Annual Report 2011 - Singapore Environment Council
Transcription
Annual Report 2011 - Singapore Environment Council
Singapore Environment Council Annual Report 2011 REDEFINING 02 RE: COLLECTIONS CONTENT 04 Message from Chairman 05 Message from Executive Director 06 Meet our Board of Directors 12 Re: Configured 14 Re: Collections 2011 18 Re: Counting 20 Re: Cognition 21 Corporate Governance 24 Financial Statement 04 CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE SWEET SIXTEEN F rom its humble beginnings in 1995, our organisation grew from just a few staff members to 16 full-time staff members last year. Our original charter was to take the lead and achieve greater awareness of green issues among our community. We followed the news during the meeting of the Conference of Parties to the UN Climate Change Convention – Kyoto Protocol in 1997. We were there when the world population hit an astounding 6 billion in 1999. In 2000, SEC organised the first Car-Free Day in Singapore and made the headlines. We cheered when the Sungei Buloh Nature Park was finally designated as a nature reserve and renamed Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve in 2002. SEC led the way in the “Bring Your Own Bag Day” campaign in 2007 – prompting mixed reactions from members of the public. And in the past 5 years, many new global movements flourished; with focus on the climate change agenda. We rode on the wave of changes, rolling out the SEC Climate Change Portal in 2009 and Project Earth Station for schools in 2010. In 2011, the SEC addressed the need to stay relevant and strengthened our position for the future. More than ever, we are positioned to play an increasingly significant role. With programmes such as the Singapore G1, ABC Waters Learning Trails and Earth Helpers, our audience is being challenged to go beyond awareness to serious action. Through the many twists and turns in both the global and local environmental scenes, the SEC has doggedly carried on with its work with determination. To be an environmentalist in today’s day and age is to be an “optimistic skeptic”! We have to take every piece of discouraging news and make it urgently relevant to our society. Even with good news and small triumphs, we cannot celebrate for long or rest on our laurels. The SEC kept up with engaging our partners, reaching out to as many people in the community as possible and never faltered in getting our message out to the media. The SEC will need to make signficant inroads and shift the mindsets of our stakeholders; moving from unbridled economic growth and materialism towards sustainable living. SEC strives to be the voice that will resonate even well beyond the shores of Singapore. I would like to take the opportunity to thank all our partners and donors for their continued support over the past 16 years, sustaining us in our quest to make a difference to the environment in Singapore. We look forward to our continued partnership through 2012. Ms Isabella Loh 05 Executive Director’s MESSAGE towards a SUSTAINABLE FUTURE 2011 will always be special to me for this was the year in which I made a new entry into my career timeline. When I took over as Executive Director of the Singapore Environment Council (SEC) in October 2011, I was faced with managing a humble team of 13 full-time staff members. I had to understand the strengths, weaknesses and idiosyncrasies of SEC to adopt an effective survival strategy. Just as how a species evolves over time, an organisation will evolve as well. It became clear that for SEC to be able to respond to the changing landscape of our world, we would have to start making changes immediately. I was grateful for the support of the SEC’s Board of Directors – as we started to streamline our portfolio and to increase our capabilities by hiring more staff members, for a start. By the end of 2011, the Singapore Environment Council had about 18 staff, and we were well poised to begin 2012 with a bang. With a highly unpredictable global economy, 2011 was filled with uncertainties, with every indication that the situation would continue till 2012 and maybe longer. Stability, focus and dedication were; and will continue to be key elements as we steer into new territories. Stability In a period of financial certainty, a non- ‐profit organisation like SEC will have to aim for stability. As most of our programmes are on- ‐going, it is important to keep them running with effective budgeting, securing sponsorship and ensuring existing partners have their concerns addressed. Focus There is an unlimited number of meaningful environmental issues and programmes that SEC could get involved in. Hence, there is a great need to maintain focus on our core projects so that we are able to make further inroads. It is so easy to get excited about new possibilities and partnerships but ultimately, we will never lose sight of our main goals. Dedication Nothing happens from lack of passion and dedication. It is my vision for SEC to continue growing and becoming the most respected environmental NGO in the region; and not just in Singapore. We strive also to be an equal opportunities employer. To this end, we have recently engaged three special needs staff members whose contributions are also important. I believe that SEC cannot care for the environment without caring for people as well. We hope the rest of Singapore will be right there with us as we make headway to a more sustainable future. Mr Jose Raymond RE: COLLECTIONS BOARD OF DIRECTORS Ms Isabella Loh Chairman Dr Teo Ho Pin Vice-Chairman Prof Leo Tan Wee Hin Vice-Chairman Ms Isabella Loh was previously the Chairman of Shell Marine Products Ltd, Shell’s CEO and Vice President for Global Marine Fuels and Lubricants. Isabella is a member of the Development Advisory Board of Imperial College of Science and Technology, London and sits on the Global Board of Aurecon Pte Limited, as well as Aurecon Australia Group Limited. Dr Teo Ho Pin is the Mayor of North West District in Singapore and a Member of Parliament for Bukit Panjang Constituency. As Mayor, he is responsible for implementing community development programmes for 719,000 residents living in North West District. He has been involved in Community Development work for almost 30 years. He is also the Chairman of Holland-Bukit Panjang Town Council and the Co-ordinating Chairman of 14 PAP Town Councils. Professor Leo Tan Wee Hin is a Professor of Biology at the National University of Singapore. He is also Director (Special Projects) in the Faculty of Science. He was previously Executive Director of the Science Centre Singapore, Director of the National Institute of Education and Chairman of the National Parks Board. Ms Loh holds an MSc degree in Management from the MIT Sloan School of Management, Boston, US, and a BSc (Honours) degree in Aeronautical Engineering from the Imperial College of Science & Technology, UK. She was recently appointed as a fellow of the prestigious Academy of Engineering. In 1991, he was seconded to be the Chief Executive Officer of Jurong Town Council responsible for the management of over 40,000 units of public housing flats. He was subsequently elected as Member of Parliament for Sembawang Group Representation Constituency in 1997. Dr Teo has also held directorship positions in private firms. Professor Tan is President and Fellow of Singapore National Academy of Science. He chairs the NParks Garden City Fund, National Youth Achievement Award Council and the Temasek STEP Board. He is also Singapore Governor to the Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF) and member of the GPC Resource Panel for National Development & Environment and Water Resources. 07 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Miss Linda De Mello Director Ms Susan De Silva Director Ms Lee Sze Yeng Director Miss Linda De Mello joined PUB since Aug 2008. She is the deputy director of Community Relations Division under 3P Network Department at PUB in charge of rolling out community engagement programme to reach out to the 3P sector to get Singaporeans to conserve, value and enjoy our waters holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree. Susan is a founding partner of the Singapore law firm ATMD Bird & Bird LLP and is head of the Corporate and Commercial Group. Ms Lee Sze Yeng is an Audit Partner with KPMG Singapore. She is the partner responsible for the Firm’s Corporate Citizenship programme. Sze Yeng is also a member of KPMG’s Audit Practice Committee and ICPAS Banking & Finance Committee. Susan has more than 20 years of experience as a corporate and commercial lawyer. Susan has been named as a leading individual for Corporate/Mergers and Acquisitions as well as for Employment Law. She is one of the few recognised environmental lawyers in Singapore; having been named in AsiaLaw Leading Lawyers 2003 as well as The International Who’s Who of Environment Lawyers (2004, 2005, 2006, 2009, 2010 and 2011 editions) and The International Who’s Who of Business Lawyers (Environment) (2004/2005, 2006, 2009 and 2011 editions). Ms Lee is a practising member of the Institute of Certified Public Accountants of Singapore and holds a first class honours degree in Accountancy from the National University of Singapore. 