docRamachandran Plots
download 
Report Transcription
Ramachandran Plots
MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, all models General case 180 Isoleucine and valine 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [13] ALA [19] [2] 4444 ALA [6] [7] [14] ALA [1] [5] [10] [11] [16] 4ALA ALA ALA [9] 4 32 GLN [20] 4 ALA [4] [9] [8] [18] 4414 ALA ALA ALA [3] [12] [17] 44 ALA [15] 414 ALA [13] 14 LEU [4] [10] 14 LEU LEU [12] [14] 14 LEU LEU [3] [2] 14 14 LEU LEU -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 0 180 Glycine 180 Psi Phi Psi [15] 31 GLY [14] 30 30 GLY GLY [15] 0 0 [2] 30 [18] 30 GLY GLY [3] GLY [11]30 30 GLY -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Psi 0 0 -180 180 Phi 180 -180 -180 69.2% (429/620) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 94.4% (585/620) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 35 outliers (phi, psi): [1] 4 ALA (-173.1, -48.2) [2] 4 ALA (-173.7, -44.6) [2] 14 LEU (-161.7, -60.2) Phi Cis proline 180 Psi 0 0 [10] [10] [11] [11] [12] [12] [13] Phi 180 -180 0 4 ALA (-172.5, -48.1) 14 LEU (-167.5, -59.0) 4 ALA (-172.5, -48.2) 30 GLY (-168.6, -75.2) 4 ALA (-173.6, -55.1) 14 LEU (-175.8, -59.9) 4 ALA (-172.5, -43.9) [2] [3] [3] [3] [4] [4] [5] [6] [7] 30 GLY (-153.4, -57.2) 4 ALA (-173.6, -55.5) 14 LEU (-162.3, -60.7) 30 GLY (-173.7, -73.3) 4 ALA (-173.3, -54.8) 14 LEU (-168.5, -58.8) 4 ALA (-172.7, -48.2) 4 ALA (-173.0, -47.7) 4 ALA (-172.5, -47.7) [13] 14 LEU (-162.1, -57.6) [14] 4 ALA (-172.6, -47.3) [14] 14 LEU (-171.2, -59.9) [14] 30 GLY (168.8, 57.0) [15] 4 ALA (-172.5, -56.1) [15] 30 GLY (165.4, 53.5) [15] 31 GLY (137.0, 63.7) [16] 4 ALA (-172.4, -48.1) [17] 4 ALA (-172.7, -55.2) [8] [9] [9] 4 ALA (-172.4, -54.2) 4 ALA (-173.1, -54.5) 32 GLN (-167.0, -51.6) [18] [18] [19] [20] 4 ALA (-172.4, -54.3) 30 GLY (-157.1, -60.1) 4 ALA (-175.0, -44.4) 4 ALA (-173.7, -54.0) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003) MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, model 1 General case 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [1] Isoleucine and valine 180 4 ALA -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 Psi 0 0 -180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Glycine 180 Psi 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Cis proline 180 Psi Psi 0 0 -180 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 -180 0 74.2% (23/31) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 96.8% (30/31) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 1 outliers (phi, psi): [1] 4 ALA (-173.1, -48.2) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003) MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, model 2 General case 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [2] Isoleucine and valine 180 4 ALA [2] 14 LEU -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 0 Psi 0 0 180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Glycine 180 Psi Phi [2] 30 GLY -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Cis proline 180 Psi Psi 0 0 -180 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 -180 0 67.7% (21/31) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 90.3% (28/31) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 3 outliers (phi, psi): [2] 4 ALA (-173.7, -44.6) [2] 14 LEU (-161.7, -60.2) [2] 30 GLY (-153.4, -57.2) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003) MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, model 3 General case 180 Isoleucine and valine 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [3][3] 4 14 ALA LEU -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 0 Psi 0 0 180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Glycine 180 Psi Phi [3] 30 GLY -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Cis proline 180 Psi Psi 0 0 -180 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 -180 0 64.5% (20/31) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 90.3% (28/31) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 3 outliers (phi, psi): [3] 4 ALA (-173.6, -55.5) [3] 14 LEU (-162.3, -60.7) [3] 30 GLY (-173.7, -73.3) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003) MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, model 4 General case 180 Isoleucine and valine 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [4] [4] 414ALA LEU -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 Psi 0 0 -180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Glycine 180 Psi 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Cis proline 180 Psi Psi 0 0 -180 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 -180 0 67.7% (21/31) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 93.5% (29/31) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 2 outliers (phi, psi): [4] 4 ALA (-173.3, -54.8) [4] 14 LEU (-168.5, -58.8) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003) MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, model 5 General case 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [5] Isoleucine and valine 180 4 ALA -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 Psi 0 0 -180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Glycine 180 Psi 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Cis proline 180 Psi Psi 0 0 -180 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 -180 0 74.2% (23/31) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 96.8% (30/31) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 1 outliers (phi, psi): [5] 4 ALA (-172.7, -48.2) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003) MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, model 6 General case 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [6] Isoleucine and valine 180 4 ALA -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 Psi 0 0 -180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Glycine 180 Psi 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Cis proline 180 Psi Psi 0 0 -180 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 -180 0 67.7% (21/31) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 96.8% (30/31) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 1 outliers (phi, psi): [6] 4 ALA (-173.0, -47.7) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003) MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, model 7 General case 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [7] Isoleucine and valine 180 4 ALA -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 Psi 0 0 -180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Glycine 180 Psi 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Cis proline 180 Psi Psi 0 0 -180 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 -180 0 67.7% (21/31) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 96.8% (30/31) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 1 outliers (phi, psi): [7] 4 ALA (-172.5, -47.7) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003) MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, model 8 General case 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [8] Isoleucine and valine 180 4 ALA -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 Psi 0 0 -180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Glycine 180 Psi 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Cis proline 180 Psi Psi 0 0 -180 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 -180 0 67.7% (21/31) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 96.8% (30/31) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 1 outliers (phi, psi): [8] 4 ALA (-172.4, -54.2) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003) MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, model 9 General case 180 Isoleucine and valine 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [9] 432 GLN [9] ALA -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 Psi 0 0 -180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Glycine 180 Psi 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Cis proline 180 Psi Psi 0 0 -180 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 -180 0 64.5% (20/31) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 