501331.20 501331.20 501112.18 501112.18 501130.19 501130.18 501265.19 501265.19 501347.19 501348.19 501668.23 501668.23 501653.22 501653.22 UTM83 Northing 5504520.00 5504614.00 5504659.00 5504696.20 5504681.50 5504725.40 5504752.50 5504768.60 5504449.00 5504314.00 5504252.00 5504257.00 5504433.00 5504630.00 5504783.00 5504739.00 5504058.00 5504037.00 5504093.00 5504580.00 5504262.00 5504731.23 5505274.60 5505312.59 5505300.59 5505300.59 5505299.59 5505299.59 5505087.60 5505087.60 5505087.60 5505061.59 5505313.59 5505313.59 5505324.59 5505325.59 5505924.59 5505924.59 5505839.58 5505839.58 62 Elevation 446.70 440.50 441.30 447.80 439.70 442.80 449.60 448.00 443.50 400.73 386.00 384.30 443.50 447.00 449.00 450.50 391.00 388.00 394.00 483.00 420.00 447.76 339.00 345.00 344.00 344.00 335.50 335.50 360.00 360.00 352.00 352.00 351.00 351.00 338.00 338.00 323.00 323.00 313.00 313.00 Azimuth 50 40 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 70 50 50 54 50 50 50 330 330 332 155 180 50 73 80 60 60 76 76 110 110 106 110 46 46 173 144 315 315 300 300 Dip -78 -70 -70 -70 -70 -70 -70 -70 -70 -55 -50 -50 -70 -70 -70 -70 -50 -50 -50 -61 -50 -65 -45 -45 -45 -60 -45 -60 -45 -60 -45 -60 -45 -60 -45 -45 -45 -60 -45 -60 Depth 225.00 195.00 165.00 237.00 153.00 191.00 141.00 132.00 285.00 260.00 118.00 202.00 318.00 201.00 207.00 204.00 58.20 122.00 119.00 197.00 191.00 146.00 169.80 136.50 50.90 50.00 72.20 119.20 128.00 245.00 123.60 179.00 95.00 95.00 50.00 68.00 179.00 131.00 184.50 191.00 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Property Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Kramer Project Total Viking Total Kramer Total 10.1 Drillhole ID KR-13-19 KR-13-20 KR-13-21 KR-13-22 KR-13-23 KR-13-24 KR-13-25 KR-13-26 KR-13-27 KR-13-28 160 132 28 UTM83 Easting 501603.22 501603.22 501533.21 501533.21 501385.20 501385.20 501415.20 501415.20 501423.20 501318.20 UTM83 Northing 5505819.59 5505819.59 5505799.59 5505799.59 5505411.59 5505411.59 5505415.59 5505415.59 5505434.59 5505439.59 Elevation 326.00 326.00 343.00 343.00 331.00 331.00 328.00 328.00 326.00 337.00 Azimuth 285 285 135 135 338 338 335 325 265 253 Dip -45 -60 -45 -60 -45 -60 -45 -60 -45 -50 Depth 182.00 200.00 131.00 191.00 50.00 98.00 137.00 128.00 154.00 95.00 22,607.50 18,973.80 3,633.70 General The current Mineral Resource Estimate is based on a drillhole database for the Viking Property containing a total of 128 drillholes for a total of 18,620.6 m of drilling. These holes were drilled by Northern Abitibi from 2008 to 2011 and include industry standard Quality Control and Quality Assurance (“QAQC”) procedures described below. Each drill collar is marked by a wooden post with a metal tag and the location of each hole has been professionally surveyed by differential GPS methods. The majority of holes contain down-hole orientation surveys. All of the Northern Abitibi drilling is supported by full geochemical analytical data and original assay certificates, archived sample pulps, and half of all the drill core samples are stored in a shed on site for reference and verification purposes. From this database, a total of 109 holes have been drilled into the Thor Deposit totaling 15,574 m of diamond drilling, and these have been used in the current Mineral Resource Estimate. In addition to drillholes, 74 lines of surface channel samples cut from trenches using a diamond saw have been treated as horizontal drillholes and also used in the resource calculation. Drilling program details are presented below. All drill information such as rock lithology and alteration, sampling information, assay results, laboratory reports, collar survey data and down-hole survey data has been assembled into digital format for modelling. 10.2 Methodology Springdale Forest Resources Ltd. of Springdale, NL provided contract drilling services for the 2008 and 2009 drilling programs at Viking, completing holes 08VK-01 to 09VK-39. NQ size drill core (~47.6 mm in diameter) was recovered in both instances using a track mounted Duralite 500 drill. Cabo Drilling (Atlantic) Corp. of Springdale, NL provided subsequent drilling in 2009 and 2010, and completed holes 10-VK-30 through 10-VK-103. Cabo employed two skid mounted hydraulic drilling rigs and recovered NQ size core in 2009 and HQ size core (63.5 mm in diameter) in 2010. Logan Drilling Ltd. of Stewiacke, Nova 63 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Scotia provided drilling in 2011 and completed holes 11VK-104 to 128. Logan used a skid mounted hydraulic drill and recovered NQ size drill core (~47.6 mm in diameter). Northern Abitibi personnel and consultants supervised all on-site geological work under the supervision of Dr. Shane Ebert, President of Northern Abitibi, and also carried out core logging, sampling, interpretive and reporting functions. Field operations were coordinated from the Company’s Pollard’s Point exploration base and drill core from Northern Abitibi programs has been placed in wooden boxes with metal identification tags and stacked in a core storage shed on site at the Company’s core logging and sampling facility. Collar locations and elevations for all holes were surveyed by independent commercial surveying firm Yates and Woods Ltd. of Corner Brook, NL using differential geographic positioning system (DGPS) methods coordinated to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) grid, Northern Hemisphere, Zone 21, and North American Datum 83 (NAD 83). Topographic relief at the Thor Trend is low to moderate, with surveyed collar coordinates defining a total elevation range of range of 143.9 m between 334.5 m and 478.4 m ASL. For Resource estimation purposes a detailed digital terrain model developed from the LIDAR survey dataset was used. The majority of holes completed by Northern Abitibi were tested for inclination and azimuth variation using a Flexit electronic down-hole survey instrument and in most instances, an end of hole measurement was made along with a mid-hole depth measurement in deeper holes. All drill core recovered by Northern Abitibi during the 2008 through 2011 programs was systematically photographed using a digital camera prior to completion of core logging and sampling. These photographs form a permanent digital record of all core recovered to date from the project and have been archived by Northern Abitibi. 10.3 Comments on Core Recovery Core recovery for the majority of drilling was measured and entered on paper logging sheets during the Northern Abitibi programs. Overall core recovery was excellent, typically averaging near 100 percent. Localized zones of broken ground were encountered in drilling with recoveries dipping to less than 80%, but these were not common. No substantive core recovery issues were encountered in any of the drilling programs. Northern Abitibi did not record RQD values. 10.4 Viking Property Drilling From 2008 to 2011, Northern Abitibi completed a total 18,620.6 m in 128 drillholes at the Viking Property (Table 11). 10.4.1 2008 Drilling Program In 2008, 10 diamond drillholes (08VK-01 to 10) totalling 575 metres of drilling were completed as an initial test of the Thor Trend (Figure 6). The drill program was successful in intersecting significant high-grade gold mineralization including 5.75 m grading 33.7 g/t Au in hole 08VK-01, 3.8 m grading 16.1 g/t Au in hole 08VK-02, 0.5 m grading 176 g/t Au in hole 08VK-03 and 0.9 m grading 119.6 g/t Au in hole 08VK-05. The drill program also identified 64 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL larger zones of lower-grade mineralization surrounding the high-grade veins, such as 23 m grading 5.1 g/t Au in hole 08VK-03 and 22 m grading 1.9 g/t Au in hole 08VK-04. 10.4.2 2009 Drilling Program In 2009, Northern Abitibi completed a total of 3,612.6 m of diamond core drilling in 35 drillholes (09VK11 to 45) that tested the Thor Trend over 500 m of north-south strike length. The 2009 drilling program continued to expand the known zone of gold mineralization along the Thor Trend and identify additional high-grade shoots and broader low-grade halos. 10.4.3 2010 Drilling Program During 2010, Northern Abitibi completed 9,734.8 m of diamond core drilling in 57 holes (10VK-46 to 103). Select results from the 2010 drilling are summarized in table 9.6 below, a location map showing all holes drilled into the Thor Trend is shown in Figure 20. Drilling in 2010 has continued to expand and infill mineralization along the Thor Trend as well as identify new zones on the property that contain potential to host additional zones of mineralization. Drilling at the southern part of the Viking Trend (known as the Viking Pond area), indicates the altered zone is up to 70 m wide and dips at a moderate angle to the southeast controlled in part by a major fault. Surface work and drilling results show the zones contains highly anomalous Au, Ag, Zn, and Cu with elevated Te-Bi-Mo-Se-Tl-W. The Viking Trend contains mesothermal style quartz and Fe-carbonate veins similar to those at the Thor Trend; however, the zone contains distinct metal associations, structural controls, and isotopic signatures (M. Minnett, pers. comm.), suggesting distinct sources/timing for mineralization or perhaps a property scale metal zonation. All of the holes drilled into the zone intersected highly anomalous gold over widths ranging from 47 to 108 m. Highlights include hole 102 which intersected 11.5 m grading 0.4 g/t Au, hole 88 which intersected 27.7 m grading 0.3 g/t Au, and hole 93 which intersected 73.5 m grading 0.2 g/t Au. Significant drill intercepts from the Viking Trend are summarized in Table 11. Drilling has defined an altered and weakly mineralized zone that is 50 to 70 m wide, dips about 45 degrees to the southwest, and is very continuous to the depths drilled (about 200m depth to date). To date only low-grade gold values have been intersected, however, only a small portion of the Trend has been tested by drilling, and higher-grade zones have been identified on surface. Most drillholes into the Viking Trend have intersected a ductile fault zone at the base of the zone, which appears to form the lower boundary to the mineralized and altered zone. This fault is termed the Viking Fault and is characterized by a highly strained mylonitic like zone locally containing boudinaged quartz vein fragments and minor biotite schist. In addition to ductile faulting, several zones of brittle faulting occur within the mineralized zone containing, chloritic-clay fault gouge and brecciated host rocks (largely augen gneiss). 65 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Figure 20: Thor Trend drillhole location map showing all drillholes to 2011 10.4.4 2011 Drilling Program During 2011, Northern Abitibi completed 4,698.2 m of diamond drilling in 25 holes (11VK-104 to 128). Drilling along the Thor Trend continues to infill and expand the mineralized zone, and several new highgrade shoots have been identified. Select results from the 2011 drill are shown in Table 11. The location of 2011 drillholes are shown in Figures 9.4 and 9.5. 66 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Results from the Thor Trend continue to show the zone contains a large area with anomalous to low-grade gold with localized high-grade shoots, many of which remain poorly defined. Several holes have been drilled outside the Thor Trend to explore additional areas of alteration and mineralization on the property. Holes 124, 125, and 126 tested the northern end of the Viking Trend, located 2 km west of the Thor Trend. All three holes intersected anomalous gold and silver mineralization located within a corridor of strong alteration and quartz veining that has been traced for 1.3 km in length and remains open at both ends. Results from hole 124 includes 8.1 metres grading 0.45 g/t Au and 2 g/t silver from 3.2 to 11.3 m depth, and 1.5 m grading 2.1 g/t Au from 17 to 18.5 m depth. Hole 125 returned 25.2 m grading 0.3 g/t Au and 2 g/t silver from 8.3 to 33.5 m depth, along with a 1.5 metre intercept grading 0.5 g/t Au and 2 g/t silver from 60 to 61.5 m depth. Hole 126 encountered anomalous gold from 9.0 to 60.5 m depth with the best interval returning 0.5 g/t Au and 4 g/t silver over 1.5 m. Hole 127 tested an induced polarization chargeability anomaly in a mostly covered zone in the central part of the Viking Property. The recently completed geophysical survey has defined this chargeability anomaly over a strike length exceeding 1000 m, with widths up to 100 m, and to date it has only been tested with one drillhole. Hole 127 intersected altered pyritic intrusive rocks with anomalous gold mineralization from 39.7 to 162.1 m depth, including 11.8 m grading 0.2 g/t Au from 43.2 to 55 m depth and 47.5 m grading 0.2 g/t Au from 85 to 132.5 m depth. The highest interval in the hole returned 0.9 g/t Au over 0.85 m. This is the first drill test of this large anomaly, and initial results are encouraging, demonstrating the zone contains significant gold anomalies and that further exploration of the zone is warranted. Table 11: Significant Drill Intercepts from the Viking Trend Drill Hole 08VK-01 including including and 08VK-02 and including including and and and 08VK-03 including including and 08VK-04 including including and including 08VK-05 and From (m) 3.00 3.00 3.60 6.70 1.80 6.00 7.00 9.30 13.60 33.40 42.20 1.30 15.00 17.10 27.50 2.50 5.00 23.00 43.20 45.00 9.00 25.80 To (m) Interval (m) Au (g/t) 8.75 6.70 4.10 40.00 6.00 9.80 7.40 9.80 18.80 34.00 43.20 24.30 15.50 17.40 28.50 24.50 5.40 24.00 54.00 46.00 25.80 26.70 5.75 3.70 0.50 33.30 4.20 3.80 0.40 0.50 5.20 0.60 1.00 23.00 0.50 0.30 1.00 22.00 0.40 1.00 10.80 1 .0 16.80 0.90 33.74 50.05 218.79 0.73 2.88 16.12 35.84 41.66 0.93 7.02 37.62 5.12 176.20 23.41 2.12 1.91 13.30 9.61 2.43 7.85 1.54 119.65 67 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Drill Hole 08VK-06 08VK-08 including and 08VK-09 and 08VK-10 and including including 09VK-11 including 09VK-12 including 09VK-13 including 09VK-14 including including including including 09VK-16 including 09VK-17 including 09VK-18 including 09VK-19 including including 09VK-20 including including including 09VK-20 09VK-20 09VK-21 including including 09VK-22 including including 09VK-23 including including 09VK-24 From (m) 39.40 7.00 11.00 33.20 8.50 47.90 10.00 29.50 30.50 32.50 2.10 5.70 0.00 8.20 5.90 123.00 20.60 48.30 49.30 57.90 73.50 31.50 37.50 20.70 47.20 28.50 38.40 2.80 12.20 26.30 5.60 6.80 14.50 33.90 71.50 71.90 4.70 18.90 43.00 8.00 10.80 18.50 11.00 19.70 24.00 13.50 To (m) Interval (m) Au (g/t) 40.00 21.00 12.60 34.80 9.50 49.20 18.00 33.50 31.50 36.50 57.50 6.40 61.50 8.60 129.40 123.60 78.00 52.60 50.30 58.40 74.50 49.00 38.00 50.10 47.60 38.80 38.80 44.20 30.40 27.50 35.60 7.00 19.00 34.60 71.90 72.30 45.20 19.40 44.00 30.20 11.00 19.00 38.00 24.50 24.50 14.50 0.60 14.00 1.60 1.60 1.00 1.30 10.