08 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Dr Leong Chee Chiew Director Dr Ming Tan Director Mr J.B. Rae-Smith Director Dr Leong joined the Singapore Botanic Gardens 1983 as a research officer. He did a stint in the Strategic Planning Division of the Ministry of National Development from 1987 to 1989. In 1990, he was appointed Deputy Executive Director of the National Parks Board. When the Parks and Recreation Department merged with the National Parks Board in 1996, he became the Deputy Chief Executive Officer (Specialist Services Department). In 2000, he took over the Board’s Parks Management Department. He is currently the Commissioner of Parks and Recreation and also the Deputy Chief Executive Officer (Professional Development and Services Cluster) of the Board. Dr Ming Tan is Director of the COMO Foundation, the philanthropic arm of the COMO Group, a lifestyle luxury company that includes fashion retailer Club 21, COMO Hotels and Resorts and COMO Shambhala. In addition to her role as Director for the Foundation, Dr Tan also spearheads employee engagement activities and sustainability policy and practice for the companies within the COMO Group. In Singapore, Dr Tan sits on the Board of Directors of organic retail company Supernature. Mr J. B. Rae-Smith graduated from University of Cambridge with MA in Engineering. He joined the Swire group in 1985 and has worked in Australia, Papua New Guinea, Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, the United States and Singapore. Mr Rae-Smith has been the Executive Director of Trading & Industrial Division, Swire Pacific Ltd since January 2008 and the Chairman of The China Navigation Company Ltd since May 2009. Prior to moving to Hong Kong, he was Managing Director of Swire Pacific Offshore Services (Pte) Ltd based in Singapore. He is 48 and happily married. Dr Leong chairs the Singapore Landscape Industry Council, the Heritage Trees Panel, the Workforce Safety and Health (Landscape) Sub-Committee and Co-chairs the inter-ministry Technical Committee on Coastal and Marine Environment. He is a Board Member of Singapore Garden City Private Limited and the Garden City Fund. 09 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mr Philip Su Director Philip Su has been Executive Director of Far East Organisation (FEO) since 2 August 2010. His responsibilities include spearheading FEO’s overseas developments, overseeing the Retail Business Group as EXCO Chairman and serving as Director on several FEO and FEO-related companies. Philip was actively involved as a Director and Board Member on several Government-linked corporations and statutory boards: Singapore Technologies Aerospace, ST Logistics and Sentosa Development Corporation. Currently, he holds several Director, Council Member and Advisory appointments in Singapore’s public sector and nongovernment organisations: National Parks Board, Institute of Employment and Employability, National University Health System, National Youth Achievement Award, and Work Development Authority’s CET Campuses development. Mr Tan Wee Hock Director Mr Tan Wee Hock joined the public service in 1985. He has been closely involved in formulating environmental policies and implementing programmes to protect and sustain the environment. He spent a number of years on the control of industrial pollution and vehicle emissions. Mr Tan took on the Directorship in heading the People, Public and Private (3P) Network Division at the National Environment Agency (NEA) in 2006. His current role is to spearhead efforts to enhance the partnership between NEA and its partners to care for and sustain the environment. He holds a Bachelor of Engineering (Chemical Engineering) with Honours and a Masters Degree in Environmental Pollution Control. 010 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Advisory Committee Mr George Huang Chang Yi Chairman, Advisory Committee Mr George Huang is currently the Managing Director of Amoy Canning Corporate (S) Ltd. He is also a companion to the Chartered Management Institute (UK) and a Fellow at the Singapore Institute of Directors. On 9 August 2011, Mr Huang received the Public Service Medal from the President of Singapore. A few of his other appointments are as President of the Singapore Manufacturing Federation (SMF), Honorary Consul-General of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia and Honorary Business Ambassador for the Queensland Government-Australia to Singapore. Mr Huang holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree. Mr Dalson Chung Advisor Mr Dalson Chung is currently the Director (Industry Development and Promotion Office) and the Director (Sustainability Office) with the National Environment Agency (NEA). Mr Chung was educated in Singapore and Germany. He obtained his Bachelor’s degree in Structural Engineering from Essen University in Germany. He later obtained his Masters degrees in Civil Engineering and Business Administration from the National University of Singapore. After graduating from Germany, Mr Chung joined the then Ministry of the Environment (ENV) in 1984 and has since held various appointments in ENV, NEA and later, Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources (MEWR). He was Head (Operations) of NEA’s Environmental Health Department from 2004 to 2006 before being seconded to MEWR as its Director, 3P Partnership Division from 2006 to 2009. Mr Melvin Koh Advisor Mr Melvin Koh started his career in 2000, as an engineer in a PUB drinking water treatment plant. Over the years, he progressed to marketing NEWater to industrial and commercial customers and operating and maintaining a water distribution network. He was also involved in research and development projects in PUB. Since January 2011, Mr Koh has been the Acting Director of the 3P Network Division in the Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources. He currently leads a team of officers to oversee Corporate Communications, Partnerships and Engagement and Service Quality. He is also the Ministry’s Quality Service Manager. 011 FINANCIAL STATEMENT 012 RE: CONFIGURED RE: CONFIGURED Back Row (From left): Vaidehi Shah, Kenneth Goh, Esther Tan, Melissa Fun, Helen Ho, Charmaine Ang, Shakilah Mohidin, Bhavna Narayanan, Neerada V Poduval, Noor Aisha, Xie Si Yu, Julien Chua, Chen Li Hua, Steffi Loe, Sarah Han, Saaz’liana Abdullah, Jose Raymond 2nd Row (From left): K Kogilam, Helmy Sarpan, Ambrose Lim, Kim Tan, Grace Ang 1st Row (From left): Joe Lim, Edwin Ker, Steven Chin, Kelvin Lai 013 FINANCIAL RE: CONFIGURED STATEMENT Labelling & Certifications Technical Admin Neerada Poduval Eco-Certifications Technical Executive Kelvin Lai Ngeow Yin Teen Administration Manager Projects Executive (Eco-L abelling & Certifications) Joe Lim Projects Edwin Ker Charmaine Ang Adminstration Manager Director of Projects Senior Projects Executive (Eco-L abelling & Certifications) Vaidehi Shah Shakilah Mohidin Projects Manager Senior Marketing Executive Marketing & Research Bhavna Narayanan Projects Executive Helen Ho Administration Assistant Sarah Han Helmy Sarpan Projects Executive Senior Marketing Executive Steffi Loe Corporate Communications and Relations Research Executive Executive ExecutiveDirector Director JOSE RAYMOND JOSE RAYMOND Finance Noor Aisha Abdul Hani Senior Communications Executive Esther Tan Steven Chin Corporate Communications Manager Finance Executive Melissa Fun Finance Assistant Administration Human Resource Kim Tan Senior Administration Manager Saaz’liana Abdullah Human Resource Executive Grace Ang Administration Executive Operations Kenneth Goh Deputy Director K Kogilam Receptionist 014 RE: COLLECTIONS RE: COLLECTIONS 2011 Singapore Green Labelling Scheme When the SEC took over the administration of the Singapore Green Labelling Scheme (SGLS) in 1999, it was not common to hear the term “eco-friendly” being used to describe a product. Awareness of eco-friendly products was nowhere near what it is today. Back then, there were only a handful of companies that had applied for the SGLS certification and there were only 5 categories. It is a different story today. As of Dec 2011, the SGLS had 2,004 different products in its database and has expanded the number of categories to 66. The growth is due to increasing demand from consumers and the hard work of marketing the scheme to companies. A major milestone was attained in Oct 2011 when the scheme was accredited by the Global Ecolabelling Network (GEN). GEN is a well-respected international non-profit association of third-party, environmental performance recognition, certification and labelling organisations. Individuals & Organisations: Vote with your dollar; choose a certified green product 015 RE: COLLECTIONS Singapore Environmental Achievement Awards (SEAA) 2011 & Senoko Energy Green Innovation Awards The SEAA is the oldest and most prestigious environmental award scheme in Singapore. Since it was launched in 1997, the competition has grown tougher and tougher. We learned how companies are becoming ‘green’ through surprising innovative and creative ways. Jointly organised with the Singapore Manufacturers’ Federation (SMa), the annual SEAA was held at the Shangri-La Hotel on 11 August 2011. It was an honour to have Minister for the Environment and Water Resources, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan as the Guest-of-Honour. Receiving the top award for the Service Category was Temasek Polytechnic while the top achiever for the Manufacturing Category was Greenpac (S) Pte Ltd. HydroBall Technics (SEA) Pte Ltd scooped up the SEC-Senoko Energy Green Innovation Award for their energyand water-efficient cleaning system for air-conditioners. Project: Eco-Office SEC and City Developments Limited (CDL) joined hands to initiate Project: Eco-Office, providing