93.5% (29/31) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 2 outliers (phi, psi): [9] 4 ALA (-173.1, -54.5) [9] 32 GLN (-167.0, -51.6) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003) MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, model 10 General case 180 Isoleucine and valine 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [10] 4 ALA [10] 14 LEU -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 Psi 0 0 -180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Glycine 180 Psi 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Cis proline 180 Psi Psi 0 0 -180 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 -180 0 71.0% (22/31) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 93.5% (29/31) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 2 outliers (phi, psi): [10] 4 ALA (-172.5, -48.1) [10] 14 LEU (-167.5, -59.0) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003) MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, model 11 General case 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [11] Isoleucine and valine 180 4 ALA -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 0 Psi 0 0 180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Glycine 180 Psi Phi [11] 30 GLY -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Cis proline 180 Psi Psi 0 0 -180 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 -180 0 67.7% (21/31) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 93.5% (29/31) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 2 outliers (phi, psi): [11] 4 ALA (-172.5, -48.2) [11] 30 GLY (-168.6, -75.2) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003) MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, model 12 General case 180 Isoleucine and valine 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [12] 14 4 ALA [12] LEU -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 Psi 0 0 -180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Glycine 180 Psi 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Cis proline 180 Psi Psi 0 0 -180 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 -180 0 71.0% (22/31) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 93.5% (29/31) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 2 outliers (phi, psi): [12] 4 ALA (-173.6, -55.1) [12] 14 LEU (-175.8, -59.9) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003) MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, model 13 General case 180 Isoleucine and valine 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [13] 4 ALA [13] 14 LEU -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 Psi 0 0 -180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Glycine 180 Psi 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Cis proline 180 Psi Psi 0 0 -180 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 -180 0 71.0% (22/31) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 93.5% (29/31) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 2 outliers (phi, psi): [13] 4 ALA (-172.5, -43.9) [13] 14 LEU (-162.1, -57.6) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003) MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, model 14 General case 180 Isoleucine and valine 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [14] 4 ALA [14] 14 LEU -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 Phi 180 Glycine 180 Psi 0 Psi [14] 30 GLY 0 0 -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Psi 0 0 -180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Cis proline 180 Psi 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 -180 0 74.2% (23/31) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 90.3% (28/31) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 3 outliers (phi, psi): [14] 4 ALA (-172.6, -47.3) [14] 14 LEU (-171.2, -59.9) [14] 30 GLY (168.8, 57.0) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003) MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, model 15 General case 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [15] Isoleucine and valine 180 4 ALA -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 Phi 180 Glycine 180 Psi 0 Psi [15] 31 GLY [15] 30 GLY 0 0 -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Psi 0 0 -180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Cis proline 180 Psi 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 -180 0 67.7% (21/31) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 90.3% (28/31) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 3 outliers (phi, psi): [15] 4 ALA (-172.5, -56.1) [15] 30 GLY (165.4, 53.5) [15] 31 GLY (137.0, 63.7) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003) MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, model 16 General case 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [16] Isoleucine and valine 180 4 ALA -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 Psi 0 0 -180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Glycine 180 Psi 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Cis proline 180 Psi Psi 0 0 -180 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 -180 0 74.2% (23/31) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 96.8% (30/31) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 1 outliers (phi, psi): [16] 4 ALA (-172.4, -48.1) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003) MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, model 17 General case 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [17] Isoleucine and valine 180 4 ALA -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 Psi 0 0 -180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Glycine 180 Psi 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Cis proline 180 Psi Psi 0 0 -180 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 -180 0 71.0% (22/31) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 96.8% (30/31) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 1 outliers (phi, psi): [17] 4 ALA (-172.7, -55.2) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003) MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, model 18 General case 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [18] Isoleucine and valine 180 4 ALA -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 0 Psi 0 0 180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Glycine 180 Psi Phi [18] 30 GLY -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Cis proline 180 Psi Psi 0 0 -180 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 -180 0 67.7% (21/31) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 93.5% (29/31) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 2 outliers (phi, psi): [18] 4 ALA (-172.4, -54.3) [18] 30 GLY (-157.1, -60.1) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003) MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, model 19 General case 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [19] Isoleucine and valine 180 4 ALA -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 Psi 0 0 -180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Glycine 180 Psi 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Cis proline 180 Psi Psi 0 0 -180 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 -180 0 67.7% (21/31) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 96.8% (30/31) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 1 outliers (phi, psi): [19] 4 ALA (-175.0, -44.4) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003) MolProbity Ramachandran analysis 1XC0, model 20 General case 180 Psi Psi 0 0 [20] Isoleucine and valine 180 4 ALA -180 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Pre-proline 180 -180 Psi 0 0 -180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Phi 180 Glycine 180 Psi 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 Trans proline 180 -180 Cis proline 180 Psi Psi 0 0 -180 0 -180 -180 0 Phi 180 -180 0 64.5% (20/31) of all residues were in favored (98%) regions. 96.8% (30/31) of all residues were in allowed (>99.8%) regions. There were 1 outliers (phi, psi): [20] 4 ALA (-173.7, -54.0) http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu Lovell, Davis, et al. Proteins 50:437 (2003)