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 55.40 0.70 61.50 0.40 113.00 0.60 57.40 4.30 1.00 0.50 1.00 17.50 0.50 29.40 0.40 10.30 0.40 41.40 18.20 1.20 30.00 0.20 4.50 0.70 0.40 0.40 40.50 0.50 1.00 22.20 0.20 0.50 27.00 4.80 0.50 1.00 7.58 1.73 9.84 16.07 2.62 6.07 0.96 3.23 6.63 5.05 0.40 8.10 0.20 4.70 0.20 9.30 2.80 20.60 45.50 36.20 12.20 2.70 36.00 1.00 19.80 1.00 5.00 2.00 4.10 37.50 1.70 34.70 5.80 11.20 7.50 14.70 1.80 14.30 6.20 1.70 37.20 7.30 7.90 41.70 135.90 1.10 68 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Drill Hole 09VK-24 09VK-25 09VK-26 including 09VK-26 09VK-27 including including including including 09VK-28 including including 09VK-29 including including 09VK-30 including including 09VK-31 including 09VK-32 including including 09VK-34 09VK-35 09VK-36 09VK-37 including 09VK-38 including 09VK-38 09VK-39 including including 09VK-40 09VK-41 including including 09VK-42 09VK-43 including including 09VK-45 including 10VK-46 From (m) 43.70 6.50 46.00 52.40 75.00 1.30 7.00 32.80 36.50 49.00 1.10 10.50 38.20 10.50 63.00 66.40 15.00 31.50 37.10 43.90 45.80 12.50 13.50 28.10 60.00 65.40 95.00 89.00 113.00 74.00 86.00 163.00 52.50 70.40 70.40 20.10 21.10 34.80 40.30 46.00 53.70 79.00 79.00 99.80 108.50 9.60 To (m) Interval (m) Au (g/t) 44.90 8.00 65.50 65.50 77.00 49.30 10.00 39.50 37.50 49.30 60.00 11.60 45.30 67.80 67.80 67.80 38.80 37.90 37.90 49.00 46.90 52.20 31.10 28.60 60.65 66.00 96.50 123.50 123.50 95.00 87.50 169.00 98.00 98.00 71.50 31.20 41.00 35.80 41.00 66.60 85.00 84.00 80.00 116.50 109.50 48.50 1.20 1.50 19.50 13.10 2.00 48.00 3.00 6.70 1.00 0.30 58.90 1.10 7.10 57.30 4.80 1.40 23.80 6.40 0.80 5.10 1.10 39.70 17.60 0.50 0.65 0.60 1.50 34.50 10.50 21.00 1.50 6.00 45.50 27.60 1.10 11.10 19.90 1.00 0.70 20.60 31.30 5.00 1.00 16.70 1.00 38.90 1.00 0.40 0.80 1.10 1.20 0.60 2.50 1.70 5.30 12.40 0.50 5.70 1.40 0.30 1.90 2.50 2.50 7.20 32.70 17.40 24.10 1.60 2.80 45.90 6.70 27.70 3.00 0.80 1.40 1.30 5.90 0.60 1.00 1.50 23.40 0.80 1.60 14.50 21.90 0.50 1.00 2.80 7.00 0.50 1.90 1.00 69 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Drill Hole including including including 10VK-47 10VK-47 10VK-47 10VK-47 10VK-48 10VK-48 10VK-48 10VK-49 including including 10VK-50 10VK-51 including including including including 10VK-52 including and and 10VK-53 10VK-53 10VK-53 10VK-54 10VK-54 including 10VK-54 10VK-55 10VK-56 10VK-57 10VK-57 10VK-58 10VK-60 including including including including 10VK-61 10VK-62 including 10VK-63 including including From (m) 9.60 15.00 18.50 102.10 133.40 151.50 199.00 41.80 47.80 76.50 135.80 135.80 146.60 10.00 66.50 104.50 123.50 123.50 134.60 32.00 70.00 127.10 187.00 90.30 123.40 186.90 49.35 78.60 90.00 114.30 39.80 107.00 91.80 152.00 141.40 4.00 21.50 24.50 27.00 27.50 156.90 28.40 30.00 33.20 33.20 33.20 To (m) Interval (m) Au (g/t) 22.35 15.45 18.90 121.60 134.10 165.00 200.00 42.70 55.40 76.90 161.20 136.80 147.20 16.00 147.40 105.00 147.40 135.60 135.60 94.30 78.50 134.20 187.50 108.40 149.00 192.10 52.00 93.00 91.50 118.00 53.50 109.00 92.80 180.30 141.90 36.00 30.00 25.50 27.50 28.50 158.00 33.50 31.00 41.00 36.00 34.00 12.75 0.45 0.40 19.50 0.70 13.50 1.00 0.90 7.60 0.40 25.40 1.00 0.60 6.00 80.90 0.50 23.90 12.10 1.00 62.30 8.50 7.10 0.50 18.10 25.60 5.20 2.65 14.40 1.50 3.70 13.70 2.00 1.00 28.30 0.50 32.00 8.50 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.10 5.10 1.00 7.80 2.80 0.80 2.20 36.80 7.40 0.70 3.80 0.50 0.90 6.00 0.70 7.60 0.60 5.50 3.60 1.30 0.80 4.70 1.50 2.60 21.10 0.80 2.40 0.90 4.00 0.40 0.30 1.10 1.70 1.20 7.10 0.90 0.30 1.30 2.30 0.30 124.80 1.80 6.40 11.10 12.90 23.00 6.80 2.30 5.40 5.00 13.30 21.50 70 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Drill Hole 10VK-64 10VK-65 10VK-68 10VK-68 10VK-68 including 10VK-71 including including including 10VK-73 including 10VK-74 including 10VK-77 10VK-79 including 10VK-81 10VK-82 10VK-83 including 10VK-85 10VK-85 10VK-86 including including 10VK-87 10VK-91A 10VK-91A including including 10VK-94 10VK-94 10VK-96 Hole 100 including 10VK-100 10VK-101 10VK-101 10VK-101 11VK-104 11VK-104 11VK-105 11VK-105 11VK-105 11VK-106 From (m) 28.10 85.30 99.50 140.50 176.70 176.70 15.10 32.00 45.50 51.10 20.00 22.20 17.00 32.20 64.50 63.50 65.50 45.50 36.20 20.40 36.70 36.00 90.50 94.80 134.60 174.50 40.00 81.00 100.40 100.40 109.30 28.90 81.10 79.50 36.50 42.50 73.50 101.20 115.00 150.00 3.00 51.40 66.90 117.50 184.60 69.40 To (m) Interval (m) Au (g/t) 28.50 86.00 101.00 154.40 178.90 177.20 111.50 37.10 70.60 51.80 34.00 32.80 35.80 33.30 71.60 69.80 65.90 52.00 43.10 37.40 37.40 51.50 91.00 175.70 135.00 175.70 54.00 91.50 110.00 101.00 110.00 29.40 84.00 89.50 74.50 57.50 74.50 101.90 131.00 150.50 3.20 51.90 67.20 149.50 185.50 72.40 0.40 0.70 1.50 13.90 2.20 0.50 96.40 5.10 25.10 0.70 14.00 10.60 18.80 1.10 7.10 6.30 0.40 6.50 6.90 17.00 0.70 13.10 0.50 65.80 0.40 1.20 14.00 10.50 9.60 0.60 0.70 0.50 2.90 10.00 38.00 15.00 1.00 0.70 16.00 0.50 0.20 0.50 0.30 32.00 0.90 3.00 3.60 2.40 2.70 0.40 4.10 9.10 0.70 2.20 1.10 8.50 1.40 1.80 1.00 6.20 0.50 0.70 6.50 0.50 0.70 1.10 8.90 0.90 96.50 0.70 10.20 5.40 0.70 0.40 1.00 6.20 5.40 3.10 0.50 0.70 0.90 1.30 7.00 5.30 0.50 12.50 1.70 3.80 2.00 0.50 1.70 0.70 71 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Drill Hole 11VK-106 including 11VK-106 11VK-107 11VK-108 including 11VK-109 11VK-109 including 11VK-110 11VK-110 11VK-111 11VK-111 including 11VK-112 including 11VK-113 11VK-113 11VK-114 including including 11VK-115 11VK-115 11VK-116 11VK-116 11VK-116 11VK-118 11VK-119 11VK-120 11VK-121 including including including 11VK-122 including 11VK-123 including 11VK-127 11VK-127 From (m) 92.50 106.40 116.50 199.90 143.50 164.90 91.50 149.00 149.00 71.60 134.00 120.00 135.10 138.00 24.10 46.00 59.50 159.80 92.60 92.60 92.60 50.50 67.30 109.00 180.00 200.10 14.60 90.20 162.10 99.00 141.70 147.80 164.00 143.00 149.50 147.50 147.50 43.20 85.00 To (m) Interval (m) Au (g/t) 110.20 106.80 116.80 201.70 170.40 165.20 112.50 159.20 150.30 82.00 142.50 126.00 152.10 139.50 49.50 47.10 60.00 177.40 136.90 114.00 93.60 52.20 68.60 119.50 190.10 201.10 40.50 101.10 214.20 164.30 142.00 148.10 164.30 152.30 150.60 165.50 150.50 55.00 132.50 17.70 0.40 0.30 1.80 26.90 0.30 21.00 10.20 1.30 10.40 8.50 6.00 17.00 1.50 25.40 1.10 0.50 17.60 44.30 21.40 1.00 1.70 1.30 10.50 10.10 1.00 25.90 10.90 52.10 65.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 9.30 1.10 18.00 3.00 11.80 47.50 0.30 6.00 29.30 2.40 0.80 26.40 0.70 2.40 10.40 0.70 0.70 0.80 1.00 3.00 0.70 6.90 2.80 0.40 0.60 0.90 4.10 4.30 2.40 0.40 0.60 1.80 0.60 0.50 0.50 0.50 20.20 10.20 10.90 0.80 3.20 0.50 1.30 0.20 0.20 72 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 10.5 Kramer Property Drilling From 2010 to 2013, Spruce Ridge completed a total 3,633.70 m in 28 drillholes at the Kramer Property (Table 12). 10.5.1 2010 Drilling Program During 2010 Spruce Ridge completed 14 diamond drillholes (KR-10-01 to 14) totalling 1,582.2 metres (Froude, 2011). Diamond drillhole KR-09-1 intersected a narrow, base metal bearing quartz vein at a depth of 6.20 m that returned an assay of 3.69 g/t Au, and is probably the down dip extension of the Kramer vein sampled at surface that returned up to 49.78 g/t Au from a well-mineralized grab sample. Diamond drillhole KR-10-2, intersected 42.5 m of altered and quartz vein mineralized augen gneiss that averaged nearly 90 ppb Au including a 3.0 m section that returned 0.70 g/t Au including 1.543 g/t Au over 1.0 m. Holes KR-10-7 and KR-10-8 tested the Whiskey Jack Prospect. Mineralization intersected in these holes supported the surface trenching results including locally higher-grade, sulfide rich quartz veining with assays of 1.12 g/t over 20.05 m and 1.50 over 14.4 m, respectively (Table 12). Drillholes KR-9 and 10, drilled from the same setup, 25 metres to the southwest of KR-10-7 and 8, intersected much thinner zones of mineralization, possibly due to a northeast plunge to the mineralized trend. This is suggested by the outcrop pattern mapped in the Whiskey Jack trench which shows the finer grained bodies irregular distribution (not continuous across the stripped area), suggesting that holes KR10-9 and 10 most likely undercut the zone. Drillholes KR-10-11 and 12 (drilled from the same setup), were designed to test the northern strike extension of the high-grade Kramer vein as well as some newly exposed fine grained granite that locally carried significant gold from channel sampling. Results were mixed suggesting a very complex and perhaps folded nature to the mineralized zone. Drillholes KR-10-13 and 14 successfully tested the quartzite zone located immediately east of the Kramer Zone. The best result was from KR-10-14, which returned 1.04 g/t Au over 11.7 m (Table 12). Mineralization (pyritic replacement of magnetite) and alteration in the quartzite is strongest at this locality, possibly influenced by an inferred east west fault immediately south of the Quartzite trench. 10.5.2 2013 Drilling Program During 2013, Spruce Ridge completed 14 diamond drillholes (KR-13-15 to 28) totalling 2,051.8 m at the Kramer Prospect (Froude, 2014). The drilling program was designed to test new zones of gold mineralization exposed by surface trenching in 2012, mainly to the northeast of the original Kramer showing discovered in 2009. Locally strongly anomalous gold values (e.g. 25.4 g/t Au over 0.5 m; KR-1317) were reported in each holes and thereby successfully extending the mineralized zone an additional 1.5 kilometres along strike (Table 12) from the original Whiskey Jack and Kramer occurrences. Table 12: Significant drill intercepts from the Kramer Trend 73 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Drill Hole KR-09-1 including KR-10-2 including KR-10-3 KR-10-5 KR-10-7 and and and including and KR-10-8 and including including KR-10-9 KR-10-10 and KR-10-11 and and KR-10-12 KR-10-14 including KR-13-15 KR-13-16 KR-13-17 And And KR-13-18 And And KR-13-19 KR-13-20 From (m) 6.20 6.20 39.50 42.50 16.60 41.00 10.10 17.00 32.80 53.50 60.05 92.80 52.00 66.85 66.85 75.50 72.00 19.35 100.70 15.70 23.65 44.15 2.40 27.75 31.40 37.75 27.50 19.70 43.80 57.05 27.10 37.40 57.50 69.25 75.25 To (m) 7.40 6.40 43.50 43.50 23.20 42.90 14.40 19.10 43.80 73.55 63.30 98.65 53.80 90.70 81.25 80.65 74.20 19.60 103.55 16.20 24.00 44.50 5.90 39.45 36.30 38.70 58.50 20.20 46.80 60.05 28.20 39.55 57.90 69.75 75.75 74 Interval (m) 1.20 0.20 4.00 1.00 6.60 1.90 4.40 2.10 11.00 20.05 3.25 5.65 1.80 23.85 14.40 5.15 2.20 0.25 2.85 0.50 0.35 0.35 3.50 11.70 4.90 0.35 1.00 0.50 3.00 3.00 1.10 2.15 0.40 0.50 0.50 Au (g/t) 0.64 3.69 0.53 1.53 0.17 0.89 0.99 0.68 0.51 1.12 5.42 0.61 0.71 0.99 1.50 3.78 0.65 2.15 1.04 1.17 0.47 2.33 0.64 1.04 2.10 0.52 0.53 25.44 0.47 0.84 0.51 0.42 0.71 0.68 1.40 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 11.0 Sampling Preparation and Security 11.1 Drilling and Trenching Programs All of the drill core was collected directly from the drill by Northern Abitibi personnel, brought to a core processing facility on the Viking site, photographed, logged, and sampled. Samples for assay are delivered by Northern Abitibi personnel directly to the assay laboratory in Springdale, NL. All drill core assay samples were marked on the drill core and on the wooden core boxes by experienced Northern Abitibi geological staff or geological consultants. Numbered sample tags for each assay interval were stapled into the core box and a second tag was placed in a plastic bag with the sample sent for assay. Drill core was cut in half by technical support staff using a diamond saw with half of the core placed in clean numbered plastic bags for assay, and half remaining in the core box and stored on site. Duplicate samples, blanks, and certified standards are included with the samples sent for assay and checked to ensure data quality and integrity. Assay samples were tied shut and placed in larger rice bags and a numbered security strap was attached to each bag. For surface channel samples, Northern Abitibi geological staff or geological consultants marked sample lines and sample intervals on exposed bedrock in trenches with spray paint. Technical support staff cut out the samples from the bedrock using a hand held diamond saw and placed them in numbered plastic bags. Metal tags with sample numbers were nailed to the outcrop along each sample line. Core and trench sampling was closely monitored by experienced geological staff. Northern Abitibi geological staff or geological consultants systematically recorded recovery, lithology, alteration and structural observations, and sample intervals from each core hole. This information is subsequently entered into Excel spreadsheets and then undergoes various checks to ensure data accuracy and to correct any data entry errors. Drill core sample intervals were laid out by geological staff based on visually determined mineralized zone limits or lithologic boundaries, and a 0.10 m minimum sample length parameter was applied along with a maximum sample length parameter of 4.0 m. The majority of sampling was carried out at 1.0 m to 1.5 m lengths. Continuous down-hole sampling of core across weakly mineralized zones was typically carried out to document low-grade values present in the alteration envelope. 