the framework to nurture an eco-conscious office environment. Eco-Office allows offices of any size and in any industry to take small steps towards sustainability. CDL wanted to take advantage of their position as building owners to influence their tenants in a positive way. Eco-Office kits containing awareness posters and stickers were given out to administrative operations all around the island. As a form of encouragement, SEC later developed a certification scheme known as the Eco-Office Label, giving these out every year to deserving offices. A few years’ ago, even the government demonstrated their commitment by encouraging their own ministries and statutory boards to obtain the Eco-Office Label. For the SEC, we saw it as validation of the programme. In 2011, twenty-six offices received their certificates at the Grand Copthorne Waterfront Hotel. Dr John Keung, Chief Executive Officer of the Building & Construction Authority, was the Guest-of-Honour at the event. Project Eco-Office would not have been possible without the continued support from CDL. It is a perfect example of how the private sector can work together with an NGO to successfully sustain a worthwhile programme. Find out if your office can be certified with the Eco Office Label! Log on to www.ecooffice.com.sg 016 RE: COLLECTIONS Schools’ Green Audit Awards (SGAA) Another long-running awards scheme for schools reached its 10th year in 2011. Students are guided by their teachers while they go around their school conducting an environmental audit. Not only do the students learn more about their school environment, they learn how to identify areas of weakness and make suggestions for improvement. An SEC representative will then visit the school to verify the results of the self-audit. The whole process instills a sense of pride in the students for their school and gives them a sense of ownership – an important lesson that SEC hopes will be translated to environmental stewardship on a global scale when the students become young adults. During the awards ceremony on 8 July 2011 held at Republic Polytechnic, SEC welcomed Ms Grace Fu, Senior Minister of State, Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources. She gave special recognition awards to the top 5 schools. In total, over 260 schools qualified for an award last year. Give our children the best start and tell them the difference that they can make in their schools, their community and for Singapore! Earth Helpers In Singapore, there are many individuals passionate about getting involved in local, environment-related volunteer work. Many have valuable skills and knowledge that others are looking for. Yet, it is not always easy to find suitable opportunities for potential volunteers. Coincidentally, companies looking for people to help with environmental projects do not always know where to start looking. SEC has stepped in to play “matchmaker” with a new Earth Helpers programme. The programme was launched on 21 April 2011, during Earth Day celebrations at Siloso Beach Resort. Attendees enjoyed an environmental storytelling session and nature guided walk. The SEC also honoured 19 Earth Helpers for committing their time to assist with our work. Individuals: Register for free as an Earth Helper and be part of a growing environmental movement. Organisations: Submit your upcoming activities and programmes to us for volunteer matching. 017 RE: COLLECTIONS Tertiary Institutions Council for the Environment (TICE) The purpose of TICE is to establish links between the different tertiary institutions. This would then allow for sharing of expertise, resources and ideas on how to communicate the message of environmental protection to tertiary students.Since engaging Singaporean youths has always been an important part of SEC’s outreach, SEC has been the facilitator for the group since 2003. The SEC is the secretariat for TICE and organises its monthly meetings. To date TICE has organised events, camps and competitions, and has also facilitated the sharing of projects and practices by institutions. In 2011, a group of budding environmentalists - students from various polytechnics gathered for a TICE eco camp with the theme, “Year of the Forest”. In the short three-day camp from 30 September to 1 October, hosted at Republic Polytechnic, the students went on nature rambles, learnt from experts in their fields and shared their ideas. Our young leaders look set to take on the challenge of building and maintaining our sustainable city in the years to come! RE: COLLECTIONS RE: COUNTING SINGAPORE GREEN LABELLING SCHEME (SGLS) AS OF DEC 2011, SEC CERTIFIED 2,004 GREEN PRODUCTS (SINCE 1999) AS OF DEC 2011, SEC CERTIFIED 104 INDIVIDUAL OFFICES (SINCE 2004) ECO-OFFICE ECO-OFFICE 396 25 75 711 23 14,617 NEW PRODUCTS CERTIFIED NEW OFFICES CERTIFIED ECO-OFFICE KITS DISTRIBUTED PRODUCTS RENEWED OFFICES RE-CERTIFIED PROFESSIONALS, MANAGERS, EXECUTIVES & BUSINESS OWNERS REACHED (PMEBs) 019 RE: COUNTING AS OF DEC 2011, SEC HAS 159 REGISTERED EARTH HELPERS (SINCE AUG 2011) EARTH HELPERS PROJECT EARTH STATION 159 28 $11,498.87 EARTH HELPERS REGISTERED NO OF SCHOOLS EXHIBITIONS CITI-YMCA YOUTH FOR CAUSES AMOUNT OF FUNDS RAISED BY SCHOOL TEAMS FOR SEC 020 RE: COGNITION RE: COGNITION Our heartfelt thanks go out to all donors, sponsors and supporters for their generosity. Every little bit goes a long way to further our cause. • City Developments Limited • Senoko Energy Pte Ltd • Greenpac (S) Pte Ltd • Komatsu Asia Pacific Pte Ltd • Hydroball Technics (SEA) Pte. Ltd • Temasek Polytechnic • JPL Industries Pte Ltd • NSL LTD $30,000 & above • Electrolux • Sembawang Shipyard • Interfaceflor Pte. Ltd • Sembcorp Environment P te Ltd • Lee Foundation • L’oreal Singapore Pte Ltd • Mitsubishi Electric Asia Pte Ltd • Purechem Veolia Environmental Services Pte Ltd • Ascendas Land (Singapore) Pte Ltd • Asian International College Pte Ltd • Keppel Land International Ltd • Lion Corporation (S) Pte Ltd • Olive Ventures • Pentens (S) Pte Ltd (Dong Ji Sdn. Bhd.) & above • Philips Electronics Singapore Pte Ltd • PowerSeraya Ltd • Setsco Services Pte Ltd • Shaw Industries Inc. • Sika Singapore Pte Ltd • ST Synthesis Pte Ltd • Koh Wei Ying, Ann • Aveda Singapore • Nu Skin Enterprises Singapore Pte Ltd • Harveen Singh Narulla $5,000 • Veolia Environment Services Singapore • ATMD Bird & Bird LLP • ComfortDelGro Corporation Ltd & above • Singapore Workforce Development Agency • The Singapore Contractors Association Limited • Ciba Vision(Singapore) Pte Ltd $10,000 • Red Element Health International Pte Ltd • Singapore Pools below $1,000 $1,000 & above 021 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE SEC Board of Directors is currently made up of 11 members. Members are elected or appointed based on rules of SEC’s governing instrument. There is also an advisory committee made up of 3 members and as well as 3 founder members. Internal Controls Responsibility of the Board • Programme Management The Board ensures that the charity is run responsibly, according to its governing instrument. SEC’s strategic growth plan, vision and mission statements are all subjected to review at regular intervals to make sure that the charity stays relevant in an ever-changing environment. The Board ensures that SEC is meeting its goals and objectives as an environmental charity. They help to ensure that effective and efficient systems are in place for managing SEC’s financial and human resources. Another important role is to maintain adequate reporting to all SEC stakeholders regarding our strategic plan and status of our programmes. • Fundraising Practices All fundraising practices are transparent and ethical, with proper accounting to donors on how funds are utitlised. All programmes and activities conducted by SEC are carefully planned, tracked and reviewed to ensure that they are relevant to the mission and vision of SEC. Each programme is evaluated for its effectiveness and the progress is reported to both the Board and programme donor. • Budget Planning and Monitoring The Board approves an annual budget for SEC’s programmes. There is close monitoring of the expenditure for each programme. • Disclosure and Transparency SEC seeks financial management advice from the Board and complies with all applicable laws and regulations. Yearly external audits are conducted to ensure that its resources are used legitimately and are accounted for. Updated information about its mission, structure, programmes, activities and finances can be viewed publicly on SEC’s website. 