11.2 Sample Preparation and Analyses Bagged core and channel samples were transported to Springdale Newfoundland, roughly 1.5 hours’ drive from the exploration site, and the majority were delivered directly to Eastern Analytical Limited the primary assay lab for the project. Over the duration of the project, some of the assay samples were sent to Accurassay Labs in Gambo, Newfoundland. Standard rock and core sample preparation protocol were generally applied, which includes drying, jaw crushing to 75% minus 10 mesh, riffle splitting of a 250 g sub-sample and then pulverizing to produce material at 98% minus 150 mesh. For several samples, a total pulp preparation was used. Gold was analyzed using Fire Assay pre-concentration and Atomic Absorption finish on a 1-assay-tonne prepared split. A second analytical split of pulverised material was analyzed for a multi-element suite using the ICP-30 analytical protocol that provides analysis of 30 separate elements using Inductively Coupled Plasma – 75 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Emission Spectrometry (ICP-ES) methods after aqua regia digestion. Eastern Analytical Limited is a commercial laboratory that provides a range of analytical services to the exploration and mining industries. It is not ISO certified but maintains industry standard internal quality control procedures that include independent third party check sampling protocols. Accurassay Labs is ISO certified. Most core and channel samples returning a gold value of 5 g/t or more were re-analysed using a screen metallics processing protocol to better address potential for presence of coarse Au in such samples. The screen metallic process used by Eastern includes pulverization of the entire sample to minus 200 mesh followed by screening to create a plus 150 mesh fraction that is separately analysed. Analysis of a minus fraction split is also carried out and the two analyses are weight averaged to create a head grade for the sample. 11.3 Security for All Northern Abitibi Programs Northern Abitibi staff and consultants were responsible for general security at drill sites, for collection of core from the drilling sites and secure delivery of core to the logging facility. All subsequent core handling, sampling and sample shipment activities were carried out in the logging facility under secure conditions under direct supervision of geological staff. Cut and bagged core and channel samples were put into rice bags and each rice bag was secured with a numbered tamper proof security strap. The samples were removed from the field facility by Northern Abitibi personnel and transported directly to Eastern Analytical laboratory in Springdale, NL or to a locked sample-receiving container at the Cabo drilling company site in Springdale for shipment to Accurassay in Gambo by a commercial transportation firm. Both laboratories were instructed to advise Northern Abitibi if any bags arrived at the respective facilities with broken security seals or other evidence of intrusion. Northern Abitibi maintained a digital record of all sample shipments information, including constituent samples in every shipment, relevant shipment dates and laboratory receipt dates. The sample preparation, analyses and security of Northern Abitibi’s Viking drill programs are consistent with industry standards and acceptable for support of the current Mineral Resource Estimate. 76 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 12.0 Data Verification 12.1 Review and Validation of Project Data Sets Anaconda has compiled all of the digital data bases used in the current resource calculation. Field data and sample intervals were originally entered into Excel spreadsheets and manually checked against source documents for errors. Original assay files received from the lab are merged into the sample database and systematically checked to ensure all samples numbers, intervals, and descriptions are correct. All of the digital databases have been constructed, reviewed, and checked by Author Ebert. All drillhole logs, assay certificates, and historic documents have been made available to Author Giroux who conducted the current Mineral Resource Estimate. The validated drillhole and trenching databases from the 2007 to 2011 programs at Viking are considered to be accurate and acceptable for use in this Mineral Resource Estimate. 12.2 Site Visit by the Authors Author Ebert has been involved in all aspects of the Viking exploration programs carried out by Northern Abitibi and is familiar with all aspects of the project geology, drilling, trenching, and sampling programs carried out between 2007 and 2011. Author Ebert has spent several months in the field at the Viking Project over the course of the Northern Abitibi exploration programs. Author Giroux has not visited the property. As part of an independent data verification Mr. Copeland completed a site visit to the Viking Project most recently from August 8th to 15th, 2016. As part of the site visit Mr. Copeland reviewed diamond drill core from the Thor and Kramer prospects. Independent check samples were taken of the drill core. A total of 10 samples were collected from two representative drillholes (09VK-20 and 10VK-46) where the mineralized zones form part of the current Mineral Resource. Check assays reasonably reproduce the results of previous sampling as shown in Figure 21. A review of sample tags within drill core boxes matches sample intervals within the database accurately. Mr. Copeland reviewed the current drill database against scanned logs, original assay certificates from Eastern Analytical and Accurassay from Northern Abitibi archive files and finds that the drillhole logging sheets and assay certificates match the database accurately and the data collected is of industry standard quality. Mr. Copeland also completed a review of Northern Abitibi QA/QC programs form the period 2007 to 2011 and finds that the QA/QC program completed by Northern Abitibi meets or exceeds industry standard practice. Downhole survey files were reviewed for extreme changes in the dip or azimuth. 77 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL All collar coordinates were checked against the topographic surface provided by Anaconda and several collar locations for the Thor and Kramer Prospects were located using a hand held GPS and match the drillhole locations in the database. Based on the review of previous procedures and practices and the results of the data verification, Mr. Copeland has very reason to believe that the drill data is of industry standard quality and suitable for use in the estimation of Mineral Resources. Figure 21: Plot of original versus check assays – drillholes 09VK-20 and 10VK-46 12.3 Quality Control and Quality Assurance (QA/QC) 12.3.1 Introduction Drill core sampling carried out by Northern Abitibi during the 2008 through 2011 programs on the Viking Property were subject to a QAQC program administered by the company. This included submission of blind blank samples, duplicate split samples of quarter core, certified analytical standards and analysis of check samples at a third party commercial laboratory. Additionally, internal laboratory reporting of quality control and assurance sampling was monitored by Northern Abitibi on an on-going basis during the course of the project. Details of the various program components are discussed below under separate headings. Portions of the underlying discussion are taken directly from Cullen and Harrington (2011) with little modification. 12.3.2 Certified Reference Material Program 78 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Northern Abitibi used four certified reference standards during the course of the 2008 through 2011 exploration programs, these being MA-3A obtained from CANMET and HGS2, AUQ2, and AUQ1 obtained from Accurassay Laboratories Ltd.. Details for all three certified standards used appear in Table 13. Table 13: Certified standards used during the Viking exploration programs Reference Material MA-3A HGS2 AUQ2 AUQ1 Certified Mean Au Value 8.56 g/t ± 0.09 g/t 3792 ppb ± 312 ppb 1431 ppb ± 94.04 ppb 1330 ppb ± 114.8 ppb Project control limits (Mean +/- 2 standard deviations) 8.56 g/t ± 0.42 g/t 3792 ppb ± 624 ppb 1431 ppb ± 188 ppb 1330 ppb ± 230 ppb Each certified standard sample consisted of a pre-packaged, prepared sample pulp weighing approximately 50 grams that was systematically inserted into the laboratory sample shipment sequence by Northern Abitibi staff. Records of certified standard insertion were maintained as part of the core sampling and logging protocols and ensured that at least one standard was submitted with each laboratory shipment. Range limits for review of certified standard results were established at the certified mean ± 2 standard deviations levels reported for inter-lab results obtained by the source laboratories. The majority of certified standards from the Viking database fall within the accepted control limits of 2 standard deviations from the certified mean value. During the 2010 drilling program several results for certified reference material AUQ2 fall below the accepted limits indicating some under reporting of gold values might have occurred. Overall, the combined results for the certified standards carried out by Northern Abitibi and the laboratories are sufficiently consistent to support the use of the assay data in the current Mineral Resource Estimate. 12.3.3 Blank Sample Programs Blank samples of comparable weight to normal half core samples were systematically inserted into the laboratory sample stream by Northern Abitibi staff during the 2008-2011 exploration programs, with approximately 1 blank per 20 samples submitted. Blank samples used by Northern Abitibi consisted of nonmineralized granitic intrusive rock from the Gull Lake Granite and were collected from a talus slide on the side of highway 420 near the start of the Viking access road. The majority of blank samples return gold values less than 5 ppb (below detection), a few samples in mineralized zones show weak gold values, with an overall average of less than 15 ppb. Only 4 blank samples show evidence of cross contamination during sample preparation with a maximum value of 375 ppb Au obtained from one blank. These anomalous blank samples typically follow samples with very high gold grade, and the labs were made aware of the concerns. No significant and systematic cross-contamination effect is interpreted to be present in the Au data set. 79 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 12.3.4 Quarter Core Duplicate Split Program Northern Abitibi carried out a program of quarter core sampling to check on variation of results between half core sample components. Roughly one quarter core duplication sample was taken in every 20 samples sent for assay. In addition, each laboratory also ran routine duplicate analyses on pulps as part of their internal quality control procedures. The samples generally show reasonable correlation in lower-grade samples. High-grade samples, however, can show considerable variability indicating a strong nugget effect as a result of coarse heterogeneous gold distribution in the high-grade veins. 12.3.5 Check Sample Programs During the course of the Viking exploration programs, Northern Abitibi periodically submitted pulp samples previously analysed by Eastern Analytical to Accurassay as an independent check on gold analyses. Accurassay is an ISO accredited commercial laboratory. Overall, the check assays compare well with the original results and are interpreted to show acceptable confirmation of Northern Abitibi dataset mineralization levels. In some of the higher-grade samples, however, the check samples show higher degrees of variation. This variation is attributed to the strong nugget effect seen within the high-grade veins. The majority of samples in the database are not strongly influenced by this nugget effect. 80 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 13.0 Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing To date only preliminary metallurgical test work has been done on the Thor Trend mineralization. In 2010, preliminary metallurgical testing was conducted on a single composite sample of representative drill core from the Thor Trend by Met-Solve Laboratories Inc. of Burnaby, British Columbia. The objective of the test work was to obtain a better understanding of the metallurgical characteristics of the mineralization at Viking and provide early identification of potential metallurgical complexities. The program included screen analysis to determine average free gold particle size, preliminary grind size versus recovery studies, and determination of gravity recoverable gold percentage and gold recovery by bottle roll cyanide leaching. Results of the metallurgical testing showed that gold mineralization at the Thor Trend is not refractory and can be readily extracted by gravity or cyanide recovery methods. No significant metallurgical concerns were identified. During the testing gold recovery of 97% was achieved by cyanide leaching of a 59-micron grind size product. Gold recovery of 95% was obtained with a combination of gravity separation and cyanide leaching at a 59-micron grind size. Gold recovery of 86% was obtained with a combination of gravity separation and cyanide leaching at a coarser grind of 258 microns. Preliminary tests showed that 70% of the gold is recoverable by gravity concentration methods at a 97-micron grind size, and higher gravity recoveries might be possible through process optimization (Ebert and Giroux, 2011). Follow-up preliminary metallurgical testing by Anaconda in late 2015 indicates that mineralization from the Thor Deposit of the Viking Project could be processed at the Pine Cove Mill using current flotation and leach circuit configuration. The results of the study are based on a homogenized sample collected from two diamond drillholes. Bench scale test work, conducted by NB Research and Productivity Council (“RPC”), primarily focused on flotation, cyanide leaching and grinding to evaluate the response of the Thor Deposit material to the current plant flow sheet for the Pine Cove Mill. In a flotation test, using a grind of (80% passing) 150 µm, currently used for Pine Cove ore, the Thor Deposit sample attained 96.0% Au recovery in 4.4% of the mass at a grade of 35.12 g/t Au in the rougher stage. In a bottle roll cyanidation test the current Pine Cove Mill regrind size of (80% passing) 20 µm obtained 94.1% Au extraction without requiring accelerating reagents and consumed 1.1 kg/t NaCN compared to 3.6 kg/t for Pine Cove ore. A Bond Ball mill grindability test was performed utilizing a limiting screen size of 150 µm and indicated that the sample has a Bond Ball Work Index (“BWI”) value of 18.5 kWh/t. The sample for the metallurgical test work on the Thor Deposit was collected by Anaconda staff from diamond drillholes VK09-20 and VK10-46, located at the northern portion of the Deposit and sent to RPC in Fredericton, New Brunswick. The 59.8 kg sample was homogenized and analyzed by ICP-OES, whole rock analysis and Au fire assay and was found to have a head grade of 1.86 g/t Au, 1.4 g/t Ag, 0.003% Cu and 2.1% Fe, and found to contain 67.26% SiO2. 