022 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE SEC Board, its Committees and Roles Board The Singapore Environment Council (SEC) Board provides independent objective guidance to SEC and acts in the best interests of SEC and periodically reviews and approves the objectives of SEC ensuring that SEC’s programs and operations are managed and directed towards achieving SEC’s objectives. It acts as advocates and enthusiastic communicators of SEC’s mission and vision, and to play an integral role in SEC’s fundraising activities. It supports and guides SEC’s programs and fundraising plans and hence assist the Council in achieving its long term strategic plans. Number of board meetings held - 3 Audit Committee Ms Lee Sze Yeng – Chairman Mr Philip Su – Member The Audit Committee makes recommendations to the Board on the selection, appointment, reappointment, and resignation of the external auditor(s), reviews the external auditor’s audit independence and reviewing the external auditor’s findings arising from the audit. It also reviews the financial information provided by the Council to the Board with particular attention paid to critical accounting policies and practices, and any changes in them, the effectiveness of the internal controls over financial reporting (including budgeting) established by management to identify, assess, manage, and disclose financial risks. Number of committee meetings held - 4 Compliance Committee Prof Leo Tan – Chairman Ms Susan de Silva – Member Mr Philip Su – Member Ms Lee Sze Yeng – Member Mr Melvin Koh – Member The Compliance Committee monitors the level of compliance by the Council, with reference to its governing instrument and all relevant laws and regulations and with regards to the administration of donation. It assists the Board in fulfilling its compliance monitoring responsibilities by investigating any activity within its Terms of Reference as well as assists the Board in the review of any specific compliance matters. Committee convenes as and when necessary Tender Committee Ms Isabella Loh – Chairman Ms Lee Sze Yeng – Member Mr Philip Su – Member The Tender Committee supports and advises the Council on the procurement process to obtain optimum value and that the process is transparent and competitive. It advises and reviews as and when necessary on procurement strategies, guidelines and policies and tendering guidelines matters. It decides on the approval of or waiving of the requirements for tenders to be called for a particular procurement of services or goods, as adhere to the Council’s Financial Policies & Procedures. It reviews conflict of interest, if any, during the procurement process. Committee convenes as and when necessary Green Label Steering Committee Ms Susan Mary de Silva – Co-Chairman Mr Philip Su Poon Ghee – Co-Chairman The Green Label Steering Committee provides professional advice on creating and maintaining the certification process. The Committee also provides support and advice on certification issues on behalf of SEC/SGLS when collaborations are forged or input is required. It assists to guide new category development, monitor the impartiality of the certification process in relation to guidelines set out in the SGLS Handbook. It helps to guide development of service delivery mechanisms related to lab testing, applications and assessment, initiates and guides programme evaluations, and recommends mechanisms for recertification. Committee convenes as and when necessary 023 FINANCIAL STATEMENT 024 FINANCIAL STATEMENT FINANCIAL STATEMENT SINGAPORE ENVIRONMENT COUNCIL (UEN 199507762R) (LIMITED BY GUARANTEE) STATEMENT BY DIRECTORS For the financial year ended 31 December 2011 In the opinion of the Directors, (a) the accompanying statement of financial position, statement of financial activities/comprehensive income, statement of changes in fund and statement of cash flows together with the notes thereto are drawn up so as to give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Council as at 31 December 2011 and of the results, changes in funds and cash flows of the Council for the financial year ended 31 December 2011, and (b) at the date of this statement, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Counci will be able to pay its debts as and when they fall due. The Board of Directors has, on the date of this statement, authorised these financial statements for issue. On behalf of the Board of Directors, ISABELLA LOH WAI KIEW Chairman LEE SZE YENG Director Singapore 29 June 2012 025 FINANCIAL STATEMENT S. K. Cheong & Co. Public Accountants and Certified Public Accountants 9 Temasek Boulevard #19-02 Suntec Tower Two Singapore 038989 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT For the financial year ended 31 December 2011 To the members of Singapore Environment Council (UEN 199507762R) Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Singapore Environment Council (the “Council”) set out on pages 6 to 32, which comprise the statement of financial position as at 31 December 2011, and the statement of financial activities/comprehensive income, statement of changes in fund and statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information. Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation of financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with the provisions of the Singapore Companies Act, Chapter 50 (the “Act”), the Singapore Charities Act, Chapter 37 (the “Charities Act”) and Singapore Financial Reporting Standards, and for devising and maintaining a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide a reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorised use or disposition; and transactions are properly authorised and that they are recorded as necessary to permit the preparation of true and fair profit and loss accounts and balance sheets and to maintain accountability of assets. Auditor’s Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Singapore Standards on Auditing. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. Tel: (65) 63386966 Fax: (65) 63387155 UEN S83PF0385E An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion. Opinion In our opinion, the financial statements are properly drawn up in accordance with the provisions of the Act, the Charities Act and Singapore Financial Reporting Standards so as to give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Council as at 31 December 2011 and the results, changes in fund and cash flows of the Council for the year ended on that date. Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements In our opinion, the accounting and other records required by the Act to be kept by the Council have been properly kept in accordance with the provisions of the Act. During the course of our audit, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that during the year: a. The use of the donation moneys was not in accordance with the objectives of the Council as required under regulation 16 of the Charities (Institutions of a Public Character) Regulations; and b.The Council has not complied with the requirements of regulation 15 (Fund-raising expenses) of the Charities (Institutions of a Public Character) Regulations. S. K. CHEONG & CO. Public Accountants and Certified Public Accountants 026 FINANCIAL STATEMENT SINGAPORE ENVIRONMENT COUNCIL (UEN 199507762R) (LIMITED BY GUARANTEE) STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION As at 31 December 2011 Note 2011 2010 $ $ 4 Total non-current assets 22,731 22,731 19,132 19,132 5 166,003 9,097 595,182 770,282 147,203 3,725 520,811 671,739 793,013 690,871 7 Total current liabilities 89,182 89,182 106,719 106,719 Net current assets or liabilities Total assets less current liabilities Net assets 681,100 703,831 703,831 565,020 584,152 584,152 703,831 584,152 703,831 584,152 ASSETS Non-current assets Plant and Equipment Current assets Trade and other receivables Prepayments Cash and cash equivalents 6 Total current assets Total assets Current liabilities Trade and other payables The funds of the charity Unrestricted funds Accumulated general funds 8 Total funds STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES/COMPREHENSIVE INCOME For the year ended 31 December 2011 Note Unrestricted funds 2011 $ 2010 $ 240,736 28,881 256,675 Incoming Resources Incoming Resources from generated fund Voluntary Income Donations Grant from National Environment Agency Sponsorships 10 146,941 105,638 83,086 Activities for generating funds Programme receipts 11 1,332,087 598,879 Investment income Interest income 12 - 520 4,110 461 2,715 1,671 9 Charitable income Administration fees/Honorarium Miscellaneous income Other incoming resources Jobs Credit Scheme Total income resources - 12,020 1,672,323 1,142,097 481,287 866,180 94,977 727,650 4,511 2,657 60,756 519,008 2,852 - 829,795 582,616 Resources expended Costs of generating funds Programme expenses Charitable activities expenses CPF contribution Salaries and bonus Staff training cost Temporary staff 13 16 027 SINGAPORE ENVIRONMENT COUNCIL (UEN 199507762R) (LIMITED BY GUARANTEE) FINANCIAL STATEMENT STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES/COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (continued) For the year ended 31 December 2011 Note Unrestricted funds 2011 2010 $ $ 20,800 3,000 1,000 2,761 10,798 13,198 1,556 11,542 6,881 1,578 1,509 3,370 4,607 4,669 6,971 1,699 16,209 61,601 6,262 20,630 7,526 11,415 8,049 6,988 615 6,328 241,562 31,200 2,500 3,000 1,087 12,778 5,073 1,965 795 566 2,644 4,273 6,483 430 1,708 59,864 4,294 8,681 507 4,691 7,249 5,357 43,718 208,863 Total resources expended 1,552,644 1,657,659 Net incoming/(outgoing) resources representing total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year 119,679 (515,562) Accumulated general fund Total fund $ $ 584,152 584,152 119,679 119,679 Closing balance at 31 December 2011 703,831 703,831 2010 Opening balance at 1 January 2010 Net outgoing resources, representing total comprehensive loss for the year 1,099,714 1,099,714 (515,562) (515,562) Closing balance at 31 December 2010 584,152 584,152 Other Operating and Administration Expenses Accountancy fee Audit fee Audit certification Advertising Awards and recognition Bad debt written off Bank charges Depreciation of plant and equipment Employee medical benefits Entertainment General expenses Gifts and representation Groceries and refreshment Insurance Legal and professional fees Postage Printing and stationery Rent Rental of office