81 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 14.0 Mineral Resource Estimate At the request of Anaconda Mining Inc., Giroux Consultants Ltd. was retained to produce an updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Viking Project, in Newfoundland. The effective date for this Resource is August 29, 2016. The updated resource was completed in order to re-assess the deposit given current gold market conditions. No additional drilling or channel sampling has been completed since the 2011 Mineral Resource Estimate of Ebert and Giroux (2011). G.H. Giroux is the qualified person responsible for the Mineral Resource Estimate. Mr. Giroux is a qualified person by virtue of education, experience and membership in a professional association. He is independent of both the issuer and the vendor applying all of the tests in section 1.5 of National Instrument 43-101. Mr. Giroux has not visited the property. 14.1 Data Analysis The supplied database for the Viking Project consisted of 128 drillholes, 218 down-hole surveys and 10,522 assays for gold. Of these holes, 109 intersected the Thor Trend mineralized zone totalling 15,574 m of diamond drilling (see Appendix 1 for a listing of all drillholes with the holes intersecting the Thor Trend highlighted). Figure 22 shows a plan view of the property and outlines the Thor Trend, which is the subject of this Mineral Resource Estimate. In addition to the drillholes a total of 74 channel samples were cut across the mineralized Thor zone using a diamond saw. These channels contained a total of 385 gold assays and were treated as horizontal drillholes in the database. The trenches containing the channel samples are shown in blue on Figure 22. A total of 42 gaps in the from-to record were found and values for gold of 1 ppb were inserted. Gold assays reported as <5 ppb were set to 3 ppb in 484 samples. Gold assays reported as blank were set to 1 ppb in 476 samples. All gold assays were then converted to ppm or grams / metric tonne (g/t). Collar locations were provided in NAD 83 format. Mr. Ebert provided a guide to produce a 3D geologic solid by outlining drillhole intervals as: • Unmineralized and weak alteration • Low-grade zone with moderate to strong alteration • High-grade zone with quartz veining, brecciation and/or stockwork This outline was used along with gold grades to produce a set of 3D mineralized solids for constraining the Mineral Resource Estimate. The solids were built using Gemcom software. The Thor Trend mineralized solids are shown in Figure 23 and Figure 24. 82 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Figure 22: Plan view showing Thor Trend (from Northern Abitibi Web Site) 83 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Figure 23: Isometric view looking north showing the mineralized Thor solids Figure 24: Isometric view looking NW showing the Thor mineralized solids, drillholes and surface topography 84 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Individual assays were “back tagged” as inside or outside the mineralized solids. Table 14 shows the statistics for gold assays inside and outside the Thor solids. Table 14: Gold assay statistics inside and outside the Thor Mineralized Solids Inside Thor Solids Au (g/t) Number of Assays 3,373 Mean Au Grade 1.58 Standard Deviation 9.43 Minimum Value 0.001 Maximum Value 307.99 Coefficient of Variation 5.97 Outside Thor Solids Au (g/t) 7,569 0.10 0.62 0.001 20.24 5.91 Some isolated high gold assays sit outside the mineralized solids and could not be joined to other intervals on other sections. The distributions of gold within and outside the mineralized solids were examined using lognormal cumulative distribution plots to determine if capping was required and if so at what level. The gold grade distribution within the Thor mineralized solids showed multiple overlapping lognormal populations (Figure 25) which when partitioned showed 6 overlapping gold populations. Figure 25: Lognormal Cumulative Frequency Plot for Au in Thor Mineralized Solids 85 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Table 15: Au Populations in Thor Mineralized Solids Population 1 2 3 4 5 6 Mean Au (g/t) 163.00 35.78 7.39 0.65 0.16 0.02 Percentage Of Total 0.15 % 1.00 % 3.06 % 40.50 % 34.49 % 20.80 % Number of Assays 5 30 91 1,211 1,031 620 Of these 6 gold populations the highest (population 1), at 0.15% of the data, represents widely spaced outlier high-grades that should be capped. Populations 2 and 3 probably represent the quartz vein intersections while perhaps populations 4 and 5 represent the disseminated and lower-grade styles of mineralization. Population 6 represents internal waste. A threshold that would separate the outliers from the remaining data would be two standard deviations above the mean of population 2, a value of 66 g/t Au. A total of 10 Au assays were capped at 66 g/t. A similar procedure was used to cap 25 assays outside the mineralized solids at 4.0 g/t Au. The results of capping are shown in Table 16. Table 16: Capped Gold assay statistics inside and outside the Thor Mineralized Solids Number of Assays Mean Au Grade Standard Deviation Minimum Value Maximum Value Coefficient of Variation 14.2 Inside Thor Solids Au (g/t) 2,988 1.14 4.82 0.001 66.00 4.21 Outside Thor Solids Au (g/t) 7,569 0.09 0.32 0.001 4.00 3.62 Composites Drillhole sample lengths ranged from a minimum of 0.10 m to a maximum of 4.0 m within the Thor mineralized solids. A total of 85% of the assays had sample lengths between 1 and 2 m. A composite length of 2.5 m was chosen to best fit the data. Uniform down-hole composites 2.5 m in length were formed honouring the Thor mineralized solids boundaries. Intervals less than 1.25 m at the edges of the solids were combined with adjoining samples. In this manner, a uniform support of 2.5± 1.25 m was created. The composite statistics are tabulated in Table 17 below. Table 17: Gold 2.5 m Composite statistics inside and outside the Thor Mineralized Solids Number of Assays Mean Au Grade Standard Deviation Minimum Value Maximum Value Coefficient of Variation Inside Thor Solids Au (g/t) 1,615 1.04 3.16 0.001 45.65 3.05 86 Outside Thor Solids Au (g/t) 4,765 0.05 0.16 0.001 2.92 3.37 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL The Au grade distribution from 2.5 m composites was examined using a lognormal cumulative frequency plot. Again, 6 overlapping lognormal populations were identified (Table 18). Table 18: Au Populations for 2.5 m Composites in Thor Mineralized Solids Population Mean Au (g/t) Percentage Of Total 1 23.89 0.82 % 2 9.69 0.92 % 3 3.14 4.05 % 4 0.32 82.16 % 5 0.05 5.76 % 6 0.009 6.28 % Number of Assays 12 14 61 1,233 86 94 The upper 3 populations are real and represent the higher-grade veins while population 4 represents the lower-grade stockwork and disseminated styles of mineralization. Populations 5 and 6 represent internal waste within the mineralized solids. A threshold of 2 standard deviations above the mean of population 4, a value of 2 g/t Au would separate the higher-grade populations from the more prevalent lower-grade style. 14.3 Variography Since a high-grade gold component is superimposed on a more prevalent lower-grade style of mineralization and there is insufficient data at present to model this high-grade, an indicator approach was used to model the deposit. Using an indicator methodology can utilize the higher-grade material even if the exact limits of the structures are at present unknown. The composite database is simplified and broken into two sets of data based on the threshold of 2 g/t Au. Samples below 2 g/t Au are assigned a value of 0 and those ≥ 2 g/t Au are assigned a value of 1. The 0’s and 1’s are then modelled using variography to determine the orientation of the higher-grade mineralization. The idea is to estimate a value between 0 and 1 for every block, through kriging these indicator values, that will predict the probability of finding high-grade in that block. The indicators were modelled using pairwise relative semivariograms. The nugget effect and sill levels were first established from the down-hole semivariogram. Horizontal models were produced in four main horizontal directions: Azimuths 90, 0, 45 and 135 degrees. The longest ranges were detected at Azimuths 135 and 180. Next, the azimuths between 135 and 180 were modelled with the longest range indicated at azimuth 150. The plunge directions along azimuth 150 were then modelled with the longest range indicated at Azimuth 150 Dip -48. The vertical plane perpendicular to azimuth 150 was then modelled with the longest range found at Azimuth 240 Dip -70. Finally, the orthogonal direction to this, of Azimuth 60 Dip 20, was modelled. In all cases, nested spherical models were fit to the data. The semivariogram parameters are shown below in Table 19 with the models used shown in Appendix 2. Once the high-grade indicator was modelled, the high-grade composites were removed from the database and the composites less than 2 g/t Au were modelled in a similar manner as explained above. The directions 87 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL of maximum continuity, in low-grades, was similar but different from the HG Indicator, with the longest directions of continuity shown along Azimuth 170 Dip 0 and Azimuth 260 Dip -30. Table 19: Semivariogram Parameters 14.4 Variable Az / Dip C0 C1 C2 HG IND. 150 / -48 060 / -20 240 / -70 LG AU 170 / 0 080 / -60 260 / -30 1.40 1.40 1.40 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.12 0.12 0.12 Short Range (m) 10.0 10.0 15.0 12.0 8.0 10.0 Long Range (m) 110.0 40.0 110.0 70.0 26.0 40.0 Block Model A block model, with blocks 5 m x 5 m x 5 m in dimension, was superimposed over the mineralized solids with the percentage below surface topography and the percentage within the mineralized solids recorded in each block. The block model origin was as follows: Lower Left Corner of Model 500520 E Block size = 5 m 50 columns 5504090 N Block size = 5 m 196 rows Top of Model 460 Elevation Block size = 5 m 55 levels No Rotation 14.5 Bulk Density A total of 23 samples from drillholes and channels were collected for specific gravity analysis. The samples were tested by the weight in air/ weight in water method by Northern Abitibi staff in the field. Six of the samples were shipped to ALS Chemex for checks and were found to have similar results. The results are tabulated in Table 20 below. 88 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Table 20: Specific Gravity Determinations ALS Chemex Viking Field Measurements Drill Hole 10VK-47 60.3m 10VK-47 65.9m 10VK-51 130m 10VK-51 83m 10VK-65 185.2m 10VK-49 136m Sample Rock type Number Wt in air (g) Wt in water (g) Specific gravity Specific gravity 808.3 766.6 859.9 763.2 475.9 492.4 557.5 581.5 598.2 677.5 439.6 738.6 725497 725498 Granite Granite Granite Granite 789.8 815.4 595.4 636.5 Diorite Diorite 1027.4 987.7 Mineralized qtz vein Mineralized qtz vein Mineralized qtz vein Mineralized qtz vein Mineralized qtz vein 807.7 833.9 596.5 823.4 505.6 513.3 487.3 545 483.7 302.8 310.9 350.1 369 377.4 426.7 277.7 472 Average 489.3 503.1 372.1 391.5 Average 691.6 669.3 Average 514.7 520.2 373.7 520.1 314.7 Average 2.74 2.74 2.73 2.73 2.75 2.71 2.69 2.74 2.71 2.70 2.72 2.77 2.73 2.63 2.61 2.67 2.60 2.63 3.06 3.10 3.08 2.76 2.66 2.68 2.71 2.65 2.69 2.73 2.74 722965 725485 726550 275487 725491 725492 725493 725494 725496 725500 Augen gneiss Augen gneiss Augen gneiss Augen gneiss Augen gneiss Augen gneiss Augen gneiss Augen gneiss Augen gneiss Augen gneiss Augen gneiss Augen gneiss 10VK-47 71.9m 10VK-47 73.8m 10VK-47 43.7m 10VK-47 42.8m 10VK-53 187.1m 725484 725484 725484 723344 725499 2.64 2.64 3.06 3.04 The average SG in the rock types augen gneiss, granite and diorites was 2.74, which was used for the lowgrade portion of the blocks while the 2.69 for quartz veins was used for the high-grade portion. A weighted average SG was then used for the mineralized portion of the block. 14.6 Grade Interpolation Grades for gold were interpolated into all blocks, with some percentage inside the mineralized solids, by a combination of Ordinary and Indicator Kriging. First, the indicator variable (HG IND) was kriged into the blocks producing a number between 0 and 1, which represents the probability of finding high-grade in that block. Then the grade for the low-grade material (LG Au) was estimated into each block using only composites below 2 g/t Au. Finally, for all blocks with a probability of having high-grade (Kriged IND > 89 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 0.0), a grade for the high-grade material (HG Au) was estimated using composites with Au ≥ 2.0 g/t. The final grade for the block was a weighted average determined as follows: Au Grade = (HG IND * HG Au) + ((1 – HG IND) * LG Au) All kriging runs were completed in a series of 4 passes with the search ellipse for each pass a function of the semivariogram range. For the first pass, the search ellipse was set to ¼ of the semivariogram range in each of the three principal directions. A minimum of 4 composites were required to estimate a block. For all blocks not estimated in pass 1, a second pass using ½ the semivariogram range was completed. A third pass using the full range and a fourth pass using twice the range completed the kriging exercise. In all passes, the maximum number of composites used was set to 12 with a maximum of 3 from any single drillhole. The search parameters and number of blocks estimated in each pass, for each run, are tabulated in Table 21 below. Table 21: Kriging Parameters Variable Pass Number Estimated HG IND 1 14,093 2 17,670 3 3,057 LG Au 1 2,377 2 15,433 3 14,708 4 3,057 HG Au 1 1,611 2 4,410 3 3,599 4 751 Az/Dip 150 / -48 150 / -48 150 / -48 170 / 0 170 / 0 170 / 0 170 / 0 150 / -48 150 / -48 150 / -48 150 / -48 Dist. (m) 27.5 55.0 110.0 17.5 35.0 70.0 140.0 27.5 55.0 110.0 220.0 Az/Dip 060/-20 060/-20 060/-20 080 / -60 080 / -60 080 / -60 080 / -60 060/-20 060/-20 060/-20 060/-20 Dist. (m) 10.0 20.0 40.0 6.5 13.0 26.0 52.0 10.0 20.0 40.0 80.0 Az/Dip 240/-70 240/-70 240/-70 260 / -30 260 / -30 260 / -30 260 / -30 240/-70 240/-70 240/-70 240/-70 Dist. (m) 27.5 55.0 110.0 10.0 20.0 40.0 80.0 27.5 55.0 110.0 220.0 The tonnage for each block was determined by: Tonnes = (5 x 5 x 5) * % inside solid * SG Where SG = (2.69 * HG IND) + (2.74 * (1 – HG IND)) 14.7 Classification Based on the study herein reported, delineated mineralization of the Thor Trend within the Viking Property is classified as a resource according to the following definitions from National Instrument 43-101 and from CIM (2014): “In this Instrument, the terms "Mineral Resource", "Inferred Mineral Resource", "Indicated Mineral Resource" and "Measured Mineral Resource" have the meanings ascribed to those terms by the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, as the CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted by CIM Council, as those definitions may be amended.” 