equipment Repair and maintenance Subscription Telephone and facsimile Transportation and travel Utilities Write off of interest receivable Website expenses 4 5 STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FUND For the financial year ended 31 December 2011 2011 Opening balance at 1 January 2011 Net incoming resources, representing total comprehensive income for the year 028 FINANCIAL STATEMENT SINGAPORE ENVIRONMENT COUNCIL (UEN 199507762R) (LIMITED BY GUARANTEE) STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS For the financial year ended 31 December 2011 Note 2011 2010 $ $ 119,679 (515,562) 11,542 - 12,778 (520) 131,221 (24,975) (16,734) (503,304) 28,492 (115,336) Cash generated from/(used in) operating activities Interest received 89,512 - (590,148) 520 Net cash generated from/(used in) operating activities 89,512 (589,628) (15,141) (10,293) (15,141) (10,293) Cash flows from operating activities Net incoming/(outgoing) resources for the year Adjustments for: Depreciation of plant and equipment Interest income 4 Operating cash flows before changes in working capital (Increase)/decrease in receivables Decrease in payables Cash flows from investing activities Purchase of plant and equipment 4 Net cash used in investing activities Cash flows from financing activities Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents at end of year 6 - - 74,371 520,811 (599,921) 1,120,732 595,182 520,811 029 FINANCIAL STATEMENT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the financial year ended 31 December 2011 These notes form an integral part of and should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements. The financial statements were authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 29 June 2012. 1. Corporate information Singapore Environment Council (the “Council”) was incorporated in Singapore as a company limited by guarantee whereby each member of the Council undertakes to meet the debts and liabilities of the Council, in the event of its liquidation, to an amount not exceeding $1 per member. As at 31 December 2011, the Council has 3 members. The Council was registered with ACRA on 2 November 1995. Its registered office is at 39 Robinson Road, #07-01 Robinson Point, Singapore 068911 and principal place of operation is at 1 Kay Siang Road, #04-02 Singapore 248922. The Council has been registered as a charity under the Charities Act, (Cap. 37) since 5 March 1996 and has Institution of Public Character status until 30 October 2012. It is an independently managed, non-profit, non-government organisation and principally engaged in the nurturing, facilitating and coordinating of environment causes and groups in and outside Singapore, working hand-in-hand with both government and private sectors. The Council’s objective is the promotion of greater public awareness of and concern for the living and natural environment, and to encourage members of the public to be more environmentally conscious. There have been no significant changes in the principal activities of the Council. 2. Summary of significant accounting policies a)Basis of preparation The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Singapore Financial Reporting Standards (“FRS”). The financial statements are prepared on the historical cost basis except as disclosed in the accounting policies below. The financial statements are presented in Singapore dollars (SGD or $), which is the Council’s functional and presentation currency. b)Changes in accounting policies The Council has adopted all the new and revised standards and Interpretations of FRS (“INT FRS”) that are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011. The adoption of these standards and interpretations did not have any effect on the financial performance or position of the Council. c)Standards issued but not yet effective The Council has not adopted the following relevant standards and interpretations that have been issued but not yet effective: The Council has not adopted new/reused FRS and interpretations which have been issued but are not yet effective. The Council does not expect these standards and interpretations to have a material effect on adoption. d)Functional currency The Council has determined the currency of the primary economic environment in which the Council operates i.e. functional currency, to be SGD. Incoming resources and resources expended are primarily influenced by fluctuations in SGD. e)Foreign currencies Transactions in foreign currencies are measured in the functional currency determined by the Council and are recorded on initial recognition in the functional currency at exchange rates approximating those ruling at the transaction dates. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at rate of exchange ruling at the end of each reporting period. Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates as at the dates of initial transactions. Nonmonetary items measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the date when the fair value was determined. Exchange differences arising on the settlement of monetary items or on translating monetary items at the end of each reporting period are recognised in the statement of financial activities/comprehensive income. f) Plant and equipment All items plant and equipment are initially recorded at cost. The cost of an item of plant and equipment is recognised as an asset if, and only if, it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Council and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. Subsequent to recognition, plant and equipment are measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. When significant parts of plant and equipment are required to be replaced in intervals, the Council recognises such parts as individual assets with specific useful lives and depreciation, respectively. Likewise, when a major inspection is performed, its cost is recognised in the carrying amount of the plant and equipment as a replacement if the recognition criteria are satisfied. All other repair and maintenance costs are recognised in the statement of financial activities/ comprehensive income as incurred. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows: Equipment 3 years Furniture and fittings 3 years Renovation 5 years The carrying values of plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The residual value, useful life and depreciation method are reviewed at the end of each reporting period, and adjusted prospectively, if appropriate. An item of plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected from its use or disposal. Any gain or loss on derecognition of the asset is included in the statement of financial activities/ comprehensive income in the year the asset is derecognised. There are no items of plant and equipment acquired in full or in part from the proceeds of a grant. Where functional items of plant and equipment have been donated, they are included in the statement of financial position come at their fair value at the date of the gift and also included in the statement of financial activities/ comprehensive income as an incoming resource. Accounting policies for the valuation of gifts are disclosed in Note 2o(iii). 030 FINANCIAL STATEMENT g) Financial assets Initial recognition and measurement Financial assets are recognised on the statement of financial position when, and only when, the Council becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the financial instrument. The Council determines the classification of its financial assets at initial recognition. When financial assets are recognised initially, they are measured at fair value, plus, in the case of financial assets not at fair value through profit or loss, directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent measurement The subsequent measurement of financial assets depends on their classification as follows: Loans and receivables Non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market are classified as loans and receivables. Subsequent to initial recognition, loans and receivables are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Gains and losses are recognised in statement of financial activities/comprehensive income when the loans and receivables are derecognised or impaired, and through the amortisation process. Derecognition A financial asset is derecognised where the contractual right to receive cash flows from the asset has expired. On derecognition of a financial asset in its entirety, the difference between the carrying amount and the sum of the consideration received and any cumulative gain or loss that had been recognised in other comprehensive income is recognised in statement of financial activities/comprehensive income. All regular way purchases and sales of financial assets are recognised or derecognised on the trade date. i.e., the date that the Council commits to purchase or sell the asset. Regular way purchases or sales are purchases or sales of financial assets that require delivery of assets within the period generally established by regulation or convention in the marketplace concerned. h)Cash and cash equivalent Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash at bank that are readily convertible to known amount of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value. Cash and cash equivalents are classified and accounted for as loans and receivables. i) Impairment of financial assets The Council assess at the end of each reporting period whether there is any objective