90 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL The terms Measured, Indicated and Inferred are defined by CIM (2014) as follows: “A Mineral Resource is a concentration or occurrence of solid material of economic interest in or on the Earth’s crust in such form, grade or quality and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade or quality, continuity and other geological characteristics of a Mineral Resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge, including sampling.” “Material of economic interest refers to diamonds, natural solid inorganic material, or natural solid fossilized organic material including base and precious metals, coal, and industrial minerals. “ “The term Mineral Resource covers mineralization and natural material of intrinsic economic interest which has been identified and estimated through exploration and sampling and within which Mineral Reserves may subsequently be defined by the consideration and application of Modifying Factors. The phrase ‘reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction’ implies a judgment by the Qualified Person in respect of the technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospect of economic extraction. The Qualified Person should consider and clearly state the basis for determining that the material has reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. Assumptions should include estimates of cutoff grade and geological continuity at the selected cut-off, metallurgical recovery, smelter payments, commodity price or product value, mining and processing method and mining, processing and general and administrative costs. The Qualified Person should state if the assessment is based on any direct evidence and testing. “ “Interpretation of the word ‘eventual’ in this context may vary depending on the commodity or mineral involved. For example, for some coal, iron, potash deposits and other bulk minerals or commodities, it may be reasonable to envisage ‘eventual economic extraction’ as covering time periods in excess of 50 years. However, for many gold deposits, application of the concept would normally be restricted to perhaps 10 to 15 years, and frequently to much shorter periods of time.” Inferred Mineral Resource “An Inferred Mineral Resource is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. Geological evidence is sufficient to imply but not verify geological and grade or quality continuity.” “An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration.” “An Inferred Mineral Resource is based on limited information and sampling gathered through appropriate sampling techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes. Inferred Mineral Resources must not be included in the economic analysis, production schedules, or estimated mine life in publicly disclosed Pre-Feasibility or Feasibility Studies, or in the Life of Mine plans and cash flow models of developed mines. Inferred Mineral Resources can only be used in economic studies as provided under NI 43-101.” “There may be circumstances, where appropriate sampling, testing, and other measurements are sufficient to demonstrate data integrity, geological and grade/quality continuity of a Measured or Indicated Mineral Resource, however, quality assurance and quality control, or other information may not meet all industry norms for the disclosure of an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource. Under these circumstances, it may 91 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL be reasonable for the Qualified Person to report an Inferred Mineral Resource if the Qualified Person has taken steps to verify the information meets the requirements of an Inferred Mineral Resource.“ Indicated Mineral Resource “An Indicated Mineral Resource is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics are estimated with sufficient confidence to allow the application of Modifying Factors in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is derived from adequately detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing and is sufficient to assume geological and grade or quality continuity between points of observation.” “An Indicated Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to a Measured Mineral Resource and may only be converted to a Probable Mineral Reserve.“ “Mineralization may be classified as an Indicated Mineral Resource by the Qualified Person when the nature, quality, quantity and distribution of data are such as to allow confident interpretation of the geological framework and to reasonably assume the continuity of mineralization. The Qualified Person must recognize the importance of the Indicated Mineral Resource category to the advancement of the feasibility of the project. An Indicated Mineral Resource Estimate is of sufficient quality to support a PreFeasibility Study which can serve as the basis for major development decisions.” Within the Thor Deposit, mineralized zones the geological continuity has been established though surface mapping, trenching and diamond drillhole interpretation. Grade continuity can be quantified by semivariogram analysis. By tying the classification to the semivariogram ranges, through the use of various search ellipses, the resource can be classified as follows: In general, Blocks estimated during pass 1 and 2 using search ellipses with dimensions up to ½ the semivariogram range were classified as Indicated. All remaining blocks were classified as Inferred. The following tables show the Indicated (Table 22) and Inferred (Table 23) Resource within the mineralized solids. This resource assumes one could mine to the limits of these solids and no dilution has been considered. Although at this time, no economic studies have been completed on the Thor Deposit and as a result, the economic cut-off is unknown, a cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au has been highlighted, as a possible open pit cut-off grade. This cut-off grade was chosen based on similarities of mining at Anaconda’s Pine Cove Mine also on the island of Newfoundland. The Pine Cove Mine is an active mine producing gold through the Pine Cove Mill using a cut-off of 0.7 g/t. Based on the Company’s mining experience and the potential to leverage the Pine Cove infrastructure where possible in any potential development of the Thor Deposit, a cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t tonne is reasonable in the absence of economic analysis. Table 22: Thor Trend Indicated Mineral Resources Au Cut-off (g/t) Tonnes> Cut-off (tonnes) Grade > Cut-off Au (g/t) Contained Ounces Au 0.50 0.60 1,817,000 1,550,000 1.42 1.57 83,000 78,000 92 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 1,342,000 1,188,000 1,055,000 937,000 840,000 762,000 689,000 630,000 572,000 357,000 214,000 147,000 1.71 1.84 1.96 2.09 2.21 2.32 2.43 2.53 2.64 3.19 3.83 4.33 74,000 70,000 66,000 63,000 59,600 56,700 53,800 51,200 48,500 36,600 26,400 20,500 Table 23: Thor Trend - Inferred Mineral Resource Au Cut-off (g/t) 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 14.8 Tonnes> Cut-off (tonnes) 847,000 688,000 592,000 502,000 412,000 350,000 300,000 262,000 231,000 200,000 176,000 94,000 48,000 29,000 Grade > Cut-off Au (g/t) 1.15 1.29 1.40 1.52 1.66 1.79 1.91 2.02 2.12 2.25 2.36 2.90 3.56 4.10 Contained Ounces Au 31,000 29,000 27,000 24,000 22,000 20,000 18,400 17,000 15,800 14,400 13,300 8,800 5,500 3,800 Model Verification North-south cross sections showing the kriged block Au grades and drillhole composites, both colour coded by grade, were produced to validate the block model. Two sections are shown in Figure 26 and Figure 27. In general, the block grades match the composite grades well and there is no indication of bias present. 93 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 5504400N 5504500N 5504600N 5504700N 5504800N 5504900N 5505000N 5505100N 5505200N 500 5504300N 500 5504200N 0.314 0.268 0.268 0.267 0.267 0.267 0.267 0.267 0.267 0.267 0.267 0.267 0.268 0.268 0.268 0.269 0.269 0.269 0.271 0.271 0.271 0.272 0.228 0.258 0.339 0.339 0.341 0.236 0.241 0.236 0.226 0.230 0.236 0.231 0.256 0.246 0.239 300 0.176 0.230 0.247 0.181 0.197 0.199 0.261 0.184 0.189 0.189 0.193 0.188 0.183 0.311 0.838 0.309 0.298 0.318 0.323 0.324 0.324 0.322 0.849 0.888 0.344 0.347 0.342 0.338 0.988 0.899 0.368 0.323 0.310 0.277 0.984 0.890 0.298 0.284 0.273 0.267 0.252 0.263 0.262 0.259 0.327 0.377 0.944 0.324 0.376 0.354 0.957 0.347 0.344 0.344 0.333 0.339 0.182 0.184 0.185 0.261 0.311 0.273 0.238 0.287 0.289 0.287 0.221 0.266 0.129 0.129 0.288 0.291 0.373 0.265 0.260 0.254 0.129 0.256 0.243 0.275 0.786 0.286 0.279 0.278 0.333 0.353 0.369 0.329 0.321 0.338 0.301 0.303 0.330 0.220 0.245 0.250 0.256 0.202 0.235 0.247 0.250 0.337 0.314 0.354 0.309 0.198 0.198 0.180 0.160 0.233 0.211 0.288 0.289 0.289 0.289 0.288 0.289 0.302 0.302 0.302 0.302 0.302 0.302 0.302 0.264 0.324 0.279 0.187 0.149 0.136 0.136 0.136 0.424 0.081 0.126 0.365 0.510 0.657 0.740 0.420 0.426 0.212 0.386 0.460 0.276 0.430 0.148 0.489 0.324 0.329 0.331 0.315 0.314 0.331 0.340 0.311 0.803 0.254 0.258 0.280 0.254 0.261 0.723 0.264 0.263 0.263 0.248 0.302 0.360 0.288 0.275 0.479 0.362 0.290 0.294 0.293 0.315 0.301 0.697 0.243 0.245 0.221 0.221 0.218 0.242 0.288 0.284 0.479 0.293 0.306 0.303 0.370 0.381 0.334 0.370 0.721 0.277 0.276 0.270 0.257 0.257 0.256 0.259 0.310 0.314 0.282 0.281 0.278 0.247 0.219 0.263 0.262 0.303 0.338 0.146 0.165 0.172 0.288 0.296 0.297 0.240 0.199 0.213 0.273 0.278 0.249 0.249 0.249 0.241 0.230 0.274 0.229 0.231 0.231 0.232 0.096 0.211 0.198 0.205 0.227 0.203 0.208 0.207 0.384 0.488 0.501 0.366 0.427 0.327 0.396 0.279 0.356 0.405 0.270 0.259 0.627 0.618 0.543 0.691 0.723 0.761 0.757 1.421 1.054 1.002 0.891 0.766 0.559 0.655 0.427 0.540 0.533 0.546 0.973 0.825 0.358 0.355 0.393 0.497 0.511 0.418 0.499 0.569 0.510 0.512 0.494 0.469 0.461 0.655 1.105 0.139 0.141 0.255 0.785 0.397 0.468 0.468 0.446 0.321 0.371 0.348 0.294 0.436 0.364 0.331 0.595 0.382 0.235 1.058 0.154 0.254 0.266 0.277 0.874 0.742 0.323 0.393 0.345 0.344 0.411 0.381 0.387 0.449 0.381 0.242 0.270 0.269 0.527 1.031 0.875 1.600 2.581 1.941 1.056 0.613 0.605 0.630 0.711 0.707 2.468 3.509 1.863 2.153 1.215 1.479 1.569 1.552 2.500 1.083 0.682 0.578 0.309 0.308 0.667 0.579 0.271 2.439 0.716 0.670 0.591 0.203 0.203 0.204 0.482 0.527 0.499 0.638 1.163 1.341 1.670 2.251 1.397 1.473 1.186 1.452 1.674 2.045 0.548 0.545 0.830 0.848 0.845 0.655 0.764 0.836 0.599 0.641 0.597 0.588 0.588 0.532 0.591 0.591 0.833 0.447 0.461 0.466 0.414 0.375 0.345 0.114 0.485 0.109 0.168 0.163 0.153 0.155 0.152 0.385 0.352 0.303 0.201 0.304 0.292 0.267 0.247 0.289 0.314 0.354 0.390 0.416 0.431 0.416 1.488 1.093 0.325 0.329 0.440 0.403 0.399 0.578 1.234 0.501 0.492 0.349 0.347 0.375 0.640 1.095 0.686 0.356 0.389 0.355 0.377 0.555 0.877 0.324 0.588 0.546 0.424 0.275 0.129 0.637 0.622 0.570 0.357 0.104 0.597 1.191 0.298 0.113 0.666 0.629 0.594 0.578 0.110 0.566 0.625 0.625 0.504 0.397 0.135 0.670 0.557 0.479 0.468 0.361 0.119 0.133 0.678 0.543 0.398 0.334 0.378 0.121 0.161 0.668 0.326 0.342 0.396 0.365 0.288 0.103 0.129 0.991 0.590 0.271 0.458 0.390 0.618 0.129 0.725 0.882 0.310 0.637 0.790 0.782 1.131 1.216 0.694 0.513 0.466 0.310 0.635 1.380 0.330 0.648 0.642 0.371 0.634 0.707 0.695 0.781 0.585 0.736 0.646 0.379 0.679 1.199 1.398 1.517 0.708 0.713 0.695 0.873 0.348 0.665 2.105 1.046 1.226 0.606 0.752 0.765 0.901 0.501 0.310 0.573 0.505 0.175 0.551 0.420 0.373 0.340 0.470 0.143 0.147 0.153 0.506 0.526 0.565 0.551 0.531 0.565 0.556 0.538 0.644 0.823 0.771 0.547 0.489 0.458 0.460 0.260 0.451 0.280 0.386 0.578 0.412 0.418 0.424 0.368 0.205 0.280 0.275 0.275 0.318 0.322 0.540 0.250 0.247 0.434 0.455 0.653 0.651 0.589 0.634 0.626 0.966 0.479 0.574 0.539 0.551 0.577 0.540 0.512 0.487 0.440 0.481 0.372 0.378 1.893 1.285 0.630 0.677 0.498 0.469 0.464 0.494 0.412 0.729 0.822 0.896 0.902 0.818 0.838 0.560 0.430 0.451 0.400 0.635 0.415 0.447 0.407 0.535 0.409 0.442 1.223 0.617 0.721 0.587 0.556 0.455 0.530 0.567 0.608 0.508 0.324 0.406 0.417 0.432 0.358 0.426 0.434 0.491 0.600 0.653 0.911 0.890 0.623 0.619 0.524 0.467 0.460 0.467 0.379 0.389 0.766 1.441 0.492 0.465 0.735 0.226 0.213 0.204 0.231 0.232 0.228 0.202 0.206 0.262 0.274 0.304 0.316 0.393 0.396 0.398 0.489 0.492 0.607 0.607 0.568 0.570 0.509 0.704 0.421 0.473 0.484 0.489 0.407 0.409 0.537 0.328 0.135 0.166 0.612 0.946 0.322 0.328 0.673 0.539 0.284 0.295 0.364 0.337 0.303 0.301 0.333 0.331 0.254 0.292 0.301 0.305 0.298 0.337 0.336 0.351 0.337 0.371 0.425 0.410 0.295 0.649 0.329 0.310 0.267 0.267 0.379 0.345 0.346 0.355 0.322 0.949 0.345 0.320 0.303 0.316 0.305 0.307 0.334 0.208 0.199 0.403 0.181 0.708 0.330 0.420 0.533 0.466 0.463 0.676 0.602 0.438 0.384 0.359 0.383 0.288 0.270 0.294 0.284 0.339 0.709 0.363 0.160 0.170 0.588 0.936 0.863 0.769 0.163 0.111 0.104 0.259 0.264 0.123 0.081 0.203 0.206 0.214 0.310 0.259 0.262 0.262 0.076 1.674 0.818 1.156 0.899 0.162 0.163 0.180 0.187 0.105 0.096 0.067 0.212 0.281 0.249 0.248 0.219 0.222 0.260 0.212 0.212 0.219 0.670 0.723 0.187 2.175 1.269 0.522 0.205 0.206 0.201 0.279 0.209 0.186 0.184 0.221 0.229 0.175 0.181 0.257 0.203 0.117 0.122 0.177 0.187 1.920 2.601 2.153 0.367 0.093 0.169 0.195 0.177 0.153 0.105 0.104 0.123 0.107 0.230 0.258 0.270 0.302 0.354 0.470 0.474 1.013 2.186 3.347 2.404 0.086 0.109 0.108 0.327 0.504 0.456 0.785 0.709 0.673 0.317 0.225 0.121 1.023 1.044 3.547 3.522 1.040 1.002 1.937 3.505 1.148 1.940 1.926 0.916 1.789 1.442 1.104 1.720 0.317 0.291 0.195 0.670 0.547 0.877 1.877 0.979 0.428 0.632 0.360 0.678 0.799 0.907 0.388 0.273 0.506 0.127 0.293 0.235 0.148 0.131 0.250 0.158 0.150 0.162 0.147 0.222 0.182 0.206 0.173 0.216 0.225 0.185 0.208 0.164 1.113 1.142 0.194 0.168 0.203 0.795 0.189 0.072 1.043 1.212 0.254 0.253 0.252 0.115 1.175 0.137 0.245 0.210 0.138 0.139 0.184 0.189 0.335 0.369 0.255 0.264 0.263 0.166 0.215 0.269 0.301 0.295 0.316 0.120 0.122 0.334 0.332 0.333 0.373 0.325 0.339 0.363 0.359 0.083 0.264 0.272 0.421 0.502 0.534 0.409 0.299 0.500 0.338 0.401 0.454 0.473 0.426 0.459 0.244 0.446 0.242 0.507 0.310 0.517 0.520 0.589 0.228 0.298 0.727 0.285 0.287 0.330 0.336 0.338 0.549 0.485 0.498 0.628 0.294 0.507 0.228 0.238 0.237 0.252 0.251 0.250 0.188 0.144 0.171 0.170 0.128 0.123 0.123 0.127 0.130 0.157 0.133 0.136 0.135 0.146 0.116 0.118 0.166 0.314 0.178 0.313 0.267 0.370 0.458 0.690 0.561 0.505 0.455 0.548 0.427 0.558 0.344 0.252 0.201 0.214 0.213 0.205 0.207 0.209 0.210 0.210 0.200 0.202 0.203 0.203 0.203 0.195 0.196 0.196 0.194 0.195 0.196 0.209 0.210 0.210 0.211 0.235 0.235 0.235 0.235 0.236 0.236 0.200 200 1.026 1.733 0.586 0.252 0.564 0.766 0.927 0.380 0.458 1.713 0.782 0.603 0.774 1.818 0.620 0.345 0.390 0.693 0.932 1.096 0.337 0.444 0.135 0.214 0.871 1.256 1.116 2.599 0.369 0.476 0.869 0.580 0.788 0.524 0.487 0.425 1.351 1.175 0.641 2.874 0.483 0.439 0.559 0.560 0.664 0.295 0.822 0.115 0.529 0.235 0.128 0.609 0.866 0.710 0.382 0.114 0.211 0.644 0.894 0.613 0.286 0.087 0.192 0.774 0.860 0.598 0.371 0.146 0.125 0.822 1.147 0.629 0.278 0.228 0.155 0.782 0.651 0.504 0.229 0.147 0.982 0.676 0.451 0.393 0.191 0.164 1.564 1.513 0.426 0.208 0.207 2.485 0.732 0.240 0.141 0.409 0.329 2.928 1.471 0.500 0.198 1.231 1.529 0.930 0.656 2.581 0.457 0.199 0.275 0.249 0.229 0.185 1.333 1.686 1.323 3.149 0.160 0.197 0.200 0.238 0.227 0.188 1.333 1.360 1.805 1.632 3.476 0.294 0.157 0.212 0.181 1.514 2.102 1.772 2.065 3.618 0.331 0.177 0.191 0.245 2.084 1.984 2.041 2.122 0.159 0.167 0.191 0.225 2.393 0.482 0.727 1.785 1.299 0.449 0.301 0.167 0.188 0.161 1.906 1.669 1.231 1.277 0.283 0.135 0.191 0.178 1.312 1.299 1.391 1.731 0.299 0.165 0.185 0.199 0.221 1.754 2.128 1.554 2.197 1.527 0.235 0.171 0.187 0.233 2.108 2.445 3.114 2.831 2.490 0.164 0.306 0.218 0.183 0.208 0.162 2.032 3.585 3.485 4.325 4.482 0.266 0.275 0.160 0.138 0.205 0.181 2.877 4.094 4.541 3.375 3.063 0.236 0.271 0.201 0.143 0.200 0.218 0.258 0.282 0.265 0.197 0.157 0.216 0.244 0.257 0.277 0.289 0.181 0.134 0.217 0.252 0.307 0.196 0.242 0.284 0.170 0.134 0.217 0.181 0.272 0.252 0.282 0.295 0.178 0.134 0.303 0.261 0.296 0.263 0.291 0.171 0.172 0.219 0.210 0.293 1.586 4.134 3.740 2.450 0.480 0.317 0.256 0.174 0.309 1.190 1.761 2.436 1.777 0.437 0.299 0.404 0.220 0.219 0.138 0.397 1.091 1.261 0.308 0.667 0.468 0.320 0.482 0.237 0.343 0.179 0.290 0.278 0.397 0.267 0.320 0.279 0.321 0.266 0.414 0.304 0.325 1.155 1.293 0.311 0.267 0.210 0.355 0.086 0.182 0.345 0.192 0.213 0.340 0.283 3.499 4.796 3.443 3.678 2.813 0.424 0.176 0.343 0.186 0.455 0.457 0.358 0.274 0.225 0.218 0.456 0.446 0.358 0.174 0.235 0.630 0.221 0.461 0.275 0.174 0.635 0.199 0.521 0.313 0.219 0.219 0.528 0.273 0.219 0.183 0.518 0.177 0.215 0.224 0.525 0.314 0.210 0.192 0.531 0.200 0.220 0.255 1.100 0.288 0.405 0.200 0.179 0.184 0.183 0.516 0.292 0.217 0.270 0.201 0.183 0.186 0.541 0.210 0.350 0.483 0.516 0.205 0.314 4.161 3.614 4.871 3.798 3.649 0.211 200 0.314 0.267 5.022 4.385 3.799 3.132 2.798 400 0.464 0.312 0.267 0.526 0.502 0.227 0.280 0.337 0.267 3.348 3.715 2.995 1.137 0.524 0.524 0.229 0.305 0.399 4.033 3.335 300 400 2.344 LEGEND 100 Au >= 0.20 < 0.40 g/t Au >= 0.40 < 0.60 g/t Au >= 0.60 < 0.80 g/t Au >= 0.80 < 1.00 g/t Au >= 1.00 g/t 100 Au > 0.0 < 0.20 g/t SECTION 500617.5 E - SHOWING INDICATOR KRIGING FOR AU ( g/t) 5504200N 5504300N 5504400N 5504500N 5504600N 5504700N 5504800N 5504900N 5505000N Figure 26: Section 500617 E showing Kriged Au grades in estimated blocks and composite both colour coded 94 5505100N 5505200N NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 5504400N 5504500N 5504600N 5504700N 5504800N 5504900N 5505000N 5505100N 5505200N 5505100N 5505200N 500 5504300N 500 5504200N 0.444 0.392 1.336 1.340 0.447 0.399 1.537 1.309 1.224 0.959 0.411 1.409 3.023 1.347 1.871 0.249 0.252 0.946 0.817 0.268 0.263 0.251 0.766 0.759 0.315 0.313 0.269 0.365 0.335 0.348 0.831 0.382 0.243 1.672 0.373 1.627 0.456 0.423 1.259 1.134 1.302 0.216 0.323 1.043 0.342 0.912 0.362 0.219 0.222 0.832 1.390 1.197 0.718 2.386 2.620 0.256 0.246 1.100 0.279 0.879 0.279 0.848 0.176 0.170 0.172 0.671 0.726 0.535 1.219 0.245 0.194 0.194 0.210 0.829 0.834 0.190 0.510 0.724 0.260 0.264 0.268 0.299 0.302 2.017 0.152 0.134 0.151 0.141 0.147 1.269 0.202 0.520 0.269 0.301 0.304 0.302 0.300 0.506 0.145 0.151 0.170 0.174 0.995 1.002 0.972 0.570 0.272 0.274 0.277 0.126 0.163 0.195 0.220 0.583 0.574 0.676 0.177 0.232 1.014 1.014 0.624 0.565 0.168 0.230 0.644 0.269 0.923 0.448 0.316 0.346 0.354 0.364 0.153 0.332 0.335 0.341 0.336 0.328 0.145 0.291 0.274 0.262 0.278 0.280 0.296 0.302 0.559 0.510 0.374 0.617 0.316 0.259 0.270 0.376 0.344 0.567 0.193 0.230 0.361 0.356 0.351 0.352 0.307 0.504 0.455 0.216 0.238 0.177 0.176 0.175 0.175 0.380 0.361 0.171 0.151 0.285 0.274 0.245 0.214 0.227 0.287 0.274 0.235 0.223 0.337 0.170 0.169 0.175 0.166 0.254 0.253 0.525 0.629 0.274 0.683 0.276 0.363 0.600 1.668 1.840 3.537 4.405 7.630 2.803 3.364 2.144 1.149 1.825 2.733 1.532 2.735 1.687 2.208 1.757 1.651 2.494 1.779 1.447 1.521 2.547 1.803 2.815 1.781 1.302 2.814 1.489 0.438 0.486 0.518 0.677 0.867 0.766 0.728 0.638 0.772 0.811 1.748 1.820 0.775 2.284 1.559 1.163 0.673 0.699 0.928 0.998 0.980 0.698 0.807 0.835 0.609 0.641 0.624 1.212 1.672 0.994 1.411 2.085 0.916 0.700 0.596 0.597 0.915 0.815 0.803 0.759 0.804 0.797 0.731 0.648 1.296 1.644 1.032 0.867 0.416 0.512 0.654 0.521 0.779 0.622 0.458 0.594 0.376 1.531 2.327 2.312 2.434 3.635 3.029 2.203 1.507 1.672 1.260 2.425 1.830 2.084 2.054 1.241 4.319 1.861 2.945 0.475 0.973 1.841 1.295 1.669 3.182 3.252 2.445 2.223 1.281 1.124 1.487 1.669 0.536 0.481 0.625 0.649 0.639 1.407 0.486 0.476 0.534 1.273 1.676 1.000 0.938 3.169 2.748 3.245 1.736 0.816 1.013 0.928 0.785 1.106 0.374 0.352 0.339 0.340 0.324 0.522 0.591 0.832 1.047 1.054 1.502 0.306 0.976 0.541 1.579 1.325 0.426 1.097 2.188 2.020 1.070 0.929 0.814 0.906 1.684 0.754 1.001 0.173 0.163 0.162 0.094 0.359 0.559 0.548 0.451 0.977 0.979 0.299 0.160 0.357 0.394 0.364 0.221 0.093 0.275 0.355 2.049 1.707 1.150 1.193 1.899 2.216 1.677 1.143 0.183 1.712 1.667 2.889 1.671 0.246 0.161 0.222 2.120 0.072 1.582 0.055 0.044 0.116 0.111 0.749 1.948 0.102 2.213 0.114 0.126 0.072 0.066 0.465 0.693 1.624 1.043 0.097 0.165 0.282 0.105 0.102 0.101 0.099 0.095 0.481 0.483 0.078 0.081 0.092 0.097 0.167 0.162 0.169 0.186 0.161 0.128 0.107 0.120 0.061 0.071 0.082 0.105 0.104 0.760 0.158 0.144 0.164 0.162 0.155 0.127 0.091 0.054 0.055 0.071 0.109 0.686 0.945 0.052 0.698 0.037 0.038 0.040 0.714 0.809 0.675 0.606 0.692 2.123 1.430 0.203 0.170 0.183 1.823 1.354 0.688 1.220 0.662 0.125 0.101 0.102 0.106 0.052 0.099 0.116 0.083 0.074 0.085 0.125 0.117 0.123 0.101 0.280 0.253 0.252 0.279 0.229 0.259 0.284 0.286 0.281 1.306 1.244 3.472 0.104 0.277 2.207 1.689 1.662 2.926 0.129 0.277 1.368 1.477 0.594 1.763 1.027 0.066 0.278 0.201 0.778 0.157 0.162 0.744 0.175 0.172 0.686 0.167 0.168 0.148 0.158 0.163 0.640 0.169 0.185 0.110 0.127 0.144 1.070 0.187 0.188 0.312 0.306 0.936 0.330 0.311 0.334 0.327 0.340 0.356 0.381 0.821 0.323 0.355 0.354 0.880 0.384 0.365 0.329 0.324 0.303 0.296 0.299 0.296 0.283 0.423 0.454 0.438 0.441 0.363 0.369 0.375 0.379 0.311 0.334 0.344 0.361 0.345 0.820 0.287 0.340 0.323 0.329 1.233 0.771 0.255 0.265 0.257 1.283 1.380 0.319 0.308 1.005 1.069 0.895 0.805 0.334 1.078 0.266 0.800 1.038 0.982 0.102 1.652 1.085 0.388 0.393 0.258 0.892 0.975 0.919 0.290 0.691 0.413 0.547 0.276 0.513 0.442 0.545 0.454 0.456 3.474 0.406 1.864 2.045 1.185 0.226 0.887 1.706 1.491 0.888 0.968 1.087 1.292 1.578 1.353 3.043 5.854 6.077 4.456 1.000 0.158 2.289 0.877 0.238 0.260 1.746 1.698 1.636 1.158 1.362 1.623 1.838 1.405 3.796 4.742 5.370 4.666 0.247 3.754 0.245 0.264 0.250 1.103 0.746 1.566 2.050 1.591 0.407 1.128 1.162 1.448 2.221 4.632 6.059 3.111 5.569 4.198 0.448 0.383 0.409 0.547 0.554 0.595 1.478 1.345 0.364 0.951 4.543 3.776 0.872 0.777 1.187 1.294 0.918 1.448 1.697 1.510 2.353 1.582 1.226 2.952 1.198 0.525 0.525 0.597 0.638 0.392 0.528 0.483 0.492 0.489 0.485 0.483 0.481 0.480 0.481 0.482 0.484 0.487 0.475 0.479 0.507 0.369 0.231 0.232 0.385 0.404 0.401 0.527 0.522 0.218 0.216 0.215 0.213 0.212 0.211 0.366 0.366 0.343 0.212 0.214 0.474 0.226 0.227 0.214 0.376 0.188 0.281 0.373 0.222 0.221 0.220 0.219 0.217 0.216 0.214 0.212 0.211 0.216 0.215 0.216 0.210 0.211 0.212 0.202 0.358 0.293 0.275 0.278 0.480 0.236 0.235 0.234 0.221 0.227 0.226 0.335 0.644 0.329 0.324 0.319 0.316 0.313 0.311 0.313 0.319 0.294 0.350 0.284 0.373 0.354 0.340 0.413 0.408 0.402 0.380 0.374 0.321 0.329 0.325 0.321 0.309 0.291 0.297 0.291 0.510 0.348 0.424 0.327 0.325 0.415 0.411 0.406 0.401 0.396 0.391 0.372 0.338 0.327 0.311 0.462 0.414 0.411 0.409 0.334 0.334 0.387 0.394 0.464 0.532 0.553 0.332 0.884 0.515 0.818 1.157 0.534 0.582 0.654 0.746 1.000 0.884 0.582 0.715 0.787 1.038 0.750 0.615 0.642 0.530 0.369 0.369 0.339 0.337 0.429 0.427 0.424 0.421 0.268 0.502 0.412 0.428 0.429 0.382 0.380 0.439 0.437 0.433 0.395 0.391 0.387 0.737 0.775 0.595 0.520 0.522 0.524 0.471 0.451 0.448 0.490 0.674 1.101 0.994 1.009 0.898 0.868 1.155 0.581 0.630 0.639 0.635 0.623 0.616 0.493 0.936 0.997 0.342 0.340 0.337 0.559 0.480 0.636 0.636 0.624 0.615 0.231 0.682 0.619 0.592 0.479 0.939 0.723 0.511 0.919 0.527 0.469 0.460 0.230 0.289 0.285 0.216 0.394 0.291 0.285 0.280 0.272 0.485 0.338 0.310 0.313 0.287 0.293 0.353 0.188 0.518 0.255 0.182 0.181 0.179 0.183 0.191 0.192 0.255 0.173 0.185 0.184 0.181 0.187 0.167 0.255 0.293 0.294 0.352 0.341 0.365 0.303 0.559 0.298 0.231 0.197 0.343 0.930 0.590 0.237 0.208 0.349 0.465 0.275 0.246 0.166 0.350 0.570 0.388 0.353 0.277 0.222 0.364 0.819 0.543 0.295 0.369 0.285 0.391 0.353 0.422 0.543 0.314 0.570 0.281 0.361 0.543 0.542 0.141 0.328 0.293 2.010 0.180 0.259 2.703 0.539 0.259 0.191 0.751 0.409 0.558 4.591 1.057 0.317 0.179 5.561 1.072 0.410 0.184 0.216 1.557 0.855 0.836 0.346 0.213 0.473 0.733 1.224 2.430 0.734 0.355 0.181 0.294 0.640 3.988 2.393 0.691 0.331 0.182 0.825 7.468 5.390 7.021 1.062 0.259 0.169 6.238 3.865 4.313 7.905 0.981 0.270 0.162 4.081 4.856 6.731 8.155 0.905 0.507 0.153 3.862 3.697 4.015 2.057 0.752 0.498 0.221 3.110 1.973 1.486 0.378 0.537 0.355 0.293 0.255 0.822 0.607 0.467 1.423 0.987 0.388 0.191 0.347 0.398 1.417 0.595 0.222 0.292 0.192 0.319 0.308 0.764 0.289 1.042 1.487 0.518 0.275 0.240 0.181 0.302 0.385 1.749 0.812 0.548 0.080 0.159 0.153 0.344 0.835 1.287 0.781 0.608 0.925 0.468 0.080 0.141 0.151 2.312 0.680 0.598 0.225 0.224 0.114 1.881 0.894 1.595 1.068 1.042 1.158 0.816 0.914 0.494 0.266 1.131 1.397 1.604 0.365 0.916 2.510 0.752 0.273 0.277 1.088 0.336 1.151 0.940 3.931 2.007 0.980 0.424 1.268 0.269 0.271 0.305 0.305 0.277 0.157 0.236 0.222 1.229 1.239 1.383 0.300 0.293 0.295 0.312 0.213 0.187 0.200 0.143 0.222 0.260 0.262 0.248 0.249 0.782 1.692 0.161 0.158 0.283 0.286 0.222 0.160 0.151 0.151 0.150 0.156 0.158 0.709 0.788 0.145 0.160 0.163 0.164 0.158 0.169 0.162 0.162 0.167 0.148 0.148 0.154 0.150 0.151 0.151 0.154 0.176 0.160 0.138 0.138 0.146 0.175 0.176 0.176 0.177 0.166 0.168 0.153 0.166 0.166 0.254 0.234 0.246 0.162 0.669 0.607 0.538 4.164 1.477 0.618 0.479 1.151 0.160 0.262 0.263 0.378 0.443 3.415 0.845 1.136 0.909 1.436 0.154 0.243 0.268 0.314 1.430 1.219 0.449 0.577 1.922 1.036 1.925 2.761 1.746 0.472 0.460 1.843 1.526 2.176 2.480 2.006 1.691 0.468 0.527 1.592 1.400 1.579 2.345 2.113 0.597 1.050 1.653 1.754 2.648 1.527 1.465 0.448 0.891 1.669 1.258 3.264 0.459 0.645 1.271 2.474 1.686 1.615 0.547 0.528 0.785 1.186 0.304 3.053 1.236 0.592 0.528 0.685 0.486 0.333 1.806 1.314 0.736 0.685 0.807 0.481 0.295 1.856 1.732 0.971 0.607 0.578 0.479 0.465 0.332 1.134 2.632 1.669 0.519 0.550 0.436 0.526 0.517 0.352 3.020 0.600 0.382 0.476 0.481 0.370 0.460 0.253 0.971 4.120 1.889 0.283 0.100 0.159 0.151 0.153 0.934 0.125 0.167 0.151 1.225 0.108 0.283 0.153 1.192 0.118 0.564 0.151 1.342 0.156 0.409 0.161 2.181 0.186 0.462 0.152 1.508 0.135 0.430 1.095 0.355 0.546 0.143 0.926 0.380 2.281 0.179 0.571 0.233 1.941 0.089 0.916 0.222 2.595 0.137 0.326 0.149 1.482 0.168 0.170 0.508 0.847 1.466 0.322 0.553 1.955 0.248 0.172 0.578 2.181 0.200 0.526 0.269 3.107 0.120 0.309 0.291 6.438 0.155 0.405 0.578 0.837 5.620 0.509 0.383 0.900 3.546 0.530 0.365 0.294 1.945 0.249 0.189 0.835 1.782 0.214 0.829 0.389 0.398 0.356 0.155 0.731 0.145 0.786 0.284 0.284 0.406 0.380 1.843 2.652 0.594 0.350 0.272 0.282 0.388 1.905 0.041 0.638 0.250 0.822 0.265 0.276 0.136 2.488 1.304 0.973 0.242 0.796 0.189 0.261 0.133 1.636 1.758 1.292 0.183 0.886 0.267 0.366 0.132 0.135 0.889 1.257 0.266 0.540 1.686 0.270 0.362 0.132 0.135 0.133 1.625 0.923 0.196 0.353 0.578 1.633 1.707 0.738 0.277 1.085 0.585 0.280 0.132 0.133 0.132 0.623 0.523 0.588 2.920 0.248 0.285 0.289 0.278 0.218 0.130 0.129 0.130 0.598 0.367 0.298 0.258 0.232 0.626 0.666 0.818 0.383 1.449 1.079 0.713 0.341 0.762 0.989 1.806 1.271 1.922 1.739 0.248 0.471 0.376 0.438 1.389 1.350 2.034 2.120 2.118 0.244 0.652 0.441 0.394 0.371 0.293 2.113 4.256 2.594 2.176 0.238 0.444 0.425 0.388 0.233 0.306 4.478 3.103 1.785 3.218 0.350 0.552 0.414 0.383 0.230 0.281 0.320 3.815 2.629 2.059 6.269 0.322 0.465 0.406 0.378 0.322 0.338 1.483 3.953 2.298 2.355 5.299 0.072 0.598 0.325 1.232 1.426 2.374 2.698 0.205 4.401 0.084 0.534 1.352 0.843 0.555 4.536 2.721 0.232 2.324 0.125 0.268 0.139 0.374 0.124 0.267 0.267 0.399 0.127 0.264 0.396 0.439 7.069 0.381 2.487 0.073 1.352 0.196 0.130 0.128 0.759 1.249 0.137 300 1.842 0.296 0.263 0.339 2.146 0.443 0.942 1.912 2.185 0.459 0.424 3.212 1.723 2.720 0.390 2.139 0.259 5.648 1.488 0.235 0.282 400 0.293 4.897 1.801 300 400 1.451 0.781 0.130 0.196 0.205 0.309 0.359 200 200 0.166 0.322 0.323 LEGEND Au > 0.0 < 0.20 g/t 100 100 Au >= 0.20 < 0.40 g/t Au >= 0.40 < 0.60 g/t Au >= 0.60 < 0.80 g/t Au >= 0.80 < 1.00 g/t Au >= 1.00 g/t SECTION 500667.5 E - SHOWING INDICATOR KRIGING FOR AU ( g/t) 5504200N 5504300N 5504400N 5504500N 5504600N 5504700N 5504800N 5504900N 5505000N Figure 27: Section 500667 E showing Kriged Au grades in estimated blocks and composite both colour coded 95 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 15.0 Adjacent Properties There are no adjacent properties of significance to report. 