evidence that a finance asset is impaired. Financial assets carried at amortised cost For financial assets carried at amortised cost, the Council first assesses individually whether objective evidence of impairment exists individually for financial assets that are individually significant, or collectively for financial assets that are not individually significant. If the Council determines that no objective evidence of impairment exists for an individually assessed financial asset, whether significant or not, it includes the asset in a group of financial assets with similar credit risk characteristics and collectively assesses them for impairment. Assets that are individually assessed for impairment and for which an impairment loss is, or continues to be recognised are not included in a collective assessment of impairment. If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on financial assets carried at amortised cost has been incurred, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows discounted at the financial asset’s original effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced through the use of an allowance account. The impairment loss is recognised in statement of financial activities/ comprehensive income. When the asset becomes uncollectible, the carrying amount of impaired financial assets is reduced directly or if an amount was charged to the allowance account, the amounts charged to the allowance account are written off against the carrying value of the financial asset. If a loan has a variable interest rate, the discount rate for measuring any impairment loss is the current effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced through the use of an allowance account. The impairment loss is recognised in statement of financial activities/comprehensive income. When the asset becomes uncollectible, the carrying amount of impaired financial assets is reduced directly or if an amount was charged to the allowance account, the amounts charged to the allowance account are written off against the carrying value of the financial asset. To determine whether there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on financial assets has incurred, the Council considers factors such as the probability of insolvency or significant difficulties of the debtor and default or significant delay in payments. If in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognised, the previously recognised impairment loss is reversed to the extent that the carrying amount of the asset does not exceed its amortised cost at the reversal date. The amount of reversal is recognised in statement of financial activities/comprehensive income. Financial assets carried at cost If there is objective evidence (such as significant adverse changes in the business environment where the issuer operators, probability of insolvency or significant financial difficulties of the issuer) that an impairment loss on financial assets carried at cost has been incurred, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows discounted at the current market rate of return for a similar financial asset. Such impairment losses are not reversed in subsequent periods. j)Leases The determination of whether an arrangement is, or contains a lease is based on the substance of the arrangement at inception date: whether fulfillment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a specific asset or assets or the arrangement conveys a right to use the asset. i) As lessee Operating lease payments are recognised as an expense in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The aggregate benefit of incentives provided by the lessor is recognised as a reduction of rental expense over the lease term on a straight-line basis. k)Financial liabilities Initial recognition and measurement Financial liabilities are recognised on the statement of financial position when, and only when, the Council becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the financial instrument. The Council determines the classification of its financial liabilities at initial recognition. 031 FINANCIAL STATEMENT All financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value and in the case of other financial liabilities, plus directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent measurement The subsequent measurement of financial liabilities depends on their classification as follows: Other financial liabilities After initial recognition, other financial liabilities are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. Gains and losses are recognised in the statement of financial activities/comprehensive income when the liabilities are derecognised, and through the amortisation process. Derecognition A financial liability is derecognised when the obligation under the liability is discharged or cancelled or expired. When an existing financial liability is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such an exchange or modification is treated as a decognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability, and the difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognised in the statement of financial activities/comprehensive income. l) Impairment of non-financial assets The Council assesses at the end of each reporting period whether there is an indication that an asset may be impaired. If any indication exists, or when an annual impairment testing for an asset is required, the Council makes an estimate of the asset’s recoverable amount. An asset’s recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s or cash-generating unit’s fair value less costs to sell and its value in use and is determined for an individual assets, unless the asset does not generate cash inflows that are largely independent of those from other assets or group of assets. Where the carrying amount of an asset or cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is considered impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset are discounted to their present value using a pretax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. In determining fair value less costs to sell, an appropriate valuation model is used. These calculations are corroborated by available fair value indicators. Impairment losses are recognised in statement of financial activities comprehensive income in those expenses categories consistent with the function of the impaired asset, except for assets that are previously revalued where the revaluation was taken to other comprehensive income. In this case the impairment is also recognised in other comprehensive income up to the amount of any previous revaluation. For assets excluding goodwill, an assessment is made at the end of each reporting period as to whether there is any indication that previously recognised impairment losses may no longer exist or may have decreased. If such indication exists, the Council estimates the asset’s or cash-generating unit’s recoverable amount. A previously recognised impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the asset’s recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognised. If that is the case, the carrying amount of the asset is increased to its recoverable amount. That increase cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation, had no impairment loss been recognised previously. Such reversal is recognised in profit or loss unless the asset is measured at revalued amount, in which case the reversal is treated as a revaluation increase. m) Provisions Provisions are recognised when the Council has present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and the amount of the obligation can be estimated reliably. Provisions are reviewed at the end of each reporting period and adjusted to reflect the current best estimate. If it is no longer probable that an outflow of economic resources will be required to settle the obligation, the provision is reversed. If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are discounted using a current pre tax rate that reflects, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. When discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised as a finance cost. n) Employee benefits (i) Defined contribution plans The Council participates in the national pension schemes as defined by the laws of the countries in which it has operations. The Council make contributions to the Central Provident Fund scheme in Singapore, a defined contribution pension scheme. Contributions to defined contribution pension schemes are recognised as an expense in the period in which the related service is performed. (ii) Short-term employee benefits Short-term employee benefit obligations are measured on an undiscounted basis and are expensed as the related service is provided. A liability is recognised for the amount expected to be paid under shortterm cash bonus or profit-sharing plans if the Council has a present legal or constructive obligation to pay this amount as a result of past service provided by the employee, and the obligation can be estimated reliably. o) Incoming resources from generated funds All incoming resources are included in the statement of financial activities/ comprehensive income to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the Council and the amount can be reliably measured. No amounts are included for services donated by volunteers. Incoming resources from generated funds comprise: Voluntary income (i) Donations/Sponsorships Donations/sponsorships are taken up and accrued as and when they are committed. Those uncommitted donations/sponsorships are recognised on receipt basis. (ii) Grants Such grants are provided by National Environment Agency for funding of approved projects that promote environmental awareness. These grants are recognised where there is reasonable assurance that the grant will be received and all attaching conditions will be complied with. When the grant relates to an expense item, it is recognised in the profit or loss over the period necessary to match them on a systematic basis to the costs that it is intended to compensate. Grants related to income are presented as a credit in the statement of financial activities/comprehensive income. (iii) Donations in kind Donations in kind are recognised based on an estimate of the fair value at the date of the receipt of the donation of the non-monetary asset or the grant of a right to a monetary asset. The donation is recognised if the amount of the gift can be measured reliably and there is no uncertainty that it will be received. 032 FINANCIAL STATEMENT Activities for generating funds Proceeds from such activities are recognised in the period in which the event takes place. Any sales of merchandise are accounted for when the transaction occurs. Investment income Investment income comprises interest income on funds invested that are recognised in the statement of financial activities/comprehensive income. Interest income is recognised as it accrues, using the effective interest method. p) Jobs Credit Scheme Cash grants received from the government in relation to the Jobs Credit Scheme are recognised as income of the period in which it becomes receivable q) Resources expended Resources expended comprise the following: Cost of generating funds Cost of generating funds includes the costs of activities carried out to generate incoming resources, which will be used to undertake charitable activities. Charitable activities expenses Charitable activities include both direct and related support costs that are related to running of the Council, and generating funds and service delivery. r) Funds structure (i) Unrestricted funds Unrestricted funds are funds that are expendable at the discretion of the Council for achieving their overall objectives. (ii) Restricted funds Restricted funds are funds that are set up for specific purposes which may be imposed by the donor or have specific restriction on the Management’s discretion regarding the utilisation of the funds. The Council does not have any restricted funds. s) Related parties A party is considered to be related to the Council if: (a) The party, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, (i) controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, the Council; (ii) has an interest in the Council that gives it significant influence over the Council; or (iii) has joint control over the Council; (b) The party is an associate; (c) The party is a jointly-controlled entity; (d) The party is a member of the key management personnel of the Council or its parent; (e) The party is a close member of the family of any individual referred to in (a) or (d); or (f) The party is an entity that is controlled, jointly controlled or significantly influenced by or for which significant voting power in such entity resides with, directly or indirectly, any individual referred to in (d) or (e); or (g) The party is a post-employment benefit plan for the benefit of the employees of the Council, or of any entity that is a related party of the Council. 3. Significant accounting judgements and estimates The preparation of the Council’s financial statements requires Management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the end of the reporting period. However, uncertainty about these assumptions and estimates could result in outcomes that could require a material adjustment to the carrying amount of the asset or liability affected in the future periods. (I) Critical judgements made in applying accounting policies In the process of applying the Council’s accounting policies, the management is of the opinion that there are no critical judgements involved that have a significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements (apart from those involving estimations). (II) Key sources of estimation uncertainty The key assumptions concerning the future and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the end of each reporting period, that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are discussed below. (i) Depreciation of plant and equipment The cost of plant and equipment of the Council is depreciated on a straightline basis over the useful lives of the plant and equipment. Management estimates the useful lives of these plant and equipment to be within 3 to 5 years. These are common life expectancies applied. The carrying amount of the Council’s plant and equipment at 31 December 2011 was $22,731 (2010: $19,132). Changes in the expected level of usage and technological developments could impact on the economic useful lives and the residual values of these assets, therefore the future depreciation charges could be revised. (ii) Allowances for trade receivables The determination of the allowance for impairment of the Council’s receivables is based on the evaluation of collectability and ageing analysis of accounts receivables, including the current credit worthiness and the past collection history of each customer. If the financial conditions of the customers of the Council were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional impairment loss may be required. The carrying amount of trade receivables at 31 December 2011 was $119,172 (2010: $131,761). 033 SINGAPORE ENVIRONMENT COUNCIL (UEN 199507762R) (LIMITED BY GUARANTEE) FINANCIAL STATEMENT NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the financial year ended 31 December 2011 4. Plant And Equipment Office Equipment Furniture and Fittings Renovation Total $ $ $ $ 2010 At 1 January Additions Disposal 38,191 10,293 - 15,289 - 3,077 - 56,557 10,293 - At 31 December 48,484 15,289 3,077 66,850 2011 At 1 January Additions Disposal 48,484 15,141 - 15,289 - 3,077 - 66,850 15,141 - At 31 December 63,625 15,289 3,077 81,991 Accumulated Depreciation 2010 At 1 January Depreciation Disposal 24,133 8,564 - 10,202 3,599 - 605 615 - 34,940 12,778 - At 31 December 32,697 13,801 1,220 47,718 2011 At 1 January Depreciation charge for the year Disposal 32,697 9,641 - 13,801 1,286 - 1,220 615 - 47,718 11,542 - At 31 December 42,338 15,087 1,835 59,260 Net Carrying Amount At 1 January 2010 14,058 5,087 2,472 21,617 At 31 December 2010 15,787 1,488 1,857 19,132 At 31 December 2011 21,287 202 1,242 22,731 Cost 5. Trade and Other Receivables 2011 Trade receivables Other receivables Deposits Fixed deposits interest receivables 2010 $ $ 119,172 30,000 16,831 46,831 131,761 42 14,785 615 15,442 166,003 147,203 Trade and other receivables are denominated in Singapore Dollars. Trade receivables Trade receivables are non-interest bearing and are generally on 30 days’ terms. They are recognised at their original invoice amounts which represent their fair values on initial recognition. Trade receivables that are past due but not impaired As at 31 December 2011, the Council has trade receivables amounting to $17,450 (2010: $102,056) that are past due at the end of the reporting period but not impaired. These receivables are unsecured and the analysis of their ageing at the end of the reporting period is as follows: 034 FINANCIAL STATEMENT SINGAPORE ENVIRONMENT COUNCIL (UEN 199507762R) (LIMITED BY GUARANTEE) 2011 2010 $ $ 15,850 1,600 - 28,450 5,750 19,263 48,593 17,450 102,056 Trade receivables past due but not impaired Past due 1 - 30 days Past due 31 - 60 days Past due 61 - 90 days More than 91 days Based on historical default rates, the Council believes that no impairment allowance is necessary in respect of receivables at the end of the reporting period. These receivables are mainly arising by customers that have a good record with the Council. Other receivables Other receivables are unsecured, non-interest bearing and repayable on demand. During the year, the fixed deposit was withdrawn earlier than maturity date to meet working capital requirements. Accordingly, the interest receivables of $615 was foregone and written off. 6. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash at bank and on hand Fixed deposit 2011 2010 $ $ 595,182 - 320,811 200,000 595,182 520,811 2011 2010 Cash and cash equivalents are denominated in Singapore Dollars. 7. Trade and Other Payables Trade payables Other payables Accruals Income received in advance GST payable $ $ 726 544 41,588 40,000 6,325 78,013 28,706 - 89,183 106,719 Trade and other payables are denominated in Singapore Dollars. Trade and other payables are non-interest bearing and are normally settled on 0 to 60 days’ terms. 8. Accumulated general fund The Council is prohibited by its Memorandum and Articles of Association from distributing any of its income and property by way of dividend, bonus or otherwise to members of the Council. 