96 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 16.0 Other Relevant Data and Information 16.1 Environmental and Surface Title Liabilities The Viking Project is located adjacent to a tributary of a licensed salmon river and Pine Martin habitat. This has not created any liability or problem in receiving permits to conduct work. Anaconda has received all permits to conduct exploration on the property in 2016 and there are no known historical permitting issues. Further, there does not appear to be any impediment to development. No problematic site environmental conditions or liabilities are known to Anaconda at the date of this Report. The Company has obtained all legal permissions or agreements required to access the property for purposes of mineral exploration activities, and these permits are in good standing at the effective date of this Report. 97 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 17.0 Interpretation and Conclusions Anaconda holds a 100% undivided interest in the Viking Project located in the White Bay area of western Newfoundland, in the province of Newfoundland and Labrador. The property includes four properties: Viking, Kramer and licences 023770M and 023771M totaling 6,225 hectares. Both the Viking and Kramer properties contain several zones of orogenic style bedrock gold mineralization, many of which have not been fully explored or defined. The best-defined zone, includes the Thor Deposit and is the subject of this Mineral Resource Estimate update, and remains open at depth, to the north and to the south. The Thor Deposit contains high-grade veins and shoots along with larger zones of lower-grade mineralization. The outline of low-grade gold mineralization has been fairly well defined over a 600-metre strike length, whereas individual high-grade shoots contain low drill densities and remain poorly defined. This Mineral Resource Estimate outlined in this Technical Report is the same as the resource update provided on December 30, 2011 in a Technical Report titled MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE UPDATE FOR THE THOR TREND DEPOSIT, NORTHERN ABITIBI MINING CORP., WHITE BAY AREA, NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR, CANADA, authored by Dr. Shane Ebert and Mr. Gary Giroux. No additional material work has been conducted on the Thor Deposit since December 30. 2011. The Mineral Resource Estimate is based on a database containing 109 holes drilled into the Thor Deposit totaling 15,574 m of diamond drilling, and 74 lines of surface channel samples cut from trenches using a diamond saw. Mineralization was constrained within 3D geologic solids built using Gemcom software. Gold assays within the mineralized solid were capped at 66 g/t Au while those outside the solid were capped at 4.0 g/t Au. There is insufficient drill data at present to accurately model the high-grade zones along the Thor Deposit so an indicator approach was used to model the high-grade. At a cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au, the Thor Deposit contains an Indicated Mineral Resource of 63,000 ounces Au (937,000 tonnes at an average grade of 2.09 g/t) plus an Inferred Mineral Resource of 20,000 ounces Au (350,000 tonnes at an average grade of 1.79 g/t) (see Table 24 below). Table 24: Thor Trend - Mineral Resources Au Cut-off (g/t) Tonnes> Cut-off (tonnes) Grade > Cut-off Au (g/t) Contained Ounces Au* Indicated 0.50 1,817,000 1.42 83,000 1.00 937,000 2.09 63,000 2.00 357,000 3.19 36,600 Inferred 0.50 847,000 1.15 31,000 1.00 350,000 1.79 20,000 2.00 94,000 2.90 8,800 *Mineralized domains are spatially constrained and capped. 98 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL The mineralized zone measures approximately 600 m in length, 30 to 50 m in width and locally up to 250 m in dip extent, and remains open along strike and to depth. There is good potential to define significant high-grade gold resources along the trend of the Thor Deposit by detailed drill delineation or underground exploration along the known high-grade gold shoots. There is further potential for discovery based on work conducted by previous operators on the Viking Property – specifically along the large valley to the west, which contains highly altered rocks over a 2-km strike length and along the area immediately east of the Thor Deposit referred to as the Asgard. The Kramer Property contains numerous mineralized zones on surface with host rocks and alteration very similar in style and setting to those observed at the Thor Deposit. The prospectivity of this property remains high for potential discovery. Licences 023770M and 023771M both contain historic soil and prospecting samples, though collected as part of a regional exploration effort. This data indicates there are areas within these two properties that may contain prospective areas for future exploration. 99 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 18.0 Recommendations The previous Technical Report dated December 30, 2011 recommended further exploration on the Viking Property. It was considered prudent by Mr. Ebert and Mr. Giroux to continue drilling and trenching on the Viking Property to test a suite of IP anomalies both adjacent to the Thor Deposit and to the west of the deposit in the Viking Trend. Previous work on the Kramer Property by Spruce Ridge indicates a suite of mineralized zones over a strike of approximately 1.4 km associated with quartz-carbonate veining and sericitization of host rocks of similar provenance at the Thor Deposit. Surface sampling indicated the presence of gold mineralization associated with these areas of alteration. Further work is required on this property to delineate the continuity of localized alteration systems and if broader zones of mineralization can be found at surface or at depth. Historic soil sampling from the 1980s predominately by BP and Noranda regionally and on licence 023771M specifically, indicates possible linear trends in soil geochemistry. More work is required to investigate the soil cover in these areas and to determine if they represent in-situ mineralization. Based on the available data the following recommendations are made for future work on the Viking Project: Viking Property – conduct drilling to determine the northern and southern extents of the mineralizing system associated with the current resource at the Thor Deposit and to test possible IP anomalies in the area south of the deposit. An initial 3,000-metre diamond drill program is recommended to test the possible extensions of the Thor Deposit and test existing IP anomalies. Also, a 2,000-metre diamond drill program is recommended to test the entire strike extent of the Viking Trend with the goal of discovering another gold deposit. Kramer Property – conduct systematic channel sampling across the mineralized zones and follow up with an initial 2,000-metre diamond drill program with the goal of discovering another gold deposit. Licences 023771M and 023770M – conduct prospecting and detailed soil sampling in areas of historical soil anomalies. A budget of $1,000,000 is proposed to conduct this first phase of work outlined above with the understanding that more diamond drilling will be required to infill areas of the existing resource as well as areas of new discovery. Table 25 contains a budget for the recommended work program at Viking, Kramer and licences 023770M and 023771M. It is estimated that the second phase of exploration, if phase 1 is successful will require expenditures of $2,000,000 - $3,000,000. Table 25: Budget for recommended work program inclusive of labour, logistics and geochemical analysis Item Viking Drilling 5000m Kramer Drilling 2000m Channel sampling/prospecting Grand Total Estimated cost $C 625,000 250,000 125,000 1,017,500 100 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 19.0 References Cited and Selected References Churchill, R. and Voordouw, R., 2006: First, second, third & fourth year assessment report documenting reconnaissance prospecting & compilation for map staked licences 09287m (Wizard Property) & Claim Groups 08878m, 10935m & 12734m (Viking Property), White Bay area, Newfoundland, NTS Sheets 12H10 & 12H11. NLDNR assessment report by Altius Resources Inc., 137 p. CIM Standards, 2005: Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy - Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserve: Definitions and Guidelines, prepared by CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions Adopted by CIM Council on December 11, 2005, 10p. Cullen, M.P., and Harrington, M., 2011: March 2nd 2011, MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE FOR THE THOR TREND GOLD DEPOSIT NORTHERN ABITIBI MINING CORP. White Bay Area Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Technical Report for Northern Abitibi Mining Corp., 145 pages. Deering, P., 1989: First and third year assessment report on geological, geochemical, geophysical and diamond drilling exploration for Licence 3158 on Claim Blocks 5429 and 5445-5449, Licence 3159 on Claim Blocks 5433 and 5450 and Licence 3612 on Claim Blocks 4412-4416 in the Silver Mountain area, Newfoundland for Noranda Exploration Company Limited; NLDNR Assessment File 12H/1093, 1989, 109 p. Dresen, G., 1991. Stress distribution and the orientation of Riedel shears; Tectonophysics 188, pp. 239– 247 Ebert, S.E., 2008: Fifth year assessment report on trenching at the Viking Property, Mineral Licence 014079m, White Bay area, Newfoundland, NTS Sheets 12H10 & 12H11; NLDNR assessment report for Altius Resources Inc., 48 p. Ebert, S. E., 2009: Seventh year assessment report on drilling and trenching at the Viking Property, Mineral Licence 014079m, white bay area, Newfoundland, NTS Sheets 12H 10 & 12H11; NLDNR assessment report for Altius Resources Inc., 46p. Ebert, S.E., 2010: Eighth year assessment report on drilling and trenching at the Viking Property, Mineral Licence 014079m, White Bay area, Newfoundland, NTS Sheets 12H10 & 12H11; NLDNR assessment report for Northern Abitibi Mining Corp, 94p. Froude, T., 2010: Report of Work on the Kramer Property, White Bay Area Newfoundland. Airborne Survey, Compilation on licence 15519M and Supplementary Report of Work on Prospecting, Trenching and Assaying on licence 12713M. Assessment work report prepared for Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. 41 pages. Geofile 012H/2046. Froude, T., 2011: Report on Diamond Drilling, Trenching and Prospecting Activities by Spruce Ridge Resources Limited on the Kramer Property Area, and adjacent licences, White Bay Area, Newfoundland. Licences 12713M, 17095M and 17096M. Assessment work report prepared for Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. 255 pages. Geofile 012H/2150. 101 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Froude, T. 2013: Report on Trenching and Prospecting Activities by Spruce Ridge Resources Limited on licences 18601M (1st Year), 19689M (6th Year) and 19690M (6th Year), Kramer Project, White Bay, NL. Assessment work report prepared for Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. 70 pages. Froude, T., 2014: Final Report on Diamond Drilling Activities in Fulfillment of JEA Funding by Spruce Ridge Resources Limited on the Kramer Property, Western Newfoundland, Licence 19689M. 159 pages. Groves, D.I., Goldfarb, R.J., Robert, R., Hart, C., 2003, Gold Deposits in Metamorphic Belts: Overview of Current Understanding, Outstanding Problems, Future Research, and Exploration Significance. Economic Geology, Vol. 98, 2003, pp. 1–29 Groves, D.I., Goldfarb, R.J., Gebre-Mariam, M., Hagemann, S. G., and F. Robert, 1998: Orogenic gold deposits: A proposed classification in the context of their crustal distribution and relationship to other gold deposit types, Ore Geology Reviews, v.13, 1998, pages 7-27 Kerr, A., 2006: Mesothermal gold mineralization in the Silurian Sop’s Arm Group, western Newfoundland: a descriptive and historical overview. Edited by C. P. G. Pereira and D. G. Walsh, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, Department of Natural Resources, Geological Survey, Report 6-1, 2006, pages 61-90, NFLD/2924 Kerr. A., 2006: Silurian rocks of the Sop’s Arm Group, western Newfoundland: some new food for future digestion, Edited by C. P. G. Pereira and D. G. Walsh, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, Department of Natural Resources, Geological Survey, Report 6-1, 2006b, pp.91- 117, NFLD/2924 Knight, I., 2007: Geological studies in the Lomond (NTS 12H/5) and adjacent map areas, of the eastern part of the Goose Arm Thrust stack, western Newfoundland, in Current Research, NLDNR Department of Mines and Energy, Geological Survey Report 04-01, pp. 127-156 Lang, J.R., Baker, T., Hart, C.J.R., and Mortensen, J.K., 2000, An Exploration Model for Intrusion Reated Gold Systems. SEG Newsletter, January 2000, Number 60. Owen, J.V., 1991: Geology of the Long Range Inlier, Newfoundland. Map 1764A. Scale: 1:250,000. In Geology of the Long Rang Inlier, Newfoundland, Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 395, 89 p. Owen, J.V., 1986: Geology of the Silver Mountain area, Western Newfoundland (12H/11) Scale: 1:50,000. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 1279. Minett, M., Sandeman, H.A., and D. Wilton, 2010: Regional setting of gold mineralization at the Viking Property, southern White Bay, Newfoundland, in Current Research, NLDNR Geological Survey Report 101, pp. 51-64 McClay, K. R. 1987: The mapping of geological structures; Geological Society of London handbook. Milton Keynes, England, Open University Press. 161 p. National Instrument 43-101: Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, Canadian Securities Administrators, adopted December 30, 2005, 19 p. 102 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL Ramsay, J. G., and Huber, M.I., 1983: The techniques of modern structural geology – volume 1: strain analysis, Academic Press, London. Rowins S.M., 2009: Geological report on regional structures and mineralization trends at the Viking gold property, western Newfoundland, NTS Sheets 12H10 & 12H11; unpublished draft report prepared for Northern Abitibi Mining Corp., 10p. Thurlow, J.G. and Churchill, R., 2007: Assessment Report on an Airborne Geophysical Survey Covering Mineral Licences 7897M, 8647M, 10141M, 10727M (Rocky Brook Property); 8878M, 9287M and 10935M (Viking and Wizard Properties); 8193M and Mining Lease 60, Western Newfoundland, NTS Sheets 12H06, 12H10, 12H11 and 12H15. Mineral assessment report prepared for Altius Resources Inc., JNR Resources Inc., Spruce Ridge Resources and Rodger Bidgood. 