9. Donations Tax exempt donations Non-tax exempt donations 2011 2010 $ $ 98,911 48,030 152,257 88,479 146,941 240,736 035 SINGAPORE ENVIRONMENT COUNCIL (UEN 199507762R) (LIMITED BY GUARANTEE) FINANCIAL STATEMENT 10. Sponsorships 2011 2010 $ $ 10,000 1,500 45,500 26,086 - 855 8,000 66,500 70,000 65,320 10,000 30,000 3,500 2,500 83,086 256,675 2011 2010 Funds are credited to income from sponsors for the following programmes: CDL Creative ECO Workshop Charity Movie Earth Helper G1 Singapore Green Label Singapore Green Summit Schools’ Green Audit Awards (SGAA) 2010 SEC Calendar Shell Eco - Marathon Singapore Environmental Achievement Award Singapore Green Label Tertiary Institution Council for the Environment (TICE) 11. Programme Receipts Ad Hoc Project Charity Movie Eco-Food Court Eco-office project Earth Station Project Miscellaneous Talk/Workshop Singapore Green Label Scheme Singapore Environmental Achievement Award YMCA - Youth for Causes $ $ 10 8,500 76,480 850 1,034 1,217,313 9,312 18,588 14,511 30,503 500 2,135 507,003 23,840 20,387 1,332,087 256,675 2011 2010 12. Investment income Interest income from fixed deposits $ $ - 520 036 FINANCIAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT STATEMENT SINGAPORE ENVIRONMENT COUNCIL (UEN 199507762R) (LIMITED BY GUARANTEE) NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the financial year ended 31 December 2011 13. Programme expenses 2011 2010 $ $ Ad Hoc Projects Asian Geographic Bring Your Own Bag Day CEO Run Charity Movies Clean and Green Singapore Clean Up Singapore Climate Change Awareness Campaign Community Roadshow CDL Creative ECO Worshop Earth Day Earth Dialogue Earth Helper Earth Station Project Eco Action Day Eco-Food Court Eco-Office Project Eco-Hotel Energy Infographic Green Homes Green Retailer Green Transport Week G1 School Green Audit Award (SGAA) SEC Calendar SEC Community Programme SEC Volunteer Programme SEC/WEC Roundtable Singapore Green Summit (SEAA) Singapore Green Label Scheme Shell Eco-Marathon Sustainable Buildings Seminar Sustainable Manufacturing Labels Tertiary Institution Council for the Environment (TICE) Talk/workshop YMCA - Youth for Causes YMCA - Citibank Youth4Cause Youth Portal VER Project 10,880 995 3,127 91 34 46 176 20 42 14,605 2,044 40,202 16 4,330 75,454 16 8 35 34,983 22,112 28,519 44 102 199,304 39,361 14 6 3,777 750 300 60 54 - 12,794 11,457 14 12 49,213 1,285 1,589 71,275 2,387 27,516 66 21 8 558,691 6,136 23,490 157 225 8,176 99,613 38,323 15,192 8,980 1,535 469 129 20 Less: Write back of Programme expenses 481,507 (220) 938,773 (72,593) 481,287 866,180 14. Income tax The Council is an approved charity under the Charities Act, Cap 37 and an institution of public character under the Income Tax Act, Cap. 134. With effect from Year of Assessment 2008, all registered charities will enjoy automatic income tax exemption without having the need to meet the 80% spending rule. Thus the Council is exempt from Income Tax. 037 SINGAPORE ENVIRONMENT COUNCIL (UEN 199507762R) (LIMITED BY GUARANTEE) FINANCIAL STATEMENT 15. Commitments At the end of the reporting period, the Council has non-cancellable lease commitments for the lease of office premises and office equipment. The lease of office premises and office equipment will expire in 2013 and 2015 respectively. The lease agreements have no clause for revision of rental charge. Payment recognised as an expense during the year: Minimum lease payments under operating leases 2011 2010 $ $ 67,863 64,158 The future minimum lease payable under non-cancellable operating leases contracted for at 31 December but not recognised as liabilities, are as follows: Within 1 year After 1 year but within 5 years 2011 2010 $ $ 67,769 55,187 49,418 26,580 122,956 75,998 16. Related parties Parties are considered to be related to the Council if the Council has the ability, directly or indirectly, to control the party or exercise significant influence over the party in making financial and operating decisions, or vice versa, or where the Council and the party are subject to common control or common significant influence. Related parties may be individuals or other entities. Key management personnel compensation Key management personnel of the Council are those persons having the authority and responsibilities for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the Council. The Council comprises board of directors who are volunteers and they do not receive remuneration. Key management personnel compensation is as follows: 2011 2010 $ $ 237,939 23,702 162,500 14,029 261,641 176,529 2011 2010 $50,001 to $100,000 $100,001 to $150,000 4 - 1 1 Total number of staff 4 2 2011 2010 $ $ 278 18,798 2,197 20,999 Salaries, bonus and other short-term benefits Central provident funds contributions The details of remuneration and benefits of employees (including key management personnel) are as follows: Number of employees in bands: Other related party transactions Other than disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements, transactions with related parties are as follows: Revenue Donations received from a related party Expenses Expenses paid to a related party 038 FINANCIAL STATEMENT SINGAPORE ENVIRONMENT COUNCIL (UEN 199507762R) (LIMITED BY GUARANTEE) 17. Financial risk management objectives and policies The main risks arising from the Council’s financial instruments are credit risk and liquidity risk. The Council is not exposed to significant interest rate risk or any foreign exchange risk. The Council’s overall business strategies, its tolerance of risks and its general risk management philosophy are determined by the Management in accordance with prevailing economic and operating conditions. No derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps are used to hedge exposures. Credit risk Credit risk is the potential risk of financial loss resulting from the failure of customers or other parties to settle their financial and contractual obligations to the Council as and when they fall due. The Management has a credit policy in place and the exposure to credit risk is monitored on an ongoing basis. Credit evaluations are performed on all customers requiring credit over a certain amount and outstanding debts are reviewed on an ongoing basis. The Council does not require collateral in respect of financial assets. Exposure to credit risk At the end of the reporting period, the Council’s maximum exposure to credit risk is represented by the carrying amount of financial assets recognised in the statement of financial position. Credit risk concentration profile Although the Council’s credit exposure is concentrated in Singapore, it has no significant concentration of credit risk with any single customer or group of customers. Financial assets that are either past due or impaired Information regarding financial assets that are either past due or impaired is disclosed in Note 5 (Trade and other receivables). Interest rate risk Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of the Council’s financial instruments will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. The Council’s exposure to interest rate risk arises primarily from the Council’s cash at bank. The Council’s policy is to obtain the most favourable interest rates available. There is no significant interest rate risk as the Council has no borrowing during or at the end of the financial year. Liquidity risk Liquidity risks refer to the risks in which the Council encounters difficulties in meeting its short-term obligations. Liquidity risks are managed by matching the payment and receipt cycle. The Council’s financial liabilities at the end of the reporting period are to be paid within 1 year. The Council manages liquidity risks through monitoring and maintaining levels of cash and bank balances deemed adequate to finance the Council’s operations and mitigate the effects of fluctuations in cash flows. 18. Fair value of financial instruments The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged or settled between knowledgeable and willing parties in an arm’s length transaction, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Fair value of financial instruments by classes that are not carried at fair value and whose carrying amounts are reasonable approximation of fair value Management has determined that the carrying amounts of cash balance, current trade and other receivables and current trade and other payables, based on their notional amounts, reasonably approximate their fair values because these are mostly short term in nature. 19. Capital management The Council defines “capital” to be the unrestricted general funds. The primary objective of the Council is to ensure that it maintains a healthy capital position through donations, sponsorship, programme receipts and government grants to sustain its operations and charitable activities. There are no changes in the Council’s approach to capital management during the year. The Council is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirement. 039 SINGAPORE ENVIRONMENT COUNCIL (UEN 199507762R) (LIMITED BY GUARANTEE) FINANCIAL STATEMENT 20. Classification of financial assets and financial liabilities The classification of the financial assets and liabilities in accordance with the categories in FRS 39 Financial Instruction: Recognition and Measurement are as follows: Note Loans and receivables Financial liabilities at amortised cost $ $ 2011 Financial assets Trade and other receivables Cash and cash equivalents 5 6 166,003 595,182 - Financial liabilities Trade and other payables 7 - (82,858) 761,185 (82,858) 147,203 2010 Financial assets Trade and other receivables Cash and cash equivalents 5 6 520,811 - Financial liabilities Trade and other payables 7 - (106,719) 668,014 (106,719) S i n g a p o r e E nv i r o n m e n t Cou n c i l 1 Kay Siang Road #04-02 Singapore 248922 Main line (65) 6337-6062 | Fax (65) 6337-6035 www.sec.org.sg