43 pages. Geofile 012H/1850. van Staal and Fyffe (1991) van Staal, C.R. and Fyffe, L. R., 1991: Dunnage and Gander zones, New Brunswick: Canadian Appalachian region; New Brunswick Natural Resources and Energy, Mineral Resources Division, Geoscience Report 91-2, 39p. van Staal, C.R., 2007: Pre-Carboniferous Tectonic Evolution and Metallogeny of the Canadian Appalachians; in Geological Association of Canada Special Publication No. 5, Wayne Goodfellow editor, p. 793-818 Williams, H., 1979: Appalachian Orogen in Canada; Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 16, pp. 197208 Williams, H., Coleman-Sadd, S.P., and Swinden, H.S., 1988: Tectonostratigraphic subdivisions of Central Newfoundland: Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 88-1B, pp. 91-98 103 .. Anaconda Mining NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 20.0 Statements of Qualifications CERTIFICATED.A. Copeland I, David. A. Copeland, of 6 Falcon Place, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, as an author of the Technical Report entitled: "NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT AND MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE FOR THE THOR DEPOSIT, VIKING PROJECT, WHITE BAY AREA, NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR, CANADA" dated effective August 29, 2016 (the "Technical Report"), do hereby certify that: 1) I am a self-employed geological consultant with an office at 6 Falcon Place, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador. 2) I am a graduate of the University ofNew Brunswick (B.Sc. Honours Geology- 1995) (M.Sc. Geology - 1999). 3) I am a member in good standing ofthe Professional Engineers and Geoscientists ofNewfoundland and Labrador (Member Number 04257). 4) I have practiced my profession continuously in Canada and internationally since graduation. My relevant experience with respect to this project includes extensive professional experience with respect to geology, mineral deposits and exploration activities in the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador and elsewhere. 5) I have read the definition of"qualified person" set out in National Instrument 43-101 and certify that, by reason ofmy education, relevant experience, and affiliation with a professional association, I meet the requirements ofa "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101. 6) I am responsible for the preparation ofparts of Sections 1 to 13 and 15 to 20 ofthe Technical Report. 7) I visited the Viking Project on behalfofAnaconda Mining Inc. most recently between August 8th and 15th, 2016. 8) I have no previous involvement with the property that is the subject of the Technical Report. 9) As ofthe effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the portion of the Technical Report for which I am responsible contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the portion ofthe Technical Report for which I am responsible not misleading. 10) I am independent of Anaconda Mining Inc. as described in section 1.5 of the National Instrument 43101. 11) I have read National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-IOIFI, and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with that instrument and form. JJ:!lJla;;:; [Sealed] David A. Copeland, M.Sc., P.Geo. 104 f>...\ A�a.conda Mining NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL CERTIFICATES. W. Ebert I, S.W. Ebert, of 9610 Shad Road, Prince George, British Columbia, as an author of the Technical Report entitled: "NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT AND MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE FOR THE THOR DEPOSIT, VIKING PROJECT, WHITE BAY AREA, NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR, CANADA" dated effective August 29, 2016 (the "Technical Report"), do hereby certify that: 1) I am a professional geoscientist providing consulting services to the mining industry with an office at 9610 Shad Road, Prince George, British Columbia. 2) I graduated from the University of Alberta in 1991 with a B.Sc. (honours) in geology and from the University of Western Australia in 1995 with a PhD. in geology. 3) I am a member in good standing of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of the Province of British Columbia. 4) I have practiced my profession continuously since 1991. I have had 25 years' experience in ore deposits and mineral exploration working on a variety of ore deposit types. 5) I have read the definition of "qualified person" set out in National Instrument 43-101 and certify that by reason of my education, relevant experience, and affiliation with a professional association, I meet the requirements of a "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101. 6) I am responsible for the preparation of parts of Sections 1 to 13 and 15 to 20 of the Technical Report. I have visited the property from 2007 to 2011. 7) I have been responsible for all of the exploration programs conducted on the Viking Property by Northern Abitibi from 2007 to 2011, and have spent considerable time on the project. 8) As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the portion of the Technical Report for which I am responsible contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the portion of the Technical Report for which I am responsible not misleading. 9) I am independent of Anaconda Mining Inc. as described in section 1.5 of the National Instrument 43-101. 10) I have read National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-lOlFl, and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with that instrument and form. Dated this 29th day of August, 2016 �E'ssir.. i&-o 0�)_, q PR0;"1CE 1' "' ( . ____ Dr. S. Ebert Ph.D., P.Geo. · W. EBERT #27825 '\. £ i �[S�aled] 1 ���-<;./ �i1' 105 .f>.,.\ A�a.conda Mining NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL CERTIFICATE G.H. Giroux I, G.H. Giroux, of 982 Broadview Drive, North Vancouver, British Columbia, as an author of the Technical Report entitled: "NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT AND MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE FOR THE THOR DEPOSIT, VIKING PROJECT, WHITE BAY AREA, NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR, CANADA" dated effective August 29, 2016 (the "Technical Report"), do hereby certify that: I am a consulting geological engineer with an office at 982 Broadview Dr., North Vancouver, 1) British Columbia. I am a graduate of the University of British Columbia in 1970 with a B.A. Sc. and in 1984 with a 2) M.A. Sc., both in Geological Engineering. 3) 4) I am a member in good standing of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of the Province of British Columbia. I have practiced my profession continuously since 1970. I have had over 40 years' experience calculating Mineral Resources. I have previously completed resource estimations on a wide variety of precious metal deposits both in B.C. and around the world, including narrow vein deposits like 6) Montarde and Efemcukuru. I have read the definition of "qualified person" set out in National Instrument 43-101 and certify that by reason of my education, experience, and affiliation with a professional association, I meet the requirements of a "qualified person" as defined in National Instrument 43-101. I am responsible for the preparation of Section 14 of the Technical Report. I have not visited the 7) property. I have not previously worked on this deposit. 5) 9) As of the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the portion of the Technical Report for which I am responsible contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the portion of the Technical Report for which I am responsible not misleading. I am independent of Anaconda Mining Inc. as described in section 1.5 of the National Instrument 10) 43-101 and National Instrument 43-101 Companion Policy Section 3.5. I have read National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43- lOlF l , and the Technical Report has been 8) 106 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL APPENDIX 1 – LISTING OF DRILL HOLES Holes intersecting the Thor Trend and used in the Mineral Resource Estimate are highlighted HOLE 08-VK-01 08-VK-02 08-VK-03 08-VK-04 08-VK-05 08-VK-06 08-VK-07 08-VK-08 08-VK-09 08-VK-10 09-VK-11 09-VK-12 09-VK-13 09-VK-14 09-VK-15 09-VK-16 09-VK-17 09-VK-18 09-VK-19 09-VK-20 09-VK-21 09-VK-22 09-VK-23 09-VK-24 09-VK-25 09-VK-26 09-VK-27 09-VK-28 09-VK-29 09-VK-30 09-VK-31 09-VK-32 09-VK-33 09-VK-34 09-VK-35 09-VK-36 09-VK-37 EASTING 500660.50 500660.48 500659.89 500651.91 500659.89 500653.43 500680.56 500664.46 500661.66 500702.52 500692.89 500693.41 500706.05 500696.53 500695.55 500651.53 500647.26 500648.11 500652.31 500653.21 500622.91 500653.08 500652.63 500646.06 500647.74 500676.10 500653.08 500652.21 500621.49 500645.64 500645.43 500633.71 500574.91 500633.49 500632.89 500632.79 500620.28 NORTHING 5504651.16 5504650.34 5504640.26 5504651.20 5504639.26 5504572.14 5504579.98 5504603.56 5504617.23 5504273.41 5504373.82 5504373.27 5504357.84 5504455.92 5504455.29 5504428.90 5504733.29 5504732.64 5504704.73 5504704.19 5504724.26 5504644.18 5504643.26 5504765.98 5504765.19 5504475.41 5504459.66 5504459.11 5504392.95 5504628.91 5504628.45 5504665.28 5504753.72 5504665.07 5504600.66 5504600.26 5504593.90 107 ELEVATION 440.71 440.69 440.61 442.00 440.61 442.12 434.66 437.36 438.51 376.99 397.66 397.30 388.57 419.35 419.31 424.39 443.04 443.08 442.39 442.31 444.61 441.22 441.07 443.64 443.62 428.47 432.69 432.62 420.55 441.24 441.19 441.32 449.43 441.26 439.14 439.14 439.60 Hole Length (m) 89.50 55.00 40.00 64.50 71.00 58.00 35.00 38.00 67.50 56.50 57.50 67.50 130.50 111.00 211.00 99.00 76.00 59.00 55.00 110.00 61.00 50.00 50.00 63.20 62.00 118.00 70.50 92.00 157.00 56.00 71.00 100.00 245.00 77.00 119.00 122.00 140.00 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 09-VK-38 09-VK-39 09-VK-40 09-VK-41 09-VK-42 09-VK-43 09-VK-44 09-VK-45 10-VK-100 10-VK-101 10-VK-102 10-VK-103 10-VK-46 10-VK-47 10-VK-48 10-VK-49 10-VK-50 10-VK-51 10-VK-52 10-VK-53 10-VK-54 10-VK-55 10-VK-56 10-VK-57 10-VK-58 10-VK-59 10-VK-60 10-VK-61 10-VK-62 10-VK-63 10-VK-64 10-VK-65 10-VK-66 10-VK-67 10-VK-68 10-VK-69 10-VK-70 10-VK-71 10-VK-72 10-VK-73 10-VK-74 10-VK-75 10-VK-76 500604.96 500611.82 500661.84 500661.25 500657.59 500658.09 500693.94 500640.10 500648.21 500597.96 498232.96 499838.86 500623.24 500560.52 500619.54 500550.61 500673.97 500636.40 500643.91 500583.49 500611.70 500587.17 500586.41 500612.08 500597.85 500584.40 500676.80 500597.39 500669.36 500646.79 500622.45 500596.82 500596.37 500629.82 500578.19 500678.15 500600.38 500655.63 500599.21 500604.42 500703.97 500635.63 500756.48 5504525.47 5504473.80 5504363.29 5504362.73 5504296.82 5504296.82 5504136.26 5504282.09 5504524.79 5504534.39 5503581.24 5504554.88 5504704.53 5504659.01 5504629.37 5504581.48 5504604.63 5504576.91 5504520.18 5504469.24 5504428.55 5504229.52 5504228.39 5504428.13 5504367.29 5504230.75 5504313.70 5504366.75 5504249.59 5504229.91 5504331.02 5504313.52 5504313.10 5504216.36 5504518.06 5504197.77 5504114.37 5504731.09 5504114.93 5504751.98 5504270.16 5504935.35 5503782.38 108 450.08 446.05 401.34 401.65 386.99 386.99 354.73 386.87 446.44 450.27 389.37 478.37 440.71 449.76 442.19 448.51 437.51 442.01 446.83 446.07 432.16 385.27 385.14 432.28 417.54 385.24 387.17 417.47 378.85 373.63 402.19 400.87 400.73 372.81 455.23 364.10 376.65 442.94 376.73 447.29 376.86 444.40 341.57 170.00 98.00 95.00 65.00 96.40 125.00 196.00 137.00 113.00 176.00 257.00 263.00 74.00 200.00 80.00 212.00 47.00 215.00 206.00 272.00 167.00 194.00 269.00 198.00 239.00 98.60 89.00 272.00 161.00 171.90 161.00 197.00 260.00 185.00 278.00 221.00 215.00 170.00 101.40 110.00 161.00 164.00 165.50 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 10-VK-77 10-VK-78 10-VK-79 10-VK-80 10-VK-81 10-VK-82 10-VK-83 10-VK-84 10-VK-85 10-VK-86 10-VK-87 10-VK-88 10-VK-89 10-VK-90 10-VK-91 10-VK-91A 10-VK-92 10-VK-93 10-VK-94 10-VK-95 10-VK-96 10-VK-97 10-VK-98 10-VK-99 11-VK-104 11-VK-105 11-VK-106 11-VK-107 11-VK-108 11-VK-109 11-VK-110 11-VK-111 11-VK-112 11-VK-113 11-VK-114 11-VK-115 11-VK-116 11-VK-117 11-VK-118 11-VK-119 11-VK-120 11-VK-121 11-VK-122 500635.63 500756.48 500613.74 500774.58 500661.69 500668.54 500661.69 500668.54 500661.69 500581.12 500327.79 498410.45 500504.21 498420.57 500580.15 500581.15 498097.20 498096.57 500591.50 498066.86 500619.81 498025.42 500842.19 498025.42 500647.08 500586.25 500625.87 500574.96 500613.42 500613.60 500599.23 500573.65 500622.21 500600.52 500571.40 500590.86 500589.82 500593.36 500680.07 500640.55 500565.67 500566.20 500532.93 5504935.35 5503782.38 5505005.72 5503737.38 5504407.28 5504217.11 5504407.28 5504217.11 5504407.28 5504605.91 5504229.55 5503977.56 5504607.32 5503976.96 5504730.23 5504731.23 5503766.35 5503765.58 5504844.34 5503715.51 5504859.49 5503676.34 5504809.71 5503676.34 5504589.71 5504569.39 5504533.87 5504492.86 5504524.00 5504614.54 5504653.40 5504695.25 5504679.63 5504724.37 5504750.02 5504769.36 5504447.09 5504313.20 5504285.27 5504258.02 5504428.85 5504628.49 5504787.46 109 444.40 341.57 442.73 334.53 415.50 367.66 415.50 367.66 415.50 443.83 428.81 383.00 454.37 383.31 447.76 447.76 384.88 384.90 442.77 384.86 438.06 383.13 409.46 383.13 440.00 444.18 447.19 457.17 448.93 440.83 442.57 447.57 440.31 446.12 449.57 447.83 442.84 400.58 385.42 385.11 442.33 447.46 449.36 209.00 191.00 176.00 146.00 65.00 52.00 88.10 93.00 104.00 206.00 110.00 140.00 261.50 146.00 50.00 146.00 125.00 137.00 168.50 152.00 128.00 154.30 193.00 130.00 94.00 232.00 169.00 282.00 225.00 195.00 165.00 237.00 153.00 191.00 141.00 132.00 285.00 260.00 118.00 202.00 318.00 201.00 207.00 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 11-VK-123 11-VK-124 11-VK-125 11-VK-126 11-VK-127 11-VK-128 500553.12 498581.96 498624.28 498712.20 499921.07 500419.92 5504732.27 5504057.85 5504033.01 5504091.67 5504577.35 5504252.92 110 449.46 396.62 394.65 405.27 481.44 415.18 204.00 58.20 122.00 119.00 197.00 191.00 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL APPENDIX 2 – SEMIVARIOGRAMS for High Grade Indicator Low Grade Gold 111 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 112 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 113 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 114 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 115 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 116 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL 117 NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate For the Thor Deposit, Viking Project - White Bay, NL APPENDIX C – CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSONS 118